| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Laboratory of Molecular Neuroendocrinology (A.Fö., I.H.M., K.J.K.), Institute of Experimental Medicine, H-1083 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Genetics, Cell, and Immunobiology (A.K.F., E.B., K.H., A.Fa.) and 3rd Department of Internal Medicine (L.R., M.K.), Semmelweis University, H-1089 Budapest, Hungary; Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute (A.N.), Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada M5G 1X5; and Molecular Immunology Research Group (A.Fa.), Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1089 Budapest, Hungary
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Krisztina J. Kovács, Ph.D., Laboratory of Molecular Neuroendocrinology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Szigony u. 43, H-1083 Budapest, Hungary. E-mail: kovacs{at}koki.hu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Leptin, the product of ob gene, secreted primarily by white adipose tissue is a pleiotropic molecule that signals to the brain about the overall metabolic state of the animal (6, 7). Leptin suppresses food intake and increases sympathetic tone by regulating the activity of two mutually antagonistic sets of hypothalamic neuropeptides, the anorexigenic [proopiomelanocortin (POMC), cocaine- and amphetamine-induced transcript (CART), and CRH] and orexigenic [neuropeptide Y (NPY), melanin-concentrating hormone, agouti-related peptide, orexin)] cell population (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). In addition, leptin receptors were found in the caudal brain stem (14) and reward-related brain structures (15). Leptin also has effects in the periphery, influencing processes as diverse as immune regulation, inflammation, hematopoesis (16, 17), and ß-oxidation in muscle cells (18).
Data are accumulating to reveal a bidirectional regulatory loop between neuronal histamine and leptin. Although hypothalamic histaminergic neurons do not express leptin receptors and are not directly sensitive to leptin, their involvement in mediation of the central effects of leptin on food intake and feeding behavior is very likely. Intracerebroventricular infusion of leptin increases the histamine turnover in the hypothalamus (19) and pharmacological depletion of brain histamine levels by
-fluoromethylhistidine attenuates leptin-induced suppression of feeding (20). Histamine H1 receptor knockout (H1R-/-) animals display an attenuated response to leptin-induced feeding suppression, directly implicating histamine neurons in the regulation of feeding behavior as a downstream signal of leptin. H1R-/- mice display diet-induced fat deposition and increased serum leptin levels (21). On the other hand, histamine reduces ob gene expression (22) and induces lipolysis (5, 23), and central infusion of histamine reduces fat accumulation in obese mice (24).
Histidine decarboxylase (HDC) is the key enzyme involved in histamine biosynthesis by decarboxylating L-histidine (25). The lack of HDC enzyme activity leads therefore to the complete absence of histamine in HDC-/- animals. The phenotypic features identified so far in HDC knockout animals include impaired allergic skin reactions, major reduction, and poor granulation of mast cells (26) weakened acute phase response (27) and blunted inducibility of IL-6 (28). Life-long deficit of HDC gene impairs cortical electroencephalogram, affects sleep-wakefulness states, and results in inability to remain awake and vigilant in response to environmental challenges (29).
The availability of a HDC-/- mouse (30) provides comprehensive model to study the role of histamine in regulation of metabolic balance and the regulatory connection between histaminergic neurons and leptin because all of the relevant histamine receptors expressed in the brain (H1R, H2R, and H3R) (2, 31) lack an appropriate agonist. The present study was therefore designed to compare the brain histaminergic system and characterize changes in feeding behavior, body weight regulation, and energy balance in wild-type and HDC-/- mice.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To confirm the genotype of the mice, genomic DNA was obtained from tail samples and analyzed by PCR using primers (HDC forward: 5'-AGT GAG GGA CTG TGG CTC CAC GTC GAT GCT-3' and HDC reverse 5'-TAC AGT CAA AGT GTA CCA TCA TCC ACT TGG-3'; neor forward: 5'-AAA CAT CGC ATC GAG CGA GCA CGT ACT CGG-3' and neor reverse 5'-ATG TCC TGA TAG CGG TCC GCC ACA CCC AGC-3').
Procedures
All metabolic experiments were carried out on mice older than 12 wk. Body weights, and food intake was monitored on 7 consecutive days in WT and HDC-/- mice. Caloric efficiency [gram of body weight gained/(gram food ingested x caloric equivalent of the food)] was calculated. After anesthesia and killing by cervical dislocation, the thickness of sc fat tissue was determined by measuring the thickness of the skin fold on the animals back with a caliper (Oditest, Kroeplin Längenmesstechnik, Germany). The epididymal white fat pad and interscapular brown adipose tissue were dissected and weighed.
To assess metabolic responses in a challenge situation (33), WT and HDC-/- mice were housed individually in cages with wire bottom and were fasted for 5 h. Their body weights were measured immediately before and after fast. At this time, rectal temperature was measured with a digital thermometer, and then animals were transported to a cold room and kept at 4 C for 90 min. Their temperature was registered at 30, 60, and 90 min in cold, and their body weight was measured again at the end of the cold challenge.
Blood samples were obtained in the morning hours (between 0900 and 1100 h) from fed and overnight-fasted animals by puncture of retrobulbar venous plexus. Leptin was measured using Quantikine M mouse leptin immunoassay kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), and insulin plasma concentration was determined by Mouse Insulin Ultrasensitive ELISA kit (DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany), respectively, according to the manufacturers instructions. Plasma corticosterone levels were determined by Octeia ELISA kit (Immunodiagnostic Systems Ltd., Boldon, UK). Triglyceride and cholesterol levels were measured by enzymatic colorimetry (GPOL-PAP and CHOD-PAP, Roche, Basel, Switzerland). High-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels were assayed with a direct HDL-Chol test kit (Randox, Crumlin, UK).
To determine glucose tolerance, mice were fasted for 18 h and given an ip injection of glucose (1 mg/g body weight). Blood samples were obtained from the retrobulbar plexus immediately before and 30, 60, and 120 min after glucose injection.
To assess the glucose response to insulin injection, mice received an ip injection of insulin (Actrapid HMge, Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark) at a dose of 1 U/kg body weight immediately after obtaining blood sample to determine basal glucose level. Further samples were withdrawn 15, 30, and 60 min after insulin challenge. Blood glucose levels were determined by One Touch glucose monitoring system (Lifescan, Milpitas, CA).
Insulin secretory response to glucose challenge was determined in fasted mice. Blood samples were withdrawn immediately before and 30, 60, and 120 min after a single ip injection of 1 mg/g body weight D-glucose.
For histidine loading, to increase hypothalamic neuronal histamine concentration and release, L-histidine (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO), the precursor of histamine was injected ip (dose: 0.1 mg/g body weight in 0.2 ml). The animals were then left undisturbed in their individual cages until perfusion 2.5 h later.
Another set of WT and histamine-deficient mice was used to assess uncoupling protein (UCP)-1 mRNA levels in the brown adipose tissue (BAT). Animals were decapitated, the interscapular BAT dissected, cleared from white adipose tissue (WAT), and frozen immediately. For Northern blots, total RNA from BAT was purified by the method of Chomczynski and Sacchi (33), separated in a 1.2% agarose gel containing 8% formaldehyde, and transferred onto Hybond-N membranes (Amersham, Freiburg, Germany) using the capillary transfer method. DNA probe for UCP-1 (kindly provided by Barbara Cannon, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden) and the ß-actin riboprobe were labeled by the random primer method (HexaLabel DNA labeling kit, MBI Fermentas, Szeged, Hungary) using 32P-dCTP (Izinta, Budapest, Hungary). Prehybridizations (42 C, 4 h) and hybridizations (42 C, overnight) were carried out in solution containing 50% (vol/vol) formamide, 6x sodium chloride/sodium citrate (SSC), 5x Denhardts solution, 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 50 mM Na-phosphate buffer, 100 µg/ml tRNA, 10 µg/ml polyU-homopolymer, and 7.5 µg/ml denatured salmon-sperm DNA. The labeled probes were added to the hybridization solution at 1 x 106 cpm/ml. Filters were washed at high-stringency conditions (room temperature in 2x SSC/0.1% SDS for 5 min, 68 C, 2x SSC/0.1% SDS for 30 min, 68 C in 0.2x SSC/0.1% SDS for 30 min). Between hybridizations, filters were washed in a solution containing 5 mM Na-phosphate/0.1% SDS at 100 C for 30 min to remove the labeled probe. Blots were detected by phosphor imager (Sigma) and exposed to x-ray films (XAR, Kodak, Rochester, NY) for 12 d at -70 C using intensifying screens; the data were analyzed by ImageJ software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij). All comparisons were made from RNA samples hybridized on the same filter and normalized to the content of ß-actin RNA detected in each individual sample.
Histological procedures
Brown and epididymal fat tissues were dissected and fixed in Bouins fixative, dehydrated, and embedded into paraffin. Ten-micrometer sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin-eosin.
Perfusion and tissue processing
Mice were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital and perfused through the heart with saline and then with 100 ml ice-cold fixative [4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M borate buffer (pH 9)]. Serial sections in the frontal plane were cut on freezing microtome, collected into antifreeze solution, and stored at -20 C.
Rabbit antibody raised against a synthetic N-terminal fragment (residues 417) of human Fos (sc-52, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) was used to identify L-histidine-activated neuronal profiles within the mouse brain. Sections were incubated in normal goat serum (1:10) for 1 h at room temperature and then in the primary antibody (dilution 1:5000) at 4 C for 72 h. Further incubation steps included 1 h in biotinylated antirabbit antibody (1:1000) and 1 h in avidin-biotin-horseradish peroxidase complex (1:500) (Vectastain Elite kit, Vector, Burlingame, CA). The peroxidase reaction was completed by diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride, 0.5 mg/ml) and nickel-ammonium-sulfate (1.5%) with 0.03% H2O2.
Histamine immunohistochemistry
To intensify histamine staining, male mice were injected with 200 mg L-histidine 24 h before perfusion. Fixation was performed according to Wang and Nakai (34) with some modifications. Brains were quickly flushed with saline followed by 4% 1-ethyl-3-(3 dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2). Then animals were consecutively perfused with 2% paraformaldehyde, 4% 1-ethyl-3-(3 dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide, and 4% paraformaldehyde, respectively. A rabbit antiserum raised against hemocyanin-conjugated histamine (generous gift from Dr. P. Panula, Turku, Finland) was applied in 1:50,000 dilution and visualized by standard avidin-biotin horseradish peroxidase method.
In situ hybridization histochemistry
To assess HDC mRNA expression, sections were hybridized with 35S-uridine 5-triphosphate-labeled antisense riboprobes corresponding to a 530-bp fragment of the HDC gene. Hybridization and autoradiographic techniques were performed as described (35). Briefly, tissue sections were mounted onto poly-L-lysine-coated slides, postfixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and digested with Proteinase K [10 mg/ml in 50 mM Tris (pH 8), and 5 mM EDTA at 37 C, 30 min], acetylated [0.25% acetic anhydride in 0.1 M triethanolamine (pH 8)], and dehydrated. Hybridization mixture [50% formamide, 0.3 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 8), 2 mM EDTA, 1x Denhardts, 10% dextran sulfate, 0.5 mg/ml yeast tRNA] was pipetted onto the slides (100 µl, containing probe at 107 dpm/ml), and hybridized overnight at 56 C. Sections were then rinsed in 4x SSC [1x SSC = 0.15 M NaCl and 15 mM trisodium-citrate buffer (pH 7)], digested with ribonuclease A (20 mg/ml in Tris-EDTA buffer with 0.5 M NaCl at 37 C for 30 min), gradually desalted, and washed in 0.1x SSC at 6575 C for 30 min. Slides were exposed to x-ray film and dipped in NTB-2 nuclear emulsion (Kodak) and exposed for 35 d, developed in D-19 developer, and lightly counterstained with thionin.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed using STATISTICA 6.0 software (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK). Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM; differences between the groups was demonstrated using ANOVA followed by Dunnetts post hoc tests. When comparisons were restricted to two experimental groups, a t test was used. Plasma glucose concentrations after ip injections of glucose or insulin and insulin secretory response to ip glucose were analyzed by repeated-measures of ANOVA. In all cases, differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Because HDC-deficient mice are not hyperphagic (Fig. 3
), we hypothesized that increased fat deposition and weight gain in HDC-/- animals are due to decreased energy expenditure. To test this hypothesis, thermoregulatory responses to cold were followed and taken as an indirect measure of ability to mobilize energy (36). The baseline core temperature of WT and knockout animals were not different (37.50 ± 0.34 C and 37.49 ± 0.29 C). However, when fasted mice were challenged at 4 C, histamine-deficient animals have an impaired ability to metabolize energy stores, and their core temperature dropped by 3.82 ± 1.02 C, whereas WT animals fell by only 1.34 ± 0.40 C by the end of 90-min test period (Fig. 4
).
|
|
To examine insulin secretory response to glucose, mice from both genotypes were fasted for 18 h and injected ip with 1 mg/g body weight D-glucose. Plasma insulin levels were measured before and 30, 60, and 120 min after glucose challenge. Within 30 min plasma insulin levels reached peak and remain elevated up to 120 min. Plasma insulin levels rose 334% in WT but only 85.7% in HDC knockout animals; however, at the plateau of the insulin secretory curve, there was no significant differences between WT and histamine-deficient mice (Fig. 5C
).
Hormone levels and other variables
Serum leptin levels were significantly higher in HDC-/- animals than in WT mice (0.64 ± 0.07 ng/ml in WT vs. 3.60 ± 0.80 in HDC-/-; n = 10; P < 0.001). Following overnight fast, serum leptin levels were reduced in WT controls (0.26 ± 0.17 ng/ml) but remained unchanged at high levels in knockout animals (3.48 ± 0.93 ng/ml) (Fig. 6A
).
|
Morning levels of plasma corticosterone were elevated in HDC-/- male mice (42.68 ± 6.88), compared with WT animals (23.03 ± 7.34 ng/ml), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.068). After fasting, corticosterone levels were increased in both genotypes (Fig. 6C
).
Serum triglyceride, cholesterol, and HDL levels were not different in HDC-/- mice, compared with wild-type controls (Table 1
).
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One possibility for the excess body weight gain of HDC-/- animals is the altered sleep-wake cycle (29). Histamine-deficient mice are more somnolent in the phase of light-dark transition and in response to environmental challenges that might effect their feeding behavior. However, no correlation was found between body weight and the daily amount of sleep-wake stages in either genotype (29).
The increased body weight in HDC-/- animals is due to the increased fat deposition to visceral (epididymal) stores, but sc fat stores are not affected significantly. The role of neuronal histamine in regulation of WAT depots is supported by the following facts: 1) recent reports by Tsuda et al. (5) and Yoshimatsu et al. (23) show that activation of central histaminergic neurons by histamine H3 autofeedback receptor antagonist or by histidine accelerates lipolysis in WAT (2). In line with this observation, infusion of histamine into the third cerebral ventricle dose-dependently increased glycerol concentration in the perfusate from the epididymal adipose tissue and results in activation of sympathetic nerve (2). Chronic, central administration of histamine reduces body fat weight in db/db mice or in mice with diet-induced obesity (24). On the contrary, accelerated fat deposition was detected in histamine H1 receptor knockout mice kept on a high-fat diet (21). These results offer an explanation for the relatively selective increase of epididymal fat deposition seen in histamine-deficient HDC-/- mice. Slight excess of glucocorticoids at the circadian trough (38) and elevated insulin levels (39) may also contribute to the selective increase of visceral fat stores seen in HDC-/- mice.
Because HDC-/- mice consume slightly less food than their WT counterparts, the increased weight gain and caloric efficiency probably is due to the impairment of mobilization of fat/energy stores. Consistent with this hypothesis, HDC-/- mice show defect in thermoregulation and decreased accessibility of fat stores when fasted animals are exposed to cold, although these measures are indirect indices of energy expenditure.
In addition to the lipolytic action in WAT, sympathetic nervous system activates BAT, hence increasing diet-induced thermogenesis and dissipating excess energy as heat. This effect is mediated via ß3-adrenoceptors and activation of UCPs in the BAT. Lack of histaminergic stimulation of sympathetic nerve activity and/or decreased energy expenditure may account for the increased interscapular BAT weight seen in histamine-deficient mice. Consistent with this hypothesis histidine decarboxylase gene targeted mice are defective to up-regulate BAT UCP-1 transcription in response to cold stimulation. At this stage of the analysis, however, it is not known whether defects of sympathetic outflow or impaired ß-adrenergic receptor function is responsible for the lack of up-regulation of UCP-1 mRNA in HDC-/- animals. It is interesting to note that H1R-/- animals display a significant reduction of the leptin-induced up-regulation of UCP-1 in BAT (21), and icv histamine injection up-regulated UCP-1 mRNA levels in leptin-resistant and diabetic mice (24).
A large body of evidence supports the hypothesis that histaminergic neurons are key players of the central mediation of peripheral signals as well as of the translation of central, hypothalamic-signaling events to the periphery. Leptin administration increases the release and turnover of histamine in the hypothalamus (19, 20); leptin-induced suppression of food intake is attenuated in mice treated with
-fluoromethylhistidine, a specific inhibitor of HDC (40). Furthermore, leptin is unable to reduce food intake in mutant mice lacking histamine H1 receptors (21, 40). On the other hand, icv infusion of histamine reduces ob gene expression, suppresses fat deposition, and decreases serum leptin concentrations in both diet-induced obesity and diabetic db/db mice (24).
HDC-deficient mice provide an excellent tool to study the interrelationship between histamine and leptin in a situation of chronic histamine insufficiency. Leptin may directly or indirectly target histaminergic neurons. Although some cells in the histaminergic premammillary nucleus express leptin receptors (41) and display c-fos induction in response to systemic leptin administration (42), the major histaminergic cell clusters in the tuberomammilary region are not directly sensitive to leptin.
Leptin receptors were identified on anorexigenic POMC-, CART-, and CRH-synthesizing neurons as well as on orexigenic NPY, melanin-concentrating hormone, and orexin neurons (10) in the rat hypothalamus. Previous studies have revealed that leptin inhibits the expression of orexigenic neuropeptides and stimulates the expression of anorexigenic peptides in the hypothalamus (8). These leptin-sensitive neurons are in a position to relay the hormonal influence of leptin to histaminergic system. In support this hypothesis,
MSH-containing axons were shown to innervate histaminergic neurons (43). This innervation seems to be reciprocal because histaminergic fibers densely innervate hypothalamic nuclei that synthesize anorexigenic and orexigenic neuropeptides (44). We have identified histaminergic fibers in close apposition with NPY-containing profiles in the arcuate nucleus (Miklós, I. H., unpublished observation). There is also a reciprocal connection between histamine- and orexin-containing neurons in the hypothalamus. Histamine-synthesizing neurons innervate leptin-sensitive orexin neurons in the lateral hypothalamus, but orexin-A and -B depolarize tuberomammilary histamine neurons (45).
Here we identified dense plexus of histaminergic fibers in the arcuate nucleus, which contain POMC (
MSH), CART, and NPY neurons. Following L-histidine injection, a subset of these arcuate neurons expresses c-Fos, suggesting an impact of histaminergic innervation on arcuate neurons. Further anatomical studies are required, however, to identify elements of the neuronal circuit underlying leptin-histamine interaction.
Based on the data presented, we propose that the lack of histamine in HDC-/- mice blocks leptin signaling through the central histaminergic neurons. As a consequence, the histaminergic stimulation of anorexigenic effector mechanisms in the hypothalamus is disrupted, resulting in an orexigenic dominance, leading to increased fat deposition and hyperleptinemia. Importantly, however, the increase in serum leptin levels is disproportionate to the increased fat mass and can be explained by a lack of feedback inhibition of leptin expression and/or leptin resistance.
Like leptin, the pancreatic hormone insulin is also an important metabolic signal to the brain (46). The secretion of insulin and its level in the blood and brain is directly proportional to the adipose mass. It has recently been shown that central anorexic effects of insulin is mediated by POMC-expressing cells in the arcuate nucleus (47). In HDC-/- mice, the elevated insulin levels suggest that anorexigenic insulin signaling is also disturbed. Based on the glucose disappearance curves, HDC knockout animals retain their insulin sensitivity; however, insulin-secretory responses to fasting and glucose challenge are affected.
The role of histaminergic mechanisms in regulation of food intake and metabolism was also addressed in histamine H1 receptor knockout mice (21). These mice, when kept on normal diet, do not show any significant metabolic phenotype, compared with WT controls; however, they became obese, accumulate visceral fat, and up-regulate ob gene when loaded with a high-fat diet. Thus, lifelong, complete absence of histamine in HDC-/- mice has a significantly more profound impact on metabolism than anticipated from the H1R-/- mice. To paint a more complex picture of the relevant receptors involved in the metabolic aspects of histamine action, it has been recently shown that mice with targeted disruption of H3 presynaptic autoreceptors are mildly obese and leptin and insulin resistant (48).
Our results point to the regulatory role of histamine in mediating anorectic (leptin and/or insulin) signals to the central nervous system. Importantly, because this is a model that lacks histamine systemically, we cannot exclude the possibility that the lack of histamine may also have a direct effect on a target in the periphery. It should be noted, that histamine weakly stimulates lipolysis in human subcutaneous fat cells (49).
In contrast to most animal models of obesity such as ob/ob mice, obesity in humans is often associated with metabolic X syndrome, which includes hyperleptinemia, glucose intolerance, and visceral fat deposition. Here we show that the HDC-/- mice display a metabolic phenotype characterized by leptin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, impaired glucose tolerance, and increased epididymal white and brown fat depots, supporting the important role that histamine plays in regulation of energy metabolism.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
A.K.F. and A.Fö. contributed equally to the manuscript.
Abbreviations: BAT, Brown adipose tissue; CART, cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript; HDC, histidine decarboxylase; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; H1R, histamine receptor, type I; ir, immunoreactive;
MSH,
-melanocyte-stimulating hormone; NPY, neuropeptide Y; POMC, proopiomelanocortin; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; SSC, sodium chloride/sodium citrate; UCP, uncoupling protein; WAT, white adipose tissue; WT, wild-type.
Received February 18, 2003.
Accepted for publication June 19, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-melanocyte stimulating hormone-containing axons. Generation of a new histamine antiserum for ultrastructural studies. Brain Res 969:7077[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Inagaki, M. Tachibana, K. Magoori, H. Kudo, T. Tanaka, M. Okamura, M. Naito, T. Kodama, Y. Shinkai, and J. Sakai Obesity and metabolic syndrome in histone demethylase JHDM2a-deficient mice Genes Cells, August 1, 2009; 14(8): 991 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Haas, O. A. Sergeeva, and O. Selbach Histamine in the Nervous System Physiol Rev, July 1, 2008; 88(3): 1183 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Yoshimoto, Y. Miyamoto, K. Shimamura, A. Ishihara, K. Takahashi, H. Kotani, A. S. Chen, H. Y. Chen, D. J. MacNeil, A. Kanatani, et al. Therapeutic potential of histamine H3 receptor agonist for the treatment of obesity and diabetes mellitus PNAS, September 12, 2006; 103(37): 13866 - 13871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Musio, B. Gallo, S. Scabeni, M. Lapilla, P. L. Poliani, G. Matarese, H. Ohtsu, S. J. Galli, R. Mantegazza, L. Steinman, et al. A Key Regulatory Role for Histamine in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis: Disease Exacerbation in Histidine Decarboxylase-Deficient Mice J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 17 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Masaki, S. Chiba, T. Yasuda, H. Noguchi, T. Kakuma, T. Watanabe, T. Sakata, and H. Yoshimatsu Involvement of Hypothalamic Histamine H1 Receptor in the Regulation of Feeding Rhythm and Obesity Diabetes, September 1, 2004; 53(9): 2250 - 2260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |