| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLE |
Institute of Maternal-Fetal Biology and the Departments of Molecular & Integrative Physiology and Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Michael J. Soares, Department of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160-7401. E-mail: msoares{at}kumc.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, PL-Iß, and PL-I
). Two previously unidentified mouse orthologs for members of the rat PRL family, PRL-like protein-I (PLP-I) and PLP-K were discovered, as were two new members of the PLP-C subfamily, PLP-C
and PLP-C
, and two new entirely unique members of the PRL family, PLP-N and PLP-O. Amino acid sequences predicted from the latter two genes most closely resembled proliferin-related protein. Each of the nine newly discovered genes is expressed in trophoblast cells of the mouse placenta in a gestationally specific pattern. In summary, elucidation of the mouse PRL gene family locus provides new insights into the expansion of the mouse PRL family and new tools for studying the genetics and biology of its members. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The initial identification of a substance extracted from the anterior pituitary possessing actions on the mammary gland and the initiation of lactation and its subsequent naming as PRL occurred over 70 yr ago (2, 3, 4, 5). The notion that there may be other hormones related to PRL developed from studies with the pregnant mouse and pregnant rat. Removal of the anterior pituitary during the second half of gestation in the mouse or rat was consistent with continued development of the mammary glands and corpus luteum (another target of PRL; Refs. 6 and7). These studies suggested an extrapituitary source of a PRL-like hormone and were followed by the discovery that extracts from the placenta possessed luteotropic (8) and mammotropic activities (9). The isolation of functional PRL mimics (PLs) from the rodent proceeded within the next few years (10, 11, 12). Their relationship with PRL was apparent following the cloning and sequence analyses of PRL cDNAs and the initial PL cDNAs (13, 14, 15, 16, 17). Existence of an expanded PRL family became evident during a search for mRNAs in 3T3 fibroblasts whose expression was dependent upon growth factor stimulation and as a byproduct of cloning rat placental lactogen (PL)-II. In the first instance, growth factor regulated mRNAs were identified with sequence similarity to PRL (18), and in the second instance unique cDNAs were isolated from a rat placental cDNA library with sequence similarity to the PRL sequence (19, 20). Several additional members were discovered during the characterization of known members of the PRL family at protein, cDNA, and genomic levels and through the use of degenerate probes and differential display strategies (21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32). More recent discoveries have been directly attributed to searching mouse and rat expressed sequence tag databases (33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43).
The PRL family genes in the mouse, rat, and cow appear to be clustered on chromosomes 13 (mouse:30, 33, 34, 35, 39, 40, 44), 17 (rat:24, 25, 27, 45, 46, 47, 48), and 23 (cow:49) of each respective species genome. Gene structure has been determined for a few members of the PRL family. Two conserved exon-intron arrangements are evident: 1) a prototypical five exon-four intron structure found in PRL (50, 51, 52), PL-II (48, 53), PLP-A (54), PLF (55), and two bovine PRL family members (56, 57); and 2) a six exon-five intron structure present in members of the PLP-C subfamily, including PLP-C variant (v) (27), PLP-C
(30), and decidual (d)PRP (58). The latter exon/intron arrangement represents the addition of a short exon between exons II and III of the prototypical PRL exon/intron organization. Based on amino acid similarities, the extra exon is likely present in all members of the PLP-C subfamily, and PLF-RP. PLP-E and PLP-F may possess a nonhomologous exon situated in the same region (37).
In the present study, we have used information derived from the public mouse genome database as a tool for identifying several new members of the mouse PRL family. We report the identification of nine new members of the PRL family and their expression patterns, and some insights into the organization of the PRL family locus on chromosome 13.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Conceptuses with associated uteri were removed on d 11, 13, 16, and 19 of gestation. Tissues were frozen in dry ice-cooled heptane and stored at -80 C until used for in situ hybridization. Alternatively, placental tissues were dissected free from maternal and fetal structures, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 C until processed for RNA analysis.
Blastocysts were isolated by flushing uterine horns on d 4 of gestation, washed, transferred to 35-mm dishes, and cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium in a humidified incubator at 37 C with an atmosphere of 95% air/5% CO2. The culture medium was supplemented with antibiotics, 1 mM glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 20% fetal bovine serum. Blastocysts hatched, attached, and demonstrated a significant outgrowth within a few days of the initiation of culture. Outgrowths were harvested following 6 d of culture.
Cloning and characterization of the PRL family cDNAs
Genes for new members of the PRL family were identified by BLAST analysis (59) using nucleotide sequences of previously identified members of the PRL family (Ref. 1 ; and Table 1
) against the public mouse genome assembly (http://mouse.ensembl.org and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/seq/MmBlast.html). Members of the PRL family were found on several overlapping bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones localized to chromosome 13 (RP23351I6, RP23189A16, RP23122C3, RP23142M3, RP23117C5, RP2320A22, RP23231P12; Childrens Hospital-BACPAC Resources, Oakland, CA). Genomic sequences possessing similarity to members of the PRL family were used to search the mouse expressed sequence tag database (National Center for Biotechnology Information; Ref. 59). One cDNA (PLP-O; clone no. 5280049R, BG077704) was obtained from the American Type Tissue Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and another cDNA (PLP-C
; Riken No. 1600019J01, AV036496) from the Riken Institute (Ibaraki, Japan; Ref. 60). The remaining cDNAs were isolated by RT-PCR from total RNA extracted with the TRIzol reagent (61) from mouse blastocyst outgrowths or placental tissues. Five micrograms of total RNA and 0.5 µg of oligo-deoxythymidine were used for reverse transcription reactions. PCRs were performed using Pfu polymerase with sets of primers based on genomic sequences (Table 2
). PCR was performed for 30 cycles (denature, 95 C for 1 min; anneal, 55 C for 1 min; extension, 72 C for 1.5 min). Amplified products were subcloned into pCRII-TOPO vector flanked by SP6 and T7 promoters with the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). cDNAs were sequenced by the Biotechnology Support Facility of the University of Kansas Medical Center. Nucleotide and amino acid sequence comparisons were performed with CLUSTAL W (version 1.8; Ref. 62). The location of signal peptides was determined by homology and the SignalP software program (version 2.0.b2; Ref. 63).
|
|
, PL-Iß, and/or PL-I
. BsaJ1 digests each of the PL-I cDNAs at nucleotide 136 and PL-I
uniquely at nucleotide 420. NlaIII digests each of the PL-I cDNAs at nucleotide 140 and 740; PL-Iß and PL-I
are additionally cut at nucleotide 324. The digested products were resolved by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels and ethidium bromide staining.
Northern blot analysis.
Northern blots were performed as previously described (34, 64). RNA was extracted from tissues using TRIzol (61). Total RNA (20 µg) was separated on 1% formaldehyde-agarose gels and transferred to nylon membranes. Blots were probed with [32P]-labeled cDNAs for PLP-Cß, PLP-C
, PLP-C
, PLP-I, PLP-K, PLP-L, PLP-N, or PLP-O. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH) cDNA was used as an internal reference to ensure integrity of the RNA samples.
In situ hybridization.
PRL family mRNAs were detected in placental tissues using nonradioactive in situ hybridization as previously described (65). Plasmids containing cDNAs for PLP-C
, PLP-C
, PLP-I, PLP-K, PLP-L, PLP-N, and PLP-O were linearized and used as templates to synthesize sense and antisense digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes according to the manufacturers instructions (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). Tissue sections were air dried and fixed in ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min. Prehybridization was carried out in a humidified chamber at 50 C in 5x SSC (standard saline citrate), 50% deionized formamide, 1x Denhardts reagent, 10% dextran sulfate, and salmon sperm DNA (100 µg/ml). Hybridizations were performed in the same incubation conditions overnight. Slides were washed in 2x SSC at room temperature for 30 min followed by treatment with ribonuclease A (100 ng/ml) and additional washes with 2x SSC for 30 min at room temperature, followed by washes with 2x SSC for 1 h at 65 C and 0.1 x SSC for 1 h at 65 C. Tissue sections were blocked for 30 min and incubated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antidigoxigenin antibody (1:500) in blocking buffer (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 2 h at room temperature. Slides were then washed and detection was performed using nitro blue tetrazolium (250 µg/ml) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (225 µg/ml; Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Two PLP-C
related genes, PLP-Cß, a PLF-RP-related gene, PLP-E, and PLP-F were found on RP23117C5. RP2320A22 contains PLF-RP, a gene related to PLF-RP, PLP-M, and a PLF gene, whereas PLP-A and PLP-L were localized to RP23231P12. The alignments of the BAC clones and the PRL family genes and their relationships to one another are presented in Figs. 1
, PL-Iß, and PL-I
. The two mouse genes similar to PLP-C
are referred to as PLP-C
and PLP-C
and the two genes possessing similarity to PLF-RP were named PLP-N and PLP-O. Because gaps are present in the current BAC clone map, it is possible that additional members of the PRL family may exist. At least one of these gaps is situated between BAC clones, RP2320A22, and RP23231P12, and near the PLF gene cluster. Thus far, we have only identified a single PLF gene from a subfamily of at least four highly related PLF genes. The sequence of the identified PLF gene is very similar but different than each of the known sequences for PLF-1, PLF-2, PLF-3, and PLF-4 (18, 55, 66, 67), suggesting the PLF cluster may consist of at least five related genes.
|
|
All PRL family genes contain five conserved exons. A subset contains an additional exon(s) situated between exons II and III of the conserved structure. dPRP, PLP-C-related genes, PLP-N, PLP-F, PLF-RP, and PLP-O contains a single extra exon, whereas PLP-E has two additional exons in this region.
PL-I subfamily: structure and expression
The mouse PL-I cDNA was cloned several years ago (17). In the original report describing the cloning of the mouse PL-I cDNA, the authors noted a complex Southern blot analysis and suggested that there may be multiple PL-I genes. As revealed from sequence analysis of two overlapping BAC clones, RP23351I6 and RP23189A16, there are three closely related PL-I genes that we have named PL-I
, PL-Iß, and PL-I
. Each of the PL-I cDNAs was cloned by PCR from either RNA isolated from blastocyst outgrowths or from gestation d 10 placentas and sequenced (Fig. 3
). Two PL-I
, three PL-Iß, and four PL-I
cDNA clones were isolated from blastocyst outgrowths, whereas six PL-I
and one PL-I
cDNA clones were isolated from gestation d 10 placenta. PL-I
, PL-Iß, and PL-I
nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences exhibited more than 98% sequence identity when compared with one another. The predicted amino acid sequence of PL-I
is identical to the predicted amino acid sequence for the originally cloned PL-I cDNA except for the absence of an amino acid in the signal peptide (Ala-20; Ref. 17). PL-I
differed from PL-Iß at three amino acid residues (Thr+69 vs. Ile+69; Val+119 vs. Ile+119; Ser+147 vs. Thr+147) and differed from PL-I
at five amino acid residues (Leu-7 vs. Phe-7; Asp+10 vs. Glu+10; Asn+22 vs. Ser+22; Thr+69 vs. Ile+69; Val+119 vs. Ile+119). PL-Iß and PL-I
differed at four amino acid residues (Leu-7 vs. Phe-7; Asp+10 vs. Glu+10; Asn+22 vs. Ser+22; Thr+147 vs. Ser+147).
|
from PL-Iß and PL-I
. PL-I
was expressed in both blastocyst outgrowths and in d 10 mouse placentas (Fig. 4
transcripts were only detectable in RNA from blastocyst outgrowths (Fig. 4
|
PLP-I.
Perusal of mouse genomic sequences revealed the existence of a mouse ortholog for rat PLP-I on BAC clone, RP23189A16 (38). A mouse PLP-I cDNA was cloned by RT-PCR from gestation d 19 mouse placenta, sequenced, and compared with rat PLP-I (Fig. 5
). Upon careful examination, we noted two errors in the original published sequence for rat PLP-I (38). Two extra nucleotides were found in the 5'-region of the cDNA resulting in two separate frame shift errors in the corresponding amino acid sequence (corrected PLP-I GenBank accession no. AF526270). Mouse PLP-I is 83% and 75% identical to rat PLP-I at nucleotide and amino acid levels. Mouse and rat PLP-I each possess a predicted 29 amino acid signal peptide; share the placement of six cysteine residues, and two conserved putative N-linked glycosylation sites. PLP-I most closely resembled PLP-J and was situated near the PL genes and PLP-J gene in the PRL gene family locus.
|
|
and PLP-C
.
and PLP-C
. The PLP-C
clone was obtained from the Riken Institute and the PLP-C
cDNA was cloned by RT-PCR from gestation d 19 mouse placentas. Both cDNAs were sequenced and their predicted amino acid sequences compared with amino acid sequences for other members of the PLP-C subfamily (Fig. 7
and PLP-C
genes are localized to a region of the PRL family locus near three other related genes, dPRP, PLP-C
, and PLP-Cß. Overall predicted amino acid sequence identities among the PLP-C subfamily range from 5166% (Fig. 7
, and dPRP each possess an additional putative N-linked glycosylation site.
|
|
|
|
|
, PLP-C
, PLP-I, and PLP-L transcripts showed increases in abundance as gestation advanced, whereas PLP-N and PLP-O mRNAs were detectable throughout the second half of gestation. None of the PRL family mRNAs tested were expressed in the kidney.
In an earlier report, PLP-I mRNA was detected in the rat testis (38). Consequently, we evaluated the expression of PLP-I in testes from adult mice and rats by Northern blot and in situ hybridization analyses with homologous probes (Fig. 10
). We could not detect PLP-I transcripts in either the mouse or rat testes by Northern blotting (Fig. 10
) or in situ hybridization (data not shown), and thus were not able to confirm the earlier finding (38). Thus, based on our experimentation, PLP-I does not appear to be expressed in testes from adult mice and rats.
Each of the newly identified members of the mouse PRL family was localized to trophoblast cells. However, they exhibited some prominent differences in the trophoblast lineage responsible for their expression. Four different trophoblast lineages are involved in the expression of PRL family members: 1) trophoblast cells of the labyrinth zone; 2) spongiotrophoblast cells of the junctional zone; 3) trophoblast giant cells of the junctional zone; 4) migratory trophoblast cells invading the decidua and myometrium of the mesometrial compartment (see Fig. 11A
). PLP-C
, PLP-C
, PLP-I, and PLP-L mRNAs were all localized to the junctional zone of the chorioallantoic placenta (Fig. 11
, BD, F). The expression of PLP-C
, PLP-I, and PLP-L was restricted to spongiotrophoblast cells, whereas PLP-C
was localized to spongiotrophoblast cells, trophoblast giant cells, and migratory trophoblast cells. PLP-K and PLP-O transcripts were detected in trophoblast cells of both the junctional and labyrinth zone compartments (Fig. 11
, E and H). Within the junctional zone, PLP-K expression was restricted to spongiotrophoblast cells, whereas PLP-O was expressed in both spongiotrophoblast cells and trophoblast giant cells. A similar localization of PLP-K mRNA in the mouse placenta was previously demonstrated with a short mouse PLP-K probe (40). PLP-N transcripts were localized to spongiotrophoblast cells and trophoblast giant cells of the junctional zone and to migratory trophoblast cells present in the mesometrial decidua and myometrium (Fig. 11G
). The PLP-N expressing cells in the decidua and myometrium were cytokeratin-positive, thus confirming their trophoblast origin (data not shown). In summary, the newly discovered PRL family genes are expressed in trophoblast cells of the mouse placenta in gestationally specific patterns.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The alignment of genes along the PRL family locus primarily reflects sequence conservation. Those genes possessing greater nucleotide identities are situated in closer proximity. PRL is positioned at one end of the mouse locus, whereas PLP-L is positioned at the other end of the locus. At a nucleotide level these genes exhibit modest similarity; however, the protein encoded by the PLP-L gene exhibits marked conservation with PRLs, especially more evolutionarily ancient PRL structures (70). Commonalities in cell-specific and/or temporal-specific aspects of gene expression do not appear to be main factors governing alignment along the locus. It is likely that analogous PRL family loci exist on rat chromosome 17 and bovine chromosome 23. Although many members of the mouse and rat PRL families are orthologous, this does not seem to be the situation in the cow, which suggests the independent utilization of the ancestral PRL template (71).
Genes within the PRL family locus were also organized based on their exon-intron structure. The prototypical five exon-four intron organization characteristic of PRL was a feature of genes clustered at both ends of the locus. The central core of genes possessed an additional exon(s) situated between exons II and III of the prototypical sequence. The insertion of the additional short exon(s) is near the location of binding site 1 found in the amino acid sequences of ligands interacting with the PRL receptor (72). dPRP, PLF-RP, and PLP-E possess the extra exon(s) and do not effectively bind the PRL receptor (73, 74, 75). Whether this is also true for the remaining members of the six/seven exon subfamily is unknown. The repeated insertion of an additional exon(s) between exons II and III of the prototypical PRL gene structure in numerous members of the PRL family implies some functional significance. Whether the extra exon(s) encode for a physical spacer, separating key regulatory domains or the inclusion of a biologically relevant motif is yet to be resolved. Exon III of PLP-C and PLF-RP related genes encodes for a short exon rich in aromatic amino acids, whereas the extra exon(s) of PLP-E and PLP-F are distinct. The latter genes encode for proteins regulating hematopoiesis (75, 76, 77). The significance of the additional exon(s) in the biological actions of PLP-E and PLP-F remains to be determined.
PL-I is situated adjacent to the PRL gene and shares the same exon-intron structure, biological targets, and receptor-signaling pathway. It is now evident in the mouse that PL-I is actually encoded by three closely related genes, which encode for three closely related proteins, referred to as PL-I
, PL-Iß, and PL-I
. The PL-I cDNA was originally cloned from the midgestation mouse placenta (17) and is equivalent to PL-I
. Each PL-I gene is expressed and exhibits distinct patterns of activation during development. PL-Iß and PL-I
are activated most dramatically in trophoblast cells isolated from blastocyst outgrowths, whereas PL-I
predominates in placenta from d 10 of gestation. These observations suggest that differences may exist in the transcriptional control of the PL-I
gene vs. PL-Iß and PL-I
genes. A mouse PL-I promoter, likely corresponding to PL-I
, has been studied in the Rcho-1 trophoblast cell model (78, 79, 80). These studies have implicated the involvement of activator protein 1 and GATA factors. Whether these regulators are restricted to a specific PL-I gene or whether they will be shared among all three PL-I genes will need to be resolved. The differential PL-I gene expression patterns suggest that there may be differences in the biological activities of each PL-I. Furthermore, the needs of an implanting blastocyst differ markedly from events at midgestation. PL-I
is a known PRL receptor agonist (81). The abilities of PL-Iß and PL-I
proteins to activate the PRL receptor-signaling pathway are not known. Amino acid sequences encoded by the three PL-I genes differ at a maximum of only five residues in the mature proteins. These amino acid substitutions are, for the most part, conservative changes. Although the amino acid changes in PL-Iß and PL-I
are not dramatically different from PL-I
they may impact the transport, stability, or actions of the ligands.
Six additional new members of the PRL gene family were discovered via mining of the mouse genome database. Two of the new members were orthologous to previously characterized members of the rat PRL family, PLP-I and PLP-K; two were classified as part of the PLP-C subfamily and were termed PLP-C
and PLP-C
, and two exhibited structural relationships with PLF-RP and were named PLP-N and PLP-O. The amino acid sequence similarities and expression patterns may provide some clues into the biology of these new members of the PRL family.
PLP-I.
PLP-I is a five exon-four intron gene situated near the PRL and PL genes. It has an ortholog in the rat. Earlier comments about peculiar structural features and expression patterns of rat PLP-I appear to be unfounded (38). Placental expression of PLP-I is prominent during the latter stages of gestation. Expression is restricted to spongiotrophoblast cells, suggesting that PLP-I may be preferentially directed toward the maternal compartment. The predicted PLP-I protein has putative N-linked sites for glycosylation and exhibits some structural relationships to classical members of the PRL family (i.e. those using the PRL receptor signaling pathway); however, whether it shares similar targets or modes of action are unknown.
PLP-K.
An ortholog of rat PLP-K was identified and possessed a five exon-four intron structure. Mouse PLP-K is very similar to rat PLP-K with the notable exception of a putative N-linked glycosylation site present in rat but not in mouse PLP-K. Based on sequence comparisons, PLP-K shares some similarity to PLF. PLF is a known regulator of blood vessel development and uterine growth (82, 83). The actions of PLF on endothelial cells are mediated by carbohydrate structures on the PLF protein backbone (84). These carbohydrate motifs interact with the insulin-like growth factor-II/mannose-6-phosphate receptor to stimulate angiogenesis (84). The absence of N-linked glycosylation sites in mouse PLP-K may not be consistent with a PLF-like mode of action. The expression pattern of mouse PLP-K is intriguing and unique among members of the PRL family. PLP-K mRNA is expressed at high levels in trophoblast cells from both junctional and labyrinth zones of the chorioallantoic placenta during the last week of gestation. The distribution of PLP-K in both junctional and labyrinth zones indicates that the PLP-K protein may be targeted to both maternal and fetal compartments.
PLP-C
and PLP-C
.
Two new members of the PLP-C subfamily possessing the characteristic six exon-five intron gene organization were found. The PLP-C subfamily appears to have been more recently evolved. Five PLP-C family members have been identified in the mouse (dPRP, PLP-C
, PLP-Cß, PLP-C
, and PLP-C
) and six in the rat (dPRP, PLP-C, PLP-Cv, PLP-Cß, PLP-D, and PLP-H). dPRP and PLP-Cß are orthologous in the mouse and rat; however, the remaining mouse and rat members are not orthologous. The biology of the PLP-C subfamily is poorly understood, other than dPRP, which binds heparin and targets eosinophils (85). Both PLP-C
, and PLP-C
are predominantly expressed in the junctional zone during the latter third of gestation. Although PLP-C
expression is restricted to spongiotrophoblast cells, PLP-C
is expressed in spongiotrophoblast and trophoblast giant cells, and to a lesser extent in a subpopulation of trophoblast cells migrating into the mesometrial decidua (see additional discussion about migratory trophoblast cells below). This pattern of gene expression indicates that PLP-C
and PLP-C
are likely targeted to maternal tissues, similar to the pattern of PLP-C
and PLP-Cß and the rat members of the PLP-C subfamily. The species specificity of the PLP-C subfamily of ligands may have evolved to regulate pregnancy-dependent processes that are unique to the mouse vs. the rat.
PLP-N and PLP-O.
Two genes with six exon-five intron structures encoding proteins with sequence similarity to PLF-RP were discovered. Orthologs for PLP-N and PLP-O have not been reported for any other species, including the rat. PLF-RP orthologs exist in the mouse, rat, and likely hamster (21, 41, 86). PLP-N is abundantly expressed in trophoblast cells of the junctional zone and trophoblast migrating into the mesometrial decidua. Migratory trophoblast cells form intimate relationships with the vasculature supplying the chorioallantoic placenta and increase in numbers during the latter stages of pregnancy (87, 88). In comparison, PLP-O is expressed in spongiotrophoblast cells and trophoblast giant cells of the junctional zone and in labyrinthine trophoblast. The spongiotrophoblast and labyrinthine trophoblast cell expression overlapped with the transcript distribution for PLP-K. In the mouse, PLF-RP targets the vasculature. It is an inhibitor of angiogenesis and a potent antagonist of PLF action (82, 89). Both PLP-N and PLP-O are in close proximity to vasculature critical to the placenta and the fetus, respectively. Whether these two PLF-RP related cytokines also target blood vessels needs to be evaluated.
Overview
The mouse possesses at least 26 different genes comprising the PRL family locus. We have considerable understanding of the biology of PRL but very little knowledge of the physiology of most of the other constituents of the locus. The evolutionary survival of this expanded gene family implies functional importance and relevance to speciation. Some ligand-receptor families have undergone coordinate evolution (69). However, no evidence exists for an expanded PRL receptor family. Our current information indicates that a few members of the PRL family use the PRL receptor signaling system; however, most do not and may instead use receptor signaling pathways characteristic of other ligands. Thus, there must be something intrinsic in the structure of the ancestral PRL template that enables it to evolve into structures recognized by other receptor systems. The existence of at least 26 natural variants should facilitate understanding the significance of key structural motifs within this family of cytokines/hormones.
In summary, elucidation of the mouse PRL gene family locus provides new insights into the expansion of the mouse PRL family and new tools for studying the genetics and biology of its members.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Paralogous refers to the relationship of homologous genes due to a duplication event; orthologous refers to the relationship of homologous genes due to a speciation event (90 91 ).
Abbreviations: BAC, Bacterial artificial chromosome; d, decidual; G3PDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; PLF, proliferin; PLF-RP, PLF-related protein; PL-I or -II, placental lactogen (I or II); PLP, PRL-like protein; PRL, prolactin; PRP, PRL-related protein; SSC, standard saline citrate; v, variant.
Received July 17, 2002.
Accepted for publication September 4, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
: structure and expression. Endocrinology 139:51575163This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Ray, D. Dutta, M. A. K. Rumi, L. N. Kent, M. J. Soares, and S. Paul Context-dependent Function of Regulatory Elements and a Switch in Chromatin Occupancy between GATA3 and GATA2 Regulate Gata2 Transcription during Trophoblast Differentiation J. Biol. Chem., February 20, 2009; 284(8): 4978 - 4988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. K. Alam, T. Konno, N. Sahgal, L. Lu, and M. J. Soares Decidual Cells Produce a Heparin-binding Prolactin Family Cytokine with Putative Intrauterine Regulatory Actions J. Biol. Chem., July 4, 2008; 283(27): 18957 - 18968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-Y. Wang, Y. Yin, H. Yuan, T. Sakamaki, H. Okano, and R. I. Glazer Musashi1 Modulates Mammary Progenitor Cell Expansion through Proliferin-Mediated Activation of the Wnt and Notch Pathways Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2008; 28(11): 3589 - 3599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Knox and J. C. Baker Genomic evolution of the placenta using co-option and duplication and divergence Genome Res., May 1, 2008; 18(5): 695 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Takahashi, O. Yamada, M. J Soares, and K. Hashizume Bovine prolactin-related protein-I is anchored to the extracellular matrix through interactions with type IV collagen J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 196(2): 225 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.S. Knox and J.C. Baker Genome-wide expression profiling of placentas in the p57Kip2 model of pre-eclampsia Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 13(4): 251 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Konno, L. A. Rempel, J. A. Arroyo, and M. J. Soares Pregnancy in the Brown Norway Rat: A Model for Investigating the Genetics of Placentation Biol Reprod, April 1, 2007; 76(4): 709 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Ho-Chen, J. J. Bustamante, and M. J. Soares Prolactin-Like Protein-F Subfamily of Placental Hormones/Cytokines: Responsiveness to Maternal Hypoxia Endocrinology, February 1, 2007; 148(2): 559 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. K. Alam, T. Konno, G. Dai, L. Lu, D. Wang, J. H. Dunmore, A. R. Godwin, and M. J. Soares A uterine decidual cell cytokine ensures pregnancy-dependent adaptations to a physiological stressor Development, January 15, 2007; 134(2): 407 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gheorghe, S. Moham, and L. D. Longo Gene Expression Patterns in the Developing Murine Placenta Reproductive Sciences, May 1, 2006; 13(4): 256 - 262. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Kolonin, J. Sun, K.-A. Do, C. I. Vidal, Y. Ji, K. A. Baggerly, R. Pasqualini, and W. Arap Synchronous selection of homing peptides for multiple tissues by in vivo phage display FASEB J, May 1, 2006; 20(7): 979 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Rider, T Potapova, G Dai, and M J Soares Stimulation of a rat uterine stromal cell line in culture reveals a molecular switch for endocrine-dependent differentiation J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 119 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zhou, X. Kong, and D. I. H. Linzer Enhanced Recovery from Thrombocytopenia and Neutropenia in Mice Constitutively Expressing a Placental Hematopoietic Cytokine Endocrinology, January 1, 2005; 146(1): 64 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ain, G. Dai, J. H. Dunmore, A. R. Godwin, and M. J. Soares From the Cover: A prolactin family paralog regulates reproductive adaptations to a physiological stressor PNAS, November 23, 2004; 101(47): 16543 - 16548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-M. Mallon, L. Wilming, J. Weekes, J. G.R. Gilbert, J. Ashurst, S. Peyrefitte, L. Matthews, M. Cadman, R. McKeone, C. A. Sellick, et al. Organization and Evolution of a Gene-Rich Region of the Mouse Genome: A 12.7-Mb Region Deleted in the Del(13)Svea36H Mouse Genome Res., October 1, 2004; 14(10a): 1888 - 1901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ozturk, A. Fresnoza, A. Savoie, H. W. Duckworth, and M. L. Duckworth Defining Regulatory Regions in the Rat Prolactin Gene Family Locus Using a Large P1 Genomic Clone Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 4742 - 4754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Emes, L. Goodstadt, E. E. Winter, and C. P. Ponting Comparison of the genomes of human and mouse lays the foundation of genome zoology Hum. Mol. Genet., April 1, 2003; 12(7): 701 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |