Endocrinology Vol. 142, No. 2 653-662
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society
Impaired Interaction of Mutant Thyroid Hormone Receptors Associated with Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Transcriptional Coregulators1
Kwang-huei Lin and
Yi-hsin Wu shen-liang chen
Department of Biochemistry, Chang-Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
333, Republic of China
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Kwang-Huei Lin, Department of Biochemistry, Chang-Gung University, 259 Wen-hwa 1 Road, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China. E-mail: khlin{at}mail.cgu.edu.tw
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Thyroid hormone (T3) exerts its many biological activities
through interaction with specific nuclear receptors (TRs) that function
as ligand-dependent transcription factors at genes that contain a
thyroid hormone response element (TRE). Mutant TRs have been detected
in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines and tissue, but their
contribution to carcinogenesis has remained unclear. The interaction of
four such mutant TRs (J7-TR
1, J7-TRß1, H-TR
1, and
L-TR
1) with transcriptional coregulators has now been
investigated. With the exception of J7-TR
1, which in the absence of
T3 exhibited transcriptional silencing activity with a
TRE-reporter gene construct in transfected cells, the mutant TRs had
little effect (compared with that of wild-type receptors) on
transcriptional activity of the reporter gene in the absence or
presence of T3, of the transcriptional corepressors SMRT,
NCoR or of the transcriptional coactivator SRC. Electrophoretic
mobility-shift assays revealed that, in the presence of T3,
the J7-TRß1 mutant did not interact with SRC, whereas J7-TR
1
and H-TR
1 exhibited reduced abilities to associate with this
coactivator and L-TR
1 showed an ability to interact with
SRC similar to that of wild-type TR
1. The dominant negative activity
of the mutant TRs in transfected cells appeared inversely related to
the ability of the receptors to interact with SRC. Whereas
J7-TRß1, H-TR
1, and L-TR
1 did not interact with
SMRT, and NCoR. J7-TR
1 bind to corepressors but failed to dissociate
from them in the presence of T3. These aberrant
interactions between the mutant TRs and transcriptional coregulators
may contribute to the highly variable clinical characteristics of human
hepatocellular carcinoma.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
THYROID hormone (T3),
through interaction with its intracellular receptors (TRs), influences
various physiological functions, including general metabolism,
development, growth, and reproduction (1, 2, 3). Two
principal types of TRs, which are encoded by genes on human chromosomes
17 (TR
) and 3 (TRß), have been identified; transcripts of each of
these genes undergo alternative splicing to generate TR
1 and TR
2
as well as TRß1 and TRß2 receptor isoforms. Like other nuclear
hormone receptors, TRs are ligand-dependent transcription factors
and contain domains that mediate binding of hormone, binding to DNA,
receptor dimerization, and interaction with various other
transcriptional factors. TRs regulate the transcription of target genes
by binding to specific DNA sequences, known as thyroid hormone response
elements (TREs), in the promoter regions of these genes. In the absence
of T3, TRs repress the activity of target
promoters, a phenomenon known as transcriptional silencing that is
thought to be mediated by interaction of the ligand binding domain of
the receptor with nuclear hormone receptor corepressors, such as SMRT
(silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor).
Ligand binding is thought to induce dissociation of TRs from
corepressors and to result in the recruitment of coactivators such as
SRC (steroid receptor coactivator) and in the consequent activation of
transcription from target promoters (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Thus, whereas
SRC does not bind to wild-type TRs in the absence of
T3, it binds to these receptors with increasing
avidity as the T3 concentration is increased. The
corepressors NCoR (nuclear receptor co-repressor) and SMRT were
recently shown to repress transcription by interacting directly with
class II histone deacetylases (11).
The role of TRs in neoplastic transformation is largely unknown
(3). To evaluate the potential contribution of TR genes to
the pathogenesis of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we previously
examined the expression and regulation of these genes in nine human
hepatoma cell lines (12, 13). Overexpression of TRß1 was
detected in three of the nine cell lines. In addition, the degree of
differentiation of the cell lines was inversely correlated with the
abundance of TRß1 protein. These observations suggested that changes
in expression of the TRß gene might contribute to
hepatocarcinogenesis. We subsequently cloned the complementary DNAs
(cDNAs) for TR
1 and TRß1 from the HCC cell line J7 and showed that
the corresponding recombinant proteins exerted a dominant negative
effect on the transactivation activity of wild-type TRs
(14). The isolation of cDNAs for TR
1 from tumor tissue
of two individuals with HCC also revealed that the encoded proteins
acted in a dominant negative manner (15). Furthermore, a
high prevalence (>60%) of point mutations has been detected in the TR
genes of tumor tissue from individuals with HCC (16).
To characterize further the properties of naturally occurring TR
mutants, we have now investigated the interactions of four such
HCC-associated mutant proteins (three TR
1 and one TRß1) with
transcriptional coregulators. All TR mutants identified in individuals
with the syndrome of resistance to thyroid hormone (RTH) have been
derived exclusively from the TRß gene (17, 18). However,
our previous studies have shown that mutations in the TR
gene also
occur naturally (14, 15), and we now show that TR
1 and
TRß1 mutants exhibit similar aberrant interactions with
transcriptional coregulators.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Plasmids
Plasmids that encode glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion
proteins containing amino acids 570 to 780 of human SRC-1 or amino
acids 1086 to 1449 of human SMRT or amino acid 2063 to 2300 of human
NCoR were kindly provided by M. G. Parker (Imperial Cancer
Research Fund, London, UK), M. Privalsky (University of California,
Davis, CA), and A. N. Hollenberg (Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA) respectively. The encoded fusion proteins were expressed in
bacteria BL-21 and purified as described (19). The
mammalian expression vectors pBK-CMV-SRC1 and pCMX-SMRT were kindly
provided by M. J. Tsai (Baylor College, Baylor, TX) and R. M.
Evans (The Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA), respectively.
Determination of the transactivation activity of TRs
The effects of SRC and SMRT on the silencing activity and
T3-dependent transactivation activity of TRs
were examined by transfection of COS-1 cells (5 x
105 cells in a 60-mm dish), with the use of
Lipofectamine (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD),
with expression vectors encoding mutant or wild-type TRs, SRC or SMRT,
and ß-galactosidase (as a control for variability in transfection
efficiency) as well as with a TRE-containing luciferase reporter
plasmid (J. L. Jameson. Northwest University, Chicago, IL). After
incubation for 24 h in the absence or presence of
T3, the cells were harvested and lysed in 250
µl of lysis buffer and a portion of the cell lysate (20 µl) was
assayed for luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities as described
previously (20). The luciferase activity was normalized on
the basis of the protein concentration and ß-galactosidase activity
of the lysates.
Electrophoretic mobility-shift assay (EMSA)
32P-Labeled oligonucleotides corresponding to various TREs (F2,
derived from the chicken lysozyme gene and consisting of two inverted
repeats of the half-site binding motif separated by six nucleotides;
DR4, two direct repeats of the half-site motif separated by four
nucleotides; or Pal, palindromic TRE) were prepared as described
(15). TR proteins were synthesized by in vitro
transcription and translation with the use of a TNT-coupled
reticulocyte lysate kit (Promega Corp.); their
concentrations were determined by measuring the intensity of the
corresponding 35S-labeled bands after SDS-PAGE.
For EMSA, identical amounts of TRs were incubated with
32P-labeled TRE oligonucleotide in the absence or
presence of retinoid X receptor
(RXR
) and
T3 as described previously (14).
Supershift analysis was performed by addition of GST-SRC or GST-SMRT or
GST-NCoR. After electrophoresis, TR homodimers and heterodimers were
visualized by autoradiography and quantified with a BAS2000 image
analyzer (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) (14).
 |
Results
|
|---|
Effects of SMRT and SRC on the silencing and
T3-dependent transactivation activities of TR mutants
The human TR mutants studied were as follows: H-TR
1 (mutant H)
contains a Val
Ala point mutation at codon 390;
L-TR
1 (mutant L) contains Glu
Lys and Pro
Ser
mutations at codons 350 and 398, respectively; J7-TR
1 contains a Met
Ile mutation at codon 259; and J7-TRß1 contains a Met
Val
mutation at codon 334 (Fig. 1
). The first
two of these mutations were identified in individuals with HCC
(15), and the latter two were identified in the HCC cell
line J7 (14). Except J7TR
1, mutant L, which bound
T3 with reduced affinity, the others had no
T3 binding activity. The SRC, SMRT, NCoR
interaction regions in the TR are indicated (Fig. 1
) (21, 22).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the mutation sites of
the four TR mutants used in the present study. The various domains and
SRC, SMRT, and NCoR binding regions of the receptors, as well as the
locations of two mutation hot spots of TRß1 associated with RTH
(17 18 ), are indicated.
|
|
The effects of SMRT and SRC on the silencing and ligand-dependent
transactivation activities of the mutant TRs were investigated by
transfection of COS-1 cells with expression vectors encoding TRs and
coregulators as well as with a reporter plasmid containing the
luciferase gene under the control of the F2-TRE. Expression of
wild-type TR
1 or TRß1 in COS-1 cells incubated in
T3-depleted (Td) medium reduced the extent of
basal transcription to 44 and 50% of control values, respectively
(Fig. 2A
). In contrast, in the presence
of 50 nM T3, TR
1 or TRß1
increased luciferase activity by factors of approximately 3.8 and 4.8,
respectively. Although the J7-TR
1 mutant exhibited silencing
activity, none of the other mutants induced marked effects on the
transcription of the reporter gene in the absence or presence of
T3. In cells cotransfected with the SMRT vector,
wild-type TR
1 or TRß1 proteins further repressed basal
transcriptional activity to 21 and 40%, respectively, of control
values (Fig. 2B
). SMRT had little effect on the transactivation
activity of the wild-type receptors in the presence of
T3, or on the extent of transcription in cells
expressing the mutant receptors either in the absence or presence of
T3. In the presence of T3,
SRC enhanced the transactivation activities of wild-type TR
1 and
TRß1 (luciferase activities were increased by the receptors by
factors of 4.6 and 6.3, respectively) (Fig. 2C
). SRC had no substantial
effect on the silencing activity of the wild-type receptors in the
absence of T3, or on the extent of transcription
in cells expressing the mutant receptors either in the absence or
presence of T3. However, SRC enhanced the
transactivation activity of J7-TR
1 in the presence of
T3 by factor of 2.2. Similar results were
obtained with the Pal-TRE and DR4-TRE as with the F2-TRE (data not
shown).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Effects of SMRT and SRC on the silencing and
ligand-dependent transactivation activities of wild-type and mutant
TRs. COS-1 cells were transfected with expression vectors encoding
wild-type or mutant TRs (0.5 µg), a ß-galactosidase expression
plasmid (0.5 µg), and an F2-TRE luciferase reporter construct (1
µg), in the absence (A) or presence of SMRT (B) or SRC (C) expression
vectors (0.5 µg). Cells were incubated for 24 h in Td medium or
in the presence of 50 nM T3, after which cell
lysates were prepared and assayed for luciferase and ß-galactosidase
activities. Normalized luciferase activity was expressed as a
percentage of that of control cells that were transfected with the
reporter construct and empty TR expression vector and were incubated in
Td or T3 medium. Data are means ± SEM
from at least three independent experiments.
|
|
Effects of SRC on the DNA binding activities of TR mutants
We next examined the effects of SRC, SMRT, and NCoR on the DNA
binding activity of mutant TRs with the use of EMSA analysis.
Production of the two wild-type TRs and four mutant receptors by
in vitro transcription and translation yielded proteins of
the expected size (49 and 55 kDa for TR
1 and TRß1, respectively);
the preparations also contained various truncated proteins (three in
the case of TR
1 and two for TRß1), which were likely the products
of internal translational initiation (16). GST-SRC,
GST-SMRT, GST-NCoR, and GST proteins were produced in and purified from
bacteria BL-21; the identity of these proteins was confirmed by
immunoblot analysis (data not shown). In the absence of
T3, wild-type TR
1 bound to a Pal-TRE
oligonucleotide as a heterodimer with RXR
, a homodimer, and a
monomer (Fig. 3A
). Addition of GST-SRC in
the absence of T3 had no effect on the pattern of
DNA-protein interaction. However, in the presence of 1
nM T3, a supershifted
complex (GST-SRC-TR
1-RXR
) was detected (Fig. 3
, A and C); further
increasing the T3 concentration (up to 100
nM) did not greatly increase the amount of this
complex, and a similar complex was not formed when GST was added in
place of GST-SRC. In contrast, GST-SRC did not interact with the
heterodimer formed by J7-TR
1 and RXR
in the presence of 1
nM T3; at
T3 concentrations of 10 and 100
nM, small amounts of a supershifted complex were
apparent. Whereas GST-SRC had virtually no effect in the supershift
assay with TR
1 mutant H at any T3
concentration, it interacted with TR
1 mutant L to an extent similar
to that observed with the wild-type receptor (Fig. 3
, A and C). GST-SRC
interacted in a T3-dependent manner with the
heterodimer formed by wild-type TRß1 and RXR
; however, no
supershifted complex was detected when GST-SRC was added to J7-TRß1
and RXR
in the presence of T3 (Fig. 3
, B and
C). Results similar to those shown in Fig. 3
were obtained with
oligonucleotides corresponding to the F2-TRE (Fig. 4
) or the DR4-TRE (Fig. 5
).

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. EMSA analysis of the interaction of mutant TRs
bound to the F2-TRE with the coactivator SRC. Analysis was performed as
described in Fig. 3 , with the exception that the Pal-TRE
oligonucleotide was replaced by an F2-TRE oligonucleotide.
|
|

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. EMSA analysis of the interaction of mutant TRs
bound to the DR4-TRE with the coactivator SRC. Analysis was performed
as described in Fig. 3 , with the exception that the Pal-TRE
oligonucleotide was replaced by a DR4-TRE oligonucleotide.
|
|
Dominant negative activities of TR mutants
To examine the relation between the affinity of TR mutants
for SRC and the dominant negative activity of the receptors, we
evaluated the inhibitory effects of the mutants on the transactivation
activity of the wild-type proteins in transfected COS-1 cells. At a
wild-type/mutant vector ratio of 1:1, the dominant negative activities
of J7-TR
1 and J7-TRß1 were greater than were those of the TR
1
mutants H and L when tested with the F2-TRE (Fig. 6A
) or the Pal-TRE (Fig. 6B
). At a
wild-type/mutant vector ratio of 1:5, the dominant negative activities
of each of the mutant receptors assayed with the F2-TRE or the Pal-TRE
were increased (Fig. 6
). When cells were transfected with equal amounts
of mutant and wild-type TR expression plasmids, the rank order of
dominant negative activity was J7-TR
1
J7-TRß1 >
H-TR
1 > L-TR
1. Thus, TR
1 mutant L, which
interacted with SRC to an extent similar to that observed with
wild-type TR
1 (
Figs. 35

), showed the lowest dominant negative
activity, whereas the impaired interaction of the other three mutant
receptors with SRC was associated with a greater dominant negative
activity.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Dominant negative activity of mutant TRs. COS-1
cells were transfected with an expression vector encoding wild-type
(WT) TR 1 or TRß1 (0.5 µg), a TR mutant vector (0.5 or 2.5 µg),
a ß-galactosidase expression plasmid (0.5 µg), and an F2-TRE (A) or
Pal-TRE (B) luciferase reporter construct (1 µg). Cells were
incubated for 24 h in Td medium or in the presence of 50
nM T3, after which cell lysates were prepared
and assayed for luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities. Luciferase
activity was normalized on the basis of protein concentration and
ß-galactosidase activity of the lysates. Data are expressed as the
percentage inhibition by each mutant receptor of the
T3-dependent transactivation activity of the
corresponding wild-type receptor, and are means ± SEM
of three independent experiments.
|
|
Effects of SMRT, NCoR on the DNA binding activities of TR
mutants
The ability of the mutant receptors to interact with the
corepressor SMRT, NCoR and the ability of T3 to
induce the dissociation of such complexes were examined by EMSA
analysis. As expected, heterodimers of wild-type TR
1 or TRß1 with
RXR
that were bound to a DR4-TRE (Fig. 7
) or to an F2-TRE (Fig. 8
) oligonucleotide interacted with
GST-SMRT in the absence of T3, and
T3 induced the dissociation of GST-SMRT from
these complexes in a concentration-dependent manner. However,
GST-SMRT did not bind to H-TR
1, L-TR
1, or J7-TRß1
mutants complexed with RXR
and a TRE; the corepressor did bind to a
reduced extent to the ternary complex formed by J7-TR
1, but the
resulting quaternary complex was not dissociated by
T3 (Figs. 7
and 8
). Similar results were observed
when GST-NCoR protein was used, except it supershifted the
J7-TR
1-RXR heterodimer intensively in the absence of T3 by using
DR4-TRE or F2-TRE (Figs. 9
and 10
). But the complex did not
dissociate by T3 (Figs. 9
and 10
).

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. EMSA analysis of the interaction of mutant TRs
bound to the DR4-TRE with the corepressor SMRT. Analysis was performed
as described in Fig. 3 , with the exception that GST-SRC was replaced by
GST-SMRT (1 µg) and that the Pal-TRE oligonucleotide was replaced by
a DR4-TRE oligonucleotide.
|
|

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8. EMSA analysis of the interaction of mutant TRs
bound to the F2-TRE with the corepressor SMRT. Analysis was performed
as described in Fig. 3 , with the exception that GST-SRC was replaced by
GST-SMRT (1 µg) and that the Pal-TRE oligonucleotide was replaced by
an F2-TRE oligonucleotide.
|
|

View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9. EMSA analysis of the interaction of mutant TRs
bound to the DR4-TRE with the corepressor NCoR. Analysis was performed
as described in Fig. 3 , with the exception that GST- SRC was replaced
by GST- NCoR (1 µg) and that the Pal-TRE oligonucleotide was replaced
by a DR4-TRE oligonucleotide.
|
|

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 10. EMSA analysis of the interaction of mutant TRs
bound to the F2-TRE with the corepressor NCoR. Analysis was performed
as described in Fig. 3 , with the exception that GST- SRC was replaced
by GST- NCoR (1 µg) and that the Pal-TRE oligonucleotide was replaced
by a F2-TRE oligonucleotide.
|
|
In summary, the J7-TR
1 mutant, which bind T3
weakly, formed a complex with RXR
and SRC at the TRE, but the
interaction of the mutant with SRC required higher concentrations of
T3 than did the interaction of wild-type TR
1
with SRC (
Figs. 35

); furthermore, T3 did not
induce dissociation of the J7-TR
1RXR
-SMRT or
J7-TR
1RXR
-NCoR complexes (
Figs. 710


). TR
1 mutant H, which
shows no T3 binding activity, did not form a
TR-RXR
-SRC complex at the DR4-TRE in the presence of
T3 (Fig. 5
) but did exhibit a reduced ability to
form such a complex at the Pal-TRE (Fig. 3
); and the F2-TRE (Fig. 4
).
TR
1 mutant L, which exhibits a reduced T3
binding activity, formed a TR-RXR
-SRC complex in the presence of
T3 with all three TREs tested to an extent
similar to that observed with wild-type TR
1 (
Figs. 35

). The
J7-TRß1 mutant, which does not bind T3, did not
interact with SRC in the presence of RXR
, T3,
and any of the TREs tested (
Figs. 35

). Mutants H-TR
1,
L-TR
1, and J7-TRß1 did not form TR-RXR
-SMRT or
TRRXR
-NCoR complexes in the absence of T3
with the two TREs tested (
Figs. 710


). Finally, the impairment in the
interaction of TR mutants with SRC appeared directly related to the
dominant negative activity of these receptors.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
To shed light on the role of TRs in hepatocarcinogenesis, we
previously characterized the TRs in 16 HCC specimens (16)
and detected several point mutations in both TR
1 and TRß1. Most of
the TR
1 mutations were located within two hot spots: amino acids
209228, and residues 245256. However, no hot spot was detected in
TRß1. The mutant proteins showed either a partial impairment or a
complete loss of DNA binding activity. The high prevalence of TR
mutations detected in the tumors of individuals with HCC suggests that
the mutant receptors might play an important role in liver
carcinogenesis. We have now characterized the interactions of four
mutant TRs with the coregulators SRC, SMRT, and NCoR. All of them are
abundant in liver (23). The interactions of all four
naturally occurring mutant receptors with the coregulators were
impaired.
The mechanisms by which SMRT and SRC regulate the expression of
T3-responsive genes have been characterized
(24, 25, 26). In the case of positively regulated genes, SMRT
binds to the unliganded form of TRs and this complex mediates the
silencing of basal transcription (27, 28). On binding of
T3, TRs dissociate from SMRT and are converted
from transcriptional repressors to transcriptional activators. However,
maximal transactivation activity is only achieved on interaction of the
ligand-bound TRs with a coactivator such as SRC. In contrast, in the
case of genes that are negatively regulated by
T3, nuclear receptor corepressors activate rather
than inhibit basal transcription (29).
The mutant TRs examined in the present study either did not bind to
SMRT or NCoR (H-TR
1, L-TR
1, and J7-TRß1), or bound
to the corepressor but failed to dissociate from it on addition of
hormone (J7-TR
1). The failure of J7-TR
1 to disscociate from SMRT
or NCoR in the presence of T3 might be due to its
reduced affinity for the hormone. Indeed, the M259I mutation in
J7-TR
1 results in almost loss all of hormone binding activity
(14). The observation that the TR
1 mutants H (V390A)
and L (E350K, P398S) as well as J7-TRß1 (M334V) did not bind to SMRT
suggests that the mutated residues, which are all located in the
COOH-terminal region of the receptors, are important for corepressor
binding. Two mutation hot spots have been identified in the hormone
binding domain of TRß1 in individuals with RTH (18, 30).
Many TRß1 mutants isolated from such individuals are able to repress
gene transcription but are unable to activate genes in response to
T3 or T4 (31).
The interaction of such mutant receptors with corepressors is thought
to be aberrant (31). The mutation site for J7-TRß1 is
located within the first hot spot for RTH mutations. Furthermore,
alignment of the sequences of the hormone binding domains of TR
1 and
TRß1 indicates that the mutated residue
(Met259) of J7-TR
1 corresponds to
Met313 of TRß1, which is also located in the
first hot spot of RTH mutations. The mutation site for TR
1 mutant H
(Val390) and one of the mutated residues of
TR
1 mutant L (Pro398) both correspond to
residues located in RTH hot spot 2 of TRß1 (17, 18).
Our results indicate that association of SMRT with mutant TRs is
not required for their dominant negative actions. Thus, all four TR
mutants examined in the present study exhibited dominant negative
activities, but only J7-TR
1 interacted with SMRT or NCoR. In
contrast, Yoh et al. (31). showed that
corepressor association appears to be required for the dominant
negative action of TRs associated with RTH. These researchers suggested
that an altered interaction with corepressors likely plays an important
role in the dominant negative action of RTH-associated TR mutants and
may contribute to the variable phenotype of this disorder
(31). Our results do not exclude the possibility that the
mutant TRs studied associate with corepressors other than SMRT.
However, with the exception of J7-TR
1, the mutants examined in the
present study did not exhibit silencing activity in transfected cells.
The silencing activity exhibited by J7-TR
1 is consistent with the
binding of this mutant to SMRT or NCoR.
The splice variants TR
1 and TR
2 are identical for the first 370
amino acids, but the remaining COOH-terminal regions of the two
proteins are completely different. This sequence divergence renders
TR
2 unable to transactivate TRE-containing genes. Tagami et
al. (32). showed that TR
2 acts as a weak
antagonist because it is deficient in interactions with the nuclear
receptor corepressors NCoR and SMRT. Cohen et al.
(33) reported that the TRß1 mutant R429Q does not
recruit NCoR. However, the R429Q-RXR heterodimer is able to recruit the
SMRT. Besides, the TRß1 mutant
G337T binds NCoR more strongly than
SMRT. This observation, together with our data, indicates that the
COOH-terminal region of TRs is important for corepressor binding and,
consequently, for silencing activity. However, we did not observe the
two corepressors SMRT and NCoR differentially interacted with mutant
TRs. In other words, SMRT and NCoR interact similarly with those four
TR mutants at least in our experimental conditions.
The dominant negative effects of various TR mutants have been
shown to correlate with the abilities of these receptors to bind NCoR
but not with the impairment in coactivator binding (34),
suggesting that the defective release of corepressors, together with
unimpaired dimerization and DNA binding activities, is important for
the inhibitory action of mutant TRs. The mutants examined in the
present study all retained DNA binding and heterodimerization
activities. However, compared with those of the wild-type receptors,
the homodimerization activities of J7-TR
1 and J7-TRß1 appeared
reduced, whereas those of H-TR
1 and L-TR
1 appeared
increased, in EMSAs performed with the Pal-TRE (Fig. 3
) or DR4-TRE
(Fig. 5
). The homodimerization activity thus appears inversely related
to dominant negative activity for these receptors, the latter of which
decreases in the rank order J7-TR
1
J7-TRß1 >
H-TR
1 > L-TR
1. The dominant negative mutants
R316H and R338W of TRß1 show selective loss of homodimerization
activity with preservation of the ability to form heterodimers with
RXR
(35). Mutations in the hinge region of TRs
selectively affect T3 binding when the receptors
are complexed with DNA as well as prevent NCoR dissociation
(36).
An inability to interact with coactivators such as SRC is also a
determinant of dominant negative activity of mutant TRs associated with
RTH (37). Consistent with this notion, we have shown that
the extent of the impairment in the interaction of the mutant TRs with
SRC appears related to the dominant negative activity of the receptors.
The GST-SRC fusion protein that we used for EMSA analysis contains
amino acids 570 to 780 of SRC. The interaction of hormone-dependent
coactivators such as SRC or glucocorticoid receptor-interaction protein
1 (GRIP1) with nuclear hormone receptors is mediated by the AF-2 domain
of the receptors, which contains a hydrophobic cleft (38).
The interaction of a naturally occurring transactivation mutant (L454V)
of TRß1 with SRC was also shown to be impaired (39),
suggesting that the affected amino acid is important for this
interaction. The mutation site for H-TR
1 and the downstream mutation
site for L-TR
1 are located in a region corresponding to
that of TRß1 containing residue 454.
In summary, our data indicate that the association of mutant TRs with
SMRT or NCoR is not required for dominant negative activity but is
required for silencing activity. Moreover, our observations suggest
that the ability of mutant TRs to interact with SRC is inversely
related to their dominant negative activity.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
1 This work was supported by grants from Chang-Gung University (CMRP
737, CMRP893, NMRP 407) and the National Science Council of the
Republic of China (NSC 87-2316-B-182002). 
Received May 25, 2000.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Cheng SY 1995 New insights into the structure
and function of the thyroid hormone receptor. J Biomed Sci 2:7789[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Oppenheimer JH, Schwartz HJ, Strait KA 1994 Thyroid hormone action: the plot thickens. Eur J Endocrinol 130:1524[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Guernsey DL, Fisher PB 1990 Thyroid hormone and
neoplastic transformation. Oncogenesis 1:389408
-
Tong GX, Jeyakumar M, Tanen MR, Bagchi MK 1996 Transcriptional silencing by unliganded thyroid hormone receptor beta
requires a soluble corepressor that interacts with the ligand-binding
domain of the receptor. Mol Cell Biol 16:19091920[Abstract]
-
Zamir I, Harding HP, Atkins GB, Horlein A, Glass CK,
Rosenfeld MG, Lazar MA 1996 Nuclear hormone receptor corepressor
mediates transcriptional silencing by receptors with distinct
repression domains. Mol Cell Biol 16:54585465[Abstract]
-
Nagy L, Kao HY, Love JD, Li C, Banayo E, Gooch JT,
Krishna V, Chatterjee K, Evans RM, Schwabe JW 1999 Mechanism of
corepressor binding and release from nuclear hormone receptors. Genes
Dev 13:32093216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Perissi V, Staszewski LM, McInerney EM, Kurokawa
R, Krones A, Rose DW, Lambert MH, Milburn MV, Glass CK, Rosenfeld
MG 208 1999 Molecular determinants of nuclear receptor-corepressor
interaction. Genes Dev 13:31983203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lee SK, Anzick SL, Choi JE, Bubendorf L, Guan XY, Jung
YK, Kallioniemi OP, Kononen J, Trent JM, Azorsa D, Jhun BH, Cheong JH,
Lee YC, Meltzer PS, Lee JW 1999 A nuclear factor, ASC-2, as a
cancer-amplified transcriptional coactivator essential for
ligand-dependent transactivation by nuclear receptors in
vivo. J Biol Chem 274:3428334293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fondell JD, Guermah M, Malik S, Roeder RG 1999 Thyroid hormone receptor-associated proteins and general positive
cofactors mediate thyroid hormone receptor function in the absence of
the TATA box-binding protein-associated factors of TFIID. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 96:19591964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Onate SA, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, OMalley BW 1995 Sequence and characterization of a coactivator for the steroid hormone
receptor superfamily. Science 270:13541357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Huang EY, Zhang J, Miska EA, Guenther MG, Kouzarides T,
Lazar MA 2000 Nuclear receptor corepressors partner with class II
histone deacetylases in a Sin3-independent repression pathway. Genes
Dev 14:4554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lin K-h, Lin Y-w, Parkison C, Cheng S-y 1994 Stimulation of proliferation by 3,3',5-triiodo-L-thyronine
in poorly differentiated human hepatocarcinoma cells overexpressing
ß1 thyroid hormone receptor. Cancer Lett 85:189194[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Lin K-h, Lin Y-w, McPhie P, Cheng S-y
Overexpression of thyroid hormone ß1 nuclear receptor is associated
with an increased proliferation of human hepatoma cells. Proceedings of
the XVI International Cancer Congress, New Delhi, India, 1994, pp
615622
-
Lin KH, Zhu XG, Shieh HY, Hsu HC, Chen ST, McPhie P,
Cheng SY 1996 Identification of naturally occurring dominant
negative mutants of thyroid hormone
1 and ß1 receptors in a human
hepatocellular carcinoma cell line. Endocrinology 137:40734081[Abstract]
-
Lin KH, Zhu XG, Hsu HC, Chen SL, Shieh HY, Chen ST,
Cheng SY 1997 Dominant negative activity of mutant thyroid hormone
1 receptors from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Endocrinology 138:53085315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lin KH, Shieh HY, Chen SL, Hsu HC 1999 Expression
of mutant thyroid hormone nuclear receptors in human hepatocellular
carcinoma cells. Mol Carcinog 26:5361[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Refetoff S, Weiss RE, Usala SJ 1993 The syndromes
of resistance to thyroid hormone. Endocr Rev 14:348399[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Usala SJ 1995 New developments in clinical and
genetic aspects of thyroid hormone resistance syndromes.
Endocrinologist 5:6876
-
Guan KL, Dixon JE 1991 Eukaryotic proteins
expressed in Escherichia coli: an improved thrombin cleavage
and purification procedure of fusion proteins with glutathione
S-transferase. Anal Biochem 192:262267[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Shieh HY, Hsu HC, Lin KH 2000 Negative regulation
of the anti-metastatic gene Nm23H1 by thyroid hormone
receptors. Endocrinology 141:25402547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jeyakumar M, Tanen MR, Bagchi MK 1997 Analysis of
the functional role of steroid receptor coactivator-1 in ligand-induced
transactivation by thyroid hormone receptor. Mol Endocrinol 11:755767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Li H, Leo C, Schroen DJ, Chen JD 1997 Characterization of receptor interaction and transcriptional repression
by the corepressor SMRT. Mol Endocrinol 11:20252037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Misiti S, Schomburg L, Yen PM, Chin WW 1998 Expression and hormonal regulation of coactivator and corepressor
genes. Endocrinology 139:24932500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chen H, Lin RJ, Xie W, Wilpitz D, Evans RM 1999 Regulation of hormone-induced histone hyperacetylation and gene
activation via acetylation of an acetylase. Cell 98:675686[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Westin S, Kurokawa R, Nolte RT, Wisely GB,
McInerney EM, Rose DW, Milburn MV, Rosenfeld MG, Glass CK 1998 Interactions controlling the assembly of nuclear-receptor heterodimers
and co-activators. Nature 395:199202[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Mangelsdorf DJ, Evans RM 1995 The RXR heterodimers
and orphan receptors. Cell 83:841850[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Spencer TE, Jenster G, Burcin MM, Allis CD, Zhou J,
Mizzen CA, McKenna NJ, Onate SA, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, OMalley BW 1997 Steroid receptor coactivator-1 is a histone acetyltransferase.
Nature 389:194198[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Horlein AJ, Naar AM, Heinzel T, Torchia J, Gloss B,
Kurokawa R, Ryan A, Kamei Y, Soderstrom M, Glass CK 1995 Ligand-independent repression by the thyroid hormone receptor mediated
by a nuclear receptor co-repressor. Nature 377:397404[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Tagami T, Madison LD, Nagaya T, Jameson JL 1997 Nuclear receptor corepressors activate rather than suppress basal
transcription of genes that are negatively regulated by thyroid
hormone. Mol Cell Biol 17:26422648[Abstract]
-
Hayashi Y, Sunthornthepvarakul T, Refetoff S 1994 Mutations of CpG dinucleotides located in the triiodothyronine
(T3)-binding domain of the thyroid hormone
receptor (TR) beta gene that appears to be devoid of natural mutations
may not be detected because they are unlikely to produce the clinical
phenotype of resistance to thyroid hormone. J Clin Invest 94:607615
-
Yoh SM, Chatterjee VK, Privalsky ML 1997 Thyroid
hormone resistance syndrome manifests as an aberrant interaction
between mutant T3 receptors and transcriptional
corepressors. Mol Endocrinol 11:470480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tagami T, Kopp P, Johnson W, Arseven OK, Jameson
JL 1998 The thyroid hormone receptor variant alpha2 is a weak
antagonist because it is deficient in interactions with nuclear
receptor corepressors. Endocrinology 139:25352544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cohen RN, Putney A, Wondisford FE, Hollenberg AN 2000 The nuclear corepressors recognize distinct nuclear receptor
complexes. Mol Endocrinol 14:900914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tagami T, Gu WX, Peairs PT, West BL, Jameson JL 1998 A novel natural mutation in the thyroid hormone receptor defines a
dual functional domain that exchanges nuclear receptor corepressors and
coactivators. Mol Endocrinol 12:18881902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kitajima K, Nagaya T, Jameson JL 1995 Dominant
negative and DNA-binding properties of mutant thyroid hormone receptors
that are defective in homodimerization but not heterodimerization.
Thyroid 5:343353[Medline]
-
Safer JD, Cohen RN, Hollenberg AN, Wondisford FE 1998 Defective release of corepressor by hinge mutants of the thyroid
hormone receptor found in patients with resistance to thyroid hormone.
J Biol Chem 273:3017530182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liu Y, Takeshita A, Misiti S, Chin WW, Yen PM 1998 Lack of coactivator interaction can be a mechanism for dominant
negative activity by mutant thyroid hormone receptors. Endocrinology 139:41974204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Feng W, Ribeiro RC, Wagner RL, Nguyen H, Apriletti JW,
Fletterick RJ, Baxter JD, Kushner PJ, West BL 1998 Hormone-dependent coactivator binding to a hydrophobic cleft on nuclear
receptors. Science 280:17471749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Collingwood TN, Rajanayagam O, Adams M, Wagner R,
Cavailles V, Kalkhoven E, Matthews C, Nystrom E, Stenlof K, Lindstedt
G, Tisell L, Fletterick RJ, Parker MG, Chatterjee VK 1997 A
natural transactivation mutation in the thyroid hormone beta receptor:
impaired interaction with putative transcriptional mediators. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 94:248253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Chen, Y. J. Chang, Y. H. Wu, and K. H. Lin
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases Potentiate Thyroid Hormone Receptor Transcriptional Activity by Stabilizing Its Protein
Endocrinology,
April 1, 2003;
144(4):
1407 - 1419.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kaneshige, H. Suzuki, K. Kaneshige, J. Cheng, H. Wimbrow, C. Barlow, M. C. Willingham, and S.-y. Cheng
A targeted dominant negative mutation of the thyroid hormone alpha 1 receptor causes increased mortality, infertility, and dwarfism in mice
PNAS,
November 29, 2001;
(2001)
261565798.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kaneshige, H. Suzuki, K. Kaneshige, J. Cheng, H. Wimbrow, C. Barlow, M. C. Willingham, and S.-y. Cheng
A targeted dominant negative mutation of the thyroid hormone alpha 1 receptor causes increased mortality, infertility, and dwarfism in mice
PNAS,
December 18, 2001;
98(26):
15095 - 15100.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|