Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 5 1754-1763
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society
Regulation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone and Its Receptor Gene Expression by 17ß-Estradiol in Cultured Human Granulosa-Luteal Cells1
Parimal S. Nathwani,
Sung Keun Kang,
Kwai Wa Cheng,
Kyung-Chul Choi and
Peter C. K. Leung2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, Canada V6H 3V5
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Peter C. K. Leung, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Room 2H304490 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3V5. E-mail: peleung{at}interchange.ubc.ca
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
There is evidence that GnRH and its binding sites are expressed in
numerous extrapituitary tissues, including the primate ovary. However,
the factors that regulate ovarian GnRH and its receptor (GnRH-R) remain
poorly characterized. Since gonadal steroids are key regulators of
ovarian functions, the present study investigated the role of
17ß-estradiol (E2) in regulating GnRH and GnRH-R
messenger RNA (mRNA) from human granulosa-luteal cells (hGLCs). RT-PCR
was used to isolate the ovarian GnRH-R transcript equivalent to the
full-length coding region in the pituitary from hGLCs. Sequence
analysis revealed that the ovarian GnRH-R mRNA is identical to its
pituitary counterpart. Basal expression studies indicated that GnRH and
GnRH-R mRNA levels significantly increased with time in
vitro, reaching levels of 160% and 170% on day 8 and 10 of
culture, respectively (P < 0.05). Treatment with
various concentrations of estradiol (1100 nM) for 24
h resulted in a dose-dependent decrease (P < 0.05)
in GnRH and GnRH-R mRNA levels. Time course studies indicated that
short-term treatment (6 h) with E2 (1 nM) had
no significant effect on GnRH mRNA levels, while long-term treatment
(48 h) with E2 resulted in a 40% decrease
(P < 0.001) in GnRH mRNA levels. In contrast,
GnRH-R mRNA levels exhibited a biphasic pattern, such that a short-term
treatment (6 h) with E2 increased GnRH-R mRNA levels by
20% (P < 0.05), whereas long-term treatment (48
h) resulted in a 60% decrease (P < 0.001) in
GnRH-R expression in hGLCs. Cotreatment of estradiol and tamoxifen
blocked the E2 induced-regulation of GnRH and its receptor
mRNAs, indicating that the E2 effect was mediated through
its receptor. In summary, our studies demonstrate that the ovary
possesses an intrinsic GnRH axis that is regulated during luteinization
in vitro, and that E2 is capable of
regulating GnRH and its receptor in the human ovary.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE (GnRH) is a
key regulator of reproductive functions in mammals. Synthesized in
hypothalamic neurons, GnRH is secreted into the hypothalamo-hypophyseal
portal system and travels to the anterior pituitary gland, where it
binds to a G protein-coupled receptor and stimulates the biosynthesis
and secretion of gonadotropins (1, 2, 3). In addition to its role at the
level of the pituitary, GnRH has been implicated as an
autocrine/paracrine regulator in several extrapituitary tissues,
including the gonads (4, 5, 6, 7, 8). During the earlier stages of follicular
maturation, GnRH exerts antigonadotrophic effects by inhibiting
granulosa cell differentiation and directly induces apoptotic cell
death of granulosa cells, reminiscent of follicular atresia (9). During
the periovulatory period, GnRH seems to play an important role in
follicular rupture and ovulation by inducing transcription of tissue
plasminogen activator (10), PG endoperoxidase synthase type 2 (11), and
progesterone receptor (12). In contrast, during the luteal phase, the
functional role of GnRH is poorly understood. Recent evidence indicates
that rat ovarian GnRH messenger RNA (mRNA) levels and serum
progesterone levels are inversely related during pregnancy and
parturition, thereby providing evidence that GnRH may regulate ovarian
steroidogenesis (13). Previous reports have demonstrated that GnRH
modulates gonadotropin-stimulated steroidogenesis in the ovary (1, 6, 15), while others have shown that GnRH directly inhibits progesterone
production in human granulosa-luteal cells (hGLCs) (5, 14). In the
primate ovary, induced luteolysis resulted in an impairment of the
steroidogenic pathway (16). Hence, locally produced GnRH may play a
role in corpus luteum regression.
It is well documented that the pituitary GnRH receptor (GnRH-R) is
regulated by GnRH and gonadal steroids. In general, homologous
regulation of the GnRH-R by its ligand exhibits a biphasic pattern of
expression in the pituitary gland, such that chronic administration of
high doses leads to receptor down-regulation, whereas pulsatile
treatments of GnRH lead to receptor up-regulation (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22). Gonadal
steroids also play an important role in regulating GnRH and GnRH-R
levels (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32). GnRH levels are inversely related to estrogen profiles
during the estrous cycle (33). Also, GnRH-R mRNA levels are highly
regulated during the estrous cycle in the rat (34), thereby providing
strong evidence that gonadal steroids are key regulators of GnRH and
GnRH-R expression at the hypothalamic and pituitary levels. However,
regulation of ovarian GnRH and its receptor is poorly characterized.
Like the pituitary GnRH-R, the ovarian GnRH-R appears to be highly
regulated during the rat estrous cycle, peaking in proestrus and estrus
(7). Gonadotropins also seem to play a role in regulating the intrinsic
ovarian GnRH axis. In both the rat (4) and human ovary (5), LH/human
(h)CG down-regulated GnRH-R mRNA levels. However, the effect of gonadal
steroids on GnRH and GnRH-R expression in the human ovary remains to be
elucidated. The present study was designed to investigate the role of
E2 in regulating GnRH and GnRH-R expression in
human granulosa-luteal cells.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Granulosa-luteal cell culture and pharmacological treatments
The use of human granulosa-luteal cells in vitro was
approved by the Clinical Screening Committee for Research and Other
Studies involving Human Subjects of the University of British Columbia.
Follicular aspirates were collected during oocyte retrieval from women
undergoing in vitro fertilization at the University of
British Columbia and granulosa-luteal cells were prepared as previously
described (5), with some modifications. Briefly, the follicular
contents were centrifuged at 1,000 x g and the
supernatant was removed. The cells were resuspended in 6 ml of medium
199 (M199) (Life Technologies, Inc., Burlington, Ontario,
Canada) and layered onto Ficoll Paque (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Bale DUrfé, Québec, Canada) and
centrifuged to remove red blood cells. Cells in the interface were
collected and rinsed twice with M199 supplemented with 100 U/ml
penicillin G and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. The cell pellet was
resuspended in M199 supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin G,
and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at a density of 1 x
105 cells/ml. The cells were seeded at a density
of 2 x 105 cells in 35-mm culture dishes
and were allowed to adhere for 48 h at 37 C in a humidified
atmosphere of 5% CO2-95% air. Subsequently, the
cells were rinsed with HBSS, and on day 4 in culture the cells were
cultured in phenol red-free M199 supplemented with 2%
charcoal-stripped FBS. Cells were treated with estradiol in a time
course and dose-dependent manner in phenol red-free M199 on day 5 in
culture. Control cultures were treated with vehicle (0.01% wt/vol of
ethanol). In addition, tamoxifen treatment alone was also performed in
the appropriate studies.
Total RNA extraction and first strand cDNA synthesis
Total RNA was extracted from cultured hGLCs using the RNaid Kit
(Bio/Can Scientific, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) as per the
manufacturers protocol. Briefly, cells were disrupted in lysis buffer
[4 M guanidine thiocynate, 25 mM sodium
citrate (pH 7.0), 0.5% N-lauroyl sarcosine, and 0.1
M ß-mercaptoethanol] and subsequently acid
phenol extracted. RNA was purified from the aqueous phase on an RNA
matrix and eluted into ribonuclease-free water. The concentration of
RNA was determined by the absorbance at 260 nm, and the integrity was
confirmed by agarose-formaldehyde gel electrophoresis.
Cloning and sequencing of the full-length GnRH-R cDNA
One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed into
first-strand cDNA in a total volume of 15 µl using the first-strand
cDNA synthesis kit (Pharmacia Biotech). Based on the
published pituitary sequence for the human GnRH-R, two primers were
designed to amplify the full-length GnRH-R from hGLCs. The sense and
antisense primers were 5'-AATATGGCAAACAGTGCCTCTC-3' (P482) and
5'-CAATCACA-GAGAAAAATATCCA-3' (P48R), respectively. The
cDNA was amplified in a 50 µl PCR reaction containing 2.5 U of
Taq polymerase (Life Technologies, Inc.) and
its buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2,
10 mM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate
(dNTP), and 50 pmol of each primer. The PCR product was separated by
agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized with ethidium bromide
staining and UV light. The PCR product was transferred to a nylon
membrane and probed with a digoxigenin-labeled GnRH-R cDNA probe
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Laval, Québec,
Canada). All probes used for Southern blot analysis were internal to
the oligonucleotide primers used for PCR amplification to avoid
nonspecific binding. After high-stringency washes, the membrane was
exposed to Omat x-ray film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY).
The putative full-length GnRH-R cDNA was cloned into PCRII Vector
(Invitrogen, San Diego, CA ) and sequenced by the dideoxy
nucleotide chain termination method using the T7 DNA Polymerase
Sequencing Kit (Pharmacia Biotech).
RT-PCR and quantification of GnRH mRNA from hGLCs
Using a semiquantitative PCR system, GnRH mRNA levels were
quantitated. PCR amplification was carried out in 50 µl reactions
containing 2.5 U of Taq polymerase (Life Technologies, Inc.) and its buffer, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM each dNTP, and
50 pmol of sense and antisense primer. The primers for GnRH were
designed based on the published sequence for human hypothalamic GnRH.
The forward and reverse primers were 5'-ATTCTACTGACTTGGTGCGTG-3' (F1)
and 5'-GGAATATGTGCAACTTGGTGT-3' (R1), respectively. PCR amplification
was carried out for 26 cycles with denaturing at 94 C for 60 sec,
annealing at 53 C for 35 sec, and extension at 72 C for 90 sec,
followed by a final extension at 72 C for 15 min. To standardize for
first-strand cDNA synthesis efficiency, PCR for ß-actin was
performed. Primers for ß-actin were designed from the human published
sequence (35). Amplified PCR products were separated by agarose gel
electrophoresis and subjected to Southern blot analysis. Quantitation
was performed using a visual light densitometer (model 620,
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Richmond, CA).
Construction of the native (target) and mutant (competitive) cDNA
for GnRH-R
Using an internal primer pair (P44F and P45R) based on the human
pituitary GnRH-R cDNA, a 347-bp fragment of native GnRH-R was obtained
by PCR amplification from human pituitary cDNA. The primers were sense
5'-GTATGCTGGAGAGTTACTCTGCA-3' (P44F) and antisense
5'-GGATGATGAAGAGGCAGCTGAAG-3' (P45R). The expected 347-bp PCR product
was separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and confirmed to be
hGnRH-R by Southern blot analysis. The PCR product was cloned into
PCRII cloning vector (Invitrogen). Sequence analysis was
performed to confirm the identity of the cloned fragment. Subsequently,
the fragment was subcloned into pBSKII (Stratagene, La
Jolla, CA) at SacI and XhoI sites. The mutant
competitor cDNA was generated by digesting the subcloned fragment with
HindIII and StyI and self-ligating the resulting
clone. The 227-bp hGnRH-R cDNA fragment contained a 120-bp deletion
from the native clone. However, the competitor retained the identical
primer binding sites as the native GnRH-R cDNA.
RT-PCR and quantification of GnRH-R mRNA from hGLCs
For competitive PCR, 4 µl of first-strand cDNA from 1 µg of
total RNA were coamplified with 0.08 pg of mutant GnRH-R cDNA. PCR
amplification was carried out in 50 µl reactions containing 2.5 U of
Taq polymerase (Life Technologies, Inc.) and
its buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 2
mM each dNTP, and 50 pmol of sense (P44F) and
antisense primer (P45R). Amplified PCR products were separated by
agarose gel electrophoresis and subjected to Southern blot analysis.
The PCR products were hybridized with a digoxigenin-labeled GnRH-R cDNA
probe (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Laval, Quebec,
Canada). After stringency washes, the membranes were exposed to Omat
x-ray film (Eastman Kodak). Quantitation was performed
using a visual light densitometer (model 620, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).
Data analysis
Relative GnRH mRNA levels were represented as the ratio of GnRH
to ß-actin. The amount of GnRH-R transcript was calculated based on
the ratio of the target to competitive cDNA. The data are represented
as the percent change relative to control. Data are depicted as the
mean ± SE. Each experiment was conducted with four
different patient samples. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA
followed by Tukeys multiple comparison test (PRISM GraphPad version
2, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). A value of
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Expression and Cloning of the ovarian GnRH-R cDNA from
hGLCs
RT-PCR amplification was used to investigate the expression of the
ovarian GnRH-R transcript equivalent to the pituitary form from hGLCs.
A pair of primers encompassing the start and stop codons was designed
based on the human pituitary sequence of GnRH-R cDNA (Fig. 1A
). As shown in Fig. 1B
, PCR
amplification yielded a 1003-bp fragment. Upon transfer of the PCR
product to a nylon membrane and hybridization with a specific cDNA
probe, a signal was detected, thereby confirming the identity of the
PCR product (Fig. 1B
, lower panel). The possibility of
cross-contamination was ruled out, as no PCR product was detected in
the negative control (Fig. 1B
, lane 1). Since the primers were located
in different exons, the amplified product was not due to genomic DNA
contamination, but rather specific amplification of mRNA. Sequencing
analysis revealed that the GnRH-R from hGLCs was identical to the
published human pituitary cDNA sequence (data not shown).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Molecular characterization of the full-length
GnRH-R cDNA from hGLCs. A, Schematic representation of the GnRH-R gene
and cDNA. The positions and sequences of the primers used for RT-PCR
amplification of the coding region of GnRH-R are depicted. TM,
Transmembrane domain. B, RT-PCR amplification and Southern blot
analysis of the GnRH-R from hGLCs. One microgram of total RNA was
reverse transcribed and amplified for 35 cycles. A negative control
without cDNA template was used to control for PCR contamination (lane
1). The PCR product was resolved on a 1% agarose gel stained with
ethidium bromide and a 1003-bp fragment was visualized (lane 3)
(upper panel). MW, Molecular weight marker (lane 2). The
1-kb fragment was confirmed to be GnRH-R by Southern blot analysis
using a digoxigenin-labeled cDNA probe (lower panel).
|
|
Validation of semiquantitative and competitive RT-PCR for GnRH and
GnRH-R
Using semiquantitative RT-PCR with primers derived from the human
hypothalamic GnRH cDNA (Fig. 2A
), the
levels of GnRH mRNA were examined in hGLCs. To determine where PCR
amplification for GnRH and ß-actin mRNA were in the logarithmic
phase, 1 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified under
different cycle numbers (Fig. 2
). Southern blot analysis revealed a
380-bp PCR product corresponding to GnRH (Fig. 2B
), and a 525-bp PCR
product for ß-actin (Fig. 2C
). A linear relationship was observed for
GnRH (Fig. 2B
, lower panel) and ß-actin (Fig. 2C
, lower panel) mRNA amplification with varying cycle numbers.
Consequently, 26 cycles for GnRH and 18 cycles for ß-actin were
employed for quantification purposes. GnRH-R mRNA levels were analyzed
using competitive RT-PCR. Coamplification of the native and mutant
GnRH-R cDNA yielded two PCR products at 347 bp and 227 bp, respectively
(Fig. 3B
). A standard curve for GnRH-R
was constructed by coamplification of a fixed amount of mutant GnRH-R
cDNA with serial dilutions of the native GnRH-R construct. Increasing
the amount of native construct resulted in a decreased amplification of
the mutant internal standard (Fig. 3C
). When the mutant GnRH-R cDNA was
plotted as a function of the ratio of the mutant and native GnRH-R
construct, a linear relationship was observed (Fig. 3D
). To determine
the optimal concentration of the competitor for quantification
purposes, a fixed amount of first-strand cDNA (4 µl synthesized from
1 µg of total RNA) was coamplified with serial dilutions of the
competitor (data not shown). Increasing the amount of mutant construct
resulted in a decline of native GnRH-R amplification from the cDNA
sample. For quantitation purposes, 0.08 pg of mutant construct was
employed for competitive RT-PCR for GnRH-R.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Validation of semiquantitative RT-PCR for GnRH and
ß-actin from hGLCs. A, Schematic representation of the GnRH cDNA,
including primer positions and sequences. SP, Signal peptide; GAP,
GnRH-associated peptide. B, Total RNA was extracted from hGLCs and 1
µg was reverse transcribed. Subsequent to PCR amplification with
primers F1/R1, a 380-bp fragment was detected by agarose gel
electrophoresis. To determine the linear phase of PCR amplification,
GnRH was amplified from hGLCs cDNA under increasing cycle numbers. A
linear relationship between the cycle number and optical density was
observed between 2530 cycles. Hence, 26 cycles were used for
quantitation of GnRH mRNA from hGLCs. C, PCR amplification for
ß-actin was performed with increasing cycle numbers. A linear
relationship between the cycle number and optical density was observed
between 1520 cycles. Thus, 18 cycles were used for quantitation
purposes.
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Construction of the native and mutant GnRH-R
cDNA and validation of GnRH-R competitive RT-PCR. A, Internal primers
(P44F and P45R) were designed based on the published human GnRH-R cDNA
sequence from the pituitary gland. RT-PCR amplification from a 760-bp
human pituitary cDNA template resulted in a 347-bp fragment
corresponding to the native GnRH-R cDNA construct. The fragment was
subcloned into pBSK II (Stratagene) at SacI
and XhoI restriction enzyme sites. The mutant was
generated by digesting the native GnRH-R cDNA with
HindIII and StyI, followed by
self-ligation. B, PCR amplification of the native and mutant GnRH-R
cDNA with P44 and P45 resulted in the expected 347-bp and 227-bp
fragments, respectively (lanes 1 and 2). Also note that both the native
and mutant GnRH-R were coamplified in the same PCR reaction (lane 3).
C, The standard curve for GnRH-R competitive PCR was constructed by
coamplification of a fixed amount mutant GnRH-R cDNA and varying
concentrations of the native GnRH-R cDNA. PCR amplification was carried
out for 33 cycles, and the products were analyzed by Southern blot
analysis. D, A linear relationship was observed when the ratio of the
native and mutant GnRH-R was plotted against the concentration of
native cDNA.
|
|
Expression of GnRH and GnRH-R during spontaneous luteinization in
vitro
To examine the changes in GnRH and GnRH-R mRNA levels with time in
culture, hGLCs were cultured for 1, 4, 8, and 10 days followed by RNA
extraction and RT-PCR quantitative analysis. As seen in Fig. 4
, GnRH and its receptor mRNA levels
significantly (P < 0.05) increased with time in
culture. For quantitative purposes, all time points were standardized
to day 1 mRNA levels. Hence, the day 1 cultures acted as controls. For
GnRH mRNA levels (Fig. 4A
), a 65% increase (P < 0.05)
was observed on day 10 compared with day 1 cultures. When day 4
cultures were compared with those on days 8 and 10, there was a
significant increase in GnRH mRNA levels with increasing time in
culture. However, there was no significant difference between day 8 and
day 10 cultures for GnRH mRNA levels. A similar trend was observed for
GnRH-R mRNA levels (Fig. 4B
). There was a 55% and 63%
(P < 0.05) increase in GnRH-R mRNA levels on day 8 and
10 cultures compared with day 1 cultures, respectively.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Changes in GnRH (A) and GnRH-R (B) expression with
spontaneous luteinization in culture. Total RNA was extracted from
hGLCs (n = 4) on day 1, 4, 8, and 10 in culture. One microgram of
total RNA was reverse transcribed. GnRH and GnRH-R mRNA levels were
estimated by semiquantitative and competitive RT-PCR, respectively, as
described in Materials and Methods. GnRH mRNA levels
were normalized against ß-actin (18 cycles) mRNA. The amount of
GnRH-R transcript was calculated from the ratio of the native and
mutant GnRH-R cDNA. Data were expressed as percent change relative to
control and represent the mean ± SE of four different
experiments from four different patients. a, P <
0.05, significantly different from the control day 1 cultures.
|
|
Effects of E2 on GnRH and GnRH-R expression in
hGLCs
Human granulosa-luteal cells were treated in a dose- and
time-dependent fashion to examine the effects of estradiol on GnRH and
GnRH-R expression (Figs. 5
and 6
). As seen in Fig. 5A
, doses as low as 1
nM decreased GnRH mRNA levels by 45% (P <
0.05) relative to control values. A 70% decrease (P <
0.001) in GnRH mRNA levels was observed with a dose of 100
nM E2. Similarly, as seen
in Fig. 5B
, estradiol had an inhibitory effect on GnRH-R mRNA levels. A
significant decrease in GnRH-R mRNA levels (40%; P <
0.05) was observed with a 1 nM
E2 treatment for 24 h. A 65% decrease
(P < 0.01) in GnRH-R mRNA levels was observed at a 100
nM E2 treatment. For the
time course studies, hGLCs were treated with 1 nM
E2 for 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h, followed by
RNA extraction and RT-PCR quantitation. For each time point a control
was included to take into account the changes during time in culture
(data not shown). Relative changes of GnRH and GnRH-R mRNA levels were
plotted as seen in Fig. 6
. Short-term treatment (6 h) with
E2 had no significant effect on GnRH mRNA levels.
However, 24 h treatment significantly decreased GnRH mRNA levels
(P < 0.001) compared with control. Long-term culture
(48 h) had no further effect on GnRH mRNA levels compared with 24
h (P > 0.05). Hence, maximal inhibition was observed
after 24 h treatment with a 1 nM dose of
E2 (Fig. 6A
). In contrast, a short-term treatment
(6 h) with E2 significantly increased GnRH-R mRNA
levels in hGLCs (P < 0.05), followed by a significant
decrease (45%; P < 0.05) after a 24-h treatment.
Long-term treatment (48 h) further decreased GnRH-R mRNA levels by 25%
(P < 0.05) when compared with the 24-h treatment (Fig. 6B
).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. The effects of different concentrations of
E2 on GnRH (A) and GnRH-R (B) mRNA in cultured hGLCs. Cells
were precultured for 4 days and on day 5 were treated with various
doses (0100 nM) of E2 for 24 h. GnRH and
GnRH-R mRNA levels were estimated by semiquantitative and competitive
RT-PCR, respectively, as described in Materials and
Methods. GnRH mRNA levels were normalized against ß-actin (18
cycles) mRNA. The amount of GnRH-R transcript was calculated from the
ratio of the native and mutant GnRH-R cDNA. Data were expressed as
percent change relative to control and represent the mean ±
SE of four different experiments from four different
patients. a, P < 0.05, significantly different
from the control.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Time-dependent effects of E2 on GnRH
(A) and GnRH-R mRNA (B) levels in cultured hGLCs. Cells were
precultured for 4 days and on day 5 were treated with a 1
nM dose of E2 for 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h.
GnRH and GnRH-R mRNA levels were estimated by semiquantitative and
competitive RT-PCR, respectively, as described in Materials and
Methods. GnRH mRNA levels were normalized against ß-actin (18
cycles) mRNA. The amount of GnRH-R transcript was calculated from the
ratio of the native and mutant GnRH-R cDNA. Data were expressed as
percent change relative to control and represent the mean ±
SE from four different experiments from four different
patients. a, P < 0.05, significantly different
from the control; b, P < 0.05, significantly
different from the 6-h treatment group; c, P <
0.05, significantly different from the 24-h treatment group.
|
|
Effects of cotreatment with E2 and tamoxifen
To determine whether the estradiol-induced regulation of GnRH and
GnRH-R was a receptor-mediated event, hGLCs were treated with
E2 (100 nM), alone or in combination
with tamoxifen (10100 nM), for 24 h. As seen in Fig. 7
, E2 significantly
decreased GnRH and GnRH-R mRNA levels (P < 0.001).
Tamoxifen alone had no significant effect on GnRH and GnRH-R mRNA
levels (data not shown). Cotreatment with E2 and
tamoxifen reversed the response in a dose-dependent fashion. When hGLCs
were treated with E2 and 10
nM tamoxifen, the mean GnRH and GnRH-R mRNA
levels increased but were not statistically significant compared with
E2 treatment alone (P >
0.05).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. The effect of E2 and tamoxifen
cotreatment on GnRH (A) and GnRH-R mRNA in cultured hGLCs. Cells were
precultured for 4 days and on day 5 were treated with a 100
nM dose of E2 in combination with varying doses
of tamoxifen (0100 nM) for 24 h. GnRH and GnRH-R
mRNA levels were estimated by semiquantitative and competitive RT-PCR,
respectively, as described in Materials and Methods.
GnRH mRNA levels were normalized against ß-actin (18 cycles) mRNA.
The amount of GnRH-R transcript was calculated from the ratio of the
native and mutant GnRH-R cDNA. Data were expressed as percent change
relative to control and represent the mean ± SE of
four different experiments from four different patients. a,
P < 0.001, significantly different from the
control. b, P < 0.01, significantly different from
the E2 treatment.
|
|
However, when the cells were treated with equimolar doses of
E2 and tamoxifen (100 nM), the
E2-induced down-regulation of GnRH and GnRH-R was
reversed. As depicted in Fig. 7
, there was no statistical difference
between the equimolar treatment group and the control group. However,
there was a significant difference between the
E2 treatment alone and equimolar treatment of
E2 and tamoxifen (P <
0.001).
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Luteinization is a complex differentiation process that is
under the influence of many gonadal factors such as steroids and growth
factors. However, the exact regulatory mechanisms underlying
luteinization and regression remain unknown. GnRH has been implicated
as an autocrine/paracrine regulator of luteal function and luteolysis
(36). Since GnRH actions are mediated through a G protein-coupled
receptor, the expression of the GnRH-R is crucial for GnRH actions.
Since cultured hGLCs express the components of the GnRH system (5, 14),
they provide an excellent model to study the autocrine/paracrine
function and regulation of GnRH in the ovary. The hGLC culture system
employed in this study has many advantages. First, since it is an
in vitro system, the confounding factors from the
hypothalamo-pituitary axis do not influence our results. Furthermore,
since the hGLCs are cultured in the absence of an androgen substrate,
the exogenous effects of E2 are not influenced by
the endogenous production. This idea is further corroborated in this
study as tamoxifen treatment alone had no significant effect on GnRH
and GnRH-R gene expression (data not shown). Finally, this culture
system is commonly used to study ovarian endocrinology in the human (5, 14, 15).
While expression of the GnRH-R from the human ovary has been previously
reported (5), molecular characterization of the ovarian transcript
equivalent to the full-length GnRH-R in the pituitary has not been
documented. The present study isolated the entire coding region of the
GnRH-R from hGLCs by RT-PCR amplification. Sequence analysis of the
1-kb fragment revealed that the ovarian GnRH-R is identical to the
pituitary cDNA sequence (37). However, the binding affinity for the
ovarian GnRH-R is lower than that of the pituitary (38, 39). This may
be explained by differential posttranslational modifications as opposed
to distinct molecular structures.
Results from the present study indicate that GnRH and its receptor mRNA
levels significantly increase with spontaneous luteinization in
vitro. Changes in GnRH mRNA levels are also seen during postnatal
development and through puberty. Increases in GnRH mRNA levels during
development are hypothesized to play a crucial role in regulating the
onset of puberty (40). Although the mechanism of increased GnRH and
GnRH-R mRNA in the ovary during luteinization remains unknown, in the
mouse changes in GnRH mRNA levels during development are attributed to
gene transcription and altered mRNA stability (40). The increase in
GnRH and its receptor mRNA levels in our culture system may be due to
the endogenous production of ovarian factors.
As gonadal steroids are key regulators of reproduction, the effects of
E2 and progesterone on GnRH and its receptor gene
expression at the hypothalamo-pituitary level are well documented
(17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32). For example, during the rat estrous cycle, GnRH mRNA levels
in the anterior hypothalamus were inversely correlated to plasma
estrogen levels, providing evidence that E2 may
directly or indirectly inhibit hypothalamic GnRH mRNA levels (33).
However, other groups have documented that E2
increases GnRH gene expression in the rat (23), which may contribute to
the gonadotropin surge before ovulation. The discrepancies observed
between different groups may be due to the anatomical regions analyzed,
time points during the estrous cycle and/or differences in
sensitivities of techniques. No information is available on the role of
steroids in regulating GnRH and its receptor in the ovary, especially
in the human. In this study we demonstrate for the first time that
estradiol negatively regulates GnRH mRNA in cultured hGLCs, and
significant effects were seen at physiological doses of 1
nM after 24 h treatment.
Like GnRH, regulation of GnRH-R by E2 in the
pituitary is well documented. In the sheep, mouse, and rat, estradiol
increased GnRH-R mRNA levels (25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32). However, other groups have
shown that E2 negatively regulates GnRH-R mRNA
levels in the rat pituitary gland (20). Differences in steroid-induced
regulation of GnRH-R also display tissue specificity. For example, in
the rat hippocampus, E2 significantly decreased
GnRH-R levels (41, 42). Taken together, these data suggest that the
GnRH-R is differentially regulated depending on the tissue and species.
Our study demonstrates that GnRH-R mRNA displays a biphasic regulatory
pattern. Short-term treatment with E2 (6 h)
resulted in an increase in GnRH-R mRNA levels, whereas a long-term
treatment resulted in a significant decrease in GnRH-R mRNA levels.
The exact mechanism by which E2 regulates GnRH
and its receptor mRNAs in the ovary remains uncertain. Others have
documented that the ovary expresses estrogen receptor
and ß (43),
and our studies confirm that the E2-mediated
regulation of GnRH and GnRH-R is a receptor-mediated event as
cotreatment with tamoxifen blocked the E2-induced
decrease in GnRH and GnRH-R mRNAs. Similar results were also obtained
in the pituitary (25). However, after binding to its receptor,
E2 may modulate GnRH and GnRH-R directly or
indirectly. Analysis of the human GnRH and GnRH-R promoter region
reveals no consensus sequence for an estrogen response element, ERE
(44). However, E2 can directly modulate
transcription of the GnRH gene (44, 45), and preliminary evidence from
our laboratory suggests that E2 may modulate
GnRH-R promoter activity. Interestingly, previous studies have shown
that E2 decreased GnRH promoter activity in
placental cells (45), providing further support for the
E2-induced down-regulation of GnRH mRNA in the
extrapituitary hGLCs. Alternatively, E2 may act
through indirect pathways to regulate GnRH and its receptor in hGLCs.
It has been demonstrated that E2 can mobilize
intracellular Ca2+ in chicken granulosa cells
(46), which may lead to activation of the protein kinase C
pathway. There is evidence that activation of the protein kinase C
pathway can modulate GnRH-R gene expression (47). The present study
indicates that the E2-induced down-regulation of
GnRH and its receptor is a receptor-mediated event.
Activation of the GnRH-R in extrapituitary tissues, in contrast to
pituitary cells, may activate the programmed cell death pathways by
interacting with the Fas/Fas ligand pathway (48). It has been
demonstrated that the FasL is capable of inducing apoptotic cell death
in rat luteal cells and hGLCs (49, 50). In rat granulosa cells, GnRH
directly induced apoptosis and may be an important factor in regulating
follicular atresia (9). Sridaran et al. (51) have reported
that GnRH decreased serum progesterone levels and induced apoptotic
cell death in the corpus luteum of rats during early pregnancy.
However, since this was an in vivo study, the direct effects
of GnRH on the ovary cannot be dissected from the influence of the
hypothalamo-pituitary axis. Thus, the role of GnRH during the luteal
phase remains poorly characterized. Nevertheless, previous reports have
implicated GnRH as a luteolytic factor. For example, LH/hCG decreased
GnRH-R expression in the rat and human ovary (4, 5). Human CG is an
important rescue factor for the maintenance of the corpus luteum during
the early stages of pregnancy. Hence, the down-regulation of GnRH-R by
LH/hCG may be involved in the maintenance of the corpus luteum during
pregnancy. Our study demonstrates an increase in GnRH and its receptor
mRNAs during spontaneous luteinization in vitro, which
suggests that GnRH, in combination with other factors, may play an
important role in corpus luteum regression. Indeed, it has been
suggested that GnRH potentiates the antigonadotropic effects of PGF2
in hGLCs (15). GnRH has been shown to inhibit the gonadotropin-induced
response in hGLCs, which may be clinically linked to the low follicular
development rates seen in patients treated with GnRH agonists for
ovulation induction (52). This idea is further corroborated by the
decreased steroidogenic potential, a biochemical marker of functional
luteolysis (16), with GnRH treatment in hGLCs (5, 14). In contrast, in
rabbits and humans, E2 increased progesterone
production during the early luteal phase (53, 54, 55). Furthermore,
deprivation of E2 in the rabbit corpus luteum
resulted in a time-dependent induction of apoptosis (56). Therefore,
the E2-induced down regulation of GnRH and its
receptor in hGLCs may play an important role in the maintenance of the
corpus luteum.
Clinically, since a GnRH regimen is a common practice in assisted
reproductive technologies, the direct ovarian effects of GnRH agonists
on follicle development and quality have been raised (57, 58). Thus,
understanding the dynamics of the intrinsic ovarian GnRH axis may play
an important role in the discernment of assisted reproductive
technologies outcomes.
In summary, we have isolated the ovarian GnRH-R transcript that is
equivalent to the full-length GnRH-R cDNA from the pituitary in
cultured hGLCs and determined that the cDNA sequence is identical to
its counterpart in the pituitary gland. In addition, we observed an
increase in GnRH and GnRH-R expression with spontaneous luteinization
in culture, suggesting that GnRH may play a role in controlling corpus
luteum function. Furthermore, E2 induced a down
regulation of GnRH and its receptor mRNA in hGLCs. Our findings
demonstrate, for the first time, that a gonadal steroid can regulate
the expression of GnRH and GnRH-R in the human ovary. Taken together,
these data strongly suggest that GnRH plays an autocrine role in the
hGLCs, and that the E2-induced down-regulation
GnRH and its receptor may contribute to the appropriate development of
the corpus luteum.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We thank the University of British Columbias in
vitro fertilization program for collecting the follicular aspirate
for hGLCs isolation.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
1 Presented in part at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the
Society for the Study of Reproduction, Pullman, Washington, 1999. This
work was supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada. 
2 Career investigator for the British Columbia Research Institute of
Childrens and Womens Health. 
Received December 13, 1999.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Conn PM 1994 The molecular mechanism of
gonadotropin-releasing hormone action in the pituitary. In: Knobil E,
Neil JD (eds) The Physiology of Reproduction. Raven Press Ltd., New
York, pp 18151826
-
Kasier UB, Jakubowiak A, Seinberger A, Chin WW 1997 Differential effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)
pulse frequency on gonadotropin subunit and GnRH receptor messenger
ribonucleic acid levels in vitro. Endocrinology 138:12241231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stojilkovic SS, Reinhart J, Catt KJ 1994 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors: structure and signal
transduction pathways. Endocr Rev 15:462499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Olofsson JI, Conti CC, Leung PCK 1995 Homologous
and heterologous regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor
gene expression in preovulatory rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 136:974980[Abstract]
-
Peng C, Fan NC, Ligier M, Vaananen J, Leung PCK 1994 Expression and regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)
and GnRH-R messenger ribonucleic acids in human granulosa-luteal cells.
Endocrinology 135:17401746[Abstract]
-
Leung PCK, Steele GL 1992 Intracellular signalling
in the gonads. Endocr Rev 13:467498
-
Bauer-Danton AC, Jameson JL 1995 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid
expression in the ovary during the rat estrous cycle. Endocrinology 136:44324438[Abstract]
-
Tsafriri A, Adashi EY 1994 Local nonsteroidal
regulators of ovarian function. In: Knobil E, Neil JD (eds) The
Physiology of Reproduction. Raven Press Ltd., New York, pp 817860
-
Billig H, Furuta I, Hsueh AJ 1994 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone directly induces apoptotic cell death in
the rat ovary: biochemical and in situ detection of
deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in granulosa cells. Endocrinology 134:245252[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ny T, Lui YX, Ohlsson M, Jones PB, Hsueh AJ 1987 Regulation of tissue type plasminogen activator activity and
messenger RNA levels by gonadotropin-releasing hormone in cultured rat
granulosa cells and cumulus-oocyte complexes. J Biol Chem 262:1179011793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wong WY, Richards JS 1992 Induction of
prostaglandin H synthase in rat preovulatory follicles by gonadotropin
releasing hormone. Endocrinology 130:35123521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Natraj U, Richards JS 1993 Hormonal regulation,
localization and functional activity of the progesterone receptor in
granulosa cells of the rat preovulatory follicles. Endocrinology 133:761769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sridaran R, Bhat GK, Mahesh VB, Presence of
ovarian/luteal GnRH, and bradykinin and their role during pregnancy and
parturition. Program of the 32nd Annual Meeting
of the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Pullman, WA, 1999, p 101
(Abstract)
-
Tureck RW, Mastroianni Jr L, Blasco L, Strauss JR 1982 Inhibition of human granulosa cells progesterone secretion by
gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 54:10781080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vaannanen J, Tong BLP, Vaannanen CCM, Chan IHY, Yuen BH,
Leung PCK 1997 Interaction of prostaglandin F2
and
gonadotropin-releasing hormone on progesterone and estradiol production
in human granulosa-luteal cells. Biol Reprod 57:13461353[Abstract]
-
Duncan WC, Illingworth PJ, Young FM, Fraser HM 1998 Induced luteolysis in the primate: rapid loss of luteinizing hormone
receptors. Hum Reprod 13:25322540[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mason DR, Arora K, Mertz LM, Catt KJ 1994 Homologous down-regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor
sites and messenger ribonucleic acid transcripts in
T31 cells.
Endocrinology 135:11651170[Abstract]
-
Kakar SS, Nath S, Bunn J, Jennes L 1997 The
inhibition of growth and down-regulation of gonadotropin releasing
hormone (GnRH) receptors in
T31 cells by GnRH agonist. Anticancer
Drugs 8:369375[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Turzillo AM, Juengel JL, Net TM 1995 Pulsatile
gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) increases concentration of GnRH
receptor messenger ribonucleic acid and numbers of GnRH receptors
during luteolysis in the ewe. Biol Reprod 53:418423[Abstract]
-
Kakar S, Grantham K, Musgrove L, Devor D, Selers C,
Neill J 1994 Rat gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor:
tissue expression and hormonal regulation of its mRNA. Mol Cell
Endocrinol 101:151157[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Wu JC, Sealfon SC, Miller WL 1994 Gonadal hormones
and gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) alter messenger ribonucleic
acid levels for GnRH receptors in sheep. Endocrinology 134:18461850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Funabashi T, Brooks PJ, Weesner G, Pfaff DW 1994 Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic
acid expression in the rat pituitary during lactation and the estrous
cycle. J Neuroendocrinol 6:261266[Medline]
-
Park OK, Gugneja S, Mayo KE 1990 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene expression during the rat estrous
cycle: effects of pentobarbital and ovarian steroids. Endocrinology 127:365372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Petersen SL, Gardner E, Adelman J, McCrone S 1996 Examination of steroid-induced changes in LHRH gene transcription using
33P- and 35S-labeled probes
specific for intron 2. Endocrinology 137:234239[Abstract]
-
Gregg DW, Allen MC, Nett T 1990 Estradiol-induced
increase in number of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors in
cultured ovine pituitary cells. Biol Reprod 43:10321036[Abstract]
-
Laws SC, Beggs MJ, Webster JC, Miller WL 1990 Inhibin increases and progesterone decreases receptors for gonadotropin
releasing hormone in ovine pituitary culture. Endocrinology 127:373380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Quinones-Jenab V, Jenab S, Ogawa S, Funabashi T, Weesner
GD, Pfaff DW 1996 Estrogen regulation of gonadotropin-releasing
hormone receptor messenger RNA in female rat pituitary tissue. Mol
Brain Res 38:243250[Medline]
-
Sakurai H, Adams BM, Adams TE 1997 Concentrations
of GnRH receptor and GnRH-receptor mRNA in pituitary tissue of
orchidectomized sheep: effects of oestradiol, progesterone and
progesterone withdrawal. J Endocrinol 152:9198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Adams BH, Sakurai H, Adams TE 1996 Concentrations
of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor messenger ribonucleic
acid in pituitary tissue of orchidectomized sheep:effect of estradiol
and GnRH. Biol Reprod 54:407412[Abstract]
-
Emons G, Nill J, Sturm R, Otrmann O 1992 Effects of
progesterone on gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor
concentration in cultured estrogen-primed female pituitary cells. J
Steroids Biochem Mol Biol 42:831839[CrossRef][Medline]
-
McArdle CA, Schomerus E, Groner I, Poch A 1992 Estradiol regulates gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor number,
growth and inositol phosphate production in
T31 cells. Mol Cell
Endocrinol 87:95103[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Yasin M, Dalkin AC, Haisenleder DJ, Kerrigan JR,
Marshall JC 1995 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse
pattern regulates GnRH receptor gene expression: augmentation by
estradiol. Endocrinology 136:15591564[Abstract]
-
Zoeller RT, Young WS 1988 Changes is cellular
levels of messenger ribonucleic acid encoding gonadotropin-releasing
hormone in the anterior hypothalamus of female rats during the estrous
cycle. Endocrinology 123:16881689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bauer-Dantoin AC, Hollenberg AN, Jameson JL 1993 Dynamic regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor mRNA
levels in the anterior pituitary gland during the rat estrous cycle.
Endocrinology 133:19111914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ng SY, Gunning P, Eddy R, Ponte P, Leavitt J, Shows T,
Kedes L 1985 Evolution of the functional human ß-actin gene and
its multi-pseudogenes. Mol Cell Biol 5:27202732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Valbuena D, Pellicer A, Guanes PP, Remohi J, Simon
C 1997 Effect of disruption versus continuation of
gonadotrophin-releasing agonist after human chorionic gonadotrophin
administration on corpus luteum function in patients undergoing
ovulation induction for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 12:21182122[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kakar SS, Murgrove LC, Devor DC, Sellers JC, Neill
JD 1992 Cloning, sequencing and expression of human
gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 189:289295[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Clayton RN, Harwood JP, Catt KJ 1979 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue binds to luteal cells and
inhibits progesterone production. Nature 282:9092[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Jones PBC, Conn PM, Marian J, Hseuh AJW 1980 Binding of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to rat ovarian
granulosa cells. Life Sci 27:21252132[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Gore AC, Roberts JL, Gibson MJ 1999 Mechanisms for
the regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene expression in the
developing mouse. Endocrinology 140:2280228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Badr M, Marchetti B, Pelletier G 1987 Modulation of
hippocampal LHRH receptors by sex steroids in the rat. Peptides 9:441442
-
Jennes L, Brame B, Centers A, Janovick JA, Conn PM 1995 Regulation of hippocampal gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)
receptor mRNA and GnRH-stimulated inositol phosphate production by
gonadal steroid hormones. Mol Brain Res 33:104110[Medline]
-
Misao R, Nakanishi Y, Sun WS, Fujimoto J, Iwagaki S,
Hirose R, Tamaya T 1999 Expression of oestrogen receptor
and
ß mRNA in corpus luteum of human subjects. Mol Hum Reprod 5:1721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Radovick S, Ticknor CM, Nakayama Y, Notides AC, Rahman
A, Weintrraub BD, Cutler GB Jr, Wondisford FE 1991 Evidence for
direct estrogen regulation of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone
gene. J Clin Invest 88:16491655
-
Dong KW, Chen ZG, Cheng KW, Yu KL 1996 Evidence for
estrogen receptor mediated regulation of human gonadotropin-releasing
hormone promoter activity in human placental cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 117:241246[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Morley P, Whitfield JF, Vanderhyden BC, Tsang BK,
Schwartz JL 1992 A new, nongenomic estrogen action: the rapid
release of intracellular calcium. Endocrinology 131:13051312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Conn PM, Rogers DC, Seay SG 1984 Biphasic
regulation of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor by receptor
microaggregation and intracellular Ca2+ levels.
Mol Pharmacol 25:5155[Abstract]
-
Murdoch WJ 1995 Immunolocalization of a
gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor site in murine endometrium that
mediates apoptosis. Cell Tissue Res 282:527529[Medline]
-
Roughton SA, Lareu RR, Bittles AH, Dharmarajan AM 1999 Fas and Fas ligand messenger ribonucleic acid and protein
expression in the rat corpus luteum during apoptosis-mediated
luteolysis. Biol Reprod 60:797804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Quirk SM, Cowan RG, Joshi SG, Henrikson KP 1995 Fas
antigen-mediated apoptosis in human granulosa/luteal cells. Biol Reprod 52:279287[Abstract]
-
Sridaran R, Hisheh S, Dharmarajan AM 1998 Induction
of apoptosis by a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist during early
pregnancy in the rat. Apoptosis 3:5157
-
Furger C, Bourrie N, Cedard L, Ferre F, Zorn JR 1996 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and triptorelin inhibit the
follicle stimulating hormone-induced response in human primary cultured
granulosa-lutein cells. Mol Hum Reprod 2:259264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Holt JA, Schreiber JR 1985 Estrogen regulation of
steroidogenesis in rabbit luteal cells. Endocrinology 117:24622470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Endo T, Henmi H, Goto T, Kitajima T, Kiya A, Nishikawa
A, Manase K, Yamamoto H, Kudo R 1998 Effects of estradiol and an
aromatase inhibitor on progesterone production in cultured luteal
cells. Gynecol Endocrinol 12:2934[Medline]
-
Wuttke W, Theiling K, Hinney B, Pitzel L 1998 Regulation of steroid production and its function within the corpus
luteum. Steroids 63:299305[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Goodman SB, Kugu K, Chen SH, Preutthipan S, Tilly KI,
Tilly JL, Dharmarajan AM 1998 Estradiol-mediated suppression
of apoptosis in the rabbit corpus luteum is associated with a shift in
expression of bcl-2 family members favoring survival. Biol Reprod 59:820827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Testart J, Lefevre B, Gougeon A 1993 Effects of
gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) on follicle and oocyte
quality. Hum Reprod 8:511518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lefevre B, Gouegeon A, Nome F, Testart J 1991 Effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and gonadotropins on
ovarian follicles in cynomolgus monkey: a model for human ovarian
hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 56:119125[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. A.T. Rodriguez, A. S.L. Cheng, P. S. Yan, D. Potter, F. J. Agosto-Perez, C. L. Shapiro, and T. H.-M. Huang
Epigenetic repression of the estrogen-regulated Homeobox B13 gene in breast cancer
Carcinogenesis,
July 1, 2008;
29(7):
1459 - 1465.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Prange-Kiel, H. Jarry, M. Schoen, P. Kohlmann, C. Lohse, L. Zhou, and G. M. Rune
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone regulates spine density via its regulatory role in hippocampal estrogen synthesis
J. Cell Biol.,
January 28, 2008;
180(2):
417 - 426.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Metallinou, B. Asimakopoulos, A. Schroer, and N. Nikolettos
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in the Ovary
Reproductive Sciences,
December 1, 2007;
14(8):
737 - 749.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Darby, J Stockley, M M Khan, C N Robson, H Y Leung, and V J Gnanapragasam
Expression of GnRH type II is regulated by the androgen receptor in prostate cancer
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
September 1, 2007;
14(3):
613 - 624.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. K. Cheng and P. C. K. Leung
Molecular Biology of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH)-I, GnRH-II, and Their Receptors in Humans
Endocr. Rev.,
April 1, 2005;
26(2):
283 - 306.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B.-S. An, J.-H. Choi, K.-C. Choi, and P. C. K. Leung
Differential Role of Progesterone Receptor Isoforms in the Transcriptional Regulation of Human Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone I (GnRH I) Receptor, GnRH I, and GnRH II
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
February 1, 2005;
90(2):
1106 - 1113.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Maudsley, L. Davidson, A. J. Pawson, R. Chan, R. L. de Maturana, and R. P. Millar
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonists Promote Proapoptotic Signaling in Peripheral Reproductive Tumor Cells by Activating a G{alpha}i-Coupling State of the Type I GnRH Receptor
Cancer Res.,
October 15, 2004;
64(20):
7533 - 7544.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Young and R. L. Stouffer
Gonadotropin and Steroid Regulation of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Endogenous Tissue Inhibitors in the Developed Corpus Luteum of the Rhesus Monkey During the Menstrual Cycle
Biol Reprod,
January 1, 2004;
70(1):
244 - 252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. K. Cheng, B. K. C. Chow, and P. C. K. Leung
An Activator Protein 1-Like Motif Mediates 17{beta}-Estradiol Repression of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Promoter via an Estrogen Receptor {alpha}-Dependent Mechanism in Ovarian and Breast Cancer Cells
Mol. Endocrinol.,
December 1, 2003;
17(12):
2613 - 2629.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Siler-Khodr, M. Grayson, and C. A. Eddy
Action of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone II on the Baboon Ovary
Biol Reprod,
April 1, 2003;
68(4):
1150 - 1156.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Khosravi and P. C. K. Leung
Differential Regulation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH)I and GnRHII Messenger Ribonucleic Acid by Gonadal Steroids in Human Granulosa Luteal Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
February 1, 2003;
88(2):
663 - 672.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. K. Cheng, C. M. Yeung, B. K. C. Chow, and P. C. K. Leung
Characterization of a New Upstream GnRH Receptor Promoter in Human Ovarian Granulosa-Luteal Cells
Mol. Endocrinol.,
July 1, 2002;
16(7):
1552 - 1564.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. H. Kim, A. Wolfe, G. R. Smith, S. A. Tobet, and S. Radovick
Promoter Sequences Targeting Tissue-specific Gene Expression of Hypothalamic and Ovarian Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone in Vivo
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 8, 2002;
277(7):
5194 - 5202.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. M. Woo, C.-J. Tai, S. K. Kang, P. S. Nathwani, S. F. Pang, and P. C. K. Leung
Direct Action of Melatonin in Human Granulosa-Luteal Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
October 1, 2001;
86(10):
4789 - 4797.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. F. Palter, A. B. Tavares, A. Hourvitz, J. D. Veldhuis, and E. Y. Adashi
Are Estrogens of Import to Primate/Human Ovarian Folliculogenesis?
Endocr. Rev.,
June 1, 2001;
22(3):
389 - 424.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Ortmann, J.M. Weiss, and K. Diedrich
Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: Ovarian actions of GnRH antagonists
Hum. Reprod.,
April 1, 2001;
16(4):
608 - 611.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Kang, C.-J. Tai, P. S. Nathwani, and P. C. K. Leung
Differential Regulation of Two Forms of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Messenger Ribonucleic Acid in Human Granulosa-Luteal Cells
Endocrinology,
January 1, 2001;
142(1):
182 - 192.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|