help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hennebold, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Adashi, E. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hennebold, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Adashi, E. Y.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 8 2725-2734
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Ovary-Selective Genes I: The Generation and Characterization of an Ovary-Selective Complementary Deoxyribonucleic Acid Library1

Jon D. Hennebold, Mamoru Tanaka, Juichiro Saito2, Berkely R. Hanson3 and Eli Y. Adashi

Division of Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Eli Y. Adashi, Division of Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 546 Chipeta Way, ARUP II, Box 20, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108. E-mail: eadashi{at}hsc.utah.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
The importance of several ovary-selective/specific genes, i.e. genes preferentially or exclusively expressed in the ovary, has been established. Indeed, null mutant female mice for the c-mos, growth and differentiation factor-9, {alpha}-inhibin, and zona pellucida-3 genes proved sterile. A loss of function mutation of the human FSH receptor gene established its critical role in ovarian function. These data support the hypothesis that genes expressed selectively or specifically in the ovary are probably essential for the normal functioning of this organ system. We have used the differential screening technique suppression subtractive hybridization to systematically isolate and clone genes that are expressed in an ovary-selective/specific manner. The resultant target complementary DNA (cDNA) library has been exhaustively screened to a point at which additional sequencing was increasingly unlikely (<=4%) to yield additional previously unencountered cDNAs. In toto, 844 clones were sequenced and analyzed for homology to known genes using the Basic Local Alignment Tool (BLAST). Of those, 342 were determined to be independent (nonredundant). One hundred and fifty-nine independent clones proved identical to previously characterized genes, whereas an additional 100 independent clones proved significantly homologous (but not identical) to previously characterized genes. Yet 83 other independent clones did not display significant homology to previously characterized genes now listed in the publicly accessible nonredundant databases. As such, these latter genes were deemed novel. Of these 83 novel genes, a total of 36 displayed ovary-specific/selective expression, as determined by probing mouse multitissue Northern blots with 32P-labeled/PCR-amplified cDNA inserts. Under these circumstances, the false positive rate was minimal, as only one novel clone was expressed at a higher level in nonovarian tissues relative to ovary. Of the 36 ovary-specific/selective novel genes, 22 proved subject to hormonal regulation during a simulated estrous cycle. In this communication we focus on 2 such novel ovary-specific/hormonally-dependent genes, the full-length sequences of which were isolated using rapid amplification of 3'-cDNA ends technology. Taken together, the present study accomplished systematic identification of those genes that are restricted in their expression to the ovary. These ovary-selective genes may have significant implications for the understanding of ovarian function in molecular terms and for the development of innovative strategies for the promotion of fertility or its control.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
A HIGHLY SYNCHRONIZED and exquisitely timed gene expression cascade controls the individual phases of the normal ovarian life cycle (1, 2). The appropriate transition from one phase of the cycle to the next requires the timely expression of a specific gene(s) to ensure the correct continuation of this preprogrammed process. To date, a major research focus of students of ovarian function has been the analysis of mostly known genes.

In the last few years several genes have been determined to be expressed in an ovary-selective manner. Examples include members of the transforming growth factor-ß superfamily, growth differentiation factor-9 (GDF-9) and {alpha}-inhibin (3, 4); c-mos, a 37-kDa cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinase (5); as well as the oocyte-derived zona pellucida (ZP) glycoproteins (ZP 1–3) (6). Each of the preceding genes was isolated and studied on a case by case basis with regard to ovarian function.

The critical role that ovary-selective genes may play in ovarian physiology was subsequently established through the generation of null mutant mice. For example, the ovaries of null mutants for GDF-9 possessed normal numbers of primordial and primary follicles but were devoid of all downstream follicular stages (7). Female null mutants for c-mos proved infertile in that meiotically active oocytes failed to arrest at metaphase II and, in fact, attempted a third round of meiosis (8, 9). Female null mutants for ZP-3 displayed markedly reduced (90%) ovulatory efficiency and consequent infertility, the complete absence of the ZP, and disorganization of the surrounding cumulus granulosa cells (10, 11). These studies, through the generation of null mutants, established that the above-mentioned ovary-selective genes are critical to murine ovarian function.

Taken together, these and other studies serve to demonstrate that several genes, whether restricted in their expression to the ovary or preferentially expressed in the ovary, constitute critical molecular determinants of ovarian function. It was, therefore, the purpose of this communication to systematically isolate genes that are expressed in an ovary-selective/specific manner.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
In vivo protocols
Female C57BL/6 mice, 19 days of age upon arrival, were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were initially quarantined for 3 days at the University of Utah Animal Resources Center. The latter adheres to the guidelines outlined by the Animal Welfare Act and by institutional animal care and use committee protocols. At 25 days of age, one group of mice (n = 8) was killed by halothane-induced asphyxiation (Halocarbon, River Edge, NJ), thereby providing unstimulated ovarian material as well as nonovarian tissues. A second group of mice (n = 37) was injected with 10 IU each of PMSG. Forty-eight hours after PMSG injection, a group of mice was killed (n = 7) to secure ovaries at the preovulatory phase of a reproductive cycle. The remaining mice (n = 30) were injected with 10 IU each of hCG. Subgroups (n = 5/subgroup) of the latter were killed at 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 h post-hCG injection. Ovaries removed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 h post-hCG treatment encompass the interval preceding follicular rupture, whereas the 24 and 48 h post-hCG treatment groups encompass the luteal phase of the ovarian cycle.

RNA isolation
Total RNA was isolated from the following nonovarian tissues of immature 25-day-old female C57BL/6 mice: brain, heart, kidney, liver, spleen, and lung. Total RNA was also isolated from the ovaries of 25-day-old female C57BL/6 mice undergoing superovulation as described above. The isolation of total RNA was performed using the RNAeasy Kit (QIAGEN, Santa Clara, CA) according to the manufacturer’s directions. Polyadenylated [poly(A)+] RNA was subsequently isolated by the use of an oligo(deoxythymidine) magnetic sphere-based separation system (RNAatract, Promega Corp., Madison, WI).

Suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH)
SSH was performed with the PCR-Select Kit (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc. San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s directions. Briefly, an equal amount of poly(A)+ RNA isolated from each of the nonovarian tissues was combined to generate a total of 1 µg poly(A)+ RNA. This messenger RNA (mRNA) was used to generate the driver complementary DNA (cDNA) through the use of the SMART cDNA synthesis kit (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Ovarian poly(A)+ RNA (1 µg) isolated from mice undergoing the above-described superovulation protocol was used to construct the tester cDNA. Thirty primary and 12 secondary PCR cycles were used in amplifying the target (subtracted) ovary-selective cDNAs.

Cloning and sequencing of cDNAs
The PCR products generated by SSH were digested with RsaI to generate blunt ends and to remove the adapters previously ligated to both ends of the target cDNAs. These cDNAs were subsequently purified using QIAGEN’s PCR purification system, ligated into the vector pCR-SCRIPT (Stratagene, San Diego, CA) and transformed into Escherichia coli strain XL-1' Blue (Stratagene). The individual cDNA inserts were isolated by PCR amplification using flanking T3 and T7 primer sites. The plasmid template used in the PCR reaction was obtained by the Wizard mini-prep kit (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) or by directly using the bacterial cultures lysed in ddH20 at a dilution of 1:50. Purified/PCR-amplified cDNAs were sequenced using T7 primers at the DNA sequencing core facility of the Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah Health Sciences Center using Perkin-Elmer Corp. ABI 377 automated sequencers. The sequence data obtained were analyzed for homology to previously characterized genes deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Informatics (NCBI) database, which includes entries from GenBank, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), and DNA Database of Japan (DDBJ) databases using the Basic Local Alignment Tool (BLAST) program.

Analysis of subtraction efficiency
An equal amount of cDNA from the (presubtraction) tester pool and final SSH-subtracted product were used as a template for the amplification of the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH). The forward (5'-TGAAGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTGGC-3') and reverse (5'-CATGTAGGCCATGAGGTCCACCAC-3') G3PDH primers (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.) were used to amplify a 983-bp product within the following PCR parameters: denaturation, 94 C for 45 sec; annealing, 60 C for 45 sec; and extension, 72 C for 1 min and 30 sec. Samples were removed following the completion of 14, 18, 22, 26, and 30 cycles. The resultant amplicon was resolved on a 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide.

Verification of ovary-selective expression (reverse Northern blot analysis)
Poly(A)+ RNA from the previously described nonovarian and ovarian tissues was used to generate double stranded cDNA using the SMART cDNA synthesis system according to the manufacturer’s directions (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.). The nonovarian and ovarian cDNAs generated were purified, quantified, separated on a 1% agarose gel, and blotted onto a Nylon membrane (MSI, Westborough, MA). The membranes were then probed with 32P-labeled/PCR-amplified cDNA inserts according to the method of Sambrook et al. (12). The blots were imaged, and band density was determined by a phosphorimager (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). Equal cDNA loading was confirmed by probing with a 32P-labeled/PCR-amplified 983-bp G3PDH product.

Northern blot analysis
Total RNA (20 µg) isolated from ovaries at different stages of the superovulation protocol was separated on denaturing 1% agarose-formaldehyde gels and transferred to nylon membranes according to the protocol of Sambrook et al. (12). Before transfer, RNA quality and concentration were assessed by ethidium bromide staining and visualization under UV light. Nonovarian tissue blots (20 µg total RNA) were purchased from Origene Technologies (Rockville, MD). Nylon membranes were prehybridized for 2–6 h at 42 C in 5 x SSPE (sodium chloride-sodium phosphate-EDTA), 50% formamide, 5 x Denhardt’s solution, and 0.25% SDS. Probes were generated by radiolabeling individual PCR-amplified cDNA inserts with [32P]deoxy-CTP using the random priming method (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). The probes were denatured in a boiling water bath for 5 min before quenching with ice. Membranes were hybridized with the relevant probe overnight at 42 C in the same (above-mentioned) solution used for prehybridization. The membranes were washed in 2 x SSC (standard saline citrate) and 0.1% SDS at room temperature three times for 5 min each time, followed by two washes in 0.125 x SSC and 0.25% SDS for 15 min at 60 C. The blots were rinsed in 4 x SSC and imaged through the use of a phosphorimager (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The intensity of signals was quantified using Molecular Analyst software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Equivalent RNA loading was verified by probing the same (stripped) blots with radiolabeled PCR products of the housekeeping genes ß-actin (for the ovarian blots) and G3PDH (for the nonovarian tissue blots).


    Results and Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
The technique of SSH has been used in a variety of experimental settings for the analysis of differentially expressed genes (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). In this study SSH was employed to identify genes that are expressed in an ovary-selective manner. The efficiency of the SSH procedure, as assessed by depletion of the housekeeping gene G3PDH, was determined by PCR amplification over a graded increase in the number of cycles. In the subtracted (target) ovarian cDNA population, the amount of G3PDH was significantly reduced relative to that of the unsubtracted ovarian cDNA (Fig. 1AGo). An additional 8–12 PCR cycles were required for the subtracted (target) cDNA to achieve the same level of G3PDH amplification as in the unsubtracted ovarian cDNA. As PCR amplification is an exponential process, this differential in cycle number translates into a 256- to 4096-fold depletion of G3PDH cDNA in the subtracted ovarian material (Fig. 1BGo).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. SSH subtraction efficiency. Subtraction efficiency was determined by analyzing the amount of G3PDH present in both the unsubtracted starting cDNA and the subtracted target cDNA through the use of increasing number of PCR cycles (A). The signal intensity for G3PDH was determined for both the unsubtracted starting material as well as for the subtracted target material (B).

 
After the cloning of the individual SSH-generated cDNA products into a plasmid vector and transformation of the latter into the appropriate bacterial host, 844 independent clones were isolated. The individual cDNA inserts were amplified using primers corresponding to plasmid sequences flanking the multiple cloning site. The individual PCR products were subsequently sequenced.

To establish an appropriate conclusion for the screening process of the subtracted ovary-selective library, the number of new sequences obtained was plotted against the total number of clones sequenced (Fig. 2Go). Only 2 new clones were obtained upon sequencing the last batch of 50 clones. These results suggested that the screening of the subtracted ovarian cDNA library was all but complete and that few new sequences were probably derived by further screening.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Ovary-selective library screening saturation. The number of new independent clones identified is plotted against the number of clones sequenced.

 
Each sequenced clone was analyzed using the BLAST program and classified as known, homologous, or novel after its evaluation against entries within the publicly accessible nonredundant database of NCBI (Table 1Go). Known genes were classified as such if the homology was complete (>98% identity) between the subtracted SSH-generated clone and the database match. The complete list of known genes isolated by SSH was deposited in the Ovarian Kaleidoscope Gene Database (http://ovary.stanford.edu). Clones were classified as homologous if they did not completely match (<98%) but exhibited an E probability value of <1-5 relative to entries in the nonredundant database of NCBI. Novel clones were designated as such if no significant match (E probability value >1-5) was obtained in the nonredundant database. Clones not matching entries within the nonredundant database were still designated as novel even if a complete sequence match was uncovered within the NCBI EST database. Such EST entries represent incomplete sequence information (~300–600 bp) of an uncharacterized gene and thus do not detract from the novelty designation. cDNAs possessing significant homology to genomic clones (i.e. cosmid, BAC, and PAC) were also classified as novel, as these entries are comprised of large uncharacterized DNA fragments from a variety of different species. Of the 844 clones analyzed, 342 were determined to be nonredundant (independent) sequences. It follows that different clones containing the same cDNA insert were sequenced multiple times. Of the 342 nonredundant genes sequenced, 159 corresponded to known genes, whereas 100 proved partially homologous to entries in the nonredundant NCBI database. Eighty-three clones were classified as novel, of which 66 shared homology with entries within the NCBI EST database.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of the SSH-derived (target) cDNA clones sequenced

 
The ovarian cDNAs isolated from the (subtracted/SSH-generated) library that corresponded to known genes, included several that have previously been reported to be expressed, specifically or selectively, in the ovary (Table 2Go). Examples include proteins encoded by genes involved in ovarian steroidogenesis [StAR, 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase I (3ßHSD), 17ßHSD I, and aromatase) and in cell to cell communication (connexin-43) (24, 25, 26, 27, 28). Also noted were genes corresponding to secreted ovarian regulators ({alpha}-inhibin, ßB-inhibin, and GDF-9),and to the oocytic ZP-3 protein (3, 4, 6). Interestingly, among the clones sequenced, the Mti10 retrotransposon was highly represented in the ovary-selective cDNA library (28 of 844 clones, or 3.3% of the total). The Mti10 retrotransposon, a mobile genetic element that relies on a RNA intermediate to move throughout the genome, belongs to the MaLR (mammalian apparent long terminal repeat-retrotransposons) family of transposons (29). It has been estimated that most mammalian genomes contain between 40,000–100,000 copies of family members of the MaLR retrotransposon, thereby accounting for a significant proportion of the genome (29).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Examples of known and homologous genes isolated from the SSH-derived (target) ovary-selective cDNA library

 
Although the utilization of SSH in the current study successfully yielded previously characterized ovary-specific genes, several expected genes were not present within the target cDNA library. For example, the oocyte-specific genes bone morphogenetic protein-15 (30), factor in the germline-{alpha} (31), germ cell nuclear factor (32), and c-mos (5) were not found within the subtracted ovarian library. Likewise, the granulosa cell-restricted FSH receptor cDNA (33) was not present within the final subtracted target ovarian cDNAs. The absence of these genes from the library may be due to an incomplete representation of the relevant mRNA in the tester cDNA pool that was used in the subtraction process. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that the genes in question could not be detected by PCR in the unsubtracted ovarian cDNAs used as the starting material for the SSH procedure (data not shown).

Both the tester and driver cDNA pools were generated by the use of the SMART (Switching Mechanism At 5'-end of RNA Transcript) cDNA synthesis kit (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.). This process relies on the addition of unique adapter oligonucleotides to the first strand cDNA. The unique adapters can then be used to prime the PCR amplification and the generation of double stranded cDNA. The advantage of this procedure is that it allows for the generation of large amounts of cDNA from limited quantities of RNA. Due to the utilization of PCR, however, some of the cDNAs may not be amplified as efficiently as others and may thus be lost from the SSH starting material. A similar inability to identify all of the expected known genes after a differential screening of retinal candidate genes was recently reported by others and ascribed to the incomplete representation of the total cDNA repertoire (34).

A significant number of subtracted/SSH-generated cDNAs exhibited partial homology to entries in the nonredundant NCBI database (Table 2Go). Most of the cDNAs in this category probably represent mouse homologues of genes identified in other species (e.g. rat P450scc, rabbit 17{alpha}-hydroxylase/17–20-lyase, etc.). A large proportion (n = 104) of the clones isolated from the subtracted/SSH-generated cDNA library exhibited significant homology to rat P450scc, representing in all likelihood the mouse counterpart. Only the 5'-region of the mouse P450scc gene has previously been deposited in the NCBI database. The latter was mirrored by 29 clones isolated from the subtracted/SSH-generated cDNA library.

The degree of ovary-selective expression for 20 randomly chosen (SSH-derived) cDNAs was verified by reverse Northern analysis. Of the 20 clones analyzed, only 1 exhibited a higher level of expression in the nonovarian (driver) cDNA compared with the ovarian (tester) cDNA, demonstrating the low false positive rate associated with SSH in this experimental circumstance. Figure 3Go depicts the ovary-selective expression of 3 cDNAs corresponding to known genes. Genes previously reported to be ovary-selective (GDF-9 and 3ßHSD) (4, 26) were confirmed as such. A member of the MT transposon family (Mti10) was also determined to be ovary selective by reverse Northern blot analysis. Ovary-selective expression of Mti10 was further supported by the observation that EST (expressed sequence tag)s corresponding to this transposable element have been isolated predominantly from unfertilized eggs and 2-cell embryo cDNA libraries. Confirmation of equivalent cDNA loading was accomplished by probing for the housekeeping gene G3PDH.



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Verification of ovary-selective expression by reverse Northern blot analysis. PCR-amplified cDNA inserts from randomly picked clones were radiolabeled and used to probe blots containing cDNAs generated from nonovarian (driver) or ovarian (tester) mRNA. After the reverse Northern blot analysis, the cDNA inserts were sequenced to ascertain their identities. Equivalent cDNA loading of the blots was verified by probing with a radiolabeled G3PDH PCR product.

 
The novel SSH-generated cDNAs were subjected to further determination of ovarian and phase specificity by Northern blot analysis. Nylon membranes containing RNA from 12 different mouse tissues as well as RNA from individual phases (i.e. unstimulated, follicular, ovulatory, and luteal) of a simulated estrous cycle were probed with radiolabeled/PCR-amplified inserts corresponding to all 83 novel cDNA clones (Table 3Go). From this analysis, 17 clones were determined to be ovary specific and phase specific. Only 4 ovary-specific clones were constitutively expressed throughout a simulated cycle. Fifteen of the 83 novel clones were classified as ovary selective, in that their ovarian expression proved highest, with limited expression in 1 or more of the nonovarian tissues. Of the 15 ovary-selective clones isolated, 5 were expressed in a phase-specific manner, with 10 being expressed constitutively. The expression of 46 of the novel cDNAs could not be detected by the Northern blot technique. This negative outcome may reflect the low level of sensitivity of the Northern blot methodology employed. Verification of ovary-selective or -specific expression of these 46 negative clones will require the use of a more sensitive methodology, such as RT-PCR, which is currently underway. Only 1 of the novel clones was expressed at a higher level in the nonovarian tissues relative to the ovarian RNA, demonstrating a low false positive rate (2.1%) for the SSH technique as used under this experimental circumstance.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Analysis of ovary- and phase-specific expression of the novel cDNAs isolated by SSH

 
From the group of novel genes determined to be ovary selective, two examples are presented in Fig. 4Go. The expression of the two novel clones (M3-D2 and M7-A10) could not be detected in any of the nonovarian RNA samples. The presence of RNA on the membranes was verified by successfully reprobing for G3PDH transcripts.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Verification of ovary-specific expression of the novel clones M3-D2 and M7-A10 by Northern blot analysis. PCR products corresponding to the novel clones M3-D2 and M7-A10 were radiolabeled and used to probe membranes containing total RNA (20 µg/lane) isolated from 12 different nonovarian tissues. The presence of RNA was verified by reprobing the membranes with a radiolabeled G3PDH PCR product.

 
The phase-specific expression pattern of clones M3-D2 and M7-A10 is shown in Fig. 5Go. The expression of the M3-D2 gene increased approximately 4.5-fold relative to that in unstimulated ovaries 48 h after treatment with PMSG (Fig. 5Go, A and C). Increases of 10- and 9.6-fold (relative to unstimulated ovaries) were observed in the ovarian expression of the novel gene M3-D2 at 24 and 48 h after the injection of hCG to PMSG-primed mice (P < 0.05), respectively. Another novel gene (M7-A10), exhibited a 50% reduction in ovarian expression (relative to unstimulated ovaries) 6 h after the administration of hCG to PMSG-primed mice (P < 0.05; Fig. 5Go, B and D). However, 24 and 48 h post-hCG, the expression of M7-A10 was increased significantly (P < 0.05) relative to the control value (1.5- and 1.8-fold). The transcript sizes of the M3-D2 and M7-A10 genes, as calculated from the Northern blot analysis, were approximately 1.3 and 1.5 kbp, respectively. Equivalent RNA loading was verified by reprobing the same membrane for ß-actin transcripts.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Phase-specific expression of the novel clones M3-D2 and M7-A10 by Northern blot analysis. PCR products corresponding to the novel clones M3-D2 (A) and M7-A10 (B) were radiolabeled and used to probe membranes containing total ovarian RNA (20 µg/lane) isolated from mice undergoing a simulated estrous cycle. Equivalent RNA loading was verified by reprobing the membranes with radiolabeled/PCR-amplified ß-actin. The signal intensities were determined by densitometry. The level of M3-D2/ß-actin (C) and M7-A10/ß-actin (D) ratios were calculated and compared with expression in the unstimulated control (CTRL) ovaries. The data are represented as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *, Statistical significance (determined by ANOVA followed by Fisher’s least significant difference post-hoc analysis, StatView 5.0) of P < 0.05 compared with the CTRL samples.

 
As SSH yields partial cDNA sequences, the full-length cDNA sequences of clones M3-D2 and M7-A10 were subsequently determined by rapid amplification of 3'-cDNA ends. The putative protein encoded by clones M3-D2 proved to be a 283-amino acid protein, the molecular mass of which was 29.9 kDa (Fig. 6AGoGo). The latter proved highly acidic (theoretical pI of 3.9) due to the large number of glutamic acid residues (49 of a total of 283). Based on its restricted expression profile and highly acidic nature, we have termed this protein ovary-specific acidic protein (OSAP). According to the PSORT protein analysis tools (http://psort.nibb.ac.jp:8000), OSAP does not possess a signal peptide, endoplasmic reticulum localization motifs, peroxisomal targeting sequences, or transmembrane-spanning domains. The PSORT cellular localization prediction algorithm suggested that OSAP may be directed to reside in the mitochondria. By using NCBI’s BLASTp program, low but significant homology (E value of 10-12) was observed between OSAP and the sea lamprey neurofilament protein (NF-180). The acidic regions of neurofilament proteins from other species were also found to possess limited but significant homology to OSAP (data not shown).



View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. The full-length cDNA sequence and putative amino acid sequence for the novel clones M3-D2 and M7-A10. The full-length cDNA sequence for clone M3-D2 (A) and M7-A10 (B) was obtained using rapid amplification of 3'-cDNA ends. The putative amino acid sequence is shown below the corresponding cDNA sequence. The underlined region indicates the polyadenylation signal sequence.

 


View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6B. Continued.

 
The open reading frame, derived from the full-length cDNA sequence of M7-A10 encodes a 235-amino acid protein, the molecular mass of which proved to be 26.8 kDa (Fig. 6BGo). PSORT analysis suggested that the M7-A10 protein lacks a signal peptide, ER localization motifs, peroxisomal targeting sequences, or transmembrane-spanning domains. The PSORT cellular localization prediction algorithm suggested that M7-A10 localizes to the cytoplasm. By using NCBI’s BLASTp program, M7-A10 was found to possess significant homology only at the amino acid level to 2 yeast proteins, termed MOB1 and MOB2 (Fig. 7Go). MOB1 (Mps One Binder) was originally identified via a yeast two-hybrid system as a binding partner for the yeast protein kinase MPS1 (35). MPS1, in turn, is necessary for proper mitotic checkpoint control and spindle pole body duplication (36). Conditional (temperature-sensitive) alleles for the yeast MOB1 gene gave rise to a late nuclear division arrest at the restrictive temperature (35). Another MPS1 binding protein was subsequently cloned and named MOB2 (35). The MOB2 protein also exhibited significant homology to the ovary-specific clone M7-A10. Based on the homology among M7-A10, MOB1, and MOB2, we propose that this new putative protein be named mammalian MOB homolog.



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. MOB1, MOB2, and M7-A10 amino acid homology. The CLUSTAL-W alignment program was used to determine the homology that may exist between the yeast mitotic regulators MOB1/MOB2 and M7-A10.

 
The mitotic defects associated with MOB1 and MOB2 yeast mutants may be related to their interaction with another protein, termed MPS1. MPS1 encodes an essential dual specificity kinase whose activity is required for both spindle body duplication, a process necessary for proper chromosomal segregation and the maintenance of the correct complement of chromosomes (36, 37, 38). Additionally, MPS1 is responsible for arrest at a mitotic checkpoint. Mitotic arrest of cells is an important process that allows for correction of spindle body defects and repair of DNA damage (39). Taken together, these yeast studies suggest a role for the ovary-specific mammalian MOB homolog in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in the ovary, possibly during meiosis.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors express their gratitude to Dr. Raymond F. Gesteland (Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center), Dr. William L. Carroll (Department of Pediatrics and the Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center), and Dr. John H. Weis (Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center) for discussions on differential screening strategies. We also thank Linda Gracie-Elder and Andy Raposa for providing expert secretarial support.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by NIH Grants HD-30288 and HD-37845 (to E.Y.A.), a Lalor Foundation Fellowship Award (to J.D.H.), and a Society for Gynecologic Investigation Medical Student Research Award (to B.H.). Back

2 Current address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2–16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216, Japan. Back

3 Current address: George Washington University School of Medicine, 2300 I Street, Washington, D.C. 20037. Back

Received March 13, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 

  1. Richards JS 1994 Hormonal control of gene expression in the ovary. Endocr Rev 15:725–751[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Richards JS, Fitzpatrick SL, Clemens JW, Morris JK, Alliston T, Sirois J 1995 Ovarian cell differentiation: a cascade of multiple hormones, cellular signals, and regulated genes. Recent Prog Horm Res. 50:223–254
  3. Meunier H, Rivier C, Evans RM, Vale W 1988 Gonadal and extragonadal expression of inhibin {alpha}, ßA, and ßB subunits in various tissues predicts diverse functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 85:247–251
  4. McGrath SA, Esquela AF, Lee SJ 1995 Oocyte-specific expression of growth/differentiation factor-9. Mol Endocrinol 9:131–136[Abstract]
  5. Propst F, Vande Woude GF 1985 Expression of c-mos proto-oncogene transcripts in mouse tissues. Nature 315:516–518[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Rankin T, Dean J 1996 The molecular genetics of the zona pellucida: mouse mutations and infertility. Mol Hum Reprod. 2:889–894
  7. Dong J, Albertini DF, Nishimori K, Kumar TR, Lu N, Matzuk MM 1996 Growth differentiation factor-9 is required during early ovarian folliculogenesis. Nature 383:531–535[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Colledge WH, Carlton MB, Udy GB, Evans MJ 1994 Disruption of c-mos causes parthenogenetic development of unfertilized mouse eggs. Nature 370:65–68[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Hashimoto N, Watanabe N, Furuta Y, Tamemoto H, Sagata N, Yokoyama M, Okazaki K, Nagayoshi M, Takeda N, Ikawa Y, Aizawa S 1994 Parthenogenetic activation of oocytes in c-mos-deficient mice. Nature 370:68–71[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Rankin T, Familari M, Lee E, Ginsberg A, Dwyer N, Blanchette-Mackie J, Drago J, Westphal H, Dean J 1996 Mice homozygous for an insertional mutation in the Zp3 gene lack a zona pellucida and are infertile. Development. 122:2903–2910
  11. Liu C, Litscher ES, Mortillo S, Sakai Y, Kinloch RA, Stewart CL, Wassarman PM 1996 Targeted disruption of the mZP3 gene results in production of eggs lacking a zona pellucida and infertility in female mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:5431–5436
  12. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Guide. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor
  13. Liu XL, Wazer DE, Watanabe K, Band V 1996 Identification of a novel serine protease-like gene, the expression of which is down-regulated during breast cancer progression. Cancer Res 56:3371–3379[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Harris AJ, Shaddock JG, Manjanatha MG, Lisenbey JA, Casciano DA 1998 Identification of differentially expressed genes in aflatoxin B1-treated cultured primary rat hepatocytes and Fischer 344 rats. Carcinogenesis 19:1451–1458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Nemeth E, Bole-Feysot C, Tashima LS 1998 Suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) identifies prolactin stimulation of p38 MAP kinase gene expression in Nb2 T lymphoma cells: molecular cloning of rat p38 MAP kinase. J Mol Endocrinol 20:151–156[Abstract]
  16. Wang X, Yaish-Ohad S, Li X, Barone FC, Feuerstein GZ 1998 Use of suppression subtractive hybridization strategy for discovery of increased tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 gene expression in brain ischemic tolerance. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 18:1173–1177[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Diatchenko L, Lau YF, Campbell AP, Chenchik A, Moqadam F, Huang B, Lukyanov S, Lukyanov K, Gurskaya N, Sverdlov ED, Siebert PD 1996 Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:6025–6030[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Diatchenko L, Lukyanov S, Lau YF, Siebert PD 1999 Suppression subtractive hybridization: a versatile method for identifying differentially expressed genes. Methods Enzymol 303:349–380[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Hufton SE, Moerkerk PT, Brandwijk R, de Bruine AP, Arends J, Hoogenboom HR 1999 A profile of differentially expressed genes in primary colorectal cancer using suppression subtractive hybridization. FEBS Lett 463:77–82[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Murphy M, Godson C, Cannon S, Kato S, Mackenzie HS, Martin F, Brady HR 1999 Suppression subtractive hybridization identifies high glucose levels as a stimulus for expression of connective tissue growth factor and other genes in human mesangial cells. J Biol Chem 274:5830–5834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Wang X, Li X, Yaish-Ohad S, Sarau HM, Barone FC, Feuerstein GZ 1999 Molecular cloning and expression of the rat monocyte chemotactic protein-3 gene: a possible role in stroke. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 71:304–312[Medline]
  22. Wu WX, Zhang Q, Ma XH, Unno N, Nathanielsz PW 1999 Suppression subtractive hybridization identified a marked increase in thrombospondin-1 associated with parturition in pregnant sheep myometrium. Endocrinology 140:2364–2371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Zhang J, Underwood LE 1999 Molecular cloning and characterization of a new fasting-inducible short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase from rat liver. Biochim Biophys Acta 1435:184–190[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Gray SA, Mannan MA, O’Shaughnessy PJ 1995 Development of cytochrome P450 aromatase mRNA levels and enzyme activity in ovaries of normal and hypogonadal (hpg) mice. J Mol Endocrinol 14:295–301[Abstract]
  25. Lee HK, Ahn RS, Kwon HB, Soh J 1997 Nucleotide sequence of rat steroidogenic acute regulatory protein complementary DNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 230:528–532[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Payne AH, Abbaszade IG, Clarke TR, Bain PA, Park CH 1997 The multiple murine 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isoforms: structure, function, and tissue- and developmentally specific expression. Steroids 62:169–175[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Sha JA, Dudley K, Rajapaksha WR, O’Shaughnessy PJ 1997 Sequence of mouse 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 cDNA and tissue distribution of the type 1 and type 3 isoform mRNAs. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 60:19–24[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Juneja SC, Barr KJ, Enders GC, Kidder GM 1999 Defects in the germ line and gonads of mice lacking connexin 43. Biol Reprod 60:1263–1270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Smit AF 1993 Identification of a new, abundant superfamily of mammalian LTR- transposons. Nucleic Acids Res 21:1863–1872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Dube JL, Wang P, Elvin J, Lyons KM, Celeste AJ, Matzuk MM 1998 The bone morphogenetic protein 15 gene is X-linked and expressed in oocytes. Mol Endocrinol 12:1809–1817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Liang L, Soyal SM, Dean J 1997 FIG{alpha}, a germ cell specific transcription factor involved in the coordinate expression of the zona pellucida genes. Development 124:4939–4947[Abstract]
  32. Chen F, Cooney AJ, Wang Y, Law SW, O’Malley BW 1994 Cloning of a novel orphan receptor (GCNF) expressed during germ cell development. Mol Endocrinol 8:1434–1444[Abstract]
  33. Kumar TR, Wang Y, Lu N, Matzuk MM 1997 Follicle stimulating hormone is required for ovarian follicle maturation but not male fertility. Nat Genet 15:201–204[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. den Hollander AI, van Driel MA, de Kok YJ, van de Pol DJ, Hoyng CB, Brunner HG, Deutman AF, Cremers FP 1999 Isolation and mapping of novel candidate genes for retinal disorders using suppression subtractive hybridization. Genomics 58:240–249[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Luca FC, Winey M 1998 MOB1, an essential yeast gene required for completion of mitosis and maintenance of ploidy. Mol Biol Cell 9:29–46[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Lauze E, Stoelcker B, Luca FC, Weiss E, Schutz AR, Winey M 1995 Yeast spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 encodes an essential dual specificity protein kinase. EMBO J 14:1655–1663[Medline]
  37. Winey M, Goetsch L, Baum P, Byers B 1991 MPS1 and MPS2:novel yeast genes defining distinct steps of spindle pole body duplication. J Cell Biol 114:745–754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Weiss E, Winey M 1996 The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint. J Cell Biol 132:111–123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Elledge SJ 1996 Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 274:1664–1672[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T. Hamatani, M. Yamada, H. Akutsu, N. Kuji, Y. Mochimaru, M. Takano, M. Toyoda, K. Miyado, A. Umezawa, and Y. Yoshimura
What can we learn from gene expression profiling of mouse oocytes?
Reproduction, May 1, 2008; 135(5): 581 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M Mihm, P J Baker, L M Fleming, A M Monteiro, and P J O'Shaughnessy
Differentiation of the bovine dominant follicle from the cohort upregulates mRNA expression for new tissue development genes
Reproduction, February 1, 2008; 135(2): 253 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Miyakoshi, M. J. Murphy, R. R. Yeoman, S. Mitra, C. J. Dubay, and J. D. Hennebold
The Identification of Novel Ovarian Proteases Through the Use of Genomic and Bioinformatic Methodologies
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2006; 75(6): 823 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. Kinouchi, T. Kinouchi, T. Hamamoto, T. Saito, A. Tavares, T. Tsuru, and S. Yamagami
Distribution of CESP-1 Protein in the Corneal Endothelium and Other Tissues.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 1397 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Tesone, R. L. Stouffer, S. M. Borman, J. D. Hennebold, and T. A. Molskness
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Production by the Monkey Corpus Luteum During the Menstrual Cycle: Isoform-Selective Messenger RNA Expression In Vivo and Hypoxia-Regulated Protein Secretion In Vitro
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2005; 73(5): 927 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Bothos, R. L. Tuttle, M. Ottey, F. C. Luca, and T. D. Halazonetis
Human LATS1 Is a Mitotic Exit Network Kinase
Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 65(15): 6568 - 6575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Vallee, C. Gravel, M.-F. Palin, H. Reghenas, P. Stothard, D. S. Wishart, and M.-A. Sirard
Identification of Novel and Known Oocyte-Specific Genes Using Complementary DNA Subtraction and Microarray Analysis in Three Different Species
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2005; 73(1): 63 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. D. Hennebold, K. Mah, W. Perez, J. E. Vance, R. L. Stouffer, C. Morisseau, B. D. Hammock, and E. Y. Adashi
Identification and Characterization of an Ovary-Selective Isoform of Epoxide Hydrolase
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2005; 72(4): 968 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. W. Newman, J. E. Stok, J. D. Vidal, C. J. Corbin, Q. Huang, B. D. Hammock, and A. J. Conley
Cytochrome P450-Dependent Lipid Metabolism in Preovulatory Follicles
Endocrinology, November 1, 2004; 145(11): 5097 - 5105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. D. Hennebold
Characterization of the ovarian transcriptome through the use of differential analysis of gene expression methodologies
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2004; 10(3): 227 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. Sakai, T. Kinouchi, S. Kawamoto, M. R. Dana, T. Hamamoto, T. Tsuru, K. Okubo, and S. Yamagami
Construction of Human Corneal Endothelial cDNA Library and Identification of Novel Active Genes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2002; 43(6): 1749 - 1756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. P. Leo, M. D. Pisarska, and A. J.W. Hsueh
DNA Array Analysis of Changes in Preovulatory Gene Expression in the Rat Ovary
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2001; 65(1): 269 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. S. Richards
Perspective: The Ovarian Follicle--A Perspective in 2001
Endocrinology, June 1, 2001; 142(6): 2184 - 2193.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M Tanaka, J. Hennebold, J Macfarlane, and E. Adashi
A mammalian oocyte-specific linker histone gene H1oo: homology with the genes for the oocyte-specific cleavage stage histone (cs-H1) of sea urchin and the B4/H1M histone of the frog
Development, January 3, 2001; 128(5): 655 - 664.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hennebold, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Adashi, E. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hennebold, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Adashi, E. Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology