help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xie, W.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xie, W.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 7 2439-2449
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Transcriptional Activation of Thymidylate Synthase by 17ß-Estradiol in MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells1

Wen Xie, Reqin Duan, Ichen Chen, Ismael Samudio and Stephen Safe2

Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4466

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Stephen H. Safe, Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4466. E-mail: ssafe{at}cvm.tamu.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Thymidylate synthase (TS) catalyzes methylation of deoxyuridine phosphate to give deoxythymidine phosphate, and 17ß-estradiol (E2) induces TS gene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Analysis of the TS gene promoter showed that E2-responsiveness required the -229 to -140 promoter region containing a G-rich sequence and CACCC box. Subsequent mutational analysis of this region indicated that only the G-rich motif (-150 to -142) was required for E2 action. Results of gel mobility shift and in vitro DNA footprinting assays showed that both estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER{alpha}) and Sp1 proteins were required for hormone-induced trans-activation that involved ER{alpha}/Sp1 binding to the G-rich site in which only Sp1 protein bound DNA. Both proteins also interacted in Drosophila cells in functional assays, confirming the transcriptional activation of TS-involved ER{alpha}/Sp1, and this adds to the increasing number of genes that are activated through this pathway in breast cancer cells.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MCF-7 HUMAN breast cancer cells express estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER{alpha}) and have been used extensively as a model for investigating the effects of estrogens, mitogenic growth factors, and antiestrogens on cell proliferation and gene expression (reviewed in Refs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Several studies demonstrate that 17ß-estradiol (E2), insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), transforming growth factor-{alpha}, epidermal growth factor, and insulin induce the growth of MCF-7 and other ER{alpha}-positive breast cancer cell lines, and in some studies combined treatment with E2 plus mitogenic polypeptides gave more than additive cell proliferation (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). Differences in responsiveness to E2/mitogenic polypeptides are frequently reported, and these may be due in part to serum factors and variable expression of wild-type and truncated forms of ER{alpha} in MCF-7 cells (18, 19, 20, 21).

Hormone-induced proliferation of MCF-7 cells is accompanied by increased DNA synthesis and [3H]thymidine uptake, and several enzymes and/or genes associated with purine and pyrimidine synthesis are also up-regulated (22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). For example, dihyrofolate reductase, thymidylate synthase (TS), and thymidine kinase responses are increased after treatment of MCF-7 cells with E2; however, the magnitude of these responses to and effects of antiestrogens were variable (26, 27). For example, E2 caused a slight increase in TS activity, and both tamoxifen and 4'-hydroxytamoxifen also increased activity, but only at some concentrations. We have been investigating the regulation of E2-induced gene expression, and analysis of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) from MCF-7 cells by suppressive subtractive hybridization identified TS as 1 of at least 45 genes up-regulated by E2. This induction response was confirmed by Northern blot analysis. Analysis of the TS gene promoter has shown that a downstream GC-rich (-150 to -142) Sp1 protein-binding site is required for E2-mediated transcriptional activation of the TS gene. ER{alpha}/Sp1 action through binding G/GC-rich motifs has now been characterized in several gene promoters, including c-fos, heat shock protein 27, retinoic acid receptor {alpha}1, adenosine deaminase, cathepsin D, bcl-2, and IGF-binding protein 4 (IGFBP-4) (29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36), and the results of this study indicate that TS is induced via a comparable pathway in MCF-7 cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemicals, MCF-7 cells, and oligonucleotides
MCF-7 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Cells were routinely maintained in MEM with phenol red and supplemented with 10% FBS plus 10 ml antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in an air-carbon dioxide (95:5) atmosphere at 37 C. For transient transfection studies, cells were grown for 1 day in DMEM/Ham’s F-12 medium, without phenol red, and 5% FBS treated with dextran-coated charcoal. The constructs pTS1, pTS2, and pTS3 contained TS gene promoter inserts linked to a bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene in pGEMBH-1 were provided by Dr. Keiichi Takeish (University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka-shi, Japan). The wild-type human ER (hER) expression plasmid was provided by Dr. Ming-Jer Tsai (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX). Recombinant human ER protein was obtained from PanVera Corp. (Madison, WI), and recombinant human Sp1 protein was obtained from Promega Corp. (Madison, WI). The dominant negative Sp1 plasmid pEBG-Sp1 was provided by Dr. G. Thiel (University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany). pPacSp1 expression plasmid was obtained from Dr. R. Tjian (Berkeley, CA), and pPacER{alpha} was prepared in this laboratory (37). Dimethylsulfoxide (Me2SO) was used as solvent for E2 and the antiestrogens. 4'-Hydroxytamoxifen was purchased from Sigma; ICI 182,780 was provided by Alan Wakeling (Astra USA, Inc.-Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK). ß-Galactosidase activity in cotransfection studies was determined using an assay kit purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). All other chemicals and biochemicals were the highest quality available from commercial sources.

Oligonucleotides derived from the TS gene promoter and a consensus Sp1 oligonucleotide were synthesized by the Gene Technologies Laboratory, Texas A & M University (College Station, TX). Structures of these oligonucleotides (sense strands) are summarized below. The putative Sp1 binding sites are underlined, and mutations incorporated in the mutant oligonucleotides are denoted by an asterisk: TS4 (-229/-140), 5'-AGC TTG CCA CAC CCG TGG CTC CTG CGT TTC CCC CTG GCG CAC GCT CTC TAG AGC GGG GGC CGC GAC CCC GCC GAG CAG GAA GAG GCG GAG CG-3'; TS4m1 (-229/-140), 5'-AGC TTG A1A1T1 A1T1T1 CCG TGG CTC CTG CGT TTC CCC CTG GCG CAC GCT CTC TAG AGC GGG GGC CGC CGC GAC CCC GCC GAG CAG GAA GAG GCG GAG CG-3'; TS4m2 (-229/-140), 5'-AGC TTG CCA CAC CCG TGG CTC CTG CGT TTC CCC CTG GCG CAC GCT CTC TAG AGC GGG GGC CGC CGC GAC CCC GCC GAG CAG GAA GAT1 C1T1T1 A1AG CG-3'; TS4m3 (-229/-140), 5'-AGC TTG CCA CAC CCG TGG CTC CTA1 G1A1T C1TC CCC CTG GCG CAC GCT CTC TAG AGC GGG GGC CGC GAC CCC GCC GAG CAG GAA GAG GCG GAG CG-3'; TSSp1 (-145/-124), 5'-AGC TTC AGG AAG AGG CGG AGC GCG GGA G-3'; TSSp1m (-145/-124), 5'-AGC TTC AGG AAG AT1C1 T1T1A1 AGC GCG GGA G-3'; and Sp1 (consensus), 5'-AGC TTA TTC GAT CGG GGC GGG GCG AGC G-3'.

Cloning
The inserts encoding the wild-type hER were removed by digesting the appropriate plasmids with EcoRI. The inserts were then religated into pcDNA3-Neo (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), which had been linearized with EcoRI and treated with CIAP (29, 30, 31, 32). The ligation products were transformed into DH5a cells, and clones were verified by sequencing. Efficiencies for in vitro transcription/translation of these genes were periodically determined using the rabbit reticulocyte lysate system and [35S]methione, followed by SDS-PAGE and quantitation of radiolabeled proteins by densitometry. Results showed that levels of immunoreactive wild-type and variant ER{alpha} proteins were not significantly different. The pBLTATA-CAT plasmid was made by digesting the pBLCAT2 vector with BamHI and XhoI to remove the thymidine kinase promoter; the double stranded E1B oligonucleotide containing complementary 5'-overhangs was then inserted into the corresponding sites. TS4, TS4m1, TS4m2, and TS4m3 oligonucleotides were cloned into the pBLTATA-CAT vector at the HindIII and BamHI sites to give the pTS4, pTS4m1, pTS4m2, and pTS4m3 constructs, respectively. pTS1, pTS2, and pTS3 constructs contained -441 to +28, -229 to +28, and -140 to +28 TS gene promoter inserts (37).

Transient transfection assay
MCF-7 cells were transfected using the calcium phosphate method with 10 µg TS gene promoter-derived constructs and 5 µg wild-type or variant ER expression plasmids; in the absence of cotransfected wild-type ER, no hormone-responsiveness was observed, and this was due to overexpression of the TS promoter-derived constructs. ß-Galactosidase-lacZ plasmid (5.0 µg) obtained from Invitrogen was cotransfected in studies determining differences in basal CAT activities with constructs containing TS gene promoter inserts; activities are corrected for transfection efficiencies. Previous studies have shown the requirement for cotransfection of hER expression plasmid using other E2-responsive constructs in MCF-7 cells (29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43). pcDNA3-Neo (Invitrogen) was used as an empty vector (control) and was also added in some experiments to maintain uniform levels of added DNA. Transfection efficiency was high, and no additional shock was required. After 18 h, medium was changed, and cells were treated with Me2SO (0.2% total volume), E2, 4'-hydroxytamoxifen, ICI 182,780, or their combinations in Me2SO for 44 h. Cells were then washed with PBS and scraped from the plates. Cell lysates were prepared in 0.15 ml 0.25 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) by three freeze-thaw-sonication cycles (3 min each). Protein concentrations were determined using BSA as a standard, and analysis of CAT activity in cell lysates used a constant amount of protein from each treatment group. Lysates were incubated at 56 C for 7 min to remove endogenous deacetylase activity. CAT activity was determined by incubating aliquots of the cell lysates with 0.2 mCi D-threo-[dichloroacetyl-1-14C]chloramphenicol and 4 mM acetylcoenzyme A. Acetylated products were visualized and quantitated using a Instant Imager system (Packard Instruments Co., Downers Grove, IL). CAT activity was calculated as a fraction of that observed in cells treated with Me2SO alone (arbitrarily set at 100), and results are expressed as the mean ± SD. At least three separate experiments were carried out for each treatment group.

Schneider cell maintenance and transfection
Schneider SL-2 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection and were grown at room temperature in T-150 flasks in Schneider’s medium (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 5% FCS (heat inactivated at 56 C for 30 min) and 0.5 x antibiotic/antimycotic solution. Three milliliters of cell suspension per plate were pipetted onto 60-mm plates, and after incubation for 24 h at room temperature, cells were transfected with 0.5 ml transfection cocktail containing 5 µg pTS4 report plasmid, 1 µg ß-galactosidase, 250 µl 2 x HBSS, and 25 µl 2.5 M CaCl2, with different amounts of pPac/Sp1 or pPac/hER{alpha} plasmids. The vector pPac was used to make the total amount of plasmid DNA 7 µg/incubation. After incubation for 20 h at room temperature, cells transfected with ER{alpha} were treated with 10-8 M E2 or received only the solvent carrier (Me2SO) for 44 h and were harvested by scraping. CAT activities were determined and normalized to ß-galactosidase activity as described above.

Ribonuclease protection assay
Cells were plated into 100-mm petri dishes and cultured in 5% stripped serum for 24 h, then synchronized for 2 days and treated with Me2SO (control) and 1 nM E2 at various time points. A solution of RNAzol B (Tel-Test, Inc., Friendswood, TX) was added, cells were scraped from the plates, and total RNA was extracted. Using a T7 promoter sequence appended to 5' of reverse PCR primers, the PCR products of TS and ß-actin complementary DNAs (cDNAs) were in vitro transcribed to [{alpha}-32P]UTP-labeled complementary RNAs (cRNAs) by a T7 RNA polymerase using the standard protocol, as described in the assay kit (Ambion, Inc. Austin, TX). The 251- and 306-nucleotide riboprobes were complementary to the coding region from 469–720 of TS mRNA and from 144–450 of ß-actin mRNA. The ribonuclease protection assay was performed following the standard protocol supplied with the assay kit (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX). Briefly, total RNA (30 µg) was incubated for 15 min at 68 C with 80,000 cpm gel-purified [{alpha}-32P]UTP-labeled cRNAs in 10 µl hybridization buffer. After hybridization, the samples were digested with ribonuclease A/T1 in 100 µl RNase digestion buffer for 30 min at 37 C. The digestion reaction was terminated by the addition of 150 µl inactivation/precipitation mix. The mixture was precipitated then denatured and electrophoresed on a 5% polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea. The gel was dried and exposed to a x-ray film for 24 h. Levels of protected cRNA probe were standardized relative to protected ß-actin cRNA probe in the same sample, and band intensities were determined on Betagen Betascope 603 blot analyzer (Intelligenetics, Inc., Mountain View, CA) or autoradiography using X-Omat film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY). Quantitation of band intensities used a Zero-D software package (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) and a JX-330 scanner (Sharp Electronics, Mahwah, NJ).

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays with pure protein
Gel electromobility shift assays were performed using recombinant Sp1 protein and different amounts of ER protein. E2 was added to the reaction at a final concentration of 20 nM and then incubated on ice for 15 min. Sp1 protein and 32P-labeled oligonucleotides were then added to the reaction mixtures in the presence of 1 µg poly[deoxyinosinic-cytidylic acid] and incubated for 15 min at 25 C. In competition experiments, different amounts of unlabeled oligonucleotides were also included in the incubation mixture. Aliquots of these mixtures were loaded onto a 4% polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide-bisacrylamide ratio, 30:0.8) and run at 110 V in 0.09 M Tris-0.09 M borate-2 mM EDTA (pH 8.0). 32P-Labeled DNA and DNA-protein bands were visualized by autoradiography and quantitated by densitometry using the Molecular Dynamics, Inc. Zero-D software package and a Sharp JX-330 scanner. For some of these studies, relative band intensities are presented as the mean ± SD for three separate experiments.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays with nuclear extracts
Synthetic oligonucleotides were synthesized, purified, annealed, and 32P labeled, and DNA binding was measured using a gel retardation assay as previously described (34). Nuclear extracts were incubated in HEGD buffer (25 mM HEPES, 1.5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, and 1.0 mM dithiothreitol, pH 7.6) with poly[d(I-C)] (200 ng) for 15 min at 20 C. The mixture was then incubated for an additional 15 min (20 C) after the addition of 32P-labeled DNA. Aliquots from reaction mixtures were loaded into a 5% polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide-bisacrylamide, 30:0.8) and electrophoresed at 110 V in 0.9 M Tris-borate and 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0. The gel was dried, and protein-DNA interactions were determined, quantitated by scanning on an Instant Imager system, and visualized by autoradiography as described above.

In vitro SssI footprinting
This is a highly sensitive assay for studying protein-DNA interactions and depends on SssI methylation of CpG sites (36, 44, 45). Fifty micrograms of pTS1 containing the -441 to +28 insert from the TS gene promoter were restricted with XhoI and diluted (10 ng/µl), and 1 µl was incubated with different concentrations of human recombinant ER{alpha}, Sp1, and both proteins simultaneously. Binding reactions were carried out in 1 x NS binding buffer (0.02 M HEPES, 0.1 M KCl, 0.005 M MgCl2, 0.004 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, and 50 mM 5-adenosylmethionine) in a volume of 25 µl. The binding reactions were incubated on ice for 5 min and then equilibrated to room temperature for 20 min. One microliter of purified SssI (New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, MA) was added to the equilibrated reactions and incubated at 30 C for 15 min and then at 75 C for 15 min; 10 µl freshly made deamination denaturation buffer (0.9 N sodium hydroxide, 25 mM EDTA, and 0.2 mg/ml sheared salmon sperm DNA) were added. After incubation for 5 min at 98 C, 200 µl of a saturated solution of sodium metabisulfite were added, and the samples were processed as described previously (44, 45). The primers used to amplify from the purified deaminated plasmid DNA were: WB1, 5'-CAC CAA CTA ACA AAA AAA AAA TAT ACT AC-3'; and WB2, 5'-TTT TAA AAT GTT TTT TAT GAT GTT ATT G-3'.

Statistics
Results are expressed as the mean ± SD for three separate determinations for each data point. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA and Scheffe’s post-hoc test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Transcriptional activation of TS gene expression by E2 in MCF-7 cells
Suppressive subtractive hybridization studies using polyadenylated mRNA from MCF-7 cells treated with E2 indicated that TS mRNA was expressed at relatively low levels but was significantly increased after treatment with E2 (data not shown). Transcriptional activation of TS by E2 was confirmed by Northern blot analysis. In some individual experiments, mRNA levels were increased by nearly 2-fold, whereas in replicate (n = 3) experiments, a significant (P < 0.05) more than 60% increase in steady state TS mRNA levels was observed after treatment with E2 (Fig. 1AGo). Basal and E2-induced CAT activities were investigated in transient transfection studies in MCF-7 cells using a series of constructs containing promoter inserts from the TS gene (37). Basal CAT activities in MCF-7 cells transfected with pTS1, pTS2, and pTS3 were comparable (Fig. 1BGo), and these data contrasted with the results of previous studies using HeLa cells (37), which showed that the -229 to -140 region of the gene promoter was primarily responsible for high basal activity that was decreased by upstream negative regulatory elements (-441 to -229).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Transcriptional activation of TS by E2. A, Ribonuclease protection assay. Total RNA (30 µg) prepared from Me2SO- and 1 nM E2-treated MCF-7 cells at various time points was hybridized with radiolabeled TS and ß-actin cRNA probes. Undigested TS (251 nucleotides; lane 2) and ß-actin (306 nucleotides; lane 3) probes, ribonuclease-digested probes (negative control; lane 4), and protected TS and ß-actin cRNA probes (lanes 5–12) were electrophoresed on a 5% polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea. After autoradiography, the percent expression levels of the 251-nucleotide protected TS cRNA was standardized relative to protected ß-actin cRNA probe as described in Materials and Methods. Results are the average of two separate determinations. B, Transient transfection. MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with pTS1, pTS2, or pTS3 and treated with Me2SO or 10 nM E2, and CAT activity was determined as described in Materials and Methods. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD for three replicate determinations. E2 significantly induced (P < 0.05) CAT activity only in cells transfected with pTS2.

 
The E2 responsiveness of constructs containing TS gene promoter inserts was determined in transient transfection studies in MCF-7 cells cotransfected with wild-type hER{alpha} (5 µg) and treated with Me2SO or 10 nM E2. In the absence of cotransfected ER{alpha}, induction by E2 was not observed due to insufficient endogenous ER{alpha} in transfected cells that overexpress the TS constructs. With the exception of plasmids that contain one or more copies of palindromic estrogen-responsive elements, most constructs containing promoter inserts from E2-responsive genes also require cotransfection with wild-type ER{alpha} in MCF-7 cells for trans-activation by E2 (29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43). The results (Fig. 1BGo) show that E2 did not induce CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with pTS1; however, after removal of the upstream -441 to -230 sequence, the resulting pTS2 construct was E2 responsive; hormone inducibility was subsequently lost in pTS3, indicating that elements required for ER{alpha} action were located in the -229 to -140 region of the TS gene promoter.

The construct pTS4 contains the -229 to -140 region of the TS gene promoter linked to a CAT reporter gene, and E2 induced CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with pTS4. Previous studies demonstrated that a CACCC box and a nonconsensus Sp1 binding motif (GAGGCGGA) were important for basal activity of constructs containing TS gene promoter inserts (37), and we have investigated the roles of both sites in E2 responsiveness using constructs mutated in the CACCC box (pTS4m1) and the downstream Sp1 binding site (pTS4m2). A third construct, pTS4m3, was mutated within a negative regulatory sequence (-212 to -202) identified in transfection studies in HeLa cells. The results of transient transfection studies showed that pTS4m1 and pTS4m3 were E2 responsive (>2.5-fold induction), indicating that the downstream G-rich site was required for ER{alpha} action. Mutation of the negative regulatory sequence did not affect E2 responsiveness; however, basal activity was higher. The results in Fig. 2BGo show that in MCF-7 cells transfected with pTS4 plus pEBG (empty vector), E2 induced CAT activity; in contrast, when pEBG was replaced by a plasmid expressing the dominant negative form of Sp1 (pEBG-Sp1), hormone-induced CAT activity was lost. These data confirm that Sp1 protein is required for ER{alpha}/Sp1 action at the G-rich site in the TS gene promoter. The results in Fig. 2CGo summarize the effects of E2, 4'-hydroxytamoxifen, ICI 182,780, and their combination on CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transfected with pTS4 and ER{alpha} expression plasmid. ICI 182,780 alone was inactive and inhibited E2-induced CAT activity, whereas 4'-hydroxytamoxifen was an ER{alpha} agonist, and a previous report also showed that TS activity was induced by 4'-hydroxytamoxifen in MCF-7 cells (26).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Activation of wild-type and mutant pTS4 constructs. A, Mutational analysis of TS4 regions (-229 to -140). MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with pTS4, pTS4m1, pTS4m2, and pTS4m3 and treated with 10 nM E2 or Me2SO, and CAT activity was determined as described in Materials and Methods. Significant induction (P < 0.05) by E2 was observed for all constructs except pTS4m2, which was mutated in the G-rich site. B, Effects of cotransfection with dominant negative Sp1 (pEBG-Sp1). MCF-7 cells were transfected with pTS4 as described above, and cotransfection with dominant negative Sp1 (pEBG-Sp1), but not empty vector (pEBG), significantly inhibited (P < 0.05) E2-induced activity. C, Effects of antiestrogens. MCF-7 cells were transfected and treated with 10 nM E2, antiestrogens, or their combinations as described in A. E2 and 1 µM 4'-hydroxytamoxifen (Tam) alone induced (P < 0.05) CAT activity, and only ICI 182,780 (I) significantly (P < 0.05) inhibited E2-induced activity (i.e. group). All experiments are expressed as the mean ± SD for at least three replicate experiments.

 
Interactions of ER{alpha} and Sp1 with TSSp1 oligonucleotide (-145 to -124).
The results in Fig. 3AGo show that nuclear extracts from MCF-7 cells treated with DMSO (control) and 10 nM E2 bound to [32P]TSSp1 (contains the -145 to -124 region of the TS gene promoter) to give a major broad high mol wt retarded band (see arrow, lanes 1 and 2), and several lower mol wt bands. Treatment with E2 increased the intensity of the retarded band (lane 2). Competition with excess unlabeled consensus Sp1 and TSSp1 oligonucleotides significantly decreased the intensity of the high mol wt band. Incubation of MCF-7 cell nuclear extracts with 32P-labeled consensus Sp1 (lane 1) and TSSp1 (lane 2) oligonucleotides gave a similar pattern of retarded bands, including the high mol wt complex (Fig. 3BGo). The intensity of the [32P]TSSp1-protein retarded band was decreased after competition with excess unlabeled consensus Sp1 and TSSp1 oligonucleotides (lanes 3–6), but not that of the TSSp1m oligonucleotide that is mutated in the G-rich Sp1 protein-binding site. The high mol wt retarded band formed after incubation of MCF-7 cell nuclear extracts with 32P-labeled consensus Sp1, and TSSp1 oligonucleotides (Fig. 3CGo, lanes 1 and 4, respectively) were supershifted after coincubation with Sp1 antibody (lanes 2 and 5), but not nonspecific goat IgG (lanes 3 and 6). 32P-Labeled mutant TSSp1 did not form the high mol wt retarded band (lane 7) after incubation with nuclear extracts.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Gel mobility shift assays: binding of nuclear extracts to [32P]TSSp1 and [32P]Sp1 oligonucleotides. A, Nuclear extract binding. Nuclear extracts from Me2SO- and E2-treated cells were incubated with [32P]Sp1 (lanes 1 and 2) or [32P]TSSp1 (lanes 3 and 4), and gel mobility shift assays were carried out as described in Materials and Methods. The complex pattern of bands was similar for both probes, but bands were more intense using a consensus [32P]Sp1 oligonucleotide. B, Oligonucleotide competition studies. Nuclear extracts were incubated with consensus [32P]Sp1 (lane 1) and [32P]TSSp1 (lanes 2–8) oligonucleotides plus unlabeled oligonucleotides as described in Materials and Methods. Unlabeled consensus Sp1 (lanes 3 and 4) and TSSp1 (lanes 5 and 6), but not TSSp1m1 (lanes 7 and 8), competitively decreased retarded band intensity. C, Sp1 antibody supershift. Nuclear extracts were incubated with [32P]Sp1 (lane 1), [32P]TSSp1 (lane 4), and [32P]TSSp1m (lane 7); coincubation with Sp1 antibody (lanes 2 and 5), but not normal IgG (lanes 3 and 6), supershifted the major retarded band.

 
Interactions of [32P]TSSp1 with recombinant human Sp1 and ER{alpha} proteins were also determined in gel mobility shift assays (Fig. 4Go). Both radiolabeled consensus Sp1 and TSSp1 oligonucleotides bound Sp1 protein (Fig. 4AGo, lanes 1–7), whereas mutation of the G-rich site in TSSp1 resulted in the loss of Sp1-DNA complex formation (lanes 8 and 9). Moreover, the intensity of the [32P]TSSp1-Sp1 retarded band (Fig. 4BGo, lane 2) was decreased after competition with excess unlabeled consensus Sp1 (lanes 3 and 4) and TSSp1 (lanes 5–7), but not TSSp1m (lane 8) oligonucleotides. Thus, results with both nuclear extracts and recombinant human Sp1 protein suggest that the G-rich site (-150 to -142) in the TS gene promoter binds with Sp1 protein, and these results complement previous studies with nuclear extracts from HeLa cells (37). Incubation of [32P]TSSp1 with recombinant human ER{alpha} alone did not give a retarded band (Fig. 4CGo, lane 6); however, coincubation of recombinant ER{alpha} plus Sp1 proteins resulted in significantly enhanced Sp1-DNA binding (lanes 3–5) compared with binding studies using Sp1 protein alone (lane 2). Thus, ER{alpha} enhanced Sp1-DNA interactions, but did not form a supershifted band. Similar results were reported in previous studies using Sp1 and ER{alpha} proteins and G/GC-rich oligonucleotides derived from other E2-responsive gene promoters in which ER{alpha} enhanced the on-rate of Sp1-DNA complex formation (29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Gel mobility shift assay: binding of Sp1 and ER{alpha} proteins. A, Sp1 protein binding. [32P]Sp1 (lanes 1 and 2), [32P]TSSp1 (lanes 3–7), and [32P]TSSp1m (lanes 8 and 9) were incubated with different amounts of recombinant Sp1 protein, and gel mobility shift assays were determined as described in Materials and Methods. Sp1-DNA retarded bands were only observed for the wild-type oligonucleotides. B, Oligonucleotide competition studies. [32P]TSSp1 was incubated with Sp1 protein (lanes 2–8) and coincubated with unlabeled Sp1 (lane 3), TSSp1 (lanes 4–6), and TSSp1m (lanes 7 and 8) oligonucleotides as described in Materials and Methods. Only Sp1 and TSSp1 oligonucleotides competitively decreased the intensity of the Sp1-DNA complex. C, Sp1 and ER{alpha} interactions. [32P]TSSp1 was incubated with 3 ng Sp1 protein (lane 2), increasing amounts of ER{alpha} protein (lanes 3–5), and excess unlabeled TSSp1 oligonucleotide (lane 6) as described in Materials and Methods. ER{alpha} enhanced Sp1-DNA binding in lanes 3–5 (226%, 353%, and 431%, respectively) compared with the band intensity in lane 2 (100%). A supershifted complex was not observed.

 
In vitro DNA footprinting with SssI methyltransferase.
Interactions of ER{alpha} and Sp1 proteins and their combination were further investigated using a highly sensitive DNA footprinting assay (44, 45). Yeast SssI methyltransferase methylates CpG sites, and this technique has been adapted to investigate in vitro interactions of ER{alpha} and Sp1 proteins interacting with the G-rich E2-responsive region of the TS gene promoter. Incubation with ER{alpha} alone (Fig. 5Go, lanes 2 and 3) did not significantly alter methylation patterns compared with the control (lane 1); increasing concentrations of Sp1 protein (20–80 ng; lanes 4–6) did not alter the footprint in the -150 to -142 regions ({circ}); however, methylation of upstream G-rich sequences (1) was decreased, indicating some enhanced Sp1 binding, but only at the highest concentration of Sp1 protein. In contrast, after coincubation of ER{alpha} (100 or 400 fmol) with the lowest concentration of Sp1 protein (20 ng), there was an enhanced footprint in the -150 to -142 region as well as other upstream (1) and downstream G-rich sites. Thus, only the combination of ER{alpha} plus Sp1 proteins footprinted the E2-responsnive G-rich sequence (-150 to -142) in the TS gene promoter.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. In vitro DNA footprinting of the TS gene promoter. The pTS1 construct was incubated with ER{alpha}, Sp1, or ER{alpha} plus Sp1 proteins, and interactions with promoter DNA were determined by SssI methyltransferase-dependent methylation of CpG sites as described in Materials and Methods. Incubation of ER{alpha} or Sp1 protein alone (lanes 2–6) did not reverse the footprint at the G-rich sequence (-150 to -142; {square}), but the high concentration of Sp1 protein (lane 6) decreased methylation at upstream G-rich sites (*). Incubation with ER{alpha} plus Sp1 (lane 8) significantly inhibited methylation at -150 to -142 and at upstream sites.

 
ER{alpha} and Sp1 interactions in Drosophila Schneider SL2 cells
Schneider SL-2 cells do not express many nuclear transcription factors, including Sp1 and ER{alpha}, and these cells have been extensively used to study functional interactions of proteins with various promoters. The results in Fig. 6AGo demonstrate that basal reporter gene activity in SL-2 cells transfected with pTS4 is increased after cotransfection with Sp1 expression plasmid. In cells cotransfected with pTS4, Sp1 (100 ng) and different concentrations of ER{alpha} expression plasmids (plus 10 nM E2), there was significant trans-activation using 20 ng ER{alpha} expression plasmid, whereas in the absence of Sp1 protein, CAT activity was similar to that in the solvent (Me2SO) control (data not shown). The enhanced ER{alpha}-Sp1 interaction at G-rich sites in SL2 cells was also observed in a comparable study using a G-rich construct containing a bcl-2 gene promoter insert (36).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Trans-activation in Schneider SL-2 cells. Schneider SL-2 cells were incubated with pTS4 and different concentrations of Sp1 expression plasmid (10–2000 ng) or Sp1 (100 ng) plus ER{alpha} expression plasmids, and CAT activity was determined as described in Materials and Methods. Compared with the control (untreated) lane, transfection with 10, 100, 500, 1000, and 2000 ng Sp1 expression plasmid resulted in 2.4-, 3.6-, 5.3-, and 6.5-fold increases in activity, respectively. Cotransfection of Sp1 (100 ng) plus ER{alpha} (2–20 ng) expression plasmids resulted in a significant 4.5-fold enhancement (P < 0.05) of activity only with the highest amount of ER{alpha}. A concentration of 10 nM E2 was used in these studies. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD for three replicate experiments.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TS is a key enzyme in nucleotide metabolism and catalyzes the methylation of deoxyuridine monophosphate to deoxythymidine monophosphate in the presence of the cofactor N5,N10-methylenetetrahydrofolate. This reaction is the sole de novo source of thymidylate for DNA synthesis, and therefore, TS is an important target for chemotherapeutic drugs such as 5-fluorouracil that inhibit DNA synthesis in various tumors (46, 47, 48). TS is highly regulated; low levels are expressed in quiescent cells, but TS is significantly induced by serum and subsequent progression from the G0 to the G1/S phase of the cell cycle (49). Lippman and co-workers reported that TS activity is increased in MCF-7 cells after treatment with E2 (26), and this is consistent with the mitogenic activity of this hormone that stimulates several cell cycle enzymes and increases G1/S phase progression in MCF-7 cells (50, 51, 52, 53, 54).

We have used suppressive subtractive hybridization (55) with polyadenylated mRNA from MCF-7 cells to identify E2-regulated genes (56), and TS was 1 of over 40 genes up-regulated by E2. Northern analysis confirmed a more than 60% increase in steady state mRNA levels, and up to a 2-fold increase has been observed in some individual experiments (data not shown). Horie and Takeishi (37) previously analyzed the TS gene promoter in HeLa cells, and their studies showed that basal activity was dependent on sequences that both increased and decreased activity. In HeLa cells, transient transfection of constructs containing an upstream negative regulatory sequence (-342 to -269) exhibited low basal activity; however, results obtained for pTS1 and pTS2 suggest that this upstream sequence does not significantly affect the basal activity of TS constructs in MCF-7 cells. In contrast, E2 responsiveness was observed with pTS2, but not pTS1 or pTS3, suggesting that 1) the -441 to -229 region contains elements that inhibit transcriptional activation by E2; and 2) the -229 to -140 region is required for induction by E2. Although the major focus of this research was to characterize the E2-responsive region of the promoter, future studies will investigate those elements and proteins in the -441 to -229 region that block estrogen action.

Basal activity of the -229 to -140 region in HeLa cells also is regulated by a CACCC box (-228 to -212), a negative regulator sequence (-212 to -202), and a nonclassical G-rich Sp1-binding site (-150 to -142), and mutations of the latter two sites result in increased and decreased basal activities, respectively, whereas mutation of the CACCC box only slightly decreased activity (37). Mutational analysis of the activating sites in the TS promoter followed by transfection in MCF-7 cells also confirmed the relative importance of the downstream G-rich site for basal activity in this cell line, and mutation of the negative regulator sequence (pTS4m3) increased basal activity in MCF-7 and HeLa cells (37). Moreover, hormone activation of pTS4, pTS4m1, pTSm2, and pTSm3 showed that only the G-rich site was required for ER{alpha}-mediated trans-activation, and this response was inhibited by ICI 182,780, whereas 4'-hydroxytamoxifen was an ER{alpha} agonist.

Physical and functional interactions of Sp1 with other nuclear proteins have previously been characterized. For example, Sp1 and E2F1 interact in vitro, and E2F1 enhances Sp1-mediated trans-activation in promoter constructs containing only GC-rich sites (57, 58). Previous studies have demonstrated that ER{alpha} and Sp1 physically interact, and ER{alpha} preferentially binds to the C-terminal DNA-binding domain of Sp1 protein (29), the region that is also required for binding other transcription factors including E2F1 (57, 58). The results summarized in Figs. 3Go and 4Go demonstrate that Sp1 protein bound the downstream G-rich sequence (TSSp1, -145 to -124), and ER{alpha} protein enhanced Sp1-DNA binding but did not supershift the band. These observations were consistent with previous reports on ER{alpha}/Sp1 interactions with other G/GC-rich site from the c-fos, adenosine deaminase, retinoic acid receptor {alpha}1, IGFBP-4, cathepsin D, bcl-2, and E2F1 genes, where ER{alpha} also enhanced the on-rate of Sp1-DNA binding without forming a supershifted ternary complex (29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36). The failure to observe a supershifted ER{alpha}/Sp1-DNA complex is somewhat surprising in view of the known physical and functional interactions of ER{alpha} and Sp1 proteins (29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36); however, comparable observations have been reported for other interacting nuclear transcription factors. For example, sterol regulatory element-binding protein and cyclin D1 also enhanced binding of Sp1 and ER to their cognate enhancer elements (59, 60), and the human T cell lymphotropic virus type 1 Tax protein activates the transcription of several nuclear proteins by enhancing their DNA binding without forming a supershifted complex (61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66). We have also used a highly sensitive in vitro footprinting assay in which yeast SssI methyltransferase methylates CpG sites, and this can be carried out under a variety of incubation conditions. The results show that neither Sp1 nor ER{alpha} protein alone footprinted the E2-responsive G-rich region of the TS gene promoter; however, in combination, a significant footprint was observed. Thus, the in vitro footprint complements gel mobility shift data to demonstrate convergent interactions of ER{alpha} and Sp1 proteins at the -150 to -142 region of the TS gene promoter.

The results of this study in MCF-7 cells demonstrate that transiently transfected ER{alpha} expression plasmid is required for hormone-mediated trans-activation of TS through a G-rich site that binds endogenous Sp1 protein. ER{alpha}/Sp1 action was further confirmed in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with ER{alpha}, pTS4, and a dominant negative expression plasmid (pEBG-Sp) for Sp1, confirming a role for Sp1 protein in this transcriptional factor complex. Moreover, functional interactions of ER{alpha} and Sp1 proteins were also observed in Schneider SL-2 cells, where ER{alpha} clearly enhanced Sp1-dependent trans-activation.

In summary, this study shows that transcriptional activation of TS by E2 in MCF-7 cells involves ER{alpha}/Sp1 interactions at a G-rich promoter sequence. This mode of ER{alpha} action is important for regulating an increasing number of E2-responsive genes, including E2F1, bcl-2, cathepsin D, IGFBP-4, retinoic acid retinoic acid receptor {alpha}1, c-fos, and adenosine deaminase (29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36). Functional and/or physical interactions of Sp1 or Sp1-like proteins have been characterized for other members of the nuclear receptor superfamily, including chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcriptor factor (COUP-TF), progesterone receptor, and steroidogenic factor-1 (67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72), suggesting that Sp1 may play an increasingly important role in the cell-specific functions of nuclear receptor transcription factors.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by NIH Grants CA-76636 and ES-09106 and the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. Back

2 Sid Kyle Professor of Toxicology. Back

Received October 29, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Dickson RB, Lippman ME 1988 Control of human breast cancer by estrogen, growth factors, and oncogenes. In: Lippman ME, Dickson RB (eds) Breast Cancer: Cellular and Molecular Biology. Kluwer Press, Boston, pp 119–166
  2. Dickson RB, Lippman ME 1991 Growth regulation of normal and malignant breast epithelium. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM (eds) The Breast. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 363–394
  3. Dickson RB, Lippman ME 1995 Growth factors in breast cancer. Endocr Rev 16:559–589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ethier SP 1995 Growth factor synthesis and human breast cancer progression. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:964–973[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lippman ME, Dickson RB 1989 Mechanisms of growth control in normal and malignant breast epithelium. Recent Prog Horm Res 45:383–440
  6. Wakeling AE, Newboult E, Peters SW 1989 Effects of antioestrogens on the proliferation of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J Mol Endocrinol 2:225–234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Karey KP, Sirbasku DA 1988 Differential responsiveness of human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and T47D to growth factors and 17ß-estradiol. Cancer Res 48:4083–4092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Darbre P, Yates J, Curtis S, King RJ 1983 Effect of estradiol on human breast cancer cells in culture. Cancer Res 43:349–354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Chalbos D, Vignon F, Keydar I, Rochefort H 1982 Estrogens stimulate cell proliferation and induce secretory proteins in a human breast cancer cell line (T47D). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 55:276–283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ogasawara M, Sirbasku DA 1988 A new serum-free method of measuring growth factor activities for human breast cancer cells in culture. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 24:911–920[Medline]
  11. Imai Y, Leung CKH, Friesen HG, Shiu RPC 1982 Epidermal growth factor receptors and effect of epidermal growth factor on growth of human breast cancer cells in long-term tissue culture. Cancer Res 42:4394–4398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Fernandez P, Safe S 1992 Growth inhibitory and antimitogenic activity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in T47D human breast cancer cells. Toxicol Lett 61:185–197[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Lippman ME, Bolan G, Huff K 1976 The effects of estrogens and antiestrogens on hormone-responsive human breast cancer in long term culture. Cancer Res 36:4595–4601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Van der Burg B, Rutteman B, Blankenstein GR, De Laat SW, Van Zoelen EJJ 1988 Mitogenic stimulation of human breast cancer cells in a growth factor-defined medium: synergistic action of insulin and estrogen. J Cell Physiol 134:101–108[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Vignon F, Bouton M-M, Rochefort H 1987 Antiestrogens inhibit the mitogenic effect of growth factors on breast cancer cells in the total absence of estrogens. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 146:1502–1508[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Van der Burg B, Isbrucker L, van Selm-Miltenburg AJP, de Laat SW, van Zoelen EJJ 1990 Role of estrogen-induced insulin-like growth factors in the proliferation of human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 50:7770–7774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Furlanetto RW, DiCarlo JN 1984 Somatomedin C receptors and growth effects in human breast cancer cells maintained in long term tissue culture. Cancer Res 44:2122–2128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ruedl C, Cappelleti V, Coradini D, Granata G, DiFranzo G 1990 Influence of culture conditions on the estrogenic cell growth stimulation of human breast cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 37:195–200[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Wiese TE, Kral LG, Dennis KE, Butler WB, Brooks SC 1992 Optimization of estrogen growth response in MCF-7 cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 28A:595–602
  20. Zugmaier G, Knabbe C, Fritsch C, Simpson S, Ennis B, Lippman M, Dickson RB 1991 Tissue culture conditions determine the effects of estrogen and growth factors on the anchorage independent growth of human breast cancer cell lines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 39:681–685[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Klotz DM, Castles CG, Fuqua SAW, Spriggs LL, Hill SM 1995 Differential expression of wild-type and variant ER mRNAs by stocks of MCF-7 breast cancer cells may account for differences in estrogen responsiveness. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 210:609–615[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Bronzert DA, Monaco ME, Pinkus L, Aitken S, Lippman ME 1981 Purification and properties of estrogen-responsive cytoplasmic thymidine kinase from human breast cancer. Cancer Res 41:604–610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Aitken SC, Lippman ME 1982 Hormonal regulation of net DNA synthesis in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells in tissue culture. Cancer Res 42:1727–1735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Cowan K, Levine R, Aitken S, Goldsmith M, Douglass E, Clendeninn N, Nienhuis A, Lippman ME 1982 Dihydrofolate reductase gene amplification and possible rearrangement in estrogen-responsive methotrexate resistant human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 257:15079–15086[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Aitken SC, Lippman ME 1983 Hormonal regulation of de novo pyrimidine synthesis and utilization in human breast cancer cells in tissue culture. Cancer Res 43:4681–4690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Aitken SC, Lippman ME 1985 Effect of estrogens and antiestrogens on growth-regulatory enzymes in human breast cancer cells in tissue culture. Cancer Res 45:1611–1620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Aitken SC, Lippman ME, Kasid A, Schoenberg DR 1985 Relationship between the expression of estrogen-regulated genes and estrogen-stimulated proliferation of MCF-7 mammary tumor cells. Cancer Res 45:2608–2615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kasid A, Davidson NE, Gelmann EP, Lippman ME 1986 Transcriptional control of thymidine kinase gene expression by estrogens and antiestrogens in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 261:5562–5567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Porter W, Saville B, Hoivik D, Safe S 1997 Functional synergy between the transcription factor Sp1 and the estrogen receptor. Mol Endocrinol 11:1569–1580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Wang F, Hoivik D, Pollenz R, Safe S 1998 Functional and physical interactions between the estrogen receptor-Sp1 and the nuclear aryl hydrocarbon receptor complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 26:3044–3052[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Sun G, Porter W, Safe S 1998 Estrogen-induced retinoic acid receptor {alpha}1 gene expression: role of estrogen receptor-Sp1 complex. Mol Endocrinol 12:882–890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Duan R, Porter W, Safe S 1998 Estrogen-induced c-fos protooncogene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells: role of estrogen receptor Sp1 complex formation. Endocrinology 139:1981–1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Qin C, Singh P, Safe S 1999 Transcriptional activation of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 4 by 17ß-estradiol in MCF-7 cells: role of estrogen receptor-Sp1 complexes. Endocrinology 140:2501–2508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Xie W, Duan R, Safe S 1999 Estrogen induces adenosine deaminase gene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells: role of estrogen receptor-Sp1 interactions. Endocrinology 140:219–227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Wang W, Dong L, Saville B, Safe S 1999 Transcriptional activation of E2F1 gene expression by 17ß-estradiol in MCF-7 cells is regulated by NF-Y-Sp1/estrogen receptor interactions. Mol Endocrinol 13:1373–1387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Dong L, Wang W, Wang F, Stoner M, Reed JC, Harigai M, Kladde M, Vyhlidal C, Safe S 1999 Mechanisms of transcriptional activation of bcl-2 gene expression by 17ß-estradiol in breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 174:32099–32107
  37. Horie N, Takeishi K 1997 Identification of functional elements in the promoter region of the human gene for thymidylate synthase and nuclear factors that regulate the expression of the gene. J Biol Chem 272:18375–18381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Savouret JF, Bailly A, Misrahi M, Rarch C, Redeuilh G, Chauchereau A, Milgrom E 1991 Characterization of the hormone responsive element involved in the regulation of the progesterone receptor gene. EMBO J 10:1875–1883[Medline]
  39. Cavailles V, Augereau P, Rochefort H 1993 Cathepsin D gene is controlled by a mixed promoter, and estrogens stimulate only TATA-dependent transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:203–207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Cavailles V, Garcia M, Rochefort H 1989 Regulation of cathepsin D and pS2 gene expression by growth factors in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol 3:552–558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Zacharewski TR, Bondy KL, McDonell P, Wu ZF 1994 Antiestrogenic effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on 17ß-estradiol-induced pS2 expression. Cancer Res 54:2707–2713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Krishnan V, Wang X, Safe S 1994 Estrogen receptor-Sp1 complexes mediate estrogen-induced cathepsin D gene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 269:15912–15917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Porter W, Wang F, Wang W, Duan R, Safe S 1996 Role of estrogen receptor/Sp1 complexes in estrogen-induced heat shock protein 27 gene expression. Mol Endocrinol 10:1371–1378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Kladde MP, Simpson RT 1996 Chromatin structure mapping in vivo using methyltransferases. Methods Enzymol 274:214–233[Medline]
  45. Kladde MP, Xu M, Simpson RT 1996 Direct study of DNA-protein interactions in repressed and active chromatin in living cells. EMBO J 15:6290–6300[Medline]
  46. Moertel CG 1994 Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 330:1136–1142[Free Full Text]
  47. Pinedo HM, Peters GF 1988 Fluorouracil: biochemistry and pharmacology. J Clin Oncol 6:1653–1664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Grem JL 1990 Fluoropyrimidines. In: Chabner BA, Collins JM (eds) Cancer Chemotherapy, Principles and Practice. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 180–224
  49. Ayusawa D, Shimizu K, Koyama H, Kaneda S, Takeishi K, Seno T 1986 Cell-cycle-directed regulation of thymidylate synthase messenger RNA in human diploid fibroblasts stimulated to proliferate. J Mol Biol 190:559–567[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Dubik D, Dembinski TC, Shiu RPC 1987 Stimulation of c-myc oncogene expression associated with estrogen-induced proliferation of human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 47:6517–6521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Altucci L, Addeo R, Cicatiello L, Dauvois S, Parker M.G., Truss M, Beato M, Sica V, Bresciani F, Weisz A 1996 17ß-Estradiol induces cyclin D1 gene transcription, p36D1-p34cdk4 complex activation and p105Rb phosphorylation during mitogenic stimulation of G1-arrested human breast cancer cells. Oncogene 12:2315–2324[Medline]
  52. Foster JS, Wimalasena J 1996 Estrogen regulates activity of cyclin-dependent kinases and retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation in breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol 10:488–498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Planas-Silva MD, Weinberg RA 1997 Estrogen-dependent cyclin E-cdk2 activation through p21 redistribution. Mol Cell Biol 17:4059–4069[Abstract]
  54. Prall OWJ, Sarcevic B, Musgrove EA, Watts CKW, Sutherland RL 1997 Estrogen-induced activation of Cdk4 and Cdk2 during G1-S phase progression is accompanied by increased cyclin D1 expression and decreased cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor association with cyclin E-Cdk2. J Biol Chem 272:10882–10894[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Diatchenko L, Lau Y-FC, Campbell AP, Chenchik A, Moqadam F, Huang B, Lukyanov S, Lukyanov K, Gurskaya N, Sverdlov ED, Siebert PD 1996 Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:6025–6030[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Chen I (ed) 1999 Aryl Hydrocarbon Areceptor-Mediated Antiestrogenic Activity in Human Breast Cancer Cells. PhD Thesis. Texas A & M University, College Station
  57. Lin S-Y, Black AR, Kostic D, Pajovic S, Hoover CN, Azizkhan JC 1996 Cell cycle-regulated association of E2F1 and Sp1 is related to their functional interaction. Mol Cell Biol 16:1668–1675[Abstract]
  58. Karlseder J, Rotheneder H, Wintersberger E 1996 Interaction of Sp1 with the growth- and cell cycle-regulated transcription factor E2F. Mol Cell Biol 16:1659–1667[Abstract]
  59. Sanchez HB, Yieh L, Osborne TF 1995 Cooperation by sterol regulatory element-binding protein and Sp1 in sterol regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor gene. J Biol Chem 270:1161–1169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Zwijsen RM, Wientjens E, Klompmaker R, van der Sman J, Bernards R, Michalides RJ 1997 CDK-independent activation of estrogen receptor by cyclin D1. Cell 88:405–415[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Zhao LJ, Giam CZ 1992 Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) transcriptional activator, Tax, enhances CREB binding to HTLV-I 21-base-pair repeats by protein-protein interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:7070–7074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Armstrong AP, Franklin AA, Uittenbogaard MN, Giebler HA, Nyborg JK 1993 Pleiotropic effect of the human T-cell leukemia virus Tax protein on the DNA binding activity of eukaryotic transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:7303–7307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Wagner SA, Green MR 1993 HTLV-1 Tax protein stimulation of DNA binding of bZIP proteins by enhancing dimerization. Science 266:395–399
  64. Franklin AA, Kubik MF, Uittenbogaard MN, Brauweiler A, Utaisincharoen P, Matthews MA, Dynan WS, Hoeffler JP, Nyborg JK 1993 Transactivation by the human T-cell leukemia virus Tax protein is mediated through enhanced binding of activating transcription factor-2 (ATF-2) ATF-2 response and cAMP element-binding protein (CREB). J Biol Chem 268:21225–21231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Anderson MG, Dynan WS 1994 Quantitative studies of the effect of HTLV-I Tax protein on CREB protein-DNA binding. Nucleic Acids Res 22:3194–3201[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Matthews MA, Markowitz RB, Dynan WS 1992 In vitro activation of transcription by the human T-cell leukemia virus type I Tax protein. Mol Cell Biol 12:1986–1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Rohr O, Aunis D, Schaeffer E 1997 COUP-TF and Sp1 interact and cooperate in the transcriptional activation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat in human microglial cells. J Biol Chem 272:31149–31155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Pipaón C, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ 1999 COUP-TF upregulates NGFI-A gene expression through an Sp1 binding site. Mol Cell Biol 19:2734–2745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Liu Z, Simpson ER 1997 Steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) and SP1 are required for regulation of bovine CYP11A gene expression in bovine luteal cells and adrenal Y1 cells. Mol Endocrinol 11:127–137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Monte D, DeWitte F, Hum DW 1998 Regulation of the human P450scc gene by steroidogenic factor 1 is mediated by CBP/p300. J Biol Chem 273:4585–4591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Owen GI, Richer JK, Tung L, Takimoto G, Horwitz KB 1998 Progesterone regulates transcription of the p21WAF1 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor gene through Sp1 and CBP/p300. J Biol Chem 273:10696–10701[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Simmen RCM, Chung TE, Imataka H, Michel FJ, Badinga L, Simmen FA 1999 Trans-activation functions of the Sp-related nuclear factor, basic transcription element-binding protein, and progesterone receptor in endometrial epithelial cells. Endocrinology 140:2517–2525[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. S. Wickramasinghe, T. T. Manavalan, S. M. Dougherty, K. A. Riggs, Y. Li, and C. M. Klinge
Estradiol downregulates miR-21 expression and increases miR-21 target gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells
Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2009; 37(8): 2584 - 2595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
W.-H. Xu, J.-R. Long, W. Zheng, Z.-X. Ruan, Q. Cai, J.-R. Cheng, G.-M. Zhao, Y.-B. Xiang, and X.-O. Shu
Association of Thymidylate Synthase Gene with Endometrial Cancer Risk in a Chinese Population
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2009; 18(2): 579 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
S. Safe and K. Kim
Non-classical genomic estrogen receptor (ER)/specificity protein and ER/activating protein-1 signaling pathways
J. Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 41(5): 263 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
S. Khan, F. Wu, S. Liu, Q. Wu, and S. Safe
Role of specificity protein transcription factors in estrogen-induced gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells
J. Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 39(4): 289 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. Kim, R. Barhoumi, R. Burghardt, and S. Safe
Analysis of Estrogen Receptor {alpha}-Sp1 Interactions in Breast Cancer Cells by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 19(4): 843 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
Y-L Zhao, W-D Han, Q Li, Y-M Mu, X-C Lu, L Yu, H-J Song, X Li, J-M Lu, and C-Y Pan
Mechanism of transcriptional regulation of LRP16 gene expression by 17-{beta} estradiol in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells
J. Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2005; 34(1): 77 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
V. X. Jin, Y.-W. Leu, S. Liyanarachchi, H. Sun, M. Fan, K. P. Nephew, T. H.-M. Huang, and R. V. Davuluri
Identifying estrogen receptor {alpha} target genes using integrated computational genomics and chromatin immunoprecipitation microarray
Nucleic Acids Res., December 17, 2004; 32(22): 6627 - 6635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. O'Lone, M. C. Frith, E. K. Karlsson, and U. Hansen
Genomic Targets of Nuclear Estrogen Receptors
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2004; 18(8): 1859 - 1875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Khan, M. Abdelrahim, I. Samudio, and S. Safe
Estrogen Receptor/Sp1 Complexes Are Required for Induction of cad Gene Expression by 17{beta}-Estradiol in Breast Cancer Cells
Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2325 - 2335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Ngwenya and S. Safe
Cell Context-Dependent Differences in the Induction of E2F-1 Gene Expression by 17{beta}-Estradiol in MCF-7 and ZR-75 Cells
Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 1675 - 1685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. Kim, N. Thu, B. Saville, and S. Safe
Domains of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} (ER{alpha}) Required for ER{alpha}/Sp1-Mediated Activation of GC-Rich Promoters by Estrogens and Antiestrogens in Breast Cancer Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2003; 17(5): 804 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Abdelrahim, I. Samudio, R. Smith III, R. Burghardt, and S. Safe
Small Inhibitory RNA Duplexes for Sp1 mRNA Block Basal and Estrogen-induced Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Progression in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., August 2, 2002; 277(32): 28815 - 28822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
T. R. Ediger, S.-E. Park, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen
Estrogen Receptor Inducibility of the Human Na+/H+ Exchanger Regulatory Factor/Ezrin-Radixin-Moesin Binding Protein 50 (NHE-RF/EBP50) Gene Involving Multiple Half-Estrogen Response Elements
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2002; 16(8): 1828 - 1839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Castro-Rivera, I. Samudio, and S. Safe
Estrogen Regulation of Cyclin D1 Gene Expression in ZR-75 Breast Cancer Cells Involves Multiple Enhancer Elements
J. Biol. Chem., August 10, 2001; 276(33): 30853 - 30861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Saville, H. Poukka, M. Wormke, O. A. Janne, J. J. Palvimo, M. Stoner, I. Samudio, and S. Safe
Cooperative Coactivation of Estrogen Receptor alpha in ZR-75 Human Breast Cancer Cells by SNURF and TATA-binding Protein
J. Biol. Chem., January 18, 2002; 277(4): 2485 - 2497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xie, W.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xie, W.
Right arrow Articles by Safe, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals