help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ichimaru, T.
Right arrow Articles by Okamura, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ichimaru, T.
Right arrow Articles by Okamura, H.
Endocrinology Vol. 142, No. 6 2489-2498
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

A Possible Role of Neuropeptide Y as a Mediator of Undernutrition to the Hypothalamic Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Generator in Goats1

Toru Ichimaru, Yuji Mori and Hiroaki Okamura

Department of Physiology, National Institute of Animal Industry, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Inashiki, Ibaraki 305, Japan; and Laboratory of Veterinary Ethology (T.I., Y.M.), Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Hiroaki Okamura, Ph.D., D.V.M., Department of Physiology, National Institute of Animal Industry, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 2 Ikeno-dai, Kukisaki, Inashiki, Ibaraki 305, Japan. E-mail: hokamu{at}niai.affrc.go.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To understand central mechanisms for nutritional infertility, the activity of the GnRH pulse generator was directly assessed in ovariectomized (OVX) goats under several experimental conditions by recording characteristic increases in the multiple-unit activity (volleys).

When estradiol (E2)-treated animals were fasted for 4–5 days, the activity of the GnRH pulse generator was gradually suppressed, and the volley interval at the end of fasting was significantly prolonged, compared with that during the feeding period (67.4 vs. 49.3 min, n = 5, P < 0.01). On the other hand, such a significant effect on the pulse generator was not observed in OVX goats. In the second experiment, the animals received a bolus intracerebroventricular injection of several doses (0, 2, 5, and 20 µg/400 µl) of neuropeptide Y (NPY). Exogenous NPY dose-dependently inhibited the pulse generator activity. At the highest dosage, the 1st posttreatment volley interval was significantly longer than that of the pretreatment (112.4 vs. 32.6 min, n = 5, P < 0.01) in OVX goats. The suppressive effect of NPY was similarly observed in OVX+E2 goats. Further, when NPY was infused (10 µg/200 µl·h for 6 h) into OVX goats, the activity of the GnRH pulse generator was almost completely inhibited during the infusion period.

Hypothalamic sites responding to fasting were immunohistochemically evaluated using an antibody for Fos in castrated goats. Fos-immunoreactive neurons were found in areas adjacent to the third ventricle. Double-labeling immunohistochemistry revealed that a subpopulation of NPY neurons in the arcuate nucleus was activated in response to fasting.

These results demonstrate that: 1) the activity of the GnRH pulse generator is suppressed by fasting in the presence of E2; 2) exogenous NPY inhibits the activity of the GnRH pulse generator regardless of the presence of E2; and 3) several hypothalamic neurons or regions, including those containing NPY in the arcuate nucleus, are activated by fasting. Collectively, these observations suggest that NPY acts as a mediator of undernutrition to the GnRH pulse generator.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
UNDERNUTRITION, OR NEGATIVE energy balance, impairs female reproductive functions (1, 2). Although nutritional influences can be exerted at any level of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis, it is generally accepted that the primary site of action is a neural structure that controls GnRH release from the hypothalamus. Indeed, a large body of studies in a variety of animals, such as rats (3, 4), monkeys (5), sheep (6, 7, 8, 9), and cattle (2, 10), have shown that undernutrition results in decrease in pulsatile LH secretion. Direct changes in GnRH release in response to undernutrition have been shown by two groups. Prasad et al. (11) found, by push-pull cannula sampling from the median eminence in ewe lambs, that the decrease in pulsatile LH secretion induced by food restriction was caused by predominantly reduced amplitude rather than frequency of episodic GnRH discharges. However, I’Anson et al. (12) recently demonstrated, by pituitary portal blood sampling, that food restriction in the same animal species resulted in decrease in both frequency and amplitude of GnRH pulses. Therefore, the precise neural mechanisms by which LH secretion is suppressed by undernutrition still remains unclear.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), known as a potent orexigenic molecule in the brain (for review, see 13), also participates in the control of LH secretion. It has been shown that intracerebroventricular administration of NPY inhibits pulsatile LH secretion in several ovariectomized (OVX) animal models, such as rat (14), monkey (15), and sheep (16, 17). Morphological studies have demonstrated that food restriction markedly increases hypothalamic NPY gene expression in rats (18) and sheep (9), as well as concentrations of NPY in the cerebrospinal fluid (17) and NPY-immunoreactivity (19) in sheep. Moreover, NPY fibers make close contact with GnRH perikarya in the preoptic area (POA) and with GnRH terminals in the median eminence (ME) (20). These lines of evidence strongly suggest that NPY is one of the pivotal molecules in the brain that transmit undernutritional signals to the regulatory system of GnRH secretion.

The hypothalamic GnRH pulse generator, although its neural component has yet to be identified, governs intermittent GnRH discharge into the pituitary portal circulation and thereby regulates pulsatile LH release (21). A method for monitoring the electrophysiological activities of the pulse generator has been developed in monkeys (22), rats (23), and goats (24, 25, 26, 27) by recording characteristic increase in the frequency of multiple-unit activity (MUA). This method has practical advantages, in that continuous and real-time analysis of pulse generator activity can be done in conscious, unrestricted animals for a long period, which tempted us to investigate central mechanisms for the well-known phenomenon of nutritional control of reproduction. In the present study, OVX goats were fasted or received central administration of NPY in the presence or absence of estradiol (E2), and changes in the activity of the GnRH pulse generator were directly analyzed by the MUA recording. In addition, immunohistochemical observations were conducted using the expression of Fos protein as a marker for neuronal activation (28) to identify hypothalamic substrates involved in the response to undernutrition.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Adult OVX Shiba goats (Capra hircus), weighing from 25–36 kg, were used in the MUA recording experiments; whereas adult castrated male goats, weighing 25–30 kg, were used for immunohistochemistry. They were loosely tied to an individual stanchion and maintained in a room that had controlled lighting (12 h light, 12 dark), temperature (23 C), and humidity (50%). The animals were fed daily, with a standard pelleted diet, between 1200 and 1400 h; and hay wafer, at 1800 h, except during the fasting period. Water was always available. All experiments were approved by the National Institute of Animal Industry Committee for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals.

Surgery
Six OVX goats were stereotaxically implanted with an array of bilateral recording electrodes into the arcuate nucleus (ARC)/ME region under halothane anesthesia, according to the procedure described previously (24). The electrode consisted of six Teflon-insulated platinum-iridium wires (75 µm in diameter). For intracerebroventricular administration of NPY, an 18-gauge stainless steel guide cannula was also inserted so that the tip was directed to Monro’s foramen and positioned at 5 mm above the lateral ventricle (LV). After confirming the position by radio-ventriculographs, the guide cannula was fixed to the skull and fitted with a 21-gauge stylet to prevent its occlusion.

MUA recording
The method for recording specific MUA, which reflects the function of the hypothalamic GnRH pulse generator, has been described elsewhere (24, 25). Briefly, signals were passed through a buffer amplifier integrated circuit, which was directly plugged into the electrode assembly. After further amplification and amplitude discrimination, MUA signals were stored, as counts per minute, in a personal computer. A characteristic increase in the MUA (MUA volley) was considered to be the electrophysiological manifestation of the GnRH pulse generator. The MUA recording was conducted continuously throughout the experimental period.

Hormonal treatment
In some experiments, the OVX goats were sc implanted with a SILASTIC capsule (id, 3 mm; od, 5 mm; length, 20 mm; Dow Corning Corp., Midland MI) filled with crystalline E2 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). This treatment produced luteal phase plasma E2 levels (4–8 pg/ml) (29). The MUA volley intervals were gradually prolonged after the E2 treatment and became stable within 5 days. After confirming that the volley intervals were maintained at a constant level at least for 3 days, the experiment was started.

Exp 1: Effect of fasting on the MUA
The effect of acute undernutrition on the activity of the GnRH pulse generator was examined in the absence (OVX, n = 6) or presence of E2 (OVX+E2, n = 5). After a control feeding period, the animals were fasted for 4–5 days. They were refed at 1200 h of the last day of fasting, and thereafter treated with the regular feeding regimen. MUA recording was done throughout the feeding, fasting, and refeeding periods, and the volley interval values during 12 h (between 0000–1200 h and 1200–2400 h) were averaged for each day. The value at the end of the fasting period (0000–1200 h) was statistically compared with that of the feeding period. Plasma LH concentrations were not determined in this experiment, to avoid the additional stress of frequent blood sampling.

Exp 2: Effect of NPY administration on the MUA
Sheep NPY (Sigma) was used to make up final concentrations of 2, 5, and 20 µg NPY in 400 µl of saline containing 0.4% BSA. After a control period, 400 µl of the NPY solution or vehicle was injected into the LV, 15 min after the beginning of one regularly occurring MUA volley, as shown in Fig. 1Go. The injection occurred over a period of 60 sec, through an injection cannula, which was 5 mm longer than the guide cannula. The injection cannula remained in place for another 60 sec. Doses of NPY and numbers of animals used in this experiment were as follows; 0 µg (n = 4), 2 µg (n = 4), 5 µg (n = 4), and 20 µg (n = 5) in the absence of E2; and 0 µg (n = 3), 2 µg (n = 3), 5 µg (n = 3), and 20 µg (n = 5) in the presence of E2. Each injection was separated from the previous injection by at least 2 days. Each value of three successive posttreatment intervals was compared with that of the pretreatment one. In some animals, blood samples were taken every 5–10 min, and the synchrony of the MUA volleys with plasma LH pulses was confirmed.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Experimental design for intracerebroventricular NPY injection. NPY or vehicle was injected 15 min after the beginning of one of the regularly occurring MUA volleys (arrow). The interval between the MUA volleys just before and after the injection was denoted as the 1st posttreatment interval, and subsequently 2nd and 3rd posttreatment intervals.

 
To examine the effect of continuous NPY administration, the injection cannula was connected to an infusion pump (STC-531, Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) by Teflon tubing, and NPY dissolved in saline containing 0.4% BSA was infused at a rate of 10 µg/200 µl·h for 6 h in three OVX goats. They also received the control infusion in the same manner. The number of the MUA volleys observed in each 6-h period (before, during, and after the infusion) was analyzed.

Exp 3: Immunohistochemical examination of hypothalamic sites responding to fasting
Male goats, regularly fed (n = 2) or fasted for 4 days (n = 4), were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (25 mg/kg BW). They were perfused bilaterally through the carotid arteries with 4 liters PBS, pH 7.4, including 4000 U heparin/liter, followed by 5 liters 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. The brain block between the optic chiasma and the anterior edge of the mammillary body was dissected out and was immersed in the same fixative overnight at 4 C and then in 20% sucrose in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at 4 C until it sank. Frontal sections (50 µm) were cut on a freezing microtome, and they were kept in the cryoprotectant solution (30) at -20 C.

The free-floating sections were rinsed in PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 (PBST) and treated with 3% H2O2 in methanol for 15 min. They were extensively rinsed with PBST and incubated with 10% normal goat serum in PBST including 1% BSA and 0.02% sodium azide (BSA-PBST) for 2 h. Then sections were subsequently incubated with anti-Fos serum (Ab-2, Oncogene Research Products, Cambridge, MA, 1:5000 in PBST) for 72 h at 4 C, biotinylated goat antirabbit IgG (1.8 µl/ml of PBST containing 1% normal goat serum; Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) for 3 h, and avidin-biotin complex solution (4.5 µl each/ml PBST; Vector Laboratories, Inc., elite kit) for 1 h. Each step was followed by three 15-min washes with PBST. After the last wash, sections were immersed in 0.175 M sodium acetate, pH 5.6, followed by reaction with the chromogen solution consisting of nickel-sulfate (25 mg/ml), 3.3'-diaminobenzidine (Sigma, 0.2 mg/ml), and 0.0025% H2O2 in 0.175 M sodium acetate for 8 min. The reaction was stopped by immersing sections in sodium acetate solution. All reactions were done at room temperature unless otherwise mentioned. Some sections were washed with 0.45% NaCl, dehydrated, mounted on coated slides, and cover-slipped; while the remaining sections were further processed for NPY immunohistochemistry. The Fos-stained sections were extensively washed with PBST and incubated with anti-NPY serum (A609/R2R Ab, UCB-Bioproducts, 1:50,000 in BSA-PBST) for 72 h at 4 C. The following procedure was similar to that for Fos staining except that the sodium acetate solution was substituted with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and nickel-sulfate was omitted from the chromogen solution. To compare NPY-immunoreactivity between the fed and fasted animals, some sections were stained solely for NPY without the procedure for Fos immunohistochemistry.

The boundaries of the hypothalamic nuclei were delineated on the basis of cresyl-violet-stained sections and the goat brain atlas (31). The sections from the fed and fasted goats that contained similar brain structure were always reacted in parallel under identical conditions. Immunohistochemical controls included substitution of the primary antiserum with preabsorbed antiserum with c-Fos peptide (Oncogen Research Products) or sheep NPY in respective staining procedure, or omission of the second biotinylated antirabbit antibody, all of which gave no reaction product (data not shown).

The extent of colocalization of Fos- and NPY-immunoreactive (ir) materials was estimated at the caudal portion of the ARC in the fasted goats. The numbers of Fos-, NPY-, and Fos/NPY-ir cells were counted under the microscope on two double-labeled sections in each animal. Because only Fos/NPY-ir neurons whose cell bodies were clearly distinguishable from surrounding densely innervated NPY-ir fibers were taken into consideration, the extent of colocalization might be underestimated in this study.

RIA
Plasma concentrations of LH were determined by the double-antibody RIA as described previously (32). The minimal detectable concentration was 0.38 ng/ml, and the intraassay coefficient of variation was 6.8%.

Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed by the General Linear Model procedure of Statistical Analysis System (SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Release 6.03 Edition, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). When significant treatment effects (P < 0.05) were revealed, the least-squared-means option program was used in post hoc comparisons of the MUA measures. Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Exp 1: Effect of fasting on the MUA
Figure 2AGo shows time course changes in the MUA volley interval throughout the experimental period, in a representative goat, with or without the E2 treatment. In the absence of E2, the volley interval was maintained at a constant level during the feeding period, and there was no apparent change for 4 days after the onset of fasting. However, at the end of the fasting period, a subtle increase was observed in all six animals examined. When the goats were treated with E2, the volley interval gradually increased after the E2 implantation but plateaued within a few days. After the onset of fasting, the volley interval began to increase again. The influence of fasting on the MUA volley interval became obvious by the second or third day of treatment, and the prolongation of the volley interval continued until food was given. Representative profiles of the MUA during feeding and at the end of fasting periods, in an OVX+E2 goat, are shown in Fig. 2BGo. After refeeding, the volley interval gradually returned to the level that had existed before fasting, by several days. Although the extent of the effect of E2 or fasting varied among animals, a similar pattern was observed in all five goats.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Time course changes in the MUA volley interval in a representative goat without or with E2 treatment. Each column indicates the mean ± SE value of the intervolley intervals in 12 h. In both experiments, the animals were fed until day -1, and then fasted between day 1 and the morning of day 5 (closed columns). At 1200 h of day 5, refeeding was started. The OVX goats received the E2 implant in the afternoon of day -7 (OVX+E2). B, Representative profiles of MUA during feeding (upper panel) and fasting (lower panel) periods in another OVX+E2 goat. C, Effect of fasting on the MUA volley interval. Values of the volley intervals during 12 h (between 0000–1200 h and 1200–2400 h) were averaged in each day. The value at the end of the fasting period (0000–1200 h of day 4 or 5, closed column) was compared with that of the feeding period (0000–1200 h of day -1, open column) in the absence (n = 6) or presence of E2 (n = 5). Values with a different letter are significantly different from each other.

 
The effects of E2 or fasting on the volley interval was statistically assessed (Fig. 2CGo). When compared at the end of the feeding period, the MUA volley interval of the OVX+E2 group was significantly longer than that of the OVX group (49.3 ± 5.5 vs. 29.8 ± 6.0 min, P < 0.02). At the end of the fasting period, the volley interval significantly increased in the presence of E2 (67.4 ± 7.5 min, P < 0.01). Although there was a tendency toward the increase in the volley interval at the end of the fasting period, the influence of fasting was not statistically significant in the absence of E2 (33.1 ± 3.9 min).

Exp 2: Effect of NPY administration on the MUA
An individual profile of the MUA, in each treatment, and summarized results are shown in Fig. 3AGo and Table 1Go, respectively. In the absence of E2, the MUA volley interval was not significantly altered by 2 or 5 µg NPY, although there was a tendency toward an increment in the 1st posttreatment volley interval. However, 20 µg NPY strongly suppressed the appearance of the volley immediately after the injection, which resulted in a significant increase in the 1st posttreatment interval, being about 3.5 times larger than the pretreatment interval. In the OVX+E2 goats, an NPY effect comparable with that in the OVX animals was observed. In both groups, the suppressive effect of NPY was only seen for the volley immediately after the injection, and the 2nd and 3rd posttreatment intervals were not affected by NPY administration. The vehicle injection had no effect on the MUA in all goats. Figure 3BGo demonstrates that the MUA volleys were exclusively associated with plasma LH pulses regardless of the steroid or NPY treatment.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. A, MUA profiles in a representative goat that received several doses of NPY injection in the absence (left panels) or presence (right panels) of E2. NPY or vehicle was injected 15 min after the beginning of one regularly occurring MUA volley (arrows). B, Examples of MUA with changes in plasma LH concentrations (upper and bottom panels). Note that the MUA volleys are always associated with LH pulses regardless of the treatments. Also note that the baseline of the MUA increased after the NPY injections in no. 79 (A, OVX), whereas it decreased in no. 415 (B, middle and bottom panels).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of NPY injection on the MUA volley intervals in OVX and OVX+E2 goats

 
Among five goats used in this experiment, three goats showed a decline in the baseline activity after the bolus NPY injection regardless of the presence or absence of E2 (Fig. 3BGo). On the other hand, an increase in the baseline activity after the NPY injection was observed in two goats, one without E2 (Fig. 3AGo) and the other with and without E2 (data not shown).

Figure 4Go shows representative profiles of the MUA in an OVX goat that received the vehicle (upper panel) or NPY (lower panel) infusion, for 6 h, into the LV. Data obtained from three animals were summarized in Table 2Go. The control infusion had no effect on the MUA. On the other hand, the continuous NPY infusion resulted in a conspicuous suppression of GnRH pulse generator activity. After the onset of NPY infusion, one or two MUA volleys with a slightly longer interval were observed, and then the MUA volleys completely disappeared throughout the infusion period. This strong suppression continued more than 50 min after the cessation of the infusion. Once the MUA volley was restored, it occurred more frequently, for several hours, compared with the preinfusion period. The mean value of the interval between the MUA volleys observed during the postinfusion period was significantly smaller than that during the preinfusion period (23.4 ± 0.5 vs. 30.8 ± 1.1 min, P < 0.05).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Representative profiles of MUA in goat no. 79 that received a continuous infusion of vehicle (upper panel) or NPY (lower panel). Each solution was infused during a period indicated by the box. Note that the MUA volley was not restored until more than 50 min after the cessation of the infusion; and after that, it occurred more frequently for several hours, compared with the preinfusion period.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of NPY infusion on the MUA volley frequency in OVX goats

 
Exp 3: Immunohistochemical examination of hypothalamic sites responding to fasting
The expression of Fos protein in response to fasting was immunohistochemically evaluated in goat brain tissue sections. Fos-ir cells were found in areas adjacent to the third ventricle in the hypothalamus of animals fasted for 4 days (Fig. 5Go). A considerable number of neurons in the ARC showed Fos-immunoreactivity being predominant at the caudal portion of the nucleus. Fos-ir neurons were also found scattered in the medial part of the dorsomedial nucleus of the hypothalamus (DMH) and periventricular regions. However, there were few Fos-ir cells in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVH). Though the number of Fos-ir cells and their staining density varied among animals, a similar distribution pattern was observed in all fasted goats. On the other hand, Fos-ir cells were scarcely seen in fed animals throughout the hypothalamus. Photomicrographs showing Fos-immunoreactivity in the ARC of fed and fasted animals are presented in Fig. 6Go, A and B, respectively.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Schematic drawings illustrating the distribution of Fos-ir neurons (dots) at rostral (left panel), middle (middle panel), and caudal (right panel) parts of the hypothalamus in a representative castrated goat fasted for 4 days. ARC, Arcuate nucleus; DMH, dorsomedial nucleus; PVH, paraventricular nucleus; VAT, ventral anterior thalamic nucleus; VMH, ventromedial nucleus; fx, fornix; mt, mammilothalamic tract; 3V, third ventricle.

 


View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Photomicrographs showing representative results of immunohistochemistry in the ARC of castrated goats. A, In the normally fed animals, Fos-ir neurons were scarcely seen; B, In animals fasted for 4 days, a number of Fos-positive signals were observed. C, Moderately stained NPY-ir fibers and a few NPY-ir neurons were observed in fed animals. D, Fasting resulted in a marked increase in NPY-ir materials in this nucleus. E, Double-labeling immunohistochemistry revealed that a subpopulation of NPY-ir neurons contain Fos-ir material in their nuclei in fasted animals. F, An enlargement of the indicated area in E. Arrows indicate double-labeled neurons. Bars = 500 µm (A and B), 100 µm (C and D); 200 µm (E), and 25 µm (F).

 
In the fed goats, moderately stained NPY-ir fibers and a few NPY-ir neurons were observed in the ARC (Fig. 6CGo). However, not only the density of NPY-ir fibers, but also the number of NPY-positive cell bodies, in the ARC were markedly enhanced by fasting (Fig. 6DGo). Double-labeling immunohistochemistry revealed that a subpopulation of NPY-ir neurons in the ARC coexpressed Fos-ir materials (Fig. 6Go, E and F). A large portion of those double-labeled cells existed in the region close to the wall of the third ventricle. It was estimated that they comprised about 40% of NPY-ir neurons and 2–3% of Fos-ir cells at the caudal portion of the ARC.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Detrimental influences of undernutrition on reproductive functions have been shown previously (1, 2, 6, 7, 10), and it has been hypothesized that the primary site of action of undernutrition could be the hypothalamus. The present results clearly demonstrate that undernutrition actually suppresses the activity of the hypothalamic GnRH pulse generator.

E2 treatment significantly prolonged the volley interval (Fig. 2CGo), possibly reflecting the negative feedback action of this steroid on the pulse generator, as has been shown in rats (4), sheep (6), and goats (24). Fasting induced a significant reduction in the MUA volley frequency in OVX+E2 goats (Fig. 2CGo). This result is comparable with a recent demonstration, in ewe lambs (12), that chronic food restriction decreases both frequency and amplitude of GnRH pulse in the pituitary portal circulation. We also observed a tendency for amplitude of volleys to be smaller at the end of the fasting period than that observed during the control period (Fig. 2BGo). Therefore, it seems that both acute and chronic undernutrition modulate the activity of the GnRH pulse generator in a similar manner in ruminants. However, in contrast to previous reports showing that chronic food restriction inhibits pulsatile GnRH/LH secretion in the absence of gonadal steroids in sheep (6, 7, 8, 9, 12), we were not able to observe a significant influence of fasting on the GnRH pulse generator activity in OVX goats. This discrepancy may be attributable to different physiological conditions between two undernutrition models. Further discussion is presented in a latter section.

The interval of the MUA volleys was gradually and continuously increased as fasting continued, and refeeding immediately began to restore the prolonged volley interval (Fig. 2AGo). These results indicate that the activity of the GnRH pulse generator is highly sensitive to changes in nutritional state of the body, which are thought to be informed by several metabolites and hormones, such as glucose (1, 33, 34), fatty acid (1), leptin (4), insulin (35), and T3 (36). Because the effect of fasting on MUA becomes apparent within a few days in E2-treated goats and those changes in MUA are visible in a real-time manner, this experimental model can be used to seek such peripheral signals involved in the nutritional control of GnRH secretion, even though fasting may not accurately reflect the state of chronic undernutrition occurring in nature.

Because NPY is considered to be an important neurotransmitter that links nutrition and reproduction (13, 17), the effect of exogenous administration of NPY on GnRH secretion was investigated in detail using the MUA technique in the OVX and OVX+E2 goats. The 1st posttreatment interval of the MUA volley was prolonged in a dose-dependent manner, after bolus NPY injections, regardless of the presence or absence of E2 (Table 1Go). The inhibitory effect of NPY on the MUA volley was even more pronounced when the peptide was continuously infused into the LV (Fig. 4Go). The present investigation confirms previous demonstrations that intracerebroventricular administration of NPY suppresses pulsatile LH secretion in OVX and OVX+E2 animals (14, 15, 16, 17), and further provides direct evidence that NPY acts at the hypothalamic level to suppress the activity of the GnRH pulse generator.

The suppressive effect of NPY was seen only for the volley immediately after the injection, and the 2nd and 3rd posttreatment intervals were not affected by 20 µg of NPY; whereas a relatively lower dose (10 µg/h) of NPY infusion almost completely suppressed the occurrence of the MUA volley (Fig. 4Go). These results indicate that continuous activation of receptors for NPY profoundly inhibits a drive to induce the MUA volley, and thus GnRH release. Five receptor subtypes have been described for NPY action in rats thus far (37). Recent studies, using specific pharmacological reagents for respective receptor subtypes, indicate that the Y5 receptor is involved in the suppression of LH release by NPY (37); whereas the Y4 receptor (38), together with the Y1 subtype (39), are responsible for the stimulatory action of NPY on LH release. Although such functional roles of NPY receptors have not been well studied, a similar mechanism may exist in ruminants. In the Shiba goat, the majority of GnRH neurons are located in the medial POA and project their fibers to the ME (40), as in rats. Because it has been demonstrated that NPY fibers and terminals make close contact with GnRH neurons in the POA and their nerve terminals in the ME in rats (20), NPY may affect GnRH release by acting at either or both sites. Another possibility is that NPY acts on the GnRH pulse generator per se to reduce its activities, although neuronal components of the pulse generator have not yet been identified. Precise localization of NPY receptors, especially the Y5 subtype, in the hypothalamus might help us to understand this issue.

In some goats, a decline of the basal level of MUA was observed immediately after the NPY injection (Fig. 3BGo), which implies that NPY inhibits nonspecifically all neural activities in the hypothalamus, including that of the GnRH pulse generator. However, this is unlikely, because the NPY injection in other goats induced an elevation of the basal level while inhibiting the occurrence of the MUA volley (Fig. 3AGo). These variable responses of the basal level might reflect subtle differences in the location of the electrodes in the ARC/ME region between individual animals. The ARC/ME region is a key neural substrate for the control of endocrine functions, and several of these functions have been shown to be modulated by central administration of NPY (41). For example, GH secretion is suppressed (42), whereas cortisol release is increased (43), by NPY. Therefore, it seems likely that changes in the basal level, after the NPY injection, were integrated results of neural activities responsible for those endocrine functions. Some of these activities seem to be related to E2 (Fig. 3AGo), but this was not confirmed in this study.

In this study, the activity of the GnRH pulse generator was significantly suppressed by fasting in the presence, but not in the absence, of E2; whereas both OVX and OVX+E2 animals were similarly inhibited by exogenous NPY. These results may raise a possibility that NPY is not the neural signal mediating the nutritional influence on the GnRH pulse generator. However, when the roles of E2 and the degree of undernutrition achieved by fasting for 4–5 days are taken into account, the steroid-dependent discrepancy between the effects of fasting and exogenous NPY is not surprising. It has been shown that gonadal steroids enhance the responsiveness of the GnRH system to the stimulatory action of NPY (44). However, this is unlikely for the inhibitory action of NPY, because it was not different between the OVX and OVX+E2 animals. It seems plausible that the amount of NPY released endogenously and acting on the GnRH pulse generator is enhanced by E2, because the primary action of gonadal steroids is to facilitate the output of peptide signals that are involved in the control of GnRH secretion (45). It has been demonstrated that estrogen receptors exist in a subpopulation of NPY neurons in the ARC (46, 47) and NPY synthesis and/or release are modulated by gonadal steroids (48). Assuming that those estrogen-sensitive NPY neurons in the ARC innervate the GnRH pulse generator and others do not, as previously suggested (46), then the impact of endogenous NPY on GnRH release in response to fasting could be much greater in the presence of E2. It is also probable that E2 acts presynaptically to enhance NPY transmission to the GnRH regulatory system. Therefore, it is very likely that the activity of endogenous NPY involved in the control of GnRH secretion is less potent in the absence of E2. Indeed, it has been shown, in rats, that the suppression of pulsatile LH release after acute fasting is dependent upon E2 (49).

With regard to the degree of undernutrition, it seemed that 4–5 days of fasting is a milder stress than chronic food restriction in ruminants, because chronic food restriction more severely suppresses pulsatile GnRH/LH secretion, both in the absence (6, 7, 8, 9, 12) and presence of gonadal steroids (6, 11). Moreover, it has been shown that food deprivation for a short period has a lesser influence on NPY mRNA expression than chronic food restriction (18). Consequently, we consider that without such facilitatory actions of E2 in OVX goat, a period of 5 days fasting might not be sufficient to stimulate endogenous NPY release to suppress GnRH pulse generator activity. On the other hand, in the growth-restricted lamb (12), it might be that NPY in the hypothalamus was sustained at high levels and thus NPY receptors were continuously activated during the long period of food restriction (more than 40 weeks); and therefore, undernutrition induced a decrease in GnRH secretion, even without E2. For a clearer conclusion, we are currently preparing further investigations to examine whether the effect of fasting in OVX+E2 goats is reversed by blocking endogenous NPY neuronal activity.

Several neurons in specific hypothalamic nuclei, which are implicated in the control of ingestion and reproduction (13), were activated in response to fasting in the male castrated goats (Fig. 5Go). Neurons containing Fos were abundant in the ARC, moderate in the DMH, and of a lesser extent in the PVH. The distribution pattern of Fos observed in the goat is in agreement with that in mice fasted for 24 h (50), suggesting that similar neural substrates are involved between monogastric and ruminant species in the neural processing of undernutrition. The observation that most of these activated neurons were localized in areas adjacent to the third ventricle implies that transmission of peripheral signals to the hypothalamus is mediated, in part, by the ventricular system. Indeed, glucose is known as an important nutritional signal not only in rats (34) but also in ruminants (33). Maekawa et al. (34) recently found glucokinase immunoreactivity in ependymocytes in the rat brain and suggested their possible involvement in a glucose-sensing mechanism. However, neural pathways by which nutritional signals are transmitted to the hypothalamus are scarcely known in ruminants.

Double-labeling immunohistochemistry revealed that a subpopulation of NPY neurons in the ARC are activated in response to fasting (Fig. 6FGo). This result confirms previous findings that food restriction increases NPY gene expression and the number of immunoreactive NPY cells in the ARC of sheep (9, 19) and rats (18), and it further suggests that NPY might be playing a critical role in processing the information from undernutrition. However, it should be mentioned that more than half of the NPY neurons did not express Fos, which implies that there are discrete subpopulations of NPY neurons in the ARC as discussed above. Conversely, because there were a number of Fos-expressing cells that did not contain NPY in the hypothalamus, not only NPY but also other peptides such as ß-endorphin (13), galanin (13, 51), and melanin-concentrating hormone (52) could participate in the fasting-induced alteration of hypothalamic activity.

In summary, we have demonstrated, in the goat, that: 1) the activity of the GnRH pulse generator is suppressed in proportion to the extent of fasting in the presence of E2; 2) exogenous NPY administered into the LV suppresses the activity of the GnRH pulse generator regardless of the presence of E2; and 3) several hypothalamic neurons/regions, including NPY neurons in the ARC, were activated by fasting. The present electrophysiological and morphological results, together with a large body of previous evidence, suggest that undernutrition stimulates NPY neurons, possibly in the ARC, and that NPY, in turn, acts centrally on the hypothalamic GnRH pulse generator to suppress its activity, and thereby pulsatile release of LH is decreased.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors are grateful to Dr. H. I’Anson for her reading of the manuscript, and Drs. O. Sasaki and T. Furukawa for their critical suggestions regarding statistics. We also thank Dr. Y. Kanai for providing animals, Ms. Y. Sakairi for her technical assistance in immunohistochemistry, and Mr. K. Matsumoto for his help in the operation of animals.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported, in part, by a Grant-in-Aid Bio Design Program from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries in Japan. Back

Received July 18, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Wade GN, Schneider JE, Li HY 1996 Control of fertility by metabolic cues. Am J Physiol 270:E1–E19
  2. Schillo KK 1992 Effects of dietary energy on control of luteinizing hormone secretion in cattle and sheep. J Anim Sci 70:1271–1282[Abstract]
  3. Nagatani S, Tsukamura H, Maeda K-I 1994 Estrogen feedback needed at the paraventricular nucleus or A2 to suppress pulsatile luteinizing hormone release in fasting female rats. Endocrinology 135:870–875[Abstract]
  4. Nagatani S, Guthikonda P, Thompson RC, Tsukamura H, Maeda K-I, Foster DL 1998 Evidence for GnRH regulation by leptin: leptin administration prevents reduced pulsatile LH secretion during fasting. Neuroendocrinology 67:370–376[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Schreihofer DA, Renda F, Cameron JL 1996 Feeding-induced stimulation of luteinizing hormone secretion in male rhesus monkeys is not dependent on a rise in blood glucose concentration. Endocrinology 137:3770–3776[Abstract]
  6. Foster DL, Olster DH 1985 Effect of restricted nutrition on puberty in the lamb: patterns of tonic luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion and competency of the LH surge system. Endocrinology 116:375–381[Abstract]
  7. Thomas GB, Mercer JE, Karalis T, Rao A, Cummins JT, Clarke IJ 1990 Effect of restricted feeding on the concentrations of growth hormone (GH), gonadotropins, and prolactin (PRL) in plasma, and on the amounts of messenger ribonucleic acid for GH, gonadotropin subunits, and PRL in the pituitary glands of adult ovariectomized ewes. Endocrinology 126:1361–1367[Abstract]
  8. McShane TM, Petersen SL, McCrone S, Keisler DH 1993 Influence of food restriction on neuropeptide-Y, proopiomelanocortin, and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone gene expression in sheep hypothalami. Biol Reprod 49:831–839[Abstract]
  9. Adam CL, Findlay PA, Kyle CE, Young P, Mercer JG 1997 Effect of chronic food restriction on pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion and hypothalamic neuropeptide Y gene expression in castrate male sheep. J Endocrinol 152:329–337[Abstract]
  10. Short RE, Bellows RA, Staigmiller RB, Berardinelli JG, Custer EE 1990 Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrus and infertility in postpartum beef cattle. J Anim Sci 68:799–816[Abstract]
  11. Prasad BM, Conover CD, Sarkar DK, Rabii J, Advis JP 1993 Feed restriction in prepubertal lambs: effect on puberty onset and on in vivo release of luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone, neuropeptide Y and beta-endorphin from the posterior-lateral median eminence. Neuroendocrinology 57:1171–1181[Medline]
  12. I’Anson H, Manning JM, Herbosa CG, Pelt J, Friedman CR, Wood RI, Bucholtz DC, Foster DL 2000 Central inhibition of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in the growth-restricted hypogonadotropic female sheep. Endocrinology 141:520–527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kalra SP, Kalra PS 1996 Nutritional infertility: the role of the interconnected hypothalamic neuropeptide Y-galanin-opioid network. Front Neuroendocrinol 17:371–401[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. McDonald JK, Lumpkin MD, DePaolo LV 1989 Neuropeptide-Y suppresses pulsatile secretion of luteinizing hormone in ovariectomized rats: possible site of action. Endocrinology 125:186–191[Abstract]
  15. Kaynard AH, Pau KY, Hess DL, Spies HG 1990 Third-ventricular infusion of neuropeptide Y suppresses luteinizing hormone secretion in ovariectomized rhesus macaques. Endocrinology 127:2437–2444[Abstract]
  16. Barker-Gibb ML, Scott CJ, Boublik JH, Clarke IJ 1995 The role of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the control of LH secretion in the ewe with respect to season, NPY receptor subtype and the site of action in the hypothalamus. J Endocrinol 147:565–579[Abstract]
  17. McShane TM, May T, Miner JL, Keisler DH 1992 Central actions of neuropeptide-Y may provide a neuromodulatory link between nutrition and reproduction. Biol Reprod 46:1151–1157[Abstract]
  18. Brady LS, Smith MA, Gold PW, Herkenham M 1990 Altered expression of hypothalamic neuropeptide mRNAs in food-restricted and food-deprived rats. Neuroendocrinology 52:441–447[Medline]
  19. Barker-Gibb ML, Clarke IJ 1996 Increased galanin and neuropeptide-Y immunoreactivity within the hypothalamus of ovariectomised ewes following a prolonged period of reduced body weight is associated with changes in plasma growth hormone but not gonadotropin levels. Neuroendocrinology 64:194–207[Medline]
  20. Li C, Chen P, Smith MS 1999 Morphological evidence for direct interaction between arcuate nucleus neuropeptide Y (NPY) neurons and gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons and the possible involvement of NPY Y1 receptors. Endocrinology 140:5382–5390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Lincoln DW, Fraser HM, Lincoln GA, Martin GB, McNeilly AS 1985 Hypothalamic pulse generators. Recent Prog Horm Res 41:369–419
  22. Knobil E 1981 Patterns of hypophysiotropic signals and gonadotropin secretion in the rhesus monkey. Biol Reprod 24:44–49[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Nishihara M, Hiruma H, Kimura F 1991 Interactions between the noradrenergic and opioid peptidergic systems in controlling the electrical activity of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone pulse generator in ovariectomized rats. Neuroendocrinology 54:321–326[Medline]
  24. Mori Y, Nishihara M, Tanaka T, Shimizu T, Yamaguchi M, Takeuchi Y, Hoshino K 1991 Chronic recording of electrophysiological manifestation of the hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator activity in the goat. Neuroendocrinology 53:392–395[Medline]
  25. Nishihara M, Takeuchi Y, Tanaka T, Mori Y 1999 Electrophysiological correlates of pulsatile and surge gonadotrophin secretion. Rev Reprod 4:110–116[Abstract]
  26. Ichimaru T, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y 1999 Stimulation of the GnRH pulse generator activity by continuous exposure to the male pheromones in the female goat. J Reprod Dev 45:243–248[CrossRef]
  27. Iwata E, Wakabayashi Y, Kakuma Y, Kikusui T, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y 2000 Testosterone-dependent primer pheromone production in the sebaceous gland of male goat. Biol Reprod 62:806–810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Morgan JI, Curran T 1989 Calcium and proto-oncogene involvement in the immediate-early response in the nervous system. Ann NY Acad Sci 568:283–290[Abstract]
  29. Mori Y, Takedomi T, Mizomoto Y, Hoshino K 1987 Induction of preovulatory endocrine events by programmed administration of progesterone and estradiol in ovariectomized goats. Jpn J Anim Reprod 33:36–40
  30. Watson Jr RE, Wiegand SJ, Clough RW, Hoffman GE 1986 Use of cryoprotectant to maintain long-term peptide immunoreactivity and tissue morphology in free floating sections. Peptides 7:155–159[Medline]
  31. Zuccolilli GO, Hayashi S, Mori Y 1995 Hypothalamic structures of the goat on stereotaxic coordinates. J Vet Med Sci 57:459–467[Medline]
  32. Mori Y, Kano Y 1984 Changes in plasma concentrations of LH, progesterone and oestradiol in relation to the occurrence of luteolysis, oestrus and time of ovulation in the Shiba goat (Capra hircus). J Reprod Fertil 72:223–230[Abstract]
  33. Foster DL, Bucholtz DC 1995 Glucose as a possible metabolic cue timing puberty. Front Endocrinol 10:319–331
  34. Maekawa F, Toyoda Y, Torii N, Miwa I, Thompson RC, Foster DL, Tsukahara S, Tsukamura H, Maeda K-I 2000 Localization of glucokinase-like immunoreactivity in the rat lower brain stem: for possible location of brain glucose-sensing mechanisms. Endocrinology 141:375–384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Olson BR, Scott DC, Wetsel WC, Elliot SJ, Tomic M, Stojilkovic S, Nieman LK, Wray S 1995 Effects of insulin-like growth factors I and II and insulin on the immortalized hypothalamic GT1–7 cell line. Neuroendocrinology 62:155–165[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Williams NI, Lancas MJ, Cameron JL 1996 Stimulation of luteinizing hormone secretion by food intake: evidence against a role for insulin. Endocrinology 137:2565–2571[Abstract]
  37. Raposinho PD, Broqua P, Pierroz DD, Hayward A, Dumont Y, Quirion R, Junien J-L, Aubert ML 1999 Evidence that the inhibition of luteinizing hormone secretion exerted by central administration of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the rat is predominantly mediated by the NPY-Y5 receptor subtype. Endocrinology 140:4046–4055[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Raposinho PD, Broqua P, Pierroz DD, Hayward A, Akinsanya K, Galyean R, Schteingart C, Junien J-L, Aubert ML 2000 Stimulation of the gonadotropic axis by the neuropeptide Y receptor Y1 antagonist/Y4 agonist 1229U91 in the male rat. Neuroendocrinology 71:2–7[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Jain MR, Pu S, Kalra PS, Kalra SP 1999 Evidence that stimulation of two modalities of pituitary luteinizing hormone release in ovarian steroid-primed ovariectomized rats may involve neuropeptide Y Y1 and Y4 receptors. Endocrinology 140:5171–5177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Hamada T, Shimizu T, Ichikawa M, Mori Y 1992 Immunohistochemical study on gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons in the Shiba goat brain. J Reprod Dev 38:133–142
  41. Leibowitz SF 1991 Brain neuropeptide Y: an integrator of endocrine, metabolic and behavioral processes. Brain Res Bull 27:333–337[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Pierroz DD, Catzeflis C, Aebi AC, Rivier JE, Aubert ML 1996 Chronic administration of neuropeptide Y into the lateral ventricle inhibits both the pituitary-testicular axis and growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I secretion in intact adult male rats. Endocrinology 137:3–12[Abstract]
  43. Porter DW, Naylor AM, McNeilly AS, Lincoln DW 1993 Endocrine actions of central neuropeptide Y in the ewe: activation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis by exogenous neuropeptide Y and role of endogenous neuropeptide Y in the secretion of luteinizing hormone during the oestrous cycle. J Neuroendocrinol 5:163–174[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Woller MJ, Terasawa E 1992 Estradiol enhances the action of neuropeptide Y on in vivo luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone release in the ovariectomized rhesus monkey. Neuroendocrinology 56:921–925[Medline]
  45. Kalra SP 1993 Mandatory neuropeptide-steroid signaling for the preovulatory luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone discharge. Endocr Rev 14:507–538[Abstract]
  46. Sar M, Sahu A, Crowley WR, Kalra SP 1990 Localization of neuropeptide-Y immunoreactivity in estradiol-concentrating cells in the hypothalamus. Endocrinology 127:2752–2756[Abstract]
  47. Skinner DC, Herbison AE 1997 Effects of photoperiod on estrogen receptor, tyrosine hydroxylase, neuropeptide Y, and beta-endorphin immunoreactivity in the ewe hypothalamus. Endocrinology 138:2585–2595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Sahu A, Phelps CP, White JD, Crowley WR, Kalra SP, Kalra PS 1992 Steroidal regulation of hypothalamic neuropeptide Y release and gene expression. Endocrinology 130:3331–3336[Abstract]
  49. Cagampang FRA, Maeda K-I, Tsukamura H, Ohkura S, Ota K 1991 Involvement of ovarian steroids and endogenous opioids in the fasting-induced suppression of pulsatile LH release in ovariectomized rats. J Endocrinol 129:321–328[Abstract]
  50. Wang L, Martinez V, Barrachina MD, Tache Y 1998 Fos expression in the brain induced by peripheral injection of CCK or leptin plus CCK in fasted lean mice. Brain Res 791:157–166[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Lopez FJ, Merchenthaler I, Ching M, Wisniewski MG, Negro-Vilar A 1991 Galanin: a hypothalamic-hypophysiotropic hormone modulating reproductive functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:4508–4512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Gonzalez MI, Baker BI, Wilson CA 1997 Stimulatory effect of melanin-concentrating hormone on luteinising hormone release. Neuroendocrinology 66:254–262[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
B. J Todd, G. S Fraley, A. C Peck, G. J Schwartz, and A. M Etgen
Central Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Receptors Play Distinct Roles in the Control of Reproduction, Food Intake, and Body Weight in Female Rats
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2007; 77(3): 492 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Ohkura, T. Ichimaru, F. Itoh, S. Matsuyama, and H. Okamura
Further Evidence for the Role of Glucose as a Metabolic Regulator of Hypothalamic Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Generator Activity in Goats
Endocrinology, July 1, 2004; 145(7): 3239 - 3246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ichimaru, T.
Right arrow Articles by Okamura, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ichimaru, T.
Right arrow Articles by Okamura, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals