Endocrinology Vol. 143, No. 1 74-83
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society
GROWTH FACTORS-CYTOKINES-ONCOGENES |
Inhibin Suppresses and Activin Stimulates Osteoblastogenesis and Osteoclastogenesis in Murine Bone Marrow Cultures
D. Gaddy-Kurten,
J. K. Coker,
E. Abe1,
R. L. Jilka and
S. C. Manolagas
Department of Physiology and Biophysics (D.G.-K., J.K.C.), and
Center for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease (E.A., R.L.J.,
S.C.M.), Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Central
Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, University of Arkansas for Medical
Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: D. Gaddy-Kurten, Department of Physiology and Biophysics University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences 4301 West Markham, Slot 505, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205. E-mail: gaddykurtendana{at}uams.edu
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Using primary murine bone marrow cell cultures, we demonstrate that
inhibin suppresses osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. In
contrast, activin supports osteoblast formation (by alkaline
phosphatase-positive and mineralized colony formation); and activin
also stimulates osteoclast formation (as measured by staining
tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive multinucleated cells).
Inhibin, the activin antagonist follistatin, and the bone morphogenetic
protein antagonist noggin can all suppress endogenous activin
accumulation in bone marrow cultures. Associated with this decrease in
activin is the loss of mineralized osteoblastic colony formation
(colony forming unit-osteoblast; CFU-OB). However, exogenous
activin administration, even in the presence of noggin, permits both
alkaline phosphatase-positive and CFU-OB colony formation in
vitro. In contrast, the stimulatory effects of locally produced
activin on osteoblast and osteoclast development are not likely to be
dominant over the suppressive effects of gonadally derived inhibin. The
suppressive effect of inhibin is maintained in the presence of either
activin or bone morphogenetic protein, suggesting the presence of a
distinct inhibin-specific receptor. Taken together, the direct
regulation of osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis by inhibin and
activin in vitro suggest that changes in the
inhibin/activin ratio detected by bone marrow cells, during the
perimenopausal transition, contribute to altered cell differentiation
and may be associated with the increased bone resorption observed at
this time.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
IT IS WIDELY accepted that estrogens
play a critical role in the maintenance of bone homeostasis and that
the cellular basis of bone loss in postmenopausal women results from
de-repression of both osteoblast and osteoclast development
(1). The pathophysiology of postmenopausal osteoporosis
involves an overproduction of osteoclasts, relative to the integrally
coupled increase in osteoblastogenesis, a process that, itself,
facilitates the support of osteoclast development
(2, 3, 4).
However, recent data have suggested that some clinical indices of
increased bone turnover can first be detected in late premenopausal
women with normal circulating estrogen levels (5). Thus,
this increased bone turnover must be nonsex steroid-dependent. Indeed,
the endocrine parameter best correlated with this increase is elevated
serum FSH levels. This early rise in FSH levels in perimenopausal women
is attributable to a selective decrease in inhibin B secretion. The
decrease in inhibin B secretion occurs in the presence of normal levels
of E2, inhibin A, GnRH, and LH (6). Because both inhibin A
and inhibin B isoforms selectively inhibit pituitary FSH secretion,
these data suggest that increased FSH is attributable to a loss in
feed-back inhibition by gonadal inhibin B in perimenopausal women,
resulting in bone loss before the loss of sex steroids. As the loss of
gonadal function progresses in postmenopausal women, the
well-established decreases in E2 accompany declining levels of both
inhibin B and inhibin A, further increasing serum FSH (6)
and markedly increasing bone loss. Thus, although the molecular
mechanisms responsible for bone loss in perimenopausal women are not
yet clear, we hypothesize that this loss reflects a direct role of
inhibins on bone marrow cell differentiation.
Inhibin B and inhibin A are heterodimeric proteins in the TGFß
superfamily composed of
ßB or
ßA subunits, respectively.
Inhibins were originally identified based on their ability to suppress
pituitary FSH secretion (7). Suppression of FSH by the
inhibins is antagonized by the related peptide, activin A, a homodimer
composed of ßA ßA subunits that is locally produced in the
gonad (7). In addition to opposing effects on pituitary
FSH production and gonadal steroid production, inhibins and activin
exert opposing effects on erythroid (8), megakaryocyte
(9), and granulocyte-macrophage cell development
(10). Activin ßA subunit mRNA is also locally produced
in bone marrow (11); and, like TGFß (12)
and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) (13), activin A is
abundantly localized in bone matrix (14). Although inhibin
-subunit expression (required for inhibin dimer formation) is very
low in human and rat bone marrow (15, 16), inhibin
accumulates in the bone marrow of 25-d-old rats within 10 min of iv
injection of [125I]-inhibin A and is retained
for at least an hour (17). These results are consistent
with the idea that the effects of inhibin on marrow cell hematopoiesis
(8, 9, 10) are attributable to inhibin derived from gonadal
sources (18).
Increasing evidence suggests the involvement of activin and inhibin in
the regulation of bone formation. In neonatal rat calvaria, activin
promotes ectopic bone formation induced by BMP (14), can
enhance proliferation of osteoblastic cells and collagen synthesis
(19), and is released from the bone matrix of calvaria
undergoing resorption (20). In fracture callus, activin
administration stimulates fracture healing (21), whereas
inhibin-
-subunit is expressed at sites of endochondral ossification
(15). During endochondral bone development, the
stimulatory actions of activin are regulated by changes in follistatin
expression during the transition from cartilage to bone (15, 22), and activin receptors have been localized during this
process (23). Follistatin is a natural antagonist that
binds activin with high affinity and neutralizes its biological
activities by preventing activin interaction with its membrane
receptors (24, 25). Follistatin mRNA and protein also have
been detected in osteoblasts and osteocytes in the developing mouse
mandible (16) and in fracture callus (21).
In vitro, follistatin mRNA has been detected in
calvarial-derived MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells (26).
However, the expression of follistatin in bone marrow in
vivo has not been reported, and it may be that it is only
expressed in bone marrow as a feedback mechanism to limit activin
action, as in the pituitary (27, 28).
Finally, administration of activin to ovariectomized rats caused a
dose-dependent blunting of ovariectomized- induced bone loss
(20, 29), providing additional evidence that local activin
tone may be a critical component in the regulation of bone cell
differentiation.
These studies led us to postulate that changes in the inhibin/activin
ratio, detected by cells within the bone marrow, contribute
significantly to bone turnover. By directly altering the balance of
osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis, the effect of the increased
inhibin/activin ratio is to increase bone resorption in the presence of
normal estrogen levels. In the current study, we tested our hypothesis
in vitro, using primary murine bone marrow cells, cultured
under osteogenic or osteoclastic conditions in the presence of
inhibins, activin A, and the activin antagonist follistatin. Our
results demonstrate direct effects of inhibin, activin, and follistatin
on both osteoblast and osteoclast development. These in
vitro effects support the existence of an endocrine/paracrine loop
in which these factors regulate osteoblast and osteoclast development
in vivo.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Experimental animals
Male Swiss Webster mice at 34 months of age were used for
these studies. All experiments were performed with University of
Arkansas for Medical Sciences Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee approval, to meet NIH guidelines, and used accepted standards
of humane animal care.
Materials
Recombinant human activin A, follistatin-288, and inhibin-A were
obtained both from the NIH National Pituitary Hormone Program and by
purchase from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Inhibin A preparations
were also purified from porcine follicular fluid and were generously
provided by Joan Vaughan and Wylie Vale at the Salk Institute. These
preparations were all verified for bioactivity before use, and all
provided similar qualitative and quantitative results. Doses for
activin, inhibin, and follistatin used in these studies were in the
physiological range of doses used to characterize effects of these
compounds on pituitary and ovarian function (30).
1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 was
purchased from BioWhittaker, Inc. (Walkersville, MD); BMP2
and noggin were purchased by R&D Systems and were also generously
provided by Vicki Rosen (Genetics Institute, Cambridge,
MA) and Niel Stahl (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
Tarrytown, NY), respectively. Antibodies to the ßA- and
-subunits
were obtained from Serotec (Raleigh, NC). Patrick Sluss
(Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital) generously
provided the antiserum against the 288- and 315-amino acid forms of
follistatin, the sizes of which are 31-kDa and 35-kDa proteins,
respectively.
Osteoblast progenitor assays
Ex vivo bone marrow cell cultures were generated from
3- to 4-month-old Swiss Webster mice as described previously
(31). Briefly, bone marrow cells were flushed from the
femurs with
MEM containing 15% FBS (HyClone Laboratories, Inc., Logan, UT), penicillin, streptomycin, and antimycotics.
Marrow cells from all mice were combined, rinsed, resuspended to obtain
a single cell suspension, and seeded in at least triplicate wells. The
numbers of colony forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F) and fully mature
colony forming unit-osteoblast (CFU-OB) present in the bone
marrow preparations were determined as previously described
(31). Cells were cultured for osteoblastogenesis in 15%
FBS containing
MEM, and supplemented with 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid
and 10 mM ß-glycerophosphate to support
mineralization. Plating density in 6-well plates was 1.5 x
106 cells/well for CFU-F development and 2.5
x 106 cells/well for CFU-OB development. Growth
factors and antagonists were diluted in 0.1 N
acetic acid, 0.1% BSA, which was used as the vehicle control in all
experiments.
The total number of CFU-F colonies represent the total number of
colonies in the culture, and they were determined on d 10 and d 28 as
an indicator of multipotential mesenchymal progenitors (32, 33). Cultures were fixed with neutral buffered formalin and
stained with either hematoxylin or methyl green to observe all colonies
(of at least 50 cells) in the dish, regardless of differentiated
state.
To determine the recruitment of mesenchymal cell progenitors into the
osteoblastic lineage early in the culture, the number of alkaline
phosphatase (AP)-positive (AP+) colonies (AP+ CFU-F) were determined by
AP staining after 10 d of culture (Sigma, St. Louis,
MO). Because osteoblastogenesis is a lengthy process, requiring 34 wk
for complete differentiation (34, 35), fully mature CFU-OB
was determined on d 2528 of culture, by the staining of mineral
deposits using Von Kossa staining, as previously described
(31). All multiple groups in a given experiment were
harvested on the same day of culture. Similar results were obtained in
osteoblastogenesis experiments harvested on d 2528.
Osteoclast progenitor assays
Bone marrow cells were obtained from the femurs of 3- to
4-month-old mice, as described above, and cultured for
osteoclastogenesis, as previously described (31), at
densities of 1 x 106 cells/well, in 24-well
plates, in 10% FBS containing
MEM supplemented with 10
nM 1,25(OH)2 vitamin
D3 to support osteoclast development. Osteoclast
formation was assessed on d 812 by staining for tartrate-resistant
acid phosphatase (TRAP; Sigma) and counting the
multinucleated (MNC) TRAP+ cells in each well. All multiple groups in a
given experiment were harvested on the same day of culture. Similar
results were obtained in osteoclast development experiments harvested
on d 812.
Statistics
Colony numbers per well and TRAP+ MNC cell numbers per well were
obtained in at least triplicate wells. Data were analyzed by one-way
ANOVA to determine significant differences between means of multiple
groups in given experiments. Post hoc analyses by Tukeys
and Mann-Whitney U tests, where appropriate, were also
applied to verify that the significance levels were valid.
Immunoblots
Cellular extracts were prepared by cell lysis, for 15 min at 4
C, in modified RIPA buffer (36), followed by
centrifugation at 14,000 x g. Supernatants (50200
µg) were fractionated on 10% or 12% SDS-PAGE and
electrophoretically transferred to either nitrocellulose or PVDF
membranes. Membranes were blocked with 1% nonfat dry milk in 20
mM Tris (pH 7.4), 0.15 M
NaCl containing 0.05% Tween 20 (TTBS), and subsequently incubated with
primary antisera overnight at 4C. Blots were washed extensively with
TTBS, reblocked with 1% milk-TTBS, and incubated for 1 h at room
temperature with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antimouse or
goat antirabbit secondary antibody (1:30,000) (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) before visualization using chemiluminescence
reagents (Pierce Chemical Co.).
 |
Results
|
|---|
Activin, inhibin, and follistatin regulate osteoblast progenitor
recruitment and mineralized colony formation in ex vivo bone
marrow cultures
To determine whether activin, follistatin, and inhibin exert
effects on the recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells to the
osteoblastic lineage, primary murine bone marrow cells were stimulated
with agents for 10 d, before analysis of AP+ colonies in
triplicate wells per treatment (Fig. 1A
).
Only inhibin exerted an effect, which was to suppress recruitment of
mesenchymal cell progenitors to the AP+ preosteoblastic lineage.
Interestingly, follistatin did not mimic the suppressive effect of
inhibin on AP+ colony formation, even at high concentrations (200
ng/ml), suggesting that the basis of inhibin repression is not inhibin
competition with activin for activin receptors in these cultures.
Inhibin also decreased AP activity on d 10 by up to 80% within each
colony (P = 0.006 by Wilcoxon nonparametric analysis).
This result suggests that inhibin suppressed commitment of mesenchymal
progenitors recruited to the osteoblast lineage.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Activin, inhibin, and follistatin regulate murine
bone marrow cell differentiation in vitro. Murine bone
marrow cells from adult mice were cultured in -MEM, 15% FCS, 50
µg/ml ascorbic acid + 10 mM ß-glycerophosphate
[control (Con)] or treated with activin A (Act), follistatin
(FS), or inhibin A (Inh). A, Growth factor effects during early
osteoblastogenesis. Recruitment of cells into the osteoblast lineage
was measured on d 10. The number of colonies staining positive for AP
(AP+) were counted and expressed as an average number per well (*,
P < 0.005 vs. control). Data are
representative of at least four similar experiments. B, Growth factor
effects on bone nodule formation. Bone marrow cell growth in osteogenic
medium, until d 28, allowed measurement of fully differentiated
osteoblastic colonies (CFU-OB). The number of colonies stained positive
for Von Kossa were counted and expressed as the number of CFU-OB per
well (*, P < 0.001 vs. control).
Data are representative of at least four similar experiments. C,
Activin A accumulation during osteoblastogenesis. The timecourse of
activin A expression and secretion during osteoblastogenic culture, as
described above for 025 d. At harvest, conditioned medium (or bone
marrow supernatant at d 0) was collected and concentrated using
Centricon-30 (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA), and
cells were lysed in RIPA buffer. An antibody against the ßA subunit
of activin A was used in immunoblot analysis of lysates (100 µg/lane)
and conditioned medium (500 µg/lane) from 025 d of culture. The
position of the 28-kDa activin A dimeric protein was determined from
the migration of colorized protein standards and compared with the
visualized bands on the chemiluminescence films. Data are
representative of at least two similar experiments. D, Effects of
growth factors on osteoclastogenesis. Primary murine bone marrow cells
were cultured for the development of osteoclasts in MEM, 15% FCS,
and 10 nM 1,25 (OH)2 vitamin D3 for
9 d. Cells were stained for TRAP activity, and the number of TRAP+
MNC cells per well was counted (*, P < 0.005
vs. control). Data are representative of at least four
similar experiments, harvested on d 812.
|
|
To determine the effects of activin, follistatin, and inhibin on the
later stages of osteoblastogenesis (i.e. the ability to form
a mineralized matrix), cells were cultured in 6-well plates for 28
d before fixation and staining of CFU-OB with Von Kossa (Fig. 1B
). The
number of CFU-OB colonies was scored in triplicate wells for each
treatment, and the values were expressed as the number of Von
Kossa-positive colonies per well. Inhibin blocked CFU-OB formation by
up to 90% in three separate experiments (Fig. 1B
). Interestingly,
although follistatin did not block AP expression (Fig. 1A
), it blocked
formation of CFU-OB (Fig. 1B
). This inhibitory effect of follistatin at
100 ng/ml provided the first indication that activin is produced in
ex vivo bone marrow cultures and that activin action is
required for full osteoblast maturation and formation of a mineralized
matrix (CFU-OB) in these cultures.
Activin A is produced and secreted by ex vivo bone marrow cultures
during osteoblastogenesis
We next confirmed that activin A was produced and secreted in
these cultures during osteoblastogenesis (Fig. 1C
). Cells were grown in
ascorbic acid and ß-glycerolphosphate to stimulate
osteoblastogenesis. Lysates and conditioned medium were harvested on
different days of culture and analyzed for activin A content. Activin A
was expressed in lysates and secreted into the medium in a
time-dependent manner. Activin A was undetectable in lysates or
conditioned medium on d 5 of culture. However, 28-kDa activin A dimer
was detected in 100 µg lysate and 500 µg conditioned medium on d
10. In multiple experiments, although lysate production (or
accumulation) was consistently maximal sometime between d 1520,
activin A content in conditioned medium progressively increased to d 25
of culture. These data demonstrate that CFU-OB formation in 25-d
ex vivo marrow cultures occurs in the presence of increasing
activin accumulation. In addition, activin accumulation at a time in
which follistatin inhibited CFU-OB formation is consistent with
follistatin neutralization of secreted activin A, as has been
demonstrated previously for neutralization of pituitary and erythroid
effects of activin A (37).
Activin and inhibin exert opposing effects on osteoclast
development
Osteoblastogenesis is intimately coupled with stromal cell support
of osteoclast development (38, 39). Thus, it was critical
to determine whether activin and inhibin also affected
osteoclastogenesis in primary bone marrow cultures. Therefore, the
effects of activin, inhibin, and follistatin on
1,25(OH)2 vitamin
D3-dependent osteoclastogenesis were measured in
primary bone marrow cultures by analyzing the formation of TRAP+
multinucleated cells on d 9 (Fig. 1D
). Exogenous activin (50 ng/ml)
enhanced osteoclastogenesis in the presence of
1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 (as
demonstrated previously) (40), whereas inhibin suppressed
the formation of multinucleated TRAP+ cells (Fig. 1D
). Thus, activin
and inhibin were found to exert opposing actions on both
osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. However, follistatin (100
ng/ml) had no effect on the formation of TRAP+ cells (Fig. 1D
),
suggesting that activin is not produced during the 9 d of
osteoclastogenesis stimulated by 1,25(OH)2
vitamin D3. The precise target cells of activin
and inhibin action during osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation
have not yet been defined. However, the fact that inhibin suppressed
stromal cell recruitment to the osteoblastic lineage is consistent with
the idea that support of osteoclast development requires stromal cell
recruitment (2, 3, 4).
Inhibin suppression of osteoblast and osteoclast development is
maintained in the presence of exogenous activin
Previous reports of inhibin action in other tissues have been
explained by inhibin opposing an endogenous activin action through
competition of ligands for activin receptors. Further, inhibin actions
in other tissues have been shown to be mimicked by the addition of
follistatin, to antagonize activin binding to the type II receptor
serine kinase (7). Therefore, we wanted to test whether
the suppressive effects of inhibin on osteoblastogenesis and
osteoclastogenesis were maintained in the presence of activin. Bone
marrow cells were cultured in the presence of 50 ng/ml inhibin A in the
absence or presence of 100 ng/ml activin A (Fig. 2
, A and
B). In the presence of the increased
activin concentration, inhibin completely suppressed osteoblastogenesis
(Fig. 2A
). The number of total CFU-F colonies was unchanged by any
treatment, excluding the possibility that inhibin nonspecifically
blocked colony formation or cell proliferation per se. Follistatin, at
100 ng/ml, had no effect on osteoblastogenesis, demonstrating the
specificity of the inhibin effect.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Activin cannot overcome inhibin suppression of
osteoblastogenesis or osteoclastogenesis. Primary murine bone marrow
cells were cultured in osteogenic medium (A) or osteoclastogenic medium
(B) as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were
untreated (Con) or treated for 10 d using 50 ng/ml inhibin A
(Inh), 50 ng/ml activin A (Act), together at a 2:1 Act: Inh ratio (Act
+ Inh), or with 100 ng/ml follistatin (FS) (A only). A, The number of
CFU-F- derived AP+ colonies and total colonies per well were
determined. B, The number of TRAP+ MNC cells per well was determined
(*, P < 0.005 vs. control). Data
are representative from at least three similar experiments.
|
|
Similarly, inhibin suppression of osteoclastogenesis (Fig. 2B
) was not
overcome by the addition of activin, even though activin alone
consistently stimulated at least a 3-fold increase in the formation of
TRAP+ cells (Fig. 2B
). Taken together, these data provide further
evidence that the suppressive effects of inhibin on marrow cell
differentiation are not likely to be mediated solely through
competition with activin for activin receptors.
Activin substitutes for BMP and recruits cells into the
osteoblastic lineage and stimulates the formation of the full
osteoblastic phenotype in vitro (CFU-OB)
To gain an understanding of the full range of activin action on
osteoblast differentiation, we used noggin to remove the effect of
endogenous BMPs on early osteoblastogenesis (41). In
addition, we also tested whether activin stimulation of
osteoclastogenesis would be maintained in the presence of BMP
antagonism. In Fig. 3A
, noggin (100
ng/ml) suppression of early and late osteoblastogenesis in murine bone
marrow cultures was overcome by treatment with activin A (30 ng/ml).
Similarly, noggin suppression of osteoclast development, as indicated
by TRAP+ multinucleated cell formation, was overcome by exogenous
activin treatment (Fig. 3B
). These results are similar to our previous
data in which exogenous BMP2 overcame noggin suppression of both
osteoblast and osteoclast development (41). These data
suggest that activin can overcome BMP suppression and support both the
recruitment of mesenchymal cells into the osteogenic lineage and
support osteoclastogenesis. The capacity of activin to selectively
overcome the suppressive effects of noggin, but not inhibin, indicates
that the suppressive effects of noggin and inhibin occur via distinct
mechanisms.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Activin directly promotes osteoblastogenesis and
osteoclastogenesis in the presence of the BMP antagonist, noggin.
Primary murine bone marrow cells were cultured in osteogenic medium (A)
or osteoclastogenic medium (B) as described in Materials and
Methods. Cells were either untreated (Con) or treated with 50
ng/ml of activin A (Act), 100 ng/ml noggin (Nog), or activin + noggin
(Act + Nog). A, The number of CFU-F-derived AP+ colonies per well was
determined on d 10, and CFU-OB on d 28. B, The number of TRAP+ MNC
cells per well was determined on d 9 (*, P <
0.005). Data are representative of at least two similar experiments.
|
|
Inhibin is not produced endogenously or secreted by ex vivo bone
marrow cultures during osteoblastogenesis
Growth factors and their antagonists are frequently locally
produced in a given environment. However, inhibin is most abundantly
synthesized in, and secreted from, the gonad (7) into the
circulation, where it exerts tissue-specific endocrine effects on
specific target organs, such as the pituitary (18). We
sought to establish whether inhibin is also locally produced and/or
regulated in primary bone marrow cells during osteoblastogenesis. Cell
lysates were prepared from freshly isolated bone marrow or from cells
cultured under osteoblastic conditions for 5, 10, or 20 d in the
presence or absence of 50 ng/ml activin A, inhibin-A, or 100 ng/ml
noggin. Immunoblot analyses were performed using an antibody against
the 18-kDa, inhibin-specific
-subunit (Fig. 4A
). The recombinant inhibin A standard
is a 32-kDa dimeric protein composed of the 18-kDa
-subunit
and a 14-kDa ßA-subunit. The d-0 freshly isolated bone marrow
contained inhibin
-subunit-containing proteins, including a band
comigrating with the inhibin A standard. Additional bands are visible
that correspond with several known species of
ß dimers comprised
of uncleaved proregions of each subunit (42). However,
none of the lysates after 5, 10, or 20 d of culture produced
inhibin
-subunit, either under control conditions or in response to
stimulation with activin A, noggin, or inhibin A. Thus,
osteoblastogenesis in murine bone marrow cultures proceeds in the
absence of basal or stimulated endogenous inhibin production. It is
likely that the
-subunit containing inhibin proteins, found in
freshly isolated bone marrow, are the result of circulating inhibin
from the gonads.
Activin A production is autostimulated and negatively regulated by
inhibin, noggin, and follistatin during osteoblastogenesis
Because activin is endogenously produced under osteogenic
conditions in vitro (Fig. 1C
), we determined whether
endogenous activin accumulation was autoregulated or could be
down-regulated by inhibin, follistatin, and noggin. Lysates were
prepared from freshly isolated bone marrow (d 0), as well as from
cultured cells after 5, 10, or 20 d in the presence or absence of
50 ng/ml activin A or inhibin-A and 100 ng/ml noggin or follistatin
(Fig. 4B
). As shown in Fig. 1C
, endogenous activin accumulation was
most prevalent in control cultures after d 10, corresponding to the
later stages of osteoblastogenesis. Activin autostimulated its
production to higher levels. The increased production was detected as
early as d 5 of culture, and there were progressive increases
throughout the culture period (Fig. 4B
). These data are consistent with
activin autoregulation serving to enhance osteoblastogenesis. One
possibility that cannot be excluded is that internalized activin A may
be contributing to the progressive activin A accumulation observed in
lysates during osteoblastogenesis. However, because a constant amount
of activin A was added to all cultures isolated on different days, the
observed progressive accumulation of activin A in lysates is more
consistent with activin autoregulation of its content. Conversely,
treatment with noggin, inhibin, or follistatin completely blocked the
production of activin A during osteoblastogenesis (Fig. 4B
). Thus, in
addition to antagonizing existing activin action, the suppressive
effects of inhibin and follistatin on osteoblastogenesis are also
mediated by inhibition of the osteogenic activin synthesis in the
cultures. Furthermore, the ability of noggin to block activin
biosynthesis indicates that endogenously produced BMPs stimulate
activin production as well.
Basal follistatin production by ex vivo bone marrow cultures is not
regulated during osteoblastogenesis
In reproductive tissues, activin action is dependent on the ratio
of activin to follistatin in the local microenvironment
(7). Thus, it was important to determine the extent to
which murine bone marrow cells produced endogenous follistatin
during osteoblastogenesis. Immunoblot analyses were performed
using cell lysates (Fig. 5A
) and
concentrated conditioned medium (Fig. 5B
) from different days of
culture. Follistatin was not found in freshly isolated bone marrow
cells (d 0). However, it was detected in lysates from d 5, and the
levels progressively decreased throughout osteoblastogenesis.
Interestingly, the amount of follistatin secreted into the medium was
low to undetectable during the time course, suggesting that most of the
follistatin remained membrane-associated in these cultures. Together
with the observed increases in activin A production during the same
time course (Fig. 4B
), these data provide further evidence of an
increasing net effect of activin during osteoblastogenesis in
vitro.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Follistatin is produced during
osteoblastogenesis. Primary murine bone marrow cells were cultured in
osteoblastic medium as described in Materials and
Methods. Lysates were prepared from freshly isolated bone
marrow (d 0), as well as from cultured cells after 5, 10, 15, 20, or
25 d in osteogenic medium. Conditioned medium from these same
cultures was concentrated using Centricon-30 filters (Millipore Corp.). Equivalent protein content, 200 µg lysate/lane (A) and
500 µg conditioned medium/lane (B), was loaded for each sample before
SDS-PAGE separation of the proteins, transfer to immobilon membrane,
and incubation with specific antibodies raised against FS that
recognize both FS288 (31 kDa) and FS315 (35 kDa). Recombinant FS288 (50
ng) was loaded as the positive control. Signals were visualized by
chemiluminescence, and migration of the bands was compared with
colorized protein standard migration on the transferred blot. Data are
representative of at least two similar experiments.
|
|
Exogenous BMP2 does not overcome the suppressive effects of inhibin
on osteoblast and osteoclast development
There are several potential mechanisms for the inhibin suppression
of osteoblastogenesis, and thus osteoclastogenesis. One possibility is
that inhibin blocks the endogenous production of osteogenic BMPs. If
so, then the addition of exogenous BMPs should restore
osteoblastogenesis. However, we found that exogenous BMP2 (100 ng/ml)
did not overcome the suppression of either osteoblastogenesis (Fig. 6A
) or osteoclastogenesis (Fig. 6B
)
caused by inhibin. These results contrast with the ability of exogenous
BMPs to restore osteoblast and osteoclast development in the presence
of noggin (41) (and data not shown). Follistatin (100
ng/ml) was unable to suppress the osteogenic effect of endogenous BMPs
(Fig. 6A
) that were blocked by noggin (Fig. 3A
). In addition, there was
no further increase in osteoblastogenesis in the presence of exogenous
BMP2 and follistatin (Fig. 6A
).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. BMP2 cannot overcome inhibin suppression of
osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. Primary murine bone marrow
cells were cultured in osteogenic medium (A) or osteoclastogenic medium
(B) as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were
either untreated (Con) or treated with 50 ng/ml inhibin A (Inh), 100
ng/ml follistatin (FS), or 100 ng/ml BMP2, alone or in combination with
inhibin (BMP2 + Inh) or in combination with follistatin (BMP2 + FS). A,
The numbers of CFU-F-derived AP+ colonies and total colonies per well
were determined on d 10. B, The number of TRAP+ MNC cells per well was
determined on d 9 (*, P < 0.005 vs.
control). Data are representative of at least two similar
experiments.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Activin supports (whereas inhibin and follistatin block)
osteoblastogenesis
The current study is the first to investigate the existence of an
endocrine/paracrine loop in which inhibin, activin, and follistatin
regulate osteoblast and osteoclast development. The effects of these
agents on osteoblastogenesis are summarized in a simplified diagram of
osteoblastogenesis in Fig. 7
. Either
activin A or BMPs (such as BMP2) can recruit murine bone marrow
mesenchymal cells into the osteoblast lineage, where they express AP
(AP+). Endogenous activin accumulation contributes to development of
the full osteoblast phenotype, because follistatin blocks the later
stage of matrix mineralization. Inhibin, as well as noggin
(41), represses mesenchymal stem cell recruitment to the
osteoblast lineage. Activin stimulation can override the inhibitory
effect of noggin on osteoblast development and support full osteoblast
differentiation. However, the suppressive effect of inhibin seems to be
dominant over the activities of both activin and BMP.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. Summary of activin, inhibin, and
follistatin effects on osteoblastogenesis in murine bone marrow
cultures. Mesenchymal stem cells can be recruited into the osteoblastic
lineage by the stimulatory effects (+) of endogenously produced BMP
and/or exogenously administered activin A. Either inhibin or noggin can
block this recruitment. Neither activin nor BMP2 can overcome inhibin
suppression of osteoblast development. Finally, the temporally
selective inhibitory effect of follistatin in cells already expressing
AP (AP+) indicates that endogenously produced activin stimulates the
later stages of osteoblastogenesis.
|
|
The suppressive effects of inhibin, noggin, and follistatin on
osteoblastogenesis may be mediated, in part, by the ability of these
agents to negatively regulate the endogenous production of activin A.
Conversely, once activin A production has been initiated by other
factors (such as endogenous BMPs), osteoblast development is supported
and maintained by autoregulated activin A production. Endogenous
activin secretion increases progressively during the culture period,
and the ability of activin to stimulate collagen I production (data not
shown) may be one of the mechanisms by which activin promotes full
matrix mineralization of osteoblasts in vitro. The data
suggest that the follistatin inhibition of CFU-OB formation in murine
bone marrow is attributable to neutralization of secreted activin A.
The dose of follistatin (100 ng/ml) that effectively suppressed
osteoblastogenesis in these cultures is similar to follistatin
concentrations previously demonstrated to neutralize the pituitary and
erythroid effects of activin A (37). Consistent with this,
inhibition of osteoblast development by follistatin occurs concurrently
with progressive increases in endogenous activin accumulation. Previous
reports indicate that BMP7 effects on Mv1Lu cell proliferation, growth
inhibition, and erythroid development (37) are sensitive
to neutralization by follistatin. However, the concentration of
follistatin required to neutralize these BMP7 effects is more than 10
times higher than that needed to neutralize activin actions
(37). Taken together, these findings suggest that
follistatin is neutralizing the actions of activin, but not BMP7, in
murine bone marrow cultures.
Activin stimulates (and inhibin blocks) osteoclast
development
Inhibin and activin also exert opposing effects on
osteoclastogenesis. The effect of activin on TRAP+ multinucleated
cell formation is consistent with a previous report showing that
activin stimulates osteoclast-like cell formation in vitro
(38). Although the target cell mediating the
osteoclastogenic effect of activin has not been identified, the
effects of both activin and inhibin on osteoclastogenesis are
consistent with activin and inhibin receptors residing, at least in
part, on stromal support cells.
It is now well accepted that the mechanism for stromal cell support of
osteoclastogenesis is the expression of RANKL on stromal cells, which
binds the receptor (RANK) on osteoclast progenitors, stimulating
osteoclast development (38, 39). By preventing recruitment
of stromal cells into the osteoblastic lineage, inhibin and noggin may
prevent stromal cells from acquiring the ability to synthesize RANKL,
thereby limiting osteoclastogenesis. Because activin can recruit
stromal cells into the osteoblastic lineage, this stimulation may be
sufficient for the expression of RANKL and subsequent
osteoclastogenesis. However, these studies do not exclude the
possibility of a direct effect of activin on osteoclasts and/or their
precursors, as has been recently reported for BMPs
(43).
Activin actions on bone in vitro and in vivo
Our studies are the first to suggest a direct role for activin on
mesenchymal cell differentiation in the bone marrow. However, other
direct actions of activin in vitro on osteoblastic cells
derived from calvaria cells have been reported (19, 26, 44). These results suggest that activin action in the local
environment of calvarial cell development (intramembranous bone
development) may be distinct from activin effects on bone remodeling
driven by cells in the bone marrow.
Activin has also been shown to be osteogenic in several in
vivo systems, similar to the BMPs (13). Local
administration of activin increases periosteal bone matrix thickness in
newborn rat parietal bone (17) and enhances
noncartilagenous ectopic bone formation stimulated by BMP2
(14). In addition, activin (0.410 µg/d) promotes
fracture healing when administered locally to rat fibula
(21).
However, recent studies in rats, using exogenous systemic activin
administration to counteract the ovariectomy- induced vertebral
bone loss, demonstrate a biphasic effect. In aged rats, in which serum
activin and follistatin are diminished (20), activin
administration at low doses (15 µg/kg) increased vertebral bone
mass and mechanical properties (20). Administration of
higher doses (25 µg/kg) of activin diminished the magnitude of these
effects (20). These conflicting results highlight the
importance of local activin tone in target tissues, such that low doses
of activin may be sufficient to specifically favor bone formation over
the general elevation of bone turnover.
Biological relevance of inhibin actions on bone marrow cell
differentiation
As far as we are aware, our data are the first to identify a
physiological effect of inhibin that is not mimicked by the activin
antagonist, follistatin. In addition, this inhibin effect was not
blocked by exogenous activin. This result provides functional evidence
to support the existence of a unique inhibin-specific receptor. Indeed,
the recent identification of specific binding of inhibin to both a
novel protein, p120 (45), and to betaglycan
(46) raises the possibility that these proteins may be
involved in mediating the suppressive effects of inhibin.
The inhibin-specific suppression of osteoblast and osteoclast
differentiation has strong biological implications. Reproductive
aging is accompanied by decreases in both inhibin A and inhibin B; the
decrease in inhibin B in perimenopausal women precedes the decrease in
inhibin A (47). This selective decrease in inhibin B
occurs in concert with an increase in E2 and an increase in FSH
(6, 47). In fact, the early increase in FSH is the only
endocrine parameter that has been correlated with increased markers of
bone resorption in perimenopausal women, although inhibin B levels were
not determined in that study (5). Thus, our data, in
conjunction with these clinical findings and the observation that
circulating iodinated inhibin can accumulate in bone marrow
(48), support our hypothesis that gonadal inhibin may
provide endocrine input into the local regulation of osteoblastogenesis
and osteoclastogenesis.
The bone loss and ensuing osteoporosis after loss of gonadal
function has been previously attributed solely to estrogen deficiency.
Our results are the first to directly demonstrate a role for other
gonadal factors on marrow cell differentiation. The in vitro
data presented here suggest a paradigm in which, before loss of sex
steroids, when diminished ovarian function is indicated by selective
decreases in inhibin B secretion, bone turnover may be accelerated
through changes in osteoblast and osteoclast development driven by
altered inhibin and activin tone. Confirmation of these in
vitro effects of inhibin and activin in vivo may
provide critical insight into the control of normal bone turnover in
cycling women.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
The authors wish to thank Dr. Larry Suva for assistance during
the preparation of the manuscript, and Drs. Herschel Conaway and Marie
Chow for critical review. In addition, we are grateful to Drs. Wylie
Vale, Anthony Mason, Patrick Sluss, Vicki Rosen, and Neil Stahl for
providing reagents before their being commercially available from other
sources.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
This work was supported by NIH Grant R01-DK-54044 (to D.G.-K.), NSF
EPSCOR Grant EPC-9704712, P01-AG-13918 (to S.C.M.), and the Department
of Veteran Affairs (to R.L.J. and S.C.M.).
1 Current Address: Mount Sinai School of Medicine One Gustave L. Levy
Place, Box 1055, New York, New York 10029. 
Abbreviations: AP, Alkaline phosphatase; BMP, bone
morphogenetic protein; CFU-OB, colony forming unit-osteoblast; CFU-F,
colony forming unit-fibroblast; MNC, multinucleated; TRAP,
tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; TTBS, 20 mM
Tris (pH 7.4), 0.15 M NaCl containing 0.05% Tween 20.
Received May 4, 2001.
Accepted for publication September 13, 2001.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Manolagas S 2000 Birth and death of bone
cells: basic regulatory mechanisms and implications for the
pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 21:115137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Parfitt AM, Mathews CH, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper M,
Frame B, Rao DS 1983 Relationships between surface, volume, and
thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis.
Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone
loss. J Clin Invest 72:13961409
-
Citron JT, Ettinger B, Genant HK 1995 Spinal
bone mineral loss in estrogen-replete, calcium-replete
premenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 5: 228233
-
Martin TJ, Ng KW 1994 Mechanisms by which cells of
the osteoblast lineage control osteoclast formation and activity.
J Cell Biochem 56:357366[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Ebeling PR, Atley LM, Guthrie JR, Burger HG,
Dennerstein L, Hopper JL, Wark JD 1996 Bone turnover markers and
bone density across the menopausal transition. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab 81:33663371[Abstract]
-
Klein NA, Illingworth PJ, Groome NP, McNeilly AS,
Battaglia DE, Soules MR 1996 Decreased inhibin B secretion is
associated with the monotropic FSH rise in older, ovulatory women: a
study of serum and follicular fluid levels of dimeric inhibin A and B
in spontaneous menstrual cycles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:27422745[Abstract]
-
Vale W, Bilezikjian LM, Rivier C 1994 Reproductive
and other roles of inhibins and activins. In: Knobil E, Neil JD, eds.
The physiology of reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 18611878
-
Yu J, Shao LE, Lemas V, Yu AL, Vaughan J, Rivier J,
Vale W 1987 Importance of FSH-releasing protein and inhibin in
erythrodifferentiation. Nature 330:765767[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Fujimoto K, Kawakita M, Kato K, Yonemura Y, Masuda T,
Matsuzaki H, Hirose J, Isaji M, Sasaki H, Inoue T 1991 Purification of megakaryocyte differentiation activity from a human
fibrous histiocytoma cell line: N-terminal sequence homology with
activin A. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 174:11631168[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Broxmeyer HE, Lu L, Cooper S, Schwall RH, Mason AJ,
Nikolics K 1988 Selective and indirect modulation of human
multipotential and erythroid hematopoietic progenitor cell
proliferation by recombinant human activin and inhibin. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 85:90529056[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yu AW, Shao LE, Frigon Jr NL, Yu J 1994 Detection
of functional and dimeric activin A in human marrow microenvironment:
implications for the modulation of erythropoiesis. Ann NY Acad Sci 718:285299[Abstract]
-
Bonewald LF, Mundy GR 1990 Role of transforming
growth factor-ß in bone remodeling. Clin Orthop 250:261276
-
Wozney J 1992 The bone morphogenetic protein family
and osteogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev 32:160167[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Ogawa Y, Schmidt DK, Nathan RM, Armstrong RM, Miller KL,
Sawamura SJ, Ziman JM, Erickson KL, de Leon ER, Rosen DM 1992 Bovine bone activin enhances bone morphogenetic protein-induced ectopic
bone formation. J Biol Chem 267:1423314237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Funaba M, Ogawa K, Murata T, Fujimura H, Murata E,
Abe M, Takahashi M, Torii K 1996 Follistatin and activin in bone:
expression and localization during endochondral bone development.
Endocrinology 137:42504259[Abstract]
-
Inoue S, Nomura S, Hosoi T, Ouchi Y, Orimo H, Muramatsu
M 1994 Localization of follistatin, an activin-binding protein, in
bone tissues. Calcif Tissue Int 55:395397[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Oue Y, Kanatani H, Kiyoki M, Eto Y, Ogata E,
Matsumoto T 1994 Effect of local injection of activin A on bone
formation in newborn rats. Bone 15:361366[Medline]
-
Meunier H, Rivier C, Evans RM, Vale W 1988 Gonadal
and extragonadal expression of inhibin
, ßA, and ßB subunits in
various tissues predicts diverse functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:247251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Centrella M, McCarthy TL, Canalis E 1991 Activin-A
binding and biochemical effects in osteoblast-enriched cultures from
fetal-rat parietal bone. Mol Cell Biol 11:250258[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sakai R, Fujita S, Horie T, Ohyama T, Miwa K, Maki T,
Okimoto N, Nakamura T, Eto Y 2000 Activin increases bone mass and
mechanical strength of lumbar vertebrae in aged ovariectomized rats.
Bone 27:9196[Medline]
-
Sakai R, Miwa K, Eto Y 1999 Local administration of
activin promotes fracture healing in the rat fibula fracture model.
Bone 25:191196[Medline]
-
Chen,P, Yu YM, Redd AH 1993 Chondrogenesis in chick
limb bud mesodermal cells: reciprocal modulation by activin and
inhibin. Exp Cell Res 206: 119127
-
Funaba M, Ogawa K, Abe M 2001 Expression and
localization of activin receptors during endochondral bone development.
Eur J Endocrinol 144:6371
-
Nakamura T, Takio K, Eto Y, Shibai H, Titani K, Sugino
H 1990 Activin-binding protein from rat ovary is follistatin.
Science 247:836838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Michel U, Albiston A, Findlay JK 1990 Rat
follistatin: gonadal and extragonadal expression and evidence for
alternative splicing. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 173:401407[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Hashimoto MM, Shoda A, Inoue S, Yamada R, Kondo T,
Sakurai T, Ueno N, Muramatsu M 1992 Functional regulation of
osteoblastic cells by the interaction of activin-A with follistatin.
J Biol Chem 267:49995004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bilezikjian LM, Corrigan AZ, Blount AL, Vale
WW 1996 Pituitary follistatin and inhibin subunit messenger
ribonucleic acid levels are differentially regulated by local and
hormonal factors. Endocrinology 137:42774284[Abstract]
-
Mather JP, Roberts PE, Krummen LA 1993 Follistatin
modulates activin activity in a cell- and tissue-specific manner.
Endocrinology 132:27322734[Abstract]
-
Sakai R 1998 Osteogenic activity of activin
in young normal rats and young, adult and aged rats after ovariectomy.
Bone 23(Suppl):467
-
Woodruff TK Mather JP 1995 Inhibin, activin and the
female reproductive axis. Annu Rev Physiol 57:219244[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Jilka RL, Takahashi K, Munshi M, Williams DC, Roberson
PK, Manolagas SC 1998 Loss of estrogen up-regulates
osteoblastogenesis in the murine bone marrow. Evidence for autonomy
from factors released during bone resorption. J Clin Invest 101:19421950[Medline]
-
Aubin JE, Liu F 1996 The osteoblast lineage.
In: Bilezikian J, Raisz LG, Rodan GA, eds. Principles of bone biology.
San Diego: Academic Press; 6986
-
Owen M 1985 Lineage of osteogenic cells and their
relationship to the stromal system. Bone Miner Res 3:125
-
Aubin JE 1998 Advances in the osteoblast lineage.
Biochem Cell Biol 76: 899910
-
DiGregorio GB, Yamamoto M, Ali AA, Abe E,
Roberson P, Manolagas SC, Jilka RL 2001 Attenuation of the
self-renewal of transit-amplifying osteoblast progenitors in the murine
bone marrow by 17ß-estradiol. J Clin Invest 107:803812[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Gaddy-Kurten D, Vale W 1995 Activin increases
phosphorylation and decreases stability of the transcription factor
Pit-1 in MtTW15 somatotrope cells. J Biol Chem 270:2873328739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yamashita H, ten Dijke P, Huylebroeck D, Sampath
TK, Andries M, Smith JC, Heldin CH, Miyazono K 1995 Osteogenic
protein-1 binds to activin type II receptors and induces certain
activin-like effects. J Cell Biol 130:217226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Suda TTN, Udagawa N, Jimi E, Gillespie MT, Martin
TJ 1999 Modulation of osteoclast differentiation and function by
the new members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor and ligand
families. Endocr Rev 20:345357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Aubin JE, Bonnelye E 2000 Osteoprotegerin and its
ligand: a new paradigm for regulation of osteoclastogenesis and bone
resorption. Osteoporos Int 11:905913[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Sakai R, Eto Y, Ohtsuka M, Hirafuji M, Shinoda H 1993 Activin enhances osteoclast-like cell formation in
vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 195:3946[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Abe E, , Yamamoto M, Taguchi Y, Lecka-Czernik B,
OBrien CA, Economides AN, Stahl N, Jilka RL, Manolagas SC 2000 Essential requirement of BMPs-2/4 for both osteoblast and osteoclast
formation in murine bone marrow cultures from adult mice: antagonism by
noggin. J Bone Miner Res 15:663673[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Schmelzer CH, Burton LE, Tamony CM, Schwall RH, Mason
AJ, Liegeois N 1990 Purification and characterization of
recombinant human activin B. Biochim Biophys Acta 1039:135141[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Kaneko H, Arakawa T, Mano H, Kaneda T, Ogasawara A,
Nakagawa M, Toyama Y, Yabe Y, Kumegawa M, Hakeda Y 2000 Direct
stimulation of osteoclastic bone resorption by bone morphogenetic
protein (BMP)-2 and expression of BMP receptors in mature osteoclasts.
Bone 27:479486[Medline]
-
Ikenoue T, Jingushi S, Urabe K, Okazaki K, Iwamoto
Y 1999 Inhibitory effects of activin-A on osteoblast
differentiation during cultures of fetal rat calvarial cells. J
Cell Biochem 75:206214[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Chong H, Pangas SA, Bernard DJ, Wang E, Gitch J, Chen W,
Draper LB, Cox ET, Woodruff TK 2000 Structure and expression of a
membrane component of the inhibin receptor system. Endocrinology 141:26002607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lewis KAGP, Blount AL, MacConell LA, Wiater E,
Bilezikjian LM, Vale W 2000 Betaglycan binds inhibin and can
mediate functional antagonism of activin signalling. Nature 404:411414[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Welt CK, McNicholl DJ, Taylor AE, Hall JE 1999 Female reproductive aging is marked by decreased secretion of dimeric
inhibin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:105111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Woodruff TK, Krummen L, Chen SA, Lyon R, Hansen SE,
DeGuzman G, Covello R, Mather J, Cossum P 1993 Pharmacokinetic
profile of recombinant human (rh) inhibin A and activin A in the
immature rat. II. Tissue distribution of
[125I]rh-inhibin A and
[125I]rh-activin A in immature female and male
rats. Endocrinology 132:725734[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Pearsall, E. Canalis, M. Cornwall-Brady, K. W. Underwood, B. Haigis, J. Ucran, R. Kumar, E. Pobre, A. Grinberg, E. D. Werner, et al.
A soluble activin Type IIA receptor induces bone formation and improves skeletal integrity
PNAS,
May 13, 2008;
105(19):
7082 - 7087.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Suva, E. Hartman, J. D. Dilley, S. Russell, N. S. Akel, R. A. Skinner, W. R. Hogue, U. Budde, K. I. Varughese, T. Kanaji, et al.
Platelet Dysfunction and a High Bone Mass Phenotype in a Murine Model of Platelet-Type von Willebrand Disease
Am. J. Pathol.,
February 1, 2008;
172(2):
430 - 439.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-R. Chen, K. Shankar, S. Nagarajan, T. M. Badger, and M. J. J. Ronis
Protective Effects of Estradiol on Ethanol-Induced Bone Loss Involve Inhibition of Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in Osteoblasts and Downstream Activation of the Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3/Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Ligand Signaling Cascade
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
January 1, 2008;
324(1):
50 - 59.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Eijken, S. Swagemakers, M. Koedam, C. Steenbergen, P. Derkx, A. G. Uitterlinden, P. J. van der Spek, J. A. Visser, F. H. de Jong, H. A. P. Pols, et al.
The activin A-follistatin system: potent regulator of human extracellular matrix mineralization
FASEB J,
September 1, 2007;
21(11):
2949 - 2960.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Canalis, A. Giustina, and J. P. Bilezikian
Mechanisms of Anabolic Therapies for Osteoporosis
N. Engl. J. Med.,
August 30, 2007;
357(9):
905 - 916.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. R. Williams
Hypogonadal Bone Loss: Sex Steroids or Gonadotropins?
Endocrinology,
June 1, 2007;
148(6):
2610 - 2612.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Gao, R. Tiwari-Pandey, R. Samadfam, Y. Yang, D. Miao, A. C. Karaplis, M. R. Sairam, and D. Goltzman
Altered Ovarian Function Affects Skeletal Homeostasis Independent of the Action of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
Endocrinology,
June 1, 2007;
148(6):
2613 - 2621.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Perrien, N. S. Akel, P. K. Edwards, A. A. Carver, M. S. Bendre, F. L. Swain, R. A. Skinner, W. R. Hogue, K. M. Nicks, T. M. Pierson, et al.
Inhibin A Is an Endocrine Stimulator of Bone Mass and Strength
Endocrinology,
April 1, 2007;
148(4):
1654 - 1665.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. A. Clines, K. S. Mohammad, Y. Bao, O. W. Stephens, L. J. Suva, J. D. Shaughnessy Jr., J. W. Fox, J. M. Chirgwin, and T. A. Guise
Dickkopf Homolog 1 Mediates Endothelin-1-Stimulated New Bone Formation
Mol. Endocrinol.,
February 1, 2007;
21(2):
486 - 498.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-R. Chen, R. L. Haley, M. Hidestrand, K. Shankar, X. Liu, C. K. Lumpkin, P. M. Simpson, T. M. Badger, and M. J. J. Ronis
Estradiol Protects against Ethanol-Induced Bone Loss by Inhibiting Up-Regulation of Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Ligand in Osteoblasts
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
December 1, 2006;
319(3):
1182 - 1190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. R. Ebeling
Inhibin in bone--new tricks for an old dog.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
May 1, 2006;
91(5):
1669 - 1670.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Perrien, S. J. Achenbach, S. E. Bled |