help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dubaquié, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lowman, H. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dubaquié, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lowman, H. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Endocrinology Vol. 142, No. 1 165-173
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Binding Protein-3-Selective Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Variants: Engineering, Biodistributions, and Clearance

Yves Dubaquié, Deborah L. Mortensen, Anthony Intintoli, Deborah A. Hogue, Gerald Nakamura, Patricia Rancatore, Philip Lester, Michael D. Sadick, Ellen Filvaroff, Paul J. Fielder and Henry B. Lowman

Departments of Protein Engineering (Y.D., G.N., H.B.L.), Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism (D.L.M., P.J.F.), Bioanalytical Technology (A.I., M.D.S.), Endocrinology (D.A.H., E.F.), and Recovery Sciences (P.R., P.L.), Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California 94080

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Henry B. Lowman, Department of Protein Engineering, 1 DNA Way, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California 94080. E-mail: hbl{at}gene.com


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) is a potent anabolic peptide that mediates most of its pleiotropic effects through association with the IGF type I receptor. Biological availability and plasma half-life of IGF-I are modulated by soluble binding proteins (IGFBPs), which sequester free IGF-I into high affinity complexes. Elevated levels of specific IGFBPs have been observed in several pathological conditions, resulting in inhibition of IGF-I activity. Administration of IGF-I variants that are unable to bind to the up-regulated IGFBP species could potentially counteract this effect. We engineered two IGFBP-selective variants that demonstrated 700- and 80,000-fold apparent reductions in affinity for IGFBP-1 while preserving low nanomolar affinity for IGFBP-3, the major carrier of IGF-I in plasma. Both variants displayed wild-type-like potency in cellular receptor kinase assays, stimulated human cartilage matrix synthesis, and retained their ability to associate with the acid-labile subunit in complex with IGFBP-3. Furthermore, pharmacokinetic parameters and tissue distribution of the IGF-I variants in rats differed from those of wild-type IGF-I as a function of their IGFBP affinities. These IGF-I variants may potentially be useful for treating disease conditions associated with up-regulated IGFBP-1 levels, such as chronic or acute renal and hepatic failure or uncontrolled diabetes. More generally, these results suggest that the complex biology of IGF-I may be clarified through in vivo studies of IGFBP-selective variants.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH factor I (IGF-I), a 70-amino acid single chain polypeptide, is a key cell survival factor regulating somatic growth and cellular proliferation (1, 2). Most of its mitogenic and metabolic responses are mediated via the IGF type I receptor, a receptor tyrosine kinase expressed in many cell types (3). Receptor engagement and subsequent activation are determined by the availability of free IGF-I. However, the majority of the circulating IGF-I pool is found in high affinity complexes with IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs). Thus, the serum half-life, tissue distribution, and biological availability of free IGF-I are predominantly modulated by the IGFBPs (1, 4, 5, 6).

The IGFBP family includes six well characterized proteins (IGFBP-1 to -6) with molecular masses ranging from 23–31 kDa and a more distantly related group of proteins (7). The structure of the classical IGFBPs consists of two conserved domains joined by a variable linker region. They are often glycosylated and contain a characteristic signature of 16–20 cysteines. The variable linker region harbors cleavage sites for IGFBP-specific proteases, which include kallikreins, cathepsins, and matrix metalloproteinases (6, 8). Proteolytic cleavage generally inactivates the binding proteins by substantially reducing their affinity for IGF-I. This controlled IGFBP degradation adds an additional regulatory loop to the complex biological IGF-I system.

The biodistribution of IGF-I critically depends on 1) the formation of long-lived high molecular mass complexes, and 2) the absolute IGFBP concentrations. IGFBP-3 and -5 are apparently unique in their ability to form a ternary complex with an 85-kDa glycoprotein called acid-labile subunit (ALS). ALS association occurs only in the presence of IGF-I, and a basic motif in the carboxyl-terminal domains of IGFBP-3 and -5 seems to mediate this interaction (9, 10, 11). These approximately 150-kDa ternary complexes are unable to permeate the vasculature, and therefore act as a circulating reservoir of IGF-I. As a consequence, the serum half-life of IGF-I in ternary complexes is reported to be 12–15 h, as opposed to 30 min in binary complexes or 10 min in the free form (11). The second determinant of IGF-I biodistribution is the total concentration of binding proteins. IGFBP-3 is the most abundant binding protein, and IGFBP-2 is the second most abundant, followed by IGFBP-1; the serum concentrations of IGFBP-4, -5, and -6 are quite low (12). IGFBP-3, therefore, represents the main IGF-I carrier in the blood. In contrast, a substantial portion of IGFBP-1 and -2 in the blood is unoccupied. Hence, they appear to be the major modulators of free IGF-I levels (12).

The levels of IGFBP-1 are negatively regulated by insulin and can fluctuate more than 10-fold in response to changes in serum glucose concentrations (6). Experimental evidence showed that IGFBP-1 participates in glucose metabolism by causing insulin release (13). Furthermore, certain pathophysiological conditions, such as diabetes or renal failure, are accompanied by highly elevated IGFBP-1 levels (1, 6, 14). It is believed that under these conditions IGF receptor signaling is inhibited due to sequestration of free ligand by IGFBP-1. Lack of the IGF-I survival signal may result in a catabolic state of the cells, eventually leading to organ failure.

We now report the characterization of two IGF-I variants with greatly reduced IGFBP-1 affinity and with low nanomolar binding to IGFBP-3. Both variants display wild-type (wt) potency in cellular kinase receptor activation assays, stimulate proteoglycan synthesis in human articular cartilage, and are still capable of forming ternary complexes with IGFBP-3 and ALS. Hence, the half-lives of these variants are still predominantly determined by IGFBP-3, but their activities are no longer regulated by IGFBP-1. The ability of these molecules to activate the IGF receptor in the presence of elevated inhibitory IGFBP-1 levels is of potential therapeutic interest.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Protein expression and purification
IGF-I variants. DNA sequences encoding IGF-I variants F49A and E3A/F49A were obtained by single stranded DNA mutagenesis (15) of the expression vector pBKIGF-f1-ori (16). Expression in Escherichia coli, purification, and refolding of the soluble variants were previously described (16).

IGFBPs. IGFBP-1 was expressed in mammalian Chinese hamster ovary cells and purified from conditioned medium as previously described (13). The gene encoding mature IGFBP-3 (17) was fused C-terminally to the gp67 signal sequence of the baculovirus transfer vector pAcGP67C (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), yielding plasmid pIGFBP3bac. Primary infection of SF9 insect cells using the BaculoGold system was performed according to the supplier’s manual (PharMingen), and viral stock amplification was also performed. For protein expression, typically 1 liter protein-free expression medium ESF 921 (Expression Systems LLC, Woodland, CA) was incubated with 2–5 x 105 Hi5 cells/ml in a 4-liter Spinner flask. Ten milliliters of viral stock solution were added, and cells were grown for 2.5 days at 27 C in the dark. Secreted protein was harvested by pelleting cells at 9000 rpm for 20 min at 4 C (centrifuge stopped without braking). The decanted supernatant was supplemented with one protease inhibitor mix tablet per liter (Complete, Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) and stored at 4 C. An IGF-I affinity column was generated by coupling 180 mg IGF-I to 4 g controlled pore glass beads (18) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The volume of the column was approximately 15 ml. After equilibration at room temperature with PBS, the IGF-I column was loaded at 15 ml/min with 2 liters insect cell supernatant containing IGFBP-3. After loading, the column was washed with 5 vol buffer A (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.2). Contaminants and proteolyzed IGFBP-3 fragments were eluted with 100 ml 50% buffer B (2 M KSCN in buffer A). Intact IGFBP-3 was eluted with 100% buffer B in 10-ml fractions, monitoring the absorption at 280 nm. The protein- containing fractions were pooled, diluted 1:1 with 20 mM 2[N-morpholino]ethanesulfonic acid (MES) (pH 6.0; containing protease inhibitors), and concentrated to 1 ml in Centriplus 30/Centricon 30 microconcentrators (Amicon, Beverly, MA). Part (0.5 ml) of the concentrated protein mixture was loaded at 0.35 ml/min onto two tandem Superdex 75 gel filtration columns (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). The running buffer was 20 mM MES (pH 6.0), 150 ml NaCl, and protease inhibitors, and the fraction size was 1 ml. The fractions judged to be 95% or more pure by SDS-PAGE were pooled and stored in aliquots at -70 C. The identity of IGFBP-3 was verified by N-terminal sequencing and mass spectrometry. The yield of purified IGFBP-3 was approximately 1 mg/liter insect cell supernatant.

ALS purification. Recombinant human (rhu) ALS (19, 20) was expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells and purified using anion exchange and hydrophobic interaction chromatography. The purified ALS was comparable to material purified using rhuIGF-I:rhuIGFBP-3 affinity chromatography methods similar to those previously described (19). Purified ALS was evaluated using quantitative amino acid analysis, SDS-PAGE, and an ALS ELISA (21). In addition, IGF-I:rhuIGFBP-3:ALS complex formation was observed by analytical size-exclusion chromatography. This purification yields an ALS preparation that is essentially free of IGFBP-3 and IGF-I (Lester, P., manuscript in preparation).

Surface plasmon resonance experiments
All experiments were performed on a BIAcore 2000 or 3000 instrument (Piscataway, NJ) at 25 C.

Competitive binding measurements. Approximately 200 RU (response units) of wt IGF-I were immobilized on the surface of a B1 chip (BIAcore, Inc.) by conventional amine-coupling. IGFBP-1 samples at 5 nM were incubated with a 3-fold dilution series of wt IGF-I, F49A, or E3A/F49A, as indicated in Fig. 1Go. The incubation and running buffer was PBS, 0.05% Tween-20, and 0.01% sodium azide. Protein mixtures were injected at 20 µl/min for 5 min, with a dissociation time of 2 min. The amount of free IGFBP-1 in solution was monitored by subtracting nonspecific binding from the total relative response after 90 sec of dissociation. Regeneration of the chip surface was achieved by a 60-sec injection of 20 mM HCl, followed by a 3-min baseline stabilization. The data were fit to a four-parameter curve to calculate the IC50 of IGFBP-1 inhibition (22).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Competitive binding of IGF-I variants to IGFBP-1 in solution, measured by biosensor analysis. Dilution series of the respective IGF-I variants were incubated with 5 nM IGFBP-1 and injected over a chip containing immobilized wt IGF-I. The amount of uncomplexed IGFBP-1 that bound to the chip is expressed as a percentage of the total signal achieved by 5 nM IGFBP-1 in the absence of competitor. The maximal responses in each experiment were 15.7 RU for wt IGF-I, 15.2 RU for F49A, and 12.9 RU for E3A/F49A. The corresponding IC50 values are listed in Results.

 
Kinetic measurements. Kinetic data for IGFBP-3 binding to E3A/F49A IGF-I were obtained as previously described (16). To monitor trimeric complex (i.e. IGF-I:IGFBP-3:ALS complex) formation, 300 RU biotinylated IGFBP-3 (sulfo-NHS-LC-LC-biotin, Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) were immobilized on a streptavidin-coupled chip (BIAcore, Inc.) in PBS, 0.05% Tween-20, and 0.01% sodium azide. The biosensor chip was primed with running buffer containing 1 µM of the respective IGF-I variant. ALS was injected at the indicated concentrations in running buffer containing 1 µM IGF-I variant at 50 µl/min for 2 min, followed by a 2-min dissociation period. The chip was regenerated with 10 µl 2 M KSCN (in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.2) at a flow rate of 20 µl/min, followed by a 3-min buffer flow for baseline stabilization.

Circular dichroism analysis
CD spectra were recorded at 25 C on an AVIV spectrometer (model 202, Lakewood, NJ) using a 1-cm path length cuvette. The protein concentration was 1 µM in PBS. The spectra were corrected for signal of the buffer alone.

Cell-based kinase receptor activation assay
IGF type I receptor kinase phosphorylation assays were carried out as previously described (23, 24). Briefly, MCF-7 cells that endogenously express IGF-I receptor, were cultured overnight in 96-well plates. The cells were then exposed to serial dilutions of wt IGF-I, F49A, or E3A/F49A for 15 min. After ligand stimulation, cells were lysed, IGF-I receptors were selectively immunoprecipitated, and the extent of tyrosine phosphorylation was determined with an antiphosphotyrosine antibody.

IGF-I activity on human articular cartilage explants
Human explants were obtained from a 79-yr-old female patient undergoing joint replacement surgery. Articular cartilage was dissected, minced, washed, and cultured in bulk for 24 h in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 in serum-free low glucose DMEM/F-12 medium with 0.1% BSA, 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), 2 mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM MEM sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies, Inc.), 20 µg/ml gentamicin (Life Technologies, Inc.), and 1.25 mg/liter amphotericin B (Sigma). Articular cartilage was aliquoted into Micronics (Costar, Inc., Cambridge, MA) tubes (~40–45 mg/tube). Twenty-four hours later, explants were treated with 40 ng/ml IGF-I, F49A, or E3A/F49A for 5 days. Fresh medium was added on days 0, 1, 2, and 3.

To measure matrix (proteoglycan) synthesis, explants were cultured with [35S]sulfate (10 µCi/ml) for the last 17 h of treatment. Explants were then washed twice with explant medium and digested overnight at 50 C in a 900-µl reaction volume of 10 mM EDTA, 0.1 M sodium phosphate, and 1 mg/ml proteinase K (Life Technologies, Inc.). Six hundred microliters of the digestion reaction were mixed (2:1) with 10% (wt/vol) cetylpyridinium chloride (Sigma) and centrifuged at 1000 x g for 15 min. The supernatant was removed, and formic acid (500 µl; Sigma) was added to dissolve the pellets. The samples were then transferred to scintillation vials containing 10 ml scintillation fluid (ICN Biomedicals, Inc., Costa Mesa, CA) and read in a scintillation counter. Shown in Fig. 5Go is the average value and SE of five samples per treatment condition.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of IGF-I variants on matrix synthesis. Human articular cartilage was incubated with 40 ng/ml wt IGF-I, F49A, E3A/F49A, or medium alone (mock) for 5 days. Cartilage matrix synthesis was measured by determining [35S]sulfate incorporation at the end of the experiment.

 
Pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution studies of IGF-I variants in rats
The experimental procedures and study designs were approved by the Genentech, Inc., animal care and use committee. Female Sprague Dawley rats (250–285 g) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories, Inc. (Hollister, CA), and group housed under conditions of controlled light and temperature. A standard rodent chow diet (Purina 5001, Ralston Purina Co., St. Louis, MO) and water were given ad libitum.

Iodination of IGF-I-variants, trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitation, and NaI administration. rhIGF-I, E3A/F49A, and F49A were iodinated by the indirect iodination method (25). The specific activity of the radiolabeled material ranged from approximately 93.1–156 µCi/µg protein. Each rat received approximately 15 µCi or 0.103–0.135 µg protein/0.2 ml dose, equivalent to 0.4–0.5 µg/kg.

NaI administration. To inhibit any nonspecific uptake of the 125I-radiolabeled material by the thyroid gland, all animals were injected with 10% NaI (0.5 ml), ip, 24 and 1 h before administration of test material.

Pharmacokinetics study. Three rats per group received an iv bolus of 15 µCi (0.2 ml) [125I]IGF-I, [125I]F49A, or [125I]E3A/F49A via a femoral vein catheter. Whole blood (0.3 ml) was collected via a jugular vein catheter before treatment and then at 1, 5, 15, and 30 min and at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h after treatment. Blood volume was replaced with 0.3 ml saline after each sample collection, and catheters were locked with 0.1 ml heparin (10 U/ml) between time points. After collection, whole blood was placed into anticoagulant tubes containing EDTA and then aliquoted (0.1 ml) and placed on ice until analysis.

Tissue distribution study. Three rats per group per time point received an iv bolus of [125I]IGF-I, [125I]F49A, or [125I]E3A/F49A via a jugular vein catheter. Five, 15, and 30 min later, animals were anesthetized with phenobarbital (25–40 mg/kg) iv. Terminal cardiac blood samples as well as spleen, heart, liver, kidney, retroperitoneal fat, and pancreas were collected. Whole blood was processed as previously described. Tissue was sectioned into 1- to 2-g pieces, rinsed in saline, blotted dry, weighed, and then placed on dry ice for measurement of 125I counts per minute.

TCA precipitations. TCA (Sigma) precipitations were performed on plasma samples used for pharmacokinetic analysis. Plasma (0.05 ml) was added to 20% TCA (0.5 ml), incubated on ice, and centrifuged. Samples were then analyzed for 125I counts per min, the supernatant was removed so that only TCA precipitate remained, and the pellet was analyzed again. Pharmacokinetic calculations were derived from TCA-precipitable counts per min.

Sample analysis. Whole blood aliquots, TCA-precipitated plasma, and preweighed tissue samples were counted using a Wallac, Inc., 1470 Wizard automatic {gamma}-counter (Turku, Finland) for 1 min. Pharmacokinetic analyses (Table 2Go) were based upon a three-compartment model that best described the steep distribution phases resulting from protein binding and tissue distribution observed in this experiment. The three-compartment model assumes three conceptual volumes of distribution, such as a central compartment, a peripheral (tissue) compartment, and a deep tissue compartment. However, these do not necessarily correspond to anatomical regions. The goodness of fit criteria included visual inspection of the observed data and model-predicted values, examination of residuals, and the criteria values generated by WinNonlin (Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Statistical comparisons were made by one-way ANOVA followed by Fischer’s protected least significant difference test and were considered significant where P < 0.05. Means and SD are shown for Fig. 6Go, A and B.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Pharmacokinetic parameters after a single iv dose in rats

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Blood clearance (A) and tissue distribution (B) of 125I-labeled IGF-I variants in rats. A, After iv administration, blood samples were collected, and their radioactivity levels were determined and plotted vs. time. The resulting curves were fitted to a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model (see Table 2Go). B, The radioactivity levels of kidney, liver, spleen, heart, and pancreas were determined for the indicated time points, and divided by the corresponding blood values.

 

    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IGF-I variants with selectively reduced IGFBP-1 affinities
The total alanine scanning mutagenesis of human IGF-I identified glutamate 3 (E3) and phenylalanine 49 (F49) as specificity determinants for binding to IGFBP-1 (16). Phage ELISA experiments suggested that both of these side-chains selectively contribute considerable binding energy for complex formation with IGFBP-1, as the IGF-I variants E3A and F49A bound with approximately 30- and 100-fold reductions in affinity, respectively. Binding affinity for IGFBP-3, however, remained unchanged for E3A and was reduced by only about 4-fold for F49A (16). We reasoned that further improved selectivity between IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 could be achieved by cumulative mutation of IGF-I, as the effects of point mutations are often additive with respect to their contribution to free energy of binding (26). We therefore constructed a double mutant of IGF-I, E3A/F49A, by combining point mutations E3A and F49A in a single molecule. Both IGF-I variants, F49A and E3A/F49A, were expressed in Escherichia coli, purified, and correctly refolded (16).

To measure the weak apparent affinities of these mutants for IGFBP-1, a competition binding assay was performed using the BIAcore instrument. IGFBP-1 at a constant concentration of 5 nM was incubated with a dilution series of the respective IGF-I variants. These protein mixtures were injected over a biosensor chip containing immobilized wt IGF-I, thereby capturing unbound IGFBP-1 from the solution. In Fig. 1Go the amount of bound IGFBP-1 (expressed as a percentage of the maximal response) is plotted against the respective IGF-I variant concentration. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was 870 ± 90 nM for F49A and was estimated to be more than 100 µM for E3A/F49A. Self-association of E3A/F49A with the immobilized IGF-I on the chip was observed at concentrations above 100 µM. The IC50 for wt IGF-I in this type of assay was 1.2 ± 0.1 nM. These apparent affinities correspond to 700-fold and more than 80,000-fold decreases in wt affinity, respectively.

The corresponding affinities for IGFBP-3 were determined in kinetic BIAcore experiments using on- and off-rates to calculate dissociation constants (Kd). The IGF-I variants were immobilized on the biosensor chip, and serial dilutions of IGFBP-3 were injected. As previously determined, F49A bound to IGFBP-3 with a Kd of 6.3 ± 1.7 nM (16). The Kd of E3A/F49A was 22.2 ± 10.3 nM (Table 1Go). The selectivity factors, defined as the apparent affinity (IC50) for IGFBP-1 divided by the apparent affinity (Kd) for IGFBP-3, were 1 for wt IGF-I, 140 for F49A, and more than 4500 for E3A/F49A. This means that F49A had an approximately 140-fold higher binding selectivity for IGFBP-3 over IGFBP-1 compared with wt IGF-I. The combined mutations in E3A/F49A increased the wt selectivity factor more than 4000-fold. This variant still bound IGFBP-3 with a Kd of 22 nM, corresponding only to a 15-fold reduction in wt affinity for IGFBP-3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Apparent affinities of IGF-I variants for IGFBP-3 determined by biosensor in kinetic binding experiments

 
Circular dichroism analysis of F49A and E3A/F49A reveals no drastic structural changes
To test whether the introduced mutations cause major changes to the protein structure, the circular dichroism spectra of the engineered IGF-I variants were collected. As shown in Fig. 2Go, both F49A and E3A/F49A have virtually identical spectra to that of wt IGF-I. The spectra reveal elements of {alpha}-helix and random coil, as expected from nuclear magnectic resonance spectroscopy of IGF-I (27). The thermal stability of neither wt nor mutant IGF-I could be determined accurately by circular dichroism (data not shown), presumably due to the relatively high random coil content already present at room temperature (28) (~30%). The fact that the circular dichroism spectra of both IGF-I variants showed no significant deviation from that of the wild type suggests that the introduced mutations do not globally alter the structure of IGF-I.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Circular dichroism spectra of IGF-I variants at 25 C. Spectra were recorded from 200–250 nm at a protein concentration of 1 µM in PBS.

 
F49A and E3A/F49A form ternary complexes with IGFBP-3 and the ALS
The majority of IGF-I in serum is found in a 150-kDa ternary complex composed of IGFBP-3 and a glycoprotein termed ALS. The half-life of this ternary complex is an order of magnitude longer than that of free IGF-I (6). Hence, ternary complex formation is a major determinant for IGF-I biodistribution. To test whether the engineered IGF-I variants were still able to form trimeric complexes with ALS, biosensor binding experiments were performed. Biotinylated IGFBP-3 was immobilized on a biosensor chip, and ALS was injected, including wt IGF-I (Fig. 3AGo), F49A (Fig. 3BGo), or E3A/F49A (Fig. 3CGo) in the running buffer at a concentration of 1 µM. As shown in Fig. 3Go, the ALS binding curves were essentially identical for all three IGF-I variants. The dissociation rates were 6.3 ± 1.7 x 10-4 sec-1 for wt IGF-I, 4.2 ± 0.9 x 10-4 sec-1 for F49A, and 4.0 ± 2.2 x 10-4 sec-1 for E3A/F49A. In the absence of any IGF-I in the running buffer, ALS did not associate with IGFBP-3 on the chip (data not shown). This experiment suggests that the novel IGF-I variants retain the ability to form ternary complexes, and that in vivo their terminal serum half-lives therefore should not be drastically shorter than that of wt IGF-I.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Trimeric complex formation of IGF-I variants, IGFBP-3, and ALS. IGFBP-3 immobilized on a biosensor chip was saturated by including 1 µM wt IGF-I (A), F49A (B), or E3A/F49A (C) in the running buffer. ALS was injected at the indicated concentrations, monitoring real-time association and dissociation to the preformed binary complex.

 
F49A and E3A/F49A fully activate the IGF-I receptor
To measure their relative biological potencies, the engineered IGF-I variants and wt IGF-I were tested in a cellular kinase receptor activation assay. This assay specifically and quantitatively monitors the extent of IGF type I receptor tyrosine phosphorylation upon extracellular stimulation by ligand (23, 24). Both IGF receptor activation curves for F49A (Fig. 4AGo) and E3A/F49A (Fig. 4BGo) were indistinguishable from the wt IGF-I standard curves. The half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) was 2.6 ± 0.2 nM for F49A and 2.6 ± 0.1 nM for E3A/F49A. The wt IGF-I EC50 values were 2.5 ± 0.1 nM (Fig. 4AGo) and 2.7 ± 0.1 nM (Fig. 4BGo).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Kinase receptor activation assays (KIRA) of IGF-I variants. MCF-7 cells overexpressing the type-I IGF receptor were incubated with dilution series of F49A (A) or E3A/F49A (B) IGF-I. The extent of IGF-I receptor phosphorylation was quantified as described (see Materials and Methods). wt IGF-I control dilution series were assayed in parallel for both experiments. The corresponding EC50 values were 2.6 ± 0.2 nM for F49A (A), 2.6 ± 0.1 nM for E3A/F49A (B), and 2.5 ± 0.1 nM (A) and 2.7 ± 0.1 nM (B) for wt IGF-I.

 
IGF-I plays a key role in cartilage growth, development, and tissue homeostasis at least in part by stimulating extracellular matrix synthesis (29). For this reason, the effects of the IGF-I variants on proteoglycan synthesis were monitored in human articular cartilage explants. As shown in Fig. 5Go, both F49A and E3A/F49A stimulated matrix synthesis as effectively as wt IGF-I in human articular cartilage. These results strongly suggest that both IGF-I mutants can activate the IGF type I receptor and thus retain full biological potency and activity.

Clearance and distribution of F49A and E3A/F49A in rats
Human wt IGF-I, F49A, and E3A/F49A were radiolabeled and administered iv to rats to assess their pharmacokinetic properties. Figure 6aGo shows plasma concentration vs. time profiles for these proteins. Both IGF-I variants cleared significantly faster compared with wt human IGF-I (Table 2Go). E3A/F49A cleared at the fastest rate (1107 ± 45 ml/h·kg), followed by F49A (427 ± 125 ml/h·kg) and wt IGF-I (151 ± 24.7 ml/h·kg). A similar trend was observed for the intermediate half-life, t1/2ß; E3A/F49A had the shortest, F49A an intermediate, and wt IGF-I the longest t1/2ß (Table 2Go; see also Discussion). These findings correlate well with the corresponding in vitro affinities for the major binding protein in the serum, IGFBP-3 (Table 1Go). Interestingly, the steady state distribution volumes were much greater for the IGF-I variants, indicating that they are less confined to the plasma compartment than is wt IGF-I (Table 2Go). Figure 6BGo shows the tissue to blood ratio for the IGF-I variants in different organs. Tissue to blood ratios greater than 1 generally indicate accumulation within that tissue. The greatest tissue to blood ratios for the IGF-I molecules were detected in the kidney, whereas ratios in the liver, spleen, heart, and pancreas were much lower. It is evident from this experiment that F49A and E3A/F49A accumulate at statistically significant higher ratios in the kidney compared with wt IGF-I.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IGF-I is an important hormone with diverse and highly regulated activities. It can associate with six different soluble binding proteins and at least two cell surface receptors (insulin and IGF type I receptors). The structural epitopes for the IGFBPs seem to overlap (at least for IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3), but different regions of this epitope confer binding protein specificity (16). We have exploited this fact to generate IGFBP-3-specific variants with greatly reduced affinities for IGFBP-1. Importantly, the introduced mutations at positions 3 and 49 do not change the affinity for the IGF type I receptor, as shown by cellular receptor phosphorylation assays and the biological response in proteoglycan synthesis experiments. This observation is supported by earlier findings that identified IGF-I residues 24, 31, 59, and 60 to be important for type I receptor binding (30, 31, 32, 33). Hence, the binding epitopes for the receptor and the binding proteins are located in different parts of the IGF-I molecule.

Another interesting structural aspect is the flexibility of IGF-I. The molecule seems to be held together primarily by three disulfide bonds that are crucial for activity (34). In solution, the entire C domain was found to be disordered by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (27). Circular dichroism analysis of IGF-I showed a high content of random coil at 25 C (28), and thermal unfolding measured by the same method revealed a complete lack of cooperativity during the transition phase (data not shown). Similar observations were made by Miller et al. (34) in denaturation studies with guanidine hydrochloride. It can be speculated that this structural flexibility is an important feature allowing for IGFBP binding, as mature insulin, an IGF-I homolog that lacks the C peptide region and appears to be more structured by CD analysis (35), has no apparent affinity for the IGFBPs (36). However, we found no evidence for direct interactions between the C region and IGFBP-1 or IGFBP-3 (16). Alternatively, insulin might be locked in an unfavorable conformation for binding to the IGFBPs.

The ability of F49A and E3A/F49A IGF-I to form ternary complexes with the acid-labile subunit and IGFBP-3 has important consequences for the serum half-lives of these variants. Details of how ALS interacts with the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 complex are unclear due to a lack of structural information on IGFBP-3 and ALS. A recent model of ALS postulates a donut-shaped structure whose internal cavity is lined with negative charges; these regions could potentially interact with positive charges on IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5 (37). The affinity of ALS for a cross-linked IGF-I/IGFBP-3 complex is on the order of 0.1–0.3 nM depending on the carbohydrate content of ALS (37). In our biosensor measurements, which analyzed ALS binding to a noncovalent IGF-I/IGFBP-3 complex (by including saturating amounts of IGF-I in the running buffer), the dissociation rates were consistently similar, between 4.0 x 10-4 to 6.3 x 10-4 sec-1. Interestingly, the apparent association rates generally decreased as a function of increasing analyte (ALS) concentrations, as illustrated here, for example, for wt IGF-I (1.83 x 105 M-1sec-1 (98 nM ALS), 1.32 x 105 M-1sec-1 (148 nM ALS), and 0.66 x 105 M-1sec-1 (333 nM ALS). The association constants for F49A and E3A/F49A followed a similar trend. Such an analyte-dependent phenomenon could be explained by preassociation of ALS oligomers. We are pursuing other methods to address the appropriate binding model for interpreting these data. Nevertheless, the experiment confirms that all three IGF-I variants tested form ternary complexes with ALS.

The pharmacokinetic characteristics of the IGF-I variants in rats differed from those of wt IGF-I. Upon closer inspection of Fig. 6AGo, it appears that the majority of differences are observed in the first 60–100 min of the experiment. In our three-compartment pharmacokinetic model, this phase is characterized by the initial and intermediate half-lives, t1/2{alpha} and t1/2ß, which probably describe the distribution of free and total radiolabeled molecules to extravascular tissues and their clearance. After this initial phase, all three IGF-I molecules are cleared at comparable rates, as suggested by their similar terminal half-life values, t1/2{gamma}, which probably reflect the elimination of 125I from the rat. The trends in t1/2{alpha} and t1/2ß observed across the three molecules are generally consistent with a more rapid rate of distribution and clearance for the IGF-I variants that are less bound to IGFBPs. Furthermore, the calculated steady state distribution volumes and clearance rates also support the interpretation that IGFBP association plays a major role in the distribution and clearance of the IGF-I variants. We therefore suggest that the initial differences in the pharmacokinetic profile reflect the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 binding equilibrium, as they correlate well with the corresponding affinities of the IGF-I variants for IGFBP-3 in vitro. Because IGFBP-3 in the blood seems to be saturated under normal conditions (1), it is reasonable to assume that the injected IGF-I variants have to compete with endogenous IGF-I for IGFBP-3 binding. The IGF-I molecules that are unable to associate with IGFBP-3 could diffuse out of the vasculature and either associate with other binding proteins or be cleared at a rapid rate (t1/2 for free IGF-I, 10–15 min) (11). Those molecules that achieve ternary complex formation with IGFBP-3 and ALS, however, experience a more prolonged serum half-life and become trapped in the vasculature. Ternary complex formation of the IGF-I variants occurs with the same efficiency as wt IGF-I in vitro, and this property appears to be reflected in the later phase (>100 min) of the pharmacokinetic profile. The fact that all three human IGF-I variants display terminal half-lives on the order of 6–9 h strongly suggests that complex formation with rat IGFBP-3 and ALS occurs in vivo. This is important, because all in vitro experiments were performed exclusively with human IGFBP-3 and ALS, whereas the in vivo experiments rely on preservation of the engineered specificities for the homologous rat binding proteins. An example where such specificity was not preserved across species is peptide p1–01, which tightly bound human IGFBP-1, but showed no measurable affinity for the rat homolog (33).

The pharmacokinetic data reported here appear to be consistent with the range of values that has been observed in the literature for total IGF-I, free IGF-I, and variants with lower affinity for IGFBPs (38, 39, 40). It has been observed, for example, that naturally occurring IGF-I variants that exhibit a reduced affinity for IGFBPs have altered pharmacokinetic profiles similar to those observed in our study. Des(1, 2, 3)IGF-I, a truncated form of wt IGF-I with a reduced affinity for IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3, had a nearly 4-fold increase in clearance and a 2-fold greater volume of distribution than IGF-I (39). Similarly, Bastian et al. (40) observed a faster clearance of radiolabeled LR3-IGF-I, an analog with reduced binding to IGFBPs, in rats compared with IGF-I. These observations are consistent with our findings comparing wt IGF-I to F49A, a molecule with reduced affinity for both IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3. Consistent with the observation that increased plasma clearance correlates with reduced affinity for IGFBPs, E3A/F49A, whose affinity for both IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 is less than that of E3A, cleared much faster and had a greater volume of distribution. These findings provide further evidence for the importance of IGFBPs in regulating the plasma levels and bioavailability of IGF-I.

Specific IGFBPs are found to be up-regulated under certain pathophysiological conditions. For example, normal levels of IGFBP-1 to -4 are found in the synovial fluid of healthy subjects (29), whereas highly elevated amounts of IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-4 were detected in that of arthritic patients (41, 42). Similarly, in serum of chronic renal failure patients the levels of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 are up-regulated in relation to the degree of renal dysfunction, thereby directly inhibiting IGF-I activity (14). A potential treatment strategy to restore IGF-I activity tries to release endogenous hormone from the IGFBPs by means of a displacer molecule (32, 33). Administration of a bioactive IGF-I variant with selectively reduced affinity for the particular inhibitory IGFBP species represents an alternative strategy. In our experiments, a statistically significant increase in kidney accumulation was observed for F49A and especially E3A/F49A compared with wt IGF-I. Based on this apparent accumulation in the kidney and the fact that they do not bind IGFBP-1, we propose that these variants may have unique properties in models of renal failure (14). However, more detailed experiments are needed to characterize the activity of these molecules in the kidney cells. Histological analysis should clarify whether the IGF-I variants occupy cell surface receptors or are rapidly cleared via the kidneys. Furthermore, the ability of F49A and E3A/F49A to stimulate cartilage matrix synthesis combined with the findings that IGFBPs may regulate the biological availability of IGF-I in articular cartilage (43) suggest that specifically engineered IGF-I variants may also be useful for the treatment of cartilage disorders such as arthritis.

In contrast to the reported inhibitory mechanism, IGFBP-1 has also been shown to potentiate IGF-I activity in cell culture under certain conditions (1). Presumably, IGFBP-1 was concentrated on the cell surface through interaction with a specific binding protein receptor. This mechanism would indirectly recruit IGF-I in close proximity to the IGF receptors, resulting in increased activity. No suitable reagents have been available to discriminate clearly between these opposing modes of actions. F49A and E3A/F49A appear to be useful molecules to address the question of inhibitory vs. potentiating effects of IGFBP-1 and to better elucidate its general physiological role. In summary, the binding protein-3-selective IGF-I variants described here represent a novel tool for the elucidation of the complicated IGFBP biology and may have a potential therapeutic benefit in conditions such as renal failure, cartilage disorders, or diabetes.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Lavon Riddle for assistance with the preparation of the IGF-I affinity column; Deborah Ansaldi for ALS purification; Germaine Fuh and Jennifer Stamos for help with the baculovirus expression system; Susan Leung and John Joly for E. coli fermentation; Robert Kelley for advice on the CD experiments; Yu-Nien Sun, Mark Ultsch, and Hans Christinger for helpful discussions; and the Genentech, Inc. DNA and protein sequencing facilities.

Received June 5, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jones JI, Clemmons DR 1995 Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: biological actions. Endocr Rev 16:3–34[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Le Roith D 1997 Insulin-like growth factors. N Engl J Med 336:633–640[Free Full Text]
  3. Ullrich A, Gray A, Tam AW, Yang-Feng T, Tsubokawa M, Collins C, Henzel W, LeBon T, Kathuria S, Chen E, Jacobs S, Francke U, Ramachandran J, Fujita-Yamaguchi Y 1986 Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor primary structure: comparison with insulin receptor suggests structural determinants that define functional specificity. EMBO J 5:2503–2512[Medline]
  4. Martin JL, Baxter RC 1994 Regulation and actions of the insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes 1:16–21
  5. Bach LA, Rechler MM 1995 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Diabetes Rev 3:38–61
  6. Ferry Jr RJ, Katz LEL, Grimberg A, Cohen P, Weinzimer SA 1999 Cellular actions of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Horm Metab Res 31:192–202[Medline]
  7. Baxter RC, Binoux MA, Clemmons DR, Conover CA, Drop SLS, Holly JMP, Mohan S, Oh Y, Rosenfeld RG 1998 Recommendations for nomenclature of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein superfamily. Endocrinology 139:4036[Free Full Text]
  8. Conover CA 1995 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein proteolysis in bone cell models. Prog Growth Factor Res 6:301–309[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Baxter RC, Bayne ML, Cascieri MA 1992 Structural determinants for binary and ternary complex formation between insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF binding protein-3. J Biol Chem 267:60–65[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Firth SM, Ganeshprasad U, Baxter RC 1998 Structural determinants of ligand and cell-surface binding of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3. J Biol Chem 273:2631–2638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Twigg SM, Baxter RC 1998 Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein 5 forms an alternative ternary complex with IGFs and the acid-labile subunit. J Biol Chem 273:6074–6079[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Clemmons DR 1997 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins and their role in controlling IGF action. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 8:45–62[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Mortensen DL, Won WB, Siu J, Reifsnyder D, Gironella M, Etcheverry T, Clark RG 1997 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 induces insulin release in the rat. Endocrinology 138:2073–2080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Tönshoff B, Powell DR, Zhao D, Durham SK, Coleman ME, Domené HM, Blum WF, Baxter RC, Moore LC, Kaskel FJ 1997 Decreased hepatic insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and increased IGF binding protein-1 and -2 gene expression in experimental uremia. Endocrinology 138:938–946[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kunkel TA, Bebenek K, McClary J 204 1991 Efficient site-directed mutagenesis using uracil-containing DNA. Methods Enzymol125–139
  16. Dubaquié Y, Lowman HB 1999 Total alanine-scanning mutagenesis of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) identifies differential binding epitopes for IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3. Biochemistry 38:6386–6396[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Wood WI, Cachianes G, Henzel WJ, Winslow GA, Spencer SA, Hellmiss R, Martin JL, Baxter RC 1988 Cloning and expression of the growth hormone-dependent insulin-like growth factor-binding protein. Mol Endocrinol 2:1176–1185[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Roy SK, Weber DV, McGregor WC 1984 High-performance immunosorbent purification of recombinant leukocyte A interferon. J Chromatogr 303:225–228[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Baxter RC, Martin JL, Beniac VA 1989 High molecular weight insulin-like growth factor binding protein complex. J Biol Chem 264:11843–11848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Leong SR, Baxter RC, Camerato T, Dai J, Wood WI 1992 Structure and functional expression of the acid-labile subunit of the insulin-like growth factor-binding protein. Mol Endocrinol 6:870–876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Baxter RC, Svejkar M, Khosravi MJ, Bennett GL, Hardman KV, Senese A, Mistry J, Walton PE, Quarmby V 2000 Measurement of the acid-labile subunit of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein complex in human serum: a comparison of four immunoassays. J Endocrinol 165:271–279[Abstract]
  22. Felder S, Zhou M, Hu P, Urena J, Ullrich A, Chaudhuri M, White M, Shoelson SE, Schlessinger J 1993 SH2 domains exhibit high-affinity binding to tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides yet also exhibit rapid dissociation and exchange. Mol Cell Biol 13:1449–1455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Sadick MD, Intintoli A, Quarmby V, McCoy A, Canova-Davis E, Ling V 1998 Kinase receptor activation (KIRA): a rapid and accurate alternative to end-point bioassays. J Pharm Biomed Anal 19:883–891
  24. Sadick MD 1999 Kinase receptor activation (KIRA): a rapid and accurate alternative to end-point bioassays. Dev Biol Standard 97:121–133[Medline]
  25. Jakeman LB, Winer J, Bennett GL, Altar CA, Ferrara N 1992 Binding sites for vascular endothelial growth factor are localized on endothelial cells in adult rat tissue. J Clin Invest 89:244–253
  26. Wells JA 1990 Additivity of mutational effects in proteins. Biochemistry 29:8509–8517[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Cooke RM, Harvey TS, Campbell ID 1991 Solution structure of human insulin-like growth factor I: a nuclear magnetic resonance and restrained molecular dynamics study. Biochemistry 30:5484–5491[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Jansson M, Uhlen M, Nilsson B 1997 Structural changes in insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I mutant proteins affecting binding kinetic rates to IGF binding protein 1 and IGF-receptor. Biochemistry 36:4108–4117[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Martel-Pelletier J, Di Battista JA, Lajeunesse D, Pelletier J-P 1998 IGF/IGFBP axis in cartilage and bone in osteoarthritis pathogenesis. Inflamm Res 47:90–100[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Cascieri MA, Chicchi GG, Applebaum J, Hayes NS, Green BG, Bayne ML 1988 Mutants of human insulin-like growth factor I with reduced affinity for the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor. Biochemistry 27:3229–3233[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Bayne ML, Applebaum J, Chichi GG, Miller RE, Cascieri MA 1990 The roles of tyrosines 24, 31, and 60 in the high affinity binding of insulin-like growth factor-I to the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem 265:15648–15652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Loddick SA, Liu X-J, Lu Z-X, Liu C, Behan DC, Chalmers DC, Foster AC, Vale WV, Ling N, De Souza EB 1998 Displacement of insulin-like growth factors from their binding proteins as a potential treatment for stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:1894–1898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Lowman HB, Chen YM, Skelton NJ, Mortensen DL, Tomlinson EE, Sadick MD, Robinson ICAF, Clark RG 1998 Molecular mimics of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) for inhibiting IGF-I: IGF-binding protein interactions. Biochemistry 37:8870–8878[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Miller JA, Owers Narhi L, Hua Q-X, Rosenfeld R, Arakawa T, Rohde M, Prestrelski S, Lauren S, Stoney KS, Tsai L, Weiss MA 1993 Oxidative refolding of insulin-like growth factor I yields two products of similar thermodynamic stability: a bifurcating protein-refolding pathway. Biochemistry 32:5203–5213[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Pittman I, Tager HS 1995 A spectroscopic investigation of the conformational dynamics of insulin in solution. Biochemistry 34:10578–10590[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Oh Y, Müller HL, Lee D-Y, Fielder PJ, Rosenfeld RG 1993 Characterization of the affinities of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins 1–4 for IGF-I, IGF-II, IGF-I/insulin hybrid, and IGF-I analogs. Endocrinology 132:1337–1344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Janosi JBM, Firth SM, Bond JJ, Baxter RC, Delhanty PJD 1999 N-Linked glycosylation and sialylation of the acid-labile subunit. J Biol Chem 274:5292–5298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Zapf J, Hauri M, Waldvogel, Froesch ER 1986 Acute metabolic effects and half-lives of intravenously administered insulin-like growth factors I and II in normal and hypophysectomized rats. J Clin Invest 77:1768–1775
  39. Ballard FJ, Knowles SE, Walton PE, Edson K, Owens PC, Mohler MA, Ferraiolo BL 1991 Plasma clearance and tissue distribution of labeled insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), IGF-II and des(1–3)IGF-I in rats. J Endocrinol 128:197–204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Bastian SEP, Walton PE, Wallace JC, Ballard FJ 1993 Plasma clearance and tissue distribution of labeled insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and an analogue LR3IGF-I in pregnant rats. J Endocrinol 138:327–336[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Matsumoto T, Gargosky SE, Iwasaki K, Rosenfeld RG 1996 Identification and characterization of insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs), and IGFBP proteases in human synovial fluid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:150–155[Abstract]
  42. Bhakta NR, Garcia AM, Frank EH, Grodzinsky AJ, Morales TI 2000 The insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) I and II bind to articular cartilage via the IGF-binding proteins. J Biol Chem 275:5860–5866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Kanety H, Shimon I, Ehrenfeld M, Israeli A, Pariente C, Karasik A 1996 Insulin-like growth factor I and its binding proteins 3 and 4 are increased in human inflammatory synovial fluid. J Rheumatol 23:815–818[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. M. Firth, F. MCDougall, A. J. MCLachlan, and R. C. Baxter
Impaired Blockade of Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I)-Induced Hypoglycemia by IGF Binding Protein-3 Analog with Reduced Ternary Complex-Forming Ability
Endocrinology, May 1, 2002; 143(5): 1669 - 1676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dubaquié, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lowman, H. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dubaquié, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lowman, H. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals