| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Departments of Physiology (N.A.W., M.P.D., Y.A., P.L.B.) and Medicine (D.J.D., P.L.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 1A8; and the Banting and Best Diabetes Centre (B.Y., D.J.D.), The Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5G 2C4
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. P. L. Brubaker, Room 3366, Medical Sciences Building, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8. E-mail: p.brubaker{at}utoronto.ca.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies of the mechanism of action of GLP-2 have been limited by a lack of suitable physiological models for study of GLP-2 receptor (GLP-2R) activation (15). Indeed, an initial report on the intestinotropic effects of GLP-2 indicated that GLP-2 stimulates differentiation but not proliferation in the intestinal epithelial IEC-6 cell line (16), whereas subsequent studies have demonstrated that pharmacological concentrations of GLP-2 induce modest proliferation in baby hamster kidney (BHK) fibroblasts stably transfected with the rat GLP-2R (17). The GLP-2R is a seven-transmembrane spanning G protein-coupled receptor classified as a member of the glucagon receptor family by virtue of its structural similarity to other members of this group, particularly the GLP-1R, with which it shares approximately 50% sequence identity (18, 19). Like the GLP-1R, the transfected GLP-2R has been demonstrated to activate the cAMP pathway. However, studies on GLP-2R signaling have only been conducted in transfected heterologous cell lines (17, 18, 20, 21) as no intestinal cell line has been shown to express the GLP-2R mRNA transcript (15). Furthermore, the identity of the cells expressing the GLP-2R within the intestine is an area under active investigation, as the receptor has been detected in human enteroendocrine cells (15), as well as in murine enteric neurons (22). Thus, the mechanism of GLP-2 action in vivo is complex, and likely involves multiple signaling pathways. We now report the development of an in vitro model for the study of GLP-2 action and demonstrate that the endogenous rat GLP-2 receptor signals via a cAMP/protein kinase A-dependent pathway in isolated rat intestinal mucosal cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To identify functional properties associated with differentiated epithelial cells, a sucrase assay was performed on isolated intestinal cell fractions. Collected cells (5 x 104) were homogenized in 1 ml of cold 50 mM KH2PO4 buffer (pH 7.0). Quantification of sucrase activity (1 U = 1 µmol/min) in the homogenate was based on the chromogenic reaction between glucose, produced upon sucrase hydrolysis of exogenously added sucrose, and a glucose oxidase reagent solution as previously described (7).
To label proliferating cells in vivo, male Fischer rats were given an ip injection of 200 µCi/kg [3H-methyl]-thymidine (Amersham Life Science, Oakville, Ontario, Canada). Rats were killed after 1 h, and small intestinal mucosal cells were isolated as described above. Fifty thousand live cells (as determined by Trypan Blue exclusion)/ml of chelating buffer from each cell fraction were then added to 3 ml of cold 10% trichloroacetic acid, followed by vigorous vortexing and centrifugation (1300 x g for 10 min at 4 C). The supernatant was aspirated and pellets were dissolved by the addition of 0.5 ml of 5% trichloroacetic acid followed by a 15-min incubation at 90 C. Samples were then analyzed for radioactivity (disintegrations per minute).
Total RNA was isolated from intestinal cell fractions (5 x 104 cells/fraction) by the guanidinium thiocyanate method (24), deoxyribonuclease I-treated and reverse transcribed at 42 C for 50 min using random hexamers and SuperScript II (Life Technologies, Inc., Burlington, Ontario, Canada). Aliquots of the first strand reaction (1/10 vol) were used as templates for PCR using Taq polymerase (Life Technologies, Inc.). Primer pairs selected for PCR were based on the reported sequences for the rat GLP-2R [sense 5'-TCTCCACTCCCAACAGATGCGTCT-3', antisense 5'-GATCTCACTCTCTTCCAGAATCTC-3' (18)], rat proglucagon [sense 5'-TATATACCTCAGGACACGGAGGAGA-3', antisense 5'-GAAGGATCCATCAGCATGTCT-3' (25)], rat chromogranin A (sense 5'-GAGGGTCCTCTCCATCCTTC-3', antisense 5'-CGCCTTCTCCTCTTTCTCCT-3'; GenBank accession no. AF145445), rat neuron-specific class III ß-tubulin (sense 5'-GGACCTCAACCACCTTGTGT-3', antisense 5'-AACATGGCCGTAAACTGCTC-3'; GenBank accession no. AF459021) and rat glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase [GAPDH; sense 5'-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAG-3', antisense 5'-GACCACAGTCCATGACATCACT-3' (26)]. Amplification of the GLP-2R cDNA was performed at an annealing temperature of 66 C for 30 cycles, resulting in the generation of a 1543-bp product. Proglucagon, chromogranin A, neuron-specific class III ß-tubulin, and GAPDH cDNA amplifications were performed at an annealing temperature of 60 C for 26 cycles, resulting in the generation of 382-, 550-, 498-, and 452-bp products, respectively. GAPDH cDNA amplification was used as an internal control in each RT-PCR experiment. The specificity of each amplification reaction was monitored by control reactions in which reverse transcriptase (but not RNA template) was omitted from the reverse transcriptase reaction mixture, or water alone was added to the reverse transcriptase reaction mix. Analysis of the PCR products was performed by agarose gel electrophoresis followed by visualization by ethidium bromide staining (Chromogranin A, ß-tubulin, and GAPDH cDNAs) or Southern blotting (GLP-2R and proglucagon cDNAs), as previously described (15, 27). 32P-labeled cDNA probes did not encompass primer sequences. Final washing conditions for the RT-PCR Southern blots were 15 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM Na citrate, and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate at 65 C.
To determine the levels of IGF-I in the isolated rat mucosal cells, cells from each fraction were homogenized in 1 ml of 1 M acetic acid (pH 3.5) and stored at -70 C before RIA for IGF-I. On the day of the assay, samples were neutralized with 90 µl of 10 N NaOH, centrifuged at 1300 x g for 10 min at 4 C. RIA was then performed on the sample supernatant using an IGF-I RIA kit (American Laboratory Products Co., Ltd., Windham, NH) according to the manufacturers instructions.
Cells from each fraction were also examined for the presence of basic fibroblast growth factor [bFGF (28)]. Cells were collected by centrifugation at 1300 x g for 30 min at 4 C, and the pellets were stored at -70 C until assay. On the day of the assay, pellets were homogenized in 0.5 ml of TBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.05% BSA and 0.005% NaN3 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). bFGF levels were determined using a bFGF enzyme immunoassay kit (Neogen Corp., Lexington, KY) according to the manufacturers instructions.
The isolated rat mucosal cells were examined for the presence of GLP-2 by RIA. In brief, cells from each fraction were homogenized in 5 ml of 1 N HCl containing 5% (vol/vol) formic acid, 1% (vol/vol) trifluoroacetic acid and 1% (wt/vol) NaCl. Homogenates were passed through a C18 silica cartridge (C18 Sep-Pak, Waters Associates, Milford MA), and the adsorbed peptides were eluted with 80% (vol/vol) isopropanol/0.1% (vol/vol) trifluoroacetic acid (29). The eluates were collected and stored at -70 C before RIA for GLP-2 using an antiserum (UTTH-7) that recognizes amino acids 2530 of GLP-2 (29).
Functional responses of isolated rat mucosal cells to GLP-2
Preliminary screening revealed a robust cAMP response to GLP-2 in fraction 12 cells (data not shown). These cells were therefore used in all subsequent assays. Cells (1.5 x 104) were suspended in 1 ml of cold incubation buffer [80 mM NaCl, 100 mM mannitol, 20 mM Tris, 3 mM K2HPO4, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM glutamine, and 1 mg/ml BSA (pH 7.4)] in borosilicate glass tubes. Cells were then incubated with 100 µM [isobutylmethyl]xanthine (IBMX) containing either vehicle (control), 100 µM forskolin (Sigma), or rat GLP-2, human [Gly2]GLP-2 (both from NPS-Allelix Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada), or GLP-1736NH2, exendin-4, glucagon, or human gastric inhibitory polypeptide (all from Bachem California Inc., Torrance, CA), each at 100 nM. Human [Gly2]-GLP-2 was used in all subsequent studies as it is resistant to degradation by the enzyme dipeptidylpeptidase IV, which is highly expressed in the rat intestinal epithelium (30). Cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 C, and the reaction was stopped by centrifugation at 1300 x g for 5 min at 4 C, followed by the addition of 1 ml 100% ethanol at -20 C. Cell fractions were then homogenized, centrifuged (1300 x g for 5 min at 4 C) to remove cellular debris, and the supernatant was collected for the determination of cAMP levels using a cAMP RIA Kit (Biomedical Technologies, Stoughton, MA). All cAMP values are expressed relative to control (vehicle), which is defined as 100% and equals 0.61 ± 0.26 pmol cAMP/1.5 x 104 cells across all experiments.
For dose-response and desensitization studies, cells (1.5 x 104) were suspended in 1 ml of DMEM (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) containing 100 µM IBMX and the protease inhibitors Trasylol (1 Kallikrein-inactivating units (KIU)/ml; Bayer Inc., Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada) and Diprotin A (100 µM; Calbiochem-Novabiochem, San Diego, CA), and were then incubated with vehicle (control), 100 µM forskolin, or 10-12 to 10-6 M [Gly2]-GLP-2 at 37 C with 5% CO2 for 30 min. In some experiments, cells were incubated (pretreatment) for 60 min in 1 ml of DMEM containing 100 µM IBMX, 1 KIU/ml Trasylol and 100 µM Diprotin A (final concentrations) with or without [Gly2]-GLP-2 at either 10-9 or 10-6 M; the reaction was stopped by centrifugation at 1300 x g for 5 min at 4 C, the cells were allowed to recover for 10 min in fresh DMEM without [Gly2]-GLP-2, and the cells then underwent 60-min incubation (treatment) at 37 C in the absence or presence of [Gly2]-GLP-2 (10-9 M) or forskolin (100 µM). For all experiments, cells were extracted and assayed for cAMP as above.
To establish the effects of GLP-2 on 3H-thymidine incorporation in vitro, cells were preincubated with vehicle (control) or H89, a protein kinase A inhibitor (10 µM; Sigma) for 10 min at 37 C with 5% CO2, followed by incubation for 30 min under the same conditions with vehicle, 10% fetal calf serum (positive control), 10-9 M [Gly2]-GLP-2 ± H89, or 100 µM forskolin (Sigma). The reaction was terminated by addition of 3 ml ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid, the precipitate was collected and dissolved in 5% trichloacetic acid by boiling for 15 min, and the total dpm was determined by liquid scintillation counting (total dpm was 46,733 ± 1,164 for control cells).
To determine MAPK responses to GLP-2, cells (
3 x 106) were incubated at 37 C for 15 min in 1 ml of DMEM containing 100 mM IBMX, 1 KIU/ml Trasylol, and 100 mM Diprotin A, without (control) or with [Gly2]-GLP-2 at either 10-9 or 10-6 M, or 10% fetal calf serum (positive control). The reaction was stopped by centrifugation at 1300 x g for 20 min at 4 C. The supernatant was discarded, and the cells were homogenized in 1.0 ml of homogenization buffer [25 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM molybdic acid, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10 nM okadaic acid]. Homogenates were centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 20 min at 4 C. The supernatants were next boiled for 5 min with sample buffer containing ß-mercaptoethanol and stored at -70 C until used. Protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Forty to 50 µg of cell extract were separated by discontinuous SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred onto Hybond-C membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Baie dUrfé, Quebec, Canada) using standard procedures. The resulting blot was blocked with 5% skim milk in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 and next incubated with a 1:1000 dilution in blocking buffer of a polyclonal antibody to p44/42 MAPK phosphorylated at Thr202 and Tyr204 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA). Proteins were detected with a secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase and an enhanced chemiluminescence commercial kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). To monitor loading and transfer conditions blots were reprobed with an antiactin polyclonal antibody (Sigma, 1:5000 dilution).
Calcium responses to GLP-2 were examined by suspending 105 cells in phosphate-free HBSS containing 2.5 mM CaCl2 and incubation with 2.5 µM fura-2 AM ester (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) at 37 C for 30 min. Cells were then washed twice with buffer and incubated at 37 C for an additional 30 min, and fura-2 fluorescence ratio measurements were made on a Hitachi F-2000 fluorescence spectrometer, (excitation: 346 nm; emission: 510 nm). Calibration was performed at 37 C with ionophore A23187 (Sigma) and MnCl2 using the Grynkiewicz equation (31) with a dissociation constant of 224 nM. [Gly2]-GLP-2 was added to the cell suspension to final concentrations of 10-11, 10-9, and 10-7 M.
Data analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences between groups were assessed by ANOVA on SAS software (Statistical Analysis System, Cary, NC), using n-1 post hoc custom hypotheses tests.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To determine whether isolated rat mucosal cells exhibit a functional response to GLP-2, cells were incubated with GLP-2, and the production of cAMP was determined (Fig. 2
). Treatment of the isolated cells with either GLP-2 or its dipeptidylpeptidase IV-resistant analog, [Gly2]-GLP-2, stimulated a significant increase in cAMP levels (10-7 M each; to 135 ± 8% and 140 ± 11% of control, respectively, P < 0.010.001). The specificity of this response was tested in the same experiments, using several structurally related members of the glucagon peptide superfamily. No changes in cAMP levels were detected in the cells following incubation with GLP-1, exendin-4 (a GLP-1 homolog), glucagon, or gastric inhibitory polypeptide (each at 10-7 M; Fig. 2
).
|
|
|
As previous studies have shown that that the highly related GLP-1 and glucagon receptors exhibit dual signaling through both cAMP- and calcium-dependent pathways (35, 36, 37), we assessed whether GLP-2R signaling in the mucosal cells was coupled to changes in [Ca2+]c. Mucosal cells were preloaded with fura-2 AM ester and subjected to spectrofluorometric analysis in the presence or absence of GLP-2. [Gly2]-GLP-2 did not increase [Ca2+]c in rat mucosal cells at any dose tested (Fig. 5
). However, the cells were responsive to the nonspecific calcium ionophore, A23187 (12.5 µM), and this response was appropriately quenched by addition of MnCl2 (6 mM). The responses to A23187 and MnCl2 were used to calculate the resting [Ca2+]c of the rat mucosal cells as 50 ± 20 nM.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Similar differences have also been noted for activation of the GLP-1R by its ligand in cells expressing the endogenous receptor compared with heterologous cells transfected with the receptor [e.g. ED50s of 0.2 and 2 nM, respectively (20, 21)]. Such discrepancies in the dose-response profiles of the endogenous and transfected receptors may result from different numbers of receptors expressed by each cell. Correlations between receptor number and dose-dependent activation have been demonstrated using transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing different levels of the GLP-1R. Cells expressing lower receptor numbers produced less cAMP but required much lower doses of GLP-1 to attain maximum activation (39). Thus, it appears that low receptor expression by cells can confer a high degree of ligand sensitivity. Furthermore, it is likely that not all of the isolated primary mucosal cells express the GLP-2R, whereas transfected cell lines are selected such that all cells express the receptor. These findings therefore suggest that at least one explanation for the difference between the results obtained in the present study with the endogenous rat GLP-2R and data obtained in studies of the transfected GLP-2R may relate to differing expression levels of the receptor protein.
It is interesting to note that the dose of [Gly2]-GLP-2 that maximally activated the endogenous rat GLP-2R is close to the circulating concentration of GLP-2 found in plasma from fasted rats [5 x 10-11 M (29, 40)] and humans [10-12 M (1, 3)]. Given that the plasma concentration of GLP-2 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33) in humans increases 3- to 6-fold within 60 min of ingestion of carbohydrate or fat (1, 3), our results suggest that the mucosal rat GLP-2R is capable of activation by the full spectrum of physiologic GLP-2 concentrations.
The GLP-2R appears to undergo homologous desensitization as pretreatment of cells with 10-6 M [Gly2]-GLP-2 completely abrogated cAMP production in response to subsequent stimulation with [Gly2]-GLP-2. Agonist-induced desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors has been shown for several receptors that share a high degree of homology with the GLP-2R, including those for GLP-1 (34, 41, 42, 43) and glucagon (43, 44). GLP-1R studies in the ß-cell line HIT-T15 have demonstrated that exposure to 10-7 M GLP-1 followed by a short recovery period significantly reduces both cAMP accumulation and insulin secretion upon restimulation with 10-8 M GLP-1 (34). Biochemical studies of the mechanisms mediating these effects have demonstrated that homologous desensitization of the rat GLP-1R requires phosphorylation at three serine doublets in the C-terminal tail of the receptor (43). The presence of similar serine doublets in the C-terminal tail of the rat GLP-2R (18) raises the possibility that the homologous desensitization reported here may occur by a similar mechanism. Alternatively, it has been reported that the related PTH receptor can couple to multiple G proteins, each with a distinct dose-response curve for activation of downstream signaling pathways (45). Furthermore, very recent studies have demonstrated that treatment of neurons expressing the GnRH receptor with high concentrations of ligand induces a switch in G protein coupling, changing the signal from Gs-cAMP stimulatory to Gi-cAMP inhibitory (46). Further studies to elucidate the mechanism(s) underlying GLP-2R desensitization are currently underway.
The intestinotropic effects of GLP-2 in vivo are exerted, in part, through stimulation of crypt cell proliferation (5, 6). In the present study, GLP-2 treatment was found to induce a modest, but significant increase in incorporation of 3H-thymidine into the isolated cells. Whether GLP-2 can actually increase cell numbers in this model was not examined, as long-term maintenance of cells isolated from the adult rat intestine is rendered difficult due to bacterial contamination. Importantly, however, these studies demonstrate for the first time that GLP-2-induced thymidine incorporation into intestinal mucosal cells was prevented by inhibition of protein kinase A. This finding is consistent with the ability of GLP-2 to enhance cAMP levels in these cells, but stands in contrast to the finding that forskolin treatment did not stimulate thymidine incorporation in the same cells. Nonetheless, these results are remarkably similar to findings made in the BHK-GLP-2R cell line, in which treatment with GLP-2, but not with 8-Br-cAMP, increased cell numbers (17). Furthermore, GLP-2 failed to increase MAPK phosphorylation in both isolated rat mucosal cells and BHK-GLP-2R cells (17), suggesting that the proliferative responses to GLP-2 in these in vitro models are not linked to activation of this growth-related kinase pathway. Whether GLP-2 directly stimulates cell proliferation or acts in part through enhancement of the activity of other growth factors present in the isolated cells, such as IGF-I and/or bFGF, is an important factor for future consideration.
GLP-2 did not alter calcium levels in the isolated rat mucosal cells, despite the ability of these cells to respond to a nonspecific calcium ionophore. The induction of calcium signaling by the related GLP-1 (35, 36) and glucagon (37) receptors, combined with the structural homology of these receptors to the GLP-2R (18), was the rationale for testing the ability of the GLP-2R to signal through calcium. However, the lack of calcium signaling by GLP-2 in the intestinal cells is consistent with the finding that the transfected GLP-2R also fails to activate calcium signaling in fibroblasts (17).
In summary, we report that [Gly2]-GLP-2 activates cAMP production in a specific dose-dependent manner in isolated rat small intestinal mucosal cells that express the GLP-2R. Physiologic doses of the peptide stimulate cAMP production and enhance 3H-thymidine uptake in a protein kinase A-dependent fashion; however, the endogenous rat GLP-2R does not couple to calcium or, importantly, to p44/p42 MAPK in the isolated cells. These findings provide a new model for future studies on the identification of the downstream mediators of intestinal GLP-2 activity in the nontransformed rodent epithelium.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: bFGF, Basic fibroblast growth factor; BHK, baby hamster kidney; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase; GLP, glucagon-like peptide; GLP-2R, GLP-2 receptor; HBSS, Hanks balanced salt solution; IBMX, [isobutylmethyl]xanthine; KIU, Kallikrein-inactivating units.
Received March 10, 2003.
Accepted for publication June 24, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Amato, S. Baldassano, R. Serio, and F. Mule Glucagon-like peptide-2 relaxes mouse stomach through vasoactive intestinal peptide release Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2009; 296(3): G678 - G684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Islam, N. Zhang, P. Wang, H. Li, P. L. Brubaker, H. Y. Gaisano, Q. Wang, and T. Jin Epac is involved in cAMP-stimulated proglucagon expression and hormone production but not hormone secretion in pancreatic {alpha}- and intestinal L-cell lines Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2009; 296(1): E174 - E181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Dube, K. J. Rowland, and P. L. Brubaker Glucagon-Like Peptide-2 Activates -Catenin Signaling in the Mouse Intestinal Crypt: Role of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Endocrinology, January 1, 2008; 149(1): 291 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Dube and P. L. Brubaker Frontiers in glucagon-like peptide-2: multiple actions, multiple mediators Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2007; 293(2): E460 - E465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Sigalet, L. E. Wallace, J. J. Holst, G. R. Martin, T. Kaji, H. Tanaka, and K. A. Sharkey Enteric neural pathways mediate the anti-inflammatory actions of glucagon-like peptide 2 Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): G211 - G221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Anini, A. Izzo, G. Y. Oudit, P. H. Backx, and P. L. Brubaker Role of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase-{gamma} in the actions of glucagon-like peptide-2 on the murine small intestine Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2007; 292(6): E1599 - E1606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Nelson, J. W. Sharp, M. S. Brownfield, H. E. Raybould, and D. M. Ney Localization and Activation of Glucagon-Like Peptide-2 Receptors on Vagal Afferents in the Rat Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 1954 - 1962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Burrin, B. Stoll, X. Guan, L. Cui, X. Chang, and D. Hadsell GLP-2 rapidly activates divergent intracellular signaling pathways involved in intestinal cell survival and proliferation in neonatal piglets Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2007; 292(1): E281 - E291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-A. Kim, M. Kakitani, J. Zhao, T. Oshima, T. Tang, M. Binnerts, Y. Liu, B. Boyle, E. Park, P. Emtage, et al. Mitogenic Influence of Human R-Spondin1 on the Intestinal Epithelium Science, August 19, 2005; 309(5738): 1256 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Kitchen, R. A. Goodlad, A. J. FitzGerald, N. Mandir, M. A. Ghatei, S. R. Bloom, J. Berlanga-Acosta, R. J. Playford, A. Forbes, and J. R.F. Walters Intestinal Growth in Parenterally-Fed Rats Induced by the Combined Effects of Glucagon-like Peptide 2 and Epidermal Growth Factor JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, July 1, 2005; 29(4): 248 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Martin, L. E. Wallace, B. Hartmann, J. J. Holst, L. Demchyshyn, K. Toney, and D. L. Sigalet Nutrient-stimulated GLP-2 release and crypt cell proliferation in experimental short bowel syndrome Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): G431 - G438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Burrin, B. Stoll, X. Guan, L. Cui, X. Chang, and J. J. Holst Glucagon-Like Peptide 2 Dose-Dependently Activates Intestinal Cell Survival and Proliferation in Neonatal Piglets Endocrinology, January 1, 2005; 146(1): 22 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Baggio, J.-G. Kim, and D. J. Drucker Chronic Exposure to GLP-1R Agonists Promotes Homologous GLP-1 Receptor Desensitization In Vitro but Does Not Attenuate GLP-1R-Dependent Glucose Homeostasis In Vivo Diabetes, December 1, 2004; 53(suppl_3): S205 - S214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Howard, R. A. Goodlad, J. R. F. Walters, D. Ford, and B. H. Hirst Increased Expression of Specific Intestinal Amino Acid and Peptide Transporter mRNA in Rats Fed by TPN Is Reversed by GLP-2 J. Nutr., November 1, 2004; 134(11): 2957 - 2964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Estall, B. Yusta, and D. J. Drucker Lipid Raft-dependent Glucagon-like Peptide-2 Receptor Trafficking Occurs Independently of Agonist-induced Desensitization Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2004; 15(8): 3673 - 3687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Martin, L. E. Wallace, and D. L. Sigalet Glucagon-like peptide-2 induces intestinal adaptation in parenterally fed rats with short bowel syndrome Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): G964 - G972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |