Endocrinology Vol. 142, No. 6 2178-2183
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society
Perspective: Male Reproduction
Ilpo Huhtaniemi and
Andrzej Bartke
Department of Obstetrics and Gyneacology (I.H.)
University of Aberdeen
Aberdeen AB24 2ZD, Scotland, United Kingdom
and
Department of Physiology (A.B.)
Southern Illinois University of Medicine
Carbondale, Illinois 62901-6512
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. Ilpo Huhtaniemi, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 2ZD, Scotland, United Kingdom. E-mail:
ilpo.huhtaniemi{at}utu.fi
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Besides unraveling the basic mechanisms underlying
male reproductive functions, studies of testicular function are
clinically important for the specialty called andrology. Andrology
covers all physiological and pathophysiological functions specific for
the male gender, ranging from conception until senescence. The main
challenges of clinical andrology entail improvement of diagnostics and
treatment of male infertility, development of male-specific methods of
fertility control, combating sexually transmitted diseases, and
improving quality of life of aging males. Better basic understanding of
male reproductive endocrinology is essential for improving our chances
to tackle these challenges. As in all fields of biomedical research,
the major recent advances have been made using the versatile
methodology of molecular biology. This short review describes some of
the recently emerged concepts of testicular endocrine regulation and
function, as well as the approaches that have enabled this progress.
The topics selected represent the subjective views of the authors. We
admit that the scope chosen by someone else could have been different,
and apologize to those whose findings and concepts were not included,
mainly because of space limitations. For the same reason, the main
emphasis of this review will be in testicular function.
 |
Human mutations and genetically modified animal models
|
|---|
The specific role of a gene product can be resolved by
overexpressing or disrupting its gene in genetically modified animals,
usually mice. Novel functions for specific genes have been found, and
useful models for the study of molecular pathogenesis of human diseases
are available. Also male reproductive endocrinology has greatly
benefited from this in vivo application of molecular
biology.
 |
The hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular (HPT) axis
|
|---|
Mutations of gonadotropin receptors have recently been discovered
in human patients. Although very rare, these findings have clarified
the molecular pathogenesis of some disturbances in the reproductive
function (1). An activating mutation of the LH receptor
(R) gene causes the male-limited, early-onset, gonadotropin-independent
precocious puberty (testotoxoicosis) but, interestingly, women with a
similar mutation seem to have no alterations of the phenotype. If the
activating LHR mutation activates the inositol trisphosphate cycle, as
was found with one particular mutation, the patient presented with
testicular Leydig cell adenomas (2). This finding
emphasizes the potential role of gonadotropins as tumor promoters, thus
supporting a theory that has been put forward on the basis of some
clinical finding on gonadal malignancies. Similar findings have been
made on the role of gonadotropins in gonadal tumorigenesis of
gene-modified mice, e.g. inhibin-
knockout (KO) mice with
high FSH levels (3), LH overexpressing mice (4, 5), and those expressing the viral oncogene SV40
T-antigen (6). Such models offer good opportunities for
further exploration of this potentially important but poorly
characterized action of gonadotropins.
Inactivating mutations of the human LHR disrupt male sex
differentiation (1), which ranges, depending on severity
of the receptor inactivation, from mild undervirilization to total lack
of genital masculinization. The phenotype in females is milder,
characterized only by anovulatory infertility. The phenotype of a
single male with inactivating mutation of the LHß gene differs from
the respective receptor mutation: the subject was normally masculinized
at birth, but failed to undergo sexual maturation (7).
This difference can be explained by the stimulatory role of human CG
(hCG) on his testicular testosterone in utero, which
naturally is not possible if the receptor is defective. The very
recently developed mouse KO model for the LHR (LuRKO mouse) allows
interesting comparison between LH/hCG effect on sexual differentiation
in mice and men (8, 9). As in the male patient with
inactivated LHß, the male LuRKO mice were normally masculinized at
birth but failed to show postnatal sexual maturation. Unlike in humans,
functional LHR is thus not necessary in the mouse fetus for sufficient
testicular androgen production to induce masculinization. Other
blood-borne or paracrine factors can apparently maintain sufficient
androgen production in the absence of LH action. It is intriguing that
such a profound difference prevails in the hormonal regulation of
masculinization between man and rodents.
Inactivating FSHß subunit and FSHR mutations have been detected in
humans (1), and the respective KO mouse models have been
developed (3, 10, 11). There is good agreement between the
mouse and human phenotypes of the inactivating FSH ligand and receptor
mutations in females; all are infertile because of arrested follicular
development. A discrepancy prevails in males; while men with FSHR
inactivation (11A ), as well as FRHß and FSHR KO mice
(4, 10, 11) present with suppressed testicular size in the
face of qualitatively normal spermatogenesis, and are fertile or
subfertile, the two men so far described with inactivating FSHß
mutation are azoospermic (12, 13). The small number of
these cases in comparison to the other models shifts the balance toward
the contention that FSH action per se is not necessary for
spermatogenesis. This finding is of practical importance, indicating
that a male contraceptive strategy based on elimination of FSH action
may not be feasible. Interestingly, no clear activating mutations of
the human FSHR have been discovered in either sex, although large
numbers of patients with the expected phenotypes (e.g.
premature ovarian failure or macro-orchia) have been screened. It is
possible that our educated guesses of phenotypes of such cases are
incorrect, or the mutations in the candidate syndromes have to be
looked for in genes participating in the postreceptor cascade of FSH
signal transduction. Therefore, genetically modified animal models for
activating gonadotropin receptor mutations would be of great help in
predicting the human phenotypes.
All in all, the severity of the phenotypes of human mutations and
genetically modified mice emphasize the sexual dichotomy between LH and
FSH; the former is critically the male gonadotropin, and the latter the
female one.
 |
The GH, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, and PRL effects
|
|---|
There is considerable evidence that the somatotropic axis, GH, and
IGF-I, as well as PRL, are involved in control of the HPT axis, and
that locally produced IGF-I participates in paracrine interactions
between different cell types in the testis. Targeted gene disruption
and transgenic technology are used to study the actions of PRL, GH, and
IGF-I in the male. The weight of the accessory reproductive glands was
reduced in PRL-KO mice (14) and increased in transgenic
mice overexpressing PRL (15). Both PRL-KO and PRLR-KO
males are fertile, although reproductive development of PRLR-KO male
mice may be delayed (14, 16). The very "mild"
reproductive phenotype of PRL-KO and PRLR-KO male mice might reflect
availability of redundant regulatory mechanisms, most likely through GH
and IGF-I.
KO of IGF-I and IGF-IR genes causes severe developmental abnormalities,
often leading to early mortality. In the surviving IGF-KO animals, the
male reproductive system is usually infantile (17). In
contrast, GHR/GH binding protein KO mice are usually fertile but mimic
many symptoms of Laron dwarfism in the human, including a delay in
sexual maturation (18 ; Keene, D. and A. Bartke,
unpublished). GHR-KO males have reduced levels of LHR and PRLR in the
testis and reduced responsiveness to GnRH or LH stimulation
(19 ; Chandrashekar, V., M. L. Dufau, and A. Bartke,
unpublished). Elevation of plasma PRL levels in these animals
(19) is of interest in that it might represent a mechanism
of physiological compensation for the loss of GH signaling. It is hoped
that studies in this novel model of GH resistance will allow clear
separation of the role of GH-dependent and GH-independent IGF-I
production in the regulation of male sexual maturation and adult
reproductive functions. However, production of animals with
testis-specific KO of IGF-I and IGF-IR is needed to evaluate the
physiological significance of IGF-I in the paracrine control of somatic
and germ cells in the testis.
Transgenic male mice overexpressing GH are usually fertile. However,
overexpression of human GH is associated with hyperplasia and
hypertrophy of seminal vesicles, loss of androgen receptors from these
organs, elevation of plasma LH, and premature loss of reproductive
competence. Many of these effects are presumably due to the combined
somatogenic and lactogenic activity of human GH in rodents because they
are either milder or absent in transgenic males overexpressing bovine
GH, which is purely somatogenic, or overexpressing endogenous GH driven
by MT-hGHRH transgene (20).
 |
The inhibin/activin-follistatin system
|
|---|
In clinical studies, the dimeric inhibin assays have established
inhibin B as the testis-specific form of this hormone, and it serves as
a good positive marker for spermatogenesis and Sertoli cell function
(21). In the adult testis, paracrine signals from germ
cells are important for Sertoli cell inhibin production. A considerable
amount of basic research has been devoted to the study of the role of
inhibins, activins, and the activin-binding molecule follistatin in the
paracrine regulation of testicular germinal and somatic cell
development and functions. While inhibin seems to have a dual,
endocrine (regulation of FSH secretion in pituitary) and para/autocrine
role in testicular function, the activin actions seem to be of the
local type in the testis and numerous extragonadal sites
(22). The testicular effects of the activins are
inhibitory, stimulatory, age and cell specific, and often opposite to
those of inhibin. Follistatin adds another dimension of complexity to
these effects. An important part to our knowledge about the physiology
and pathophysiology of inhibin peptides has emerged from the
gene-modified mouse models for inhibin, activin, activin receptors and
follistatin produced by Matzuk and co-workers (23). Clear
testicular phenotypes were found with many of the models, in support of
important role of these peptides in testicular function, including the
function of inhibin as tumor suppressor. Recent studies from their
laboratory address the importance spatiotemporal expression of the
different inhibin peptides and their receptors using insertional
mutagenesis (24). In general, a topical question to be
answered with cell-specific KO models, using the Cre/loxP technique, is
the functional importance of the numerous putative para/autocrine local
factors within the testis, including the inhibin peptides.
While the activin receptors and mechanisms of activin action are
relatively well delineated, the receptor for inhibin, and its ultimate
mechanism of action still remain elusive. One theory is that inhibin in
fact is an inhibitor of activin action, although mounting evidence
indicates that it also interacts with specific membrane-binding
proteins that are likely to be the putative inhibin receptors. Some
molecules with inhibin binding activity, as well as their interactions
with the known activin receptor ActRIIA, have recently been identified:
one is a 120-kDa membrane-anchored proteoglycan, p120
(25); the other is the type III TGFß receptor,
betaglycan (26). It is possible that inhibin acts, in
part, through inhibition of activin action by forming inhibitory
complexes with type II activin receptors, while some of the inhibin
actions could be independent using different receptor molecules and
signaling mechanisms. The final answer to this conundrum may be
near.
 |
Spermatogenesis
|
|---|
It seems to be almost a universal phenomenon that transgenes show
unexpected expression in some of the numerous cell types of the testis,
a finding that agrees with the low endogenous expression of so many
genes in the testis. The functional significance of this phenomenon is
not understood. Another general feature of transgenesis is that quite
often, an unexpected side finding in a study exploring a
nonreproductive phenomenon, is the infertility of male transgenic or KO
mice. This failure of the experimental model can be turned into virtue,
if the model elucidates the basic mechanisms of spermatogenesis. There
are numerous studies where KO or overexpression of specific growth
factors affects some aspects of spermatogenesis
(27, 28, 29, 30, 31).
If we exit the realm of endocrine and paracrine regulatory events, KO
mice have been developed with primary defects at every stage of
spermatogenesis (32), thus creating a database that can be
used for decoding the network of genetic hierarchy that is responsible
for spermatogenesis. Besides function of gene products in
vivo, the models have elucidated promoter and untranslated
sequences involved in male germ cell differentiation. The exploitation
of these models to explore the basic mechanisms of spermatogenesis is
just in its initial phase. It has been somewhat puzzling that the KO of
some genes known to be involved in spermatogenesis has not caused
infertility, and that silencing of some genes not known to be involved
in testicular function have caused infertility (32).
Besides unraveling the basic mechanisms of spermatogenesis, the novel
animal models may offer new strategies for male contraception. If, for
instance, a gene product crucial for spermatogenesis or sperm
maturation can be specifically inactivated using a pharmacological
inactivator, a specific male contraceptive method may be within
reach.
In the study of spermatogenesis, another recent methodological
breakthrough is the technique of germ cell transplantation, which has
vast prospects of application (33). These include at least
the possibilities to investigate fundamental aspects of
spermatogenesis, the clinical prospects to treat male infertility, and
the possibilities to genetically manipulate spermatogonial stem cells
to develop transgenic animals. It is possible that the pending
questions about the physiological significance of paracrine regulation
of spermatogenesis will be solved with this novel approach. The power
of this technique is perhaps best illustrated by the recent
demonstration that in heterospecific germ cell transplantation between
the rat and the mouse, duration of spermatogenesis is determined by the
transplanted germ cells rather than by the resident Sertoli cells
(34). This result could not have been predicted from
previous studies of Sertoli cells-germ cells interactions. Finally, the
study of spermatogenesis in lower animal species, e.g.
Drosophila and C. elegans, have opened up new
avenues into studies of mammalian spermatogenesis.
 |
Estrogens and testicular function
|
|---|
It is very well established that the principal female sex steroid,
estradiol (E2) is produced by the testis, that
E2 and other estrogens are present in the
circulation of a normal adult male, and that conversion of testosterone
to E2 is important in androgen signaling
particularly in the brain. Production of E2 by
the Leydig cells in response to LH and by the immature rat Sertoli
cells in response to FSH have been studied in considerable detail. In
recent years there has been a resurgence of interest in the study of
the role of estrogens in the male. This stemmed primarily from the
following developments:
1) Discovery of the second type of estrogen receptor, named estrogen
receptor ß (ERß) and demonstration that its distribution in the
testis and in the male reproductive tract differs from that of the
long-known ER
(35).
2) Development of mice with targeted disruption of ER
or ERß
(36), which allowed studies of the physiological role of
estrogen signaling in the male.
3) Suggestion that reduction in sperm counts and increase in the
incidence of testicular tumors in men in some industrialized areas may
be due to estrogenic substances in the environment
(37).
Studies in male mice, rats and monkeys revealed the presence of ER
in the Leydig cells, rete testis, efferent ducts and epididymis, as
well as in the pituitary, with some species differences
(36). Expression of ER
was particularly intense in the
efferent ducts that transport spermatozoa suspended in the fluid
secreted by the Sertoli cells from the testis to the epididymis. In
contrast, ERß was widely expressed in the testis, including Sertoli
cells, Leydig cells, and germ cells, as well as in the epididymis,
prostate, and seminal vesicles.
Male ERKO mice with targeted disruption of ER
have increased plasma
testosterone levels but are infertile due to distension of the rete
testis and excurrent ducts and progressive loss of testicular weight,
reflecting damage to seminiferous epithelium and exfoliation of germ
cells (36). Studies in these animals revealed a previously
unsuspected important physiological role of endogenous estrogen: the
control of fluid reabsorption in the efferent ducts and the initial
segment of the epididymis (36). Male BERKO mice with
selective disruption of ERß are fertile and exhibit no major
alterations in the function of the male reproductive system
(36). This suggests that the effects of endogenous
estrogens on the development and function of the male reproductive
system identified by treatment with aromatase inhibitors
(38) or KO of the aromatase gene (39) are due
primarily, if not exclusively, to signaling via ER
. However, several
weak estrogens, including plant estrogens and environmental pollutants,
were recently shown to bind to ERß with greater affinity than to
ER
(40). There is also evidence for the inhibitory
effects of liganded ERß on the signaling via ER
. These findings
are potentially very important because they may explain the apparent
paradox of significant biological effects of phytoestrogens and
environmental estrogenic pollutants that are very weakly estrogenic and
are usually ingested in very limited amounts. Current progress in
elucidating the actions of estrogens and antiestrogens at the molecular
level and in development and study of selective ER modulators (SERMS)
raises hope for resolving at least some of the controversies
surrounding the possible impact of environmental estrogens on male
reproductive health. Of particular concern is the suspected importance
of prenatal exposure to environmental estrogens and other endocrine
disruptors on development of the male reproductive tract and adult
reproductive function (37).
 |
Paracrine/autocrine regulation of testicular function
|
|---|
For the last 15 yr or so, a deluge of information has emerged on
paracrine and autocrine effects within the testis of almost any
bioactive molecule detected somewhere in the body (41, 42). These effects have invariably been demonstrated in
vitro, often in cocultures of two testicular cell compartments.
The confusing picture about importance of these findings has been
boosted by the findings that a surprisingly large number of genes are
expressed somewhere in the testis, often having their transcripts
differently processed from those observed in other organs. This appears
to have resulted in stagnation of the research of para/autocrine
regulation of the testis, and a novel intratesticular expression or
novel in vitro effects of molecule X no longer receive the
enthusiasm it would have received some years ago. It is clear that new
methodological breakthroughs are needed to make progress, and such
methods are now available. The cell-specific and/or inducible gene KO
techniques are the likely approach to demonstrate whether the
intratesticular production and action of a given molecule is
physiologically important or whether it simply represents biological
redundancy.
 |
Testicular apoptosis
|
|---|
It is very well documented that both natural and experimentally
induced fluctuations in production of spermatozoa can almost always be
traced to alterations in the proportion of germ cells that survive
particular stages of spermatogenesis. Loss of germ cells in the testis,
similarly to the situation in the ovary, occurs primarily, and perhaps
exclusively, via programmed cell death, apoptosis (43, 44). Germ cell apoptosis in the testis increases in response to
seasonal or experimentally induced hormonal deprivation, elevated
temperature, ischemia, or toxicants known to suppress sperm production,
with both H-P-T axis and somatotropic axis (GH and IGF-I) acting as
germ cell survival factors. Testicular apoptosis involves the Fas
system. Sertoli cells produce Fas ligand (FasL), a proapoptotic factor
that binds to Fas, a transmembrane receptor protein on germ cells
(45). A recent analysis of the available data led to the
conclusion that survival of germ cells may reflect balance of
prosurvival and proapoptotic signals (e.g. FasL) originating
from the Sertoli cells and concomitant changes in Fas protein in germ
cells (45, 46). Studies in mice with targeted disruption
of genes involved in the regulation of apoptosis provided evidence that
this process is essential for normal sperm production and male
fertility (47, 48, 49). Further studies of the Fas system and
the regulation of pro- and anti-apoptotic signals in the testis should
produce major advances in the understanding of paracrine interactions
between the Sertoli cells and the germ cells and may provide new
directions for the treatment of male infertility and for development of
novel approaches to contraception.
It should be mentioned that apoptotic cell death is also importantly
involved in regression of male accessory reproductive glands in
response to androgen withdrawal and in the loss of Leydig cells in
response to toxicants (46).
 |
Aging and male endocrine function
|
|---|
The present understanding of the effects of aging on the endocrine
function of the testis is derived primarily from the studies in men and
in laboratory rats. As recently as 10 yr ago, the mechanisms of
reproductive aging in these two species were believed to be
fundamentally different. In healthy men, there is a relatively small
but detectable gradual decline in testosterone production by the
testis, accompanied by increase in testosterone binding globulin
levels, leading to significant decline in the levels of free
testosterone in peripheral circulation (50). There is also
a decline in the amplitude of the diurnal rhythms of plasma
testosterone levels (51). These changes are occurring in
the presence of increasing gonadotropin levels and thus were assumed to
represent a primary defect in function of the Leydig cell
(50). In contrast, in male rats, age-related decline in
plasma testosterone levels were ascribed to alterations in
catecholaminergic transmission in the hypothalamus and decline in GnRH
and gonadotropin secretion, and thus representing secondary rather than
primary Leydig cell failure (52). In one strain of rats
commonly used for aging research, Fischer 344, these changes are
amplified by development of Leydig cell adenomas which secrete
progesterone and, therefore, suppress gonadotropin release
(53).
Research conducted during the last decade resulted in the determination
that male reproductive aging is far more complex. Application of novel
statistical methods to the analysis of gonadotropin and testosterone
levels in serially collected blood samples from young and elderly men
revealed numerous age-related changes in function of the HPT axis.
These alterations included reduced amplitude of LH pulses apparently
due to reduced LHRH stimulatory input, increased LH pulse frequency
reflecting reduced negative feedback, and evidence for disrupted
temporal relationships between LH and testosterone pulses
(54). Synchrony between LH pulses and oscillations in the
levels of FSH and PRL was also disrupted in healthy older men
(54). These findings indicate existence of primary changes
at both hypothalamic and testicular levels in the aging human male.
Many of the recent studies of reproductive aging in the male rat used
the Brown Norway rat, a long-lived strain with very low incidence of
reproductive tumors or age-related obesity. In old males from this
strain, plasma testosterone levels are greatly reduced and there are
various indications of primary Leydig cell failure. For example, Zirkin
and his colleagues (55) treated old rats with ethane 1,
2-dimethane sulfonate (EDS), a Leydig cell toxin and examined the
animals after their testes were repopulated by newly produced Leydig
cells. These "young" Leydig cells restored high plasma testosterone
levels even though they were functioning under the influence of an old
hypothalamic-pituitary system and in the environment of an old testis.
Detailed study of LH pulses and hypothalamic control of LH release in
Brown Norway rat (56) provided evidence for abnormalities
that resemble those in aging men. Thus, reproductive aging in both
species apparently involves changes both in the Leydig cells and in the
hypothalamic-pituitary control of their function.
Many recent and current studies of male reproductive aging address a
very important issue of androgen replacement in the aging males.
Interest in this area coincides with development of several novel
transdermal and depot injection systems of delivery of testosterone.
There is considerable evidence that testosterone therapy can improve
libido, potency, muscle function and bone mineral density as well as
various aspects of cognitive function in hypogonadal men and in elderly
men. However, the opinions concerning risk:benefit ratio of androgen
therapy in healthy middle aged and elderly subjects differ widely
(57) and much additional work will be needed to achieve
consensus in this area. Likewise, the causality between the
aging-related decline of testosterone levels and the symptoms of aging
remains to be demonstrated.
 |
Clinical relevance of the information obtained and future
perspectives
|
|---|
It is intriguing to speculate how much the novel information on
the genetic causes of male infertility will help in the diagnostics and
treatment of male infertility. A rare mutation as cause of infertility
can be diagnosed, but if there is no specific treatment available, the
mere knowledge of pathogenesis may turn out to be very costly for the
health care systems. The Y chromosome deletions (58) may
be common enough to be diagnosed in men from couples undergoing
intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), to predict whether the
fathers infertility is likely to be inherited by the son. Anything
less frequent, although possible to diagnose using molecular biological
methods, may be too costly for health care systems. What is reassuring
is the realistic expectation that the proportion of idiopathic male
infertility will be shrinking through advances in molecular
diagnostics.
While the role of the classical endocrine regulatory systems in
maintaining testicular function has been quite well delineated with an
array of gene-modified animals, we still know relatively little about
the intracellular signaling systems involved. It is likely that the
next generation of transgenics and KOs will concentrate on functions at
this level of the hormonal signaling cascade and on detecting
pathogenesis of syndromes at this level. For instance, the CREM system
seems to be the master switch in effects of FSH on spermatogensis
(59), and the C/EBP ß is involved in the downstream
cascade of LH action (60). It is likely that novel
mutations at the postreceptor level of regulation of gonadal function
will be identified as underlying pathogenesis in men with apparent
disturbance of gonadotropin action, but without defects in the cognate
ligand or receptor.
Our concepts about estrogen action underwent quite dramatic revision
upon the recent discovery of another estrogen receptor, ERß. The
possibility of existence of another androgen receptor has remained
elusive. We still do not understand why androgen action within the
testis requires incomparably higher androgen concentrations, if after
all the testicular and extratesticular androgen effects are regulated
by the same receptor molecule. Determining whether there is another
intratesticular androgen receptor, akin to the ERß, remains a
challenge for future research.
In andrology, similar to other fields of biomedical research, novel
techniques hold promise of progress at an unprecedented pace.
Subtractive hybridization and DNA array analyses, combined with
advances in cloning individual genes and mapping the whole genome and
with the emerging field of proteomics, should make it possible to
discover novel regulatory mechanisms and pathways and to elucidate
mechanisms of action of hormones, local factors, drugs, and
environmental substances that influence testicular function. The issues
of statistical analysis and experimental verification of the enormous
amounts of new data that can be generated by microarray procedures are
certain to be resolved, and this and other powerful novel methods will
find their place in both research and diagnostics.
Received February 28, 2001.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Themmen APN, Huhtaniemi IT 2000 Mutations of
gonadotropins and gonadotropin receptors: Elucidating the physiology
and pathophysiology of pituitary-gonadal function. Endocr Rev 21:551583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liu G, Duranteau L, Carel JC, Monroe J, Doyle DA,
Shenker A 1999 Leydig-cell tumors caused by an activating mutation
of the gene encoding the luteinizing hormone receptor. N Engl
J Med 341:17311736[Free Full Text]
-
Risma KA, Clay CM, Nett TM, Wagner T, Yun J, Nilson
JH 1995 Targeted overexpression of luteinizing hormone in
transgenic mice leads to infertility, polycystic ovaries, and ovarian
tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:13221326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kumar TR, Palapattu G, Wang P, Woodruff TK, Boime I,
Byrne MC, Matzuk MM 1999 Transgenic models to study gonadotropin
function: the role of follicle-stimulating hormone in gonadal growth
and tumorigenesis. Mol Endocrinol 13:851865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kero J, Poutanen M, Zhang FP, Rahman N, McNicol AM,
Nilson JH, Keri RA, Huhtaniemi IT 2000 Elevated luteinizing
hormone induces expression of its receptor and promotes steroidogenesis
in the adrenal cortex. J Clin Invest 105:633641[Medline]
-
Kananen K, Rilianawati, Paukku T, Markkula M, Rainio
EM, Huhtaniemi I 1997 Suppression of gonadotropins inhibits
gonadal tumorigenesis in mice transgenic for the mouse inhibin
alpha-subunit promoter/simian virus 40 T-antigen fusion gene.
Endocrinology 138:35213531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weiss J, Axelrod L, Whitcomb RW, Harris PE, Crowley WF,
Jameson JL 1992 Hypogonadism caused by a single amino acid
substitution in the beta subunit of luteinizing hormone. N Engl
J Med 326:179183[Medline]
-
Zhang F-P, Poutanen M, Wilbertz J, Huhtaniemi I 2001 Normal prenatal but arrested postnatal sexual development of
luteinizing hormone receptor knockout (LuRKO) mice. Mol Endocrinol 15:182193
-
Lei ZM, Mishra S, Zou W, Xu B, Foltz M, Li X, Rao
CV 2001 Targeted disruption of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic
gonadotropin receptor gene. Mol Endocrinol 15:184200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dierich A, Sairam MR, Monaco L, Fimia GM, Gansmuller A,
LeMeur M, Sassone-Corsi P 1998 Impairing follicle-stimulating
hormone (FSH) signaling in vivo: targeted disruption of the FSH
receptor leads to aberrant gametogenesis and hormonal imbalance. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 95:1361213617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Abel MH, Wootton AN, Wilkins V, Huhtaniemi I, Knight PG,
Charlton HM 2000 The effect of a null mutation in the
follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene on mouse reproduction.
Endocrinology 141:17951803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tapanainen JS, Aittomäki K, Min J,
Vaskivuo T, Huhtaniemi IT 1997 Men homozygous for an
inactivating mutation of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)
receptor gene present variable suppression of spermatogenesis and
fertility. Nat Genet 15:205206[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Lindstedt G, Nystrom E, Matthews C, Ernest I, Janson PO,
Chatterjee K 1998 Follitropin (FSH) deficiency in an infertile
male due to FSHß gene mutation. A syndrome of normal puberty and
virilization but underdeveloped testicles with azoospermia, low FSH but
high lutropin and normal serum testosterone concentrations. Clin Chem
Lab Med 36:663665[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Phillip M, Arbelle JE, Segev Y, Parvari R 1998 Male
hypogonadism due to a mutation in the gene for the beta-subunit of
follicle-stimulating hormone. N Engl J Med 338:17291732[Free Full Text]
-
Steger RW, Chandrashekar V, Zhao W, Bartke A, Horseman
N 1998 Neuroendocrine and reproductive functions in male mice with
targeted disruption of the prolactin gene. Endocrinology 139:36913695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wennbo H, Kinblom J, Isaksson OGP, Törnell J 1997 Transgenic mice overexpressing the prolactin gene develop dramatic
enlargement in the prostate gland. Endocrinology 138:44104415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ormandy CJ, Camus A, Barra J, Damotte D, Lucas B, Buteau
H, Edery M, Brousse N, Babinet C, Binart N, Kelly PA 1997 Null
mutation of the prolactin receptor gene produces multiple reproductive
defects in the mouse. Genes Dev 11:167178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Baker J, Hardy MP, Zhou J, Bondy C, Lupu F, Bellvé
AR, Efstratiadis A 1996 Effects of an IGF-I gene null mutation on
mouse reproduction. Mol Endocrinol 10:903918[Abstract]
-
Zhou Y, Xu BC, Maheshwari HG, He L, Reed M, Lozykowski
M, Okada S, Wagner TE, Cataldo LA, Coschigano K, Baumann G, Kopchick
JJ 1997 A mammalian model for Laron syndrome produced by targeted
disruption of the mouse growth hormone receptor/binding protein gene
(The Laron mouse). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:1321513220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chandrashekar V, Bartke A, Coschigano KT, Kopchick
JJ 1999 Pituitary and testicular function in growth hormone
receptor gene knockout mice. Endocrinology 140:10821088[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bartke A, Cecim M, Tang K, Steger RW, Chandrashekar V,
Turyn D 206 1994 Neuroendocrine and reproductive consequences of
overexpression of growth hormone in transgenic mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol
Med345359
-
Anderson RA, Sharpe RM 2000 Regulation of inhibin
production in the human male and its clinical applications. Int J
Androl 23:136144[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Risbridger GP, Cancilla B 2000 Role of activins in
the male reproductive tract. Rev Reprod 5:99104[Abstract]
-
Nishimori K, Matzuk MM 1996 Transgenic mice in the
analysis of reproductive development and function. Rev Reprod 1:203212[Abstract]
-
Pierson TM, Wang Y, DeMayo FJ, Matzuk MM, Tsai SY,
Omalley BW 2000 Regulable expression of inhibin A in wild-type and
inhibin
null mice. Mol Endocrinol 14:10751085[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chong H, Pangas SA, Bernard DJ, Wang E, Gitch J, Chen W,
Draper LB, Cox ET, Woodruff TK 2000 Structure and expression of a
membrane component of the inhibin receptor sysetm. Endocrinology 141:26002607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lewis KA, Gray PC, Blount AL, MacConell LA, Wiater E,
Bilezikijan LM, Vale W 2000 Betaglycan binds inhibin and can
mediate functional antagonism f activin signalling. Nature 404:411414[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Baker J, Hardy MP, Zhou J, Bondy C, Lupu F, Bellve AR,
Efstratiadis A 1996 Effects of an Igf1 gene null mutation on mouse
reproduction. Mol Endocrinol 10:903918
-
Grootegoed JA, Baarends WM, Roest HP, Hoeijmakers
JH 1998 Knockout mouse model and gametogenic failure. Mol Cell
Endocrinol 145:161166[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Zhao GQ, Liaw L, Hogan BL 1998B one morphogenetic
protein 8A plays a role in the maintenance of spermatogenesis and the
integrity of the epididymis. Development 125:11031112
-
Gnessi L, Basciani S, Mariani S, Arizzi M, Spera G, Wang
C, Bondjers C, Karlsson L, Betsholtz C 2000 Leydig cell loss and
spermatogenic arrest in platelet-derived growth factor
(PDGF)-A-deficient mice. J Cell Biol 149:10191026[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Meng X, Lindahl M, Hyvonen ME, Parvinen M, de Rooij DG,
Hess MW, Raatikainen-Ahokas A, Sainio K, Rauvala H, Lakso M, Pichel JG,
Westphal H, Saarma M, Sariola H 2000 Regulation of cell fate
decision of undifferentiated spermatogonia by GDNF. Science 287:14891493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Venables JP, Cookoe HJ 2000 Lessons from knockout
and transgenic mice for infertility in men. J Endocrinol Invest 23:584591[Medline]
-
McLean DJ, Johnston DS, Russell LD, Griswold MD 2001 Germ cell transplantation and the study of testicular function.
Trends Endocrinol Metab 12:1621[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Franca L, Ogawa T, Avarbock M, Brinster R, Russsell
L 1998 Germ cell genotype controls the cell cycle during
spermatogenesis. Biol Reprod 59:13711377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kuiper GGJM, Carlsson B, Grandien K, Enmark E, Haggblad
J, Nilsson S, Gustafsson J-A 1997 Comparison of the ligand binding
specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors
and ß. Endocrinology 138:863870[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Couse JF, Korach KS 1999 Estrogen receptor null
mice: what have we learned and where will they lead us? Endocr Rev 20:358417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Toppari J, Larsen J, Christiansen P, Giwercman A,
Grandjean P, Guillette Jr L, Jegou B, Jense T, Jouannet P,
Keiding N, Leffers H, McLachlan, Meyer O, Muller J, Rajpert-De Meyts E,
Scheike T, Sharpe RMS, JS, Skakkebaek N 1996 Male reproductive
health and environmental xenooestrogens. Environ Health Perspec
[Suppl] 104:741803
-
Ellinwood WE, Hess DL, Roselli CE, Spies HG, Resko
JA 1984 Inhibition of aromatization stimulates luteinizing hormone
and testosterone secretion in adult male rhesus monkeys. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 59:10881096[Abstract]
-
Fisher C, KH G, Parlow A, Simpson E 1998 Characterization of mice deficient in aromatase (ArKO) because of
targeted disruption of the cyp 19 gene. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 95:69656970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kuiper GGJM, Lemmen JG, Carlsson B, Corton JC, Safe SH,
van der Saag PT, van der Burg B, Gustafsson J-A 1998 Interaction
of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor ß.
Endocrinology 139:42524263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Saez JM 1994 Leydig cells: endocrine, paracrine,
and autocrine regulation. Endocr Rev 15:574626[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Huhtaniemi I, Toppari J 1995 Endocrine, paracrine
and autocrine regulation of testicular steroidogenesis. Adv Exp Med
Biol 1995:377:3354
-
Billig H, Furuta I, Rivier C, Tapanainen J, Parvinen M,
Hsueh AJW 1995 Apoptosis in testis germ cells: Developmental
changes in gonadotropin dependence and localization to selective tubule
stages. Endocrinology 136:512[Abstract]
-
Sinha Hikim A, Wang C, Leung A, Swerdloff R 1995 Involvement of apoptosis in the induction of germ cell degerneation in
adult rats after gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist treatment.
Endocrinology 136:27702775[Abstract]
-
Boekelheide K, Fleming SL, Johnson KJ, Patel S, R.,
Schoenfeld HA 2000 Role of Sertoli cells in injury-associated
testicular germ cell apoptosis. Soc Exper Biol Med 225:105115
-
Nandi S, Banerjee PP, Zirkin BR 1999 Germ cell
apoptosis in the testes of Sprague Dawley rats following testosterone
withdrawal by ethane 1,2-dimethanesulfonate administration:
relationship to Fas? Biol Reprod 61:7075[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Knudson C, Tung K, Tourtelloutte W, Brown G, Korsmeyer
S 1995 Bax-deficient mice with lymphoid hyperplasia and male germ
cell death. Science 270:9699[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rodriguez I, Ody C, Araki K, Garcia I, Vassalli P 1997 An early and massive wave of germinal cell apoptosis is required
for the development of functional spermatogenesis. EMBO J 16:22622270[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Honarpour N, Richardson J, Hammer R, Wang X, Herz J 2000 Adult Apaf-1-deficient mice exhibit male infertility. Dev Biol 218:248258[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Vermeulen A, Deslypere J 1985 Testicular endocrine
function in the aging male. Maturitas 7:273279[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Tenover J, Matsumoto A, Clifton D, Bremner W 1988 Age related alterations in the circadian rhythms of pulsatile
luteinizing hormone and testosterone secretion in healthy men. J
Gerontol 43:M163M168
-
Meites J 1988 Neuroendocrine basis of aging in the
rat. In: Everitt A, Walton J (eds) Regulation of Neuroendocrine Aging.
Karger, AG, Basel, pp 3750
-
Amador A, Steger R, Bartke A, Johns A, Siler-Khodr TM,
Parker Jr CR, Shephard AM 1985 Testicular LH receptors during
aging in Fischer 344 rats. J Androl 6:6164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Veldhuis JD 2000 Recent neuroendocrine facets of
male reproductive aging. Exp Gerontol 35:12811308[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Chen H, Huhtaniemi I, Zirkin BR 1996 Depletion and
repopulation of Leydig cells in the testes in aging brown Norway rats.
Endocrinology 137:34473452[Abstract]
-
Gruenewald DA, Naai M, Hess DL, Matsumoto A 1994 The Brown Norway rat as a model of male reproductive aging: evidence
for both primary and secondary testicular failure. J Gerontol Biol Sci
49:B42B50
-
Tenover J 1997 Testosterone in the aging male. J
Androl 18:103106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McElreavey K, Krausz C 1999 Sex chromosome genetics
99. Male infertility and the Y chromosome. Am J Hum Genet 64:928933[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Sassone-Corsi P 1998 CREM: a master-switch
governing male germ cells differentiation and apoptosis. Semin Cell Dev
Biol 9:475482[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Robinson GW, Johnson PF, Hennighausen L, Sterneck E 1998 The C/EBPß transcription factor regulates epithelial cell
proliferation and differentiation in the mammary gland. Genes Dev 12:19071916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Bhandari, K. R. Juluri, A. C. Resnick, and S. H. Snyder
Gene deletion of inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1 reveals inositol pyrophosphate regulation of insulin secretion, growth, and spermiogenesis
PNAS,
February 19, 2008;
105(7):
2349 - 2353.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Wagener, J Fickel, J Schon, A Fritzenkotter, F Goritz, and S Blottner
Seasonal variation in expression and localization of testicular transforming growth factors TGF-{beta}1 and TGF-{beta}3 corresponds with spermatogenic activity in roe deer
J. Endocrinol.,
November 1, 2005;
187(2):
205 - 215.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Stelzer and J. Don
Atce1: A Novel Mouse Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'-Monophosphate-Responsive Element-Binding Protein-Like Gene Exclusively Expressed in Postmeiotic Spermatids
Endocrinology,
May 1, 2002;
143(5):
1578 - 1588.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R.I. McLachlan, L. O'Donnell, S.J. Meachem, P.G. Stanton, D.M. de Kretser, K. Pratis, and D.M. Robertson
Identification of Specific Sites of Hormonal Regulation in Spermatogenesis in Rats, Monkeys, and Man
Recent Prog. Horm. Res.,
January 1, 2002;
57(1):
149 - 179.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|