help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cobellis, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fasano, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cobellis, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fasano, S.
Endocrinology Vol. 143, No. 1 163-170
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society


REPRODUCTION-DEVELOPMENT

Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Fos Protein Forms Regulate Resumption of Spermatogenesis in the Frog, Rana esculenta

Gilda Cobellis, Rosaria Meccariello, Giulia Fienga, Riccardo Pierantoni and Silvia Fasano

Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Sez. F. Bottazzi, II Università di Napoli, 80138 Naples, Italy

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Riccardo Pierantoni, Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Sez. F. Bottazzi, II Università di Napoli, Via Costantinopoli 16, 80138 Naples, Italy. E-mail: riccardo.pierantoni{at}unina2.it


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The role of Fos proteins in the regulation of germ cell progression during spermatogenesis has been studied in the frog, Rana esculenta. A peculiarity of this animal model is the finding of Fos in cytoplasmic compartment of primary spermatogonia during the resting period of the annual reproductive cycle. Interestingly, Fos is localized in the nuclear compartment when spermatogenesis resumes. Using Western blot analysis, we show that a 52-kDa Fos protein occurs in testicular cytosolic preparations, whereas two different Fos signals of 43 and 68 kDa are typical of the nuclear compartment. The 68-kDa Fos immunoreactive protein increases in nuclear extracts in concomitance with spermatogonia (SPG) proliferation either during the annual sexual cycle or in experimental animal groups where SPG proliferation was induced by thermal stimulus (24 C). Indeed, an increase in proliferating cell nuclear antigen was detectable after thermal induction of mitotic activity. A decrease in the 52-kDa signal and a concomitant increase in the 68-kDa signal is observed in testes of 24 C treated groups. The use of alkaline phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase inhibitors indicates that the 68-kDa protein is a phosphorylated form. Estrogens, which are able to induce SPG proliferation, are responsible for the appearance of the 43-kDa Fos form in nuclear testicular extracts. In conclusion, our results show, for the first time in a vertebrate species, that storage in the cytoplasm, on the one hand, and appearance as well as phosphorylation of Fos proteins in the nucleus of germ cells, on the other hand, regulate spermatogenesis progression during the seasonal breeding. Moreover, the phosphorylated 68-kDa Fos form may be involved in mechanisms underlying SPG proliferation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IT IS ACTUALLY accepted that estrogens regulate testicular activity in vertebrates (1). How E2 affects sperm production in mammals is still a matter of debate. In fact, {alpha}ER knockout ({alpha}ERKO) mice show impairment of sperm production, and this has been ascribed to a defect of luminal fluid reabsorption in the head of epididymis (2, 3). This seems to be proved by transplantation of spermatogonia (SPG) from {alpha}ERKO mice in normal animals deprived of germ cells (4). Results indicate that spermatogenesis arising from {alpha}ERKO spermatogonia is not disrupted; therefore, spermatogenic cells do not require {alpha}ER for development or function. However, a direct effect of estrogens on tubular compartment is also considered. Indeed, E2 restores spermatogenesis in hypogonadic mice (5), and ßER have been found in germ cells (6).

The use of nonmammalian vertebrate animal models has given insight into the mechanisms underlying spermatogenesis (1, 7, 8, 9). Several advantages can be ascribed to the use of these models. In particular, the presence of numerous seasonal breeder species allows the study of different stages of germ cells appearing progressively during the annual sexual cycle. Moreover, spermatogenesis occurs in cysts consisting of Sertoli cells enveloping germ cells at the synchronous stage (10); this allows an easy recognition of germ cell associations. Recently, we have used the frog, Rana esculenta, to localize protooncogene products appearing in the testis during the annual sexual cycle. R. esculenta is characterized, during the year, by a potentially continuous spermatogenesis (i.e. SPG never become refractory) (11) with a period of SPG proliferation (mid-winter, early spring) and a period in which spermatogenesis shuts down (late autumn, early winter) (12, 13). Interestingly, Fos protein immunoreactivity is localized in the cytoplasmic compartment of SPG during the resting period, whereas a nuclear localization is evidenced when spermatogenesis resumes (14); this process seems to be regulated by estrogens (15). Cytoplasmic localization of immediate-early gene products has also been described in other models, as, for example, during spermatogenesis in Vulpes vulpes (16), in cancer cells (17, 18), in ovine trophoblasts (19), in neuronal cells (20), and in Xenopus oocytes (21). Therefore, a change in the localization of Fos protein from the cytoplasm into the nucleus may switch on spermatogenesis. In this respect, possible differences in Fos forms between cytoplasm and nucleus can be hypothesized.

The scope of this paper was to determine whether these differences exist and to look at possible relationships with the progression of spermatogenesis. We describe the Fos protein profile in the testes of the frog, R. esculenta, during the annual sexual cycle. We show a 52-kDa Fos immunoreactive protein in cytosolic extracts, whereas two different Fos signals of 43 and 68 kDa are evidenced in the nuclear compartment. The 68-kDa signal increases in nuclear extracts concomitantly with the SPG proliferation period and also in animals in which SPG proliferation has been stimulated by thermal manipulation at 24 C. Experiments carried out using alkaline phosphatase (AP) and AP inhibitors indicate that the 68-kDa protein is a phosphorylated form. Furthermore, the thermal treatment suggests that this form derives from the 52-kDa Fos protein. Finally, we indicate that the presence of the 43-kDa form in nuclear extract is induced by E2.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
This research was approved by the Italian Ministry of University and Scientific and Technological Research. Intact male frogs (R. esculenta) were captured near Naples, early in the afternoon. The animals for in vivo treatments were maintained in plastic tanks (50 x 25 x 17 cm) with food (meal worms) and water ad libitum. The frogs were killed under anesthesia with MS222 (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO), and testes were immediately stored at -80 C until processed for protein preparation.

Cytoplasmatic and nuclear protein extraction
Cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts were prepared by modifications of methods previously described (22). Briefly, 100 mg testis tissue were gently homogenized using a type B pestle in 0.7 vol buffer [10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 12% glycerol, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 0.5 mM spermidine] in the presence of protease inhibitors [4 µg/ml leupeptin, aprotinin, pepstatin A, chymostatin, phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF), and 5 µg/ml N-{alpha}-p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)]. After centrifugation at 800 x g, the supernatant was removed and centrifuged on glycerol at 100,000 x g for 1 h at 4 C to obtain cytosolic extracts. The nuclear pellet (presence and purity of the nuclei were checked under a microscope), washed three times, was resuspended with 1.2 vol (1.2 µl/mg pellet) of buffer [10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 420 mM NaCl, 15% glycerol, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM DTT, and 2 mM spermidine] in the presence of protease inhibitors and mix at 4 C for 30 min. Nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 30 min at 4 C. The supernatants, containing nuclear proteins, were collected. Protein concentrations of cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts were determined using the Lowry assay (23).

Mouse-specific germ cell J protein [MSJ (24)], also available in R. esculenta (25), and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) were assayed to check for the absence of contamination (not shown). Indeed, the former is specifically available in the cytoplasm (26) and the latter in the nuclei (27) of testicular cells.

Western blot analysis
Proteins (25 µg/well) were separated by 8%, 10%, or 12% (depending on the case) SDS-PAGE and then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK) for 2.5 h at 280 mA and 4 C. The filters, stained by Ponceau S (Sigma, St. Quentinen- Yvelines, France) as the control of protein loading, were treated for 3 h to prevent nonspecific adsorption with blocking solution (5% nonfat powdered milk and 0.25% Tween 20 in Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.6) and finally incubated overnight at 4 C on orbital shaker with the primary antibody in a blocking solution lacking Tween 20. Anti-Fos and anti-PCNA were diluted 1:1000. The filters, washed three times in Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.6, containing 0.25% Tween 20, were incubated for 1 h with appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-IgG diluted 1:1000 (DAKO Corp., Copenhagen, Denmark) and then washed again. The immune complexes were detected using the ECL Western blotting detection system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The membranes, stripped at 60 C for 30 min in stripping buffer (100 mM 2-mercaptoetanol, 2% SDS, and 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6), were reprobed one time to check the specificity of immunoreaction using preadsorbed antibody with 10-6 M antigen.

Total protein extraction and immunoprecipitation
Frozen testes were homogenized in ice-cold lysis buffer [3 ml/g tissue 10 mM HEPES, (pH 7.9), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 420 mM NaCl, 15% glycerol, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM DTT, and 2 mM spermidine] in the presence of protease inhibitors (4 µg/ml leupeptin, aprotinin, pepstatin A, chymostatin, PMSF, and 5 µg/ml TPCK) and then centrifuged several times at 10,000 x g for 10 min at 4 C to obtain a clarified lysate. Then, 600 µg total protein were used for immunoprecipitation as follows: it was diluted by adding 10 vol RIPA buffer [PBS, pH 7.6 (9.1 mM Na2HPO4, 1.7 mM NaH2PO4, and 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS] and incubated with 10 µl primary anti-Fos antibody (0.2 µg/µl; sc-253-G, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) for 1 h at 4 C. The immunoprecipitation was carried out at 4 C on a rocker platform overnight, adding 20 µl of the appropriate immunoprecipitation reagent (0.25 µg/µl; Protein G-Plus-Agarose, sc-2002, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). Immunoprecipitates were pulled down by centrifugation at 1000 x g for 5 min at 4 C and washed four times with PBS, pH 7.6, each time repeating the centrifugation step. Finally, the pellet was dissolved in 20 µl electrophoresis sample buffer [80 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 10% glycerol, 4% SDS, 100 mM DTT, and 300 µg/ml bromophenol blue] and boiled for 5 min. Immunoprecipitates were separated through 8% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot using anti-Fos antibody (0.2 µg/µl; sc-253-G, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The negative control was obtained as described above using RIPA buffer instead of the primary antibody or instead of the total protein extract.

Antibody
Polyclonal anti c-Fos antibody (sc-253-G, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), used for Western blot and immunoprecipitation, was raised in goats against an acid sequence within a highly conserved domain in Fos family members (c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1, and Fra-2) of human origin, identical to corresponding mouse, rat, and chicken sequences (as reported in the manufacturer’s instructions).

Anti-PCNA (PC10; sc-56, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) was a mouse monoclonal antibody. It is reported in the manufacturer’s instruction that the antibody reacts with PCNA p36 protein of mouse, rat, human, insect, and yeast origin by Western blot.

The specificity of the Fos signals found by Western blot was tested by extinguishing the reaction with excess amount (10-6 M) of the cognate peptide (sc-253-P, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and through immunoprecipitation as described above.

Seasonal cycle
To detect Fos immunoreactivity, cytosolic and nuclear extracts were prepared from frog (n = 10/month) testes collected monthly for 1 yr and used for Western blot analysis. During the second year, the cycle was checked to perform in vivo and in vitro experiments.

Induction of spermatogonial proliferation by thermal treatment
The experiment was carried out in October, when SPG proliferation slows. Ten fresh animals were killed, whereas the remaining 20 animals were kept for 3 months at low temperature (4 C) and injected on alternate days with homologous hypophysis homogenate (100 µl amphibian Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer containing one third hypophysis equivalent per injection) in the dorsal sac. It is well known that this treatment empties the testis of meiotic cells, and only slow proliferating SPG cells are detectable (12, 13). After 3 months of treatment, 10 animals were killed, and 10 animals were treated for an additional week at 24 C with hypophysis homogenate to induce SPG proliferation. Testis fragments from control frogs and from 4- and 24 C-treated animals were prepared for routine histological observation (hematoxylin/eosin staining) to check germ cell stage composition. Furthermore, nuclear extracts were analyzed by Western blot for PCNA content to check the status of the cell cycle.

Dephosphorylation experiments
In the first experiment, nuclear proteins (140 µg), extracted from January testes, were incubated at 37 C in the presence of protease inhibitors (4 µg/ml leupeptin, aprotinin, pepstatin A, chymostatin, PMSF, and 5 µg/ml TPCK: 80 µg) were incubated with phosphatase inhibitors (0.3 nM okadaic acid, 10 mM p-nitrophenylphosphate, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, and 0.1 mM sodium orthovanadate), and 60 µg were incubated without phosphatase inhibitors. Aliquots of 20 µg proteins were stored on ice for different times (0, 5, 15, and 30 min) and analyzed by Western blot.

In the second experiment, five aliquots (20 µg each) of a nuclear protein extract (still extracted from January testes) were dephosphorylated by increasing quantities (0, 4, 10, and 20 U) of AP from calf intestine (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) for 15 min at 30 C. In an additional tube, 20 µg nuclear protein extract were incubated with a cocktail of AP inhibitors, used at a 50-fold dilution (phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 1, Sigma-Aldrich Corp.) and with a maximal quantity of AP from calf intestine (20 U) for 15 min at 30 C.

17ß-E2 in vivo treatment
Animals collected during February were separated into three experimental groups (n = 10): the control group was injected with 100 µl KRB (pH 7.4), the E2-treated group was injected with 100 µl KRB containing 10-5 M 17ß-E2, the E2+antagonist-treated group was injected first with 50 µl KRB containing 10-3 M of the estrogen antagonist ICI182–780 (Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK) and then, after 1 h, with 50 µl KRB containing 10-5 M 17ß-E2. Injections were given in the dorsal sac on alternate days for 2 wk.

Statistical analysis
Quantification of 52- and 68-kDa signals detected by Western blot analysis during the annual sexual cycle was carried out using a transmitting scanning densitometer (Ultrascan XL, LKB, Bromma, Sweden), evaluating the integration of peak areas of each month. The relative amounts of the signals are expressed as the fold increase over the minimal value registered.

ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test for multigroup comparison were carried out to assess the significance of differences. Data were considered significantly different at P < 0.05 and are expressed as the mean ± SEM.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expression of Fos-immunoreactive proteins during the seasonal cycle in frog testes
We studied Fos protein expression during the annual reproductive cycle of R. esculenta testis by Western blot. We analyzed both cytosolic and nuclear protein extracts, and three specific bands of about 43, 52, and 68 kDa were found. In particular, 52-kDa Fos signal was present exclusively in cytoplasmic extracts from January until December (Fig. 1AGo). The intensity of this band (Fig. 1BGo) was higher from September through December (P < 0.01) than in the January through July period, with June excluded (P < 0.01, June vs. July).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Western blot analysis of cytosolic (A) and nuclear (C) protein extracts from R. esculenta testes. A, Expression pattern of a 52-kDa Fos protein during the annual reproductive cycle. The intensity of the signal is higher from September until December (P < 0.01) than during the January through July period, June excluded (P < 0.01, June vs. July). B, Graphed values of relative amounts of 52-kDa signal found in each month during 2 consecutive yr. Results are the mean ± SEM and are represented as the fold increase over the minimal value found during February. C, Expression pattern of two specific Fos protein bands of 43 and 68 kDa during the annual reproductive cycle. The 43-kDa band is present in September through October only, whereas the 68-kDa band is available from January through December, being higher (P < 0.01) from January until July, June excluded (P < 0.05, June vs. July). These results are representative of three separate experiments carried out during 2 consecutive yr. D, Graphed values of relative amounts of 68-kDa signal found in each month. Results are the mean ± SEM and are represented as the fold increase over the minimal value found during September.

 
In nuclear extracts, two specific Fos-immunoreactive bands of about 43 and 68 kDa have been found (Fig. 1CGo). In particular, the 43-kDa signal was present in September through October only, whereas the 68-kDa signal was present from January until December. The intensity of this band (Fig. 1DGo) was higher (P < 0.01) during the January through July period (June excluded, P < 0.05) and decreased thereafter.

Fos-immunoreactive protein expression in testes with and without proliferating SPG after thermal treatment
To study the role of Fos protein in spermatogenesis, Fos pattern expression has been analyzed in total protein extract from testes of October animals, from testes of animals showing only slow proliferating SPG (animals at 4 C), and from testes resuming normal proliferating SPG (animals at 24 C). Histological observations indicated that in control testes all spermatogenic stages were present, whereas 4 C frog testes were almost exclusively composed of SPG (Fig. 2Go). Signs of spermatogenesis progression (appearance of very few spermatocytes) were evidenced in 24 C-treated animals (not shown). Moreover, to check the resumption of the SPG cell proliferative cycle at 24 C, testicular PCNA content has been analyzed by Western blot. As expected, PCNA signal was stronger in testes of 24 C-treated animals, indicating that SPG proliferation resumes (Fig. 3AGo). The lower amount of PCNA in control group is consistent with meiotic and postmeiotic germ cell populations available in the testis of October animals compared with the 4 C group, in which SPG predominate. PCNA detection by immunocytochemistry has previously been reported in R. esculenta testis (27). With respect to Fos analysis, Western blot indicated that the 52- and 68-kDa immunoreactive proteins were present in all testicular preparations (Fig. 3BGo). In particular, 52-kDa signal was strong in control frogs and in those kept at 4 C. A decrease in signal was found in animals treated at 24 C when SPG proliferation restarts. Conversely, 68-kDa signal increased at 24 C (Fig. 3BGo). To further check the presence of specific 52- and 68-kDa Fos related proteins in the total protein extract of October animals, immunoprecipitation was carried out with the same Fos antibody as that used for Western blot analysis. The two proteins, showing reverse relations in the thermal treatment, were found (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Section stained with hematoxylin/eosin showing the testis of animals treated for 3 months at 4 C with homologous pituitary homogenate (magnification, x380). In the tubules, spermatogonia are primarily present. Few residual spermatozoa (triangles) are also available. S, Sertoli cells; SPZ, spermatozoa; I, interstitium.

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. PCNA (A) and Fos (B) detection by Western blot analysis using total protein extracts from October R. esculenta testes, after thermal treatment. Lane 1, Fresh animals; lane 2, animals treated for 3 months at 4 C with homologous pituitary homogenate (PD); lane 3, animals later kept for 1 wk at 24 C. A, PCNA content: the signal increases in testicular extracts of animals treated at 24 C (lane 3). B, Fifty-two- and 68-kDa Fos proteins are present in all groups considered. In particular, the 52-kDa signal is stronger in lanes 1 and 2 than in lane 3. Conversely, the 68-kDa signal is more pronounced in lane 3 than in lanes 1 and 2. These results are representative of three separate assays.

 


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Immunoprecipitation of 52- and 68-kDa Fos proteins (lane 1). A total protein extract from October R. esculenta testes (see thermal experiment) was used. Lanes 2 and 3 represent controls obtained without adding primary antibody or protein extract, respectively.

 
Characterization of 68-kDa immunoreactive Fos protein through dephosphorylation experiments
To characterize 68-kDa protein and verify whether it was a phosphorylated form, experiments of dephosphorylation were carried out. The experiments were carried out using the nuclear protein extracted from testes of January frogs containing a strong 68-kDa immunoreactive signal (Fig. 5Go, lane 1). In the first experiment the extract was incubated for 5, 15, and 30 min with or without phosphatase inhibitors (Fig. 5Go, lanes 2–4 and 5–7, respectively). The 68-kDa signal was present only in the nuclear extracts incubated with phosphatase inhibitors, whereas it disappeared when the inhibitors were absent. In the second experiment the extract was dephosphorylated by increasing concentration of AP. The intensity of the 68-kDa band decreased in the presence of increasing concentrations of AP (Fig. 6Go, lanes 2–4), but it was still present when the nuclear extract was incubated with AP in combination with specific inhibitors (Fig. 6Go, lane 5). These results indicated that the 68-kDa Fos immunoreactive protein was a phosphorylated form.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Nuclear protein extracts from January R. esculenta testes analyzed by Western blot after dephosphorylation experiments. Nuclear protein extracts were treated with (lanes 2–4) or without (lanes 5–7) phosphatase inhibitors for different periods of time at 37 C. The control (lane 1) shows a specific Fos band of 68 kDa. In the presence of phosphatase inhibitors (lanes 2–4) this band is still present, whereas it completely disappears in their absence (lanes 5–7). These results are representative of four separate experiments.

 


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Nuclear protein extracts from January R. esculenta testes analyzed by Western blot after a dephosphorylation experiment with AP. Samples were treated with increasing amounts of AP (from calf intestine). Lane 1, Control; lanes 2–4, samples added with 4, 10, and 20 U AP; lane 5, sample treated with 20 U AP and AP inhibitors (magnification, x50). The 68-kDa band is present in the control (lane 1) and progressively disappears in the presence of AP (lanes 2–4). When AP inhibitors are added (lane 5), the 68-kDa band reappears and shows an intensity comparable to that of the control. These results are representative of four separate experiments.

 
17ß-E2 effect on Fos immunoreactive pattern of frog testes after in vivo treatment
Cytoplasmic and nuclear protein extracts from testes of experimental animals were analyzed by Western blot (Fig. 7Go). Fifty-two- and 68-kDa immunoreactive proteins appeared in cytoplasmic (Fig. 7AGo) and nuclear (Fig. 7BGo) preparations, respectively, and were not affected by E2 treatment. Conversely, a 43-kDa Fos protein appeared in testicular nuclear extracts of animals treated with E2. The specificity of the signals was determined through the use of preabsorbed antibody (Fig. 7Go, lower panels).



View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Fos protein expression in frog testis after in vivo E2 treatment, as analyzed by Western blot. A, Cytoplasmic protein extracts: a 52-kDa Fos-specific band is present in all groups examined. B, Nuclear protein extracts: a 68-kDa Fos-specific band is present in all groups considered; a 43-kDa Fos-specific band appears exclusively in E2-treated animals. The specificity of the reactions was demonstrated by preabsorbing the antibody with an excess (10-6 M) of the corresponding peptide (lower panels). These results are representative of three separate assays.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our results show that storage of Fos in cytoplasmic compartment should not be considered heretic, but is a mechanism regulating spermatogenesis during the seasonal breeding. This can be demonstrated using an adequate experimental model such as the frog, R. esculenta.

Fos family proteins are constituted by several members, such as c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1, and Fra-2. These proteins dimerize with Jun family members to constitute a transcription factor, named activator protein 1. Different homodimers (Jun-Jun) and heterodimers (Fos-Jun) have been proved to have different transcriptional activity (28). c-Fos activity has been detected in mammalian testis, particularly in premeiotic germ cells during spermatogenesis in the mouse (29). In the frog, R. esculenta, we have shown that the appearance of Fos first in the cytoplasmic and then in the nuclear compartment may trigger SPG proliferation and resumption of the spermatogenic wave during the annual sexual cycle (15). In this paper, using an antiserum raised against all Fos family members, we characterize the different Fos forms available in cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments and show relationships with SPG proliferation. By Western blot analysis, we confirm the presence of Fos immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm and nuclei of testicular cells (Ref. 15 and present data). As previous results indicate that the cytoplasmic localization is exclusively ascribed to spermatogonial cells (14), the presence of Fos protein is attributable to these germ cells. Immunoprecipitation (Fig. 4Go) and preabsorption (Fig. 7Go) of Fos antibody have been carried out to test the antiserum used. However, the Fos protein pattern detected here shows some differences compared with previous observations (15). Some changes in the methods used in the present work may explain these results.

Cytosolic Fos signal available during the annual sexual cycle is represented by 52-kDa protein, showing a weak intensity during the active SPG proliferation period (January–July) and a strong intensity during the resting phase (September–December). Interestingly, the 68-kDa signal in the nucleus mismatches the 52-kDa immunoreactivity available in the cytoplasm. In fact, a strong signal is detected between January and July. We have no explanation for the strong immunoreaction related to the 52-kDa protein in cytosolic extracts during June, but we confirm that concomitantly with a strong signal in one cellular compartment, a weak signal is detectable in the other (note the decrease in 68-kDa intensity during June in the nuclear compartment as the strong 52-kDa signal in the cytoplasm appears). Overall, these results suggest that the 68-kDa Fos-related protein is involved in the regulation of SPG proliferation.

To support this hypothesis, we have treated frogs under thermal conditions that slow (4 C) or trigger (24 C) SPG proliferation. Indeed, the lack of refractoriness of SPG to environmental stimuli in potentially continuous spermatogenesis (11) may be particularly useful in this animal model to study SPG proliferation. Western blot analysis of whole protein extract of October animals shows a strong 52-kDa signal. This is attributable to a cytoplasmic localization, as evidenced by the results obtained during the annual sexual cycle. Animals kept at 4 C for 3 months and treated with homologous hypophysis homogenate have testes primarily showing slow proliferating SPG, as checked by histological observation. It is well known that the above treatments slow SPG proliferation due to the low temperature while allowing postmitotic germ cells to mature until spermiation produced by gonadotropin treatment (12, 13). Therefore, results from testes of 4 C-treated frogs (deprived of postmeiotic and meiotic stages) further confirm that the 52- and 68-kDa signals found in controls are ascribed to SPG cells. Moreover, the analysis carried out using whole protein extract permits a better understanding of the relationship between the two molecular forms because they are observed in the same preparation. Interestingly, when 4 C-treated frogs, showing primarily SPG and deprived of other stages, are transferred to a condition (24 C) that accelerates the SPG proliferative cell cycle, as indicated by PCNA content, and triggering spermatogenesis (12, 13), we detect a weak 52-kDa immunoreactivity and a highly intense 68-kDa signal. As this signal has been shown to be typical of the nuclear compartment when spermatogenesis resumes during the annual sexual cycle, it is easy to conclude that the 68-kDa protein in 24 C-treated frogs should be present in SPG nuclei. Therefore, we indicate that the regulatory role of the 68-kDa protein in the nuclei during spermatogenesis may be concerned with the induction of SPG mitosis. In addition, a reverse relationship exists between cytoplasmic and nuclear Fos forms.

The inverse relationship between the 52- and 68-kDa Fos signals, available both during the annual sexual cycle and in thermal treated animals, may indicate that the higher molecular form of Fos-immunoreactive protein is due to a modification of the 52-kDa protein. Phosphorylation may account for this. If so, the addition of phosphatase inhibitors to the nuclear extract must protect the putative phosphorylated 68-kDa protein. Conversely, disappearance of the signal should be detected in the absence of phosphatase inhibitors. As this is the case, we strongly indicate that the 68-kDa signal is constituted by a phosphorylated protein. To further support this conclusion, nuclear testicular extracts were incubated with increasing concentrations of AP alone or in combination with specific inhibitors. Our results unequivocally show that the 68-kDa signal gradually decreases with concomitant increase in AP concentration, whereas the inhibitors counteract this effect. Thus, phosphorylation was definitely proved. Surprisingly, the 52-kDa form was not observed after dephosphorylation. We have no explanation for this phenomenon, but we speculate that after dephosphorylation the protein is rapidly digested in the nuclear extract. Dephosphorylated c-Fos forms have been reported to have a short half-life (30). Furthermore, c-Fos degradation can be observed despite the presence of protease inhibitors (31). In this respect, persistence of the 52-kDa form (see thermal experiment) when a total (cytoplasmic plus nuclear) protein extract is used may indicate protection exerted by cytosolic substances. It is worthy of note that the inverse relationship between 52- and 68-kDa forms is clearly evidenced with thermal treatment. In addition, both proteins can be immunoprecipitated from a total protein extract.

To gain further information on nuclear Fos proteins, we treated frogs with E2, which induces strong Fos localization in SPG nuclei. Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of 52- and 68-kDa proteins in cytosolic and nuclear testicular extracts, respectively. Interestingly, the 43-kDa protein is the form found in nuclear extracts of E2-treated animals. The antiestrogen ICI counteracts the E2 effect, indicating that the appearance of the 43-kDa protein is dependent on an ER-mediated mechanism. The presence of ER in amphibian, R. esculenta included, testis has been proved previously (32). Furthermore, this experiment, together with specific markers of cytosolic and nuclear extracts (MSJ and PCNA), respectively, can be used to asses the absence of contamination in nuclear and cytosolic extracts.

Although E2 treatment confirms the presence of the 43-kDa signal described during the annual sexual cycle, we have no explanation for the appearance of this signal during September through October, when endogenous estrogens are undetectable (33, 34). Probably very low estrogen levels, below the sensitivity of the RIA method used, may explain this result. Alternatively, regulation by other factors during September and October in frog testis may induce the presence of the 43-kDa Fos-related protein. For example, modulation of the 43-kDa protein has been obtained by treating frogs with a GnRH analog (Cobellis, G., R. Meccariello, S. Minucci, C. Palmiero, R. Pierantoni, and S. Fasano, unpublished).

A final speculation that can be made from the present results concerns the identities of the different Fos-related signals. Indeed, an antiserum that recognizes all Fos family members has been used in the present study. It is well known that c-Fos protein may have different molecular masses depending on phosphorylation status. Indeed, 52- to 68-kDa c-Fos proteins have been found in other systems (35, 36, 37, 38). As in our system, 52 and 68 kDa are well in the range of the size of c-Fos proteins reported in literature, we suppose that the 68-kDa signal is a hyperphosphorylated c-Fos form derived from the 52-kDa c-Fos protein. Therefore, the absence of 52-kDa signal in the nuclear extract of E2-treated frog testes may be explained by its rapid transformation into the 68-kDa form after translocation into the nuclear compartment (see also data from 4- and 24 C-treated frogs showing the inverse relationship between the two signals and absence of the 52-kDa form in nuclear extracts after dephosphorylation experiments). Which factors are responsible for the putative translocation of the 52-kDa form should be matter of further investigation.

The 43-kDa signal is well within the size range of Fra proteins, which are members of the Fos family (39, 40). Interestingly, Fra-1 and Fra-2 have been localized in spermatids during spermatogenesis in mammals (16). The appearance of spermatids in the frog, R. esculenta, testis has been described to occur during September through October (12, 13) when 43-kDa signal is available during the annual sexual cycle.

In conclusion, our results show for the first time in a vertebrate species that storage and phosphorylation of Fos proteins in the cytoplasm and nucleus of germ cells, respectively, regulate testicular activity. In particular, a phosphorylated 68-kDa Fos form may be involved in the mechanisms underlying SPG proliferation.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Zeneca Pharmaceuticals for supplying ICI 182–780.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by ex 40% Geremia, ex 60% MURST, CNR Target Project Biotecnologie and Regione Campania.

Abbreviations: AP, Alkaline phosphatase; DTT, dithiothreitol; ERKO, {alpha}ER knockout; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride; TPCK, N-{alpha}-p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone.

Received June 22, 2001.

Accepted for publication July 26, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Callard G 1992 Autocrine and paracrine role of steroids during spermatogenesis: studies in Squalus acanthias and Necturus maculosus. J Exp Zool 261:132–142[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Eddy EM, Washburn TF, Bunch DO, Goulding EH, Gladen BC, Lubhan DB Korach KS 1996 Targeted disruption of the estrogen receptor gene in male mice causes alteration of spermatogenesis and infertility. Endocrinology 137:4796–4805[Abstract]
  3. Hess RA, Bunick D, Lee KH, Bahr J, Taylor TA, Korach KS, Lubhan DB 1997 A role for estrogens in the male reproductive system. Nature 390:509–512[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Mahato D, Goulding EH, Korach KS, Eddy EM 2000 Spermatogenic cells do not require estrogen receptor-{alpha} for development or function. Endocrinology 141:1273–1275[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ebling FJP, Brooks AN, Gorrin AS, Ford H, Kerr JB 2000 Estrogenic induction of spermatogenesis in the hypogonadal mouse. Endocrinology 141:2861–2869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Saunders PTK, Fisher JS, Sharpe RM, Millar MR 1998 Expression of estrogen receptor ß (ERß) occurs in multiple types, including some germ cells, in the rat testis. J Endocrinol 156:R13–R17
  7. Minucci S, Di Matteo L, Pierantoni R, Varriale B, Rastogi RK, Chieffi G 1986 In vivo and in vitro stimulatory effect of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (HOE766) on spermatogonial multiplication in the frog, Rana esculenta. Endocrinology 119:731–736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Di Matteo L, Minucci S, Fasano S, Pierantoni R, Varriale B, Chieffi G 1988 GnRH antagonist decreases androgen production and spermatogonial multiplication in frog (Rana esculenta): indirect evidence for the existence of GnRH or GnRH-like material receptors in the hypophysis and testis. Endocrinology 122:62–67[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Fasano S, Pierantoni R 1993 The vertebrate testis: communication between interstitial and germinal compartment. In: Facchinetti F, Herderson IW, Pierantoni R, Polzonetti-Magni AM, eds. Cellular communication in reproduction. Bristol: J Endocrinol Ltd.; 113–124
  10. Minucci S, De Rienzo G, Di Sena R, Cobellis G, Meccariello R, Pierantoni R, Fasano S 2000 Effects of multiple injections of ethane 1,2-dimethane sulphonate (EDS) on the frog, Rana esculenta, testicular activity. J Exp Zool 287:384–393[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Chieffi G, Rastogi RK, Milone M, Iela l 1980 Amphibian reproduction: reproductive physiology in the male Rana esculenta L. Boll Zool 47:63–70
  12. Rastogi RK, Iela L, Saxena PK, Chieffi G 1976 The control of spermatogenesis in the green frog, Rana esculenta. J Exp Zool 169:151–166[CrossRef]
  13. Rastogi RK 1976 Seasonal cycle in anuran (Amphibia) testis: the endocrine and environmental control. Boll Zool 43:151–172
  14. Chieffi P, Minucci S, Cobellis G, Fasano S, Pierantoni R 1995 Changes in proto-oncogene activity in testis of the frog, Rana esculenta, during the annual reproductive cycle. Gen Comp Endocrinol 99:127–136[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Cobellis G, Pierantoni R, Minucci S, Pernas-Alonso R, Meccariello R, Fasano S 1999 c-fos activity in Rana esculenta testis: seasonal and estradiol induced changes. Endocrinology 140:3238–3244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Cohen DR, Vandermark SE, McGovern JD, Bradley MP 1993 Transcriptional regulation in testis: a role for transcription factor AP1 complex at various stages of spermatogenesis. Oncogene 8:443–455[Medline]
  17. Li W, Park JW, Nuijens A, Sliwkowski MX, Keller GA 1996 Heregulin is rapidly translocated to the nucleus and its transport is correlated with c-myc induction in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 12:2473–2477[Medline]
  18. Neyns B, Katesuwanasing D, Vermeij J, Bourgain C, Vandamme B, Amfo K, Lissens W, De Sutter P, Hooghe-Peters E, De Greve J 1996 Expression of the jun family genes in human ovarian cancer and normal ovarian epithelium surface. Oncogene 12:1247–1257[Medline]
  19. Xavier F, Lagarrigue S, Guillomot M, Gaillard-Sanchez I 1997 Expression of c-fos and jun proto-oncogene in ovine trophoblast in relation to interferon-{tau} expression and early implantation process. Mol Reprod Dev 46:127–137[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Cobellis G, Vallarino M, Meccariello R, Pierantoni R, Masini MS, Mathieu M, Pernas-Alonso R, Chieffi P, Fasano S 1999 Fos localization in cytosolic and nuclear compartments in neurons of the frog, Rana esculenta, brain: an analysis carried out in parallel with GnRH molecular forms. J Neuroendocrinol 11:725–735[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Gusse M, Cjhysdael J, Evan G, Soussi T, Mechali M 1989 Translocation of a store of maternal cytoplasmic c-myc protein into nuclei during early development. Mol Cell Biol 9:5395–5403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Dignam JD, Lebowitz RM, Roeder AG 1983 Accurate transcription by RNApolymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res 11:1475–1489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ 1955 Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275
  24. Berruti G, Perego L, Borgonovo B, Martegani E 1998a MSJ-1, a new member of the DnaJ family of proteins, is a male germ cell-specific gene product. Exp Cell Res 239:430–441
  25. Meccariello R, Berruti G, Cobellis G, Junier MP, Pierantoni R, Fasano S Possible role of MSJ-1 protein in acrosome formation. Proc of the 11th European Workshop on Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology of the Testis, 2000 (Abstract B12)
  26. Berruti G, Perego L, Martegani E 1998b Molecular cloning and developmental pattern of expression of MSJ-1 a new male germ cell specific DnaJ homologue. Adv Exp Med Biol 444:145–151
  27. Chieffi P, Franco R, Fulgione D, Staibano S 2000 PCNA in the testis of the frog, Rana esculenta: a molecular marker of mitotic testicular epithelium proliferation. Gen Comp Endocrinol 119:11–16[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Karin M, Liu Z, Zandi E 1997 AP-1 function and regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 9:240–246[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Kierszenbaum AL 1994 Mammalian spermatogenesis in vivo and in vitro: the partnership of spermatogenic and somatic cell lineages. Endocr Rev 15:116–134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Chen R-H, Juo PC-H, Curran T, Blenis J 1996 Phosphorylation of c-Fos at the C-terminus enhances its trasforming activity. Oncogene 12:1493–1502[Medline]
  31. Acquaviva C, Salvat C, Brockly F, Bossis G, Ferrara P, Piechaczyk M, Jariel-Encontre I 2001 Cellular and viral proteins are degraded by different proteolytic systems. Oncogene 20:942–950[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Fasano S, Pierantoni R, Minucci S, Di Matteo L, Chieffi G 1989 Seasonal fluctuations of estrogen binding activity in the testis of the frog, Rana esculenta. Gen Comp Endocrinol 74:157–161
  33. Fasano S, Minucci S, Di Matteo L, D’Antonio M, Pierantoni R 1989 Intratesticular feed back mechanisms in the regulation of steroid profiles in the frog, Rana esculenta. Gen Comp Endocrinol 75:335–342[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Cobellis G, Pierantoni R, Fasano S 1997 C-fos and c-jun-like mRNA expression in frog (Rana esculenta) testis during the annual reproductive cycle. Gen Comp Endocrinol 106:23–29[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Curran T, Miller AD, Zokas L, Verma IM 1984 Viral and cellular fos proteins: a comparative analysis. Cell 36:259–268[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Curran T, Teich NM 1982 Candidate product of the FBJ murine osteosarcoma virus oncogene: characterization of a 55,000-dalton phosphoprotein. J Virol 42:114–122[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Ofir R, Dwarki VJ, Rashid D, Verma IM 1990 Phosphorylation of C terminus of FOS protein is required for transcriptional transrepression of c-fos promoter. Nature 348:80–82[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Li SL, Cougnon N, Bresson-Bepoldin L, Zhao SJ, Schlegel WC 1996 Fos mRNA and FOS protein expression is induced by Ca2+ influx in GH3B6 pituitary cells. J Mol Endocrinol 16:229–238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Cohen DR, Ferreira PCP, Gentz R, Franza Jr BR, Curran T 1989 The product of a Fos-related gene, fra-1, binds cooperatively to the AP-1 site with jun: transcription factor AP-1 is comprised of multiple protein complexes. Genes Dev 3:173–184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Nishina H, Sato H, Suzuki T, Dato M, Iba H 1990 Isolation and characterization of fra-2, an additional member of the fos gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:3619–3623[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Wahlgren, K. Svechnikov, M.-L. Strand, K. Jahnukainen, M. Parvinen, J.-A. Gustafsson, and O. Soder
Estrogen Receptor {beta} Selective Ligand 5{alpha}-Androstane-3{beta}, 17{beta}-Diol Stimulates Spermatogonial Deoxyribonucleic Acid Synthesis in Rat Seminiferous Epithelium in Vitro
Endocrinology, June 1, 2008; 149(6): 2917 - 2922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. Cobellis, G. Cacciola, D. Scarpa, R. Meccariello, R. Chianese, M. F. Franzoni, K. Mackie, R. Pierantoni, and S. Fasano
Endocannabinoid System in Frog and Rodent Testis: Type-1 Cannabinoid Receptor and Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Activity in Male Germ Cells
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2006; 75(1): 82 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. Cobellis, M. Lombardi, D. Scarpa, G. Izzo, G. Fienga, R. Meccariello, R. Pierantoni, and S. Fasano
Fra1 Activity in the Frog, Rana esculenta, Testis: A New Potential Role in Sperm Transport
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2005; 72(5): 1101 - 1108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. Rusovici and H. A. LaVoie
Expression and Distribution of AP-1 Transcription Factors in the Porcine Ovary
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2003; 69(1): 64 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. A. Wolfe and S. R. Grimes
Specific Binding of Nuclear Proteins to a Bifunctional Promoter Element Upstream of the H1/AC Box of the Testis-Specific Histone H1t Gene
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2003; 68(6): 2267 - 2273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. Cobellis, R. Meccariello, S. Minucci, C. Palmiero, R. Pierantoni, and S. Fasano
Cytoplasmic Versus Nuclear Localization of Fos-Related Proteins in the Frog, Rana esculenta, Testis: In Vivo and Direct In Vitro Effect of a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 954 - 960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cobellis, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fasano, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cobellis, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fasano, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals