Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 4 1384-1393
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society
Dexamethasone Counteracts the Effect of Prolactin on Islet Function: Implications for Islet Regulation in Late Pregnancy1
Anthony J. Weinhaus,
Nicholas V. Bhagroo,
T. Clark Brelje and
Robert L. Sorenson
Department of Cell Biology and Neuroanatomy, University of
Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Robert L. Sorenson, Ph.D., Department of Cell Biology and Neuroanatomy, University of Minnesota Medical School, 4144 Jackson Hall, 321 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0303. E-mail: soren{at}lenti.med
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Islets undergo a number of up-regulatory changes to meet the increased
demand for insulin during pregnancy, including increased insulin
secretion and ß-cell proliferation. It has been shown that elevated
lactogenic hormone is directly responsible for these changes, which
occur in a phasic pattern, peaking on day 15 of pregnancy and returning
to control levels by day 20 (term). As placental lactogen levels remain
elevated through late gestation, it was of interest to determine
whether glucocorticoids (which increase during late gestation) could
counteract the effects of lactogens on insulin secretion, ß-cell
proliferation, and apoptosis.
We found that insulin secretion measured over 24 h in culture and
acute secretion measured over 1 h in response to high glucose were
increased at least 2-fold by PRL treatment after 6 days in culture.
Dexamethasone (DEX) treatment had a significant inhibitory effect on
secretion in a dose-dependent manner at concentrations greater than 1
nM. At 100 nM, a concentration equivalent to
the plasma corticosteroid level during late pregnancy, DEX inhibited
secretion to below control levels. The addition of DEX (>1
nM) inhibited secretion from PRL-treated islets to levels
similar to those produced by DEX treatment alone.
Bromodeoxyuridine (10 µM) staining for the final 24
h of a 6-day culture showed that PRL treatment increased cell
proliferation 6-fold over the control level. DEX treatment alone
(11000 nM) did not reduce cell division below the control
level, but significantly inhibited the rate of division in PRL-treated
islets.
YoYo-1, an ultrasensitive fluorescent nucleic acid stain, was added (1
µM; 8 h) to the medium after 13 days of culture to
examine cell death. Islets examined under confocal microscopy showed
that DEX treatment (100 nM) increased the number of cells
with apoptotic nuclear morphologies. This was quantified by counting
the number of YoYo-labeled nuclei per islet under conventional
epifluorescence microscopy. The numbers of YoYo-1-positive nuclei per
islet in control and PRL-treated islets were not different after 3 days
of culture. However, DEX treatment increased YoYo-1 labeling 7-fold
over that in controls. DEX also increased YoYo-1 labeling in
PRL-treated islets 3-fold over the control level.
These data show that the increased plasma glucocorticoid levels found
during the late stages of pregnancy could effectively reverse
PRL-induced up-regulation of islet function by inhibiting insulin
secretion and cell proliferation while increasing apoptosis.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
TO ACCOMMODATE the increased demand for
insulin that occurs during pregnancy, the islets of Langerhans undergo
major structural and functional changes. The inability of the maternal
islets to respond to the increased demand for insulin can lead to the
development of gestational diabetes, a condition that, if untreated, is
threatening to the well-being of both the mother and the fetus (1).
Adaptive changes that occur during normal pregnancy include 1)
increased glucose-stimulated insulin secretion with a decrease in the
glucose stimulation threshold (2, 3), 2) increased insulin synthesis
(4, 5), 3) increased ß-cell proliferation and islet volume (6, 7), 4)
increased gap junctional coupling among ß-cells (8), 5) increased
glucose metabolism with elevated levels of glucokinase and glucose
transporter 2 (3), and 6) increased cAMP metabolism (9). These changes
in islet function have been shown to correlate with the increase in
serum placental lactogen (PL) levels during gestation (7).
Experiments, both in vitro and in vivo, examining
the effects of homologous PL and PRL on islets indicate that hormones
of lactogenic specificity induce the same changes in islets as those
observed during pregnancy. These changes include 1) enhancement of
glucose-stimulated insulin secretion with decreased glucose stimulation
threshold (10, 11), 2) increased insulin synthesis (12), 3) increased
glucose utilization and oxidation (3, 13), 4) increased glucose
metabolism with elevated levels of glucokinase and glucose transporter
2 (3), and 5) increased cAMP metabolism (9). Furthermore, the changes
observed in lactogen-treated islets require a similar length of time to
occur as those observed in pregnancy. Based on these studies, it is
apparent that lactogens (PL and/or PRL) are the key regulatory hormones
for adaptation of islets to pregnancy.
Although, the up-regulatory changes that occur in islets during
pregnancy are becoming increasingly well documented, there is little
information about islet function during the return to nonpregnant
conditions. During pregnancy in rats, up-regulation of islet function
reaches peak levels on days 1415. These levels slowly return to
control levels by term (day 21) (7). Remarkably, this return to normal
levels occurs in the presence of high concentrations of PL. This
suggests that there are other inhibitory influences dominant in the
later stages of pregnancy. Although autoregulation of lactogen
receptors seems possible, it is unlikely, because prolonged stimulation
of islets by lactogens in vivo and in vitro
indicated that the effects of lactogenic activity on the up-regulation
of islets can be maintained (10, 14). An alternative hypothesis is that
a hormone that increases in concentration during the later stages of
pregnancy mediates this down-regulation in the presence of elevated
lactogen levels.
Measurements have shown that rat maternal plasma total and free
corticosterone (CS) concentrations are increased by day 15 and continue
to increase markedly until parturition (15, 16, 17). Interestingly, the
increases in CS levels in maternal plasma correlate with the number of
live fetuses during the final 3 days of gestation. During the final 5
days of gestation, the binding capacity of CS-binding globulin for CS
remained unchanged in maternal plasma and fell dramatically in fetal
plasma (15, 16). An increase in maternal plasma CS concentrations is a
characteristic of the late stages of gestation.
There are many studies in the literature examining the effects of
glucocorticoids on islet function. The effects are dependent upon two
factors of major importance: the concentration of and length of
exposure to glucocorticoid. Although many disparate results have been
reported, the data are consistent in demonstrating that exposure to
elevated concentrations of glucocorticoids results in an inhibition of
insulin secretion (18, 19, 20). In contrast, in vitro studies
examining the effects of long term exposure to near-physiological
glucocorticoid concentrations demonstrate a slight stimulatory effect
on secretion as well as ß-cell hyperplasia and hypertrophy (18, 21).
However, exposure, either acute or chronic, to pathophysiological
glucocorticoid concentrations results in a marked inhibition of insulin
secretion (20, 22).
The aim of the present study was to examine whether dexamethasone (DEX)
can counteract the ability of PRL to up-regulate islet function. A
similar interaction has been reported in Nb2 lymphoma cells, in which
PRL induces cell proliferation and DEX inhibits cell division and
increases apoptosis, whereas the combination of PRL/DEX counteracts the
effects of either hormone alone (23). The demonstration of a similar
relationship in ß-cells would suggest that the increase in
glucocorticoids in late pregnancy may have a role in the return of
islet function toward the normal nonpregnant levels observed in later
stages of gestation.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Islet isolation and culture
Rat islets were isolated from 3- to 6-day-old neonates pooled
from two or more litters (Sprague Dawley, Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc., Indianapolis, IN) by a nonenzymatic method previously
described (24). All experiments were carried out in accordance with
protocols approved by the institutional animal care and use committee
of the University of Minnesota. After isolation, groups of 30 islets
were transferred to 24-well multiwell plates (Costar,
Cambridge, MA) and cultured free floating in 2 ml RPMI 1640 containing
10 mM glucose supplemented with 1% horse serum
(HyClone Laboratories, Inc., Logan, UT), 10 mM
HEPES, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin-fungizone antibiotic-antimycotic
(Sigma, St. Louis, MO).
For each experiment, the multiwell plates were incubated at 37 C in a
humidified atmosphere of 95% air-5% CO2. The
culture medium was changed every 24 h and stored at -20 C for
subsequent assay. Insulin concentrations were determined by immunoassay
(25) using rat insulin standards (Linco Research, Inc.,
St. Charles, MO).
The culture medium was supplemented with the desired hormones and test
substance(s) as needed for each experiment. PRL was added as a
concentrated sterile aqueous solution resulting in a final
concentration of 500 ng/ml. We have previously demonstrated that this
concentration of PRL is sufficient to produce the maximal effects on
islet function induced by activation of the PRL receptor (7, 13, 26).
The rat PRL (NIDDK rPRL B-8-SIAFP; 30 IU/mg) was obtained from the
National Hormone and Pituitary Program of the NIDDK (Baltimore, MD).
The concentration of CS in the serum of pregnant rats increases from
180 nM in controls to 1100 nM on day 16 of
gestation, and up to 3800 nM by the end of gestation on day
21 (15, 16, 17, 18). Because DEX is approximately 30-fold more potent than CS
(27), DEX (Sigma) was added as a 95% ethanol solution,
resulting in a final concentration of 100 nM in most
experiments. The final concentration of ethanol in the culture medium
was less than 0.1%, and an equivalent amount of ethanol was added to
the controls.
Determination of hormone effects on insulin secretion
The effects of the hormones on insulin secretion were examined
by measuring the insulin concentration in the culture medium from the
daily changes during the 6 days of treatment. After this treatment, the
acute response of the islets to glucose stimulation was also examined.
The islets were allowed to reach basal metabolic rates by preincubating
them for 1 h in a Krebs-Henseleit solution (KRB) containing 120
mM NaCl, 4.8 mM KCl, 2.6 mM
CaCl2, 1.18 mM
KH2PO4, 1.1 mM
MgSO4, 25 mM
NaHCO3, 10 mM HEPES, 0.1% BSA, and
2.8 mM glucose. After this preincubation, the islets were
stimulated for 1 h in KRB containing 2.8, 7.2, or 13.5
mM glucose. The insulin concentration of this medium was
measured. The islets were then washed with Hanks Balanced Salt
Solution (HBSS) and sonicated for 1 min in 1.0 ml RIA buffer. The
insulin concentration in these extracts was measured to determine the
total insulin content of the islets.
2-Bromo-5'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) immunocytochemistry
To estimate islet ß-cell proliferation, BrdU was added to the
culture medium to a final concentration of 10 µM for the
final 24 h of the 6-day culture period. The islets were then
washed in HBSS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and treated for 20 min
with 0.5 N HCl. Immunostaining was performed with a mouse
monoclonal anti-BrdU antibody (Caltag Laboratories, Inc.,
San Francisco, CA), and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat
antimouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.,
West Grove, PA) was used as a secondary antibody. To determine islet
ß-cell proliferation, the number of BrdU-labeled nuclei per islet was
counted by direct observation with conventional epifluorescence
microscopy. At least 35 islets were examined for each treatment group.
Slides were coded so that the evaluator was unaware of the treatment
groups. Details of this procedure for islet ß-cell studies have been
previously reported (14, 28).
Cytochemical staining for apoptotic nuclei
To estimate the rate of cell death in islet ß-cells, apoptotic
nuclei were identified using an ultrasensitive fluorescent nucleic acid
stain, YoYo-1 iodide (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR).
The dye is impermeant to live cells and virtually nonfluorescent unless
intercalated into double stranded DNA. YoYo-1 (1 µM) was
added to the culture medium for the final 8 h of the culture
period. This length of time was necessary for complete staining through
the islet. Islets were then washed in HBSS and fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde plus 0.01% glutaraldehyde. The number of YoYo-labeled
nuclei per islet was counted by direct observation with conventional
epifluorescence microscopy using standard fluorescein isothiocyanate
filters. At least 25 islets were examined for each treatment group.
Slides were coded so that the evaluator was unaware of the treatment
groups. Examination of YoYo-labeled nuclei was conducted through 3 days
of culture, after which the fluorescence in the DEX-treated islets was
too great for accurate quantitation.
