| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLE |
, -1ß, and IL-6 mRNA Levels in Leydig Cell Progenitors
Population Council and The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Patricia L. Morris, Center for Biomedical Research, Population Council and The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021. E-mail: p-morris{at}popcbr.rockefeller.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IL-1ß, and IL-6) mRNAs were measured by PCR and real-time PCR analyses, respectively. COX function was assessed using COX activity inhibitors: indomethacin (INDO; COX1 and COX2 inhibitor) and NS-398 (COX2 selective inhibitor). Our data indicate that endogenous progenitor COX1 mRNA levels are low and are not regulated by IL-1ß. In contrast, COX2 mRNA is induced by IL-1ß at 6, 9, and 24 h. IL-1ß induction of IL mRNAs was in part significantly impaired in the presence of INDO or NS-398. Among the prostanoids tested, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), PGF2
, and carbaprostacyclin reversed the INDO inhibition of IL production. PGs alone have no (IL-1
and IL-1ß) or a modest (IL-6) effect on IL mRNA levels. PGE2, PGF2
, and PGI2 measurements show that IL-1ß treatment significantly increases progenitor Leydig cell production of these PGs. Taken together, our data demonstrate that this COX2 cascade is a regulator of cytokines in Leydig progenitors. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and PGI2) and thromboxane (TXA2). There are two distinct isoforms of COX: COX1 and COX2. COX1 displays the characteristics of a housekeeping gene. Although higher levels of that enzyme may be found in several specific tissues and cells, including endothelium, seminal vesicles, monocytes, and platelets, COX1 is constitutively expressed in most tissues (1). In contrast, COX2 expression is barely detected at a constitutive level and is markedly inducible in specialized cell types (1). In particular tissues, COX2 regulates specific physiological functions, such as the inflammatory process, ovulation, implantation, perinatal kidney development, ductus arteriosus remodeling, or ulcer healing (2). COX1 and COX2 activities are differentially inhibited by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. For example, aspirin and indomethacin (INDO) inhibit both enzymes, whereas NS-398 is a selective inhibitor for COX2 (3, 4).
|
Adult rat Leydig cells in culture release PGE2, and this release is inhibited by INDO (14). Some studies have provided evidence for increased PGE2 release in Leydig cells treated with AA, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, and endothelin (8, 14, 15, 16). To date, no physiological role for PGE2 has been identified by these studies.
The human and rat testes produce IL-1 in vivo (17, 18). PGE2 release is induced by IL-1 in cultured adult rat Leydig cells (19). The mechanism by which IL-1 increases PGE2 production in these cells is unknown. Whether COX2 is induced in Leydig cells by IL-1 or other proinflammatory agents was not investigated. In adult Leydig cells, IL-1 has been shown to have either a stimulatory or no effect on basal testosterone production (20). In contrast, IL-1 inhibits LH/hCG and/or cAMP-stimulated testosterone production (20). Calkins et al. (19) have shown that INDO slightly reversed the IL-1 inhibition of hCG-induced testosterone release by adult rat Leydig cells. These results suggest that prostanoids in part mediate the IL-1 inhibitory effect on steroidogenesis in these cells.
Khan and colleagues (21) have shown that IL-1ß stimulates DNA synthesis in Leydig cells isolated from prepubertal rats, e.g. immature Leydig cells, but not in adult Leydig cells. IL-1ß was shown to increase LH-induced steroidogenesis in immature rat Leydig cells (22). Furthermore, IL-6 receptors were demonstrated in Leydig cells freshly isolated and purified from prepubertal rats (23). Taken together, these results indicate that developmentally the Leydig cell is responsive to IL. It has been proposed that these cytokines may play a physiological role in the paracrine/autocrine regulation of pubertal development of Leydig cells (24, 25, 26). IL-1 is a potent inducer of cytokine expression in the Leydig cells at latter stages of maturation (17, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31). In murine macrophages and the rat immature ovary, COX activity was shown to be involved in the production of IL during inflammation (32, 33, 34). The aim of the present study was to determine whether Leydig progenitors at an early stage of development respond to IL-1 with increased steady state mRNA cytokine levels. Furthermore, the levels of COX2 mRNA and the role(s) of COX2 and its metabolites in IL-1 signaling were investigated in progenitor Leydig cells (PLC).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3
-HSD) immunocytochemistry and 3ß-HSD histochemistry as previously described (35). On isolation, the Leydig cell progenitors isolated from d-18 testes were macrophage free; 30 ± 1% were lightly positive for 3ß-HSD, and the remaining cells were strongly or weakly 3
-HSD positive (n = 8). The cells were cultured for 1 d in serum-free medium supplemented with 0.1% fetal bovine serum. PLC were rinsed twice with fresh serum- and phenol red-free culture medium and then treated with IL-1ß (10 ng/ml) in the absence (6, 9, or 24 h) or presence (24 h) of INDO (10 µM) or NS-398 (1 or 10 µM). Cells may also have been treated with PGs (10 µM) in the absence (for 18 h) or presence (for 24 h) of IL-1ß (10 ng/ml) and INDO (10 µM). The doses of IL-1ß and PGs were selected based on several similar studies that showed their maximal effects (37, 38, 39, 40). Doses of COX inhibitors were chosen based on studies that demonstrated their specificity and effectiveness at these concentrations (41, 42, 43). Procedures involving the use of animals strictly followed the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals set forth by the NIH.
Total RNA extraction
Total RNA was extracted from PLC using the TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) according to the manufacturers instructions. RNA was measured using 260/280 UV spectrophotometry.
RT-PCR
Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed for 15 min at 42 C with 2.5 U/µl Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). RT was performed in a 20-µl mixture containing 5 mM MgCl2, 1x PCR buffer II, 1 mM of each deoxy-NTP, 1 U/µl ribonuclease inhibitor, and 2.5 mM random hexamers. Samples were then denatured for 5 min at 99 C. A no-template control was performed for each experiment, establishing the absence of genomic contamination of the samples.
PCR was performed by using 1 µl of each RT product as a template. The following primers were used: COX1 sense primer, 5'-CCCAGAGTCATGAGTCGAAGGAG-3'; antisense primer, 5'-CAGGCGCATGAGTACTTCTCGG-3' (353-bp product) (44); COX2 sense primer, 5'-GCAAATCCTTGCTGTTCCAATC-3'; antisense primer, 5'-GGAGAAGGCTTCCCAGCTTTTG-3' (335-bp product) (44); and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) sense primer, 5'-GCTCTGATGACACCACTCTGC-3'; antisense primer, 5'-GTGGTAGACCAGCCCATGGA-3' (276-bp product). AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (PE Applied Biosystems) was used at 25 mU/µl. The PCR reaction mixture (25 µl) contained 2 mM MgCl2, 1x PCR buffer II, and each primer at 0.2 µM. Amplification was performed in a programable thermal controller (model PTC-100, MJ Research, Inc., Watertown, MA). The samples were first denatured at 95 C for 2 min, followed by 30 PCR cycles; the temperature profile was 95 C for 30 sec, 60 C for 30 sec, and 72 C for 1 min and 30 sec. After the last cycle, an additional extension incubation of 7 min at 72 C was performed.
After amplification, PCR products (5 µl of each sample) were subjected to size separation by polyacrylamide gel (420% Tris/boric acid/EDTA gels, Novex, San Diego, CA). The bands were visualized by UV fluorescence after staining with ethidium bromide (2.5 µg/ml) for 15 min. Densitometric analysis was performed using the PC version of NIH Image software (Scion Image) after photography with a computer-assisted camera (Kodak, Rochester, NY).
Real-time PCR
Real-time PCR (TaqMan) analysis was used for relative quantitation of mRNA levels using a standard curve method. The detection of IL mRNAs was performed using proprietary predeveloped TaqMan primers and probes (PE Applied Biosystems). Real-time PCR analyses were conducted to quantitatively determine the levels of rat IL-1
, IL-1ß, and IL-6 mRNAs (6-carboxy-fluorescein-labeled probes) with 18S ribosomal RNA (VIC-labeled probe) used to normalize the data.
TaqMan reactions were set up in optical 96-well reaction plates by adding 24 µl of a mix containing 12.5 µl TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix 2x, 2.5 µl of primers and probes (10x, according to the manufacturers instructions), and 9 µl autoclaved water. One microliter of RT samples prepared as described above was subsequently added to each well. The reactions were set up in triplicate.
The real-time fluorescence-monitored PCR reactions were performed using a PE Applied Biosystems model 7700 Sequence Detection System. The temperature profile was 50 C for 2 min, 95 C for 10 min, and then 95 C for 15 sec and 60 C for 1 min for 40 cycles. Using the manufacturers software, a threshold above the noise was chosen, and the cycle number (CT) at which fluorescence, generated by the cleavage of the probe, exceeded the threshold was determined for each well. For each real-time PCR analysis, a standard curve was generated by six 2-fold serial dilutions in water of the RT samples corresponding to the 24-h treatment of PLC with IL-1ß. CT values were compared with the standard curve after linear regression analysis. Experimental samples were diluted 3-fold for comparison with the standard curve. A no-template control was performed for each reaction in duplicate.
PG ELISA
Measurements of PGs in PLC culture medium were performed using ELISA kits according to the manufacturers instructions (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI). Detection limits for PGE2, PGF2
, and 6-keto-PGF1
were 7.8, 3.9, and 15.6 pg/ml, respectively.
Data analysis
Densitometric analyses are expressed in arbitrary units. Real-time PCR data are expressed as a percentage of the IL-1ß 24-h response. All results are the mean ± SEM derived from the number of different experiments as indicated (n). Statistical analyses were performed using t test or paired t test, with a confidence level of 95%.
Drugs
PGD2, PGE2, PGF2
, carbaprostacyclin (cPGI2; pentanoic acid, 5-[hexahydro-5-hydroxy-4-(3-hydroxy-1-octenyl)-2(1H)-pentalenylidene]-,[3
S-[2E,3
,4
(1E,3R*),5ß,6
]]-), U46619 (5-heptenoic acid, 7-[6-(3-hydroxy-1-octenyl)-2-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-yl]-,[1R-[1
,4
,5ß(Z),6
(1E,3S*)]]-), and NS-398 (N-[2-(cyclohexyloxy)-4-nitrophenyl]-methanesulfonamide) were purchased from Cayman Chemical. INDO [1-(4-chlorobenzoyl)-5-methoxy-2-methyl-1H-indole-3-acetic acid] was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Recombinant mouse IL-1ß was purchased from R\|[amp ]\|D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN). PGs and COX inhibitors were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), and subsequent dilutions, as needed, were performed in serum- and phenol red-free medium on the day of the experiment. DMSO alone was used as vehicle in all plates as required. The final DMSO concentrations varied from 0.30.06%. IL-1ß was initially reconstituted in a solution of 0.1% BSA in PBS; the final BSA concentration was 0.0001%.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
, IL-1ß, and IL-6 mRNAs were evaluated by real-time PCR. The three mRNAs are each significantly induced by IL-1ß (Fig. 4
(3-fold), IL-1ß (3-fold), and IL-6 (2-fold). There is no significant difference between the effect of INDO and that of NS-398.
|
, or cPGI2 (a stable analog of PGI2). The steady state levels of IL-1
, IL-1ß, and IL-6 mRNAs were evaluated using real-time PCR. These data are shown in Fig. 5
and IL-1ß. In contrast, IL-6 mRNA was significantly induced by PGE2, PGF2
, and cPGI2 in the same range (i.e.
15% of the IL-1ß response measured after a 24-h treatment). Subsequently, the effect(s) of the different PGs (10 µM) was tested on cells concomitantly treated with IL-1ß (10 ng/ml) and INDO (10 µM) for 24 h. Real-time PCR data demonstrated that PGs at the least restored the inhibition of the IL-1
, IL-1ß, and IL-6 mRNA induction by IL-1ß due to INDO (Fig. 6
and PGE2 were the most potent factors of those prostanoids tested that restored IL-1
and IL-1ß mRNA levels. Interestingly, cPGI2 was selectively effective in restoring IL-6 mRNA levels (P < 0.03). In either case, U46619 (a TXA2-mimetic agonist) and PGD2 either did or did not have a modest, but significant, effect (P < 10-6).
|
|
, and PGI2 by PLC (Fig. 7
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IL-1ß, and IL-6) in rat PLC. Furthermore, in the presence of COX inhibitors, IL-1ß stimulation of cytokine mRNA is impaired, implicating the COX2 pathway in this regulation. In progenitors, exogenous PGs alone either do not stimulate (IL-1
and IL-1ß) or moderately stimulate (IL-6) cytokine mRNA levels. In contrast, when the progenitors are treated with IL-1ß and INDO, exogenous PGs fully restore the level of cytokine mRNAs to that achieved in the absence of the COX inhibitor. Finally, in PLC treated with IL-1ß and INDO, PGF2
and PGE2 are the most potent PGs to induce IL-1
and IL-1ß mRNAs. Moreover, cPGI2 is the most effective prostanoid for selective induction of IL-6 mRNA. IL-1ß treatment significantly increases the endogenous production of the three PGs (PGE2, PGF2
, and PGI2) by progenitors. COX2 expression is induced in specialized cell types and tissues, such as ovarian granulosa cells, macrophages, endothelium, and seminal vesicles, and is developmentally regulated (1). Factors that regulate COX2 expression are specific for both the tissue and the function affected; the effects of COX2 activity on individual biological processes are defined by their cellular context. For example, in human endothelial cells IL-1ß, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or TNF increases COX2 mRNA levels (45). In comparison, in granulosa cells COX2 is induced by IL-1ß, but is also hormonally induced by FSH and LH (46, 47, 48). The data presented herein demonstrate that although PLC COX1 mRNA levels are not regulated by IL-1ß, the steady state levels of COX2 mRNA are induced by this cytokine. Whether this effect is due to an increased transcription or a stabilization of COX2 mRNA was not investigated in the present study. COX2 mRNA induction by IL-1ß in PLC is not changed by the presence of COX inhibitors, findings consistent with an inhibition of COX catalytic activity without changes in gene expression. Moreover, these results suggest that AA metabolites do not exert a feedback control on PLC COX2 expression as was proposed recently for macrophages (49).
COX activity was shown to be involved in the production of IL-6, but not IL-1, in rodent models of inflammation (32, 33, 50). INDO blocks IL-6 mRNA induction by IL-1ß in the immature rat ovary (34). In contrast, Syed et al. (51) found that INDO increased IL-6 production in 20-d-old rat Sertoli cells stimulated by IL-1
. As AA metabolites derived from the lipoxygenase pathway are likely to be responsible for the increased production of IL-6 in immature Sertoli cells, the effect of INDO may be due in part to an accumulation of AA (51). In Leydig cells obtained from immature and adult rats, IL-1ß is a potent inducer of cytokine expression (27, 28, 29, 30, 31). Our present data demonstrate that IL-1ß induces multiple cytokine (IL-1
, IL-1ß, and IL-6) production in an earlier stage of Leydig cell maturation (PLC). Furthermore, both INDO and the selective COX2 inhibitor, NS-398, partially abrogated this effect. As the results obtained with INDO and NS-398 were not statistically different, COX2, and not COX1, mediates IL-1ß induction of cytokine mRNAs in PLC. These results are consistent with a specific association between COX2 activity and activation of inflammation-associated genes (33, 52).
In other tissues the effect of PGE2 on the regulation of cytokine expression has been extensively studied. PGE2 has opposing effects regarding the particular cytokines evaluated. The addition of PGE2 decreases the TNF
and IL-12 production induced in murine peritoneal macrophages stimulated by LPS or zymosan, two strong activators of inflammation (53, 54, 55, 56). In contrast, PGE2 potentiates IL-6 release induced by LPS or IL-1ß in murine peritoneal macrophages or the immature rat ovary, respectively (34, 54). Furthermore, Portanova and colleagues (50) showed that in a rat model of inflammation, an injection of anti-PGE2 antibodies reduces serum IL-6 levels. PGI2 analogs also modulate cytokine production in vitro in a similar way (56, 57, 58). The data shown in the present study indicate that PGE2, cPGI2, and PGF2
(10 µM for 18 h) induce IL-6 mRNA in PLC without affecting the levels of IL-1
and IL-1ß mRNAs. Although the 6- to 8-fold-induction of IL-6 mRNA by the PGs is modest (
15%) compared with that after IL-1ß induction (24 h), these results are consistent with significant differences in PG signaling and transcriptional activation of distinct IL gene promoters. Whereas PGs themselves had either no or a modest effect, they fully restored the IL-1ß induction of the three-cytokine mRNAs in progenitors treated with IL-1ß and INDO. A significant enhancement of the effect of IL-1ß in the presence of INDO was observed for PGF2
(IL-1
and IL-1ß mRNA) and cPGI2 (IL-6) and was confirmed in the absence of INDO (data not shown). These results are consistent with data previously obtained in murine peritoneal macrophages. Actually, exogenous PGE2 has either a weak inhibitory or a stimulatory effect on the production of TNF
and IL-6, respectively, in untreated macrophages (32, 33, 54). However, when PGE2 is added to macrophages activated by LPS or activated cells derived from a murine model of inflammation, the effect on the cytokine production is potentiated (32, 33). Williams and Shacter (33) proposed that other signals that regulate responsiveness to PGE2 have to be temporally correlated with PGE2 release to regulate cytokine production in macrophages. Based on data herein provided, a proposed schema for the mechanistic role of COX2 in the IL-1ß regulation of IL mRNA in PLC is illustrated (Fig. 8
). Furthermore, to confirm that the IL-1ß effect is mediated by PGs, these mediators were measured for the first time in serum-free conditioned medium samples obtained from Leydig progenitors. Our data indicate that multiple PGs (PGE2, PGF2
, and PGI2) are released by IL-1ß-treated progenitors. Although the release of PGE2 by adult rat Leydig cells cultured with a combination of hCG and IL-1ß has been reported previously, PGF2
and PGI2 production was not investigated (19).
|
and PGE2 are the most active of the PGs tested to restore the transcription of IL-1
and IL-1ß mRNAs in progenitor cells treated with IL-1ß and INDO. In contrast, cPGI2 is more effective in increasing IL-6 mRNA levels under the same conditions. Such specificity suggests that in PLC the receptors and/or the signal pathway activated by PGF2
and PGE2 are not the same as those used by cPGI2. In addition, our data are consistent with ligand-specific differences in transcriptional activators at the level of the IL-1 and IL-6 gene promoters. Further studies will be required to better understand the molecular mechanisms used by PGs to differentially activate cytokines in PLC.
IL-1 and IL-6 are produced in rat as well as human testis under basal conditions by Sertoli and Leydig cells during their development or during inflammation (17, 18, 27, 29, 30, 31, 51, 59). IL-1 and IL-6 have differential effects in the testis. For example, IL-1 has been found to stimulate DNA synthesis in spermatogonia and preleptotene spermatocytes, whereas IL-6 exerts the opposite effect (60, 61). The present report suggests that COX2 mRNA is induced by IL-1ß in rat PLC. The data are consistent with a mechanistic role for COX2 in the IL-1ß regulation of cytokine mRNA levels in these progenitor cells (Fig. 8
). The findings of the present study suggest that COX2 could regulate the balance of the different testicular ILs and that selective COX2 inhibitors could provide new therapeutic strategies to modulate normal and pathological testicular function.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: AA, Arachidonic acid; COX, cyclooxygenase; cPGI2, carbaprostacyclin; CT, cycle number at which fluorescence exceeds threshold; DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide; 3ß-HSD, 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; INDO, indomethacin; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; PG, prostaglandin; PLC, progenitor Leydig cells; StAR, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein.
Received April 17, 2002.
Accepted for publication May 28, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
messenger ribonucleic acid expression in primary cultures of Leydig cells. Endocrinology 129:28622866
and -1ß regulate interleukin-6 expression in Leydig and Sertoli cells. Recent Prog Horm Res 50:367372
-activated site-binding activities of Stat5b in primary rat Leydig cells and MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. Endocrinology 139:18721882
messenger ribonucleic acid expression in primary cultures of Leydig cells. Endocrinology 129:28622866
(IFN-
) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) regulate differently IL-12 production in human intestinal lamina propria mononuclear cells (LPMC). Clin Exp Immunol 117:469475[CrossRef][Medline]
-dependent cyclooxygenase 2 expression. J Exp Med 191:21312144
receptor expression by interleukin-1ß in cultured human granulosa-luteal cells. Endocrinology 138:36383644
. J Biol Chem 275:2802828032
(IL-1
) release, which triggers IL-6 production by an autocrine mechanism, through the lipoxygenase pathway. Endocrinology 136:30703078[Abstract]
and IL-6 production induced by lipopolysaccharide in mouse peritoneal neutrophils. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 278:224228[CrossRef][Medline]
and interleukin-10 production by prostaglandins I2 and E2: studies with prostaglandin receptor-deficient mice and prostaglandin E-receptor subtype-selective synthetic agonists. Biochem Pharmacol 61:11531160[CrossRef][Medline]
, interleukin 1, and interleukin 6. Cytokine 3:327332[CrossRef][Medline]
. Endocrinology 129:16141620This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. D Madison, J. M Scarlett, P. Levasseur, X. Zhu, K. Newcomb, A. Batra, D. Bowe, and D. L Marks Prostacyclin signaling regulates circulating ghrelin during acute inflammation J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 196(2): 263 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Del Bravo, A. Catizone, G. Ricci, and M. Galdieri Hepatocyte Growth Factor-Modulated Rat Leydig Cell Functions J Androl, November 1, 2007; 28(6): 866 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Winnall, U. Ali, M. K. O'Bryan, J. J. Hirst, P. A.F. Whiley, J. A. Muir, and M. P. Hedger Constitutive Expression of Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthase 2 by Somatic and Spermatogenic Cells Is Responsible for Prostaglandin E2 Production in the Adult Rat Testis Biol Reprod, May 1, 2007; 76(5): 759 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ishikawa and P. L. Morris A Multistep Kinase-Based Sertoli Cell Autocrine-Amplifying Loop Regulates Prostaglandins, Their Receptors, and Cytokines Endocrinology, April 1, 2006; 147(4): 1706 - 1716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ishikawa, K. Hwang, D. Lazzarino, and P. L. Morris Sertoli Cell Expression of Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein-Related Lipid Transfer 1 and 5 Domain-Containing Proteins and Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein-1 Are Interleukin-1{beta} Regulated by Activation of c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase and Cyclooxygenase-2 and Cytokine Induction Endocrinology, December 1, 2005; 146(12): 5100 - 5111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Walch, E. Clavarino, and P. L. Morris Prostaglandin (PG) FP and EP1 Receptors Mediate PGF2{alpha} and PGE2 Regulation of Interleukin-1{beta} Expression in Leydig Cell Progenitors Endocrinology, April 1, 2003; 144(4): 1284 - 1291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |