| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
1-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Is Estradiol Dependent in the Preoptic Area and Hypothalamus of Female Rats1
Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Arnulfo Quesada, Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, F113, Bronx, New York 10461. E-mail: quesada{at}aecom.yu.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-adrenoceptor
potentiation of adenylyl cyclase. Binding studies in membranes
demonstrate that ovariectomized, E2-primed animals show a
significant increase in the density of
[125I]IGF-I-binding sites in both POA and HYP compared
with ovariectomized control animals. Neither the IC50 for
[125I]IGF-I displacement by IGF-I nor the levels of IGF-I
binding proteins in serum or brain tissue are affected by
E2. RIA results showed that E2 does not modify
serum or brain IGF-I levels. These results indicate that E2
regulation of NE receptor function in the POA and HYP involves
increased expression of IGF-IR, and that after E2
treatment, IGF-IR activation augments
1-adrenoceptor
signaling. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, we were able to demonstrate that inhibition of protein tyrosine kinase activity with genistein, a general tyrosine kinase inhibitor, augments NE-stimulated cAMP accumulation in the HYP of ovariectomized rats and that this effect is augmented by E2 treatment. In the POA, genistein augments NE-stimulated cAMP accumulation only if ovariectomized rats are primed with E2 (6). Thus, protein tyrosine kinases may regulate NE receptor function in these two brain regions in a hormone-dependent manner. The current study investigates the existence and possible effects of E2 on cross-talk between insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and AR signaling in the HYP and POA of female rats.
IGF-I has been identified as one of the major growth factors regulating the reproductive system of female rats. IGF-I signals via its receptor, IGF-IR, which is a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of growth factor receptors. IGF-I regulates neuroendocrine events such as the release of GH (7) and GnRH (8), the timing of puberty (9, 10), and, perhaps, female sexual behavior (11). IGF-I, IGF-IR, and IGF-I-binding proteins (IGF-IBPs) are locally synthesized by glia and neurons of the HYP (12, 13). In various tissues and cell types, E2 can modulate IGF-I action by regulating IGF-I gene expression (14, 15), IGF-IR (16, 17), or IGF-IBPs (17, 18). Synergistic interactions between E2 and IGF-I on neurite growth have also been demonstrated in monolayer hypothalamic cultures (19).
Because IGF-I and E2 act synergistically in both
the nervous system and peripheral reproductive organs, we examined the
possible existence of cross-talk between ARs and IGF-I in the POA and
HYP. Adrenergic agonist-induced cAMP accumulation in brain slices was
used as the marker of intracellular interaction among
E2, IGF-I, and ARs. In brain, the regulation of
adenylyl cyclase by NE receptors is complex; ß-ARs are linked
directly to adenylyl cyclase activation via the stimulatory G protein,
Gs. In many cases, including HYP and POA, the
1-AR alone has no effect on adenylyl cyclase,
but potentiates ß-AR activation of cAMP synthesis (20).
Thus, when appropriate agonists are employed, cAMP accumulation can be
used to monitor the function of both ß- and
1-ARs. The ability of protein kinase C (PKC)
inhibitors to block and of PKC activators to mimic
1-AR augmentation of cAMP synthesis suggest
that PKC mediates
1-AR potentiation of
adenylyl cyclase activity in rat brain (20).
Our studies demonstrate that IGF-I enhances NE-stimulated cAMP
accumulation in HYP and POA from ovariectomized rats, but only if
slices are derived from E2-primed animals. This
change in IGF-I function is accompanied by increased
[125I]IGF-I binding density in HYP and POA
membranes. Examination of AR subtypes mediating the cAMP response to NE
reveals that IGF-I enhances
1-AR potentiation
of cAMP synthesis.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Drug treatment
Slices were incubated for 75 min to allow cAMP levels to
equilibrate (25), then were exposed for 15 min to IGF-I or
vehicle. After the 15-min incubation with IGF-I, slices were stimulated
with vehicle, NE dissolved in 0.01 N HCl, phenylephrine
(PHE) or isoproterenol (ISO) dissolved in aCSF, phorbol
12,13-dibutyrate (PDB) or UK 14304 dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide
(DMSO), or forskolin dissolved in 1% ethanol. Stimulation was carried
out for 20 min. In experiments using prazosin (PRAZ), the drug was
dissolved in DMSO and added 5 min before NE stimulation. The IGF-I
antagonist JB-1, dissolved in aCSF, was added 5 min before IGF-I. The
final concentration of DMSO or ethanol on control slices was 0.1%.
Each experiment used tissue from one control and one EB-treated animal,
and each experiment was replicated four times.
cAMP determination
After drug treatment the slices were disrupted by sonication in
5% ice-cold trichloroacetic acid. The supernatant containing cAMP and
the pellet containing tissue protein were separated by centrifugation.
The supernatant was acidified with 1 N HCl and extracted
four times with hydrated ether. The samples were dried by
lyophilization and analyzed for cAMP content using a modified Gilman
cAMP assay (26). The protein concentration was determined
by resuspending the pellet in 2 N NaOH and assaying by a
modified Lowry assay (27). All cAMP values were expressed
as picomoles of cAMP per mg protein. The EC50 for
IGF-I enhancement of NE-stimulated cAMP accumulation was calculated
using the EBDA program (Elsevier-Biosoft, Cambridge,
UK).
IGF-IR binding assay
A modified version of a published protocol was used
(28). The HYP and POA were dissected separately and
immersed in ice-cold buffer [15% (v/w) 1 mM
NaHCO3, 2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and aprotinin at 1
trypsin inhibitory unit/ml], and homogenized in a glass/Teflon
homogenizer. Each experiment used combined tissue from two control and
two hormone-treated animals. The homogenate was centrifuged at
1,000 x g for 10 min at 4 C. The supernatant was
decanted, and the pellet was homogenized again as described above. The
two resulting supernatants were pooled and centrifuged at 25,000
x g for 30 min at 4 C. The pellet was washed once and
stored at -70 C until assayed.
Displacement binding assays for IGF-IR were performed as described by
Pons et al. (17). Pellets were resuspended in
assay buffer [Krebs-Ringer phosphate buffer (KRP),
Ca2+ free, containing 150
mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.2
mM
KH2PO4, 16
mM
Na2HPO4, and 1.2
mM MgSO4] at a final
protein concentration of 250 µg/ml. The total reaction volume of the
assay was 150 µl KRP buffer containing 50 µl membranes, 0.1% BSA,
5 x 10-11
M [125I]IGF-I (SA, 2,000
Ci/mmol; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ), 1
mg/ml bacitracin, and increasing concentrations
(10-710-12
M) of unlabeled human recombinant IGF-I
(Sigma, St. Louis, MO) diluted in KRP. Radioactivity bound
in the presence of 10-7
M cold IGF-I was considered nonspecific binding.
All assays were performed in triplicate. Samples were incubated for
18 h at 4 C on a shaking platform, then centrifuged at 10,000
x g for 5 min. The supernatants were aspirated, and the
pellets were washed once with ice-cold KRP containing 0.5
M sucrose. Radioactivity in the precipitates was
counted in a
-spectrometer. The density of
[125I]IGF-I specific binding was analyzed by
subtracting nonspecific binding from total binding and was expressed as
femtomoles of [125I]IGF-I per mg protein.
Competition experiments were analyzed using the EBDA program to
calculate IC50 for IGF-I.
IGF-IBP assay
Trunk blood samples were collected when the animal was
decapitated, allowed to clot overnight at 4 C, then centrifuged at
2,000 x g for 30 min. Serum was decanted into
polypropylene tubes and frozen at -20 C until analysis. For tissue
analysis three POA and three HYP from control or
E2-treated animals were pooled for each
experiment. Tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70
C. The extraction procedure for IGF-IBPs from both serum and brain
tissue was adapted from that described by Funston et al.
(29). Samples were homogenized in a glass/Teflon
homogenizer on ice at a concentration of 100 mg tissue/ml SDS-cholate
buffer (0.5% SDS, 1% cholate, and 0.1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride), sonicated for 15 sec, and centrifuged at
13,600 x g for 10 min. Aliquots of supernatant were
removed to determine protein concentration by a modified Lowry assay
(27). Samples of POA and HYP (200 µg protein) and 5 µl
serum were subjected to SDS-PAGE under nondenaturing conditions using a
4% stacking gel and 12.5% separating gel (30). Proteins
were then electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose filter, and
IGF-IBPs were quantified by incubating the filters with
[125I]IGF-I [5 x
10-6 cpm/5 ml saline, 1%
BSA (A 7030, Sigma), and 0.1% Tween-20]
(31). Quantitative analysis of IGF-IBPs was conducted by
exposing filters to autoradiographic film (3H Hyperfilm, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and scanning the autoradiograms on a
Kodak DC-120 digital camera with a +3 diopter lens
(Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY). The image was
digitized and analyzed quantitatively using the Kodak 1D
gel analysis program.
IGF-I RIA
Concentrations of IGF-I in blood and tissue were determined
using a RIA kit for human IGF-I (Peninsula Laboratories, Inc., Belmont, CA). Serum samples (100 µl) were diluted in an
equal volume of PBS (0.01 M
Na2HPO4, 0.15 M
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1% sodium azide) containing 0.05%
Triton-X 100. Diluted serum samples (200 µl) and tissue homogenates
(200 µl) were extracted with 800 µl acid-ethanol (12.5% HCl and
87.5% ethanol). Samples were incubated for 2 h at 4 C and
centrifuged at 1200 x g for 30 min. A 400-µl aliquot
of supernatant was then neutralized with 160 µl 0.855
M Tris base. The neutralized supernatant was
incubated for 2 h at 4 C and centrifuged at 1200 x
g for 30 min. A 100-µl aliquot of supernatant was removed
for RIA. All samples were analyzed in a single assay, with an intrassay
coefficient of variation of 4%.
Materials
EB was purchased from Steraloids, Inc. (Wilton, NH). PHE, ISO,
PRAZ, IBMX, and PDB were obtained from Sigma. Forskolin
was obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). NE and UK
14304 were purchased from RBI/Sigma (Natick, MA). JB-1 was
obtained from Peninsula Laboratories, Inc.
Statistics
cAMP levels were analyzed with the StatView statistical program
(Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA), using two-way ANOVA with drug
treatment and hormone as the two factors. Significant differences
between means were determined for main effects by the
Student-Newman-Keuls test and least square means for interactions.
In experiments using drug treatment as the only factor, one-way ANOVA
was used. Significant differences between means were determined by
Fishers protected least significant difference test. Students
t test was used to determine statistical differences between
control and hormone-treated groups for IGF-IR binding, IGF-I levels,
and IGF-IBP analysis. Differences were considered significant at
P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
1-, and
2-AR components of cAMP accumulation in POA
and HYP slices of E2-treated animals
1-ARs, which are Gq
coupled and augment adenylyl cyclase activity via PKC
(20). In addition, previous studies (6, 32)
suggest that under some circumstances,
2-ARs
also play a role in the cAMP response to NE stimulation in HYP and POA.
Therefore, we examined which ARs are regulated by IGF-I in POA and HYP
slices using the ß-AR agonist ISO, the
1-AR
agonist PHE, and the
2-AR agonist UK
14304.
Pretreatment with IGF-I does not significantly enhance ISO-stimulated
cAMP accumulation in either brain region, although there is a trend for
IGF-I to increase the cAMP response to ISO (Table 1
). Moreover, IGF-I does not enhance the
cAMP response to ISO plus UK 14304, a selective full agonist for
2-AR, in either brain region (Table 1
).
Neither PHE, the
1-AR agonist, nor UK 14304,
alone or in combination with IGF-I, modifies cAMP levels (data not
shown). As previously reported (20), the
1-AR agonist PHE significantly increases
ISO-stimulated cAMP accumulation in slices from both brain regions.
Moreover, IGF-I significantly enhances the cAMP response to PHE plus
ISO in slices from both brain regions (Table 1
). To confirm that IGF-I
influences the
1-AR component of the cAMP
response to NE, we also examined the ability of PRAZ, a selective
antagonist for
1-AR, to suppress IGF-I
enhancement of NE-stimulated cAMP accumulation. PRAZ blocks IGF-I
enhancement of NE-stimulated cAMP accumulation in both brain regions.
Furthermore, in the HYP, PRAZ significantly inhibits the cAMP response
to NE alone; in the POA, this effect was not quite significant
(P < 0.08; Table 2
).
|
|
1-ARs, which are
Gq coupled and augment adenylyl cyclase activity
via PKC. If IGF-I is enhancing the cAMP response to NE by modulating
the
1-AR component, as suggested by the
findings with selective
1-AR agonists and
antagonists, then maximal activation of PKC by the phorbol ester PDB
should occlude IGF-I potentiation of the cAMP response to the ß-AR
agonist ISO. Alternatively, if IGF-I potentiation of cAMP synthesis
does not involve PKC activation, then PDB and IGF-I should have
additive effects on the response to ISO. The phorbol ester PDB
significantly enhances ISO-stimulated cAMP accumulation in slices from
both brain regions (Table 2
E2 modulation of the IGF-I system
In various tissues and cell types, E2
increases IGF-I gene expression (14, 15) and modulates
IGF-I action by regulating the levels of IGF-IR (17) and
IGF-IBPs (17, 18). Moreover, E2
increases IGF-I immunoreactivity in the arcuate nucleus of the HYP
(33). Several of these factors were investigated to
examine potential mechanisms underlying the E2
dependence of IGF-I enhancement of
1-AR
signaling.
To test whether E2 regulates IGF-IR in POA and
HYP, [125I]IGF-I binding in membranes was
quantified. E2-primed animals show a significant
increase in [125I]IGF-I binding density in both
POA and HYP membranes compared with OVX control animals (Table 3
). The IC50 for
[125I]IGF-I displacement is not affected by
hormone treatment (Table 3
). RIA results showed that IGF-I levels are
the same independent of hormonal treatment for serum, POA, and HYP
(Fig. 5
). Furthermore, analysis of
[125I]IGF-I binding to serum and to soluble
tissue protein after electrophoresis indicated that IGF-IBP levels are
not modulated by E2 in either serum or extracts
of POA and HYP (Fig. 6
).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Examination of AR subtypes with selective agonists for ß-,
2-, and
1-AR reveals
that IGF-I enhances NE-stimulated cAMP accumulation via modulation of
1-AR potentiation of adenylyl cyclase. As
shown previously (20), the
1-AR
agonist PHE, which does not increase cellular cAMP by itself,
potentiates the cAMP response to the ß-AR agonist ISO. Preincubation
with IGF-I significantly increases cAMP accumulation only in slices
stimulated with both ISO and PHE. Because IGF-I does not significantly
augment the cAMP response to ISO alone, the growth factor must be
modulating the
1-AR component of the cAMP
response. This interpretation is supported by two other observations.
First, the
1-AR antagonist PRAZ blocks IGF-I
enhancement of NE-stimulated cAMP synthesis. Second, maximal activation
of PKC, the downstream mediator of
1-AR
potentiation of adenylyl cyclase, occludes IGF-I augmentation of
ISO-stimulated cAMP accumulation.
The data also suggest that IGF-I modulation of
1-AR signaling probably occurs at the level of
the receptor and/or the G protein. Potentiation of
1-AR signaling is unlikely to be mediated by
IGF-I activation of adenylyl cyclase, because IGF-I does not enhance
the cAMP response to forskolin, a direct activator of adenylyl cyclase.
IGF-I enhancement of cAMP accumulation is observed in the presence of
PDE inhibitors, ruling out PDE as a target of IGF-I action. It is also
unlikely that IGF-I directly activates PKC. If IGF-I acted by this
route, it should facilitate the cAMP response to both ISO and forskolin
(20), neither of which was observed in the present
experiments. These findings are consistent with reports that protein
tyrosine kinases regulate G protein-coupled receptor activation of the
phospholipase C pathway in Rat-1 fibroblasts (36) and
Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing metabotropic glutamate receptor
1
(37). Moreover, IGF-I can modulate receptor-G protein
coupling, resulting in modulation of receptor function
(38).
Quantitation of
1-AR potentiation of cAMP
synthesis, a PKC-mediated response, is an excellent means to monitor
1-AR function in rat brain slices. Agonist
occupancy of
1-ARs can activate both
phospholipase C and phospholipase A2 (39, 40), producing a variety of second messengers that activate PKC
(41). Additionally, at least two
1-AR subtypes, termed
1B- and
1A-AR, are
expressed in the HYP (42). Both subtypes of
1-AR can mediate potentiation of adenylyl
cyclase (43). Thus, measurement of any single second
messenger generated by phospholipase C and A2
activation may overlook the pathway by which
1-ARs stimulate PKC activity.
Previous studies from our laboratory demonstrated that
E2 selectively increases
1b-AR messenger RNA (44) and
1B-AR binding density (45) in the
POA and HYP of female rats. This E2-dependent
increase in receptor expression correlates with increased
1-AR potentiation of ß-AR-stimulated cAMP
accumulation (45). In view of these results, it is
possible that the E2-dependence of IGF-I
potentiation of
1-AR signaling is due to
increased
1B-AR expression in the POA and HYP
of female rats.
The present results were unexpected in view of our previous findings
with genistein, a general tyrosine kinase inhibitor (6).
We found that inhibition of tyrosine kinase activity with genistein
enhances NE-stimulated cAMP accumulation in POA and HYP slices. This
effect is dependent on in vivo E2
treatment in the POA and is amplified by E2
treatment in the HYP. Thus, it might have been predicted that IGF-I
would inhibit NE-stimulated cAMP synthesis. However, we now find that
exogenous IGF-I enhances, rather than inhibits,
1-AR signaling in both POA and HYP, and that
this action of IGF-I is E2 dependent. Because
genistein and IGF-I have similar effects on
1-AR signaling in these brain regions, an
explanation may lie in the complexity of the system. Different protein
tyrosine kinases might regulate
1-AR signaling
in opposite directions. IGF-IR may also modulate
1-AR signaling independently of tyrosine
kinase activation (46). Alternatively, genistein may not
completely inhibit the tyrosine kinase activity of IGF-IR in brain
slices from female rats. Indeed, preincubation of HYP and POA slices
from E2-primed female rats with genistein does
not block IGF-I potentiation of
1-AR signaling
(Quesada, A., and A. M. Etgen, unpublished observations). Thus,
partial IGF-IR autophosphorylation may be sufficient for IGF-IR
modulation of
1-AR signaling.
As mentioned previously, E2 can modulate IGF-I action by stimulating IGF-I gene expression or by increasing IGF-IR and/or IGF-IBPs in several tissues and cell cultures. Our studies demonstrate that E2 modestly, but significantly, increases [125I]IGF-I binding density in the POA and HYP, indicating an increase in IGF-IR in these two brain regions. Toran-Allerand et al. (19) suggested that an increase in IGF-IR in neurons exposed to E2 might explain the synergistic interaction between E2 and insulin/IGF-I on neurite outgrowth in hypothalamic explants. Thus, induction of IGF-IR by E2 may increase the sensitivity of cells to IGF-I action, thereby enhancing the biological effects of the peptide. Other important molecules involved in the regulation of IGF-I action are its binding proteins. E2 can increase IGF-IBP expression in the HYP. Incubation of cultured HYP neurons with 0.1 nM E2 for 5 days increases IGF-IR and IGF-IBP-2 levels (17). Likewise, a single injection of E2 to OVX female rats, which does not modulate IGF-IR protein levels quantified by immunoblotting in the HYP after 24 h, increases IGF-BP-2 immunostaining in the arcuate nucleus (47). We found increases in IGF-IR, but no change in IGF-IBPs, when quantified with [125I]IGF-I binding methods after a 48-h exposure to E2. The difference between doses and duration of hormone treatment and experimental methods may explain why we did not observe E2-induced increases in IGF-IBPs in the HYP.
In addition to regulation of IGF-I function in neurons, E2 can modulate IGF-IR, IGF-IBPs, and the morphology of hypothalamic astrocytes (48). Tanycytes are specialized astroglia that modulate the secretion of GnRH and other neurohormones from nerve terminals in the median eminence (49). Glial cells may modulate neuroendocrine events at least in part by synthesizing and/or releasing trophic factors that, in turn, act on neurons or other glial cells (17). Duenas et al. (33) demonstrated that levels of IGF-I immunoreactivity increase in hypothalamic tanycytes on the morning and afternoon of proestrus, when the preovulatory LH surge and sexual receptivity are initiated in female rats. IGF-I immunoreactivity decreases to basal levels by the morning of metestrus, when LH levels and sexual receptivity are low. Furthermore, IGF-I immunoreactivity in the median eminence decreases when gonadal steroid levels are reduced by OVX and increases in a dose-dependent manner when OVX rats are injected with E2. Unlike Duenas et al. (33), we did not find that E2 increases IGF-I levels in the POA, HYP, or serum of OVX rats. However, our data on IGF-I levels in whole HYP and POA do not rule out the possibility that E2-dependent increases in IGF-I levels might be limited to specific hypothalamic regions.
Behavioral data from this laboratory suggest that activation of
hypothalamic
1-AR by endogenously released NE
participates in hormonal facilitation of female rat sexual behavior
(50). Pharmacological blockade of
1B-AR blocks both the facilitation of sexual
behavior and the electrophysiological responses of ventral medial
hypothalamic neurons to
1-AR agonists in
E2-primed female rats (51). In
addition, NE acts via
1-ARs to facilitate the
release of GnRH in an E2-dependent manner
(52). The facilitatory effect of E2
on GnRH release may be exerted at the median eminence, where the GnRH
axons converge to release the neuropeptide into the portal vasculature.
Arcuate neurons and tanycytes express IGF-IRs (53), and
immunocytochemical studies from our laboratory show
1B-AR immunoreactivity in arcuate fibers and
possibly in tanycytes of the median eminence (54). Thus,
it can be hypothesized that IGF-IRs and
1-ARs,
particularly the
1B-AR subtype, interact in
these two brain regions to modulate female reproductive function.
In summary, our results demonstrate that IGF-I enhances NE-stimulated
cAMP accumulation in POA and HYP only if slices are derived from
E2-primed rats. Pharmacological studies reveal
that IGF-I enhances NE-stimulated cAMP accumulation by modulating
1-AR potentiation of adenylyl cyclase. Thus,
E2 regulation of NE receptor function in the POA
and HYP might involve increased expression of IGF-IR, which, in turn,
augments NE signaling via E2-induced
1B-AR. Our finding that both
1B-AR expression and IGF-I modulation of the
1-AR signaling are
E2-regulated events suggests that interactions
between IGF-I and NE receptor signaling pathways may participate in
E2 regulation of GnRH release and female sexual
behavior. Future research in our laboratory will examine this
possibility in more detail.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received July 24, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1- and
ß-adrenoceptor intercommunication in rat hypothalamic slices. J
Neurochem 56:628635[CrossRef][Medline]
2-noradrenergic receptors in
the paraventricular nucleus and other brain areas: relation to
circulating corticosterone and feeding behavior. Life Sci 38:473482[CrossRef][Medline]
2- and
ß-adrenoceptor rhythms are correlated with circadian feeding:
evidence from chronic methamphetamine treatment and withdrawal. Brain
Res 321:8390[CrossRef][Medline]
subunit of Gq/G11. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 93:82588263
subunit. Science 276:18781881
1-Adrenergic activation of brown adipocytes
leads to an increased formation of inositol polyphosphates. FEBS Lett 195:319322[CrossRef][Medline]
-adrenergic and
-aminobutyric acid receptor modulation of cyclic AMP accumulation in
rat brain slices. J Neurochem 47:800810[Medline]
-1 adrenergic receptor subtypes in discrete regions of rat brain.
J Neurosci 10:25802586[Abstract]
-adrenoceptor subtypes. J Neurochem 52:690698[CrossRef][Medline]
1b-adrenoceptor mRNA in female
rat hypothalamus-preoptic area. J Neuroendocrinol 8:449455[CrossRef][Medline]
1B-noradrenergic
receptors in the hypothalamus and preoptic area. J Neurosci 12:38693876[Abstract]
1-adrenergic agonists act on the ventromedial
hypothalamus to cause neuronal excitation and lordosis facilitation:
electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Brain Res 588:237245[CrossRef][Medline]
1-Adrenergic regulation of estrogen-induced
increases in luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone mRNA levels and
release. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 17:7782[Medline]
1B-adrenergic receptor in
female rat brain regions involved in stress and neuroendocrine
function. Neurochem Int 35:383391[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Hamadeh, M. C. Devries, and M. A. Tarnopolsky Estrogen Supplementation Reduces Whole Body Leucine and Carbohydrate Oxidation and Increases Lipid Oxidation in Men during Endurance Exercise J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3592 - 3599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Daftary and A. C. Gore IGF-1 in the Brain as a Regulator of Reproductive Neuroendocrine Function Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2005; 230(5): 292 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Etgen and M. Acosta-Martinez Participation of Growth Factor Signal Transduction Pathways in Estradiol Facilitation of Female Reproductive Behavior Endocrinology, September 1, 2003; 144(9): 3828 - 3835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Quesada and A. M. Etgen Functional Interactions between Estrogen and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I in the Regulation of alpha 1B-Adrenoceptors and Female Reproductive Function J. Neurosci., March 15, 2002; 22(6): 2401 - 2408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |