help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wira, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kaushic, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wira, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kaushic, C.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 8 2877-2885
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Antigen-Presenting Cells in the Female Reproductive Tract: Influence of Estradiol on Antigen Presentation by Vaginal Cells1

Charles R. Wira, Richard M. Rossoll and Charu Kaushic

Department of Physiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. C. R. Wira, Department of Physiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Borwell Building, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756-0001.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The objective of the present study was to define the afferent arm of the mucosal immune system in the lower female reproductive tract. We report here that antigen presentation by vaginal cells is under hormonal control. When vaginal cells from ovariectomized rats treated with estradiol (0.01–10 µg) were incubated with ovalbumin-specific T cells and ovalbumin, a dose-dependent inhibition of antigen presentation was measured. In time course studies, estradiol given to ovariectomized rats inhibited vaginal cell antigen presentation within 24 h after a single injection, relative to that seen in saline controls. To determine whether changes in antigen presentation were attributable to the effect of estradiol on the number of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in the vagina, tissues were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Our findings indicate that estradiol inhibited antigen presentation without affecting the number of major histocompatibility complex class II positive cells and at a time when macrophage/dendritic cells/granulocytes in the vagina increase in response to estradiol treatment. Antibody neutralization studies indicated that antigen presentation by vaginal cells from ovariectomized rats is mediated through class II and involves the expression of transmembrane proteins B7.1 and B7.2. In other studies, vaginal APCs interact with thymus APCs to synergistically enhance antigen presentation under conditions in which vaginal antigen presentation is inhibited by estradiol. Analysis of conditioned media indicates that enhancement of thymus antigen presentation involves the release of a soluble factor(s) into the culture media of vaginal cells. When spleen cells were cocultured with vaginal cells from saline-treated rats, proliferation increased in the presence of concanavalin A and/or phytohemagglutinin and decreased with lipopolysaccharide, relative to spleen cells and mitogen alone. In contrast, when incubated with vaginal cells from estradiol-treated rats, spleen cell proliferation was not affected with concanavalin but was inhibited with phytohemagglutinin and lipopolysaccharide. These studies demonstrate that estradiol regulates antigen presentation by vaginal cells and that vaginal cells, in turn, influence antigen presentation, as well as B and T cell proliferation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE MUCOSAL IMMUNE system in the female reproductive tract and at other mucosal surfaces is the first line of defense against pathogenic organisms (1, 2). Defense at mucosal surfaces is mediated through both humoral and cell-mediated immunity. In the female reproductive tract, the unique requirements for regulation of antigen presentation and immune responses must deal with potential bacterial and viral pathogens, allogeneic spermatozoa, and the immunologically distinct fetus (3). To accomplish this, the female reproductive tract has evolved to be responsive both to the constraints of procreation and to immune protection of the mother.

An effective immune response requires that antigen-presenting cells (APCs) process antigen and present it to T cells to induce T cell activation (4, 5). For an immune response to be initiated, exogenous antigen is internalized, processed, and returned to the cell surface in association with major histocompatibility complex class II for recognition by CD4+ T cells (6). Exogenous antigen can also stimulate class I-restricted T cell activation after uptake by APCs via a phagocytic pathway (7). After antigen presentation, lymphocyte effector functions (including cytokine production, cytotoxicity, and antibody synthesis) are activated.

Previous studies have shown that the reproductive tract is an inductive site for immune responses. Using inactivated polio vaccine, Ogra and Ogra (8) demonstrated that antigen placed in the uterus and vagina of women resulted in specific antibodies in uterine and cervicovaginal secretions. In animals (for reviews, see Refs. 9, 10), a variety of antigens, placed in both the lower and upper reproductive tract, induce local IgA and IgG antibodies in uterine and cervicovaginal secretions. Although optimal conditions and sites of immunization remain to be identified, these studies demonstrate that immune responses can be elicited by local immunization within the female reproductive tract. What remains to be established is the way induction of immune responses is regulated to meet the challenges of maternal protection and perpetuation of the species.

Our studies in the rat demonstrate that the afferent arm of the mucosal immune system in the female reproductive tract is under hormonal control (11, 12). These studies showed that antigen presentation by epithelial and stromal cells in the uterus and isolated cells from the vagina varies with the stage of the estrous cycle and is under hormone and cytokine control. In the uterus, antigen presentation by epithelial cells increases at proestrus, the stage of the reproductive cycle when blood estradiol levels are known to be elevated, and after the administration of estradiol to ovariectomized rats (12). In contrast, antigen presentation by uterine stromal cells is inhibited by estradiol (11, 12). In the vagina, antigen presentation is inhibited in response to estradiol and reversed when progesterone is given along with estradiol (13). In other studies, we found that antigen presentation in the uterus increases when ovariectomized rats are treated with IFN{gamma} or IL-6 (12).

The overall objective of the present study was to examine the regulation by estradiol of antigen presentation in the vagina of the rat. The goals of this study were to: 1) measure the effect, of dose and length of time of estradiol administration, on antigen presentation by vaginal cells to OVA-specific T cells; 2) examine the effect of estradiol on MHC class II expression and the numbers of macrophage/dendritic cells/granulocytes in the vagina at the time of antigen presentation; and 3) determine whether APCs in the vagina act synergistically with other APCs to enhance antigen presentation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
General procedures
Lewis adult female rats (Charles River Laboratories, Inc. Breeding Laboratories, Kingston, NY), weighing between 150–200 g, were maintained in a constant-temperature room with fixed light-dark intervals of 12 h each and allowed food and water ad libitum. Animals were ovariectomized 7 days before each experiment. Animals were killed by decapitation; and uterus, vagina, and thymus were recovered for isolation of uterine, vaginal, and thymus cells.

Preparation of uterine and vaginal cells
Vaginal cells were prepared by incubation with 0.25% trypsin/2.5% pancreatin (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) for 60 min at 4 C and for 60 min at 20 C before separation by mesh sieve (250 µm pore size), as previously described (13). Cells were aspirated through 18- and 20-gauge needles to prepare isolated cells before resuspension in proliferation medium consisting of RPMI-1640 (Life Technologies) containing 25 mM HEPES supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone Laboratories, Inc., Logan, UT), 5% NCTC 109, 5 x10-5 M 2-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 2.5 µg/ml Amphotericin B.

Isolation and purification of T lymphocytes and thymus-adherent cells
T cell lines for in vitro studies were prepared from the lymph nodes of Lewis rats injected with OVA-complete Freund’s adjuvant (FCA) emulsion into the footpads (100 µg OVA in 100 µl PBS and 100 µl FCA per rat). After 9 days, paraaortic and popliteal lymph nodes were isolated, and lymphocytes prepared for cell culture, as described previously (11). Briefly, T cells were incubated in initiation medium (proliferation medium containing 200 µg/ml OVA with 1% rat serum) for 3 days; after which, cells were separated by density centrifugation and cultured in proliferation medium supplemented with 5% supernatant from rat spleen cells cultured with 5 µg/ml concanavalin A (Con A). After 7–10 days incubation, cells were restimulated with OVA, in the presence of thymus cells, to increase T cell numbers and were then frozen in liquid nitrogen until assays were performed.

Because the thymus gland of the rat is a rich source of dendritic cells, adherent cells were prepared as follows: Thymus glands (4–5/group) were dispersed by mincing with forceps in Dulbecco’s PBS. After debris was allowed to settle for 2 min, cells were centrifuged (500 x g for 7 min) and washed in Dulbecco’s PBS before resuspension in proliferation medium at a concentration of 3 ml per thymus. To isolate the APC population of monocytes/macrophages and dendritic cells, the suspension was diluted 1:20, plated (20 ml) onto plastic Petri dishes (150-mm diameter) and incubated, 1 h at 37 C, for APCs to adhere to the plastic. Unattached cells were removed by two washes with media, after which, attached cells were released by scraping with a rubber scraper (Costar, Cambridge, MA) and were resuspended in fresh medium.

Antigen presentation assays
To measure antigen presentation, OVA-sensitized T cells (1 x 105 cells/100 µl), in proliferation medium, were cultured in triplicate wells, in 96-well microtiter plates, with irradiated epithelial cells from the uterus or vaginal cells (1 x 105 cells/100 µl) in the presence of OVA (50 µl) at varying concentrations (APC+T+OVA) (11). APC (uterine/vaginal cells) populations were irradiated, before the start of antigen presentation, with 4000 rads to prevent their proliferation. Controls included in all experiments were: APCs incubated with T cells in the absence of ovalbumin (OVA; APC+T), APCs incubated with OVA (APC+OVA), and T cells incubated with OVA (T+OVA). After 48 h of incubation at 37 C, T lymphocyte proliferation was measured by 3H-thymidine uptake. Each well received 1 µCi of 3H-thymidine (50 µl), 20–24 h before the termination of each experiment. Cells in individual wells were transferred onto glass fiber filtermats with a cell harvester (Skatron, Sterling, VA). Radioactivity incorporated into cells was measured in a liquid scintillation counter (Packard, Meriden, CT). The significance of the differences between experimental and control groups was calculated by Student’s t test.

Immunohistochemical analysis
Uterus and vagina were excised, trimmed below the cervix, and washed in cold saline (0.9% NaCl) before AMeX processing (a procedure that uses acetone, methyl alcohol, and xylene) (14). Briefly, 6 mm-sections were cut on a microtome and placed on glass slides coated with 1.5% BSA. Sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through ethyl alcohol grades. Rehydrated sections were washed in 0.01 M PBS/BSA (1 mg/ml). Nonspecific binding was blocked by incubating sections with 1% horse serum for 20 min at room temperature. Monoclonal antibodies used were mouse antirat Ia (OX-6) and mouse antirat macrophages, granulocytes, and dendritic cells (OX-41) (Harlan Bioproducts for Science, Inc., Indianapolis, IN). Sections were stained with primary antibody at a dilution of 1:200 for 30 min, rinsed, and incubated with horse antimouse Ig conjugated to biotin (1:200 dilution) for an additional 30 min. Other sections were stained with isotype control Igs at an equivalent concentration, instead of primary antibody. Horse antimouse IgG (rat adsorbed), conjugated to biotin, was obtained from Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA. Avidin-biotin coupled to alkaline phosphatase or peroxidase (ABC Elite kit, Vector Laboratories, Inc.), followed by Vector Red or diaminobenzidine (substrates from Vector Laboratories, Inc.), respectively, was used to reveal antigen localization. Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated in alcohol, and mounted in Permount medium before being examined under the microscope.

Spleen cell proliferation
To measure spleen cell proliferation, spleens were removed aseptically from animals, and single cell suspensions were prepared by teasing with sterile forceps. Tissue debris was allowed to settle for 2 min, and the supernatant containing single cells was spun at 500 x g for 10 min. Spleen cells were treated with NH4Cl solution for 5 min to lyse the RBC, as previously described (15). Cells were washed three times with RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS and were plated into 96-well chambers at a concentration of 5 x 105 cells per well. A final concentration of 1 µg/ml concanavalin A (Con A, Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 10 µg/ml phytohemagglutinin (PHA, Sigma), or 30 µg/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) was added to each well. Proliferative responses were measured by uptake of 1 µCi/well of 3H-thymidine for the last 24 h of a 3-day culture. Results are reported as mean cpm ± SE of triplicate cultures. Each experiment was repeated four times.

Hormone treatment and antibodies
Estradiol-17ß, from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA), was initially dissolved in ethanol, evaporated to dryness, and then resuspended in 0.9% saline. Control animals received only saline. To correct for the alcohol present in the estradiol preparation, an equivalent amount of ethanol was evaporated in flasks used to prepare saline.

Purified antirat B7.1 (CD 80) and B7.2 (CD 86) antibodies were purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Antibodies were used at a final concentration of approximately 10 µg/ml. MOPC-21 (Sigma) and P3 myeloma supernatant (a generous gift from Dr. Michael Fanger, Department of Microbiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH) were used as IgG1 isotype controls at the same concentration.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effect of estradiol, administered at various doses, on antigen presentation by vaginal cells
Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that estradiol has an inhibitory effect on antigen presentation by APCs in the vagina of ovariectomized rats (13). To determine the dose range of this response, groups of ovariectomized animals were treated with increasing amounts of estradiol (0.01–1.0 µg/day) for 3 days before the rats were killed 24 h after the third injection. As seen in Fig. 1Go, antigen presentation by vaginal cells is not affected with 0.01 µg/day but is inhibited with 0.1- and 1.0-µg doses of estradiol. In all cases, thymidine incorporation in controls was lower than that seen in Fig. 1Go, when APCs were incubated with T cells without OVA. Irrespective of whether vaginal cells were from saline- or estradiol-treated rats, T cell proliferation was low, in the absence of OVA. In other studies (not shown), we found that increasing the dose of estradiol to 10 µg/day had no further effect on vaginal antigen presentation beyond that seen with 1.0 µg/day.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of increasing doses of estradiol on antigen presentation by vaginal cells from ovariectomized rats. Ovariectomized rats received 100 µl estradiol (0.01–1.0 µg/rat) daily for 3 days. Control animals were given saline (100 µl). Twenty-four hours after the third injection, animals were killed, vaginal tissues were pooled, and cells were prepared by enzymatic digestion, as described in Materials and Methods. APCs (1 x 105 cells/100 µl) were incubated with OVA-sensitized T cells (T; 1 x 105 cells/100 µl) and OVA (300 µg/ml) for 3 days. 3H-thymidine was added for the last 24 h of incubation. Values shown are 3H-thymidine incorporation for APC+T+OVA and APC+T incubations, as the mean ± SE of APCs from four animals/per group. **, Significantly (P < 0.001) different from saline controls.

 
Response of antigen presentation by vaginal cells to treatment with estradiol
To establish the time course of vaginal antigen presentation inhibition by estradiol, ovariectomized rats were treated with estradiol (1 µg/day) for 1, 2, or 3 days before sacrifice 24 h after each injection. As shown in Fig. 2Go, treatment with a single injection of estradiol inhibits vaginal cell antigen presentation to OVA-specific T cells by 75% of that seen with APCs from saline controls. Treatment for 2 additional days had no significant effect on antigen presentation beyond that seen at day 1. To more fully characterize the onset of the inhibitory response in the vagina, ovariectomized animals were injected with a single dose of estradiol (1 µg) and killed 4, 10, and 24 h later. As seen in Fig. 3Go, inhibition of antigen presentation was not detected at 4 and 10 h but was significant, at 24 h following hormone treatment, relative to saline controls. As with our long-term course study (Fig. 2Go), we found that antigen presentation in response to estradiol was inhibited by 75% of that seen with saline controls within 24 h of hormone treatment. These studies indicate that a time interval of 10–24 h is needed to observe an inhibition by estradiol of vaginal cell antigen presentation.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Time course of the effect of estradiol on antigen presentation by isolated vaginal cells. Ovariectomized rats were injected with estradiol (1 µg/day) for 1, 2, or 3 days before the rats were killed 24 h after the third injection. Control animals received saline (100 µl) for 3 days. Vaginae were pooled (3–4 rats/group) and cells prepared for incubation with OVA-sensitized T cells and OVA for 3 days. 3H-thymidine was added for the last 24 h of incubation. Each bar represents the mean cpm ± SE of triplicate wells. *, Significantly (P < 0.01) less than saline controls.

 


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Short time course of estradiol inhibition of antigen presentation by vaginal cells. Ovariectomized animals (4–5 rats/group) were injected with estradiol (1 µg/rat) in 100 µl saline and killed either 4, 10, or 24 h later. Control animals received saline (100 µl) before death 24 h later. Vaginal cells were prepared and analyzed for their ability to present antigen, as described in Fig. 1Go. *, Antigen presentation was significantly (P < 0.01) lower than that seen with saline controls.

 
Effect of estradiol on the presence of APCs in the vagina
The inhibition of antigen presentation by vaginal APCs, after estradiol treatment, prompted us to examine, by immunohistochemistry, the effect of estradiol on the presence and distribution of APCs in the vagina. Isotype controls used in this study are indicated in Fig. 4Go, A and B. Based on visual analysis, these studies suggest that, in the absence of estradiol (saline controls), numerous MHC Class-II positive cells (OX-6 positive) are distributed in the stroma below the squamous epithelial layer. Estradiol treatment (1 µg/day for 3 days) seems to have no effect on the number of MHC Class-II positive cells, relative to saline controls (Fig. 4DGo); OX-6 positive cells were observed with the same frequency as those seen in saline-treated animals. Occasional clusters of MHC class II positive cells, however, were observed adjacent to the epithelial layer in estradiol-treated animals (not shown). Compared with large numbers of MHC Class II positive cells in the vaginal tissues of saline-treated rats, only limited numbers of macrophages, dendritic cells, and granulocytes (localized by OX-41 antibody) were seen in these tissues (Fig. 4EGo). In contrast to Class II, increased numbers of OX-41 positive cells were localized in the subepithelial stroma of vagina from estradiol-treated animals (Fig. 4FGo). This study suggests that estradiol has a pronounced effect on increasing the number of macrophages, dendritic cells, and granulocytes in vaginal tissues without increasing or decreasing the number of Class II positive cells in the lower reproductive tract.



View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical localization of class II expression and macrophage/dendritic cells/granulocytes distribution in vaginal tissues of ovariectomized animals after estradiol treatment. Paraffin-embedded sections of vaginae were prepared and stained with either isotype control antibody (A–B), anticlass II antibody (OX-6) (C–D), or antimacro-phage/dendritic cells/granulocytes antibody (OX-41) (E–F), as described in Materials and Methods. Vaginal sections were from animals treated daily with saline (A, C, and E) or estradiol (1 µg/rat) (B, D, and F) for 3 days and killed 24 h after the last injection. Bar, 80 µm.

 
To examine the possible roles of costimulatory molecules in antigen presentation by vaginal cells, isolated cells from saline- and estradiol-treated rats were incubated with OVA-specific T cells and OVA, in the presence of specific antibodies to B7.1 and B7.2 molecules. As seen in Fig. 5Go, which is representative of three separate experiments, the addition of murine monoclonal antibodies to B7.1 and B7.2 significantly lowered antigen presentation of OVA to OVA-specific T cells. In other experiments (not shown), when vaginal cells from saline- and/or estradiol-treated ovariectomized rats were incubated with OVA-specific T cells and anti-class II antibodies, antigen presentation was inhibited by OX-6 (anti-class II Ia), relative to that seen with isotype control (IgG1).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Role of B7.1 and B7.2 in antigen presentation by vaginal cells from saline- and estradiol-treated rats. Ovariectomized rats (7/group) were treated with estradiol (2 µg/0.1 ml/day) or saline (0.1 ml) for 3 days and killed 24 h after the last injection. Vaginal cells were incubated with OVA-specific T cells and OVA, along with antibodies (mouse antirat B7.1 and B7.2; 10 µg/ml) or an isotype control (IgG1; 10 µg/ml) for 3 days, with the addition of 3H-thymidine for the last 24 h. *, Antigen presentation was significantly (P < 0.02) lower than isotype control after the addition of B7.1 and B7.2 antibodies; **, significantly (P < 0.001) lower than isotype control.

 
Influence of vaginal cells on antigen presentation by thymus-adherent cells
To determine whether vaginal cells interact synergistically with other APCs, adherent cells prepared from the thymus were cocultured with vaginal APCs. Thymus glands were pooled from saline- and estradiol-treated rats to prepare isolated adherent cells, as indicated in Materials and Methods. Light microscopic analysis of these cells indicated that the majority have a dendritic-like appearance (11). Selection of thymus-adherent cells for these studies was determined in titration experiments (not shown), in which adherent cells (103–105 cells/well) were incubated with OVA-specific T cells and OVA to identify the lowest cell concentration at which antigen presentation could be detected. The degree of T cell proliferation induced by a given concentration of thymus APCs (TAPC, 5 x 104/well) is indicated in Fig. 6Go (solid bar). When vaginal cells (APCs, 1 x 105) from saline-treated rats were cultured with thymus-adherent cells along with OVA-specific T cells and OVA (APC/TAPC+T+OVA), antigen presentation was additive. Also shown in Fig. 6Go is the inhibitory effect of estradiol treatment (2 and 20 µg) on vaginal cell antigen presentation. In contrast, when vaginal cells from estradiol-treated rats are incubated with thymus-adherent cells, antigen presentation increases significantly beyond that seen with vaginal cells (APC+T+OVA) or thymus cells (TAPC+T+OVA) alone. This synergistic effect, which was observed in four separate experiments, suggests that coculture of vaginal cells with thymus-adherent cells enhances antigen presentation of one or both APCs, under conditions in which estradiol given in situ is inhibiting vaginal antigen presentation.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effect of vaginal cells from saline- and estradiol-treated rats on antigen presentation by thymus-adherent cells. Adherent cells from the thymus (5 x 104 cells/100 µl) were incubated with vaginal cells (1 x 105 cells/100 µl) from saline- and estradiol-treated rats, OVA-sensitized T cells, and OVA for 3 days, with the addition of 3H-thymidine for the last 24 h. **, Significantly (P < 0.001) greater than antigen presentation by vaginal cells (APC+T+OVA) or thymus cells (TAPC+T+OVA); +, significantly (P < 0.001) lower than antigen presentation by vaginal cells from saline-treated rats.

 
Stimulatory effect of vaginal conditioned media (CM) on antigen presentation by thymus-adherent cells
Conditioned media from vaginal cells was prepared by treating ovariectomized rats with three daily injections of saline or estradiol (1 µg/day) before death. Isolated vaginal cells were then cultured in RPMI-1640 media with 10% FBS for 3 days, and supernatants were collected. As seen in Fig. 7Go, CM prepared from saline-and estradiol-treated animals, when added to thymus-adherent cells incubated with OVA-specific T cells, significantly increases antigen presentation beyond that seen with APC+T+OVA alone. This response was observed in three separate experiments. In all studies, CM prepared from saline-treated animals had a more pronounced stimulatory effect on antigen presentation by thymus cells than did CM prepared from the vaginal cells of estradiol-treated animals. Vaginal cells used to prepare CM were tested independently for their ability to present antigen to T cells. In both studies, estradiol treatment was found to have a pronounced inhibitory effect, relative to that seen with saline controls. These findings indicate that vaginal cells from saline- and estradiol-treated rats produce a soluble factor(s) that enhances TAPC antigen presentation. Because the response with CM from estradiol-treated rats was lower than that seen with CM from saline controls, it suggests that estradiol either decreased the production of the soluble factor or led to the production by vaginal cells of a separate inhibitory factor that reversed the effect seen with CM from saline controls.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effect of vaginal cell CM from saline- and estradiol-treated rats on antigen presentation by adherent cells from the rat thymus. Isolated vaginal cells (2.5 x 105 cells/250 µl) from saline- and estradiol-treated rats (1 µg/day for 3 days) were cultured for 3 days in RPMI-1640 media with 10% FBS before centrifugation at 1000 x g for 10 min to prepare CM. Antigen presentation was measured by incubating isolated thymus adherent cells (APCs; 5 x 104 cells) with T cells (1 x 105) and OVA (300 µg/ml) along with CM (100 µl) from vaginal cells of saline- and estradiol-treated rats. Controls were incubated with fresh RPMI-1640 media with 10% FBS. **, Significantly (P < 0.001) greater than antigen presentation by thymus cells (APC+T+OVA) incubated without CM.

 
Effect of vaginal cells on spleen cell mitogenesis
To examine whether vaginal cells influence immune cell proliferation, cells from the spleen and vagina were cultured, either alone or together, in the presence of known mitogens. Isolated spleen cells were prepared from a pool of spleens from saline- and estradiol-treated rats, as described in Materials and Methods. Results shown in Fig. 8Go are representative of four separate experiments. As seen in Fig. 8AGo, vaginal cells from saline-treated animals, when added to spleen cells in the presence of Con A, had a 2- to 3-fold higher proliferation than that seen with spleen cells alone [ four out of four (4/4) experiments]. In contrast, the addition of vaginal cells from estradiol-treated rats had either a slight stimulatory effect (1/4) or no effect on Con A-stimulated spleen cell mitogenesis (3/4). Proliferation of spleen cells in the absence of mitogens, vaginal cells in the presence of mitogen, vaginal and spleen cells alone, vaginal cells alone, and spleen cells alone were either low or not different from background. In response to PHA (Fig. 8BGo), spleen cells had a significantly higher proliferative response when vaginal cells from saline-treated rats were present (3/4) and a significantly lower response with estradiol-treated vaginal cells (4/4). In contrast, spleen cell proliferation in the presence of LPS, a known B cell mitogen, was significantly lower when vaginal cells from saline- or estradiol-treated animals were present (4/4), than that seen in the absence of vaginal cells (Fig. 8CGo).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Mitogenic response of isolated spleen cells (Spl) incubated with vaginal cells (Vg) from saline- and estradiol-treated rats. Splenocytes were incubated with isolated vaginal cells from ovariectomized rats (five/group) treated with saline (0.1 ml) or estradiol (1 µg/0.1 ml) for 1 day before sacrifice. Vaginal cells (1 x 105) and spleen cells (5 x 105) were cocultured with Con A (1 µg/ml), PHA (10 µg/ml), and LPS (30 µg/ml) for 2 days, before the addition of 3H-thymidine to culture wells for an additional 24 h. Each bar represents the mean ± SE of four replicates. *, (spleen + mitogen) is significantly different (P < 0.02) from (spleen + vaginal cells + mitogen) values; **, (spleen + mitogen) is significantly different (P < 0.001) from (spleen + vaginal cells + mitogen) values.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The presented studies demonstrate that vaginal cells are able to present antigen and that antigen presentation is precisely regulated by estradiol. By analyzing the onset of estradiol inhibition of antigen presentation by vaginal cells, we found that the effect of estradiol is rapid and complete within 24 h of hormone administration. These studies also demonstrate that the inhibitory effect of estradiol is not caused by the clearance (traffic) of APCs from the vagina; but rather, it occurs at a time when MHC class II expression remains unchanged and macrophage/dendritic cells/granulocytes are accumulating in the vagina. In other studies, vaginal cells interact with adherent cells from the thymus to enhance antigen presentation. This effect is attributable, in part, to the release of a soluble factor(s) that influences mitogenesis when vaginal cells are cocultured with spleen cells.

Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that the female reproductive tract is an inductive site for initiating immune responses. Both the uterus and vagina contain APCs that are functionally capable of presenting antigen to OVA-specific T cells (11, 13). We found that antigen presentation by uterine epithelial cells is increased in intact rats at proestrus, the stage during the estrous cycle when estradiol levels are known to be elevated, and in ovariectomized animals treated with estradiol (11). In contrast, antigen presentation by uterine stromal cells and vaginal cells is inhibited by estradiol (13). The data presented in this article extend these findings by demonstrating the rapid inhibition by estradiol of vaginal cell antigen presentation. In other studies, we found that the release of estradiol by the ovary, on the afternoon of day 2 diestrus, precedes by 24 h increases in IgA and pIgR levels in the uterus (16). Our finding of a maximal inhibitory response to estradiol within 24 h, in the present study, suggests that estradiol release by the ovary at diestrus is responsible for the inhibition of antigen presentation in the vagina that occurs at proestrus and estrus (13).

Dendritic cells are known to act synergistically with other APCs in presenting antigen to T cells (17, 18). Macrophages in the lung, for example, which are known to be weak APCs, are thought to produce antigenic peptides that are picked up by dendritic cells and presented to T cells (18). We found that uterine epithelial and/or stromal cells, when cocultured with thymus-adherent cells, enhance antigen presentation beyond that seen by uterine cells alone or thymus cells alone (11). In the present study, antigen presentation is enhanced synergistically when vaginal cells are coincubated with dendritic-like cells. These studies demonstrate that APCs in both the upper and lower reproductive tract interact synergistically with APCs from other sites in the body. Because dendritic cells present antigen at sites distant from the site of antigen uptake (19), these studies suggest that cooperative interactions between different APCs in the reproductive tract (dendritic cells, macrophages, B cells, and epithelial cells) may occur to optimize chances for mounting an effective immune response in the female reproductive tract.

Coculture of spleen cells and vaginal cells from saline- and estradiol-treated rats has a profound effect on mitogenesis and varies with the mitogen used. For example, when Con A and/or PHA, two T cell mitogens, are added to spleen cells along with vaginal cells from saline-treated rats, spleen cell proliferation is enhanced 2–2.5 times beyond that seen in the absence of vaginal cells. In contrast, vaginal cells from estradiol-treated rats, under the same conditions, either inhibit or have no effect on mitogenesis. Moreover, when LPS (a known B cell mitogen) is present, vaginal cells from saline- and estradiol-treated rats inhibit spleen cell proliferation. These findings indicate that, depending on the immune cell stimulated (T cells, B cells, or APCs), vaginal cells have separate and distinct effects on cell proliferation.

Unexpectedly, we found that antigen presentation by thymus-adherent cells is stimulated by CM prepared from isolated vaginal cells of saline- and estradiol-treated rats. Though antigen presentation was increased in both cases, the magnitude of the response was significantly greater with CM from saline-treated animals than that seen after estradiol treatment. What is remarkable is that, in 3/3 experiments, antigen presentation by vaginal cells used to prepare the CM was fully inhibited in terms of their ability to present antigen. Our finding that CM from the vaginal cells of estradiol-treated rats is less stimulatory than that seen with control CM suggests either that the soluble factor (cytokine) involved is inhibited by estradiol treatment or that multiple factors (stimulatory vs. inhibitory) are involved. One possible interpretation of this is that, at a time when estradiol is inhibiting antigen presentation in the vagina, it is stimulating APCs or other cells in the vagina, to produce cytokines that enhance thymus cell antigen presentation. Identification of the cytokine(s) involved, the cells responsible for cytokine production, and the cells (APCs and/or T cells) that respond to the cytokine(s) produced remain to be determined.

These studies suggest that MHC class II expression on vaginal APCs is not the rate-limiting step by which estradiol inhibits antigen presentation, because inhibition is complete at a time (24 h) when vaginal MHC class II expression remains unchanged. Others have shown that, in addition to MHC class II, costimulatory molecules (including ICAM-1, CD4, CD40, and CD40 ligand) play a central role in the transduction of signals from APCs to T cells (20, 21). Our finding that antigen presentation by vaginal cells is inhibited when antibodies to B7.1 and B7.2 are added to the culture media indicates that antigen presentation by vaginal APCs is mediated through these transmembrane costimulatory molecules. B7.1 and B7.2 proteins are costimulatory molecules present on the surfaces of APCs and are important for the activation of T cells specific for both foreign antigens and autoantigens (22). Our ongoing studies are aimed at determining whether estradiol inhibits antigen presentation by vaginal cells by down-regulating the expression of B7.1 and B7.2, as well as other costimulatory molecules. Unexpectedly, we found that estradiol-induced inhibition of antigen presentation is maximal at a time when, based on visual examination of stained tissue sections, Class II positive cells seem to remain constant in the vagina and macrophages/dendritic cells/granulocytes increase in response to estradiol treatment. This paradoxical observation suggests either that estradiol is lowering class II expression on those cells in the vagina or that granulocytes entering the vagina express low levels of Class II. Further studies are needed to resolve this finding.

Our findings suggest that local immunosuppression in the vagina protects against immune responses to sperm, which could lead to infertility. We have previously found that antigen presentation in the vagina of the rat is inhibited at estrus, when mating is most likely to occur (13). Because semen is deposited in the vagina at this time, our findings suggest that the presence of allogeneic sperm in the vagina coincides with a transient down-regulation of the afferent arm of the immune system, possibly to decrease the chance of sensitization to sperm. That immune suppression does occur in the female reproductive tract is well documented at the time of implantation and throughout pregnancy (23, 24, 25, 26). Mediated, in part, through the actions of TGF-ß, NK cells are suppressed at the site of implantation (27, 28). Others have suggested a potential role for IFN{gamma} in the uterus of the pregnant mouse, which would be to up-regulate class I expression to mask trophoblastic cells from being killed by NK cells (29). Our findings extend these observations by demonstrating that, in addition to that seen in the uterus, localized suppression also occurs in the vagina, in response to estradiol.

These findings may have particular importance in terms of susceptibility to sexually transmitted diseases. Studies by Marx et al. (30) demonstrated that primate susceptibility to simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), the causative agent of AIDS-like symptoms in Macaques, is increased 8-fold when animals are treated with progesterone before intravaginal infection. These studies suggested that progesterone thins the layer of squamous cells in the vagina, possibly to increase vaginal penetration by SIV. An alternative possibility, suggested by our findings, is that progesterone suppresses antigen recognition and presentation in the vagina, which, in turn, leads to the rapid progression of disease. We and others previously have shown that estradiol and/or progesterone stimulate and inhibit mucosal immunity in the female reproductive tract and that regulation varies with the site in the reproductive tract studied and the species analyzed (10, 31, 32). Recently, we found that progesterone pretreatment of adult female rats is required for the induction of uterine and vaginal chlamydial infection (33). In other species, estradiol leads to enhanced susceptibility to infection in the guinea pig and human (34). Whether sex hormones enhance human susceptibility to bacterial and viral infection in the female reproductive tract by suppressing immune recognition of potential pathogens remains to be determined.

With the identification of the reproductive tract as an inductive site for immune responses, our studies in the rat suggest that the stage of the menstrual cycle in women may be an important determinant in the successful use of mucosal vaccines against sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV. In other studies, we have found that APCs in the human fallopian tube, uterus, cervix, and vagina are functionally able to present tetanus toxoid antigen to autologous T cells (35). These studies led to the suggestion that antigen presentation in the human female reproductive tract may be under hormonal control, because tissues from some patients (ovary, Fallopian tube, endocervix, and ectocervix) were unable to present antigen to T cells. Whether this reflects changes in hormone balance during the menstrual cycle remains to be established.

In conclusion, we report that the afferent arm of the mucosal immune system in the rat vagina is under hormonal control. These studies indicate that control of antigen presentation by estradiol in the vagina is separate and distinct from that seen in the uterus. Further, these findings suggest that endocrine balance, which varies with the stage of the menstrual cycle, menopause, the use of oral contraceptives, and hormone replacement therapy, may be important determinants in the recognition and response of the mucosal immune system to potential pathogens.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors gratefully thank Drs. William F. Hickey and Weiguo Zhao, Department of Pathology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, for their assistance in developing the OVA-specific T cell line used in this study.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by Research Grants AI-13541 and AI-34478 from NIH and, in part, by the Norris Cotton Cancer Center Support Grant CA-23108. The flow cytometry analyses were performed in the Herbert C. Englert Cell Analysis Laboratory, which is part of the NCCC core grant (CA-23108) and by equipment grants from the Fannie E. Rippel Foundation. Back

Received December 2, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ogra P, Yamanaka T, Losonsky GA 1981 Local immunologic defenses in the genital tract. In: Fleicher N (ed) Reproductive Immunology. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, pp 381–394
  2. Underdown BJ, Schiff JM 1986 Immunoglobulin A: strategic defense initiative at the mucosal surface. Annu Rev Immunol 4:389–417[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Wira CR, Stern J 1992 Endocrine regulation of the mucosal immune system in the female reproductive tract: control of IgA, IgG, and secretory component during the reproductive cycle, at implantation and throughout pregnancy. In: Pasqualini JR, Scholler R (eds) Hormones and Fetal Pathophysiology. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 343–368
  4. Ziegler K, Unanue ER 1981 Identification of a macrophage antigen-processing event required for Ia region-restricted antigen presentation to T-lymphocytes. J Immunol 127:1869–1875[Abstract]
  5. Ashwell JD, DeFranco AL, Paul WE, Schwartz RH 1984 Antigen presentation by resting B cells. Radiosensitivity of the antigen-presentation function and two distinct pathways of T cell activation. J Exp Med 159:881–905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Weinberger O, Herrmann S, Mescher MF, Benacerraf B, Burakaff SJ 1981 Antigen-presenting cell function in induction of helper T cells for cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses: evidence for antigen processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:1796–1799[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kovacsovics-Bankowski M, Rock KL 1995 A phagosome-to-cytosol pathway for exogenous antigens presented on MHC class I molecules. Science 267:243–246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ogra PL, Ogra SS 1973 Local antibody response to poliovaccine in the human female genital tract. J Immunol 110:1307–1311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Parr MB, Parr EL 1994 Mucosal immunity in the female and male reproductive tracts. In: Ogra PL, Mestecky J, Lamm ME, Strober W, McGhee JR, Bienenstock J (eds) Handbook of Mucosal Immunology. Academic Press, New York, pp 677–689
  10. Wira CR, Kaushic C 1996 Mucosal immunity in the female reproductive tract: effect of sex hormones on immune recognition and responses. In: Kiyono H, Ogra PL, McGhee JR (eds) Mucosal Vaccines: New Trends In Immunization. Academic Press, New York, pp 375–388
  11. Wira CR, Rossoll RM 1995 Antigen-presenting cells in the female reproductive tract: influence of the estrous cycle on antigen presentation by uterine epithelial and stromal cells. Endocrinology 136:4526–4534[Abstract]
  12. Prabhala RH, Wira CR 1995 Sex hormone and IL-6 regulation of antigen presentation by epithelial and stromal cells in the uterus of the rat. J Immunol 155:5566–5573[Abstract]
  13. Wira CR, Rossoll RM 1995 Antigen-presenting cells in the female reproductive tract: influence of sex hormones on antigen presentation in the vagina. Immunology 84:505–508[Medline]
  14. Kaushic C, Frauendorf E, Wira CR 1997 Polymeric immunoglobulin A receptor in the rodent female reproductive tract: expression in vagina and tissue specific mRNA regulation by sex hormones. Biol Reprod 57:958–966[Abstract]
  15. Prabhala RH, Wira CR 1991 Cytokine regulation of the mucosal immune system: in vivo stimulation by interferon-{gamma} of secretory component and immunoglobulin A in uterine secretions and proliferation of lymphocytes from spleen. Endocrinology 129:2915–2923[Abstract]
  16. Wira CR, Stern JE 1985 Rapid effect of ovarian hormones on secretory component (SC) in uterine secretions of the rat: the involvement of RNA synthesis in SC production. In: Peeters H (ed) Protides in Biological Fluids. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 255–257
  17. Miyazaki H, Osawa T 1983 Accessory functions and mutual cooperation of murine macrophages and dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol 13:984–989[Medline]
  18. Gong JL, McCarthy KM, Rogers RA, Schneeberger EE 1994 Interstitial lung macrophages interact with dendritic cells to present antigenic peptides derived from particulate antigens to T cells. Immunology 81:343–351[Medline]
  19. McWilliam AS, Nelson DJ, Holt PG 1995 The biology of airway dendritic cells. Immunol Cell Biol 73:405–413[Medline]
  20. Clark EA, Ledbetter JA 1994 How B and T cells talk to each other. Nature 367:425–428[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Foy T, Aruffo A, Bajorath J, Buhlmann J, Noelle R 1996 Immune regulation by CD40 and its ligand GP39. Annu Rev Immunol 14:591–617[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Kuchroo VK, Das MP, Brown JA, Ranger AM, Zamvil SS, Sobel RA, Weiner HL, Nabavi N, Glimcher LH 1995 B7.1 and B7.2 costimulatory molecules activate differentially the Th1/Th2 developmental pathways: application to autoimmune disease therapy. Cell 80:707–718[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Stagnaro GA, Roman SH, Cobin RH, El HE, Wallenstein S, Davies TF 1992 A prospective study of lymphocyte-initiated immunosuppression in normal pregnancy: evidence of a T-cell etiology for postpartum thyroid dysfunction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 74:645–653[Abstract]
  24. Saleem MA, Jha P, Buckshee K, Farooq A 1992 Studies on mitogen-induced lymphocyte transformation and the effect of pregnancy serum on mitogen-induced normal lymphocyte culture. Gynecol Obstet Invest 33:9–14[Medline]
  25. Nakamura N, Miyazaki K, Kitano Y, Fujisaki S, Okamura H 1993 Suppression of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity during human pregnancy. J Reprod Immunol 23:119–130[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Clark DA, Drake B, Head JR, Stedronska CJ, Banwatt D 1990 Decidua-associated suppressor activity and viability of individual implantation sites of allopregnant C3H mice. J Reprod Immunol 17:253–264[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Clark DA, Flanders KC, Banwatt D, Millar BW, Manuel J, Stedronska CJ, Rowley B 1990 Murine pregnancy decidua produces a unique immunosuppressive molecule related to transforming growth factor beta-2. J Immunol 144:3008–3014[Abstract]
  28. Saito S, Morii T, Enomoto M, Sakakura S, Nishikawa K, Narita N, Ichijo M 1993 The effect of interleukin 2 and transforming growth factor-beta 2 (TGF-beta 2) on the proliferation and natural killer activity of decidual CD16- CD56 bright natural killer cells. Cell Immunol 152:605–613[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Grabowska A, Chumbley G, Carter N, Loke YW 1990 Interferon-gamma enhances mRNA and surface expression of class I antigen on human extravillous trophoblast. Placenta 11:301–308[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Marx PA, Spira AI, Gettie A, Dailey PJ, Veazey RS, Lackner AA, Mahoney CJ, Miller CJ, Claypool LE, Ho DD, Alexander NJ 1996 Progesterone implants enhance SIV vaginal transmission and early virus load. Nat Med 2:1084–1089[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Schumacher GFB 1973 Soluble proteins in cervical mucus. In: Blandau RJ, Moghissi K (eds) The Biology of the Cervix. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 201–233
  32. Sullivan DA, Richardson GS, MacLaughlin DT, Wira CR 1984 Variations in the levels of secretory component in human uterine fluid during the menstrual cycle. J Steroid Biochem 20:509–513[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Kaushic C, Murdin AD, Underdown BJ, Wira CR 1998 Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the female reproductive tract of rat: influence of progesterone on infectivity and immune response. Infect Immun 66:393–398
  34. Sweet RL, Blankfort-Doyle M, Robbie MO, Schachter J 1986 The occurrence of chlamydial and gonococcal salpingitis during the menstrual cycle. JAMA 255:2246–2250
  35. Fahey JV, Prabhala RH, Guyre PM, Wira CR 1999 Antigen-presenting cells in the human female reproductive tract: analysis of antigen presentation in pre- and post-menopausal women. Am J Reprod Immunol 42:49–57



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. M. Seavey and T. R. Mosmann
Paternal Antigen-Bearing Cells Transferred during Insemination Do Not Stimulate Anti-Paternal CD8+ T Cells: Role of Estradiol in Locally Inhibiting CD8+ T Cell Responses
J. Immunol., December 1, 2006; 177(11): 7567 - 7578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
D. M. LeBlanc, M. M. Barousse, and P. L. Fidel Jr.
Role for Dendritic Cells in Immunoregulation during Experimental Vaginal Candidiasis.
Infect. Immun., June 1, 2006; 74(6): 3213 - 3221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. R. Ryan, R. Shepherd, J. K. Leavey, Y. Gao, F. Grassi, F. J. Schnell, W.-P. Qian, G. J. Kersh, M. N. Weitzmann, and R. Pacifici
An IL-7-dependent rebound in thymic T cell output contributes to the bone loss induced by estrogen deficiency
PNAS, November 15, 2005; 102(46): 16735 - 16740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. R. Wira, R. M. Rossoll, and R. C. Young
Polarized Uterine Epithelial Cells Preferentially Present Antigen at the Basolateral Surface: Role of Stromal Cells in Regulating Class II-Mediated Epithelial Cell Antigen Presentation
J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1795 - 1804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. J. Keller, A. Tuyama, M. J. Carlucci, and B. C. Herold
Topical microbicides for the prevention of genital herpes infection
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2005; 55(4): 420 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. T. Teng, C. Beard, and W. Gladwell
Differential Expression and Estrogen Response of Lactoferrin Gene in the Female Reproductive Tract of Mouse, Rat, and Hamster
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2002; 67(5): 1439 - 1449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. R. Wira, M. A. Roche, and R. M. Rossoll
Antigen Presentation by Vaginal Cells: Role of TGF{beta} as a Mediator of Estradiol Inhibition of Antigen Presentation
Endocrinology, August 1, 2002; 143(8): 2872 - 2879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
T. M. Kish, L. R. Budgeon, P. A. Welsh, and M. K. Howett
Immunological Characterization of Human Vaginal Xenografts in Immunocompromised Mice : Development of a Small Animal Model for the Study of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Infection
Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2001; 159(6): 2331 - 2345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wira, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kaushic, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wira, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kaushic, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals