| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
Medical Research Council Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, Center for Reproductive Biology (N.A., C.M., K.J.T., M.W., J.S.F., M.M., M.R.M., R.M.S.), Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom EH3 9ET; Institute of Experimental Morphology and Anthropology, Bulgarian Academy of Science (N.A.), 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria; and School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes University (N.P.G.), Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom OX3 0BP
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. R. M. Sharpe, Medical Research Council Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, Center for Reproductive Biology, 37 Chalmers Street, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom EH3 9ET. E-mail: r.sharpe{at}mrc.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In adulthood, testis weight was decreased dose dependently in rats treated neonatally with DES, but only the lowest dose group (0.01 µg) showed evidence of mating (3 of 6) and normal fertility (3 litters). Animals treated neonatally with OP or Bis-A had normal or increased (Bis-A) testis weights and exhibited reasonably normal mating/fertility. Animals fed a soy-free diet had significantly larger testes than controls fed a soy-containing diet, and this difference was confirmed in a much larger study of more than 24 litters, which also showed a significant decrease in plasma FSH levels and a significant increase in body weight in the males kept on a soy-free diet. Neonatal treatment with genistein did not alter adult testis weight, and although most males exhibited normal mating and fertility, a minority did not mate or were infertile. It is concluded that 1) neonatal exposure of rats to low levels of estrogens can advance the first wave of spermatogenesis at puberty, although it is unclear whether this is due to direct effects of the estrogen or to associated elevation of FSH levels; 2) the effect of high doses of OP and Bis-A on these processes is essentially benign; and 3) the presence or absence of soy or genistein in the diet has significant short-term (pubertal spermatogenesis) and long-term (body weight, testis size, FSH levels, and possibly mating) effects on males.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(14, 15), ERß
(16), or aromatase (17, 18) in male mice. In
each of these transgenics, grossly normal development of the testis and
reproductive system reportedly occurs, at least up to puberty, findings
that question whether estrogens play a significant physiological role
in male reproductive development (1). The contrast between
these two extreme situations is puzzling and presumably indicates that
current understanding of estrogen action in the male is insufficient to
enable the two sets of findings to be reconciled. In turn, this lack of
understanding represents an obstacle to informed assessment of whether
individual environmental estrogens pose any significant risk to the
developing male (10, 19, 20). Based on published findings it is clear that perinatal overexposure to estrogens results in adverse effects on male reproductive development, and investigators searching for potential effects of environmental estrogens have therefore focused on trying to demonstrate similar adverse effects of these compounds. In general, perinatal exposure to high doses of potent estrogens appears necessary for the induction of major adverse effects on the developing male reproductive system (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 21), although there are published studies that have shown effects (not necessarily adverse) of much lower levels of potent estrogens (22). As all identified environmental estrogens are considerably less potent than estradiol and diethylstilbestrol (DES), it is perhaps most logical to expect that little or no adverse effects of such compounds will be found on male reproductive development, even at high doses, unless their effects are not related straightforwardly to their estrogenic potency. Recently published studies that have addressed this issue have yielded conflicting results (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32), and although they have generated an intense debate about low dose effects of estrogens, opinion remains divided as to whether environmental estrogens are likely to induce adverse effects at other than very high doses.
From our own studies involving neonatal administration of potent estrogens such as DES, we have been puzzled by the need to administer very high doses to induce gross adverse changes to the developing male reproductive tract (13, 21). Findings from transgenic mice (ERKOs, BERKOs, and ARKOs) (14, 15, 16, 17, 18) and our own studies of adult rats treated with an aromatase inhibitor (33) have all demonstrated no gross changes to the reproductive tract (other than the efferent ducts in ERKOs) after manipulation of endogenous estrogen levels, and this caused us to question whether the end points used for these studies were the most appropriate or the most sensitive. This was reinforced by our preliminary finding that neonatal administration of high doses of environmental estrogens caused either no or minimal effects on the end points that we studied (13) (our unpublished data). This prompted us to investigate whether there were hidden (i.e. not gross) effects of low levels of estrogens that were not obvious, but were only discernable by systematic analysis. For these studies we focused on the pubertal development of the seminiferous cords/tubules of the testis for two reasons. First, Sertoli cells and most germ cells express ERß throughout early development (4, 5, 6) (our unpublished data), and we have shown that neonatal exposure to relatively low doses of DES can affect the development of Sertoli cells (11, 21). Second, isolated reports have indicated that estrogens might exert stimulatory effects on early germ cell development in the testes of several animals (34, 35, 36, 37, 38). We therefore compared the effects of neonatal exposure of male rats to high levels of two industrial environmental (weak) estrogens [octylphenol (OP) and bisphenol A (Bis-A)] with the effects of the phytoestrogen genistein (and soy-free vs. soy-containing diets) and contrasted these with the effects of the potent estrogen DES administered in doses spanning a 1000-fold range. Because a number of treatment-induced changes in early testicular development were observed, we also assessed whether these treatments resulted in any long-term consequences by measuring testis weight and assessing fertility in adulthood.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It was also evaluated whether the phytoestrogens in soy were able to affect male reproductive development. This was undertaken by comparing male offspring reared by mothers maintained on a (standard) soy-containing diet (no. 4 described above) with those 5) reared by mothers maintained on a nominally soy-free diet (rat and mouse soy-free breeding diet, SDS), in which the soy is substituted by fishmeal (maize gluten is also added, and the overall cereal content is increased to 78% compared with 64% in the standard diet). Additionally, the effect of 6) administering genistein to male pups maintained on a soy-free diet was also evaluated. Soy-free reared animals were generated as follows. Adult female rats were placed on a soy-free diet for a minimum of 3 weeks before mating and then maintained on this diet throughout mating, pregnancy, and lactation; the male pups when weaned were subsequently maintained on the same soy-free diet until they were killed. At birth, some of the male offspring born to mothers maintained on a soy-free diet were treated with the soy derivative genistein (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) by daily sc injection from days 218. The dose of genistein administered was 4 mg/kg·day to equate to the reported total phytoestrogen intake by 4-month-old human infants maintained on a 100% soy-formula milk diet (39, 40). The genistein was prepared by dissolving in 0.4 M KOH and then diluting 1:20 with 0.1 M PBS containing 2.5 mg/ml gelatin (Sigma) to give a dosing solution of 0.8 mg/ml, which was kept at 4 C. The control animals maintained on the same soy-free diet were treated with the vehicle alone. Vehicle- and genistein-treated pups were equally represented in each cross-fostered litter.
Rats from the various treatment groups described above were subsequently sampled on day 18, 25, or 90100 (=adults). Animals were anesthetized with flurothane, blood was collected from the heart into a heparinized syringe, and the animals were then killed by cervical dislocation. For the rats sampled at 18 and 25 days the testes were dissected out, weighed, and fixed for approximately 5 h in Bouins solution. In excess of 300 males were used for these studies, and at least 2 separate experiments were performed for each of the treatments specified on day 18; comparable results were obtained in each experiment. Data for individual treatment groups from the separate experiments were pooled for analysis and illustration.
A more detailed comparison of males in natural litters reared to adulthood on soy-free and soy-containing diets was also made. A total of 24 litters of males reared on a soy-free diet were compared with 29 litters of males reared on the standard soy-containing diet. At 9095 days of age, the males were killed by inhalation of rising levels of CO2, blood was collected from the posterior vena cava into a heparinized syringe, and the testes were dissected out and weighed. Values for mean testis weight and blood FSH levels for each litter were then generated.
Mating and fertility
Some of the males from the treatment groups above that were
reared until adulthood were assessed for mating and fertility at 8090
days of age. Each male was placed with an adult female rat in a mating
cage floored with a wire mesh grid. Cages were checked each day for
mating plugs, and when one or more plugs were found, the male was
removed, and the female was caged separately until birth, when the
offspring were counted. If a plug was not found after 7 days, the male
was scored as not having mated and was removed from the cage; the
female was monitored to confirm the absence of pregnancy.
Processing of blood samples and testis tissue
Plasma samples were stored at -20 C until used for hormone
analysis. After fixation in Bouins solution, testis tissue was
transferred into 70% ethanol before being processed for 17.5 h in
an automated Shandon processor and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections
of 5 µm thickness were cut, floated onto slides coated with 2%
3-aminopropyltriethoxy-silane (Sigma), and dried at 50 C
overnight before being used for cell quantification studies and
visualization of apoptotic germ cells as described below.
Determination of Sertoli cell and germ cell nuclear volume per
testis, the germ cell apoptotic index, and seminiferous tubule lumen
formation on days 1825
The purpose of these studies was to quantify various
aspects of the first wave of spermatogenesis at puberty in the various
treatment groups. Standard point counting of cell nuclei was used, as
described previously (11, 21), to determine the nuclear
volume per testis of Sertoli cells, germ cells (apoptotic and
nonapoptotic), and seminiferous tubule lumen volume. These data were
then used to determine for each animal the following: 1) the nuclear
volume of viable (nonapoptotic) spermatocytes and spermatogonia per
unit Sertoli cell nuclear volume as an index of spermatogenic
efficiency; 2) the germ cell apoptotic index based on the ratio of the
nuclear volume of apoptotic/viable germ cells per testis; and 3)
seminiferous tubule lumen percent volume (=lumen formation) as an
indicator of Sertoli cell functional development (41).
Apoptotic germ cells were identified based on DNA fragmentation, which
was detected by in situ DNA 3'-end labeling in histological
sections using a nonradioactive labeling method that resulted in a high
degree of specificity and low background staining, as described and
validated in detail previously (11). Cross-sections of
testes from 514 (day 18) or 512 (day 25) rats in each treatment
group were examined under oil immersion using a Leitz x63
plan apo objective fitted to a Leitz Laborlux microscope
and a 121-point eyepiece graticule (Rockleigh, NJ). Using a systematic
clock-face sampling pattern from a random starting point, 16 fields
were counted. Points falling over the nuclei of Sertoli cells,
spermatogonia, or spermatocytes (apoptotic or nonapoptotic) or over
seminiferous tubule lumens were scored and expressed as a percentage of
the total points counted. For each animal, the values for percent
nuclear volume were converted to absolute nuclear volumes per testis by
reference to testis volume (=weight), as shrinkage was minimal,
i.e. testis weights before and after fixation were
comparable in each treatment group.
As significant changes in Sertoli cell number occur in some of the treatment groups used in the present studies (21), account had to be taken of this difference when comparing relative volumes of germ cells per testis. Therefore, data for spermatocytes and spermatogonia have been expressed as nuclear volumes per testis relative to Sertoli cell nuclear volume per testis to indicate the relative (nuclear) volume of each germ cell type supported per unit Sertoli cell nuclear volume. Cell nuclear volume can be equated to numbers of cells per testis, assuming no change in nuclear diameter of the target cell in the different treatment groups. Measurement of spermatocyte nuclear diameter in selected treatment groups on day 18 in the present studies confirmed no major difference (data not shown). However, because of the complex shape of the Sertoli cell nucleus, it was not possible in the present studies to determine average Sertoli cell nuclear size, although we have shown previously that point count measurement of Sertoli cell nuclear volume per testis equates broadly to Sertoli cell number determined by the disector method (21) (see also Results). It was therefore not possible to convert the present data to absolute numbers of germ cells per Sertoli cell.
In accord with previous studies of the first wave of spermatogenesis at puberty (41), it was noted that most apoptotic germ cells in the present studies appeared to be spermatocytes. However, as apoptotic germ cells cannot be identified with complete certainty, the apoptotic index reported in the present studies was derived by expressing the relative nuclear volume per testis of apoptotic germ cells to the combined nuclear volumes per testis of spermatogonia and spermatocytes. As the latter cell types do not have identical nuclear diameters, derivation of the index in this way may introduce a small error. However, as changes in spermatogonia and spermatocyte nuclear volumes per testis individually paralleled the change in total germ cell nuclear volume per testis in the various treatment groups, expression of apoptotic germ cell nuclear volume relative to that of viable spermatocytes (or spermatogonia) yielded results of comparable significance to those presented below for the apoptotic index (not shown).
Measurement of plasma hormone levels
Plasma levels of FSH were measured by RIA using materials
generously supplied by the NIDDK. Results have been expressed in terms
of the rat FSH RP-2 standard. In the FSH assay, plasma levels measured
in hypophysectomized rats range from 1.22.3 ng/ml, and values in this
range are therefore considered to be baseline. Plasma levels of inhibin
B were measured using a two site enzyme-linked immunoassay that uses a
capture antibody directed against the C-terminal portion of the human
ßB-subunit and the F(ab) fraction of a mouse
monoclonal antibody (R1) to the N-terminal portion of the inhibin
-subunit conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (42, 43).
The assay has been previously validated for measurement of inhibin B in
the rat (44, 45), and in the present studies it was
confirmed that rat plasma diluted in parallel with the inhibin B
standard and that levels of inhibin B in castrate adult male rat plasma
were reduced to undetectable levels (<60 pg/ml).
Statistics
Comparison of the different parameters for the various treatment
groups was made using ANOVA, as all data were normally distributed.
Where significant differences between groups were indicated, subgroup
comparisons also used ANOVA, but employed the variance from the
experiment as a whole (for that parameter) as the measure of error.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to the various parameters on day 25
With one or two exceptions, the pronounced treatment-related
changes evident on day 18 were no longer evident on day 25. For
example, apart from animals maintained on a soy-free diet, no treatment
group exhibited any significant increase in spermatocyte nuclear volume
per Sertoli cell nuclear volume compared with controls (Fig. 5
), although it should be noted that the
spermatocyte nuclear volume per Sertoli cell nuclear volume ratio
increased more than 6-fold in controls from day 18 (Fig. 4
) to day 25
(Fig. 5
). The latter change occurred despite no increase in FSH levels
in controls between days 18 and 25, and in the various treatment groups
the blood FSH profile still showed treatment-related changes (mainly
increases compared with control) similar to those seen on day 18 (Figs. 4
and 5
). The only treatment group that showed a more or less identical
(comparative) profile to that on day 18 was the group treated
neonatally with 10 µg DES, in which there was an elevated germ cell
apoptotic index, decreased spermatocyte nuclear volume per Sertoli cell
nuclear volume, and reduced FSH levels (Fig. 5
) and retarded lumen
formation (not shown). Comparison of control rats reared on a soy-free
diet with those reared on a soy-containing diet showed echoes of
the changes evident on day 18, but only one of these parameters was
marginally statistically significant (Figs. 4
and 5
). Moreover, on day
25 genistein-treated animals showed no significant differences from
soy-free controls for any of the parameters measured (Fig. 5
). It is
emphasized that treatment with genistein continued up until day 18, in
contrast to the other treatments (DES, Bis-A, and OP), which had ceased
on day 12.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An elegant series of studies by Russell and colleagues (41, 46, 47) has demonstrated that the first wave of spermatogenesis at puberty in the male rat is characterized by several interrelated temporal changes involving formation and progressive expansion of the seminiferous tubule lumen, a progressive increase in germ cell volume and numbers, and a progressive decrease in the number of degenerating germ cells (48). We have therefore used these three end points to characterize pubertal spermatogenesis in rats treated neonatally with DES, OP, or Bis-A or in which exposure to soy/genistein was manipulated. The trends observed in the three parameters from 1825 days of age in control rats in the present studies were comparable to those reported by Russell and colleagues in their studies. However, we recognized that significant variation occurs between (control) males from different litters (due to litter size, genetic differences, maternal competency, etc.) with regard to the precise onset of the temporal trends in spermatogenic parameters, raising the possibility of detecting changes in these parameters due simply to chance rather than as a consequence of treatment. This possibility was minimized by 1) cross-fostering male pups from several litters at birth into control and experimental groups and by restricting litter size to 812 pups, 2) repeating each experiment on day 18 at least twice and only accepting an effect as treatment induced if a similar change was found in both experiments, 3) pooling data from the different experiments and from the several control groups to fully represent the spectrum of changes due to chance, and 4) in statistical evaluation, using the pooled variance for each parameter from the study as a whole (i.e. from all control and treatment groups, with n = >120 for day 18 animals) to minimize the possibility of false detection of treatment-induced changes.
Our findings on the effects of the different estrogenic compounds on the first wave of spermatogenesis at puberty have shown that all three of the evaluated parameters changed more or less in concert, although the treatment-induced changes ranged from severe retardation of spermatogenesis in males exposed to the highest dose (10 µg/injection) of DES, as reported in our earlier studies (11), to stimulatory effects by low doses of DES or by treatment with OP or Bis-A. The latter findings suggest that low levels of potent estrogens or a high dose of weak estrogens have similar effects and that these can result in significant advancement of testicular/spermatogenic development at puberty. In contrast, the present data suggest that the presence of soy (and thus phytoestrogens) in the rats diet or the direct administration of genistein to neonates results in retardation of several aspects of pubertal spermatogenesis, a change that is opposite to that induced by the weak estrogens OP and Bis-A or by low doses of DES. Thus the rearing of control (vehicle-injected) animals on a soy-free diet substantially increased spermatocyte and spermatogonia nuclear volume per unit Sertoli cell nuclear volume compared with that in controls reared on a standard soy-containing diet, and administration of genistein to rats kept on a soy-free diet reversed this change and also retarded lumen formation, suppressed FSH levels, and increased the germ cell apoptotic index. These effects of genistein were broadly equivalent to a dose of approximately 1 µg DES, although it is emphasized that, unlike DES, genistein did not uniformly suppress all aspects of pubertal spermatogenesis, as it had only a minor effect on testis weight and was associated with high, rather than low, Sertoli cell nuclear volume per testis. The apparent selectivity of action of soy/genistein and its surprisingly high (apparent) estrogenic potency could perhaps be related to the reported relatively high affinity of genistein for ERß (49), which is expressed in both Sertoli and germ cells (4, 5, 6). As the dose of genistein administered in our studies was nominally based on the total phytoestrogen exposure of human infants fed a 100% soy-formula milk diet (39), our findings reinforce the conclusion from this study (39) that such a diet is likely to have biological effects (see also below). As outlined below, soy and genistein also express significant biological activity in addition to their estrogenicity, and this should be kept in mind when considering the possible pathways of their actions on the testis.
There are several possible mechanisms that could explain the present findings. Most obviously, plasma FSH levels on day 18 showed changes that broadly paralleled the changes in pubertal spermatogenesis, i.e. higher FSH levels associated with advancement, and lower FSH levels associated with retardation, of spermatogenesis. However, this relationship was not absolutely consistent from group to group, and the fact that on day 25 the FSH changes persisted whereas the (positive) changes to spermatogenesis were generally no longer evident raises doubts as to whether all of the changes observed can be explained simply by changes in FSH. As testosterone is also a key player in spermatogenesis at puberty (48), and elevated FSH levels can advance (48, 50, 51), whereas estrogen can retard (48, 52), pubertal Leydig cell development, it will be important to explore whether changes in Leydig cell development/testosterone levels might also underlie some of the changes in some of the treatment groups. Such studies are in progress. Regardless of what these findings may show, the present demonstration that neonatal exposure to low doses of potent estrogens/high doses of weak estrogens can elevate FSH levels in blood in early puberty (after treatment has ceased) is of interest, especially as we have shown that such a change may persist into adulthood (21). This may indicate some resetting of hypothalamic-pituitary control of FSH secretion.
An entirely different explanation for the stimulatory effect of low levels of estrogens on pubertal spermatogenesis in the present studies is that they are the result of a direct effect of estrogen on the Sertoli and/or germ cells. Sertoli cells, spermatogonia, and most spermatocytes express ERß at all stages of normal pubertal development (4, 5, 6) (our unpublished data), and we have produced several lines of evidence that suggest direct effects of neonatal estrogen treatment on Sertoli cells (11, 21). There are also data in the literature for a number of species that demonstrate stimulatory effects of estrogens on gonocytes (37), spermatogonial stem cells (38), and spermatogonia (34, 35) as well as precocious activation of spermatogenesis in the human testis associated with an estrogen-secreting tumor (36). In the present studies most of the treatments ceased on day 12 (soy and genistein manipulations extended to day 18), so if the effects observed on pubertal spermatogenesis are attributable to direct stimulation of Sertoli or germ cells by estrogen, then clearly these effects are able to persist for several days after cessation of treatment. The absence of these stimulatory effects on day 25, compared with controls, might then reflect the longer period since withdrawal of exogenous estrogen. With such an explanation in mind, we extended treatment with one of the stimulatory low doses of DES (0.1 µg/injection) up to day 18 of neonatal life, but found that the stimulatory effects on pubertal spermatogenesis in these rats was no greater than that shown for the comparable group in the present studies when treatment was terminated on day 12 (unpublished data). It is obviously difficult in the present studies to disentangle possible direct effects of estrogens on Sertoli/germ cells from effects due to altered FSH levels (and possibly altered testosterone levels). Nevertheless, in view of the other pieces of data cited from the literature, further study of the direct effect of estrogens on germ cells are clearly warranted.
The present data suggest that the effects of OP and Bis-A on reproductive development of the neonatal male rat are benign, athough it is emphasized that only a single high dose of either compound was tested. However, in almost every respect the effects of these two compounds were comparable to those of the lowest doses of DES. Logically, it therefore seems unlikely that lower doses of these compounds will induce adverse effects (because of their estrogenicity), although the presently observed stimulatory effects will presumably be lost at some lower dose. These data, and especially the conclusions, are somewhat at odds with other published studies of the effects of Bis-A or OP/nonylphenol in rats or mice, in which either no effects (28, 29, 30, 31, 32) or adverse effects on reproductive development/function (23, 24, 25, 26, 27) were reported. However, these studies used different aged animals and/or treatment regimens and did not study the end points used in the present studies. Based on the limited data that we present here, it would appear unlikely that human exposure to OP or Bis-A during neonatal life/puberty would result in any detectable adverse effect on spermatogenesis or fertility, because the level of human exposure is unlikely to be as high as that used in our treatments.
The present data concerning the effects of male exposure to soy/genistein are not so reassuring with regard to the likely consequences of human exposure. Removal of soy from the diet of our rats had positive (and life-long) consequences in terms of pubertal spermatogenesis and final testis and body size, implying that phytoestrogens or other components of the soymeal may exert mild retardation of these end points. The fact that administration of genistein, to rats fed a soy-free die, reversed these changes (with the exception of change in testis size) is consistent with these effects being due to phytoestrogens, although clearly there are other possible interpretations that are unrelated to the estrogenicity of soy/genistein, e.g. inhibition of tyrosine kinase activity in testicular cells. For example, in vitro studies have shown that genistein is able to inhibit differentiation of immature Sertoli cells (53) and to inhibit the growth and proliferation of various testicular cell lines (54), and at least some of these effects have been attributed to the tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity of genistein (53). Similar effects in vivo could certainly account for some of the presently described inhibitory effects of genistein and a soy-containing diet on spermatogenesis at puberty.
There is a substantial literature on the effects of soy-derived phytoestrogens on rodent reproductive development (55, 56, 57, 58), although none has investigated the end points described here in early male puberty, and many of the earlier studies may not have taken account of the presence or absence of soymeal in the diet. Our studies have shown detectable effects of neonatally administered genistein on reproductive development of male rats, although this did not result in any major detrimental long-term consequence in terms of testis size. Furthermore, although the data for mating and fertility were largely normal in genistein-treated rats, a proportion of the treated animals exhibited evidence of impaired mating and/or fertility. It is cautioned that the numbers of animals involved in the latter studies was low, and more detailed studies, using a range of doses of genistein, are required to establish whether this is a real or a chance finding. The fact that most laboratory animal colonies are maintained on a diet containing high levels of genistein and other soy phytoestrogens with no evidence of widespread breeding problems is relevant in this regard. However, our finding that the continuous presence of soy in the diet mildly retards spermatogenic development and results in lifelong alterations in body weight, testis weight, and FSH levels does have significant implications for all studies of male reproductive development and function. Although the effects observed were not huge and were probably of minimal biological consequence, it is clear that variation in such effects due to variation in the isoflavone content of soymeal (59) could be an important contributor/creator of "noise" in studies of endocrine disruption. Our findings add to the conviction (59) that such effects may explain some of the controversy and inconsistency of findings in this area.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Recipient of a Royal Society/North Atlantic Treaty Organization
postdoctoral fellowship. ![]()
Received March 9, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(ER
) within the testis and excurrent ducts of the rat and marmoset
monkey from perinatal life to adulthood. J Endocrinol 153:485495[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Warita, K. Okamoto, K.-i. Mutoh, Y. Hasegawa, Z.-P. Yue, T. Yokoyama, Y. Matsumoto, T. Miki, Y. Takeuchi, H. Kitagawa, et al. Activin A and Equine Chorionic Gonadotropin Recover Reproductive Dysfunction Induced by Neonatal Exposure to an Estrogenic Endocrine Disruptor in Adult Male Mice Biol Reprod, January 1, 2008; 78(1): 59 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Enokizono, H. Kusuhara, and Y. Sugiyama Effect of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (Bcrp/Abcg2) on the Disposition of Phytoestrogens Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2007; 72(4): 967 - 975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. T. Akingbemi, T. D. Braden, B. W. Kemppainen, K. D. Hancock, J. D. Sherrill, S. J. Cook, X. He, and J. G. Supko Exposure to Phytoestrogens in the Perinatal Period Affects Androgen Secretion by Testicular Leydig Cells in the Adult Rat Endocrinology, September 1, 2007; 148(9): 4475 - 4488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H O Goyal, T D Braden, C S Williams, and J W Williams Role of estrogen in induction of penile dysmorphogenesis: a review Reproduction, August 1, 2007; 134(2): 199 - 208. |