help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, N.
Right arrow Articles by Meidan, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levy, N.
Right arrow Articles by Meidan, R.
Endocrinology Vol. 142, No. 12 5254-5260
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


REPRODUCTION-DEVELOPMENT

Distinct Cellular Localization and Regulation of Endothelin-1 and Endothelin-Converting Enzyme-1 Expression in the Bovine Corpus Luteum: Implications for Luteolysis

Nitzan Levy, Miri Gordin, Roni Mamluk, Masashi Yanagisawa, Michael F. Smith, Jim H. Hampton and Rina Meidan

Department of Animal Sciences (N.L., M.G., R.Ma., R.Me.), Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel; Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Genetics (M.Y.), University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235; and Department of Animal Sciences (M.F.S., J.H.H.), University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Rina Meidan, Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel. E-mail: rina.meidan{at}huji.ac.il


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Endothelin-1 (ET)-1 within the corpus luteum (CL) is rapidly up-regulated during natural or PGF2{alpha}-induced luteolysis; however, such an increase was not observed at early luteal stage, when the CL is refractory to PGF2{alpha}. The mature and active form of ET-1 is derived from the inactive intermediate peptide, big ET-1, by ET-converting enzyme (ECE)-1. This study therefore examined the developmental and cell-specific expression of ECE-1 in bovine CL. A significant, 4-fold, elevation in ECE-1 expression (mRNA and protein levels) occurred during the transition of the CL from early to midluteal phase. Analysis using in-situ hybridization and enriched luteal cell subpopulations showed that both steroidogenic and endothelial cells of the CL expressed high levels of ECE-1 mRNA; prepro ET-1 mRNA, on the other hand, was only expressed by resident endothelial cells. These data suggest that luteal parenchymal and endothelial cells may cooperate in the biosynthesis of mature bioactive ET-1. In the mature CL, ECE-1 mRNA increase occurred both in steroidogenic and endothelial cells and was accompanied by a significant rise in ET-1 peptide. However, in contrast to ECE-1, prepro ET-1 mRNA levels were similar in early and midluteal-phase CL. Low ECE-1 levels during the early luteal phase, restricting the production of active ET-1, may explain why the immature CL is able to withstand PGF2{alpha}-induced luteolysis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ENDOTHELIN (ET)-1, ORIGINALLY isolated from porcine aortic endothelial cells (1), belongs to a structurally homologous peptide family, which includes ET-2, ET-3, and sarafotoxins (2). These peptides bind two distinct subtypes of G protein-coupled receptors, termed ETA and ETB (3, 4).

ET-1, initially identified as a potent vasoconstrictor (1), has diverse biological functions. Studies carried out in recent years have demonstrated that ET-1 is involved in the process of luteal regression (5, 6). These studies showed that prepro ET-1 (ppET-1) mRNA and peptide levels are rapidly up-regulated during natural or PGF2{alpha}-induced luteolysis (7, 8, 9). Elevated ET-1, acting via the selective ETA binding sites, caused a dose-dependent inhibition of basal and LH/human CG-stimulated biosynthesis of progesterone and an increase in PGF2{alpha}. These observations were made in ovine, bovine, and human luteal cells (6, 10, 11, 12, 13). In accordance with the inhibitory role of ET-1 in corpus luteum (CL) function, we have recently reported that the expression of ETA receptors was inversely correlated with steroidogenesis in luteal cells, namely factors that stimulated steroidogenesis inhibited ETA receptor levels (14). Blocking ET-1 action by means of ETA antagonists decreased the antisteroidogenic effects of PGF2{alpha} under both in vitro (10) and in vivo (5, 6) conditions. The administration of either ET-1 or a subluteolytic dose of PGF2{alpha} to ewes and cows significantly reduced progesterone concentrations of jugular venous blood without shortening of luteal life span; however, the combination of these treatments acted synergistically to produce complete luteolysis (6, 15). Collectively, these data strongly support the concept that ET-1 plays a significant, physiological role during luteolysis.

ET-1 is synthesized from a precursor of approximately 200 amino acids (aa), which is proteolytically cleaved into big ET-1 (38 aa) and further processed to the active form of ET-1 (21 aa) by ET-converting enzyme (ECE) (16, 17). Unlike the mature form of ET-1, the big ET-1 precursor has negligible biological activity (16). There are 2 separate ECE genes, termed ECE-1 and ECE-2 (17, 18). Both enzymes are zinc-binding metalloendopeptidases, but they function at different optimal pH levels and are different in tissue distribution. ECE-2 is more abundant in neural tissues, whereas ECE-1 is present in a wide variety of tissues (17, 19). ECE-1 mRNA levels in steroidogenic tissues (adrenals, ovaries, and testis) are significantly higher than those in the traditional ET-1-producing tissues, such as kidney, lung, and heart (17). Tripiciano and colleagues (20) recently reported that the cyclic contraction of the seminiferous tubules, which is regulated by ET-1, is mediated by a cyclic expression of ECE-1 in Sertoli cells. These data suggest that the spatial (cellular) and temporal patterns of ECE-1 expression can have profound effects on ET-1 bioavailability.

This study was therefore undertaken to investigate the developmental and cell-specific expression of ECE-1 and ppET-1 in bovine CL during the early and midluteal phases of the estrous cycle.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
SuperScriptII RNase H- Reverse Transcriptase and Ultra pure electrophoresis agarose gel were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD). Deoxynucleotide triphosphates, random hexamer oligodeoxynucleotides, and Taq DNA polymerase were from Farmentas (Vilnius, Lithuania). Oigonucleotide primers were synthesized by Bio-Technology General Corp. (Rehovot, Israel); Dulbecco’s modified MEM: Ham’s F12 1:1 (vol/vol), M-199 nutrient mixture, bovine Big ET-1, phosphoramidon, protease inhibitor cocktail for mammalian cell extracts, and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). C18 cartridges were from Waters Corp. (Milford, MA); Bandeiraea Simplicifolia Lectin-1 (BS-1) was from Vector Laboratories, Inc. (Burlingame, CA); collagenase type IV was from Worthington Biochemical Corp. (Freehold, NJ); and uncoated magnetic beads (Dynabeads M-450) were from Dynal (Oslo, Norway).

CL Collection
CL were collected at a local slaughter house, and luteal stage was determined by macroscopic examination, as described by M. J. Fields and P. A. Fields (21). CL were divided into two groups: early luteal phase (d 2–4) and midluteal phase (d 9–14). For studies involving luteal RNA extractions, CL were frozen in liquid N2 immediately after slaughter.

Luteal cell dispersion and purification
CL were dispersed using collagenase as previously described (22). Briefly, CL were washed, sliced with a tissue slicer, and preincubated in a shaking bath at 37 C for 10 min in M-199 media. Slices were than incubated in M-199 containing 0.5% BSA and collagenase (420 U/ml). Every 10 min, dissociated cells were removed, and fresh media containing collagenase was added. This procedure was repeated 7–8 times. Magnetic tosylactivated beads were coated with BS-1 lectin [0.15 mg/ml, expressed in bovine endothelial cells (23)] for 24 h at room temperature. The beads were than washed and stored at 4 C until use. Dispersed luteal cells were suspended in 1% BSA in PBS, mixed with beads at a bead:endothelial cell ratio of 1:3, and incubated for 25 min at 4 C on a rocking platform. The adherent cells were washed with 1% PBS and concentrated using a magnet until the supernatant was free of cells. Both BS-1-positive cells and nonadherent cells (BS-1-negative) were collected for RNA extraction.

Follicular cell isolation and cultures
Ovaries were obtained at slaughter; granulosa and theca cells were isolated from healthy bovine preovulatory follicles, as previously described (24). To induce luteinization, granulosa and theca cells were cultured in the presence of 1% FCS, insulin (2 µg/ml), and forskolin (10 µM). Total RNA was extracted on the ninth day of culture.

RNA extraction and semiquantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from cells and tissues using the guanidinium thiocyanate method (25). Semiquantitative RT-PCR was performed as previously described (22), with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH) as an internal standard. Sequence analysis or restriction mapping ascertained the identity of the PCR products. Alternative splicing of the ECE-1 gene at the 5' end produces four isoforms (26). Therefore, primers for ECE-1 were designed to span the 3' region of the gene (1277–1906). Sequence analysis showed that these primers do not amplify ECE-2. Computer searches and sequence alignments were performed by using software from Genetics Computer Group (Madison, WI). A list of primers is presented in Table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Primer list

 
In situ hybridization
Procedures for in situ hybridization were as previously described (27). A 550-bp cDNA-encoding bovine ECE-1 was generated using RT-PCR. The cDNA was ligated into pGEM-T-Easy vector (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) and sequenced. Both antisense and sense [35S]uridine triphosphate-labeled cRNA probes (107 cpm/ml) were transcribed from linearized cDNA templates using a transcription kit (Promega Corp.) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Hybridization was performed using 100 µl diluted probe in a humidified oven at 55 C for 20 h. After hybridization, slides were washed twice by shaking in double-strength saline sodium citrate (SSC) (45-52 C) for 15 min at room temperature and were treated with ribonuclease (RNase-A; 50 mg/ml in double-strength SSC) for 1 h at 37 C. Slides were then washed at 55 C in double-strength SSC containing 0.1% ß-mercaptoethanol (BME) for 15 min, in single-strength SSC/0.1% BME for 15 min, in single-strength SSC/50% formamide/0.1% BME for 30 min, and twice in 0.1-strength SSC/BME for 15 min each. The slides were dehydrated, air-dried, dipped in NTB-2 emulsion (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY), and exposed for 21 d at 4 C. Slides were developed, lightly counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin, and mounted for microscopic examination. For each CL, two sections were hybridized with the antisense probe, and one section was hybridized to the sense probe. Sections from animals ovariectomized at different times were balanced in each hybridization run to minimize bias caused by variation among runs. Hybridization intensity was measured using the Bioquant image analyses system (R&M Biometrics, Nashville, TN); the image analysis system determined the number of graphic pixels occupied by the silver grains.

Determination of ET-1 and big ET-1 peptide concentrations
ET-1 concentrations in CL extracts and in culture media were determined with double-antibody enzyme immunoassays (EIAs; 9, 11). ET-1 extraction was carried out as previously described (7). Tissues were homogenized in 10 vol 1-M acetic acid and boiled. Homogenates were centrifuged, and the supernatants were loaded on C18 cartridges preequilibrated with 1 M acetic acid. The adsorbed materials were eluted with 3 ml 60% acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The eluates were evaporated in vacuum to dryness and dissolved in EIA buffer. The values of ET-1 measured in tissue extracts were corrected for recovery losses (the recovery -56 ± 3.0% was determined using synthetic ET-1 added to CL extracts). The ED50 of the assay was 450 pg/ml. Cross-reactivity of ET-1 antiserum with synthetic ET-1, ET-2, ET-3, and big ET-1 were 100%, 50%, 22%, and 3%, respectively.

Big ET-1 concentrations in CL extracts (obtained as described above) were determined using an enzyme-linked immunoassay kit (Biomedica, Vienna, Austria). The ED50 of big ET-1 assay was 20.9 pg/ml. The cross-reactivity of ET-1 was lower than 1%.

Evaluation of ECE activity
Granulosa and theca-derived luteal cells were incubated in M-199 medium containing 0.5% BSA alone, or with the addition of big ET-1 (100 nM) in the presence or absence of phosphoramidon, a metalloprotease inhibitor (17) (10 µM) for 24 h. ET-1 concentrations in supernatants were determined by EIA.

Western analyses
CL were homogenized in lysis buffer [20 mM Tris HCl, pH8.6; 1% SDS; phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 mM); and protease inhibitor cocktail] and were immediately boiled for 10 min. After chilling, homogenates were centrifuged for 15 min at 2000 x g, and protein concentrations of the supernatant were determined using DC reagents (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). Samples containing 10 µg protein were separated by 7.5% SDS/PAGE, under reducing conditions, and were electrically transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Inc., Keene, NH). After 2 h blocking [in TBST (20 mM Tris HCl buffered saline containing 0–15% Tween-20) containing 5% BSA], membranes were incubated with anti-ECE-1 antiserum (produced at M. Yanagisawa’s lab, Ref. 18), directed against ECE1 C-terminal peptide for 2 h. The membranes reacted with primary antibodies (diluted 1:4000), were washed, and than incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG for 1 h at room temperature, and binding was detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Western blots were exposed to x-ray films and subsequently scanned and quantitated using NIH Image (version 1.61).

Statistical analyses
Data are presented as means ± SEM. The expression of the various genes was quantified using the densitometric analysis, relative to an internal standard (G3PDH). Statistical analysis was carried out using the JMP package [version 3.2; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC (28)]. One-way ANOVA was used to determine the statistical significance of individual groups, as indicated in the text. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expression of ppET-1 and ECE-1 during early and midluteal phases
We first determined the expression of ET-1 during early and midluteal stages. ET-1 peptide concentrations in early CL tissue (d 2–4) were 7-fold lower than in CL at the midluteal phase (d 9–14; P < 0.02, Fig. 1Go). Surprisingly, however, levels of ppET-1 mRNA were similar during the early and midluteal phases. This large discrepancy between ppET-1 mRNA expression and the levels of the mature ET-1 peptide form could indicate that ECE-1 expression varies with CL age. Indeed, as demonstrated in Fig. 2Go, ECE-1 expression, measured at both the mRNA (Fig. 2BGo) and the protein level (Fig. 2AGo), were 3- to 4-fold higher in CL collected at midcycle vs. CL in the early luteal phase. In agreement with these findings, concentrations of big ET-1 at early luteal phase were higher than those measured at midcycle CL (5.9 ± 1.22 vs. 3.4 ± 0.02 pg/mg protein, P < 0.05, respectively); and the ratio of ET-1/big ET-1, reflecting ECE-1 activity, increased from 0.28 (early luteal phase) to 3.54 (mature CL).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Luteal ET-1 expression during the early and midbovine luteal phases. ppET-1 mRNA levels were determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR using G3PDH as an internal standard. ET-1 peptide concentrations in CL extracts were determined by EIA. *, Significant statistical difference (P < 0.02) between early and midluteal phases.

 


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. ECE-1 expression during early and midluteal phases. A, ECE-1 mRNA levels (determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR using G3PDH as an internal standard); left panel, inverse picture of ethidium bromide stained agarose gel shows a typical RT-PCR reaction with two replicates; right panel, bars, means ± SEM of the densitometric analysis (n = 6 for each luteal stage). B, ECE-1 protein levels; left panel, Western blot using specific anti-ECE-1 antibody, showing a typical reaction with two replicates; right panel, densitometric analysis of the ECL stained 130-kD bands; bars, means ± SEM of four samples for each stage of the cycle; *, significant statistical difference (P < 0.01).

 
Cellular localization of ECE-1 and ppET-1 mRNA during early and midluteal phases
The CL is a heterogeneous tissue, containing mainly endothelial and steroidogenic cell types. Therefore, it was of interest to determine the cellular localization of ppET-1 and ECE-1 in this gland. Early and mature CL tissues were enzymatically dispersed, and endothelial cells were enriched by the use of magnetic beads coated with the endothelial cell-specific lectin, BS-1, as detailed in Materials and Methods. The identification of BS-1 positive cells as endothelial cells was confirmed by presence of the endothelial cell marker, CD31 (29) (Fig. 3AGo). The elevated CD31 expression in total dispersed cells at midcycle indicates a higher proportion of endothelial cells at this stage and is in agreement with other studies (30). As expected, the levels of CD31 in enriched endothelial cells of early and midcycle CL were similar (Fig. 3AGo). The remaining BS-1 negative cells comprised an enriched steroidogenic cell population, as judged by the high mRNA levels of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR; Fig. 3BGo). Purity of endothelial and steroidogenic cell fractions was estimated using these two cell-specific markers, CD31 and StAR; BS-1 positive cells expressed only 3–5% of the steroidogenic cell marker, and BS-1 negative cells expressed 1–3% of the endothelial cells marker.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. mRNA levels of CD31 (A) and StAR (B) in luteal cell populations enriched from early luteal (early, e) and midluteal (mature, m) phase CL. Dispersed cells (enzymatically dispersed CL cells), BS-1 positive cells (cells adherent to BS-1-coated magnetic beads), BS-1 negative cells (nonadherent cells). mRNA levels were determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR using G3PDH as an internal standard. Data are the means ± SEM (n = 4 for each luteal stage) of the densitometric analysis. *, Significant (P < 0.05) statistical difference between young and mature CL.

 
We then determined levels of ppET-1 and ECE-1 in these two cell fractions at various stages of CL development; ppET-1 mRNA was mainly localized to the endothelial cell fraction (Fig. 4AGo), both in early and mature CL. In accord with data presented in Fig. 1Go, ppET-1 mRNA levels were similar in dispersed cells of CL collected at early and midluteal phases. In contrast, the endothelial cell fraction derived from the mature CL expressed lower levels of ppET-1 (which were not statistically significant; P < 0.06) than the corresponding endothelial cell fraction at early cycle. The difference between total dispersed CL cells and enriched endothelial cells is perhaps a result of two opposing events during CL maturation: an increase in endothelial cell number, and a decrease in ppET-1 mRNA per endothelial cell. Unlike ppET-1, the ECE-1 mRNA levels were expressed to a similar level by both steroidogenic and endothelial cell fractions (Fig. 4BGo). ECE-1 mRNA levels increased significantly as the CL matured, and this increment was observed both in the steroidogenic and endothelial cells (Fig. 4BGo). The finding that the mature CL contains higher levels of ECE-1 mRNA is consistent with the data obtained from nondispersed CL tissues (Fig. 2Go). To visualize the cellular localization of ECE-1 in intact luteal tissue, in situ hybridization with an antisense probe to ECE-1 was performed (Fig. 5Go). In excellent agreement with data obtained using enriched luteal cell preparations (Fig. 4Go), in situ hybridization studies showed that ECE-1 mRNA was localized to both the endothelial cell layer of blood vessels and to parenchymal cells of CL; this was observed both at early and midluteal phases (Fig. 5Go, A and C). Also in accordance with data presented in Figs. 2Go and 4Go, lower hybridization of the ECE-1 probe was observed in early vs. mature CL (320 ± 61 and 634 ± 35 arbitrary units, respectively; Fig. 5Go, A and C). No specific hybridization was observed when hybridizing with the sense probe (Fig. 5EGo).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. mRNA levels of ppET-1 (A) and ECE-1 (B) in luteal cell populations enriched from early luteal and midluteal phase CL. For details, refer to legend to Fig. 4Go. *, Significant (P < 0.05) statistical difference between young and mature CL.

 


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Detection of ECE-1 mRNA in sections of bovine CL by in situ hybridization of a [35S]cRNA probe; Darkfield (A, C) and brightfield (B, D) views of early and mature CL. Both luteal (L) and endothelial cells (EC) expressed ECE-1; surrounding smooth muscle cells were negative. The intensity of ECE-1 mRNA hybridization was higher in midcycle CL then in early CL. E, Darkfield view of a midcycle CL hybridized with the sense probe, showing no specific hybridization.

 
mRNA expression and bioactivity of ECE-1 in steroidogenic luteal cells
Because the methods used above could not determine whether both steroidogenic luteal cells express ECE-1 gene, we have determined its presence in granulosa and theca-derived luteal cells obtained after in vitro luteinization. Data presented in Fig. 6AGo, show that ECE-1 mRNA was readily detectable in both of these luteal cell types. To examine whether these cells indeed express the enzymatic activity, exogenous big bovine ET-1 was added to the culture medium; Both cells types efficiently converted big ET-1 into mature ET-1 (Fig. 6BGo). Addition of the metalloprotease inhibitor, phosphoramidon, which inhibits ECE activity, significantly inhibited the production of ET-1 peptide (Fig. 6BGo).



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. mRNA expression and biological activity of ECE-1 in luteinized granulosa cells (LGC) and luteinized theca cells (LTC). A, Detection of ECE-1 mRNA by RT-PCR, two replicates; B, conversion of big ET-1. Luteinized granulosa and theca cells were incubated in medium containing big ET-1 (0.1 µM) in the presence or absence of phosphoramidon (10 µM) for 24 h at 37 C. ET-1 concentrations were determined by EIA, as detailed in Materials and Methods. *, Significant (P < 0.01) statistical difference of the respective cell types treated with big ET-1 alone.

 
Together, the findings presented in Figs. 4BGo, 5Go, and 6Go indicate that luteal steroidogenic cells express functional ECE-1 capable of producing mature ET-1 peptide.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study shows that ECE-1 mRNA was expressed by both steroidogenic and endothelial cells of the bovine CL, whereas ppET-1 mRNA was only expressed by the resident endothelial cells. Additionally, ECE-1, but not ppET-1, increased during the transition of the CL from early to midluteal phase. The increment in ECE-1 levels (mRNA and protein) was accompanied by increased ET-1 peptide concentrations.

ET-1 plays an important role in the female reproductive cycle: its quick ascent during luteal regression (7, 8, 9), ability to inhibit steroidogenesis in vitro and in vivo (6, 10, 11, 13), combined with the observation that the luteolytic effects of PGF2{alpha} were decreased by pretreatment with a ETA antagonists (6, 10), suggest that this peptide functions as an important element of the luteolytic cascade. In addition, ET-1 may act to prevent premature luteinization of follicular cells (31). Hence, changes in spatial and/or temporal expression of ppET-1 and ECE-1, which modulate ET-1 peptide levels, could affect processes such as ovulation and the establishment of pregnancy. Moreover, given the short half-life of ET-1, the cellular localization of ECE-1 may determine its bioavailability in various ovarian compartments.

ET-1 is synthesized by the endothelium of virtually all blood vessels and in nonvascular cell types such as cardiac myocytes, adrenal zona glumerulosa cells, and testicular Sertoli cells (32, 33, 34). These cells express both ppET-1 and ECE-1 genes, so that a single cell type is presumably capable of producing bioactive ET-1 peptide. Steroidogenic cells of the CL are unique in that they express high levels of ECE-1 mRNA, whereas ppET-1 is undetectable. This observation has two important implications: that parenchymal and endothelial cells within the CL may cooperate in the biosynthesis of mature bioactive ET-1; also, that conversion of big ET-1 into active ET-1, adjacent to its site of action (the ETA receptor) on the plasma membrane of a steroidogenic cell (14), may be necessary to ensure that short-lived, mature ET-1 is active. The findings demonstrating that ECE-1 -/- mice had a phenotype similar to that of ET-1 or ETA deficient mice, despite the presence of substantial amounts of mature ET-1 peptide (35), support the notion that to achieve its biological effect, ET-1 must be produced within a physiologically relevant microenvironment.

ECE-1 knockout mice and also the double, ECE-1 and -2 knockouts, contained immunoreactive ET-1, suggesting that other peptidases are also capable of converting big ET1. Indeed, it was shown that matrix metalloproteinase-2 (36) and chymase (37) can cleave big ET-1; nevertheless, it should not be ignored that these ECE knockout mice had developmental defects, such as mice lacking ET-1, indicating the importance of ECE-1 in the generating bioavailable ET-1.

The existence of several different isoforms of ECE-1 that are transcribed from a single gene by alternative promoters was reported (26). These forms have comparable enzymatic activity, but they differ in their intracellular localization. Whereas some are highly expressed on the cell surface, others are almost exclusively intracellular (38). The identity of ECE-1 isoforms in steroidogenic cells is still unknown; however, because steroidogenic luteal cells can cleave exogenous big ET-1 and do not express ppET-1, they may express the isoform confined to the plasma membrane. However, further investigation is warranted to characterize ECE-1 isoforms in steroidogenic cells.

Using various detection methods (Figs. 2Go, 4Go, and 5Go), we were able to demonstrate that, as the CL matures, an increase in ECE-1 expression and activity occurs. Increased ECE-1 expression in endothelium may be attributed to the presence of vascular endothelial growth factor in the mature CL (30), as demonstrated previously for this cell type (39). What may cause such an increase in steroidogenic cells is still unknown. The transcription of ECE-1 in different luteal cell types, steroidogenic and endothelial, would allow for cell type- specific regulation of the enzyme, so that the gland could accommodate the varying needs for ET-1 under different physiological conditions.

Genetic manipulation studies have demonstrated that changes in ECE-1 expression can affect ET-1 biosynthesis (35, 40). Nevertheless, only a small number of studies have demonstrated such regulatory roles for ECE-1 under physiological conditions. Tripiciano et al. (20) reported that rhythmic tubular contractility of testicular tissue was controlled by cyclic expression of ECE-1, restricting the production of mature ET-1 to a defined zone during appropriate developmental stages of the tissue. An analogous event is reported here for CL development. The increase in ET-1 peptide in midcycle CL was accompanied by increased expression of ECE-1. Because ppET-1 mRNA did not rise concurrently, these results also suggest that ECE-1 expression may restrict ET-1 biosynthesis at this stage of the cycle. Conversely, during luteal regression, when ET-1 peptide concentrations again increase (7, 8), ppET-1 mRNA rises in parallel (7, 9), whereas ECE-1 mRNA remains unchanged (Levy and Meidan, data not shown). Therefore, our results may indicate that the significance of ppET-1 and ECE-1 expression to ET-1 biosynthesis could vary throughout CL life span: ECE-1 plays an important role at early luteal phase; and ppET-1, possibly at later stages of the cycle.

The mechanism by which PGF2{alpha} exerts its luteolytic effects was a subject of vigorous research in recent years; and several mediators [NO (41), luteal PGF2{alpha} (42), voltage-activated sodium channels (43), reactive oxygen species (44), and ET-1 (6, 9, 15)] were all implicated in this phenomenon. However, the other facet of this process, namely the refractory nature of the immature CL to the luteolytic actions of PGF2{alpha}, has remained unresolved. We have recently shown that, in contrast to the responsive CL during midcycle, neither ET-1 nor ETA-R mRNA were elevated when a luteolytic dose of PGF2{alpha} was administered early in the cycle. The current study also points out the importance of uninterrupted ET-1 biosynthesis to the process of luteal regression. Low ECE-1 levels during the early luteal phase restrict the production of active ET-1. If ET-1 functions as an essential mediator of PGF2{alpha} actions, then its absence may result in CL being unable to respond to this PG. However, not only was ET-1 peptide very low in the untreated early CL, but PGF2{alpha} injection failed to increase its levels (9). Low ECE-1 levels could also account for this phenomenon; during luteolysis, there is a sustained increase in ET-1 peptide concentrations (8). This increase is driven by an autoregulatory positive feedback mechanism, in which ET-1 in itself (45), and ET-1-induced hypoxia (46), synergize in stimulating ppET-1 transcription. These would drastically augment ET-1 production, provided that sufficient amounts of ECE-1 are present. In the early CL, low ECE-1 levels may limit the propagation of the positive feedback loop, causing the early CL to be refractory to the luteolytic actions of PGF2{alpha}.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful to Dr. Anna Grazul-Bilska for helpful advice concerning luteal endothelial cell enrichment procedure, to Dr. E. Girsh for his help in the ET-1 determinations, and to Dr. D. Wolfenson and Mr. Z. Roth for their help in ovary collection.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by a grant from the United States-Israel Binational Agricultural Research & Development Foundation.

Abbreviations: aa, Amino acid; BME, ß-mercaptoethanol; BS-1, Bandeiraea simplicifolia lectin-1; CL, corpus luteum; ECE, ET-converting enzyme; EIA, antibody enzyme immunoassay; ET, endothelin; G3PDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ppET-1, prepro ET-1; SSC, saline sodium citrate; StAR, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein.

Received February 13, 2001.

Accepted for publication August 22, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, Mitsui Y, Kobayashi M, Watanabe T, Masaki T 1988 A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature 332:411–415[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Yanagisawa M, Masaki T 1989 Biochemistry and molecular biology of the endothelins. Trends Pharmacol Sci 10:374–378[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Arai H, Hori S, Aramori I, Ohkubo H, Nakanishi S 1990 Cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding an endothelin receptor. Nature 348:730–732[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Sakurai T, Yanagisawa M, Takuwa Y, Miyazaki H, Kimura S, Goto K, Masaki T 1990 Cloning of a cDNA encoding a nonisopeptide-selective subtype of the endothelin receptor. Nature 348:732–735[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Meidan R, Milvae RA, Weiss S, Levy N, Friedman A 1999 Intra-ovarian regulation of luteolysis. J Reprod Fertil (Suppl 54):217–228
  6. Hinckly ST, Milvae RA 2001 Endothelin-1 mediates prostaglandin F2{alpha}- induced luteal regression in the ewe. Biol Reprod 64:1619–1623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Girsh E, Wang W, Mamluk R, Arditi F, Friedman A, Milvea RA, Meidan R 1996 Regulation of endothelin-1 expression in the bovine corpus luteum: elevation by prostaglandin F2{alpha}. Endocrinology 137:5191–5196[Abstract]
  8. Ohtani M, Kobayashi S, Miyamoto A, Hayashi K, Fukui Y 1998 Real time relationships between intraluteal and plasma concentrations of endothelin, oxytocin, and progesterone during prostaglandin F2{alpha}-induced luteolysis in the cow. Biol Reprod 58:103–108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Levy N, Kobayashi S, Roth Z, Wolfenson D, Miyamoto A, Meidan R 2000 Administration of prostaglandin F2{alpha} during the early bovine luteal phase does not alter the expression of ET-1 and of its type A receptor: a possible cause for corpus luteum refractoriness. Biol Reprod 63:377–382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Girsh E, Milvae RA, Wang W, Meidan R 1996 Effect of endothelin-1 on bovine luteal cell function: role in prostaglandin F2{alpha} induced anti-steroidogenic action. Endocrinology 137:1306–1312[Abstract]
  11. Miyamoto A, Kobayashi S, Arata S, Ohtani M, Fukui Y, Schams D 1997 Prostaglandin F2{alpha} promotes the inhibitory effects of endothelin-1 on the bovine luteal function in-vitro. J Endocrinol 152:R7–R11
  12. Miceli F, Minici F, Garcia PM, Navarra P, Proto C, Mancuso S, Lanzone A, Apa R 2001 Endothelins enhance prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2{alpha}) biosynthesis and release by human luteal cells: evidence of a new paracrine/autocrine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:811–817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Apa R, Miceli F, de Feo D, Pierro E, Ayala G, Mancuso S, Napolitano M, Lanzone A 1998 Endothelin-1: expression and role in human corpus luteum. Am J Reprod Immunol 40:370–376
  14. Mamluk R, Levy N, Rueda B, Davis JS, Meidan R 1999 Characterization and regulation of type A endothelin receptor gene expression in bovine luteal cell types. Endocrinology 140:2110–2116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Miyamoto A, Naoko O, Ohtani M 2001 Effect of endothelin-1 on functional luteolysis in the cow. Biol Reprod 64(Suppl 1):232 (Abstract)
  16. Okada K, Miyazaki Y, Takada J, Matsuyama K, Yamaki T, Yano M 1990 Conversion of big endothelin-1 by membrane-bound metalloendopeptidase in cultured bovine endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 171:1192–1198[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Xu D, Emoto N, Giaid A, Slaughter C, Kaw S, deWit D, Yanagisawa M 1994 ECE-1: a membrane-bound metalloprotease that catalyzes the proteolytic activation of big endothelin-1. Cell 78:473–485[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Emoto N, Yanagisawa M 1995 Endothelin-converting enzyme-2 is a membrane-bound, phosphoramidon-sensitive metalloprotease with acidic pH optimum. J Biol Chem 270:15262–15268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Korth P, Bohle RM, Corvol P, Pinet F 1999 Cellular distribution of endothelin-converting enzyme-1 in human tissues. J Histochem Cytochem 47:447–462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Tripiciano A, Peluso C, Morena AR, Palombi F, Stefanini M, Ziparo E, Yanagisawa M, Filippini A 1999 Cyclic expression of endothelin-converting enzyme-1 mediates the functional regulation of seminiferous tubule contraction. J Cell Biol 145:1027–1038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Fields MJ, Fields PA 1996 Morphological characteristics of the bovine corpus luteum during the estrous cycle and pregnancy. Theriogenology 45:1295–1325
  22. Mamluk R, Chen D, Greber Y, Davis J, Meidan R 1998 Characterization of prostaglandin F2{alpha} and LH receptors mRNA expression in different bovine luteal cell types. Biol Reprod 58:849–856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Goede V, Schmidt T, Kimmina S, Kozian D, Augustin HG 1998 Analysis of blood vessel maturation processes during cyclic ovarian angiogenesis. Lab Invest 78:1385–1394[Medline]
  24. Meidan R, Girsh E, Blum O, Aberdam E 1990 In vitro differentiation of bovine theca and granulosa cells into small and large luteal-like cells: morphological and functional characteristics. Biol Reprod 43:913–921[Abstract]
  25. Chomoczynsky P, Sacchi N 1987 Single step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159[Medline]
  26. Turner A, Barnes K, Schweizer A, Valdenaire O 1998 Isoforms of endothelin-converting enzyme: why and where? Trends Pharmacol Sci 19:483–486[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Xu Z, Garverick HA, Smith GW, Smith MF, Hamilton SA, Youngquist RS 1995 Expression of messenger ribonucleic acid encoding cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage, cytochrome p450 17{alpha}-hydroxylase, and cytochrome P450 aromatase in bovine follicles during the first follicular wave. Endocrinology 136:981–989[Abstract]
  28. SAS Institute 1994 JMP Statistics and graphics guide. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis System Institute, Inc
  29. Vecchi A, Garlanda C, Lampugnani MG, Resnati M, Matteucci C, Stoppacciaro A, Schnurch H, Risau W, Ruco L, Mantovani A 1994 Monoclonal antibodies specific for endothelial cells of mouse blood vessels: their application in the identification of adult and embryonic endothelium. Eur J Cell Biol 63:247–254[Medline]
  30. Reynolds LP, Grazul Bilska AT, Redmer DA 2000 Angiogenesis in the corpus luteum. Endocrine 12:1–9[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Flores JA 2000 Gene expression of endothelin-1 in the porcine ovary: follicular development. Biol Reprod 63:1377–1382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Serneri GG, Cecioni I, Vanni S, Paniccia R, Bandinelli B, Vetere A, Janming X, Bertolozzi I, Boddi M, Lisi GF, Sani G, Modesti PA 2000 Selective up-regulation of cardiac endothelin system in patients with ischemic but not idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: endothelin-1 system in the human failing heart. Circ Res 86:377–385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Mathieu MN, Hamroun D, Pouzeratte Y, Guerineau NC, Guillon G, Chevillard C 1998 Adrenal steroid-secreting cells express endothelin-1. Endocr Res 24:743–747[Medline]
  34. Maggi M, Barni T, Orlando C, Fantoni G, Finetti G, Vannelli GB, Mancina R, Gloria L, Bonaccorsi L, Yanagisawa M 1995 Endothelin-1 and its receptors in human testis. J Androl 16:213–224[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Yanagisawa H, Yanagisawa M, Kapur RP, Richardson JA, Williams SC, Clouthier DE, deWit D, Emoto N, Hammer RE 1998 Dual genetic pathways of endothelin-mediated intercellular signaling revealed by targeted disruption of endothelin converting enzyme-1 gene. Development 125:825–836[Abstract]
  36. Fernandez PC, Radomski MW, Davidge ST 1999 Vascular matrix metalloproteinase-2 cleaves big endothelin-1 yielding a novel vasoconstrictor. Circ Res 85:906–911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Nakano A, Kishi F, Minami K, Wakabayashi H, Nakaya Y, Kido H 1997 Selective conversion of big endothelins to tracheal smooth muscle-constricting 31-amino acid-length endothelins by chymase from human mast cells. J Immunol 159:1987–1992[Abstract]
  38. Emoto N, Nurhantari Y, Alimsardjono H, Xie J, Yamada T, Yanagisawa M, Matsuo M 1999 Constitutive lysosomal targeting and degradation of bovine endothelin-converting enzyme-1a mediated by novel signals in its alternatively spliced cytoplasmic tail. J Biol Chem 274:1509–1518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Matsuura A, Kawashima S, Yamochi W, Hirata K, Yamaguchi T, Emoto N, Yokoyama M 1997 Vascular endothelial growth factor increases endothelin-converting enzyme expression in vascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 235:713–716[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Telemaque S, Emoto N, deWit D, Yanagisawa M 1998 In vivo role of endothelin-converting enzyme-1 as examined by adenovirus-mediated overexpression in rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 31(Suppl 1):S548–S550
  41. Jaroszewski JJ, Hansel W 2000 Intraluteal administration of a nitric oxide synthase blocker stimulates progesterone and oxytocin secretion and prolongs the life span of the bovine. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 224:50–55[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Tsai SJ, Wiltbank MC 1998 Prostaglandin F2{alpha} regulates distinct physiological changes in early and mid-cycle bovine corpora lutea. Biol Reprod 58:346–352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Bulling A, Berg FD, Berg U, Duffy DM, Stouffer RL, Ojeda SR, Gratzl M, Mayerhofer A 2000 Identification of an ovarian voltage-activated Na+-channel type: hints to involvement in luteolysis. Mol Endocrinol 14:1064–1074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Riley J, Behrman HR 1991 In vivo generation of hydrogen peroxide in the rat corpus luteum during luteolysis. Endocrinology 128:1749–1753[Abstract]
  45. Saito S, Hirata Y, Imai T, Marumo F 1995 Autocrine regulation of the endothelin-1 gene in rat endothelial cells. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 26(Suppl 3): S84–S87
  46. Aversa CR, Oparil S, Caro J, Li H, Sun SD, Chen YF, Swerdel MR, Monticello TM, Durham SK, Minchenko A, Lira SA, Webb ML 1997 Hypoxia stimulates human preproendothelin-1 promoter activity in transgenic mice. Am J Physiol 273:L848–L855



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. J Cannon, J. S Davis, and J. L Pate
The class II major histocompatibility complex molecule BoLA-DR is expressed by endothelial cells of the bovine corpus luteum
Reproduction, May 1, 2007; 133(5): 991 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
D. H. Townson
Immune cell-endothelial cell interactions in the bovine corpus luteum
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 46(6): 1055 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Rosiansky-Sultan, E. Klipper, K. Spanel-Borowski, and R. Meidan
Inverse Relationship between Nitric Oxide Synthases and Endothelin-1 Synthesis in Bovine Corpus Luteum: Interactions at the Level of Luteal Endothelial Cell
Endocrinology, November 1, 2006; 147(11): 5228 - 5235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
E. Klipper, N. Levy, T. Gilboa, L. Muller, and R. Meidan
Identification of a novel alternatively spliced variant endothelin converting enzyme-1 lacking a transmembrane domain.
Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 723 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Meidan, E. Klipper, T. Gilboa, L. Muller, and N. Levy
Endothelin-converting Enzyme-1, Abundance of Isoforms a-d and Identification of a Novel Alternatively Spliced Variant Lacking a Transmembrane Domain
J. Biol. Chem., December 9, 2005; 280(49): 40867 - 40874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. Kisliouk, H. Podlovni, K. Spanel-Borowski, O. Ovadia, Q.-Y. Zhou, and R. Meidan
Prokineticins (Endocrine Gland-Derived Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and BV8) in the Bovine Ovary: Expression and Role as Mitogens and Survival Factors for Corpus Luteum-Derived Endothelial Cells
Endocrinology, September 1, 2005; 146(9): 3950 - 3958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Sen, E. Choudhary, E. K. Inskeep, and J. A. Flores
Effects of Selective Protein Kinase C Isozymes in Prostaglandin2{alpha}-Induced Ca2+ Signaling and Luteinizing Hormone-Induced Progesterone Accumulation in the Mid-Phase Bovine Corpus Luteum
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2005; 72(4): 976 - 984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E. Choudhary, A. Sen, E. K. Inskeep, and J. A. Flores
Developmental Sensitivity of the Bovine Corpus Luteum to Prostaglandin F2{alpha} (PGF2{alpha}) and Endothelin-1 (ET-1): Is ET-1 a Mediator of the Luteolytic Actions of PGF2{alpha} or a Tonic Inhibitor of Progesterone Secretion?
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 633 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E. Klipper, T. Gilboa, N. Levy, T. Kisliouk, K. Spanel-Borowski, and R. Meidan
Characterization of endothelin-1 and nitric oxide generating systems in corpus luteum-derived endothelial cells
Reproduction, October 1, 2004; 128(4): 463 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M Ohtani, S Takase, M P B Wijayagunawardane, M Tetsuka, and A Miyamoto
Local interaction of prostaglandin F2{alpha} with endothelin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} on the release of progesterone and oxytocin in ovine corpora lutea in vivo: a possible implication for a luteolytic cascade
Reproduction, January 1, 2004; 127(1): 117 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. Kisliouk, N. Levy, A. Hurwitz, and R. Meidan
Presence and Regulation of Endocrine Gland Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/Prokineticin-1 and Its Receptors in Ovarian Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 3700 - 3707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
N. Levy, M. Gordin, M. F. Smith, O. U. Bolden-Tiller, and R. Meidan
Hormonal Regulation and Cell-Specific Expression of Endothelin-Converting Enzyme 1 Isoforms in Bovine Ovarian Endothelial and Steroidogenic Cells
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2003; 68(4): 1361 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
H. Funke-Kaiser, F. Reichenberger, K. Kopke, S.-M. Herrmann, J. Pfeifer, H.-D. Orzechowski, W. Zidek, M. Paul, and E. Brand
Differential binding of transcription factor E2F-2 to the endothelin-converting enzyme-1b promoter affects blood pressure regulation
Hum. Mol. Genet., February 15, 2003; 12(4): 423 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Muller, A. Barret, E. Etienne, R. Meidan, O. Valdenaire, P. Corvol, and C. Tougard
Heterodimerization of Endothelin-converting Enzyme-1 Isoforms Regulates the Subcellular Distribution of This Metalloprotease
J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(1): 545 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, N.
Right arrow Articles by Meidan, R.