help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chusho, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakao, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chusho, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakao, K.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 10 3807-3813
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Genetic Models Reveal That Brain Natriuretic Peptide Can Signal through Different Tissue-Specific Receptor-Mediated Pathways1

Hideki Chusho, Yoshihiro Ogawa, Naohisa Tamura, Michio Suda, Akihiro Yasoda, Takashi Miyazawa, Ichiro Kishimoto, Yasato Komatsu, Hiroshi Itoh, Kiyoshi Tanaka, Yoshihiko Saito, David L. Garbers2 and Kazuwa Nakao

Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan; and Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-9050

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Yoshihiro Ogawa, Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. E-mail: ogawa{at}kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), a hormone produced primarily by the cardiac ventricle, is thought to be involved in a variety of homeostatic processes through its cognate receptor, guanylyl cyclase A (GC-A). We previously created transgenic mice overexpressing BNP under the control of the liver-specific human serum amyloid P component promoter (BNP-transgenic mice) and demonstrated that they exhibit reduced blood pressure and cardiac weight accompanied by an elevation of plasma cGMP concentrations and marked skeletal overgrowth through the activation of endochondral ossification. To address whether BNP exerts its biological effects solely through GC-A, we produced BNP-transgenic mice lacking GC-A (BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice) and examined their cardiovascular and skeletal phenotypes. The GC-A-/- mice are hypertensive with cardiac hypertrophy relative to wild-type littermates, which is not alleviated by overexpression of BNP in BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice. The BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice, however, continue to exhibit marked longitudinal growth of vertebrae and long bones comparably to BNP-Tg mice. This study provides genetic evidence that BNP reduces blood pressure and cardiac weight through GC-A, whereas it dramatically alters endochondral ossification in the absence of this receptor. Therefore, the BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice provide the first experimental model demonstrating that this natriuretic peptide can signal in a tissue-specific manner through a receptor other than GC-A.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE NATRIURETIC peptide system consists of a family of three structurally related endogenous ligands; atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) (1, 2, 3), and three membrane-bound receptors, two of which are guanylyl cyclase (GC)-coupled receptors (GC-A and GC-B) that mediate the biological actions of the ligands, and one of which is a biologically silent clearance receptor (C receptor) implicated in the metabolic clearance of the ligands (4, 5, 6). The latter also seems to mediate several cell signaling and biological effects (7). ANP and BNP are cardiac hormones that are produced predominantly by the atrium or ventricle, respectively (8, 9, 10, 11), and are thought to play important roles in the regulation of cardiovascular homeostasis, primarily through GC-A (12, 13). On the other hand, CNP occurs in a wide variety of central and peripheral tissues (14, 15, 16, 17) and may act locally as an autocrine/paracrine regulator through GC-B (12, 13).

Using the liver-specific human serum amyloid P component (SAP) promoter, we have generated transgenic mice with elevated plasma BNP concentrations (BNP-transgenic mice) (18) comparable to those in patients with cardiovascular disorders (3, 8, 19) and suggested that they serve as a unique experimental model system in which to assess the long-term effects of BNP in vivo. The BNP-transgenic mice show a marked reduction in blood pressure and cardiac weight, accompanied by a significant increase in plasma cGMP concentration (18). These findings indicate that BNP is capable of modifying cardiovascular homeostasis on a long-term basis, thereby suggesting its usefulness for the treatment of cardiovascular disorders such as hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy. Unexpectedly, however, these mice also exhibit marked skeletal overgrowth, accompanied by the activation of endochondral ossification (20). In contrast, transgenic mice overexpressing ANP in the liver (ANP-transgenic mice) have been shown to develop lower blood pressure, but no skeletal phenotypes have been reported to date (21). These findings suggest that ANP and BNP, thought to act through GC-A, may have different signaling pathways. Furthermore, both GC-A-deficient and ANP-deficient mice are hypertensive with cardiac hypertrophy, but show no skeletal defects (22, 23, 24). Recently, it has been reported that C receptor-deficient mice show decreased blood pressure and skeletal abnormalities similar to those in BNP-transgenic mice (25). These findings suggest complex interplay among natriuretic peptides and receptors in vivo.

In this study we use a genetic model to establish that BNP exerts its biological effects solely through a GC-A-mediated pathway in some cases (blood pressure regulation), but in other cases (regulation of skeletal growth) a pathway clearly independent of GC-A mediates the BNP response.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Several lines of BNP-transgenic mice under the control of the liver-specific human SAP promoter were produced, as reported previously (18, 20). The SAP promoter is highly specific to the liver and is constitutively active only after the birth (26). Transgenic mice carrying 20 copies of the transgene (line 55) were used in this study. Male BNP-transgenic mice were crossed with female heterozygous GC-A-deficient mice (GC-A+/- mice) (22) to produce BNP-transgenic mice with the disrupted GC-A allele (BNP-Tg/GC-A+/- mice). Originally, GC-Adeficient mice were produced on a C57BL/6–129/SvJ hybrid background (22), whereas BNP-transgenic mice have been maintained on a C57BL/6 background (18). Among the F1 generation, GC-A+/- mice were intercrossed with BNP-Tg/GC-A+/- mice to obtain nontransgenic GC-A+/+ mice (GC-A+/+ mice), BNP-transgenic GC-A+/+ mice (BNP-Tg mice), nontransgenic GC-A+/- mice (GC-A+/- mice), BNP-transgenic GC-A+/- mice (BNP-Tg/GC-A+/- mice), nontransgenic GC-A-/- mice (GC-A-/- mice), and BNP-transgenic GC-A-/- mice (BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice). In this study we analyzed the cardiovascular and skeletal phenotypes of GC-A+/+, BNP-Tg, GC-A-/-, and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice. Genotypes for the BNP transgene and disrupted GC-A allele were determined by Southern blot analysis using mouse tail DNAs. All of the experimental procedures were approved by the Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine committee on animal research.

Plasma BNP and ANP concentration measurements
Plasma BNP and ANP concentrations were determined by RIAs specific for mouse BNP and ANP, respectively (18).

Blood pressure measurements
Systolic blood pressure was measured by a noninvasive computerized tail-cuff method (BP-98A, Softron Corp., Tokyo, Japan) (18) using 5-month-old conscious mice. Mice were acclimated to the tail-cuff method for 3 days. At least six readings were taken for each measurement. Blood pressure was always measured by the same individual, who was not informed of the genotype of each animal.

Soft x-ray analysis
Five-month-old female mice were killed, skinned, eviscerated, and subjected to soft x-ray analysis (36 KVp, 4 mA for 2 min; Softron type SRO-M5, Softron Corp.) (20).

Skeletal preparation and histology
Vertebrae and tibias from 7-day-old mice were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, decalcified in 10% EDTA/0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, for 7 days, and embedded in paraffin. Five-micron-thick sections were cut from paraffin-embedded specimens and stained with Alcian blue (pH 2.5) and hematoxylin-eosin (20). Digoxigenin-labeled antisense and sense riboprobes were obtained from the RT-PCR product for type II collagen (a gift from Dr. Y. Yamada, NIH, Bethesda, MD), type X collagen (a gift from Dr. B. R. Olsen, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA), and GC-B (nucleotides 762-1394 of rat GC-B complementary DNA, GenBank M26896) using a DIG RNA labeling kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). In situ hybridization analysis was performed as previously described (27).

cGMP concentration measurements
The apical half of cardiac ventricles from 5-month-old male mice and tail bones from 7-day-old neonates were homogenized in 1 ml 6% trichloroacetic acid with a Physcotron homogenizer (NITI-ON Medical Supply, Chiba, Japan). The cGMP concentrations in ventricular and bone tissues, plasma, and urine were determined by a RIA for cGMP as previously reported (13).

Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as the mean ± SE. The statistical significance of differences in mean value was assessed by two-way ANOVA or Fisher’s test. Differences among mean values were considered significant as values of P < 0.05 and P < 0.01.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plasma BNP and ANP concentrations
Plasma BNP concentrations in GC-A+/+ mice were mostly below the detection limit of the RIA for mouse BNP (<20 fmol/ml; n = 8; Fig. 1AGo). Plasma BNP concentrations in GC-A-/- mice were 39.2 ± 7.0 fmol/ml and were significantly higher than those in GC-A+/+ mice (P < 0.05). Plasma BNP concentrations in BNP-Tg and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice (2734 ± 480 and 1941 ± 295 fmol/ml, respectively) were markedly elevated (~50- to 100-fold increases) relative to those in GC-A+/+ and GC-A-/- mice. No significant difference in plasma BNP concentration was noted between BNP-Tg and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice. Plasma ANP concentrations in GC-A+/+, BNP-Tg, GC-A-/-, and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice were 52.9 ± 6.1, 91.1 ± 33.1, 82.3 ± 11.9, and 100.1 ± 28.0 fmol/ml, respectively (n = 6; Fig. 1BGo). No significant differences in plasma ANP concentration were noted among genotypes.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Plasma BNP and ANP concentrations in 5-month-old GC-A+/+, BNP-Tg, GC-A-/-, and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice. A, Plasma BNP concentrations. B, Plasma ANP concentrations. Dotted lines represent the detection limits of the assays. (n = 6–8). *, P < 0.01 vs. GC-A+/+; #, P < 0.05 vs. GC-A+/+; §, P < 0.01 vs. GC-A-/-.

 
Cardiovascular phenotypes
At 5 months of age, the tail-cuff systolic blood pressure of BNP-Tg mice was approximately 20 mm Hg lower than that of GC-A+/+ mice (98 ± 3 vs. 116 ± 3 mm Hg; n = 6; Fig. 2AGo). The blood pressure of GC-A-/- mice (145 ± 3 mm Hg) was approximately 30 mm Hg higher than that of GC-A+/+ mice. These data are consistent with previous reports (18, 22, 23). On the other hand, no significant differences in blood pressure were observed between GC-A-/- and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice (144 ± 4 mm Hg).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Cardiovascular phenotypes of 5-month-old GC-A+/+, BNP-Tg, GC-A-/-, and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice (n = 6). A, The tail-cuff systolic blood pressure. B, Heart to body weight ratio. *, P < 0.01 vs. GC-A+/+; #, P < 0.01 vs. BNP-Tg.

 
At 5 months of age, the heart to body weight ratio was reduced significantly in BNP-Tg mice compared with GC-A+/+ mice (3.4 ± 0.2 vs. 4.8 ± 0.2 mg/g BW; n = 6; P < 0.01; Fig. 2BGo). GC-A-/- mice had a significant increase in heart to body weight ratio (8.1 ± 0.5 mg/g BW) relative to GC-A+/+ mice (~170%; P < 0.01). The BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice developed cardiac hypertrophy (7.9 ± 0.4 mg/g BW), and no significant difference was noted between GC-A-/- and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice.

Skeletal phenotypes
Figure 3AGo shows a gross appearance of 7-month-old female GC-A+/+, BNP-Tg, GC-A-/-, and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice. The BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice developed skeletal deformities, characterized by hunch back and elongated limbs, paws, and tails, which are similar to those in BNP-Tg mice as previously reported (20). Soft x-ray analysis revealed that at 7 months of age, BNP-Tg and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice had longer vertebral bodies and tibias compared with GC-A+/+ and GC-A-/- mice, respectively (Fig. 3BGo). At 10 and 20 weeks of age, the naso-anal length of BNP-Tg mice was significantly greater than that of GC-A+/+ mice (n = 4 each; P < 0.05 at 10 weeks of age; P < 0.01 at 20 weeks of age; Fig. 3CGo). No significant difference in naso-anal length was noted between GC-A+/+ and GC-A-/- mice. The naso-anal length of BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice was increased significantly compared with that of GC-A-/- mice (P < 0.05 at 10 weeks of age; P < 0.01 at 20 weeks of age). No significant difference was noted between BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- and BNP-Tg mice. The longitudinal lengths of fifth lumbar vertebrae and tibias were also significantly greater in BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- and BNP-Tg than those in GC-A-/- and GC-A+/+ mice, respectively (n = 4; P < 0.01; Fig. 3DGo).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Skeletal phenotypes of GC-A+/+, BNP-Tg, GC-A-/-, and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice. A, Gross appearance (7-month-old). From top to bottom, GC-A+/+, BNP-Tg, GC-A-/-, and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice. B, Soft x-ray analysis (7-month-old). From top to bottom, GC-A+/+, BNP-Tg, GC-A-/-, and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice. C, Naso-anal length (10- and 20-week-old). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (vs. GC-A+/+ mice). #, P < 0.05; ##, P < 0.01 (vs. GC-A-/- mice). D, The longitudinal lengths of fifth lumbar vertebrae and tibias (5-month-old mice). §, P < 0.01 (vs. GC-A+/+); §§, P < 0.01 (vs. GC-A-/-).

 
Histological analysis of tibias from 7-day-old neonates revealed that the hypertrophic zones of growth plate cartilage in BNP-Tg and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice were longer than those in GC-A+/+ and GC-A-/- mice (Fig. 4Go, A–D). The heights of hypertrophic chondrocyte zone in BNP-Tg and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice were 280 ± 12 and 290 ± 5 µm, respectively, which were significantly larger than those in GC-A+/+ and GC-A-/- mice (200 ± 9 and 220 ± 5 µm, respectively; n = 6; P < 0.01). No significant differences in the heights of nonhypertrophic chondrocyte zone were noted among GC-A+/+, BNP-Tg, GC-A-/-, and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice (870 ± 16, 870 ± 8, 890 ± 10, and 910 ± 20 µm, respectively; n = 6).



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Histological and in situ hybridization analysis of tibias and vertebrae from 7-day-old GC-A+/+ (A, E, I, and M), BNP-Tg (B, F, and J), GC-A-/- (C, G, and K), and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- (D, H, and L) mice. A–D. Alcian blue and hematoxylin-eosin staining of tibias (magnification, x50). H, Hypertrophic zone of growth plate cartilages. E–L, In situ hybridization analysis of type II collagen (E–H) and type X collagen (I–L) of vertebrae (magnification, x100). M, In situ hybridization analysis of GC-B (M) of tibias from GC-A+/+ mice (magnification, x50). The arrow denotes the zone where GC-B mRNA expression is detected.

 
In situ hybridization analysis revealed no significant difference in type II collagen messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in vertebrae from GC-A+/+, BNP-Tg, GC-A-/-, and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice (Fig. 4Go, E–H). By contrast, type X collagen-positive hypertrophic chondrocyte zones were increased in height in BNP-Tg and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice relative to those in GC-A+/+ and GC-A-/- mice (Fig. 4Go, I–L). In this study GC-B mRNA expression was detected in the proliferative and prehypertrophic zones of the growth plate in GC-A+/+ mice (Fig. 4MGo). This is consistent with a recent report that GC-B mRNA is expressed predominantly in proliferating chondrocytes of the fetal mouse tibia (28).

Urinary, plasma, ventricular, and bone cGMP concentrations
Urinary, plasma, and ventricular cGMP concentrations were increased significantly in 5-month-old BNP-Tg mice (20.3 ± 5.9 pmol/min, 50.6 ± 11.1 pmol/ml, and 13.7 ± 0.8 pmol/g tissue, respectively) relative to those in GC-A+/+ mice (5.2 ± 1.7 pmol/min, 12.8 ± 3.5 pmol/ml, and 11.4 ± 0.4 pmol/g tissue, respectively; n = 6; P < 0.01; Fig. 5Go, A–C). By contrast, GC-A-/- mice (1.4 ± 0.3 pmol/min, 2.4 ± 0.5 pmol/ml, and 2.1 ± 0.2 pmol/g tissue, respectively) had significantly lower urinary, plasma, and ventricular cGMP concentrations than GC-A+/+ mice (P < 0.01). No significant difference was noted between GC-A-/- and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice (2.6 ± 0.6 pmol/min, 3.7 ± 0.6 pmol/ml, and 2.1 ± 0.2 pmol/g tissue, respectively).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Urinary, plasma, ventricular, and bone cGMP concentrations in GC-A+/+, BNP-Tg, GC-A-/-, and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice. A, Urinary cGMP concentrations (5-month-old mice). B, Plasma cGMP concentrations (5-month-old mice). C, Ventricular cGMP concentrations (5-month-old mice). D, Bone cGMP concentrations (7-day-old mice). *, P < 0.01 vs. GC-A+/+; #, P < 0.01 vs. BNP-Tg; §, P < 0.01 vs. GC-A-/-.

 
Bone cGMP concentrations in GC-A-/- mice (16.5 ± 2.4 pmol/g tissue) were roughly equivalent to those in GC-A+/+ mice (22.3 ± 3.2 pmol/g tissue; n = 4; Fig. 5DGo). Bone cGMP concentrations were increased significantly in BNP-Tg and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice (52.8 ± 3.9 and 46.3 ± 12.4 pmol/g tissue, respectively) compared with those in GC-A+/+ and GC-A-/- mice (n = 4; P < 0.01).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We previously demonstrated that BNP-transgenic mice develop hypotension with small hearts (18), but notably also marked skeletal overgrowth relative to nontransgenic littermates (20). On the other hand, GC-A-deficient mice display salt-resistant hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy without skeletal defects (22, 23). Given that ANP-transgenic mice have not been reported to display the skeletal phenotype, these reports suggest that BNP can signal through pathways independent of GC-A. Genetic models can provide a strong means by which to define signaling pathways. In this case, the cross of animals overproducing BNP with animals lacking GC-A provides a means of determining whether the actions of BNP can be mediated by other receptors.

We observed no significant differences in blood pressure and heart to body weight ratio between GC-A-/- and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice. These results indicate that BNP does not lower blood pressure and inhibit cardiac hypertrophy in the absence of GC-A. Plasma, urinary, and ventricular cGMP concentrations were elevated in BNP-Tg mice but decreased in GC-A-/- mice relative to GC-A+/+ mice. Furthermore, no significant differences were noted between GC-A-/- and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice. Thus, the hypotensive and antihypertrophic effects of BNP are mediated by increased production of cGMP through the activation of GC-A. This is consistent with the previous observation that ANP and BNP fail to relax precontracted aortic rings prepared from GC-A-/- mice (29). A significant reduction of cardiac weight in BNP-Tg mice might be at least partly due to the hypotensive effect of BNP. However, previous studies reported that ANP can reduce the cell volume of cultured rabbit cardiocytes through a cGMP-mediated pathway (30, 31). Taken together, our results suggest that BNP exerts its antihypertrophic effect on the heart through GC-A expressed in both blood vessels and heart.

This study demonstrates that BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice continue to exhibit marked longitudinal growth of vertebrae and long bones comparable to that in BNP-Tg mice. Histologically, BNP-Tg mice are indistinguishable from BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice, in that both genetic models show increases in the height of the hypertrophic zone of growth plate cartilage as revealed by increased expression of type X collagen mRNA in both genotypes. These findings indicate that BNP can activate endochondral ossification through another pathway in vivo, although GC-A mRNA is expressed in mouse long bones (32). In this study, bone cGMP concentrations in BNP-Tg and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice are increased significantly relative to those in GC-A+/+ and GC-A-/- mice, respectively. These observations suggest that GC-A expressed in the bone is not coupled to the increase the cGMP production. We reported that BNP can increase the longitudinal growth of cultured mouse long bones through a cGMP-mediated pathway (20). Furthermore, mice lacking type II cGMP-dependent protein kinase develop dwarfism as a result of impaired endochondral ossification (33), suggesting the importance of cGMP signaling in endochondral ossification. It is, therefore, likely that BNP can activate GCcoupled receptor(s) other than GC-A in vivo, thereby affecting endochondral ossification.

GC-B is the another GC-coupled receptor that BNP is known to activate (4, 6). In this study we have shown that GC-B mRNA is expressed in the proliferative and prehypertrophic zones of the growth plate. We have previously suggested that CNP is an endogenous natriuretic peptide in the bone and may activate endochondral ossification via GC-B in cultured fetal mouse tibias (32). Furthermore, we have recently created transgenic mice expressing CNP under the control of the cartilage-specific type II collagen promoter. They exhibit marked skeletal overgrowth accompanied by increased endochondral ossification (A. Yasoda, Y. Ogawa, N. Tamura, M. Suda, H. Chusho, T. Miyazawa, K. Tanaka, and K. Nakao unpublished data), which is very similar to those found in BNP-Tg and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice. It suggests that CNP can locally affect endochondral ossification. Taken together, the data of this study suggest that in BNP-Tg and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice, BNP is secreted from the liver into the circulation at a high rate and cross-reacts with GC-B in vertebrae and long bones, thereby activating endochondral ossification. In this context, Matsukawa et al. have recently reported that C receptor-deficient mice show hunched backs, elongated long bones, and vertebral bodies (25), which are very similar to those of BNP-Tg and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice. With no significant increases in plasma ANP and BNP concentrations in C receptor-deficient mice, disruption of C receptor should result in the increased availability of an endogenous ligand (i.e. CNP) to GC-B, thereby activating endochondral ossification (25).

On the other hand, no skeletal overgrowth has been reported in ANP-transgenic mice (21), although ANP and BNP can activate both GC-A and GC-B equipotently (12, 13). However, we have observed that ANP and BNP can similarly activate endochondral ossification in cultured fetal mouse tibias (20, 32). Moreover, increased body length was observed in proportion to the copy number of the BNP transgene (20), and no gross skeletal abnormalities were found in BNP-transgenic mice with the lower copy number of the transgene. Therefore, it is likely that high plasma ANP or BNP concentrations are needed to promote endochondral ossification in vivo. Considering that plasma ANP concentrations in ANP-transgenic mice (21) are about 1 order of magnitude lower than plasma BNP concentrations in BNP-transgenic mice (20), ANP-transgenic mice may have few or mild skeletal abnormalities. Detailed histological examinations of the skeleton of ANP-transgenic mice are needed to address this issue.

It has been recognized that the phenotypes of experimental animals sometimes vary, depending on their genetic backgrounds (34). Originally, GC-A-deficient mice were produced on a C57BL/6–129/SvJ hybrid background (22), whereas BNP-transgenic mice have been maintained on a C57BL/6 background (18). Thus, the four genotypes used in this study (GC-A+/+, BNP-Tg, GC-A-/-, and BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice) may differ genetically in addition to the GC-A allele and BNP transgene, which might affect their phenotypes. However, the cardiovascular and skeletal phenotypes of BNP-Tg and GC-A-/- mice examined in this study are identical to those of BNP-transgenic and GC-A-deficient mice reported previously (18, 20, 22). It is, therefore, unlikely that the skeletal phenotypes of BNP-Tg/GC-A-/- mice may result from genetic variations among the animals examined.

Nevertheless, it is also possible that there is an as yet unidentified GC- or non-GC-coupled receptor with high affinity to BNP (35, 36), thereby mediating its cardiovascular and skeletal effects. Recently, at least 29 guanylyl cyclase sequences have been reported in Caenorhabditis elegans (37). A recent study suggested the existence of a large number of non-GC-coupled natriuretic peptide receptor other than C receptor in rat FRTL-5 thyroid cells (38). Further studies are required for the identification of an unknown biologically active receptor(s) specific for BNP.

In conclusion, this study provides genetic evidence that BNP exerts its cardiovascular effects through a GC-A-mediated pathway, whereas it can affect endochondral ossification through a GC-coupled receptor(s) other than GC-A, possibly GC-B.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Takehiko Koji and Toshifumi Tsurusaki at Nagasaki University for valuable suggestions for in situ hybridization. We also acknowledge Hitomi Hiratani and Mayumi Nagamoto for technical assistance, and Yoshiko Isa and Yuko Nakajima for secretarial assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by grants from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture; the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare; the Kanae Foundation for Life and Socio-Medical Science; the Salt Science Research Foundation; Study Group of Molecular Cardiology; the Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research; and Research for the Future of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS-RFTF 96100204 and 98100801). Back

2 Investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Back

Received January 28, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rosenzweig A, Seidman CE 1991 Atrial natriuretic factor and related peptide hormones. Annu Rev Biochem 60:229–255[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Nakao K, Ogawa Y, Suga S, Imura H 1992 Molecular biology and biochemistry of the natriuretic peptide system. I. Natriuretic peptides. J Hypertens 10:907–912[Medline]
  3. Ogawa Y, Nakao K 1995 Brain natriuretic peptide as a cardiac hormone in cardiovascular disorders. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM (eds) Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Raven Press, New York, vol 1:833–840
  4. Chinkers M, Garbers DL 1991 Signal transduction by guanylyl cyclases. Annu Rev Biochem 60:553–575[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Maack T, Suzuki M, Almeida FA, Nussenzveig D, Scarborough RM, McEnroe GA, Lewicki JA 1987 Physiological role of silent receptors of atrial natriuretic factor. Science 238:675–678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Nakao K, Ogawa Y, Suga S, Imura H 1992 Molecular biology and biochemistry of the natriuretic peptide system. II. Natriuretic peptide receptors. J Hypertens 10:1111–1114[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Levin ER 1993 Natriuretic peptide C-receptor: more than a clearance receptor. Am J Physiol 264:E483–E489
  8. Mukoyama M, Nakao K, Hosoda K, Suga S, Saito Y, Ogawa Y, Shirakami G, Jougasaki M, Obata K, Yasue H, Kambayashi Y, Inouye K, Imura H 1991 Brain natriuretic peptide as a novel cardiac hormone in humans. Evidence for an exquisite dual natriuretic peptide system, atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide. J Clin Invest 87:1402–1412
  9. Dagnino L, Drouin J, Nemer M 1991 Differential expression of natriuretic peptide genes in cardiac and extracardiac tissues. Mol Endocrinol 5:1292–1300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Tamura N, Ogawa Y, Yasoda A, Itoh H, Saito Y, Nakao K 1996 Two cardiac natriuretic peptide genes (atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide) are organized in tandem in the mouse and human genomes. J Mol Cell Cardiol 28:1811–1815[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Nakagawa O, Ogawa Y, Itoh H, Suga S, Komatsu Y, Kishimoto I, Nishino K, Yoshimasa T, Nakao K 1995 Rapid transcriptional activation and early mRNA turnover of brain natriuretic peptide in cardiocyte hypertrophy. evidence for brain natriuretic peptide as an "emergency" cardiac hormone against ventricular overload. J Clin Invest 96:1280–1287
  12. Koller KJ, Lowe DG, Bennett GL, Minamino N, Kangawa K, Matsuo H, Goeddel DV 1991 Selective activation of the B natriuretic peptide receptor by C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP). Science 252:120–123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Suga S, Nakao K, Hosoda K, Mukoyama M, Ogawa Y, Shirakami G, Arai H, Saito Y, Kambayashi Y, Inouye K, Imura H 1992 Receptor selectivity of natriuretic peptide family, atrial natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide, and C-type natriuretic peptide. Endocrinology 130:229–239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Komatsu Y, Nakao K, Suga S, Ogawa Y, Mukoyama M, Arai H, Shirakami G, Hosoda K, Nakagawa O, Hama N, Kishimoto I, Imura H 1991 C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) in rats and humans. Endocrinology 129:1104–1106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Suga S, Nakao K, Itoh H, Komatsu Y, Ogawa Y, Hama N, Imura H 1992 Endothelial production of C-type natriuretic peptide and its marked augmentation by transforming growth factor-ß. Possible existence of "vascular natriuretic peptide system." J Clin Invest 90:1145–1149
  16. Chrisman TD, Schulz S, Potter LR, Garbers DL 1993 Seminal plasma factors that cause large elevations in cellular cyclic GMP are C-type natriuretic peptides. J Biol Chem 268:3698–3703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Vollmar AM, Gerbes AL, Nemer M, Schulz R 1993 Detection of C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) transcript in the rat heart and immune organs. Endocrinology 132:1872–1874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ogawa Y, Itoh H, Tamura N, Suga S, Yoshimasa T, Uehira M, Matsuda S, Shiono S, Nishimoto H, Nakao K 1994 Molecular cloning of the complementary DNA and gene that encode mouse brain natriuretic peptide and generation of transgenic mice that overexpress the brain natriuretic peptide gene. J Clin Invest 93:1911–1921
  19. Morita E, Yasue H, Yoshimura M, Ogawa H, Jougasaki M, Matsumura T, Mukoyama M, Nakao K 1993 Increased plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 88:82–91[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Suda M, Ogawa Y, Tanaka K, Tamura N, Yasoda A, Takigawa T, Uehira M, Nishimoto H, Itoh H, Saito Y, Shiota K, Nakao K 1998 Skeletal overgrowth in transgenic mice that overexpress brain natriuretic peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:2337–2342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Steinhelper ME, Cochrane KL, Field LJ 1990 Hypotension in transgenic mice expressing atrial natriuretic factor fusion genes. Hypertension 16:301–307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lopez MJ, Wong SK, Kishimoto I, Dubois S, Mach V, Friesen J, Garbers DL, Beuve A 1995 Salt-resistant hypertension in mice lacking the guanylylcyclase-A receptor for atrial natriuretic peptide. Nature 378:65–68[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Oliver PM, Fox JE, Kim R, Rockman HA, Kim HS, Reddick RL, Pandey KN, Milgram SL, Smithies O, Maeda N 1997 Hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, and sudden death in mice lacking natriuretic peptide receptor A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:14730–14735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. John SW, Krege JH, Oliver PM, Hagaman JR, Hodgin JB, Pang SC, Flynn TG, Smithies O 1995 Genetic decreases in atrial natriuretic peptide and saltsensitive hypertension. Science 267:679–681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Matsukawa N, Grzesik WJ, Takahashi N, Pandey KN, Pang S, Yamauchi M, Smithies O 1999 The natriuretic peptide clearance receptor locally modulates the physiological effects of the natriuretic peptide system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7403–7408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Zhao X, Araki K, Miyazaki J, Yamamura K 1992 Developmental and liver-specific expression directed by the serum amyloid P component promoter in transgenic mice. J Biochem (Tokyo) 111:736–738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Mori K, Ogawa Y, Ebihara K, Tamura N, Tashiro K, Kuwahara T, Mukoyama M, Sugawara A, Ozaki S, Tanaka I, Nakao K 1999 Isolation and characterization of CA XIV, a novel membrane-bound carbonic anhydrase from mouse kidney. J Biol Chem 274:15701–15705[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Yamashita Y, Takeshige K, Inoue A, Hirose S, Takamori A, Hagiwara H 2000 Concentration of mRNA for the natriuretic peptide receptor-C in hypertrophic chondrocytes of the fetal mouse tibia. J Biochem (Tokyo) 127:177–179[Free Full Text]
  29. Lopez MJ, Garbers DL, Kuhn M 1997 The guanylyl cyclase-deficient mouse defines differential pathways of natriuretic peptide signaling. J Biol Chem 272:23064–23068[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Clemo HF, Baumgarten CM 1991 Atrial natriuretic factor decreases cell volume of rabbit atrial and ventricular myocytes. Am J Physiol 260:C681–C690
  31. Clemo HF, Baumgarten CM 1995 cGMP and atrial natriuretic factor regulate cell volume of rabbit atrial myocytes. Circ Res 77:741–749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Yasoda A, Ogawa Y, Suda M, Tamura N, Mori K, Sakuma Y, Chusho H, Shiota K, Tanaka K, Nakao K 1998 Natriuretic peptide regulation of endochondral ossification. evidence for possible roles of the C-type natriuretic peptide/guanylyl cyclase-B pathway. J Biol Chem 273:11695–11700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Pfeifer A, Aszodi A, Seidler U, Ruth P, Hofmann F, Fassler R 1996 Intestinal secretory defects and dwarfism in mice lacking cGMP-dependent protein kinase II. Science 274:2082–2086[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Doetschman T 1999 Interpretation of phenotype in genetically engineered mice. Lab Anim Sci 49:137–143[Medline]
  35. Kambayashi Y, Nakao K, Kimura H, Kawabata T, Nakamura M, Inouye K, Yoshida N, Imura H 1990 Biological characterization of human brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and rat BNP: species-specific actions of BNP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 173:599–605[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Garbers DL 1992 Guanylyl cyclase receptors and their endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine ligands. Cell 71:1–4[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Baude EJ, Arora VK, Yu S, Garbers DL, Wedel BJ 1997 The cloning of a Caenorhabditis elegans guanylyl cyclase and the construction of a ligand-sensitive mammalian/nematode chimeric receptor. J Biol Chem 272:16035–16039[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Sellitti DF, Doi SQ 1999 Regulation of natriuretic peptide receptors by thyrotropin in FRTL-5 rat thyroid cells: evidence for nonguanylate cyclase atrial natriuretic factor-binding sites in cells lacking the natriuretic peptide receptor C. Endocrinology 140:1365–1374[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
A. Marchini, B. Hacker, T. Marttila, V. Hesse, J. Emons, B. Weiss, M. Karperien, and G. Rappold
BNP is a transcriptional target of the short stature homeobox gene SHOX
Hum. Mol. Genet., December 15, 2007; 16(24): 3081 - 3087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Moffatt, G. Thomas, K. Sellin, M.-C. Bessette, F. Lafreniere, O. Akhouayri, R. St-Arnaud, and C. Lanctot
Osteocrin Is a Specific Ligand of the Natriuretic Peptide Clearance Receptor That Modulates Bone Growth
J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2007; 282(50): 36454 - 36462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Kawakami, Y. Saito, I. Kishimoto, M. Harada, K. Kuwahara, N. Takahashi, Y. Nakagawa, M. Nakanishi, K. Tanimoto, S. Usami, et al.
Overexpression of Brain Natriuretic Peptide Facilitates Neutrophil Infiltration and Cardiac Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Expression After Acute Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, November 23, 2004; 110(21): 3306 - 3312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Muller, A. K. Mukhopadhyay, R. C. Speth, G. Guidone, R. Potthast, L. R. Potter, and R. Middendorff
Spatiotemporal Regulation of the Two Atrial Natriuretic Peptide Receptors in Testis
Endocrinology, March 1, 2004; 145(3): 1392 - 1401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
I. Boutin-Ganache, S. Picard, and C. F. Deschepper
Distinct gene-sex interactions regulate adult rat cardiomyocyte width and length independently
Physiol Genomics, December 26, 2002; 12(1): 61 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. Miyazawa, Y. Ogawa, H. Chusho, A. Yasoda, N. Tamura, Y. Komatsu, A. Pfeifer, F. Hofmann, and K. Nakao
Cyclic GMP-Dependent Protein Kinase II Plays a Critical Role in C-Type Natriuretic Peptide-Mediated Endochondral Ossification
Endocrinology, September 1, 2002; 143(9): 3604 - 3610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
T. Suganami, M. Mukoyama, A. Sugawara, K. Mori, T. Nagae, M. Kasahara, K. Yahata, H. Makino, Y. Fujinaga, Y. Ogawa, et al.
Overexpression of Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Mice Ameliorates Immune-Mediated Renal Injury
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2001; 12(12): 2652 - 2663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. Kishimoto, K. Rossi, and D. L. Garbers
A genetic model provides evidence that the receptor for atrial natriuretic peptide (guanylyl cyclase-A) inhibits cardiac ventricular myocyte hypertrophy
PNAS, February 8, 2001; (2001) 51625598.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
W. K. Samson
Editorial: The Power of Two--Molecular Differentiation of the Vascular and Bone Actions of the Natriuretic Peptides
Endocrinology, October 1, 2000; 141(10): 3525 - 3526.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. Kishimoto, K. Rossi, and D. L. Garbers
A genetic model provides evidence that the receptor for atrial natriuretic peptide (guanylyl cyclase-A) inhibits cardiac ventricular myocyte hypertrophy
PNAS, February 27, 2001; 98(5): 2703 - 2706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chusho, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakao, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chusho, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nakao, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals