help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zabludoff, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zabludoff, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, W. W.
Endocrinology Vol. 142, No. 6 2318-2327
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Male Germ Cells Regulate Transcription of the Cathepsin L Gene by Rat Sertoli Cells1

Sonya D. Zabludoff2,3, Martin Charron2, Joshua N. DeCerbo, Natalia Simukova4 and William W. Wright

Division of Reproductive Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. William W. Wright, Division of Reproductive Biology, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21205. E-mail: bwright{at}jhmi.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It is well known that male germ cells regulate the steady state levels of numerous transcripts expressed by Sertoli cells. To date, however, there has been no direct test of whether this regulation reflects changes in gene transcription and/or transcript stability. This study used two experimental approaches to test the hypothesis that germ cells regulate transcription of the cathepsin L gene by rat Sertoli cells. We examined this gene because, in vivo, steady state levels of cath L messenger RNA in Sertoli cells change in a stage-specific manner as the surrounding germ cells progress through the 14 stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. In the first experimental approach, seminiferous tubules at stages VI–VII and stages IX–XII were incubated for 1 h in 4-thiouridine, and the amount of metabolically labeled cath L messenger RNA was quantified. The results demonstrate that transcription of the cath L gene by Sertoli cells is 7-fold higher at stages VI–VII than at stages IX–XII. The second experimental approach examined the ability of germ cells to regulate the activity of cath L reporter constructs in mature Sertoli cells. Before these studies, we isolated a cath L genomic clone and demonstrated that this clone contains the transcription start site of the cath L gene expressed by Sertoli cells. Transient transfection analysis then demonstrated that two reporter constructs, containing 244 and about 2.1 kb of sequence upstream from the transcription start site, had similar activities in mature Sertoli cells. However, germ cells only affected the activity of the larger construct in Sertoli cells, which was reduced by 30%. We conclude that germ cells regulate transcription of the cath L gene by Sertoli cells and that repressive effects of germ cells are mediated by elements upstream from nucleotide -244 of this gene.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IN MAMMALS, spermatogenesis occurs in a physiological environment regulated by Sertoli cells. These somatic cells express cell adhesion molecules and secrete growth factors, transport proteins, metabolites, proteases, and protease inhibitors. Through these products, Sertoli cells influence germ cell survival, replication, differentiation, and movement within the seminiferous epithelium (1, 2, 3, 4). Evidence indicates that many functions of Sertoli cells are affected by interactions with germ cells (5, 6, 7, 8). For example, steady state levels of numerous transcripts expressed by rat Sertoli cells vary as the adjacent spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and spermatids progress in synchrony through the stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium (2). Additionally, the expression of many transcripts by cultured immature Sertoli cells changes when these cells are cocultured with male germ cells (9, 10). We and others have proposed that in vivo, the responses of Sertoli cells to germ cells may ultimately influence the development of the surrounding germ cells (4, 11, 12). Thus, defining how germ cells affect Sertoli cell function may advance our understanding of the regulation of male fertility.

Despite considerable data demonstrating that germ cells regulate steady state levels of many transcripts expressed by Sertoli cells, there has been no direct determination of whether such regulation reflects changes in gene transcription by these somatic cells and/or alterations in the rate of turnover of the transcripts. Consequently, the experiments in this paper directly test the hypothesis that germ cells regulate gene transcription by Sertoli cells. These experiments are conducted from the vantage point of the gene encoding cathepsin L (cath L). This gene was chosen because mature rat Sertoli cells in stage VI–VII seminiferous tubules express high steady state levels of this transcript, whereas at other stages there is minimal or undetectable expression of this transcript (5, 11). Additionally, there is evidence that this stage-specific expression results from multiple interactions between Sertoli cells and their adjacent germ cells (13). Studies of testes undergoing germ cell depletion and repletion led us to propose that at stages I–IV and stages IX–XIV, pachytene and diakinetic spermatocytes as well as step 9–15 spermatids repress expression of cath L messenger RNA (mRNA) (13). However, the increased expression of cath L mRNA by Sertoli cells within normal, stage V tubules argues that at midcycle either the repressive signal is no longer produced by the germ cells or its effect is counteracted by a different, derepressive signal from germ cells. Finally, at stages VI–VII, step 18 and 19 spermatids appear to further stimulate steady state levels of cath L mRNA in Sertoli cells (5, 13, 14). This stimulation must cease before spermiation, however, because cath L mRNA levels are reduced 4-fold in stage VIII tubules (15).

The experiments in this study use two experimental approaches to test the hypothesis that germ cells regulate transcription of the cath L gene by rat Sertoli cells. The first experiment compares the amounts of cath L mRNA that are synthesized in 1 h by mature rat Sertoli cells in stage VI–VII tubules and in stage IX–XII tubules. In the remaining experiments we isolate and characterize the 5'-end of the rat cath L gene and then examine the ability of germ cells to regulate the expression of cath L reporter constructs in mature Sertoli cells. The results of these experiments provide the first direct proof that germ cells regulate gene transcription by Sertoli cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Seminiferous tubules, Sertoli cells, and male germ cells were isolated from mature, 60- to 90-day-old Sprague Dawley rats (Charles Rivers Laboratories, Wilmington, MA). The use of animals for the experiments described in this paper was approved the institutional animal care and use committee of The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health.

Analysis of transcription of the cath L gene by Sertoli cells in stage VI–VII and stage IX–XII seminiferous tubules
Stage-specific transcription of the cath L gene was assayed by a modification of published methods for analysis of metabolically labeled RNA (16). Forty centimeters of stage VI–VII or stage IX–XII tubules were incubated for 1 h in 600 µl Ham’s F-12/DMEM supplemented with 1 mM 4-thiouridine and 110 nM [3H]uridine (SA, 45 Ci/mmol; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Tubules were then solubilized in 4.2 M guanidine isothiocyanate, 25 mM sodium citrate, and 0.7% ß-mercaptoethanol and stored frozen at -80 C. This procedure was repeated three more times, the samples from the same stages were pooled, and total RNA was isolated (11). As a negative control, another 1.5 m of stage VI–VII tubules were incubated without 4-thiouridine, and the RNA was isolated. Two hundred micrograms of total RNA from each set of tubules were then dissolved in 1.2 ml 0.15 M LiCl in NES [50 mM NaOAc (pH 5.6), 4 mM EDTA, and 0.1% SDS]. This mixture was heated for 5 min at 70 C and incubated batchwise for 2 h at 4 C with 0.6 ml (packed volume) organomercurial agarose (Affi-Gel 501, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA) (16). The resin was then sedimented, and RNA in the supernatant was precipitated. The resin was washed three times for 5 min each time at 4 C with 1.3 ml 0.5 M LiCl in NES and once with 1.3 ml 0.1 M LiCl in NES. and bound RNA was eluted with 200 µl 20 mM dithiothreitol/0.1 M LiCl in NES. Aliquots containing RNA were identified by measuring incorporated radioactivity, these aliquots were pooled, and the RNA was precipitated in the presence of 1 µl glycogen. The same 200-µl fractions were collected from the set of tubules incubated without 4-thiouridine. One microgram of the bound RNA (~50% total sample) from stage VI–VII and stage IX–XII tubules incubated with 4-thiouridine and 60% of the total sample from stage VI–VII tubules incubated without 4-thiouridine were fractionated on denaturing agarose gels. Two micrograms of RNA that did not bind to the resin were also fractionated, and the integrity of all samples of RNA was demonstrated by staining the RNA in the gel with ethidium bromide. RNA was then blotted to a nylon membrane and probed sequentially for cath L mRNA and clusterin mRNA, which is expressed at all stages of the cycle by Sertoli cells (17, 18, 19). Radioactivity was detected with x-ray film, the film was scanned, and the intensities of individual bands were quantified using IP Lab Imaging Software (Scanalytics, Inc., Fairfax, VA). Control experiments demonstrated that the intensity of the image on the film was linear and proportional to the amount of RNA analyzed.

Analysis of the turnover of cath L mRNA in Sertoli cells in stage VI–VII and stage I-IV tubules
Ten centimeters of stage VI–VII or stage I-IV seminiferous tubules were collected immediately or cultured for 7 h in Ham’s F-12/DMEM supplemented with 0.1% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; control) or 10 µg/ml actinomycin D. Preliminary experiments demonstrated that this dose of inhibitor quantitatively blocked RNA synthesis. RNA was then isolated, 3 µg RNA were fractionated on denaturing agarose gels, and cath L mRNA was analyzed as described above.

Cloning of the 5'-end of the rat cath L gene and generation of cath L-firefly luciferase reporter constructs
A Sprague Dawley rat genomic library (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) was probed with [32P]cath L complementary DNA (cDNA) (11, 20). To identify genomic clones that contained the 5'-end of the cath L gene, we rescreened cath L cDNA-positive clones with 32P-labeled 5'-CCTCAGGTGTTTGAACCATGACCCCTTTAC-3', which encodes the most 5'-region of cath L cDNA (21). The largest clone that hybridized to this oligonucleotide was analyzed further. A restriction map of this clone was generated (22), restriction fragments were subcloned, and ends were sequenced (23). To obtain contiguous sequence starting approximately 2 kb upstream of exon 1 and extending into intron 2, nested deletions in a maximum of 150-bp increments were created and sequenced (24).

Cath L genomic fragments were ligated into the promoterless firefly luciferase (Luc) reporter construct, pGL-2 basic (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). The construct, cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc contained a SacI to BamHI genomic fragment (Fig. 2Go). The SacI site was converted to a blunt end by digestion with Klenow polymerase. The construct, cath L (-244/+33)-Luc was generated by PCR using primers that encoded KpnI or HindIII restriction sites at the 5'- and 3'-ends of the genomic fragment, respectively (Fig. 2Go). Constructs were purified by ion exchange chromatography (endotoxin-free maxi columns, QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA) followed by CsCl2 centrifugation (25). The genomic fragment in both constructs was sequenced.



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Structure and sequence of the 5'-end of the rat cath L gene. Top, This diagram of the 5'-end of the cath L gene shows the positions of the transcription start site (bent arrow), the first and second exons, the first intron, and 43 bp of the second intron. This figure also shows the positions of the oligonucleotides used for primer extension analysis and to generate cath L (-244/+33)-Luc (see lines under diagram). Additionally, the following restriction sites are indicated: SacI (-2065), BamHI (+33 and +933), and EcoRI (+1147). Bottom, Sequence of the 5'-end of the cath L gene. The first and second exons are shaded, and the first ATG, which is in the second exon, is boxed. Nucleotides are numbered relative to first of two adjacent nucleotides, which serve as transcription start sites. The five upstream areas that share significant sequence identity with the promoter of the MIS RII gene (GenBank Accession No. AF092445) are underlined.

 
Determination of whether the genomic clone encodes the cath L gene expressed in the testis and whether that gene uses a unique transcription start site in the testis
To determine whether the genomic clone encoded the 5'-end of the gene expressed in Sertoli cells, we investigated whether there was a single copy of this gene in the rat genome. Rat genomic DNA was isolated from liver (26, 27) and digested with one of eight restriction enzymes (BamHI, EcoRI, HhaI, HindIII, KpnI, PstI, PvuII, or SacI). The digested DNA was then fractionated on an 0.8% agarose gel, transferred to a nylon membrane, and hybridized with a 32P-labeled, 747-bp genomic fragment. This fragment encompassed exon II (137 bp), intron II (600 bp), and 10 bp of exon III of the genomic clone (28, 29, 30).

Transcription start sites were identified by both primer extension and S1 nuclease protection analyses (31, 32). The 32P-labeled oligonucleotide used for primer extension analysis was antisense to nucleotides +41 to +71 of cath L mRNA (see Fig. 2Go, A and B). S1 nuclease protection analysis was performed using a 270-mer single strand cDNA. This probe was synthesized using the same oligonucleotide used for primer extension analysis. Products of both primer extension and S1 nuclease analyses were fractionated on 7% denaturing acrylamide gels along with known sequencing reactions as size standards.

Transfection of rat Sertoli cells with cath L reporter constructs
Sertoli cells were isolated from mature rats as previously described (33) and cultured at a density of 1.5 x 105 cells/cm2 on 30-mm Millicell-HA culture chambers (Millipore Corp., Bedford MA) coated with 280 µl Matrigel (Becton- Dickinson Laboratories, Bedford, MA.). Cells were cultured in F-12/DMEM supplemented with 8H [human transferrin (5 µg/ml), insulin (10 µg/ml), epidermal growth factor (1 ng/ml), retinol acetate (3.5 x 10-8 M), testosterone (10-7 M), human recombinant or highly purified ovine FSH (50 ng/ml), 2.1 µM vitamin E, and 200 µM vitamin C]. Residual germ cells were removed after 24 h of culture by a 2-min incubation in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4. The next day, cells were transfected for 5–6 h with 0.5 pmol of the appropriate cath L-Luc reporter construct or pGL-2 basic, 0.09 pmol cytomegalovirus-Renilla luciferase (pRL-CMV; Promega Corp.), 15 µl Lipofectamine (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), and sufficient F-12/DMEM to bring the final volume to 1.35 ml. After transfection, cells were washed twice with F-12/DMEM and cultured for an additional 18–20 h in F-12/DMEM plus 8H. Cells were then collected by digestion of the Matrigel with dispase (Becton Dickinson Laboratories, Bedford, MA), washed twice with HEPES-saline, and lysed in 200 µl Passive Lysis Buffer (Promega Corp.) supplemented with 5 µg/ml leupeptin and 20 µg/ml aprotinin. Lysates were frozen in dry ice and stored at -80 C until measurement of firefly and Renilla luciferase activities (see below). Preliminary experiments demonstrated that cotransfection with pRL-CMV did not change the apparent activities of cath L-Luc constructs in Sertoli cells.

To study the effects of germ cells on cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc and cath L (-244/+33)-Luc activities, mature Sertoli cells were isolated, cultured, and transfected as described above. During transfection, a pool of spermatogenic cells from all stages of the cycle was obtained by digesting mature testes twice for 20 min each time with 0.1% collagenase, 0.2% hyaluronidase, 0.03% deoxyribonuclease, and 0.03% soy trypsin inhibitor. The germ cell suspension was filtered sequentially through 50-, 30-, and 20-µm pore size nylon cloth, clumps of cells were allowed to settle out in 2% BSA, and the suspended germ cells were pelleted by centrifugation and washed three or four times with culture medium. Microscopic examination of the pelleted cells revealed all types of male germ cells except elongated spermatids, which were removed during filtration of the germ cells through nylon cloth. After transfection, 0–4 x 106 germ cells were added to the Sertoli cells, and the cocultures were maintained for 18 h in 8H supplemented with 3.5 x 10-8 M retinoic acid, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 13 mM sodium lactate. Two control experiments were performed to characterize the morphology of germ cells in coculture and the specificity of the response to Sertoli cells to germ cells. In the first, cocultures containing 4 x 106 germ cells were fixed in 4% buffered glutaraldehyde, imbedded in Epon, sectioned either parallel or at right angles to the Millipore membrane, and stained with toluidine blue. The morphology of the germ cells was then examined by light microscopy. In the second control experiment, transfected Sertoli cells were cocultured with 2 x 106 K562 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA).

Luciferase assays
Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured in 5–20 µl Sertoli cell extracts using the dual luciferase assay from Promega Corp. To correct for differences in transfection efficiency, the activity of each cath L-Luc luciferase construct in Sertoli cells was expressed as a ratio of firefly luciferase to Renilla luciferase enzyme activities. Titration of extracts demonstrated that the amounts of both luciferase activities in cell extracts were in the linear ranges of the assays.

Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed by ANOVA, and differences between individual means tested by Fisher’s multiple range test using StatView (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Differences were defined as significant at P <= 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Analysis of stage-specific transcription of the cath L gene and turnover of cath L mRNA by Sertoli cells
To test the hypothesis that there was stage-specific transcription of the cath L gene, stage VI–VII and stage IX–XII seminiferous tubules were incubated for 1 h with 4-thiouridine plus [3H]uridine, total metabolically labeled RNA was isolated, and the amount of metabolically labeled cath L mRNA was assayed. At both sets of stages, similar amounts of [3H]uridine were incorporated into RNA (stages VI–VII, 17,300 cpm; stages IX–XII, 16,960 cpm). Additionally, similar masses of S-uridine-labeled RNA were synthesized (stages VI–VII, 1.63 µg; stages IX–XII, 2.49 µg). Thus, there was a similar level of incorporation of exogenous uridine into RNA by stage VI–VII tubules and stage IX–XII tubules. Staining the RNA in the agarose gel with ethidium bromide revealed that none of the samples of RNA was degraded (data not shown).

Densitometric analysis of the Northern blots demonstrated that stage VI–VII tubules contained 7-fold more 4-thiouridine-labeled cath L mRNA than did stage IX–XII tubules (Fig. 1AGo, compare the amounts of 4-thiouridine-labeled cath L RNA synthesized by stage VI–VII tubules and by stage IX–XII tubules; this RNA bound to the organomercurial agarose). Only 4-thiouridine-containing RNA bound organomercurial agarose, as none of the cath L mRNA in stage VI–VII tubules incubated without 4-thiouridine bound this resin (Fig. 1AGo, compare bound with not bound fractions from stage VI–VII tubules; 4-thiouridine -). In contrast to the stage-specific transcription of the cath L gene, stage VI–VII and stage IX–XII tubules contained similar amounts of metabolically labeled clusterin mRNA (Fig. 1AGo). Results from the clusterin mRNA analysis confirm that metabolically labeled RNA from both stage VI–VII and stage IX–XII tubules was intact.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Analysis of the stage-specific transcription and turnover of cath L mRNA. A, Analysis of stage-specific transcription by Sertoli cells in stage VI–VII and stage IX–XII tubules. A total of 1.6 meters of stage VI–VII or stage IX–XII seminiferous tubules were incubated for 1 h in the presence (+) or absence (-) of 1 mM 4-thiouridine. RNA was then isolated and fractionated by organomercurial agarose into bound and not bound fractions. Northern blot analysis was used to measure the relative amounts of cath L mRNA and control clusterin mRNA in the following: 1 µg of the bound, 4-thiouridine-labeled RNA from stage VI–VII and from stage IX–XII tubules; 60% of the bound fraction obtained from stage VI–VII tubules incubated without 4-thiouridine, and 2 µg of the RNA from each fraction of RNA not bound to the resin. B, Analysis of the turnover of cath L mRNA by Sertoli cells in stage VI–VII and stage I–IV tubules. Ten centimeters of stage VI–VII and I-IV seminiferous tubules were immediately collected or incubated for 7 h in 10 µg/ml actinomycin D or the vehicle control, DMSO. RNA was then isolated, and the cath L mRNA in 3 µg total RNA was analyzed by Northern blot analysis.

 
Although the marked accumulation of metabolically labeled cath L mRNA at stages VI–VII, but not at stages IX–XII, was consistent with stage-specific transcription, these results might also be observed if in 1 hr there was substantial turnover of cath L mRNA at stages of low cath L mRNA expression, but not at stages VI–VII. Thus, final proof of stage-specific transcription of the cath L gene required that we determine whether there were substantial, stage-specific differences in the turnover of cath L mRNA. To address this possibility, we measured cath L mRNA levels in stage VI–VII and in stage I–IV seminiferous tubules that were freshly isolated or were incubated for 7 h with either 0.1% DMSO or 10 µg actinomycin D (Fig. 1BGo). Stage I–IV tubules were studied because it was our experience that they contained higher concentrations of cath L mRNA then stage IX–XII tubules. Thus, we anticipated that it would be easier to examine transcript stability at stages I–IV than at stages IX–XII. Actinomycin D treatment reduced the amount of total RNA recovered from stage VI–VII and stage I–IV tubules by 38% and 32%, respectively. However, Northern blot analysis demonstrated that 7 h of actinomycin D treatment did not change the amounts of cath L mRNA measured in 3 µg RNA from stage VI–VII tubules and from stage I–IV tubules (Fig. 1BGo). Thus, taken together, our data support the hypothesis that the stage-specific expression of cath L mRNA results primary, if not solely, from stage-specific transcription of the cath L gene.

Isolation of the 5'-end of a rat cath L gene
Although the above studies proved that the cath L gene was transcribed in a stage-specific manner, they did not directly prove that germ cells regulate gene transcription by Sertoli cells. To generate this proof we decided to determine whether germ cells regulated the expression of cath L reporter constructs that had been transfected into mature Sertoli cells. We expected that this demonstration would require the isolation of a new cath L genomic clone, as published clones for the rat and murine cath L genes encode only 270 bp of sequence upstream from the transcription start site (34, 35). Those clones might lack important elements mediating the effect of germ cells on cath L gene transcription by Sertoli cells. We, therefore, cloned a 12-kb genomic fragment encoding the 5'-end of the cath L gene. This fragment contained approximately 9 kb upstream from exon 1 through part of intron 4 (data not shown). A series of nested deletions was generated for selected subclones of this genomic fragment, and 3213 bp of continuous sequence were obtained (Fig. 2Go). This sequence contained 2066 bp of sequence upstream from the transcription start site (defined in Fig. 3Go), the first and second exons, the first intron, and 43 bp of the second intron. As previously reported, the translation start site is present in the second exon (34).



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The cath L gene is a single copy gene that uses two adjacent nucleotides as transcription start sites. A, Demonstration that there is a single copy of the cath L gene in the rat genome. Rat genomic DNA was digested with BamHI, EcoRI, PvuII, or SacI; 10 µg digested DNA and DNA size standards were fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis and blotted to nylon; and DNA was hybridized to a 747-bp genomic fragment that contained exon 2, intron 2, and 10 bp of exon 3 of the genomic clone. The sizes and numbers of the fragments are predicted by the restriction digestion maps of genomic clones of the cath L gene. B, Primer extension analysis of the transcription start site of the cath L gene. Fifty micrograms of total RNA from testis, liver, and kidney and 100 µg total RNA from small intestine were hybridized to a [32P]oligonucleotide antisense of nucleotides +41 to +71 of the cath L gene and primer extended with Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase. The products of these reactions and a known sequencing reaction used as a size standard were analyzed on a denaturing 7% polyacrylamide gel. C, S1 nuclease protection analysis of the transcription start site of the cath L gene. Twenty-five micrograms of total RNA from testis, kidney, and liver and 50 µg total RNA from small intestine were hybridized with a 270-nucleotide single stranded, 32P-labeled antisense DNA probe, and the hybridization mixture was digested with S1 nuclease. Undigested probe and the reaction products were analyzed as described for primer extension analysis.

 
Determination of whether the genomic clone encodes the cath L gene expressed in Sertoli cells and the identification of transcription start sites in that gene
Before generating cath L reporter constructs to examine the transcriptional response of Sertoli cells to germ cells, it was necessary to answer two questions. First, does the genomic clone encode the gene expressed in Sertoli cells, and second, does this clone contain the transcription start site used by those cells? We asked the first question because some genes exist in multiple functional copies in the genome (36, 37). If, however, there was a single cath L gene in the rat genome, the isolated fragment would necessarily encode the cath L gene expressed by Sertoli cells. In this case, digestion of rat genomic DNA with restriction enzymes would fragment the endogenous cath L gene in a manner consistent with the restriction maps of the genomic clones described here and previously (34). Additionally, data from the genomic clones would identify restriction enzymes generating a single gene fragment able to hybridize with the 747-bp cath L genomic probe used by us for Southern blot analysis. However, if cath L were a multicopy gene, some restriction enzymes would generate multiple restriction fragments that hybridized to the 747-bp probe.

When rat liver DNA was digested with BamHI, EcoRI, PvuII, or SacI, fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis, and hybridized to the 747-bp genomic probe, single restriction fragments of the predicted sizes were detected (Fig. 3AGo). Single restriction fragments were also detected after digestion with HhaI, HindIII, KpnI, and PstI (data not shown).

We next asked whether the cloned genomic fragment contains the transcription start site used by Sertoli cells. This question was prompted by the possibility that transcription of the cath L gene by Sertoli cells might be initiated from a cell-specific promoter that used a novel transcription start site (38). However, primer extension analysis identified the same two adjacent residues (C and A) as transcription start sites in RNA from testis, kidney, liver, and small intestine (Fig. 3BGo). S1 nuclease protection analysis was then used to confirm this finding. The 3'-end of the 270 nucleotide single stranded antisense DNA probe was 69 and 70 nucleotides downstream from the nucleotides identified as start sites by primer extension analysis. When this probe was hybridized to RNA from testis, kidney, liver, and small intestine and then digested with S1 nuclease, fragments of 69 and 70 nucleotides were, in fact, generated. These nucleotides are labeled nucleotides +1 and +2 in Fig. 2Go. Taken together, the data in Figs. 1Go and 3Go indicate that a single copy cath L gene is transcribed in a stage-specific manner by rat Sertoli cells using the same transcription start sites; thus, it is likely that Sertoli cells use the same core promoter as other cell types.

Demonstration that germ cell repress expression of a cath L-luciferase reporter construct in Sertoli cells and identification of a region of the cath L gene that mediates the repressive effects of germ cells
Two cathepsin L-luciferase reporter constructs, cath L (-244/+33)-Luc and cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc, were used to test the hypothesis that germ cells regulate gene expression by isolated Sertoli cells. We chose these constructs for the following reasons. Preliminary experiments demonstrated that cath L (-244/+33)-Luc was expressed in Sertoli cells isolated from both mature (60-day-old) and immature (30-day-old) rats and that expression of this construct was 3-fold greater in the mature Sertoli cells (Charron, M., and W. W. Wright, unpublished). Thus, this construct contains the core promoter as well as regulatory elements active in these cells. We reasoned that these regulatory elements might also mediate the effect of germ cells on cath L gene transcription. We also tested cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc because we recognized that the effects of germ cells might be mediated by elements which were upstream from -244 of the cath L gene.

The analysis of the effect of germ cells on Sertoli cell gene transcription entailed three experiments. In the first experiment, we compared the expression of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc, cath L (-244/+33)-Luc and the negative control, pGL-2 basic in mature Sertoli cells which were cultured in the absence of germ cells. Results demonstrate that cath L (-244/+33)-Luc and cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc produced similar levels of luciferase activity in mature Sertoli cells and that these levels were at least 100-fold higher than the luciferase activities in cells transfected with the negative control construct, pGL-2 basic (Fig. 4AGo). These results demonstrate that both cath L-Luc constructs produce promoter-dependent luciferase expression in mature Sertoli cells. Additionally, they show that elements upstream from -244 of the cath L gene do not affect expression of the reporter gene when Sertoli cells are cultured without germ cells.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Analysis of the activities of two cath L-luciferase reporter constructs in mature Sertoli cells and the effect of male germ cells on the activities of these constructs in mature Sertoli cells. A, Comparison of the expression of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc, cath L (-244/+33)-Luc, and pGL-2 basic in mature Sertoli cells. Diagrams of the constructs are shown to the left of the data for each construct. In these diagrams, the dark gray areas depict the upstream region of the cath L gene in the construct, the black box depicts the 33 bp of the first exon, and the light gray arrow denotes the firefly luciferase reporter gene. The small black arrow identifies the transcription start site used by the rat cath L gene. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of cath L-firefly luciferase Luc/CMV-Renilla luciferase and are the results of two independent experiments, each conducted in triplicate. Data points marked with different letters are statistically different. B, Comparison of the effect of a 1–4 million spermatogenic cells on the activity in mature Sertoli cells of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc and cath L (-245/+33)-Luc. Data (mean ± SEM) are expressed as the percentage of cath L-Luc/CMV-Renilla Luc in Sertoli cells cultured without spermatogenic cells. There results were obtained from two independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Data points marked with different letters are statistically different. The statistically significant effect of germ cells on the expression of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc was confirmed in eight additional experiments.

 
The second and third experiments tested that hypothesis that a pool of germ cells from all stages of the cycle would modulate the activities of the two cath L-reporter constructs described above. As cath L gene transcription is repressed at most stages of the cycle, we anticipated that this pool of germ cells would repress expression of the cath L-reporter constructs. We chose not to test germ cells from a specific stage of the cycle for two reasons. Firstly, the requisite numbers of germ cells from a specific stage of the cycle could only be obtained from animals whose testes had been stage-synchronized by vitamin A depletion and repletion (19). Secondly, germ cells from a particular stage of the cycle were not needed to test the hypothesis that germ cells regulate gene transcription by Sertoli cells.

In the second experiment we asked whether germ cells would repress the activity in Sertoli cells of cath L (-244/+33)-Luc. In this experiment Sertoli cells were transfected with cath L (-244/+33)-Luc for 5 h and were then either cultured alone for an additional 18 h or were cocultured with 1–4 x 106 germ cells. Results demonstrated that activity of cath L (-244/+33)-Luc in Sertoli cells cultured without germ cells did not differ from the activity of that construct in Sertoli cells cultured with 1–4 x 106 germ cells (Fig. 4BGo).

In the third experiment, which was conducted simultaneously with the second, we asked whether elements upstream from -244 mediate the effects of germ cells on cath L gene transcription. Thus, Sertoli cells were transfected with cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc and were then cultured alone or were cocultured with 1–4 x 106 germ cells as described above. In contrast to what was observed when Sertoli cells were transfected with cath L (-244/+33)-Luc, 1 x 106 germ cells caused a significant, 30% reduction in expression of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc (Fig. 4BGo). Increasing the numbers of germ cells above 1 x 106 had no additional effect, demonstrating that the effect of germ cells was saturable (Fig. 4BGo). Additionally, statistical analysis confirmed that all doses of germ cells had a significantly greater repressive effect on expression of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc than on cath L (-244/+33)-Luc. For example, 1 x 106 germ cells had a significantly greater effect on expression of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc (75% of control) than on expression of cath L (-244/+33)-Luc (90% of control).

We next asked whether the germ cells remained viable in the cocultures. Light microscopic analysis of 1 µm plastic sections of the cocultures revealed that at the end of the experiment, greater than 95% of the germ cells in the cocultures were morphology normal (data not shown). Finally, we asked whether the effect of germ cells would be mimicked by another cell type. In this experiment germ cells were transfected with cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc and then cultured alone, with 2 x 106 germ cells or with 2 x 106 of control, K562 cells. Consistent with the results of Fig. 4BGo, germ cells caused a 30% reduction in the activity of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc (expressed as the ratio of firefly luciferase to Renilla luciferase activities) in mature Sertoli cells (Table 1Go). This reduction was due to a decrease in firefly luciferase activity encoded by cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc and not to an increase in Renilla luciferase activity (Table 1Go). In contrast, an equal number of K562 cells increased the ratio of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc to CMV-Renilla luciferase activities by 60% (Table 1Go). This increase did not result from increased firefly luciferase activity, but to decreased Renilla luciferase activity in the Sertoli cells (Table 1Go). Taken together, the data from all of the coculture experiments support the hypothesis that germ cells regulate gene transcription by mature Sertoli cells. The repressive effect of germ cells on expression of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc is a response of the Sertoli cells to viable germ cells and is not observed when Sertoli cells are cocultured with control, K562 cells. The repressive effect of germ cells is mediated by regulatory elements that are upstream from -244 of the cath L gene.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of 2 x 106 germ cells or 2 x 106 K562 cells on expression by Sertoli cells of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc, CMV-Renilla Luc and the ratio of the luciferase enzyme activities produced from these two reporter constructs

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Germ cells regulate transcription of a single copy cath L gene that uses the same transcription start sites that are used in other cell types
The experiments described in this paper used two independent, but complementary, approaches to prove that germ cells regulate transcription of the cath L gene by Sertoli cells. The first approach, metabolic labeling of cath L mRNA, has a number of strengths. This approach allows for the analysis of gene transcription by Sertoli cells within their normal physiological environment, the seminiferous tubule. Additionally, rates of transcription by Sertoli cells at different stages of the cycle, and thus in the presence of germ cells at specific steps of development, can be investigated. Thus, the demonstration of stage-specific gene transcription of the cath L gene strongly argues that germ cells regulate transcription of this gene by Sertoli cells. This demonstration coupled with our previous report that cath L mRNA expression is repressed at stages I–IV and IX–XI provided the insight that some germ cells cause repression of cath L gene transcription by Sertoli cells (13). There are weaknesses to this approach, however. It does not allow one to directly test the transcriptional response of Sertoli cells to the addition of germ cells, nor does it allow identification of the region of a gene that mediates the effect of germ cells. These weaknesses led us to explore the second approach, measurement of the effect of germ cells on expression in Sertoli cells of cath L-luciferase reporter constructs. This approach does not share the deficiencies of the first experimental approach and holds promise for identifying the cis-acting elements that mediate the effects of germ cells on cath L gene transcription. The weaknesses of the second approach are that the Sertoli cells are removed from their physiological environment, the seminiferous tubule, and transcription of a reporter construct, and not the endogenous gene, is measured. Given these weaknesses, it is noteworthy that the repressive effect of a mixture of germ cells on expression of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc by Sertoli cells was predicted by the fact that at most stages of the cycle, cath L gene transcription by Sertoli cells is repressed (13).

Our data prove that the cath L gene expressed in rat Sertoli cells is the same gene that is expressed in many different cell types of the rat. Our data also argue that all cells use the same cath L core promoter. In contrast to what has been reported for human cath L mRNA, we detected no heterogeneity in the 5'-untranslated region of rat cath L mRNA (39). This difference between the rat and human transcripts may stem from the fact that the first intron and the first exon of the rat gene share no area of significant sequence identity with the human gene. In summary, our data indicate that the effect of germ cells on cath L gene transcription by Sertoli cells involves the same gene and same core promoter that are active in many other cell types in the rat.

Stage-specific expression of cath L mRNA by Sertoli cells results from changes in the rate of transcription of the cath L gene
In this study we used metabolic labeling to prove that stage-specific changes in steady state levels of cath L mRNA result primarily from changes in the rate of gene transcription. As with all metabolic labeling studies, the validity of this experimental approach was predicated on the equal incorporation of exogenous uridine at both sets of stages. As tubules from both sets of stages exhibited similar levels of incorporation of [3H]uridine and yields of 4-thiourdine-labeled RNA, this requirement was met. The validity of this experiment also required that the half-life of cath L mRNA was similar at both sets of stages and substantially longer than 1 h. Otherwise, measurement of stage-specific differences in transcription of the cath L gene would be confounded by the rate of transcript turnover. However, our examination of the turnover of cath L mRNA in stage VI–VII and stage I–IV tubules indicates that at both sets of stages, the transcript turns over slowly, and the half- life of the transcript appears to be longer than 7 h. We realize, however, that, actinomycin D treatment can alter the turnover of some transcripts (40), raising concerns about interpretation of our data. In this regard, it is important to note that other observations support the conclusion that the half-life of cath L mRNA is longer than 7 h. Quantitative Northern blot analysis demonstrates that after stage VIIa,b there is a logarithmic decrease in cath L mRNA levels (15). This logarithmic decrease continues until stage IX, and half-maximal levels of cath L mRNA are reached in the middle of stage VIIc,d, which occurs 13.4 h after stage VIIa,b. Assuming that transcription of the cath L gene ceases at the end of stage VIIa,b, this observation is consistent with the slow turnover of cath L mRNA that was observed in actinomycin D-treated tubules. Therefore, taken together our studies demonstrate that stage-specific expression of cath L mRNA by Sertoli cells results primarily from changes in the rate of gene transcription. These studies provide the first direct proof of stage-specific gene transcription by Sertoli cells. The results of these studies, when placed in the context of how germ cells regulate steady state levels of cath L mRNA, suggest that the regulation of stage-specific transcription is complex. At stages I–VI and stages IX–XIV, transcription is repressed. At stages V–VII this repression is lost or derepressed, and at stages VI–VII transcription is stimulated. This cycle of transcriptional repression and stimulation appears to be due to a sequence of interactions between mature Sertoli cells and the surrounding germ cells that progress in synchrony through the stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium (13).

A region of the cath L gene upstream from the core promoter is required for germ cells to repress cath L gene transcription
There are numerous reports that germ cells, when cocultured with Sertoli cells, regulate the expression of a number of different transcripts (9, 10, 41). However, this paper presents the first direct proof that germ cells regulate gene transcription by cultured Sertoli cells and demonstrates that the region of the cath L gene that mediates the response to germ cells is upstream from the core promoter. Our observation that a pool of total germ cells collected from all stages of the cycle repressed the expression of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc is consistent with the fact that cath L mRNA expression is repressed at stages I–IV and stages IX–XIV, which constitute 55% of the duration of one cycle of the seminiferous epithelium (42). This repressive effect of germ cells was clearly saturable, as the addition of more than 1 x 106 germ cells did not further decrease cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc activity in Sertoli cells. Such saturation is a hallmark of a receptor-mediated process. This repressive effect may be germ cell specific, as the addition of 2 x 106 K562 cells did not recapitulate the effect of germ cells. However, why was there not a greater repressive effect of germ cells? Two aspects of our experimental design provide possible explanations. Firstly, in vitro, the germ cells are cultured on top of the Sertoli cells, whereas in vivo, germ cells surround the Sertoli cells. As such, our in vitro experiments do not replicate the numbers of germ cells that bind Sertoli cell in vivo or the distribution of the germ cells around the Sertoli cells. Secondly, the added germ cells were from all stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. This mixing of germ cells from different stages is important, because we have previously postulated that germ cells in stage V–VIII tubules may trigger a derepressive signal within Sertoli cells, a signal that counteracts the repression caused by germ cells at other stages (13). If this is the case, then in the coculture experiments, 55% of the germ cells were potentially inhibitory, whereas 45% of the germ cells were potentially disinhibitory to cath L gene transcription (42). This mixture of germ cells with potentially opposite effects on cath L gene transcription could produce the 30% inhibition of cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc expression that we observed.

In contrast to the repressive effect of germ cells on cath L (-2060/+33)-Luc expression, they had no effect on expression of the smaller construct, cath L (-244/+33)-Luc. These data demonstrate that regulatory elements upstream from -244 are essential for the response of cath L to the repressive effects of germ cells. Obviously, our experiments do not address whether elements downstream from -244 are also required for germ cells to repress transcription of the cath L gene.

An important next step in this research is to identify the specific elements that mediate the effects of spermatogenic cells on cath L gene transcription. Some of these elements reside between -2060 and -244. It is possible that these elements are shared with another gene that is also maximally expressed by Sertoli cells at stages VI and VII. Such a gene encodes the RII receptor for Mullerian inhibiting substance (MIS) (8). Comparison of the upstream sequences of both the cath L and MIS RII genes demonstrate that five areas of the cath L gene, ranging in size from 28–137 bp, exhibit 76–84% sequence identity with upstream areas of the MIS RII gene (43). All of these areas in the cath L gene are in the broad region that contains the elements mediating repressive effects of spermatogenic cells. Interestingly, for four of these six areas, the corresponding sequences in the MIS RII gene contain inverted Alu repeats. This is of particular interest because Alu and other retroviral inserts have become important regulatory elements in other genes (44). Thus, one or more of the regions in the cath L gene that contain the putative retroviral inserts may contain functional cis-acting elements that mediate responses to germ cells. If these regions contain those regulatory elements, they may mediate the sequential inhibitory, disinhibitory, and stimulatory effects of spermatogenic cells that are responsible for the stage-specific transcription of the cath L gene by mature rat Sertoli cells.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Parlow for the donation of human recombinant FSH, and Drs. Jan Roser and Harold Papkoff for the gift of ovine FSH.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by the NICHHD, NIH through Cooperative Agreement U54-HD-36209) as part of the Specialized Cooperative Centers Program in Reproduction Research. Additional support was provided by the NIH (R01-HD-17989) and the Hopkins Population Center (P30-HD-06268). The sequence of the 5'-end of the rat cathepsin L gene reported in this paper has been deposited in the GenBank database (Accession No. AF025476). Back

2 S.Z. and M.C. contributed equally to this work. Back

3 Current address: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Summit, New Jersey 07091. Back

4 Current address: Biology Department, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. Back

Received October 3, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Mruk D, Zhu L, Silvestrini B, Lee W, Cheng C 1997 Interactions of proteases and protease inhibitors in Sertoli-germ cell cocultures preceding the formation of specialized Sertoli-germ cell junctions in vitro. J Androl 18:612–622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Wright W 1993 Cellular interactions in the seminiferous epithelium. In: Desjardins C, Ewing L (eds) Cell and Molecular Biology of the Testis. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 377–399
  3. Woodruff TK, Borree J, Attie KM, Cox ET, Rice GC, Mather JP 1992 Stage- specific binding of inhibin and activin to subpopulations of rat germ cells. Endocrinology 130:871–881[Abstract]
  4. Hakovirta H, Kaipia A, Soder O, Parvinen M 1993 Effects of activin-A, inhibin-A and transforming growth factor-ß 1 on stage-specific deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis during rat seminiferous epithelial cycle. Endocrinology 133:1664–1668[Abstract]
  5. Kim GH, Wright WW 1997 A comparison of the effects of maturation and aging of the testis on the stage-specific expression of CP-2/cathepsin L mRNA by Sertoli cells of the Brown Norway rat. Biol Reprod 57:1467–1477[Abstract]
  6. Rannikko A, Penttila T, Zhang F, Toppari J, Parvinen M, Huhtaniemi I 1996 Stage-specific expression of the FSH receptor gene in the prepubertal and adult rat seminiferous epithelium. J Endocrinol 151:29–35[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Rich K, Bardin C, Gunsalus G, Mather J 1983 Age-dependent pattern of androgen-binding protein secretion from rat Sertoli cells in primary culture. Endocrinology 113:2284–2293[Abstract]
  8. Baarends WM, Hoogergrugge JW, Post M, Visser JA, de Rooij DG, Parvinen M, Themmen APN, Grootegoed JA 1995 Anti-Mullerian hormone and anti-Mullerian hormone type II receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression during postnatal testis development and in the adult testis of the rat. Endocrinology 136:5614–5622[Abstract]
  9. Syed V, Hecht N 1997 Up-regulation and down-regulation of genes expressed in cocultures of rat Sertoli cells and germ cells. Mol Reprod Dev 47:380–389[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Syed V, Gomez E, Hecht N 1999 Messenger ribonucleic acids encoding a serotonin receptor and a novel gene are induced in Sertoli cells by a secreted factor(s) from male rat meiotic germ cells. Endocrinology 140:5754–5760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Erickson-Lawrence M, Zabludoff SD, Wright WW 1991 Cyclic protein-2, a secretory product of rat Sertoli cells, is the proenzyme form of cathepsin L. Mol Endocrinol 5:1789–1798[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Yomogida K, Ohtani H, Harigae H, Ito E, Nishimune Y, Engel JD, Yamamoto M 1994 Developmental stage- and spermatogenic cell-specific expression of transcription factor GATA-1 in mouse Sertoli cells. Development 120:1759–1766[Abstract]
  13. Wright W, Zabludoff SD, Penttilä T-L, Parvinen M 1995 Germ cell-Sertoli cell nteractions: regulation by germ cells of the stage-specific expression of CP-2/cathepsin l mRNA by Sertoli cells. Dev Genet 16:104–113[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Maguire S, Millar M, Sharpe R, Saunders P 1993 Stage-dependent expression of mRNA for cyclic protein 2 during spermatogenesis is modulated by elongate spermatids. Mol Cell Endocrinol 94:79–88[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Wright W 1994 Stage-specific expression of the cathepsin L gene by rat Sertoli cells. In: Bartke A (ed) Function of Somatic Cells in the Testis. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 96–108
  16. Woodford T, Schlegel R, Pardee A 1988 Selective isolation of newly synthesized mammalian mRNA after in vivo labeling with 4-thiouridine or 6-thioguanosine. Anal Biochem 171:166–172[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Wright W, Fiore C, Zirkin B 1993 The effect of aging on the seminiferous epithelium of the Brown Norway rat. J Androl 14:110–117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Collard M, Griswold M 1987 Biosynthesis and molecular cloning of sulfated glycoprotein 2 secreted by rat Sertoli cells. Biochemistry 26:3297–3303[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Morales C, Hugly S, Griswold MD 1987 Stage-dependent levels of specific mRNA transcripts in Sertoli cells. Biol Reprod 1035–1046
  20. Sambrook J, Fritsch E, Maniatis T 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, vol 1:7.71–7.83
  21. Ishidoh K, Towatari T, Imajoh S, Kawasaki H, Kominami E, Katunuma N, Suzuki K 1987 Molecular cloning and sequencing of cDNA for rat cathepsin L. FEBS Lett 223:69–73[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Baker R, Board P 1988 An improved method for mapping recombinant lamda phage clones. Nucleic Acids Res 16:1198[Free Full Text]
  23. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR 1977 DNA sequencing with chain-termination inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hoheisel J, Pohl FM 1986 Simplified preparation of unidirectional deletion clones. Nucleic Acids Res 14:3605[Free Full Text]
  25. Radloff R, Bauer W, Vinograd J 1967 A dye-buoyant-density method for the detection and isolation of closed circular duplex DNA: the closed circular DNA in HeLa cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 57:1514–1521[Free Full Text]
  26. Gross-Bellard M, Oudet P, Chambon P 1973 Isolation of high-molecular weight DNA from mammalian cells. Eur J Biochem 36:32–38[Medline]
  27. Enrietto PJ, Payne LN, Haywan MJ 1983 A recovered avian myelocytomatosis virus that induces lymphomas in chickens. Pathogenic properties and their molecular basis. Cell 35:369–379[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Southern EM 1975 Detection of specific sequences amoung DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98:503–517[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Wahl GM, Stern M, Stark GR 1979 Efficient transfer of large DNA fragments from agarose gels to diazobenzyloxymethyl-paper and rapid hybridization by using dextran sulfate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:3683–3987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B 1983 A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem 132:6–13[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. McKnight SL, Kingsbury R 1982 Transcription control signals of a eukaryotic protein-coding gene. Science 217:316–324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Berk A, Sharp P 1977 Sizing and mapping of early adenovirus mRNAs by gel electrophoresis of S1 endonuclease-digested hybrids. Cell 12:721–732[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Karzai AW, Wright WW 1992 Regulation of the synthesis and secretion of transferrin and cyclic protein-2/cathepsin L by mature rat Sertoli cells in culture. Biol Reprod 47:823–831[Abstract]
  34. Ishidoh K, Kominami E, Suzuki K, Katunuma N 1989 Gene structure and 5'-upstream sequence of rat cathepsin L. FEBS Lett 259:71–74[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Troen B, Chauhan S, Ray D, Gottesman M 1991 Downstream sequences mediate induction of the mouse cathepsin L promoter by phorbol esters. Cell Growth Differ 2:23–31[Abstract]
  36. Fernandez M, Castronovo V, Rao C, Sobel M 1991 The high affinity murine laminin receptor is a member of a multicopy gene family. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 175:84–90[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Carter T, Bonnemann C, Wang C, Obici S, Parano E, De FBM, Ross B, Penchaszadeh G, Mackenzie A, Soares M, Kunkel L, Gilliam T 1997 A multicopy transcription-repair gene, BTF2p44, maps to the SMA region and demonstrates SMA associated deletions. Hum Mol Genet 6:229–236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Lan Z, Lye R, Holic N, Labus J, Hinton B 1999 Involvement of polyomavirus enhancer activator 3 in the regulation of expression of {gamma}-glutamyl transpeptidase messenger ribonucleic acid-IV in the rat epididymis. Biol Reprod 60:664–673[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Rescheleit D, Rommerskirch W, Wiederanders B 1996 Sequence analysis and distribution of two new human cathepsin L splice variants. FEBS Lett 394:345–348[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Harrold S, Genovese C, Kobrin B, Morrison S, Milcarek C 1991 A comparison of apparent mRNA half-life using kinetic labeling techniques vs decay following administration of transcriptional inhibitors. Anal Biochem 198:19–29[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Chung S, Zhu L, Mo M, Silvestrini B, Lee W, Cheng C 1998 Evidence for cross-talk between Sertoli and germ cells using selected cathepsins as markers. J Androl 19:686–703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Clermont Y, Harvey SC 1965 Duration of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium of normal, hypophysectomized and hypophysectomized, hormone-treated rats. Endocrinology 76:80–89
  43. Teixeira J, Kehas D, Antun R, Donahoe P 1999 Transcriptional regulation of the rat Mullerian inhibiting substance type II receptor in rodent Leydig cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:13831–13838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Britten R 1996 DNA sequence insertion and evolutionary variation in gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:9374–9377[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
P J O'Shaughnessy, L Hu, and P J Baker
Effect of germ cell depletion on levels of specific mRNA transcripts in mouse Sertoli cells and Leydig cells
Reproduction, June 1, 2008; 135(6): 839 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Charron, J.-Y. Chern, and W. W. Wright
The Cathepsin L First Intron Stimulates Gene Expression in Rat Sertoli Cells
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2007; 76(5): 813 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R.-S. Fujino, K. Tanaka, M. Morimatsu, K. Tamura, H. Kogo, and T. Hara
Spermatogonial Cell-Mediated Activation of an I{kappa}B{zeta}-Independent Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Pathway in Sertoli Cells Induces Transcription of the Lipocalin-2 Gene
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2006; 20(4): 904 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
M. D. Anway, M. D. Show, and B. R. Zirkin
Protein C Inhibitor Expression by Adult Rat Sertoli Cells: Effects of Testosterone Withdrawal and Replacement
J Androl, September 1, 2005; 26(5): 578 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. M. Hill, M. D. Anway, B. R. Zirkin, and T. R. Brown
Intratesticular Androgen Levels, Androgen Receptor Localization, and Androgen Receptor Expression in Adult Rat Sertoli Cells
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2004; 71(4): 1348 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K.-F. Lee, W. S.B. Yeung, J. F.C. Chow, C. K. Shum, and J. M. Luk
Different Testicular Gene Expression Patterns in the First Spermatogenic Cycle of Postnatal and Vitamin A-Deficient Rat Testis
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2004; 70(4): 1010 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. D. Anway, W. W. Wright, B. R. Zirkin, N. Korah, J. S. Mort, and L. Hermo
Expression and Localization of Cathepsin K In Adult Rat Sertoli Cells
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2004; 70(3): 562 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
V. Sriraman and J. S. Richards
Cathepsin L Gene Expression and Promoter Activation in Rodent Granulosa Cells
Endocrinology, February 1, 2004; 145(2): 582 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Charron, J. N. DeCerbo, and W. W. Wright
A GC-Box Within the Proximal Promoter Region of the Rat Cathepsin L Gene Activates Transcription in Sertoli Cells of Sexually Mature Rats
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2003; 68(5): 1649 - 1656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Charron, J. S. Folmer, and W. W. Wright
A 3-Kilobase Region Derived from the Rat Cathepsin L Gene Directs In Vivo Expression of a Reporter Gene in Sertoli Cells in a Manner Comparable to That of the Endogenous Gene
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2003; 68(5): 1641 - 1648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]