help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dees, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ojeda, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dees, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ojeda, S. R.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 4 1325-1331
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Alcohol Ingestion Inhibits the Increased Secretion of Puberty-Related Hormones in the Developing Female Rhesus Monkey1

W. Les Dees, G. A. Dissen, J. K. Hiney, F. Lara and S. R. Ojeda

Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Public Health, Texas A & M University (W.L.D., J.K.H., F.L.), College Station, Texas 77843; and Neuroscience Division, Oregon Regional Primate Research Center (G.A.D., S.R.O.), Beaverton, Oregon 97006

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: W. Les Dees, Ph.D., Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Public Health, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4458.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Alcohol (ALC) use and abuse by adolescents has been rising at an alarming rate. Whether ALC consumption during prepubertal years affects specific hormones and the process of sexual maturation is not known. We used immature female rhesus macaques to assess the effects of ALC on circulating levels of hormones known to be critical for the pubertal process. Ten monkeys averaging 20.3 ± 0.3 months of age were bled by saphenous vein puncture at 0830 and 2030 h each day for 5 consecutive days to determine baseline levels of GH, insulin-like growth factor I, FSH, LH, estradiol (E2), and leptin. For the next 12 months, each day at 1330 h five monkeys were administered ALC (2 g/kg), and five monkeys were administered an isocaloric sucrose solution via a nasogastric approach. Blood was again collected twice daily on 5 consecutive days at 24, 28, and 32 months for hormone analysis. Food consumption and weight gain were similar for ALC-treated and control animals. The expected night-related increase in serum GH occurred during late juvenile development (28–32 months of age) in control animals, but was suppressed (P < 0.05) in ALC-treated animals. This action was paralleled by a decrease (P < 0.01) in serum insulin-like growth factor I. Serum LH and E2 were also depressed by ALC, with their effects most pronounced at 32 months (LH, P < 0.01; E2, P < 0.001). Serum FSH and leptin were not altered. Although ALC did not affect age at menarche, the interval between subsequent menstruations was lengthened (P < 0.05), thereby showing that ALC affected the development of a regular monthly pattern of menstruation. These results demonstrate the detrimental effects of ALC on the activation of hormone secretion that accompanies puberty in female rhesus monkeys. They also suggest that the subsequent growth spurt and normal timing or progression of puberty may be at risk in human adolescents and teenagers consuming even relatively moderate amounts of ALC on a regular basis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A RECENT NIH survey has demonstrated an alarming trend of alcohol (ALC) use occurring at earlier ages, often during adolescence (1). Interestingly, females account for the greatest change in this drinking pattern. This nationwide study of students in the United States indicated that ALC use begins as early as the sixth grade, with peak initiation occurring between grades seven through nine. The study also indicated that 24% of girls in the eighth grade had consumed ALC within 30 days of the survey and that 14% had consumed more than five drinks in a row on one or more occasions during the prior 2 weeks. The increasing incidence of ALC use and abuse at this early age is noteworthy because adolescence represents a potentially vulnerable time for developing individuals, who may be more sensitive to the drug and less tolerant to its detrimental effects than adults. Whether ALC abuse alters the secretion of puberty-related hormones at this critical time of growth and development has not been evaluated, but this warrants serious consideration in view of the reported affects of ALC on endocrine function of experimental animals. The possibility that ALC could alter neuroendocrine development has been suspected for years, as a history of any drug ingestion is routinely investigated to identify the potential causes of altered pubertal development or endocrine function (2). Studies using rats have shown that ALC consumption causes delayed female puberty (3, 4) and alters the levels of puberty-related hormones (4, 5). Even though case studies involving ALC use and abuse by adolescent and teenage humans are limited in number, they have suggested that the drug can disrupt endocrine function in addition to stature and weight distribution in young people (6, 7, 8) as well as place them at risk for nutritional deficiencies (9). In the present study, we used female rhesus monkeys to examine the effects of chronic exposure to a low dose of ALC on early pubertal maturation, as assessed by developmental changes in the secretion of specific puberty-related hormones, timing of first menses, as well as development of a regular monthly pattern of menstruation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Ten immature female rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulata) born and raised at the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center (ORPRC) were used for this study. After removal from their mothers, they were raised in a nursery with other monkeys of similar ages and had free access to natural light from 10–11 months of age to 19–20 months of age. The monkeys selected for the study were closely matched in age, ranging from 19.5–22.2 months, with a mean (±SEM) age of 20.3 ± 0.31 months. None of the monkeys had been exposed previously to ALC or any other drug. For the study, the monkeys were individually housed indoors with controlled lighting (12-h light, 12-h dark cycle; lights on, 0700 h) and temperature (22 C). They were fed monkey chow (Jumbo 537, Ralston Purina Co., St. Louis, MO) twice daily at 0800 and 1500 h. Each monkey was fed enough food per day to equate to approximately 4–5% of body weight. The body weight of juvenile monkeys fed this amount falls within the 50th percentile for normal weight compared with rhesus macaques raised at the ORPRC over the last 15 yr. Food consumption was assessed and recorded daily. The monkeys were weighted at 2- to 4-week intervals, and the amount of food provided was adjusted as the animals grew. This feeding regimen is routinely used by the ORPRC for growing monkeys. Their diet was supplemented two times per week with apple slices and three times per week with 100 g of a mixture of corn, oats, and barley with molasses (Ralston Purina Co.) plus raisins, whole peanuts, sunflower seeds, and sweetened breakfast cereal. Animal maintenance and research were approved by the ORPRC institutional animal care and use committee in accordance with the NIH policy on the use of animals in research and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The health of the monkeys was monitored by veterinarians in the Division of Animal Resources at the ORPRC.

Experimental procedures
Initial blood samples were obtained from all monkeys at an average of 20.3 months for assessment of baseline hormone levels for GH, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), FSH, LH, estradiol (E2), and leptin. The samples (3.5 ml) were withdrawn via saphenous vein punctures twice daily at 0830 and 2030 h for 5 consecutive days. Starting on the sixth day at 1330 h, five monkeys were administered ALC (2 g/kg; 25% ethanol diluted in saline), and five monkeys were administered a sucrose/saline vehicle control that was isocalorically equivalent to the ethanol/saline solution. Both solutions were administered in equal volumes (10 ml/kg BW) through a pediatric grade nasogastric tube (5-French, Professional Medical Products, Inc., Greenwood, SC). To ease insertion, the tip of the feeding tube was dipped in 2% xylocaine jelly (Astra USA, Inc., Westbourgh, MA). The ALC and sucrose solutions were administered every day by this procedure until each monkey was 32 months of age. To determine the effects of ALC on developing hormone patterns, blood samples were collected as described above when the monkeys were 24, 28, and 32 months old. All blood samples for hormone analysis were allowed to clot overnight, then centrifuged, and the serum was stored at -20 C until assayed for hormone levels.

Blood ALC analysis
Blood samples were collected via saphenous vein puncture 3 h after ALC administration, and the levels of ALC in blood were subsequently measured in duplicate by an enzymatic method (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) shown to be both sensitive and reliable (10). The 3-h interval was selected because it is at this time that ALC levels peak after intragastric administration (11, 12). The blood ALC levels were assessed periodically by this method as well as by monitoring blood samples taken at 0830 h to assure overnight clearance of ALC from the blood.

Hormone analysis
Monkey FSH and LH were assessed in serum using kits obtained from the National Hormone and Pituitary Program, NIDDK. Assay sensitivity for FSH was 0.4 ng/ml, and the intra- and interassay variations were 2.0% and 3.5%, respectively. The sensitivity of the LH assay was 0.07 ng/ml, and the intra- and interassay variations were 3.4% and 5.6%, respectively. Serum GH and IGF-I were assessed using human kits purchased from Diagnostics Systems Laboratories, Inc. (Webster, TX). The sensitivity of the GH assay was 0.1 ng/ml, and the intra- and interassay variations were 4.2% and 6.3%, respectively. Assay sensitivity for IGF-I was 5.0 ng/ml, and the intra- and interassay variations were 3.0% and 6.1%, respectively. Serum E2 was assessed using a human kit purchased from Diagnostic Products (Los Angeles, CA) with an assay sensitivity of 5.0 pg/ml, and the intra- and interassay variations were 4.3% and 6.4%, respectively. Monkey leptin was measured in serum by a kit purchased from Linco Research, Inc. (St. Charles, MO), with an assay sensitivity of 0.5 ng/ml, and the intra- and interassay variations were 1.6% and 2.3%, respectively.

Statistical analysis
Longitudinal differences within groups were analyzed by ANOVA with post-hoc testing using the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple range test. Cross-sectional differences between control and ALC-treated groups were assessed by Student’s t test. The tests were conducted using INSTAT software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The dose of 2 g ALC/kg administered each afternoon produced a mean ± SEM blood ALC concentration of 158.1 ± 8.8 mg/dl 3 h after nasogastric intubation. At that time, the monkeys appeared only mildly intoxicated. Throughout the course of the study, appetite and food consumption were not altered by this dose of ALC. Assessment of morning (AM) blood samples confirmed that by this time there was little or no remaining ALC detectable. Body weights were not different (P > 0.05) between control and ALC-treated monkeys whether comparing either mean monthly weights in kilograms (Fig. 1Go) or the percent increase from their respective beginning weights (control, 24.5 ± 2.4%; ALC, 19.3 ± 2.9%).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of chronic ALC exposure on body weight. Note that monthly weight gains were not different between control (CON) and ALC-treated monkeys.

 
Figure 2Go demonstrates that there were no significant differences in the starting levels of any of the hormones measured, as determined by averaging the daily AM and evening (PM) concentrations of each hormone, then expressing them as a mean ± SEM over 5 consecutive days. The levels of these hormones were again measured at 24, 28, and 32 months after ALC or sucrose administration for 4, 8, and 12 months, respectively. Assessing the mean 5-day hormone levels at each of these time points showed a suppression of GH in the ALC-treated monkeys compared with the controls at both 28 (P < 0.05) and 32 (P < 0.05) months of age (Fig. 2AGo). The serum levels of IGF-I were also suppressed compared with control values at 28 (P < 0.05) and 32 (P < 0.001) months of age (Fig. 2BGo). Additionally, the IGF-I levels in the ALC-treated group at 32 months were depressed (P < 0.05) compared with their own levels at 20, 24, and 28 months. Although the levels of serum FSH were not affected (Fig. 2CGo), the 5-day assessment revealed depressed (P < 0.01) levels of serum LH from 24–32 months of age in the ALC-treated monkeys compared with the controls (Fig. 2DGo). Furthermore, lower (P < 0.05) LH levels were observed in the ethanol-treated monkeys from 24–32 months of age compared with their own levels at 20 months of age. The levels of serum E2 in the ALC-treated monkeys were modestly depressed (P < 0.05) at 28 months of age, but were markedly suppressed (P < 0.001) by 32 months compared with E2 levels in control monkeys (Fig. 2EGo). Even at 32 months of age, serum E2 levels in ALC-treated monkeys were not different from their own 20-month-old starting levels. In contrast, by 32 months of age, E2 levels in control monkeys were substantially increased (P < 0.001) over their 20-month-old levels (Fig. 2EGo). Serum leptin levels were not different between ALC-treated and control monkeys at any of the time points assessed (Fig. 2FGo).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of ALC on puberty-related hormones. Blood samples were drawn daily from each monkey at 0830 h (AM) and 2030 h (PM) for 5 consecutive days. Hormones were measured in serum, and the daily averages were recorded by combining the AM and PM values from each monkey. These values were then used to determine the monkey’s respective hormone level over the 5-day period. Each point represents the mean ± SEM 5-day hormone levels from ALC (n = 5) and CON (n = 5) monkeys during the 20-, 24-, 28-, and 32-month sampling periods. A, GH levels in the ALC-treated monkeys were suppressed compared with those in CON at both 28 and 32 months. B, ALC caused a moderate suppression of IGF-I at 28 months, followed by a marked decline by 32 months. Furthermore, in the ALC-treated group, IGF-I levels at 32 months were below their 20 month starting levels. C and D, respectively, show that FSH levels were not affected by ALC, but LH levels were reduced from 24–32 months of age compared with CON levels and were lower at all time points compared with the 20 month starting levels. E, E2 levels in CON monkeys rose markedly between 28 and 32 months of age, but this did not occur in ALC-treated monkeys, thus causing levels to be lower at 28 and 32 months of age. F, Leptin levels were not affected by ALC. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (ALC vs. same month CON). +, P < 0.05; ++, P < 0.001 (ALC or CON vs. own 20-month-old starting level).

 
Because GH and LH are released in a diurnal fashion as puberty approaches, the effects of ALC on the secretion of these hormones were further assessed by comparing their AM levels with those in the PM. As shown in Fig. 3AGo, the pattern of AM-low, PM-high GH levels began developing only in the control monkeys by 28 months of age (earlier ages not shown). Although the GH levels at that time were elevated each of the five evenings, only during one evening were the levels significantly higher than the respective AM levels. This pattern further developed by 32 months of age, when it was again apparent that the GH levels rose each evening, with three of the five evenings now showing significantly higher GH levels compared with their respective AM levels (Fig. 3CGo). Contrasting with the controls, ALC-treated monkeys did not show a pattern of elevated GH levels either at 28 (Fig. 3BGo) or 32 (Fig. 3DGo) months of age. Expressing these data as total (AM or PM) GH output for every 5-day period analyzed demonstrated marked increases (P < 0.01) in serum GH levels in the evenings at both 28 and 32 months of age in control, but not ALC-treated, monkeys (Fig. 3Go, E and F, respectively). Importantly, this developmental pattern of increased PM GH release as well as the ability of ALC to block this event were also observed when each monkey was evaluated individually and not as a group (not shown).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of ALC on the diurnal secretion of GH. A–D, Serum GH from control (CON) and ALC-treated monkeys at 28 and 32 months of age. Bars represent the mean ± SEM GH levels from both groups of monkeys with samples taken at 0830 h (AM) and at 2030 h (PM) for each of the 5 consecutive days, as noted by the number under each set of bars. The AM-low, PM-high pattern of GH secretion began developing in CON monkeys by 28 months and was further developed at 32 months. Note that ALC blocked this pattern of elevated GH secretion in the PM from developing. E and F, These data are the mean ± SEM of the combined 5-day AM and combined 5-day PM GH levels from CON and ALC-treated monkeys at both 28 and 32 months of age. Note that at both time points PM elevations in GH occurred in the CON, but not the ALC-treated, monkeys. A and C: *, P < 0.05 vs. same day AM levels; E and F: **, P < 0.01 vs. respective AM CON levels; +, P < 0.05 vs. respective PM CON levels.

 
In contrast to GH, serum LH levels in control animals were statistically similar in the AM and PM of the entire period examined (Fig. 4Go, A–D). ALC treatments suppressed LH levels equally well at both times of the day, with the first decrease (P < 0.01) being detected at 24 months of age and the levels remaining suppressed at those levels throughout the study (Fig. 4Go, A–D). Detailed analysis of daily serum LH levels for each group revealed the occurrence of small, sporadic increases in some of the PM values during the 5-day sampling period. These developing increases in LH secretion are best shown by calculating the mean ± SEM change in PM over AM levels for the 5 days. Figure 4EGo demonstrates that at 28 months of age, the magnitude of these evening increases was similar in both groups (controls, 0.7 ± 0.06 ng/ml; ALC, 0.9 ± 0.15 ng/ml). However, by 32 months of age, the LH rise in the control monkeys had further increased in the PM to 1.6 ± 0.2 ng/ml over that in the AM, whereas in the ALC-treated monkeys, this PM increase was still approximately the same level as that observed at 28 months (0.85 ± 0.1 ng/ml), now about half that of controls (P < 0.01). Thus, ALC suppressed not only basal LH values, but also the early developing increases in evening LH levels that precede puberty. ALC consumption did not delay menarche [controls, 24.5 ± 2.8 (n = 4); ALC-treated, 25.5 ± 1.2 (n = 4)]. One animal in each group had not undergone menarche by the end of the study at 32 months of age. Figure 5Go depicts the number of days between menstruations in four control and four ethanol-treated monkeys during the subsequent months after menarche. The monkeys receiving ALC showed a longer (P < 0.05) interval between those periods of menstruation than the control monkeys. Although we had limited samples for progesterone analysis, the levels were low throughout the experiment, and there were no signs of either corpora lutea or ablicans upon histological inspection of the ovaries from all animals, suggesting that none had reached ovulatory competency.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of ALC on the diurnal secretion of LH. Blood samples were taken at 0830 h (AM) and 2030 h (PM) for 5 consecutive days. A–D, Serum LH levels from 20–32 months of age, respectively. Bars represent the mean ± SEM of the 5-day combined AM and the 5-day combined PM LH levels from both control (CON) and ALC-treated monkeys. By 24 months of age and continuing throughout the study, ALC caused the suppression of LH equally well at both times of day. E, Effect of ALC on the developing PM increase in the LH secretory pattern. Bars represent the mean ± SEM increase ({Delta}) in PM levels over those levels observed in the AM for the 5-day sampling period. Note that at 28 months, the PM increases were similar in both groups, but at 32 months, these PM increases in the ALC-treated monkeys were about half what was observed in the CON monkeys. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (vs. same month CON).

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of ALC on menstrual patterns. The developing intermenstruation intervals (mean number of days between menstruations) are shown for four control (solid symbols) and four ALC-treated (open symbols) monkeys during subsequent months after menarche. All but two intervals were below 40 days in the controls, whereas all but three intervals were above 50 days in the ALC-treated animals. Note that two of the ALC-treated animals showed intervals between menstruations in excess of 140 days. The inset depicts the mean ± SEM intervals between menstruations for each group. The double horizontal lines show the mean ± SEM adult menstrual pattern for 20 rhesus monkeys in the ORPRC colony. *, P < 0.05.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
For several years physicians have been aware of the possibility that ALC may alter the developing neuroendocrine system; however, despite this awareness very little is actually known of the effects of ALC ingestion on puberty-related hormones and the progression of the pubertal process. It is known that even after 2 weeks of abstinence, ALC caused depressed estrogen levels in adolescent girls ranging from 12–18 yr of age (7). Also, ALC has been shown to cause depressed testosterone and LH levels in adolescent, midpubertal boys (6). Although limited, those important studies in humans provided the initial evidence for the effects of ALC during pubertal development. In the present study, we have used prepubescent female rhesus monkeys as an animal model to assess in more detail the chronic effects of ALC on adolescent neuroendocrine development. Our study is the first to show that ALC ingestion lowers prepubertal circulating levels of GH, IGF-I, LH, and E2 compared with control values. Furthermore, although the age at first menstruation was not affected, the interval between subsequent menstruations was lengthened significantly, showing that ALC alters the development of a regular monthly pattern of menstruation.

The low dose of ALC used in this study produced only moderate blood ALC levels for a short period of time in the afternoon before declining and did not significantly alter the monkeys’ food consumption or weight gain throughout the experiment. The fact that growth rates were not altered further suggests that this dose of ALC did not interfere markedly with appetite and metabolism. Furthermore, the levels of serum leptin, a peptide known for its role in controlling appetite, were unchanged by ALC. Our results do not, however, rule out the possibility that ALC may alter leptin or an action of leptin at a later time in pubertal development, as the drug has recently been shown to lower serum leptin during late juvenile development in female rats (13). The levels of GH were slightly lower by 24 months of age in the ALC-treated monkeys and were significantly depressed at 28 and 32 months. These depressions were associated with the absence of the expected increase in GH secretion at night between 28 and 32 months of age, which did occur in the control monkeys. Similar to what we have seen in rats (14), the ALC-induced depression in GH secretion was paralleled by a similar depression in IGF-I. Hence, as these monkeys were well nourished, it is likely that the suppressed circulating levels of IGF-I contributed to the slightly lower body weights observed in the ALC-treated monkeys. Although the mechanism of an ALC-induced depression in this peptide is not known, it could be due to depressed GH, an alteration in the synthesis or affinity of the GH receptor, or a direct effect on the hepatocyte to block IGF-I synthesis or processing.

The fact that ALC caused depressed levels of serum LH without affecting FSH is not surprising, because we have previously reported this differential effect on gonadotropin secretion in prepubertal female rats (4, 5, 15). Although the mechanism of this action is not known, it is possible that ALC can detrimentally affect the neurons producing LHRH in the hypothalamus, but not affect those neurons producing the proposed FSH-releasing hormone. With regard to LH, the serum levels were suppressed in the ALC-treated monkeys from 24–32 months of age. Interestingly, in contrast to the effect on GH, the ALC treatments suppressed LH levels equally well during both the AM and PM hours. It is known that increases in LH values in the PM are pivotal for the progression of the mammalian pubertal process (16). We first noted small sporadic PM increases in LH levels in both control and ALC-treated monkeys at 28 months of age, with these evening increases being similar in both groups; however, by 32 months of age the magnitude of these evening increases in ALC-treated monkeys were less than half that in the controls and, in fact, were not greater than the elevations observed at 28 months. Also, the control monkeys showed the expected developmental increase in serum E2 levels, which did not occur in the monkeys receiving ALC. Thus, we suggest that the ability of ALC to suppress the developing increases in LH and E2 contributes to this drug’s action to lengthen the time between menstruations, hence altering significantly the development of a normal, regular monthly menstrual pattern.

Recent evidence supporting the hypothesis that IGF-I is a metabolic signal capable of acting centrally to influence the pubertal process warrants discussion, because it may provide insight into the mechanism by which ALC affects LH secretion. It has been known for several years that circulating levels of IGF-I increase markedly during pubertal development (17, 18, 19). We have shown using the rat that IGF-I stimulates LHRH secretion form the female median eminence incubated in vitro (20). Furthermore, we showed IGF-I derived from peripheral sources is capable of acting centrally to induce LH release and that the central administration of IGF-I can advance female puberty in the rat (21). Subsequently, it was reported that the premature elevation of serum IGF-I levels advanced first ovulation in rhesus monkeys, an action resulting from increased LHRH neuronal activity (22). Furthermore, it has very recently been shown that IGF-I replacement can advance puberty in GH receptor knockout mice (23). Taken together, there is now compelling evidence in both rodents and primates that IGF-I plays an important role in linking somatic development to the activation of the LHRH/LH-releasing system and the acquisition of female puberty. We suggest that increased LH levels during pubertal development are due at least in part to rising levels of IGF-I crossing the blood-brain barrier at the median eminence and facilitating LHRH release. Importantly, we have shown here that between 28 and 32 months of age, ALC caused a dramatic decrease in serum IGF-I levels, which was associated with a further suppression of LH. Furthermore, during this period, these actions were associated with the lack of a significant increase in serum E2 levels and the noted prolonged interval between menstruations in ALC-treated monkeys. Although the mechanism of action by which ALC alters serum IGF-I is not known, it seems plausible that the reduced levels of IGF-I caused by ALC are insufficient to stimulate the LHRH release typically associated with the PM increases in LH secretion at this time of development. Our data showing the ALC-induced reduction in the PM increases in LH at this time support this action.

In summary, our results are the first to demonstrate significant detrimental effects of low dose ALC exposure on the activation of critical puberty-related hormones in female rhesus monkeys. Furthermore, we showed that even though the age at first menstruation was not altered, the drug did significantly alter the development of a regular monthly pattern of menstrual activity. Although important follow-up studies are needed, the present results suggest that human adolescents and teenagers consuming moderate amounts of ALC are at risk for alterations in growth and the normal timing of puberty.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Sam Siemon, Tonya Swanson, Donald Ediger, Douglas Barr, Dennis Grund, Shirley Trogdon, and the other members of the Division of Animal Resources, ORPRC, for their professional care and husbandry of the animals used in this study.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by NIH Grants AA-07216, AA-00104, ES-09106, and RR-0016. Back

Received September 24, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Johnson LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG 1996 National Survey Results on Drug Use from the Monitoring the Future Study, vol 1. NIH publication 96–4139, NIDA, Rockville, MD
  2. Kulin HE 1989 Disorders of sexual maturation, delayed adolescence and precocious puberty. In: DeGroot LJ (ed) Endocrinology. Saunders, Philadelphia, vol 3:1873–1889
  3. Bo WJ, Krueger WA, Rudeen PK, Symmes SK 1982 Ethanol-induced alterations in the morphology and function of the rat ovary. Anat Rec 202:255–260[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Dees WL, Skelley CW 1990 Effects of ethanol during the onset of female puberty. Neuroendocrinology 51:64–69[Medline]
  5. Dees WL, Skelley CW, Hiney JK, Johnston CA 1990 Actions of ethanol on hypothalamic and pituitary hormones in prepubertal female rats. Alcohol 7:21–25[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Diamond F, Ringenberg L, MacDonald D, Barnes J, Shi Hu C, Duckett G, Sweetland M, Root A 1986 Effects of drug and alcohol abuse upon pituitary-testicular function in adolescent males. J Adolescent Health Care 7:28–33[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Block GD, Yamamoto ME, Mallick A, Styche AJ 1993 Effects on pubertal hormones by ethanol abuse in adolescents. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 17:505
  8. Block GD Yamamoto ME, Ishii E 1991 Association of adolescent alcohol consumption on growth and body composition. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 15:361
  9. Block GD, Ishii E 1991 Food patterns among adolescents: influence of alcohol consumption. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 15:359
  10. Redetzki HM, Dees WL 1976 Comparison of four kits for enzymatic determination of ethanol in blood. Clin Chem 22:83–86[Abstract]
  11. Mello NK, Bree MP, Skupny AST, Mendelson JH 1983 Blood alcohol levels as a function of menstrual cycle phase in female macaque monkeys. Alcohol 1:27–31
  12. Redetzki HM, Dees WL, Maddox JH 1975 Influence of potassium chloride on alcohol absorption. Life Sci. 15:2145–2156
  13. Hiney JK, Dearth R, Lara F, Wood S, Srivastava V, Dees WL 1999 Effects of ethanol on leptin secretion, and the leptin-induced luteinizing hormone (LH) release from late juvenile female rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 23:1785–1792[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Srivastava V, Hiney JK, Nyberg CL, Dees WL 1995 Effect of ethanol on the synthesis of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) and the IGF-I receptor in late prepubertal female rats: a correlation with serum IGF-I. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 19:1467–1473[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Dees WL, Rettori V, Kozlowski GP, McCann SM 1985 Ethanol and the pulsatile release of luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone and prolactin in ovariectomized rats. Alcohol 2:641–646[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Terasawa E, Bridson WE, Nass TE, Noonan JJ, Dierschke DJ 1984 Developmental changes in the luteinizing hormone secretory pattern in peripubertal female rhesus monkeys: comparison between gonadally intact and ovariectomized animals. Endocrinology 115:2233–2240[Abstract]
  17. Handelsman DJ, Spaliviero JA, Scott CD, Baxter RC 1987 Hormonal regulation of the peripubertal surge of insulin-like growth factor-1 in the rat. Endocrinology 120:491–496[Abstract]
  18. Copeland KC, Eichberg JW, Parker CR, Bartke A 1985 Puberty in the chimpanzee: somatomedin and its relationship to somatotropic growth and steroid hormone concentrations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 60:1154–1160[Abstract]
  19. Anders J, Bang P, Hertel NT, Main K, Dalgaard P, Jorgensen K, Muller J, Hall K, Skakkebaek NE 1994 Serum insulin-like growth factor-1 in 1030 healthy children, adolescents, and adults: relation to age, sex, stage of puberty, testicular size, and body mass index. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:744–752[Abstract]
  20. Hiney JK, Ojeda SR, Dees WL 1991 Insulin-like growth factor-1: a possible metabolic signal involved in the regulation of female puberty. Neuroendocrinology 54:420–423[Medline]
  21. Hiney JK, Srivastava V, Nyberg CL, Ojeda SR, Dees WL 1996 Insulin-like growth factor of peripheral origin acts centrally to accelerate the initiation of female puberty. Endocrinology 137:3717–3728[Abstract]
  22. Wilson ME 1998 Premature elevation in serum insulin-like growth factor-1 advances first ovulation in rhesus monkeys. J Endocrinology 158:247–257[Abstract]
  23. Danilovich N, Wernsing D, Coschigano K, Kopchick J, Bartke A 1999 Deficits in female reproductive function in GH-receptor-knockout mice; role of IGF-I. Endocrinology 140:2637–2640[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. A. Dissen, R. K. Dearth, H. M. Scott, S. R. Ojeda, and W. L. Dees
Alcohol Alters Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in Immature Female Rhesus Monkeys by a Hypothalamic Action
Endocrinology, October 1, 2004; 145(10): 4558 - 4564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dees, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ojeda, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dees, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ojeda, S. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals