help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freemark, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freemark, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, P. A.
Endocrinology Vol. 142, No. 2 532-537
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Body Weight and Fat Deposition in Prolactin Receptor-Deficient Mice1

Michael Freemark, Don Fleenor, Phyllis Driscoll, Nadine Binart and Paul A. Kelly

Departments of Pediatrics (M.F., D.F., P.D.) and Cell Biology (M.F.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710; and INSERM U-344, Faculté de Médecine Necker, Paris, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Michael Freemark, Department of Pediatrics, Box 3080, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710. E-mail: freem001{at}mc.duke.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To explore the roles of the lactogens in adipose tissue development and function, we measured body weight, abdominal fat content, and plasma leptin concentrations in a unique model of lactogen resistance: the PRL receptor (PRLR)-deficient mouse. The absence of PRLRs in knockout mice was accompanied by a small (5–12%), but progressive, reduction in body weight after 16 weeks of age. Females were affected to a greater degree than males. The reduction in weight in female PRLR-deficient mice (age 8–9 months) was associated with a 49% reduction in total abdominal fat mass and a 29% reduction in fat mass expressed as a percentage of body weight. Lesser reductions were noted in male mice. Plasma leptin concentrations were reduced in females but not in males. That the reductions in abdominal fat may reflect in part the absence of lactogen action in the adipocyte is suggested by the demonstration of PRLR messenger RNA in normal mouse white adipose tissue. Nevertheless, steady state levels of PRLR messenger RNA in mature adipocytes are very low, suggesting that the effects of lactogens might be mediated by other hormones or cellular growth factors. Our observations suggest roles for the lactogens in adipose tissue growth and metabolism in pregnancy and postnatal life.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE LACTOGENIC hormones PRL and placental lactogen (PL) play roles in carbohydrate metabolism through effects on pancreatic insulin production and peripheral insulin sensitivity (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). However, the roles of the lactogens in lipid metabolism are poorly understood. Two lines of evidence suggest that the lactogens exert lipolytic actions in white adipose tissue during lactation and late pregnancy. First, the hyperprolactinemia of lactation is accompanied by depletion of abdominal fat stores and synthesis and secretion of triglycerides by the mammary gland (9, 10), and second, hPL stimulates lipolysis in adipose tissue in vivo and in vitro and potentiates the lipolytic effects of theophyline (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). These observations must be interpreted with caution, however, because 1) a reduction of circulating PRL concentrations in lactating rats has no effect on abdominal lipid synthesis and storage (10), and 2) the hPL used for early investigations was purified from human placenta and may have been contaminated by trace amounts of placental GH, a potent lipolytic agent. In addition, under some experimental conditions hPL stimulates glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis in isolated adipocytes, mimicking the lipogenic effects of insulin (20).

More importantly, recent investigations have failed to demonstrate lipolytic effects of ovine PL or recombinant bovine PL, bovine PRL, mouse PRL, or mouse PL in homologous systems (21, 22, 23). Indeed, PRL stimulates food intake and fat deposition in female rats (24, 25, 26) and birds (27, 28, 29) and has lipogenic effects in fetal and newborn rat hepatocytes (30, 31).

To clarify the roles of the lactogens in fuel homeostasis, we measured body weight, abdominal fat content, and plasma leptin in a unique model of lactogen resistance: the PRL receptor (PRLR)-deficient mouse. This experimental model was created by targeted deletion of the gene encoding the mouse PRLR (32). PRLR knockout mice are resistant to the actions of mouse PRL and mouse PL, which bind only to the mouse PRLR. Female homozygous PRLR-deficient mice are sterile, a consequence of progesterone deficiency, hypoestrogenemia, and defects in egg transport and implantation. The male homozygous mutants, on the other hand, appear to have near-normal reproductive capacity and normal serum testosterone concentrations (33). PRLR-deficient mice also have reduced rates of bone formation, decreased bone mineralization, and hyperparathyroidism (33), but the effects of PRLR deficiency on weight gain and fat deposition have not been examined previously.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice
The generation of PRLR-deficient mice has been described in detail previously (32, 33). Heterozygous mutants (129Sv/C57BL/6) were bred to produce -/-, +/-, and +/+ animals. The pups were genotyped by PCR amplification of the NEO gene using specific primers, described previously (33). The mode of handling and treatment of laboratory mice were approved by the institutional committee on the treatment of laboratory animals of Duke University Medical Center.

The mice were maintained on a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle (lights on, 0700–1900 h) with food and water provided ad libitum. The chow (Laboratory Rodent Diet 5001, Ralston Purina Co., St. Louis, MO) provided 12.1% of calories as fat, 28% as protein, and 59.8% as carbohydrate. All mice were virginal and were housed in cages in groups of four or five. Body weights of individual mice were measured between 12–75 weeks of age using a cross-sectional approach. A single PRLR-deficient male that weighed 26 g at 68 weeks of age was eliminated as an outlier before final analysis of growth data.

Blood samples were secured at 0900 h after a 17-h fast. The blood was obtained rapidly (15–20 sec) by retroorbital puncture without anesthesia and was collected into EDTA-coated tubes. All animals were sampled on at least three separate occasions between 6 and 9 months of age; plasma leptin levels were analyzed on each of the samples in separate assays. Plasma leptin was measured using mouse RIA kits purchased from Linco Research, Inc. (St. Louis MO). The mice were killed by cervical dislocation. Abdominal fat stores were measured at the time of death; all adipose tissue that was grossly visible was retrieved and weighed.

RT-PCR and Southern analysis
Samples of adipose tissue were obtained from wild-type males (M), virgin female (F), and lactating females (LF). Three animals were analyzed from each group, and the experiments were repeated three times.

Total RNA was prepared from abdominal fat of adult mice using Tri-Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The RNA was reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using the following protocol. Five micrograms of total RNA were incubated for 60 min at 37 C with 200 U Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc./BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) in buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, with 50 mM KCl and 5 mM MgCl2) containing 1 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates (Promega Corp.), 10 mM dithiothreitol, 30 U ribonuclease inhibitor (RNAsin), and 1 µg random hexamer oligonucleotides in a total volume of 30 µl. Control samples contained either no RNA or no reverse transcriptase.

One fifth of the cDNA generated under these conditions was subjected to PCR using primers encoding nucleotides 600–619 (5'-GACTCGCTGCAAGCCAGACC-3', sense) and 1018–1037 (5'-TGACCAGAGTCACTGTCAGG-3', antisense) of the long isoform of the mouse PRLR (34). Additional aliquots of cDNA were subjected to PCR using a sense primer (5'-GAGAAAAACACCTATGAATGTC-3', exon 5) common to all forms of the receptor and an antisense primer common to all forms (5'-CGTCTACTCATAGTTTAGGA-3', exon 9) or antisense primers encoding the short isoform PRL-Rs1 (5'-CCTTGAGACTAGATTATTGGC-3', exon 11) or the long isoform (5'-CAATCTGTCCATAAGTCTAGC-3', exon 10). The primer pairs designated 5F-9R, 5F-10R, and 5F-11R refer to the forward primer in exon 5 and the reverse primers in exons 9, 10, and 11. The reaction buffer contained 18.6 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, with 45.9 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM deoxy-NTPs, 0.2 U Taq polymerase (Life Technologies, Inc./BRL), and 25 pmol of each of the primers in a final volume of 50 µl. After a 4-min denaturation at 94 C, the samples were subjected to 30 cycles of PCR. Samples were denatured at 94 C for 45 sec, annealed at 56-60 C for 45 sec, and extended at 72 C for 1–2 min, with a final elongation cycle at 72 C for 10 min. The samples were separated on a 1.2% agarose gel and transferred to Boeh- ringer-Mannheim-charged membranes. The membranes were then probed with a digoxigenin-labeled RNA probe encoding bases 553-1191 of the mouse PRLR. The probe was generated using a BamHI-EcoRI fragment of a plasmid containing the mPRLR (pSP73-PRL-Rs1, provided by Dr. Daniel Linzer). The antisense RNA was generated using T3 RNA polymerase and was labeled with digoxigenin using a kit from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN).

The membranes were incubated at 42 C overnight in a hybridization mixture containing 5 x SSC (standard saline citrate), 0.1% N-lauroylsarcosine, 0.02% SDS, 1% blocking reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and 50% formamide. On the following morning the membranes were washed twice in 2 x SSC with 0.1% SDS (15 min each), twice with 0.5 x SSC with 0.1% SDS, and twice with 0.1 x SSC with 0.1% SDS (10 min). All washes were performed at 68 C. After rinsing with malate buffer, the membranes were incubated in blocking solution for 1 h and then with antidigoxigenin-alkaline phosphatase (1:5000) for 30 min. The membranes were washed in malate buffer three times for 15 min each time. Chemiluminescent detection of the digoxigenin-labeled probe was performed by applying CSPD (10 µg/ml; Tropix, Bedford, MA) diluted in buffer 3 [100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.5), 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM MgCl2] and exposing the membranes to Hyperfilm enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Elk Grove, IL) for 5 min.

Statistical analysis
Differences among sample means were assessed by ANOVA followed by the Newman-Keuls test of multiple comparisons. All experiments were repeated on at least two or three occasions. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In a cross-sectional analysis, the weights of PRLR-deficient mice were compared with the weights of wild-type littermate controls between 12 and 76 weeks of age. As shown in Fig. 1Go, the weights of the PRLR-deficient males and females were comparable to those of their wild-type littermates at 12–16 weeks of age. After 16 weeks of age, however, the weight curves of the PRLR-deficient mice and their wild-type controls appeared to diverge. Between 16 and 76 weeks, the slopes of the regression lines defining weight gain in the PRLR-deficient males (0.12) and females (0.06) were significantly less than the slopes of the regression lines depicting weight gain in the wild-type animals (0.20–0.21). This finding suggests that the rates of weight gain in wild-type mice after 16 weeks of age exceed the rates of weight gain in PRLR-deficient mice.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Cross-sectional analysis of body weights of PRLR-deficient (-/-) and wild-type (+/+) mice. Individual male (+/+, n = 37; -/- n = 35) and female (+/+, n = 78; -/-, n = 47) mice were weighed in the morning at the ages indicated on the graph. Equations represent the lines generated by regression analysis, with y representing weight in grams and x representing weeks of age.

 
The differences in weight between PRLR-deficient and wild-type mice were more conspicuous in females than in males. At 27–37 weeks of age, the weights of homozygous mutant males (34.3 ± 0.8 g; n = 12) were not significantly different from the weights of wild-type males (35.8 ± 1.3 g; n = 7). At that stage, however, homozygous mutant females (25.2 ± 0.5 g; n = 19) weighed 8.3% less (P < 0.01) less than wild-type females (27.8 ± 0.5 g; n = 31). By 42–76 weeks of age the PRLR-deficient males (36.1 ± 0.8 g; n = 13) weighed approximately 12% less (P < 0.03) than wild-type males (41.1 ± 1.0 g; n = 19), whereas PRLR-deficient females (27.4 ± 0.9 g; n = 13) weighed 12.3% less (P < 0.01) than wild-type females (31.1 ± 0.9 g; n = 12). It should be noted that there was considerable variability in the weights of wild-type and PRLR-deficient mice at all developmental stages.

The decrement in body weight in adult PRLR-deficient mice (age, 8–9 months) was accompanied by a reduction in abdominal fat stores. Total abdominal fat content, reflecting sc, mesenteric, perirenal, and epididymal (male) or periovarian (female) fat stores, was 34% less (P < 0.05; Fig. 2Go left) in mutant males (1.05 ± 0.20 g; n = 11) than in wild-type males (1.58 ± 0.18 g; n = 12) and 49% less (P < 0.02; Fig. 2Go, left) in mutant females (0.67 ± 0.14 g; n = 9) than in wild-type females (1.31 ± 0.22 g; n = 7). Significant differences between PRLR-deficient and wild-type females were also detected when total abdominal fat was expressed as a function of total body weight (+/+ females, 4.5 ± 0.4%; -/- females, 3.2 ± 0.3%; Fig. 2Go, right).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Total abdominal fat content of PRLR-deficient (-/-) and wild-type (+/+) mice at 8–9 months of age. Abdominal fat content represents stores of sc, mesenteric, perirenal, and epididymal (male) or periovarian (female) fat. +/+ males, n = 12; -/- males, n = 11; +/+ females, n = 10; -/- females, n = 11. Left, Absolute values; right, expressed as a percentage of body weight.

 
The reductions in abdominal fat content in PRLR-deficient females were accompanied by a 40% reduction in fasting plasma levels of the adipocyte hormone leptin (P < 0.02; Fig. 3Go). Leptin levels in PRLR-deficient males did not differ from those in wild-type littermates. A reduction in plasma leptin in female mice was also noted when leptin levels were expressed as a function of body weight [+/+ females, 0.26 ± 0.04 ng/ml·g; -/- females, 0.17 ± 0.02 ng/ml·g (P < 0.05); +/+ males, 0.13 ± 0.03; -/- males, 0.13 ± 0.02].



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Plasma leptin concentrations in PRLR-deficient (-/-) and wild-type (+/+) mice at 7–9 months of age. Blood samples were obtained after a 17-h overnight fast. +/+ males, n = 11; -/- males, n = 9; +/+ females, n = 12; -/- females, n = 14. Similar results were noted in three separate experiments.

 
To determine whether the effects of PRLR deficiency on adipose tissue mass might be mediated directly by changes in PRL action in the adipocyte, we examined the expression of PRLR messenger RNA (mRNA) in mouse adipose tissue. As shown in Fig. 4Go, A and B, the mRNAs encoding the long and short isoforms of the PRLR are expressed in adipose tissue of normal male mice, virgin female mice, and lactating female mice; PCR of adipose tissue cDNA generated a single product that hybridized to a digoxigenin-labeled RNA probe encoding the mouse PRLR. However, the levels of adipose tissue PRLR mRNA, as determined by Northern analysis, are very low, near the limits of detectability (not shown). This observation concords with recent studies demonstrating low levels of PRLR immunoreactivity in mouse adipose tissue (35).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. A, mRNA encoding the long isoform of the PRLR is expressed in mouse white adipose tissue. Total RNA from abdominal fat from wild-type adult males (M), adult virgin females (F), and lactating females (LF) was used for the preparation of cDNA. The cDNA was then subjected to RT-PCR using primers encoding the long isoform of the mouse PRLR. Control samples contained no reverse transcriptase (-RT) or no RNA. The single 438-bp product generated by PCR hybridized to a digoxigenin-labeled probe encoding the mouse PRLR. B, mRNA encoding the short as well as the long isoforms of the PRLR are expressed in mouse white adipose tissue. Total RNA from abdominal fat (adult virgin female mice) was used for the preparation of cDNA. The cDNA was then subjected to RT-PCR using primers encoding a product common to both long and short isoforms (5F/9R), to the long isoform (5F/10R), or to the short (5F/11R) isoform of the mouse PRLR. The lane labeled -RT represents the PCR reaction after a control cDNA incubation performed in the absence of reverse transcriptase. The various PCR products are of the expected sizes (common 5F/9R, 569 bp; 5F/10R, 653 bp; 5F/11R, 690 bp) and hybridized to digoxigenin-labeled probes encoding the mouse PRLR (not shown).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The absence of PRLRs in knockout mice was accompanied by a small, but progressive, reduction in the rate of weight gain after 16 weeks of age and a reduction in abdominal fat mass. Females were affected to a greater extent than males. As serum leptin concentrations in humans and rodents correlate strongly with adipocyte mass and percent body fat, the reduction in fat mass in PRLR-deficient females probably contributed to the reduction in plasma leptin levels. Leptin levels in PRLR-deficient males, on the other hand, were not reduced significantly. This may reflect the fact that the relative reductions in fat mass (as a percentage of body weight) in PRLR-deficient males were not as great as the reductions in fat mass in PRLR-deficient females. In addition, leptin levels correlate more strongly with the amount of sc fat than with visceral fat stores (36) and are higher in females than in males. It is possible that the effects of PRLR deficiency on the distribution of fat in females may differ from its effects on fat distribution in males.

Our findings of reduced fat content and leptin deficiency in PRLR-deficient mice would seem to contradict prevailing hypotheses that ascribe to the lactogens a major role in the accentuated lipolysis of late pregnancy. Nevertheless, the literature provides evidence that lactogenic hormones may have lipogenic as well as lipolytic effects in vivo. First, PRL stimulates fat deposition and weight gain in female rats, pigeons, ring doves, and sparrows and may contribute to the seasonal fattening of birds in preparation for flight (24, 27, 28, 29). Second, PRL stimulates increases in white adipose tissue leptin mRNA and plasma leptin levels in female rats in vivo (37). Finally, available (albeit limited) evidence suggests that hyperprolactinemia in men and nonpregnant women may be accompanied by weight gain (38, 39, 40, 41). The weight gain in men may be reversed by bromocryptine, which reduces serum PRL levels (40). Bromocryptine also reduces food intake, body fat, hepatic triglyceride synthesis, and adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase activity in obese mice (42, 43). Notwithstanding the fact that bromocryptine may have independent effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, these observations suggest that lactogens may have adipogenic activity in vivo, at least under certain conditions.

The association of hyperprolactinemia with abdominal fat deposition does not pertain during lactation, when abdominal fat stores are depleted, and triglycerides are synthesized and secreted by the mammary gland (18, 19). The roles of PRL and other hormones in the conversion from lipogenesis to lipolysis in abdominal fat are unclear. Insulin action in adipose tissue is blunted during lactation (44), but this is not induced by hyperprolactinemia because 1) bromocryptine treatment of lactating rats reduces serum PRL concentrations, but has no effect on lipid synthesis in abdominal fat; and 2) a reduction in serum PRL attenuates the lipogenic response to insulin (19, 44). Williamson and his colleagues conclude that the reduction in adipose tissue stores during lactation reflects a resistance to insulin action rather than the increase in serum PRL levels. It is possible that the effects of lactogens on adipose tissue metabolism may vary with developmental stage and with changes in the prevailing hormonal environment. It should be noted that our measurements of abdominal fat content were performed only in adult mice; it is possible that the effects of PRLR deficiency on abdominal fat might vary with age and pubertal status.

What explains the changes in body weight, abdominal fat content, and serum leptin in adult PRLR-deficient mice? There are at least four possible contributing factors. First, as lactogenic hormones stimulate food intake in pigeons, ring doves, sparrows, sheep, and female rats (24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 45), the reduction in body weight and fat content of PRLR-deficient mice may reflect in part a reduction in caloric intake. Second, the reduction in abdominal fat content of PRLR-deficient mice may reflect a reduction in insulin production, as suggested by studies of the effects of lactogenic hormones in isolated pancreatic islets and in rat insulinoma cells (4, 5, 6, 7, 8). Third, PRLR deficiency in female mice is accompanied by a state of progesterone deficiency and hypoestrogenemia (32, 33). As progesterone stimulates food intake and fat deposition (46, 47), and estrogen induces leptin production in female rats (48, 49), the reduction in abdominal fat content and serum leptin in female PRLR-deficient mice may derive in part from a deficiency of sex steroids. Interestingly, the testosterone levels in male PRLR-deficient mice are normal (33); thus, the small reductions in abdominal fat content in male mice cannot be explained by a deficiency or an excess of testosterone.

Finally, the detection of PRLRs in normal mouse adipose tissue (this study and Ref. 35) and in the brown and white adipose tissue of fetal rats and sheep (50, 51, 52) suggests that the reductions in abdominal fat in PRLR-deficient mice might reflect the failure of lactogens to exert direct lipogenic effects on adipose cell development and/or metabolism. PRLR expression is induced during the differentiation of adipocytes from primary mouse bone marrow stromal cells (53), and PRL stimulates adipogenic conversion of NIH-3T3 preadipocytes and enhances their expression of adipocyte genes, including CCAAT enhancer-binding protein-ß, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma}, adipsin, and lipoprotein lipase (54, 55). Although the levels of PRLR mRNA and PRLR immunoreactivity (35) in mature mouse adipocytes are quite low, the expression of PRLRs in preadipocytes has not been examined systematically. Thus, it remains unclear whether the effects of lactogens on adipose tissue development or function are mediated directly through effects on the adipocyte or preadipocyte or indirectly through effects on hypothalamic function or through changes in the production, secretion, or action of other hormones or growth factors, such as the glucocorticoids, thyroid hormone, the catecholamines, GH, and the insulin-like growth factors.

Although we found a small reduction in weight gain in PRLR-deficient mice, no apparent deficit in weight gain was reported in mice with a targeted deletion of the gene for PRL (56, 57). The PRL-deficient mice were assessed at 2–6 weeks and at 6 months of age. Given the progressive reduction in weight gain with age in the PRLR-deficient mice, it is possible that deficits in weight gain in PRL-deficient mice might not emerge until after 6 months of age. Alternatively, the phenotypes of the PRLR-deficient and PRL-deficient mice may differ in certain respects. Phenotypic differences between the PRLR-deficient and the PRL-deficient mice might be related in part to differences in exposure to lactogenic hormones in utero. Mouse PRL is not detected in serum until after birth (58), but mouse PL II circulates in fetal serum in mid- to late gestation (59). PRLR-deficient mice, being resistant to the effects of PL as well as PRL, are deprived of the biological actions of mouse PL II during fetal life. In contrast, PRL-deficient mice are theoretically exposed to PL II in utero, although the levels of PL II in fetal PRL-deficient mice have not yet been measured.

Novel roles for the lactogens in fetal and maternal adipose tissue development and function are suggested by the patterns of hormone production, adipose tissue accumulation, and leptin expression during pregnancy. The mass of adipose tissue and the serum concentrations of leptin increase during the first 26–32 weeks of gestation in the pregnant mother and during the third trimester in the human fetus (60, 61, 62, 63, 64). The accumulation of fat mass and the rise in serum leptin coincide with striking increases in the concentrations of lactogenic hormones in maternal and fetal blood. In pregnant women, for example, the concentrations of hPL and PRL increase progressively between 10 and 36 weeks gestation to levels approximating 6000 and 130 ng/ml, respectively (65). In the human fetus, serum hPL concentrations rise from 5 ng/ml at midgestation to approximately 30 ng/ml at term (66), whereas PRL concentrations increase exponentially from 10–20 ng/ml at 28 weeks to 150–300 ng/ml at term (67). Thus, increases in the lactogenic hormones together with high levels of progesterone and estrogen (46, 47, 48, 49, 68) may contribute to the accumulation of adipose tissue stores and induction of serum leptin in the mother and fetus. Interestingly, the percent body fat mass and the concentrations of leptin in pregnant women decline slightly during the third trimester (62, 63, 64). This may reflect the rising levels of placental GH, which has potent lipolytic effects and reduces serum leptin concentrations in vivo (69, 70, 71). Fat mass and leptin concentrations may not decline in the human fetus in late gestation because placental GH does not circulate in fetal serum (69) and because there is a relative deficiency of GH receptors in fetal tissues (65).

In summary, the loss of PRLRs is associated with reductions in body weight and abdominal fat mass and hypoleptinemia in females. These observations suggest novel roles for the lactogens in adipose tissue development and function during pregnancy and postnatal life.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Dr. Chris Ormandy for helpful comments.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by grants from the NICHD (HD-24192 to M.F.), the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation (196029 to M.F.), Eli Lilly & Co. (to M.F.), and INSERM (to P.A.K.). Back

Received August 18, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kalkhoff RK, Richardson BL, Beck P 1969 Relative effects of pregnancy, human placental lactogen and prednisolone on carbohydrate tolerance in normal and subclinical diabetic subjects. Diabetes 18:153–163[Medline]
  2. Ryan EA, Enns I 1988 Role of gestational hormones in the induction of insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:341–347[Abstract]
  3. Leturque A, Hauguel S, Sutter DMT 1989 Effects of placental lactogen and progesterone on insulin stimulated glucose metabolism in rat muscles in vitro. Diabet Metab 15:176–182[Medline]
  4. Brelje TC, Sorenson RL 1991 Role of prolactin versus growth hormone on islet B-cell proliferation in vitro: implications for pregnancy. Endocrinology 128:45–57[Abstract]
  5. Sorenson RL, Brelje TC, Roth C 1993 Effects of steroid and lactogenic hormones on islets of Langerhans: a new hypothesis for the role of pregnancy steroids in the adaptation of islets to pregnancy. Endocrinology 2227–2234
  6. Brelje TC, Scharp DW, Lacy PE, Ogren L, Talamantes F, Robertson M, Friesen HG, Sorenson RL 1993 Effects of homologous placental lactogens, prolactins and growth hormones on islet ß cell division and insulin secretion in rat, mouse and human islets: implication for placental lactogen regulation of islet function during pregnancy. Endocrinology 132:870–887
  7. Petryk A, Fleenor D, Driscoll P, Freemark M 2000 Prolactin induction of insulin gene expression: the roles of glucose and glucose transporter-2. J Endocrinol 164:277–286[Abstract]
  8. Fleenor D, Petryk A, Driscoll P, Freemark M 2000 Constitutive expression of placental lactogen in pancreatic beta cells: effects on cell morphology, growth and gene expression. Pediatr Res 47:136–142[Medline]
  9. Bandyopadhyay GK, Lee LY, Guzman RC, Nandi S 1995 Effects of reproductive status on lipid mobilization and linoleic acid metabolism in mammary glands. Lipids 30:155–162[Medline]
  10. Do Nascimento O, Illic V, Williamson DH 1989 Re-examination of the putative roles of insulin and prolactin in the regulation of lipid deposition and lipogenesis in vivo in mammary gland and white and brown adipose tissue of lactating rats and litter-removed rats. Biochem J 258:273–278[Medline]
  11. Grumbach MM, Kaplan SL, Abrams CL, Bell JJ, Conte FA 1966 Plasma free fatty acid response to the administration of chorionic "growth hormone-prolactin." J Clin Endocrinol Metab 26:478–482[Medline]
  12. Berle P 1973 Comparative studies on the metabolic effects of some parameters of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism after intravenous administration of human placental lactogen, human prolactin and human growth hormone. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) [Suppl] 173:104[Medline]
  13. Strange RC, Swyer GI 1974 The effect of human placental lactogen on adipose tissue lipolysis. J Endocrinol 61:147–152[Medline]
  14. Mochizuki M, Morikawa H, Ohga Y, Tojo S 1975 Lipolytic action of human chorionic somatomammotropin. Endocrinol Jpn 22:123–129[Medline]
  15. Williams C, Coltart TM 1978 Adipose tissue metabolism in pregnancy: the lipolytic effect of human placental lactogen. Br J Obstet Gynecol 85:43–46[Medline]
  16. Turtle JR, Kipnis DM 1967 The lipolytic action of human placental lactogen on isolated fat cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 144:583–593[Medline]
  17. Genazzani AR, Benuzzi-Badoni M, Felber JP 1969 Human chorionic somatomammotropin: lipolytic action of a pure preparation on isolated fat cells. Metab Clin Exp 18:593–598
  18. Felber JP, Zaragoza N, Benuzzi-Badoni M, Genazzani AR 1972 The double effect of human chorionic somatomammotropin and pregnancy on lipogenesis and on lipolysis in the isolated rat epididymal fat pad and fat pad cells. Horm Met Res 4:293–296[Medline]
  19. Fredholm BB, Persson B 1973 Actions of human chorionic somatomammotropin in dog subcutaneous adipose tissue in situ. Horm Metab Res 5:347–350[Medline]
  20. Recio F, Knight BL, Osorio C, Myant NB 1979 The effect of human placental lactogen upon the metabolism of rat and human adipose tissue. Rev Espan Fisiol 35:143–152
  21. Iliou JP, Demarne Y 1987 Evolution of the sensitivity of isolated adipocytes of ewes to the lipolytic effects of different stimuli during pregnancy and lactation. Int J Biochem 19:253–258[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Houseknecht KL, Bauman DE, Vernon RG, Byatt JC, Collier RJ 1996 Insulin-like growth factors 1 and 2, somatotropin, prolactin, and placental lactogen are not acute effectors of lipolysis in ruminants. Dom Anim Endocrinol 13:239–249[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Fielder PJ, Talamantes F 1987 The lipolytic effects of mouse placental lactogen II, mouse prolactin, and mouse growth hormone on adipose tissue from virgin and pregnant mice. Endocrinology 121:493–497[Abstract]
  24. Byatt JC, Staten NR, Salsgiver WJ, Kostelc JG, Collier RJ 1993 Stimulation of food intake and weight gain in mature female rats by bovine prolactin and bovine growth hormone. Am J Physiol 264:E986–E992
  25. Gerardo-Gettens T, Moore BJ, Stern JS, Horwitz BA 1989 Prolactin stimulates food intake in a dose-dependent manner. Am J Physiol 256:R276–R280
  26. Sauve D, Woodside B 1996 The effect of central administration of prolactin on food intake in virgin female rats is dose-dependent, occurs in the absence of ovarian hormones and the latency to onset varies with feeding regimen. Brain Res 729:75–81[Medline]
  27. Goodridge AG, Ball EG 1967 The effect of prolactin on lipogenesis in the pigeon. In vivo studies. Biochemistry 6:1676–1682[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Garrison MM, Scow RO 1975 Effect of prolactin on lipoprotein lipase in crop sac and adipose tissue of pigeons. Am J Physiol 228:1542–1544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Buntin JD, Hnasko RM, Zuzick PH 1999 Role of the ventromedial hypothalamus in prolactin-induced hyperphagia in ring doves. Physiol Behav 66:255–261[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Machida T, Taga M, Minaguchi H 1990 Effect of prolactin on lipoprotein lipase activity in the fetal rat liver. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynecol 16:261–265[Medline]
  31. Julve J, Robert MQ, Llobera M, Peinado-Onsurbe J 1996 Hormonal regulation of lipoprotein lipase activity from 5-day-old rat hepatocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 116:97–104[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Ormandy CJ, Camus A, Barra J, Damotte D, Lucas B, Buteau H, Edery M, Babinet C, Binart N, Kelly PA 1997 Null mutation of the prolactin receptor gene produces multiple reproductive defects in the mouse. Genes Dev 11:167–178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Clement-Lacroix P, Ormandy C, Lepescheux L, Ammann P, Damotte, d, Goffin V, Bouchard B, Amling M, Gaillard-Kelly M, Binart N, Baron R, Kelly PA 1999 Osteoblasts are a new target for prolactin: analysis of bone formation in prolactin receptor knockout mice. Endocrinology 140:96–105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Clarke DL, Linzer DI 1993 Changes in prolactin receptor expression during pregnancy in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology 133:224–32[Abstract]
  35. Camarillo IG, Thordarson G, Moffat JG, Van Horn KM, Talamantes FJ The prolactin receptor is expressed both in the epithelia and the stroma of the rat mammary gland. 82nd Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, Toronto, Canada, 2000 (Abstract 578)
  36. Montague CT, O’Rahilly S 2000 The perils of portliness: causes and consequences of visceral adiposity. Diabetes 49:883–888[Abstract]
  37. Gualillo O, Lago F, Garcia M, Menendez C, Senaris R, Casanueva FF, Dieguiez C 1999 Prolactin stimulates leptin secretion by rat white adipose tissue. Endocrinology 140:5149–5153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Cohen LM, Greenberg DB, Murray GB 1984 Neuropsychiatic presentation of men with pituitary tumors. Psychosomatics 25:925–928[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Creemers LB, Zelissen PMJ, van’t Verlaat JW, Koppeschaar HPF 1991 Prolactinoma and body weight: a retrospective study. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 125:392–396[Medline]
  40. Greenman Y, Tordjman K, Stern N 1998 Increased body weight associated with prolactin secreting pituitary adenomas: weight loss with normalization of prolactin levels. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 48:547–553[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Ferreira MF, Sobrinho LG, Santos MA, Sousa MF, Uvnas-Moberg K 1998 Rapid weight gain, at least in some women, is an expression of a neuroendocrine state characterized by reduced hypothalamic dopaminergic tone. Psychoneuroendocrinology 23:1005–1013[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Cincotta AH, Tozzo E, Scislowski PW 1997 Bromocryptine/SKF38393 treatment ameliorates obesity and associated metabolic dysfunctions in obese (ob/ob) mice. Life Sci 61:951–956[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Scislowski PW, Tozzo E, Zhang Y, Phaneuf S, Prevelige R, Cincotta AH 1999 Biochemical mechanisms responsible for the attenuation of diabetic and obese conditions in ob/ob mice treated with dopaminergic agonists. Int J Obesity 23:425–431[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Da Costa TH, Williamson DH 1993 Effects of exogenous insulin or vanadate on disposal of dietary triacylglycerols between mammary gland and adipose tissue in the lactating rat: insulin resistance in white adipose tissue. Biochem J 290:557–561
  45. Min SH, Mackenzie DD, Breier BH, McCutcheon SN, Gluckman PD 1996 Growth-promoting effects of ovine placental lactogen (oPL) in young lambs: comparison with bovine growth hormone provides evidence for a distinct effect of oPL on food intake. Growth Regul 6:144–151[Medline]
  46. Galleti F, Klopper A 1964 The effect of progesterone on the quantity and distribution of body fat in the female rat. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 46:379–386
  47. Hervey E, Hervey GR 1967 The effects of progesterone on body weight and composition in the rat. J Endocrinol 37:361–381
  48. Shimizu H, Shimomura Y, Nakanishi Y, Futawatari T, Ohtani K, Sato N, Mori M 1997 Estrogen increases in vivo leptin production in rats and human subjects. J Endocrinol 154:285–292[Abstract]
  49. Kristensen K, Pedersen SB, Richelsen B 1999 Regulation of leptin by steroid hormones in rat adipose tissue. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 259:624–630[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Symonds ME, Phillips ID, Anthony RV, Owens JA, McMillen IC 1998 Prolactin receptor gene expression and foetal adipose tissue. J Neuroendocrinol 10:885–890[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Royster M, Driscoll P, Kelly PA, Freemark M 1995 The prolactin receptor in the fetal rat: cellular localization of messenger RNA, immunoreactive protein, and ligand-binding activity and induction of expression in late gestation. Endocrinology 136:3892–3900[Abstract]
  52. Bispham J, Heasman L, Clarke L, Ingleton PM, Stephenson T, Symonds ME 1999 Effect of maternal dexamethasone treatment and ambient temperature on prolactin receptor abundance in brown adipose and hepatic tissue in the foetus and newborn lamb. J Neuroendocrinol 11:849–856[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. McAveney KM, Gimble JM, Yu-Lee L 1996 Prolactin receptor expression during adipocyte differentiation of bone marrow stroma. Endocrinology 137:5723–5726[Abstract]
  54. Spooner PM, Chernick SS, Garrison MM, Scow RO 1979 Development of lipoprotein lipase activity and accumulation of triacylglycerol in differentiating 3T3–L1 adipocytes. Effects of prostaglandin F2{alpha}, 1-methyl-3-isobutylxxanthine, prolactin and insulin. J Biol Chem 254:1305–1311[Free Full Text]
  55. Nanbu-Wakao R, Fujitani Y, Masuho Y, Muramatu M, Wakao H 2000 Prolactin enhances CCAAT enhancer-binding protein-ß and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} messenger RNA expression and stimulates adipogenic conversion of NIH-3T3 cells. Mol Endocrinol 14:307–316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Horseman ND, Zhao W, Montecino-Rodriguez E, Tanaka M, Nakashima K, Engle SJ, Smith F, Markoff E, Dorschkind K 1997 Defective mammopoiesis, but normal hematopoiesis, in mice with a targeted disruption of the prolactin gene. EMBO J 16:6926–6935[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Steger RW, Chandrashekar V, Zhao W, Bartke A, Horseman ND 1998 Neuroendocrine and reproductive functions in male mice with targeted disruption of the prolactin gene. Endocrinology 139:3691–3695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Slabaugh MB, Lieberman ME, Rutledge JJ, Gorski J 1982 Ontogeny of growth hormone and prolactin gene expression in mice. Endocrinology 110:1489–97[Medline]
  59. Ogren L, Talamantes F 1988 Prolactins of pregnancy and their cellular source. Int Rev Cytol 112:1–65[Medline]
  60. Hay Jr WW 1999 Metabolic changes in pregnancy. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds) Encyclopedia of Reproduction. Academic Press, San Diego, vol 3:1016–1026
  61. Freinkel N, and Metzger BE 1992 Metabolic changes in pregnancy. In: Wilson JD, Foster DW (eds) Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 993–1006
  62. Schubring C, Englaro P, Siebler T, Blum WF, Demirakca T, Kratzsch J, Kiess W 1998 Longitudinal analysis of maternal serum leptin levels during pregnancy, at birth and up to six weeks after birth: relation to body mass index, skinfolds, sex steroids, and umbilical cord blood leptin levels. Horm Res 50:276–283[CrossRef][Medline]
  63. Sivan E, Whttaker PG, Sinha D, Homko CJ, Lin M, Reece EA, Boden G 1998 Leptin in human pregnancy: the relationship with gestational hormones. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1128–1132[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. Tamas P, Sulyok E, Szabo I, Vizer M, Ertl T, Rascher W, Blum WF 1998 Changes of maternal serum leptin levels during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 46:169–171[CrossRef][Medline]
  65. Freemark M 1999 The roles of growth hormone, prlactin and placental lactogen in human fetal development: critical analysis of molecular, cellular and clinical investigations. In: Handwerger S (ed) Molecular and Cellular Pediatric Endocrinology, Humana Press, Totowa, pp 57–83
  66. Lassarre C, Hardouin S, Daffos F, Forestier F, Frankenne F, Binoux M 1991 Serum insulin like growth factors and insulin like growth factor binding proteins in the human fetus: relationship with growth in normal subjects and in subjects with intrauterine growth retardation. Pediatr Res 29:219–225
  67. Debieve F, Beerlandt S, Hubinont C, Thomas K 2000 Gonadotropins, prolactin, inhibin A, inhibin B, and activin A in human fetal serum from midpregnancy and term pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:270–274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Albrecht ED, Pepe GJ 1998 Secretion and metabolism of steroids in primate mammals during pregnancy. In: Bazer FW (ed) Endocrinology of Pregnancy. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 319–352
  69. Frankenne F, Closset J, Gomez F, Scippo ML, Smal J, Hennen G 1988 The physiology of growth hormones in pregnant women and partial characterization of the placental GH variant. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66:1171–1180[Abstract]
  70. Richelsen B 1997 Action of growth hormone in adipose tissue. Horm Res [Suppl 5] 48:105–110
  71. Miyakawa M, Tsushima T, Murakami H, Isozaki O, Demura H, Tanaka T 1998 Effect of growth hormone on serum concentrations of leptin: study in patients with acromegaly and GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3476–3479[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. Ben-Jonathan, C. R. LaPensee, and E. W. LaPensee
What Can We Learn from Rodents about Prolactin in Humans?
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2008; 29(1): 1 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. Naef and B. Woodside
Prolactin/Leptin Interactions in the Control of Food Intake in Rats
Endocrinology, December 1, 2007; 148(12): 5977 - 5983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. H. Schmitz, H. Lin, M. D. Sammel, C. R. Gracia, D. B. Nelson, S. Kapoor, T. L. DeBlasis, and E. W. Freeman
Association of Physical Activity with Reproductive Hormones: The Penn Ovarian Aging Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2007; 16(10): 2042 - 2047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
G.D. Cooper, L.C. Pickavance, J.P.H. Wilding, J.A. HarroLd, J.C.G. HaLford, and A.J. Goudie
Effects of olanzapine in male rats: enhanced adiposity in the absence of hyperphagia, weight gain or metabolic abnormalities
J Psychopharmacol, June 1, 2007; 21(4): 405 - 413.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
D. J Flint, N. Binart, S. Boumard, J. J Kopchick, and P. Kelly
Developmental aspects of adipose tissue in GH receptor and prolactin receptor gene disrupted mice: site-specific effects upon proliferation, differentiation and hormone sensitivity.
J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2006; 191(1): 101 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. R. LaPensee, N. D. Horseman, P. Tso, T. D. Brandebourg, E. R. Hugo, and N. Ben-Jonathan
The Prolactin-Deficient Mouse Has an Unaltered Metabolic Phenotype
Endocrinology, October 1, 2006; 147(10): 4638 - 4645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. Gentili, M. J. Waters, and I. C. McMillen
Differential regulation of suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 in the liver and adipose tissue of the sheep fetus in late gestation
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): R1044 - R1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Kok, F. Roelfsema, J. G. Langendonk, C. C. de Wit, M. Frolich, J. Burggraaf, A. E. Meinders, and H. Pijl
Increased circadian prolactin release is blunted after body weight loss in obese premenopausal women
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2006; 290(2): E218 - E224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Kedzia, L. Lacroix, N. Ameur, T. Ragot, P. A. Kelly, B. Caillou, and N. Binart
Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Arises in the Absence of Prolactin Signaling
Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 65(18): 8497 - 8503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Fleenor, J. Oden, P. A. Kelly, S. Mohan, S. Alliouachene, M. Pende, S. Wentz, J. Kerr, and M. Freemark
Roles of the Lactogens and Somatogens in Perinatal and Postnatal Metabolism and Growth: Studies of a Novel Mouse Model Combining Lactogen Resistance and Growth Hormone Deficiency
Endocrinology, January 1, 2005; 146(1): 103 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
S Viengchareun, H Bouzinba-Segard, J-P Laigneau, M-C Zennaro, P A Kelly, A Bado, M Lombes, and N Binart
Prolactin potentiates insulin-stimulated leptin expression and release from differentiated brown adipocytes
J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2004; 33(3): 679 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Kok, F. Roelfsema, M. Frolich, A. E. Meinders, and H. Pijl
Prolactin Release Is Enhanced in Proportion to Excess Visceral Fat in Obese Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4445 - 4449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
X. Q. Xiao, K. L. Grove, B. E. Grayson, and M. S. Smith
Inhibition of Uncoupling Protein Expression during Lactation: Role of Leptin
Endocrinology, February 1, 2004; 145(2): 830 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. M. Thompson, D. A. S. Gill, R. Davies, N. Loveridge, P. A. Houston, I. C. A. F. Robinson, and T. Wells
Ghrelin and Des-Octanoyl Ghrelin Promote Adipogenesis Directly in Vivo by a Mechanism Independent of the Type 1a Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor
Endocrinology, January 1, 2004; 145(1): 234 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. A. Shang and M. J. Waters
Constitutively Active Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5 Can Replace the Requirement for Growth Hormone in Adipogenesis of 3T3-F442A Preadipocytes
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2003; 17(12): 2494 - 2508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Ling, L. Svensson, B. Oden, B. Weijdegard, B. Eden, S. Eden, and H. Billig
Identification of Functional Prolactin (PRL) Receptor Gene Expression: PRL Inhibits Lipoprotein Lipase Activity in Human White Adipose Tissue
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2003; 88(4): 1804 - 1808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Zinger, M. McFarland, and N. Ben-Jonathan
Prolactin Expression and Secretion by Human Breast Glandular and Adipose Tissue Explants
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 689 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. Nanbu-Wakao, Y. Morikawa, I. Matsumura, Y. Masuho, M.-a. Muramatsu, E. Senba, and H. Wakao
Stimulation of 3T3-L1 Adipogenesis by Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2002; 16(7): 1565 - 1576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
P. Valet, G. Tavernier, I. Castan-Laurell, J. S. Saulnier-Blache, and D. Langin
Understanding adipose tissue development from transgenic animal models
J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2002; 43(6): 835 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Diaz-Torga, C. Feierstein, C. Libertun, D. Gelman, M. A. Kelly, M. J. Low, M. Rubinstein, and D. Becu-Villalobos
Disruption of the D2 Dopamine Receptor Alters GH and IGF-I Secretion and Causes Dwarfism in Male Mice
Endocrinology, April 1, 2002; 143(4): 1270 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]