To examine the morphology of necrotic nuclei stained with YoYo, islets
were incubated at 43 C with 2% sodium azide for 8 h in the
presence of 1 µM YoYo. Islets were then fixed, mounted on
slides, and examined using laser scanning confocal microscopy. Images
of immunostained islets were captured by MRC-1000 Confocal Imaging
System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Cambridge, MA) mounted
on an Olympus Corp. BH-2 microscope equipped for
epifluorescence (Lake Success, NY). This system allowed the
three-dimensional structure of intact isolated islets to be represented
without physical sectioning (29, 30).
Expression of data and statistical methods.
All results are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
Statistical differences among means were assessed with Students
t test for unpaired samples or ANOVA with Tukeys test for
multiple comparisons. Each experiment was repeated more than three
times. Each treatment group within an experiment was replicated six
times.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Effects of PRL and DEX on insulin secretion
Steady state insulin secretion. To examine the effects of PRL,
DEX, and the combination of PRL and DEX on steady state insulin
secretion, islets were cultured for 6 days in the presence of 500 ng/ml
PRL, DEX (11000 nM), or PRL plus DEX (11000
nM). The medium was changed daily, and the amount of
insulin secreted per 24 h was determined. Cumulative secretion
over the 6-day culture period was calculated as the sum of the daily
measurements.
After 6 days of culture, insulin secretion from control islets was
1.3 ± 0.13 mU/islet·6 days. Insulin secretion from PRL-treated
islets was increased by 2.1-fold over the control level
(P = 0.005; n = 6) as reported previously (3, 13, 14, 28). DEX treatment had a significant inhibitory effect on secretion
in a dose-dependent manner at concentrations greater than 1
nM (P < 0.005; n = 6; Fig. 1
). Secretion from islets treated with
both PRL and DEX (>1 nM) was significantly lower
than that from PRL-treated islets (P < 0.004; n =
6), suggesting that DEX effectively blocks the stimulatory effect of
PRL on steady state insulin secretion.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Effects of PRL (500 ng/ml) and DEX (11000
nM) on insulin secretion from rat islets during 6 days in
culture. The medium was changed every 24 h, and the cumulative
secretion was calculated as the sum of the measurements of these
sample. A 2.2-fold increase in insulin secretion was observed with PRL
alone (*, P < 0.01 vs. control).
DEX decreased insulin secretion from both control and PRL-treated
islets in a dose-dependent manner at concentrations greater than 1
nM (**, P < 0.01 vs.
control or islets treated with PRL alone, respectively).
|
|
The temporal effects of PRL and DEX were determined by examining
insulin secretion every 24 h. The effect of PRL on insulin
secretion could be detected after 2 days of culture, gradually
increasing during the subsequent days (Fig. 2
). Islets were then treated with a
concentration of DEX (100 nM) that is approximately
equivalent to the plasma CS concentration during pregnancy. The
inhibitory effect of 100 nM DEX on secretion was detected
after 1 day of treatment (P < 0.05; n = 6) and
continued through day 6. Similarly, secretion from islets treated with
both PRL and DEX (100 nM) was significantly lower
than that from PRL-treated islets after 1 day of culture
(P < 0.001; n = 6) and continued to be
significantly lower than that from PRL-treated islets through the 6
days of culture. These data indicate that the concentration of plasma
CS found during the late stages of pregnancy is sufficient to
effectively inhibit the stimulatory effect of PRL on insulin
secretion.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Time dependence of the effects of PRL (500 ng/ml)
and DEX (100 nM) on insulin secretion from rat islets
during 6 days in culture. The medium was changed daily, and the
concentration of insulin secreted was determined. An increase in
insulin secretion was observed after 2 days of culture with PRL alone
(*, P < 0.05 vs. control). DEX
decreased insulin secretion from control islets and prevented the
increase in insulin secretion observed with PRL alone (**,
P < 0.05 vs. control or islets
treated with PRL alone, respectively).
|
|
Acute glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. To further examine
the effects of PRL, DEX, and the combination of PRL and DEX on islet
function, insulin secretion was measured in response to an acute 1-h
glucose challenge. After 6 days of culture, islets were exposed to a
1-h preincubation in low glucose followed by a 1-h incubation in KRB
containing 2.8, 7.2, or 13.5 mM glucose. As expected,
glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from PRL-treated islets was
greater than that from control islets in response to each glucose
concentration examined (Fig. 3
).
Secretion was increased 2.7-, 2.8-, and 1.7-fold over the control
value, respectively (P = 0.03). As expected, secretion
from DEX-treated islets (100 nM) was
significantly lower than that from control islets in response to
glucose concentrations above 2.8 mM
(P = 0.04; n = 4). Secretion from islets treated
with PRL plus DEX at glucose concentrations above 2.8
mM was significantly lower than that from
PRL-treated islets (P < 0.01). These data show that
DEX effectively inhibits the up-regulatory effects of PRL on secretion
and indirectly suggest that DEX inhibits the up-regulatory effects of
PRL on glucose signaling or metabolism.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Effects of PRL and DEX (100 nM) on
glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from rat islets cultured as
indicated for 6 days. Islets were exposed to a 1-h preincubation in low
glucose followed by a 1-h incubation in KRB containing 2.8, 7.2, or
13.5 mM glucose. A 2- to 3-fold increase in insulin
secretion was observed at all glucose concentrations with PRL alone (*,
P < 0.05 vs. control). DEX
treatment decreased insulin secretion from control and PRL-treated
islets at stimulatory glucose concentrations (**, P
< 0.05 vs. control or islets treated with PRL alone,
respectively).
|
|
Effects of PRL and DEX on insulin content
We have demonstrated that DEX effectively inhibits insulin
secretion and inhibits the stimulatory effect of PRL on secretion. To
determine whether the inhibitory effect of DEX is a consequence of
reduced insulin content, the effects of PRL, DEX, and the combination
of PRL and DEX on insulin content were measured. Total insulin content
was measured from homogenized islets after 6 days of treatment in
culture.
In control islets, the insulin content was 0.73 ± 0.13 mU/islet
(n = 4). The insulin contents in islets treated with PRL, DEX (100
nM), and the combination of PRL and DEX (100
nM) were 0.92 ± 0.09, 0.53 ± 0.11, and
0.75 ± 0.11 mU/islet (n = 4), respectively. The insulin
contents in the treatment groups were not different from that in the
control group. This suggests that the inhibitory effect of DEX on
secretion is not a consequence of a measurable decrease in insulin
content.
Effects of PRL and DEX on islet cell division
To examine the effects of PRL, DEX, and the combination of PRL and
DEX on islet cell proliferation, BrdU was added to the culture medium
to a final concentration of 10 µM during the final
24 h of the 6-day culture period. The islets were then
immunohistochemically stained for BrdU, and the number of labeled
nuclei per islet was counted (Fig. 4
). In
control islets, the number of BrdU-labeled nuclei per islet was
15.4 ± 5.9 (n = 6). The number of BrdU-labeled nuclei per
islet in PRL-treated islets was 6.4-fold greater than the control value
(P = 0.01; n = 6). This corresponds to approximate
labeling indexes of less than 2% for control islets and 12% for the
PRL-treated islets, assuming that there are 800-1000 cells/islet as
previously reported (14). This large increase in islet cell division by
PRL is comparable to that observed in our previous studies (7, 14, 28, 31).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. The effects of PRL and DEX on islet cell
proliferation in rat islets cultured as indicated for 6 days. The rate
of cell division was determined by the addition of BrdU to the medium
during the final 24 h of culture. The number of BrdU-labeled
nuclei per islet was increased more than 6-fold by PRL alone (*,
P < 0.05 vs. control). At all
concentrations of DEX examined, the number of BrdU-labeled nuclei per
islet was significantly decreased (**, P < 0.05
vs. islets treated with PRL alone).
|
|
BrdU labeling in DEX-treated islets, although inhibited by 47.7%,
42.8%, and 55.5% (n = 4) at 1, 100, and 1000 nM, was
not significantly different from that in controls. In contrast, BrdU
labeling in islets treated with PRL plus DEX (1, 10, 100, and 1000
nM) was significantly lower than that in PRL-treated islets
(P = 0.04; n = 5). These data suggest that DEX
effectively inhibits the stimulatory effect of PRL on islet cell
division, as indicated by BrdU labeling. This pattern of inhibition
agrees with the effects of DEX on PRL-induced up-regulation of insulin
secretion.
Laser scanning confocal microscopy examination demonstrated that
greater than 90% of the BrdU-labeled nuclei in PRL-treated and control
rat islets were observed in ß-cells with insulin immunoreactivity
(14). Therefore, the present data suggest that the inhibitory effect of
DEX on cell division is involved in the return of islet ß-cell
numbers and insulin secretion to normal levels.
Effects of PRL and DEX on islet cell death
Confocal microscopic examination of islet nuclei during cell
death. For the investigation of cell death, islets were stained
with YoYo, an ultrasensitive fluorescent nucleic acid stain that is
impermeant to live cells. Before this stain was used for examination of
the effects of DEX on islets, the morphology of necrotic nuclei in
intact islets stained with YoYo was investigated. Islets were incubated
at 43 C and exposed to sodium azide for 8 h in the presence of
YoYo. The islets were then fixed, mounted, and imaged using confocal
microscopy. Throughout the islet, necrotic nuclei labeled with YoYo
appeared intact with typical nuclear morphology and homogeneously
fluorescent with very low background staining (Fig. 5B
).

View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. The morphology of YoYo-stained nuclei in control
and DEX-treated rat islets. A, Normal nuclear morphology was observed
in all cells of control islets treated with sodium azide to induce
necrosis. Scale bar, 25 µM. B, Higher
magnification view of labeled nuclei in these islets. These nuclei
appear intact, with typical nuclear morphology; the chromatin is
primarily distributed in clumps at the periphery of the nucleus and the
more centrally located nucleolus. Scale bar, 5
µM. This pattern should be compared with apoptotic nuclei
at various stages observed in islets treated with 100 nM
DEX for 2 days. C, Nucleus showing condensation of chromatin.
Scale bar, 5 µM. D, Margination of the
condensed chromatin toward the nuclear membrane is also observed.
Scale bar, 5 µM. E, Breakdown of the
nuclear membrane and chromatin filling the entire cell. Scale
bar, 5 µM. F, Breakdown of the cell membrane and
streaming of the chromatin outside the cell. Scale
bar, 5 µM.
|
|
Islets were then cultured in the presence of PRL, DEX (100
nM), or the combination of PRL and DEX. YoYo (1
µM) was added to the culture medium for the final 8
h of a 48-h culture, and confocal imaging was performed to observe
nuclear morphology. The control and PRL-treated islets had
approximately zero to two necrotic cells per islet (i.e.
intact homogeneously fluorescent nuclei with typical nuclear morphology
scattered on the surface). In contrast, although the DEX-treated islets
contained a similar number of necrotic nuclei (on the surface of the
islet), there were predominantly nuclei with atypical morphologies, and
these were located throughout the islet (Fig. 5
, CF). Four different
morphologies were observed: 1) the condensation of chromatin into a
small sphere (Fig. 5C
); 2) the margination of the condensed chromatin
toward the nuclear membrane (Fig. 5D
); 3) the chromatin filling the
cellular space, suggesting the breakdown of the nuclear membrane (Fig. 5E
); and 4) the chromatin exuding out of the cell, suggesting the
breakdown of the cell membrane (Fig. 5F
). These morphologies were
previously described as being stages of apoptosis (32, 33, 34).
Lower magnification confocal imaging demonstrates the effect of DEX on
YoYo labeling in treated islets. The number of YoYo-labeled nuclei per
islet was very low and not noticeably different in control and
PRL-treated islets (Fig. 6
, upper
left and right panels). In contrast, DEX treatment
resulted in a large number of YoYo-labeled nuclei (Fig. 6
, lower
left panel). The number of labeled nuclei in the PRL- plus
DEX-treated islets was similar to that in controls (Fig. 6
, lower
right panel).

View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Effects of PRL (500 ng/ml) and DEX (100
nM) on the number of apoptotic nuclei in rat islets. Islets
were cultured in the presence of PRL, DEX, or the combination of PRL
and DEX for 2 days. The apoptotic cells were visualized by staining
with YoYo and image analysis by confocal microscopy. The number of
labeled nuclei per islet was noticeably greater in DEX-treated islets.
Even in the presence of PRL, DEX increased the number of labeled nuclei
per islet. Scale bar, 25 µM.
|
|
Quantification of the effects of PRL and DEX on islet cell
death
The effects of PRL, DEX, and the combination of PRL and DEX on
islet cell death were then quantified by counting the number of
YoYo-labeled nuclei per islet under conventional epifluorescence
microscopy. For these experiments, YoYo-1 (1 µM) was
added to the medium for the final 8 h of a 10- to 72-h culture
period. In control islets, the number of YoYo-labeled nuclei per islet
was 2.96 ± 0.76 (n = 4) after 10 h of culture and
6.61 ± 0.38 (n = 4) at the end of the 3-day culture period
(Fig. 7
). The number of YoYo-labeled
nuclei in PRL-treated islets was not different from that in controls
throughout the 3-day culture period. As expected, labeling in
DEX-treated islets (100 nM) was significantly greater than
that in control islets. The number of labeled nuclei increased to
14.0 ± 1.0, 25.1 ± 1.0, and 49.1 ± 4.9 after 24, 48,
and 72 h of culture (P = 0.01; n = 3). YoYo
labeling in islets treated with PRL plus DEX (100
nM) was greater than that in PRL-treated and
control islets after 24, 48, and 72 h (P = 0.01;
n = 3). These data show that DEX is effective in increasing the
number of apoptotic cells in an islet, and furthermore, that DEX is
effective during PRL treatment. Moreover, these data suggest that the
increased plasma CS levels found during the late stages of pregnancy
could effectively increase the rate of cell death, which would lead to
the return of islet cell numbers to normal levels.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. The effects of PRL and DEX (100 nM) on
the rate of apoptosis observed in rat islets cultured for 1072 h with
the indicated hormones. The apoptotic cells were visualized by staining
with YoYo and counted using conventional epifluorescence microscopy.
The number of YoYo-labeled nuclei per islet progressively increased
with longer incubations with DEX alone (*, P <
0.05 vs. control). PRL alone had no effect on the number
of labeled nuclei per islet. Even in the presence of PRL, DEX
progressively increased the number of labeled nuclei per islet with
longer incubation periods (**, P < 0.05
vs. islets treated with PRL alone).
|
|
In a separate set of experiments, islet cell death was examined in
islets treated with progesterone (Prg). Prg is a hormone that also
increases in concentration during the later stages of pregnancy and has
previously been shown (at 1 µg/ml) to counteract the stimulatory
effects of PRL on islets (28). Islet cell death was quantified by
counting the number of YoYo-labeled nuclei per islet under conventional
epifluorescence microscopy after 48 h of treatment in culture. The
number of YoYo-labeled nuclei per islet significantly increased after
treatment with Prg (1 µg/ml; P < 0.05; Fig. 8
). Note that labeling of islets treated
with DEX (100 nM) was significantly greater than
that of Prg-treated islets (P = 0.05). Furthermore, in
the presence of PRL, DEX increased the number of labeled nuclei per
islet above that in islets treated with PRL alone (P <
0.05), but not to the level with DEX alone (P < 0.05).
In contrast, Prg in the presence of PRL increased the number of labeled
nuclei above that with PRL treatment alone (P < 0.05)
to a level not different from that with Prg alone. Interestingly, these
data show that although Prg alone is not as effective in inducing
apoptosis as DEX, in the presence of PRL the number of YoYo-labeled
nuclei per islet is not different from that with DEX. These data
suggest that DEX and Prg together may contribute to counteract the
stimulatory effects of elevated lactogens during the latter stages of
pregnancy.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8. The effects of Prg (1 µg/ml), DEX (100
nM), and PRL (500 ng/ml) on the rate of apoptosis observed
in rat islets cultured for 48 h with the indicated hormones. The
apoptotic cells were visualized by staining with YoYo and were counted
using conventional epifluorescence microscopy. The number of
YoYo-labeled nuclei per islet was significantly increased with
treatment with Prg or DEX (*, P < 0.05), although
DEX increased labeling significantly more than Prg
(P = 0.05). In the presence of PRL, DEX increased
the number of nuclei per islet above that with PRL treatment alone (**,
P < 0.05), but not to the level with DEX alone
(P < 0.05). In contrast, Prg in the presence of
PRL increased the number of labeled nuclei above that with PRL
treatment (**, P < 0.05) to a level not different
from that with Prg treatment alone. These data show that Prg is not as
effective as DEX at inducing apoptosis. However, unlike DEX, the
presence of PRL does not diminish the effect of Prg on apoptosis.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
During pregnancy there is major up-regulation of islet function.
During this time there is an increase in insulin secretion and a surge
in ß-cell division (3, 7, 10, 11, 31). In studies using homologous
PRL on rat islets in vitro, it was determined that PRL
induces all of the up-regulatory changes characteristic of those
observed during pregnancy (10, 11, 14). The changes in islet function
that occur during pregnancy do so in a phasic pattern, with a peak in
rats on days 1415 and a return to normal by the end of pregnancy (7).
In the present study we examined whether glucocorticoids (which
increase in concentration late in gestation) could counteract the
up-regulatory effects of PRL on insulin secretion, islet cell division,
and apoptosis in an in vitro model.
In the present study we show that DEX had an inhibitory effect on
insulin secretion in a dose-dependent manner at concentrations greater
than 1 nM and was effective after 1 day of treatment. The
addition of DEX inhibited the up-regulatory effects of PRL on islets,
returning secretion, steady state and acute, to control levels. We
found that DEX had no effect on total insulin content, suggesting that
the DEX-induced inhibition of secretion is not due to a decrease in
insulin stores. We further show that DEX treatment strongly inhibited
the PRL-induced up-regulation of cell division, returning them to
control levels. In addition, DEX increased the amount of islet cell
death (apoptosis) in both control and PRL-treated islets. These results
demonstrate the ability of glucocorticoid (at concentrations equivalent
to those in maternal plasma during late stages of pregnancy) to reverse
PRL-induced up-regulated islet function by inhibiting insulin secretion
and islet cell division and returning islet cell numbers to control
levels. However, further studies are needed to determine whether
similar results are observed with conditions that more closely resemble
the temporal evolution of hormonal changes during pregnancy.
The inhibition of insulin secretion from islets by DEX alone is
consistent with the findings of previous studies (19, 20, 35, 36, 37). The
mechanism by which this occurs is not completely understood. This
decrease in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion could not be
attributed to decreases in insulin content (20, 22, 35, 37, 39). It
does not appear to involve a defect in the recognition of glucose,
because no changes in the rate of glucose oxidation, NADPH production,
or intracellular Ca2+ concentrations have been
observed (20, 35, 39). These observations are surprising considering
that a decrease in the expression of the glucose transporter 2 (Glut-2)
(37, 40) and the sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1) component of the
ATP-sensitive K+ channel of the ß-cells (41)
has also been reported. Moreover, this defect is not restricted to
glucose, because an impairment of insulin secretion in response to
arginine, tolbutamide, or high concentrations of
K+ after DEX treatment is also observed (20, 39).
These inhibitory effects of DEX can be reversed by incubation with
(Bu)2cAMP or phorbol ester (20, 38). This
suggests that the potentiation pathways that regulate the rate of
insulin secretion, for example cAMP/protein kinase A and phospholipase
C/protein kinase C pathways, can compensate for the actions of DEX.
This is further supported by an impairment in the activation of
phospholipase C, protein kinase C, and mobilization of intracellular
Ca2+ stores in response to acetylcholine after
DEX treatment (20). Overall, it appears that DEX acts at a distal site
by decreasing the efficacy of Ca2+ on the
secretory response by interfering with the potentiation pathways
(42).
In contrast, a major factor in the up-regulation of islet function by
PRL appears to be an increased recognition of glucose. We have shown
that the increased insulin secretion from PRL-treated islets
corresponds to an elevation in glucose metabolism resulting from an
increase in glucokinase activity (3). Furthermore, no changes in cAMP
production or its effectiveness on the secretion of insulin granules
have been observed for comparable rates of glucose metabolism in
control and PRL-treated islets (9). This suggests that DEX can
counteract the effects of PRL on insulin secretion because it
interferes with more distal sites of the stimulus-secretory process.
This implies that the increase in glucose metabolism and thereby the
potentiation pathways induced by PRL is not sufficient to overcome the
effects of DEX.
The concentration of Prg in the maternal plasma of the rat is important
in initiation of both parturition and lactation. Although elevated
during late gestation, maternal Prg levels fall to low levels before
birth. In contrast, maternal corticosteroid concentrations increase
late in gestation and decrease rapidly after birth (43). A previous
study has shown that Prg is involved in counteracting the influence of
lactogenic hormones during the later stages of pregnancy (28). Prg had
a major impact on the effect of PRL on insulin secretion and islet cell
division in a time-dependent manner. This study showed that
up-regulation of islets progress under the influence of lactogenic
stimulus, and Prg acts to counteract the effects of lactogens. During
gestation, the increase in Prg peaks earlier than that in
glucocorticoids, then decreases rapidly, whereas glucocorticoid levels
remain high until parturition (43). It seems likely that Prg and DEX
act together to return up-regulated islet function to normal levels by
parturition.
Table 1
summarizes the effects of
pregnancy or PRL on the up-regulation of islet function and the effects
of DEX on the counterregulation of islet function. Pregnancy increases
insulin secretion and cell division 8- to 9-fold over the control value
by day 15. This increase returns to control levels before term (day
20). Similar to midpregnancy, PRL treatment of islets in
vitro increases insulin secretion and ß-cell proliferation 3- to
5-fold over control values. In a manner similar to late pregnancy, the
addition of DEX or Prg to PRL-treated islets in vitro causes
a decrease in insulin secretion and islet cell proliferation to control
levels. In addition, DEX or Prg can induce islet cell death in the
presence of PRL. These data, using this in vitro model of
islets during pregnancy, suggest that the combined effects of DEX and
Prg on islet function may provide an important inhibitory mechanism for
the return of islets to control levels at the end of pregnancy.
In summary, we propose that during late pregnancy, elevated
glucocorticoid levels have a down-regulatory effect on islet function.
In this study we examined the hypothesis that glucocorticoids, which
are increased in maternal plasma during late gestation, are responsible
for counteracting the up-regulatory influence of lactogenic hormones on
islets during the later stages of pregnancy. The temporal and
dose-dependent changes observed in PRL-treated islets in
vitro in the presence of DEX are similar to those seen in islets
during pregnancy. This supports the hypothesis that glucocorticoids are
responsible for counteracting the stimulatory effects of elevated
lactogens during the later stages of pregnancy.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
1 This work was supported by NIDDK Grant DK-33655 and in part by NIH
Training Grant DK-07203 (to A.J.W.). 
Received August 11, 1999.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Jovanovic-Peterson L, Peterson CM 1991 Pregnancy and the endocrine pancreas. In: Samols E (ed) The Endocrine
Pancreas. Raven Press, New York, pp 229252
-
Green IC, Taylor KW 1972 Effects of pregnancy in
the rat on the size and insulin secretory response of islets of
Langerhans. J Endocrinol 54:317325[Medline]
-
Weinhaus AJ, Stout LE, Sorenson RL 1996 Glucokinase, hexokinase, glucose transporter 2 and glucose metabolism
in islets during pregnancy and prolactin treated islets in
vitro: mechanisms for long term up-regulation of islets.
Endocrinology 137:16401649[Abstract]
-
Bone AJ, Taylor KW 1976 Metabolic adaptation to
pregnancy shown by increased biosynthesis of insulin in islets of
Langerhans isolated from pregnant rats. Nature 262:501502[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Green IC, Howell SL, Montague W, Taylor KW 1973 Regulation of insulin release from isolated islets of Langerhans of the
rat in pregnancy. Biochem J 134:481487[Medline]
-
Aerts L, Van Assche FA 1975 Ultrastructural
changes of the endocrine pancreas in pregnant rats. Diabetologica 11:285289[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Parsons JA, Brelje TC, Sorenson RL 1992 Adaptation
of islets of Langerhans to pregnancy: increased islet cell
proliferation and insulin secretion correlates with the onset of
placental lactogen secretion. Endocrinology 130:14591566[Abstract]
-
Sheridan JD, Anaya P, Parsons JA, Sorenson RL 1988 Increased dye coupling in pancreatic islets from rats in late-term
pregnancy. Diabetes 37:908911[Abstract]
-
Weinhaus AJ, Bhagroo NV, Brelje TC, Sorenson RL 1998 Role of cAMP in upregulation of insulin secretion during the
adaptation of islets of Langerhans to pregnancy. Diabetes 7:14261435
-
Sorenson RL, Johnson MG, Parsons JA, Sheridan JD 1987 Decreased glucose stimulation threshold, enhanced insulin
secretion, and increased ß cell coupling in islets of
prolactin-treated rats. Pancreas 2:283288[Medline]
-
Sorenson RL, Brelje TC, Hegre OD, Marshall S, Anaya P,
Sheridan JD 1987 Prolactin (in vitro) decreases the
glucose stimulation threshold, enhances insulin secretion, and
increases dye coupling among islet B cells. Endocrinology 121:14471453[Abstract]
-
Markoff E, Beattie GM, Hayek A, Lewis UJ 1990 Effects of prolactin and glycosylated prolactin on (pro)insulin
synthesis and insulin release from cultured rat pancreatic islets.
Pancreas 5:99103[Medline]
-
Brelje TC, Allaire P, Hegre OD, Sorenson RL 1989 Effects of prolactin versus growth hormone on islet function and the
importance of using homologous mammosomatotropic hormones.
Endocrinology 125:23922399[Abstract]
-
Brelje TC, Sorenson RL 1991 Role of prolactin
versus growth hormone on islet B-cell proliferation in
vitro: implications for pregnancy. Endocrinology 128:4557[Abstract]
-
Dupouy JP, Coffigny H, Magre S 1975 Maternal and
foetal corticosterone levels during late pregnancy in rats. J
Endocrinol 65:347352[Abstract]
-
Martin CE, Cake MH, Hartmann PE, Cook IF 1977 Relationship between foetal corticosteroids, maternal progesterone and
parturition in the rat. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 84:167176[Medline]
-
Cohen A 1976 Adrenal and plasma corticosterone
levels in the pregnant, foetal and neonatal rat, in the perinatal
period. Horm Metab Res 8:474478[Medline]
-
Billaudel B, Sutter BCJ 1979 Direct effect of
corticosterone upon insulin secretion studied by three different
techniques. Horm Metab Res 11:555560[Medline]
-
Billaudel B, Mathias PCF, Sutter BCJ, Malaisse WJ 1984 Inhibition by corticosterone of calcium inflow and insulin release
in rat pancreatic islets. J Endocrinol 100:227233[Abstract]
-
Lambillotte C, Gilon P, Henquin JC 1997 Direct
glucocorticoid inhibition of insulin secretion: an in vitro
study of dexamethasone effects in mouse islets. J Clin Invest 99:414423[Medline]
-
Hellerstrom C 1977 Growth patterns of pancreatic
islets in animals. In: Volk BW, Wellman KF (eds) The Diabetic Pancreas.
Plenum Press, New York, pp 6197
-
Pierluissi J, Navas FO, Ashcroft SJH 1986 Effect of
adrenal steroids on insulin release from cultured rat islets of
Langerhans. Diabetologia 29:119121[CrossRef][Medline]
-
LaVoie HA, Witorsch RJ 1995 Investigation of
intracellular signals mediating the anti-apoptotic action of prolactin
in Nb2 lymphoma cells. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 209:257269[Abstract]
-
Hegre OD, Marshall S, Schulte BA, Hickey GE, Williams F,
Sorenson RL, Serie JR 1983 Non-enzymic in vitro
isolation of perinatal islets of Langerhans. In Vitro 19:611620[Medline]
-
Morgan CR, Lazarow A 1963 Immunoassay for insulin;
two antibody system. Diabetes 12:115126
-
Brelje TC, Scharp DW, Lacy PE, Ogren L, Talamantes F,
Robertson M, Friesen HG, Sorenson RL 1993 Effect of homologous
placental lacotgens, prolactins, and growth hormones on islet B-cell
division and insulin secretion in rat, mouse, and human islets:
implication for placental lactogen regulation of islet function during
pregnancy. Endocrinology 132:879887[Abstract]
-
Riad-Fahmy D, Read G, Hughes IA 1979 Corticosteroids. In: Gray CH, James VHT (eds) Hormones in Blood.
Academic Press, London, pp 237243
-
Sorenson RL, Brelje TC, Roth C 1993 Effects of
steroid and lactogenic hormones on islets of Langerhans: a new
hypothesis for the role of pregnancy steroids in the adaptation of
islets to pregnancy. Endocrinology 133:22272234[Abstract]
-
Brelje TC, Scharp DW, Sorenson RL 1989 Three-dimensional imaging of intact isolated islets of Langerhans with
confocal microscopy. Diabetes 38:808814[Abstract]
-
Brelje TC, Wessendorf MW, Sorenson RL 1993 Multicolor laser scanning confocal immunofluorescence microscopy:
practical applications and limitations. Methods Cell Biol 38:98182
-
Brelje TC, Parsons JA, Sorenson RL 1994 Regulation
of islet ß-cell proliferation by prolactin in rat islets. Diabetes 43:263273[Abstract]
-
Hoorens A, Van de Casteele M, Kloeppel G, Pipeleers
D 1996 Glucose promotes survival of rat pancreatic ß-cells by
activating synthesis of proteins which suppress a constitutive
apoptotic program. J Clin Invest 98:15681574[Medline]
-
Davis MAD, Smith MW, Chang SH, Trump BF
Characterization of a renal epithelial cell model of apoptosis using
okadaic acid and the NRK-52E cell line. Toxicol Pathol 22:595605
-
Mathieu C, Jozan S, Mazars P, Come MG, Moisand A,
Valette A 1995 Density-dependent induction of apoptosis by
transforming factor-ß1 in a human ovarian carcinoma cell line. Exp
Cell Res 216:1320[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Ling Z-C, Khan A, Delauny F, Davani B, Ostenson C-G,
Gustafsson J-A, Okret S, Landau BR, Efendic S 1998 Increased
glucocorticoid sensitivity in islet ß-cells: effects on glucose
6-phosphatatase, glucose cycling and insulin release. Diabetologia 41:634639[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Philippe J, Missotten M 1990 Dexamethasone inhibits
insulin biosynthesis by destabilizing insulin messenger ribonucleic
acid in hamster insulinoma cells. Endocrinology 127:16401645[Abstract]
-
Gremlich S, Roduit R, Thorens B 1997 Dexamethasone
induces posttranslational degradation of GLUT2 and inhibition of
insulin secretion in isolated pancreatic ß-cells. J Biol Chem 272:32163222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Philippe J, Giordano E, Gjinovci A, Meda P 1992 Cyclic adenosine monophosphate prevents the glucocorticoid-mediated
inhibition of insulin gene expression in rodent islet cells. J
Clin Invest 90:22282233
-
Khan A, Ostenson C-G, Berggren P-O, Efendic S 1992 Glucocorticoid increases glucose cycling and inhibits insulin release
in pancreatic islets of ob/ob mice. Am J Physiol
263:E663E666
-
Ohneda M, Johnson JH, Inman LR, Unger RH 1993 GLUT-2 function in glucose-unresponsive ß-cells of
dexamethasone-induced diabetes in rats. J Clin Invest 92:19501956
-
Khan A, Hong-Lie C, Landau B 1995 Glucose-6-phosphatase activity in islets from ob/ob and lean
mice and the effect of dexamethasone. Endocrinology 136:19341938[Abstract]
-
Hernandez-Sanchez C, Leroith D 1998 Glucocorticoids
regulate the expression of the sulfonylurea receptor. Diabetes [Suppl
1] 47:A176
-
Gembal M, Detimary P, Gilon P, Gao ZY, Henquin JC 1993 Mechanisms by which glucose can control insulin release
independently from its action on adenosine triphosphate-sensitive
K+ channels in mouse B-cells. J Clin Invest 91:871880
-
Gala RR, Westphal U 1965 Corticosteroid-binding
globulin in the rat. Possible role in the initiation of lactation.
Endocrinology 76:10791088[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T C. Brelje, N. V Bhagroo, L. E Stout, and R. L Sorenson
Beneficial effects of lipids and prolactin on insulin secretion and {beta}-cell proliferation: a role for lipids in the adaptation of islets to pregnancy
J. Endocrinol.,
May 1, 2008;
197(2):
265 - 276.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Karnik, H. Chen, G. W. McLean, J. J. Heit, X. Gu, A. Y. Zhang, M. Fontaine, M. H. Yen, and S. K. Kim
Menin Controls Growth of Pancreatic {beta}-Cells in Pregnant Mice and Promotes Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Science,
November 2, 2007;
318(5851):
806 - 809.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. F Anhe, T. C A Nogueira, J. E Nicoletti-Carvalho, C. Lellis-Santos, H. C Barbosa, J. Cipolla-Neto, J. R Bosqueiro, A. C Boschero, and S. Bordin
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3-regulated sarcoendoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase 2 expression by prolactin and glucocorticoids is involved in the adaptation of insulin secretory response during the peripartum period
J. Endocrinol.,
October 1, 2007;
195(1):
17 - 27.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Ghanaat-Pour, Z. Huang, M. Lehtihet, and A. Sjoholm
Global expression profiling of glucose-regulated genes in pancreatic islets of spontaneously diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats
J. Mol. Endocrinol.,
August 1, 2007;
39(2):
135 - 150.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Voltarelli, C. E. B. Couri, A. B. P. L. Stracieri, M. C. Oliveira, D. A. Moraes, F. Pieroni, M. Coutinho, K. C. R. Malmegrim, M. C. Foss-Freitas, B. P. Simoes, et al.
Autologous Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
JAMA,
April 11, 2007;
297(14):
1568 - 1576.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Holness, G. K. Greenwood, N. D. Smith, and M. C. Sugden
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha} and Glucocorticoids Interactively Regulate Insulin Secretion During Pregnancy
Diabetes,
December 1, 2006;
55(12):
3501 - 3508.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Ranta, D. Avram, S. Berchtold, M. Dufer, G. Drews, F. Lang, and S. Ullrich
Dexamethasone induces cell death in insulin-secreting cells, an effect reversed by exendin-4.
Diabetes,
May 1, 2006;
55(5):
1380 - 1390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Fujinaka, D. Sipula, A. Garcia-Ocana, and R. C. Vasavada
Characterization of Mice Doubly Transgenic for Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein and Murine Placental Lactogen: A Novel Role for Placental Lactogen in Pancreatic {beta}-Cell Survival
Diabetes,
December 1, 2004;
53(12):
3120 - 3130.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Gesina, F. Tronche, P. Herrera, B. Duchene, W. Tales, P. Czernichow, and B. Breant
Dissecting the Role of Glucocorticoids on Pancreas Development
Diabetes,
September 1, 2004;
53(9):
2322 - 2329.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Shao, L. Qiao, and J. E. Friedman
Prolactin, progesterone, and dexamethasone coordinately and adversely regulate glucokinase and cAMP/PDE cascades in MIN6 {beta}-cells
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
February 1, 2004;
286(2):
E304 - E310.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Holness and M. C. Sugden
Dexamethasone during Late Gestation Exacerbates Peripheral Insulin Resistance and Selectively Targets Glucose-Sensitive Functions in {beta} Cell and Liver
Endocrinology,
September 1, 2001;
142(9):
3742 - 3748.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Blondeau, J. Lesage, P. Czernichow, J. P. Dupouy, and B. Breant
Glucocorticoids impair fetal {beta}-cell development in rats
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
September 1, 2001;
281(3):
E592 - E599.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|