help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, D. M.
Endocrinology Vol. 142, No. 4 1393-1402
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Identification of Specific Inhibin A-Binding Proteins on Mouse Leydig (TM3) and Sertoli (TM4) Cell Lines1

Craig A. Harrison, Paul G. Farnworth, Karen L. Chan, Peter G. Stanton, Guck T. Ooi, Jock K. Findlay and David M. Robertson

Prince Henry’s Institute of Medical Research, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia

Address all correspondence to: Dr. David M. Robertson, Prince Henry’s Institute of Medical Research, P.O. Box 5152, Clayton, 3168 Victoria, Australia. E-mail: david.robertson{at}med.monash.edu.au


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The binding of human inhibin A to cell surface binding proteins of mouse Leydig (TM3) and Sertoli (TM4) cell lines was investigated. Scatchard analysis identified two classes of inhibin A-binding sites on TM3 (Kd(1) = 85 pM and 4,160 sites/cell; Kd(2) = 520 pM and 12,500 sites/cell) and TM4 (Kd(1) = 61 pM and 2,620 sites/cell; Kd(2) = 520 pM and 10,400 sites/cell) cells. Compared with inhibin A, inhibin B only partially competed [125I]inhibin A binding (6–8%), whereas activin A competed weakly (<0.01%). Chemical cross-linking of [125I]inhibin A to both cell lines identified five [125I]inhibin A binding complexes with apparent molecular masses of 70, 95, 145, 155, and more than 200 kDa. Inhibin A displacement of [125I]inhibin A from each of these cross-linked species (ED50 = 60–110 pM) closely resembled displacement from intact TM3 (ED50 = 97 ± 32 pM) and TM4 (ED50 = 75 ± 28 pM) cells, suggesting that all of these proteins are involved in the high affinity inhibin A binding complex. Immunoprecipitation of iodinated inhibin A complexed to TM3 and TM4 cells with an antibody against human betaglycan identified protein complexes of more than 200, 145, and 95 kDa. It is concluded that the high affinity binding complex for inhibin A found in these cell lines consists of betaglycan and several proteins of unknown identity and may represent the putative inhibin receptor complex.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
INHIBIN, A GONADAL protein, suppresses FSH synthesis and secretion by gonadotropes of the anterior pituitary, thereby regulating ovarian follicle maturation in females and sperm production in males (1, 2). Inhibins are disulfide-linked, dimeric proteins composed of a glycosylated {alpha}- subunit and one of two ß-subunits A or ßB) (3) and, based on sequence homology, are members of the transforming growth factor-ß (TGFß) family of growth and differentiation factors (4). Homo- or heterodimers of the ßA- and ßB-subunits form activins (A, AB, and B) that are functional antagonists of inhibins (3, 5). Within the anterior pituitary gland, activins stimulate FSH synthesis and release by the gonadotropes (3).

The mechanism of inhibin action is unclear, although two models have been proposed (6); in one, inhibin competes with the structurally related molecule, activin, for access to the activin receptor, and in the second, inhibin binds specifically to its own receptor and transduces an independent signal. The cellular response to activin, in contrast, has been well characterized and is transduced through two types of membrane-bound, serine-threonine kinases, one a ligand-binding receptor (ActRII) and the other a signal-generating receptor (ActRI) (5). Both receptor types have an extracellular ligand-binding domain, a single transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic portion that has serine/threonine kinase activity. ActRI subunits are phosphorylated and thus activated by ligand-bound ActRII (5). Activated ActRI then phosphorylates cytoplasmic Smad proteins, which form part of the postreceptor signal transduction system (7). Inhibin is able to bind ActRII with 10-fold lower affinity than activin, but does not recruit ActRI (8, 9). It is therefore likely that the ability of inhibin to inhibit activin action is based in part upon the dominant negative interaction with receptor types. However, there are cells and tissues in which inhibin is unable to attenuate the activin response (10, 11), suggesting that additional components are required for inhibin action. In addition, specific, high affinity binding sites for inhibin have been detected on ovine pituitary cells (12), and in situ ligand binding studies show specific binding of iodinated recombinant inhibin A and activin A to ovarian and testicular tissue sections (13, 14).

Recently, significant progress has been made in the elucidation of the additional components required for inhibin action. Lewis et al. (15) showed that the type III TGFß receptor, betaglycan, is an inhibin-binding protein that can associate with ActRII. Betaglycan is a heparan sulfate proteoglycan that binds inhibin with high affinity (Kd = 600 pM) and enhances binding of inhibin to ActRII in cells coexpressing ActRII and betaglycan. The resulting complex is resistant to activin competition. Moreover, betaglycan confers inhibin A sensitivity to cell lines that normally respond poorly to this hormone, thereby facilitating inhibin’s antagonism of activin action. Another membrane-anchored proteoglycan with affinity for inhibin, p120, has been identified in bovine pituitary cells (16). p120 interacts strongly with ActRIB in a ligand-responsive manner, and both inhibin A and B partially block the assembly of a p120-ActRIB complex (17). p120 immunostaining is intense in gonadotropes of the rat pituitary and in testicular Leydig cells, both of which are targets of inhibin action (16). However, p120, like betaglycan, does not appear to have an intrinsic signaling function and therefore is unlikely to mediate an inhibin-specific signal alone. Thus, there may be additional binding proteins representing the inhibin receptor present in inhibin target tissues.

We have screened a number of gonadal cell lines as putative inhibin target cells. The present study describes the characterization of inhibin A-specific binding proteins in mouse Leydig (TM3) and Sertoli (TM4) cell lines. A high affinity inhibin A binding complex consisting of five components was identified on the surface of TM3 and TM4 cells, and its characteristics are described.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
Antibodies directed against human betaglycan, human ActRIIA, and human ActRIIB were obtained from R & D Systems (Minneapolis, MD). Antibodies directed against the {alpha}-subunit of inhibin (R1) and the ßA-subunit of inhibin (E4) were provided by Biotech Australia (Sydney, Australia). The p120 antibody was a gift from T. Woodruff. Lactoperoxidase (from bovine milk, 80–120 U/mg protein), BSA, EDTA, phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF), Triton X-100, Nonidet P-40, sodium deoxycholate, and n-octyl-ß-D-glucopyranoside were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The cross-linker bis-[sulfosuccinimidyl]suberate (BS3) and Pansorbin (protein A) were products of Pierce Chemical Co. (Rockford, IL). Protein G agarose was obtained from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Mannheim, Germany). Na125I was a product of Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Aylesbury, UK). DMEM, Ham’s F-12, glutamine, and FBS were obtained from Trace Biosciences (Castle Hill, Australia). Dulbecco’s PBS was obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD). Antibiotics for cell culture were obtained from CSL (Parkville, Australia), and disposable plastic cluster plates for cell culture were purchased from Costar (Cambridge, MA).

Recombinant inhibin A and B and activin A
Recombinant human (rh-) inhibin A (obtained from Biotech Australia was stored at -70 C in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid/acetonitrile after purification. The physicochemical and biological characterization of rh-inhibin A has been described previously (18). Rh-activin A was purified to homogeneity from culture medium obtained from mammalian cells stably transfected with the human inhibin {alpha} and ßA complementary DNAs (18). Purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE under nonreducing and reducing conditions, and by in vitro bioassay and activin A enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Rh-inhibin B (lot 1070051, R & D Systems) was determined in this laboratory to be 1.7-fold more immunoactive on a wt/wt basis than the inhibin B standard in the inhibin B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (inhibin B detection antibodies and inhibin B standard provided by Oxford Bioinnovations, Oxfordshire, UK). This preparation possessed 0.28-fold the bioactivity of rh-inhibin A standard (National Institute of Biological Standards and Control 96/784) in an inhibin in vitro bioassay using FSH suppression by rat pituitary cells in culture as an end point with an ID50 of 0.25 ng/ml.

Cell lines
Mouse Leydig (TM3) and Sertoli (TM4) cell lines derived from the testis of immature BALB/c mice were originally characterized based on their morphology, hormone responsiveness, and metabolism of steroids (19). Cell lines were maintained in DMEM/F-12 medium supplemented with glutamine, antibiotics, and 10% FBS at 37 C. Cells were cultured as follows, unless otherwise specified: 75,000 cells/1.0 ml medium/well were seeded in 24-well cluster dishes for binding and competition assays; 1 x 106 cells/6 ml/well were plated in 6-well cluster dishes for binding and affinity cross-linking assays. After culture for 1 day, serum-containing medium was changed to serum-free medium containing insulin (10 µg/ml), transferrin (1 µg/ml), BSA (6%, wt/vol), and antibiotics (penicillin, streptomycin, and fungizone) for 24 h.

Binding of [125I]inhibin to TM3 and TM4 cell lines
[125I]Inhibin A and [125I]inhibin B (~120 µCi/µg) were prepared as previously described (12). Cell cultures were washed, then incubated in 50 mM HEPES-buffered DMEM/F-12 medium containing 0.1% BSA and protease inhibitors (0.4 mM EDTA and 50 ng/ml PMSF). Binding affinity and binding site concentration were assessed by incubating cells in duplicate for 4 h at 23 C on a rotary mixer (50 cycles/min) with [125I]inhibin (40,000 cpm/0.4 ml·well, corresponding to a final concentration of 20–30 pM) in the absence or presence of increasing doses (5 pM to 20 nM) of unlabeled inhibin A, inhibin B, or activin A. Nonspecific binding, identified as binding that was not displaceable at higher concentrations of unlabeled inhibin A (20 nM), was subtracted from all binding data. The binding reaction was terminated by placing the culture plates on ice and washing the cell monolayers three times with 0.2 ml ice-cold PBS (10 mM NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 and 154 mM NaCl, pH 7.4). Cells were lysed in 0.30 ml 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min at room temperature, and radioactivity in the recovered lysate and a single rinse were pooled and counted in a {gamma}-counter. The binding parameters were determined by nonlinear regression assessment of saturation binding curves using Prism software (version 2.0, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA) and by Scatchard analysis.

Affinity cross-linking
TM3 or TM4 cells (1 x 106) were incubated for 4 h at 23 C in 0.6 ml binding medium containing 300 pM [125I]inhibin A or [125I]inhibin B (~400,000 cpm) with or without increasing concentrations (5 pM to 20 nM) of unlabeled inhibin A, inhibin B, or activin A. Cell monolayers were washed three times with ice-cold cross-linking buffer (50 mM HEPES, 125 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 5 mM MgSO4, and 1 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4), and bound hormone was cross-linked to cell surface proteins with BS3 (0.25 mM in cross-linking buffer) for 30 min at 4 C. The cells were washed twice with ice-cold quench buffer (85 mM Tris and 30 mM NaCl, pH 7.8), lysed with 0.50 ml octyl-ß-D-glucopyranoside (1% in quench buffer containing 0.4 mM EDTA and 50 ng/ml PMSF), and the recovered lysates were centrifuged (10,000 x g for 10 min). The supernatant was concentrated (Speed-Vac, Savant Instruments, Farmingdale, NY), combined with Tricine sample buffer, and binding proteins were separated by nonreducing 6.5% SDS-PAGE (20). Gels were dried and analyzed by autoradiography using BioMax film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY).

Immunoprecipitation of inhibin cross-linked complexes
To immunoprecipitate [125I]inhibin A cross-linked complexes, 2 µg antibodies directed against the {alpha}C-subunit of inhibin (R1), betaglycan, p120, ActRIIA, or ActRIIB were added to lysates (1 x 106 cells/ml) of cross-linked samples and incubated for 16 h at room temperature. Immune complexes were obtained by the addition of 20 µl Pansorbin (protein A) or protein G agarose and incubation for an additional 1 h at room temperature. The resulting immobilized immune complexes were pelleted by centrifugation, washed twice with 1 ml RIPA buffer [50 mM Tris (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS], and bound protein was eluted by boiling in 40 µl Tricine sample buffer. Immunoprecipitated, cross-linked complexes were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.

HPLC
All liquid chromatographic separations were performed using a Beckman Coulter, Inc., Gold HPLC system (Palo Alto, CA), and UV absorbance was monitored at 214 nm with a Beckman Coulter, Inc., 166 UV/visible detector. Samples were analyzed by reverse phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) using a Brownlee Aquapore RP-300 RP column (100 x 2.1 mm, 7-µm particle size) on a gradient of 25–70% acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid at 0.5 ml/min over 30 min.

Betaglycan, ActRIIA, ActRIIB, and p120 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in TM3 and TM4 cell lines
Total RNA was extracted from TM3 and TM4 cells using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) or CsCl centrifugation. RNA (0.5 µg) was amplified by RT-PCR in a 50-µl reaction volume with avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) reverse transcriptase and Taq polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Castle Hill, Sydney, Australia) using the following mouse-specific primer pairs: ActRIIA sense, 5'- CTAATGTGGTCTCTTGGAATGAAC-3'; ActRIIA antisense, 5'-TCATAGACTAGATTCTTTGGGAGG-3'; ActRIIB sense, 5'-CCTCCTGGGGATACCCATGGA-3'; ActRIIB antisense, 5'-TTAGATGCTGGACTCTTTAGGGA-3'; p120 sense, 5'-GGAAGGGAAAGGCATTGGAAAC-3'; p120 antisense, 5'-TGGTTACACTCTTCAAGGACTACGG-3'; betaglycan sense, 5'-AAAAGATGGTCGTGGCTGTAG-3'; and betaglycan antisense, 5'- GGAGTATGGAGAGAGAAAGCAGG-3'. For betaglycan and p120, RT-PCR was performed at 50 C for 30 min (RT) and at 95 C for 5 min (denaturation), followed by 35 cycles of 95 C for 1 min, 55 C for 1 min, and 72 C for 1 min. The elongation step at the last cycle was at 72 C for 5 min to ensure complete extension of DNA fragments. For ActRIIA and ActRIIB, real-time PCR was performed for 40 cycles using the FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green 1 kit (Lightcycler, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) with a final Mg2+ concentration of 3.5 mM, annealing conditions of 64 C for 5 sec and extension at 72 C for 25 sec, and product quantitation at 79 C. An aliquot of the amplified samples (8 µl) was electrophoresed on a 1.2% agarose-1 x TBE gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. For ActRIIA and ActRIIB, PCR products were also analyzed by their melting curve profiles by real-time PCR (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Binding of [125I]inhibin A to Leydig (TM3) and Sertoli (TM4) cell lines
[125I]inhibin A bound to TM3 and TM4 cell lines in a time- and temperature-dependent manner. At 23 C, specific binding reached a maximum by 4–6 h, decreased slightly, and then remained stable for at least another 20 h (Fig. 1Go, A and E). When the binding reaction was performed at 37 C, [125I]inhibin A bound to cells more rapidly, but the level of binding was 80% of that observed at 23 C, possibly reflecting internalization and degradation of the ligand (data not shown). Standard assay conditions of 4-h incubation at 23 C with 1 million cells/culture well were used. Under these conditions, nonspecific binding of [125I]inhibin A to TM3 and TM4 cells was low (~1%), and total binding ranged between 8–10% of the added tracer. Biphasic Scatchard plots with similar Kd values were obtained with 4- and 16-h incubations (data not shown).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Characterization of the binding of [125I]inhibin A to mouse Leydig (TM3) and Sertoli (TM4) cell lines. A and E, Time course of the binding of [125I]inhibin A to TM3 and TM4 cells in culture at 23 C. Binding of [125I]inhibin A to 1 million cells/well in the absence (•, total binding) or presence ({square}, nondisplaceable binding) of an excess of unlabeled inhibin A (final concentration, 10 nM) was performed as described in Materials and Methods, except that incubations were terminated at the times indicated. Specific binding ({circ}) was calculated as the difference between total and nondisplaceable binding at each time point. Saturation binding curves (B and F) and Scatchard plots (C and G) of [125I]inhibin A binding to TM3 and TM4 cells. Binding was performed at 23 C on 1 million cells/well, and nondisplaceable binding was determined in the presence of 13 nM (200 ng) unlabeled inhibin A. Data are from one representative experiment (see Table 1Go for combined data). D and H, Competition between [125I]inhibin A and unlabeled inhibin A, inhibin B, and activin A for binding to TM3 and TM4 cells. [125I]Inhibin A was incubated with TM3 (D) and TM4 (H) cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled inhibin A ({blacksquare}), inhibin B ({circ}), and activin A ({blacktriangleup}). Data at each point represent the average result for binding obtained from duplicate wells.

 
Typical patterns of specific [125I]inhibin A binding to TM3 and TM4 cells are presented in Fig. 1Go (B and F). Scatchard plots of data obtained for [125I]inhibin A binding to these cell lines (Fig. 1Go, C and G) resolved both high and low affinity binding components (TM3: Kd(1) = 85 ± 35 pM and 4,160 ± 1030 sites/cell; Kd(2) = 520 ± 200 pM and 12,500 ± 2540 sites/cell; TM4: Kd(1) = 61 ± 5 pM and 2,620 ± 550 sites/cell; Kd(2) = 520 ± 90 pM and 10,400 ± 3030 sites/cell; Table 1Go). Competition curves for binding of [125I]inhibin A to TM3 and TM4 cells (Fig. 1Go, D and H) indicated high affinity inhibin A binding (ED50: TM3 = 97 ± 32 pM; TM4 = 75 ± 28 pM) that was specific, as assessed by the low cross-reaction with activin A (ED50 = >100 nM). Interestingly, inhibin B cross-reacted weakly with [125I]inhibin A-binding sites (ED50 = 6 nM with both TM3 and TM4 cells).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Dissociation constants (Kd) and binding site concentrations estimated by Scatchard analysis of the binding of [125I]inhibin to TM3 (Leydig) and TM4 (Sertoli) cell lines during 4-h incubation at 23 C

 
Affinity labeling of inhibin-binding proteins
To characterize the binding proteins for inhibin A on TM3 (Fig. 2AGo) and TM4 (Fig. 2BGo) cells, [125I]inhibin A was incubated with cells for 4 h at 23 C, covalently linked to cell proteins with the bifunctional cross-linker BS3, then products were extracted with 1% octyl-ß-D-glucopyranoside, immunoprecipitated with an antibody directed against the inhibin {alpha}-subunit (R1), and analyzed by nonreducing SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Affinity-labeled protein bands of relative masses more than 200, 155, 145, 95, and 70 kDa, corresponding to proteins of more than 200, 125, 115, 65, and 40 kDa after subtraction of inhibin (Table 2Go) were evident in both cell lines (Fig. 2AGo, lanes 2 and 6), and such binding was displaced by excess unlabeled inhibin A (5 nM; Fig. 2AGo, lanes 4 and 8), but not by unlabeled activin A (5 nM; Fig. 2AGo, lanes 3 and 7). Other bands present represented free [125I]inhibin A tracer and a tracer-related species (Fig. 2AGo, lanes 1 and 5).



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Characterization of inhibin-binding proteins on TM3 and TM4 cells by affinity cross-linking. A, TM3 and TM4 cells were incubated with [125I]inhibin A in the absence (lanes 2 and 6) or presence of unlabeled activin A (5 nM; lanes 3 and 7) or inhibin A (5 nM; lanes 4 and 8). After washing, cells were untreated (lanes 1 and 5) or treated with 0.25 mM BS3 (lanes 2–5 and 6–8). The cell lysate was separated on 6.5% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography. B, TM4 cells were incubated with [125I]inhibin A (lanes 1–3) or [125I]inhibin B (lanes 4–6) in the absence (lanes 1 and 4) or presence of unlabeled inhibin A (200 pM; lanes 2 and 5) or inhibin B (2 nM; lanes 3 and 6). After washing, cells were treated with 0.25 mM BS3, and the cell lysate was separated on 6.5% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography. Data are representative of five experiments. The sizes of molecular mass standards and inhibin cross-linked bands are shown in kilodaltons. C, Competition between [125I]inhibin B and unlabeled inhibin A and inhibin B for binding to TM4 cells. [125I]Inhibin B was incubated with TM4 cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled inhibin A ({blacksquare}) and inhibin B (•). Data at each point represent the average result for binding obtained from duplicate wells.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Characterization of specific inhibin A binding proteins on mouse Leydig (TM3) and Sertoli (TM4) cell lines

 
Based on molecular mass determinations, [125I]inhibin B (Fig. 2BGo, lane 4) interacted with the same group of binding proteins as [125I]inhibin A (Fig. 2BGo, lane 1). Compared with inhibin A (Fig. 2BGo, lane 2), inhibin B (Fig. 2BGo, lane 3) was a poor competitor of [125I]inhibin A binding to TM4 cells. In contrast, inhibin A (Fig. 2BGo, lane 5) was more effective in displacing [125I]inhibin B from all affinity cross-linked complexes than were 10-fold higher concentrations of unlabeled inhibin B (Fig. 2BGo, lane 6). Competition curves for binding of [125I]inhibin B to TM4 cells (Fig. 2CGo) confirmed that inhibin A (ED50 = 50 pM) was more effective than inhibin B (ED50 = 400 pM) at displacing cell-bound [125I]inhibin B. Similar results were seen with TM3 cells (data not shown).

To resolve cell-derived [125I]inhibin A-binding proteins from [125I]inhibin A tracer-related species, cross-linked TM3 (Fig. 3BGo) and TM4 (Fig. 3CGo) extracts were fractionated by RP-HPLC, analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and compared with [125I]inhibin A tracer treated with BS3 (Fig. 3AGo). Free 30-kDa [125I]inhibin A eluted predominantly in fractions 19–25, with some tailing across the chromatogram. Other high molecular mass [125I]inhibin A tracer-related components coeluted with [125I]inhibin A in this region. [125I]Inhibin A cross-linked complexes in TM3 and TM4 cells were identified in fractions 27–33 (54–60% CH3CN), in which the 145- to 155-kDa complexes eluted first, followed by the 95- and 70-kDa complexes. The 70-kDa protein complex was more evident in TM4 than TM3 cells (compare lanes 29–30 of Fig. 4CGo and Fig. 4BGo, respectively). The more than 200-kDa cross-linked complex was poorly resolved by RP-HPLC and was spread across fractions 26–33, suggesting heterogeneity of this species.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. SDS-PAGE analysis of HPLC fractions of [125I]inhibin A and [125I]inhibin A cross-linked to TM3 and TM4 cells. [125I]inhibin A (A) and [125I]inhibin A cross-linked to TM3 (B) and TM4 (C) cell lines, as described in Materials and Methods, were fractionated by RP-HPLC, and radioactive fractions were separated on 6.5% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography. Data are representative of three experiments. The sizes of the molecular mass standards and inhibin cross-linked bands are shown in kilodaltons.

 


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Inhibin dose-response curves for displacement of [125I]inhibin A from TM3 and TM4 cross-linked complexes. To assess displacement of [125I]inhibin A from cross-linked species, binding to TM3 (A) and TM4 (C) cells was determined in the absence (lane 1) or presence of increasing concentrations of inhibin A (10 pM, lane 2; 20 pM, lane 3; 39 pM, lane 4; 78 pM, lane 5; 156 pM, lane 6; 312 pM, lane 7; 625 pM, lane 8; 1.25 nM, lane 9; 2.5 nM, lane 10). After 4-h incubation, cells were cross-linked with 0.25 mM BS3. The cell lysate was immunoprecipitated with an antibody directed against the {alpha}-subunit of inhibin (R1), and the immunoprecipitate was separated on 6.5% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography. Dose-response curves for [125I]inhibin A displacement from the 200-kDa ({circ}), 155-kDa ({square}), 145-kDa ({blacktriangledown}), and 95-kDa ({diamondsuit}) cross-linked species were generated by densitometric analysis of cross-linked bands and were compared with [125I]inhibin A displacement from TM3 (B, •) and TM4 (D, •) cells. Data are representative of three separate experiments. A dose-response curve was not generated for the 70-kDa cross-linked species because of the faintness of the band in these experiments. The sizes of molecular mass standards and inhibin cross-linked bands are shown in kilodaltons.

 
Titration of affinity-labeled binding proteins with unlabeled inhibin A
TM3 (Fig. 4AGo) and TM4 (Fig. 4CGo) cells were incubated with [125I]inhibin A and increasing concentrations of unlabeled inhibin A (10 pM to 2.5 nM), cross-linked, immunoprecipitated with an antibody directed against the inhibin {alpha}-subunit (R1), and separated by 6.5% SDS-PAGE. Inhibin A dose-response curves (Fig. 4Go, B and D), generated after densitometric analyses of the resulting autoradiograms, indicated that displacement of [125I]inhibin A from each cross-linked species (ED50 = 60–110 pM) closely resembled inhibin displacement from intact TM3 (ED50 = 97 ± 32 pM) and TM4 (ED50 = 75 ± 28 pM) cells (Table 2Go). Low affinity inhibin-binding sites in TM3 and TM4 cells were not resolved by affinity cross-linking. An affinity cross-linking time course of [125I]inhibin A binding to TM3 and TM4 cells (Fig. 5Go, A and C) suggested that inhibin associates with each of its binding proteins within 15 min. Densitometric analyses of the autoradiograms indicated that the time courses of binding of [125I]inhibin A to all of its binding partners on TM3 cells were similar (Fig. 5BGo), whereas on TM4 cells the larger molecular mass species may bind first (Fig. 5DGo).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Time course of inhibin receptor formation on TM3 and TM4 cells. [125I]Inhibin A was incubated with TM3 (A) and TM4 (C) cells for various times, and cells were cross-linked with 0.25 mM BS3 for 30 min. The cell lysate was immunoprecipitated with an antibody directed against the {alpha}-subunit of inhibin (R1), and the immunoprecipitate was separated on 6.5% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography. Time-course binding curves for formation of 200-kDa ({circ}), 155-kDa ({square}), 145-kDa ({blacktriangleup}), and 95-kDa ({diamondsuit}) cross-linked complexes on TM3 (B) and TM4 (D) cells were generated by densitometric analysis of the resulting autoradiograms. A curve was not generated for the 70-kDa cross-linked species because of the faintness of the band in these experiments. The sizes of molecular mass standards and inhibin cross-linked bands are shown in kilodaltons.

 
Characterization of inhibin A-binding proteins in TM3 and TM4 cell lines
A recent study indicated that the type III TGFß receptor, betaglycan, can function as an inhibin coreceptor with ActRIIA or ActRIIB. Betaglycan binds inhibin A with high affinity and enhances its binding in cells coexpressing ActRII and betaglycan (15). In addition, inhibin A can bind to the membrane proteoglycan, p120 (16).

To establish whether the inhibin A-binding proteins include betaglycan, ActRII, and/or p120 in TM3 and TM4 cells, cultures were labeled with [125I]inhibin A, cross-linked, and subjected to immunoprecipitation using antibodies directed against inhibin {alpha}-subunit (R1), inhibin ßA-subunit (E4), ActRIIA, ActRIIB, p120, or betaglycan. All of the antibodies tested reacted with their target antigens in immunoprecipitation studies, although the activin receptor antibodies were not particularly effective (data not shown). In TM4 cells the R1 antibody recognized all of the cross-linked species (i.e. 70, 95, 145, 155, and >200 kDa; Fig. 6Go, lane 2, and Table 2Go). The E4 and betaglycan antibodies immunoprecipitated [125I]inhibin A cross-linked complexes with relative molecular masses of 95, 145, and more than 200 kDa (Fig. 6Go, lanes 1 and 3). The 70- and 155-kDa species were not immunoprecipitated with either of these antibodies. Anti-ActRIIA (Fig. 6Go, lane 3), anti-ActRIIB (not shown), and anti-p120 (Fig. 6Go, lane 4) antibodies did not immunoprecipitate any [125I]inhibin cross-linked complexes. Similar results were obtained with TM3 cells. An excess of unlabeled inhibin A blocked the immunoprecipitation of [125I]inhibin A cross-linked complexes by inhibin or betaglycan antibodies, but similar concentrations of unlabeled inhibin B or activin A competed poorly (data not shown).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Immunoprecipitation of [125I]inhibin A cross-linked complexes with antibodies directed against inhibin ßA-subunit, inhibin {alpha}-subunit, betaglycan, ActRIIA, and p120. [125I]Inhibin A was incubated with TM4 cells for 4 h, and cells were cross-linked with 0.25 mM BS3 for 30 min. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with antibodies directed against the ßA-subunit of inhibin (lane 1), the {alpha}-subunit of inhibin (lane 2), betaglycan (BG; lane 3), ActRIIA (lane 4), or p120 (lane 5). Immunoprecipitates were separated on 6.5% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography. Similar results were obtained with TM3 cells (not shown). The sizes of molecular mass standards and inhibin cross-linked bands are shown in kilodaltons.

 
The failure to identify known inhibin A-binding proteins (ActRIIA, ActRIIB, and p120) by cross-linking and immunoprecipitation suggested that these proteins may not be expressed in TM3 and TM4 cells. RT-PCR analysis confirmed that p120 mRNA is not detectable in these cell lines (Fig. 7AGo, lanes 2 and 3) despite positive expression in rat pituitary (Fig. 7AGo, lane 4) and rat (Fig. 7AGo, lane 5) and mouse (Fig. 7AGo, lane 6) testicular samples. In contrast, betaglycan (Fig. 7AGo, lanes 2 and 3), ActRIIA (Fig. 7BGo, lanes 2 and 4), and ActRIIB (Fig. 7BGo, lanes 3 and 5) mRNA expressions were detected in TM3 and TM4 cells.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. RT-PCR analysis of p120, betaglycan, ActRIIA, and ActRIIB mRNA in TM3 and TM4 cells. A, Total RNA from TM3 (lanes 2 and 7) and TM4 (lanes 3 and 8) cells, rat pituitary (lanes 4 and 9), rat testis (lanes 5 and 10), and mouse testis (lanes 6 and 11) was amplified by RT-PCR in either the presence (lanes 2–6) or absence (lanes 7–11) of AMV reverse transcriptase (RT) using primers specific for mouse p120 (top panel) or betaglycan (BG; bottom panel). Amplified products were electrophoresed on an agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The amplified 282-bp p120 mRNA transcript and 560-bp betaglycan mRNA transcript are indicated by arrows. B, Total RNA from TM3 (lanes 2 and 4) and TM4 (lanes 3 and 5) cells was amplified by RT-PCR (Roche Lightcycler) using primers specific for ActRIIA and ActRIIB. The 700-bp ActRIIA transcript and the 470-bp ActRIIB transcript are indicated by arrows.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study we identified two classes of specific binding sites for human recombinant inhibin A on mouse Leydig (TM3) and Sertoli (TM4) cell lines. The affinities estimated for these two sites (TM3: Kd = 85 and 520 pM; TM4: Kd = 61 and 520 pM) were significantly higher than those observed for inhibin A binding to ovine pituitary cells (Kd = 280 pM and 3.9 nM) (12) or for activin binding to vascular endothelial cells (Kd = 250 pM and 6 nM) (21), hepatocytes (Kd = 300 pM and 3.5 nM) (22) and embryonal carcinoma cells (Kd = 150–400 pM and 1.5–3 nM) (23). In contrast, inhibin-binding protein abundance on TM3 and TM4 cells was similar to that seen in the pituitary (given that gonadotropes represent a small proportion of pituitary cells) (12) and was comparable to activin receptor abundance on the cell lines tested (21, 22, 23). The differences in affinity may reflect the number of proteins involved in the inhibin A-binding protein complex on TM3 and TM4 cells.

Affinity cross-linking and immunoprecipitation studies using an inhibin {alpha}-subunit-directed antibody identified five binding proteins for inhibin A with deduced molecular masses, after subtraction of inhibin, of more than 200, 125, 115, 65, and 40 kDa. Interestingly, similar studies using an inhibin ßA-subunit antibody failed to identify the 125- and 40-kDa proteins, possibly reflecting the involvement of the ß-subunit in binding to these two proteins. Inhibin A displacement of [125I]inhibin A from each of the cross-linked species (ED50 = 60–110 pM) closely resembled inhibin displacement from intact TM3 (ED50 = 97 ± 32 pM) and TM4 (ED50 = 75 ± 28 pM) cells, suggesting that these proteins are all part of a high affinity inhibin A-binding complex. The components of the low affinity inhibin A-binding site were not resolved by these studies. An affinity cross-linking time course of [125I]inhibin A binding to TM3 and TM4 cells suggests that inhibin A does not initially bind to any single protein that mediates complex formation but, rather, binds to a preformed complex.

Precedents exist within the TGFß superfamily for ligand binding to preformed heterooligomeric receptor complexes. Experiments using a yeast two-hybrid interaction assay, double immunoprecipitation analyses, and antibody-mediated immunofluorescence copatching (24, 25, 26) have shown that TGFß receptor type I (TßRI) and TGFß receptor type II (TßRII) can form heteromeric complexes in the absence of TGFß. These studies indicated that the TßRI-TßRII heteromeric receptor complexes preexist in latent forms and are activated by TGFß (27). The TGFß receptor type III, beta-glycan (28), also interacts in a ligand-independent and -dependent manner with TßRI and TßRII, respectively, to form heterooligomeric complexes that mediate TGFß actions (29). In addition to these three receptors, several other high molecular mass (150–180 kDa) cell surface proteins, including endoglin (30) and glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins (31, 32), have been shown to interact with the TGFß signaling receptor complex in different cell types. There is also some evidence that activin A may bind to a heterotrimeric receptor complex, consisting of ActRI, ActRII, and an unidentified 160-kDa protein, on vascular endothelial cells (21). Endoglin can also associate with activin A via association with ActRII (33).

Of the known inhibin-binding proteins only glycosylated betaglycan (>200 kDa) and betaglycan core protein (115 kDa) were confirmed as components of the inhibin-binding complex in TM3 and TM4 cells. Betaglycan is a membrane- anchored proteoglycan with an 853-amino acid core protein that carries heparan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate glycosaminoglycan chains attached to Ser535 and Ser546 (7). The cytoplasmic region of betaglycan is short (43 amino acids) and lacks any discernible signaling motif. Recently, Lewis et al. (15) showed that betaglycan can associate with inhibin (but not activin), and that the resulting inhibin/betaglycan complex competes with activin for access to ActRII, thereby preventing formation of the activin/ActRII complex required for recruitment of ActRI and initiation of the activin-signaling cascade.

Both ActRIIA and ActRIIB are expressed in TM3 and TM4 cell lines and, based on previous studies (15), may correspond to the 65-kDa protein detected by affinity cross-linking. This species was coprecipitated with betaglycan; however, our immunoprecipitation studies using antibodies directed against both ActRIIA and ActRIIB could not confirm that either of the ActRII isoforms is a component of the inhibin A-binding complex in these cells. This may reflect the low level of expression of the 65-kDa protein or the affinities of the ActRII antibodies used. It is worth noting that in [125I]activin cross-linking studies a band consistent in size with the 65-kDa inhibin-binding protein was observed, and this species was displaceable with unlabeled activin (Farnworth, P., unpublished observations). The other recently identified cell surface inhibin-binding protein, p120 (16), is not involved in the inhibin-binding complex in TM3 or TM4 cells. Although a 155-kDa cross-linked complex (125 kDa plus inhibin) of a size consistent with p120 was identified on these cell lines, it was not precipitated using an antibody directed against p120. This is consistent with the failure of RT-PCR studies to detect p120 mRNA in either of these cell lines. Interestingly, Chong et al. (16) detected p120 protein in Leydig cells and in Sertoli cell cytoplasmic processes by immunohistochemical analysis of tissue sections derived from adult rat testis.

Thus, there are two and possibly three unidentified proteins (125, 65?, and 40 kDa) on the surface of TM3 and TM4 cells that bind inhibin A with high affinity and may represent inhibin A-specific receptors. Activin A did not block inhibin A cross-linking to any of the proteins identified, suggesting specificity of the interactions. Interestingly, inhibin B also displayed low cross-reactivity (5%) for [125I]inhibin A binding to TM3 and TM4 cells. This suggests a potential difference in the molecular actions of inhibin A and B and supports the concept that a different class of binding proteins may mediate inhibin B’s actions. However, binding and cross-linking studies showed that inhibin B interacts with the same binding proteins as inhibin A, albeit with lower affinity. Thus, inhibin B may function as a weak agonist of inhibin A in TM3 and TM4 cell lines. The significance of this observation in vivo is unknown, although it would clearly have ramifications in both the male, where inhibin B is the only detectable form of inhibin (34), and the female, where the levels of the two inhibin forms fluctuate throughout the menstrual cycle (35).

The identification of a high affinity inhibin A-binding complex on the surface of Leydig (TM3) and Sertoli (TM4) cell lines provides additional evidence that inhibin acts as a paracrine/autocrine regulator in the testis. Previous studies have indicated that gonadal inhibin A acts directly on interstitial (Leydig) cells, although low level inhibin binding was also detected in Sertoli cells (14, 16, 36). In contrast, activin may exert its activity through interactions with Sertoli and spermatogonial cells (14, 36). As is the case in the pituitary, inhibin appears to antagonize activin action in the testis. Activin acts as an inhibitor of LH/hCG action on androgen biosynthesis at all stages of Leydig cell differentiation, whereas inhibin facilitates LH action on immature Leydig cells (37, 38). Activin also stimulates the proliferation of spermatogonial cells in vitro (39), and inhibin decreases spermatogonial proliferation when injected locally into hamster testis (40).

Two models for inhibin signaling have been proposed (6, 15). In one, inhibin competes with the structurally related molecule activin for access to the activin receptor, and thus blocks activin action. In the second, inhibin binds specifically to its own receptor and transduces an independent signal. The data presented here suggest that inhibin may operate via both mechanisms in TM3 and TM4 cells. By binding beta-glycan, and possibly ActRII, inhibin A could block the activin pathway. At the same time, other components identified in this study as part of the inhibin A-binding complex may initiate downstream signal transduction events. In this way, inhibin A could act to antagonize the effect of activin and exert its own specific actions.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. T. Woodruff for supplying p120 and an antibody directed against p120; Drs. A. Drummond and J.-F. Ethier for supplying oligonucleotide primers; and P. Leembruggen, N. Jagiello, and S. Panckridge for technical assistance. We also thank K. Kwan for his contributions to the initial studies.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by a program grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (RegKey 983212) and a Ramsay Fellowship (to C.H.). Back

Received November 15, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Burger HG, Farnworth PG, Findlay JK, Gurusinghe CJ, Healy DL, Mamers P, Mason A, Robertson DM 1995 Aspects of current and future inhibin research. Reprod Fertil Dev 7:997–1002[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Mather JP, Moore A, Li RH 1997 Activins, inhibins, and follistatins: further thoughts on a growing family of regulators. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 215:209–222[Abstract]
  3. Vale W, Rivier C, Hsueh A, Campen C, Meunier H, Bicsak T, Vaughan J, Corrigan A, Bardin W, Sawchenko P 1988 Chemical and biological characterization of the inhibin family of protein hormones. Recent Prog Horm Res 44:1–34
  4. Massague J 1990 The transforming growth factor beta family. Annu Rev Cell Biol 6:597–641[CrossRef]
  5. Mathews LS 1994 Activin receptors and cellular signaling by the receptor serine kinase family. Endocr Rev 15:310–325[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Robertson DM, Hertan R, Farnworth PG 2000 Is the action of inhibin mediated via a unique receptor? Rev Reprod 5:131–135[Abstract]
  7. Massague J 1998 TGF-ß signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 67:753–791[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Martens JW, de Winter JP, Timmerman MA, McLuskey A, van Schaik RH, Themmen AP, de Jong FH 1997 Inhibin interferes with activin signaling at the level of the activin receptor complex in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Endocrinology 138:2928–2936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Xu J, McKeehan K, Matsuzaki K, McKeehan WL 1995 Inhibin antagonizes inhibition of liver cell growth by activin by a dominant-negative mechanism. J Biol Chem 270:6308–6313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lebrun JJ, Vale WW 1997 Activin and inhibin have antagonistic effects on ligand-dependent heteromerization of the type I and type II activin receptors and human erythroid differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 17:1682–1691[Abstract]
  11. Bilezikjian LM, Blount AL, Campen CA, Gonzalez-Manchon C, Vale W 1991 Activin-A inhibits proopiomelanocortin messenger RNA accumulation and adrenocorticotropin secretion of AtT20 cells. Mol Endocrinol 5:1389–1395[Abstract]
  12. Hertan R, Farnworth PG, Fitzsimmons KL, Robertson DM 1999 Identification of high affinity binding sites for inhibin on ovine pituitary cells in culture. Endocrinology 140:6–12[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Woodruff TK, Krummen L, McCray G, Mather JP 1993 In situ ligand binding of recombinant human [125I]activin-A and recombinant human [125I]inhibin-A to the adult rat ovary. Endocrinology 133:2998–3006[Abstract]
  14. Krummen LA, Moore A, Woodruff TK, Covello R, Taylor R, Working P, Mather JP 1994 Localization of inhibin and activin binding sites in the testis during development by in situ ligand binding. Biol Reprod 50:734–744[Abstract]
  15. Lewis KA, Gray PC, Blount AL, MacConell LA, Wiater E, Bilezikjian LM, Vale W 2000 Betaglycan binds inhibin and can mediate functional antagonism of activin signalling. Nature 404:411–414[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Chong H, Pangas S, Bernard D, Wang E, Gitch J, Chen W, Draper L, Cox E, Woodruff T 2000 Structure and expression of a membrane component of the inhibin receptor system. Endocrinology 141:2600–2607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Chapman S, Woodruff T Modulation of activin receptor assembly and signal transduction by the inhibin binding protein. 82nd Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, Toronto, Canada, 2000 (Abstract 551), p 120
  18. Tierney ML, Goss NH, Tomkins SM, Kerr DB, Pitt DE, Forage RG, Robertson DM, Hearn MT, de Kretser DM 1990 Physicochemical and biological characterization of recombinant human inhibin A. Endocrinology 126:3268–3270[Abstract]
  19. Mather J 1980 Establishment and characterisation of two distinct mouse testicular epithelial cell lines. Biol Reprod 23:243–252[Abstract]
  20. Schagger H, von Jagow G 1987 Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem 166:368–379[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. McCarthy SA, Bicknell R 1994 Activin-A binds to a heterotrimeric receptor complex on the vascular endothelial cell surface. Evidence for a type 3 activin receptor. J Biol Chem 269:3909–3912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Zhang YQ, Kanzaki M, Mashima H, Mine T, Kojima I 1996 Characterization of the activin receptor in cultured rat hepatocytes. Hepatology 24:446–450[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Kondo S, Hashimoto M, Etoh Y, Murata M, Shibai H, Muramatsu M 1989 Identification of the two types of specific receptor for activin/EDF expressed on Friend leukemia and embryonal carcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 161:1267–1272[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Chen RH, Moses HL, Maruoka EM, Derynck R, Kawabata M 1995 Phosphorylation-dependent interaction of the cytoplasmic domains of the type I and type II transforming growth factor-ß receptors. J Biol Chem 270:12235–12241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Yamashita H, ten Dijke P, Franzen P, Miyazono K, Heldin C 1994 Formation of hetero-oligomeric complexes of type I and type II receptors for transforming growth factor-beta. J Biol Chem 269:20172–20178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wells RG, Gilboa L, Sun Y, Liu X, Henis YI, Lodish HF 1999 Transforming growth factor-beta induces formation of a dithiothreitol-resistant type I/type II receptor complex in live cells. J Biol Chem 274:5716–5722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Zhu HJ, Sizeland AM 1999 Extracellular domain of the transforming growth factor-beta receptor negatively regulates ligand-independent receptor activation. J Biol Chem 274:29220–29227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lopez-Casillas F, Cheifetz S, Doody J, Andres JL, Lane WS, Massague J 1991 Structure and expression of the membrane proteoglycan betaglycan, a component of the TGF-ß receptor system. Cell 67:785–795[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Tam BY, Philip A 1998 Transforming growth factor-beta receptor expression on human skin fibroblasts: dimeric complex formation of type I and type II receptors and identification of glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored transforming growth factor-ß binding proteins. J Cell Physiol 176:553–564[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Cheifetz S, Bellon T, Cales C, Vera S, Bernabeu C, Massague J, Letarte M 1992 Endoglin is a component of the transforming growth factor-beta receptor system in human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 267:19027–19030[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Dumont N, O’Connor-McCourt MD, Philip A 1995 Transforming growth factor-beta receptors on human endometrial cells: identification of the type I, II, and III receptors and glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchored TGF-ß binding proteins. Mol Cell Endocrinol 111:57–66[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Cheifetz S, Massague J 1991 Isoform-specific transforming growth factor-ß binding proteins with membrane attachments sensitive to phosphatidylino-sitol-specific phospholipase C. J Biol Chem 266:20767–20772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Barbara NP, Wrana JL, Letarte M 1999 Endoglin is an accessory protein that interacts with the signaling receptor complex of multiple members of the transforming growth factor-ß superfamily. J Biol Chem 274:584–594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Anawalt BD, Bebb RA, Matsumato AM, Groome NP, IIIingworth PJ, McNeilly AS, Bremner WJ 1996 Serum Inhibin B levels reflect Sertoli cell function in normal men and in men with testicular dysfunction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3341–3345[Abstract]
  35. Lockwood GM, Muttukrishna S, Ledger WL 1998 Inhibins and activins in human ovulation, conception and pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update 4:284–295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Woodruff TK, Borree J, Attie KM, Cox ET, Rice GC, Mather JP 1992 Stage-specific binding of inhibin and activin to subpopulations of rat germ cells. Endocrinology 130:871–881[Abstract]
  37. Hsueh AJ, Dahl KD, Vaughan J, Tucker E, Rivier J, Bardin CW, Vale W 1987 Heterodimers and homodimers of inhibin subunits have different paracrine action in the modulation of luteinizing hormone-stimulated androgen biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:5082–5086[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Lin T, Calkins JK, Morris PL, Vale W, Bardin CW 1989 Regulation of Leydig cell function in primary culture by inhibin and activin. Endocrinology 125:2134–2140[Abstract]
  39. Mather JP, Attie KM, Woodruff TK, Rice GC, Phillips DM 1990 Activin stimulates spermatogonial proliferation in germ-Sertoli cell cocultures from immature rat testis. Endocrinology 127:3206–3214[Abstract]
  40. van Dissel-Emiliani FM, Grootenhuis AJ, de Jong FH, de Rooij DG 1989 Inhibin reduces spermatogonial numbers in testes of adult mice and Chinese hamsters. Endocrinology 125:1899[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. G. Farnworth, Y. Wang, R. Escalona, P. Leembruggen, G. T. Ooi, and J. K. Findlay
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Blocks Inhibin Binding to Different Target Cell Types in a Context-Dependent Manner through Dual Mechanisms Involving Betaglycan
Endocrinology, November 1, 2007; 148(11): 5355 - 5368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Makanji, C. A. Harrison, P. G. Stanton, R. Krishna, and D. M. Robertson
Inhibin A and B in Vitro Bioactivities Are Modified by Their Degree of Glycosylation and Their Affinities to Betaglycan
Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2309 - 2316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
P. G Farnworth, Y. Wang, P. Leembruggen, G. T Ooi, C. Harrison, D. M Robertson, and J. K Findlay
Rodent adrenocortical cells display high affinity binding sites and proteins for inhibin A, and express components required for autocrine signalling by activins and bone morphogenetic proteins.
J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2006; 188(3): 451 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
D. J. Bernard, K. H. Burns, B. Haupt, M. M. Matzuk, and T. K. Woodruff
Normal Reproductive Function in InhBP/p120-Deficient Mice
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2003; 23(14): 4882 - 4891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. M. Bilezikjian, A. M. O. Leal, A. L. Blount, A. Z. Corrigan, A. V. Turnbull, and W. W. Vale
Rat Anterior Pituitary Folliculostellate Cells Are Targets of Interleukin-1{beta} and a Major Source of Intrapituitary Follistatin
Endocrinology, February 1, 2003; 144(2): 732 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J.-F. Ethier, P. G. Farnworth, J. K. Findlay, and G. T. Ooi
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Modulates Inhibin A Bioactivity in the L{beta}T2 Gonadotrope Cell Line by Competing for Binding to Betaglycan
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2002; 16(12): 2754 - 2763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
C. Welt, Y. Sidis, H. Keutmann, and A. Schneyer
Activins, Inhibins, and Follistatins: From Endocrinology to Signaling. A Paradigm for the New Millennium
Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2002; 227(9): 724 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. A. Pangas, A. W. Rademaker, D. A. Fishman, and T. K. Woodruff
Localization of the Activin Signal Transduction Components in Normal Human Ovarian Follicles: Implications for Autocrine and Paracrine Signaling in the Ovary
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2644 - 2657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
R. L. Jones, L. A. Salamonsen, Y. C. Zhao, J.-F. Ethier, A. E. Drummond, and J. K. Findlay
Expression of activin receptors, follistatin and betaglycan by human endometrial stromal cells; consistent with a role for activins during decidualization
Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 8(4): 363 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. A. MacConell, A. M. O. Leal, and W. W. Vale
The Distribution of Betaglycan Protein and mRNA in Rat Brain, Pituitary, and Gonads: Implications for a Role for Betaglycan in Inhibin-Mediated Reproductive Functions
Endocrinology, March 1, 2002; 143(3): 1066 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
D. J. Bernard, S. C. Chapman, and T. K. Woodruff
Minireview: Inhibin Binding Protein (InhBP/p120), Betaglycan, and the Continuing Search for the Inhibin Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2002; 16(2): 207 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract