help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goddard, I.
Right arrow Articles by Benahmed, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goddard, I.
Right arrow Articles by Benahmed, M.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 6 2068-2074
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Transforming Growth Factor-ß Receptor Types I and II in Cultured Porcine Leydig Cells: Expression and Hormonal Regulation

Isabelle Goddard, Mourad Bouras, Michele Keramidas, Jean Claude Hendrick, Jean Jacques Feige and Mohamed Benahmed

INSERM, U-407, Communications Cellulaires en Biologie de la Reproduction, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud (I.G, M.B., M.B.), 69921 Oullins, France; INSERM, U-244, CEA Grenoble (M.K., J.J.F.), 38054 Grenoble, France; and Laboratoire de Radioimmunologie, Université de Liège (J.C.H.), 4000 Liège, Belgium

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. M. Benahmed, INSERM, U-407, Communications Cellulaires en Biologie de la Reproduction, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, BP 12, F-69921 Oullins Cedex, France. E-mail: benahmed{at}lsgrisn1.univ-lyon1.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The steroidogenic activity of testicular Leydig cells is controlled both by the pituitary hormone (LH) and by growth factors such as transforming growth factor-ß peptides (TGFß1, -2, and -3; inhibin/activin; and anti-Mullerian hormone). By using primary cultures of porcine Leydig cells as a model, the aim of the study was to identify and characterize the TGFß receptors and to study their regulation by LH/hCG. TGFß receptors have been identified and characterized through three different approaches, including cross-linking experiments and Western and Northern blotting analyses. In cross-linking experiments, labeled TGFß was shown to bind to three different molecular species of 300, 80, and 53 kDa, which may correspond to the protein betaglycan (also known as TGFß type III receptor) and TGFß type II and I receptors (TGFßRII and TGFßRI), respectively. The presence of TGFßRI and -RII was further demonstrated by Western blotting analysis using specific polyclonal antibodies. Finally, the expression of betaglycan, TGFßRII, and TGFßRI messenger RNAs, was confirmed by Northern blotting analysis, as shown by the presence of 6.4-, 4.6-, and 5.8-kb messenger RNAs, respectively. By using a RT-PCR approach, the mediators of the TGFß signal, Smads 1–7, were also detected in cultured Leydig cells. TGFßRI and TGFßRII protein levels were enhanced by hCG/LH in a dose-dependent (maximal effect with 0.3 ng/ml hCG) and time-dependent (maximal effect observed after 48 h of hCG treatment) manner. Furthermore, to determine whether the stimulatory effect of LH/hCG was mediated by testosterone, use was made of aminogluthetimide, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450scc. The inhibition of testosterone formation did not affect the stimulatory effect of LH/hCG on TGFßRI and -RII levels, suggesting that the gonadotropin action is not mediated by the steroid hormone. Together, the present findings demonstrate that the TGFß receptors are expressed and are under hormonal (gonadotropin) control in cultured porcine Leydig cells.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
DURING BOTH THE fetal and the adult period, testicular development and function are under the control of hormones (1), growth factors, and cytokines (2, 3). Among the growth factors are various peptide families, including the fibroblast growth factors, epidermal growth factor/transforming growth factor-{alpha}, transforming growth factor-ßs (TGFßs), cytokines (interleukin-1 and -6, tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, and stem cell factor), and neurotropins (nerve growth factor and brain-derived growth factor). In mammals, the TGFß peptide family comprises closely related peptides, including TGFß1, -2, and -3, that share high homology between species and more distant peptides, such as inhibins, activins, anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) (4, 5).

The critical role of the TGFß peptide family in male gonadal development and function is supported by at least three types of observations. Firstly, TGFß family peptides have been shown to be present in the testis. Secondly, TGFß1 has been largely shown to modulate different testicular activities mainly in in vitro systems. For example, TGFß1 has been reported to be a modulator of hormone formation in both cultured Leydig and Sertoli cells and of contractility, shape, and organization of peritubular myoid cells (for reviews, see Refs. 2, 3). Some TGFß-related peptides have also been reported to affect testicular functions and particularly Leydig cell steroidogenesis. Among these factors are inhibins and activins (6, 7) and AMH (8). Thirdly, recent observations in transgenic models in which genes related to the TGFß peptide families were manipulated (knockout, overexpression) indicated that the reproductive function in these animals was affected. For example, in TGFß2-deficient mice, testis hypoplasia, cryptorchidism, and ectoplasia were observed (9); in BMP8-deficient mice, the germ cells of all homozygote mutants either failed to proliferate or showed a marked reduction in proliferation and a delayed differentiation (10). Overproduction of TGFß1 may also affect the testis with atrophy of the gonad and thickened tubular basement membranes (11). Together, these data clearly indicate that the action of the TGFß peptide family is probably of major importance for the testis in terms of both development and function (i.e. steroidogenesis and gametogenesis).

However, paradoxically, although the testicular activity of the ligands TGFß and related peptides have been largely studied, very little is known about their testicular receptors, obligatory intermediates in their action. With exception of immunohistochemical approaches to localization (12, 13), such receptors have not yet been characterized in terms of proteins and messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in the testis. It is known that the members of the TGFß superfamily transduce signals through two different types of serine/threonine protein kinase receptors, known as type I and type II receptors (5). TGFß superfamily ligands bind to the TGFß type II receptor (TGFßRII), which has a constituitively active kinase; the TGFß type I receptor (TGFßRI) is then recruited into the TGFß/TGFßRII complex, and this results in the activation of TGFßRI kinase (14). The TGFßRI kinase transduces intracellular signals by activation of various proteins, including Smad proteins. The signal is transferred to the Smad proteins through the receptor kinase-mediated phosphorylation of pathway-specific Smads. The signal is then propagated primarily through protein-protein interactions between Smad proteins, which are heterooligomeric, and between Smads and transcription factors. Specifically, Smads are the mediators not only for TGFß, but also for activins, AMH and BMPs. Specifically, Smads 1, 5, and 8 appear as substrates for the BMP type I receptor kinase and the orphan receptor ALK1. Smads 2 and 3 are phosphorylated by activated activin or TGFßRI. Smad 4 is a common mediator, as it forms heterooligomeric complexes with other activated Smads. The inhibitory Smads (anti-Smads, Smads 6 and 7) antagonize the activity of the Smad 4-and other Smads (i.e. 1, 2, 3, 5, 8) complexes (for reviews, see Refs. 5, 15).

By using a model of purified cultured Leydig cells, the aim of the present study was to 1) identify and characterize TGFß receptors and Smads in this testicular cell type and 2) determine whether the expression of the TGFß receptors is under the control of the endocrine system exerted through LH/hCG action on Leydig cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
DMEM and Ham’s F-12 were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc.(Grand Island, NY). Transferrin, vitamin E, HEPES, chloramine-T, and aminogluthetimide were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Collagenase/dispase was obtained from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Mannheim, Germany). hCG (CR 121; 13,450 IU/mg) was a gift from Dr. R. E. Canfield (Columbia University, New York, NY) and from Organon (3000 IU/mg). Na125I (IMS30) and [{alpha}-32P]deoxy (d)-CTP were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Aylesbury, UK). Oligonucleotide primers were obtained from Genset (Paris, France). Molonry murine leukemia virus was obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. (Eragny, France), and Taq polymerase was purchased from Promega Corp. (Lyon, France).

Human TGFß type I receptor (ALK-5) complementary DNAs (cDNAs) (16), and porcine TGFß type III receptor cDNAs (17) were provided by Dr. K. Miyazono (Uppsala, Sweden). Porcine TGFß type II receptor cDNAs (18) was provided by Dr. X. F. Wang (Durham, NC). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNAs were a gift from Dr. J. M. Blanchard (Faculté des Sciences, Montpellier, France).

Leydig cell preparation and culture
Isolated Leydig cells were prepared from porcine testes (2–3 weeks old) by collagenase treatment as described by Mather and Phillips (19) and modified by Benahmed et al. (20). Briefly, decapsulated testes were minced and washed in DMEM/Ham’s F-12 medium (1:1). After collagenase dissociation (0.5 mg/ml, 90 min at 32 C), cells were washed by centrifugation (200 x g for 10 min). The pellets were then resuspended and submitted to two successive sedimentations of 5 and 15 min. The crude interstitial cells were recovered from the supernatants, and Leydig cells were prepared from this fraction by Percoll gradient centrifugation. The purity of Leydig cells was more than 90%, as determined by histochemical 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase staining.

Leydig cells were plated in Falcon (Los Angeles, CA) six-multiwell plates (2 x 106 cells/dish) or 100 x 20-mm petri dishes (107 cells/dish) and cultured at 32 C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2-95% air in DMEM/Ham’s F-12 medium (1:1) containing sodium bicarbonate (1.2 mg/ml), 15 mM HEPES, gentamicin (20 µg/ml), and nystatin (20 IU/ml). This medium was supplemented with insulin (2 µg/ml), transferrin (5 µg/ml), and vitamin E (10 µg/ml).

Testosterone production
Basal and LH/hCG-stimulated testosterone secretion was measured in the culture medium using specific RIA (21).

125I labeling of TGFß1
TGFß1 was purified according to the method described by Cone et al. (22). Purified TGFß1 (1 µg) was labeled with 125I by the chloramine-T method following the procedure described by Frolik et al. (23). Briefly, 1 µg TGFß1 was diluted with 10 µl 1.5 M potassium phosphate, pH 7.4, and 10 µl [125I]Na. To initiate the reaction, a 5-µl aliquot of chloramine-T solution (0.1 mg/ml) was added. After 2 min at room temperature, an additional 5-µl aliquot was added, followed 1.5 min later by final a 5-µl aliquot. One minute after the last addition of chloramine-T, 25 µl 50 mM N-acetyltyrosine were added. After 2 min, 200 µl 60 mM potassium iodide and 200 µl 8 M urea were added. The mixture was run through an equilibrated PD-10 Pharmacia Biotech column and eluted with 4 mM HCl, 75 mM sodium chloride, and 0.1% BSA. Preparations of [125I]TGFß1 with a specific activity of about 5–10 x 106 cpm/pmol, determined by trichloroacetic acid precipitation, were obtained by this method.

Affinity cross-linking of TGFß receptors
Leydig cell monolayers (cultured in six-multiwell plates) were affinity labeled with [125I]TGFß1 as described by Goddard et al. (24). Briefly, cultured Leydig cells, previously incubated with [125I]TGFß1, were treated with 0.3 mM disuccinimidyl suberic acid (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) for 15 min at 0 C. The cells were then washed and scraped off in the presence of ice-cold 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.0) containing 0.25 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin. After centrifugation of the extracts, the supernatants were adjusted to a final concentration of 10% glycerol, 2% SDS, and 1.3% 2ß-mercaptoethanol before SDS-PAGE analysis. SDS-PAGE was performed according to the Laemmli procedure (25), using 6% polyacrylamide flat gels. At the end of the separation, the gels were stained for proteins with Coomassie blue, dried, and then autoradiographed using Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Hyperfilm-MP. 14C-Methylated molecular mass markers were myosin (200 kDa), phosphorylase b (97.4 kDa), and BSA (69 kDa; Rainbow 14C-methylated protein molecular mass markers Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

It is assumed that each of the affinity-labeled complexes contains a monomer of TGFß (electrophoresis was conducted under reducing conditions that dissociate disulfide-linked TGFß dimers). Throughout this study, the molecular mass of the TGFß monomer (12 kDa) was subtracted to the estimated size of the TGFß-binding protein.

Western blotting analysis
Leydig cells cultured in 100 x 20-mm petri dishes (107 cells/dish) were incubated in 1 ml RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and 50 mM Tris, pH 8) with freshly added phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (10 µg/ml) for 1 h on ice. Cells were then scraped and centrifuged at 15,000 x g for 20 min at 4 C. Proteins from Leydig cells were resolved on 7.5% SDS-PAGE gels and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using 25 mM Tris and 185 mM glycine, pH 8.3, containing 20% methanol. The transfer was performed at a constant voltage of 100 V for 1 h. The membranes were blocked for 1–2 h in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 [TBST; 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20] containing 5% milk (TBSTM) and rinsed three times in TBST. The nitrocellulose membranes were incubated with 500 ng/ml (1:200 dilution) of the polyclonal anti-TGFß receptor type I or type II (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) in TBSTM overnight at 4 C. The membranes were rinsed three times in TBST and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in TBSTM containing antirabbit biotinylated antibodies (from donkey; 1:400 dilution). The membranes were then rinsed three times and incubated with streptavidin-biotinylated horseradish peroxidase complex (1:3000 dilution) for 30 min at 20 C. After washing the membranes were colored in a solution of diaminobenzidene chromogen (10 mg in 17 ml TBS with 17 µl H2O2, 30%). Molecular mass markers were myosin (207 kDa), ß-galactosidase (139 kDa), BSA (84 kDa), and carbonic anhydrase (41 kDa; Kaleidoscope prestained standards, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Richmond, CA).

Northern blotting analysis
Total RNAs were extracted from Leydig cells cultured in petri dishes, as described by Chomczynski and Sacchi (26). Briefly, cells were scrapped in 4 M guanidine thiocyanate, 25 mM trisodium citrate, 0.5% sarcosyl, and 0.1 M 2ß-mercaptoethanol, followed by a phenol-chloroform extraction in the presence of 0.2 M sodium acetate, pH 4. After precipitation with isopropanol, RNAs were washed with 75% ethanol. After solubilization with water, RNA quantities were estimated by spectrophotometry at 260 nm.

Forty micrograms of total RNAs (denatured for 15 min at 65 C in the presence of 2.2 M formaldehyde and 12.5 M formamide) were loaded on 1.2% agarose-2.2 M formaldehyde gels for electrophoretic separation, then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-C extra, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) by capillary transfer with 10 x SSC (1.5 M NaCl and 0.15 M sodium citrate) and fixed at 80 C for 2 h. cDNA probes (ALK-5, porcine TR-II, or porcine TR-III) were labeled with [{alpha}-32P]dCTP using a random primer labeling kit (Promega Corp.). Labeled probes were separated from free nucleotides by filtration through diethylaminoethyl-cellulose column.

After 5–6 h of prehybridization at 42 C, filters were hybridized overnight with labeled probes (2 x 106 cpm/ml ALK-5, porcine TR-II or porcine TR-III) at 42 C in 50% formamide, 5 x SSPE (0.9 M NaCl, 0.05 M sodium phosphate, and 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.4), 5 x Denhardt’s solution (1 g Ficoll, 1 g polyvinyl pyrrolidone, and 1 g BSA/liter), 0.1% SDS, 10% dextran sulfate, and 100 µg/ml transfer RNA from baker’s yeast. The filters were then washed four times in 2 x SSC-0.1% SDS at room temperature for 20 min and twice in 0.1 x SSC-0.1% SDS at 55 C for 20 min. The filters were autoradiographed using Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Hyperfilm-MP.

RT-PCR analysis
Single stranded complementary DNAs (cDNAs) were obtained from RT of 3 µg total RNAs using random hexanucleotides as primers (5 µM) in the presence of dNTPs (25 µM), dithiothreitol (10 µM), and Moloney murine leukemia virus (10 U/µl) for 1 h at 37 C. cDNAs (1 µl of RT mixture) were amplified by PCR with Taq polymerase (0.04 U/µl), dNTPs (20 µM), and specific primers (0.4 µM). The mixture was first heated at 95 C for 5 min, and then 35 cycles of 95 C for 40 sec, 55 C for 1 min, 72 C for 2 min, and 72 C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gels and visualized using a UV (254 nm) table. The specific oligonucleotide primers, designed to amplify sequences of the different Smad cDNAs, are shown in Table 1.

Data analysis
The band densities were determined by densitometric analysis using a Bioimage scanner (Bio Image UK, Cheshire, UK).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Characterization of Leydig cell TGFß receptors
To characterize the TGFß cellular binding moieties, cross-linking of Leydig cell-bound [125I]TGFß1 was performed, using the homobifunctional agent disuccinimidyl suberate. After the cross-linking reaction, the cells were treated with 1% Triton X-100, and the extract was subjected to SDS-PAGE in the presence of a reducing agent. Figure 1AGo shows the autoradiogram of an electrophoretic analysis of Leydig cell membranes cross-linked with [125I]TGFß1 in the absence or presence of unlabeled TGFß1. Three major labeled cross-linking species of about 300, 80, and 53 kDa were present in Leydig cells (Fig. 1AGo). These TGFß-binding proteins correspond to the TGFßRIII, -RII, and -RI, respectively.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Identification of TGFß receptor proteins and mRNA in Leydig cells. A, Affinity labeling of Leydig cells with [125I]TGFß1. Cultured Leydig cells were incubated for 3 h at 4 C with 0.3 nM [125I]TGFß1 alone or in the presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled TGFß1 (0.37–10 nM), washed, then cross-linked with disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS). The detergent extracts were electrophoresed under reducing conditions. On the left, an autoradiograph is shown. The positions corresponding to the molecular size markers are indicated on the left. On the right, densitometric analysis of TGFßRI, -RII. and -RIII is shown. B, Western immunoblotting for TGFß receptors. Leydig cell proteins were separated by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Nitrocellulose membranes were incubated with polyclonal anti-TGFßRI (1:200 dilution; B-I) or RII (1:200 dilution; B-II). Arrows indicate the positions of TGFß receptors. C, Identification of TGFßRI (C-I), -RII (C-II), and -RIII (C-III) mRNAs. The positions of the ribosomal bands (28S and 18S) are indicated on the left.

 
The different labeled species (including TGFßRI, -RII, and -RIII) decreased in intensity with increasing concentrations of unlabeled TGFß1 (0–10 nM). It is interesting to note that the addition of 3.3 nM unlabeled TGFß1 completely inhibited TGFßRI and -RII. TGFßRIII binding was partially inhibited by the addition of 10 nM unlabeled TGFß1 (Fig. 1AGo).

By using Western blotting analysis with specific polyclonal antibodies, the presence of both TGFßRI and TGFßRII was confirmed, with their molecular masses were about 60 and 90 kDa, respectively (Fig. 1BGo).

TGFßRI, -RII, and -RIII were also detected in forms of mRNA in the Leydig cells. As shown in Fig. 1Go, C-I, a single TGFßRI transcript of 5.8 kb was observed. A single TGFßRII transcript was identified at 4.6 kb (Fig. 1Go, C-II). A single transcript for TGFßRIII of 6.4 kb was detected (Fig. 1Go, C-III) in cultured Leydig cells.

Identification of Smads, the mediators of the TGFß signal
Using a RT-PCR approach, it is shown in Fig. 2Go that cultured Leydig cells express the specific mRNAs for Smads 1–7.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Identification of Smads in Leydig cells by RT-PCR. cDNAs obtained from RT of total RNAs were amplified by PCR with specific primers. nc, Negative control; PCR was performed in the absence of cDNAs. The size of DNA ladder is indicated on the left.

 
Hormonal regulation of TGFßRI and TGFßRII expression on Leydig cells
As testicular Leydig cell activity is known to be under the control of the endocrine system and specifically under the control of LH/hCG, in the next series of experiments we studied whether TGFßRI and -RII expression is under the control of this hormone.

Addition of hCG (from 0.1–10 ng/ml) to Leydig cells resulted, after 48 h of treatment, in a dose-dependent increase in both the 53- and 80-kDa bands/signals corresponding to TGFßRI and -RII, respectively. The maximal stimulatory effect was obtained with 0.3 ng/ml hCG (Fig. 3AGo). As shown in Fig. 3BGo, this stimulatory effect of hCG was time dependent. After 48 h of hCG treatment, TGFßRI and -RII levels increased about 12- and 3.5-fold, respectively.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of hCG on the expression of TGFß receptors. Leydig cells were cultured, for 48 h in the presence of increasing concentrations of hCG (0–10 ng/ml; A) or for 16–66 h in the presence of 10 ng/ml of hCG (B). After 3-h incubation with [125I]TGFß, cells were treated with disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS). The detergent extracts were electrophoresed under reducing conditions. The positions corresponding to the molecular sizes of TGFßRI, -RII, and -RIII are shown.

 
The data in Figs. 4Go and 5Go show that in hCG-treated Leydig cells, the stimulation of TGFßRI and -RII proteins was related to an increase in the level of their corresponding specific mRNAs. For TGFßRI mRNA, Fig. 4AGo indicates that the maximal effect (2-fold increase) was obtained with 2.5 IU/ml hCG. For TGFßRII mRNA, Fig. 5AGo indicates that the maximal effect (2-fold increase) was obtained with 0.61 IU/ml hCG. The stimulatory effect of gonadotropin on TGFß receptor mRNAs was also time dependent. The maximal effect of the gonadotropin was observed after 6 and 4 h of treatment on TGFßRI (Fig. 4BGo) and TGFßRII (Fig. 5BGo) mRNA levels, respectively.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of hCG on TGFßRI mRNA levels. Cultured Leydig cells were incubated, for 2 h in the presence of increasing concentrations of hCG (Organon; 0–5 IU/ml; A) or for 2–8 h in the presence of 1.25 IU/ml hCG (B). Total cellular RNAs were extracted, and Northern blotting analysis was performed using 40 µg total RNAs/lane. Membranes were successively hybridized with TGFßRI and GAPDH cDNA probes. In the upper panel, a representative autoradiograph is shown; in the lower panel, densitometric analysis of the TGFßRI/GAPDH mRNA ratios is shown.

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of hCG on TGFßRII mRNA levels. Cultured Leydig cells were incubated, for 2 h in the presence of increasing concentrations of hCG (Organon; 0–2.5 IU/ml; A) or for 2–6 h in the presence of 1.25 IU/ml hCG (B). Total cellular RNAs were extracted, and Northern blotting analysis was performed using 40 µg total RNAs/lane. Membranes were successively hybridized with TGFßRII and GAPDH cDNA probes. In the upper panel, a representative autoradiograph is shown; in the lower panel, densitometric analysis of the TGFßRII/GAPDH mRNA ratios is shown.

 
Because in Leydig cells LH/hCG stimulates testosterone production, we investigated the possibility that the stimulatory action of LH/hCG on the expression of TGFß receptors was mediated by testosterone. To test this possibility, testosterone formation was inhibited in hCG-treated Leydig cells. To prevent testosterone formation, Leydig cells were incubated in the presence of 1 mM aminogluthetimide (an inhibitor of 20–22-cholesterol desmolase activity). Aminogluthetimide treatment was efficient because LH/hCG-stimulated testosterone secretion was dramatically reduced by aminogluthetimide (hCG, 2.2 ± 0.4 ng/ml; hCG plus aminogluthetimide, 0.13 ± 0.03 ng/ml). The data in Fig. 6Go indicate that, as expected, hCG treatment increased the levels of TGFßRI and -RII, but (pre)treatment with aminogluthetimide plus hCG did not suppress hCG-stimulated TGFßRI and RII expression. Together, these observations suggest that the stimulatory effect of LH/hCG on TGFß receptors is probably not mediated by steroid hormones, particularly by testosterone.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effect of hCG in the absence or presence of aminogluthetimide on TGFß receptors. Leydig cells were cultured for 48 h in the presence of hCG (10 ng/ml) and with or without aminogluthetimide (1 mM). Leydig cells were then incubated for 3 h at 4 C with 0.3 nM [125I]TGFß1, washed, and cross-linked with disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS). The detergent extracts were electrophoresed under reducing conditions, and the dried gels were exposed for autoradiography. The positions corresponding to the molecular size markers are indicated on the left.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The aim of the present study was first to identify and characterize the TGFß receptors and then to determine the action of LH/hCG on these receptors in testicular Leydig cells. Using porcine Leydig cells cultured in defined medium as a model, we report that these testicular cells express TGFß receptors. By using cross-linking experiments and Northern blotting analysis, we show that TGFß binding to Leydig cell membranes occurs at the level of TGFß type I, II, and III receptors. The presence of TGFßRI was assessed by the presence of a TGFß-binding protein of 53 kDa and a mRNA of 5.8 kb as previously reported (16, 27). The presence of TGFßRII in Leydig cells was assessed by the presence of a TGFß-binding protein of 80 kDa (27) and a transcript of 4.6 kb corresponding to the size reported in the literature for the other extragonadal cell types (28, 29). Finally, the presence of TGFßRIII (which, in fact, is not a true receptor because it does not transduce any signal), also termed betaglycan, was assessed by the presence of a TGFß-binding protein of 300 kDa (30) and a mRNA of about 6 kb, corresponding to the size reported in the literature (31, 32). Such findings are compatible with our previous data showing the presence of TGFßRI and TGFßRII in porcine Leydig cells using an immunohistochemistry approach (12). The same antibodies directed against TGFß receptors were used both for the immunohistochemistry approach (12) and in the Western blotting analysis (the present study).

For both TGFßRI and TGFßRII, we detected one form of mRNA as well as one major band of protein using Northern and Western blotting analyses, respectively. In the cross-linking experiments, TGFß appears to bind not only to TGFßRI, TGFßRII, and betaglycan, but also to other (membrane) binding proteins. The nature of these other proteins is unknown. It will be of interest to identify these proteins as 1) they may modulate TGFß action at the Leydig cell level; and 2) they appear to be also regulated, as are the TGFß receptors, by LH/hCG (see below). Together, the presence of TGFß receptors identified through specific mRNAs and proteins detected with specific antibodies and through their binding ability (cross-linking experiments) indicates that these receptors are functional and are probably involved in the previously reported TGFß modulatory action on steroid hormone formation in Leydig cells (for reviews, see Refs. 2, 3). Furthermore, identification of the expression in Leydig cells of Smads known to be involved in TGFß action reinforces the functional aspect of TGFß receptors in the testicular cells.

One of the major observations made in the present paper is related to the positive regulatory action of LH/hCG on TGFß receptor expression in Leydig cells. Such an effect was more specifically observed on TGFßRI and TGFßRII. The hormone stimulated the expression of TGFßRI and -RII at both the mRNA and protein levels. Such a hormonal effect is probably mediated by the cAMP/protein kinase A pathway, as the LH/hCG action on TGFß receptors was mimicked by 8-bromo-cAMP (our unpublished data). That TGFßRI and -RII were positively regulated by LH/hCG at both the mRNA and protein levels would suggest that the hormone may act at a transcriptional level, although it remains to be determined whether LH/hCG increases TGFß receptor type I and II gene transcription and/or receptor mRNA stability. Finally, as Leydig cell stimulation with LH/hCG resulted in the production of steroid hormones, particularly testosterone, the possibility that the action of LH/hCG on the receptors is mediated by these hormones was examined. Such a possibility appears not to occur, as inhibition of the production of steroid hormone after aminogluthetimide treatment did not reduce the action of LH/hCG on TGFß receptors. By contrast, our data indicate that aminogluthetimide enhances the action of LH/hCG on TGFß receptors, evaluated through the cross-linking experiments. Based on such an observation, one may speculate that testosterone (or other Leydig cell steroid hormones) inhibits TGFß receptors. However, although a negative regulatory action of testosterone on TGFß receptors has been reported in rat extragonadal tissues such as the ventral prostate (33), such an effect of steroid hormone in testicular Leydig cells remains to be demonstrated. As testosterone (and other Leydig cell steroids) appears not to mediate LH/hCG action on TGFß receptors, the possibility exists that a mediating effect might be exerted by local signaling molecules, such as testicular growth factors and cytokines (2, 3).

In extragonadal tissues, TGFß receptors have been reported to be modulated by different factors and/or in different physiological and pathological conditions. For example, TGFß receptor expression has been shown to depend on several cell parameters, such as energy metabolism (34, 35), and the types of the extracellular matrix components (36, 37). Also, TGFß receptors were decreased in pathological situations, such as in tumor cells (38, 39, 40, 41, 42), and increased in other pathologies, such as fibrosis (43) and Alzheimer’s disease (44). Finally, hormones, specifically those acting though nuclear receptors, may modulate TGFß receptor expression. Specifically, vitamin D (45), estradiol administrated during fetal life (46), testosterone (47), and finasteride (48) (an inhibitor of the conversion of testosterone to 5{alpha}-dihydrotestosterone) have been shown to affect TGFß receptor expression. The present data are to our knowledge the first demonstration that hormones such as gonadotropin (acting via the cAMP/protein kinase A pathway) up-regulate TGFß receptor expression in terms of both proteins and mRNAs in the male gonad. In the female gonad, Roy and Kole (49, 50) reported, using immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting approaches, that LH and FSH enhance TGFßRII protein in hamster and human ovaries. In these reports the TGFß receptors in the ovary were not studied at the mRNA level. In addition, by contrast to our present findings, TGFßRI protein was not affected by gonadotropins in the ovary.

Finally, in addition to the regulatory action of the gonadotropins on TGFß receptors, it will be interesting to determine in the future whether the gonadotropin may affect other components of the TGFß transducing system, such as Smads, which are present in Leydig cells (our present data).

Together, the numerous observations from different laboratories showing that TGFß antagonizes LH/hCG steroidogenic action in Leydig cells (for reviews, see Refs. 2, 3) coupled to our present findings demonstrating that LH/hCG increases the expression of functional TGFß receptors, and thus potentially TGFß action, support the concept of the existence of a short loop between the hormone and the growth factor at the Leydig cell level. It is tempting to speculate that LH/hCG may use the TGFß system to end or reduce its own steroidogenic action or that of other growth factors that enhance LH/hCG stimulated-steroid hormone production in Leydig cells, such as epidermal growth factor/TGF{alpha} and insulin-like growth factor I (for reviews, see Refs. 2, 3). Indeed, in our laboratory, we have previously shown that TGFß antagonizes the stimulatory action of epidermal growth factor/TGF{alpha} (51) and insulin-like growth factor I (52) on LH/hCG-induced testosterone formation. Such interactions between the growth factors and the gonadotropin may occur to modulate the intratesticular levels of testosterone required for correct spermatogenesis (1). However, besides its action on steroid hormone formation, TGFß exhibits other activities, particularly on cell proliferation, immune response, extracellular matrix component formation, and cell death, and therefore one cannot exclude the possibility that the gonadotropin, through the modulation of TGFß receptors, may indirectly control such activities in the testis.

In summary, using porcine cultured Leydig cells as a model, we have characterized in these testicular cells the mRNAs and functional binding proteins for TGFß receptors and have shown that such receptors are under the control of the endocrine system through LH/hCG action.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are indebted to Drs. K. Miyazono (Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Uppsala, Sweden) and X. F. Wang (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC) for providing cDNA clones for TGFß type I, III, and II receptors, respectively. We thank M. A. Chauvin for technical assistance, and A. McLeer for critical reading of the manuscript. We are grateful to Mr. P. Bouteille for providing us with porcine testes.

Received November 11, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Sharpe RM 1994 Regulation of spermatogenesis. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds) The Physiology of Reproduction. Raven Press, New York, vol 1:1363–1434
  2. Benahmed M 1996 Growth factors and cytokines in the testis. In: Comhaire FH (ed) Male Infertility. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 55–97
  3. Gnessi L, Fabbri A, Spera G 1997 Gonadal peptides as mediators of development and functional control of the testis: an integrated system with hormones and local environment. Endoc Rev 18:541–609[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Josso N, Racine C, di Clemente N, Rey R, Xavier F 1998 The role of anti-Mullerian hormone in gonadal development. Mol Cell Endocrinol 145:3–7[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Massague J 1998 TGF-ß signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 67:753–791[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Hsueh AJW, Dahl KD, Vaughan J, Tucker E, Rivier J, Bardin CW, Vale W 1987 Heterodimers and homodimers of inhibin subunits have different pacacrine action in the modulation of luteinizing hormone-stimulated androgen biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:5082–5086[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Mauduit C, Chauvin MA, de Peretti E, Morera AM, Benahmed M 1991 Effect of activin A on dehydroepiandrosterone and testosterone secretion by primary immature porcine Leydig cells. Biol Reprod 45:101–109[Abstract]
  8. Lee MM, Seah CC, Masiakos PT, Sottas CM, Preffer FI, Donahoe PK, Maclaughlin DT, Hardy MP 1999 Mullerian-inhibiting substance type II receptor expression and function in purified rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 140:2819–2827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Sanford LP, Ormsby I, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Sariola H, Friedman R, Boivin GP, Cardell EL, Doetschman T 1997 TGFß2 knockout mice have multiple developmental defects that arenon-overlapping with other TGFß knockout phenotypes. Development 124:2659–2670[Abstract]
  10. Zhao GQ, Deng K, Labosky PA, Liaw L, Hogan BL 1996 The gene encoding bone morphogenetic protein 8 is required for the initiation and maintenance of spermatogenesis in the mouse. Genes Dev 13:1657–1669
  11. Sanderson N, Factor V, Nagy P, Kopp J, Kondaiah P, Wakefield L, Roberts AB, Sporn MB, Thorgeirsson SS 1995 Hepatic expression of mature transforming growth factor beta 1 in transgenic mice results in multiple tissue lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:2572–2576[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Caussanel V, Tabone E, Hendrick JC, Dacheux F, Benahmed M 1997 Cellular distribution of transforming growth factor ßs 1, 2, and 3 and their types I and II receptors during postnatal development and spermatogenesis in the boar testis. Biol Reprod 56:357–367[Abstract]
  13. Olaso R, Pairault C, Habert R 1998 Expression of type I and II receptors for transforming growth factor ß in the adult rat testis. Histochem Cell Biol 110:613–618[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Wrana JL, Attisano L, Wieser R, Ventura F, Massague J 1994 Mechanism of activation of the TGF-ß receptor. Nature 370:341–347[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Derynck R, Feng XH 1997 TGF-ß receptor signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta 1333:F105–150
  16. Franzen P, ten Dijke P, Ichijo H, Yamashita H, Schulz P, Heldin CH, Miyazono K 1993 Cloning of a TGF ß type I receptor that forms a heteromeric complex with the TGF beta type II receptor. Cell 75:681–692[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Moren A, Ichijo H, Miyazono K 1992 Molecular cloning and characterization of the human and porcine transforming growth factor-ß type III receptors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 189:356–362[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Lin HY, Wang XF, Ng-Eaton E, Weinberg RA, Lodish HF 1992 Expression cloning of the TGF-ß type II receptor, a functional transmembrane serine/threonine kinase. Cell 68:775–785[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Mather JP, Phillips DM 1984 Primary cultures of testicular somatic cells. In: Barnes DW, Sirbasku DA, Sato JH (eds) Methods for Serum-Free Culture of Cells of the Endocrine System. Liss, New York, pp 29–45
  20. Benahmed M, Morera AM, Chauvin MC, de Peretti E 1987 Somatomedin C/insulin-like growth factor 1 as a possible intratesticular regulator of Leydig cell activity. Mol Cell Endocrinol 50:69–77[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Forest MG, Cathiard AM, Bertrand J 1973 Total and unbound testosterone levels in newborns and normal hypogonadal children: use of a sensitive radioimmunoassay for testosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 36:1132–1142[Medline]
  22. Cone JL, Brown DR, DeLarco JE 1988 An improved method of purification of transforming growth factor, type ß from platelets. Anal Biochem 168:71–74[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Frolik CA, Wakefield LM, Smith DM, Sporn MS 1984 Characterization of a membrane receptor for transforming growth factor-ß in normal rat kidney fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 259:10095–11000
  24. Goddard I, Hendrick JC, Benahmed M, Morera AM 1995 Transforming growth factor ß receptor expression in cultured porcine granulosa cells. Mol Cel Endocrinol 115:207–213[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Laemmli UK 1970 Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N 1987 Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159[Medline]
  27. Cheifetz S, Like B, Massague J 1986 Cellular distribution of type I and type II receptors for transforming growth factor-ß. J Biol Chem 261:9972–9978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Inagaki M, Moustakas A, Lin HY, Lodish HF, Carr BI 1993 Growth inhibition by transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) type I is restored in TGF-ß-resistant hepatoma cells after expression of TGF-beta receptor type II cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:5359–5363[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kadin ME, Cavaille-Coll MW, Gertz R, Massague J, Cheifetz S, George D 1994 Loss of receptors for transforming growth factor beta in human T-cell malignancies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:6002–6006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Massague J 1985 Subunit structure of a high-affinity receptor for type ß-transforming growth factor. Evidence for a disulfide-linked glycosylated receptor complex. J Biol Chem 260:7059–7066[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Wang XF, Lin HY, Ng-Eaton E, Downward J, Lodish HF, Weinberg RA 1991 Expression cloning and characterization of the TGF-ß type III receptor. Cell 67:797–805[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Lopez-Casillas F, Cheifetz S, Doody J, Andres JL, Lane WS, Massague J 1991 Structure and expression of the membrane proteoglycan betaglycan, a component of the TGF-beta receptor system. Cell 67:785–795[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Kyprianou N, Isaacs JT 1988 Identification of a cellular receptor for transforming growth factor-ß in rat ventral prostate and its negative regulation by androgens. Endocrinology 123:2124–2131[Abstract]
  34. Riser BL, Ladson-Wofford S, Sharba A, Cortes P, Drake K, Guerin CJ, Yee J, Choi ME, Segarini PR, Narins RG 1999 TGF-beta receptor expression and binding in rat mesangial cells: modulation by glucose and cyclic mechanical strain. Kidney Int 56:428–439[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Pascal MM, Forrester JV, Knott RM 1999 Glucose-mediated regulation of transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) and TGF-ß receptors in human retinal endothelial cells. Curr Eye Res 19:162–170[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Wang D, Sun L, Zborowska E, Willson JK, Gong J, Verraraghavan J, Brattain MG 1999 Control of type II transforming growth factor-ß receptor expression by integrin ligation. J Biol Chem 274:12840–12847[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Tseng SC, Li DQ, Ma X 1999 Suppression of transforming growth factor-ß isoforms, TGF-ß receptor type II, and myofibroblast differentiation in cultured human corneal and limbal fibroblasts by amniotic membrane matrix. J Cell Physiol 179:325–335[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Chen MF, Gray KD, Prentice MA, Mariano JM, Jakowlew SB 1999 Human pulmonary acinar aplasia: reduction of transforming growth factor-ß ligands and receptors. Pediatr Res 46:61–70[Medline]
  39. Matsushita M, Matsuzaki K, Date M, Watanabe T, Shibano K, Nakagawa T, Yanagitani S, Amoh Y, Takemoto H, Ogata N, Yamamoto C, Kubota Y, Seki T, Inokuchi H, Nishizawa M, Takada H, Sawamura T, Okamura A, Inoue K 1999 Down-regulation of TGF-ß receptors in human colorectal cancer: implications for cancer development. Br J Cancer 80:194–205[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Kim IY, Ahn HJ, Zelner DJ, Shaw JW, Lang S, Kato M, Oefelein MG, Miyazono K, Nemeth JA, Kozlowski JM, Lee C 1996 Loss of expression of transforming growth factor ß type I and type II receptors correlates with tumor grade in human prostate cancer tissues. Clin Cancer Res 2:1255–1261[Abstract]
  41. Williams RH, Stapleton AM, Yang G, Truong LD, Rogers E, Timme TL, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT, Thompson TC 1996 Reduced levels of transforming growth factor ß receptor type II in human prostate cancer: an immunohistochemical study. Clin Cancer Res 2:635–640[Abstract]
  42. Villanueva A, Garcia C, Paules AB, Vicente M, Megias M, Reyes G, de Villalonga P, Agell N, Lluis F, Bachs O, Capella G 1998 Disruption of the antiproliferative TGF-ß signaling pathways in human pancreatic cancer cells. Oncogene 17:1969–1978[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Roulot D, Sevcsik AM, Coste T, Strosberg AD, Marullo S 1999 Role of transforming growth factor ß type II receptor in hepatic fibrosis: studies of human chronic hepatitis C and experimental fibrosis in rats. Hepatology 29:1730–1738[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Lippa CF, Flanders KC, Kim ES, Croul S 1998 TGF-ß receptors-I and -II immunoexpression in Alzheimer’s disease: a comparison with aging and progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurobiol Aging 19:527–533[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Abe H, Iehara N, Utsunomiya K, Kita T, Doi T 1999 A vitamin D analog regulates mesangial cell smooth muscle phenotypes in a transforming growth factor-ß type II receptor-mediated manner. J Biol Chem 274:20874–20878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Chang WY, Birch L, Woodham C, Gold LI, Prins GS 1999 Neonatal estrogen exposure alters the transforming growth factor-beta signaling system in the developing rat prostate and blocks the transient p21(cip1/waf1) expression associated with epithelial differentiation. Endocrinology 140:2801–2813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Kyprianou N, Isaacs JT 1988 Identification of a cellular receptor for transforming growth factor-ß in rat ventral prostate and its negative regulation by androgens. Endocrinology 123:2124–2131
  48. Saez C, Gonzalez-Baena AC, Japon MA, Giraldez J, Segura DI, Miranda G, Rodriguez-Vallejo JM, Gonzalez-Esteban J, Torrubia F 1998 Regressive changes in finasteride-treated human hyperplastic prostates correlate with an upregulation of TGF-ß receptor expression. Prostate 37:84–90[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Roy SK, Kole AR 1995 Transforming growth factor-ß receptor type II expression in the hamster ovary: cellular site(s), biochemical properties, and hormonal regulation. Endocrinology 136:4610–4620[Abstract]
  50. Roy SK, Kole AR 1998 Ovarian transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) receptors: in-vitro effects of follicle stimulating hormone, epidermal growth factor and TGF-ß on receptor expression in human preantral follicles. Mol Hum Reprod 4:207–214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Sordoillet C, Chauvin MA, Hendrick JC, Franchimont P, Morera AM, Benahmed M 1992 Sites of interaction between epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-ß1 in the control of steroidogenesis in cultured porcine Leydig cells. Endocrinology 130:1352–1358[Abstract]
  52. Besset V, Collette J, Chauvin MA, Franchimont P, Benahmed M 1994 Effect of transforming growth factor-ß1 on the insulin-like growth factor system in cultured porcine Leydig cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 99:251–257[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. G. Farnworth, Y. Wang, R. Escalona, P. Leembruggen, G. T. Ooi, and J. K. Findlay
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Blocks Inhibin Binding to Different Target Cell Types in a Context-Dependent Manner through Dual Mechanisms Involving Betaglycan
Endocrinology, November 1, 2007; 148(11): 5355 - 5368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. Bourguiba, S. Chater, C. Delalande, M. Benahmed, and S. Carreau
Regulation of Aromatase Gene Expression in Purified Germ Cells of Adult Male Rats: Effects of Transforming Growth Factor {beta}, Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha}, and Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'-Monosphosphate
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2003; 69(2): 592 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
D. J. Bernard
Editorial Commentary: SMAD Expression in the Testis Predicts Age- and Cell-Specific Responses to Activin and TGF{beta}
J Androl, March 1, 2003; 24(2): 201 - 203.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A. Narula, S. Kilen, E. Ma, J. Kroeger, E. Goldberg, and T. K. Woodruff
Smad4 Overexpression Causes Germ Cell Ablation and Leydig Cell Hyperplasia in Transgenic Mice
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2002; 161(5): 1723 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. A. MacConell, A. M. O. Leal, and W. W. Vale
The Distribution of Betaglycan Protein and mRNA in Rat Brain, Pituitary, and Gonads: Implications for a Role for Betaglycan in Inhibin-Mediated Reproductive Functions
Endocrinology, March 1, 2002; 143(3): 1066 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goddard, I.
Right arrow Articles by Benahmed, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goddard, I.
Right arrow Articles by Benahmed, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals