help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ke, H. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ke, H. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, D. D.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 4 1338-1344
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Lasofoxifene (CP-336,156), a Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator, Prevents Bone Loss Induced by Aging and Orchidectomy in the Adult Rat

Hua Zhu Ke, Hong Qi, D. Todd Crawford, Kristin L. Chidsey-Frink, Hollis A. Simmons and David D. Thompson

Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases, Central Research Division, Pfizer, Inc., Groton, Connecticut 06340

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. H. Z. Ke, Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases, Box 8118-216, Central Research Division, Pfizer, Inc., Groton, Connecticut 06340. E-mail: huazhu_ke{at}groton.pfizer.com


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It has been well documented that selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) can prevent bone loss in ovariectomized rats and postmenopausal women. The purposes of this study were to determine the effects of a potent and orally active SERM, lasofoxifene (CP-336,156), on bone mass, bone strength, total serum cholesterol, prostate weight, and histology in adult male orchidectomized (ORX) rats.

Sprague Dawley male rats at 10 months of age were divided into 6 groups, with 10 rats/group. The first group was necropsied on day 0 and served as basal controls. The remaining rats were either sham operated (n = 10) and treated orally with vehicle, or ORX (n = 40) and treated with either vehicle or lasofoxifene at 1, 10, or 100 µg/kg·day for 60 days. Total serum cholesterol, prostate weight and histology, distal femoral bone mineral density (DFBMD) by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, and static and dynamic bone histomorphometry of the third lumbar vertebral body were determined. Maximal load and stiffness of the fifth lumbar vertebral body were also determined by compression tests.

Age-related decreases in DFBMD (-9%) and trabecular bone volume (TBV; -13%) of the third lumbar vertebral body were found in sham-operated rats compared with basal controls. ORX induced significant increases in total serum cholesterol (+31%), eroded surface (+48%), activation frequency of bone turnover (+103%) and significant decreases in prostate weight (-89%), DFBMD (-14%), TBV (-23%), and maximal load (-17%) compared with basal controls. Compared with sham controls, ORX induced significant increases in eroded perimeter and activation frequency. Lasofoxifene decreased body weight in all dose groups compared with both sham and ORX control values. Compared with ORX controls, ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 10 or 100 µg/kg·day had significantly lower percent eroded perimeter activation frequency and significantly higher DFBMD, TBV, and maximal load. Further, lasofoxifene at 10 and 100 µg/kg·day significantly decreased total serum cholesterol by 46% and 68% in ORX rats, whereas no effect was found in prostate weight and histology parameters compared with ORX control values. These data showed that lasofoxifene prevented bone loss by inhibiting bone turnover associated with aging and orchidectomy in 10-month-old male rats. Further, lasofoxifene decreased total serum cholesterol and did not affect the prostate in these rats. These results suggest that SERMs such as lasofoxifene may be useful therapeutic agents for preventing bone loss in elderly men with some degree of hypogonadism.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OSTEOPOROTIC fractures occur more commonly in women than men after 45 yr of age (1). This difference may be attributed to the higher peak bone mass of the appendicular skeleton and the slower bone loss during aging in men than in women (2, 3). However, osteoporosis and associated fractures are a common skeletal disorder in aging men (1), to the extent that one third of hip fractures occur in men (4). It has been reported that a mutation in the estrogen receptor gene in a man caused osteoporosis and incomplete epiphyseal closure (5). More recently, results from clinical investigations indicated that bone loss in elderly men is more significantly correlated with declining estrogen levels than with declining androgen levels (6, 7, 8). Thus, it has been hypothesized that estrogen deficiency plays an important role in age-related bone loss in elderly men (9).

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are currently being investigated as alternatives to estrogen for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). SERMs have been shown to maintain estrogen’s positive bone and cardiovascular effects while minimizing several of the objectionable side-effects of estrogen (11, 17). We have discovered a nonsteroidal SERM, lasofoxifene (CP-336,156). Previously we reported (18, 19) that lasofoxifene binds selectively (>100-fold selectivity against all other steroid receptors) and with high affinity to human estrogen receptor-{alpha} and human estrogen receptor-ß with IC50 values of 1.5 and 1.2 nM, respectively, which are similar to those seen with estradiol. No uterine hypertrophy was observed in immature (3-week-old) or aged (17-month-old) female rats treated with lasofoxifene (18). In ovariectomized (OVX) rats, lasofoxifene completely prevented OVX-induced bone loss and inhibited the increased bone turnover associated with estrogen deficiency (18).

Recent data suggest that estrogen deficiency may play an important role in age-related bone loss in elderly men. We hypothesize that SERMs prevent osteopenia in males. In this study, we examined the effects of lasofoxifene on the adult orchidectomized (ORX) male rat, which has been used as a model for osteopenia in males (20, 21, 22, 23).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and study protocol
Sixty Sprague Dawley male rats at 10 months of age (Charles River Laboratories, Inc., Wilmington, MA), weighing approximately 630 g, were used for this study. The rats were obtained at 3 months of age and were housed singly in 20 x 32 x 20-cm cages at local vivarium conditions (24 C; 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle) for 7 months before the study. All rats were allowed free access to water and a pelleted commercial diet (Agway ProLab 3000, Agway County Food, Inc., Syracuse, NY) containing 0.97% calcium, 0.85% phosphorus, and 1.05 IU/g vitamin D3. The experiments were conducted according to Pfizer, Inc., animal care-approved protocols, and animals were maintained in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Ten rats were necropsied on day 0 as basal controls. Ten rats were sham operated (sham) and treated by daily oral gavage with vehicle (10% ethanol and 90% saline, 1 ml/rat) for 60 days as sham-operated controls. The remaining rats (n = 10/group) were ORX and treated by oral gavage with either vehicle or lasofoxifene at doses of 1, 10, and 100 µg/kg·day for 60 days beginning 1 day postsurgery. All rats were given sc injections of 10 mg/kg calcein (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), a fluorochrome bone marker, at 12 and 2 days before death to determine dynamic changes in bone tissues (24).

After 60 days of treatment, body weight was determined. The rats were then necropsied, and blood was obtained by cardiac puncture. Total serum cholesterol was determined using a high performance cholesterol colorometric assay (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). The prostate wet weight was determined immediately at necropsy. Five-micron, paraffin-embedded, hematoxylin- and eosin-stained prostate sections were used for qualitative observation of histological changes among groups using a microscope. The third lumbar vertebral body (LV3) was removed and saved for static and dynamic bone histomorphometry. The fifth lumbar vertebral body (LV5) was removed and frozen in saline until bone strength testing.

All surgical and necropsy procedures performed in rats were under anesthesia by ip injection of a mixture of ketamine/xylazine (57 mg/0.86 mg·ml solution/kg BW).

Femoral bone mineral measurements
Each right femur was scanned ex vivo using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (QDR-1000/W, Hologic, Inc., Waltham, MA) equipped with regional high resolution scan software. Bone area, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD) of the total femur, distal femoral metaphysis (the second 0.5 cm from the distal end of femur), and femoral shaft (mid 0.5 cm of the femur) were determined as previously described (12, 13).

LV3 cancellous bone histomorphometry
At necropsy, LV3 was removed, dissected free of soft tissue, fixed in 70% ethanol, stained in Villanueva bone stain, dehydrated in graded concentrations of ethanol, defatted in acetone, then embedded in methyl methacrylate (Eastman Organic Chemicals, Rochester, NY). Parasagittal sections of LV3 at 220 µm thickness were cut using a low speed metallurgical saw (Buehler Co., Lake Bluff, IL) and then ground to 20 µm for histomorphometric analysis (25). These 20-µm sections were used to determine indexes related to bone mass, bone structure, bone resorption, bone formation, and bone turnover using an Image Analysis System (Osteomeasure, Inc., Atlanta, GA). Histomorphometric measurements were performed in cancellous bone tissue of LV3 at distances greater than 0.5 mm from the cranial and caudal growth plates.

Measurements and calculations related to bone mass and structure included trabecular bone volume (TBV), thickness, number, and separation, whereas measurements and calculations related to bone resorption included eroded perimeter and percent eroded perimeter. Further, the parameters related to bone formation and turnover included percent labeling perimeter [(double labeling perimeter + 1/2 single labeling perimeter)/total trabecular perimeter x 100], percent osteoid perimeter, mineral apposition rate, bone formation rate/BV, bone formation rate/bone surface (BS), wall width (average distance between reversal line and quiescent trabecular surface), formation period, resorption period, and activation frequency. The definitions and formula for calculations of these parameters were described previously by Parfitt et al. (26) and Jee et al. (27).

Mechanical testing of LV5
Using a Material Testing System (model 810, MTS Systems Corp., Minneapolis, MN), a compression test was used to determine the mechanical properties of LV5 (28, 29). The spinous process and posterior pedicle arch were first removed from LV5 using a low speed saw. Both cranial and caudal ends of epiphyses were removed with a parallel saw set at a distance of 5.0 mm to generate two parallel surfaces (Fig. 1Go). The specimen was then compressed to failure at a displacement rate of 0.1 mm/sec using a 2.5-kN load cell (MTS model 661, 14A-03). The load and displacement curve were obtained from each test. The maximal load is the force that results in mechanical failure of the LV5 (Fig. 1Go). Stiffness was calculated from the linear portion of load and displacement curve.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Representation of the load cell and dimension employed in the LV5 compression test to assess maximal load and stiffness.

 
Statistics
Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistics were calculated using StatView 4.0 packages (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA). ANOVA was used for all six group comparisons, and Fisher’s protected least significant difference test was used to compare the differences between each group (30). P < 0.05 was considered a significant difference.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Body weight
There was no significant difference in body weight at necropsy among basal controls, sham-operated controls, ORX controls, and ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 1 µg/kg·day (Table 1Go). Body weight was significantly decreased in ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 10 or 100 µg/kg·day compared with sham-operated controls at the end of the study (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Changes in body weight, prostate weight, and total serum cholesterol

 
Prostate weight and histology
Prostate weight decreased by 43% in sham-operated rats (12-month-old) compared with basal controls (10-month-old). Compared with basal and sham controls, ORX significantly decreased prostate weight by 89% and 80%, respectively (Table 1Go). There was no significant difference in prostate weight between ORX rats treated with any dose of lasofoxifene and vehicle. Qualitative observations of prostate histology sections suggested no difference in the epithelium and the smooth muscle fibers in the stroma between lasofoxifene-treated ORX rats compared with vehicle-treated ORX rats.

Total serum cholesterol
Total serum cholesterol did not significantly differ between sham-operated and ORX controls (Table 1Go). Total serum cholesterol significantly increased in ORX rats compared with basal controls. A dose-dependent decrease in total serum cholesterol was seen in lasofoxifene-treated ORX rats compared with vehicle-treated ORX rats. Lasofoxifene at 10 and 100 µg/kg·day significantly decreased total serum cholesterol compared with basal values, sham controls, ORX controls, or ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 1 µg/kg·day. There was a significant decrease in total serum cholesterol in ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 100 µg/kg·day compared with levels in those treated with 10 µg/kg·day (Table 1Go).

Femoral bone mineral measurements
Significant decreases in distal femoral metaphysis BMC (-9.6%) and BMD (-8.9%) were found in sham controls compared with basal controls (Table 2Go). ORX for 2 months induced a nonsignificant decrease in distal femur BMC (-4.1%) and BMD (-5.5%) compared with sham controls. Compared with basal controls, ORX induced a significant decrease in total femur BMD (-4.9%), distal femur BMC (-13.3%), and BMD (-13.9%). Lasofoxifene at a dose of 10 or 100 µg/kg·day significantly prevented the decreases in total femoral BMD, distal femoral BMC, and BMD induced by aging and ORX. All parameters listed in Table 2Go did not differ between basal controls and ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 10 or 100 µg/kg·day. Compared with ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 1 µg/kg·day, ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 10 or 100 µg/kg·day had higher BMC and BMD in total femur, distal femoral metaphysis, and femoral shafts. Furthermore, total femoral BMD was significantly higher in ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 100 µg/kg·day compared with levels in rats treated with 10 µg/kg·day (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Changes in femoral BMC and BMD

 
LV3 histomorphometry
Effects of aging. Compared with basal controls, there was a significant decrease in TBV (-13%), trabecular thickness (-9%), and mineral apposition rate (-24%) in sham-operated controls (Table 3Go and Fig. 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Selective cancellous bone histomorphometric parameters of third lumbar vertebral body

 


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. TBV (A), osteoid perimeter (B), eroded perimeter (C), and activation frequency (D) of third lumbar vertebral cancellous bone in basal controls (Basal), sham-operated controls (Sham), and ORX rats treated with vehicle (ORX) or lasofoxifene at 1 µg/kg·day (1 µg), 10 µg/kg·day (10 µg), or 100 µg/kg·day (100 µg) for 2 months. a, P < 0.05 vs. Basal; b, P < 0.05 vs. Sham; c, P < 0.05 vs. ORX; d, P < 0.05 vs. ORX plus1 µg/kg·day; e, P < 0.05 vs. ORX plus 10 µg/kg·day.

 
Effects of ORX. Compared with basal controls, ORX induced significant decreases in TBV (-23%), trabecular thickness (-14%), and mineral apposition rate (-18%). Further, significant increases in labeling perimeter, osteoid perimeter, eroded perimeter, bone formation rate/BV, and bone formation rate/BS were found in ORX controls compared with both basal and sham controls (Table 3Go and Fig. 2Go). In addition, activation frequency was greater in ORX rats than in sham controls.

Effects of lasofoxifene. There was a significant decrease in eroded perimeter (-48%), but no significant difference was found in other parameters listed in Table 3Go and Fig. 2Go in ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 1 µg/kg·day compared with ORX controls. Compared with ORX controls, ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 10 µg/kg·day had significantly higher trabecular thickness (+16%) and significantly lower percent labeling perimeter, percent osteoid perimeter, percent eroded perimeter, bone formation rate/BV, bone formation rate/BS, and formation period. ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 100 µg/kg·day had significantly greater TBV, trabecular thickness, wall width, formation period, and resorption period and significantly lower labeling perimeter, osteoid perimeter, eroded perimeter, mineral apposition rate, bone formation rate/BV, bone formation rate/BS, and activation frequency compared with ORX controls. Compared with sham controls, there was no significant difference in all other parameters listed in Table 3Go and Fig. 2Go in ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 10 or 100 µg/kg·day, with the exception of an increase in mineral apposition rate with 10 µg/kg·day and an increase in trabecular thickness with 100 µg/kg·day.

Compared with ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 1 µg/kg·day, ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 10 µg/kg·day had significantly higher trabecular bone thickness and mineral apposition rate and significantly lower labeling perimeter, osteoid perimeter, and formation period. ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 100 µg/kg·day had significantly higher TBV, trabecular thickness, trabecular number, wall width, formation period, and resorption period compared with those treated with lasofoxifene at 1 µg/kg·day (Table 3Go and Fig. 2Go). Trabecular separation, labeling perimeter, osteoid perimeter, mineral apposition rate, bone formation rate/BV, bone formation rate/BS, and activation frequency were significantly lower in ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 100 µg/kg·day than in rats treated with lasofoxifene at 1 µg/kg·day. Further, ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 100 µg/kg·day had significantly higher wall width, formation period, and resorption period and significantly lower mineral apposition rate, bone formation rate/BV, bone formation rate/BS, and activation frequency compared with ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 10 µg/kg·day (Table 3Go and Fig. 2Go).

Mechanical testing of LV5
Maximal load did not differ between basal and sham controls (Fig. 3Go). A nonsignificant decrease (-11%) in maximal load was found in ORX controls compared with sham controls. ORX significantly decreased maximal load (-17%) compared with that in basal controls. No significant difference was found in ORX rats treated with 1 µg/kg·day lasofoxifene compared with basal, sham, or ORX controls. ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 10 or 100 µg/kg·day had significantly higher maximal load (both +30%) compared with ORX controls (Fig. 3Go). No statistically difference was observed in ORX rats treated with lasofoxifene at 10 or 100 µg/kg·day compared with those treated with lasofoxifene at 1 µg/kg·day (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Maximal load (A) and stiffness of LV5 in basal controls (Basal), sham-operated controls (Sham), and ORX rats treated with vehicle (ORX) or lasofoxifene at 1 µg/kg·day (1 µg), 10 µg/kg·day (10 µg), or 100 µg/kg·day (100 µg) for 2 months. a, P < 0.05 vs. Basal; b, P < 0.05 vs. Sham; c, P < 0.05 vs. ORX; d, P < 0.05 vs. ORX plus 1 µg/kg·day; e, P < 0.05 vs. ORX plus 10 µg/kg·day.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of this study demonstrated that lasofoxifene (CP-336,156), a SERM, prevented bone loss and preserved bone strength by inhibiting bone resorption and bone turnover associated with aging and ORX in adult male rats. Similar to those results observed in OVX rats (18), lasofoxifene decreased body weight and reduced total serum cholesterol in ORX rats. Further, lasofoxifene did not affect the prostate in these rats.

The mechanism for body weight loss in lasofoxifene-treated ORX rats is currently unknown. Food intake was not determined in this study. However, more recent studies suggest that lasofoxifene decreased food intake by approximately 15% in aged male rats (Ke, H. Z., et al., in preparation). Thus, we hypothesize that a decrease in food intake in lasofoxifene-treated ORX rats may in part contribute to a loss in body weight. Studies are currently underway to determine which component of body composition changes in response to lasofoxifene treatment in aged male rats.

In addition to the above findings, we found age-related changes between 10 (basal controls) and 12 (sham controls) months of age in male rats. There were significant decreases in prostate weight (-44%), distal femoral BMC and BMD, vertebral TBV, thickness, and mineral apposition rate at 12 months of age compared with 10 months of age in these male rats. These age-related changes might be due in part to the decrease in testosterone levels at 12 vs. 10 months of age. Our previous finding (31) that serum testosterone levels decreased approximately 30% at 12 months (82.6 ± 13.9 ng/dl) compared with 10 months (118.5 ± 21.5 ng/dl) of ages in male rats support this hypothesis. These results were in agreement with our earlier findings (33), which indicated that male rats achieve their peak cancellous bone mass at or before 10 months of age, and an age-related cancellous bone loss occurs thereafter. Thus, the skeletal metabolism status of 10-month-old male rats might be similar to that of 50-yr-old men, as Agnusdei et al. (32) reported that bone loss in men accelerates after 50 yr of age. Thus, adult male rats at or older than 10 months may be a very useful model to study age-related bone loss in men.

The decreased bone mass in ORX rats in the current study was mainly accounted for by age-related bone loss. As discussed above, an age-related decrease in bone mass was observed in sham controls compared with basal controls. ORX for 2 months induced only nonsignificant decreases in distal femoral BMC and BMD, lumbar vertebral TBV, and maximal load compared with sham controls. Longer than 2 months may be needed to induce significantly lower bone mass in adult ORX rats compared with sham controls. Vanderschueren et al. (22) reported that ORX in 13-month-old male rats induced a significant decrease in bone mass at 4 months but not at 1 month postsurgery compared with sham controls. Nevertheless, bone mass and bone strength decreased significantly in ORX controls compared with basal controls in the current study. These data also demonstrated the importance of basal (time zero) controls in such studies.

Androgen deficiency may express its effects on skeletal tissues via the androgen receptor and/or the estrogen receptor, as previously reviewed by Vanderschueren et al. (33). It has been shown that either androgen (21) or estrogen (22) replacement can prevent bone changes induced by androgen deficiency in ORX rats. Similar to the effects of estrogen (22), our data showed that treatment with lasofoxifene, which selectively binds to the estrogen receptors (>100-fold selectivity against all other steroid receptors), prevented bone loss and bone turnover associated with aging and androgen deficiency in adult male rats. At an oral dose as low as 1 µg/kg·day, lasofoxifene partially inhibited the increases in bone resorption. At this dose level, however, bone mass and strength did not differ between vehicle- and lasofoxifene-treated ORX rats. The decreases in bone mass and strength and the increases in bone resorption and turnover were prevented by lasofoxifene at doses of 10 and 100 µg/kg·day in ORX rats. These bone-protective effects of lasofoxifene in ORX male rats were similar to those previously reported in female OVX rats (18). In the OVX female rats, we found that lasofoxifene at doses equal to or greater than 10 µg/kg·day completely prevented bone loss and inhibited bone turnover associated with estrogen deficiency.

It has been well documented that SERMs decrease total serum cholesterol in OVX female rats (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) and decrease total serum cholesterol and low density lipoprotein in postmenopausal women (10, 17). It has also been reported that oral estrogen treatment improves serum lipid levels in elderly men (34). Although the rat is not an ideal model of human lipid modulation, we found that lasofoxifene decreased total serum cholesterol in ORX male rats in this study, indicating that lasofoxifene acts as an estrogen agonist for serum lipoproteins in male rats, similar to that in OVX female rats. The mechanism of the lipid-lowering effects of lasofoxifene in ORX male rats is not clear. The decreases in food intake and body weight in these rats induced by lasofoxifene treatment may result in the decreased total serum cholesterol.

In summary, we found that lasofoxifene acted as an estrogen agonist on bone and serum cholesterol and had no effect on prostate weight in the adult ORX rat model. These results suggested that SERMs such as lasofoxifene might be useful agents for the prevention of osteoporosis not only in postmenopausal women, but also in elderly men with some degree of hypogonadism.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Dr. Webster Jee of University of Utah for help with the histomorphometric measurements, Dr. Victor Shen of Helen Hayes Hospital for help with the mechanical tests of bones, and Drs. Mei Li and David B. MacLean of Pfizer Central Research for helpful discussions and suggestions.

Received August 26, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kanis JA, Pitt FA 1992 Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Bone 13:S7–S15
  2. Slosman DO, Rizzoli R, Pichard C, Donath A, Bonjour JP 1994 Longitudinal measurements of regional and whole body bone mass in young healthy adults. Osteop Int 4:185–190[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Preece MA, Pan H, Ratcliffe SG 1992 Auxological aspects of male and female puberty. Acta Paediatric [Suppl] 383:11–13
  4. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 1992 Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteop Int 2:285–289[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Smith EP, Boyd J, Frank GR, Takahashi H, Cohen RM, Specker B, Williams TC, Lubahn Korach KS 1994 Estrogen resistance caused by a mutation in the estrogen-receptor gene in a man. N Engl J Med 331:1056–1061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Slemenda CW, Longcope C, Zhou L, Hui SL, Peacock M, Johnston CC 1997 Sex steroids and bone mass in older men. J Clin Invest 100:1755–1759[Medline]
  7. Greendale GA, Edelstein S, Barrett-Connor E 1997 Endogenous sex steroids and bone mineral density in older women and men: the Rancho Bernardo study. J Bone Miner Res 12:1833–1843[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Khosla S, Melton III LJ, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Klee GG, Riggs BL 1998 Relationship of serum sex steroid levels and bone turnover markers with bone mineral density in men and women: a key role for bioavailable estrogen. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2266–2274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Riggs BL, Khosla S, Melton III LJ 1998 A unitary model for involutional osteoporosis: estrogen deficiency causes both type I and type II osteoporosis in postemenopausal women and contributes to bone loss in aging men. J Bone Miner Res 13:763–773[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Cosman F, Lindsay R 1999 Selective estrogen receptor modulators: clinical spectrum. Endocr Rev 20:418–434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Bryant HU, Glasebrook AL, Yang NN, Sato M 1996 A pharmacological review of raloxifene. J Bone Miner Metab 14:1–9
  12. Ke HZ, Simmons HA, Pirie CM, Crawford DT, Thompson DD 1995 Droloxifene, a new estrogen antagonist/agonist, prevents bone loss in ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 136:2435–2441[Abstract]
  13. Ke HZ, Chen HK, Qi H, Pirie CM, Simmons HA, Ma YF, Jee WSS, Thompson DD 1995 Effects of droloxifene on the prevention of cancellous bone loss and bone turnover in the axial skeleton of aged, ovariectomized rats. Bone 17:491–496[Medline]
  14. Black LJ, Sato M, Rowley ER, Magee DE, Bekele A, Williams DC, Gullinan GJ, Bendele R, Kauffman RR, Bensch WR, Frolik CA, Termine JD, Bryant HU 1994 Raloxifene (LY 139481 HCl) prevents bone loss and reduces serum cholesterol without causing uterine hypertrophy in ovariectomized rats. J Clin Invest 93:63–69
  15. Turner CH, Sato M, Bryant HU 1994 Raloxifene preserves bone strength and bone mass in ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 135:2001–2005[Abstract]
  16. Ke HZ, Chen HK, Simmons HA, Qi H, Crawford DT, Pirie CM, Chidsey-Frink KL, Ma YF, Jee WSS, Thompson DD 1997 Comparative effects of droloxifene, tamoxifen, and estrogen on bone, serum cholesterol, and uterine histology in the ovariectomized rat model. Bone 20:31–39[Medline]
  17. Delmas PD, Bjarnason NH, Mitlak BH, Revoux AC, Shah AS, Huster WJ, Draper M, Christiansen C 1997 Effects of raloxifene on bone mineral density, serum cholesterol concentration, and uterine endometrium in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 337:1641–1647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ke HZ, Paralkar VM, Grasser WA, Crawford DT, Qi H, Simmons HA, Pirie CM, Chidsey-Frink KL, Owen TA, Smock SL, Chen HK, Jee WSS, Cameron KO, Rosati RL, Brown TA, DaSilva-Jardine P, Thompson DD 1998 Effects of CP-336,156, a new, nonsteroidal estrogen agonist/antagonist, on bone, serum cholesterol, uterus, and body composition in rat models. Endocrinology 139:2068–2076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Rosati RL, DaSiva-Jardine P, Cameron KO, Thompson DD, Ke HZ, Toler SM, Brown TA, Pan LC, Ebbinghaus CF, Reinhold AR, Elliot NC, Newhouse BN, Tjoa CM, Sweetnam PM, Cole MJ, Arriola MW, Gauthier JW, Crawford DT, Nickerson DF, Pirie CM, Qi H, Simmons HA, Tkalcevi GT 1998 Discovery and preclinical pharmacology of a novel, potent, non-steroidal estrogen receptor agonist/antagonist, CP-336,156, a diaryltetrahydronaphthalene. J Med Chem 41:2928–2931[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Turner RT, Hannon KS, Demers LM, Buchanan J, Bell NH 1989 Differential effects of gonadal function on bone histomorphometry in male and female rats. J Bone Miner Res 4:557–563[Medline]
  21. Wakley GK, Schutt HD, Hannon KS, Turner RT 1991 Androgen treatment prevents loss of cancellous bone in the orchidectomized rats. J Bone Miner Res 6:325–330[Medline]
  22. Vanderscheuren D, Van Herck D, Suiker AMH, Visser WJ, Schot LPC, Bouillon R 1992 Bone and mineral metabolism in aged male rats: short and long term effects of androgen deficiency. Endocrinology 130:2906–2916[Abstract]
  23. Li M, Jee WSS, Ke HZ, Tang LY, Ma YF, Liang XG, Setterberg RB 1995 Prostaglandin E2 administration prevents bone loss induced by orchidectomy in rats. J Bone Miner Res 10:66–73[Medline]
  24. Frost HM 1969 Tetracycline-based histologic analysis of bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 3:211–237
  25. Baron R, Vignery A, Neff L, Silvergate A, Maria AS 1983 Processing of undecalcified bone specimens for bone histomorphometry. In: Recker RR (ed) Bone Histomorphometry: Techniques and Interpretation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 13–36
  26. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, Ott SM, Recker RR 1987 Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. J Bone Miner Res 2:595–610[Medline]
  27. Jee WSS, Li XJ, Inoue J, Jee KW, Haba T, Ke HZ, Setterberg RB, Ma YF 1997 Histomorphometric assay of the growing long bone. In: Takahashi H (ed) Handbook of Bone Morphology. Nishimusa, Niigata City, pp 87–112
  28. Mosekilde L, Danielsen CC, Gasser J 1994 The effect on vertebral bone mass and strength of long term treatment with antiresorptive agents, human PTH (1–38), and combination therapy, assessed in aged ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 134:2126–2134[Abstract]
  29. Ke HZ, Shen V, Qi H, Crawford DT, Wu DD, Liang XG, Chidsey-Frink KL, Pirie CM, Simmons HA, Thompson DD 1998 Prostaglandin E2 increases bone strength in intact rats and in ovariectomized rats with established osteopenia. Bone 23:249–255[Medline]
  30. Neter J, Wasserman W, Whitmore GA 1982 Applied Statistics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp 544–572
  31. Ke HZ, Qi H, Crawford DT, Pirie CM, Simmons HA, Thompson DD 1996 Longitudinal and cross-sectional characterization of long-term skeletal effects of aging and orchidectomy in the male rat. Bone [Suppl] 19:67
  32. Agnusdei D, Civitelli R, Camporeale A, Parisi G, Gennari L, Nardi P, Gennari C 1998 Age-related decline of bone mass and intestinal calcium absorption in normal males. Calcif Tissue Int 63:197–201[Medline]
  33. Vanderschueren D, Boonen S, Bouillon R 1998 Action of androgen versus estrogen in male skeletal homeostasis. Bone 23:391–394[Medline]
  34. Giri S, Thompson PD, Taxel P, Contois JH, Otvos J, Allen R, Ens G, Wu AH, Waters DD 1998 Oral estrogen improves serum lipid, homocysteine and fibrinolysis in elderly men. Atherosclerosis 137:359–366[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
F. F. Vajdos, L. R. Hoth, K. F. Geoghegan, S. P. Simons, P. K. LeMotte, D. E. Danley, M. J. Ammirati, and J. Pandit
The 2.0 A crystal structure of the ER{alpha} ligand-binding domain complexed with lasofoxifene
Protein Sci., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 897 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
D. Vanderschueren, L. Vandenput, S. Boonen, M. K. Lindberg, R. Bouillon, and C. Ohlsson
Androgens and Bone
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 389 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. Z. Ke, G. L. Foley, H. A. Simmons, V. Shen, and D. D. Thompson
Long-Term Treatment of Lasofoxifene Preserves Bone Mass and Bone Strength and Does Not Adversely Affect the Uterus in Ovariectomized Rats
Endocrinology, April 1, 2004; 145(4): 1996 - 2005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. L. Smith and B. W. O'Malley
Coregulator Function: A Key to Understanding Tissue Specificity of Selective Receptor Modulators
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2004; 25(1): 45 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
L. PLOUFFE JR. and S. SIDDHANTI
The Effect of Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators on Parameters of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Gonadal Axis
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2001; 949(1): 251 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. A. Cohen, B. Pittman, C.-X. Wang, C. Aliaga, L. Yu, and J. D. Moyer
LAS, a Novel Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator with Chemopreventive and Therapeutic Activity in the N-Nitroso-N-methylurea-induced Rat Mammary Tumor Model
Cancer Res., December 1, 2001; 61(24): 8683 - 8688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ke, H. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ke, H. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, D. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals