help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fitts, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fitts, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, C. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*LIOTHYRONINE
*TAMOXIFEN
Endocrinology Vol. 142, No. 10 4223-4235
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Estrogen and Tamoxifen Interplay with T3 in Male Rats: Pharmacologically Distinct Classes of Estrogen Responses Affecting Growth, Bone, and Lipid Metabolism, and Their Relation to Serum GH and IGF-I

James M. Fitts, Robert M. Klein and C. Andrew Powers

Department of Pharmacology (J.M.F., C.A.P.) and Department of Radiology (R.M.K.), New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York 10595

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: C. Andrew Powers, Ph.D., Department of Pharmacology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York 10595. E-mail: andrew_powers{at}nymc.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Estrogen (E) and T3 regulate gene expression by receptor mechanisms that may enable hormonal interplay affecting growth and metabolism. Prior studies of E and tamoxifen (TM) interplay with T3 in female rats identified a subset of E responses that required T3 for expression and exhibited large agonist responses to TM. In contrast, TM acted more like an antagonist in most T3-independent E responses. This study used male rats to further explore the role of T3 in E effects on growth and metabolism, and the relation of such effects to changes in serum GH and IGF-I. Orchidectomized, hypothyroid rats were treated 6 wk with vehicle, E2 benzoate (E2B), or TM with or without T3. The following parameters were measured: body weight change; tibia length and bone mineral density; heart and kidney weight; food intake and body temperature; serum levels of glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, GH, and IGF-I; seminal vesicle weight; and anterior pituitary levels of GH, PRL, glandular kallikrein, and total protein. Interplay with T3 contributed to multiple E effects on growth and metabolism, and some E responses involved both T3-dependent and T3-independent components. Both E2B and TM increased serum GH, but the increases were poorly coupled to IGF-I. Correlation/regression analysis of individual rat data sets suggested distinct roles for GH and IGF-I in specific E effects. E2B and TM effects on somatic growth exhibited positive correlations with IGF-I and negative correlations with GH; effects on bone mineral density and triglycerides exhibited positive correlations with GH and negative correlations with IGF-I. Three pharmacologically distinct classes of in vivo E responses were identified in this study, and TM displayed a profile of biological activity that may be useful for men undergoing androgen-deprivation therapy.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ESTROGENS (E) REGULATE THE growth and function of female sex organs, but effects on bone have led to use for osteoporosis (1). Conversely, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) such as tamoxifen (TM) and raloxifene inhibit E effects on the breast but mimic E effects on bone (2, 3). This paradoxical pharmacology reflects the diversity of ER mechanisms, with SERMs interfering with mechanisms at some targets while activating those at others. The mechanisms involved in ER signaling are influenced by cell phenotype, the target gene, and the activity of other signaling networks (4, 5, 6). With regard to the latter, there is evidence that multiple ER mechanisms may enable interplay with other hormone signaling systems, including those for T3 (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13).

T3 regulates growth as well as energy and lipid and bone metabolism; E interplay with T3 may provide a versatile mechanism for metabolic adaptations related to reproductive biology. The physiological relevance of such interplay has been explored in ovariectomized, hypothyroid female rats (14, 15, 16, 17). The results identified a subset of E responses that are T3 dependent; this includes effects on growth, bone mass, and triglycerides. T3-independent E responses include uterine growth and induction of pituitary PRL and kallikrein. Moreover, TM exhibited high agonist efficacy in T3-dependent responses but acted more like an antagonist in most T3-independent responses. These findings suggest that estrogens may mediate two distinct types of biological regulation. In T3-independent responses, E can be viewed as a primary driver that fully activates the ER mechanisms mediating the response, and SERMs appear to poorly activate such mechanisms. In T3-dependent responses, however, E can be viewed as a modulator whose responses rely on interplay with T3 signaling mechanisms; such modulator actions are also activated by SERMs.

The concept of distinct primary driver and modulator actions may clarify E actions in complex physiological systems regulated by multiple hormones. Moreover, targeted activation of modulator responses by SERMs may benefit novel groups of patients. For example, androgen deprivation therapy used in men with disseminated prostate cancer can increase the risk of osteoporosis and bone fractures (18, 19, 20, 21). Estrogens can induce a state of androgen deprivation that can avoid such risks (22), but doses needed for satisfactory tumor responses are often toxic (23), and even low doses evoke breast growth. On the other hand, use of SERMs during androgen deprivation therapy may well prevent osteoporosis with little risk of toxicity or breast growth. However, there is little information about SERM effects in men.

Animal studies of SERMs or their interplay with T3 have also focused on females. Thus, it is unclear if males exhibit equivalent responses, and there are reasons why such equivalence should not be presumed. In particular, the GH-IGF-I axis is targeted by both T3 and estrogens, and some estrogen effects on growth and metabolism have been proposed to reflect changes in the GH-IGF-I axis (24, 25, 26, 27). However, an irreversible sex difference in GH secretory patterns develops soon after birth (24, 28), and this may influence the nature of E effects in males and females. In addition, the association between E effects on the GH-IGF-I axis and E effects on growth and metabolism has not been rigorously analyzed in either male or female rats. Specifically, correlation/regression analyses of data sets of individual rats have not been reported. Thus, it is unclear if measures of growth or metabolism in a given rat during E treatment are significantly related to the GH or IGF-I levels in that rat.

To address the above considerations, male rats were used 1) to study the role of T3 in E and SERM effects and their relation to GH and IGF-I, and 2) to evaluate the therapeutic potential of SERMs in androgen-deprived males. The results show that interplay with T3 contributes to multiple E actions in male rats and imply that SERMs may benefit men on androgen deprivation therapy. In addition, the correlation/regression analyses suggest novel roles for GH and IGF-I in E effects on specific parameters. Finally, the data revealed three pharmacologically distinct classes of E responses that presumably reflect the diversity of ER effector mechanisms in vivo.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
All protocols followed NIH guidelines on the use and care of animals and were approved by the institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Forty-eight young adult male Sprague Dawley rats were used (Taconic Farms, Inc., Germantown, PA); rats were 75–80 d old and weighed 350–375 g upon arrival. Forty-four of the rats were given 0.03% methimazole (a thioamide inhibitor of thyroid hormone synthesis) in drinking water throughout the study to induce hypothyroidism and allow experimental control of T3 levels. Calcium chloride (1%) was included with methimazole in the water to ensure adequate dietary calcium intake because hypothyroidism decreases food intake by up to 40% (14). Methimazole evoked functional hypothyroidism in all rats within 14 d based on loss of normal weight gain. Rats were then orchidectomized under halothane-O2 anesthesia, and experimental treatments started 3 d after surgery (when rats were 92–97 d old). Four rats were not treated with methimazole and were subjected only to sham-surgery to provide euthyroid, testis-intact controls. During the study, one hypothyroid rat died from complications of anesthesia, and one died from spinal cord trauma due to an injection accident. Thus, data were obtained from 42 orchidectomized-hypothyroid rats and 4 euthyroid, testis-intact rats.

It should be noted that the male rats used in this study had ages similar to those of female rats used in previous studies of T3 interactions. Both male and female rats still have active epiphyseal growth plates in the age range studied, unlike the bones of adult men and women or aged adult rats. Nonetheless, young adult rats respond to gonadectomy and E or SERM treatment with robust changes in cancellous bone turnover and BMD that are qualitatively similar to those of aged rats with closed epiphyses (29, 30).

Experimental design and drug treatments
A gonadectomized, hypothyroid rat model was used which allows TM, E2B, and T3 effects to be separately identified and hormonal interactions studied. The model was designed to selectively detect E2B and TM effects on the pharmacodynamic actions of T3 and avoid other types of hormonal interactions. Thus, use of methimazole eliminates changes in the synthesis or release of T3 or T4 as a mechanism of E2B or TM effects. Use of T3 eliminates interactions related to 5'-deiodination of T4 to T3. Use of T3 also avoids interactions due to E2B or TM effects on plasma T4-binding proteins (transthyretin and T4-binding globulin). T3 has only 1/10 the affinity of T4 for such proteins, and unlike T4, the distribution of T3 in the rat is not restricted by plasma protein binding (volume of distribution = 1.65 liter/kg for T3 vs. 0.16 liter/kg for T4) (31).

Six groups of orchidectomized rats received the following drug and hormone treatments starting 3 d after surgery: 1) vehicle solutions alone (n = 8); 2) TM (trans isomer, free base) at 0.5 mg/kg via sc injection, once daily (n = 7); 3) 17ß-E2–3-benzoate (E2B) at 50 µg/kg via sc injection three times weekly (n = 6); 4) T3 (sodium salt) at 10 µg/kg via ip injection once daily (n = 7); 5) T3 plus TM (n = 7); and 6) T3 plus E2B (n = 8). The group of four euthyroid, testis-intact rats received daily injections of vehicle solutions. During the treatment phase of the study, body weight was measured three times per week and food intake was measured once a week. Rats were gang-caged (3–4 per cage) to decrease risk of hypothermia due to hypothyroidism; thus, total food intake per group was measured during a 24-h period, and average intake per rat interpolated. Body temperature was measured weekly with a rectal thermocouple probe and digital thermometer to provide an index of T3 effects on thermogenesis.

The doses of E2B, TM, and T3 used in this study have been found to yield maximal target organ and growth responses in dose-response studies in ovariectomized or ovariectomized, hypothyroid female rats (15, 32). E2B and TM were dissolved in sesame oil with 2% benzyl alcohol; T3 was dissolved in 0.9% NaCl with 5 mM NaOH.

Tissue processing
After 6 wk of treatment, rats were euthanized in random order with 100 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (ip) between 1030 and 1530 h. Blood, anterior pituitaries, and right tibias were collected within 5 min of pentobarbital injection as previously described (14, 15). Blood samples were allowed to clot for 5 min at room temperature, cooled on ice, and then refrigerated at 5 C; serum was collected the next day, aliquoted, and stored at -80 C until assay. The right tibia was stripped of most muscle and connective tissue and stored in 70% ethanol for subsequent measurements of tibia length (an index of longitudinal growth) and bone mineral density (BMD). Anterior pituitaries were sonicated in 400 µl of 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 150 mM NaCl and 0.1% Triton X-100; samples were then aliquoted and stored at -20 C until assay. Seminal vesicles were dissected and weighed. The ventral prostate lobes were visually inspected for any gross differences in size. The left kidney and heart were dissected and weighed to examine the effect of TM or E2B on T3 actions that yield increases in heart and kidney mass that exceed changes in overall somatic growth (33, 34).

Analysis of BMD
Tibia BMD was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry with a QDR-1000 (Hologic, Inc., Waltham, MA) as previously described (14, 15). Image analysis software (Hologic, Inc.) automatically calculated bone mineral content (g), cross-sectional area (cm2), and BMD (g/cm2) in two regions: the proximal tibia and the diaphysis. The proximal tibia (upper 1/3 of tibia length) is relatively enriched in cancellous bone and has a higher ratio of cancellous to cortical bone than the diaphysis (middle 1/3 of tibia length) (35).

Metabolic analyses
Lipid metabolism was assessed by measuring total cholesterol, triglycerides, and ß-hydroxybutyrate (an index of fatty acid ß-oxidation) in serum using colorimetric kits from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Serum glucose was measured as an index of carbohydrate metabolism using a colorimetric kit from Stanbio Laboratories (San Antonio, TX). In the rat, 70–80% of serum cholesterol is bound to high-density lipoprotein, and estrogens and SERMs have equivalent effects on high density lipoprotein- or low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (36).

Assay of serum GH and IGF-I
Serum levels of GH and IGF-I were used to assess changes in the GH-IGF-I axis. Total serum levels of IGF-I were determined using a RIA kit from Nichols Institute Diagnostics (San Juan Capistrano, CA) after extraction of IGF-I from serum. IGF-I in rat serum was separated from IGF-binding proteins using the acid-ethanol extraction method described by Crawford et al. (37). Serum samples (100 µl) were mixed with 900 µl acid-ethanol solution (12.5% 2 M HCl: 87.5% ethanol, vol/vol) and incubated 30 min at room temperature. Following centrifugation at 1,500 x g for 30 min at 5 C, 200 µl of the supernate was mixed with 100 µl 0.855 M Tris base (pH 11) and incubated 30 min at room temperature. After centrifugation at 1,500 x g for 30 min (5 C), 100 µl of the final supernate was mixed with 1.4 ml phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), and used for RIA. This acid-ethanol extraction method has previously been validated for RIA of total IGF-I in male and female rat serum by comparison with results using HPLC methodology (37). Serum GH was determined using a rat GH RIA kit from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Piscataway, NJ).

Anterior pituitary analyses
Induction of anterior pituitary PRL and GH by E and T3, respectively, was qualitatively analyzed using denaturing PAGE as previously described (15, 16). Such analyses have previously been validated with GH and PRL RIAs (15, 16). Anterior pituitary levels of glandular kallikrein (an E-induced protease in lactotrophs) was assayed using D-Val-Leu-Arg-p-nitroanilide as previously described (38). Total protein provided an index of E-induced anterior pituitary hyperplasia (38).

Statistical analysis of grouped data
Data were subjected to ANOVA followed by a posthoc analysis with Duncan’s new multiple range test; P < 0.05 was the criterion of significance. Serum GH and triglyceride data values were log-transformed to normalize variances.

The change in a parameter due to T3 (‘{Delta} due to T3') was calculated by subtracting the mean of the vehicle, TM, or E2B group without T3 from each data point in the matching group with T3; transformed data were then analyzed as noted above. This facilitated comparison of E2B and TM interplay with T3 in diverse parameters and was used to calculate the % efficacy of TM relative to E2B (100%) in responses involving interplay with T3.

Correlation/regression analysis
Pearson’s product-moment correlation (r) and multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify significant associations of serum GH or IGF-I to other parameters. Correlations/regressions were calculated using sets of individual rat data (single units of expression) that captured the effects of the four distinct hormonal manipulations studied (T3 manipulation with and without an estrogenic background, and estrogenic manipulation with and without a T3 background). Correlations capturing the effect of T3 manipulation without an estrogenic background were calculated using individual rat data from groups 1 (vehicle alone) and 4 (T3 alone) (n = 15 data pairs per parameter). Correlations during T3 manipulation with an estrogenic background used data from groups 2 (TM alone), 3 (E2B alone), 5(T3 plus TM) and 6 (T3 plus E2B) (n = 27). Correlations during estrogenic manipulation without T3 used data from groups 1 (vehicle alone), 2 (TM alone), and 3 (E2B alone) (n = 21). Correlations during estrogenic manipulation in the presence of T3 used data from groups 4 (T3 alone), 5 (TM plus T3) and 6 (E2B plus T3) (n = 21).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TM, E2B, and T3 effects on tibia BMD
BMD of the proximal tibia (enriched in cancellous bone) was 9% lower in orchidectomized, hypothyroid controls than in euthyroid, testis-intact rats (Fig. 1Go). This probably reflects the lack of testicular androgens (39, 40, 41, 42). T3 alone had no effect on BMD but potentiated TM and E2B effects: TM evoked 4.2% increases in rats lacking T3, and 9.8% increases in rats given T3. E2B evoked 12.8% and 17.6% increases in BMD in the absence or presence of T3, respectively. In T3-treated rats, TM prevented bone loss associated with orchidectomy, while E2B yielded BMD values exceeding euthyroid, testis-intact rats (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of TM, E2B, and T3 on tibia BMD in hypothyroid, orchidectomized rats. This and all other figures show results from groups of 6–8 hypothyroid, orchidectomized rats after treatment for 6 wk with vehicle (V), TM (0.5 mg/kg daily), or E2B (50 µg/kg three times per week) either with or without T3 (10 µg/kg daily). A group of euthyroid, testis-intact males (I) was also studied. Left panel, Proximal tibia BMD. Right panel, Tibia diaphysis BMD. Panel inset, Change ({Delta}) in BMD due to T3 in various treatment conditions (see Materials and Methods for details). Values represent the mean + SEM. *, P < 0.05 vs. V or V + T3. **, P < 0.05 vs. T3. *** P < 0.05 vs. V + T3 or TM + T3.

 
TM had 1/3 the efficacy of E2B in rats lacking T3, but BMD increases due to T3 interplay with TM and E2B were equivalent (see inset, Fig. 1Go). This suggests that E effects on BMD in male rats involved a T3-independent component in which TM had low efficacy, and a T3-dependent component in which TM and E2B had equivalent efficacy.

It is of note that rats lacking T3 displayed no net growth (see Fig. 3Go), and E2B increased proximal tibia BMD in such rats without altering tibia length (see Fig. 4Go) or cross-sectional area (not shown). E2B effects on BMD were thus largely independent of changes in bone growth.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of TM, E2B, and T3 on body weight in hypothyroid, orchidectomized rats. Panel inset, Changes due to T3. Values represent the mean + SEM. *, P < 0.05 vs. matching group without T3. **, P < 0.05 vs. T3 alone.

 


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of TM, E2B, and T3 on tibia length and serum GH and IGF-I in hypothyroid, orchidectomized rats. Left panel, Tibia length. Middle panel, Serum GH. Right panel, Serum IGF-I. Panel insets, Changes due to T3. V, Vehicle; I, euthyroid, testis-intact. Values represent the mean + SEM. *, P < 0.05 vs. V. **, P < 0.05 vs. V + T3 or T3.

 
Tibia diaphysis BMD did not significantly differ among groups (Fig. 1Go). The diaphysis has a lower ratio of cancellous bone to cortical bone, and the data are consistent with differences in the turnover rates and E sensitivity of cancellous bone and cortical bone (29, 30, 35).

TM, E2B, and T3 effects on serum levels of cholesterol and triglycerides
TM lowered cholesterol by 38 mg/dl in orchidectomized, hypothyroid rats lacking T3 (Fig. 2Go). Cholesterol was also reduced by T3 (-24 mg/dl), and T3 and TM effects were additive. Thus, TM and T3 affect cholesterol independently of one another. Remarkably, E2B had no effect on cholesterol, even at doses as high as 250 µg/kg (unpublished data). Euthyroid, testis-intact male rats had slightly lower cholesterol levels (-18 mg/dl) than orchidectomized, hypothyroid rats treated with T3, but the difference was not significant (Fig. 2Go).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of TM, E2B, and T3 on total serum cholesterol, serum triglycerides, and seminal vesicle weight in hypothyroid, orchidectomized rats. Left panel, Total serum cholesterol. Middle panel, Serum triglycerides. Right panel, Seminal vesicle weight. Panel insets, Changes due to T3. V, Vehicle; I, euthyroid, testis-intact controls. Values represent the mean + SEM. *, P < 0.05 vs. V. **, P < 0.05 vs. V + T3.

 
Serum triglycerides in intact rats were over twice that of orchidectomized, hypothyroid controls (Fig. 2Go). T3, TM, or E2B alone did not alter triglycerides in hypothyroid rats, although TM tended to lower levels. However, TM and E2B increased triglycerides in T3-treated rats (Fig. 2Go); the TM increase was 65% that evoked by E2B (inset, Fig. 2Go).

TM, E2B, and T3 effects on male sex organs
TM had no effect on seminal vesicle weight in orchidectomized, hypothyroid rats with or without T3 (Fig. 2Go); this was also the case with the ventral prostate (based on visual inspection). E2B in combination with T3 evoked a small rise in seminal vesicle weight (Fig. 2Go), but seminal vesicles in rats given E2B plus T3 were still minuscule compared with testis-intact rats.

TM, E2B, and T3 effects on somatic growth
In the first 10 d, orchidectomized, hypothyroid controls lost 3% of body weight while E2B- or TM-treated rats lost 9% (Fig. 3Go). Weight then stabilized in control and TM-treated rats, but a slow weight loss continued in E2B-treated rats (-4% in 32 d) (Fig. 3Go). T3 increased weight, and this gain was inhibited 78% by TM and 65% by E2B (inset, Fig. 3Go).

In rats lacking T3, TM or E2B did not alter tibia length. However, increases in tibia length evoked by T3 were similarly inhibited by TM (-69%) and E2B (-81%) (inset, Fig. 4Go).

During the 6-wk treatment phase of the study, euthyroid, testis-intact rats gained 70% more weight than orchidectomized, hypothyroid rats treated with T3 alone (not shown). This presumably reflects a stimulation of somatic growth by testicular androgens (43), which may also partly account for the greater tibia lengths of testis-intact rats (Fig. 4Go).

TM, E2B, and T3 effects on serum and pituitary GH
Serum GH in orchidectomized, hypothyroid rats was only 8% that of euthyroid, testis-intact rats (Fig. 4Go), and this was associated with a loss of pituitary GH content (Fig. 5Go). Although T3 alone increased serum GH, it yielded only 25% the level of euthyroid, testis-intact males even though pituitary GH content was almost fully restored. In rats lacking T3, TM and E2B evoked 4.0-fold and 6.9-fold increases in serum GH, respectively, whereas T3 alone yielded a 3.2-fold increase (Fig. 4Go). However, TM and E2B evoked only weak T3-like effects on pituitary GH content (Fig. 5Go). Thus, TM and E2B effects on serum GH do not simply reflect changes in pituitary GH content; alterations in neuroendocrine regulation are evident.



View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. The effect of TM, E2B, and T3 on pituitary GH and PRL content in hypothyroid, orchidectomized rats. Pituitary samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE, and the gel stained with Coomassie blue R-250. Gel lanes were loaded with equivalent volumes of pooled anterior pituitary homogenate from euthyroid, testis-intact rats (1 ), or hypothyroid, orchidectomized rats treated with vehicle (2 ), TM (3 ), E2B (4 ), T3 (5 ), T3 plus TM (6 ), or T3 plus E2B (7 ). Molecular weight markers are shown on the far left, and GH and PRL bands are indicated by arrows.

 
TM and E2B effects on serum GH were enhanced by T3 and yielded increases greater than expected from an additive interaction with T3 (inset, Fig. 4Go). In either the presence or absence of T3, TM displayed half the efficacy of E2B on serum GH. On the other hand, T3 induction of pituitary GH content was clearly inhibited by TM, whereas E2B had little effect (Fig. 5Go). Thus, although TM mimicked E2B effects on serum GH in T3-treated rats, it displayed a distinct effect on pituitary GH. The pituitary GH data of male rats match the results of similar studies in female rats (14, 15, 16, 17). TM or E2B effects to increase serum GH, however, were much smaller in female rats, and were not enhanced by T3 (15).

Only orchidectomized, hypothyroid rats given T3 in combination with TM or E2B had serum GH levels approaching those of euthyroid, testis-intact males. However, serum GH increases evoked by E2B and TM did not yield corresponding increases in somatic growth.

TM, E2B, and T3 effects on serum IGF-I
Orchidectomized, hypothyroid rats had serum IGF-I levels that were half that of testis-intact, euthyroid rats (Fig. 4Go). T3 alone fully restored IGF-1 to the levels of euthyroid, testis-intact rats despite its relatively modest effect on serum GH. In contrast, E2B or TM did not yield IGF-I increases similar to T3 even though they caused greater increases in serum GH. Interestingly, E2B and TM had differing effects on IGF-I in the absence of T3; TM modestly increased IGF-I (+20%), whereas E2B markedly lowered IGF-I (-40%) (Fig. 4Go).

Rats treated with E2B plus T3 also had much lower IGF-I levels than those given T3 alone, due in large part to a smaller IGF-I response to T3. TM also displayed a tendency to lower IGF-I in T3-treated rats (-12%) that did not reach significance. However, unlike E2B, TM alone modestly increased IGF-I (+20%), and this partly masked inhibition of T3 effects. When IGF-I increases due to T3 were calculated, it was evident that this T3 effect was significantly inhibited by TM (-42%) as well as by E2B (-73%) (inset, Fig. 4Go). TM effects on IGF-I in male rats resemble results in female rats (14): this includes both TM’s tendency to increase IGF-I in the absence of T3, and the inhibition of T3 effects on IGF-I.

Effects on food intake, body temperature, serum glucose, and serum ß-hydroxybutyrate
Orchidectomized, hypothyroid male rats lacking T3 consumed 35% less food per kg body weight than euthyroid, testis-intact males (Fig. 7Go). T3 increased food intake to that of euthyroid, testis-intact rats. E2B and TM did not alter food intake in rats with or without T3 (inset, Fig. 7Go). TM and E2B effects on growth and metabolism are unlikely to reflect changes in food intake. The data further document that not all T3 effects are sensitive to E2B or TM.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effect of TM, E2B, and T3 on relative food intake, body temperature and serum glucose in hypothyroid, orchidectomized rats. Left panel, Relative food intake. Middle panel, Body temperature. Right panel, Serum glucose. Panel insets, Changes due to T3. V, Vehicle; I, euthyroid, testis-intact. Values represent the mean + SEM. *, P < 0.05 vs. V. **, P < 0.05 vs. V + T3 or T3.

 
Body temperature was unaffected by TM or E2B in the absence of T3 (Fig. 7Go). T3 produced a 1.5 C increase in temperatures of orchidectomized, hypothyroid rats. T3 effects on body temperature were slightly inhibited by TM and E2B (-11% and -33%, respectively), but only E2B had a significant effect. Only a small fraction of the thermogenic effects of T3 are sensitive to E2B, and TM has only 1/3 the efficacy of E2B.

Euthyroid, testis-intact rats had significantly lower body temperatures (-1.0 C) than orchidectomized, hypothyroid rats given T3 (Fig. 7Go). This temperature difference is due to testicular androgens; it does not reflect use of an excessive T3 dose (our manuscript in preparation).

TM and E2B tended to lower serum glucose in orchidectomized, hypothyroid rats lacking T3, but the changes were insignificant (Fig. 7Go). T3 alone had no effect on glucose but enhanced TM and E2B effects over 2-fold. Decreases in glucose evoked by E2B (-28%) were significant in T3-treated rats, but not those for TM (-13%). Serum ß-hydroxybutyrate levels were less than 2.5 mg/dl in all groups (data not shown); thus, no major treatment effects on fatty acid oxidation were evident. The glucose and ß-hydroxybutyrate data did not reveal alterations in energy metabolism likely to explain E2B and TM effects on growth.

TM, E2B, and T3 effects on relative heart and kidney weights
Calculation of organ weight relative to body weight (relative weight, g/kg) can detect changes in organ weight that are disproportionate from changes in body weight. T3 significantly increased relative heart weight in hypothyroid male rats (Fig. 8Go); this may reflect direct actions on the heart as well as effects secondary to changes in vascular tone and autonomic nervous system function (33). TM and E2B did not alter relative heart weight in rats lacking T3, and increases evoked by T3 were insensitive to E2B or TM (inset, Fig. 8Go). Relative kidney weight was slightly increased by TM or E2B in rats lacking T3 (+0.5 and +0.4 g/kg, respectively). T3 caused greater increases (+1.2 g/kg). T3 and TM had additive effects on relative kidney weight, but increases with E2B plus T3 were larger than expected (inset, Fig. 8Go).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Effect of TM, E2B, and T3 on relative heart and kidney weights in hypothyroid, orchidectomized rats. Left panel, Relative heart weight. Right panel, Relative kidney weight. Panel insets, Changes due to T3. V, Vehicle; I, euthyroid, testis-intact. Values represent the mean + SEM. *, P < 0.05 vs. V. **, P < 0.05 vs. V + T3 or T3.

 
TM, E2B, and T3 effects on the anterior pituitary
Total pituitary protein content is well correlated with pituitary weight and provides a useful index of E-evoked pituitary hyperplasia in the rat (38, 44). E2B or T3 alone caused only modest protein increases, but synergized with one another to evoke striking increases (Fig. 6Go). Unlike E2B, TM slightly decreased pituitary protein in the presence or absence of T3.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effect of TM, E2B, and T3 on anterior pituitary levels of glandular kallikrein and total protein in hypothyroid, orchidectomized rats. Left panel, Total glandular kallikrein activity. Middle panel, Glandular kallikrein specific activity. Right panel, Total anterior pituitary protein. Panel insets, Changes due to T3. V, Vehicle; I, euthyroid, testis-intact. Values represent the mean + SEM. *, P < 0.05 vs. V. **, P < 0.05 vs. all other groups.

 
E2B selectively induced pituitary PRL in rats lacking T3 (Fig. 5Go). T3 alone evoked only small PRL increases, but markedly enhanced E2B actions. However, PRL increases with E2B plus T3 were coupled to nonspecific increases pituitary proteins characteristic of tissue hyperplasia (Figs. 5Go and 6Go). TM did not alter PRL either with or without T3.

T3 alone slightly decreased glandular kallikrein (Fig. 6Go), an E-induced lactotroph protease (32). E2B induced total kallikrein activity (nmol/min·pituitary) by 6-fold in the absence of T3, and 18-fold in the presence of T3. However, E2B induction of kallikrein was unaffected by T3 when expressed as specific activity (nmol/min·mg protein) to adjust for changes in total protein due to tissue hyperplasia (Fig. 6Go). TM lacked effect on glandular kallikrein.

Overall, the data indicate that E2B induction of PRL and kallikrein was T3 independent, whereas E2B actions to evoke pituitary hyperplasia were T3 dependent. The hyperplastic effect of E is due to a selective induction of lactotroph proliferation (45, 46), and this amplifies E2B effects on PRL and kallikrein by increasing lactotroph numbers.

Correlation of serum GH and serum IGF-I with other physiological parameters
Group means suggested that E2B and TM effects on GH and IGF-I may be related to changes in four other parameters: {Delta} body weight, tibia length, proximal tibia BMD and serum triglycerides. Correlation/regression analysis was used to quantitatively assess these associations.

E2B and TM effects on a parameter might reflect changes in T3 regulation of GH or IGF-I, changes in GH or IGF-I independent of T3, effects unrelated to GH or IGF-I, or combinations thereof. To separately evaluate these alternatives, correlation analysis was performed on four unstructured sets of individual rat data capturing the relationships associated with T3 manipulations with or without an estrogenic background (E2B or TM treatment), and estrogenic manipulations with or without a T3 background (see Materials and Methods for details).

Relative heart weight illustrates results for a parameter that was unaffected by E2B or TM and was unlikely to be related to GH or IGF-I. Relative heart weights during T3 manipulation in the absence of E2B/TM were strongly correlated with GH and IGF-I, but these correlations were absent from T3 manipulations with E2B/TM (Table 1Go). Because E2B or TM altered GH and IGF-I without affecting relative heart weight (Figs. 4Go and 7Go), the correlations during T3 manipulation without E2B/TM must be coincidental. Indeed, heart weight was not significantly correlated with GH or IGF-I in estrogenic manipulations (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Correlation of serum GH and IGF-I with other parameters in hypothyroid, orchidectomized rats during distinct hormonal manipulations under different hormonal backgrounds

 
GH correlations with IGF-I illustrate results obtained with parameters known to be functionally related in vivo. During T3 manipulation, GH exhibited a significant positive correlation with IGF-I in the absence of E2B/TM, but not in the presence of E2B/TM (Table 1Go). Thus, an estrogenic background impaired GH induction of IGF-I during T3 manipulation, as expected from the grouped results (Fig. 4Go, inset). GH and IGF-I were poorly related during estrogenic manipulations without T3, but a surprising negative correlation was seen during estrogenic manipulation of T3-treated rats (Table 1Go). This inverse relation suggests the operation of an IGF-I negative feedback loop that inhibits GH release and is T3 dependent. These results suggest that decreases in IGF-I (or reduced sensitivity of the feedback loop to IGF-I) may contribute to E2B and TM effects on GH in T3-treated rats.

Body weight change during T3 manipulation without E2B or TM was positively correlated with GH and IGF-I (Table 1Go). E2B and TM degraded such correlations during T3 manipulation; this suggests that a portion of E2B/TM effects on body weight involve T3 actions unrelated to changes in GH and IGF-I levels per se (see below). On the other hand, weight change in estrogenic manipulations was positively correlated with IGF-I and negatively correlated with GH regardless of T3 background. Given the essential role of IGF-I in growth (25), the results suggest that IGF-I decreases also partly contribute to E effects on weight.

Tibia length was not correlated with GH during T3 manipulation without E2B/TM but displayed a strong positive correlation with IGF-I (Table 1Go). This IGF-I correlation was obliterated in the presence of E2B/TM. Thus, changes in serum IGF-I poorly explain E2B and TM effects on T3-evoked bone growth; effects on other T3 actions that promote bone growth seem likely. This might include T3 actions to enhance tissue sensitivity to IGF-I because hypothyroidism eliminated growth but lowered IGF-I only 50% (see Figs. 3Go and 4Go). On the other hand, tibia length was positively correlated with IGF-I and negatively correlated with GH during estrogenic manipulations in the presence of T3, but not in its absence. Given the role of IGF-I in longitudinal bone growth (25), this suggests that decreases in IGF-I may also contribute to E2B and TM effects on tibia length. It is also noteworthy that, unlike body weight change, tibia length displayed an association with IGF-I and GH only in the presence of T3.

Proximal tibia BMD was positively correlated with serum GH during T3 manipulations in the presence of E2B or TM, but not in their absence. The BMD and GH correlation was even stronger in estrogenic manipulations, and T3 had little influence on the association. Unlike body weight or tibia length, BMD was not significantly correlated with IGF-I during T3 manipulations, and BMD was negatively correlated with IGF-I during estrogenic manipulations regardless of T3. In view of evidence that GH can increase BMD (47), the correlation analyses suggest that E2B and TM effects on BMD may partly reflect their effects on serum GH.

Triglycerides displayed a significant positive correlation with GH only during T3 manipulations in the presence of E2B/TM. Triglycerides and IGF-I were poorly associated during T3 manipulations. Triglycerides were also significantly correlated with GH (positive) and IGF-I (negative) during estrogenic manipulations with T3, but not in its absence. In view of evidence that GH can increase triglycerides (48, 49), the results suggest that GH may contribute to E2B and TM effects on triglycerides. Unlike BMD, the triglyceride response to E2B and TM displayed a T3 requirement that appears unrelated to effects on GH and IGF-I.

Multiple linear regression analysis
During estrogenic manipulations with T3, serum GH and IGF-I were inversely related, and it wasn’t surprising that GH and IGF-I correlations with a parameter were often the inverse of one another. However, GH and IGF-I were not correlated during estrogenic manipulations without T3; thus, it was notable that in such manipulations BMD was positively correlated with GH and negatively correlated with IGF-I, whereas the opposite occurred with body weight change (Table 1Go). This suggested that GH and IGF-I may independently contribute to E effects on BMD and body weight. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate this possibility.

Multiple linear regression analysis can be used to test hypotheses that two or more independent variables (GH and IGF-I in this case) make significant, independent contributions to regressions predicting the observed levels of a dependent variable (BMD, etc.). This involves fitting a regression equation to the data using the method of least-squares. The residual sum squares (total, regression, and error) are then used to determine the significance of the regression coefficients contributed by each independent variable (null hypothesis: coefficients = 0), and the regression correlation coefficient (r). For the present analysis, the significance of the regression coefficient of each independent variable was of primary interest.

Proximal tibia BMD was the only parameter where GH and IGF-I both made significant, independent contributions to regressions predicting observed values. In estrogenic manipulations without T3, BMD was well correlated (r = 0.78; P < 0.01) with regression predictions [BMD = 0.258 + 0.0242(logGH) - 0.000064(IGF-I)], and the regression coefficients for GH and IGF-I were each significant (P < 0.01). In estrogenic manipulations with T3, BMD displayed an r = 0.71 (P < 0.01) with regression predictions [BMD = 0.270 + 0.0172(logGH) - 0.0000373(IGF-I)]; the IGF-I coefficient was significant (P = 0.04) and the GH coefficient neared significance (P = 0.067). Regression predictions from analysis of all orchidectomized rat data [BMD = 0.239 + 0.0271(logGH) - (0.0000234 x IGF-I)] yielded an r = 0.72 (P < 0.01), with significant regression coefficients for both GH (P < 0.01) and IGF-I (P = 0.02).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Selective metabolic effects of tamoxifen in male rats
Elderly men are often intolerant or poorly responsive to drugs commonly used to prevent osteoporosis or lower cholesterol, and may benefit from alternative therapies. SERMs selectively mimic metabolic effects of estrogens on bone and low density lipoprotein cholesterol in postmenopausal women (50, 51, 52, 53, 54) and might evoke such metabolic benefits in men without risk of feminization. In orchidectomizedhypothyroid rats treated with T3 in this study, TM prevented BMD decreases associated with orchidectomy, and lowered blood cholesterol. Moreover, TM lacked androgenic effects on seminal vesicle or prostate growth. Euthyroid male rats have yielded equivalent findings (our manuscript in preparation). Ovariectomized female rats similar in age to the males of this study have usefully modeled E effects on bone in postmenopausal women (29, 30), and the present results may have corresponding relevance for androgen-deprived men. Studies of TM in androgen-deprived men should soon address this issue.

Influence of T3 on E2B and tamoxifen effects, and relation to the GH-IGF-I axis
The hypothyroid, gonadectomized rat model enables the detection of target-selective T3 and E interplay arising from pharmacodynamic (receptor-mediated) mechanisms (14, 15, 16, 17). The present data further indicate that some actions of E2B and TM involve interplay with T3 and also imply some sex differences. Moreover, correlation analysis provided a rigorous test of the association of serum GH and IGF-I with specific E responses in individual rats. The significant correlations found in data sets capturing the effects of estrogenic manipulation do not prove a cause and effect linkage. Nonetheless, the significant correlations satisfy an essential requirement of hypotheses that changes in GH and IGF-I contribute to E effects on growth and metabolism, and also imply distinct roles for GH and IGF-I in different E responses.

Interactions related to the GH-IGF-I axis and somatic growth
The GH-IGF-I axis has a major role in growth and metabolism (25, 27, 47, 55), and is a likely target of E and T3 interplay. T3 promotes GH synthesis and secretion, enhances GH induction of hepatic IGF-I synthesis, and induces IGF-I receptors and binding proteins (56, 57, 58). Estrogens and TM also increase GH secretion but lower serum IGF-I as well as hepatic expression of IGF-I mRNA (26, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65).

In the present study, increases in serum GH evoked by T3 were coupled to significant increases in IGF-I. In contrast, TM or E2B failed to increase IGF-I despite striking effects to increase GH. Interestingly, estrogen effects on serum IGF-I appear to involve two components. A T3-independent component was evident in E2B effects to lower IGF-I by 40% in rats lacking T3; TM lacked agonist efficacy in this component and slightly raised IGF-I. A T3-dependent component was evident in E2B and TM inhibition of T3 induction of IGF-I; TM had 58% the efficacy of E2B in this component. These data are consistent with findings in hypothyroid female rats (14) in which TM slightly elevated IGF-I in rats lacking T3, but inhibited T3 effects on IGF-I. It should be noted that TM did not inhibit ovine GH effects on somatic growth or IGF-I in hypothyroid rats (14), nor do estrogens consistently inhibit GH effects on serum IGF-I or hepatic IGF-I mRNA in hypophysectomized rats (61, 62). Overall, E effects on serum IGF-I are complex and seem likely to target T3 actions that enhance GH effects, as well as mechanisms independent of T3 or GH.

Multiple mechanisms also seem to mediate E effects on T3-evoked growth. Weight gain and tibia length were correlated with IGF-I during estrogenic manipulations, suggesting that decreases in IGF-I contribute to E2B and TM effects to inhibit growth. In T3-treated rats, the net decrease in IGF-I caused by E2B (-55%) seemed large enough to impair growth, but the 12% decrease with TM was unlikely to do so. This might indicate that IGF-I production in targets such as bone is more relevant to E2B and TM effects on growth (66, 67). Alternatively, decreases in tissue sensitivity to IGF-I due to E effects on IGF-I receptors or binding proteins may contribute to the inhibition of somatic growth (63, 64, 65). Indeed, IGF-I feedback inhibits GH release (68, 69), and TM effects on serum GH in T3-treated rats seem consistent with reduced sensitivity of the feedback mechanism to IGF-I. Decreases in IGF-I sensitivity may also be relevant to E2B and TM effects to degrade the correlation of body weight change and tibia length with serum GH and IGF-I during T3 manipulations.

Interactions related to BMD
In ovariectomized-hypothyroid female rats, T3 decreased proximal tibia BMD, and E2B and TM effects seemed to reflect inhibition of T3 actions (14, 15). This appeared consistent with T3 actions directly on bone to stimulate resorption (70, 71), the increased risk of osteoporosis due to thyrotoxicosis (72, 73), and E prevention of T4-evoked bone loss in postmenopausal women (74, 75). Nonetheless, T3 alone lacked effect on BMD in the present male rats, and E2B increased BMD in the absence of T3. This suggests a sex difference in T3 effects on BMD; direct comparisons of the sexes are needed to clarify this issue.

TM had less effect on BMD than E2B in the present male rats, but TM has been shown to fully mimic E effects on BMD in female rats (76, 77), again hinting at a sex difference. In this regard, it is of note that E effects on BMD seemed to involve two components; TM had efficacy equal to E2B in a T3-dependent component but only 33% efficacy in a T3-independent component. Given the T3-dependence of E effects on BMD in female rats (14), the T3-independent component may be most relevant to any sex differences.

GH stimulates bone remodeling associated with longitudinal growth and also participates in the remodeling of mature bone (47). Although GH stimulates both bone resorption and formation, an anabolic effect eventually emerges due to greater bone formation. In the present study, BMD was positively correlated with serum GH during estrogenic manipulations in either the presence or absence of T3; such results suggest that GH increases contribute to E2B and TM effects on BMD. This association is unlikely to reflect changes in growth-related bone remodeling since somatic growth was absent in rats lacking T3. Given the sex difference in GH secretion patterns (see Introduction), GH might also be relevant to possible sex differences in T3 and E effects on BMD. Nonetheless, it is important to note that GH release evoked by T3 alone failed to increase BMD in this and other studies of hypothyroid, gonadectomized rats (14, 15). This may be relevant to evidence that E can act directly on bone to alter remodeling (1, 78); such actions may enhance the net anabolic effect of GH. Indeed, TM enhanced ovine GH effects on BMD in hypothyroid rats (14), and transgenic mice overexpressing human GH require ovarian estrogens to develop elevated BMD (79).

BMD was also negatively correlated with IGF-I during estrogenic manipulations. Bone growth and remodeling involves a complex interplay between T3, GH, IGF-I as well as other hormones and cytokines, and is not fully understood (27, 47, 78). Many GH effects result from IGF-I released from the liver or target tissue (the somatomedin theory of GH action). However, effector mechanisms unrelated to IGF-I also contribute in some tissues, including bone (the dual-effector theory of GH action) (47, 80, 81). An implication of the dual-effector theory is that GH and IGF-I may make distinct contributions to GH responses involving dual effectors. Indeed, multiple linear regression analysis showed that GH and IGF-I each made significant, independent contributions to regression equations predicting BMD during estrogenic manipulations; this was true of no other physiological parameters. This result appears to satisfy a major requirement of the hypothesis that GH actions via multiple effector mechanisms (IGF-I dependent and independent) may be relevant to E effects on BMD.

Interactions related to serum triglycerides and cholesterol
Estrogens and SERMs can increase serum triglycerides in rats and man (50, 54, 82, 83). In the male rats used in this study, such increases were T3 dependent, and TM had 65% the efficacy of E2B; female rats gave similar results (14, 15, 17). Moreover, triglycerides were positively correlated with GH during estrogenic manipulations in T3-treated rats. This may be relevant to reports that GH can stimulate the hepatic synthesis or release of triglycerides (48, 49). Although T3 alone had little effect on triglycerides, it is well known to stimulate multiple pathways involved in fatty acid and triglyceride synthesis, storage, mobilization, and oxidation. E interplay with a subset of such T3 actions might alter the balance between opposing pathways to increase triglycerides.

The role of T3 in E and SERM effects on serum cholesterol had not been previously studied. TM evoked cholesterol decreases that were T3 independent, but E2B had no effect despite powerful actions on other parameters in the same rats. Others have reported similar findings. Thus, ethinyl E2 and SERMs lowered cholesterol at doses affecting the uterus, somatic growth and bone metabolism, but 17ß-E2 had no effect on cholesterol at doses evoking maximal effects on other targets (36, 84). Moreover, this phenomenon is not dependent on the route of drug dosing (36). Classic estrogens such as 17ß-E2, E2B, and ethinyl E2 have been thought to have equivalent pharmacodynamic actions despite differing pharmacokinetics, and act as potent agonists in most T3-independent E responses. However, the cholesterol response reveals a more complex pharmacology and defines a novel T3-independent E response. LH suppression in ovariectomized rats is another unusual T3-independent response because E2B and TM exhibit similar agonist efficacy (15).

Interactions related to lactotroph hyperplasia
Pituitary hyperplasia evoked by E2B represents another distinct E response: it was T3 dependent, but TM lacked agonist efficacy (unlike other T3-dependent responses). E2B and T3 interplay to evoke cell proliferation is tissue-specific since induction of uterine growth does not require T3 (15). The interplay is also gene specific because PRL and kallikrein induction in lactotrophs was largely T3-independent.

Pharmacological classification of in vivo E responses
E2 binding to ER{alpha} or ERß is now recognized to trigger a cascade of interactions among diverse effector molecules that ultimately evoke an E response. It is also evident that SERMs can activate ER effector mechanisms mediating some responses, while inhibiting those mediating other responses (see Refs. 4, 5, 6 for review). This differential sensitivity of ER effector mechanisms is widely recognized to provide the molecular foundation for the disparate pharmacological characteristics of different E responses. However, the pharmacological features of different in vivo E responses have not been systematically analyzed, and it’s unclear how many pharmacologically distinct classes are operative in animals and man. Such information may identify groups of in vivo E responses mediated by similar effector mechanisms, and indicate how many distinct effector mechanisms regulate physiological systems in vivo. Also, as ER ligands become available that target selective ER subtypes or effectors, it may be possible to link the pharmacological classes to specific ER effector mechanisms. Conversely, classification efforts may identify sets of in vivo E responses amenable to selective pharmacological targeting, and thus facilitate efforts to design new ER ligands with novel therapeutic actions.

Based on the present results and prior reports (16, 17, 36, 76, 77, 84), three pharmacologically distinct classes of in vivo E responses can currently be identified in the rat (Classes A, B, and C) (Table 2Go). In Class A responses, classic estrogens (E2B, 17ß-E2, ethinyl E2) act as potent agonists, and TM acts more like an antagonist (<33% agonist efficacy). In Class B responses, classic estrogens are potent agonists, and TM acts more like an agonist (>=50% agonist efficacy). In Class C responses, TM and ethinyl E2 are potent agonists, but E2B and 17ß-E2 are inactive at doses evoking maximal Class A effects.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Pharmacological classes of estrogen responses in vivo1

 
It should be noted that E effects on some targets (e.g. BMD and IGF-I) seem to involve integration of multiple classes (A and B). Moreover, the various classes may partly reflect the ER subtype involved. For example, both ER{alpha} and ERß exhibit Class A pharmacology on model genes regulated via E response elements (85, 86, 87, 88, 89). However, in models regulated by transcription factor AP-1, ER{alpha} exhibits Class B pharmacology while ERß exhibits Class C pharmacology (88); ERß also exhibits Class C pharmacology in certain other models (89). Systematic characterization of in vivo E responses using a larger number of distinctive ER ligands may further refine the pharmacological classification.


    Acknowledgments
 


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: BMD, Bone mineral density; E2B, E2 benzoate; SERMs, selective estrogen receptor modulators; TM, tamoxifen.

Received March 27, 2001.

Accepted for publication June 27, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Turner RT, Riggs BL, Spelsberg TC 1994 Skeletal effects of estrogen. Endocr Rev 15:275–300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. MacGregor JI, Jordan VC 1998 Basic guide to the mechanisms of antiestrogen action. Pharmacol Rev 50:151–196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Cosman F, Lindsay R 1999 Selective estrogen receptor modulators: clinical spectrum. Endocr Rev 20:418–434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Katzenellenbogen JA, O’Malley BW, Katzenellenbogen BS 1996 Tripartite steroid hormone receptor pharmacology: interaction with multiple effector sites as a basis for the cell- and promoter-specific action of these hormones. Mol Endocrinol 10:119–131[Free Full Text]
  5. Torchia J, Glass C, Rosenfeld MG 1998 Co-activators and co-repressors in the integration of transcriptional responses. Curr Opin Cell Biol 10:373–383[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. McDonnell DP 1999 The molecular pharmacology of SERMs. Trends Endocrinol Metab 10:301–311[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Glass CK, Holloway JM, Devary OV, Rosenfeld MG 1988 The thyroid hormone receptor binds with opposite transcriptional effects to a common sequence motif in thyroid hormone and estrogen response elements. Cell 54:313–323[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Segars JH, Marks MS, Hirschfeld S, et al. 1993 Inhibition of estrogenresponsive gene activation by the retinoid X receptor ß: evidence for multiple inhibitory pathways. Mol Cell Biol 13:2258–2268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Zhu YS, Yen PM, Chin WW, Pfaff DW 1996 Estrogen and thyroid hormone interaction on regulation of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:12587–12592[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Pernasetti F, Caccavelli L, Van de Weerdt C 1997 Thyroid hormone inhibits the human prolactin gene promoter by interfering with activating protein-1 and estrogen stimulations. Mol Endocrinol 11:986–996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Scott REM, Wu-Peng S, Yen PM, Chin WW 1997 Interactions of estrogen- and thyroid hormone receptors on a progesterone receptor estrogen response element (ERE) sequence: a comparison with the vitellogenin A2 ERE. Mol Endocrinol 11:1581–1592[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lee S-K, Choi H-S, Song M-R, Lee M-O, Lee JW 1997 Estrogen receptor, a common interaction partner for a subset of nuclear receptors. Mol Endocrinol 12:1184–1192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lopez GN, Webb P, Shinsako JH, Baxter JD, Greene GL, Kushner PJ 1999 Titration by estrogen receptor activation function-2 of targets that are downstream from coactivators. Mol Endocrinol 13:897–909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fitts JM, Klein RM, Powers CA 1998 Comparison of tamoxifen effects on the actions of triiodothyronine or growth hormone in the ovariectomized-hypothyroid rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 286:392–402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. DiPippo VA, Lindsay R, Powers CA 1995 Estradiol and tamoxifen interactions with thyroid hormone in the ovariectomized-thyroidectomized rat. Endocrinology 136:1020–1033[Abstract]
  16. DiPippo VA, Powers CA 1991 Estrogen induction of growth hormone in the thyroidectomized rat. Endocrinology 129:1696–1700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. DiPippo VA, Powers CA 1997 Tamoxifen and ICI 182,780 interactions with thyroid hormone in the ovariectomized-thyroidectomized rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 281:142–148[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. McGrath SA, Diamond T 1995 Osteoporosis as a complication of orchidectomy in 2 elderly men with prostate cancer. J Urol 154:535–537[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Townsend MF, Sanders WH, Northway RO, Graham SD 1997 Bone fractures associated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists used in the treatment of prostate carcinoma. Cancer 79:545–550[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Daniell HW 1997 Osteoporosis after orchidectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 157:439–444[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Diamond T, Campbell J, Bryant C, Lynch W 1998 The effect of combined androgen blockade on bone turnover and bone mineral density in men treated for prostate cancer: response to cyclic etidronate. Cancer 83:1561–1566[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Eriksson S, Eriksson A, Stege R, Carlstrom K 1995 Bone mineral density in patients with prostatic cancer treated with orchidectomy and with estrogens. Calcif Tissue Int 57:97–99[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Cox RL, Crawford ED 1995 Estrogens in the treatment of prostate cancer. J Urol 154:1991–1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Jansson J-O, Eden S, Isaksson O 1985 Sexual dimorphism in the control of growth hormone secretion. Endocr Rev 6:128–150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Ohlsson C, Isgaard J, Tornell J, Nilsson A, Isaksson OG, Lindahl A 1993 Endocrine regulation of longitudinal bone growth. Acta Paediatr Suppl 391:33–40
  26. Borski RJ, Tsai W, De-Mott-Friberg R, Barkan AL 1996 Regulation of somatic growth and the somatotropic axis by gonadal steroids: primary effect on insulin-like growth factor I expression and secretion. Endocrinology 137:3253–3259[Abstract]
  27. Williams GR, Robson H, Shalet SM 1998 Thyroid hormone actions on cartilage and bone: interactions with other hormones at the epiphyseal plate and effects on linear growth. J Endocrinol 157:391–403[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Jansson JO, Ekberg S, Isaksson O, Mode A, Gustafsson JA 1985 Imprinting of growth hormone secretion, body growth, and hepatic steroid metabolism by neonatal testosterone. Endocrinology 117:1881–1889[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kalu DN 1991 The ovariectomized rat model of postmenopausal bone loss. Bone Miner 15:175–192[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Thompson DD, Simmons HA, Pirie CM, Ke HZ 1995 FDA guidelines and animal models for osteoporosis. Bone 17(Suppl):125S–133S
  31. Oppenheimer JH, Schwartz HL, Shapiro HC, Bernstein G, Surks MI 1970 Differences in primary cellular factors influencing the metabolism and distribution of 3,5,3'-L-triodothyronine and L-thyroxine. J Clin Invest 49:1016–1024
  32. Powers CA, Hatala MA, Pagano PJ 1989 Differential responses of pituitary kallikrein and prolactin to tamoxifen and chlorotrianisene. Mol Cell Endocrinol 66:93–100[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Klein I 1990 Thyroid hormone and the cardiovascular system. Am J Med 88:631–637[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Marshall SM, Flyvbjerg A, Jorgensen KD, Weeke J, Orskov H 1993 Effects of growth hormone and thyroxine on kidney insulin-like growth factor-I and renal growth in hypophysectomized rats. J Endocrinol 136:399–406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Shen V, Dempster DW, Birchman R, Xu R, Lindsay R 1993 Loss of cancellous bone mass and connectivity in ovariectomized rats can be restored by combined treatment with parathyroid hormone and estradiol. J Clin Invest 91:2479–2487
  36. Lundeen SG, Carver JM, McKean M-L, Winneker RC 1997 Characterization of the ovariectomized rat model for evaluation of estrogen effects on plasma cholesterol. Endocrinology 138:1552–1558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Crawford BA, Martin JL, Howe CJ, Handelsman DJ, Baxter RC 1992 Comparison of extraction methods for insulin-like growth factor-I in rat serum. J Endocrinol 134:169–176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Hatala MA, Powers CA 1988 Glandular kallikrein in estrogen-induced pituitary tumors: time course of induction and correlation with prolactin. Cancer Res 48:4158–4162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Wakley GK, Schutte HDJ, Hannon KS, Turner RT 1991 Androgen treatment prevents loss of cancellous bone in the orchidectomized rat. J Bone Miner Res 6:325–330[Medline]
  40. Vanderschueren D, van Herck E, Suiker AM, Visser WJ, Schot LP, Bouillon R 1992 Bone and mineral metabolism in aged male rats: short and long term effects of androgen deficiency. Endocrinology 130:2906–2916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Vanderschueren D 1996 Androgens and their role in skeletal homeostasis. Hormone Res 46:95–98[Medline]
  42. Schoutens A, Verhas M, L’hermite-Baleriaux M, L’hermite M, Verschaeren A, Dourov N, Mone M, Heilporn A, Tricot A 1986 Growth and bone haemodynamic responses to castration in male rats: reversibility by testosterone. Acta Endocrinol 107:428–432
  43. Jansson J-O, Eden S, Isaksson O 1983 Sites of action of testosterone and estradiol on longitudinal bone growth. Am J Physiol 244:E135–E140
  44. Lloyd RV 1983 Estrogen-induced hyperplasia and neoplasia in the rat anterior pituitary gland: an immunohistochemical study. Am J Pathol 113:198–206[Abstract]
  45. De Nicola AF, von Lawzewitsch I, Kaplan SE, Libertun C 1978 Biochemical and ultrastructural studies on estrogen-induced pituitary tumors in F344 rats. J Natl Cancer Inst 61:753–763
  46. Holtzman S, Stone JP, Shellabarger CJ 1979 Influence of diethylstilbestrol treatment on prolactin cells of female ACI and Sprague-Dawley rats. Cancer Res 39:779–784[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Ohlsson C, Bengtsson BA, Isaksson OG, Andreassen TT, Slootweg MC 1998 Growth hormone and bone. Endocr Rev 19:55–79[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Elam MB, Wilcox HG, Solomon SS, Heimberg M 1992 In vivo growth hormone treatment stimulates secretion of very low density lipoprotein by the isolated perfused rat liver. Endocrinology 131:2717–2722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Bänsch D, Chen-Haudenschild C, Dirkes-Kersting A, Schulte H, Assmann G, von Eckardstein A 1998 Basal growth hormone levels in women are positively correlated with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I independently of insulin-like growth factor I or insulin. Metabolism 47:339–344[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Love RR, Wiebe DA, Newcomb PA, et al. 1991 Effects of tamoxifen on cardiovascular risk factors in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med 115:860–864
  51. Cuzick J, Allen D, Baum M, et al. 1993 Long term effects of tamoxifen. Eur J Cancer 29A:15–21
  52. Delmas PD, Bjarnson NH, Mitlak BH, Ravoux AC, Shah AS, Huster WJ, Draper M 1997 Effects of raloxifene on bone mineral density, serum cholesterol concentrations, and uterine endometrium in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 337:1641–1647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Love RR, Wiebe DA, Newcomb PA, et al. 1987 Effects of tamoxifen on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 326:852–856[Abstract]
  54. Thangaraju M, Kumar K, Gandhirajan R, Sachdanandam P 1994 Effect of tamoxifen on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Cancer 73:659–663[CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Davidson MB 1987 Effect of growth hormone on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Endocr Rev 8:115–131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Nanto-Salonen K, Muller H, Hoffman AR, Vu TH, Rosenfeld RG 1993 Mechanisms of thyroid hormone action on the insulin-like growth factor system: all thyroid hormone effects are not growth hormone mediated. Endocrinology 132:781–788[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Scow RO, Simpson ME, Asling CW, Li CH, Evans HM 1949 Response by the rat thyroparathyroidectomized at birth to growth hormone and to thyroxin given separately or in combination. Anat Rec 104:445–463[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Wolf M, Ingbar SH, Moses AC 1989 Thyroid hormone and growth hormone interact to regulate insulin-like growth factor-I mRNA and circulating levels in the rat. Endocrinology 125:2905–2914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Huynh HT, Tetenes E, Wallace L, Pollak M 1993 In vivo inhibition of insulin-like growth factor I gene expression by tamoxifen. Cancer Res 53:1727–1730[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Clemmons DR, Underwood LE, Ridgeway EC, Kliman B, Kjellberg RN, Van Wyk JJ 1980 Estradiol treatment of acromegaly: reduction of immunoreactive somatomedin-C and improvement of metabolic status. Am J Med 69:571–575[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Murphy LJ, Friesen HG 1988 Differential effects of estrogen and growth hormone on uterine and hepatic insulin-like growth factor I gene expression in the ovariectomized hypophysectomized rat. Endocrinology 122:325–332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Krattenmacher R, Knauthe R, Parczyk K, Walker A, Hilgenfeldt U, Fritzemeier KH 1994 Estrogen action on hepatic synthesis of angiotensinogen and IGF-I: direct and indirect estrogen effects. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 48:207–214[CrossRef][Medline]
  63. Huynh H, Nickerson T, Pollak M, Yang X 1996 Regulation of insulin-like growth factor I receptor expression by the pure antiestrogen ICI 182780. Clin Cancer Res 2:2037–2042[Abstract]
  64. Kassem M, Okazaki R, De Leon D, et al. 1996 Potential mechanism of estrogen-mediated decrease in bone formation: estrogen increases production of inhibitory insulin-like growth factor- binding protein-4. Proc Assoc Am Physicians 108:155–164[Medline]
  65. Kalu DN, Arjmandi BH, Liu CC, Salih MA, Birnbaum RS 1994 Effects of ovariectomy and estrogen on the serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3. Bone Miner 25:135–148[Medline]
  66. Yakar S, Liu JL, Stannard B, et al. 1999 Normal growth and development in the absence of hepatic insulin-like growth factor I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7324–7329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Sjogren K, Liu JL, Blad K, et al. 1999 Liver-derived insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) is the principal source of IGF-I in blood but is not required for postnatal body growth in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7088–7092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Berelowitz M, Szabo M, Frohman LA, Firestone S, Chu L, Hintz RL 1981 Somatomedin-C mediates growth hormone negative feedback by effects on both the hypothalamus and the pituitary. Science 212:1279–1281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Frohman LA, Downs TR, Chomczynski P 1992 Regulation of growth hormone secretion. Front Neuroendocrinol 13:344–405[Medline]
  70. Mundy GR, Shapiro JL, Bandelin JG, Canalis EM, Raisz LG 1976 Direct stimulation of bone resorption by thyroid hormones. J Clin Invest 58:529–534
  71. Kawaguchi H, Pilbeam CC, Woodiel FN, Raisz LG 1994 Comparison of the effects of 3,5,3'-triiodothyroacetic acid and triiodothyronine on bone resorption in cultured fetal rat long bones and neonatal mouse calvariae. J Bone Miner Res 9:247–253[Medline]
  72. Mosekilde L, Eriksen EF, Charles P 1990 Effects of thyroid hormones on bone and mineral metabolism. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 19:35–63[Medline]
  73. Allain TJ, McGregor AM 1993 Thyroid hormones and bone. J Endocrinol 139:9–18[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Schneider DL, Barrett-Connor EL, Morton DJ 1996 Thyroid hormone use and bone mineral density in elderly women. JAMA 271:1245–1249
  75. Faber J, Galloe AM 1994 Changes in bone mass during prolonged subclinical hyperthyroidism due to L-thyroxine treatment: a meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol 130:350–356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Sato M, Rippy MK, Bryant HU 1996 Raloxifene, tamoxifen, nafoxidine, or estrogen effects on reproductive and nonreproductive tissues in ovariectomized rats. FASEB J 10:905–912[Abstract]
  77. Ke HZ, Chen HK, Simmons HA, et al. 1997 Comparative effects of droloxifene, tamoxifen, and estrogen on bone, serum cholesterol, and uterine histology in the ovariectomized rat model. Bone 20:31–39[Medline]
  78. Spelsberg TC, Subramaniam M, Riggs BL, Khosla S 1999 The actions and interactions of sex steroids and growth factors/cytokines on the skeleton. Mol Endocrinol 13:819–828[Free Full Text]
  79. Sandstedt J, Tornell J, Norjavaara E, Isaksson OG, Ohlsson C 1996 Elevated levels of growth hormone increase bone mineral content in normal young mice, but not in ovariectomized mice. Endocrinology 137:3368–3374[Abstract]
  80. Green H, Morikawa M, Nixon T 1985 A dual effector theory of growth-hormone action. Differentiation 29:195–198[CrossRef][Medline]
  81. Lindahl A, Isgaard J, Carlsson L, Isaksson OG 1987 Differential effects of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I on colony formation of epiphyseal chondrocytes in suspension culture in rats of different ages. Endocrinology 121:1061–1069[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Kim HJ, Kalkhoff RK 1975 Sex steroid influence on triglyceride metabolism. J Clin Invest 56:888–896
  83. Fewster ME, Pirrie RE, Turner DA 1967 Effect of estradiol benzoate on lipid metabolism in the rat. Endocrinology 80:263–271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  84. Qu Q, Zheng H, Dahllund J, et al. 2000 Selective estrogenic effects of a novel triphenylethylene compound, FC1271a, on bone, cholesterol level, and reproductive tissues in intact and ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 141:809–820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  85. Kuiper GJM, Enmark E, Pelto-Huikko M, Nilsson S, Gustafsson JA 1996 Cloning of a novel estrogen receptor expressed in rat prostate and ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:5925–5930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  86. Watanabe T, Inoue S, Ogawa S, et al. 1997 Agonistic effect of tamoxifen is dependent on cell type, ERE-promoter context, and estrogen receptor subtype: functional difference between estrogen receptors {alpha} and ß. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 236:140–145[CrossRef][Medline]
  87. Barkhem T, Carlsson B, Nilsson Y, Gustafsson J-A 1999 Differential response of estrogen receptor {alpha} and estrogen receptor ß to partial estrogen agonists/antagonists. Mol Pharmacol 54:105–112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. Paech K, Webb P, Kuiper GGJM, et al. 1997 Differential ligand activation of estrogen receptors ER{alpha} and ERß at AP1 sites. Science 277:1508–1510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  89. Zou A, Marschke KE, Arnold KE, et al. 1999 Estrogen receptor ß activates the human retinoic acid receptor {alpha}-1 promoter in response to tamoxifen and other estrogen receptor antagonists, but not in response to estrogen. Mol Endocrinol 13:418–430[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
J. M. Fitts, R. M. Klein, and C. A. Powers
Comparison of Tamoxifen and Testosterone Propionate in Male Rats: Differential Prevention of Orchidectomy Effects on Sex Organs, Bone Mass, Growth, and the Growth Hormone-IGF-I Axis
J Androl, July 1, 2004; 25(4): 523 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
N. Vasudevan, S. Ogawa, and D. Pfaff
Estrogen and Thyroid Hormone Receptor Interactions: Physiological Flexibility by Molecular Specificity
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2002; 82(4): 923 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fitts, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fitts, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Powers, C. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*LIOTHYRONINE
*TAMOXIFEN


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals