| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
Unité associée INRA de Physiopathologie et Toxicologie Expérimentales (V.G., N.P.-H., C.G., J.G., P.L.T.) Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 31076 Toulouse, France; Laboratoire de Neuroendocrinologie Expérimentale (M.G., N.S.), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U501, 13326 Marseille, France; and Unité associée INRA de Physiopathologie Respiratoire des Ruminants (O.A., F.S.), Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 31076 Toulouse, France
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: P. L. Toutain, Laboratoire de Physiologie & Thérapeutique, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 23 chemin des Capelles, 31076 Toulouse. E-mail: pl.toutain{at}envt.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In conclusion, natural scrapie displays a syndrome of hypercorticism associated with increased ACTH secretion, hyperresponsiveness of the adrenals, and lower CBG binding capacity, which leads to overexposure to CBG-free cortisol.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Different endocrine tests have to be carried out to distinguish the possible causes of any Cushing-like syndrome. In ewes, the principal regulator of ACTH release by pituitary corticotrophs is the hypothalamic CRH that drives the adrenal secretion of cortisol (2). Glucocorticoids provide negative feedback control for ACTH release by inhibiting anterior pituitary corticotrophs, as well as hypothalamic centers (3). Thus, scrapie-induced hypercorticism could be mediated by 1) scrapie-induced damage to the control centers of the nervous system, including the hypothalamus and/or the pituitary gland; or 2) autonomous hyperactivity of the adrenal glands. The spontaneous pattern of ACTH secretion was examined to identify the central or peripheral origin of the syndrome of hypercorticism. In addition, the responsiveness of the hypophysis to ovine CRF (oCRF) and that of adrenals to an exogenously administered 124 fragment of ACTH (ACTH124, tetracosactide) were determined. Finally, the responsiveness of the pathways involved in the feedback inhibition of cortisol of scrapie-affected ewes was examined using a low-dose dexamethasone suppression test.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design
The objective of Exp 1 was to compare cortisol disposition in
scrapie-affected ewes with that of healthy animals. During the first
period, blood samples were collected at 1-h intervals for 24 h.
The experiment was begun at 0800 h. During the second period,
which took place 1 week later, cortisol (hydrocortisone,
Sigma; l'Isle dAbeau Chesnes, La Verpillière,
France) was iv administered at a dosage of 1 mg/kg at 1000 h.
Dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg, Cortamethasone, Vetoquinol, Lure,
France) was iv administered at 0700 h to prevent interference with
endogenous cortisol secretion. Peripheral blood samples were collected
at 1-h intervals for 3 h before and after cortisol administration
at 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min, then at 1-h intervals until
12 h post administration.
Exp 2 was performed 4 days later and was designed: 1) to test the integrity of the pathway involved in the negative feedback inhibition of cortisol; and 2) to compare both the endogenous secretion of ACTH and the adrenal gland responsiveness to stimulation with an exogenously administered 124 fragment of ACTH (ACTH124, tetracosactide) of scrapie-affected ewes with that of healthy ewes. During the first period, blood samples were collected at 10-min intervals from 1300 h to 1730 h. The samples were chilled in wet ice. During the second period, i.e. the following day, dexamethasone (Cortamethasone, 0.01 mg/kg) and tetracosactide (Synacthene immediat, Ciba-Geigy, Rueil Malmaison, France, 5 µg/kg) were successively iv administered at a 6-h interval. Peripheral blood samples were collected before (at 0800 h) and 3, 4, and 6 h after dexamethasone administration, then after tetracosactide administration at 2, 4, 8, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 210 min. One scrapie-affected ewe was killed after the completion of Exp 2.
Nine days later, Exp 3 was performed to compare the pituitary and adrenal responsiveness to a stimulation with oCRF of scrapie-affected ewes with that of healthy ewes. The experiment was begun at 1300 h. Peripheral blood samples were collected 60 and 30 min before and after an iv administration of oCRF (Sigma, 0.4 µg/kg) at 4, 8, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min; then at 15-min intervals for 2 h; and finally 3.5, 4 and 5 h post administration. The samples were chilled in wet ice. The seven remaining scrapie-affected ewes were killed from 12 days to 4 months after the completion of Exp 3.
Administrations and blood sampling
All drugs were injected in the right jugular vein via an
indwelling catheter that had been inserted the day preceding the
experiments. Cortisol was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and ethanol
50:50 (vol/vol) to produce a concentration of 50 mg/ml. oCRF was
dissolved in saline containing 2% sterile ovine plasma and HCl 0.001
M 1%. Blood samples were obtained from the left jugular
vein with an indwelling catheter inserted the day before the
experiments. Blood samples for cortisol assay were collected in
heparinized tubes and centrifuged for 10 min at 1400 x
g. Blood samples for ACTH assay were collected in tubes
containing EDTA/benzamidine placed in ice and centrifuged at 700
x g for 8 min within 15 min of collection. Finally, blood
samples for oCRF assay were collected in tubes containing EDTA (4%)
and centrifuged at 700 x g for 10 min. The plasma was
separated and stored at -20 C until assayed.
Histology
After iv pentobarbital injection and exsanguination, the brain
was removed and stored in a 10% formalin buffered solution for 3
weeks. Samples (obex, midpons) were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin,
cut into 2-µm-thick sections, and stained using a classical
Hematoxylin-eosin method. The diagnosis of scrapie was confirmed by the
identification of perikaryonic and/or neuropilar vacuolisation in at
least three gray matter nuclei.
Analytical methods
All hormone measurements involved radioimmunological techniques.
Cortisol was assayed in duplicate using 50-µl aliquots of plasma and
the RIA method adapted from Gomez Brunet and Lopez Sebastian (4). The
level of quantification of the assay was 4 ng/ml. The mean intraassay
coefficient of variation for three plasma levels (4, 16, and 32 ng/ml)
was 13% (4 assays); the mean interassay coefficient of variation for
these plasmas was 14%.
ACTH levels were measured in polyethyleneglycol plasma extracts by RIA, as previously described (5). Plasma tetracosactide concentrations were measured using the same RIA method, except that [125I] ACTH124 and ACTH124 were used instead of [125I] ACTH139 and ACTH139. Circulating CRF was measured in acetone plasma extracts using a previously described RIA method (6). The intraassay coefficients of variation within the measurement range of each assay were 5% for ACTH and tetracosactide and 6% for CRF. The limits of detection of the assays were 5 pg ACTH/ml, 2.5 pg tetracosactide/ml, and 10 pg CRF/ml plasma.
Kinetic analysis
Plasma cortisol (total concentrations) were analyzed using a
compartmental approach: monocompartmental and bicompartmental models
were constructed assuming that the cortisol not specifically bound to
CBG (i.e. free cortisol and nonspecifically bound to
albumin) was the sole form eliminated from the central compartment,
with a rate constant of k10,
(min-1) from a central compartment with a volume
of Vc (liter/kg). In the central compartment,
cortisol is specifically bound to CBG with Bmax
(nmol) being the CBG maximal binding capacity, and
Kd (nmol) the cortisol dissociation constant,
i.e. the free plasma cortisol corresponding to half
saturation of CBG. Bmax and
Kd were estimated as amounts but were expressed
in terms of concentration by dividing the estimated amount by the
volume of distribution of the free fraction, i.e.
Vc. It should be understood that in our model,
the nonspecific cortisol binding was ignored, and the free cortisol
corresponded to truly free cortisol plus the cortisol that was not
specifically bound to albumin (see Discussion).
A fifth-order Runge-Kutta method with variable step size was used to solve the models numerically. The parameters were obtained using REVOL, a free derivative of the Monte Carlo minimizing algorithm (7). The goodness of fit of the described model was assessed using least-square criteria. The data points were weighted using 1/yi2, with yi the ith fitted concentration. An F test was used to select the appropriate number of compartments (1 or 2), and a bicompartmental model was selected.
Finally, the estimated parameters were k10 (min-1), k12 (min-1, first-order rate constants between central and peripheral compartments), and k21 (min-1, first-order rate constants between peripheral and central compartment), Vc (liter/kg), Bmax (nmol), and Kd (nmol).
The plasma clearance of CBG-free cortisol (ClF,
liter/kg·min) was calculated using Eq 1
:
![]() | (1) |
The plasma half life for terminal phase was calculated using Eq 2
:
![]() | (2) |
The steady-state volume of distribution of CBG-free cortisol was
obtained from Eq 3
:
![]() | (3) |
The nycthemeral cortisol production rate
(PR024h) was calculated from Eq 4
:
![]() | (4) |
The CBG-free cortisol concentrations (CBGfree)
were calculated from raw data using Eq 5
:
![]() | (5) |
Tetracosactide and oCRF
The kinetic parameters for oCRF and tetracosactide were
calculated from the plasma oCRF and tetracosactide concentration-time
profile, respectively, according to the classical equations of Gibaldi
and Perrier (8) and using a program for nonlinear regression analysis
adapted from Multi (9).
The cortisol production rate induced by tetracosactide and oCRF
administration was calculated from Eq 6
:
![]() | (6) |
The ACTH production rate induced by oCRF administration was estimated
from Eq 7
:
![]() | (7) |
Statistical analysis
Results are reported as mean ± SD. Statistics
were performed using the Statgraphics program (version 5, STSC
Inc., Rockville, MD, 1991). A P value lower than 0.05
was considered as significant. Corticoid concentrations below the limit
of quantification of the assay were arbitrarily fixed at 2 ng/ml. The
effect of scrapie on cortisol pharmacokinetics and CBG binding
parameters was assessed using a one-way ANOVA. Because of the
heterogeneity of variances in Exp 1, the nonparametric Kruskall-Wallis
test was used to analyze the effect of scrapie on total and CBG-free
cortisol plasma concentrations.
Similarly, in Exp 2, the nonparametric Kruskall-Wallis unilateral test was used to analyze the effect of scrapie on cortisol and ACTH concentrations. The effect of scrapie on tetracosactide and oCRF pharmacokinetic parameters was assessed using a one-way ANOVA. The same test was performed to examine the effect of scrapie on tetracosactide and cortisol production rates induced by the oCRF administration.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The mean disposition parameters of cortisol obtained after a 1-mg/kg iv
cortisol administration and the CBG-binding parameters are given in
Table 1
. The mean CBG-free cortisol
plasma clearance of scrapie-affected ewes [29.7 ± 10.5
ml/(kg·min)] did not differ from that of healthy ewes [26.4 ±
4.2 ml/(kg·min)], ANOVA, P > 0.05). Similarly, the
other pharmacokinetic parameters were unaffected by the disease, except
for Vc, which was significantly higher in
scrapie-affected ewes (ANOVA, P < 0.05). The overall
mean CBG maximal binding capacity of scrapie-affected ewes (14.8
± 6.1 ng/ml) was about two times lower than that obtained in healthy
ones (34.3 ± 15.3 ng/ml, ANOVA, P < 0.05). The
mean value of the apparent Kd was 2.6 ± 1.6
ng/ml in scrapie-affected ewes and 3.9 ± 2.6 ng/ml in healthy
ones. This difference was not statistically significant (ANOVA,
P > 0.05).
|
Exp 2
Fig. 2
shows the individual
temporal variations in plasma ACTH and cortisol concentrations observed
in healthy and scrapie-affected ewes. Visual inspection of the figure
indicates that the range of mean ACTH plasma concentrations of
scrapie-affected ewes was wider than that obtained in healthy ewes,
extending from 68.7335.5 pg/ml for diseased ewes vs.
85.7137.1 pg/ml for healthy ones. Mean plasma ACTH concentrations of
scrapie-affected ewes observed throughout the 4-h period (177.2 ±
123.5 pg/ml) were significantly higher than those observed in healthy
ewes (116.4 ± 32.5 pg/ml, unilateral Kruskal-Wallis,
P < 0.05).
|
Six hours after the administration of dexamethasone at a dosage of 0.01 mg/kg, cortisol and ACTH could not be detected in any of the healthy ewes, whereas four of the eight scrapie-affected ewes exhibited higher plasma cortisol levels than the limit of quantification of the assay.
Mean tetracosactide disposition parameters [Plasma clearance,
T1/2, Vc,
VSS, mean residence time (MRT)] of
scrapie-affected ewes did not differ from values observed in healthy
ewes (Table 2
).
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Stimulation of the adrenocortical function in scrapie-affected ewes is consistent with the increased urinary corticoid levels demonstrated in a previous study (1) and the abnormal enlargement of the adrenal glands observed in ewes naturally affected with scrapie (10) and in experimentally infected mice (11) and hamsters (12, 13).
Cortisol kinetics have been investigated in ewes using various methodological approaches (14, 15, 16). In our study, we used a modeling method based on the evaluation of CBG-free cortisol plasma clearance. To compare our results with those from the literature, the value for total cortisol plasma clearance can be approximated to 0.5 liter/kg·h by multiplying the mean value of CBG-free cortisol plasma clearance of the present experiment (1.6 liter/kg·h) by an estimated percentage of CBG-free cortisol corresponding to the physiological plasma cortisol levels (i.e. 30% for a mean plasma cortisol concentration of 15 ng/ml, assuming a Bmax of 28.2 ng/ml and a Kd of 3.3 ng/ml, 17). The value of total plasma cortisol clearance generally reported or calculated from tracer or perfusion methods varied from 12 liter/kg·h (14, 15, 16, 18). The wide range of reported values for total plasma cortisol clearance can be explained by the fact that this variable is directly linked to the fraction of cortisol available for elimination, i.e. the CBG-free cortisol fraction that is subjected to instantaneous variations each time the plasma cortisol levels reach values that exceed the CBG binding capacity. In contrast, the plasma CBG-free cortisol clearance is a parameter that is independent of the temporal fluctuations in secretion of the hormone and reflects the real capacity of elimination. We have demonstrated that the plasma CBG-free cortisol clearance is unaffected by the prion disease. The calculated mean cortisol production rate of healthy ewes, based on individual values of this clearance, was 3.5 µg/kg·h. The cortisol secretion rate was increased by a factor of 5 in scrapie-affected ewes, whereas the plasma hormone concentrations were only doubled. The apparent discrepancy between adrenal secretion rate and plasma cortisol levels was attributable to the nonlinearity of plasma cortisol binding to CBG and to the lower CBG binding capacity of scrapie-affected ewes, which resulted in an increased CBG-free cortisol fraction. Indeed, the CBG binding capacity of healthy ewes, estimated using our pharmacokinetic model, varied within the range of physiological values previously obtained using equilibrium dialysis (17), whereas it was decreased by a factor of 2 in scrapie-affected ewes. The reduced CBG binding capacity of diseased ewes was confirmed using the reference method of equilibrium dialysis (19). The fall in plasma CBG could result from the depressive effect of hypercorticism on CBG synthesis, as previously suggested in rats (20). Whatever the origin of the scrapie-induced decrease in CBG binding capacity, it will result in an amplifying mechanism of the still stimulated adrenal function. Indeed, the total plasma cortisol concentrations in diseased ewes often attain higher levels than the reduced threshold of CBG maximal binding capacity, thereby resulting in a more-than-proportional increase in the diffusible plasma CBG-free cortisol levels.
From a mechanistic point of view, the stimulation of adrenal activity in scrapie-affected ewes could result from specific alterations of the neuronal systems involved in control of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) or from autonomous hyperactivity of the adrenal gland of infected animals. Our results support the hypothesis that adrenal dysfunction results from scrapie-induced cerebral damage, rather than from pathological changes in the adrenals. Indeed, we showed that the plasma ACTH concentrations of scrapie-affected ewes were about 1.5-fold greater than those observed in healthy ewes. Assuming that the kinetic disposition parameters of tetracosactide reflect the disposition parameters of natural ACTH, we can conclude that the secretion of ACTH was increased by a factor of 1.5 in diseased ewes despite the 5-fold increase in cortisol secretion rate. The ratio between cortisol and ACTH production rate increases in scrapie-affected ewes was partially explained by the increased responsiveness of the adrenal cortex. Indeed, the administration of tetracosactide induced a 2-fold increase of cortisol production in diseased ewes, compared with healthy ones. Due to the sigmoidal pattern of the dose-response relationship, the sensitivity of the response will depend on tetracosactide concentrations. Because, in our experimental conditions, the dosage of tetracosactide (5 µg/kg) was near maximal (21), it is likely that the response tended to be maximal and that a lower dose of tetracosactide could have induced a more-than-2-fold increase of adrenal response. However, we cannot rule out that extrapituitary mechanisms of adrenal regulation may assist in the maintenance of high plasma cortisol levels. Indeed, it is often reported that ACTH levels do not correspond to elevated concentrations of glucocorticoids (22). The increased adrenocortical responsiveness to tetracosactide could reflect the hypertrophy of the cells of the zona fasciculata of the adrenal cortex evidenced in diseased ewes. Alternatively, we cannot exclude the hypothesis that the sensitivity of adrenocortical cells to ACTH was increased in scrapie-affected ewes by a mechanism involving a positive effect of the hormone on its own receptors (23).
The higher secretion profiles of ACTH were observed in three of the four diseased ewes that exhibited only a partial response to the low dexamethasone suppression test. A recent study performed in knockout mice demonstrated that dexamethasone brain penetration is low, thus supporting the concept of a pituitary rather than a central site of dexamethasone action in its suppression of the HPA axis (24). According to this assumption, our results indicate that the pathways involved in cortisol feedback inhibition at the pituitary level remained functional in some diseased ewes. A decreased sensitivity of the nervous central system to cortisol feed back inhibition without functional alteration of the pituitary target could explain both the effectiveness of dexamethasone and the maintained pituitary secretion of ACTH in these ewes.
The oCRF administration stimulated ACTH secretion from the pituitary, resulting in increased cortisol production in both healthy and scrapie-affected ewes. The pituitary response to oCRF was not modified by the prion disease, whereas the stimulated adrenal secretions seemed to be greater in scrapie-affected ewes than in the healthy ones. However, the increased adrenal response to oCRF-induced ACTH secretion was not statistically evidenced in scrapie-affected ewes. As demonstrated for cortisol, the pharmacokinetic parameters of tetracosactide and oCRF were not affected by the prion disease, thus demonstrating that scrapie-induced adrenal dysfunction did not involve alteration of the elimination processes.
Our results suggest that scrapie could induce a sequence of HPA adaptations, ultimately resulting in a total or partial state of cortisol refractoriness reflected by sustained ACTH secretion and reduced suppression response to dexamethasone. Scrapie-induced cortisol resistance could result from two mechanisms: 1) increased arginine vasopressin secretion by the magnocellular neurons located in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei, which might permit the escape of ACTH from cortisol suppression; and/or 2) increased CRF and/or arginine vasopressin secretion by the parvocellular neurons located in the paraventricular nucleus, which could result from an impaired feedback inhibition. In agreement with the former hypothesis, a functional hypertrophy of the supraoptico-infundibular neurosecretory subsystem was evidenced in ewes naturally affected with scrapie (25). The second hypothesis is comforted by the increased number of hypothalamic CRF neurons demonstrated in the experimental model of hamsters infected with the 139H strain of scrapie (26).
Whatever the origin of scrapie-induced hypercorticism, attention should
be paid to the pathophysiological meaning and consequences of chronic
overexposure of the central nervous system to CBG-free cortisol. In
Alzheimers disease, glucocorticoids have been shown to have a
protective effect by slowing the rate of progression, because the
activation of specific inflammatory mechanisms contributes to
neurodegeneration (27). Recent studies suggest that a glial production
of cytokine induced by PrPsc deposition may contribute to the
development of pathological lesions in a murine scrapie model (28). The
inflammatory nature of the brain lesions could explain the reduced
susceptibility to scrapie when steroids are administered to
experimentally infected mice (29). Thus, it can be hypothesized that
the hypercorticism response observed in the present experiment is aimed
to counteract a brain inflammation process. Indeed, glucocorticoids are
potent inhibitors of the Nuclear factor
B family, which could be
involved in the central nervous system response to pathogenic stimuli
leading to neuronal death (30). However, a long-term sustained
secretion of cortisol could exacerbate the slow neurodegenerative
process involved in the prion disease. Indeed, excessive exposure to
glucocorticoids was shown to have deleterious effects in the rodent
brain (31). On the other hand, a more general inhibitory effect of
cortisol overexposure on the immune system of infected animals could
help to explain the absence of a detectable immune response observed in
prion disease (see Ref. 32 for review).
In conclusion, the main result of the present experiment is that ewes with naturally occurring scrapie display a major syndrome of hypercorticism associated with a hyperresponsive adrenal cortex and lowered CBG binding capacity. The secretion of ACTH was increased in diseased ewes despite the high secretion rate of cortisol, this suggesting a disruption of the pathways involved in the feedback inhibition of cortisol, which could result from cerebral damage.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 1, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
,20
-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one in
the sheep. J Steroid Biochem 18:173177[CrossRef][Medline]
B/Rel
proteins a point of convergence of signalling pathways relevant in
neuronal function and dysfunction. Biochem Pharmacol 57:17[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J D Bailey, J G Berardinelli, T E Rocke, and R A Bessen Prominent pancreatic endocrinopathy and altered control of food intake disrupt energy homeostasis in prion diseases J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 197(2): 251 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Peden, D. L. Ritchie, H. P. Uddin, A. F. Dean, K. A. F. Schiller, M. W. Head, and J. W. Ironside Abnormal prion protein in the pituitary in sporadic and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease J. Gen. Virol., March 1, 2007; 88(3): 1068 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Viguie, Y Chilliard, V Gayrard, N Picard-Hagen, P Monget, A Dutour, and P-L Toutain Alterations of somatotropic function in prion disease in sheep J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2004; 183(2): 427 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Picard-Hagen, V. Gayrard, M. Alvinerie, H. Smeyers, R. Ricou, A. Bousquet-Melou, and P. L. Toutain A nonlabeled method to evaluate cortisol production rate by modeling plasma CBG-free cortisol disposition Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2001; 281(5): E946 - E956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |