help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tannenbaum, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Waxman, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tannenbaum, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Waxman, D. J.
Endocrinology Vol. 142, No. 11 4599-4606
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Temporal Relationship Between the Sexually Dimorphic Spontaneous GH Secretory Profiles and Hepatic STAT5 Activity

Gloria S. Tannenbaum, Hee K. Choi, Wendy Gurd and David J. Waxman

Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology and Neurosurgery (G.S.T., W.G.), McGill University, and the Neuropeptide Physiology Laboratory, McGill University-Montréal Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Montréal, Québec H3H 1P3, Canada; and Division of Cell and Molecular Biology (H.K.C., D.J.W.), Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Gloria S. Tannenbaum, Neuropeptide Physiology Laboratory, McGill University-Montreal Children’s Hospital Research Institute, 2300 Tupper Street, Montréal, Québec H3H 1P3, Canada; E-mail: gloria.tannenbaum{at}mcgill.ca, or to Dr. David J. Waxman,


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
STAT5 transduces transcriptional responses to GH in liver and other tissues and is proposed to mediate the sexually dimorphic effects of plasma GH secretory profiles on rodent liver gene expression. Previous studies have suggested that STAT5 undergoes repeated activation in direct response to successive GH pulses in adult male rats, with STAT5 activation being desensitized in females by their more persistent pattern of GH exposure. These findings, however, were based on in vitro studies or single blood samples analyzed for GH in vivo. In view of the highly pulsatile nature of rat GH secretion, we presently examined these hypotheses by concurrent monitoring of spontaneous GH secretory profiles and hepatic STAT5 activity in conscious, free-moving adult male and female rats. Rats were killed at times associated with spontaneous peaks or troughs of the GH rhythm; livers were removed and analyzed for STAT5 DNA-binding activity. In males, liver STAT5 activity was highest during the initial phase (15–60 min) of a GH secretory episode (mean ± SE relative STAT5 activity = 86.5 ± 11.4; plasma GH = 146.7 ± 22.4 ng/ml) and was significantly lower (P < 0.01) during the downswing of a pulse, 45–75 min after the GH peak (STAT5 = 26.1 ± 1.7; GH = 33.3 ± 13.1 ng/ml), consistent with a time-dependent down-regulation of GH signaling to STAT5. The lowest STAT5 activity was observed during the subsequent GH trough period (STAT5 = 3.6 ± 1.1; GH = 2.6 ± 0.1 ng/ml). In females, liver STAT5 activity was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than peak male levels during the initial phase of a GH secretory burst (STAT5 = 35.1 ± 15.9; GH = 68.1 ± 31.6 ng/ml) although similar to that of males during a plasma GH nadir (STAT5 = 11.0 ± 2.6; GH = 8.4 ± 2.2 ng/ml). We conclude that: 1) liver STAT5 is repeatedly activated by successive, spontaneous GH secretory episodes in intact adult male rats at approximately 3- to 3.5-h intervals; 2) time-dependent down-regulation of GH signaling to hepatic STAT5 in vivo begins by 45 min after GH peak stimulation; and 3) the lower level of liver STAT5 activation seen in adult female rats, compared with males, is a consequence of the sex-dependent differences in GH secretory patterns that characterize these animals (i.e. lower-amplitude GH pulses and lack of prolonged interpulse nadir of GH in the feminine, compared with masculine profile).


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE SECRETION OF GH from the pituitary gland is characterized by multiple episodic bursts. There is, however, a marked sex difference in the pattern of GH secretion in most mammalian species, including humans [see (1, 2) for review]. Particularly in the rat, the male GH secretory profile is characterized by high-amplitude GH bursts at regular 3- to 4-h intervals, separated by a prolonged (1–1.5 h) period of mostly undetectable plasma GH levels (3). In contrast, the female rat exhibits irregular, more frequent, lower-amplitude GH pulses superimposed on an elevated GH baseline (4, 5). These distinct sex differences in the temporal patterns of GH release are of biological significance because they evoke remarkable male-female differences in body growth (6, 7), liver enzyme expression (8, 9), and GH intracellular signaling pathways (10).

Many members of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) superfamily, which encode monooxygenases active in the hydroxylation of endogenous steroids and foreign chemicals, are expressed in liver in a sex-specific manner in response to the sexually dimorphic pattern of pituitary GH secretion (11, 12, 13). STAT5b, a signal transducer and activator of transcription protein that mediates transcriptional responses to a variety of cytokines, growth factors, and hormones in liver and other tissues (14, 15, 16), has been proposed to mediate the sexually dimorphic effects of plasma GH secretory profiles on liver gene expression in rodents (10). This proposal is in part based on the finding that male plasma GH pulses activate liver STAT5b to a substantially higher level than that seen in females (10) and is strongly supported by the phenotypic characteristics of male STAT5b knockout mice, which include the loss of expression of multiple male-specific, GH-regulated liver genes including CYPs (17, 18, 19, 20). The strong correlation between rat liver nuclear STAT5 activity (primarily in the form of STAT5b) and the presence of significant GH levels in plasma at the time of liver removal (21) further suggested that STAT5 undergoes repeated activation by tyrosine phosphorylation in direct response to successive GH pulses in male rats. By contrast, the activation of liver STAT5 by plasma GH stimulation in female rats is considerably weaker and is proposed to be a consequence of down-regulation of STAT5 activation by the more persistent exposure to GH that occurs in females (22).

The earlier experiments leading to the proposal that liver STAT5 signaling is directly responsive to the temporal pattern of plasma GH stimulation, described above, were based on in vitro studies or single blood samples of GH obtained at the time of liver excision. In view of the highly pulsatile nature of GH secretion in the rat, a more direct test of these hypotheses requires an examination of the temporal relationship between the spontaneously occurring GH pulses and liver STAT5 activity in individual male and female rats. In the present study, we addressed this question by concurrently monitoring spontaneous GH secretory profiles and hepatic STAT5 activity in conscious free-moving adult male and female rats under normal physiological conditions.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and experimental procedures
Adult male (250–375 g) and female (230–250 g) Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from Charles River Canada (St. Constant, Québec, Canada) and individually housed in an isolated room under a rigidly controlled 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle (lights on: 0600–1800 h) in a temperature- (22 ± 1 C) and humidity-controlled environment. Purina rat chow (Ralston Purina, St. Louis, MO) and tap water were available ad libitum. Chronic intracardiac venous cannulas were implanted under sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, ip) anesthesia using a previously described technique (3). After surgery, the rats were placed directly in isolation test chambers with food and H2O freely available until body weight returned to preoperative levels (usually within 5–7 d).

On the day of the experiment, blood samples (0.3 ml) were withdrawn every 15 min starting at 0800 h until the rats were killed by decapitation at either 1100 h or 1300 h. These times were chosen because they correspond to typical peak and trough periods of GH secretion, respectively, in male rats maintained under the above photoperiodic conditions, as previously established in this laboratory (3, 23). All blood samples were immediately centrifuged, and the plasma was separated and stored at -20 C for subsequent assay of GH. To avoid hemodynamic disturbance, the red blood cells were resuspended in normal saline and returned to the animal after removal of the next blood sample. At death, the livers were immediately removed, frozen in isopentane at -40 C, and stored at -80 C until analysis of STAT5 activity. All animal-based procedures were approved by the McGill University Animal Care Committee.

Preparation of whole-liver homogenates
Approximately 200–400 mg of frozen rat liver tissue was homogenized at 4 C in a Dounce tissue grinder (10 strokes) in 2 ml of ice-cold homogenization buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.6, l mM EDTA, 250 mM sucrose) containing a mixture of protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors (22). Samples were centrifuged at 9000 rpm for 20 min at 4 C in a Sorvall RC-5C centrifuge. Supernatants were aliquoted, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 C. Little or no STAT5 DNA-binding activity was present in the pellet fraction.

EMSA analysis
STAT5 DNA binding was measured by EMSA using a double-stranded DNA probe corresponding to the STAT5/mammary gland factor response element of the rat ß-casein promoter, 5'-GGA-CTT-CTT-GGA-ATT-AAG-GGA-3' (sense strand, nucleotides -101 to -80). The sense strand was end labeled with 32P using T4 polynucleotide kinase, annealed to the antisense strand, and then purified on a BioSpin 30 chromatography column. Whole-liver homogenates (30 µg) were assayed for EMSA activity as described (22). EMSA gels were dried and exposed to PhosphorImager plates for 1–3 d. Radioactive band intensities were quantitated and analyzed on a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) using ImageQuant software. Background PhosphorImager values (typically corresponding to 2–5% of a maximal male liver STAT5 signal) were determined based on the average of 2–4 blank regions from each gel and were subtracted from all samples on the gel to yield net activity values. Values are expressed as a percentage of a standard high STAT5 activity male rat liver sample or the average of several such male rat liver samples. The high STAT5 activity male rat liver reference samples used for quantitation of STAT5 DNA-binding activity in the present study were the same standards used in our two previous studies (21, 22).

Hormone assays
Plasma GH concentrations were measured in duplicate by double-antibody RIA using materials supplied by the NIDDK Hormone Distribution Program (Bethesda, MD). The averaged plasma GH values are reported in terms of the rat GH reference preparation rGH RP-2. The standard curve was linear between 0.62 and 320 ng/ml; the least detectable concentration of plasma GH under the conditions used was 1.2 ng/ml. The intraassay and interassay coefficients of variation were 7.7% and 10.7%, respectively, for duplicate samples of pooled plasma containing a mean GH concentration of 60.7 ng/ml.

Statistical analyses
ANOVA, followed by unpaired t tests, were used for statistical comparisons between experimental groups. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the degree of relation between plasma GH concentrations and hepatic STAT5 activity levels. Results are expressed as mean ± SE. P< 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Temporal relationship between GH secretory pattern and hepatic STAT5 DNA-binding activity in adult male rats
Figure 1Go illustrates spontaneous plasma GH profiles of six individual adult male rats killed during various phases of the GH rhythm; their corresponding liver STAT5 DNA-binding activities are shown in Fig. 2Go. The typical pulsatile pattern of GH secretion characteristic of the male rat (3) was evident in all animals, with major episodes of GH release occurring at 3- to 4-h intervals (mean ± SE GH pulse amplitude: 211 ± 3.9 ng/ml); in the intervening trough periods lasting approximately 1.5 h, plasma GH levels were mostly undetectable (<1.2 ng/ml) (Fig. 1Go, A–C). Liver STAT5 DNA-binding activity (Fig. 2Go) was highest during the initial phase of a GH secretory episode (15–60 min after pulse initiation) (Fig. 1Go, rats J1, J10; also see rats T10 and T11, Fig. 2Go). By contrast, livers of animals killed during a GH trough period (90–120 min after the GH peak) exhibited an extremely weak STAT5 signal (rats T16, J4 and T17). Intermediate liver STAT5 activity was observed in rats killed during the downswing of a GH pulse (~45–75 min after the GH peak; rats T15, J6 and J9; Figs. 1Go and 2Go).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Individual representative plasma GH profiles of adult male rats killed during either the upswing (A) or downswing (B) of a GH secretory episode or during a GH trough period (C). Arrows indicate the time the rats were killed and liver excision for STAT5 activity analysis.

 


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. STAT5 DNA-binding activity assayed in livers of individual adult male rats whose GH secretory profiles are shown in Fig. 1Go. EMSAs were carried out using whole-liver homogenates prepared from individual livers as described in Materials and Methods. Also included are four additional liver samples, whose GH secretory profiles are not shown in Fig. 1Go (lanes 3, 4, 7, and 10). The signal shown for sample T11 (lane 4) is representative of the active male liver STAT5 standard (=103% of the male standard).

 
Comparison of the liver STAT5 activity values measured during the three phases of the GH secretion rhythm revealed that the mean liver STAT5 activity (86.5 ± 11.4) during the upswing of a GH pulse, occurring approximately 3–3.5 h after the preceding GH secretory episode, was significantly higher than that observed during the GH pulse downswing (26.1 ± 1.7; P < 0.01) or the GH trough period (3.6 ± 1.1; P < 0.001) (Fig. 3Go; STAT5 activities expressed as a percent of a maximal male liver STAT5 response). A significant correlation between the plasma GH level and relative hepatic STAT5 activity at the time of liver excision was observed (r = 0.94; P < 0.001).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Mean plasma GH profiles and mean relative hepatic STAT5 activity levels (percent of maximal male response) in male rats during various phases of the GH rhythm. STAT5 activity was highest during the initial phase (15–60 min) of a GH secretory episode (A) and was lowest during the GH trough period (C). Intermediate STAT5 activity was observed during the downswing of a pulse, 60 min after the GH peak (B). Values are the mean ± SE. Arrows indicate time the rats were killed and liver excision. The number of animals in each group is shown in parentheses. a, P < 0.01 vs. GH pulse upswing; b, P < 0.001 vs. GH pulse upswing and downswing

 
Relationship between GH secretory pattern and hepatic STAT5 DNA-binding activity in adult female rats
Individual plasma GH profiles of female rats killed during times of either GH peak or GH baseline concentrations and their corresponding liver STAT5 DNA-binding activities are shown in Figs. 4Go and 5Go, respectively. Female rats exhibited the characteristic female pattern of GH secretion, with lower-amplitude, more frequent GH pulses occurring at approximately 1-h intervals (mean ± SE GH pulse amplitude: 111.6 ± 21.6 ng/ml; P < 0.05, compared with males), separated by an elevated baseline GH concentration (Fig. 4Go, A–F). In contrast to the males, plasma GH levels in these animals rarely reached undetectable levels. Liver STAT5 DNA-binding activity was greater in female rats killed during a GH peak period (rats T2, T25, and T24) than during the GH baseline period (rats T1, T8, and T4) (Fig. 5Go). Although the mean relative STAT5 activity level in females during a spontaneous GH peak (35.0 ± 15.9) was higher than that observed during the GH baseline (11.0 ± 2.6) (Fig. 6Go), this difference did not reach statistical significance.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Individual representative plasma GH profiles of adult female rats killed during either the time of a GH peak (A–C) or during the GH baseline period (D–F). Arrows indicate the time the rats were killed and liver excision.

 


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. STAT5 DNA-binding activity assayed in livers of the individual adult female rats whose GH secretory profiles are shown in Fig. 4Go. EMSA assays were carried out using whole-liver homogenates prepared from individual livers as described in Materials and Methods. Also included are four additional liver samples, whose GH secretory profiles are not shown in Fig. 4Go (lanes 3, 4, 7, and 8).

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Mean plasma GH profiles and relative hepatic STAT5 activity in female rats. Liver STAT5 activity levels (percent of maximal male response) in females were lower than peak male levels during the initial phase of a GH secretory burst (A) although similar to those of males during a plasma GH nadir (B). Values are the mean ± SE. Arrows indicate the times the rats were killed. The number of animals in each group is shown in parentheses.

 
Comparisons across sexes revealed that, in females, liver STAT5 activity at the time of a GH peak was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that observed in males during the initial phase of a GH secretory burst, although baseline STAT5 activity in females was similar to that of males during a GH trough period. There was no significant correlation between the plasma GH level and hepatic STAT5 DNA-binding activity in females (r = 0.27; P > 0.1), in contrast to that observed in males.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The sexual dimorphism of GH secretory patterns, discovered more than two decades ago in the rat and subsequently observed in other mammalian species, including humans, is an important determinant of a number of physiological responses to GH, including pubertal body growth rate and liver gene expression. Earlier studies aimed at defining the distinct signaling elements in male and female plasma GH patterns recognized by the liver, a major target of GH action, suggested that the time interval between plasma GH pulses is a key feature, with a minimum GH off-time required to elicit a male liver response (24). Elucidation of the molecular events and intracellular signals that underlie this response has been advanced by the discovery that the transcription factor STAT5b, which can be activated by a variety of cytokines and growth factors, including GH, is not only more strongly activated by GH in the livers of male, compared with female rats (10), but is essential for the sexually dimorphic effects of GH as well (17). Liver STAT5b activity in individual male rats is strongly correlated with the presence of significant levels of GH in blood based on single blood samples obtained at the time of liver excision, leading to the hypothesis that STAT5b may be directly activated by each succeeding plasma GH pulse, such that pulsatile plasma GH induces a pulsatile STAT5 signal (10, 21). The present study tests this hypothesis in a rigorous fashion by concurrent monitoring of spontaneous GH secretory profiles and hepatic STAT5 activity in conscious, free-moving adult rats.

The results reported here provide strong evidence that, in male rats under physiological conditions, each incoming male GH pulse, occurring approximately 3–3.5 h after the preceding GH secretory episode, strongly stimulates the activation of STAT5 (primarily STAT5b) in liver tissue. Liver STAT5 activity, which was highest during the initial phase (15–60 min) of a GH secretory episode, was found to be down-regulated as a function of time after the onset of GH pulse stimulation, such that by the conclusion of the secretory burst (typically 90–120 min after its peak), little or no STAT5 activity was detectable (Fig. 3CGo). This finding accounts for our earlier observation of very low liver STAT5 activity in male rats killed when plasma GH levels are less than 3.7 ng/ml (21), which is presently shown to correspond to a GH trough period. The time dependence of the down-regulation of liver STAT5 signaling, evidenced by the intermediate STAT5 activity measured in rats sampled during the GH pulse downswing (45–75 min after GH peak stimulation), is consistent with the observation in cultured liver cells that the activation of GH receptor-JAK2 signaling by GH induces a series of events that culminate in the down-regulation and termination of receptor-dependent signaling to STAT5b (25). These signal termination events begin by approximately 45 min after the initial GH stimulus and are dependent on protein synthesis and proteosome activity (25, 26, 27). These two requirements appear to reflect the involvement of suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS and CIS) proteins (28), which are rapidly synthesized following the initial GH stimulatory event and can inhibit GH receptor-JAK2 signaling by multiple mechanisms (29, 30), including a proteosome-dependent degradation mechanism (31). Other studies point to the additional involvement of specific protein tyrosine phosphatases, such as SHP-1 and PTP-1B in the termination of STAT5 signaling (32, 33, 34).

Liver STAT5 activation in adult female rats and in male rats administered an exogenous female-like pattern of GH stimulation is substantially lower than in untreated males (22). This low female liver STAT5 activity was proposed to reflect a down-regulation of GH receptor-JAK2 signaling, as indicated by the down-regulation of signaling that is observed in vivo upon continuous infusion of GH (10, 22) or in cultured liver cells treated with GH continuously for less than or equal to 2–3 h (26, 27). The present observation that liver STAT5 activity in female rats is significantly lower than peak male levels, even during the initial phase of a GH secretory burst, and similar to that observed in males during the downswing of a GH pulse, provides strong support for this proposal. Liver STAT5 activity in female rats sampled during a plasma GH nadir was 3-fold higher than the corresponding male GH trough period STAT5 activity, consistent with studies showing STAT5 signaling to be low, but not absent, in liver cells treated with GH continuously (35). The female plasma GH pattern thus desensitizes hepatic STAT5 signaling only partially. The low STAT5 signal seen in liver cells treated with GH continuously is maintained only so long as GH continues to be present in the culture medium, reflecting a need to continuously reactivate signaling to STAT5, presumably in the form of newly formed active GH receptor-JAK2 signaling complexes (26). The physiological significance of the low-level STAT5 signal induced by GH in female liver is uncertain but may include some of the body growth effects of GH and activation of a subset of female-expressed CYPs (19) or other liver-expressed genes.

STAT5b is activated by a specific phosphorylation of tyrosine residue 699, which induces dimerization, nuclear translocation, and DNA binding of the transcriptionally active STAT. GH-activated STAT5b (35) as well as cytokine-activated STAT1 (36) cycle back to the cytoplasm, where they are reutilized rather than degraded at the conclusion of a hormone/cytokine stimulatory event. Consequently, the strong positive correlation between the plasma GH profile and the activation status of liver STAT5 seen in male rats in the present study provides strong evidence that STAT5 actively and repeatedly shuttles approximately every 3–3.5 h from the cytoplasm into the nucleus and then back out to the cytoplasm, in direct response to each successive GH secretory burst—a key determinant being the long period of low or no plasma GH in the masculine profile, which permits the resensitization of GH receptor signaling (24) by JAK-STAT cascades. The pulsatility of the extracellular GH stimulus thus generates a pulsatile, intracellular STAT5 signal leading to the nucleus. Whether this pulsatile signal stimulates a pulsatile transcriptional response of STAT5 target genes remains to be established.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Brigitte Moreau and Geneviève Parent for excellent technical assistance, Christopher Wiwi for assistance in carrying out EMSA analyses, Julie Temko and Mary Penwarden for manuscript preparation, and the National Hormone and Peptide Program, NIDDK, and Dr. A. F. Parlow for the generous provision of rat GH RIA materials.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Grant MT-15440 (to G.S.T.) from the Medical Research Council of Canada and by NIH Grant DK-33765 (to D.J.W.). G.S.T. holds a Chercheur de Carrière Award from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec.

Abbreviations: CYP, Cytochrome P450; STAT5, a signal transducer and activator of transcription protein that mediates transcriptional responses to a variety of cytokines.

Received June 8, 2001.

Accepted for publication July 18, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jansson JO, Ekberg S, Isaksson O 1985 Sexual dimorphism in the control of growth hormone secretion. Endocr Rev 6:128–150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Giustina A, Veldhuis JD 1998 Pathophysiology of the neuroregulation of GH secretion in experimental animals and the human. Endocr Rev 19:717–797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Tannenbaum GS, Martin JB 1976 Evidence for an endogenous ultradian rhythm governing growth hormone secretion in the rat. Endocrinology 98:562–570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Edén S 1979 Age- and sex-related differences in episodic growth hormone secretion in the rat. Endocrinology 105:555–560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Painson J-C, Tannenbaum GS 1991 Sexual dimorphism of somatostatin and growth hormone-releasing factor signaling in the control of pulsatile growth hormone secretion in the rat. Endocrinology 128:2858–2866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Jansson J-O, Albertsson-Wikland K, Edén S, Thorngren K-G, Isaksson O 1982 Circumstantial evidence for a role of the secretory pattern of growth hormone in control of body growth. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 99:24–30[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Robinson ICAF, Clark RG 1987 The secretory pattern of GH and its significance for growth in the rat. In: Isaksson O, Binder C, Hall K, Hökfelt B, eds. Growth hormone—basic and clinical aspects. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 109–127
  8. Sundseth SS, Alberta JA, Waxman DJ 1992 Sex-specific, growth hormone-regulated transcription of the cytochrome P450 2C11 and 2C12 genes. J Biol Chem 267:3907–3914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Legraverend C, Mode A, Westin S, Strom A, Eguchi H, Zaphiropoulos PG, Gustafsson J-A 1992 Transcriptional regulation of rat P-450 2C gene subfamily members by the sexually dimorphic pattern of growth hormone secretion. Mol Endocrinol 6:259–266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Waxman DJ, Ram PA, Park SH, Choi HK 1995 Intermittent plasma growth hormone triggers tyrosine phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of a liver-expressed, Stat 5-related DNA binding protein. Proposed role as an intracellular regulator of male-specific liver gene transcription. J Biol Chem 270:13262–13270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Waxman DJ 1992 Regulation of liver-specific steroid metabolizing cytochromes P450: cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase, bile acid 6ß-hydroxylase, and growth hormone-responsive steroid hormone hydroxylases. J Steroid Biochem Molec Biol 43:1055–1072[CrossRef]
  12. Mode A 1993 Sexually differentiated expression of genes encoding the P4502C cytochromes in rat liver - a model system for studying the action of growth hormone. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 46:77–86[Medline]
  13. Shapiro BH, Agrawal AK, Pampori NA 1995 Gender differences in drug metabolism regulated by growth hormone. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 27:9–20[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Grimley PM, Dong F, Rui H 1999 Stat5a and Stat5b: fraternal twins of signal transduction and transcriptional activation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 10:131–157[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Darnell JEJ 1997 STATs and gene regulation. Science 277:1630–1635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Herrington J, Smit LS, Schwartz J, Carter-Su C 2000 The role of STAT proteins in growth hormone signaling. Oncogene 19:2585–2597[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Udy GB, Towers RP, Snell RG, Wilkins RJ, Park SH, Ram PA, Waxman DJ, Davey HW 1997 Requirement of STAT5b for sexual dimorphism of body growth rates and liver gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7239–7244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Teglund S, McKay C, Schuetz E, van Deursen JM, Stravopodis D, Wang D, Brown M, Bodner S, Grosveld G, Ihle JN 1998 Stat5a and Stat5b proteins have essential and nonessential, or redundant, roles in cytokine responses. Cell 93:841–850[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Park SH, Liu X, Hennighausen L, Davey HW, Waxman DJ 1999 Distinctive roles of STAT5a and STAT5b in sexual dimorphism of hepatic P450 gene expression. Impact of Stat5a gene disruption. J Biol Chem 274:7421–7430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Davey HW, Park SH, Grattan DR, McLachlan MJ, Waxman DJ 1999 STAT5b-deficient mice are growth hormone pulse-resistant: role of STAT5b in sex-specific liver P450 expression. J Biol Chem 274:35331–35336[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Choi HK, Waxman DJ 2000 Plasma growth hormone pulse activation of hepatic JAK-STAT5 signaling: developmental regulation and role in male-specific liver gene expression. Endocrinology 141:3245–3255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Choi HK, Waxman DJ 1999 Continuous GH, but not prolactin, maintains low-level activation of STAT5a and STAT5b in female rat liver. Endocrinology 140:5126–5135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Tannenbaum GS, Ling N 1984 The interrelationship of growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor and somatostatin in generation of the ultradian rhythm of GH secretion. Endocrinology 115:1952–1957[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Waxman DJ, Pampori NA, Ram PA, Agrawal AK, Shapiro BH 1991 Interpulse interval in circulating growth hormone patterns regulates sexually dimorphic expression of hepatic cytochrome P450. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:6868–6872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Gebert CA, Park S-H, Waxman DJ 1999 Termination of growth hormone pulse-induced STAT5b signaling. Mol Endocrinol 13:38–56[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Gebert CA, Park S-H, Waxman DJ 1999 Down-regulation of liver JAK2-STAT5b signaling by the female plasma pattern of continuous growth hormone stimulation. Mol Endocrinol 13:213–227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Fernandez L, Flores-Morales A, Lahuna O, Silva D, Norstedt G, Haldosen LA, Mode A, Gustafsson JA 1998 Desensitization of the growth hormone-induced Janus kinase 2 (Jak 2)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (Stat5)-signaling pathway requires protein synthesis and phospholipase C. Endocrinology 139:1815–1824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Yoshimura A 1998 The CIS family: negative regulators of JAK-STAT signaling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 9:197–204[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Ram PA, Waxman DJ 1999 SOCS/CIS protein inhibition of growth hormone-stimulated STAT5 signaling by multiple mechanisms. J Biol Chem 274:35553–35561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Hansen JA, Lindberg K, Hilton DJ, Nielsen JH, Billestrup N 1999 Mechanism of inhibition of growth hormone receptor signaling by suppressor of cytokine signaling proteins. Mol Endocrinol 13:1832–1843[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ram PA, Waxman DJ 2000 Role of the cytokine-inducible SH2 protein CIS in desensitization of STAT5b signaling by continuous growth hormone. J Biol Chem 275:39487–39496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Hackett RH, Wang YD, Sweitzer S, Feldman G, Wood WI, Larner AC 1997 Mapping of a cytoplasmic domain of the human growth hormone receptor that regulates rates of inactivation of Jak2 and Stat proteins. J Biol Chem 272:11128–11132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Ram PA, Waxman DJ 1997 Interaction of growth hormone-activated STATs with SH2-containing phosphotyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 and nuclear JAK2 tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem 272:17694–17702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Aoki N, Matsuda TA 2000 Cytosolic protein-tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B specifically dephosphorylates and deactivates prolactin-activated STAT5a and STAT5b. J Biol Chem 275:39718–39726[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Gebert CA, Park SH, Waxman DJ 1997 Regulation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 5b activation by the temporal pattern of growth hormone stimulation. Mol Endocrinol 11:400–414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Haspel RL, Salditt-Georgieff M, Darnell JEJ 1996 The rapid inactivation of nuclear tyrosine phosphorylated Stat1 depends upon a protein tyrosine phosphatase. EMBO J 15:6262–6268[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. D. Meyer, E. V. Laz, T. Su, and D. J. Waxman
Male-Specific Hepatic Bcl6: Growth Hormone-Induced Block of Transcription Elongation in Females and Binding to Target Genes Inversely Coordinated with STAT5
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2009; 23(11): 1914 - 1926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. Ohlsson, S. Mohan, K. Sjogren, A. Tivesten, J. Isgaard, O. Isaksson, J.-O. Jansson, and J. Svensson
The Role of Liver-Derived Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2009; 30(5): 494 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
E. V. Laz, A. Sugathan, and D. J. Waxman
Dynamic in Vivo Binding of STAT5 to Growth Hormone-Regulated Genes in Intact Rat Liver. Sex-Specific Binding at Low- But Not High-Affinity STAT5 Sites
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2009; 23(8): 1242 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
D. J. Waxman and M. G. Holloway
Sex Differences in the Expression of Hepatic Drug Metabolizing Enzymes
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2009; 76(2): 215 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. M. Oldham, C. C. Osepchook, F. Jeanplong, S. J. Falconer, K. G. Matthews, J. V. Conaglen, D. F. Gerrard, H. K. Smith, R. J. Wilkins, J. J. Bass, et al.
The decrease in mature myostatin protein in male skeletal muscle is developmentally regulated by growth hormone
J. Physiol., February 1, 2009; 587(3): 669 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
V. Wauthier and D. J. Waxman
Sex-Specific Early Growth Hormone Response Genes in Rat Liver
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2008; 22(8): 1962 - 1974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. V. Laz, M. G. Holloway, C.-S. Chen, and D. J. Waxman
Characterization of Three Growth Hormone-Responsive Transcription Factors Preferentially Expressed in Adult Female Liver
Endocrinology, July 1, 2007; 148(7): 3327 - 3337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
C. Gardmo and A. Mode
In vivo transfection of rat liver discloses binding sites conveying GH-dependent and female-specific gene expression
J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 37(3): 433 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. Anzulovich, A. Mir, M. Brewer, G. Ferreyra, C. Vinson, and R. Baler
Elovl3: a model gene to dissect homeostatic links between the circadian clock and nutritional status
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 2690 - 2700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
D. J. Waxman and C. O'Connor
Growth Hormone Regulation of Sex-Dependent Liver Gene Expression
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 20(11): 2613 - 2629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. H. Clodfelter, M. G. Holloway, P. Hodor, S.-H. Park, W. J. Ray, and D. J. Waxman
Sex-Dependent Liver Gene Expression Is Extensive and Largely Dependent upon Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5b (STAT5b): STAT5b-Dependent Activation of Male Genes and Repression of Female Genes Revealed by Microarray Analysis
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 20(6): 1333 - 1351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
C. Thangavel, W. Dworakowski, and B. H. Shapiro
INDUCIBILITY OF MALE-SPECIFIC ISOFORMS OF CYTOCHROME P450 BY SEX-DEPENDENT GROWTH HORMONE PROFILES IN HEPATOCYTE CULTURES FROM MALE BUT NOT FEMALE RATS
Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2006; 34(3): 410 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
X. Bonnefont, A. Lacampagne, A. Sanchez-Hormigo, E. Fino, A. Creff, M.-N. Mathieu, S. Smallwood, D. Carmignac, P. Fontanaud, P. Travo, et al.
Revealing the large-scale network organization of growth hormone-secreting cells
PNAS, November 15, 2005; 102(46): 16880 - 16885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Landsman and D. J. Waxman
Role of the Cytokine-induced SH2 Domain-containing Protein CIS in Growth Hormone Receptor Internalization
J. Biol. Chem., November 11, 2005; 280(45): 37471 - 37480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. He, K. Loesch, J. W. Cowan, X. Li, L. Deng, X. Wang, J. Jiang, and S. J. Frank
Janus Kinase 2 Enhances the Stability of the Mature Growth Hormone Receptor
Endocrinology, November 1, 2005; 146(11): 4755 - 4765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. A. Wiwi and D. J. Waxman
Role of Hepatocyte Nuclear Factors in Transcriptional Regulation of Male-specific CYP2A2
J. Biol. Chem., February 4, 2005; 280(5): 3259 - 3268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. E. Rowland, A. M. Lichanska, L. M. Kerr, M. White, E. M. d'Aniello, S. L. Maher, R. Brown, R. D. Teasdale, P. G. Noakes, and M. J. Waters
In Vivo Analysis of Growth Hormone Receptor Signaling Domains and Their Associated Transcripts
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 66 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
E. V. Laz, C. A. Wiwi, and D. J. Waxman
Sexual Dimorphism of Rat Liver Nuclear Proteins: Regulatory Role Of Growth Hormone
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2004; 3(12): 1170 - 1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. C. Brelje, L. E. Stout, N. V. Bhagroo, and R. L. Sorenson
Distinctive Roles for Prolactin and Growth Hormone in the Activation of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5 in Pancreatic Islets of Langerhans
Endocrinology, September 1, 2004; 145(9): 4162 - 4175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. A. Wiwi, M. Gupte, and D. J. Waxman
Sexually Dimorphic P450 Gene Expression in Liver-Specific Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4{alpha}-Deficient Mice
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2004; 18(8): 1975 - 1987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. G. Miquet, A. I. Sotelo, A. Bartke, and D. Turyn
Suppression of Growth Hormone (GH) Janus Tyrosine Kinase 2/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5 Signaling Pathway in Transgenic Mice Overexpressing Bovine GH
Endocrinology, June 1, 2004; 145(6): 2824 - 2832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
F. Tronche, C. Opherk, R. Moriggl, C. Kellendonk, A. Reimann, L. Schwake, H. M. Reichardt, K. Stangl, D. Gau, A. Hoeflich, et al.
Glucocorticoid receptor function in hepatocytes is essential to promote postnatal body growth
Genes & Dev., March 1, 2004; 18(5): 492 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-H. Park and D. J. Waxman
Inhibitory Cross-talk between STAT5b and Liver Nuclear Factor HNF3beta . IMPACT ON THE REGULATION OF GROWTH HORMONE PULSE-STIMULATED, MALE-SPECIFIC LIVER CYTOCHROME P-450 GENE EXPRESSION
J. Biol. Chem., November 9, 2001; 276(46): 43031 - 43039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Schwartz
Editorial: Pulsatile Hormone Patterns Governing Transcription Factor Function
Endocrinology, November 1, 2001; 142(11): 4595 - 4598.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tannenbaum, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Waxman, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tannenbaum, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Waxman, D. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals