| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLE |
and ß Have Similar Activities in Multiple Endothelial Cell Pathways
Womens Health Research Institute (M.J.E., H.A.H., S.K.K., S.J.A.) and Department of Chemical Sciences, Wyeth Research (C.P.M.), Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Mark J. Evans, Wyeth Research, 500 Arcola Road, Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426. E-mail: evansm{at}wyeth.com.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(ER
) and ERß in vascular cells has greatly increased the complexity of potential estrogen regulatory pathways in the cardiovascular system. Here, human umbilical vein endothelial cells were engineered using adenovirus vectors to express either ER
or ERß. The activities of ER
and ERß were compared in three distinct gene regulatory pathways, including inhibition of IL-1ß induction of E-selectin expression, inhibition of basal endothelin-1 production, and the ability to induce two matrix-stabilizing enzymes: tissue transglutaminase and a novel member of the lysyl oxidase family. Both ERs were active on these end points, although ERß was typically less efficacious than ER
. As no class of gene regulation could differentiate ER
from ERß activity, we characterized a novel steroid (7
-thiophenyl-E2) that bound with similar affinities to ER
and ERß, but functioned as an ER
agonist and ERß antagonist for all of these endothelial responses. This pattern of receptor subtype-selective activity was not unique to endothelial cells, but was also seen in metabolically active HepG2 cells, suggesting potential in vivo utility. The panel of endothelial responses coupled with a selective modulator should provide a means to characterize the roles of ER
and ERß in endothelial cells in vivo. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The role of estrogens in cardiovascular disease prevention is complex. HRT has been shown in numerous studies to significantly lower low density lipoprotein levels (5, 6, 7, 8). Furthermore, low levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL) are now known to be a significant risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (9, 10, 11), and estrogens increase HDL levels by approximately 1020% (5, 6, 7). Finally, estrogens decrease levels of lipoprotein(a) in women (12, 13), another suggested risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (13, 14, 15). The mechanism of action for these effects probably resides in the liver, as transdermal administration of estrogens fails to either elevate HDL levels or decrease lipoprotein(a) levels (16, 17). Comparison of the magnitude of estrogen-mediated lipid changes with the degree of reduction in mortality has suggested that these lipid changes account for only a minority of the beneficial effects (18). As much as 75% of the beneficial effects of HRT are thus currently believed to be independent of lipid changes.
Development of the atherosclerotic lesion is now recognized as an inflammatory process. One of the key early steps in development of the lesion is transmigration of monocytes from the circulation into the subendothelial space, a process dependent upon the expression of adhesion molecules such as E-selectin, vascular cellular adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 by endothelial cells through a nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B)-dependent up-regulation of gene expression (19, 20). HRT decreases levels of soluble E-selectin and VCAM-1 in women (21, 22, 23, 24), suggesting that endothelial expression of these molecules is decreased in vivo. In addition, estrogen treatment of ovariectomized mice results in the inhibition of diet-induced VCAM-1 expression (25), suggesting that down-regulation of VCAM-1 may be a significant component of estrogen inhibition of atherosclerotic lesion development (26). These effects are probably due to the direct influence of estrogens on endothelial cell gene expression. Indeed, it has been recently shown that treatment of cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) with 17ß-estradiol inhibits IL-1ß induction of these adhesion molecules (27). Furthermore, in addition to lesion size, lesion complexity/stability are major determinants of clinical coronary events, which can be precipitated by either endothelial denudation or plaque rupture (28), two processes facilitated by elevated blood pressure. In women, estrogens are known to decrease levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1) (29, 30, 31), a major determinant of blood pressure and a potent chemoattractant for monocytes (32). In HUVEC, estrogen regulates transcriptional expression of ET-1 through the transcription factor activating protein-1 (AP-1) (33).
The concept of direct vascular therapeutic effects of estrogen is further supported by experimental findings using rabbits in which the cholesterol levels were maintained constant by varying the animals diet. Treatment of these rabbits with estrogen greatly decreased aortic cholesterol accumulation (34). In contrast, if the endothelium was removed by balloon catheter injury, estrogen no longer had any protective effect (34). Thus, endothelial cells appear to be significantly involved in estrogen protective activities. This model has been reinforced by the finding of both estrogen receptor
(ER
) and ERß in vessel endothelial cells, with the levels of ERß increasing up to 40-fold after vessel injury (35, 36). Notably, estrogen treatment reduces vascular injury in wild-type, ER
knockout (ER
KO), and ERßKO mice (37, 38, 39), but does not reduce injury in ER
ERß double KO mice (40), suggesting that ER
and ERß may play redundant roles in vascular protection.
In cotransfection studies, ER
and ERß behave similarly on synthetic estrogen response element (ERE)-driven reporters in response to various ligands, including 17ß-estradiol (41, 42). In contrast, in cotransfection studies, 17ß-estradiol activates AP-1-dependent transcription through ER
, but inhibits AP-1-dependent transcription through ERß (43, 44). Thus, 17ß-estradiol produces similar results for ER
and ERß in one transcriptional pathway (regulation of ERE activity), but has opposite effects on ER
and ERß in a second transcriptional pathway (regulation of AP-1 activity). Little is known regarding the comparative abilities of ER
and ERß to regulate gene expression mediated by complex promoters within a chromosomal context, especially in endothelial cells. Here we demonstrate that ER
and ERß are both able to mediate estrogen activity in three distinct processes: inhibition of IL-1ß induction of expression of E-selectin, inhibition of basal ET-1 production, and induction of matrix-modifying enzymes. However, a novel estrogen derivative, 7
-thiophenyl-E2, functioned as an ER
agonist, but an ERß antagonist, for all of these responses. The combination of knowledge of endothelial cell functions mediated by ERs coupled with a pharmacological tool to differentially regulate these receptors should allow a clearer understanding of which receptor is active in endothelial cells in vivo.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ER Western blotting
On d 1, 100-mm dishes were seeded with 2 x 106 human aortic endothelial cells in EGM. On d 2, the cells were refed deficient EGM [EGM prepared using phenol red-free EBM and 2% charcoal/dextran-treated fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Laboratories, Inc., Logan, UT)] containing replication-defective adenovirus (45) expressing human full length wild-type ER
(Ad5ER
) or ERß (Ad5ERß) at an approximate multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 50 or 500, respectively. After allowing the virus to adsorb to the cells for 1 h at 37 C, the cells were washed once with deficient EGM and refed deficient EGM. Six hours later the cells were refed deficient EGM containing 100 nM 17ß-estradiol. On d 3, nuclear extracts were prepared as previously described (46). Twenty-five micrograms of nuclear extract protein were subjected to SDS-PAGE on an 8% gel, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed using rabbit polyclonal antibodies specific for ER
or ERß. Bound primary antibody was detected using peroxidase-coupled goat antirabbit IgG (Zymed Laboratories, Inc., San Francisco, CA), followed by chemiluminescent (ECL, Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) detection of peroxidase activity.
Binding assays
For in vitro binding assays, the ligand-binding domains of human ER
(with an N-terminal His tag) or ERß (with an N-terminal His tag and a C-terminal flag epitope) were expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3) by isopropyl-ß-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside induction for 2 h at 25 C. A crude lysate was prepared in 50 mM Tris-Cl and 150 mM NaCl (pH 7.4) using a French press, and insoluble material was removed by centrifugation. Binding reactions were performed in Wallac high binding, cross-talk-free, 96-well plates containing 2 nM [3H]17ß-estradiol (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA), unlabeled compounds and 1 µg crude lysate in Dulbeccos PBS supplemented with 1 mM EDTA. After incubation at room temperature for 518 h, unbound material was removed by rinsing, and bound disintegrations per minute were determined by liquid scintillation counting.
For whole cell binding assays, HUVEC were plated on d 1 in 24-well plates at 1 x 105 cells/well in EGM medium. On d 2, the cells were refed deficient EGM containing Ad5ER
or Ad5ERß at an approximate MOI of 30. After allowing the virus to adsorb to the cells for 1 h at 37 C, the cells were refed deficient EGM. On d 3, the cells were refed medium B [phenol red-free EBM (Clonetics) supplemented with 0.25% BSA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 0.1% antibiotic-antimycotic (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD)] containing 0.8 nM [3H]17ß-estradiol plus various concentrations of competitor. After incubation at 37 C for 1 h, the cells were washed four times with ice-cold PBS containing 0.1% BSA and twice with ice-cold HBSS supplemented with 7.5 mM EDTA plus 0.1% methylcellulose. The cells were treated with 100% ethanol for 15 min. The ethanol extract was added to Optiphase scintillant (Wallac, Inc., Turku, Finland) and counted using a 1450 MicroBeta scintillation counter (Wallac, Inc.). Nonspecific binding was determined by the addition of 1 µM unlabeled 17ß-estradiol to the binding reactions. Fifty percent inhibitory concentration values were determined by fitting a four-parameter equation to a plot of specific bound counts vs. competitor concentration.
E-selectin assay
On d 1, HUVEC were plated in EGM at 7000 cells/well in 96-well plates. On d 2, the cells were infected with Ad5ER
or Ad5ERß at an approximate MOI of 300. After infection, the cells were washed and refed with deficient EGM. After 6 h, the cells were refed medium B containing compounds. On d 3, the cells were refed medium B containing compounds plus 30 U/ml recombinant human IL-1ß (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). After 5 h of incubation at 37 C, the cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and fixed with PBS containing 2% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. The cells were again washed three times with PBS. E-selectin expression was determined by an ELISA using 2 µg/ml anti-CD62E monoclonal antibody (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), followed by 1 µg/ml peroxidase-labeled goat antimouse IgG+A+M (Zymed Laboratories, Inc.). Antibody binding was quantified by using o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride as the substrate and measuring end-point absorbance at 490 nm.
ET-1 assay
On the morning of d 1, HUVEC were plated in EGM at 14,000 cells/well in 96-well plates. Approximately 6 h later, the cells were infected with Ad5ER
or Ad5ERß at an approximate MOI of 300. After allowing the virus to adsorb for 1 h at 37 C, the cells were washed and refed deficient EGM. On d 2, the cells were refed medium B containing compounds. After 5 h of incubation at 37 C, the medium was removed and assayed by ET-1 ELISA (R\|[amp ]\|D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN).
Isolation of endothelial estrogen-regulated gene-7 (EER-7)
EER-7 was identified by differential display using HUVEC RNA. On d 1, HUVEC were plated at 3 x 106 cells/150-mm plate. On d 2, the cells were infected as described above. Five hours after treatment with either vehicle or 100 nM 17ß-estradiol, the cells were harvested using TRIzol (Life Technologies, Inc.). RNA was prepared according to the manufacturers protocol, treated with 10 U deoxyribonuclease I (Life Technologies, Inc.) at 37 C for 1 h, and repurified by RNeasy spin column (QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA).
After deoxyribonuclease I treatment, 6 µg total RNA were incubated with 1x reverse transcriptase buffer [25 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.3), 37.6 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM dithiothreitol], 20 µM deoxy-NTPs, and 0.2 µM HT11C oligonucleotide (AAGCTTTTTTTTTTTC) in a final volume of 600 µl. This reaction mixture was incubated at 65 C for 5 min to denature secondary structures, followed by a 10-min incubation at 37 C. Superscript reverse transcriptase (30 µl; 200 U/µl; Life Technologies, Inc.) was then added to the reaction, and incubation was continued for 1 h at 37 C. The enzyme was inactivated by heating at 75 C for 5 min. An aliquot of this reaction was then used for the second strand synthesis in PCR buffer [10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.4), 100 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.001% gelatin] containing 2 µM deoxy-NTPs, 15 nM [33P]deoxy-ATP (NEN Life Science Products), 1 U AmpliTaq (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT), and 1 µM arbitrary primer 5'-AAGCTTGCCATGG-3'. This reaction was amplified using 40 cycles of 92 C for 15 sec, 40 C for 2 min, and 72 C for 30 sec. The PCR products were separated on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel for 3 h at 2000 V. The gel was transferred to filter paper, dried under vacuum at 80 C for 1 h, and exposed to x-ray film for 24 h. The developed film was then superimposed over the dried gel, and the band of interest was identified. The corresponding gel slice was excised and boiled in water for 15 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, and recovered PCR product was precipitated using glycogen as a carrier at -20 C overnight with sodium acetate/ethanol. The resulting pellet was used in a reamplification PCR in the presence of 1x PCR buffer, 20 mM deoxy-NTPs, 0.2 mM arbitrary primer, 0.2 mM HT11C oligonucleotide, and 2 U AmpliTaq, with the same conditions as those described above.
One band (no. 7), approximately 320 bp in size, showed a very strong induction by 17ß-estradiol treatment and was designated endothelial EER-7. The EER-7 fragment was cloned by TA cloning into the pCRII vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). Sequencing of the insert revealed it to be a novel clone. Other bands identified in a similar manner corresponded to known genes, such as transglutaminase.
To isolate the complete EER-7 cDNA, a PCR screening approach (OriGene Rapid-Screen) was used with a human placenta library. Oligonucleotide primers derived from the EER-7 insert sequence (5'-TTTGCTCAGCTGAGCTCCT-3' and 5'-TAAGATAAAGGTAAGGACACTA-3') were used to screen the master plate. Subplates corresponding to each positive well were rescreened in multiple rounds to identify positive individual colonies. One clone contained a cDNA insert corresponding to the predicted EER-7 transcript size determined by Northern analysis and was sequenced in its entirety. Blast analysis of the NCBI UniGene database identified this sequence as Hs.306814.
Transglutaminase protein expression and activity
On d 1, HUVEC were plated in EGM at 7000 cells/well in 96-well plates. On d 2, the cells were infected with Ad5ßGal, Ad5ER
, or Ad5ERß at an approximate MOI of 300. After infection, the cells were washed and refed with deficient EGM. After 6 h, the cells were refed medium B containing compounds. For determination of transglutaminase protein, cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot using a monoclonal antibody directed against human transglutaminase type II (MS-300-P1, Lab Vision, Fremont, CA) at a 1:500 dilution, followed by a goat antimouse peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Zymed Laboratories, Inc.) with chemiluminescent detection (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). For measurement of transglutaminase activity, cells were incubated with [3H]putrescine at 37 C followed by trichloroacetic acid precipitation of total cellular protein essentially as described previously (47).
Northern analysis
On d 1, HUVEC were plated in EGM at 3 x 106 cells/150-mm dish. On d 2, the cells were infected with Ad5ER
or Ad5ERß at an approximate MOI of 300, washed, and refed medium B. Five hours later, the cells were refed medium B containing compounds. After incubation at 37 C for 20 h, total RNA was prepared from the cells by RNeasy method (QIAGEN). RNA was fractionated by electrophoresis on 1% agarose, transferred to nylon membranes, and hybridized to 32P-labeled probes prepared from EER-7 and GAPDH cDNAs using an oligonucleotide labeling kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as previously described (38).
HepG2 transfection
HepG2 cells (1 x 107) were transfected with 50 µg NF-
B luciferase reporter plasmid, 20 µg Rous sarcoma virus-ß-galactosidase, and either 25 µg cDNA3 ER
or cDNA3 ERß expression plasmids by electroporation at 100 V/cm, 1700 µF, 72
(BTX, San Diego, CA). Transfected cells were allowed to recover for 20 min, resuspended in deficient growth medium (DMEM supplemented with 1% MEM nonessential amino acids, 10% heat-inactivated charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum, 10 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin) and aliquoted at 1 x 105 cells/well in 96-well plates. On d 2, the cells were refed deficient growth medium supplemented with 100 U/ml IL-1ß and the indicated compounds. Luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities were assayed 6 h later using commercial luciferase (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) and ß-galactosidase (Tropix, Bedford, MA) reagents. The NF-
B luciferase reporter plasmid contains three copies of the human MHC class I promoter NF-
B-binding site upstream of the thymidine kinase promoter truncated at position -105.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ERß (35, 36). However, the expression of ER varies dramatically with culture conditions and passage number of primary endothelial cells. Treatment of HUVEC with high doses of 17ß-estradiol maintains the expression of ER
(27), but the use of ligand to maintain the expression of ER confounds further analysis. We therefore employed an adenovirus infection system (45) to selectively express either ER
or ERß in endothelial cells. Western blotting of nuclear extracts prepared from cultured human aortic endothelial cells or HUVEC did not detect significant levels of either ER
or ERß (Fig. 1
were detected in nuclear extract prepared from cells infected with replication-defective adenovirus designed to express ER
. No induction of ERß was seen in these cells. Similarly, high levels of ERß were detected in cells infected with adenovirus expressing ERß, with no ER
detectable in these cells. Both ER
and ERß were present in nuclear extracts prepared from cells infected with both adenoviruses. Staining of cells infected with an adenovirus expressing ß-galactosidase demonstrated that under these conditions greater than 90% of cells were infected, allowing analysis of endogenous gene regulations.
|
and ERß activity in diverse gene regulatory pathways
to inhibit NF-
B signaling (48). Following stimulation with IL-1ß, HUVEC expressing either ER
or ERß showed a 5-fold increase in cell surface E-selectin levels in the absence of receptor ligand. Addition of increasing concentrations of 17ß-estradiol inhibited E-selectin induction by up to 80% in cells expressing ER
and up to 50% in cells expressing ERß (Fig. 2
|
or ERß with increasing concentrations of 17ß-estradiol reduced ET-1 production by up to 50% and 30%, respectively (Fig. 3
and 10 nM 17ß-estradiol producing maximal activity through ERß. The addition of increasing concentrations of ICI-182780 completely blocked the inhibition of ET production by 2 nM 17ß-estradiol in HUVEC expressing either ER
or ERß (Fig. 3
|
and ERß to induce gene expression in endothelial cells, it was first necessary to identify genes induced by estrogen treatment of endothelial cells. Differential expression analysis of HUVEC expressing ER (data not shown) revealed a novel gene, designated here EER-7, which was induced up to 100-fold by treatment with 17ß-estradiol. EER-7 is highly homologous to the recently identified mouse LOXC gene (50) in both primary amino acid sequence and gene structure (Fig. 4
and ERß functioned similarly to stimulate expression of EER-7 at the mRNA level in the presence of 17ß-estradiol, but were inactive in the presence of ICI-182780 (Fig. 6
|
|
|
or ERß with 17ß-estradiol resulted in approximately a 2-fold increase in cellular transglutaminase activity (Fig. 7
or ERß, but not in cells infected with a control ß-galactosidase adenovirus or in uninfected cells. ICI-182780 was able to block the 17ß-estradiol inductions.
|
and ERß responses in HUVEC
from ERß activity in vivo, as both receptors had similar potentials to interact with multiple endogenous signaling pathways. However, these responses have allowed identification of a compound [7
-thiophenyl-17ß-estradiol (7
-TP-E2)] that functions as an ER
agonist and ERß antagonist in each of these diverse pathways. 7
-TP-E2 binds in vitro with high affinity to both ER
and ERß bacterially expressed ligand binding domains (Table 1
and ERß expressed in HUVEC (Fig. 8
and ERß, whereas 7
-TP-E2 had a few-fold higher potency for ERß than for ER
. This difference was more prominent in the HUVEC whole cell binding assay, possibly attributable to the use of the full-length receptor in HUVEC compared with use of only the ligand binding domain of the ER in the in vitro assays.
|
|
-TP-E2 functioned as an ER
agonist, but ERß antagonist, for inhibition of E-selectin induction by IL-1ß (Fig. 2A
had a similar maximal response to treatment with either 17ß-estradiol or 7
-TP-E2. 7
-TP-E2 was approximately 100-fold less potent than 17ß-estradiol for regulation of E-selectin expression (Fig. 2
-TP-E2 (Fig. 8
-TP-E2 had no agonist activity in HUVEC expressing ERß for any of these regulations. In contrast, 7
-TP-E2 was able to inhibit 17ß-estradiol activation of ERß activity to the same extent as ICI-182780 for regulation of E-selectin expression (Fig. 2D
To ascertain whether the activity of 7
-TP-E2 was unique to endothelial cells, HepG2 cells were cotransfected with ER expression plasmids along with an NF-
B-driven luciferase reporter plasmid. Both ER
and ERß were able to inhibit this NF-
B-driven reporter response (Fig. 9A
), consistent with the results obtained on E-selectin expression in HUVEC. 7
-TP-E2 also inhibited NF-
B promoter activation in cells expressing ER
, but not in cells expressing ERß. Rather, 7
-TP-E2 functioned similar to ICI-182780 in cells expressing ERß and inhibited ERß activity (Fig. 9B
). Thus, 7
-TP-E2 activity as an ER
agonist and ERß antagonist is not specific for either a particular estrogen response pathway or a particular cell type.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ERß, their contributions to specific endothelial cell functional end points in response to ER agonists has not been thoroughly investigated. By using adenoviruses selectively expressing either ER
or ERß we demonstrate here that both receptors can inhibit IL-1ß induction of E-selectin expression (Fig. 2
B and ATF2 pathways (53, 54). Glucocorticoid receptor inhibits the induction of E-selectin expression by selectively blocking the NF-
B pathway (55). The ability of ER
and ERß to inhibit expression from an NF-
B-driven reporter plasmid (Fig. 9
Recently, ERßKO, but not ER
KO, mice have been shown to develop systemic and diastolic hypertension due to a defect in smooth muscle function (56). In humans, polymorphisms at both the ER
and ERß loci have been associated with the development of hypertension (57, 58). One potential explanation for these observations is the ability of estrogen treatment to lower plasma levels of ET-1. ET-1 levels are elevated within the atherosclerotic lesion, where it is produced by endothelial cells, macrophages, and smooth muscle cells (32). Both ER
and ERß lowered basal production of ET-1 in HUVEC to a magnitude similar to that seen in women.
In contrast to the known inhibitory effects of estrogens on endothelial cells, little is known about the ability of estrogens to induce gene expression in endothelial cells. By differential gene expression analysis we identified several genes induced in HUVEC expressing ER. Notable among these were two genes involved in the maturation of the extracellular matrix. First, ER
and ERß both induced the expression of a novel gene, designated here EER-7, by as much as 100-fold. The EER-7 protein is greater than 90% identical in amino acid sequence to the recently described LOXC (50) protein. Further, the human EER-7 and murine LOXC genes have an identical exon structure, and both contain strong ERE elements within their promoters, suggesting that they are true orthologs. The LOXC gene has been demonstrated to be a novel member of the lysyl oxidase family, capable of cross-linking type I and type II collagen. A human multiple tissue RNA blot demonstrated that EER-7 expression was very high in the aorta, suggesting that this gene may, in fact, be important in the maintenance of vascular wall structure. A second gene regulated by ER in HUVEC at the RNA, protein, and activity levels is tissue transglutaminase. Tissue transglutaminase is also involved in the cross-linking of extracellular matrix proteins, including collagen. Potentially, estrogen up-regulation of matrix cross-linking proteins, such as EER-7 and tissue transglutaminase, contributes to the low incidence of aortic aneurysms seen in women compared with men (59). In regard to atherosclerosis, transglutaminase is required for activation of latent TGFß (60), and tamoxifen elevation of TGFß levels correlates with its protection against lesion development in the mouse (61). ER induction of transglutaminase in endothelial cells may explain this correlation.
The ability of ER
and ERß to regulate the same genes in HUVEC is consistent with the expression of both receptors in endothelial cells and the apparent redundancy of ER
and ERß in certain animal models, but it does not imply that both receptors necessarily mediate all these effects in vivo. For this conclusion to be drawn, a pharmacological dissociation between ER
and ERß in these pathways is necessary. 7
-TP-E2, a 7
-thio-substituted 17ß-estradiol (62), binds to ER
and ERß with similar potencies, but acts as an ER
agonist and an ERß antagonist for E-selectin inhibition, ET-1 inhibition, and EER-7 induction. Recently, two other compounds, R,R-THC, a cis-diethyl-substituted tetrahydrochrysene (63), and 2,2-bis-(p-hydroxy-phenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane (64) have been shown to act as ER
agonists and ERß antagonists in cotransfection assays measuring ER ability to stimulate gene expression. It is unclear that these compounds would maintain this pattern of activity on endogenous promoters in multiple stimulatory and inhibitory pathways. For example, we have recently found that in the mouse liver raloxifene and genistein can function as ER
agonists for inhibition of inflammatory gene induction, but are inactive for stimulation of gene expression (65). Further, receptor cross-reactivity will be an important parameter for this class of compounds. In fact, 2,2-bis-(p-hydroxy-phenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane has recently shown to be an antagonist of androgen receptor activity (66). As 7
-TP-E2 is a derivative of 17ß-estradiol, and steroidal estrogens typically do not interact strongly with other nuclear hormone receptors, it may retain a high degree of receptor selectivity.
The similarity of the binding potency of 7
-TP-E2 for ER
compared with ERß along with the high degree of conservation between ER
and ERß of ligand-interacting amino acids suggest that 7
-TP-E2 may make similar contacts to each receptor. However, the overall resulting protein structure is likely to be very different: ER
folds into a conformation capable of interacting productively with coactivators, whereas ERß fails to do so. The crystal structure of ER
with 17ß-estradiol revealed a large unoccupied cavity opposite the
face of the B ring (67). The 7
-TP substituent of 7
-TP-E2 could potentially be accommodated in this cavity in ER
. Alteration of this cavity in ERß might allow 7
-TP-E2 to still bind, but the resulting overall structure of the ERß protein could be altered to a form unable to interact with necessary cofactors. Similarly, ICI-182780 is comprised of 17ß-estradiol with a very large side-chain at the 7
position (68). However, this side-chain may be sufficiently large so as to be unable to be accommodated by either the ER
or ERß ligand-binding domains without distorting the receptor into a conformation unable to productively interact with coactivators. Structure-activity studies of compounds similar to 7
-TP-E2 indicate that the composition of the 7
group is indeed a major factor in establishing the ER
agonist/ERß antagonist activity pattern (data not shown). The structures of R,R-THC bound to both ER
and ERß have recently been determined (69). As expected, helix 12 in ER
bound to R,R-THC is in the same position as when E2 is bound. Surprisingly, helix 12 in ERß bound to R,R-THC is in a position similar to that seen with the agonist genistein and is not in a position similar to the helix 12 orientation observed when the antagonists raloxifene and ICI-182780 are bound. Whether this "passive antagonism" would also occur with 7
-TP-E2 is unknown.
In summary, the results in this study suggest that ER
and ERß can play redundant roles in at least three distinct regulatory pathways: inhibition of inflammatory cytokine-mediated endothelial cell activation, inhibition of basal ET-1 production, and induction of matrix-stabilizing enzymes. In addition, the results in this study document a unique profile of novel steroidal ER ligand, 7
-TP-E2, that functions as a dual ER
agonist and ERß antagonist. This compound may be useful in elucidating the contributions of these receptors to endothelial cell function in vivo.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: AP-1, Activating protein-1; EBM, endothelial cell basal medium; EER-7, endothelial estrogen-regulated gene-7; ER, estrogen receptor; ERE, estrogen response element; ET-1, endothelin-1; HDL, high density lipoprotein; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; KO, knockout; MOI, multiplicity of infection; NF-
B, nuclear factor-
B; RR-THC, cis-diethyl-substituted tetrahydrochrysene; 7
-TP-E2, 7
-thiophenyl-17ß-estradiol; VCAM-1, vascular cellular adhesion molecule 1.
Received March 28, 2002.
Accepted for publication June 4, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B signal transduction pathway in aortic endothelial cells is primed for activation in regions predisposed to atherosclerotic lesion formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:90529057
B is present in the atherosclerotic lesion. J Clin Invest 97:17151722[Medline]
B activity in vivo. Circ Res 89:823830
and ß. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:70777082
-deficient mice. Nat Med 3:545548[CrossRef][Medline]
, ß (double) knockout mice. Circ Res 89:534539
and ß. Endocrinology 138:863870
and ERß at AP1 sites. Science 277:15081510
and ß is cell type- and promoter-dependent. J Biol Chem 274:3200832014
B in HepG2 cells. Endocrinology 141:34033411
-induced E-selectin expression is activated by the nuclear factor-
B and c-JUN N-terminal kinase/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. J Biol Chem 272:27532761
B and TRAF-RAC/CDC42-JNK-c-Jun/ATF2 pathways. J Immunol 159:35083518[Abstract]
B and not ATF/c-Jun. J Immunol 158:38363844[Abstract]
or estrogen receptor-ß. Endocrinology 140:800804
and ß. Endocrinology 140:57465753
inhibits IL-1ß induction of gene expression in the mouse liver. Endocrinology 143:25592570This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Bukulmez, D. B. Hardy, B. R. Carr, R. A. Word, and C. R. Mendelson Inflammatory Status Influences Aromatase and Steroid Receptor Expression in Endometriosis Endocrinology, March 1, 2008; 149(3): 1190 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Iqbal, O. Latchoumanin, and I. J. Clarke Rapid in Vivo Effects of Estradiol-17{beta} in Ovine Pituitary Gonadotropes Are Displayed by Phosphorylation of Extracellularly Regulated Kinase, Serine/Threonine Kinase, and 3',5'-Cyclic Adenosine 5'-Monophosphate-Responsive Element-Binding Protein Endocrinology, December 1, 2007; 148(12): 5794 - 5802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Christian, P. Y. Liu, S. Harrington, M. Ruan, V. M. Miller, and L. A. Fitzpatrick Intimal Estrogen Receptor (ER){beta}, But Not ER{alpha} Expression, Is Correlated with Coronary Calcification and Atherosclerosis in Pre- and Postmenopausal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2006; 91(7): 2713 - 2720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Meyer, E. Haas, and M. Barton Gender Differences of Cardiovascular Disease: New Perspectives for Estrogen Receptor Signaling Hypertension, June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1019 - 1026. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Klinge, K. A. Blankenship, K. E. Risinger, S. Bhatnagar, E. L. Noisin, W. K. Sumanasekera, L. Zhao, D. M. Brey, and R. S. Keynton Resveratrol and Estradiol Rapidly Activate MAPK Signaling through Estrogen Receptors {alpha} and {beta} in Endothelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., March 4, 2005; 280(9): 7460 - 7468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Chadwick, S. Chippari, E. Matelan, L. Borges-Marcucci, A. M. Eckert, J. C. Keith Jr., L. M. Albert, Y. Leathurby, H. A. Harris, R. A. Bhat, et al. Identification of pathway-selective estrogen receptor ligands that inhibit NF-{kappa}B transcriptional activity PNAS, February 15, 2005; 102(7): 2543 - 2548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Y. Liu, R. C. Christian, M. Ruan, V. M. Miller, and L. A. Fitzpatrick Correlating Androgen and Estrogen Steroid Receptor Expression with Coronary Calcification and Atherosclerosis in Men without Known Coronary Artery Disease J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 1041 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Dietrich, A. Haitel, J. C. Huber, and W. J. Reiter Expression of Estrogen Receptors in Human Corpus Cavernosum and Male Urethra J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2004; 52(3): 355 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Harnish, L. M. Albert, Y. Leathurby, A. M. Eckert, A. Ciarletta, M. Kasaian, and J. C. Keith Jr. Beneficial effects of estrogen treatment in the HLA-B27 transgenic rat model of inflammatory bowel disease Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, January 1, 2004; 286(1): G118 - G125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |