help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, J. K.
Endocrinology Vol. 143, No. 4 1423-1433
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society


REPRODUCTION-DEVELOPMENT

Expression and Localization of Activin Receptors, Smads, and ßglycan to the Postnatal Rat Ovary

Ann E. Drummond, Minh Tan Le, Jean-Francois Ethier, Mitzi Dyson and Jock K. Findlay

Prince Henry’s Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Ann Drummond, Ph.D., Prince Henry’s Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia. E-mail: . ann.drummond{at}med.monash.edu.au


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Despite understanding the molecular basis of activin/TGFß and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling, this study is the first to characterize multiple, sequential elements of these pathways in the ovary concurrently. The expression of activin/BMP receptor, Smad, and ßglycan mRNAs by postnatal rat ovaries were investigated by real-time PCR. Activin/BMP receptors (ActRIA, ActRIB, ActRIIA, and ActRIIB), ßglycan, and Smad 1–8 mRNAs were expressed by the ovary. Activin receptor and Smad 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7 mRNAs declined up to 4-fold between postnatal d 4–8, coinciding with secondary follicle formation. The emergence of antral follicles (postnatal d 12) saw ActRIA, ActRIIB, and Smad 2 mRNA expression return to d 4 levels, whereas ActRIB, ActRIIA, and Smads 1, 4, 5, and 7 remained at lower levels. ßglycan mRNA levels increased 2-fold between d 8 and 12, suggesting expression by the developing theca. Smad 3, 6, and 8 mRNAs were unchanged. Activin receptor and Smad proteins were present in oocytes at all stages of follicular development; granulosa cells of primary-antral follicles, and theca cells. ßglycan protein was present in oocytes, granulosa cells, and theca cells at all stages of folliculogenesis. The colocalization of receptors and Smads supports the notion that activin/TGFß and BMP signaling pathways are functional in the cellular compartments of the follicle.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE ACQUISITION OF gonadotropin sensitivity by ovarian follicles marks an important developmental milestone in the folliculogenic process. We have previously shown that activin sensitizes ovarian cells of postnatal rats to FSH stimulation (1), suggesting that activin may be part of the mechanism that regulates the responsiveness of granulosa cells to FSH. To advance this hypothesis, we need to establish that activin is produced by the postnatal rat ovary and that pathways exist to transduce activin signals. We have demonstrated by the presence of mRNA, the capacity of these follicles to express the inhibin/activin ß-subunits (1) and thus the potential to produce activin, although to date, activin dimer production by rat ovarian cell cultures has not been measured. Nevertheless, activin has been detected in human and bovine follicular fluid, media conditioned by cumulus-oocyte (2) and granulosa cells (human and bovine) (3) and in tissue extracts of chicken ovary (4), indicating that ovarian cells can produce activin.

Members of the TGFß family of peptides, including activin, transduce their signals via serine/threonine kinases, of which there are 2 types (5, 6); I and II, the type I receptors being the primary transducers of signals. Activin receptors comprise type IA (ActRIA) and IB (ActRIB), IIA (ActRIIA) and IIB (ActRIIB), of which there are four forms designated ActRIIB1–4 (7, 8). Activin receptors have been identified in rat, human, and mouse ovaries (9, 10, 11, 12, 13) at various developmental stages, although their presence and pattern of expression in the rat ovary during the establishment of folliculogenesis has yet to be determined. Functional antagonism of the activin signaling pathway has recently been demonstrated by the inhibin coreceptor ßglycan (14). In the presence of ßglycan, the affinity of inhibin for the activin type II receptor is enhanced leading to sequestration of the receptor and an inability of activin to bind and initiate signal transduction. ßglycan may therefore be important in determining whether activin signaling components interact to form functional pathways that may have special significance in ovarian cells. Expression of ßglycan mRNA by the ovary has not been previously reported, although protein has been localized to the rat ovary in a preliminary study (14).

Following ligand binding, the type II receptor kinases phosphorylate and thereby activate type I receptors, which subsequently phosphorylate and activate the appropriate intracellular substrates or Smad(s) (reviewed in Ref. 15). Smads 1, 5, and 8 are phosphorylated by activated bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptors (16, 17, 18), and Smads 2 and 3 are phosphorylated by activin and TGFß receptors (19, 20). A complex with Smad 4 is then formed and these composites translocate to the nucleus to activate the transcription of target genes (for review, see Ref. 15). Inhibitory Smads (Smad 6 and 7) have been identified (21, 22), although no definitive mechanism of action has been elucidated. They have been shown to associate with type I receptors, effectively blocking the association and activation of Smads (23), inhibit phosphorylation of receptor-Smad complexes (22) and compete with Smad 4 for binding to the receptor activated complex (24). Whatever the mechanism of Smad 6 and Smad 7 action, the endpoint is a block of signal transduction. Little information is available on the expression of the intracellular signaling Smad proteins by the ovary. Smad 2 protein has been localized to hen granulosa cells (25) and human oocytes and Smad 2 mRNA detected in human oocytes (26). Smad 3 mRNA has been detected in mouse granulosa cells (27).

It is conceivable that members of the TGFß superfamily other than activin may play a role in the acquisition of gonadotropin sensitivity in the ovary. Recently, BMP-4 and -7 have been shown to increase the sensitivity of isolated granulosa cells to FSH stimulation (28), as has TGFß in the past (29, 30). Given our desire to elucidate the roles of activin and other members of the TGFß superfamily in establishing and perpetuating the folliculogenic process, we investigated the expression of the activin receptor subtypes, ßglycan and Smads, in the ovary of the postnatal rat. This model has proven valuable in our studies of folliculogenesis (1, 31, 32) because defined follicle populations appear for the first time, in a sequential manner, during the first 12 d after birth. Thus, the specific aims of the study were to: 1) establish the presence of mRNA for the activin/BMP receptor subtypes, ßglycan and Smads in the postnatal ovary; 2) determine the pattern of expression of these mRNAs during this developmental period and establish if there is coordinated expression of receptors with specific Smads; and 3) localize activin receptor and Smad proteins to specific ovarian cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Female Sprague Dawley rats were obtained from Monash University Central Animal Services (Melbourne, Australia). Ovaries were collected from rats at 4, 8, and 12 d of age, for the purpose of RNA extraction or for the preparation of formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded blocks. Animals were maintained under standard conditions of lighting and temperature and received laboratory feed pellets and water ad libitum. The study was approved by the institutional Animal Experimentation and Ethics Committee as conforming to the guidelines established by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

RNA extraction
Ovaries were dissected free of fat and adhering tissue and homogenized in 1 ml Ultraspec RNA reagent (Biotecx: Fisher Biotec, Melbourne, Australia). After 5 min on ice, 0.2 ml chloroform per ml of Ultraspec RNA reagent was added to the samples, which were then shaken vigorously and stored at 4 C for 5 min before centrifuging for 15 min at 12,000 x g. RNA was precipitated from the aqueous phase with 1 volume of isopropanol, after which the pellet was washed twice with ethanol, air-dried, and resuspended in sterile water. To ensure that the RNA was completely dissolved, the samples were incubated for 10 min at 60 C. At least three independent pools of RNA were prepared from the ovaries of postnatal rats at each age studied. The number of ovaries/pool ranged from 24–40, depending on the age of the animal.

RT
RNA (2 µg) was reverse transcribed with 50 U Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Expand, Roche, Sydney, Australia) and final concentrations of 1x cDNA synthesis buffer (supplied with enzyme), 1 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates (Roche), 20 U Rnasin (Promega Corp., Sydney, Australia) 10 mM dithiothreitol and 25 pmol oligo deoxythymidine-15 (Roche), as previously described (31).

Real time PCR
mRNA expression was analyzed using the Roche LightCycler (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) as previously described (32). In these studies, two separate rat ovarian cDNAs prepared from the ovaries of 22-d-old rats, were assigned arbitrary unitage and employed as the assay standard and quality control, respectively. For PCR, 2 µl each of the standard cDNA pool diluted 1:2, 1:20, 1:200, and 1:2000 (arbitrarily designated 1.0, 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively), the quality control cDNA pool diluted 1:25, and the sample cDNAs diluted 1:10–1:20 in sterile water, were added to individual capillaries. Taq enzyme, deoxynucleotide triphosphates, reaction buffer, and SYBR GREEN I dye were supplied in the FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), of which 2 µl/capillary was added. Primer concentrations of 17.5–25 pmol were added to each capillary. The primer specific nucleotide locations, sequences and product sizes are shown in Table 1Go. Magnesium concentrations (2–4 mM), annealing temperatures (57-64 C), and extension times (number of seconds = product size/25 plus 3) were determined for individual primer sets. The capillary volume was made up to 20 µl with sterile water. Forty cycles of PCR were programmed to ensure the threshold crossing point (cycle number) was attained. Fluorescence emission was monitored continuously during cycling. At the completion of cycling, melting curve analysis was carried out to establish the specificity of the amplicons produced. In addition, each amplicon was sequenced to verify the identity of the amplified product (data not shown). The level of expression of each mRNA and their estimated crossing points in each sample were determined relative to the standard preparation using the LightCycler computer software. A ratio of specific mRNA/GAPDH amplification was then calculated, to correct for any differences in efficiency at RT. The relative abundance of the mRNAs, expressed as fold changes, was extrapolated from crossing point data. A difference of 1 PCR cycle in crossing point number translates into a 2-fold change in mRNA expression. In many cases, an estimated 2-fold change in mRNA abundance was not statistically different from the appropriate control, given the variation in crossing point number between individual pools.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primer sequences used to amplify activin receptors, ßglycan, Smad, and GAPDH mRNAs

 
In most instances, individual pools for each age group or treatment with each primer set were performed in a single PCR experiment. The intraassay variation was never more than 5% (n = 7) regardless of the primer set. The nature of LightCycler PCR diminishes issues such as assay sensitivity and at the concentrations of standard and sample used in these studies, the sensitivity threshold (picograms) was never approached.

Immunohistochemistry
Antibodies directed against ActRIA, ActRIB, ActRIIA, ActRIIB, ßglycan, (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) Smad 2, 4, 5, and 8 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), were used to localize the respective proteins to 5-µm sections of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded ovary using standard immunohistochemical protocols. These antisera were selected because they were suitable for localizing rat proteins and had previously been used for Western blotting and/or immunohistochemistry (14, 33, 34, 35). Briefly, sections were dewaxed in histosol (Australian Biostain, Australia), dehydrated in ethanol, and washed in water. The sections were microwaved in 0.1 M citrate buffer, pH 7.4, on high power for 12 min and allowed to cool before equilibrating in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4. The sections were blocked for 30 min in 1% blocking reagent (Roche), after which the primary antibody, appropriately diluted 1:10–1:200 (0.02–50 µg/ml) was added and the sections incubated for 48 h at 4 C. Following extensive washing in PBS, the biotinylated second antibody (DAKO Corp., Carpinteria, CA) was added to the sections for a 60-min incubation at room temperature. After washing in PBS, the sections were incubated with a peroxidase conjugated avidin-biotin complex (Vector Elite, Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) for 60 min at room temperature after which the reaction product was developed using 3,3' diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAKO Corp.) and hydrogen peroxide in PBS. The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated in ethanol, cleared in histosol and coverslips mounted using DPX (British Drug House, Poole, UK). Control sections received either buffer or IgG (goat) diluted appropriately, in place of primary antibody. The ovaries of 6–10 rats, two sections/ovary were examined for each antibody in three separate experiments. The staining was scored by two independent observers, as outlined in the legends to the tables. Follicles were classified as follows: primordial follicles contained an oocyte surrounded by a single layer of flattened squamous granulosa cells; primary follicles contained an oocyte surrounded by a single layer of cuboidal granulosa cells; secondary follicles contained an oocyte surrounded by two or more layers of granulosa cells, and antral follicles were those in which the oocyte was contained within multiple layers of granulosa cells in which fluid filled spaces were apparent.

Statistical analysis
Data collected from at least three separate RT-PCR experiments were analyzed using GBstat. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA in conjunction with a posthoc multiple comparison test (Fisher’s least significant difference test). P values of < 0.05 compared with the appropriate control were regarded as statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ovarian activin/BMP receptor and ßglycan mRNA expression
ActRIA, ActRIB, ActRIIA, and ActRIIB mRNAs were expressed by postnatal rat ovaries from 4-, 8-, and 12-d-old rats (Fig. 1Go). The expression of all four activin receptor mRNAs was highest at d 4. Thereafter, the expression of ActRIB and ActRIIA mRNAs declined and remained at this level up to d 12. ActRIA and ActRIIB mRNA expression were also reduced at d 8, but by d 12 had returned to the level of expression recorded in ovaries of 4-d-old rats. ßglycan mRNA was expressed by postnatal rat ovaries from 4-, 8- and 12-d-old rats (Fig. 1Go). The level of expression was similar in ovaries of 4- and 8-d-old rats, but by d 12 ßglycan mRNA expression had increased 2-fold relative to d 4 levels.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Levels of expression of activin receptor and ßglycan mRNAs in postnatal rat ovaries normalized for GAPDH mRNA expression. Black histograms represent the activin type I receptors, open histograms the type II receptors, and the striped histograms ßglycan. The number of pools (n) analyzed separately at each age is indicated below each graph. The data are represented as mean ± SEM. Histograms without common letters are statistically different, P < 0.05.

 
To assess the relative abundance of the individual mRNAs in the ovaries during this developmental period, crossing point comparisons of real-time PCR reactions were undertaken and fold changes estimated. The fewer PCR cycles required to reach the detection threshold the more abundant the mRNA. ßglycan mRNA was significantly more abundant than any of the activin receptor mRNAs during the development of the ovary up to postnatal d 12 (Tables 2Go and 3AGo). In ovaries of 4- and 8-d-old rats, similar levels of expression were noted for ActRIA, ActRIB, and ActRIIA, whereas ActRIIB was the least abundant receptor mRNA (Tables 2Go and 3AGo). By d 12, the expression of ActRIB mRNA had declined to levels observed for ActRIIB (Table 3AGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. The crossing point or number of PCR cycles required for individual mRNAs to reach the LightCycler detection threshold

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Relative levels of expression of activin receptor, ßglycan, and Smad mRNAs by postnatal rat ovaries expressed as fold changes

 
Ovarian Smad mRNA expression
Smad 1–8 mRNAs were expressed by postnatal ovaries of 4-, 8-, and 12-d-old rats (Fig. 2Go). The ovarian expression of Smad 3, 6, and 8 mRNAs did not change significantly between d 4 and 12. The mRNA expression of the remaining Smads (Smads 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7) was highest at d 4, reduced in comparison at d 8 and by d 12, either remained at the level of expression recorded at d 8 (Smad 4 and 7), continued to decline (Smad 5), returned to d 4 levels (Smad 2), or assumed a level of expression in between d 4 and d 8 (Smad 1) (Fig. 2Go).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Levels of expression of Smad 1–8 mRNAs in postnatal rat ovaries normalized for GAPDH mRNA expression. The number of pools (n) analyzed separately at each age is indicated below each graph. Black histograms represent the BMP-related Smads (1, 5, and 8), open histograms the activin/TGFß-related Smads, striped histograms the inhibitory Smads (6 and 7), and the cross-hatched histograms, common Smad 4. The data are represented as mean ± SEM. Histograms without common letters are statistically different, P < 0.05.

 
The abundance of mRNAs within ligand-specific Smad groupings were assessed by crossing point comparisons, with the common Smad 4 used as a reference. Of the activin-related Smads, Smad 2 mRNA was significantly more abundant than Smad 3 mRNA in the postnatal ovary (Tables 2Go and 3BGo). Consistently, the difference in expression of these Smads was separated by 6–7 PCR cycles (Table 2Go), which translates into 64- to 128-fold more Smad 2 than Smad 3, given that 1 PCR cycle represents a 2-fold change in mRNA (Table 3BGo). The common Smad 4 and Smad 2 showed a similar pattern of expression except that Smad 2 was more abundant than Smad 4 (Tables 2Go and 3BGo). Smad 8 was the least abundant BMP-related Smad in the ovary during d 4–12, whereas Smad 5 was the most abundant mRNA in 4- and 8-d-old ovaries. By d 12, Smad 5 was expressed at levels similar to Smad 1 (Tables 2Go and 3CGo). Smad 4 mRNA was expressed at levels similar to Smad 1 during d 4–12 (Tables 2Go and 3CGo). The inhibitory Smads 6 and 7 were expressed at similar levels in the ovary during d 4–12 (Table 2Go), although this level of expression was 4- to 8-fold less than Smad 4 mRNA abundance (Tables 2Go and 3DGo).

Immunohistochemical localization of ActRIA, ActRIB, ActRIIA, ActRIIB, ßglycan, and Smads 2, 4, 5, and 8 to postnatal rat ovaries
Protein for all four activin receptors, Smads 2, 4, 5, and 8 and ßglycan were immunolocalized to the ovaries of 4-, 8-, and 12-d-old rats (Figs. 3Go and 4Go, and Tables 4–6GoGoGo). Activin receptor proteins were essentially confined to oocytes and granulosa cells, except ActRIB, which was also present in theca cells of secondary and antral follicles. In sections of d 4 ovaries, ActRIA, ActRIB, ActRIIA, and ActRIIB were localized to the oocyte cytoplasm of primordial follicles with granulosa cells expressing only ActRIB and ActRIIA and then only in a few follicles (Table 4Go). We did not detect protein for any of the activin receptors in primary follicles on d 4. In sections of d 8 ovaries, primordial (oocytes), primary (granulosa cells and oocytes) and secondary follicles (oocytes and granulosa cells) localized most of the activin receptor proteins (Fig. 3Go, A–D, and Table 5Go). Expression of ActRIA protein by granulosa cells was not observed until follicles reached the secondary stage and ActRIIB proteins were detected in oocytes of primordial and primary, but not secondary follicles. A similar pattern of expression was observed in sections of d 12 ovary (Table 6Go). Activin receptor and ßglycan proteins were not localized to blood vessels. ßglycan protein was localized to primordial, primary, secondary, and antral follicle oocytes and granulosa cells and theca cells during the postnatal period (Fig. 3EGo, and Tables 4–6GoGoGo). Cytoplasmic and nuclear staining patterns were evident in most cases. ßglycan protein was not detected in blood vessels.



View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical localization of ActRIA (A), ActRIB (B), ActRIIA (C), ActRIIB (D), and ßglycan (E) proteins to ovaries of 8-d-old rats. IgG control section (F). Granulosa cells (GC), oocyte (O), theca cell (T), primordial follicle (P), secondary follicle (S), x20 magnification.

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical localization of Smad 2 (A), Smad 4 (B), Smad 5 (C) and Smad 8 (D) proteins to ovaries of 8-d-old rats. IgG control section (E). Granulosa cells (GC), oocyte (O), theca cell (T), primordial follicle (P), primary follicle (Pr), secondary follicle (S), blood vessel (BV). Arrowheads ({blacktriangleup}) point to granulosa cells that are in the process of differentiating. Arrows ({uparrow}) indicate half-moon staining pattern (oocyte cytoplasm) observed with antibodies for Smad 5 (C) and 8 (D). x20 Magnification.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Immunohistochemical localisation of activin receptor, Smad, and ßglycan proteins to sections of 4-d-old rat ovaries

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Immunohistochemical localization of activin receptor, Smad, and ßglycan proteins to sections of 8-d-old rat ovaries

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Immunohistochemical localization of activin receptor, Smad, and ßglycan proteins to sections of 12-d-old rat ovaries

 
Smad 2 protein was localized to blood vessels of all ovarian sections (Fig. 4AGo and Tables 4–6GoGoGo) and primary follicles (oocytes and granulosa cells) of 4-d-old rat ovaries, with both nuclear and cytoplasmic staining patterns (Table 4Go). Sections of 8- and 12-d-old ovaries localized Smad 2 protein to primordial (granulosa cells), primary (oocytes and granulosa cells), secondary and antral follicles (oocytes and granulosa cells), and theca (Fig. 4AGo, and Tables 5Go and 6Go). Smad 4 protein was localized to primordial follicle oocytes (but not granulosa cells) and primary follicles (oocytes and granulosa cells) of 4-d-old rat ovaries (Table 4Go). In addition to these follicle populations, the ovaries of 8- and 12-d-old rats also localized protein to secondary follicles and theca cells (Fig. 4BGo, and Tables 5Go and 6Go) with a predominantly cytoplasmic staining pattern. Smad 5 and Smad 8 proteins were localized to the oocyte cytoplasm of primordial follicles (d 4–12), primary follicles (d 4–12), and secondary and antral follicles (d 8 and 12) (Fig. 4Go, C–D, and Tables 4–6GoGoGo), with an unusual half-moon staining pattern evident in most oocytes, particularly small follicles (Fig. 4Go, C–D). From the intensity of staining, Smad 5 appeared to be more abundant than Smad 8. Smad 5 protein was also present in granulosa cells of primary follicles of d 4 ovaries but was not detected in granulosa cells of any other follicles at any other time (Fig. 4Go C–D). Smad 8 protein was not detected in granulosa cells or theca cells at any stage.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Elements of the activin/TGFß/BMP signal transduction pathways have been localized to the ovaries of postnatal rats. Activin/BMP receptor, ßglycan, and Smad mRNAs were present at d 4, a time when only primordial and a few primary follicles are resident in the ovary. Thereafter, with the appearance of secondary and antral follicles in the ovary, (d 8 and 12, respectively), changes in the relative expression of these mRNAs, with the notable exception of Smads 3, 6, and 8, were recorded. It is important to note that during this developmental period, granulosa cells are actively proliferating and the cellular composition of the ovary is changing. Thus changes in mRNA expression need to be considered in the context of ovarian development.

Activin/BMP receptor mRNA expression
The expression of activin receptor mRNAs is consistent with previously published reports indicating that human cumulus cells, granulosa-luteal cells and oocytes and mouse oocytes and cumulus-oocyte complexes contain ActRIA, ActRIB, ActRIIA, and ActRIIB (10, 12, 13, 36). Activin subunit mRNA has also been localized to human and mouse oocytes (12). In the rat ovary, He et al. (37), reported that ActRIA mRNA was mainly localized to oocytes of preantral and antral follicles, whereas ActRIB mRNA was not detected using the in situ hybridization technique employed. More recently, Zhao et al. (38) reported that oocytes and somatic cells of rat preantral follicles expressed ActRIIA and localized activin A protein. Our data suggests that ActRIB mRNA is present in the postnatal rat ovary (presence of protein confirmed immunohistochemically), but the level of expression declined with increasing follicular development. ActRIIA and ActRIIB mRNAs are expressed by the ovaries of d 15 rat embryos (39) and the ovaries of immature and adult rats (9, 11, 40). The presence of ActRIIB mRNA in the ovary has been somewhat equivocal given that Cameron et al. (11) reported low level expression in oocytes and granulosa cells by in situ hybridization, whereas Aloi et al. (40) did not detect any ActRIIB mRNA in adult ovary by RT-PCR. Our studies indicate that postnatal rat ovaries (and immature 25-d-old rat ovaries, unpublished data) express ActRIIB mRNA and protein, but it was clearly the least abundant of the activin receptor subtypes. It is important to keep in mind that BMPs can also use receptors initially identified as activin receptors, for signaling (18, 41).

Regulation of activin receptor mRNAs
Little is known about what regulates the expression of activin receptor mRNAs in the ovary. In adult cycling rats, ActRIA and ActRIIA have been shown to be regulated by gonadotropins and E2 (40). ActRIA and ActRIIA expression declined in vivo after the proestrous gonadotropin surge, or in response to the administration of human CG and FSH to hypophysectomized rats. E2 decreased ActRIA and increased ActRIIA mRNA in ovaries of hypophysectomized rats. In the presence of both gonadotropins and E2, ActRIA expression was reduced, the authors concluding that this response was mediated by E2 produced in response to FSH stimulation. ActRIIA expression was inhibited by gonadotropins and E2, essentially mimicking the effect of gonadotropins alone, indicating a direct action of gonadotropins potent enough to counteract the stimulatory effect of E2. Immediately after birth, the rat ovary is unresponsive to FSH stimulation. By postnatal d 8, secondary (preantral) follicles are present and capable of responding to FSH, thus the decline in ActRIIA mRNA expression we report here, may be mediated by FSH. The production of E2 by follicles increases with development so that antral follicles, present in ovaries of 12-d-old rats, have the largest capacity. We cannot say at this time whether E2 influences the expression of ActRIA and ActRIIA by the postnatal rat ovary. Similarly, the regulation of ovarian ActRIB, ActRIIB, ßglycan, and Smad mRNAs has yet to be addressed.

Protein localization
Our data indicate that a functional activin signaling pathway exists in the oocytes of primordial follicles from d 8 onwards, which is consistent with a role for activin in oocyte maturation that has previously been reported for human (42), bovine (43), rat (44, 45), zebrafish (46, 47), and primate (48) oocytes. While activin receptor and Smad 4 proteins were present in primordial follicle oocytes of ovaries from 4-d-old rats, Smad 2 protein was not detected and therefore the ability of activin to transduce a signal in these oocytes is questionable. It is possible that the expression of Smad 2 was simply below the level of sensitivity of the immunohistochemistry protocol. Alternatively, Smad 3 may be involved in the transmission of activin signals, although this seems doubtful given that Smad 3 mRNA was clearly the least abundant of the activin/TGFß Smads. In contrast, granulosa cells of primordial follicles across the postnatal period failed to consistently express any of the proteins under investigation, suggesting that granulosa cells of these early stage follicles could not support an action of activin/TGFß.

An interesting finding of these studies was the apparent age-dependent appearance of activin receptors by primary follicles. Oocytes and granulosa cells of primary follicles from 4-d-old rat ovaries did not localize activin receptor proteins. These same follicle populations in ovaries of 8- and 12-d-old rats, however, did contain detectable activin receptor proteins. We noted that most of the primary follicles present at d 4 contained granulosa cells, which were enlarged and transparent, leading us to hypothesize that these follicles exist in a transitional state and may not express differentiated parameters, e.g. activin receptors, during this transformation. Our earlier studies (1) clearly demonstrated an effect of activin on inhibin production by d 4 ovarian cells in culture, the implication being that activin receptors are present and that granulosa cells of primary follicles were the likely source of inhibin. If this is indeed the case, then perhaps activin receptor proteins are expressed at a level below the sensitivity of our immunohistochemistry protocol. Alternatively, after 2 d in culture, our ovarian cells may have matured, acquired activin receptors and responded to activin stimulation (in this instance by producing inhibin). This would be consistent with time course studies undertaken in our laboratory, which indicate that ovarian cells from 4-d-old rats produce most of their inhibin 24–48 h (32 ; Drummond, A. E., M. Dyson, and J. K. Findlay, unpublished observations) after initiating the culture.

ßglycan in the ovary
ßglycan mRNA expression was stable in the ovaries of 4- and 8-d-old rats, in which oocytes and granulosa cells of early stage follicles predominate. Between d 8 and d 12, a significant increase in expression occurred, which coincided with the appearance of theca cells around secondary preantral follicles. Consistent with these results, ßglycan protein was localized to oocytes, granulosa cells, and theca cells as expected. Given the duality of ßglycan’s roles, its ability to act as an inhibin coreceptor and to functionally antagonize activin signaling (14), the localization of ßglycan to specific cellular populations will be paramount in ascertaining its role. Inhibin has been shown to stimulate human thecal cell steroidogenesis (49), and in this capacity ßglycan may act as an inhibin coreceptor. The picture is more complex in regards to granulosa cells as these produce inhibin and activin, respond to activin and express activin receptors, thus inhibin through ßglycan, may act to antagonize activin action in these cells.

BMP signaling
An action of BMP-4 and -7 on steroidogenesis has recently been described (28), with the data prompting the authors to propose that BMPs may act as luteinization inhibitors. In some respects, notably the enhancement of E2 production by FSH-stimulated granulosa cells in culture, the action of these BMPs is similar to activin (28) raising issues of redundancy and relative importance of individual factors in ovarian regulation. The similarity of signal transduction pathways and confusion in regards to receptor activation by these ligands has not clarified matters. The complexity of the receptor-signaling pathway is highlighted by reports that BMP-7 and activin bind to the same type II receptors (18, 41) but recruit distinct type I receptors. Activin has been shown to recruit ActRIB and transduce signals via Smad 2 or 3, whereas BMP-7 recruits ActRIA and transduces signals through Smad 1, 5, and 8 (18). Our data show that ActRIA protein is confined to oocytes at all stages and granulosa cells of secondary and antral follicles, suggesting that these are primary sites of BMP action. Localization of Smad 5 and 8 proteins to oocytes (of most follicles) is also consistent with an action of BMPs. Given that Smad 8, was clearly the least abundant of the BMP-related Smads and its mRNA expression did not change with follicular status, we hypothesize that Smad 1or 5 mediate BMP signaling in the oocyte. We have yet to localize Smad 1 protein to ovarian cells. It is unclear as to whether the location of the Smad proteins within the cell is an indicator of activation, i.e. does nuclear localization of protein indicate an activated Smad? In these studies, both cytoplasmic and nuclear localization were evident for Smad 2 and 4, although not always simultaneously within the same cells or in the same follicle populations. The localization of Smad 8 to the cytoplasm of oocytes and Smad 5 to oocyte and granulosa cell cytoplasm would, if this premise is correct, suggest inactive proteins and a nonfunctional signaling pathway.

In conclusion, we have established the presence of activin receptor, Smad and ßglycan mRNAs in postnatal rat ovaries and localized proteins indicative of activin/TGFß and BMP signaling pathways to specific ovarian cells (Table 7Go). The role of activin in promoting follicular differentiation (1, 50) is strengthened by the colocalization of important signaling elements to growing follicles and those in which an antrum is forming. A direct action of activin on oocytes is also supported by the data. It is likely that an important role for inhibin in the ovary is to antagonize activin action, via ßglycan, so that follicles capable of responding to activin and producing inhibin and ßglycan may be destined for atresia. The presence of BMP signaling elements in oocytes suggests an involvement of BMPs in oocyte maturation, in addition to their postulated role as luteinization inhibitors (28). Additional studies are required to establish whether individual follicle populations localize unique signaling pathways or if active pathways of the TGFß family can be identified in follicles. The spatial (cell specific) and temporal expression patterns of the components of these pathways will determine the capacity of follicular cells to respond and the type of response induced by members of the TGFß family, if and when they are expressed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Summary of activin receptor, Smad, and ßglycan protein expression by ovaries of 8- and 12-d-old rats and the potential signaling pathway(s) involved

 


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors would like to thank Sue Panckridge for her assistance in the preparation of the figures.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Regkey 983212).

Abbreviations: ActRIA, ActRIB, ActRIIA, and ActRIIB, Activin/BMP receptors; BMP, bone morphogenetic protein.

Received October 4, 2001.

Accepted for publication December 14, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Drummond AE, Dyson M, Mercer JE, Findlay JK 1996 Differential responses of post-natal rat ovarian cells to FSH and activin. Mol Cell Endocrinol 122:21–32[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Lau CP, Ledger WL, Groome NP, Barlow DH, Muttukrishna S 1999 Dimeric inhibins and activin A in human follicular fluid and oocyte-cumulus culture medium. Hum Reprod 14:2525–2530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Knight PG, Muttukrishna S, Groome NP 1996 Development and application of a two-site enzyme immunoassay for the determination of ‘total’ activin-A concentrations in serum and follicular fluid. J Endocrinol 148:267–279[Abstract]
  4. Lovell TM, Gladwell RT, Cunningham FJ, Groome NP, Knight PG 1998 Differential changes in inhibin A, activin A, and total {alpha}-subunit levels in granulosa and thecal layers of developing preovulatory follicles in the chicken. Endocrinology 139:1164–1171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Mathews LS 1994 Activin receptors and cellular signaling by the receptor serine kinase family. Endocr Rev 15:310–325[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Hoodless PA, Wrana JL 1998 Mechanism and function of signaling by the TGFß superfamily. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 228:235–272[Medline]
  7. Attisano L, Wrana JL, Cheifetz S, Massague J 1992 Novel activin receptors: distinct genes and alternative mRNA splicing generate a repertoire of serine/threonine kinase receptors. Cell 68:97–108[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ethier JF, Lussier JG, Silversides DW 1997 Bovine activin receptor type IIB messenger ribonucleic acid displays alternative splicing involving a sequence homologous to Src-homology 3 domain binding sites. Endocrinology 138:2425–2434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Feng ZM, Madigan MB, Chen CL 1993 Expression of type II activin receptor genes in the male and female reproductive tissues of the rat. Endocrinology 132:2593–600[Abstract]
  10. Wu TC, Jih MH, Wang L, Wan YJ 1994 Expression of activin receptor II and IIB mRNA isoforms in mouse reproductive organs and oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 38:9–15[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Cameron VA, Nishimura E, Mathews LS, Lewis KA, Sawchenko PE, Vale WW 1994 Hybridization histochemical localization of activin receptor subtypes in rat brain, pituitary, ovary, and testis. Endocrinology 134:799–808[Abstract]
  12. Sidis Y, Fujiwara T, Leykin L, Isaacson K, Toth T, Schneyer AL 1998 Characterization of inhibin/activin subunit, activin receptor, and follistatin messenger ribonucleic acid in human and mouse oocytes: evidence for activin’s paracrine signaling from granulosa cells to oocytes. Biol Reprod 59:807–812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Peng C, Ohno T, Koh LY, Chen VT, Leung PC 1999 Human ovary and placenta express messenger RNA for multiple activin receptors. Life Sci 64:983–994[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Lewis KA, Gray PC, Blount AL, MacConell LA, Wiater E, Bilezikjian LM, Vale W 2000 Betaglycan binds inhibin and can mediate functional antagonism of activin signaling. Nature 404:411–414[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Zhang Y, Derynck R 1999 Regulation of Smad signaling by protein associations and signaling crosstalk. Trends Cell Biol 9:274–279[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Graff JM, Thies RS, Song JJ, Celeste AJ, Melton DA 1994 Studies with a Xenopus BMP receptor suggest that ventral mesoderm-inducing signals override dorsal signals in vivo. Cell 79:169–179[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Hoodless PA, Haerry T, Abdollah S, Stapleton M, O’Connor MB, Attisano L, Wrana JL 1996 MADR1, a MAD-related protein that functions in BMP2 signaling pathways. Cell 85:489–500[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Macias-Silva M, Hoodless PA, Tang SJ, Buchwald M, Wrana JL 1998 Specific activation of Smad1 signaling pathways by the BMP7 type I receptor, ALK2. J Biol Chem 273:25628–25636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Baker JC, Harland RM 1996 A novel mesoderm inducer, Madr2, functions in the activin signal transduction pathway. Genes Dev 10:1880–1889[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Macias-Silva M, Abdollah S, Hoodless PA, Pirone R, Attisano L, Wrana JL 1996 MADR2 is a substrate of the TGFß receptor and its phosphorylation is required for nuclear accumulation and signaling. Cell 87:1215–1224[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Nakao A, Roijer E, Imamura T, Souchelnytskyi S, Stenman G, Heldin CH, ten Dijke P 1997 Identification of Smad2, a human Mad-related protein in the transforming growth factor ß signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 272:2896–2900[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Imamura T, Takase M, Nishihara A, Oeda E, Hanai J, Kawabata M, Miyazono K 1997 Smad6 inhibits signaling by the TGF-ß superfamily. Nature 389:622–626[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Hayashi H, Abdollah S, Qiu Y, Cai J, Xu YY, Grinnell BW, Richardson MA, Topper JN, Gimbrone Jr MA, Wrana JL, Falb D 1997 The MAD-related protein Smad7 associates with the TGFß receptor and functions as an antagonist of TGFß signaling. Cell 89:1165–1173[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Hata A, Lagna G, Massague J, Hemmati-Brivanlou A 1998 Smad6 inhibits BMP/Smad1 signaling by specifically competing with the Smad4 tumor suppressor. Genes Dev 12:186–197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Li M, Li J, Hoodless PA, Tzukazaki T, Wrana JL, Attisano L, Tsang BK 1997 Mothers against decapentaplegic-related protein 2 expression in avian granulosa cells is up-regulated by transforming growth factor ß during ovarian follicular development. Endocrinology 138:3659–3665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Osterlund C, Fried G 2000 TGFß receptor types I and II and the substrate proteins Smad 2 and 3 are present in human oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod 6:498–503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kano K, Notani A, Nam SY, Fujisawa M, Kurohmaru M, Hayashi Y 1999 Cloning and studies of the mouse cDNA encoding Smad3. J Vet Med Sci 61:213–219[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Shimasaki S, Zachow RJ, Li D, Kim H, Iemura S, Ueno N, Sampath K, Chang RJ, Erickson GF 1999 A functional bone morphogenetic protein system in the ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7282–7287[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Knecht M, Feng P, Catt K 1987 Bifunctional role of transforming growth factor-ß during granulosa cell development. Endocrinology 120:1243–1249[Abstract]
  30. Zhang ZW, Findlay JK, Carson RS, Herington AC, Burger HG 1988 Transforming growth factor ß enhances basal and FSH-stimulated inhibin production by rat granulosa cells in vitro. Mol Cell Endocrinol 58:161–166[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Drummond AE, Baillie AJ, Findlay JK 1999 Ovarian estrogen receptor {alpha} and ß mRNA expression: impact of development and estrogen. Mol Cell Endocrinol 149:153–161[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Drummond AE, Dyson M, Thean E, Groome NP, Robertson DM, Findlay JK 2000 Temporal and hormonal regulation of inhibin protein and subunit mRNA expression by post-natal and immature rat ovaries. J Endocrinol 166:339–354[Abstract]
  33. Zhao J, Lee M, Smith S, Warburton D 1998 Abrogation of Smad3 and Smad2 or of Smad4 gene expression positively regulates murine embryonic lung branching morphogenesis in culture. Dev Biol 194:182–195[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Dong C, Li Z, Alvarez Jr R, Feng XH, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ 2000 Microtubule binding to Smads may regulate TGF ß activity. Mol Cell 5:27–34[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Schneider-Kolsky M, Manuelpillai U, Gargett C, Wallace EM 2001 Activin ßA-subunit and activin receptors in human myometrium at term and during labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108:869–874
  36. Eramaa M, Hilden K, Tuuri T, Ritvos O 1995 Regulation of inhibin/activin subunit messenger ribonucleic acids (mRNAs) by activin A and expression of activin receptor mRNAs in cultured human granulosa-luteal cells. Endocrinology 136:4382–4389[Abstract]
  37. He WW, Gustafson ML, Hirobe S, Donahoe PK 1993 Developmental expression of four novel serine/threonine kinase receptors homologous to the activin/transforming growth factor-ß type II receptor family. Dev Dyn 196: 133–142
  38. Zhao J, Taverne MA, van Der Weijden GC, Bevers MM, van Den Hurk R 2001 Effect of activin A on in vitro development of rat preantral follicles and localization of activin A and activin receptor II. Biol Reprod 65:967–977[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Kaipia A, Toppari J, Huhtaniemi I, Paranko J 1994 Sex difference in the action of activin-A on cell proliferation of differentiating rat gonad. Endocrinology 134:2165–2170[Abstract]
  40. Aloi JA, Marshall JC, Yasin M, Gilrain JT, Haisenleder DJ, Dalkin AC 1997 Ovarian activin receptor subtype and follistatin gene expression in rats: reciprocal regulation by gonadotropins. Biol Reprod 56:1565–1569[Abstract]
  41. Yamashita H, ten Dijke P, Huylebroeck D, Sampath TK, Andries M, Smith JC, Heldin CH, Miyazono K 1995 Osteogenic protein-1 binds to activin type II receptors and induces certain activin-like effects. J Cell Biol 130:217–226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Alak BM, Coskun S, Friedman CI, Kennard EA, Kim MH, Seifer DB 1998 Activin A stimulates meiotic maturation of human oocytes and modulates granulosa cell steroidogenesis in vitro. Fertil Steril 70:1126–1130[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Silva CC, Knight PG 1998 Modulatory actions of activin-A and follistatin on the developmental competence of in vitro-matured bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod 58:558–565[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Itoh M, Igarashi M, Yamada K, Hasegawa Y, Seki M, Eto Y, Shibai H 1990 Activin A stimulates meiotic maturation of the rat oocyte in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 166:1479–1484[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Sadatsuki M, Tsutsumi O, Yamada R, Muramatsu M, Taketani Y 1993 Local regulatory effects of activin A and follistatin on meiotic maturation of rat oocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 196:388–395[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Pang Y, Ge W 1999 Activin stimulation of zebrafish oocyte maturation in vitro and its potential role in mediating gonadotropin-induced oocyte maturation. Biol Reprod 61:987–992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Wu T, Patel H, Mukai S, Melino C, Garg R, Ni X, Chang J, Peng C 2000 Activin, inhibin, and follistatin in zebrafish ovary: expression and role in oocyte maturation. Biol Reprod 62:1585–1592[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Alak BM, Smith GD, Woodruff TK, Stouffer RL, Wolf DP 1996 Enhancement of primate oocyte maturation and fertilization in vitro by inhibin A and activin A. Fertil Steril 66:646–653[Medline]
  49. Hillier SG, Yong EL, Illingworth PJ, Baird DT, Schwall RH, Mason AJ 1991 Effect of recombinant inhibin on androgen synthesis in cultured human thecal cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 75:R1–R6
  50. Findlay JK 1993 An update on the roles of inhibin, activin and follistatin as local regulators of folliculogenesis. Biol Reprod 48:15–23[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. L. Kipp, S. M. Kilen, T. K. Woodruff, and K. E. Mayo
Activin Regulates Estrogen Receptor Gene Expression in the Mouse Ovary
J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2007; 282(50): 36755 - 36765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E. Nilsson, N. Rogers, and M. K Skinner
Actions of anti-Mullerian hormone on the ovarian transcriptome to inhibit primordial to primary follicle transition
Reproduction, August 1, 2007; 134(2): 209 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. E. Drummond, M. Tellbach, M. Dyson, and J. K. Findlay
Fibroblast Growth Factor-9, a Local Regulator of Ovarian Function
Endocrinology, August 1, 2007; 148(8): 3711 - 3721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. L. Burger, D. J. Haisenleder, G. M. Wotton, K. W. Aylor, A. C. Dalkin, and J. C. Marshall
The regulation of FSHbeta transcription by gonadal steroids: testosterone and estradiol modulation of the activin intracellular signaling pathway
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2007; 293(1): E277 - E285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
H. Wang, J.-Y. Jiang, C. Zhu, C. Peng, and B. K. Tsang
Role and Regulation of Nodal/Activin Receptor-Like Kinase 7 Signaling Pathway in the Control of Ovarian Follicular Atresia
Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2006; 20(10): 2469 - 2482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
P. G Knight and C. Glister
TGF-{beta} superfamily members and ovarian follicle development.
Reproduction, August 1, 2006; 132(2): 191 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
S. Mazerbourg and A. J.W. Hsueh
Genomic analyses facilitate identification of receptors and signalling pathways for growth differentiation factor 9 and related orphan bone morphogenetic protein/growth differentiation factor ligands
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 373 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Yang and S. K. Roy
Transforming Growth Factor B1 Stimulated DNA Synthesis in the Granulosa Cells of Preantral Follicles: Negative Interaction with Epidermal Growth Factor
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2006; 75(1): 140 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. A. Pangas, X. Li, E. J. Robertson, and M. M. Matzuk
Premature Luteinization and Cumulus Cell Defects in Ovarian-Specific Smad4 Knockout Mice
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 20(6): 1406 - 1422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
P. G Farnworth, Y. Wang, P. Leembruggen, G. T Ooi, C. Harrison, D. M Robertson, and J. K Findlay
Rodent adrenocortical cells display high affinity binding sites and proteins for inhibin A, and express components required for autocrine signalling by activins and bone morphogenetic proteins.
J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2006; 188(3): 451 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
T M Lovell, P G Knight, and R T Gladwell
Differential expression of mRNAs encoding the putative inhibin co-receptor (betaglycan) and activin type-I and type-II receptors in preovulatory and prehierarchical follicles of the laying hen ovary
J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2006; 188(2): 241 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Omori, K. Nakamura, S. Yamashita, H. Matsuda, T. Mizutani, K. Miyamoto, and T. Minegishi
Effect of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Estrogen on the Expression of Betaglycan Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Levels in Cultured Rat Granulosa Cells
Endocrinology, August 1, 2005; 146(8): 3379 - 3386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J.L. Juengel and K.P. McNatty
The role of proteins of the transforming growth factor-{beta} superfamily in the intraovarian regulation of follicular development
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 144 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]