Endocrinology Vol. 143, No. 12 4868-4874
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society
Tyrosines 559 and 807 in the Cytoplasmic Tail of the Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Receptor Play Distinct Roles in Osteoclast Differentiation and Function
Xu Feng1,
Sunao Takeshita1,
Noriyuki Namba,
Shi Wei,
Steven L. Teitelbaum and
F. Patrick Ross
Departments of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine (X.F., S.T., N.N., S.W., S.L.T., F.P.R.), St. Louis, Missouri 63110; and Department of Pediatrics, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry (N.N.), Okayama 700-8558, Japan
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: F. Patrick Ross, Ph.D., Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Barnes-Jewish Hospital North, Mailstop 90-31-649, 216 South Kingshighway, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. E-mail: rossf{at}medicine.wustl.edu.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Osteoclast (OC) differentiation requires that precursors, such as macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF)-dependent bone marrow macrophages, receive signals transduced by receptor activator of nuclear factor
B (RANK) and c-Fms, receptors for RANK ligand (RANKL) and M-CSF, respectively. Activated c-Fms autophosphorylates cytoplasmic tail tyrosine residues, which, by recruiting adaptor molecules, initiate specific signaling pathways. To identify which tyrosine residues are involved in c-Fms signaling in primary cells, we retrovirally transduced M-CSF-dependent bone marrow macrophages with a chimera comprising the external domain of the erythropoietin (Epo) receptor linked to the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of c-Fms. Transduced cells differentiate into bone-resorbing osteoclasts when treated with RANKL and either M-CSF or Epo, confirming that both endogenous and chimeric receptors transmit osteoclastogenic signals. Cells expressing chimeric receptors with Y697F, Y706F, Y721F, and Y921F single point mutations generate normal numbers of bone-resorbing OCs, with normal bone-resorbing activity when treated with RANKL and Epo. In contrast, those expressing Y559F generate fewer OCs, whereas theY807F mutant is incapable of osteoclastogenesis. Finally, although mature OCs expressing Y559F exhibit impaired bone resorption, those bearing Y807F do not. Thus, we have identified specific tyrosine residues in the cytoplasmic tail of c-Fms that are critical for transmitting M-CSF-initiated signals individually required for OC formation or function, respectively.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
THE OSTEOCLAST (OC), the principal bone-resorbing cell, is formed by differentiation of monocyte/macrophage precursors under the influence of two cytokines, macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor
B (RANK) ligand (RANKL) (1, 2, 3, 4). The key osteoclastogenic role of M-CSF is established by the fact that op/op mice, which secrete no functional M-CSF, are devoid of OCs (1, 2), a phenotype that can be rescued by recombinant M-CSF (5). M-CSF initiates intracellular signaling by binding to its receptor, c-Fms, which, like other members of the receptor tyrosine kinase family, comprises an extracellular ligand-binding region, a single transmembrane sequence, and a cytoplasmic tail containing a tyrosine kinase domain. Upon ligand binding, the receptor dimerizes, stimulating its tyrosine kinase activity and thus autophosphorylating six tyrosine residues within the cytoplasmic tail, namely 559, 697, 706, 721, 807, and 921 (numbers based on the murine c-Fms sequence) (6). Experiments based on tyrosine point mutational analysis indicate that Y559, Y706, and Y721 are binding sites for c-Src, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1, and phosphoinositol 3-kinase, respectively, whereas Y697 and Y921 recognize Grb2 (6, 7). On the other hand, no protein has been shown to interact directly with Y807, the most heavily phosphorylated residue (7).
All prior experiments relating to tyrosine residue function involved expression of c-Fms mutants in transformed cell lines and are thus of questionable physiological relevance. To address this issue, we turned to M-CSF-dependent bone marrow macrophages (MDBMs), cells of the myeloid lineage and precursors of fully differentiated OCs, which are M-CSF targets. To obviate the impact of endogenous c-Fms in these cells, we transduced them with a chimeric receptor comprising the external domain of the erythropoietin (Epo) receptor linked to the transmembrane and intracellular domains of c-Fms. The chimeric receptor-bearing MDBMs were then exposed to the key osteoclastogenic cytokine RANKL and recombinant Epo. The latter protein, on binding the chimeric receptor, activates a signaling cascade that mimics that generated by ligation of endogenous c-Fms by its ligand M-CSF. We also transduced MDBMs with forms of the chimeric receptor in which individual cytoplasmic tail tyrosine residues were replaced with phenylalanine, again followed by RANKL and Epo treatment. We show that although tyrosines 697, 706, 721, and 921 are not critical for the formation and/or function of osteoclasts, Y559 and Y807 have essential and distinct roles in these processes.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Preparation of retrovirus expressing Epo receptor (EpoR)/c-Fms chimeras
We used standard molecular biological methods, including subcloning into the retrovirus pMX-puro (8), to construct cDNA coding for two chimeric proteins: EpoR1/c-Fms, consisting of the external and transmembrane domains of murine EpoR linked to the intracellular domain of c-Fms, and EpoR2/c-Fms consisting of the external domain of EpoR linked to the transmembrane and intracellular domains of c-Fms. The primers used for PCR to amplify fragments of murine EpoR and c-Fms are: 5'-CCGGATCCTCTAGACTGCCATGGACAAACTCAGGGTGCCCCTCTGGCCT-3' and 5'-AGAACTAGTGATCTTCTGCTGCAGAGTCCGGCGGTGGGA-3' for EpoR1 with 5-AGAACTAGTTACAAGTACAAGCAGAAGCCGAAGTACCAG-3' and 5'-CCGCGGCCGCCCACTAGGATCCTCAGCAGAACTGGTAATTGTTAGGCTGCAG-3' for the cytoplasmic tail of c-Fms, and 5'-CCGGATCCTCTAGACTGCCATGGACAAACTCAGGGTGCCCCTCTGGCCT-3' and 5'-AGAACTAGTGCTAGCGGTCAGTAGTGACGCGGGCTCAGA-3' for EpoR2, with 5'-CCGCGGCCGCCCAAGAACTAGTCTCCCCGATGAGTCCCTCTTCACTCCGGTG-3' and 5'-CTAGGATCCTCAGCAGAACTGGTAATTGTTAGGCTGCAG-3' for the transmembrane and intracellular domains of c-Fms. All mutations were generated using the QuickChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Expression of the various plasmids was achieved by subcloning into the BamHI and NotI sites of pMX-puro vector to express these chimeras (8). All relevant clones were sequenced to ensure they coded for the appropriate protein fragments.
Plat-E packaging cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% heat-inactivated FBS supplemented with puromycin and blasticidin as previously described (9). The plasmids were transiently transfected into Plat-E cells using Lipofectamine Plus reagent (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). Virus was collected at 48, 72, and 96 h after transfection.
Infection, selection, and expansion of bone marrow macrophages
M-CSF-dependent bone marrow macrophages (MDBMs) were cultured in the presence of 0.1 vol of culture supernatant of M-CSF-producing cells from bone marrow cells of 6- to 9-wk-old mice for 2 d as previously described (10). Then, cells were infected with virus for 24 h in the presence of 0.1 vol of culture supernatant of M-CSF-producing cells and 4 µg/ml polybrene (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Cells were further cultured in the presence of M-CSF and 2 µg/ml puromycin for selection and expansion of transduced cells. Transduced cells were used for the studies described below.
Generation and use of osteoclasts
Retrovirally transduced precursors were cultured in the presence of 20 U/ml recombinant human Epo (or 20 ng/ml M-CSF for control) and 100 ng/ml RANKL in 96-well culture plates or 48-well culture plates with or without dentin slices. Osteoclasts began to form on d 3 and were stained for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) on d 5 using a commercial kit (Sigma, 387-A). TRAP activity was measured by TRAP solution assay (11). For resorption studies osteoclasts were generated on whale dentin slices from infected or uninfected marrow macrophages as described above. Dentin was harvested on d 7, cells were removed with 0.25 M ammonium hydroxide and mechanical agitation, and the matrix was subjected to scanning electron microscopy (12). For analysis of bone resorption by cells expressing chimeric receptors bearing cytoplasmic tail point mutations, we prepared TRAP-positive mononuclear preosteoclasts (pOCs) by culturing infected MDBMs for 2 d with RANKL and M-CSF in the presence of puromycin (2 µg/ml). Cells were lifted and replated on dentin slices in the presence of RANKL and either Epo or, as a positive control, M-CSF. Dentin was harvested on d 2, and resorption pits were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (10).
Western analysis
MDBMs infected with various point mutations or control virus were washed twice with ice-cold PBS. Western blot analysis was performed on 10-µg protein aliquots as described previously (13). In brief, electrophoresis in 6% SDS-PAGE was followed by transfer to nitrocellulose, with blocking using 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20. Membranes were exposed overnight at 4 C to rabbit polyclonal antibodies, washed, and incubated with secondary goat antirabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody for 1 h. The polyclonal antibodies used were c-Fms (C-terminal, C-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), phospho-c-Fms (Y721; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Beverly, MA), and ß-actin (Sigma). Membranes were washed extensively, and an enhanced chemiluminescence detection assay (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) was performed following the manufacturers directions.
 |
Results
|
|---|
MDBMs are not readily transfected by traditional means, and thus our first exercise was to retrovirally transduce a series of chimeric receptors in these primary OC precursors. The transduced cells therefore contain both endogenous receptor (c-Fms) and a chimera, whose extracellular domain is that of the EpoR, with the intracellular tail identical to that of c-Fms, or contains individual Y to F substitutions. The transmembrane portion of the chimeras reflects that of either EpoR or c-Fms, respectively (Fig. 1
). Epo exposure may stimulate a chimeric receptor to initiate signals from either its wild-type or mutated cytoplasmic domain. Alternatively, the same cells will activate endogenous c-Fms when exposed to M-CSF (Fig. 1
), again resulting in signals resulting in OC formation and function. Thus, Epo or M-CSF treatment of transduced MDBMs permits delineation of those cytoplasmic tail tyrosine residues mediating specific cellular events in physiologically relevant cells. As our studies were aimed at defining tyrosine residues important for osteoclast differentiation and function, all subsequent experiments were performed in the presence of optimal amounts of RANKL.
These studies involved generating retrovirus containing cDNAs coding for chimeras, expressing either the EpoR external and transmembrane domains linked to the c-Fms cytoplasmic domain (EpoR1/c-Fms) or the EpoR external domain linked to the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of c-Fms (EpoR2/c-fms). MDBMs were infected with virus, and after culture with M-CSF for 2 d to increase cell number, the expression of each chimera was confirmed by Western analysis using an antibody against the c-Fms cytoplasmic tail. As expected, bands of 140 and 160 kDa, representing endogenous c-Fms before and after processing, respectively, were present in both mock-transfected and transduced cells (Fig. 2a
). In addition, MDBMs transduced with either chimera exhibited bands of the expected size, namely 90 kDa, with the levels of both chimeric receptors being almost identical and approximating those of mature, endogenous c-Fms. Next, as a marker of signal transduction, we examined phosphorylation of the EpoR/c-Fms chimera in cells stimulated with Epo. As shown in Fig. 2b
, Epo exposure of EpoR2/ c-Fms-expressing cells leads to the transient phosphorylation of residue Y721, whereas EpoR1/c-Fms does not (data not shown).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Expression of EpoR/c-Fms expression in MDBMs. a, Cells were infected with a retrovirus carrying EpoR1/c-Fms or EpoR2/ c-Fms for 24 h in the presence of M-CSF and 4 µg/ml polybrene. Virus was removed after 24 h; the cells continued to be cultured for 48 h and then were analyzed by Western analysis with an antibody against c-Fms intracellular domain as described in Materials and Methods. Endogenous c-Fms is indicated by arrowheads (bands at 160 and 140 kDa), and the chimeric receptor by the arrow at 90 kDa. b, MDBMs were infected with a retrovirus carrying EpoR2/c-Fms, selected, and expanded in the presence of M-CSF and puromycin (2 µg/ml). Cells were cultured in the absence of serum and M-CSF, and then restimulated with Epo (20 U/ml). Cell lysates were prepared at the indicated times after Epo stimulation. Upper panel, Transient phosphorylation of c-Fms (Y721). Lower panels, The expression of ß-actin demonstrates equal loading of cell lysates.
|
|
Cells expressing either EpoR1/c-Fms or EpoR2/c-Fms were treated with M-CSF, Epo, or RANKL alone or with combinations of RANKL plus Epo or M-CSF. After 6 d, cell number, as an index of survival and proliferation, and TRAP activity, a marker of osteoclastic differentiation, were determined. As expected, all cells treated with M-CSF alone, regardless of the presence of chimeric receptors, contained numerous macrophages, but not OCs (Fig. 3
). These correspond to the previous signaling data, as shown in Fig. 2b
. Establishing that EpoR2/c-Fms signals like endogenous c-Fms, cells bearing this chimera also survive and proliferate after Epo exposure. In contrast, Epo fails to support the viability of EpoR1/c-Fms-expressing cells. Consistent with the essential survival signals generated by c-Fms, all cells exposed to RANKL alone die. On the other hand, transduced cells treated with M-CSF plus RANKL differentiate into osteoclasts in all circumstances. Finally, after treatment with RANKL and Epo, cells expressing EpoR2/c-Fms give rise to osteoclasts whose number and appearance are indistinguishable from those generated from the same cells with M-CSF and RANKL. In contrast and consistent with its failure to promote macrophage survival or autophosphorylation in response to Epo, the EpoR1/c-Fms chimera fails to transmit osteoclastogenic signals.

View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. MDBMs expressing EpoR2/c-Fms differentiate into functional osteoclasts in response to Epo and RANKL. Cells were infected with virus expressing the chimeras EpoR1/c-Fms or EpoR2/c-Fms for 24 h, at which time virus was removed, and the cells were washed and cultured in M-CSF-containing medium for 2 d. Cells were then treated with M-CSF (10 ng/ml) alone, Epo (5 U/ml) alone, RANKL (100 ng/ml) alone, M-CSF (10 ng/ml) plus RANKL (100 ng/ml), or Epo (5 U/ml) plus RANKL (100 ng/ml). Five days later cells were stained for TRAP. EpoR2/c-Fms-expressing MDBMs differentiate into osteoclasts in the presence of Epo and RANKL, whereas those expressing EpoR1/c-Fms do not. Both sets of cells form osteoclasts when treated with M-CSF and RANKL.
|
|
Although the above experiments demonstrate that a specific chimeric EpoR/c-Fms receptor can replace endogenous c-Fms with respect to osteoclast generation, they do not prove that the resulting cells can resorb bone. To address this issue, MDBMs bearing either EpoR1/c-Fms or EpoR2/c-Fms were cultured on dentin slices in the presence of RANKL and either M-CSF or Epo. After 7 d, the cells were removed, and the dentin was examined by scanning electron microscopy. As expected, cells exposed to M-CSF and RANKL formed numerous resorptive pits. Alternatively, only those expressing EpoR2/c-Fms were capable of excavating the matrix when treated with Epo and RANKL (Fig. 4
), findings that parallel the capacity of precursors carrying the same chimera to generate TRAP-positive osteoclasts. Thus, Epo treatment of cells carrying a chimeric receptor containing the EpoR external domain coupled to the transmembrane and cytoplasmic tail portions of c-Fms can functionally replace the signals created by ligation of endogenous c-Fms by M-CSF, its natural ligand.

View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Osteoclasts generated with Epo and RANKL resorb bone. The experiment in Fig. 3 was repeated on dentin slices, and the cultures were continued for 5 more d after osteoclasts formed. The dentin slices were subjected to scanning electron microscopy. The osteoclasts derived from EpoR2/c-Fms-expressing MDBMs in response to Epo and RANKL resorb bone.
|
|
We next turned to the tyrosine residues in the c-Fms cytoplasmic tail mediating OC differentiation and function. Thus, using our retroviral strategy we expressed a series of chimeric EpoR2/c-Fms receptors in MDBMs, each carrying a point mutation in one of the putatively functional tyrosine residues, 559, 697, 706, 721, 807, and 921. Once again, as demonstrated by the equal intensity bands at 90 kDa, all individual point mutants were expressed at levels similar to those of the wild-type chimera and endogenous c-Fms (Fig. 5a
). As expected, treatment of cells bearing the different mutants with RANKL and M-CSF led to the formation of many osteoclasts (Fig. 5b
, upper panels). Furthermore, treatment with Epo and RANKL of OC precursors containing any of the single Y to F mutations at position 697, 706, 721, or 921 gave rise to OCs in numbers equivalent to those bearing the nonmutated chimera or exposed to M-CSF and RANKL. In contrast, substantially fewer OCs were derived by Epo/RANKL treatment of cells bearing either Y559F or Y807F mutation (Fig. 5b
, lower panels). In this single experiment the numbers of OCs in the presence of M-CSF vs. Epo were 51/0, 55/52, 54/5, 54/48, 55/45, 46/42, 52/17, and 55/45 in vector alone (vehicle), wild-type EpoR/c-Fms, Y549F, Y697F, Y706F, Y721F, Y807F, and Y921F mutants, respectively. Furthermore, to quantify the effects of each individual Y to F mutation for osteoclastogenesis, a TRAP solution assay was performed. Figure 5c
clearly shows that Y559 and Y807 are critical for osteoclastogenesis, confirming the results in Fig. 5b
.

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Tyrosine residues 559 and 807 provide distinct signals for osteoclast differentiation. a, MDBMs expressing wild-type EpoR2/c-Fms chimera (Control), those containing individual point mutants (Y to F at positions 559, 697, 706, 721, 807, and 921), or pMX-puro vector alone (Vehicle) were cultured in the presence of M-CSF (20 ng/ml) and puromycin (2 µg/ml) for 4 d. Cells were restimulated with (+) or without (-) Epo after 6-h starvation of serum and M-CSF, and 2 min later cell lysates were prepared and analyzed by Western using anti-c-Fms antibody. The 90-kDa bands of each chimeric receptor indicate the same expression levels, which correspond to those of endogenous c-Fms. Separate cultures of these cells were treated with M-CSF (20 ng/ml) or Epo (20 U/ml) plus RANKL (100 ng/ml) and puromycin (2 µg/ml) for 4 d, at which time they were assessed by TRAP staining (b) and TRAP solution assay (c). b, Osteoclast number was directly enumerated under conditions in which either M-CSF or Epo was used to activate c-Fms (data shown below panel). c, Triplicate cultures were subjected to a quantitative TRAP solution assay. Data are the mean ± SD. With the exception of Y559F and Y807F, cells expressing both wild-type and mutant EpoR2/c-Fms form numerous osteoclasts in the presence of Epo and RANKL. Of importance, equal numbers of OCs in all mutant cells and vector alone were observed in the presence of M-CSF and RANKL.
|
|
Finally, to establish the potential role of individual cytoplasmic tyrosine point mutations in the functional capacity of mature osteoclasts, we transduced MDBMs with EpoR2/c-Fms chimeric receptors containing either wild-type c-Fms cytoplasmic sequence or those in which the six separate single tyrosine residues had been mutated to phenylalanine. After transduction, all cultures were treated with optimal concentrations of M-CSF and RANKL for 2 d, at which time numerous mononuclear TRAP-positive pOCs had been generated (data not shown). Cells were lifted, and equal numbers of pOCs were replated into the culture plate with or without dentin slices. Culture was continued for an additional 1 or 2 d in the presence of RANKL and either Epo or, as a positive control, M-CSF. Again, equal numbers of OCs formed when pOCs expressing individual point mutations were treated with M-CSF and RANKL for 1 d (Fig. 6a
, upper panels). On the other hand, Epo and RANKL treatment generated numerous OCs using as targets pOCs expressing wild-type chimera (control), Y697F, Y706F, Y721, Y807F, and Y921F mutants. Although vector alone (vehicle) generated no osteoclasts, as expected, the number of TRAP-positive multinucleated cells was slightly lower with Y807F and was almost zero in the case of Y559F. These data demonstrate that pOCs expressing all mutant receptors except Y559F can fully differentiate into mature OCs from pOCs within 24 h. TRAP staining of cells kept in culture for 2 d revealed that, once again, all mutants except Y559F generated numerous OCs (Fig. 6b
, top panels). To evaluate the resorptive capacity of these cells, they were removed from the dentin, which was then stained by Coomassie brilliant blue, a procedure identifying the presence of resorption pits. Once again, cells bearing a Y to F mutation at positions 697, 706, 721, or 921 in the cytoplasmic tail all generated numerous pits, whereas those bearing Y599F were functionally inactive (Fig. 6b
, lower panels). pOCs expressing wild-type chimera receptor could not generate any pits in the absence of RANKL (data not shown). Of note, and in contrast to the role of Y807 in osteoclast formation, mutation of this residue to phenylalanine failed to suppress the capacity of cells to resorb bone. pOCs bearing the Y559F mutant generated equivalent numbers of OCs and pits compared with the wild-type chimera receptor when cultured in the presence of M-CSF and RANKL (data not shown). These data show that the expression of this chimeric receptor does not inhibit signaling through the endogenous c-Fms receptor.

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Roles of various Y to F point mutations in bone resorption. a, MDBMs expressing wild-type EpoR2/c-Fms chimera (Control), those containing individual point mutants (Y to F at positions 559, 697, 706, 721, 807, and 921), or pMX-puro vector alone (Vehicle) were cultured with M-CSF, RANKL, and puromycin for 2 d to generate committed osteoclast precursors. a, Cells were replated into culture plates and treated with M-CSF (20 ng/ml; upper panels) or Epo (20 U/ml; lower panels) plus RANKL (100 ng/ml) and puromycin (2 µg/ml). After 1 d, cells were stained for TRAP. Equal numbers of OCs were observed in all cultures treated with M-CSF and RANKL, including vector alone. When cells were exposed to Epo and RANKL, no osteoclasts and only a few such cells were detected in vector alone (Vehicle) and Y559F mutant, respectively. Other mutants and the wild-type chimera expressing cells form many osteoclasts. b, The same pOCs used in panel a were cultured with or without dentin slices and treated with Epo (20 U/ml) and RANKL (100 ng/ml) for 2 d, at which time cells were stained with TRAP (upper panels) or dentin with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (lower panels). Both wild-type and all mutants, with the exception of Y559F, generated numerous resorptive pits, whereas apoptotic OCs were seen in Y807F mutant. Thus, although both Y559 and Y807 in the c-Fms cytoplasmic tail are essential for osteoclast differentiation, only Y559 is required for bone resorption.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
It is well known that M-CSF is critical for the proliferation of early osteoclast progenitors, as osteopetrotic op/op mice demonstrate a complete absence of osteoclasts (1, 2, 5). M-CSF has also been reported to induce cytoskeletal reorganization, which is critical for bone-resorbing activity in OCs (14), and to stimulate resorption by isolated human OCs (15). Despite these observations, the detailed role of M-CSF in osteoclastogenesis and function has not been defined.
Previous studies of the role of individual c-Fms tyrosine residues in cell function and signaling were performed by transfecting wild-type or mutated c-Fms into either fibroblasts or IL-3-dependent myeloid cells, neither of which normally expresses the receptor. The presence of wild-type c-Fms renders such cells responsive to treatment with M-CSF, manifest either as a change in the proliferation rate or, in the case of the myeloid cells, a limited degree of differentiation. The data obtained from these and related studies are conflicting and/or incomplete (6). For example, expression of the Y807F point mutant in NIH-3T3 cells leads to almost complete loss of proliferation in response to M-CSF. In contrast, the same mutant, when expressed on Rat-1 fibroblasts, minimally alters the capacity of the cells to divide in response to M-CSF. Finally, in the IL-3-dependent FDC-P1 line, activation of c-Fms Y807F again enhances proliferation (16). Importantly, fibroblasts and M-CSF-independent myeloid cells cannot become osteoclasts, a major consequence of M-CSF action, and thus it is not possible to gain meaningful insights into the role of c-Fms in differentiation into bone-resorptive polykaryons when using such cells. In summary, although M-CSF is clearly essential for differentiation of MDBMs, the role of individual tyrosine residues in the cytoplasmic tail of its receptor c-Fms in signal transduction is unclear. To address this issue we turned to transduction of appropriate chimeric receptors into these cells, which represent authentic OC precursors.
We have previously expressed the ß3 integrin subunit in MDBMs by retroviral transduction (17). We used an analogous approach to investigate the role of individual cytoplasmic tyrosine residues of c-Fms in OC differentiation and function. The fact that the c-Fms null mouse, if available, would have few or no bone marrow macrophages as targets for transduction, required that we use wild-type MDBMs, which express endogenous c-Fms. To overcome this problem we developed a chimeric receptor strategy. We believed that this approach might be successful, as chimeric transmembrane receptors have, in other circumstances, provided important information on the role of individual tyrosine residues in intracellular signaling (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). Of greater relevance, similar methods have been applied to analysis of the role of specific cytoplasmic tail tyrosine residues in c-Fms signaling, albeit not in cells endogenously expressing the receptor (24, 25).
We first engineered two chimeric proteins, each containing the external domain of the EpoR and the cytoplasmic tail of c-Fms. We chose to use the external domain of the EpoR because it, like c-Fms, signals as a dimer. Given this fact and reports in which the external domain of EpoR has been used to initiate signaling from the cytoplasmic tail of receptor tyrosine kinases, we reasoned that one or more of these chimeras would activate c-Fms-induced intracellular signals. In addition, as neither osteoclasts nor their precursors express EpoR, Epo would stimulate exclusively the chimeric receptor. Our data indicate that only the chimeric protein comprising the extracellular domain of EpoR linked to the transmembrane and intracellular domains of c-Fms is capable of mimicking the endogenous c-Fms in mediating osteoclast differentiation. These findings initially suggest that the transmembrane domain of c-Fms is required for signaling by the chimera. However, an alternative explanation is provided by recent reports that the transmembrane domain of the EpoR plays an unexpected role in transducing signals (26). This region of the molecule has dimerizing capacity in the absence of receptor liganding and also mediates changes in the conformation of the intracellular tail after binding of Epo (27). Thus, it is possible that the Epo transmembrane domain acts as a dominant negative regulator of c-Fms activation.
This chimeric receptor approach allowed us to identify Y559 and Y807 as two important tyrosine residues in the c-Fms cytoplasmic tail involved in osteoclast differentiation and/or function. Previous studies have suggested that Y559 in the c-Fms cytoplasmic tail associates with c-Src (28). Given that osteoclastogenesis is not impaired in c-Src knockout mice (29), it is unlikely that c-Src plays a direct role in c-Fms-mediated osteoclast differentiation. Thus, the mechanism by which Y559 in the cytoplasmic tail of c-Fms contributes to OC differentiation and function is unknown.
Consistent with a previous report demonstrating that Y807 plays a role in M-CSF-induced FDC-P1 cell differentiation (16), we found that this residue also involved in osteoclast differentiation. In contrast, signals emanating from this residue are not required for the resorptive capacity of mature osteoclasts. As studies have failed to identify the signaling molecule(s) binding to Y807, the downstream signaling pathway derived from this tyrosine residue is also unknown.
In summary, the current report represents the first study of c-Fms signaling in which identification of functional tyrosine residues was performed in a physiologically relevant cellular background. This approach enables us to establish that Y559 and Y807 in the c-Fms cytoplasmic tail are two critical residues mediating osteoclast differentiation and that the former residue is also important for the resorptive capacity of the mature bone-resorbing polykaryon. These data serve as a starting point to elucidate c-Fms signaling pathways in osteoclast differentiation and function.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We thank Dan Ory and Gregory Longmore, of the Department of Medicine, WA University School of Medicine, for providing reagents and stimulating discussion and Paulette Shubert for expert secretarial assistance.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
This work was supported by NIH Grants AR-42404 and AR-46582 (to F.P.R.) and DE-05413, AR-32788, and AR-45623 (to S.L.T.); a grant from Shriners Hospital (to S.L.T.); and a Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation grant (to X.F.).
1 X.F. and S.T. equally contributed to this study. 
Abbreviations: Epo, Erythropoietin; EpoR, erythropoietin receptor M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; MDBM, macrophage colony-stimulating factor-dependent bone marrow macrophages; OC, osteoclast; pOC, preosteoclast; RANK, receptor activator of nuclear factor
B; RANKL, RANK ligand; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase.
Received May 1, 2002.
Accepted for publication August 6, 2002.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Kodama H, Yamasaki A, Nose M, Niida S, Ohgame Y, Abe M, Kumegawa M, Suda T 1991 Congenital osteoclast deficiency in osteopetrotic (op/op) mice is cured by injections of macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J Exp Med 173:269272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W, Bartocci A, Ferrante AWJ, Ahmed-Ansari A, Sell KW, Pollard JW, Stanley ER 1990 Total absence of colony-stimulating factor 1 in the macrophage-deficient osteopetrotic (op/op) mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:48284832[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yasuda H, Shima N, Nakagawa N, Yamaguchi K, Kinosaki M, Mochizuki S, Tomoyasu A, Yano K, Goto M, Murakami A, Tsuda E, Morinaga T, Higashio K, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Suda T 1998 Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:35973602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, Kelley MJ, Dunstan CR, Burgess T, Elliott R, Colombero A, Elliott G, Scully S, Hsu H, Sullivan J, Hawkins N, Davy E, Capparelli C, Eli A, Qian YX, Kaufman S, Sarosi I, Shalhoub V, Senaldi G, Guo J, Delaney J, Boyle WJ 1998 Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell 93:165176[CrossRef][Medline]
- Felix R, Cecchini MG, Fleisch H 1990 Macrophage colony stimulating factor restores in vivo bone resorption in the op/op mouse. Endocrinology 127:25922594[Abstract]
- Hamilton JA 1998 The biochemistry of colony stimulating factor-1 action. In: Thomson AW, ed. The cytokine handbook. San Diego: Academic Press; vol 3:689712
- Bourette RP, Rohrschneider LR 2000 Early events in M-CSF receptor signaling. Growth Factors 17:155166[Medline]
- Onishi M, Nosaka T, Misawa K, Mui AL-F, Gorman D, McMahon M, Miyajima A, Kitamura T 1998 Identification and characterization of a constitutive active STAT5 mutant that promotes cell proliferation. Mol Cell Biol 18:38713879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Morita S, Kojima T, Kitamura T 2000 Plat-E: an efficient and stable system for transient packaging of retroviruses. Gene Ther 7:10631066[CrossRef][Medline]
- Takeshita S, Kaji K, Kudo A 2000 Identification and characterization of the new osteoclast progenitor with macrophage phenotypes being able to differentiate into mature osteoclasts. J Bone Miner Res 15:14771488[CrossRef][Medline]
- Lam J, Takeshita S, Barker JE, Kanagawa O, Ross FP, Teitelbaum SL 2000 TNF-
induces osteoclastogenesis by direct stimulation of macrophages exposed to permissive levels of RANK ligand. J Clin Invest 106:14811488[Medline]
- Greenfield EM, Alvarez JI, McLaurine EA, Oursler MJ, Blair HC, Osdoby P, Teitelbaum SL, Ross FP 1992 Avian osteoblast conditioned media stimulate bone resorption by targeting multinucleating osteoclast precursors. Calcif Tissue Int 51:317323[CrossRef][Medline]
- Wei S, Wang MW-H, Teitelbaum SL, Ross FP 2001 RANK ligand activates nuclear factor-
B in osteoclast precursors. Endocrinology 142:12901295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Insogna KL, Sahni M, Grey AB, Tanaka S, Horne WC, Neff L, Mitnick M, Levy JB, Baron R 1997 Colony-stimulating factor-1 induces cytoskeletal reorganization and c-src-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of selected cellular proteins in rodent osteoclasts. J Clin Invest 100:24762485[Medline]
- Edwards M, Sarma U, Flanagan AM 1998 Macrophage colony-stimulating factor increases bone resorption by osteoclasts disaggregated from human fetal long bones. Bone 22:325329[Medline]
- Bourette RP, Myles GM, Carlberg K, Chen AR, Rohrschneider LR 1995 Uncoupling of the proliferation and differentiation signals mediated by the murine macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor expressed in myeloid FDC-P1 cells. Cell Growth Differ 6:631645[Abstract]
- Feng X, Novack DV, Faccio R, Ory DS, Aya K, Boyer MI, McHugh KP, Ross FP, Teitelbaum SL 2001 A Glanzmanns mutation of the ß3 integrin gene specifically impairs osteoclast function. J Clin Invest 107:11371144[Medline]
- Socolovsky M, Fallon AE, Lodish HF 1998 The prolactin receptor rescues EpoR-/- erythroid progenitors and replaces EpoR in a synergistic interaction with c-kit. Blood 92:14911496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gregory RC, Jiang N, Todokoro K, Crouse J, Pacifici RE, Wojchowski DM 1998 Erythropoietin receptor and STAT5-specific pathways promote SKT6 cell hemoglobinization. Blood 92:11041118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Joneja B, Wojchowski DM 1997 Mitogenic signaling and inhibition of apoptosis via the erythropoietin receptor Box-1 domain. J Biol Chem 272:1117611184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Declercq W, Vandenabeele P, Fiers W 1995 Dimerization of chimeric erythropoietin/75 kDa tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptors transduces TNF signals: necessity for the 75-kDa TNF receptor transmembrane domain. Cytokine 7:701709[CrossRef][Medline]
- Chiba T, Nagata Y, Kishi A, Sakamaki K, Miyajima A, Yamamoto M, Engel JD, Todokoro K 1993 Induction of erythroid-specific gene expression in lymphoid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:1159311597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bazzoni F, Alejos E, Beutler B 1995 Chimeric tumor necrosis factor receptors with constitutive signaling activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:53765380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lee AW, Nienhuis AW 1992 Functional dissection of structural domains in the receptor for colony-stimulating factor-1. J Biol Chem 267:1647216483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Roussel MF, Transy C, Kato JY, Reinherz EL, Sherr CJ 1990 Antibody-induced mitogenicity mediated by a chimeric CD2-c-fms receptor. Mol Cell Biol 10:24072412[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Constantinescu SN, Keren T, Socolovsky M, Nam H-S, Henis YI, Lodish HF 1998 Ligand-independent oligomerization of cell-surface erythropoietin receptor is mediated by the transmembrane domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:43794384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Constantinescu SN, Huang LJ-S, Nam H-S, Lodish HF 2001 The erythropoietin receptor cytosolic juxtamembrane domain contains an essential, precisely oriented, hydrophobic motif. Mol Cell 7:377385[CrossRef][Medline]
- Alonso G, Koegl M, Mazurenko N, Courtneidge SA 1995 Sequence requirements for binding of Src family tyrosine kinases to activated growth factor receptors. J Biol Chem 270:98409848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Soriano P, Montgomery C, Geske R, Bradley A 1991 Targeted disruption of the c-src proto-oncogene leads to osteopetrosis in mice. Cell 64:693702[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Faccio, S. Takeshita, G. Colaianni, J. Chappel, A. Zallone, S. L. Teitelbaum, and F. P. Ross
M-CSF Regulates the Cytoskeleton via Recruitment of a Multimeric Signaling Complex to c-Fms Tyr-559/697/721
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 29, 2007;
282(26):
18991 - 18999.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Takeshita, R. Faccio, J. Chappel, L. Zheng, X. Feng, J. D. Weber, S. L. Teitelbaum, and F. P. Ross
c-Fms Tyrosine 559 Is a Major Mediator of M-CSF-induced Proliferation of Primary Macrophages
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 29, 2007;
282(26):
18980 - 18990.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Schubert, C. Schalk-Hihi, G. T. Struble, H.-C. Ma, I. P. Petrounia, B. Brandt, I. C. Deckman, R. J. Patch, M. R. Player, J. C. Spurlino, et al.
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Kinase Domain of Colony-stimulating Factor-1 Receptor (cFMS) in Complex with Two Inhibitors
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 9, 2007;
282(6):
4094 - 4101.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Teitelbaum
Osteoclasts: What Do They Do and How Do They Do It?
Am. J. Pathol.,
February 1, 2007;
170(2):
427 - 435.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Zhou, H. Kitaura, S. L. Teitelbaum, G. Krystal, F. P. Ross, and S. Takeshita
SHIP1 Negatively Regulates Proliferation of Osteoclast Precursors via Akt-Dependent Alterations in D-Type Cyclins and p27
J. Immunol.,
December 15, 2006;
177(12):
8777 - 8784.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Zhao, F. P. Ross, and S. L. Teitelbaum
Unoccupied {alpha}v{beta}3 Integrin Regulates Osteoclast Apoptosis by Transmitting a Positive Death Signal
Mol. Endocrinol.,
March 1, 2005;
19(3):
771 - 780.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Liu, D. Xu, H. Yang, H. Xu, Z. Shi, X. Cao, S. Takeshita, J. Liu, M. Teale, and X. Feng
Functional Identification of Three Receptor Activator of NF-{kappa}B Cytoplasmic Motifs Mediating Osteoclast Differentiation and Function
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 24, 2004;
279(52):
54759 - 54769.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Sapi
The Role of CSF-1 in Normal Physiology of Mammary Gland and Breast Cancer: An Update
Experimental Biology and Medicine,
January 1, 2004;
229(1):
1 - 11.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-G. Yeung and E. R. Stanley
Proteomic Approaches to the Analysis of Early Events in Colony-stimulating Factor-1 Signal Transduction
Mol. Cell. Proteomics,
November 1, 2003;
2(11):
1143 - 1155.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|