help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christian, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christian, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. F.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 9 3111-3119
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Nongenomic Actions of Testosterone on a Subset of Lactotrophs in the Male Rat Pituitary1

H. C. Christian, N. J. Rolls and J. F. Morris

Department of Human Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom OX1 3QX

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. John F. Morris, Department of Human Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, United Kingdom OX1 3QX. E-mail: john.morris{at}anat.ox.ac.uk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Rapid, nongenomic effects of testosterone on PRL release in vitro were investigated. Anterior pituitary tissue from adult male rats was stimulated in vitro for 5 or 20 min with testosterone (T; 1 or 100 nM) or testosterone-BSA (T-BSA; 1 or 100 nM) with or without 1.2 mM tannic acid, which enables visualization of secretory granule exocytosis. Within 5 min, both concentrations of T and T-BSA stimulated exocytosis from type 2 lactotrophs (characterized by small spherical granules), but not from type 1 lactotrophs (characterized by large polymorphic granules). The effects of T on type 2 lactotrophs could be blocked by preincubation with dopamine (500 nM), but were not time or concentration dependent, and could not be inhibited by 1) removal of extracellular Ca2+, 2) the L-type Ca2+ channel blocker nifedipine (100 nM), 3) the Ca2+-adenosine triphosphatase inhibitor thapsigargin (150 nM), 4) the PKC inhibitor retinal (10 µM), or 5) the {gamma}-aminobutyric acidA chloride channel blocker picrotoxin (100 µM). T-BSA (0.1 nM to 1 µM) for 5 or 20 min also caused an increased release of immunoreactive PRL into the medium compared with control incubations. T and T-BSA did not stimulate exocytosis from gonadotrophs or cause LH release. In conclusion, we report for the first time a rapid, nongenomic effect of T on PRL secretion.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
STEROIDS HAVE long been known to exert genomic effects by binding to high affinity intracellular receptors, DNA binding, and regulation of transcription. Increasingly, however, rapid nongenomic actions of steroids are being recognized in the brain and neuroendocrine systems (1). As early as 1942, Selye (2) demonstrated rapid, reversible sedative and anesthetic actions of progesterone and other steroids in the rat central nervous system, but only recently have studies in this area advanced (3). Whereas genomic actions take hours or days to produce their actions, rapid steroid effects are activated within seconds to minutes, too fast to be explained by the current genomic model. Furthermore, the effects are not blocked by inhibitors of either transcription or translation. The best characterized rapid effects are those of neurosteroids, steroids (e.g. allopregnanolone) synthesized by glial cells in the brain and peripheral nerves, which bind to and exert allosteric modulation of inhibitory {gamma}-aminobutyric acidA(GABAA) receptors (4). The circulating plasma steroids, estradiol (5, 6), corticosterone (7), and testosterone (T) (8, 9), have all been shown to exert rapid effects on the electrical activity of hypothalamic and hippocampal neurons. Many similar, rapid, nongenomic effects of steroids have been reported in other tissues. For example, progesterone stimulates oocyte maturation (10) and induction of the acrosome reaction in sperm (11) and inhibits smooth muscle contractility (12).

In rodents two main subtypes of lactotroph can be characterized morphologically by electron microscopy (13). Type 1 cells contain large polymorphic electron-dense secretory granules, whereas type 2 cells contain numerous smaller electron-dense granules. In male rodents the two types of lactotroph are present in approximately equal proportions. T is the major circulating steroid in male rodents. In the anterior pituitary T is known to exert genomic inhibitory effects on PRL synthesis via classical cytoplasmic receptor binding and regulation of DNA transcription (14). However, little is known regarding rapid, nongenomic actions of any steroid in the anterior pituitary and the mechanism(s) by which these might occur. Steroids conjugated to BSA are impermeant to the plasma membrane and therefore cannot access cytoplasmic receptors. They have been used increasingly as tools to investigate nongenomic, cell surface effects of steroids (15, 16).

As part of an investigation of the varied effects of steroids in the male pituitary, we have, therefore, investigated whether T and the conjugate T-BSA can exert a rapid, nongenomic action on the release of PRL by use of a combination of tannic acid and electron microscopic analysis and RIA. Tannic acid was used to capture the cores of granules as they are exocytosed (17), thereby enabling the cellular sites of exocytosis to be localized and quantitated by electron microscopy.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Adult normal male Sprague Dawley rats bred from a colony at the Department of Human Anatomy and Genetics (Oxford, UK) and weighing 190–210 g were used. The Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication 85–23) were followed. The rats were housed postweaning in groups of five per cage in a quiet room with 14 h of light and 10 h of darkness and temperature maintained at 20–21 C; food and water were available ad libitum. All experiments were started between 0800–0900 h to avoid changes associated with the circadian rhythm. Animals were killed by stunning and decapitation, and the anterior pituitary was removed.

Secretion of PRL in vitro by anterior pituitary segments
Identification of secreting cells. Anterior pituitary glands were cut into 4 roughly equal segments. The segments were distributed randomly (1 segment/well) in the wells of 24-well tissue culture plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA) and incubated at 37 C for 90 min in a humidified atmosphere saturated with 95% O2-5% CO2 in 1 ml incubation medium [1% (vol/vol) aprotinin (Bayer Corp., Saffron Waldon, UK) and 1% (vol/vol) penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma) in oxygenated Earle’s Balanced Salt solution (EBSS; phenol red free; Sigma, Dorset, UK, pH 7.4]. The segments were then transferred to fresh incubation medium to which had been added 1.2 mM tannic acid (BDH, Poole, UK) and T (1 or 100 nM), T-BSA (1 or 100 nM), or 28 mM K+ (positive control) and incubated for an additional 5 or 20 min. To eliminate the possibility of nonspecific steroid membrane effects or effects of the BSA conjugate on hormone release, a range of other steroids at equal concentrations were subsequently tested, namely 17{alpha}- and 17ß-estradiol, corticosterone, progesterone, and progesterone-BSA. In separate experiments tissue was equilibrated for 15 min before steroid contact with nifedipine (100 nM), thapsigargin (150 nM), retinal (10 µM), picrotoxin (100 µM), or dopamine (500 nM) which were then included in the medium with T-BSA for the remainder of the experiment. At the end of the final incubation, tissue was immersion fixed in glutaraldehyde (2.5% in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2) for 1 h and then processed into Spurr’s resin.

Assay of secreted PRL and LH. The experiments in which hormone released into the medium was assayed followed the protocol described above, except that no tannic acid was added to the incubation medium. Medium from the final incubation was collected and stored in aliquots (300 µl; 20 C) for subsequent measurement of immunoreactive (ir-) PRL and ir-LH by RIA. Pituitary segments were weighed on a torsion balance and discarded.

Preparation and incubation of dispersed anterior pituitary cells
Suspensions of dissociated anterior pituitary cells were prepared as described previously (18). Briefly, anterior pituitary cells were dissociated by incubation (1 h, 37 C) with collagenase (0.2%, wt/vol; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Sussex, UK) and deoxyribonuclease in EBSS enriched with BSA (0.4%; Sigma); the dispersion was aided by gentle trituration (30 sec every 10 min). The resulting cell suspension was centrifuged (300 x g, 10 min), the pellet was resuspended in 5 ml BSA-enriched EBSS, and the suspension was filtered through 20-µm nylon mesh to remove any large clumps of debris. The filtrate was then centrifuged (300 x g, 10 min), and the pellet was resuspended in 5 ml incubation medium. The cells were examined at the light microscope level to verify the effectiveness of the dispersion and counted using a hemocytometer. Cell viability was assessed by the trypan blue exclusion test and was always found to be more than 95%.

The cells were plated at a density of 2.5 x 105 cells/ml·well in 24-well cell culture plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA) and incubated for 90 min at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere saturated with 95% O2-5% CO2. They were then challenged for 5 min with T, T-BSA (1 pM to 1 µM), or 28 mM K+; controls were incubated in an equal volume of incubation medium alone. After centrifugation (600 x g, 4 C, 10 min), the supernatant fluid was harvested and assayed for ir-PRL. In some experiments, 1.2 mM tannic acid was also added with incubation medium, and the pituitary cells were retained for quantitative electron microscopy.

Quantitative electron microscopy
The anterior pituitary segments and isolated cells were prepared for electron microscopy using standard methods. Briefly, segments were postfixed in osmium tetroxide (1%, wt/vol, in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer) contrasted with uranyl acetate (2%, wt/vol, in distilled water), dehydrated through increasing concentrations of ethanol (70–100%), and embedded in Spurr’s resin (Agar Scientific (UK), Stansted, UK). Ultrathin sections (50–80 nm) were viewed with a JEM-1010 transmission microscope (JEOL USA, Inc., Peabody, MA). Cut sections were collected once a full block face was presented; thus, sections were relatively superficial. Immunogold labeling for PRL was performed to aid cell identification; rabbit antirat PRL (National Hormone and Pituitary Program, Gaithersburg, MD) was used at a dilution of 1:5000. For control sections, the primary antibody was omitted and replaced with 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer containing 1% (wt/vol) egg albumin. Endocrine cells in sections taken systematically from different depths of the embedded tissue were identified on the basis of their secretory granule populations (shape, electron density, size, and distribution), organelle structures, nucleus size, and chromatin characteristics (13) and by immunogold labeling (19). Cells from individual samples were always identified and counted on four to eight randomized grids according to a systematic random procedure (20).

RIA of PRL and LH
PRL was determined in duplicate by RIA using a primary antibody of defined specificity raised in rabbits against rat PRL, with synthetic PRL as a reference preparation and [125I]PRL as tracer (all reagents generously supplied by the National Hormone and Pituitary Program). The assay sensitivity was 0.5 ng/ml, and the inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation were 10% and 4%, respectively. Dilution curves of test samples were parallel that of the standard PRL preparation. LH was determined by RIA using a primary antibody raised in rabbits against rat LH, rat LH reference preparation, and rat [125I]LH as tracer (reagents also supplied by the National Hormone and Pituitary Program). The assay sensitivity was 1 ng/ml, and the inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation were 11% and 8%, respectively.

Drugs
The following were used. T 3-(O-carboxy-methyl)oxime:BSA (20–30 mol steroid/mol BSA), T 3-(O-carboxy-methyl)oxime:BSA-fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugate, progesterone 3-(O-carboxy-methyl)oxime:BSA (15–45 mol steroid/mol BSA), and BSA-fluorescein isothiocyanate (all from Sigma) were initially dissolved in EBSS adjusted to pH 9 with 1 M NaOH and diluted in EBSS, pH 7.4. T, 17{alpha}- and 17ß-estradiol, progesterone, and corticosterone (all from Sigma) were initially dissolved in a small amount of ethanol and subsequently diluted with EBSS; the final concentration of ethanol never exceeded 0.1%, and appropriate controls were included in each experiment. Nifedipine, picrotoxin, thapsigargin, retinal, dopamine (all from Sigma) were dissolved and diluted in EBSS immediately before use. All solutions were adjusted to pH 7.4 before use.

Statistical analysis
Quantitation of secretion by electron microscopy was analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Preliminary analysis of RIA by the Shapiro-Wilks test showed that the data were normally distributed. Subsequent analysis was performed using ANOVA with post-hoc comparisons made using Duncan’s multiple range test. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. As the basal rate of ir-PRL and ir-LH release varied between experiments, statistical analyses were made within experiments only. Each of the studies shown was repeated at least three times (for specific details, see figure legends), and in all instances a similar data profile was seen.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effect of T and T-BSA on exocytotic release of PRL from type 1 and type 2 lactotrophs in vitro
Stimulation of anterior pituitary segments in vitro with 28 mM K+ (positive control) for either 5 or 20 min induced the expected significant (P < 0.01) increase in the release of ir-PRL (Fig. 1AGo) and LH (Fig. 3AGo). T-BSA (10-10–10-6 M) for 5 or 20 min significantly (P < 0.05) stimulated ir-PRL at all concentrations tested (Fig. 1AGo). By contrast, T-BSA exerted no detectable effect on the amount of ir-LH released (Fig. 3AGo).



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of T-BSA (0.1 nM, 10 nM, and 1 µM) for 5 or 20 min in vitro on the release of ir-PRL into the medium. {square}, 5-min exposure to steroid; , 20-min exposure to steroid. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 6).The data are typical of those from three replicate experiments. **, P < 0.01 vs. corresponding basal control. {dagger}, P < 0.05, 20-min vs. 5-min exposure to 28 mM K+ (by ANOVA plus Duncan’s multiple range test). B, Electron micrograph showing exocytosis from a type 2 lactotroph in response to T-BSA (1 nM for 5 min). Exocytoses were either single (arrowheads) or multiple (arrow). Magnification, x12,000.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Lack of effect of T-BSA (10-10–10-6 M) for 5 or 20 min in vitro on secretion of ir-LH detected by RIA of the medium (A) and exocytosis from rat anterior pituitary gonadotrophs (B). Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 6). The data are typical of those from three replicate experiments. *, P < 0.05 vs. corresponding basal control (by ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test).

 
Electron micrographs showed that in both in vitro preparations, pituitary segments, and isolated cells, the integrity and ultrastructural morphology of the pituitary cells were well preserved throughout the incubations. Analysis of tannic acid-captured exocytosis showed that the nonspecific depolarizing stimulus, 28 mM K+, induced a significant (P < 0.01) increase in the release of immunoidentified PRL from both type 1 and type 2 lactotrophs. In contrast, T and T-BSA (Fig. 1BGo) stimulated the release of PRL only from the small granule type 2 lactotrophs. T-BSA (1 and 100 nM) for 5 or 20 min in vitro caused a significant (P < 0.01) increase in the mean number of exocytotic events observed per releasing type 2 lactotroph (Fig. 2AGo). The proportion of secreting type 2 lactotrophs also increased (1 nM T-BSA, 56 ± 2%; 100 nM, 50 ± 3%; P < 0.01 vs. control, 23 ± 1%). Nearly all (85 ± 4%) of the exocytosis occurred at the vascular borders of the cells. In contrast, no effect of the steroid was observed either on the number of type 1 lactotrophs releasing PRL-containing granules (1 nM T-BSA, 23 ± 1%; 100 nM, 20 ± 2%; P = vs. control, 22 ± 1%) or on the number of exocytoses from these cells (Fig. 2BGo). Also, no significant difference compared with EBSS controls was observed with either dose of steroid on the number of exocytoses occurring from gonadotrophs (Fig. 3BGo). Although a significant (P < 0.05) increase in PRL release in response to 28 mM K+ between 5 and 20 min was detected, the exocytotic responses to T-BSA treatment for 5 or 20 min did not differ, nor did the responses to the three concentrations of T-BSA (0.1 nM, 10 nM, and 1 µM) tested (Fig. 1AGo).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of T-BSA (1 and 100 nM) for 5 or 20 min in vitro on exocytosis from rat anterior pituitary type 2 (A) and type 1 (B) lactotrophs. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 6). **, P < 0.01 vs. corresponding basal control (by Mann-Whitney U test). The data are typical of those from three replicate experiments.

 
17ß-Estradiol (0.1 and 10 nM, 20 min) also produced a significant (P < 0.01) stimulation of ir-PRL release not significantly different from that measured in response to T and T-BSA. However, the same concentrations of the inactive stereoisomer 17{alpha}-estradiol, progesterone, progesterone-BSA, or corticosterone were all without effect (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Comparison of the effects of T, T-BSA, 17ß- and 17{alpha}-estradiol, progesterone, progesterone-BSA, and corticosterone (all at 0.1 nM and 10 nM) for 20 min in vitro on the release of ir-PRL into the medium. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 6). The data are typical of those from three replicate experiments. **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05 (vs. corresponding basal control, by ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test).

 
The T-stimulated exocytosis of PRL from type 2 lactotrophs was significantly inhibited by inclusion of 500 nM dopamine in the prestimulus and stimulating incubation media (Fig. 5AGo), as was the proportion of responsive type 2 lactotrophs (from 56 ± 2%, control, to 23 ± 1% with 1 nM T-BSA and 9.0 ± 0.4% with 100 nM T-BSA, respectively; P < 0.05). By contrast, none of the treatments designed to test the involvement of extracellular Ca2+ (Fig. 5BGo), L-type Ca2+ channels (nifedipine; Fig. 5CGo), intracellular Ca2+ release (thapsigargin; Fig. 5DGo), or protein kinase C (retinal; Fig. 5EGo) had a detectable effect on the T-induced exocytosis. Furthermore, treatment of anterior pituitary segments with the GABAA channel inhibitor picrotoxin (Fig. 5FGo) had no significant effect on either the number of secreting type 2 lactotrophs or the amount of exocytosis induced from these cells in response to either concentration of T-BSA (1 and 100 nM). Parallel studies revealed similar profiles of responses in pituitary tissue from male mice to nonconjugated T at the same concentrations (data not shown).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of T-BSA (1 and 100 nM) for 5 min on exocytosis from type 2 lactotrophs in the presence and absence of dopamine (A; 500 nM), no extracellular calcium (B), nifedipine (C; 100 nM), thapsigargin (D; 150 nM), retinal (E; 10 µM), and picrotoxin (F; 100 µM). Values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 4). {square}, Control; , test treatment. **, P < 0.01 vs. corresponding basal control (by Mann-Whitney U test). The data are typical of those from three replicate experiments.

 
Figure 6Go demonstrates that a similar data profile was observed when comparing the effects of T and T-BSA in the isolated anterior pituitary cell preparation to those measured in anterior pituitary segments. T and T-BSA (1 pM to 1 µM) produced significant (P < 0.01) concentration-dependent increases in ir-PRL release within 5 min (Fig. 6AGo). No significant difference was detected between responses to T or T-BSA at matching concentrations. Electron microscopic analysis of tannic acid-captured exocytosis confirmed that the source of PRL released was the type 2 and not type 1 lactotrophs (Fig. 6BGo).



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. A, Effects of T and T-BSA (10-12–10-6) for 5 min on the release of ir-PRL into the medium from isolated anterior pituitary cells. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 6). The data are typical of those from four replicate experiments. **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05 (vs. corresponding steroid-free control; by ANOVA plus Duncan’s multiple range test). B, Electron micrograph showing exocytosis from a type 2 lactotroph (L) in the isolated pituitary cell preparation in response to T-BSA (10-10 M for 5 min). Exocytoses are labeled by arrows. S, Somatotroph, no exocytosis detected. Magnification, x14,000.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Very little is known regarding rapid, nongenomic actions of steroids in the anterior pituitary. Recently, the steroid 3{alpha}-hydroxy-4-pregnen-20-one, which is readily converted from and to progesterone, has been shown selectively and rapidly (within minutes) to suppress GnRH-induced FSH release (21, 22). Rapid actions of estradiol to stimulate PRL secretion from GH3 clonal pituitary cells (23) have been reported, and we have demonstrated similar actions of estradiol on PRL release from type 2 lactotrophs in male rat pituitary glands (24). In the present study, tannic acid capture of granule exocytosis and quantitative electron microscopy have demonstrated that physiological concentrations of T (10-10–10-6 M) can elicit significant PRL release from type 2 lactotrophs within 5 min. In addition, T can recruit nonreleasing type 2 lactotrophs into the secreting population of cells. These effects were detected in both in vitro anterior pituitary preparations tested: anterior pituitary segments in which the intimate cell-cell contacts and three-dimensional tissue arrangements are intact, and isolated anterior pituitary cells where these arrangements are lost but diffusion of test ligands to target sites might be expected to be more efficient. These data suggest that 1) in the segment preparation, adequate diffusion of steroids and steroid-BSA conjugates was achieved within the 5-min treatment periods; and 2) it is likely that T acts directly on type 2 lactotrophs and not on adjacent cells to regulate the release of a local intrapituitary paracrine regulator of PRL secretion. Neither type 1 lactotrophs nor gonadotrophs were observed to respond to T. It was perhaps not surprising that no effect of T on gonadotrophs was demonstrated, as any effect might well be an inhibition of stimulated release, which we did not test. T via conversion to the metabolite dihydrotestosterone is known to regulate GnRH-induced Ca2+ signaling directly in the pituitary by a genomic mechanism (25).

The rapid effects of T on PRL release from type 2 lactotrophs appear to be specific because only this population of cells was affected by exposure to the steroid. If the effects of T reported here were due to general membrane depolarization or alterations in membrane fluidity, then a more general stimulation of anterior pituitary secretion would have been expected. The lack of effect on type 1 lactotrophs of T cannot be attributed to a lack of affect of tannic acid on these cells, because K+-stimulated release was readily detectable. Furthermore, the range of other steroids tested, except for 17ß-estradiol, was without effect on PRL release. As the effects of T-BSA were not mimicked by those of progesterone-BSA, the possibility that the BSA conjugate may be mediating a membrane effect is unlikely. Furthermore, the effects of nonconjugated T were indistinguishable from those of T conjugated to BSA in both anterior pituitary in vitro preparations tested. Therefore, it would appear likely that 1) the stimulatory action of T is exerted at the cell surface; and 2) the effect is not mediated via intracellular conversion of T to either estrogen (by aromatase) or 5{alpha}-dihydrotestosterone (by 5{alpha}-reductase) in lactotrophs, although conversion by other cell types cannot be excluded. In the PRL-secreting cell line GH3 B6, estradiol rapidly stimulates PRL release by acting both directly, to cause a sustained train in action potentials (23), and indirectly (26), via reversal of dopamine inhibition. The reason why T exerts its nongenomic secretagogue effect specifically on type 2 lactotrophs could be that only type 2 lactotrophs express putative surface receptors for T, and this possibility is currently under investigation in our laboratory. A single class of estradiol-specific thermolabile binding sites on pituitary membranes from female rats has previously been characterized (27). The absence of a difference in the amount of PRL released in response to 5- or 20-min exposure to T or T-BSA might suggest that tannic acid is acting in some way to prevent either membrane recycling of putative T-binding proteins, which hinders resensitization of these proteins, or that, once used, sites of exocytosis are blocked by the captured cores. However, this would not appear to be the case, as no significant difference was found between the PRL responses to T-BSA measured at each time point by RIA in the absence of tannic acid, whereas a difference was found in response to the depolarizing stimulus of high molarity K+.

Androgens have previously been shown to induce rapid increases in intracellular Ca2+ in cardiac myocytes (28), mouse kidney cells (29), and human prostate cancer cells (30). These effects of T appear to be initiated through hormone-specific membrane androgen-binding sites, although these have yet to be characterized (28, 31). Our experiments, however, using Ca2+-free EBSS, nifedipine, and thapsigargin, demonstrated that influx of extracellular Ca2+ through L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and release of intracellular Ca2+ stores are not prerequisites for the T-induced effects on type 2 lactotrophs. Similarly, we have previously shown that the effect of estradiol on the exocytosis of oxytocin and vasopressin from the dendrites of magnocellular neurosecretory neurons is not affected by the absence of Ca2+ in the bathing medium (32). Studies by others have also indicated that secretion from certain cell types, for example intact neutrophils (33), platelets (34), and a component of insulin release from pancreatic islets (35), is not dependent on a rise in intracellular Ca2+. It is possible that T may cause local release of intracellular Ca2+ at the site of exocytosis, but this would be very difficult to demonstrate or inhibit by established methods (36).

The GABAA-chloride channel receptor complex is well established as the target for a number of nongenomic actions of steroids on neuronal excitability (4). GABAA receptor subunits have been localized in the anterior pituitary (37, 38), and functional studies have demonstrated that GABA and GABAA receptor agonists exert biphasic effects on PRL release: transient stimulation followed by prolonged sustained inhibition (38). Therefore, it appeared possible that T-BSA induced PRL release by potentiation of the GABAA receptor-mediated transient stimulation. However, blockade of GABAA receptor chloride channels with picrotoxin had no influence on T-BSA-induced PRL release, so modulation of GABAA receptor complex function is unlikely to be involved in the secretagogue effect of T on type 2 lactotrophs. Furthermore, because retinal did not influence induced PRL release from type 2 lactotrophs, signaling through protein kinase C does not appear to be involved.

Importantly, it should be noted that acute changes in steroid milieu to which the pituitary tissue was subjected in vitro would not occur in vivo. The effects of T on type 2 lactotrophs were inhibited by dopamine to amounts not significantly different from control levels, and dopamine is known to have differential effects on lactotroph subtypes (39, 40, 41). This suggests that under conditions of normal inhibitory dopaminergic tone in vivo no such nongenomic secretagogue effect of T would be apparent. However, it is likely that circulating steroids would play an active role to modulate the activity of the population of type 2 lactotrophs in relation to normal PRL pulsatility when dopamine tone is removed. The physiological relevance to male reproduction is not immediately obvious. Stimulation of lactotrophs is known to inhibit gonadotropins (42). Therefore, T, by facilitating PRL release, may contribute to the negative feedback of T on gonadotropin release.

In conclusion, we report for the first time a rapid, nongenomic effect of T on PRL secretion. The determination of the signaling pathways and mechanisms activated by T and the detection and characterization of putative pituitary plasma membrane T-binding sites are the focus of ongoing investigation.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank the Department of Neuroendocrinology, Imperial College School of Medicine (London, UK), for RIA facilities, and the National Hormone and Pituitary Program (Rockville, MD), for the generous supply of reagents. We thank Lynne Scott, Sarah Rodgers, Derek Hardiman, and Bob Wickens for expert technical help.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by a Society for the Study of Fertility Junior Research Fellowship (to H.C.C.), a Medical Research Council graduate studentship (to N.J.R.), the Wellcome Trust, and the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC). Back

Received December 6, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Brann DW, Hendry LB, Mahesh VB 1995 Emerging diversities in the mechanism of action of steroid hormones. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 52:113–133[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Selye H 1942 Correlations between the structure and the pharmacological actions of the steroids. Endocrinology 30:437–453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Pietras RJ, Szego CM 1977 Specific binding sites for oestrogen at the outer surfaces of isolated endometrial cells. Nature 265:69–72[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Baulieu EE 1997 Neurosteroids of the nervous system, by the nervous system, for the nervous system. Recent Prog Horm Res 52:1–32
  5. Dufy B, Partouche C, Poulain D, Dufy-Barbe L, Vincent JD 1976 Effects of oestrogen on the electrical activity of identified and unidentified hypothalamic units. Neuroendocrinology 22:38–47[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Kelly MJ, Moss RL, Dudley CA 1976 Differential sensitivity of pre-optic septal neurons to microelectrophoresed estrogen during the estrous cycle. Brain Res 114:152–157[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Hua S-Y, Chen Y-Z 1989 Membrane receptor mediated electrophysiological effects of glucocorticoid on mammalian neurons. Endocrinology 124:687–691[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Yamada Y 1979 Effects of testosterone on unit activity in rat hypothalamus and sepum. Brain Res 172:165–168[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Teylor TJ, Vardaris RM, Lewis D, Rawitch AB 1980 Gonadal steroids: effects on excitability of hippocampal pyramidal cells. Science 209:1017–1018[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Smith L, Ecker R 1971 The interaction of steroids with Rana pipiens oocytes in the induction of maturation. Biochim Biophys Acta 720:356–363
  11. Baldi E, Krausz C, Luconi M, Bonaccorsi L, Maggi M, Forti G 1995 Actions of testosterone on human sperm: a model of non-genomic effects of steroids. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 53:199–203[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Putnam CD, Brann DW, Kolbeck RC, Mahesh VB 1991 Inhibition of uterine contractility by progesterone and progesterone metabolites; mediation by progesterone and gamma amino butyric acid A receptor systems. Biol Reprod 43:266–272
  13. Nogami H, Yoshimura F 1982 Fine structural characteristics of prolactin cells identified immunohistochemically in the male rat. Anat Rec 202:261–274[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Haug E, Aarkvaag A, Sunde A, Gautvik KM, Eik Ness KB 1982 Androgen metabolism and mechanism of action in prolactin-secreting rat pituitary cells in culture. J Steroid Biochem 16:51–59[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Swenson KL, Sladek CD 1997 Gonadal steroid modulation of vasopressin secretion in response to osmotic stimulation. Endocrinology 138:2089–2097[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ke FC, Ramirez VD 1987 Membrane mechanism mediates progesterone stimulatory effect on LHRH release from superfused rat hypothalami in vitro. Neuroendocrinology 45:514–517[Medline]
  17. Morris JF, Pow DV 1991 Widespread release of peptides in the central nervous system:quantitation of tannic acid-captured exocytoses. Anat Rec 231:431–437
  18. Christian HC, Taylor AD, Flower RJ, Morris JF, Buckingham JC 1997 Characterization and localization of lipocortin 1 binding sites on rat anterior pituitary cells by fluorescence-activated cell analysis/sorting and electron microscopy. Endocrinology 138:5341–535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Nakane PK 1975 Identification of anterior pituitary cells by immunoelectron microscopy. In: Tixier-Vidal A, Farquhar M (eds) The Anterior Pituitary Gland. Academic Press, New York, pp 134–158
  20. Weibel ER 1973 Stereological techniques for electron-microscopic morphometry. In: Hayat MA (ed) Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy, vol 3. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 239–296
  21. Wiebe JP 1997 Non genomic actions of steroids on gonadotrophin release. Recent Prog Horm Res 52:71–99
  22. Wiebe JP, Dhanvantari S, Watson PH, Huang Y 1994 Suppression in gonadotropes of gonadotropin releasing hormone-stimulated FSH release by the gonadal- and neurosteroid 3{alpha}-hydroxy-4-pregnen-20-one involves cytosolic calcium. Endocrinology 134:377–382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Zyzek E, Dufy-Barbe L, Dufy B, Vincent JD 1981 Short-term effects of estrogen on release of prolactin by pituitary cells in culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 102:1151–1157[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Christian HC, Morris JF 1998 Rapid non genomic actions of estrogen on a subset of anterior pituitary lactotrophs. Eur J Neurosci 10:116.09 (Abstract)
  25. Tobin VA, Canny BJ 1998 The regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced calcium signals in male rat gonadotrophs by testosterone is mediated by dihydrotestosterone. Endocrinology 139:1038–1045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Dufy B, Vincent JD, Fleury H, Du Pasquier P, Gourdji D, Tixier Vidal A 1979 Dopamine inhibition of action potentials in a prolactin secreting cell line is modulated by oestrogen. Nature 282:855–857[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Bression D, Michard M, Le Dafniet M, Pagesy P, Peillon F 1986 Evidence for a specific estradiol binding site on rat pituitary membranes. Endocrinology 119:1048–1051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Koenig H, Fan CC, Goldstone AD, Lu CY, Trout JJ 1989 Polyamines mediate androgenic stimulation of calcium fluxes and membrane transport in rat heart myocytes. Circ Res 64:415–426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Koenig H, Goldstone A, Lu CY 1982 Testosterone induces a rapid stimulation of endocytosis, amino acid and hexose transport in mouse kidney cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 106:346–353[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Steinsapir J, Socci R, Reinach P 1991 Effects of androgen on intracellular calcium of LNCaP cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 179:90–96[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Koenig H, Goldstone A, Lu CY 1983 Polyamines regulate calcium fluxes in a rapid membrane response. Nature 305:530–534[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Wang H, Ward AR, Morris JF 1995 Oestradiol acutely stimulates exocytosis of oxytocin and vasopressin from dendrites and somata of hypothalamic magnocellular neurons. Neuroscience 68:1179–1188[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Barrowman MM, Cockcroft S, Gomperts BD 1986 Potentiation and inhibition of secretion from neutrophils by phorbolester. FEBS Lett 201:137–142[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Rink TJ, Sanchez A, Hallam TJ 1983 Diacylglycerol and phorbolester stimulate secretion without raising cytoplasmic free calcium in human platelets. Nature 305:317–319[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Komatsu M, Noda M, Sharp GW 1998 Nutrient augmentation of Ca2+-dependent and Ca2+-independent pathways in stimulus-coupling to insulin secretion can be distinguished by their guanosine triphosphate requirements: studies on rat pancreatic islets. Endocrinology 139:1172–1183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Burgoyne RD, Cheek TR 1991 Locating intracellular calcium stores. Trends Biochem Sci 16:319–20[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Grandison L, Guidotti A 1979 {gamma}-Amino butyric acid receptor function in rat anterior pituitary: evidence for control of prolactin release. Endocrinology 105:754–759[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Anderson RA, Mitchell R 1986 Biphasic effect of GABAA receptor agonists on prolactin secretion: evidence for two types of GABAA receptor complex on lactotrophs. Eur J Pharmacol 124:1–9[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Hu L, Lawson DM 1996 Prolactin release from subpopulations of rat lactotrophs in the presence and absence of dopamine. J Endocrinol 148:113–120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Kukstas LA, Domec C, Bascales L, Bonnet J, Verrier D, Israel JM, Vincent JD 1991 Different expression of the two dopaminergic D2 receptors D2415 and D2444 in two types of lactotroph each characterised by their response to dopamine and modification of expression by sex steroids. Endocrinology 129:1101–1103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Bression D, Brandi AM, Pagesy P, Le Dafniet M, Martinet M, Brailly S, Michard M, Peillon F 1985 In vitro and in vivo antagonistic regulation by oestradiol and progesterone of the rat pituitary domperidone binding sites: correlation with ovarian steroid regulation of the dopaminergic inhibition of prolactin secretion in vitro. Endocrinology 116:1905–1911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Makino T, Takahashi M, Fukuoka K, Seki T, Tizuka R 1987 Self-priming effect on pituitary gonadotrophins in hyperprolactinemic women. Endocrinol Jpn 35:919–925



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. Huerta-Ocampo, H. C. Christian, N. M. Thompson, M. M. El-Kasti, and T. Wells
The Intermediate Lactotroph: A Morphologically Distinct, Ghrelin-Responsive Pituitary Cell in the Dwarf (dw/dw) Rat
Endocrinology, November 1, 2005; 146(11): 5012 - 5023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
I. A. Bobulescu, V. Dwarakanath, L. Zou, J. Zhang, M. Baum, and O. W. Moe
Glucocorticoids acutely increase cell surface Na+/H+ exchanger-3 (NHE3) by activation of NHE3 exocytosis
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2005; 289(4): F685 - F691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Zagar, G. Chaumaz, and M. Lieberherr
Signaling Cross-talk from G{beta}4 Subunit to Elk-1 in the Rapid Action of Androgens
J. Biol. Chem., January 23, 2004; 279(4): 2403 - 2413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. M. Braun and P. Thomas
Androgens Inhibit Estradiol-17{beta} Synthesis in Atlantic Croaker (Micropogonias undulatus) Ovaries by a Nongenomic Mechanism Initiated at the Cell Surface
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2003; 69(5): 1642 - 1650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
R. M. LOSEL, E. FALKENSTEIN, M. FEURING, A. SCHULTZ, H.-C. TILLMANN, K. ROSSOL-HASEROTH, and M. WEHLING
Nongenomic Steroid Action: Controversies, Questions, and Answers
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2003; 83(3): 965 - 1016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
H C Christian and J F Morris
Rapid actions of 17{beta}-oestradiol on a subset of lactotrophs in the rat pituitary
J. Physiol., March 1, 2002; 539(2): 557 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
H C Christian and J F Morris
Rapid actions of 17{beta}-oestradiol on a subset of lactotrophs in the rat pituitary
J. Physiol., March 1, 2002; 539(2): 557 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christian, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christian, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals