| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
-Induced Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription-1 Activation and Expression of the Inducible Isoform of Nitric Oxide Synthase in INS-1 Cells
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Nobuo Sekine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tokyo School of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. E-mail: nobuosek-tky{at}umin.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and TNF
synergistically induce the inducible
isoform of nitric oxide synthase and elicit severe cytotoxicity in
pancreatic ß-cells. We demonstrate here that GH, the well known
ß-cell mitogen, inhibits nitric oxide production by reducing
inducible nitric oxide synthase gene induction by the two cytokines and
counteracts their cytotoxic effect in insulin-secreting INS-1 cells. To
elucidate the underlying mechanism, we examined activation of the
transcription factors implicated in the induction of inducible nitric
oxide synthase, signal transducer and activator of transcription-1, and
nuclear factor-
B. GH inhibited tyrosine phosphorylation and DNA
binding of signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 promoted
by interferon-
, whereas nuclear factor-
B activation by TNF
was
not affected by GH. GH was found to induce suppressor of cytokine
signaling-1 and -3, both of which are able to inhibit interferon-
activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription-1,
suggesting that they are likely to mediate the inhibitory action of GH.
Finally, exposure of INS-1 cells to interferon-
resulted in the
impairment of insulin secretion in response to glucose, which was
restored by the addition of GH. These results indicate that GH
counteracts the effect of interferon-
through the inhibition of
signal transducer and activator of transcription-1. This action of GH
may be sufficient to suppress the synergistic induction of inducible
nitric oxide synthase by interferon-
and TNF
, thereby preventing
the cytotoxicity to ß-cells. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent investigations on cytokine signaling have established the Janus
kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)
pathway as the major signaling paradigm for a number of cytokines,
including GH and PRL (10, 11). It has been shown that GH
activates JAK2 followed by the activation of some STAT proteins (STAT1,
STAT3, and STAT5) according to its target cell type (11).
On the other hand, interferon-
(IFN
), an inhibitory cytokine for
ß-cells (12), activates both JAK1 and JAK2, followed by
the activation of STAT1 (10). It is well known that
IFN
, especially in combination with other cytokines, such as IL-1ß
and TNF
, elicits severe cytotoxicity in ß-cells
(13, 14, 15). These cytokines are capable of producing nitric
oxide (NO) by stimulating the expression of the inducible isoform of NO
synthase (iNOS) in ß-cells, the event implicated in the ß-cell
damage (16).
Considering the similarity in the signaling mechanisms, despite the
opposing biological effects of GH and IFN
on ß-cells, we
hypothesize that there may be an interaction between their signaling
pathways. Thus in the present study we examined whether GH is capable
of preventing the deleterious effect of IFN
, using a rat
insulin-secreting cell line. INS-1 (17), the
differentiated features of which have been well characterized
(17, 18, 19). We have previously shown that GH and PRL, both
of which stimulate cell growth and insulin biosynthesis, activate JAK2
in this cell line (9). Moreover, the effects of IFN
in
INS-1 cells (20, 21) are consistent with those reported in
other insulin-secreting cells, especially human islet cells (14, 22), in that IFN
alone inhibits glucose-induced insulin
secretion and, in combination with TNF
, elicits ß-cell
cytotoxicity.
We demonstrate here that GH counteracts the cytotoxic effect by IFN
and TNF
through the inhibition of NO production as well as of iNOS
induction by these cytokines. Our results suggest that this effect is
probably mediated by the inhibition of IFN
-activated STAT1 by GH,
and that this inhibitory action of GH may be sufficient to abolish the
synergism by IFN
and TNF
. We also show that GH induces the gene
expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins, the
negative regulators of STAT proteins, which might mediate the
inhibitory effect of GH on IFN
-induced STAT1 activation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
was purchased from Genzyme
Diagnostics (Cambridge, MA), and recombinant murine TNF
was obtained
from R & D Systems (Funakoshi, Tokyo, Japan). Monoclonal antibodies against phosphorylated tyrosine (4G10) and STAT1 were from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc." (Lake Placid, NY), and
specific cDNA probe for mouse macrophage iNOS was purchased from Cayman
Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI).
[
-32P]Deoxy-CTP,
[
-32P]ATP, and
[methyl-3H]thymidine were
obtained from Amersham International (Little Chalfont,
UK). The One Step RT-PCR kit (avian myeloblastosis virus) was purchased
from TaKaRa (Otsu, Japan).
Cell culture
INS-1 cells were cultured in the complete medium (CM) composed
of RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10 mM HEPES, 10%
heat-inactivated FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100
U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, 1 mM sodium
pyruvate, and 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol as previously
reported (17).
[3H]Thymidine incorporation
Cells (2 x 104 cells/microwell) were
cultured in CM for 2 d and incubated for 72 h with 100 U/ml
IFN
plus 50 ng/ml TNF
in the absence or presence of 5
nM GH. During the final 24 h, 0.5 µCi/well
[methyl-3H]thymidine was added
to the medium. The labeled cells were lysed in 0.1% SDS and
precipitated in 20% trichloroacetic acid containing 0.8 mg/ml BSA. The
pellet was resuspended in 0.2 M NaOH, and
radioactivity was measured with a liquid scintillation counter.
Measurement of nitrite production
INS-1 cells were incubated for 48 h in a defined serum-free
medium (SFM) composed of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 0.65
nM IGF-I, T3, ethanolamine,
phosphoethanolamine, and 0.1% human albumin (19) in the
absence or presence of 5 nM GH. Nitrite production in the
culture medium was determined colorimetrically using a commercial
Griess reagent assay kit (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan).
Optical density was measured using a microplate reader (model 3550,
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA), and the
absolute values were calculated according to the manufacturers
instructions (Dojindo).
Northern blotting
INS-1 cells (107 cells/dish) were cultured
in CM for 5 d before an overnight culture in a serum-free RPMI
1640 medium supplemented with 1% BSA. Cells were then incubated in SFM
for 6 h with 100 U recombinant murine IFN
and/or 50 ng/ml
recombinant murine TNF
in the absence or presence of 5
nM GH. Total RNA was extracted by the acid guanidium
thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method (24). Northern
blotting was performed by a standard protocol using a specific cDNA
probe for mouse macrophage iNOS labeled by Megaprime kit
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The blots were reprobed with
32P-labeled glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA as an internal standard to ensure equal
loading of RNA.
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting
Cells (107 cells/dish) were cultured
as described for Northern blotting. After removal of the culture
medium, cells were washed twice with the modified Krebs-Ringer
bicarbonate-HEPES buffer (KRBH) containing 140 mM NaCl, 3.6
mM KCl, 0.5 mM
NaH2PO4, 0.5 mM
MgSO4, 1.5 mM
CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 2
mM NaHCO3, 0.1% BSA, and 3
mM glucose. Cells were then preincubated in the same buffer
for 30 min and stimulated with the cytokines for 15 min at 37 C in the
absence or presence of 5 nM GH. After two washes with PBS,
whole cell lysates were prepared in the lysis buffer composed of 20
mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 30 mM sodium fluoride, 30
mM sodium pyrophosphate, 2 mM EDTA, 2
mM EGTA, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 1%
Triton X-100, 1% deoxycholate, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, and 2 mM sodium
orthovanadate. Cell lysates were sonicated briefly and centrifuged at
12,000 x g for 60 min. For immunoprecipitation,
supernatants were incubated with the monoclonal anti-STAT1 antibody by
rotating end over end overnight at 4 C. The immune complex was then
precipitated by incubation for 60 min at 4 C with protein G-Sepharose
beads (Pharmacia Biotech Europe, Brussels, Belgium), and
eluted by boiling in SDS-sample buffer for 5 min. All samples were
subjected to 7.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane
(Schleicher & Schuell, Inc., Dassel, Germany). After
blocking with Tris-buffered saline containing 1% BSA for 120 min, the
nitrocellulose membrane was incubated at 4 C overnight in the same
buffer with monoclonal antibodies against phosphorylated tyrosine
(4G10). Blots were washed, exposed to horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
goat antimouse IgG (Sigma) for 90 min, and detected by the
enhanced chemiluminescence kit according to the manufacturers
instructions (Amersham Life Science, Little Chalfont, UK).
EMSA
INS-1 cells were cultured and stimulated as described for
immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. Nuclear extracts were
prepared from the cells as previously described (25). Two
synthetic double-strand oligonucleotides were end-labeled with
[
-32P]ATP by T4 polynucleotide kinase
(Takara, Japan) and used as probes. These represent the
IFN
-activated site (GAS) in the iNOS gene promoter,
5'-CTTTTCCCCT-AACAC-3' (26), and the consensus nuclear
factor-
B (NF-
B) binding sequence (
B site),
5'-GATCCC-AACGGCAGGGGAATTCCCCTCTCC-3' (27). EMSA was
performed according to a method described previously (28).
The probe (104 cpm) was incubated with 10 µg of
the nuclear protein along with 1 µg poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC)
(Pharmacia Biotech) in each reaction for 30 min at room
temperature. DNA-protein complexes were resolved on 4% nondenaturing
acrylamide gels, dried, and visualized by autoradiography.
RT-PCR for the detection of SOCS mRNA
INS-1 cells were incubated and total RNA was extracted as
described for Northern blotting. Total RNA (1 µg), which was treated
by deoxyribonuclease I for 2 h, was reverse transcribed with avian
myeloblastosis virus-derived reverse transcriptase. Sequences of the
forward and reverse primers to detect rat SOCS proteins were: SOCS1,
5'-CCGCTCCCACTCTGATTACCG-3' and 5'-AGTGCTCCAGCAGCTCGAAGA-3'; SOCS2,
5'-GCGAGAGACTTTGCCATACCA-3' and 5'-AGAATCCAATCTGAATTTCCCG-3'; and
SOCS3, 5'-ACCGTTGACAGTCTTCCGACA-3' and 5'-GCCTCAAGACCTTCAGCTCCA-3'. In
addition, the expression of GAPDH was examined as a control using
the following primers: GAP1, 5'-GGAGCCAAAAGGGTCATCATC-3'; and GAP2,
5'-AGAGGCAGGGATGATGTTCTG-3'. The PCR condition was one cycle at 94
C for 2 min; 27 cycles at 94 C for 30 sec, at 63 C for 30 sec, and at
72 C for 30 sec; and one cycle at 72 C for 7 min. PCR products were
analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.
Static incubation for determination of insulin secretion and the
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 tetrazolium bromide colorimetric
assay
INS-1 cells (
5 x 104 cells/well)
were seeded in 96-well microtiter plates coated with
poly-L-ornithine (Sigma), cultured for 3
d in CM, and incubated for 24 h in the absence or presence of 100
U/ml IFN
and/or 5 nM GH. The culture medium was removed,
and cells were washed twice with KRBH containing 3 mM
glucose. Cells were then preincubated in the same buffer for 30 min at
37 C, followed by a 30-min incubation in KRBH containing 3 or 15
mM glucose. After the incubation, the
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 tetrazolium bromide colorimetric assay
(18) was performed by incubating the cells for an
additional 30 min. Cellular insulin content was measured by RIA after
acid-ethanol extraction using rat insulin as standard.
Statistics
Results are presented as the mean ± SEM for
the number of preparations given in parentheses. Statistical
significance was determined by unpaired t test. In case of
multiple comparisons, data were evaluated by one-way ANOVA followed by
post-hoc Scheffé analysis. Differences between
experimental and control groups were considered significant at
P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
TNF
and TNF
. Addition of 5
nM GH to SFM resulted in an increase in
[3H]thymidine incorporation by approximately
70% (Fig. 1
and 50 ng/ml TNF
markedly decreased
[3H]thymidine incorporation, whereas either
cytokine alone had no effect (Fig. 1
60%) restored (Fig. 1
|
and TNF
and
50 ng/ml TNF
for 48 h resulted in a marked increase in nitrite
production, whereas neither cytokine alone affected nitrite production
from INS-1 cells (Fig. 2
nor TNF
alone induces the iNOS
gene (21), nitrite production appeared to occur in
parallel with the induction of iNOS mRNA. Addition of 5 nM
GH significantly inhibited nitrite production stimulated by the two
cytokines (Fig. 2
and TNF
(Fig. 3
|
|
-induced tyrosine phosphorylation and DNA
binding of STAT1 in INS-1 cells
-inducible genes (29), including iNOS
(30). We therefore examined the effects of GH on the
IFN
-induced activation of STAT1 in INS-1 cells by both
immunoblotting as well as EMSA. GH itself did not induce tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT1 (not shown), but inhibited the STAT1
phosphorylation promoted by IFN
after a 15-min exposure (Fig. 4
was confirmed by EMSA, which showed the binding of
nuclear proteins to iNOS GAS (Fig. 5A
in both the
absence (Fig. 5A
.
|
|
-induced DNA binding of NF-
B in INS-1
cells
B, another transcription factor that has been implicated in the
iNOS induction (30). TNF
promoted the DNA binding of
nuclear proteins to the consensus NF-
B binding site (Fig. 5B
B binding was not
affected by an addition of GH (Fig. 5B
Effects of GH and IFN
on SOCS mRNA expression in INS-1 cells
Recent investigations have identified a new family of
proteins that inhibit cytokine signaling (32, 33, 34). SOCS1
and SOCS3 are such proteins; their expression has been reported to be
induced by GH in 3T3-F442 fibroblasts as well as in murine hepatocytes
in vivo (35). Moreover, both SOCS1 and SOCS3
have been shown to inhibit IFN
signaling pathways in cells
(36). We therefore examined the expression of the SOCS
proteins, including SOCS2 in INS-1 cells, by RT-PCR to investigate
whether the inhibitory effect of GH on the IFN
-induced STAT1
activation could be mediated by any of these proteins. After 30 min of
incubation, GH induced the mRNA expression of all three SOCS proteins
(Fig. 6
, lane b). Interestingly, as shown
by this semiquantitative analysis with RT-PCR, GH seemed to augment the
SOCS1 induction by IFN
(Fig. 6
, upper panel,
lanes c and d). There was a weak induction of the SOCS2 mRNA both by GH
(Fig. 6
, middle panel, lane b) and IFN
(Fig. 6
, middle panel, lane d); again, their effects appeared to be
additive. On the contrary, GH (Fig. 6
, lower panel, lane b)
as well as IFN
(Fig. 6
, lower panel, lane d) clearly
increased the expression of SOCS3 mRNA, although, in contrast to
SOCS1and SOCS2, there was no additive effect when cells were stimulated
simultaneously with GH and IFN
(Fig. 6
, lower panel, lane
c).
|

, but not that of TNF
, in inhibiting NO production and DNA
synthesis by these cytokines. We therefore examined the effect of GH on
glucose-induced insulin secretion in INS-1 cells, which has been shown
to be impaired by exposure to IFN
(21). Exposure of
INS-1 cells to 100 U/ml IFN
for 24 h indeed resulted in
approximately 50% reduction of insulin secretion in response to
glucose (Fig. 7
maintained the glucose
responsiveness of INS-1 cells to secrete insulin (Fig. 7
alone (Fig. 7
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and IFN
, on pancreatic ß-cells
(12, 16). NO generated through the induction of iNOS in
the cell may cause inhibition of mitochondrial metabolism, protein
modification, and DNA cleavage (16, 37, 38), all of which
could lead to ß-cell death. We show here that exposure of INS-1 cells
to IFN
and TNF
resulted in a severe impairment of DNA synthesis
in parallel with NO production, both of which were partially restored
by the addition of GH. Thus, the protective effect of GH on INS-1 cells
exposed to the cytokines could be explained at least partly by the
inhibition of NO production.
It is well known that IFN
, which by itself has little effect on the
iNOS expression, synergistically induces iNOS in combination with
TNF
in various cell types, including ß-cells (13, 14, 15, 22). The induction of iNOS gene is regulated by
cytokine-activated transcription factors that bind to each specific
site in the promoter of the iNOS gene (30, 39). Activation
of NF-
B is believed to be an essential step for the TNF
-induced
iNOS expression (40, 41). It has been shown that the
inhibition of NF-
B decreases the cytokine-induced expression of iNOS
in insulin-secreting cells (21, 40). Similarly, the
requirement of IFN
-activated transcription factors, interferon
regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) (42) as well as STAT1
(21), for the induction of iNOS by IFN
has been
reported. The promoter of the mouse iNOS gene, in fact, contains
binding sites for both NF-
B and IFN
-responsive transcription
factors, including STAT1 (39). Interestingly, the
activation of either NF-
B or STAT1 alone is insufficient, but that
of both factors is required, for full induction of iNOS gene
(21), suggesting that there may be interaction between
their activation pathways. In this study we have shown that GH
inhibited both tyrosine phosphorylation and DNA binding of STAT1,
whereas DNA binding of NF-
B was not affected. It is therefore likely
that the inhibitory effect of GH on iNOS gene expression is via the
inhibition of STAT1 activation by IFN
, but not via that of NF-
B
by TNF
.
To elucidate the mechanism mediating the inhibition of STAT1 by
GH, we investigated the expression of SOCS proteins, the negative
regulator of the JAK-STAT pathway (35, 36). A number of
related proteins have recently been identified and also referred to as
cytokine-inducible SH2-containing proteins (43), JAK2
binding protein (33), or STAT-induced STAT inhibitors
(34). These proteins have been shown to bind directly to
JAKs or to interact with tyrosine-phosphorylated STATs or cytokine
receptors. Our results indicate that GH indeed up-regulates the
expression of SOCS1, SOCS2, and SOCS3. Of these SOCS members, both
SOCS1 and SOCS3, but not SOCS2, are capable of inhibiting STAT1
phosphorylation by IFN
(36, 44). It has been shown that
SOCS1 efficiently inhibits IFN
activation of JAK1 and Tyk2 by
directly binding these tyrosine kinases (36). On the
contrary, SOCS3, which binds to receptor-specific sequences, does not
strongly inhibit IFN
signaling (36). Moreover, the
present study shows that GH appears to augment the SOCS1 mRNA
expression induced by IFN
. It should therefore be reasonable to
suppose that GH may inhibit IFN
activation of STAT1 mainly by
enhancing the induction of SOCS1.
With respect to SOCS3, similar findings have recently been reported in
monocytes, where IL-10 inhibits the expression of IFN
-induced genes
by suppressing tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1 (44).
Expression of the SOCS3 gene, which is induced in response to IL-10, is
considered to mediate this action. Moreover, lipopolysaccharide (LPS)
also induces SOCS3, thereby inhibiting STAT1 activation by IFN
in
Bac1.2F5 macrophages (45). In this context, the effect of
LPS is interesting, because LPS decreases tyrosine phosphorylation of
JAK1, but has no effect on JAK2. We have previously shown that GH
clearly promotes JAK2 tyrosine phosphorylation, whereas IFN
fails to
phosphorylate JAK2, but induces JAK1 phosphorylation in INS-1 cells
(21). Taken together, it is also possible that SOCS3
activated by GH inhibits IFN
-induced JAK1 activation in INS-1
cells.
The counteraction of GH against the effect of IFN
is also
demonstrated in this study for the restoration of glucose-induced
insulin secretion. After a 24-h exposure to IFN
, INS-1 cells show
blunted insulin secretion. This can be ascribed to impairment of
glucose metabolism in the mitochondria (21), which
generates metabolic coupling factors to elicit exocytosis of insulin
granules (46). The underlying mechanism for this effect of
IFN
remains unknown. The results of this study suggest that STAT1
may mediate this effect, and that the inhibition of STAT1 by GH could
lead to the restoration of insulin secretory function. Alternatively,
the action of GH that retains cellular metabolism in the ß-cell
(9) might be related.
In conclusion, we demonstrate in this study a novel anticytokine effect
of GH, which counteracts the induction of iNOS as well as the
inhibition of insulin secretion by IFN
in ß-cells. This effect is
probably mediated by the inhibition of IFN
-induced STAT1 activation
through the induction of the SOCS proteins, especially SOCS1.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: CM, Complete medium; GAPDH,
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GAS, interferon-
-activated
site; IFN
, interferon-
; iNOS, inducible isoform of nitric
oxide synthase; IRF-1, interferon regulatory factor-1; JAK, Janus
kinase; KRBH, Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate-HEPES buffer; LPS,
lipopolysaccharide; NMMA,
NG-monomethyl-L-arginine;
NF-
B, nuclear factor-
B; NO, nitric oxide; SFM, defined serum-free
medium; SOCS, suppressor of cytokine signaling; STAT, signal transducer
and activator of transcription.
Received January 19, 2001.
Accepted for publication May 9, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, tumor necrosis factor, lymphotoxin, and
interleukin 1. Diabetes 37:133136[Abstract]
and interferon-
inhibit insulin
secretion and cause DNA damage in unweaned-rat islets: extent of nitric
oxide involvement. Diabetes 45:183189[Abstract]
inhibits insulin release and induces cell death in the pancreatic
ß-cell line INS-1 independently of nitric oxide production. Exp Cell
Res 237:217222[CrossRef][Medline]
B and inducible
isoform of nitric oxide synthase induction by interferon-
and tumor
necrosis factor-
in INS-1 cells. J Cell Physiol 184:4657[CrossRef][Medline]
-activated site (GAS) is necessary for
full expression of the mouse iNOS gene in response to
interferon-
and lipopolysaccharide. J Biol Chem 272:12261230
B interacts functionally with the
platelet-derived growth factor B-chain shear-stress response element in
vascular endothelial cells exposed to fluid shear stress. J Clin
Invest 96:11691175
: tyrosine phosphorylation
of a 91-kD DNA binding protein. Science 258:18081812
and bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J Exp
Med 177:17791784
B in the signaling mechanism.
Endocrinology 136:47904795[Abstract]
B (NF-
B) and induce nitric
oxide production in human pancreatic islets. FEBS Lett 385:46[CrossRef][Medline]
-induced interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1)
expression in rodent and human islet cells precedes nitric oxide
production. Endocrinology 138:27472753
- and
interferon
-induced genes by suppressing tyrosine phosphorylation of
STAT1. Blood 93:14561463
.
J Immunol 163:26402647This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Grasemann, F. Ratjen, D. Schnabel, E. Reutershahn, U. Vester, and H. Grasemann Effect of growth hormone therapy on nitric oxide formation in cystic fibrosis patients Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2008; 31(4): 815 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jensen, E. D Galsgaard, A. E Karlsen, Y. C Lee, and J. H Nielsen STAT5 activation by human GH protects insulin-producing cells against interleukin-1{beta}, interferon-{gamma} and tumour necrosis factor-{alpha}-induced apoptosis independent of nitric oxide production J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2005; 187(1): 25 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Brelje, L. E. Stout, N. V. Bhagroo, and R. L. Sorenson Distinctive Roles for Prolactin and Growth Hormone in the Activation of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5 in Pancreatic Islets of Langerhans Endocrinology, September 1, 2004; 145(9): 4162 - 4175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Chen, M. M.W. Chong, R. Darwiche, H. E. Thomas, and T. W.H. Kay Severe Pancreatitis with Exocrine Destruction and Increased Islet Neogenesis in Mice with Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling-1 Deficiency Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2004; 165(3): 913 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Ronn, J. A. Hansen, K. Lindberg, A. E. Karlsen, and N. Billestrup The Effect of Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 on GH Signaling in {beta}-Cells Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2002; 16(9): 2124 - 2134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |