| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology (K.J.S., J.-P.W., B.N.S., F.E.D.), Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory (K.J.S.), Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Cell Biology, National Science Foundation Center for Biological Timing, University of Virginia (S.M.M.), Charlottesville, Virginia 22908
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Suzanne M. Moenter, Department of Internal Medicine, P.O. Box 800578, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908. E-mail: smm4n{at}virginia.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Efforts to understand the mechanisms responsible for episodic GnRH release have been hampered by the diffuse distribution of these neuroendocrine cells in the hypothalamus; this has greatly limited single cell experiments aimed at identifying the electrophysiological mechanisms responsible for the secretory patterns of GnRH neurons. Previous studies of GnRH neurons have primarily relied on either immortalized transformed GnRH cell lines (GT17 cells) (10, 11) or cultured embryonic GnRH neurons (12). There is no report of a pattern of activity from these model systems that reflects the intermittent or pulsatile nature of GnRH release in the intact animal. In contrast, a recent study of GnRH neurons identified by expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) suggests that GnRH neurons in hypothalamic slices are generally silent (13). Previous studies, therefore, have not assessed the pattern of electrical activity of individual GnRH neurons and have not reported the activity patterns that would be expected to underlie episodic hormone release (e.g. similar to the multiple unit electrical activity recorded in vivo and thought to correspond to the GnRH pulse generator). In the present study we used whole-cell recording of GFP-identified GnRH neurons in slices from the preoptic area and hypothalamus to record patterns of electrical activity congruent with the pulsatile secretion of GnRH.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Electrophysiology
Coronal slices from the diagonal band of Broca, preoptic area,
and hypothalamus were prepared as described previously
(14). Mice were anesthetized with halothane and
decapitated; the brain was then rapidly removed and placed in cold
(1-2 C) artificial cerebrospinal fluid (14) containing
125 mM NaCl, 24 mM
NaHCO3, 1.25 mM
NaH2PO4, 1 mM
MgCl2, 2.5 mM KCl, 10 mM
glucose, and 1.0 mM CaCl2, pH
7.37.4. The region containing the preoptic area and hypothalamus was
blocked, and two or three 200-µm coronal slices were prepared. Slices
were incubated at 32-35 C in artificial cerebrospinal fluid for at
least 2 h before electrophysiological recordings. Whole-cell
recordings were obtained with patch pipettes containing 130
mM potassium gluconate, 10 mM HEPES, 1
mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1
mM CaCl2, 5 mM EGTA, 5
mM biocytin, and 2 mM ATP and brought to pH
7.27.4 with KOH. Pipette resistances were 2.55.0 M
. Biocytin was
included in the pipette to both facilitate post-hoc
identification of recorded cells and also to examine coupling between
GnRH neurons (15). Biocytin is a low molecular mass
molecule (372 Da) that can pass through cytoplasmic bridges and gap
junctions (15, 16). After fixation, biocytin was detected
using avidin conjugates.
Data collection and analysis
GnRH neurons, both individual neurons and neurons that were
closely associated with another GFP-positive neuron, were targeted for
recording based on visual identification of GFP expression and
accessibility within the slice. Whole cell patch-clamp recordings were
obtained using an Axopatch 1D amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City,
CA), with filtering at 5 kHz. Data were digitized on-line with a
Neurocorder (DR-484, Neurodata, Inc., New York, NY) and were stored on
videocassettes for off-line analysis with Axotape and pClamp software
(version 6.0, Axon Instruments). Current-clamp recordings were used to
assess endogenous action potential firing. Cells with 15 min of
current-clamp recording were assessed for stability by the following
criteria before inclusion in the analysis: initial resting membrane
potential was more negative than -50 mV, input resistance at
initiation and termination of the recording was more than 1 G
, and
action potential amplitude was more than 60 mV initially and was
maintained within 10 mV of the initial amplitude throughout the
recording. Frequency histograms were used to analyze the frequency and
duration of activity of the 21 cells passing these criteria. GnRH
neurons fired high frequency, repetitive action potentials that were
grouped in episodes. As illustrated in Fig. 2
, the duration of an
episode was measured from the onset of 4 Hz or more firing to the end
of the last burst of 4 Hz or more firing. An episode included both the
bursts (e.g. 11 bursting episodes in Fig. 2
) and the intervening periods of
quiescence (<1 min). The assessment of possible electronic coupling
was made in voltage-clamp recordings from 1 member of a pair of closely
apposed GnRH neurons (9 of the 32 pairs anatomically examined). Resting
membrane potential was compared using Students t test,
with significance accepted at P < 0.05.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
0.010.02 Hz). The mean duration of the
quiescent period before the episodes of activity was 13.5 ± 1.4
min (range, 0.530.6 min), which presumably represents a minimum. The
onset of burst activity was manifest as an abrupt shift to high
frequency firing that ranged from 413 Hz (see Materials and
Methods for definition of bursts). Figure 3
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The episodic electrical activity of single GnRH neurons in slices was
qualitatively similar to the episodic function of the GnRH pulse
generator. Our finding of quiescence in GnRH neurons (in some neurons,
up to 30 min) is consistent with the long intervals reported between
multiple unit bursts, GnRH pulses, and LH pulses (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9) in intact rodents, ruminants, and primates
(i.e. often >1 h). In mice, the model employed in the
present study, similar LH interpulse intervals have been observed,
ranging from 6080 min in castrates to over 3 h in gonad-intact
animals (17, 18, 19). Further, the abrupt onset of firing
observed in the present study is consistent with the rapid rise in GnRH
release during a pulse (1, 20). The duration of episodes
of action potential firing of GnRH neurons in the present study (3120
sec) was of the same order of magnitude as that of other measures of
GnRH neuron activity. These include the duration of GnRH release in
estradiol-treated ovariectomized ewes (60300 sec) (20),
intracellular calcium spikes in cultured GnRH neurons from embryonic
rhesus monkeys (
90 sec) (21), and multiple unit
activity in intact rhesus monkeys (132246 sec) (22).
These observations suggest a more prolonged event than the episodes of
neuronal firing that we observed in the present study. In this regard,
pulses of GnRH could reflect secretion from multiple GnRH neurons that
may not fire in complete synchrony. Furthermore, the onset of multiple
unit activity, rather than the entire duration, appears to be
associated with LH secretion (23). Mathematical extraction
of single unit activities from the multiple unit recordings suggests
that the episodes result from increased activity of individual neurons
rather than activation of additional neurons (24). We
observed such an increase in spike frequency in 7 of 15 neurons,
whereas episodes of activity in 8 other GnRH neurons were due to
activation of previously quiescent cells. In the present study,
however, GnRH neurons did not exhibit more than 1 episode of enhanced
firing. Given the LH interpulse intervals (i.e. often >1 h)
(17, 18, 19), however, one would not anticipate multiple
episodes of activity if these intervals of action potential firing
underlie GnRH release.
Although episodic bursts of action potentials have been associated with peptide release in other neuroendocrine systems, GnRH release has not yet been linked directly to any particular pattern of electrical activity. In the magnocellular neuroendocrine systems controlling water balance and milk ejection through the release of vasopressin and oxytocin, the amount of hormone released per action potential is enhanced when spike activity is clustered into bursts (25, 26). Magnocellular neuroendocrine cells alter their firing behavior, shifting between bursting and nonbursting modes in response to physiological or experimental stimuli (27). Similarly, individual GnRH neurons in this study expressed firing patterns that included periods of both quiescence and episodes of repetitive firing. By analogy with other neuroendocrine systems, the temporal shifts in electrical activity of GnRH neurons reported here suggest that burst firing may contribute to pulsatile hormone release. More direct evidence of a link between burst firing and GnRH release would support the general hypothesis that episodic hormone release depends directly on the activity pattern of neuroendocrine cells.
Episodic GnRH release is presumed to reflect synchronization of the firing patterns of multiple GnRH neurons. Several mechanisms have been proposed to underlie such coordination, including direct soma to soma communication through cytoplasmic bridges (28) or gap junctions (29), synaptic interactions (30), or diffusable second messengers such as nitric oxide (31, 32). In the present study only the possibility of direct coupling was explored. Of 92 GnRH neurons examined for electrical and tracer coupling, we observed evidence for such a link in only 1 instance, suggesting that this is a rare event in this neural system.
The assessment of cell to cell coupling is complicated by limitations of both neuroanatomical and electrophysiological techniques. Although tracer coupling is generally regarded as a valid indication of coupling, artifactual labeling of damaged cells can occur. Additionally, it can be difficult to visualize the precise coupling site in sections of this thickness (200 µm). Hypothetical coupling currents may reflect action potentials originating from unclamped dendrites of the recorded cell, as opposed to action potentials transmitted from a coupled cell. In the sole pair of hypothetically coupled neurons, the amplitude of coupling currents was severalfold smaller than that which would be expected from typical unclamped action potentials, and the waveform of the coupling currents was faster than that of an excitatory postsynaptic current. These data together with weak evidence of possible tracer coupling in the same pair of neurons suggest the GnRH neuron was functionally coupled to its neighboring GnRH neuron.
The low coupling rate observed in the present study (3%) is similar to the prevalence of soma to soma cytoplasmic bridges previously reported between GnRH neurons of rats (28). Our findings are also consistent with those of Kusano et al. (12), who demonstrated a lack of direct cell to cell communication in cultured olfactory placode GnRH neurons. In contrast, our observed coupling rate is much lower than that reported for GT17 cells, in which 1530% of cells appear to be dye coupled (33, 34). Our data suggest that any putative synchronization among GnRH neurons that leads to pulsatile release of the hormone probably involves mechanisms other than direct coupling at the level of the cell body. Some other form of local circuit communication in this region of the brain may contribute to synchronization of the GnRH neuronal network
These data suggest that the episodic electrical activity ascribed to the GnRH pulse generator can be observed at the level of the single GnRH neuron in preoptic/hypothalamic slices. The similarity between the action potential firing in GnRH neurons and other biological markers used to monitor activity of the GnRH pulse generator (i.e. multiple unit recordings and GnRH release) is striking. Taken together, our data are consistent with the hypothesis that intermittent episodes of burst firing of individual GnRH neurons underlie the episodic secretion of GnRH. The mechanism by which such activity in these neurons might be synchronized to produce coordinated release, however, remains to be further elucidated.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Present address: Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, 2000
Percival Stern Hall, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana
70118. ![]()
Received January 13, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Constantin and S. Wray Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-1 Neuronal Activity Is Independent of Hyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide-Modulated Channels but Is Sensitive to Protein Kinase A-Dependent Phosphorylation Endocrinology, July 1, 2008; 149(7): 3500 - 3511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Roberts and K. J. Suter Emerging methodologies for the study of hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing-hormone (GnRH) neurons Integr. Comp. Biol., May 17, 2008; (2008) icn039v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-F. Wang and G. I. Hatton Dominant Role of {beta}{gamma} Subunits of G-Proteins in Oxytocin-Evoked Burst Firing J. Neurosci., February 21, 2007; 27(8): 1902 - 1912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Chu and S. M. Moenter Physiologic Regulation of a Tetrodotoxin-Sensitive Sodium Influx That Mediates a Slow Afterdepolarization Potential in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons: Possible Implications for the Central Regulation of Fertility. J. Neurosci., November 15, 2006; 26(46): 11961 - 11973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Arroyo, B. Kim, R. L. Rasmusson, G. Bett, and J. Yeh Hyperpolarization-Activated Cation Channels Are Expressed in Rat Hypothalamic Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Neurons and Immortalized GnRH Neurons Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 2006; 13(6): 442 - 450. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kato, N. Tanaka, S. Usui, and Y. Sakuma The SK channel blocker apamin inhibits slow afterhyperpolarization currents in rat gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurones J. Physiol., July 15, 2006; 574(2): 431 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Khadra and Y.-X. Li A Model for the Pulsatile Secretion of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone from Synchronized Hypothalamic Neurons Biophys. J., July 1, 2006; 91(1): 74 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. L. Wayne, K. Kuwahara, K. Aida, Y. Nagahama, and K. Okubo Whole-Cell Electrophysiology of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons that Express Green Fluorescent Protein in the Terminal Nerve of Transgenic Medaka (Oryzias latipes) Biol Reprod, December 1, 2005; 73(6): 1228 - 1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Abe and E. Terasawa Firing Pattern and Rapid Modulation of Activity by Estrogen in Primate Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone-1 Neurons Endocrinology, October 1, 2005; 146(10): 4312 - 4320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Chu and S. M. Moenter Endogenous Activation of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors Modulates GABAergic Transmission to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons and Alters Their Firing Rate: A Possible Local Feedback Circuit J. Neurosci., June 15, 2005; 25(24): 5740 - 5749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J P Ebling The neuroendocrine timing of puberty Reproduction, June 1, 2005; 129(6): 675 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Greenwood and R. D. Fernald Social Regulation of the Electrical Properties of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons in a Cichlid Fish (Astatotilapia burtoni) Biol Reprod, September 1, 2004; 71(3): 909 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-F. Wang and G. I. Hatton Milk Ejection Burst-Like Electrical Activity Evoked in Supraoptic Oxytocin Neurons in Slices From Lactating Rats J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2004; 91(5): 2312 - 2321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Woller, S. Meyer, A. Ada-Nguema, and D. Waechter-Brulla Dissecting Autocrine Effects on Pulsatile Release of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in Cultured Rat Hypothalamic Tissue Experimental Biology and Medicine, January 1, 2004; 229(1): 56 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. MATAGNE, M.-C. LEBRETHON, A. GERARD, and J.-P. BOURGUIGNON In Vitro Paradigms for the Study of GnRH Neuron Function and Estrogen Effects Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2003; 1007(1): 129 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Keenan, W. S. Evans, and J. D. Veldhuis Control of LH secretory-burst frequency and interpulse-interval regularity in women Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2003; 285(5): E938 - E948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kato, K. Ui-Tei, M. Watanabe, and Y. Sakuma Characterization of Voltage-Gated Calcium Currents in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons Tagged with Green Fluorescent Protein in Rats Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 5118 - 5125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Z. Krsmanovic, N. Mores, C. E. Navarro, K. K. Arora, and K. J. Catt An agonist-induced switch in G protein coupling of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor regulates pulsatile neuropeptide secretion PNAS, March 4, 2003; 100(5): 2969 - 2974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Nunemaker, M. Straume, R. A. DeFazio, and S. M. Moenter Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons Generate Interacting Rhythms in Multiple Time Domains Endocrinology, March 1, 2003; 144(3): 823 - 831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Nunemaker, R. A. DeFazio, and S. M. Moenter Estradiol-Sensitive Afferents Modulate Long-Term Episodic Firing Patterns of GnRH Neurons Endocrinology, June 1, 2002; 143(6): 2284 - 2292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Kuehl-Kovarik, W. A. Pouliot, G. L. Halterman, R. J. Handa, F. E. Dudek, and K. M. Partin Episodic Bursting Activity and Response to Excitatory Amino Acids in Acutely Dissociated Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons Genetically Targeted with Green Fluorescent Protein J. Neurosci., March 15, 2002; 22(6): 2313 - 2322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.-J. Zhang, K. Kusano, P. Zerfas, A. Iacangelo, W. S. Young III, and H. Gainer Targeting of Green Fluorescent Protein to Secretory Granules in Oxytocin Magnocellular Neurons and Its Secretion from Neurohypophysial Nerve Terminals in Transgenic Mice Endocrinology, March 1, 2002; 143(3): 1036 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Nunemaker, R. A. DeFazio, M. E. Geusz, E. D. Herzog, G. R. Pitts, and S. M. Moenter Long-Term Recordings of Networks of Immortalized GnRH Neurons Reveal Episodic Patterns of Electrical Activity J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 86 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Pitts, C. S. Nunemaker, and S. M. Moenter Cycles of Transcription and Translation Do Not Comprise the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Generator in GT1 Cells Endocrinology, May 1, 2001; 142(5): 1858 - 1864. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Vazquez-Martinez, S. L. Shorte, F. R. Boockfor, and L. S. Frawley Synchronized Exocytotic Bursts from Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-Expressing Cells: Dual Control by Intrinsic Cellular Pulsatility and Gap Junctional Communication Endocrinology, May 1, 2001; 142(5): 2095 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||