help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sugawara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Fujimoto, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sugawara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Fujimoto, S.
Endocrinology Vol. 142, No. 8 3570-3577
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

RIP 140 Modulates Transcription of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Gene through Interactions with Both SF-1 and DAX-1

Teruo Sugawara, Syuji Abe, Noriaki Sakuragi, Yuko Fujimoto, Eiji Nomura, Kenji Fujieda, Masaki Saito and Seiichiro Fujimoto

Departments of Biochemistry (T.S.), Pediatrics (S.A.), and Obstetrics and Gynecology (N.S., Y.F., E.N., S.F.), Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8638, Japan; Department of Pediatrics, Asahikawa Medical College (K.F.), Asahikawa, Hokkaido 078-8510, Japan; and Division of Virology of the National Cancer Center Research Institute (M.S.), Tukiji, Tokyou 104-8638, Japan

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Teruo Sugawara, Department of Biochemistry, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Kita-ku, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan. E-mail: terusuga{at}med.hokudai.ac.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Coregulators have been suggested to act as a bridging apparatus between nuclear receptors and the transcriptional machinery. The orphan receptor SF-1 plays a role in controlling the basal and cAMP-stimulated expression of the human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene. DAX-1 is the gene responsible for X-linked adrenal hypoplasia congenita and blocks steroid biosynthesis by impairing the expression of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. In the present study we examined the role of coregulators in the actions of SF-1 and DAX-1 on the human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein promoter. We found that the coregulator RIP 140 interacts with SF-1 in the yeast two-hybrid system. Glutathione-S-transferase pull-down assays and coimmunoprecipitations confirmed the interaction between RIP 140 and SF-1. RIP 140 was also shown to interact with DAX-1. When an RIP 140 expression vector was introduced into Y-1 cells, basal and cAMP-stimulated human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein promoter activities decreased. The inhibitory effect of RIP 140 on human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein promoter activity was dependent upon the presence of SF-1. The cAMP response of an SF-1 response element was inhibited by both RIP 140 and DAX-1 expression vectors at low concentrations of plasmids. We conclude that RIP 140 binds to the orphan nuclear receptor SF-1 and DAX-1 and modulates their actions on the human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein promoter.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
COACTIVATORS AND COREPRESSORS modulate the transcriptional activity of nuclear receptors. It has been suggested that these cofactors serve as a bridging apparatus between the nuclear receptor and the transcriptional machinery. RIP 140 was first identified in breast cancer cell lines, and it has been isolated by in vitro protein-protein interaction assays using hormone-binding domains of the ER as a bait (1, 2). RIP 140 interacts not only with ER, but also with the RARs, RXRs, and TRs (3). Although RIP 140 was at first thought to function as a coactivator for RAR, ER, and the AR (1, 3, 4, 5), it has also been shown to function as a corepressor. RIP 140 is associated with RAR/RXR heterodimers and suppresses retinoic acid induction of reporter gene constructs (6). RIP 140 also suppresses trans-activation of TR2 (7), which is an orphan receptor.

SF-1 is an orphan nuclear receptor (8) and plays a major role in regulation of the expression of steroidogenic P450 enzymes and the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene, which plays a key role in the intramitochondrial movement of cholesterol to P450scc (9, 10, 11, 12). The transport of cholesterol from the outer mitochondrial membrane to the inner membrane is the rate-limiting process of steroidogenesis. The StAR gene is mutated in subjects with congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia (13), resulting in marked impairment of adrenal gonadal steroid synthesis. The promoters of the human, mouse and porcine StAR genes each contain SF-1 binding sites (14, 15, 16, 17), and SF-1 has been shown to be important for basal and cAMP-stimulated activity of the human StAR promoter (16).

DAX-1 has been identified as the gene responsible for adrenal hypoplasia congenita (18, 19). Human DAX-1 protein consists of 470 amino acids (aa), and half of the 225 aa of the C-terminal region have high homology to the ligand-binding domain of some members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily (20, 21, 22, 23). DAX-1 is expressed in a tissue-specific manner, and it is found in the adrenal cortex, testis, ovary, anterior pituitary gonadotropes, and ventral medial hypothalamus (21, 24, 25). In steroidogenic tissues, DAX-1 blocks steroid biosynthesis by impairing the expression of the StAR gene (26, 27), which is also restricted to steroid-producing cells of the adrenal gland, testis, and ovary (28). Thus, the orphan receptors SF-1 and DAX-1 play key roles in the control of StAR gene expression and, hence, steroid hormone production.

We have demonstrated an interaction between Sp1 and SF-1 on the human StAR promoter (29). Although Sp1 and SF-1 interact with each other and cooperate to regulate the basal activity of the human StAR promoter, these interactions have only a small influence on cAMP-stimulated promoter activity. Other factors, coactivators or corepressors, may combine with SF-1 and DAX-1 to control the human StAR gene. In the present study we examined the role of a comodulator in SF-1 and DAX-1 actions on human StAR gene transcription.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plasmid constructs
A 1.3-kb HindIII fragment of the StAR gene promoter [nucleotides (nt) -1293 to +39] was cloned into a pGL2 plasmid vector (Promega Corp., Madison, WI), which contains firefly luciferase as a reporter gene. pGL2StAR (nt -235 to +39) was prepared by PCR as previously described (29). pTKLuc4xSF-1 contained four copies of an SF-1-binding site (nt - 105 to -95) (30). The mouse DAX-1 expression vector pRc/RSVDAX-1 was provided by Dr. Kenichiro Morohashi of the National Institute for Basic Biology (Okazaki, Japan). The human RIP 140 expression vector pEF-RIP 140 containing human RIP 140 cDNA was provided by Dr. Malcolm G. Parker, Imperial Cancer Research Fund (London, UK). Mouse SF-1 complementary DNA (cDNA) and the mouse SF-1-glutathione-S-transferase (GST) fusion protein construct were provided by Dr. Keith L. Parker, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. The human DAX-1 fusion protein was prepared from a NcoI/EcoRI fragment of the human DAX-1 cDNA by PCR and cloned into pET-32a (Novagen, Inc., Madison, WI). The ß-galactosidase expression vector (pCH110, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) was used for normalization of luciferase data. A plasmid expressing a GAL4-SF-1 fusion was provided by Dr. Jerome F. Strauss III (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). It was constructed by inserting an SalI/EcoRI fragment from bovine SF-1 cDNA, which lacks the DNA-binding domain (the first 114 aa), into a pBDGAL4 Cam vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), which has a GAL4 DNA-binding domain (GAL4). A plasmid expressing a GAL4-activating domain (GAD)-RIP 140 fusion was constructed by inserting an SacI/NcoI fragment prepared by PCR using an RIP 140 cDNA as a template into a pACT2 vector, which has a GAD (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). To produce a plasmid expressing a GAL4-DAX-1 fusion, a fragment encompassing mouse DAX-1 cDNA (aa 247–472) was amplified by PCR from the DAX-1 expression vector and cloned into the pAS2–1 vector. The plasmids were prepared for transfection studies using a QIAGEN Maxiprep system (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany).

Cell culture and antibodies
Mouse Y-1 adrenal tumor cells and COS-1 cells were obtained from RIKEN Cell Bank (Tsukuba, Japan). Human granulosa-like tumor KGN cells were a gift from Dr. Yoshihiro Nishi (Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Kyushu, Japan) (31). The Y-1 cells and COS-1 cells were grown in 35-mm plastic dishes. The Y-1 cells and COS-1 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS and 50 µg/ml gentamicin. The KGN cells were grown in DMEM/Ham’s F-12 containing 10% FCS and 50 µg/ml gentamicin. A polyclonal antibody against DAX-1 was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). A polyclonal antibody against SF-1 was provided by Dr. Kenichiro Morohashi.

Luciferase assays
Mouse Y-1 adrenal tumor cells and COS-1 cells were grown in 35-mm plastic dishes in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, as previously described (29). Cells were transfected with pGL2 plasmids and pCH110 with 4.5 µl Tfx-50 (Promega Corp.)/1 µg DNA with DAX-1 or RIP 140 expression plasmids. Cells were harvested 48 h after transfection. Some cultures were treated with 8-bromo-cAMP (1 mM) during the final 24 h of culture. Cell extracts were made in 400 µl lysis buffer (Promega Corp.). One hundred microliters were used for the luciferase assay, and 150 µl were used for the ß-galactosidase assay. The luciferase assay results were normalized to ß-galactosidase activity to compensate for variations in transfection efficiency, as previously described (29).

GST pull-down experiment
The RIP 140 coding sequence was prepared by PCR and cloned into a PCR II vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). RIP 140 protein was synthesized in vitro using a T7 RNA polymerase-based TNT-coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega Corp.). The murine SF-1-GST fusion protein construct, provided by Dr. Keith Parker, was expressed in bacteria (32) and was used for pull-down assays and coimmunoprecipitation. SF-1-GST fusion protein bound to glutathione-Sepharose-4B beads was incubated for 3 h with 50 µl in vitro-translated [35S]methionine-labeled RIP 140 in a total volume of 250 µl incubation buffer [50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.4), 150 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, and 1% Triton-X]. Beads were collected by microcentrifugation and washed three times. Washed beads were resuspended in 20 µl 2 x SDS sample buffer, heated for 5 min, and pelleted in a microfuge, and the supernatant was subjected to SDS-PAGE.

Cross-linking experiment and coimmunoprecipitation
Coimmunoprecipitations were performed using in vitro-translated protein, as previous described (29). The pBK SF-1 plasmid was used to generate radiolabeled SF-1 in a TNT T7-coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega Corp.) (29). 35S-Labeled SF-1 was incubated with recombinant human DAX-1. RIP 140 protein was synthesized in vitro using a T7 RNA polymerase-based TNT-coupled reticulocyte lysate system described previously (Promega Corp.). 35S-Labeled RIP 140 was incubated with recombinant GST-SF-1 or recombinant human DAX-1. The human DAX-1 protein was expressed in bacteria according to the instructions in the supplier’s manual (Novagen, San Diego, CA). The reaction mixture was diluted with binding buffer (20 mM HEPES, 5% glycerol, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 mM EDTA, in a final volume of 25 µl) and cross-linked with a reversible cross-linking agent (5 mM dithiobis[succinimidyl propionate]) for 1 h at 25 C, then quenched with 0.22 M lysine. Radioimmunoprecipitation was carried out by adding 500 µl RIPA buffer (PBS, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 10 mg/ml phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 30 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml sodium orthovanadate) and 1 µl antiserum. After incubating for 1 h at 4 C, 20 µl protein G-Sepharose 4FF (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) were added, and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 4 C. The bound complex was then washed four times with RIPA buffer containing 2 M urea. The precipitated proteins were eluted with 20 µl 2 x SDS sample buffer to reverse the cross-links, resolved on a 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel, dried, and visualized by autoradiography.

Coprecipitation with fusion protein
For coprecipitation, Y-1 cells or KGN whole cell extracts (1 mg) in buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, and 1 x proteinase inhibitor cocktail; Compete Mini, Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany] were incubated with GST-SF-1 (100 ng) or human recombinant DAX-1 (100 ng), which have a His tag, for 1 h at 4 C in 500 µl IP buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM EGTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, and 1 x proteinase inhibitor cocktail]. After incubating, 20 µl glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) or His-Bind Resin (Novagen) were added, and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 4 C. The bound complex was then washed three times with IP buffer. The precipitated proteins were eluted with 20 µl 2 x SDS sample buffer and resolved on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Western analysis was performed using a rabbit polyclonal anti-DAX-1 IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) at a 1:1000 dilution or a rabbit polyclonal anti-RIP 140 IgG (Affinity BioReagents, Inc., Golden, CA) at a 1:500 dilution.

Yeast two-hybrid interaction screening
A human testis cDNA library (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.) in the activation domain vector pACT2 was amplified using the supplier’s recommended protocol. To identify SF-1 interacting proteins, the human testis cDNA library in pACT2 was introduced into the yeast reporter strain CG-1945 (MATa, ura3-52, his3-200, ade2-101, lys2-801, trp1-901, leu2-3,112, gal4-542, gal80-538, cyhr2, LYS2::GAL1UAS-GAL1TATA-HIS3, URA3::GAL417-mers(x3)-CYC1TATA-lacZ); MATCHMAKER Two-Hybrid System 2, CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.) bearing a plasmid expressing GAL4-SF-1 fusion. One x 106 transformants were plated onto a selective synthetic medium lacking histidine, leucine, and tryptophan and grown for 3–5 d at 30 C. A ß-galactosidase filter assay was used for determining ß-galactosidase activity according to the recommended protocol of the manufacturer. Plasmid DNA from all His+ and LacZ+ colonies was isolated after electroporation of total yeast DNA into Escherichia coli stain HB101 and selection of M9 medium lacking leucine. After restriction analysis, cDNA inserts were sequenced using a GAL4 AD sequencing primer.

Yeast two-hybrid interaction assays
Yeast two-hybrid interaction assays were used to verify the interaction between SF-1 and RIP 140 and between RIP 140 and DAX-1. Yeast strain Y187 (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.) with a genotype of MAT{alpha}, ura3-52, his3-200, ade2-101, trp1-901, leu2-3,112, gal4{Delta}, met-, gal80{Delta}, URA3::GAL1UAS-GAL1TATA-lacZ was used for the assays. The plasmid GAL4 and GAD fusion constructs were transformed into the Y187 strain using the YEASTMAKER Yeast Transformation System (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.). Quantitative liquid ß-galactosidase activity assays were performed according to the protocol of the manufacturer (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.). Briefly, transformants were cultured in a selective synthetic medium lacking leucine and tryptophan and grown for 2 d at 30 C (SF-1 and RIP 140 interaction). Transformants were cultured in a synthetic medium medium lacking leucine and tryptophan and grown overnight at 30 C. On the following day, 2 ml of the overnight culture were transferred to 8 ml YPD medium and cultured for 3 h at 30 C (DAX-1 and RIP 140). One and a half milliliters of culture were centrifuged, and the cells were washed with Z buffer (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.). The cells were resuspended with 300 µl Z buffer and used for the ß-galactosidase assay. Activity was normalized to growth (OD600) and assay time. pVA3–1 encodes DNA-BD/murine p53 protein in pAS2–1. pTD1–1 encodes an AD/simian virus 40 large T antigen protein in pACT2. The ß-galactosidase activity of pVA3–1 and pTD1–1 vector was used as a positive control.

Data analysis
Values are presented as the mean ± SE. Significance between experimental groups was determined by unpaired t test. P < 0.05 was taken as the level of significance.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
RIP 140 interacts with both SF-1 and DAX-1
A Gal4-based yeast two-hybrid system was used to identify proteins interacting with SF-1. A plasmid expressing a GAL4SF-1 fusion, containing the bovine SF-1 aa115–461, was used to screen a human testis cDNA library in the yeast strain CG-1945. Forty positive clones were obtained from screening 1 x 106 clones. DNA sequence analysis revealed a single cDNA encoding nuclear factor RIP 140 (aa 525-1158). RIP 140 was thought to function as a coactivator or a corepressor, modulating the transcriptional activity of nuclear receptors. SF-1 is an orphan nuclear receptor and plays a major role in regulation of the expression of the StAR gene. Other clones coding known or unknown proteins were not examined in this study. A plasmid expressing a GAD-RIP 140 (aa 1–1158) fusion was constructed, and its interaction with a plasmid expressing a GAL4-SF-1 fusion was examined (Table 1Go). To quantify the interaction between SF-1 and RIP 140, liquid cultures were assayed for ß-galactosidase activity with o-nitrophenyl ß-D-galactopyranoside. The empty vectors GAL4 and GAD did not activate the reporter gene. Cotransformation with a GAL4 expression vector and a GAD-RIP 140 fusion expression vector or GAL4-SF-1 and GAD did not increase reporter activity. However, GAL4-SF-1 and GAD-RIP 140 induced a 6-fold greater activation of the reporter gene compared with the activity observed when GAL4 and GAD expression vectors were cotransformed into yeast strain Y187 (Fig. 1Go). These results suggest that there is interaction between SF-1 and RIP 140 in vivo.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Interaction of SF-1 with RIP 140 in the yeast two-hybrid assay

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Two-hybrid interaction assays with RIP 140 and SF-1. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y187 reporter host strains were transfected with a GAL4-SF-1 fusion vector and a GAD-RIP 140 vector. Transformants were cultured in synthetic medium lacking leucine and tryptophan and grown for 2 d at 30 C. ß-Galactosidase activity is expressed relative to the ß-galactosidase activity of pVA3–1 and pTD1–1 vectors as a control. pVA3–1 encodes DNA-BD/murine p53 protein in pAS2–1. pTD1-1 encodes an AD/SV40 large T antigen protein in pACT2. The results are presented as the mean ± SE from three separate experiments.

 
GST pull-down assays were performed to examine the direct interaction between SF-1 and RIP 140 (Fig. 2AGo). In vitro-translated [35S]RIP 140 was mixed with GST or GST-SF-1 and then subjected to SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. These experiments revealed that RIP 140 interacts directly with GST-SF-1, but not with GST. Coimmunoprecipitation was performed to confirm the physical interaction between RIP 140 and SF-1 (Fig. 2BGo). [35S]RIP 140 and GST-SF-1 fusion proteins were incubated and cross-linked with dithiobis[succinimidyl propionate], a bifunctional reversible cross-linker. The protein complexes were immunoprecipitated with RIP 140 antibody, SF-1 antiserum, or preimmune serum and protein G-Sepharose. Washed beads were boiled in SDS sample buffer to reverse the cross-links. 35S-Labeled RIP 140 and GST-SF-1 complexes were precipitated with the SF-1 antibody and RIP 140 antibody, but not with preimmune serum. Moreover, unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate did not yield an immunoprecipitation radioactive band with the SF-1 or RIP 140 antiserum. These results confirm the interaction between SF-1 and RIP 140 in vitro.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, GST pull-down assays and coimmunoprecipitation with SF-1 and RIP 140. A, The in vitro interaction of GST-SF-1 with RIP 140 (aa 1–1158) was analyzed in a GST pull-down assay. In vitro-translated [35S]RIP 140 (50 µl) was incubated with GST or GST-SF-1 (50 ng)-coupled glutathione-Sepharose-4B beads. Washed beads were boiled in 2 x SDS sample buffer and resolved by SDS-PAGE. B, In vitro-translated [35S]RIP 140(5 µl) or 35S-labeled unprogrammed rabbit reticulocyte lysate (5 µl) was incubated with 5 mM dithiobis[succinimidyl propionate] in the presence or absence of GST-SF-1 (100 ng). The protein complexes were then immunoprecipitated with SF-1 antiserum, RIP 140 antiserum, or preimmune serum and protein G-Sepharose. Washed beads were boiled in 2 x SDS sample buffer, and precipitated proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE.

 
A yeast two-hybrid assay was used to examine the interaction between DAX-1 and RIP 140. A plasmid expressing a GAL4-DAX-1 fusion containing mouse DAX-1 aa 247–472, which is thought to represent a ligand-binding domain, was tested with GAD-RIP 140 (Table 2Go). To quantify the interaction between DAX-1 and RIP 140, liquid cultures were assayed for ß-galactosidase activity. Cotransformation with GAL4-DAX-1 and GAD-RIP 140 induced a 1.6-fold greater activation of the reporter gene compared with the activity observed with GAL4 and GAD vectors (Fig. 3Go). Even though RIP 140 has a low affinity interaction with DAX-1, these results indicate that there is interaction between DAX-1 and RIP 140 in vivo.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Interaction of RIP 140 with DAX-1 in the yeast two-hybrid assay

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Two-hybrid interaction assays with RIP 140 and DAX-1. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y187 reporter host strains were transfected with a GAL4-DAX-1 fusion (aa 247–472) vector and a GAD-RIP 140 vector. Transformants were cultured in synthetic medium lacking leucine and tryptophan and grown overnight at 30 C. On the following day, 2 ml of the overnight culture were transferred to 8 ml YPD medium and cultured for 3 h at 30 C. ß-Galactosidase activity is expressed relative to the ß-galactosidase activity of a GAL4 expression vector and a GAD expression vector. The ß-galactosidase activity of pVA3–1 and pTD1–1 vector was used as a positive control. pVA3–1 encodes a GAL4-murine p53 fusion protein. pTD1-1 encodes a GAD-simian virus 40 large T antigen protein in pACT2. The results are presented as the mean ± SE from three separate experiments. **, Significantly different from transfection with GAL4/GAD (P < 0.01).

 
Coimmunoprecipitation was performed to examine the direct interaction between DAX-1 and RIP 140 (Fig. 4Go). [35S]RIP 140 and human recombinant DAX-1 protein were incubated and cross-linked with dithiobis[succinimidyl propionate]. The protein complexes were immunoprecipitated with DAX-1 antibody or preimmune serum and protein G-Sepharose. [35S]RIP 140 and DAX-1 complexes were precipitated with the DAX-1 antibody, but not with preimmune serum. Transcription factors, 35S-labeled Oct-1 as a negative control, was not precipitated with the DAX-1 antibody. The immunoprecipitation results showed that there is a direct interaction between DAX-1 and RIP 140 in vitro.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Interaction of RIP 140 with DAX-1. In vitro-translated [35S]RIP 140 (5 µl) or [35S]Oct-1 (5 µl) was incubated with 5 mM dithiobis[succinimidyl propionate] in the presence or absence of recombinant DAX-1 (100 ng). The protein complexes were then immunoprecipitated with human DAX-1 antibody or preimmune serum and protein G-Sepharose. Washed beads were boiled in 2 x SDS sample buffer, and precipitated proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE.

 
Coimmunoprecipitation was performed to examine the direct interaction between DAX-1 and SF-1 (Fig. 5Go). 35S-Labeled SF-1 and DAX-1 complexes were precipitated with the DAX-1 antibody. The immunoprecipitation results showed that there is also a direct interaction between DAX-1 and SF-1 in vitro.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Interaction of DAX-1 with SF-1. In vitro-translated [35S]SF-1 (5 µl) or 35S-labeled unprogrammed rabbit reticulocyte lysate (5 µl) was incubated with 5 mM dithiobis[succinimidyl propionate] in the presence or absence of DAX-1 (100 ng). The protein complexes were then immunoprecipitated with DAX-1 antibody, SF-1 antiserum, or preimmune serum and protein G-Sepharose. Washed beads were boiled in 2 x SDS sample buffer, and precipitated proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE.

 
To confirm the interaction between DAX-1 and RIP 140 or between DAX-1 and SF-1 in steroid hormone-producing cells, coimmunoprecipitation using whole cell extracts was performed (Fig. 6Go). Whole cell extracts from mouse Y-1 cells or human granulosa-like tumor cells, KGN cells, were incubated with GST-SF-1 or His-tagged human DAX-1 recombinant protein. The protein complex was precipitated with glutathione-Sepharose-4B or His-Bind resin. The protein complexes were analyzed on a Western blot using DAX-1 antibody or RIP 140 antibody. As shown in Fig. 6AGo, the DAX-1 antibody detected a specific band at 55 kDa in Y-1 cells and SKG cells (lanes 1 and 4). The DAX-1 protein was precipitated by GST-SF-1 fusion protein in both Y-1 cells and KGN cells (lanes 3 and 6). This coprecipitation result presented DAX-1-interacted SF-1 in steroid hormone-producing cells. The RIP 140 antibody detected 140 kDa in Y-1 cells and KGN cells in Fig. 6BGo (lanes 1 and 6). The RIP 140 protein was precipitated by GST-SF-1 fusion protein (lanes 3 and 7) and His-tagged DAX-1 fusion protein (lanes 5 and 10). The coprecipitation results showed that RIP 140 interacted with DAX-1 and that RIP 140 interacted with SF-1 in steroid-producing cells. The coprecipitation results showed interactions between SF-1 and DAX-1, SF-1 and RIP 140, and DAX-1 and RIP 140 in cells. These results showed that DAX-1 physically interacts with RIP 140 and SF-1 to control the human StAR promoter.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Interaction among SF-1, DAX-1, and RIP 140 in steroid- producing cells. Whole cell extracts were prepared from mouse Y-1 cells and human KGN cells that had been treated with 1.0 mM 8-bromo-cAMP for 24 h. GST-SF-1 or His-tagged human DAX-1 recombinant proteins were incubated with whole cell extracts. A, The protein complexes were precipitated with glutathione-Sepharose 4B and analyzed by Western blotting with an anti-DAX-1 antibody. Ten percent of the amount of whole cell extracts was used for input (lanes 1 and 4). A 55-kDa protein, DAX-1, was detected in Y-1 cells (lane 3) and KGN cells (lane 6). B, The protein complexes were precipitated with glutathione-Sepharose 4B (lanes 2, 3, 7, and 8) and His-Bind resin (lanes 4, 5, 9, and 10) and analyzed by Western blotting with an anti-RIP 140 antibody. Five percent of the amount of whole cell extracts was used for input (lanes 1 and 6). The RIP 140 antibody detected a 140-kDa protein, RIP 140, in Y-1 cells (lanes 3 and 8) and KGN cells (lanes 5 and 6).

 
Functional significance of the RIP 140/SF-1 and RIP 140/DAX-1 interactions
To examine the effects of RIP 140 on human StAR promoter activity, various amounts of RIP 140 expression plasmids were transfected into Y-1 cells, which express endogenous SF-1, and human StAR promoter activity was determined. The introduction of RIP 140 resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in human StAR promoter activity in the basal state and in the presence of 1 mM 8-bromo-cAMP (Fig. 7Go). pGL2 StAR, which was constructed from the -235 to +39 fragment, contains two SF-1-binding sites (-105 to -96 and -43 to -36). To determine whether the inhibitory effect of RIP 140 on StAR promoter activity is dependent upon the presence of SF-1, the RIP 140 expression vector and pGL2StAR were cotransfected into COS-1 cells, which do not have endogenous SF-1, with (Fig. 8AGo) or without (Fig. 8BGo) an SF-1 expression vector. When COS-1 cells were transfected with the RIP 140 expression vectors in the absence of SF-1, basal and cAMP-stimulated pGL2StAR promoter activities were not affected. However, the introduction of exogenous RIP 140 resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in pGL2StAR promoter activity in both the presence and absence of 1 mM 8-bromo-cAMP in COS-1 cells transfected with the SF-1 expression vector. Thus, the action of RIP 140 on the StAR promoter is dependent on SF-1.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effect of RIP 140 on human StAR promoter activity. Y-1 cells were cotransfected with 1 µg pGL2 1.3-kb StAR reporter plasmid, and increasing amounts of pEF-RIP 140 expression plasmids and cultured in the absence or presence of 1 mM 8-bromo-cAMP. Values presented are the mean ± SE promoter activities, expressed as a percentage of that of pGL2StAR, from three separate experiments in which each treatment group contained three replicate cultures. *, Significant difference for basal activity, compared with pGL21.3kb StAR (P < 0.05). ++, Significant difference with 8-bromo-cAMP, compared with pGL21.3kb StAR (P < 0.01).

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. RIP 140 inhibits the human StAR promoter in the presence of SF-1. COS-1 cells were cotransfected with 1 µg pGL2 StAR reporter plasmid and increasing amounts of pEF-RIP 140 expression plasmid without (A) or with (B) 0.5 µg mouse SF-1 expression plasmids, and the cells were cultured without or with 0.5 M 8-bromo-cAMP. Values presented are the mean ± SE promoter activities, expressed as a percentage of those of pGL2StAR, from three separate experiments in which each treatment group contained three replicate cultures. * and **, Significant difference for basal activity, compared with pGL2StAR. + and ++, Significant difference with 8-bromo-cAMP, compared with pGL2StAR. * and +, P < 0.05; ** and ++, P < 0.01.

 
To investigate the interactions of RIP 140 and DAX-1 in the presence of SF-1, a reporter construct containing SF-1 response elements, pTKLuc4xSF-1 was prepared and transfected into Y-1 adrenal tumor cells. pTKLuc4xSF-1 was cotransfected with increasing amounts of the DAX-1 expression vector alone, RIP 140 expression vector alone, or both DAX-1 and RIP 140 expression vectors. When the DAX-1 expression plasmid was transfected into Y-1 cells, basal and cAMP-stimulated pTKLuc4xSF-1 promoter activities increased, but cAMP-stimulated promoter activity did not change when the DAX-1 expression plasmid was transfected at the highest dose of the plasmid (Fig. 9AGo). The basal activity of pTKLuc4xSF-1 increased in the presence of a small amount of the RIP 140 expression vector (Fig. 9BGo). However, the cAMP induction of promoter activity was ablated at high concentrations of the RIP 140 expression plasmid (Fig. 9BGo). The basal promoter activity was increased by cotransfection with RIP 140 and DAX-1. However, with 500 ng RIP 140 expression plasmid and 500 ng DAX-1 expression plasmid, basal promoter activity was not increased, and cAMP-stimulated human promoter activity was blocked. That is, when both RIP 140 and DAX-1 plasmids were transfected, cAMP induction of the StAR promoter activity was inhibited at lower concentrations than when RIP 140 or DAX-1 was transfected alone (Fig. 9CGo).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. RIP 140 inhibits cAMP-stimulated activity of the SF-1 response elements synergistically with DAX-1. pTKLuc4xSF-1 (50 ng) was cotransfected to Y-1 cells with increasing amounts of the DAX-1 expression vector alone (0–4 µg; A), RIP 140 expression vector alone (0–2 µg; B), or both RIP 140 and DAX-1 expression vectors (C; either 100 or 500 ng RIP 140 and either 100 or 500 ng DAX-1). Cultures were carried out in the absence or presence of 1 mM 8-bromo-cAMP. Values presented are the mean ± SE promoter activities, expressed as a percentage of those of pTKLcu4xSF-1, from three separate experiments in which each treatment group contained three replicate cultures. * and **, Significant difference for basal activity, compared with pTKLuc4xSF-1 without RIP 140 expression vector. + and ++, Significant difference with 8-bromo-cAMP, compared with pTKLuc4xSF-1 without RIP 140 expression vector. * and +, P < 0.05; ** and ++, P < 0.01.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
SF-1 is an orphan nuclear receptor, although the AF-2 trans-activation domain is conserved in all SF-1 proteins. Because the AF-2 motif has been identified in ligand-activated receptors, the conservation of this domain raises the possibility that a ligand mediates SF-1-dependent trans-activation (33) and that it interacts with coactivators, including RIP 140. SF-1 aa 115–461 (GAL4-SF-1), including the AF-2 ligand-binding domain, interacted with RIP 140 in the yeast-two hybrid assay. SF-1 has been shown to interact with DAX-1 in both the proximal AF-2 domain and the C-terminal AF-2 domain, called the R domain (aa 437–447) of SF-1 (34), and DAX-1 has been shown to interact with SF-1 in the DAX-1 N-terminal domain, which is a repeated structure of 65–67 aa (35). In the yeast two-hybrid system, DAX-1 interacted with RIP 140 in the ligand-binding domain (aa 247–472), which is different from the domain binding SF-1. Thus, DAX-1 and SF-1 interactions are mediated by different domains than those responsible for RIP 140 binding to DAX-1 and SF-1.

The StAR protein is important for the synthesis of steroid hormones because it promotes cholesterol movement to the mitochondrial inner membranes, which is the rate-limiting step in steroidogenesis (9, 36). Tropic hormones (ACTH, LH, and FSH) regulate steroid hormone synthesis through several signal transduction pathways, including cAMP-dependent PKA, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, PKC, and mitogen-activated protein kinase. Human StAR gene expression is increased by a cAMP analog, 8-bromo-cAMP (37). The promoter of human StAR is also stimulated by a cAMP analog, and SF-1 plays a role in controlling the cAMP-stimulated promoter activity (16). DAX-1 is one of the transcription factors that suppresses StAR gene promoter activity (26, 38), although the mechanism of suppression is not clear. DAX-1 has been reported to regulate human StAR gene transcription by binding to a hairpin structure in the proximal promoter, causing allosteric inhibition of the binding site of SF-1 (26). It has also been reported that DAX-1 interacts directly with SF-1 and inhibits the transcriptional activity of SF-1 (34, 35, 39). 8-Bromo-cAMP-stimulated synthesis of human StAR mRNA in human ovarian cells was inhibited by cycloheximide (37, 40), suggesting that newly synthesized proteins are required for cAMP-stimulated StAR gene transcription. The transcriptional activity of SF-1 appears to require direct interaction with other transcription factors. Indeed, SF-1 has been shown to interact with Sp1 to control human StAR expression (29). Although cAMP-induced promoter activity was not completely inhibited by 2 µg of the transfected RIP 140 expression vector, the RIP 140 expression vector transfected into Y-1 cells, which have endogenous SF-1, decreased basal and cAMP-stimulated human StAR promoter activities with increasing amounts of the RIP 140 vector. Interaction of other factors with RIP 140 is needed to repress the cAMP-induced StAR promoter activity. Although RIP 140 did not affect cAMP induction of the human promoter activity, StAR promoter activity decreased after cotransfection of RIP 140 and SF-1 expression vectors into COS-1 cells, which do not express SF-1. Thus, the inhibitory effect of RIP 140 on the human StAR promoter activity is dependent on the presence of SF-1.

When transfected with the DAX-1 expression vectors alone, basal and cAMP-stimulated promoter activities of pTKLuc4xSF-1 were not repressed at a low concentration of the transfected plasmid. Our results are consistent with the reported finding that DAX-1 is incapable of repressing SF-1 action through a single SF-1 site even though SF-1 trans-activation is present (41). When transfected with the DAX-1 or RIP 140 expression vector alone, cAMP-stimulated promoter activity of pTKLuc4xSF-1 was ablated at a high concentration of the transfected plasmid. However, the cAMP-stimulated promoter activity was inhibited when both RIP 140 and DAX-1 expression plasmids were cotransfected at low concentrations. These results demonstrate a functional significance of RIP 140, SF-1, and DAX-1 interactions in terms of control of human StAR promoter activity.

A coactivator is defined as a molecule that interacts with nuclear receptors and enhances their promoter activities, whereas a corepressor is defined as a molecule that lowers transcription. RIP 140 can function as an activator or a repressor depending on the cell environment, the interacting nuclear receptor, and the promoter. RIP 140 has a biphasic effect on ER-mediated reporter gene expression. At a low level of RIP 140, transcription of an ER gene increased, but it was strongly suppressed at high levels of RIP 140 plasmid (1). Our results are consistent with those findings, in that StAR promoter activity was increased when small amounts of RIP 140 plasmid were transfected, but was inhibited when a large amount of RIP 140 plasmids was transfected. RIP 140 suppressed the promoter activity in the basal and cAMP-stimulated states in a dose-dependent manner in Y-1 cells, which have endogenous SF-1. However, in COS-1 cells, which do not have endogenous SF-1, RIP 140 did not inhibit StAR promoter activity. With increasing amounts of RIP 140 and DAX-1 plasmids, cAMP-stimulated promoter activity was inhibited at lower concentrations than when RIP 140 or DAX-1 was transfected alone. This synergism may be due to inhibition of SF-1 function by the enhanced action of DAX-1. On the other hand, at lower plasmid concentrations, basal promoter activity was increased, possibly because RIP 140 stimulated SF-1 trans-activity action and prevented the inhibitory action of DAX-1.

In conclusion, the present study has provided evidence of physical interaction between RIP 140, SF-1, and DAX-1 and evidence of a role of these interactions in the control of human StAR gene transcription. The effects of RIP 140 on StAR promoter activity are dose dependent and dependent on the presence of SF-1.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Dr. Jerome F. Strauss III (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) for his critical reading of this manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: aa, Amino acids; GAD, GAL4-activating domain; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; nt, nucleotides; StAR, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein.

Received December 20, 2000.

Accepted for publication April 6, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Cavailles V, Dauvois S, L’Horset F, et al. 1995 Nuclear factor RIP 140 modulates transcriptional activation by the estrogen receptor. EMBO J 14:3741–51[Medline]
  2. Cavailles V, Dauvois S, Danielian PS, Parker MG 1994 Interaction of proteins with transcriptionally active estrogen receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:10009–10013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. L’Horset F, Dauvois S, Heery DM, Cavailles V, Parker MG 1996 RIP-140 interacts with multiple nuclear receptors by means of two distinct sites. Mol Cell Biol 16:6029–6036[Abstract]
  4. Joyeux A, Cavailles V, Balaguer P, Nicolas JC 1997 RIP 140 enhances nuclear receptor-dependent transcription in vivo in yeast. Mol Endocrinol 11:193–202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ikonen T, Palvimo JJ, Janne OA 1997 Interaction between the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of the rat androgen receptor modulates transcriptional activity and is influenced by nuclear receptor coactivators. J Biol Chem 272:29821–29828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lee CH, Wei LN 1999 Characterization of receptor-interacting protein 140 in retinoid receptor activities. J Biol Chem 274:31320–31326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Lee CH, Chinpaisal C, Wei LN 1998 Cloning and characterization of mouse RIP 140, a corepressor for nuclear orphan receptor TR2. Mol Cell Biol 18:6745–6755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Mellon SH, Bair SR 1998 25-Hydroxycholesterol is not a ligand for the orphan nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1). Endocrinology 139:3026–3029[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Stocco DM, Clark BJ 1996 Regulation of the acute production of steroids in steroidogenic cells. Endocr Rev 17:221–244[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Parker KL, Schimmer BP 1995 Transcriptional regulation of the genes encoding the cytochrome P-450 steroid hydroxylases. Vitam Horm 51:339–370[Medline]
  11. Morohashi K, Hatano O, Nomura M, Takayama K, Hara M, Yoshii H, Takakusu A, Omura T 1995 Function and distribution of a steroidogenic cell-specific transcription factor, Ad4BP. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 53:81–88[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Zhang P, Mellon SH 1996 The orphan nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor-1 regulates the cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate-mediated transcriptional activation of rat cytochrome P450c17 (17{alpha}-hydroxylase/c17–20 lyase). Mol Endocrinol 10:147–158[Abstract]
  13. Lin D, Sugawara T, Strauss III JF, et al. 1995 Role of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein in adrenal and gonadal steroidogenesis. Science 267:1828–1831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Caron KM, Ikeda Y, Soo SC, Stocco DM, Parker KL, Clark BJ 1997 Characterization of the promoter region of the mouse gene encoding the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. Mol Endocrinol 11:138–147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Sugawara T, Lin D, Holt JA, et al. 1995 Structure of the human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene: StAR stimulates mitochondrial cholesterol 27-hydroxylase activity. Biochemistry 34:12506–12512[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Sugawara T, Holt JA, Kiriakidou M, Strauss III JF 1996 Steroidogenic factor 1-dependent promoter activity of the human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene. Biochemistry 35:9052–9059[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. LaVoie HA, Garmey JC, Veldhuis JD 1999 Mechanisms of insulin-like growth factor I augmentation of follicle-stimulating hormone-induced porcine steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene promoter activity in granulosa cells. Endocrinology 140:146–153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Muscatelli F, Strom TM, Walker AP, et al. 1994 Mutations in the DAX-1 gene give rise to both X-linked adrenal hypoplasia congenita and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Nature 372:672–676[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Zanaria E, Muscatelli F, Bardoni B, et al. 1994 An unusual member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily responsible for X-linked adrenal hypoplasia congenita. Nature 372:635–641[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Bourguet W, Ruff M, Chambon P, Gronemeyer H, Moras D 1995 Crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain of the human nuclear receptor RXR-{alpha}. Nature 375:377–382[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Swain A, Zanaria E, Hacker A, Lovell-Badge R, Camerino G 1996 Mouse Dax1 expression is consistent with a role in sex determination as well as in adrenal and hypothalamus function. Nat Genet 12:404–409[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Zhang YH, Guo W, Wagner RL, et al. 1998 DAX1 mutations map to putative structural domains in a deduced three-dimensional model. Am J Hum Genet 62:855–864[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Wagner RL, Apriletti JW, McGrath ME, West BL, Baxter JD, Fletterick RJ 1995 A structural role for hormone in the thyroid hormone receptor. Nature 378:690–697[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Tamai KT, Monaco L, Alastalo TP, Lalli E, Parvinen M, Sassone-Corsi P 1996 Hormonal and developmental regulation of DAX-1 expression in Sertoli cells. Mol Endocrinol 10:1561–1569[Abstract]
  25. Ikeda Y, Swain A, Weber TJ, et al. 1996 Steroidogenic factor 1 and Dax-1 colocalize in multiple cell lineages: potential links in endocrine development. Mol Endocrinol 10:1261–1272[Abstract]
  26. Zazopoulos E, Lalli E, Stocco DM, Sassone-Corsi P 1997 DNA binding and transcriptional repression by DAX-1 blocks steroidogenesis. Nature 390:311–315[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Lalli E, Melner MH, Stocco DM, Sassone-Corsi P 1998 DAX-1 blocks steroid production at multiple levels. Endocrinology 139:4237–4243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sugawara T, Holt JA, Driscoll D, et al. 1995 Human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein: functional activity in COS-1 cells, tissue-specific expression, and mapping of the structural gene to 8p11.2 and a pseudogene to chromosome 13. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:4778–82[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Sugawara T, Saito M, Fujimoto S 2000 Sp1 and SF-1 interact and cooperate in the regulation of human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene expression. Endocrinology 141:2895–2903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Sugawara T, Kiriakidou M, McAllister JM, Kallen CB, Strauss III JF 1997 Multiple steroidogenic factor 1 binding elements in the human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene 5'-flanking region are required for maximal promoter activity and cyclic AMP responsiveness. Biochemistry 36:7249–7255[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Nishi Y, Yanase T, Mu YM, et al. 2001 Establishment and characterization of a steroidogenic human granulosa-like tumor cell line, KGN, that expresses functional follicle-stimulating hormone receptor. Endocrinology 142:437–445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Lala DS, Rice DA, Parker KL 1992 Steroidogenic factor I, a key regulator of steroidogenic enzyme expression, is the mouse homolog of fushi tarazu-factor I. Mol Endocrinol 6:1249–1258[Abstract]
  33. Parker KL, Schimmer BP 1997 Steroidogenic factor 1: a key determinant of endocrine development and function. Endocr Rev 18:361–377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Crawford PA, Dorn C, Sadovsky Y, Milbrandt J 1998 Nuclear receptor DAX-1 recruits nuclear receptor corepressor N-CoR to steroidogenic factor 1. Mol Cell Biol 18:2949–2956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Nachtigal MW, Hirokawa Y, Enyeart-VanHouten DL, Flanagan JN, Hammer GD, Ingraham HA 1998 Wilms’ tumor 1 and Dax-1 modulate the orphan nuclear receptor SF-1 in sex-specific gene expression. Cell 93:445–454[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Strauss III JF, Kallen CB, Christenson LK, et al. 1999 The steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR): a window into the complexities of intracellular cholesterol trafficking. Recent Prog Horm Res 54:369–394
  37. Kiriakidou M, McAllister JM, Sugawara T, Strauss III JF 1996 Expression of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) in the human ovary. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:4122–4128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Lalli E, Bardoni B, Zazopoulos E, et al. 1997 A transcriptional silencing domain in DAX-1 whose mutation causes adrenal hypoplasia congenita. Mol Endocrinol 11:1950–1960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Ito M, Yu R, Jameson JL 1997 DAX-1 inhibits SF-1-mediated transactivation via a carboxy-terminal domain that is deleted in adrenal hypoplasia congenita. Mol Cell Biol 17:1476–1483[Abstract]
  40. Clark BJ, Soo SC, Caron KM, Ikeda Y, Parker KL, Stocco DM 1995 Hormonal and developmental regulation of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. Mol Endocrinol 9:1346–1355[Abstract]
  41. Hanley NA, Rainey WE, Wilson DI, Ball SG, Parker KL 2001 Expression profiles of SF-1, DAX1, and CYP17 in the human fetal adrenal gland: potential interactions in gene regulation. Mol Endocrinol 15:57–68[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
T. Sugawara, E. Nomura, and N. Hoshi
Cholesterol sulphate affects production of steroid hormones by reducing steroidogenic acute regulatory protein level in adrenocortical cells
J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 195(3): 451 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. R. Cederroth, O. Schaad, P. Descombes, P. Chambon, J.-D. Vassalli, and S. Nef
Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Is a Major Contributor to Estrogen-Mediated Fetal Testis Dysgenesis and Cryptorchidism
Endocrinology, November 1, 2007; 148(11): 5507 - 5519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
T. Sugawara, N. Sakuragi, and H. Minakami
CREM confers cAMP responsiveness in human steroidogenic acute regulatory protein expression in NCI-H295R cells rather than SF-1/Ad4BP.
J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2006; 191(1): 327 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. Carascossa, J. Gobinet, V. Georget, A. Lucas, E. Badia, A. Castet, R. White, J.-C. Nicolas, V. Cavailles, and S. Jalaguier
Receptor-Interacting Protein 140 Is a Repressor of the Androgen Receptor Activity
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2006; 20(7): 1506 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. A. Helguero, M. Hedengran Faulds, C. Forster, J.-A. Gustafsson, and L.-A. Haldosen
DAX-1 Expression Is Regulated during Mammary Epithelial Cell Differentiation
Endocrinology, July 1, 2006; 147(7): 3249 - 3259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
P. Augereau, E. Badia, M. Fuentes, F. Rabenoelina, M. Corniou, D. Derocq, P. Balaguer, and V. Cavailles
Transcriptional Regulation of the Human NRIP1/RIP140 Gene by Estrogen Is Modulated by Dioxin Signalling
Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 69(4): 1338 - 1346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. N. Winnay, J. Xu, B. W. O'Malley, and G. D. Hammer
Steroid Receptor Coactivator-1-Deficient Mice Exhibit Altered Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Function
Endocrinology, March 1, 2006; 147(3): 1322 - 1332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Mutoh, J. Taketoh, K. Okamura, T. Kagawa, T. Ishida, Y. Ishii, and H. Yamada
Fetal Pituitary Gonadotropin as an Initial Target of Dioxin in Its Impairment of Cholesterol Transportation and Steroidogenesis in Rats
Endocrinology, February 1, 2006; 147(2): 927 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
B. F. Clem and B. J. Clark
Association of the mSin3A-Histone Deacetylase 1/2 Corepressor Complex with the Mouse Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Gene
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2006; 20(1): 100 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. N. Winnay and G. D. Hammer
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone-Mediated Signaling Cascades Coordinate a Cyclic Pattern of Steroidogenic Factor 1-Dependent Transcriptional Activation
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2006; 20(1): 147 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Castet, A. Boulahtouf, G. Versini, S. Bonnet, P. Augereau, F. Vignon, S. Khochbin, S. Jalaguier, and V. Cavailles
Multiple domains of the Receptor-Interacting Protein 140 contribute to transcription inhibition
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2004; 32(6): 1957 - 1966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
H. Hiroi, L. K. Christenson, L. Chang, M. D. Sammel, S. L. Berger, and J. F. Strauss III
Temporal and Spatial Changes in Transcription Factor Binding and Histone Modifications at the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein (StAR) Locus Associated with StAR Transcription
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2004; 18(4): 791 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. J. Thompson, S. M. Ross, and K. W. Gaido
Di(n-Butyl) Phthalate Impairs Cholesterol Transport and Steroidogenesis in the Fetal Rat Testis through a Rapid and Reversible Mechanism
Endocrinology, March 1, 2004; 145(3): 1227 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
B. Borud, G. Mellgren, J. Lund, and M. Bakke
Cloning and Characterization of a Novel Zinc Finger Protein that Modulates the Transcriptional Activity of Nuclear Receptors
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2003; 17(11): 2303 - 2319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]