help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2003-0524
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
144/10/4544    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tao, Y.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Segaloff, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tao, Y.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Segaloff, D. L.
Endocrinology Vol. 144, No. 10 4544-4551
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Functional Characterization of Melanocortin-4 Receptor Mutations Associated with Childhood Obesity

Ya-Xiong Tao and Deborah L. Segaloff

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Ya-Xiong Tao, Ph.D., Department of Physiology and Biophysics, 5-471 Bowen Science Building, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242. E-mail: ya-xiong-tao{at}uiowa.edu.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) is a member of the rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptor family. The binding of {alpha}-MSH to the MC4R leads to increased cAMP production. Recent pharmacological and genetic studies have provided compelling evidence that MC4R is an important regulator of food intake and energy homeostasis. Allelic variants of MC4R were reported in some children with early-onset severe obesity. However, few studies have been performed to confirm that these allelic variants result in an impairment of the receptor’s function. In this study, we expressed wild-type and variant MC4Rs in HEK293 cells and systematically studied ligand binding, agonist-stimulated cAMP, and cell surface expression. Six of the 11 mutants examined had either decreased (S58C, N62S, Y157S, C271Y) or no (P78L, G98R) ligand binding, with proportional impairments in [Nle4, D-Phe7]-{alpha}-MSH-stimulated cAMP production. Confocal microscopy confirmed that the observed decreases in hormone binding by these mutants are associated with decreased cell surface expression due to intracellular retention of the mutants. The other five allelic variants (D37V, P48S, V50M, I170V, N274S) were found to be expressed at the cell surface and to bind agonist and respond with increased cAMP production normally. The data on these latter five variants raise the question as to whether they are indeed causative of the obesity or not and, if so, by what mechanism. Our data, therefore, stress the importance of characterizing the properties of MC4R variants associated with early-onset severe obesity. We further propose a classification scheme for mutant MC4Rs based upon their properties.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTORS (GPCRs) comprise one of the largest families of cell surface proteins (1). A large variety of stimuli such as photons, odorants, amines, ions, peptides, and large glycoprotein hormones rely on GPCRs to relay information to the inside of the cell by activating G proteins and downstream effector molecules. Based on sequence homologies, the superfamily of GPCRs can be divided into at least six families, the largest of which is the rhodopsin-like (family A) of GPCRs (1). The numerous human diseases caused by mutations of GPCRs highlights the importance of GPCRs. Activating and inactivating mutations of GPCRs have been associated with, among many other diseases, retinitis pigmentosa, night blindness, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, dwarfism, familial glucocorticoid deficiency, and infertility (2). Gain-of-function mutations are thought to result in constitutive activation of a GPCR by disrupting interhelical interactions that maintain the receptor in the ground state (3, 4) or impairing desensitization (5). Functional characterization of GPCR mutants that result in loss-of-function have identified several defects, including defects in expression due to either reduced biosynthesis and/or accelerated degradation (6), defects in trafficking of intracellular receptor to the plasma membrane (6, 7, 8, 9), defects in ligand binding (6, 10), and defects in G protein coupling (11), or a combination thereof (12, 13).

Melanocortin receptors (MCRs) are members of family A, rhodopsin-like GPCRs. They have been named MC1R to MC5R according to the sequence of their cloning. The ligands for the MCRs are derived from posttranslational processing of the pre-prohormone proopiomelanocortin (POMC) (14). MC1R is the classical receptor for {alpha}-MSH present in melanocytes that regulates the production of pigments (15, 16). MC2R is the classical receptor present in the adrenal cortex that binds ACTH and is involved in the regulation of adrenal steroidogenesis and growth (16). MC3R and MC4R, the neural melanocortin receptors, are expressed in the brain (17, 18, 19, 20). MC3R is highly expressed in the hypothalamus and in a few regions of the brainstem (17, 18), whereas MC4R is expressed more widely in the brain, including the cortex, thalamus, hypothalamus, brainstem, and spinal cord (20). MC5R, expressed in various peripheral tissues, is involved in the regulation of exocrine gland functions (21, 22, 23). All five MCRs couple primarily to Gs and, therefore, increase cAMP production upon agonist stimulation.

Recent studies using transgenic and knockout mice have unraveled important functions for MC3R and MC4R. Mice lacking POMC or MC4R expression were obese (24, 25). Mice overexpressing the endogenous antagonist of MC3R and MC4R, Agouti-related protein (AgRP), were also obese (26, 27). Yellow agouti mice are obese because of the ubiquitous expression of Agouti, which is also an antagonist for MC4R (28). Pharmacological evidence further links the MC3R and MC4R to food intake. Thus, injection of melanotan II, an agonist of MC3R and MC4R, into the third ventricle decreased food intake (29, 30), whereas injection of the C-terminal peptide of AgRP, an antagonist of these receptors, increased food intake (31). More recently, mutations in MC4R and POMC have provided human genetic evidence supporting a role of MC4R in energy homeostasis. A nonsense mutation in POMC was found to result in obesity, in addition to red hair, fair skin (due to lack of MC1R function) and adrenal failure (due to lack of MC2R function) (32). Nonsense mutations in MC4R were found in early-onset severe obesity (33, 34). Since these initial reports, numerous mutations were reported in different patient cohorts (35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47). However, in many of the earlier reports, the functions of the variant MC4Rs were not studied, and therefore only an association rather than a cause/effect link of the mutation with the physical phenotype was provided. We set out to provide this missing link by functionally characterizing several mutant MC4Rs. Indeed, our data strongly argue that variant DNA does not necessarily mean that it is the cause of obesity in the patient.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In vitro mutagenesis of MC4R
A c-myc epitope tag was inserted at the N terminus of the wild-type (wt) MC4R (kindly provided by Dr. I. Gantz, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) by QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Briefly, oligonucleotide primers including the sequences encoding the c-myc epitope (EQKLISEEDL) displaced wt sequences in the double-strand plasmid prepared in pBlueScript vector using pfu Turbo DNA polymerase. The PCRs consisted of initial denaturation at 95 C for 30 sec, followed by 18 cycles of 95 C for 30 sec, 55 C for 30 sec, and 68 C for 12 min. Then the amplicon was digested with DpnI, which digested the methylated parental DNA from pBlueScript, and left the nicked mutated plasmids intact. Repair of nicked plasmids was achieved during transformation using supercompetent XL1-Blue Escherichia coli cells. After verifying that the intended mutation was achieved by automated DNA sequencing (performed by the DNA Core Facility of the University of Iowa Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center), the insert containing the whole coding region was inserted back into pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The entire coding region of the plasmid in pcDNA3.1 was sequenced to verify that the mutation was correct and there were no unintended errors during the PCR or ligation steps.

After verifying that the inserted c-myc tag did not affect ligand binding or hormone stimulation of cAMP production (data not shown), eleven point mutations were introduced into the wt MC4R containing the c-myc epitope tag (herein referred as myc-MC4R) using the same approach as described above except that the PCR consisted of 12 cycles instead of 18 cycles. The mutants created were D37V in extracellular domain (38), P48S in transmembrane (TM) I (43), V50M in TM I (41), S58C in TM I (41), N62S in TM I (39), P78L in TM II (38), G98R in TM II (42), Y157S in the second intracellular loop (48), I170V in TM IV (41), C271Y in the third extracellular loop (39), and N274S in the third extracellular loop (35).

Cells and transfection
HEK293 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). These cells were maintained at 5% CO2 in DMEM containing 50 µg/ml gentamicin, 10 mM HEPES, and 10% newborn calf serum. Cells were plated on gelatin-coated 35-mm six-well clusters (obtained from Corning, Corning, NY). Transfection was performed using the calcium precipitation method except that the overnight incubation was performed at 5% CO2 (49). Four-microgram plasmid in 2 ml media was used per 35-mm dish. Cells were used 48 h after transfection for studies of ligand binding and hormone stimulation of cAMP generation.

To establish nonclonal cells stably expressing MC4R, cells were selected for two weeks in growth media containing 200 µg/ml geneticin. The cells were thereafter maintained in media containing geneticin.

[Nle4, D-Phe7]-{alpha}-MSH (NDP-MSH) binding to intact cells
Iodinated NDP-MSH, a superpotent agonist for the MC4R (50), was purchased from Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences (Boston, MA). Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were washed twice with warm Waymouth’s MB752/1 media modified to contain 1 mg/ml BSA and 50 µg/ml gentamicin (referred to as Waymouth/BSA). One milliliter of fresh Waymouth/BSA was added to each well, and then 100,000 cpm of 125I-NDP-MSH (50 µl) was added to each well, with or without different concentrations of unlabeled NDP-MSH (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Belmont, CA). The final concentration of unlabeled NDP-MSH ranged from 10-12 to 10-6 M.

After incubation at 37 C for 1 h, cells were placed on ice, washed twice with cold Hanks’ balanced salt solution modified to contain 1 mg/ml BSA and 50 µg/ml gentamicin. Then 100 µl of 0.5 N NaOH was added to each well. Cells were collected using cotton swabs, and counted in {gamma} counter. Binding capacity and IC50 values were calculated using DeltaGraph software (Monterey, CA).

NDP-MSH stimulation of intracellular cAMP production
HEK293 cells were plated and transfected as described above. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were washed twice with warm Waymouth/BSA. Then 1 ml of fresh Waymouth/BSA containing 0.5 mM isobutylmethylxanthine (Sigma) was added to each well. After a 15-min incubation at 37 C, either buffer alone or different concentrations of NDP-MSH were added and the incubation was continued for another hour. The cells were then placed on ice, media were aspirated, and intracellular cAMP were extracted by the addition of 0.5 N percholoric acid containing 180 µg/ml theophylline, and measured using RIA. All determinations were performed in triplicate. Maximal responses (Rmax) and EC50 values were calculated using DeltaGraph software.

Imaging of cells stably expressing MC4R by confocal microscopy
HEK293 cells stably expressing wt or mutant myc-MC4R were established as described above. The day before the experiment, HEK293 cells stably expressing wt or mutant MC4Rs were plated onto lysine-coated slides (Biocoat cellware purchased from Falcon). All solutions and procedures were at room temperature. On the day of the experiment, cells were washed three times with filtered PBS for immunohistochemistry [PBS-IH, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.4 mM KH2PO4, 4.3 mM Na2HPO4 (pH 7.4)]. Cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS-IH for 30 min. After a further wash of three times with PBS-IH, cells were permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100 in PBS-IH for 5 min. For cell surface staining, this step was omitted. Then the cells were incubated with blocking solution (5% BSA in PBS-IH) for 1 h, and incubated 1 h with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibody 9E10 (Affinity Bioreagents, Golden, CO) diluted 1:100 in PBS-IH containing 1 mg/ml BSA. Cells were then washed five times with PBS-IH, allowed to dry, and covered with Vectashield Mounting Media (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and a glass coverslip. Images were collected with a Bio-Rad 1024 laser scanning confocal microscope.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, 11 different mutations previously identified in obese patients were functionally characterized in HEK293 cells. These cells have been used extensively in previous studies on the functional characterization of mutant MC4Rs associated with obesity (see Refs. 36 and 51 for examples). All mutants, as well as wt MC4R, were transfected at maximal plasmid concentrations (4 µg per 35-mm dish in 2 ml of media). In the same experiment, both competitive binding assays and dose-dependent hormone stimulation of cAMP production were measured. From the competitive binding assay, the IC50 (concentration of cold NDP-MSH that resulted in 50% inhibition) as well as Bmax (binding capacity) were calculated. From the dose-dependent NDP-MSH stimulation of intracellular cAMP production, the Rmax as well as EC50 (concentration of NDP-MSH that cause 50% maximal cAMP production) were determined. From the results of at least three independent experiments, it became clear that some mutants behave like wt MC4R in that all the parameters were not significantly different from wt MC4R. These mutants include D37V, P48S, V50M, I170V, and N274S (Figs. 1Go and 2Go and Table 1Go). Therefore, it remains to be determined whether these variants are responsible for the obesity observed in the patients and, if so, by what mechanism.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Accumulation of intracellular cAMP in cells transiently transfected with wt and mutant MC4Rs. Cells were transfected, stimulated with different concentrations of NDP-MSH, and intracellular cAMP measured as described in Materials and Methods. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of triplicate determinations within one experiment. All experiments were performed at least three times and similar results were obtained.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Competitive binding of radiolabeled NDP-MSH in cells transiently transfected with wt and mutant MC4Rs. Cells were transfected and binding assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Different concentrations of unlabeled NDP-MSH were used to inhibit the binding of 125I-NDP-MSH to wt and mutant. Results shown are mean ± range of duplicate determinations within one experiment. All experiments were performed at least three times and similar results were obtained.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Ligand binding and agonist-stimulated cAMP production of wt and mutant MC4Rs

 
The other six mutants were found to have either decreased (S58C, N62S, Y157S, and C271Y) or no (P78L and G98R) ligand binding, with proportional impairments in NDP-MSH stimulated cAMP production (Figs. 1Go and 2Go and Table 1Go). It should be pointed out that the G98R MC4R mutant had been carefully characterized in the original report by Kobayashi et al. (42). It had been shown that this mutant receptor is completely devoid of ligand binding and cAMP generation in response to NDP-MSH stimulation. Our data are in agreement with this report (data not shown). We included this mutant in our study, though, so that we could further determine its cellular localization (see below). It is interesting to note that mutant S58C had the same Rmax as wt MC4R, even though it exhibited greatly diminished ligand binding, suggesting the presence of spare receptors in this heterologous expression system. Impaired binding of agonist to the Y157S and C271Y mutants were reflected in a rightward shift of their dose-response curves, resulting in increased EC50 (EC50 for Y157S was increased 9-fold compared with wt, and EC50 was increased 66.5 fold for C271Y, Table 1Go).

To ascertain the cellular localization of the mutant MC4Rs, cells stably expressing wt or mutant MC4R were stained with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibody for c-myc epitope, and images were obtained from a laser confocal microscope. Cells that were not subjected to permeabilization revealed cell surface receptor expression, whereas cells that were first permeabilized revealed both cell surface and intracellular receptor expression. The wt MC4R was easily detected on the cell surface of nonpermeabilized cells (Fig. 3Go). Permeabilization revealed that a significant amount of wt MC4R was also located intracellularly (Fig. 3Go). As expected, the mutants that showed normal binding, including D37V, P48S, I170V, and N274S, were expressed well on the cell surface (Fig. 3Go). Those mutants with diminished binding, including S58C, N62S, P78L, G98R, Y157S, and C271Y, showed a lack of cell surface expression. Staining of permeabilized cells showed that these mutants were expressed, but were retained intracellularly (Fig. 3Go). These results suggest that defective trafficking is the major cause of obesity caused by loss-of-function MC4R mutations.



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Confocal imaging of wt and mutant myc-MC4Rs. Cells stably expressing wt and mutant myc-MC4Rs were permeabilized or left intact as indicated and then stained with florescein-conjugated anti-myc monoclonal antibody and imaged by confocal microscopy.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
There are two major findings from our study of variant MC4Rs. First, we determined that not all variant MC4Rs with amino acid changes result in a loss-of-function when tested in a heterologous expression system. In fact, 5 of 11 mutants we studied exhibited apparently normal functions in terms of cell surface expression, ligand binding and second messenger generation (Figs. 1–3GoGoGo and Table 1Go). It remains to be determined whether these amino acid changes affect the functions of the MC4R with respect to the endogenous antagonist, AgRP. In addition, these mutants could potentially affect other aspects of MC4R function, such as desensitization, which has been reported in V2 vasopressin receptor mutations (52). One must also consider that these variants might affect other signaling systems such as mobilization of intracellular free calcium (53). Finally, it is pertinent to emphasize that obesity is a multi-factorial disease. Therefore, these variants might, when coexpressed with other polymorphisms, lead to an increased susceptibility to obesity. For example, Liggett and colleagues (54) recently demonstrated synergism between ß1- and {alpha}2C-adrenergic receptors polymorphisms. In any case, our data emphasize the importance of functional studies when new DNA allelic variants of MC4R are reported.

Another important finding from this study is that intracellular trapping of the mutated MC4R is the major defect of the MC4R when early-onset severe obesity is associated with a loss-of-function of the MC4R mutant. Confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed that all six mutants that exhibit a loss-of-function phenotype are trapped intracellularly (Fig. 3Go). Functional characterization of two frameshift mutations of the MC4R also revealed that these two mutants were trapped intracellularly (51). Because the MC4R, like other GPCRs, is an integral membrane protein that transverses the membrane seven times, its folding is understandably complicated. Any perturbations in the folding process will result in a receptor that is misfolded and will be recognized by the cell’s quality control mechanisms within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), thereby prevented it from exiting the ER. Indeed, transit out of the ER is the rate-limiting step in expression of human {delta}-opioid receptor at the cell surface (55). In general, intracellular retention of misfolded mutant receptors is one of the most common reasons for loss-of-function phenotypes in GPCRs. Such observations have been found for, among others, rhodopsin (7, 8), the vasopressin receptor (reviewed in Ref. 56), the endothelin B receptor (57), the calcium-sensing receptor (58), the GnRH receptor (59), the LH receptor (9), and the FSH receptor (60).

While our studies were being prepared for publication, three papers were published that also examined the functional properties of several different MC4R variants (47, 61, 62). Our study, however, is not redundant in that it is the only one to functionally characterize the MC4R variants D37V, P48S, Y157S, and N274S. Furthermore, our studies shows that the G98R mutant, previously shown to have a loss-of-function phenotype (42), is due to a lack of cell surface expression of this mutant receptor. Importantly, the data from our study as well as the others point to decreased cell surface expression as being the most prevalent defect in loss-of-function MC4R mutants associated with early-onset severe obesity.

Of the MC4R variants that were examined both in our study as well other recent studies, there are both confirmatory as well as dissimilar observations. Similar results were obtained with the mutant P78L, which was consistently shown to lack signaling and cell surface expression (present study as well as Refs. 61 and 62). Our results on N62S are also in agreement with Yeo et al. (47) in that this mutant appears to retain partial signaling capabilities. Finally, our results on the MC4R mutant V50M are generally in agreement with the studies of Vaisse and colleagues (61). Both studies show that that the EC50 and Rmax are not significantly different between cells expressing the wt vs. V50M mutant. However, we observed only a 3-fold increase in the EC50 with S58C mutant, whereas they reported a 15-fold increase. This may be due to either or both of two technical differences between the studies. First, different methods were used to measure signaling by the MC4R. In their study, a luciferase reporter gene assay was used, which is less sensitive than the direct measurement of intracellular cAMP. Furthermore, the native ligand {alpha}-MSH was used in their study, while we used the superpotent analog NDP-MSH. With regards to the C271Y mutant, Yeo et al. (47) were unable to observe any signaling, whereas we detected some signaling at high concentrations of NDP-MSH (Fig. 1Go). Again, these different observations may be due to the different methods used to measure cAMP and/or the agonist used. There are also some discrepancies with regards to I170V. Whereas our data show that I170V is normal with respect to cell surface expression, ligand binding, as well as signaling (Figs. 1–3GoGoGo and Table 1Go), Vaisse and colleagues (61) suggested that this mutant exhibited a loss-of-function due to decreased cell surface expression. However, their data showed only a 16% reduction in maximal binding capacity of the I170V mutant and the signaling properties were not examined. The study by Adan and colleagues (62) also suggested that I170V exhibited a loss-of-function phenotype with the cell surface expression level 45% of wt and the Rmax 47% of wt (as determined by measuring adenylyl cyclase activity). The reasons for these apparent discrepancies are not clear.

With the data from the present study, as well as the recently published data about the functional defects of MC4R variants associated with childhood obesity, and following the model of LDL receptor mutations (63), we propose the following scheme for classifying MC4R mutations:

Class I: null mutations
This class of mutants produces no receptor protein due to defective synthesis and/or accelerated degradation. Although there are no studies performed yet to directly verify this, W16X (45), Y35X (38, 64) and L64X (44) are proposed to belong to this class.

Class II: intracellularly trapped mutants
This class comprises the largest set of MC4R mutations reported to date, including the frameshift mutations {Delta}CTCT at codon 211 (51) and the TGAT insertion at codon 244 (51), S58C (present study and Ref. 61), N62S (present study and Ref. 47), P78L (present study and Refs. 61 and 62), N97D (47), G98R (present study), I102S (61), L106P (47), I125K (47), R165Q (62), R165W (61, 62), L250Q (61), Y287X (47), C271Y (present study and Ref. 47), P299H (61), I316S (47), and I317T (61, 65).

Class III: binding defective mutants
These mutant MC4Rs display relatively normal expression on the cell surface, but ligand binding is impaired in terms of decreased maximal binding and/or binding affinity, therefore causing impairments in hormone-stimulated signaling. These mutants include I137T (36), N97D, L106P, I125K, I316S (47) and {Delta}88–92 (Donohoue, P. A., Y.-X. Tao, M. Collins, G. S. H. Yeo, S. O’Rahilly, and D. L. Segaloff, manuscript submitted for publication). It is of particular interest that O’Rahilly and colleagues identified a MC4R mutation (I316S) that alters the relative affinities of the receptor for its endogenous agonist ({alpha}-MSH) and antagonist (AgRP) (47). Therefore, this mutant can be classified as a subset within this class.

Class IV: signaling defective mutants
These mutant receptors are expressed on the cell surface and bind ligand relatively normally, but agonist-stimulated signaling is impaired. Mutants I137T (36), A175T and V253I may belong to this class (47), although in one report, V253I was found to have a relatively normal Rmax, albeit the EC50 was increased 3-fold (61). In fact, this variant was found recently in one normal weight control subject (45), suggesting that this variant has relatively normal functions.

Class V: variants with unknown defects
These variants behave similarly to the wt MC4R in heterologous expression systems in the parameters studied. Some of the variants, such as D37V, P48S, V50M, I170V, and N274S (present study), exhibit normal cell surface expression, ligand binding, and agonist-stimulated cAMP. Whether and how these variants cause energy imbalance and therefore obesity is unclear. D37V is present as a double mutation Y35X/D37V (38, 64). We would argue that the phenotype is most likely the result of the Y35X nonsense mutation. The difference between these variants and common polymorphisms such as V103I and I251L is that these variants are not assumed to be present in normal subjects. However, as mentioned above, a variant (V253I) previously identified as a missense mutation associated with obesity was later found in a normal weight subject (45). Other MC4R mutants that would fall within this category are I102T, F202L and N240S, which were found only in normal weight subjects but not obese subjects (44). Finally, it is unclear whether T112M falls into this category or not. Whereas it was originally identified in obese subjects (38, 39) and recent studies suggest that it causes a loss-of-function phenotype (62), earlier functional studies showed it to have normal functions (36, 39) and it has since been reported in one control subject (44).

In summary, our results stress the importance of analyzing the functional properties of variant MC4Rs identified in obese subjects to more accurately determine if the phenotype of the variant is indeed consistent with the clinical phenotype. Moreover, we anticipate that a classification system such as one proposed herein will be beneficial in managing the increasingly large array of MC4R mutations associated with early childhood obesity.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Ira Gantz (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) for generously providing us the wt MC4R cDNA and advice on setting up the ligand binding assay. We thank the anonymous reviewers for suggestions that were valuable in revising an earlier version of the manuscript.


   Footnotes
 
This work was supported by a Beginning-Grant-in-Aid (0265236Z) from the American Heart Association Heartland Affiliate (Y.-X.T.) and NIH Grant HD22196 (to D.L.S.). The services and facilities provided by the Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center of the University of Iowa, supported by DK25295, are also gratefully acknowledged.

Abbreviations: AgRP, Agouti-related protein; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; MCR, melanocortin receptor (MC1R–MC5R); NDP-MSH, [Nle4, D-Phe7]-{alpha}-MSH; POMC, proopiomelanocortin; Rmax, maximal response; TM, transmembrane; wt, wild-type.

Received April 25, 2003.

Accepted for publication June 10, 2003.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bockaert J, Pin JP 1999 Molecular tinkering of G protein-coupled receptors: an evolutionary success. EMBO J 18:1723–1729[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Spiegel AM 1996 Defects in G protein-coupled signal transduction in human disease. Annu Rev Physiol 58:143–170[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Rao VR, Oprian DD 1996 Activating mutations of rhodopsin and other G protein-coupled receptors. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 25:287–314[Medline]
  4. Parnot C, Miserey-Lenkei S, Bardin S, Corvol P, Clauser E 2002 Lessons from constitutively active mutants of G protein-coupled receptors. Trends Endocrinol Metab 13:336–343[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Swords FM, Baig A, Malchoff DM, Malchoff CD, Thorner MO, King PJ, Hunyady L, Clark AJ 2002 Impaired desensitization of a mutant adrenocorticotropin receptor associated with apparent constitutive activity. Mol Endocrinol 16:2746–2753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Tsukaguchi H, Matsubara H, Taketani S, Mori Y, Seido T, Inada M 1995 Binding-, intracellular transport-, and biosynthesis-defective mutants of vasopressin type 2 receptor in patients with X-linked nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. J Clin Invest 96:2043–2050
  7. Sung CH, Schneider BG, Agarwal N, Papermaster DS, Nathans J 1991 Functional heterogeneity of mutant rhodopsins responsible for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:8840–8844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Sung CH, Davenport CM, Nathans J 1993 Rhodopsin mutations responsible for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Clustering of functional classes along the polypeptide chain. J Biol Chem 268:26645–26649[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Latronico A, Segaloff D 1999 Naturally occurring mutations of the luteinizing-hormone receptor: Lessons learned about reproductive physiology and G protein-coupled receptors. Am J Hum Genet 65:949–958[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Gaylinn BD, Dealmeida VI, Lyons Jr CE, Wu KC, Mayo KE, Thorner MO 1999 The mutant growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) receptor of the little mouse does not bind GHRH. Endocrinology 140:5066–5074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rosenthal W, Antaramian A, Gilbert S, Birnbaumer M 1993 Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. A V2 vasopressin receptor unable to stimulate adenylyl cyclase. J Biol Chem 268:13030–13033[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Latronico AC, Chai Y, Arnhold IJP, Liu X, Mendonca BB, Segaloff DL 1998 A homozygous microdeletion in helix 7 of the luteinizing hormone receptor associated with familial testicular and ovarian resistance is due to both decreased cell surface expresssion and impaired effector activation by the cell surface receptor. Mol Endocrinol 12:442–450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Birnbaumer M, Gilbert S, Rosenthal W 1994 An extracellular congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus mutation of the vasopressin receptor reduces cell surface expression, affinity for ligand, and coupling to the Gs/adenylyl cyclase system. Mol Endocrinol 8:886–894[Abstract]
  14. Smith AI, Funder JW 1988 Proopiomelanocortin processing in the pituitary, central nervous system, and peripheral tissues. Endocr Rev 9:159–179[Medline]
  15. Chhajlani V, Wikberg JE 1992 Molecular cloning and expression of the human melanocyte stimulating hormone receptor cDNA. FEBS Lett 309:417–420[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Mountjoy KG, Robbins LS, Mortrud MT, Cone RD 1992 The cloning of a family of genes that encode the melanocortin receptors. Science 257:1248–1251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gantz I, Konda Y, Tashiro T, Shimoto Y, Miwa H, Munzert G, Watson SJ, DelValle J, Yamada T 1993 Molecular cloning of a novel melanocortin receptor. J Biol Chem 268:8246–8250[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Roselli-Rehfuss L, Mountjoy KG, Robbins LS, Mortrud MT, Low MJ, Tatro JB, Entwistle ML, Simerly RB, Cone RD 1993 Identification of a receptor for gamma melanotropin and other proopiomelanocortin peptides in the hypothalamus and limbic system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8856–8860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gantz I, Miwa H, Konda Y, Shimoto Y, Tashiro T, Watson SJ, DelValle J, Yamada T 1993 Molecular cloning, expression, and gene localization of a fourth melanocortin receptor. J Biol Chem 268:15174–15179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Mountjoy KG, Mortrud MT, Low MJ, Simerly RB, Cone RD 1994 Localization of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4-R) in neuroendocrine and autonomic control circuits in the brain. Mol Endocrinol 8:1298–1308[Abstract]
  21. Chhajlani V, Muceniece R, Wikberg JE 1993 Molecular cloning of a novel human melanocortin receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 195:866–873[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Gantz I, Shimoto Y, Konda Y, Miwa H, Dickinson CJ, Yamada T 1994 Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of a fifth melanocortin receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 200:1214–1220[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Chen W, Kelly MA, Opitz-Araya X, Thomas RE, Low MJ, Cone RD 1997 Exocrine gland dysfunction in MC5-R-deficient mice: evidence for coordinated regulation of exocrine gland function by melanocortin peptides. Cell 91:789–798[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Yaswen L, Diehl N, Brennan MB, Hochgeschwender U 1999 Obesity in the mouse model of pro-opiomelanocortin deficiency responds to peripheral melanocortin. Nat Med 5:1066–1070[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Huszar D, Lynch CA, Fairchild-Huntress V, Dunmore JH, Fang Q, Berkemeier LR, Gu W, Kesterson RA, Boston BA, Cone RD, Smith FJ, Campfield LA, Burn P, Lee F 1997 Targeted disruption of the melanocortin-4 receptor results in obesity in mice. Cell 88:131–141[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Graham M, Shutter JR, Sarmiento U, Sarosi I, Stark KL 1997 Overexpression of Agrt leads to obesity in transgenic mice. Nat Genet 17:273–274[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Ollmann MM, Wilson BD, Yang YK, Kerns JA, Chen Y, Gantz I, Barsh GS 1997 Antagonism of central melanocortin receptors in vitro and in vivo by agouti-related protein. Science 278:135–138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lu D, Willard D, Patel IR, Kadwell S, Overton L, Kost T, Luther M, Chen W, Woychik RP, Wilkison WO, Wilkinson WO, Cone RD1994 Agouti protein is an antagonist of the melanocyte-stimulating-hormone receptor. Nature 371:799–802
  29. Fan W, Boston BA, Kesterson RA, Hruby VJ, Cone RD 1997 Role of melanocortinergic neurons in feeding and the agouti obesity syndrome. Nature 385:165–168[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Thiele TE, van Dijk G, Yagaloff KA, Fisher SL, Schwartz M, Burn P, Seeley RJ 1998 Central infusion of melanocortin agonist MTII in rats: assessment of c-Fos expression and taste aversion. Am J Physiol 274:R248–R254
  31. Rossi M, Kim MS, Morgan DG, Small CJ, Edwards CM, Sunter D, Abusnana S, Goldstone AP, Russell SH, Stanley SA, Smith DM, Yagaloff K, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR 1998 A C-terminal fragment of Agouti-related protein increases feeding and antagonizes the effect of {alpha}-melanocyte stimulating hormone in vivo. Endocrinology 139:4428–4431[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Krude H, Biebermann H, Luck W, Horn R, Brabant G, Gruters A 1998 Severe early-onset obesity, adrenal insufficiency and red hair pigmentation caused by POMC mutations in humans. Nat Genet 19:155–157[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Yeo GS, Farooqi IS, Aminian S, Halsall DJ, Stanhope RG, O’Rahilly S 1998 A frameshift mutation in MC4R associated with dominantly inherited human obesity. Nat Genet 20:111–112[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Vaisse C, Clement K, Guy-Grand B, Froguel P 1998 A frameshift mutation in human MC4R is associated with a dominant form of obesity. Nat Genet 20:113–114[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Mergen M, Mergen H, Ozata M, Oner R, Oner C 2001 A novel melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) gene mutation associated with morbid obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Gu W, Tu Z, Kleyn PW, Kissebah A, Duprat L, Lee J, Chin W, Maruti S, Deng N, Fisher SL, Franco LS, Burn P, Yagaloff KA, Nathan J, Heymsfield S, Albu J, Pi-Sunyer FX, Allison DB 1999 Identification and functional analysis of novel human melanocortin-4 receptor variants. Diabetes 48:635–639[Abstract]
  37. Sina M, Hinney A, Ziegler A, Neupert T, Mayer H, Siegfried W, Blum WF, Remschmidt H, Hebebrand J 1999 Phenotypes in three pedigrees with autosomal dominant obesity caused by haploinsufficiency mutations in the melanocortin-4 receptor gene. Am J Hum Genet 65:1501–1457[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Hinney A, Schmidt A, Nottebom K, Heibult O, Becker I, Ziegler A, Gerber G, Sina M, Gorg T, Mayer H, Siegfried W, Fichter M, Remschmidt H, Hebebrand J 1999 Several mutations in the melanocortin-4 receptor gene including a nonsense and a frameshift mutation associated with dominantly inherited obesity in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1483–1486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Farooqi IS, Yeo GS, Keogh JM, Aminian S, Jebb SA, Butler G, Cheetham T, O’Rahilly S 2000 Dominant and recessive inheritance of morbid obesity associated with melanocortin 4 receptor deficiency. J Clin Invest 106:271–279[Medline]
  40. Vaisse C, Clement K, Durand E, Hercberg S, Guy-Grand B, Froguel P 2000 Melanocortin-4 receptor mutations are a frequent and heterogeneous cause of morbid obesity. J Clin Invest 106:253–262[Medline]
  41. Dubern B, Clement K, Pelloux V, Froguel P, Girardet JP, Guy-Grand B, Tounian P 2001 Mutational analysis of melanocortin-4 receptor, agouti-related protein, and {alpha}-melanocyte-stimulating hormone genes in severely obese children. J Pediatr 139:204–209[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Kobayashi H, Ogawa Y, Shintani M, Ebihara K, Shimodahira M, Iwakura T, Hino M, Ishihara T, Ikekubo K, Kurahachi H, Nakao K 2002 A novel homozygous missense mutation of melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) in a Japanese woman with severe obesity. Diabetes 51:243–246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Miraglia Del Giudice E, Cirillo G, Nigro V, Santoro N, D’Urso L, Raimondo P, Cozzolino D, Scafato D, Perrone L 2002 Low frequency of melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) mutations in a Mediterranean population with early-onset obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 26:647–651[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Jacobson P, Ukkola O, Rankinen T, Snyder EE, Leon AS, Rao DC, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH, Lonn L, Cowan Jr GS, Sjostrom L, Bouchard C 2002 Melanocortin 4 receptor sequence variations are seldom a cause of human obesity: the Swedish Obese Subjects, the HERITAGE Family Study, and a Memphis cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4442–4446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Marti A, Corbalan MS, Forga L, Martinez JA, Hinney A, Hebebrand J 2003 A novel nonsense mutation in the melanocortin-4 receptor associated with obesity in a Spanish population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 27:385–388[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Farooqi IS, Keogh JM, Yeo GS, Lank EJ, Cheetham T, O’Rahilly S 2003 Clinical spectrum of obesity and mutations in the melanocortin 4 receptor gene. N Engl J Med 348:1085–1095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Yeo GS, Lank EJ, Farooqi IS, Keogh J, Challis BG, O’Rahilly S 2003 Mutations in the human melanocortin-4 receptor gene associated with severe familial obesity disrupts receptor function through multiple molecular mechanisms. Hum Mol Genet 12:561–574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Lee Y-S, Poh LK-S, Loke K-Y, A novel melanocortin 4 receptor gene (MC4R) mutation associated with severe obesity. Program of the 84th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, San Francisco, CA, 2002, p 589 (Abstract P3-419)
  49. Chen C, Okayama H 1987 High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA. Mol Cell Biol 7:2745–2752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Sawyer TK, Sanfilippo PJ, Hruby VJ, Engel MH, Heward CB, Burnett JB, Hadley ME 1980 4-Norleucine, 7-D-phenylalanine-{alpha}-melanocyte-stimulating hormone: a highly potent {alpha}-melanotropin with ultralong biological activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:5754–5748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Ho G, MacKenzie RG 1999 Functional characterization of mutations in melanocortin-4 receptor associated with human obesity. J Biol Chem 274:35816–35822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Barak LS, Oakley RH, Laporte SA, Caron MG 2001 Constitutive arrestin-mediated desensitization of a human vasopressin receptor mutant associated with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:93–98[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Mountjoy KG, Kong PL, Taylor JA, Willard DH, Wilkison WO 2001 Melanocortin receptor-mediated mobilization of intracellular free calcium in HEK293 cells. Physiol Genomics 5:11–19[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Small KM, Wagoner LE, Levin AM, Kardia SL, Liggett SB 2002 Synergistic polymorphisms of ß1- and {alpha}2C-adrenergic receptors and the risk of congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 347:1135–1142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Petaja-Repo UE, Hogue M, Laperriere A, Walker P, Bouvier M 2000 Export from the endoplasmic reticulum represents the limiting step in the maturation and cell surface expression of the human delta opioid receptor. J Biol Chem 275:13727–13736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Morello JP, Bichet DG 2001 Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Annu Rev Physiol 63:607–630[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Tanaka H, Moroi K, Iwai J, Takahashi H, Ohnuma N, Hori S, Takimoto M, Nishiyama M, Masaki T, Yanagisawa M, Sekiya S, Kimura S 1998 Novel mutations of the endothelin B receptor gene in patients with Hirschsprung’s disease and their characterization. J Biol Chem 273:11378–11383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Bai M, Quinn S, Trivedi S, Kifor O, Pearce SH, Pollak MR, Krapcho K, Hebert SC, Brown EM 1996 Expression and characterization of inactivating and activating mutations in the human Ca2+o-sensing receptor. J Biol Chem 271:19537–19545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Leanos-Miranda A, Janovick JA, Conn PM 2002 Receptor-misrouting: an unexpectedly prevalent and rescuable etiology in gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor-mediated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4825–4828[Abstract]
  60. Touraine P, Beau I, Gougeon A, Meduri G, Desroches A, Pichard C, Detoeuf M, Paniel B, Prieur M, Zorn JR, Milgrom E, Kuttenn F, Misrahi M 1999 New natural inactivating mutations of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor: correlations between receptor function and phenotype. Mol Endocrinol 13:1844–1854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Lubrano-Berthelier C, Durand E, Dubern B, Shapiro A, Dazin P, Weill J, Ferron C, Froguel P, Vaisse C 2003 Intracellular retention is a common characteristic of childhood obesity-associated MC4R mutations. Hum Mol Genet 12:145–153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Nijenhuis WA, Garner KM, VanRozen RJ, Adan RA2003 Poor cell surface expression of human melanocortin-4 receptor mutations associated with obesity. J Biol Chem 278:22939–22945
  63. Hobbs HH, Russell DW, Brown MS, Goldstein JL 1990 The LDL receptor locus in familial hypercholesterolemia: mutational analysis of a membrane protein. Annu Rev Genet 24:133–170[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. Hebebrand J, Fichter M, Gerber G, Gorg T, Hermann H, Geller F, Schafer H, Remschmidt H, Hinney A 2002 Genetic predisposition to obesity in bulimia nervosa: a mutation screen of the melanocortin-4 receptor gene. Mol Psychiatry 7:647–651[CrossRef][Medline]
  65. VanLeeuwen D, Steffey ME, Donahue C, Ho G, MacKenzie RG 2003 Cell surface expression of the melanocortin-4 receptor is dependent on a C-terminal di-isoleucine sequence at codons 316/317. J Biol Chem 278:15935–15940[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J EndocrinolHome page
Z.-C. Fan, J. L Sartin, and Y.-X. Tao
Molecular cloning and pharmacological characterization of porcine melanocortin-3 receptor
J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2008; 196(1): 139 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
C. Staubert, P. Tarnow, H. Brumm, C. Pitra, T. Gudermann, A. Gruters, T. Schoneberg, H. Biebermann, and H. Rompler
Evolutionary Aspects in Evaluating Mutations in the Melanocortin 4 Receptor
Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 4642 - 4648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
P. M. Conn, A. Ulloa-Aguirre, J. Ito, and J. A. Janovick
G Protein-Coupled Receptor Trafficking in Health and Disease: Lessons Learned to Prepare for Therapeutic Mutant Rescue in Vivo
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2007; 59(3): 225 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
J. D. Ahn, B. Dubern, C. Lubrano-Berthelier, K. Clement, and G. Karsenty
Cart Overexpression Is the Only Identifiable Cause of High Bone Mass in Melanocortin 4 Receptor Deficiency
Endocrinology, July 1, 2006; 147(7): 3196 - 3202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Y.-X. Tao and D. L. Segaloff
Functional Analyses of Melanocortin-4 Receptor Mutations Identified from Patients with Binge Eating Disorder and Nonobese or Obese Subjects
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5632 - 5638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Mol GenetHome page
K. A. Beaumont, R. A. Newton, D. J. Smit, J. H. Leonard, J. L. Stow, and R. A. Sturm
Altered cell surface expression of human MC1R variant receptor alleles associated with red hair and skin cancer risk
Hum. Mol. Genet., August 1, 2005; 14(15): 2145 - 2154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
ABDOMINAL OBESITY STUDY GROUP, F. E. VON EYBEN, J. P. KROUSTRUP, J. F. LARSEN, and J. CELIS
Comparison of Gene Expression in Intra-Abdominal and Subcutaneous Fat: A Study of Men with Morbid Obesity and Nonobese Men Using Microarray and Proteomics
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2004; 1030(1): 508 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DiabetesHome page
L. Ma, P. A. Tataranni, C. Bogardus, and L. J. Baier
Melanocortin 4 Receptor Gene Variation Is Associated With Severe Obesity in Pima Indians
Diabetes, October 1, 2004; 53(10): 2696 - 2699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Med. Genet.Home page
A Dempfle, A Hinney, M Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, M Raab, F Geller, T Gudermann, H Schafer, and J Hebebrand
Large quantitative effect of melanocortin-4 receptor gene mutations on body mass index
J. Med. Genet., October 1, 2004; 41(10): 795 - 800.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Y.-X. Tao and D. L. Segaloff
Functional Characterization of Melanocortin-3 Receptor Variants Identify a Loss-of-Function Mutation Involving an Amino Acid Critical for G Protein-Coupled Receptor Activation
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2004; 89(8): 3936 - 3942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
D. Mizrachi and D. L. Segaloff
Intracellularly Located Misfolded Glycoprotein Hormone Receptors Associate with Different Chaperone Proteins than Their Cognate Wild-Type Receptors
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2004; 18(7): 1768 - 1777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. A. Donohoue, Y.-X. Tao, M. Collins, G. S. H. Yeo, S. O'Rahilly, and D. L. Segaloff
Deletion of Codons 88-92 of the Melanocortin-4 Receptor Gene: A Novel Deleterious Mutation in an Obese Female
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2003; 88(12): 5841 - 5845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
144/10/4544    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow