| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLE |
Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Sundeep Khosla, M.D., Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Endocrine Research Unit, West Joseph 5-194, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905. E-mail: khosla.sundeep{at}mayo.edu.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
FosB, a naturally occurring splice variant of Fos B (2).
FosB is a member of the AP-1 (activator protein-1) family of basic leucine zipper transcription factors that are involved in the early responses of cells to a number of transmembrane signaling agents, including PTH (3). Mice overexpressing
FosB have marked reductions in serum leptin levels (2), and, based on the evidence reviewed below, it was possible that the osteosclerosis in these animals was related to this abnormality, as opposed to an intrinsic functional alteration in osteoblastic cells. The authors demonstrate fairly convincingly that restoration of circulating leptin levels in the
FosB transgenic mice fails to reduce bone formation parameters, consistent with an intrinsic change in osteoblast function in these animals. These findings provide further evidence that manipulating
FosB levels in osteoblasts may be a fruitful approach to novel anabolic approaches to osteoporosis. They also highlight, however, a fairly spirited controversy regarding the possible role of leptin in regulating bone metabolism. This revolves around the issue of whether the major effects of leptin on bone are mediated via central (i.e. through the central nervous system) or peripheral actions. As with most scientific controversies (as long as both sides are arguing based on sound data), potential resolutions may provide further insights that could perhaps have been overlooked by the opposing camps.
It had been recognized for a long time that obesity is protective against the development of bone loss and osteoporotic fractures. A number of factors, including mechanical loading, increased aromatization of androgens to estrogens by adipose tissue (4), and increased insulin levels (5), had been proposed as mediating this protective effect of obesity on the skeleton, with evidence to support each of these factors. However, the identification of the ob gene (6), and the discovery that the protein encoded by this gene, leptin, was a hormone produced by adipocytes that regulated body weight (7), raised the possibility that leptin may also be a possible mediator of this protective effect. Consistent with this, some (8, 9), but not all (10), observational studies found that circulating leptin levels were positively associated with bone mass at various sites, particularly in postmenopausal women. Moreover, leptin administration reduced ovariectomy-induced bone loss in rats (11) and led to an increase in femoral length, total body bone area, bone mineral content, and bone density in leptin-deficient (ob/ob) mice (12). Additionally, in human bone marrow stromal cells (which were bipotential, with the capacity to differentiate either to osteoblasts or to adipocytes), leptin enhanced osteoblastic and inhibited adipocytic differentiation (13). These cells also expressed (by RT-PCR and by Western immunoblot analysis) both the short and long forms of the leptin receptor (OB-R). Interestingly, human bone marrow adipocytes, like extramedullary adipocytes, produce relatively large amounts of leptin (14), suggesting that leptin may, in fact, be an important paracrine signaling molecule between adipocytes and preosteoblastic cells in the bone marrow microenvironment. More recently, leptin has also been shown to be produced by primary cultures of human osteoblasts, to promote mineralization of these cells (15, 16), and to act as a growth factor on the chondrocytes of skeletal growth centers (17). Finally, leptin appears to inhibit osteoclast generation from both peripheral blood mononuclear cells as well as spleen cells, related (at least in part) to an increase in osteoprotegerin and decrease in receptor activator of nuclear factor-
B ligand production by supporting stromal cells (11, 16, 18).
Collectively, these findings were easy to incorporate into conventional thinking about the relationship between fat mass and bone mass. More fat meant more leptin, and leptin appeared to 1) be positively associated with bone mass; 2) have beneficial effects on bone in animal studies; and 3) enhance osteoblast differentiation/function and reduce osteoclast development in vitro. This would have been a relatively straightforward story had it ended there.
However, concurrently with these developments on the peripheral actions of leptin on bone, Ducy et al. (19) were pursing a novel and, in fact, somewhat surprising observation. Both the leptin-deficient (ob/ob) and -resistant (db/db) mouse have hypogonadism and hypercortisolism (19). Combined with the inability to either produce or respond to leptin, these abnormalities would be predicted to result in marked skeletal osteopenia; however, the reverse was observed. These animals had profound increases in bone mass associated with an increase in bone formation rate that appeared to be due not to an increase in osteoblast number but to increased osteoblastic activity. Moreover, intracerebroventricular infusion of leptin in both ob/ob and wild-type mice resulted in bone loss. Thus, these studies convincingly demonstrated that leptin inhibited bone formation through a central mechanism, likely mediated by the hypothalamus (19).
These were truly remarkable findings, even if most of us were at a loss to reconcile them with the accumulating data indicating that leptin also appeared to have peripheral, positive effects on bone. At first glance, these negative central effects vs. the positive peripheral effects of leptin on bone make no sense; nature is generally quite parsimonious, and it seemed as though evolution had somehow misfired in coming up with these conflicting pathways that may, in the end, result in no net effect on bone.
One approach is to argue that the data on one side or the other are wrong. This appears, however, to be unlikely. The findings of Ducy et al. (19) are elegant and convincing; on the other hand, the accumulating evidence from multiple laboratories that leptin does have direct actions on osteoblastic and chondrocytic cells (13, 15, 16, 17, 18), attenuates ovariectomy-induced bone loss in rats (11), and is associated with bone mass in humans (8, 9) is also hard to dismiss. Can both be right, and if so, why would nature have gone through all this trouble?
The solution, perhaps, is provided by an eloquent perspective delineated by Flier (20) that may help in understanding the true role of leptin in a number of systems. In it, he stresses that leptin should not be regarded as an antiobesity hormone but rather as a "signal of energy deficiency and as an integrator of neuroendocrine function." According to this view, an important, or perhaps the major, function of leptin is as a "starvation" signal modulating a number of neuroendocrine responses to caloric restriction, as was likely to occur during times of famine. Thus, leptin levels fall rapidly, within hours of caloric restriction in rodents (21). These changes in leptin levels appear to be causally related to a number of starvation-induced changes in neuroendocrine function, including activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (resulting in hypercortisolism) and suppression of the thyroid and reproductive axes (Ref. 20 and Fig. 1
). At least in rodents, starvation also causes a suppression of both GH and IGF-I production (22), whereas in humans, it causes GH to rise but suppresses IGF-I (23).
|
What, then, occurs when the organism survives starvation and food again is plentiful? Based on the "thrifty genotype" hypothesis, this should now be a time to store energy for when times are not so good again. It has been suggested that under conditions of increasing energy intake and rising fat stores, it would be to the organisms disadvantage to decrease appetite and forfeit this opportunity to store up for hard times (20). Under this scenario, as leptin levels rise, there develops a central resistance to leptin that appears, at least in part, to be due to markedly reduced transport of leptin from the blood into the CSF (25). This would, therefore, tend to limit the reduction in appetite and likely also blunts the central inhibition of bone formation with rising leptin levels. Concurrently, however, the positive peripheral effects of leptin on bone would then come into play (Fig. 1
). This makes perfect sense from the perspective of the organism, because as fat mass rises, there is a need to support this with an increase in skeletal mass: for this, the central inhibitory effect of leptin on bone formation is blunted and the peripheral beneficial effects of leptin on bone formation and resorption become predominant. This formulation also predicts that the skeletal response to exogenous, systemic leptin administration may be quite variable, depending on the balance between the central inhibitory and peripheral stimulatory effects of leptin in a given individual.
Although the scheme summarized in Fig. 1
is plausible and attractive in terms of reconciling the seemingly disparate observations on the central and peripheral actions of leptin on bone, it is a hypothesis that requires further testing. Clearly, major gaps remain in our understanding of how changes in energy intake, body weight, and fat mass regulate bone metabolism. For example, it is at present unclear just how the hypothalamus alters bone formation. In addition, are there species differences in this model? That this may be the case is suggested by the observations that peripheral leptin administration decreases food intake in rodents (26), but fails to do so (at least acutely) in rhesus monkeys (27), perhaps due to a more drastic limitation in transport of leptin into the CSF. Finally, it appears that neuropeptide Y and hypothalamic Y2 receptors, which are involved in appetite control, also regulate bone formation via a central mechanism (28). Thus, this complex story is likely just starting to unfold. What seems clear, however, is that it would be unwise to dismiss leptin as unimportant to bone. The bulk of the evidence would, in fact, suggest that leptin may be one of the key factors linking energy intake to bone metabolism via both central and peripheral mechanisms.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviation: CSF, Cerebrospinal fluid.
Received August 12, 2002.
Accepted for publication August 14, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
FosB transgenic mice is independent of circulating leptin levels. Endocrinology 143:43044309
FosB transcription factors(s) increases bone formation and inhibits adipogenesis. Nat Med 6:985990[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Shi, V. K. Yadav, N. Suda, X. S. Liu, X. E. Guo, M. G. Myers Jr., and G. Karsenty Dissociation of the neuronal regulation of bone mass and energy metabolism by leptin in vivo PNAS, December 23, 2008; 105(51): 20529 - 20533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Richert, T. Chevalley, D. Manen, J.-P. Bonjour, R. Rizzoli, and S. Ferrari Bone Mass in Prepubertal Boys Is Associated with a Gln223Arg Amino Acid Substitution in the Leptin Receptor J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4380 - 4386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Hamrick Leptin and Bone: A Consensus Emerging? IBMS BoneKEy, March 1, 2007; 4(3): 99 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Rousseau, Z Atcha, J Denton, F R A Cagampang, A R Ennos, A J Freemont, and A S I Loudon Skeletal bone morphology is resistant to the high amplitude seasonal leptin cycle in the Siberian hamster J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2005; 186(3): 475 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Martin, R. de Vittoris, V. David, R. Moraes, M. Begeot, M.-H. Lafage-Proust, C. Alexandre, L. Vico, and T. Thomas Leptin Modulates both Resorption and Formation while Preventing Disuse-Induced Bone Loss in Tail-Suspended Female Rats Endocrinology, August 1, 2005; 146(8): 3652 - 3659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Schulze, K. O. O'Brien, E. L. Germain-Lee, S. L. Booth, A. Leonard, and B. J. Rosenstein Calcium Kinetics Are Altered in Clinically Stable Girls with Cystic Fibrosis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3385 - 3391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Matsunuma, T. Kawane, T. Maeda, S. Hamada, and N. Horiuchi Leptin Corrects Increased Gene Expression of Renal 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3-1{alpha}-Hydroxylase and -24-Hydroxylase in Leptin-Deficient, ob/ob Mice Endocrinology, March 1, 2004; 145(3): 1367 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |