help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, K.-h.
Right arrow Articles by Wu shen-liang chen, Y.-h.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, K.-h.
Right arrow Articles by Wu shen-liang chen, Y.-h.
Endocrinology Vol. 142, No. 2 653-662
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Impaired Interaction of Mutant Thyroid Hormone Receptors Associated with Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Transcriptional Coregulators1

Kwang-huei Lin and Yi-hsin Wu shen-liang chen

Department of Biochemistry, Chang-Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan 333, Republic of China

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Kwang-Huei Lin, Department of Biochemistry, Chang-Gung University, 259 Wen-hwa 1 Road, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China. E-mail: khlin{at}mail.cgu.edu.tw


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Thyroid hormone (T3) exerts its many biological activities through interaction with specific nuclear receptors (TRs) that function as ligand-dependent transcription factors at genes that contain a thyroid hormone response element (TRE). Mutant TRs have been detected in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines and tissue, but their contribution to carcinogenesis has remained unclear. The interaction of four such mutant TRs (J7-TR{alpha}1, J7-TRß1, H-TR{alpha}1, and L-TR{alpha}1) with transcriptional coregulators has now been investigated. With the exception of J7-TR{alpha}1, which in the absence of T3 exhibited transcriptional silencing activity with a TRE-reporter gene construct in transfected cells, the mutant TRs had little effect (compared with that of wild-type receptors) on transcriptional activity of the reporter gene in the absence or presence of T3, of the transcriptional corepressors SMRT, NCoR or of the transcriptional coactivator SRC. Electrophoretic mobility-shift assays revealed that, in the presence of T3, the J7-TRß1 mutant did not interact with SRC, whereas J7-TR{alpha}1 and H-TR{alpha}1 exhibited reduced abilities to associate with this coactivator and L-TR{alpha}1 showed an ability to interact with SRC similar to that of wild-type TR{alpha}1. The dominant negative activity of the mutant TRs in transfected cells appeared inversely related to the ability of the receptors to interact with SRC. Whereas J7-TRß1, H-TR{alpha}1, and L-TR{alpha}1 did not interact with SMRT, and NCoR. J7-TR{alpha}1 bind to corepressors but failed to dissociate from them in the presence of T3. These aberrant interactions between the mutant TRs and transcriptional coregulators may contribute to the highly variable clinical characteristics of human hepatocellular carcinoma.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THYROID hormone (T3), through interaction with its intracellular receptors (TRs), influences various physiological functions, including general metabolism, development, growth, and reproduction (1, 2, 3). Two principal types of TRs, which are encoded by genes on human chromosomes 17 (TR{alpha}) and 3 (TRß), have been identified; transcripts of each of these genes undergo alternative splicing to generate TR{alpha}1 and TR{alpha}2 as well as TRß1 and TRß2 receptor isoforms. Like other nuclear hormone receptors, TRs are ligand-dependent transcription factors and contain domains that mediate binding of hormone, binding to DNA, receptor dimerization, and interaction with various other transcriptional factors. TRs regulate the transcription of target genes by binding to specific DNA sequences, known as thyroid hormone response elements (TREs), in the promoter regions of these genes. In the absence of T3, TRs repress the activity of target promoters, a phenomenon known as transcriptional silencing that is thought to be mediated by interaction of the ligand binding domain of the receptor with nuclear hormone receptor corepressors, such as SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor). Ligand binding is thought to induce dissociation of TRs from corepressors and to result in the recruitment of coactivators such as SRC (steroid receptor coactivator) and in the consequent activation of transcription from target promoters (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Thus, whereas SRC does not bind to wild-type TRs in the absence of T3, it binds to these receptors with increasing avidity as the T3 concentration is increased. The corepressors NCoR (nuclear receptor co-repressor) and SMRT were recently shown to repress transcription by interacting directly with class II histone deacetylases (11).

The role of TRs in neoplastic transformation is largely unknown (3). To evaluate the potential contribution of TR genes to the pathogenesis of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we previously examined the expression and regulation of these genes in nine human hepatoma cell lines (12, 13). Overexpression of TRß1 was detected in three of the nine cell lines. In addition, the degree of differentiation of the cell lines was inversely correlated with the abundance of TRß1 protein. These observations suggested that changes in expression of the TRß gene might contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis. We subsequently cloned the complementary DNAs (cDNAs) for TR{alpha}1 and TRß1 from the HCC cell line J7 and showed that the corresponding recombinant proteins exerted a dominant negative effect on the transactivation activity of wild-type TRs (14). The isolation of cDNAs for TR{alpha}1 from tumor tissue of two individuals with HCC also revealed that the encoded proteins acted in a dominant negative manner (15). Furthermore, a high prevalence (>60%) of point mutations has been detected in the TR genes of tumor tissue from individuals with HCC (16).

To characterize further the properties of naturally occurring TR mutants, we have now investigated the interactions of four such HCC-associated mutant proteins (three TR{alpha}1 and one TRß1) with transcriptional coregulators. All TR mutants identified in individuals with the syndrome of resistance to thyroid hormone (RTH) have been derived exclusively from the TRß gene (17, 18). However, our previous studies have shown that mutations in the TR{alpha} gene also occur naturally (14, 15), and we now show that TR{alpha}1 and TRß1 mutants exhibit similar aberrant interactions with transcriptional coregulators.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plasmids
Plasmids that encode glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins containing amino acids 570 to 780 of human SRC-1 or amino acids 1086 to 1449 of human SMRT or amino acid 2063 to 2300 of human NCoR were kindly provided by M. G. Parker (Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, UK), M. Privalsky (University of California, Davis, CA), and A. N. Hollenberg (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) respectively. The encoded fusion proteins were expressed in bacteria BL-21 and purified as described (19). The mammalian expression vectors pBK-CMV-SRC1 and pCMX-SMRT were kindly provided by M. J. Tsai (Baylor College, Baylor, TX) and R. M. Evans (The Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA), respectively.

Determination of the transactivation activity of TRs
The effects of SRC and SMRT on the silencing activity and T3-dependent transactivation activity of TRs were examined by transfection of COS-1 cells (5 x 105 cells in a 60-mm dish), with the use of Lipofectamine (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), with expression vectors encoding mutant or wild-type TRs, SRC or SMRT, and ß-galactosidase (as a control for variability in transfection efficiency) as well as with a TRE-containing luciferase reporter plasmid (J. L. Jameson. Northwest University, Chicago, IL). After incubation for 24 h in the absence or presence of T3, the cells were harvested and lysed in 250 µl of lysis buffer and a portion of the cell lysate (20 µl) was assayed for luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities as described previously (20). The luciferase activity was normalized on the basis of the protein concentration and ß-galactosidase activity of the lysates.

Electrophoretic mobility-shift assay (EMSA)
32P-Labeled oligonucleotides corresponding to various TREs (F2, derived from the chicken lysozyme gene and consisting of two inverted repeats of the half-site binding motif separated by six nucleotides; DR4, two direct repeats of the half-site motif separated by four nucleotides; or Pal, palindromic TRE) were prepared as described (15). TR proteins were synthesized by in vitro transcription and translation with the use of a TNT-coupled reticulocyte lysate kit (Promega Corp.); their concentrations were determined by measuring the intensity of the corresponding 35S-labeled bands after SDS-PAGE. For EMSA, identical amounts of TRs were incubated with 32P-labeled TRE oligonucleotide in the absence or presence of retinoid X receptor {alpha} (RXR{alpha}) and T3 as described previously (14). Supershift analysis was performed by addition of GST-SRC or GST-SMRT or GST-NCoR. After electrophoresis, TR homodimers and heterodimers were visualized by autoradiography and quantified with a BAS2000 image analyzer (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) (14).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effects of SMRT and SRC on the silencing and T3-dependent transactivation activities of TR mutants
The human TR mutants studied were as follows: H-TR{alpha}1 (mutant H) contains a Val -> Ala point mutation at codon 390; L-TR{alpha}1 (mutant L) contains Glu -> Lys and Pro -> Ser mutations at codons 350 and 398, respectively; J7-TR{alpha}1 contains a Met -> Ile mutation at codon 259; and J7-TRß1 contains a Met ->Val mutation at codon 334 (Fig. 1Go). The first two of these mutations were identified in individuals with HCC (15), and the latter two were identified in the HCC cell line J7 (14). Except J7TR{alpha}1, mutant L, which bound T3 with reduced affinity, the others had no T3 binding activity. The SRC, SMRT, NCoR interaction regions in the TR are indicated (Fig. 1Go) (21, 22).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the mutation sites of the four TR mutants used in the present study. The various domains and SRC, SMRT, and NCoR binding regions of the receptors, as well as the locations of two mutation hot spots of TRß1 associated with RTH (17 18 ), are indicated.

 
The effects of SMRT and SRC on the silencing and ligand-dependent transactivation activities of the mutant TRs were investigated by transfection of COS-1 cells with expression vectors encoding TRs and coregulators as well as with a reporter plasmid containing the luciferase gene under the control of the F2-TRE. Expression of wild-type TR{alpha}1 or TRß1 in COS-1 cells incubated in T3-depleted (Td) medium reduced the extent of basal transcription to 44 and 50% of control values, respectively (Fig. 2AGo). In contrast, in the presence of 50 nM T3, TR{alpha}1 or TRß1 increased luciferase activity by factors of approximately 3.8 and 4.8, respectively. Although the J7-TR{alpha}1 mutant exhibited silencing activity, none of the other mutants induced marked effects on the transcription of the reporter gene in the absence or presence of T3. In cells cotransfected with the SMRT vector, wild-type TR{alpha}1 or TRß1 proteins further repressed basal transcriptional activity to 21 and 40%, respectively, of control values (Fig. 2BGo). SMRT had little effect on the transactivation activity of the wild-type receptors in the presence of T3, or on the extent of transcription in cells expressing the mutant receptors either in the absence or presence of T3. In the presence of T3, SRC enhanced the transactivation activities of wild-type TR{alpha}1 and TRß1 (luciferase activities were increased by the receptors by factors of 4.6 and 6.3, respectively) (Fig. 2CGo). SRC had no substantial effect on the silencing activity of the wild-type receptors in the absence of T3, or on the extent of transcription in cells expressing the mutant receptors either in the absence or presence of T3. However, SRC enhanced the transactivation activity of J7-TR{alpha}1 in the presence of T3 by factor of 2.2. Similar results were obtained with the Pal-TRE and DR4-TRE as with the F2-TRE (data not shown).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of SMRT and SRC on the silencing and ligand-dependent transactivation activities of wild-type and mutant TRs. COS-1 cells were transfected with expression vectors encoding wild-type or mutant TRs (0.5 µg), a ß-galactosidase expression plasmid (0.5 µg), and an F2-TRE luciferase reporter construct (1 µg), in the absence (A) or presence of SMRT (B) or SRC (C) expression vectors (0.5 µg). Cells were incubated for 24 h in Td medium or in the presence of 50 nM T3, after which cell lysates were prepared and assayed for luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities. Normalized luciferase activity was expressed as a percentage of that of control cells that were transfected with the reporter construct and empty TR expression vector and were incubated in Td or T3 medium. Data are means ± SEM from at least three independent experiments.

 
Effects of SRC on the DNA binding activities of TR mutants
We next examined the effects of SRC, SMRT, and NCoR on the DNA binding activity of mutant TRs with the use of EMSA analysis. Production of the two wild-type TRs and four mutant receptors by in vitro transcription and translation yielded proteins of the expected size (49 and 55 kDa for TR{alpha}1 and TRß1, respectively); the preparations also contained various truncated proteins (three in the case of TR{alpha}1 and two for TRß1), which were likely the products of internal translational initiation (16). GST-SRC, GST-SMRT, GST-NCoR, and GST proteins were produced in and purified from bacteria BL-21; the identity of these proteins was confirmed by immunoblot analysis (data not shown). In the absence of T3, wild-type TR{alpha}1 bound to a Pal-TRE oligonucleotide as a heterodimer with RXR{alpha}, a homodimer, and a monomer (Fig. 3AGo). Addition of GST-SRC in the absence of T3 had no effect on the pattern of DNA-protein interaction. However, in the presence of 1 nM T3, a supershifted complex (GST-SRC-TR{alpha}1-RXR{alpha}) was detected (Fig. 3Go, A and C); further increasing the T3 concentration (up to 100 nM) did not greatly increase the amount of this complex, and a similar complex was not formed when GST was added in place of GST-SRC. In contrast, GST-SRC did not interact with the heterodimer formed by J7-TR{alpha}1 and RXR{alpha} in the presence of 1 nM T3; at T3 concentrations of 10 and 100 nM, small amounts of a supershifted complex were apparent. Whereas GST-SRC had virtually no effect in the supershift assay with TR{alpha}1 mutant H at any T3 concentration, it interacted with TR{alpha}1 mutant L to an extent similar to that observed with the wild-type receptor (Fig. 3Go, A and C). GST-SRC interacted in a T3-dependent manner with the heterodimer formed by wild-type TRß1 and RXR{alpha}; however, no supershifted complex was detected when GST-SRC was added to J7-TRß1 and RXR{alpha} in the presence of T3 (Fig. 3Go, B and C). Results similar to those shown in Fig. 3Go were obtained with oligonucleotides corresponding to the F2-TRE (Fig. 4Go) or the DR4-TRE (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. EMSA analysis of the interaction of mutant TRs bound to the Pal-TRE with the coactivator SRC. Wild-type or mutant TR{alpha}1 (A) or TRß1 (B) proteins were preincubated in the presence of RXR{alpha}, 32P-labeled Pal-TRE oligonucleotide, and the indicated concentrations of T3 before the addition of GST (1 µg) or GST-SRC (1 µg) as indicated. SS, supershifted complex; HD, TR-RXR{alpha} heterodimer, D, TR homodimer; and M, TR monomer. C, The proportion of the amount of TR-RXR{alpha} heterodimer formed in the absence of GST-SRC that was supershifted by GST-SRC at each concentration of T3 was quantified by image analysis. Data are from an experiment that was repeated at least three times with similar results.

 


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. EMSA analysis of the interaction of mutant TRs bound to the F2-TRE with the coactivator SRC. Analysis was performed as described in Fig. 3Go, with the exception that the Pal-TRE oligonucleotide was replaced by an F2-TRE oligonucleotide.

 


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. EMSA analysis of the interaction of mutant TRs bound to the DR4-TRE with the coactivator SRC. Analysis was performed as described in Fig. 3Go, with the exception that the Pal-TRE oligonucleotide was replaced by a DR4-TRE oligonucleotide.

 
Dominant negative activities of TR mutants
To examine the relation between the affinity of TR mutants for SRC and the dominant negative activity of the receptors, we evaluated the inhibitory effects of the mutants on the transactivation activity of the wild-type proteins in transfected COS-1 cells. At a wild-type/mutant vector ratio of 1:1, the dominant negative activities of J7-TR{alpha}1 and J7-TRß1 were greater than were those of the TR{alpha}1 mutants H and L when tested with the F2-TRE (Fig. 6AGo) or the Pal-TRE (Fig. 6BGo). At a wild-type/mutant vector ratio of 1:5, the dominant negative activities of each of the mutant receptors assayed with the F2-TRE or the Pal-TRE were increased (Fig. 6Go). When cells were transfected with equal amounts of mutant and wild-type TR expression plasmids, the rank order of dominant negative activity was J7-TR{alpha}1 ~ J7-TRß1 > H-TR{alpha}1 > L-TR{alpha}1. Thus, TR{alpha}1 mutant L, which interacted with SRC to an extent similar to that observed with wild-type TR{alpha}1 ( Figs. 3–5GoGoGo), showed the lowest dominant negative activity, whereas the impaired interaction of the other three mutant receptors with SRC was associated with a greater dominant negative activity.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Dominant negative activity of mutant TRs. COS-1 cells were transfected with an expression vector encoding wild-type (WT) TR{alpha}1 or TRß1 (0.5 µg), a TR mutant vector (0.5 or 2.5 µg), a ß-galactosidase expression plasmid (0.5 µg), and an F2-TRE (A) or Pal-TRE (B) luciferase reporter construct (1 µg). Cells were incubated for 24 h in Td medium or in the presence of 50 nM T3, after which cell lysates were prepared and assayed for luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities. Luciferase activity was normalized on the basis of protein concentration and ß-galactosidase activity of the lysates. Data are expressed as the percentage inhibition by each mutant receptor of the T3-dependent transactivation activity of the corresponding wild-type receptor, and are means ± SEM of three independent experiments.

 
Effects of SMRT, NCoR on the DNA binding activities of TR mutants
The ability of the mutant receptors to interact with the corepressor SMRT, NCoR and the ability of T3 to induce the dissociation of such complexes were examined by EMSA analysis. As expected, heterodimers of wild-type TR{alpha}1 or TRß1 with RXR{alpha} that were bound to a DR4-TRE (Fig. 7Go) or to an F2-TRE (Fig. 8Go) oligonucleotide interacted with GST-SMRT in the absence of T3, and T3 induced the dissociation of GST-SMRT from these complexes in a concentration-dependent manner. However, GST-SMRT did not bind to H-TR{alpha}1, L-TR{alpha}1, or J7-TRß1 mutants complexed with RXR{alpha} and a TRE; the corepressor did bind to a reduced extent to the ternary complex formed by J7-TR{alpha}1, but the resulting quaternary complex was not dissociated by T3 (Figs. 7Go and 8Go). Similar results were observed when GST-NCoR protein was used, except it supershifted the J7-TR{alpha}1-RXR heterodimer intensively in the absence of T3 by using DR4-TRE or F2-TRE (Figs. 9Go and 10Go). But the complex did not dissociate by T3 (Figs. 9Go and 10Go).



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. EMSA analysis of the interaction of mutant TRs bound to the DR4-TRE with the corepressor SMRT. Analysis was performed as described in Fig. 3Go, with the exception that GST-SRC was replaced by GST-SMRT (1 µg) and that the Pal-TRE oligonucleotide was replaced by a DR4-TRE oligonucleotide.

 


View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. EMSA analysis of the interaction of mutant TRs bound to the F2-TRE with the corepressor SMRT. Analysis was performed as described in Fig. 3Go, with the exception that GST-SRC was replaced by GST-SMRT (1 µg) and that the Pal-TRE oligonucleotide was replaced by an F2-TRE oligonucleotide.

 


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. EMSA analysis of the interaction of mutant TRs bound to the DR4-TRE with the corepressor NCoR. Analysis was performed as described in Fig. 3Go, with the exception that GST- SRC was replaced by GST- NCoR (1 µg) and that the Pal-TRE oligonucleotide was replaced by a DR4-TRE oligonucleotide.

 


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. EMSA analysis of the interaction of mutant TRs bound to the F2-TRE with the corepressor NCoR. Analysis was performed as described in Fig. 3Go, with the exception that GST- SRC was replaced by GST- NCoR (1 µg) and that the Pal-TRE oligonucleotide was replaced by a F2-TRE oligonucleotide.

 
In summary, the J7-TR{alpha}1 mutant, which bind T3 weakly, formed a complex with RXR{alpha} and SRC at the TRE, but the interaction of the mutant with SRC required higher concentrations of T3 than did the interaction of wild-type TR{alpha}1 with SRC ( Figs. 3–5GoGoGo); furthermore, T3 did not induce dissociation of the J7-TR{alpha}1–RXR{alpha}-SMRT or J7-TR{alpha}1–RXR{alpha}-NCoR complexes ( Figs. 7–10GoGoGoGo). TR{alpha}1 mutant H, which shows no T3 binding activity, did not form a TR-RXR{alpha}-SRC complex at the DR4-TRE in the presence of T3 (Fig. 5Go) but did exhibit a reduced ability to form such a complex at the Pal-TRE (Fig. 3Go); and the F2-TRE (Fig. 4Go). TR{alpha}1 mutant L, which exhibits a reduced T3 binding activity, formed a TR-RXR{alpha}-SRC complex in the presence of T3 with all three TREs tested to an extent similar to that observed with wild-type TR{alpha}1 ( Figs. 3–5GoGoGo). The J7-TRß1 mutant, which does not bind T3, did not interact with SRC in the presence of RXR{alpha}, T3, and any of the TREs tested ( Figs. 3–5GoGoGo). Mutants H-TR{alpha}1, L-TR{alpha}1, and J7-TRß1 did not form TR-RXR{alpha}-SMRT or TR–RXR{alpha}-NCoR complexes in the absence of T3 with the two TREs tested ( Figs. 7–10GoGoGoGo). Finally, the impairment in the interaction of TR mutants with SRC appeared directly related to the dominant negative activity of these receptors.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To shed light on the role of TRs in hepatocarcinogenesis, we previously characterized the TRs in 16 HCC specimens (16) and detected several point mutations in both TR{alpha}1 and TRß1. Most of the TR{alpha}1 mutations were located within two hot spots: amino acids 209–228, and residues 245–256. However, no hot spot was detected in TRß1. The mutant proteins showed either a partial impairment or a complete loss of DNA binding activity. The high prevalence of TR mutations detected in the tumors of individuals with HCC suggests that the mutant receptors might play an important role in liver carcinogenesis. We have now characterized the interactions of four mutant TRs with the coregulators SRC, SMRT, and NCoR. All of them are abundant in liver (23). The interactions of all four naturally occurring mutant receptors with the coregulators were impaired.

The mechanisms by which SMRT and SRC regulate the expression of T3-responsive genes have been characterized (24, 25, 26). In the case of positively regulated genes, SMRT binds to the unliganded form of TRs and this complex mediates the silencing of basal transcription (27, 28). On binding of T3, TRs dissociate from SMRT and are converted from transcriptional repressors to transcriptional activators. However, maximal transactivation activity is only achieved on interaction of the ligand-bound TRs with a coactivator such as SRC. In contrast, in the case of genes that are negatively regulated by T3, nuclear receptor corepressors activate rather than inhibit basal transcription (29).

The mutant TRs examined in the present study either did not bind to SMRT or NCoR (H-TR{alpha}1, L-TR{alpha}1, and J7-TRß1), or bound to the corepressor but failed to dissociate from it on addition of hormone (J7-TR{alpha}1). The failure of J7-TR{alpha}1 to disscociate from SMRT or NCoR in the presence of T3 might be due to its reduced affinity for the hormone. Indeed, the M259I mutation in J7-TR{alpha}1 results in almost loss all of hormone binding activity (14). The observation that the TR{alpha}1 mutants H (V390A) and L (E350K, P398S) as well as J7-TRß1 (M334V) did not bind to SMRT suggests that the mutated residues, which are all located in the COOH-terminal region of the receptors, are important for corepressor binding. Two mutation hot spots have been identified in the hormone binding domain of TRß1 in individuals with RTH (18, 30). Many TRß1 mutants isolated from such individuals are able to repress gene transcription but are unable to activate genes in response to T3 or T4 (31). The interaction of such mutant receptors with corepressors is thought to be aberrant (31). The mutation site for J7-TRß1 is located within the first hot spot for RTH mutations. Furthermore, alignment of the sequences of the hormone binding domains of TR{alpha}1 and TRß1 indicates that the mutated residue (Met259) of J7-TR{alpha}1 corresponds to Met313 of TRß1, which is also located in the first hot spot of RTH mutations. The mutation site for TR{alpha}1 mutant H (Val390) and one of the mutated residues of TR{alpha}1 mutant L (Pro398) both correspond to residues located in RTH hot spot 2 of TRß1 (17, 18).

Our results indicate that association of SMRT with mutant TRs is not required for their dominant negative actions. Thus, all four TR mutants examined in the present study exhibited dominant negative activities, but only J7-TR{alpha}1 interacted with SMRT or NCoR. In contrast, Yoh et al. (31). showed that corepressor association appears to be required for the dominant negative action of TRs associated with RTH. These researchers suggested that an altered interaction with corepressors likely plays an important role in the dominant negative action of RTH-associated TR mutants and may contribute to the variable phenotype of this disorder (31). Our results do not exclude the possibility that the mutant TRs studied associate with corepressors other than SMRT. However, with the exception of J7-TR{alpha}1, the mutants examined in the present study did not exhibit silencing activity in transfected cells. The silencing activity exhibited by J7-TR{alpha}1 is consistent with the binding of this mutant to SMRT or NCoR.

The splice variants TR{alpha}1 and TR{alpha}2 are identical for the first 370 amino acids, but the remaining COOH-terminal regions of the two proteins are completely different. This sequence divergence renders TR{alpha}2 unable to transactivate TRE-containing genes. Tagami et al. (32). showed that TR{alpha}2 acts as a weak antagonist because it is deficient in interactions with the nuclear receptor corepressors NCoR and SMRT. Cohen et al. (33) reported that the TRß1 mutant R429Q does not recruit NCoR. However, the R429Q-RXR heterodimer is able to recruit the SMRT. Besides, the TRß1 mutant {Delta}G337T binds NCoR more strongly than SMRT. This observation, together with our data, indicates that the COOH-terminal region of TRs is important for corepressor binding and, consequently, for silencing activity. However, we did not observe the two corepressors SMRT and NCoR differentially interacted with mutant TRs. In other words, SMRT and NCoR interact similarly with those four TR mutants at least in our experimental conditions.

The dominant negative effects of various TR mutants have been shown to correlate with the abilities of these receptors to bind NCoR but not with the impairment in coactivator binding (34), suggesting that the defective release of corepressors, together with unimpaired dimerization and DNA binding activities, is important for the inhibitory action of mutant TRs. The mutants examined in the present study all retained DNA binding and heterodimerization activities. However, compared with those of the wild-type receptors, the homodimerization activities of J7-TR{alpha}1 and J7-TRß1 appeared reduced, whereas those of H-TR{alpha}1 and L-TR{alpha}1 appeared increased, in EMSAs performed with the Pal-TRE (Fig. 3Go) or DR4-TRE (Fig. 5Go). The homodimerization activity thus appears inversely related to dominant negative activity for these receptors, the latter of which decreases in the rank order J7-TR{alpha}1 ~ J7-TRß1 > H-TR{alpha}1 > L-TR{alpha}1. The dominant negative mutants R316H and R338W of TRß1 show selective loss of homodimerization activity with preservation of the ability to form heterodimers with RXR{alpha} (35). Mutations in the hinge region of TRs selectively affect T3 binding when the receptors are complexed with DNA as well as prevent NCoR dissociation (36).

An inability to interact with coactivators such as SRC is also a determinant of dominant negative activity of mutant TRs associated with RTH (37). Consistent with this notion, we have shown that the extent of the impairment in the interaction of the mutant TRs with SRC appears related to the dominant negative activity of the receptors. The GST-SRC fusion protein that we used for EMSA analysis contains amino acids 570 to 780 of SRC. The interaction of hormone-dependent coactivators such as SRC or glucocorticoid receptor-interaction protein 1 (GRIP1) with nuclear hormone receptors is mediated by the AF-2 domain of the receptors, which contains a hydrophobic cleft (38). The interaction of a naturally occurring transactivation mutant (L454V) of TRß1 with SRC was also shown to be impaired (39), suggesting that the affected amino acid is important for this interaction. The mutation site for H-TR{alpha}1 and the downstream mutation site for L-TR{alpha}1 are located in a region corresponding to that of TRß1 containing residue 454.

In summary, our data indicate that the association of mutant TRs with SMRT or NCoR is not required for dominant negative activity but is required for silencing activity. Moreover, our observations suggest that the ability of mutant TRs to interact with SRC is inversely related to their dominant negative activity.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from Chang-Gung University (CMRP 737, CMRP893, NMRP 407) and the National Science Council of the Republic of China (NSC 87-2316-B-182002). Back

Received May 25, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cheng SY 1995 New insights into the structure and function of the thyroid hormone receptor. J Biomed Sci 2:77–89[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Oppenheimer JH, Schwartz HJ, Strait KA 1994 Thyroid hormone action: the plot thickens. Eur J Endocrinol 130:15–24[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Guernsey DL, Fisher PB 1990 Thyroid hormone and neoplastic transformation. Oncogenesis 1:389–408
  4. Tong GX, Jeyakumar M, Tanen MR, Bagchi MK 1996 Transcriptional silencing by unliganded thyroid hormone receptor beta requires a soluble corepressor that interacts with the ligand-binding domain of the receptor. Mol Cell Biol 16:1909–1920[Abstract]
  5. Zamir I, Harding HP, Atkins GB, Horlein A, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG, Lazar MA 1996 Nuclear hormone receptor corepressor mediates transcriptional silencing by receptors with distinct repression domains. Mol Cell Biol 16:5458–5465[Abstract]
  6. Nagy L, Kao HY, Love JD, Li C, Banayo E, Gooch JT, Krishna V, Chatterjee K, Evans RM, Schwabe JW 1999 Mechanism of corepressor binding and release from nuclear hormone receptors. Genes Dev 13:3209–3216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Perissi V, Staszewski LM, McInerney EM, Kurokawa R, Krones A, Rose DW, Lambert MH, Milburn MV, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG 208 1999 Molecular determinants of nuclear receptor-corepressor interaction. Genes Dev 13:3198–3203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lee SK, Anzick SL, Choi JE, Bubendorf L, Guan XY, Jung YK, Kallioniemi OP, Kononen J, Trent JM, Azorsa D, Jhun BH, Cheong JH, Lee YC, Meltzer PS, Lee JW 1999 A nuclear factor, ASC-2, as a cancer-amplified transcriptional coactivator essential for ligand-dependent transactivation by nuclear receptors in vivo. J Biol Chem 274:34283–34293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Fondell JD, Guermah M, Malik S, Roeder RG 1999 Thyroid hormone receptor-associated proteins and general positive cofactors mediate thyroid hormone receptor function in the absence of the TATA box-binding protein-associated factors of TFIID. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1959–1964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Onate SA, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW 1995 Sequence and characterization of a coactivator for the steroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science 270:1354–1357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Huang EY, Zhang J, Miska EA, Guenther MG, Kouzarides T, Lazar MA 2000 Nuclear receptor corepressors partner with class II histone deacetylases in a Sin3-independent repression pathway. Genes Dev 14:45–54[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lin K-h, Lin Y-w, Parkison C, Cheng S-y 1994 Stimulation of proliferation by 3,3',5-triiodo-L-thyronine in poorly differentiated human hepatocarcinoma cells overexpressing ß1 thyroid hormone receptor. Cancer Lett 85:189–194[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Lin K-h, Lin Y-w, McPhie P, Cheng S-y Overexpression of thyroid hormone ß1 nuclear receptor is associated with an increased proliferation of human hepatoma cells. Proceedings of the XVI International Cancer Congress, New Delhi, India, 1994, pp 615–622
  14. Lin KH, Zhu XG, Shieh HY, Hsu HC, Chen ST, McPhie P, Cheng SY 1996 Identification of naturally occurring dominant negative mutants of thyroid hormone {alpha}1 and ß1 receptors in a human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line. Endocrinology 137:4073–4081[Abstract]
  15. Lin KH, Zhu XG, Hsu HC, Chen SL, Shieh HY, Chen ST, Cheng SY 1997 Dominant negative activity of mutant thyroid hormone {alpha}1 receptors from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Endocrinology 138:5308–5315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Lin KH, Shieh HY, Chen SL, Hsu HC 1999 Expression of mutant thyroid hormone nuclear receptors in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Mol Carcinog 26:53–61[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Refetoff S, Weiss RE, Usala SJ 1993 The syndromes of resistance to thyroid hormone. Endocr Rev 14:348–399[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Usala SJ 1995 New developments in clinical and genetic aspects of thyroid hormone resistance syndromes. Endocrinologist 5:68–76
  19. Guan KL, Dixon JE 1991 Eukaryotic proteins expressed in Escherichia coli: an improved thrombin cleavage and purification procedure of fusion proteins with glutathione S-transferase. Anal Biochem 192:262–267[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Shieh HY, Hsu HC, Lin KH 2000 Negative regulation of the anti-metastatic gene Nm23–H1 by thyroid hormone receptors. Endocrinology 141:2540–2547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Jeyakumar M, Tanen MR, Bagchi MK 1997 Analysis of the functional role of steroid receptor coactivator-1 in ligand-induced transactivation by thyroid hormone receptor. Mol Endocrinol 11:755–767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Li H, Leo C, Schroen DJ, Chen JD 1997 Characterization of receptor interaction and transcriptional repression by the corepressor SMRT. Mol Endocrinol 11:2025–2037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Misiti S, Schomburg L, Yen PM, Chin WW 1998 Expression and hormonal regulation of coactivator and corepressor genes. Endocrinology 139:2493–2500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Chen H, Lin RJ, Xie W, Wilpitz D, Evans RM 1999 Regulation of hormone-induced histone hyperacetylation and gene activation via acetylation of an acetylase. Cell 98:675–686[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Westin S, Kurokawa R, Nolte RT, Wisely GB, McInerney EM, Rose DW, Milburn MV, Rosenfeld MG, Glass CK 1998 Interactions controlling the assembly of nuclear-receptor heterodimers and co-activators. Nature 395:199–202[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Mangelsdorf DJ, Evans RM 1995 The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptors. Cell 83:841–850[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Spencer TE, Jenster G, Burcin MM, Allis CD, Zhou J, Mizzen CA, McKenna NJ, Onate SA, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW 1997 Steroid receptor coactivator-1 is a histone acetyltransferase. Nature 389:194–198[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Horlein AJ, Naar AM, Heinzel T, Torchia J, Gloss B, Kurokawa R, Ryan A, Kamei Y, Soderstrom M, Glass CK 1995 Ligand-independent repression by the thyroid hormone receptor mediated by a nuclear receptor co-repressor. Nature 377:397–404[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Tagami T, Madison LD, Nagaya T, Jameson JL 1997 Nuclear receptor corepressors activate rather than suppress basal transcription of genes that are negatively regulated by thyroid hormone. Mol Cell Biol 17:2642–2648[Abstract]
  30. Hayashi Y, Sunthornthepvarakul T, Refetoff S 1994 Mutations of CpG dinucleotides located in the triiodothyronine (T3)-binding domain of the thyroid hormone receptor (TR) beta gene that appears to be devoid of natural mutations may not be detected because they are unlikely to produce the clinical phenotype of resistance to thyroid hormone. J Clin Invest 94:607–615
  31. Yoh SM, Chatterjee VK, Privalsky ML 1997 Thyroid hormone resistance syndrome manifests as an aberrant interaction between mutant T3 receptors and transcriptional corepressors. Mol Endocrinol 11:470–480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Tagami T, Kopp P, Johnson W, Arseven OK, Jameson JL 1998 The thyroid hormone receptor variant alpha2 is a weak antagonist because it is deficient in interactions with nuclear receptor corepressors. Endocrinology 139:2535–2544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Cohen RN, Putney A, Wondisford FE, Hollenberg AN 2000 The nuclear corepressors recognize distinct nuclear receptor complexes. Mol Endocrinol 14:900–914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Tagami T, Gu WX, Peairs PT, West BL, Jameson JL 1998 A novel natural mutation in the thyroid hormone receptor defines a dual functional domain that exchanges nuclear receptor corepressors and coactivators. Mol Endocrinol 12:1888–1902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Kitajima K, Nagaya T, Jameson JL 1995 Dominant negative and DNA-binding properties of mutant thyroid hormone receptors that are defective in homodimerization but not heterodimerization. Thyroid 5:343–353[Medline]
  36. Safer JD, Cohen RN, Hollenberg AN, Wondisford FE 1998 Defective release of corepressor by hinge mutants of the thyroid hormone receptor found in patients with resistance to thyroid hormone. J Biol Chem 273:30175–30182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Liu Y, Takeshita A, Misiti S, Chin WW, Yen PM 1998 Lack of coactivator interaction can be a mechanism for dominant negative activity by mutant thyroid hormone receptors. Endocrinology 139:4197–4204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Feng W, Ribeiro RC, Wagner RL, Nguyen H, Apriletti JW, Fletterick RJ, Baxter JD, Kushner PJ, West BL 1998 Hormone-dependent coactivator binding to a hydrophobic cleft on nuclear receptors. Science 280:1747–1749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Collingwood TN, Rajanayagam O, Adams M, Wagner R, Cavailles V, Kalkhoven E, Matthews C, Nystrom E, Stenlof K, Lindstedt G, Tisell L, Fletterick RJ, Parker MG, Chatterjee VK 1997 A natural transactivation mutation in the thyroid hormone beta receptor: impaired interaction with putative transcriptional mediators. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:248–253[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. L. Chen, Y. J. Chang, Y. H. Wu, and K. H. Lin
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases Potentiate Thyroid Hormone Receptor Transcriptional Activity by Stabilizing Its Protein
Endocrinology, April 1, 2003; 144(4): 1407 - 1419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Kaneshige, H. Suzuki, K. Kaneshige, J. Cheng, H. Wimbrow, C. Barlow, M. C. Willingham, and S.-y. Cheng
A targeted dominant negative mutation of the thyroid hormone alpha 1 receptor causes increased mortality, infertility, and dwarfism in mice
PNAS, November 29, 2001; (2001) 261565798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Kaneshige, H. Suzuki, K. Kaneshige, J. Cheng, H. Wimbrow, C. Barlow, M. C. Willingham, and S.-y. Cheng
A targeted dominant negative mutation of the thyroid hormone alpha 1 receptor causes increased mortality, infertility, and dwarfism in mice
PNAS, December 18, 2001; 98(26): 15095 - 15100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, K.-h.
Right arrow Articles by Wu shen-liang chen, Y.-h.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, K.-h.
Right arrow Articles by Wu shen-liang chen, Y.-h.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals