help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jarred, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Risbridger, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jarred, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Risbridger, G. P.
Endocrinology Vol. 141, No. 9 3471-3477
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Evidence That Estrogens Directly Alter Androgen-Regulated Prostate Development1

Renea A. Jarred, Belinda Cancilla, Gail S. Prins, Kristina A. Thayer, Gerald R. Cunha and Gail P. Risbridger

Monash Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash University, Monash Medical Center, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia; Department of Anatomy, University of California School of Medicine K.A.T., G.R.C.), San Francisco, California 94143; and Department of Urology, University of Illinois College of Medicine (G.S.P.), Chicago, Illinois 60612

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. G. P. Risbridger, Monash Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash Medical Center, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia. E-mail: gail.risbridger{at}med.monash.edu.au


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Neonatal exposure to high doses of estrogen results in permanent suppression of prostate growth and reduced sensitivity to androgens in adulthood. It is unclear whether alterations in prostate growth are due to a direct effect of estrogens on the gland or are the result of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis suppression and a subsequent reduction in androgen levels. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether estrogens have a direct effect on the prostate using a defined method of culturing neonatal prostates. Newborn rat ventral prostates were microdissected and cultured in the presence of testosterone, which resulted in branching morphogenesis and ductal canalization. Solid cords of epithelium differentiated into acini lined by tall columnar epithelial cells; these acini were surrounded by stromal cells, expressing smooth muscle {alpha}-actin. When cultured in the presence of 17ß-estradiol or diethylstilbestrol in addition to testosterone, androgen-induced prostatic growth was reduced, and differentiation was altered. Although estrogen-treated explants were smaller than controls, quantification of epithelial, stromal, and luminal volumes using unbiased stereology revealed significant changes; the proportion of epithelial cells and lumen decreased, and the proportion of stroma increased compared with control values. Concurrent with this reduced growth rate, we observed a disturbance in the branching pattern and a reduction in ductal canalization. Specifically, stromal differentiation and organization were disrupted, so that a discontinuous smooth muscle layer was observed around the epithelial ducts, and epithelial differentiation was altered. The effects of estrogens were not accompanied by a decrease in androgen response via the androgen receptor, because immunolocalization of this receptor remained constant. These data demonstrate that high doses of estrogens are growth inhibitory and have direct effects on prostate development in vitro, which may occur in vivo in addition to indirect effects via suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE INITIATION and maintenance of prostatic development are androgen-dependent processes (1). During development, the primary target tissue for androgens is the urogenital mesenchyme, which directs budding and branching morphogenesis of the epithelium through paracrine mediators (1). Conversely, the developing epithelium induces differentiation and the morphological pattern of smooth muscle development (2), so that the interaction between the epithelium and mesenchyme is bidirectional.

The developing rodent prostate is also sensitive to other hormones, including estrogens. Exposure to low doses of estrogen during gestation in the mouse have been reported to increase adult prostate weight and androgen receptor levels as well as significantly increase prostatic glandular budding (3, 4, 5). However, the effects of exogenous treatment with low doses of estrogen are still controversial and have not been reproduced in all experiments (6).

In contrast, several studies in which neonatal rats (7, 8, 9, 10, 11) and mice (12, 13) have been exposed to higher doses of estrogen resulted in a permanent suppression of prostate growth, a reduced response to androgens, and an induction of epithelial hyperplasia in adulthood. Prins and colleagues (11) have shown that the reduced responsiveness to androgens is related to a decrease in androgen receptor (AR) expression and may be associated with lower serum androgen levels. However, administration of exogenous androgens only partially restored prostate growth and AR expression (11). These data suggested that the effects of estrogens were mediated not only by changes in androgen levels via suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, but also by additional direct effects on prostate growth.

The majority of studies examining the effect of high doses of estrogens on prostate growth have been carried out in vivo, where exogenous estrogen administration down-regulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (14). In these studies, altered androgen levels confuse the analysis of direct effects of estrogens on prostate. To address this issue, we used a defined serum-free organ culture method (15, 16) that permits androgen-induced growth and differentiation of the neonatal rat ventral prostate (VP) in vitro and mimics the events that occur in vivo, as documented previously (17, 18, 19, 20). The aim of this study was to determine whether exogenous estrogens have a direct effect on prostate development in the presence of androgens in vitro.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and tissue collection
Newborn Sprague Dawley male rats were obtained from Central Animal Services, Monash University (Clayton, Australia), and killed on the day of birth (day 0). Procedures and animal care were performed according to the requirements and with the permission of the standing committee of ethics in animal experimentation, Monash University. VPs were microdissected from day 0 animals for histological and stereological analysis or for organ culture. To reduce variability of growth between animals, one VP lobe from each gland was used for experimental treatment, and the other was used for control cultures.

Organ culture
Organ culture was carried out as previously described (15). Briefly, microdissected VPs were cultured on Millicell CM filters (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) floating on 500 µl nutrient medium in a four-well plate at 37 C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. A basal medium of DMEM/Ham’s F-12 (1:1, vol/vol), supplemented with insulin (10 µg/ml) and transferrin (10 µg/ml) was used in all experimental groups, and medium was replenished every 48 h. The medium was supplemented with 10 nM testosterone (T), and treatment groups were cultured with high doses of 17ß-estradiol (E2; 20 µM) or diethylstilbestrol (DES; 5 µM) together with 10 nM T. In some experiments, a range of doses (10 nM to 100 µM) of E2 and DES was used.

The organs were harvested after 6 days of culture. Explants were photographed, fixed in Bouin’s fixative for 2 h at room temperature, and then processed to paraffin for histological and stereological analysis.

Stereology
An unbiased estimate of prostate volume on day 0 and after 6 days of organ culture was obtained using the Cavalieri principle (21). Images of paraffin serial sections were captured using a Dage-MTI digital camera interfaced with a Power Macintosh G3 computer using Scion Image software (Scion Corp., Frederick, MD) and printed with an incorporated grid. Section area was estimated using traditional point counting on a minimum of 10 sections uniformly spaced throughout the explant. The estimate of volume was based on the following formula: Vprostate = 1/n x {Sigma}p x T x a(p), where n was the fraction of sections analyzed (starting with a random section), {Sigma}p was the sum of points, T was the section thickness (5 µm), and a(p) was the area associated with each point on the grid.

Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Comparisons between control and treatment groups were made using a two-tailed paired t test. All analyses were conducted using Prism 2.01 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA).

Immunohistochemistry
Smooth muscle {alpha}-actin, high mol wt cytokeratins, cytokeratin 10, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess smooth muscle cell differentiation with an antibody to smooth muscle {alpha}-actin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; 6.9 µg/ml). Epithelial differentiation was assessed by immunohistochemistry with antibodies to high mol wt cytokeratins (HMWCKs; DAKO Corp., Carpinteria, CA; 4.4 µg/ml) and cytokeratin 10 (CK10; DAKO Corp.; 4.4 µg/ml). Proliferating cells were detected in tissue sections by immunohistochemistry with an antibody to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA; DAKO Corp.; 3.85 µg/ml).

Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described (22) with the following modifications. Sections stained for PCNA, HMWCKs, and CK10 were subjected to microwave antigen retrieval in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0). In addition, sections stained for HMWCKs were incubated with 0.1% trypsin with 0.2% CaCl2 at 37 C for 10 min. All sections were then treated with 3% (vol/vol) hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min and blocked with CAS block (Zymed Laboratories, Inc., San Francisco, CA).

Sections were then incubated with primary antibodies or concentration-matched mouse IgG (DAKO Corp.; negative control sections) for 1 h at room temperature. Antibodies were detected by incubation with peroxidase-labeled polymer (Envision System, DAKO Corp.), which is conjugated to antimouse and antirabbit Igs, for 30 min at room temperature and then color reacted with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (liquid substrate kit, Zymed Laboratories, Inc.). The reactions were stopped in water, and sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin, dehydrated, cleared, and mounted.

Androgen receptor. Affinity-purified polyclonal antibody PG-21–39, purification batch 31 (2 µg/ml), was used to localize AR. Sections were incubated with primary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature, and antibodies were detected as previously described (22). Antibodies were preabsorbed with AR21 (AR peptide) and AR462 (unrelated AR peptide) at a 10x molar excess overnight at 4 C before incubation on tissue sections as negative and positive controls.

Double immunohistochemistry for smooth muscle {alpha}-actin and HMWCK. Sections were stained for HMWCKs as described above. Before counterstaining, sections were incubated with double stain enhancer (Zymed Laboratories, Inc.) for 20 min. After rinsing with PBS, sections were incubated with CAS (Zymed Laboratories, Inc.) followed by primary antibody for smooth muscle {alpha}-actin and developed with peroxidase-labeled polymer (DAKO Corp. Envision System) as described above. After color reaction with a peroxidase substrate kit (Vector VIP, Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA), sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin, dehydrated, cleared, and mounted.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Characterization of day 0 VP
Day 0 rat VP was composed of undifferentiated epithelial cells, which form solid cords immunoreactive for HMWCKs (Fig. 1Go, A and B), and mesenchyme containing fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells (Fig. 1Go, C and D) and other stromal cells. At birth the smooth muscle cells were organized in a continuous layer around the epithelial ducts in the proximal region near the urethra (Fig. 1Go, C and D).



View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Culture of neonatal rat ventral prostate. Photomicrographs demonstrating histological characteristics of day 0 rat ventral prostate (A–D). Immunolocalization of undifferentiated epithelial cells with HMWCK marker (A and B) and smooth muscle {alpha}-actin (C and D). Whole mount images of day 0 VP as it appeared before culture (E) and after 6 days of culture in the presence of 10 nM T (F). Bar, 100 µm (A and C); 50 µm (B and D), and 500 µm (E and F).

 
Androgen-induced VP growth
On day 0, each lobe of the VP consisted of two main ducts which were already branched (Fig. 1EGo). These explants were cultured in the presence of T (10 nM), which induced extensive branching over 6 days of culture (Fig. 1FGo) and a significant increase in the size of the organ. Unbiased stereology demonstrated a 5-fold increase in explant volumes from 0.040 mm3 on day 0 to 0.206 mm3 after 6 days of culture in the presence of T (Fig. 2Go). Regional variation in the differentiation of epithelium and mesenchyme was observed after culture as differentiation occurs in a proximal to distal fashion (Fig. 3Go, A–C), similar to that previously described in vivo. Smooth muscle cells formed continuous layers surrounding the epithelial ducts, particularly in the proximal region (Fig. 3Go, A and B). In the distal region, the ducts were solid undifferentiated cords of epithelium (Fig. 3Go, A and B). In the proximal region, ductal canalization occurred and the epithelium underwent differentiation; basal cells immunopositive for HMWCKs were interspersed between a single layer of tall columnar luminal epithelial cells that lined the lumen and were immunonegative for HMWCKs (Fig. 3CGo).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Quantitation of organ volume before (day 0) and after (day 6) culture in the presence of 10 nM T. **, P < 0.005 (n = 4).

 


View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Histological characteristics of VP explants grown for 6 days in vitro with 10 nM T. (A–C). Double immunolocalization of smooth muscle {alpha}-actin (purple) and HMWCKs (brown). Low (A) and high (B) power images demonstrate the variation in cellular organization along the ducts from proximal to distal regions; undifferentiated solid cords are observed at the distal (Di) tips with canalized, maturing ducts surrounded by organized smooth muscle {alpha}-actin in the proximal (Pr) region. C, High power of proximal region demonstrates basal cells (B) and tall columnar epithelial cells (S) lining the lumen (*). Bar, 250 µm (A), 100 µm (B), and 25 µm (C).

 
Effects of high dose estrogens on androgen-induced VP growth
VPs were cultured in the presence of T alone (Fig. 4Go, A and B) or in the presence of E2 plus T (Fig. 4CGo) or DES plus T (Fig. 4DGo). Both estrogens caused a reduction in androgen-induced growth. Although explants in all treatment groups increased in size over the 6 days of culture, a significant decrease in the final explant volume on day 6 was observed after culture with E2 (Fig. 5AGo) and DES (Fig. 5BGo) compared with controls treated with T alone. Although estrogen-treated explants were smaller than controls, quantitation of cellular compartment volumes showed a significant increase in the proportion of stroma (percentage of total explant volume) and a significant decrease in the proportion of epithelium and lumen for both the E2 plus T (Fig. 5CGo) and DES plus T (Fig. 5DGo) groups compared with VP explants cultured with T alone. Concurrent with the reduced growth rate after culture in the presence of E2 plus T, normal budding and branching were interrupted, resulting in fewer epithelial ducts compared with explants cultured with T alone, as seen histologically (Fig. 6Go, A and B).



View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effects of estrogens on androgen-induced prostate growth. Pair-matched organs (A and C, and B and D) were cultured in the presence of T alone (A and B), T with 20 µM E2 (C), or T with 5 µM DES (D). Bar, 500 µm.

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Total volume of explants (A and B) and proportions of tissue compartments (C and D) were determined using unbiased stereology. A significant reduction in total volume was observed after treatment with E2 plus T (A) or DES plus T (B). A significant increase in proportion of stromal tissue, concurrent with a significant decrease in epithelial and luminal proportions after treatment with E2 plus T (C) or DES plus T (D) was seen compared with controls. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005 (n = 4).

 


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Histological characteristics of VPs after culture in the presence of T (10 nM; A, C, E, G, H, K, and L) or in the presence of T with E2 (20 µM; B, D, F, I, J, M, and N). A and B, Photomicrographs of cultured explants double stained for smooth muscle {alpha}-actin (purple) and HMWCKs (brown), demonstrating effects on ductal branching. C and D, Immunolocalization of smooth muscle {alpha}-actin in the proximal region; note the disruption of smooth muscle organization after E2 treatment with discontinuous layers around epithelial ducts. E and F, Immunolocalization of CK10 in the proximal region; note the multilayering of squamous epithelial cells after E2 treatment. G–J, Immunolocalization of AR in the proximal (G and I) and distal (H and J) regions of the explants; no changes in levels of AR expression were observed after E2 treatment. K–N, Immunolocalization of PCNA; no changes in proliferation were observed after E2 treatment. Bar, 250 µm (A and B). Bar, 100 µm (C, D, and G–J) and 50 µm (E, F, and K–N).

 
In addition to overall growth inhibition and disrupted ductal branching, we observed alterations in both epithelial and stromal cell differentiation after culture in the presence of E2 plus T. In the presence of T alone, smooth muscle cells formed continuous layers around the canalized proximal epithelial ducts (Fig. 6CGo). However, culture with E2 plus T disrupted the differentiation and organization of smooth muscle, so that discontinuous layers of smooth muscle {alpha} actin-containing cells were interspersed between unstained stromal cells, particularly around proximal ducts (Fig. 6DGo). This resulted in an apparent increase in non-smooth muscle stromal cells, particularly in the proximal region (Fig. 6DGo), compared with controls. In addition to disruption of ductal branching and mesenchymal differentiation, culture in the presence of E2 plus T initiated the process of squamous metaplasia of the epithelium, which was never observed in explants cultured in the presence of T alone (Fig. 6Go, E and F). This was characterized by multilayering and cornification of epithelial cells, which was confirmed by the expression of CK10 (Fig. 6FGo). In the presence of T alone, none of these metaplastic changes was observed; undifferentiated epithelial cords gave rise to canalized ducts lined by epithelial cells that were immunonegative for CK10 (Fig. 6EGo). The estrogen-induced changes to prostatic growth were not due to changes in AR localization. In the presence of T alone, AR was immunolocalized to mesenchymal and epithelial cells throughout the explant (Fig. 6Go, G and H). This expression pattern was not altered after culture in the presence of E2 plus T (Fig. 6Go, I and J), and there was no apparent difference in the staining intensity for AR. Immunolocalization of PCNA was similar after T treatment or E2 plus T (Fig. 6Go, K–N), with a greater degree of proliferation in the growing distal tips compared with the differentiating proximal region. Identical results were observed with DES plus T treatment (data not shown) as described above for E2 plus T.

The effect of E2 plus T on prostatic growth was dose responsive. The effects of E2 over a range of concentrations from 10 nM to 20 µM (Fig. 7Go, A–F), in the presence of a constant 10-nM T concentration, showed that high doses of E2 (micromolar concentrations) reduced prostatic growth rate, whereas decreasing the E2 concentration reduced this inhibitory effect on growth rate such that these organ cultures (nanomolar concentrations) were not different from control explants cultured in the presence of T alone.



View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Dose-response effect of E2 treatment on T-treated VP organ cultures. Explants cultured in the presence of T alone (A) and in the presence of 10 nM E2 (B), 100 nM E2 (C), 1 µM E2 (D), 10 µM E2 (E), 20 µM E2 (F). Bar, 500 µm.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study reports the direct effects of estrogens on androgen-induced growth of neonatal prostates in vitro. Using an organ culture technique, we have characterized the model system in which androgens induced branching morphogenesis, cellular proliferation, smooth muscle differentiation, and segregation of the epithelium into luminal and basal subtypes and ductal canalization as described previously (15, 16). In the presence of estrogens (either DES or E2), the effects of T on prostate growth were reduced, and differentiation was altered. Ductal branching was reduced, fewer epithelial ducts were present, and canalization of these ducts was limited. Specifically, the results show that although there is an overall decrease in the growth rate of the organ after exposure to high dose estrogens for 6 days, compared with control explants, this effect was not due to a uniform decrease in the individual components of the tissue. Using unbiased stereology to quantitate the changes to epithelium, lumen, and stromal tissue volumes, our results showed that the proportion of epithelium and lumen was significantly decreased, whereas the proportion of stromal tissue was significantly increased compared with controls.

Development of the VP in the presence of androgens in vitro proceeds with the appropriate events that are temporally and spatially coordinated as described in vivo (17, 18, 19, 20). Estrogen caused changes to both epithelial and stromal in vitro development. In the epithelium, both E2 and DES induced squamous metaplasia, which was characterized by multilayering of squamous epithelial cells and the onset of CK10 expression. These in vitro epithelial changes are similar to those observed in vivo after neonatal estrogenization (7, 11, 13), although the metaplastic changes described in those studies were prolonged through to adulthood. Concurrent with these changes in epithelial differentiation, we observed reduced ductal canalization; this was confirmed by stereology, which demonstrated a significant decrease in luminal volume.

In addition to these epithelial changes, stromal development was also altered by estrogen exposure. An overall increase in the proportion of stromal volume was measured using stereological techniques after culture with estrogens plus androgens. A similar increase in stromal tissue was reported by Prins and colleagues (20, 23), who described increased proliferation of periductal fibroblasts of neonatally estrogenized adult rat VPs. We have shown that the stromal changes were much more pronounced in the proximal region of the explant; however, as most of the cells in the organ were labeled with PCNA after 6 days of culture, we were unable to discern specific changes in proliferation of these stromal cells. Alternatively, increased production of extracellular matrix or an increase in the size of the stromal cells may occur in addition to cellular proliferation. Concurrent with changes in stromal volume, we observed significant changes to the organization of the smooth muscle cells in the periductal area, where treatment with estrogen resulted in a discontinuous layer of smooth muscle, associated with other stromal cells. This disruption to the smooth muscle layer may be due to fibroblast proliferation or other changes described above.

To date, many studies have attempted to delineate the effects of estrogens due to a removal of androgens from those due to a direct estrogen action. Exogenous administration of estrogens in vivo results in a decrease in androgen levels after suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (14). Studies in canines (24) and rats (25) have attempted to alleviate this complication by administering estrogens in combination with a constant level of androgens. In those studies the observed metaplastic changes were believed to be a direct effect of estrogens, rather than the result of androgen withdrawal (24, 25).

Previous studies have examined the long-term effects of estrogens after short-term neonatal estrogenization. In such experiments, estrogen treatment resulted in a decrease in AR expression and reduced sensitivity to androgens; this decrease was observed as early as postnatal day 10 (after estrogenization on postnatal days 1–5) (11). A decrease in AR expression in vivo cannot be attributed to a reduction in T, as loss of T by neonatal castration or neonatal flutamide exposure does not affect prostatic AR levels by postnatal day 10 (26). This suggests that the decrease in AR observed after neonatal estrogenization is independent of T levels and is regulated through an alternative mechanism. In the present study we did not observe a decrease in AR localization, although this short-term in vitro system investigated the acute effects of estrogenization, and long-term in vitro effects could not be determined.

Alternatively, the effects of high dose estrogens may be mediated directly through one of the estrogen receptor (ER) subtypes, ER{alpha} or ERß. The developing mouse urogenital sinus binds E2 as early as day 16 of gestation (27), and ER protein and/or messenger RNA (mRNA) have been detected in the neonatal (postnatal days 1–5) rat VP. ER{alpha} was localized in mesenchymal cells of the proximal region, but not in the distal region (28), and low levels of ERß mRNA were expressed predominantly in epithelial cells throughout the gland (29). Neonatal estrogenization significantly up-regulated expression of ER{alpha} in the stroma, although ERß mRNA expression remained constant (29). Localization of ERs in the epithelium and stroma of the developing prostate is consistent with a direct action of estrogens, and this concept is supported by the studies described in this manuscript.

To establish whether estrogen action is mediated via either of the ER subtypes, it might be possible to inhibit the response using an antiestrogenic compound, such as tamoxifen. However, tamoxifen can also act as a potent agonist, as shown in studies on mouse uterus and vagina (30, 31). Pure estrogen antagonists such as ICI 182,780 are available (32); however, high concentrations (10- to 100-fold the micromolar doses of estrogens used) are needed, and these doses of ICI antagonist are toxic in these organ cultures. Future studies will aim to delineate the specific role of each ER subtype using specific ER{alpha} and ERß antagonists.

This study has been restricted to high doses of E2 and DES and has clearly demonstrated a direct inhibitory effect on prostate growth in the presence of constant androgen levels. Previous studies in mice have suggested that low doses of estrogens, such as DES and bisphenol A can have an opposite effect and stimulate prostate growth (4, 5), although this effect could be mouse strain dependent (6). The rat organ culture model provides researchers with an independent system to study the effects of a range of doses of estrogens or other estrogenic compounds, such as phytoestrogens or environmental estrogens.

In summary, we have demonstrated that high doses of estrogens have a direct inhibitory effect on prostate growth rates in vitro. Therefore, future evaluation of the actions of estrogens in vivo must consider direct actions in addition to indirect effects, which may be mediated through altered androgen levels.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Health and Medical Research Council Program Grant 973218 and NIH Grants DK-47517, DK-52708, CA-64872, CA-59831, CA-84294. Back

Received May 9, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cunha GR, Donjacour AA, Cooke PS, Mee S, Bigsby RM, Higgins SJ, Sugimura Y 1987 The endocrinology and developmental biology of the prostate. Endocr Rev 8:338–362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hayward SW, Rosen MA, Cunha GR 1997 Stromal-epithelial interactions in the normal and neoplastic prostate. Br J Urol [Suppl 2] 79:18–26
  3. Nonneman DJ, Ganjam VK, Welshons WV, Vom Saal FS 1992 Intrauterine position effects on steroid metabolism and steroid receptors of reproductive organs in male mice. Biol Reprod 47:723–729[Abstract]
  4. vom Saal FS, Timms BG, Montano MM, Palanza P, Thayer KA, Nagel SC, Dhar MD, Ganjam VK, Parmigiani S, Welshons WV 1997 Prostate enlargement in mice due to fetal exposure to low doses of estradiol or diethylstilbestrol and opposite effects at high doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2056–2061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Timms BG, Petersen SL, vom Saal FS 1999 Prostate gland growth during development is stimulated in both male and female rat fetuses by intrauterine proximity to female fetuses. J Urol 161:1694–1701[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Ashby J, Tinwell H, Haseman J 1999 Lack of effects for low dose levels of bisphenol A and diethylstilbestrol on the prostate gland of CF1 mice exposed in utero. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 30:156–166[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Arai Y 1970 Nature of metaplasia in rat coagulating glands induced by neonatal treatment with estrogen. Endocrinology 86:918–920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Rajfer J, Coffey DS 1978 Sex steroid imprinting of the immature prostate. Long-term effects. Invest Urol 16:186–190[Medline]
  9. Rajfer J, Coffey DS 1979 Effects of neonatal steroids on male sex tissues. Invest Urol 17:3–8[Medline]
  10. Naslund MJ, Coffey DS 1986 The differential effects of neonatal androgen, estrogen and progesterone on adult rat prostate growth. J Urol 136:1136–1140[Medline]
  11. Prins GS 1992 Neonatal estrogen exposure induces lobe-specific alterations in adult rat prostate androgen receptor expression. Endocrinology 130:3703–3714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Turner T, Edery M, Mills KT, Bern HA 1989 Influence of neonatal diethylstilbestrol treatment on androgen and estrogen receptor levels in the mouse anterior prostate, ventral prostate and seminal vesicle. J Steroid Biochem 32:559–564[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Singh J, Handelsman DJ 1999 Morphometric studies of neonatal estrogen imprinting in the mature mouse prostate. J Endocrinol 162:39–48[Abstract]
  14. Cook JC, Johnson L, O’Connor JC, Biegel LB, Krams CH, Frame SR, Hurtt ME 1998 Effects of dietary 17ß-estradiol exposure on serum hormone concentrations and testicular parameters in male Crl:CD BR rats. Toxicol Sci 44:155–168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lipschutz JH, Foster BA, Cunha GR 1997 Differentiation of rat neonatal ventral prostates grown in a serum-free organ culture system. Prostate 32:35–42[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Sugimura Y, Foster BA, Hom YK, Lipschutz JH, Rubin JS, Finch PW, Aaronson SA, Hayashi N, Kawamura J, Cunha GR 1996 Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) can replace testosterone in the ductal branching morphogenesis of the rat ventral prostate. Int J Dev Biol 40:941–951[Medline]
  17. Hayashi N, Sugimura Y, Kawamura J, Donjacour AA, Cunha GR 1991 Morphological and functional heterogeneity in the rat prostatic gland. Biol Reprod 45:308–321[Abstract]
  18. Hayward SW, Baskin LS, Haughney PC, Foster BA, Cunha AR, Dahiya R, Prins GS, Cunha GR 1996 Stromal development in the ventral prostate, anterior prostate and seminal vesicle of the rat. Acta Anat 155:94–103[Medline]
  19. Hayward SW, Baskin LS, Haughney PC, Cunha AR, Foster BA, Dahiya R, Prins GS, Cunha GR 1996 Epithelial development in the rat ventral prostate, anterior prostate and seminal vesicle. Acta Anat 155:81–93[Medline]
  20. Prins GS, Birch L 1995 The developmental pattern of androgen receptor expression in rat prostate lobes is altered after neonatal exposure to estrogen. Endocrinology 136:1303–1314[Abstract]
  21. Bertram JF 1995 Analyzing renal glomeruli with the new stereology. Int Rev Cytol 161:111–172[Medline]
  22. Jarred RA, Cancilla B, Richards M, Groome NP, McNatty KP, Risbridger GP 1999 Differential localization of inhibin subunit proteins in the ovine testis during fetal gonadal development. Endocrinology 140:979–986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Chang WY, Wilson MJ, Birch L, Prins GS 1999 Neonatal estrogen stimulates proliferation of periductal fibroblasts and alters the extracellular matrix composition in the rat prostate. Endocrinology 140:405–415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Merk FB, Warhol MJ, Kwan PW, Leav I, Alroy J, Ofner P, Pinkus GS 1986 Multiple phenotypes of prostatic glandular cells in castrated dogs after individual or combined treatment with androgen and estrogen. Morphometric, ultrastructural, and cytochemical distinctions. Lab Invest 54:442–456[Medline]
  25. Martikainen PM, Makela SI, Santti RS, Harkonen PL, Suominen JJ 1987 Interaction of male and female sex hormones in cultured rat prostate. Prostate 11:291–303[Medline]
  26. Husmann DA, McPhaul MJ, Wilson JD 1991 Androgen receptor expression in the developing rat prostate is not altered by castration, flutamide, or suppression of the adrenal axis. Endocrinology 128:1902–1906[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Cooke PS, Young P, Hess RA, Cunha GR 1991 Estrogen receptor expression in developing epididymis, efferent ductules, and other male reproductive organs. Endocrinology 128:2874–2879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Prins GS, Birch L 1997 Neonatal estrogen exposure up-regulates estrogen receptor expression in the developing and adult rat prostate lobes. Endocrinology 138:1801–1809[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Prins GS, Marmer M, Woodham C, Chang W, Kuiper G, Gustafsson JA, Birch L 1998 Estrogen receptor-beta messenger ribonucleic acid ontogeny in the prostate of normal and neonatally estrogenized rats. Endocrinology 139:874–883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Iguchi T, Todoroki R, Yamaguchi S, Takasugi N 1989 Changes in the uterus and vagina of mice treated neonatally with antiestrogens. Acta Anat 136:146–154[Medline]
  31. Sato T, Ohta Y, Okamura H, Hayashi S, Iguchi T 1996 Estrogen receptor (ER) and its messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the genital tract of female mice exposed neonatally to tamoxifen and diethylstilbestrol. Anat Rec 244:374–385[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Hu XF, Veroni M, De Luise M, Wakeling A, Sutherland R, Watts CK, Zalcberg JR 1993 Circumvention of tamoxifen resistance by the pure anti-estrogen ICI 182,780. Int J Cancer 55:873–876[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Chen, I. Hsu, A. Wolfe, S. Radovick, K. Huang, S. Yu, C. Chang, E. M. Messing, and S. Yeh
Defects of Prostate Development and Reproductive System in the Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Null Male Mice
Endocrinology, January 1, 2009; 150(1): 251 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
K. T Gray, J. L Short, E. R Simpson, and S. Ventura
The effects of targeted deletion of the aromatase enzyme on prostatic contractile responses to noradrenaline in mice
J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 195(3): 495 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. S. Hydock, C.-Y. Lien, C. M. Schneider, and R. Hayward
Effects of voluntary wheel running on cardiac function and myosin heavy chain in chemically gonadectomized rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3254 - H3264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
B. Anguiano, A. Lopez, G. Delgado, C. Romero, and C. Aceves
Deiodinase type 1 activity is expressed in the prostate of pubescent rats and is modulated by thyroid hormones, prolactin and sex hormones.
J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 190(2): 363 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. A Taylor, P. Cowin, J. F. Couse, K. S. Korach, and G. P. Risbridger
17{beta}-Estradiol Induces Apoptosis in the Developing Rodent Prostate Independently of ER{alpha} or ER{beta}
Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 191 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Rignell-Hydbom, L. Rylander, S. Elzanaty, A. Giwercman, C.H. Lindh, and L. Hagmar
Exposure to persistent organochlorine pollutants and seminal levels of markers of epididymal and accessory sex gland functions in Swedish men
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1910 - 1914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
A Bardin, N Boulle, G Lazennec, F Vignon, and P Pujol
Loss of ER{beta} expression as a common step in estrogen-dependent tumor progression
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2004; 11(3): 537 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Martin, M. Ross, K. E. Chapman, R. Andrew, P. Bollina, J. R. Seckl, and F. K. Habib
CYP7B Generates a Selective Estrogen Receptor {beta} Agonist in Human Prostate
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 2928 - 2935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. J. Ellem, J. F. Schmitt, J. S. Pedersen, M. Frydenberg, and G. P. Risbridger
Local Aromatase Expression in Human Prostate Is Altered in Malignancy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2004; 89(5): 2434 - 2441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. P. Gilleran, O. Putz, M. DeJong, S. DeJong, L. Birch, Y. Pu, L. Huang, and G. S. Prins
The Role of Prolactin in the Prostatic Inflammatory Response to Neonatal Estrogen
Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 2046 - 2054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. A. Jarred, M. Keikha, C. Dowling, S. J. McPherson, A. M. Clare, A. J. Husband, J. S. Pedersen, M. Frydenberg, and G. P. Risbridger
Induction of Apoptosis in Low to Moderate-Grade Human Prostate Carcinoma by Red Clover-derived Dietary Isoflavones
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2002; 11(12): 1689 - 1696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. J. Bianco, D. J. Handelsman, J. S. Pedersen, and G. P. Risbridger
Direct Response of the Murine Prostate Gland and Seminal Vesicles to Estradiol
Endocrinology, December 1, 2002; 143(12): 4922 - 4933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. H. Thin, E. Kim, S. Yeh, E. R. Sampson, Y.-T. Chen, L. L. Collins, R. Basavappa, and C. Chang
Mutations in the Helix 3 Region of the Androgen Receptor Abrogate ARA70 Promotion of 17beta -Estradiol-induced Androgen Receptor Transactivation
J. Biol. Chem., September 20, 2002; 277(39): 36499 - 36508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. G. Ramos, J. Varayoud, C. Sonnenschein, A. M. Soto, M. Munoz de Toro, and E. H. Luque
Prenatal Exposure to Low Doses of Bisphenol A Alters the Periductal Stroma and Glandular Cell Function in the Rat Ventral Prostate
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2001; 65(4): 1271 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. S. Prins, L. Birch, J. F. Couse, I. Choi, B. Katzenellenbogen, and K. S. Korach
Estrogen Imprinting of the Developing Prostate Gland Is Mediated through Stromal Estrogen Receptor {alpha}: Studies with {alpha}ERKO and {beta}ERKO Mice
Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 61(16): 6089 - 6097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. J. McPherson, H. Wang, M. E. Jones, J. Pedersen, T. P. Iismaa, N. Wreford, E. R. Simpson, and G. P. Risbridger
Elevated Androgens and Prolactin in Aromatase-Deficient Mice Cause Enlargement, But Not Malignancy, of the Prostate Gland
Endocrinology, June 1, 2001; 142(6): 2458 - 2467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Pasquali, V. Rossi, D. Esposito, C. Abbondanza, G. A. Puca, A. Bellastella, and A. A. Sinisi
Loss of Estrogen Receptor {beta} Expression in Malignant Human Prostate Cells in Primary Cultures and in Prostate Cancer Tissues
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2001; 86(5): 2051 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jarred, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Risbridger, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jarred, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Risbridger, G. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals