help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kecha, O.
Right arrow Articles by Geenen, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kecha, O.
Right arrow Articles by Geenen, V.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 3 1209-1217
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Involvement of Insulin-Like Growth Factors in Early T Cell Development: A Study Using Fetal Thymic Organ Cultures1

Ouafae Kecha, Fabienne Brilot, Henri Martens, Nathalie Franchimont, Chantal Renard, Roland Greimers, Marie-Paule Defresne, Rosita Winkler and Vincent Geenen

Institute of Pathology CHU-B23 (O.K., F.B., H.M., N.F., C.R., V.G.), Laboratory of Radio-Immunology & Neuroendocrine-Immunology, Cell Pathology (R.G.), Histology and Cytology (M.-P.D.), Molecular Oncology (R.W.), University of Liège, B-4000 Liège 1-Sart Tilman, Belgium

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Vincent Geenen, M.D., Ph.D., Institute of Pathology CHU-B23, University of Liège, B-4000 Liège 1-Sart Tilman, Belgium. E-mail: vgeenen{at}ulg.ac.be


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The expression of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and IGF receptor genes was investigated by RT-PCR during ontogeny of the murine thymus. IGF-1, IGF-1R, M6P/IGF-2R genes are expressed in the thymus both in fetal and postnatal life, whereas IGF-2 messenger RNAs (mRNAs) decline after birth but are still detectable on the seventh week. By in situ hybridization, IGF-2 transcripts were located in the outer cortex and medulla of the postnatal thymus, and on the whole surface of the epithelial-like network in the fetal thymus. The effects of anti-IGFs and IGF-receptors neutralizing Abs on the generation of pre-T cell subpopulations were then investigated using fetal thymic organ cultures (FTOC). FTOC treatment with an anti-IGF-2 mAb, an anti-IGF-1R mAb, or an anti-M6P/IGF-2R polyclonal Ab induced a blockade of T cell differentiation at the CD4-CD8- stage, as shown by a significant increase in the percentage of CD4-CD8- cells and a decrease in the percentage of CD4+CD8+ cells. Moreover, anti-IGF-2 Ab treatment induced an increase in CD8+ cells suggesting that thymic IGF-2 might have a role in determining differentiation into the CD4 or CD8 lineage. Anti-IGF-1 Ab treatment decreased the proportion in CD4-CD8- cells and increased the frequency in CD4+CD8+. FTOC treatment with anti-(pro)insulin did not exert any significant effect on T cell development. These data indicate that the intrathymic IGF-mediated signaling plays an active role in the early steps of T cell differentiation during fetal development.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
BEFORE REACTING against nonself infectious agents, the immune system has to tolerate the host molecular structure (self). The induction of self-tolerance is a multistep process that begins in the thymus during fetal ontogeny (central tolerance) and also involves inactivating mechanisms outside the thymus (peripheral tolerance) (1, 2). The thymus is the primary lymphoid organ implicated in the development of competent and self-tolerant T cells (3). During ontogeny, T cell progenitors originating from hemopoietic tissues (yolk sac, fetal liver, then bone marrow) enter the thymus and undergo a program of proliferation, T cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement, maturation and selection (4). Intrathymic T cell maturation proceeds through discrete stages that can be traced by analysis of their cluster differentiation (CD) surface antigens (4). Briefly, the phenotype of early T cell progenitors is double negative for the expression of CD4 and CD8 (CD4-CD8-), then they become double positive CD4+CD8+, acquire CD3, and finally turn into single positive cells expressing either CD4 or CD8 (4). It is well established that close interactions between thymocytes (pre-T cells) and the thymic cellular environment are crucial both for T cell development and the induction of central self-tolerance (5). Particular interest has focused on the ability of thymic stromal cells to synthesize polypeptides belonging to various neuroendocrine families (6). It has been proposed that the thymic repertoire of neuroendocrine-related precursors play a dual role in T cell development (7). Thymic polypeptide precursors constitute a source of growth factors, but they are also processed in a way that leads to the presentation of neuroendocrine self-antigens (8, 9). Through this latter way, it has been hypothesized that the T cell system is educated to tolerate the corresponding hormonal families.

GH and insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) are implicated in the regulation of lymphopoiesis and T cell development (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). IGFs (IGF-1 and IGF-2) are small single chain polypeptides that are known to have growth, mitogenic, and differentiative effects (16). Their biological effects are mediated by three types of receptors: the type 1 IGF receptor (IGF-1R) (17), the mannose-6-phosphate/type 2 IGF receptor (M6P/IGF-2R) (18), and the insulin receptor (19). IGF-1R is a transmembrane protein with intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity. Activation follows the binding of IGF-1, IGF-2 or insulin to IGF-1R, although the affinity of this receptor for the three ligands is different (IGF-1 > IGF-2 > insulin). These ligands activate the IGF-1R and initiate a signaling cascade that results in the differentiation and/or the proliferation of many cell types (20). M6P/IGF-2R is a single-chain transmembrane protein with a high affinity for IGF-2, a low affinity for IGF-1 and almost undetectable affinity for insulin (reviewed in Ref. 16). The M6P/IGF-2R extracellular domain is composed of fifteen highly conserved repeated motifs comprising different binding sites for IGF-2, mannose-6-phosphate, transforming growth factor-ß (TGFß) (21), and retinoic acid (22). The complexity of the system is enhanced by the fact that the biological properties of IGFs are modulated by a family of at least six IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) (23, 24).

The components of the IGF axis, including IGFBPs, have been characterized in the human thymus. Human thymic epithelial cells (TEC) express different members of the IGF axis, with a predominance of IGF-2 and IGFBP-2 to-6 (25, 26). In the thymus, IGF-1 expression is restricted to sparse cells with a macrophage-like morphology and distribution (25, 27). Thymocytes (pre-T cells) have been found to express both types of IGF receptors (IGF-1R and M6P/IGF-2R) (28, 29, 30). Administration of IGF-1 stimulates thymus and spleen growth and T cell proliferation and development (31, 32) and modulates the regeneration of T cells in a rat model of dexamethasone-induced apoptosis (32). In addition, the thymus of IGF-2 transgenic mice contains high levels of IGF-2 mRNA and displays an increased thymic cellularity, with a higher number of the CD4+ T cell subset (33). Therefore, a number of experimental data support the existence of a functional IGF-mediated signaling between stromal cells (TEC and macrophages) and immature T cells during their differentiation within the thymus.

In the present study, we assessed the expression of IGFs and IGF receptors during the early embryonic development of thymocytes, and their role in T cell development. We first investigated the temporo-spatial expression of IGFs and IGF-receptors during ontogeny of the murine thymus. We then investigated the effects of blockade of IGF-mediated signaling in fetal thymus organ culture (FTOC), a very appropriate in vitro model for the study and manipulation of T cell development (34).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and tissue collection
Balb/c mice were mated overnight (16 h) and fetuses were removed from the pregnant females at various days of gestation (plug date = day 0). Thymi were collected daily on fetal days (FD) 14–20 and on postnatal day 1, and weekly at 1–7 weeks of age. They were either used for total RNA extraction, or embedded in Tissue-Tek for in situ hybridization. Fetal liver and brain were collected from FD 14 and 16 and used as positive controls. The experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the Ethical Committee on Animal Experimentation at the University of Liège.

Reagents and antibodies
FTOC were cultured in the Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s (IMDM) medium supplemented with L-glutamine (2 mM), HEPES (25 mM), penicillin (100 UI/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml) and 10% FCS (all reagents were purchased from BioWhittaker, Inc., Verviers, Belgium). This medium will be referred as complete medium (34).

Rabbit IGF-1 polyclonal antibody (pAb) was obtained from Biogenesis (Sandown, NH). Mouse antihuman IGF-2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (IgG1) was purchased from Cymbus Biotechnology LTD (Chandlers Ford, UK). Mouse antirat (pro)insulin mAb (IgG1) was obtained from Biogenesis. This antibody recognizes human, rat, and mouse insulin/(pro)insulin.

Mouse antihuman IGF-1R mAb ({alpha}IR3, IgG1) was obtained from Oncogene Science, Inc. (Cambridge, MA). This antibody recognizes and neutralizes mouse (35), rat (36), and human IGF-1R (37). Rabbit pAb against M6P/IGF-2R (As 293) was kindly provided by RG MacDonald (University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE) (38).

Purified rabbit IgG (Prepro Tech Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ) and mouse antihuman FSH mAb (IgG1) were used as controls.

All the preparation of antibodies were dialyzed overnight in 9{per thousand} NaCl to eliminate sodium azide and other preservatives.

Phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled antimouse CD4 and fluorescein (FITC)-labeled antimouse CD8 mAbs were purchased from Becton Dickinson and Co. Immunocytometry System (BDIS, Mountain View, CA).

Fetal thymic organ cultures (FTOC)
FTOC were performed as described by Plum et al. (34). Briefly, four to six single thymus lobes from mice at fetal day 14 were placed on the surface of preboiled membrane filters (0.8 µm pore size; Nucleopore, Costar, Cambridge, MA) which were supported on blocks of surgical gelfoam (Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI) in 2.5 ml of complete medium. The cultures were grown for 7 days at 5% CO2, 37 C in the presence of anti-IGF-1 pAb (1.8, 3.75, and 5 µg/ml), anti-IGF-2 mAb (0.6, 1.8 and 3.75 µg/ml), anti-proinsulin/insulin mAb (1.8, 3.75, and 5 µg/ml), anti-M6P/IGF-2R pAb (5 and 10 µg/ml), or anti-IGF-1R mAb (1.5, 3 and 5 µg/ml). Control cultures were performed in basal conditions, in the presence of 1.8 to 10 µg/ml purified rabbit Ig, or with 0.6 to 3.75 µg/ml mAb anti-FSH. At the end of the cultures, cell suspensions were prepared and the percentage of living cells were estimated by trypan blue exclusion test.

Flow cytometry
Cell suspensions were incubated for 20 min at 4 C with a 1/200 dilution of FITC-CD8 and a 1/400 dilution of PE-CD4 mAbs. Just before flow cytometry, propidium iodide (PI, 5 µg/ml; Sigma) was added to the cells to exclude the death of altered PI-positive cells from analysis. Flow cytometry was performed using a FACStar Plus sorter (Becton Dickinson and Co.) equipped with an air-water cooled blue argon laser (488 nm) powered at 100 mW (Spinnaker 160, Spectra Physics, Mountain View, CA) and with the cellquest analysis software (Becton Dickinson and Co.).

For each sample, forward and right light scatter and triple fluorescence were determined on 10,000 cells and stored in list mode data files. Fluorescence signals were recorded on a three decade log scale. The green (FITC), orange (PE) and far red (PI) fluorescences were collected through a 530/30, a 575/25, and a 670/20 bandpass filter, respectively. An electronic compensation was used to correct spectral overlap between FITC and PE fluorescences. The PI fluorescence is one magnitude order more intense than the PE fluorescence in the orange channel and did not disturb the PE signal. The PI signal is also purely detected in the far-red channel, and no compensation was needed to collect this third fluorescence. Therefore, the PI-positive death cells can be unambiguously discarded by gating the far-red fluorescence.

In situ hybridization
The mouse IGF-2 probe was kindly provided by G. I. Bell (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) (39). A 460-bp fragment was subcloned in the pGEM-3Z, and synthesized using a DIG RNA labeling kit (SP6/T7) (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 1 µg of sense and antisense matrix riboprobes were transcribed and labeled in a reaction containing SP6 (antisense) or T7 (sense) RNA polymerase and digoxigenin-labeled UTP for 60 min at 37 C (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The probe was digested with DNase to remove template DNA. The mixture was then fractionated by electrophoresis on agarose gels and purified by ammonium acetate precipitation. The yield was estimated by comparison to labeled control riboprobe in serially diluted dot blots.

Eight-micrometer tissue sections were fixed for 10 min in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature, washed with PBS, and dehydrated in alcohol. Slides were incubated in a humidified chamber at 50 C with a digoxigenin-conjugated riboprobe (100 ng/ml) in hybridization buffer (300 mM NaCl; 10 mM Na2HPO4, pH 6.8; 10 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.5; 50 mM EDTA, pH 6.8) supplemented with 50% formamide, 5% dextran sulfate, 100 µg/ml transfer RNA, and 100 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA overnight. Posthybridization washes were performed at 50 C for 2 h in 50% formamide hybridization buffer. Sections were digested with 30 µg/ml RNase A (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) at 37 C for 30 min to remove nonspecifically bound probe, then washed twice in 2 x SSC (20 x SSC: 3 M NaCl, 0.3 M sodium citrate dihydrate) at 50 C for 30 min. The sections were then washed in PBS containing 0.05% Tween and incubated overnight with a sheep anti-digoxigenin F(ab)2 mAb conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) diluted 1/500 in PBS containing 2% normal sheep serum. After washing in PBS, slides were transferred to alkaline Tris-buffer, pH 9.5. Staining was revealed after 2 h at room temperature in alkaline Tris-buffer containing 4.5 µg/ml nitroblue tetrazolium salt and 3.5 µg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate. The reaction was stopped by thorough washing in Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.2, containing 10 mM EDTA. Slides were counterstained with methyl green and mounted in DPX solution.

RT-PCR analyses
Tripure (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was added to tissue fragments, and RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were treated by RNase free DNase I (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) to remove potentially contaminating DNA. Each sample at different ages represents a pool of mouse thymi and experiments were repeated three times.

RT was performed using 2 µg of total RNA in the presence of 1 mM dNTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 30 U of avian reverse transcriptase (Promega Corp.) and 500 nM random hexamer primers (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in a final volume of 25 µl. Samples were incubated at 70 C for 10 min and 1 h at 42 C.

The PCR reaction was carried out in a final volume of 50 µl using the equivalent of 400 ng of total RNA (5 µl of the RT reaction) was amplified in the presence of 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM each dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP, 1.5 U TaKaRa Taq DNA polymerase (all reagents are from TAKARA SHUZO CO, Ltd., Japan), and 0.5 µM of each primer (Life Technologies, Inc.). The newly synthesized complementary DNAs (cDNAs) were denatured at 94 C for 3 min and amplified by 30 PCR cycles at 94 C for 90 sec; annealed for 90 sec at the indicated temperature (Table 1Go), 72 C for 90 sec, followed by 72 C for 10 min. The sequences of oligonucleotide primers are indicated in Table 1Go. To discard the risk of amplifying genomic DNA, primers were chosen in different exons of IGF genes. Control PCR have also been performed in absence of RT. PCR products were fractionated by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Sequence of oligonucleotides used in PCR experiments

 
Southern blotting and hybridization
The RT-PCR products were separated by gel agarose electrophoresis and vacuum blotted in 10 x SSC for 90 min onto Zeta-Probe GT nylon membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). The mouse IGF-2 (39), IGF-1 (43) and rat IGF-1R (17) cDNA probes were labeled with [{alpha}-32P] dCTP (50 mCi at a specific activity of 3000 Ci/mmol, ICN, Costa Mesa, CA) by random priming using Ready To Go reaction mix (Pharmacia LKB, Piscataway, NJ). Unincorporated nucleotides were removed by gel filtration on a Sephadex G50 column. A 40 mer M6P/IGF-2R oligonucleotide probe TGGACTGCACCTACT TCTTCACATGGGACACTAAATACGCCTGCA was purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. and labeled by T4 polynucleotide kinase with [{gamma}-32P] dATP.

The blotted membranes were hybridized for 16 h at 42 C with 5 x 107 cpm of the probe. The washes were performed at 65 C as follows: twice in 40 mM Na2HPO4 pH 7.2, 5% SDS for 30 min and twice in 40 mM Na2HPO4 pH 7.2, 1% SDS for 30 min. The blots were exposed for 1 h to phosphorimager.

Statistical analyses
The percentage of each cell population was computed as mean ± SEM of five to six different experiments for each condition, and tested for normality with the Kolmogoro-Smirno test. The inhibition and stimulation were computed as percentage of the control, and analyzed with ANOVA and multicomparative Student’s-Newmann-Keuls test. Results were considered to be significant at the 0.01 level. Statistical analyses were carried out with GraphPad Software, Inc. PRISM 2.0 software (San Diego, CA).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Analysis of IGF and IGF receptor mRNA levels in thymi
RT-PCR analyses of total RNA from murine fetal and postnatal thymi revealed that IGF-1, IGF-2, IGF-1R, and M6P/IGF-2R genes are expressed from FD 14 until 7 weeks of age (Figs. 1Go, A and B, and 2, A and B). Although RT-PCR conditions were not quantitative, a striking difference was apparent between the IGF-2 signals and the other messages. Similar mRNA levels of IGF-1 (215 bp), IGF-1R (395 bp), M6P/IGF-2R (235 bp) were detected in all the fetal and postnatal thymi. On the contrary, IGF-2 (356 bp) mRNA levels declined after birth, but weak signals were still detected in 7-week old thymi (Fig. 1Go, A and B). Amplification of GAPDH cDNA (198 bp) was used as an internal standard (Fig. 1CGo).



View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Amplification of IGF-1, IGF-2, GAPDH mRNAs from murine fetal and postnatal thymuses by RT-PCR. The RT-PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized with ethidium bromide. The predicted sizes for the amplification bands using primer specific for IGF-1, IGF-2 were 215 bp for IGF-1, and 356 bp for IGF-2 (Fig. 1AGo). M1, 100 bp markers; M2, 1 kb ladder; C, brain as positive control; H2O, negative control (no RNA). The RT-PCR products were blotted to a membrane and hybridized to the murine IGF-2 cDNA probe (Fig. 1BGo). Amplification of GAPDH cDNA (198 bp) was used as an internal standard (Fig. 1CGo)

 
Localization of IGF-2 mRNA by in situ hybridization
To determine the cellular sites of thymic IGF-2 expression, in situ hybridizations were performed on FD14 and postnatal day 2 thymi with an antisense IGF-2 digoxigenin-labeled riboprobe. In the fetal thymus, the staining was distributed on the whole surface of the epithelial-like network (Fig. 3Go, D and E). In the postnatal thymus, IGF-2 transcripts were located in the outer cortex and in the medulla (Fig. 3Go, A and B). This distribution of IGF-2 mRNA labeling corresponds to the distribution of epithelial components in the thymic subcapsular cortex and medulla. Hybridization to liver from FD15 was used as positive control (data not shown). The absence of hybridization of the sense probe (Fig. 3Go, C and F) confirmed the specificity of labeling. Thus, our results indicate that IGF-2 mRNA is expressed mainly in the epithelial component of the murine thymus.



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. RNA in situ hybridization on frozen sections of murine postnatal and fetal thymi with IGF-2 antisense and sense digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes. Labeling with antisense IGF-2 riboprobe in the postnatal thymus (Fig. 3AGo, magnification 100x, and Fig. 3BGo, magnification 630x). Labeling of fetal thymus (FD 14) (Fig. 3DGo, magnification 100x, and Fig. 3EGo, magnification 630x). Positive staining for IGF-2 message appears in dark brown, whereas nuclei are counterstained with methyl green. The arrows indicate sites of labeling; c: subcapsular and outer cortex; s: septae. Negative hybridization using the sense riboprobe (Fig. 3CGo, magnification 100x, and Fig. 3FGo, magnification 400x) confirmed the specificity of the labeling.

 
FTOC
Preliminary studies checked the expression of IGF and IGF-R genes during the total incubation time of FTOC (data not shown). After 1 week of culture, T cell differentiation and growth were analyzed by flow cytometry. As shown in Table 2Go, there was a marked increase in the four T cell subpopulations during the 1-week of incubation, indicating that FTOC is an adequate system to analyze T cell differentiation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Fetal thymic lobe cell number

 
Effect of FTOC treatment with neutralizing anti-IGF-1 and anti-IGF-2 Abs on T cell differentiation
Neither anti-IGF-1 nor anti-IGF-2 Abs induced a significant change (p = N.S.) in the total cell number or the percentage of dead cells as measured by propidium iodide staining. The doses of the different antibodies were the minimal ones necessary to produce a significant effect on T cell differentiation.

Treatment with anti-IGF-2 mAb (3.75 µg/ml) induced a 27% increase of the frequency of CD4-CD8-, a 23% decrease of CD4+CD8+, and a 70% increase of CD8+ (Fig. 4Go). No significant change was observed in the frequency of single CD4+ (Table 3Go and Fig 4Go).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of anti-IGFs on the distribution of T cell subsets. Flow cytometry analyses show the number (N) of thymocytes stained with CD4 and CD8 and recovered from FTOC exposed to medium only (C) or with antibodies directed against IGF-1 (5 µg/ml) or IGF-2 (3.75 µg/ml) for 1 week. The figure shows one representative experiment of five to six independent ones. DN, Double negative for the expression of CD4 and CD8 (CD4-CD8-); DP, double positive for the expression of CD4 and CD8 (CD4+CD8+).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Percentage of T cell subsets (mean ± SEM) in murine FTOC by flow cytometry analysis

 
Interestingly, the treatment of FTOC with an anti-IGF-1 pAb (5 µg/ml) induced a 30% decrease of CD4-CD8- cells, a 18.5% increase of CD4+CD8+ cells, but did not have a significant effect on CD4+ and CD8+ subpopulations (Table 3Go and Fig. 4Go). FTOC treatment with an anti-(pro)insulin mAb did not exert any significant effect on the total cell number or on T cell differentiation (Table 3Go).

As further controls, FTOC treatment with anti-FSH mAb or with rabbit IgG did not induce any significant change in the cell number or in the relative proportion of the four T cell subpopulations.

Effect of the blockade of IGF-mediated signaling with anti-IGF-R Abs on T cell differentiation
FD14 thymi were cultured for 1 week in the presence of anti-M6P/IGF-2R (10 µg/ml) or anti-IGF-1R (3 µg/ml), and the cell suspensions were analyzed by flow cytometry. The total percentage of viable cells was not affected by any of the anti-IGF-R Abs tested. FTOC treated with purified anti-M6P/IGF-2R pAb displayed a 31% decrease in total cell number. This included a 46% increase of CD4-CD8- cells and a 34% decrease of CD4+CD8+ cells. The proportion of CD4+ and CD8+cells was not affected (Table 3Go).

The total cell number in FTOC treated with anti-IGF-1R was decreased by 81%. Treatment with anti-IGF-1R induced a 72% increase of CD4-CD8- cells, a 33% decrease of CD4+CD8+ cells, a 31% decrease of CD4+ and a 30% decrease of CD8+ cell subsets (Table 3Go).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Human thymic epithelium expresses different members of the IGF axis (IGF-2, IGFBP-2 to -6) (26). The presence of IGFs and IGFBPs in the thymus raises the question of their biological role in T cell maturation. To investigate this hypothesis, we first analyzed IGF (IGF-1 and IGF-2) and IGF receptor (IGF-1R and M6P/IGF-2R) gene expression in murine thymus during ontogeny. IGFs and IGF-receptors are expressed in fetal and postnatal thymi. IGF-1, IGF-1R and M6P/IGF-2R mRNAs are similarly detected in the thymus both in fetal and postnatal life, whereas IGF-2 gene expression seems to decline after birth but is still detectable on the seventh week. The postnatal decline of IGF-2 mRNA levels is consistent with previous observations (44), but its presence in the postnatal life suggests that thymic IGF-2 could exert biological effects after birth. IGF-2 transcripts were detected by in situ hybridization in the outer cortex and in the medulla of murine postnatal thymus, in accordance with the previous localization of IGF-2 immunoreactivity in rat and human thymus (25). With regard to the expression of IGF receptor genes, the detection of their transcripts by RT-PCR was performed on whole thymic extracts. The cell type responsible for their expression is therefore not definable in these conditions. However, it has been repeatedly reported that thymocytes (immature T cells) express both types of IGF receptors (28, 29, 30).

The role of the thymus in T cell differentiation may be approached in vitro by murine FTOC. The advantage of this model is that it closely mimics physiological conditions in vivo (34). We checked the daily expression of IGFs and IGF receptors in FTOC and found that these genes were expressed all along the culture period. To investigate the role of IGFs in thymus physiology, IGFs and IGF-receptors were neutralized by specific Abs, and the development of T lymphocytes was analyzed by their expression of CD surface antigens.

The treatment of FTOC with anti-IGF-1 antibody decreased CD4-CD8- cells and increased CD4+CD8+ cells, but did not change the percent of CD4+ and CD8+ cell subsets. These results indicate that IGF-1 could preferentially exert mitogenic effects on immature CD4-CD8- cells and inhibit commitment from the CD4-CD8- to the CD4+CD8+ stage. This hypothesis is reinforced by the fact that GH and IGF-1 have been previously reported to be important in thymocyte proliferation and survival (28, 31, 32). In 9-month-old mice, systemic administration of IGF-1 induced growth of immature thymocytes (Thy-1), with no visible effect on T cell subpopulations (31). An increase in peanut agglutinin receptor binding, a marker of immature thymocytes (both CD4-CD8- and CD4+CD8+) (31) was also observed in IGF-1-treated mice. In addition, IGF-1 treatment induced an increase of both CD4-CD8-and CD4+CD8+ subpopulations in 4-week-old rats (32). The apparent discrepancy between the positive effect of both IGF-1 and anti-IGF-1 Abs on CD4+CD8+ cell number might be explained by the differences in the models used: in vivo IGF-1 administration to rats vs. in vitro treatment of murine FTOC. The absence of IGF-1 Ab effect on the total thymocyte number could be due to the action of IGF-2, which is the thymic dominant member of the insulin family and is not neutralized by anti-IGF-1. Indeed, the residual thymic IGF-2, acting through both IGF-1R and M6P/IGF-2R, could maintain a normal thymocyte proliferation despite the blockade of IGF-1. This is supported by observations made in Snell dwarf mice. These GH- and IGF-1-deficient mice show a severe reduction in splenocyte cell number (45), but only a moderate reduction in the number of thymocytes. This also suggests that IGF-1 could be more important for B-cell development than for T cell differentiation.

Anti-IGF-2 mAb significantly increased the percentage of CD4-CD8- cells, decreased the CD4+CD8+ cells, and increased CD8+ cells. The simultaneous increase of CD4-CD8- cells and decrease of CD4+CD8+ cells reflect the inhibition by anti-IGF-2 mAb of the early differentiation step from CD4-CD8- to CD4+CD8+ cells. This suggests that IGF-2 may be important for differentiation of CD4-CD8- cells into CD4+CD8+ cells and/or the survival of these two populations. In IGF-2 transgenic mice (33) and in IGF-2 transgenic dwarf mice (45), high levels of thymic IGF-2 mRNA correlate with an increase of thymic cellularity and higher numbers of CD4+ T cells. The increase in the percent of CD4+ cells in IGF-2 transgenic mice and in IGF-2 transgenic dwarf mice suggests that CD4+CD8+ cells preferentially differentiate toward CD4+CD8-. These observations are consistent with the increase in the percentage of CD8+ cells that we observed using anti-IGF-2-treatment of FTOC. Anti-IGF-2 treatment also induces a slight decrease in the percentage of CD4+ cell subset, suggesting that thymic IGF-2 might have a role in determining differentiation into the CD4 or CD8 lineage. Taken together, both the transgenic studies and the present data indicate that thymic IGF-2 exerts an important role in early thymocyte differentiation. It must be kept in mind, however, that although we checked the daily expression of IGF and IGF-R genes in fetal thymic lobes during their incubation, the antibodies used in the blocking studies inhibited both the thymic IGFs as well as the FCS-derived IGFs.

Though the (pro)insulin gene is expressed in the thymus (46, 47), the FTOC treatment with an anti-(pro)insulin mAb did not exert any significant effect on the total cell number or T cell differentiation. This result suggests that, at least using this experimental protocol, thymic (pro)insulin may not be essential for T cell development and differentiation. Further studies are needed to decipher the role of thymic (pro)insulin on T cell development.

Compared with control FTOC and with anti-IGFs Ab-treated FTOC, the treatment of cultures with anti-IGF-1R or anti-M6P/IGF-2R Abs induced a decrease of the total cell number by 81 and 31%, respectively, whereas the percentage of viable cells was not affected. This observation further argues that IGF-1R mainly, but also M6P/IGF-2R, control the level of T cell proliferation and/or survival. It also appears that the neutralizing of the IGF receptors exerts a significant influence on the total number of T cells, whereas the blockade of the ligands did not modify this parameter. This shows that IGF-1 and IGF-2 may compensate each other when one is blocked, whereas this is clearly not the case when one IGF receptor is blocked. Besides a classic mitogenic effect, IGFs have also been repeatedly reported to exert anti-apoptotic effects in different cell systems (48, 49, 50). Treatment with anti-IGF-1R induced an increase in the percentage of CD4-CD8- cells, whereas CD4+CD8+ and mature single positive cell percentages decreased. These results show that the IGF-1R is critical for T cell differentiation at distinct stages. Our data also show that the blockade of IGF-1 and IGF-1R induces two opposite directions in T cell differentiation. One plausible explanation would be that IGF-1 locally exerts some antagonistic effect by decreasing the binding of the dominant IGF-2 to the IGF-receptors so that this antagonism would be alleviated through the blockade with anti-IGF-1 Ab.

Anti-M6P/IGF-2R treatment induced a significant increase of the percentage of CD4-CD8- cells, in parallel with a decrease of the percent of CD4+CD8+ cells, while the percentage of single positive cells was not affected. This experiment indicates that M6P/IGF-2R-mediated signaling is involved in T cell differentiation from CD4-CD8- to CD4+CD8+ subtypes. Because M6P/IGF-2R is also known to bind TGFß (21), retinoic acid (22) and IGF-2, additional work is needed to discriminate the effective thymic ligand of M6P/IGF-2R implicated in T cell development. FTOC treatment with TGFß inhibits the growth and differentiation of CD4-CD8- thymocytes (34), whereas retinoic acid (51, 52) impairs the thymocyte maturation from the double negative stage to the double positive stage and increases the frequency of CD4 single positive cells. With regard to the interactions between IGFs and retinoic acid in hematopoiesis, IGF-1 was previously shown to prevent the apoptosis induced by retinoic acid in human promyeloid cells (49).

The strongest effects upon T cell proliferation and differentiation were observed in FTOC treated with anti-IGF-1R mAb. All the members of the insulin family, IGF-1, IGF-2, and insulin itself, are able to bind and activate IGF-1R-mediated signaling. IGF-1, IGF-2, and IGF-1R are highly expressed in fetal and postnatal thymi, and the expression of IGF-1R has been reported on both mature and immature lymphocytes (28, 29, 30). Our study demonstrates that the neutralization of IGF-1R-mediated signaling strongly inhibits T cell proliferation and differentiation in FTOC. This observation is in agreement with the well-known growth and differentiation-promoting activities mediated by this IGF receptor.

In conclusion, this study confirms the existence of a functional IGF axis in the murine thymus. Only the expression of IGF-2 gene significantly varies during development. The blockade of IGF-mediated signaling profoundly disturbs the early steps of T cell differentiation. Because the different components of the IGF axis have also been characterized in the human thymus, the present results might be transposable to the development of human T lymphocytes.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Amplification of IGF-1R, IGF-2R mRNAs from murine fetal and postnatal thymuses by RT-PCR. The RT-PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized with ethidium bromide. The predicted sizes for the amplification bands using primer specific for IGF-1R or M6P/IGF-2R were 395 for IGF-1R (Fig. 2AGo) and 235 bp for M6P/IGF-2R (Fig. 2BGo). M1, 100 bp markers; M2, 1 kb ladder; C, brain as positive control; H2O, negative control (no RNA).

 

    Acknowledgments
 
Our gratitude is due to Dr. Magda Desmedt and to Pr. Jan Plum (Ghent University) who introduced us to the management of fetal thymic organ cultures, to Mark Throsby (Necker University Hospital, Paris) who instructed the methodology for in situ hybridization, and to Dale L. Greiner (Worcester, Massachusetts Medical Center) for his advice and careful review of our manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This study was selected for a Travel Grant and for an oral presentation at the 81st Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, San Diego, California, June 1999. These studies were supported by the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International, by the National Fund of Scientific Research (Belgium), by the Association Belge du Diabète (Fonds Suzanne et Jean Pirart), by the Association contre le Cancer (Belgium), by the Research Special Fund of Liège University, and by the Fondation Léon Fredericq of Liège Medical School. Back

Received July 4, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Herold KC, Quintans J 1995 Immunological mechanisms causing autoimmune endocrine diseases. In: DeGroot LJ, Besser M, Burger HG, Jameson JL, Loriaux DL, Marshall JC, Odell WD, Polts Jr JT, Rubenstein AH, Cahill Jr GF, Martini L, Nelson DH (eds) Endocrinology, ed. 3. Philadelphia, Saunders, vol 3, pp 2990–3012
  2. Geenen V, Kroemer G 1993 Multiple ways to cellular immune tolerance. Immunol Today 14:573–575[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Shortman K, Wu L 1996 Early T lymphocyte progenitors. Annu Rev Immunol 14:29–47[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. von Boehmer H 1992 Thymic selection: a matter of life and death. Immunol Today 13:454–458[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Boyd RL, Tucek CL, Godfrey DI, Izon DJ, Wilson TJ, Davidson NJ, Bean AGD, Ladyman HM, Ritter MA, Hugo P 1993 The thymic microenvironment. Immunol Today 14:445–459[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Martens H, Goxe B, Geenen V 1996 The thymic repertoire of neuroendocrine self-antigens: physiological implications in T-cell life and death. Immunol Today 17:312–317[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Geenen V, Kecha O, Martens H 1998 Thymic expression of neuroendocrine self-peptide precursors: role in T cell survival and self-tolerance. J Neuroendocrinol 10:811–822[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Martens H, Malgrange B, Robert F, Charlet C, De Groote D, Heymann D, Godard A, Soulillou JP, Moonen G, Geenen V 1996 Cytokine production by human thymic epithelial cells: control by the immune recognition of the neurohypophysial self-antigen. Regul Pept 67:39–45[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Vanneste Y, Ntodou Thome A, Vandersmissen E, Charlet C, Franchimont D, Martens H, Lhiaubet AM, Schimpff RM, Rostène W, Geenen V 1997 Identification of neurotensin-related peptides in human thymic epithelial cell membranes and relationship with major histocompatibility complex class I molecules. J Neuroimmunol 76:161–166[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Gjerset RA, Yeargin J, Volkman SK, Vila V, Arya J, Haas M 1990 Insulin-like growth factor-I supports proliferation of autocrine thymic lymphoma cells with a pre-T cell phenotype. J Immunol 145:3497–3501[Abstract]
  11. Binz K, Joller P, Froesch P, Binz H, Zapf J, Froesch ER 1990 Repopulation of the atrophied thymus in diabetic rats by insulin-like growth factor 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:3690–3694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Li YM, Brunke DL, Dantzer R, Kelley KW 1992 Pituitary epithelial cell implants reverse the accumulation of CD4-CD8-lymphocytes in thymus glands of aged rats. Endocrinology 130:2703–2709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kelley KW, Arkins S, Li YM 1992 Growth hormone, prolactin, and insulin-like growth factors: new jobs for old players. Brain Behav Immun 6:317–326[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Murphy WJ, Durum SK, Longo DL 1992 Role of neuroendocrine hormones in murine T cell development: growth hormone exerts thymopoietic effects in vivo. J Immunol 149:3851–3857[Abstract]
  15. Clarke R 1997 The somatogenic hormones and insulin-like growth factor-1: stimulators of lymphopoiesis and immune function. Endocr Rev 18:157–179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Humbel RE 1990 Insulin-like growth factors I and II. Eur J Biochem 190:445–462[Medline]
  17. LeRoith D, Werner H, Beitner-Johnson D, Roberts Jr CT 1995 Molecular and cellular aspects of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor. Endocr Rev 16:143–163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Morgan DO, Edman JC, Standring DN, Fried VA, Smith MC, Roth RA, Rutter WJ 1987 Insulin-like growth factor II receptor as a multifunctional binding protein. Nature 329:301–307[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Morrione A, Valentinis B, Xu SQ, Yumet G, Louvi A, Efstratiadis A, Baserga R 1997 Insulin-like growth factor II stimulates cell proliferation through the insulin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:3777–3782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Stewart CE, Rotwein P 1996 Growth, differentiation, and survival: multiple physiological functions for insulin-like growth factors. Physiol Rev 76:1005–1026[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Dennis PA, Rifkin DB 1991 Cellular activation of latent transforming growth factor beta requires binding to the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor type II receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:580–584[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kang JX, Li Y, Leaf A 1997 Mannose-6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor-II receptor is a receptor for retinoic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:13671–13676[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Jones JL, Clemmons DR 1995 Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins. Endocr Rev 16:3–34[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Kelley KM, Oh Y, Gargosky SE, Gucev Z, Matsumoto T, Hwa V, Ng L, Simpson DM, Rosenfeld RG 1996 Insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs) and their regulatory dynamics. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 28:619–637[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Geenen V, Achour I, Robert F, Vandersmissen E, Sodoyez JC, Defresne MP, Boniver J, Lefèbvre PJ, Franchimont P 1993 Evidence that insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF-2) is the dominant thymic member of the insulin superfamily. Thymus 21:115–127[Medline]
  26. Kecha O, Martens H, Franchimont N, Achour I, Hazée-Hagelstein MT, Renard-Charlet C, Geenen V, Winkler R 1999 Characterization of the insulin-like growth factor axis in the human thymus. J Neuroendocrinol 11:435–440[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Arkins S, Rebeiz N, Biragyn A, Reese DL, Kelley KW 1993 Murine macrophages express abundant insulin-like growth factor-I class I Ea and Eb transcripts. Endocrinology 133:2334–2343[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Verland S, Gammeltoft S 1989 Functional receptors for insulin-like growth factors I and II in rat thymocytes and mouse thymoma cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 67:207–216[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Kooijman R, Scholtens LE, Rijkers GT, Zegers BJM 1995 Type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor expression in different developmental stages of human thymocytes. J Endocrinol 147:203–209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Goxe B, Martens H, Vandersmissen E, Achour I, Kecha O, Geenen V 1995 Interactions entre les cellules T et la famille insulinique: étude du récepteur de l’IGF-II. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 56:399 (Abstract)
  31. Clark R, Strasser J, McCabe S, Robbins K, Jardieu P 1993 Insulin-like growth factor-1 stimulation of lymphopoiesis. J Clin Invest 92:540–548
  32. Hinton PS, Peterson CA, Dahly EM, Ney DM 1998 IGF-I alters lymphocyte survival and regeneration in thymus and spleen after dexamethasone treatment. Am J Physiol 274:R912–R920
  33. Kooijman R, van Buul-Offers SC, Scholtens LE, Schuurman HJ, Van den Brande LJ, Zegers BJ 1995 T cell development in insulin-like growth factor-II transgenic mice. J Immunol 154:5736–5745[Abstract]
  34. Plum J, De Smedt M, Leclercq G, Vandekerckhove B 1995 Influence of TGF-ß on murine thymocyte development in fetal thymus organ culture. J Immunol 154:5789–5798[Abstract]
  35. Hill PA, Reynolds JJ, Meikle MC 1995 Osteoblasts mediate insulin-like growth factor-I and-II stimulation of osteoclast formation and function. Endocrinology 136:124–131[Abstract]
  36. Leung K, Rajkovic IA, Peters E, Markus I, Van Wyk JJ, Ho KK 1996 Insulin-like growth factor I and insulin down regulate growth hormone (GH) receptors in rat osteoblasts: evidence for a peripheral feedback loop regulating GH action. Endocrinology 137:2694–270[Abstract]
  37. Li YM, Schacher DH, Liu Q, Arkins S, Rebeiz N, McCusker Jr RH, Dantzer R, Kelley KW 1997 Regulation of myeloid growth and differentiation by the insulin-like growth factor I receptor. Endocrinology 138:362–368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. MacDonald RG, Pfeffer SR, Coussens L, Tepper MA, Brocklebank CM, Mole JE, Anderson JK, Chen E, Czech MP, Ullrich A 1988 A single receptor binds both insulin-like growth factor II and mannose-6-phosphate. Science 239:1134–1137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Stempien MM, Fong NM, Rall LB, Bell GI 1986 Sequence of a placental cDNA encoding the mouse insulin-like growth factor II precursor. DNA 5:357–361[Medline]
  40. Clawson TF, Lee WH, Yoder MC 1996 Differential expression of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in murine hematopoietic stromal cell lines. Mol Cell Endocrinol 120:59–66[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Rho O, Bol DK, You J, Beltran L, Rupp T, DiGiovanni J 1996 Altered expression of insulin-like growth factor I and its receptor during multistage carcinogenesis in mouse skin. Mol Carcinog 17:62–69[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Szabo PE, Mann JR 1995 Biallelic expression of imprinted genes in the mouse germ line: implications for erasure, establishment, and mechanisms of genomic imprinting. Genes Dev 9:1857–1868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Bell GI, Stempien MM, Fong NM, Rall LB 1986 Sequences of liver cDNAs encoding two different mouse insulin-like growth factor I precursors. Nucleic Acids Res 14:7873–7882[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Gangji V, Rydziel S, Gabbitas B, Canalis E 1998 Insulin-like growth factor II promoter expression in cultured rodent osteoblasts and adult rat bone. Endocrinology 139:2287–2292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Kooijman R, van Buul-Offers SC, Scholtens LE, Reijnen-Gresnigt RG, Zegers BJ 1997 T and B cell development in pituitary deficient insulin-like growth factor-II transgenic dwarf mice. J Endocrinol 155:5736–5745
  46. Jolicoeur C, Hanahan D, Smith KM 1994 T-cell tolerance toward a transgenic beta-cell antigen and transcription of endogenous pancreatic genes in the thymus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:6707–6711[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Throsby M, Homo-Delarche F, Chevenne D, Goya R, Dardenne M, Pleau JM 1998 Pancreatic hormone expression in the murine thymus: localization in dendritic cells and macrophages. Endocrinology 139:2399–2406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Minshall C, Arkins S, Freund GG, Kelley KW 1996 Requirement for phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase to protect hemopoietic progenitors against apoptosis depends upon the extracellular survival factor. J Immunol 156:939–947[Abstract]
  49. Liu Q, Schacher D, Hurth C, Freund GG, Dantzer R, Kelley KW 1997 Activation of phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase by insulin-like growth factor–I rescues promyeloid cells from apoptosis and permits their differentiation into granulocytes. J Immunol 159:829–837[Abstract]
  50. Pàrrizas M, Saltiel AR, LeRoith D 1997 Insulin like growth factor 1 inhibits apoptosis using the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. J Biol Chem 272:154–161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Napolitano M, Bellavia D, Maroder M, Farina M, Vacca Alessandra, Frati L, Gulino A, Screpanti A 1997 Modulation of cytokine gene expression by thymic lympho-stromal cell to cell interaction: effect of retinoic acid. Thymus 24:247–258[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Yagi J, Uchida T, Kuroda K, Uchiyama T 1997 Influence of retinoic acid on the differentiation pathway of T cells in the thymus. Cell Immunol 181:153–162[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. N. Vallejo, J. J. Michel, L. K. Bale, B. H. Lemster, L. Borghesi, and C. A. Conover
Resistance to age-dependent thymic atrophy in long-lived mice that are deficient in pregnancy-associated plasma protein A
PNAS, July 7, 2009; 106(27): 11252 - 11257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
Y.-W. Chu, S. Schmitz, B. Choudhury, W. Telford, V. Kapoor, S. Garfield, D. Howe, and R. E. Gress
Exogenous insulin-like growth factor 1 enhances thymopoiesis predominantly through thymic epithelial cell expansion
Blood, October 1, 2008; 112(7): 2836 - 2846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
I. Hansenne, C. Renard-Charlet, R. Greimers, and V. Geenen
Dendritic cell differentiation and immune tolerance to insulin-related peptides in igf2-deficient mice.
J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 4651 - 4657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Baudler, J. Baumgartl, B. Hampel, T. Buch, A. Waisman, C. M. Snapper, W. Krone, and J. C. Bruning
Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Controls Type 2 T Cell-Independent B Cell Response
J. Immunol., May 1, 2005; 174(9): 5516 - 5525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A. A. Wylie, D. J. Pulford, A. J. McVie-Wylie, R. A. Waterland, H. K. Evans, Y.-T. Chen, C. M. Nolan, T. C. Orton, and R. L. Jirtle
Tissue-Specific Inactivation of Murine M6P/IGF2R
Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2003; 162(1): 321 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. A. French, S. R. Broussard, W. A. Meier, C. Minshall, S. Arkins, J. F. Zachary, R. Dantzer, and K. W. Kelley
Age-Associated Loss of Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Cells Is Reversed by GH and Accompanies Thymic Reconstitution
Endocrinology, February 1, 2002; 143(2): 690 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kecha, O.
Right arrow Articles by Geenen, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kecha, O.
Right arrow Articles by Geenen, V.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals