help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mackova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mackova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, A. K.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 11 4202-4208
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

p38MAPK Inhibition Enhances Basal and Norepinephrine-Stimulated p42/44MAPK Phosphorylation in Rat Pinealocytes1

M. Mackova, J. R. Man, C. L. Chik and A. K. Ho

Department of Physiology (M.M., J.R.M., A.K.H.) and Department of Medicine (C.L.C.), Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, 7-26 Medical Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. A. K. Ho, Department of Physiology, 7–26 Medical Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada. E-mail: anho{at}ualberta.ca


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Interaction between p38MAPK and p42/44MAPK in rat pinealocytes was examined by determining the effects of p38MAPK inhibitors on the phosphorylation of p42/44MAPK using Western blot analysis. Treatment with SB202190, a specific inhibitor of p38MAPK, increased p42/44MAPK phosphorylation in a concentration-dependent manner. SB202190 also enhanced the magnitude and the duration of norepinephrine-activated p42/44MAPK phosphorylation. The effect of SB202190 on p42/44MAPK phosphorylation was abolished by PD98059 or UO126, inhibitors of MEK, suggesting that SB202190 is acting upstream of MEK in activating p42/44MAPK. The SB202190-induced phosphorylation of p42/44MAPK was not blocked by inhibitors of cGMP-dependent kinase (KT5823), protein kinase C (calphostin C) or Ca2+/calmodulin dependent kinase (KN93) suggesting that these pathways may not be involved in the effect of SB202190. SB202190 further increased p42/44MAPK phosphorylation that was stimulated by 8-bromo-cGMP, 4ß phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, or ionomycin. In contrast, inhibition of p42/44MAPK phosphorylation by dibutyryl-cAMP persisted when p42/44MAPK phosphorylation was increased by SB202190. Furthermore, inhibition of p42/44MAPK phosphorylation had no effect on p38MAPK activation. These results suggest that inhibition of p38MAPK causes activation of p42/44MAPK and acts synergistically with norepinephrine in the regulation of p42/44MAPK activation in rat pinealocytes.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MITOGEN-ACTIVATED protein kinases (MAPKs), which play an important role in mediating cellular responses to various extracellular stimuli (1, 2) can be divided into three subgroups: 1) extracellularly responsive kinases (p42/44MAPK or extracellular signal-regulated kinase1/2) (3, 4, 5); 2) c-Jun N-terminal kinases (p46/54JNK or stress-activated kinases) (6, 7), and 3) p38MAPK (8, 9, 10, 11). Whereas p42/44MAPK is typically stimulated by growth factors and mitogenic stimuli, p38MAPK and p46/54JNK are mainly activated by cellular stresses (11, 12). Although extracellular stimuli may be different, the mechanisms of activating different MAPK subfamilies are similar in that parallel phosphorylation cascades are involved which result in the activation of MAPKs through phosphorylation of threonine and tyrosine residues of the enzymes (13, 14). In the case of p42/44MAPK, the dual specific kinases responsible for their phosphorylation and activation are the MAPK kinase (MEK1/2) (15), whereas p38MAPK is activated by MAPK kinase 3 (MKK3) and MKK6, and p46/54JNK by MKK4 and MKK7 (16, 17).

Among the different MAPKs, p42/44MAPK is the most studied. Besides signaling pathways activated by growth factors, pathways involving cyclic nucleotides (18, 19), protein kinase C (PKC) (20, 21) and intracellular Ca2+ (22) have all been shown to modulate p42/44MAPK activation. More recently, fine tuning of cellular responses to MAPKs through interaction of p42/44MAPK and p38MAPK has also been reported (23, 24, 25, 26).

In rat pinealocytes, we have demonstrated the presence of high level of Raf-1, MEK1 and p42/44MAPK (27) and activation of p42/44MAPK by norepinephrine (NE) (27), the endogenous neurotransmitter that regulates pineal functions (28). The main signaling mechanism that mediates the effect of NE on p42/44MAPK phosphorylation is the cGMP/protein kinase G (PKG) pathway (27). The high level of expression of p38MAPK in rat pinealocytes (our unpublished observation) and known interaction between MAPK subfamilies in other cells (23, 24, 25, 26) suggest that potential interaction between p38MAPK and p42/44MAPK may modulate MAPK activation in the pineal gland. In the present study, we investigated the interaction between p38MAPK and p42/44MAPK by determining the effect of p38MAPK inhibition on basal and stimulated p42/44MAPK phosphorylation. Two specific inhibitors of p38MAPK, SB203580 and SB202190, were used and SB202474 was included as a negative control (29, 30).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
8-Bromo-cAMP, dibutyryl-cAMP, isoproterenol, NE, 4ß phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), polyclonal antibodies against p42/44MAPK and p38MAPK and monoclonal antibodies against phosphorylated p42/44MAPK (p-p42/44MAPK)and p38MAPK (p-p38MAPK) were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). SB202190, SB203580, SB202474, H89, H7, KT5823, KN93, calphostin C, UO124, UO126, PD98059, calyculin A, dephostatin and ionomycin were obtained from Calbiochem Corp. (San Diego, CA). All other chemicals were of the purest grades available commercially. Antibodies for the RIAs of cAMP and cGMP were gifts from Dr. A. Baukal (NICHHD, NIH, Bethesda, MD).

Preparation of pinealocytes
Sprague Dawley rats (male; weighing 150 g) were obtained from the University of Alberta Animal Unit. Pinealocytes were prepared from freshly dissected rat pineal glands by trypsinization as described previously (31, 32). The cells were suspended in DMEM containing 10% FCS and maintained at 37 C for 24 h in a gas mixture of 95% air and 5% CO2 before experiments. Tissue samples were freshly collected, rinsed in ice-cold PBS, and kept frozen in dry ice until homogenized in a buffer solution (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 containing 2 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 1% Triton-X, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 2 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride). After centrifuged at 15,000 x g for 15 min at 4 C, the supernatant was assayed for protein and its concentration adjusted. After mixing with 2x sample buffer and boiled for 5 min, the samples were stored frozen until electrophoresis.

Drug treatment of pinealocytes
For the determination of MAPK activation, aliquots of pinealocytes (5 x 104 cells/0.5 ml for p42/44MAPK and 1 x 105 cells/0.5 ml for p38MAPK) were treated with drugs that had been prepared in concentrated solutions in water or dimethylsulfoxide for 15 min (unless otherwise indicated). Treated cells were collected by centrifugation (2 min, 12,000 x g). Samples for Western blot analysis were solubilized in 1x sample buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8 containing 2 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mg/ml aprotinin, 10 mg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; 5% 2-mercaptoethanol; 10% glycerol, 2% SDS and 0.002% bromphenol blue) by boiling for 5 min and stored until electrophoresis.

Western blot
SDS-PAGE was performed according to the procedure of Laemmli (33) using 10% acrylamide (Mini-Protein II gel system, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). Following electrophoresis, gels were equilibrated for 20 min in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 190 mM glycine, and 20% methanol). Proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (1 h, 100 V) which were then incubated with a blocking solution [5% dried skim milk in 100 mM Tris (pH 7.5) with 140 mM NaCl and 0.01% Tween 20] for a minimum of 1.5 h. The blots were then incubated overnight at 4 C with diluted specific antisera as indicated. After washing twice with the blocking solution, the blots were incubated with diluted horseradish peroxidase-conjugated second antibodies (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature. They were then washed extensively and developed using enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

cAMP and cGMP assays
cAMP and cGMP measurements were made on samples of cells (1.5 x 104 cells/0.4 ml) treated with different drugs for 15 min; the RIA method of detection has been described in detail (32, 34).

Statistical analysis
For the Western blots, a typical blot from at least three similar experiments was presented. Selected results were quantified using densitometric measurements and analyzed by Sigmagel (Jandel Scientific Software, San Rafael, CA), normalized to the control level and presented as the mean ± SEM from three separate experiments. Statistical comparisons were analyzed by paired t test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
p38MAPK expression in rat pineal gland
The expression of p38MAPK in the rat pineal gland was compared with those in other tissues including the cortex, hypothalamus, cerebellum, anterior pituitary, and liver. Western blot analysis showed that the level of p38MAPK expression in the rat pineal gland was comparable to hypothalamus, cortex, and cerebellum but less than that in the anterior pituitary gland or liver (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Tissue distribution of p38MAPK. Tissue protein (25 µg per lane) was subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE. p38MAPK was identified by Western blotting using polyclonal antibodies as described in Materials and Methods. COR, Cortex; HYP, hypothalamus; CER, cerebellum; PIN, pineal; PIT, pituitary; LIV, liver. The blot shown is representative of three separate experiments with similar results.

 
Effects of p38MAPK inhibitors on the activation of p42/44MAPK
Treatment of pinealocytes with SB202190, a specific p38MAPK inhibitor (29), for 15 min caused a concentration-dependent increase in p-p42/44MAPK with a significant increase observed at 1 µM of SB202190 (Fig. 2AGo). In contrast, the negative control SB202474 (10 µM) had no effect on p-p42/44MAPK. The maximal increase in p-p42/44MAPK by SB202190 (10 µM) treatment was observed at 15 min, and the increase was sustained for at least 60 min (Fig. 2BGo). Similar results were obtained with SB203580, another specific inhibitor of p38MAPK (30) (data not shown). To determine the involvement of MEK1/2 in SB202190-induced increase in p-p42/44MAPK, two MEK inhibitors, PD98059 and UO126, were used (35, 36). Treatments with either PD98059 (1 µM) or UO126 (1 µM) but not UO124 (1 µM), the negative control, were effective in abolishing the effect of SB202190 on p-p42/44MAPK (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of a p38MAPK inhibitor on p42/44MAPK activation. A, Pinealocytes (5 x 104 cells/0.5 ml) were cultured for 24 h and treated with (A) graded concentrations of SB202190 (SB+; 0.1 to 10 µM) or SB202474 (SB-; 10 µM) for 15 min and (B) SB+ (10 µM) for different time periods as indicated. The cells were then collected by centrifugation, dissolved in 1x sample buffer, and analyzed by Western blotting using a monoclonal antibody against p-p42/44MAPK as described in Materials and Methods. The blot presented is representative of three separate experiments. Blots were scanned and analyzed by Sigmagel. The relative densitometric readings [control (Con) = 1] from three separate experiments are presented in the bottom panel as mean ± SEM values (open columns, p-p44MAPK; hatched columns, p-p42MAPK). *, P < 0.05, significantly different from control.

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effects of PD98059, UO126 and UO124 on SB202190-stimulated p42/44MAPK phosphorylation. Pinealocytes (5 x 104 cells/0.5 ml) were cultured for 24 h and treated for 15 min with SB202190 (SB+; 10 µM) in the absence or presence of PD98059 (PD; 1 µM), UO126 (1 µM) or UO124 (1 µM). The cells were then collected by centrifugation, dissolved in 1x sample buffer and analyzed by Western blotting using a monoclonal antibody against p-p42/44MAPK as described in Materials and Methods. The blot presented is representative of three separate experiments.

 
Effect of p38MAPK inhibition on NE-stimulated p42/44MAPK activation
We have previously shown that in rat pinealocytes, p42/44MAPK can be activated by NE, the endogenous neurotransmitter (27). In the following experiment, we investigated the effect of p38MAPK inhibition on NE-stimulated p-p42/44MAPK. As shown in Fig. 4Go, NE alone caused a concentration-dependent increase in the level of p-p42/44MAPK. Cotreatment with NE and SB202190 resulted in a larger increase in p-p42/44MAPK than the response to NE or SB202190 alone, suggesting that the effect of NE and p38MAPK inhibition is additive. The time course of the response to NE and SB202190, alone and in combination, was also determined. As shown in Fig. 5Go, cotreatment with NE and SB202190 resulted in a sustained increase in p-p42/44MAPK that persisted for 3 h. In contrast, an increase in p-p42/44MAPK was not observed beyond 1 h when cells were treated with either NE or SB202190 alone. These results suggest that the presence of p38MAPK inhibition increases the magnitude as well as the duration of NE-activated p-p42/44MAPK.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Interaction of SB202190 and NE in activating p42/44MAPK. A, Pinealocytes (5 x 104 cells/0.5 ml) were cultured for 24 h and treated for 15 min with graded concentrations of NE (1 to 100 µM) in the presence or absence of SB202190 (SB+; 10 µM). The cells were then collected by centrifugation, dissolved in 1x sample buffer and analyzed by Western blotting using a monoclonal antibody against p-p42/44MAPK as described in Materials and Methods. The blot presented is representative of three separate experiments. B, Blots were scanned and analyzed by Sigmagel. The relative densitometric readings (Con = 1) from three separate experiments are presented as mean ± SEM values (top panel, p-p44MAPK; bottom panel, p-p42MAPK). * P < 0.05, significantly different from the corresponding treatment without SB+.

 


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Time-course of SB202190 and NE-induced p42/44MAPK activation. A, Pinealocytes (5 x 104 cells/0.5 ml) were cultured for 24 h and treated for the indicated time with NE (10 µM), SB202190 (SB+; 10 µM) or both. The cells were then collected by centrifugation, dissolved in 1x sample buffer and analyzed by Western blotting using a monoclonal antibody against p-p42/44MAPK as described in Materials and Methods. The blots presented are representative of three separate experiments. B, Blots were scanned and analyzed by Sigmagel. The relative densitometric readings (Con = 1) from three separate experiments are presented as mean ± SEM values (top panel, p-p44MAPK; bottom panel, p-p42MAPK). * P < 0.05, significantly different from control.

 
Effects of p38MAPK inhibition on p-p42/44MAPK by pathways activated by NE in rat pinealocytes
To examine the interaction between p38MAPK inhibition and NE on p-p42/44MAPK, pharmacological agents were used to selectively stimulate individual signaling pathways that are known to be activated by NE in pinealocytes (37). Whereas activation of protein kinase A (PKA) by 1 mM of dibutyryl-cAMP caused a reduction in p-p42/44MAPK (Fig. 6AGo), activation of PKG (by 1 mM of 8-bromo-cGMP), PKC (by 0.1 µM of PMA) or elevation of intracellular Ca2+ (by 1 µM of ionomycin) was effective in elevating the level of p-p42/44MAPK (Fig. 6BGo). Cotreatment with SB202190 further enhanced the levels of p-p42/44MAPK maximally stimulated by 8-bromo-cGMP, PMA, or ionomycin, (Fig. 6BGo). In contrast, activation of PKA by dibutyryl-cAMP reduced SB202190-induced increase in p-p42/44MAPK (Fig. 6AGo). Inhibitors of cGMP-dependent protein kinase (KT5823; 1 µM), cAMP-dependent protein kinase (H89; 1 µM), PKC (calphostin C; 1 µM) and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase (KN93; 1 µM) also had no effect on the SB202190-induced increase in p-p42/44MAPK (Fig. 6CGo). Treatment with SB202190 (10 µM) did not have an effect on cAMP and cGMP levels (Table 1Go). These results suggest that SB202190 is not using the same pathway as NE in stimulating p42/44MAPK phosphorylation.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effects of protein kinase activators and inhibitors on SB202190-stimulated p42/44MAPK phosphorylation. Pinealocytes (5 x 104 cells/0.5 ml) were cultured for 24 h and treated for 15 min with (A) dibutyryl-cAMP (DB-cA; 1 mM); (B) PMA (0.1 µM); 8-bromo-cGMP (Br-cG: 1 mM) or ionomycin (ION; 1 µM) in the presence or absence of SB202190 (SB+; 10 µM); or (C) SB202190 (SB+; 10 µM) in the absence or presence of KT5823 (1 µM), calphostin C (Cal-C, 1 µM), H89 (1 µM) or KN93 (1 µM). The cells were then collected by centrifugation, dissolved in 1x sample buffer and analyzed by Western blotting using a monoclonal antibody against p-p42/44MAPK as described in Materials and Methods. The blots presented are representative of four separate experiments.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of SB202190 on cAMP and cGMP levels

 
Effect of phosphatase inhibitors on SB202190-induced increase in p-p42/44MAPK
One potential mechanism through which SB202190 can increase the level of p-p42/44MAPK is by inhibiting dephosphorylation of p42/44MAPK or components of the signaling cascade that activate p42/44MAPK. To test this possibility, two phosphatase inhibitors, calyculin A (a serine/threonine phosphatase inhibitor) and dephostatin (a protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor), were used (38, 39). Treatment with calyculin A (0.3 µM) or dephostatin (100 µM) alone elevated the level of p-p42/44MAPK. Under this condition, SB202190 (10 µM) remained effective in increasing the level of p-p42/44MAPK (Fig. 7Go). These results suggest that the increase in p-p42/44MAPK by SB202190 is probably through a mechanism that is independent of dephostatin- or calyculin A-sensitive phosphatases.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effects of protein phosphatase inhibitors on SB202190-stimulated p42/44MAPK phosphorylation. Pinealocytes (5 x 104 cells/0.5 ml) were cultured for 24 h and treated for 15 min with calyculin A (Caly-A; 0.3 µM) or dephostatin (Dephos; 100 µM) in the absence or presence of SB202190 (SB+; 10 µM). The cells were then collected by centrifugation, dissolved in 1x sample buffer and analyzed by Western blotting using a monoclonal antibody against p-p42/44MAPK as described in Materials and Methods. The blot presented is representative of three separate experiments.

 
Effect of p42/44MAPK inhibition on p-p38MAPK
To further examine the interaction between p42/44MAPK and p38MAPK, the effect of p42/44MAPK inhibition on p38MAPK phosphorylation was determined. Treatment with two MEK inhibitors, PD98059 (1 µM) or UO126 (1 µM) (35, 36) reduced p-p42/44MAPK but had no effect on basal p-p38MAPK level (Fig. 8Go). In the same experiment, treatment with SB202190 (10 µM) was effective in elevating p-p42/44MAPK but had little effect on p-p38MAPK (Fig. 8Go). None of these treatments had an effect on the protein levels of p42/44MAPK and p38MAPK (Fig. 8Go). These results suggest that, whereas inhibition of p38MAPK phosphorylation could increase p42/44MAPK phosphorylation, inhibition of p42/44MAPK has no effect on p38MAPK activation.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Effects of different MAPK inhibitors on p38MAPK and p42/44MAPK phosphorylation. Pinealocytes (1 x 105 cells/0.5 ml) were cultured for 24 h and treated for 20 min with SB202190 (SB+; 10 µM), PD98059 (PD; 1 µM) or UO126 (1 µM). The cells were then collected by centrifugation, dissolved in 1x sample buffer. Aliquots from the same samples were analyzed for p-p38MAPK and p-p42/44MAPK levels by Western blotting using monoclonal antibodies and p38MAPK and p42/44MAPK using polyclonal antibodies as described in Materials and Methods. The blots presented are representative of three separate experiments.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Although p42/44MAPK and p38MAPK belong to two subfamilies of MAPKs and are activated by different MEKs (15, 16, 17), results from the present study indicate that there is a close relationship between these two subfamilies of MAPKs in rat pinealocytes. This is based on the observations that both basal and adrenergic-activated p42/44MAPK phosphorylation is significantly modulated by p38MAPK activities. Whereas inhibition of p38MAPK alone by specific inhibitors, SB202190 or SB203580, is effective in elevating the level of p-p42/44MAPK, inhibition of the p42/44MAPK activation by PD98059 or UO126 has no effect on p38MAPK phosphorylation. Taken together, these results suggest the presence of a signal input from p38MAPK that negatively regulates p42/44MAPK in rat pinealocytes. Furthermore, because the effect of SB202190 can be abolished by PD98059 and UO126, two MEK inhibitors, the site of action for the p38MAPK inhibitors is either at and/or upstream of MEK1/2.

We have previously shown that, in rat pinealocytes, NE, the endogenous neurotransmitter, can activate p42/44MAPK (27). In the present study, we found that inhibition of p38MAPK by SB202190 further enhances the NE-stimulated p42/44MAPK activation. However, neither the cGMP-PKG nor the cAMP-PKA pathway appears to mediate the effect of p38MAPK inhibition on p42/44MAPK activation. This is based on the observations that, whereas KT5823 is effective in abolishing the effect of dibutyryl cGMP on MAPK phosphorylation (27), neither H89, a PKA inhibitor, nor KT5823, a PKG inhibitor, has an effect on the increase in p42/44MAPK phosphorylation induced by the p38MAPK inhibitor. SB202190 also has no effect on cAMP and cGMP levels. Furthermore, the effects of maximal activation of PKA and PKG by pharmacological means on p42/44MAPK phosphorylation are additive to that of the p38MAPK inhibitor with PKA reducing and PKG further enhancing p42/44MAPK phosphorylation. Thus, it appears that the mechanism that mediates the effect of p38MAPK inhibition on p42/44MAPK phosphorylation is distinct from the known pathways used by NE in activating p42/44MAPK. However, the consequence of the additive effect of SB202190 on NE-stimulated p42/44MAPK phosphorylation is that the magnitude and duration of p42/44MAPK phosphorylation is significantly higher than that stimulated by NE or by p38MAPK inhibition alone. These results suggest that through inhibition of p38MAPK, the p42/44MAPK response is amplified. Moreover, interaction between p38MAPK and p42/44MAPK likely provides a mechanism through which input signals that activate different members of the MAPK families can be integrated.

The involvement of PKC in the activation of p42/44MAPK in other tissues is well established (17, 18, 20). In this study, we found that pharmacological activation of PKC by PMA is an effective means of activating p42/44MAPK in this tissue. However, our results argue against PKC in mediating the effect of p38MAPK inhibition on p42/44MAPK phosphorylation in rat pinealocytes. This is based on the observations that the effect of maximal activation of PKC by PMA on p42/44MAPK phosphorylation is additive to that of the p38MAPK inhibitor. Furthermore, calphostin C, a PKC inhibitor, has no effect on p42/44MAPK activation induced by the p38MAPK inhibitor. In contrast, calphostin C is effective in reducing the PMA-stimulated p42/44MAPK phosphorylation (our unpublished observation).

Another possible mechanism through which p38MAPK inhibitor can enhance p42/44MAPK phosphorylation is by inhibition of phosphatases that participate either directly or indirectly in regulating p42/44MAPK phosphorylation. Apart from MKP-1, protein phosphatase 2A has also been shown to be directly involved in the dephosphorylation of p-p42/44MAPK (40). Even though inhibition of serine/threonine phosphatases by calyculin A or tyrosine phosphatases by dephostatin are both effective means in activating p42/44MAPK in rat pinealocytes, neither phosphatase inhibitors appear to be involved in the effect of p38MAPK inhibition on p42/44MAPK phosphorylation. This is based on the observation that the p38MAPK inhibitor remains effective in causing a further increase in p-p42/44MAPK induced by the phosphatase inhibitors. However, these results could not exclude the involvement of phosphatases that are not sensitive to calyculin A or dephostatin in mediating the effect of the p38MAPK inhibitors.

Our results support that p42/44MAPK likely represents an important target through which multiple signal inputs are integrated in the rat pineal gland. In addition to its activation by NE through a PKG-dependent mechanism (27), we now found that NE activation of p42/44MAPK is also modulated by the state of p38MAPK activation. Whereas inhibition of p38MAPK causes an increase in p42/44MAPK phosphorylation, inhibition of p42/44MAPK has no effect on p38MAPK phosphorylation. These results suggest the presence of a one-way cross-talk between p38MAPK and p42/44MAPK in the rat pineal gland. Similar one-way cross-talk between p38MAPK and p42/44MAPK has previously been described in a rat hepatoma cell line (26) and activation of p38MAPK causes inhibition of p42/44MAPK has also been reported in other cell types (23, 25).

Although the function of p42/44MAPK in rat pinealocytes is not known, these kinases may be involved in gene transcription in the rat pineal gland because they play an important role in the regulation of nuclear transcription factor in other cells (41). The potential involvement p42/44MAPK in pineal gene transcription underscores the importance to determine the mechanism through which p38MAPK inhibition causes activation of MEK1/2 and p42/44MAPK. Elucidating the mechanism involved in the interaction between different members of the MAPK family will undoubtedly advance our knowledge on pineal cell biology. The importance of this line of research is also suggested by the recent observation that MAPK is involved in clock oscillation of the chick pineal gland (42).


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council of Canada. Back

Received June 21, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Seger R, Krebs EG 1995 The MAPK signaling cascade. FASEB J 9:726–735[Abstract]
  2. Cobb MH 1999 MAP kinase pathways. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 71:479–500[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Ray LB, Sturgill TW 1987 Rapid stimulation by insulin of a serine/threonine kinase in 3T3/L1 adipocytes that phosphorylates microtubule-associated protein 2 in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:1502–1506[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Boulton TG, Nye SH, Robbins DJ, Ip NY, Radziejewska E, Morgenbesser SD, DePinho RA, Panayotatos N, Cobb MH, Yancopoulos GD 1991 ERKs: a family of protein-serine/threonine kinases that are activated and tyrosine phosphorylated in response to insulin and NGF. Cell 65:663–675[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Boulton TG, Yancopoulos GD, Gregory JS, Slaughter C, Moomaw C, Hsu J, Cobb MH 1990 An insulin-stimulated protein kinase similar to yeast kinases involved in cell cycle control. Science 249:64–67[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Pulverer BJ, Kyriakis JM, Avruch J, Nikolakaki E, Woodgett JR 1991 Phosphorylation of c-jun mediated by MAP kinases. Nature 353:670–674[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Gupta S, Barrett T, Whitmarsh AJ, Cavanagh J, Sluss HK, Derijard B, Davis RJ 1996 Selective interaction of JNK protein kinase isoforms with transcription factors. EMBO J 15:2760–2770[Medline]
  8. Jiang Y, Chen C, Li Z, Guo W, Gegner JA, Lin S, Han J 1996 Characterization of the structure and function of a new mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38ß). J Biol Chem 271:17920–17926[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Jiang Y, Gram H, Zhao M, New L, Gu J, Feng L, Di Padova F, Ulevitch RJ, Han J 1997 Characterization of the structure and function of the fourth member of p38 group mitogen-activated protein kinases, p38{delta}. J Biol Chem 272:30122–30128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Stein B, Yang MX, Young DB, Janknecht R, Hunter T, Murray BW, Barbosa MS 1997 p38–2, a novel mitogen-activated protein kinase with distinct properties. J Biol Chem 272:19509–19517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Whitmarsh AJ, Davis RJ 1996 Transcription factor AP-1 regulation by mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathways. J Mol Med 74:589–607[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Kyriakis JM, Banerjee P, Nikolakaki E, Dai T, Rubie EA, Ahmad MF, Avruch J, Woodgett JR 1994 The stress-activated protein kinase subfamily of c-Jun kinases. Nature 369:156–160[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Ray LB, Sturgill TW 1988 Insulin-stimulated microtubule-associated protein kinase is phosphorylated on tyrosine and threonine in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:3753–3757[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Rossomando AJ, Payne DM, Weber MJ, Sturgill TW 1989 Evidence that pp42, a major tyrosine kinase target protein, is a mitogen-activated serine/threonine protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6940–6943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Payne DM, Rossomando AJ, Martino P, Erickson AK, Her JH, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Weber MJ, Sturgill TW 1991 Identification of the regulatory phosphorylation sites in pp42/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP kinase). EMBO J 10:885–892[Medline]
  16. Enslen H, Raingeaud J, Davis RJ 1998 Selective activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase isoforms by the MAP kinase kinases MKK3 and MKK6. J Biol Chem 273:1741–1748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Raingeaud J, Whitmarsh AJ, Barrett T, Derijard B, Davis RJ 1996 MKK3- and MKK-6 regulated gene expression is mediated by the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway. Mol Cell Biol 16:1247–1255[Abstract]
  18. Wu J, Dent P, Jelinek T, Wolfman A, Weber MJ, Sturgill TW 1993 Inhibition of the EGF-activated MAP kinase signaling pathway by adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate. Science 262:1065–1069[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Callsen D, Pfeilschifter J, Brune B 1998 Rapid and delayed p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by nitric oxide: the role of cyclic GMP and tyrosine phosphatase inhibition. J Immunol 161:4852–4858[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Sauma S, Friedman E 1996 Increased expression of protein kinase Cß activates ERK3. J Biol Chem 271:11422–11426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Schonwasser DC, Marais RM, Marshall CJ, Parker PJ 1998 Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway by conventional, novel, and atypical protein kinase C isotypes. Mol Cell Biol 18:790–798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Rosen LB, Ginty DD, Weber MJ, Greenberg ME 1994 Membrane depolarization and calcium influx stimulate MEK and MAP kinase via activation of Ras. Neuron 12:1207–1221[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Zhang C, Baumgartner RA, Yamada K, Beaven MA 1997 Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase regulates production of tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} and release of arachidonic acid in mast cells. Indication of communication between p38 and p42 MAP kinases. J Biol Chem 272:13397–13402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Xing J, Kornhauser JM, Xia Z, Thiele EA, Greenberg ME 1998 Nerve growth factor activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways to stimulate CREB serine 133 phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 18:1946–1955[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Alexandrov A, Keffel S, Goepel M, Michel MC 1998 Stimulation of {alpha}1A-adrenoceptors in Rat-1 cells inhibits extracellular signal-regulated kinase by activating p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Mol Pharmacol 54:755–760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Singh RP, Dhawan P, Golden C, Kapoor GS, Mehta KD 1999 One-way cross-talk between p38MAPK and p42/44MAPK. Inhibition of p38MAPK induces low density lipoprotein receptor expression through activation of the p42/44MAPK cascade. J Biol Chem 274:19593–19600[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Ho AK, Hashimoto K, Chik CL 1999 3',5'-cyclic guanosine monophosphate activates mitogen-activated protein kinase in rat pinealoctyes. J Neurochem 73:598–604[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Klein DC 1985 Photoneural regulation of the mammalian pineal gland. In: Evered D, Clark S (eds) Photoperiodism, Melatonin and the Pineal. Ciba Foundation Symposium, Pitman, London, vol 117:38–56
  29. Young PR, McLaughlin MM, Kumar S, Kassis S, Doyle ML, McNulty D, Gallagher TF, Fisher S, McDonnell PC, Carr SA, Huddleston MJ, Seibel G, Porter TG, Livi GP, Adams JL, Lee JC 1997 Pyridinyl imidazole inhibitors of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase bind in the ATP site. J Biol Chem 272:12116–12121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Hazzalin CA, Cano E, Cuenda A, Barratt MJ, Cohen P, Mahadevan LC 1996 p38/RK is essential for stress-induced nuclear responses: JNK/SAPKs and c-Jun/ATF-2 phosphorylation are insufficient. Curr Biol 6:1028–1031[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Buda M, Klein DC 1978 A suspension culture of pinealocytes: regulation of N-acetyltransferase activity. Endocrinology 103:1483–1493
  32. Ho AK, Ogiwara T, Chik CL 1996 Thapsigargin modulates agonist-stimulated cyclic AMP responses through cytosolic calcium-dependent and -independent mechanisms in rat pinealocytes. Mol Pharmacol 49:1104–1112[Abstract]
  33. Laemmli UK 1970 Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Harper JF, Brooker GJ 1975 Femtomole sensitive radioimmunoassay for cyclic AMP nd cyclic GMP after 2'-O-acetylation by acetic anhydride in aqueous solution. J Cyclic Nucleotide Res 1:207–218[Medline]
  35. Alessi DR, Cuenda A, Cohen P, Dudley DT, Saltiel AR 1995 PD098059 is a specific inhibitor of the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem 270:27489–27494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Favata MF, Horiuchi KY, Manos EJ, Daulerio AJ, Stradley DA, Feeser WS, Van Dyk DE, Pitts WJ, Earl RA, Hoobs F, Copeland RA, Magolda RL, Scherle PA, Trzaskos JM 1998 Identification of a novel inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. J Biol Chem 273:18623–18632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Chik CL, Ho AK 1989 Multiple receptor regulation of cyclic nucleotides in rat pinealocytes. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 53:197–203[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Ho AK, Chik CL 1995 Phosphatase inhibitors potentiate adrenergic-stimulated cAMP and cGMP production in rat pinealocytes. Am J Physiol 268:E458–E466
  39. Umezawa K 1997 Induction of cellular differentiation and apoptosis by signal transduction inhibitors. Adv Enzyme Regul 37:393–401[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Sontag E, Fedorov S, Kamibayashi C, Robbins D, Cobb M, Mumby M 1993 The interaction of SV40 small tumor antigen with protein phosphatase 2A stimulates the MAP kinase pathway and induces cell proliferation. Cell 75:887–897[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Pende M, Fisher TL, Simpson PB, Russell JT, Blenis J, Gallo V 1997 Neurotransmitter- and growth factor-induced cAMP response element binding protein phosphorylation in glial cell progenitors: role of calcium ions, protein kinase C, and mitogen-activated protein kinase/ribosomal S6 kinase pathway. J Neurosci 17:1291–1301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Sanada K, Hayashi Y, Harada Y, Okano Y, Fukada Y 2000 Role of circadian activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase in chick pineal clock oscillation. J Neurosci 20:986–991[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. L. Chik, T. G. Arnason, W. G. Dukewich, D. M. Price, A. Ranger, and A. K. Ho
Histone H3 Phosphorylation in the Rat Pineal Gland: Adrenergic Regulation and Diurnal Variation
Endocrinology, April 1, 2007; 148(4): 1465 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
R. A Reimer
Meat hydrolysate and essential amino acid-induced glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion, in the human NCI-H716 enteroendocrine cell line, is regulated by extracellular signal-regulated kinase1/2 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases.
J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2006; 191(1): 159 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. M. Price, C. L. Chik, and A. K. Ho
Norepinephrine Induction of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase-1 Expression in Rat Pinealocytes: Distinct Roles of {alpha}- and {beta}-Adrenergic Receptors
Endocrinology, December 1, 2004; 145(12): 5723 - 5733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. L. Chik, M. Mackova, D. Price, and A. K. Ho
Adrenergic Regulation and Diurnal Rhythm of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphorylation in the Rat Pineal Gland
Endocrinology, November 1, 2004; 145(11): 5194 - 5201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Yadav, S. K. Roach, and J. S. Schorey
Increased Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activity and TNF-{alpha} Production Associated with Mycobacterium smegmatis- but Not Mycobacterium avium-Infected Macrophages Requires Prolonged Stimulation of the Calmodulin/Calmodulin Kinase and Cyclic AMP/Protein Kinase A Pathways
J. Immunol., May 1, 2004; 172(9): 5588 - 5597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. R. Man, S. Rustaeus, D. M. Price, C. L. Chik, and A. K. Ho
Inhibition of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Enhances Adrenergic-Stimulated Arylalkylamine N-Acetyltransferase Activity in Rat Pinealocytes
Endocrinology, March 1, 2004; 145(3): 1167 - 1174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. B. Keeton, K. D. Bortoff, W. L. Bennett, J. L. Franklin, D. Y. Venable, and J. L. Messina
Insulin-Regulated Expression of Egr-1 and Krox20: Dependence on ERK1/2 and Interaction with p38 and PI3-Kinase Pathways
Endocrinology, December 1, 2003; 144(12): 5402 - 5410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. Yadav, M. Straume, J. Heath III, and M. Zatz
Are Changes in MAPK/ERK Necessary or Sufficient for Entrainment in Chick Pineal Cells?
J. Neurosci., November 5, 2003; 23(31): 10021 - 10031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. K. Ho, M. Mackova, C. Cho, and C. L. Chik
Regulation of 90-Kilodalton Ribosomal S6 Kinase Phosphorylation in the Rat Pineal Gland
Endocrinology, August 1, 2003; 144(8): 3344 - 3350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mackova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mackova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, A. K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals