help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2003-0048
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hsieh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hsieh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*Protein
*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN
*ESTRADIOL
Endocrinology Vol. 144, No. 10 4597-4606
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Expression and Localization of Secreted Frizzled-Related Protein-4 in the Rodent Ovary: Evidence for Selective Up-Regulation in Luteinized Granulosa Cells

Minnie Hsieh, Sabine M. Mulders, Robert R. Friis, Arun Dharmarajan and JoAnne S. Richards

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine (M.H., J.S.R.), Houston, Texas 77030; Research and Development, NV Organon (S.M.M.), 5340 BH Oss, The Netherlands; University of Western Australia School of Anatomy and Human Biology (A.D.), Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia; West Australian Institute of Medical Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (A.D.), Shenton Park, Western Australia 6009, Australia; and Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern (R.R.F.), CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. JoAnne S. Richards, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030. E-mail: joanner{at}bcm.tmc.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Secreted frizzled-related protein-4 (sFRP-4) belongs to a family of soluble proteins that have a Frizzled-like cysteine-rich domain and function as modulators of Wnt-Frizzled (Fz) signals. As several Wnts and Fz are expressed at defined stages of follicular development in rodent ovaries, these studies were undertaken to evaluate the hormone-regulated expression and localization of sFRP-4. In the mouse ovary, the expression of sFRP-4 mRNA was up-regulated in granulosa cells of large antral follicles after human chorionic gonadotropin administration and was also elevated in corpora lutea, as determined by RT-PCR and in situ hybridization analyses. In hypophysectomized rat ovaries, sFRP-4 expression was similarly induced by human chorionic gonadotropin and further up-regulated by PRL. PRL also stimulated the secretion of sFRP-4 protein from luteinized rat granulosa cells in culture. Therefore, regulation of sFRP-4 by LH and PRL may be important for modulating Fz-1, which is known to be expressed in periovulatory follicles, and Wnt-4/Fz-4, which are expressed in corpora lutea.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE OVARY IS a dynamic organ that undergoes specific changes in response to the pituitary gonadotropins FSH and LH (1, 2) and ovarian-derived factors to support follicle growth, ovulation, and luteinization. Ovarian-derived factors include steroid hormones and receptors such as estrogen receptors ({alpha} and ß) that are obligatory for normal follicle maturation (3), the progesterone receptor (PR) that is essential for ovulation (4), and members of the TGFß superfamily (e.g. Mullerian inhibitory substance, growth differentiation factor-9, and bone morphogenic protein-4, -7, and -15) that impact follicle organization and ovarian cell functions (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). In addition, Wnt-4, a member of the Wnt/wingless family of extracellular signaling proteins, is critical during early ovarian development. Mice null for Wnt-4 exhibit sex-reversed ovaries that are depleted of oocytes at birth and contain supporting cells expressing genes characteristic of testis development (11). These mice die shortly after birth, precluding further analysis of Wnt-4 function in the mature rodent ovary. Genotypic XY humans with a duplicated part of chromosome 1p that includes WNT-4 are feminized (12). Overexpression of Wnt-4 in cultured mouse Leydig and Sertoli cells resulted in strong up-regulation of Dax1 (dosage-sensitive sex reversal, adrenal hypoplasia congenita critical region on the X chromosome, gene 1) (12), a putative repressor of steroidogenic factor-1, which in the adult gonad regulates the expression of many genes, including aromatase (13), P450 side-chain cleavage (14), Mullerian inhibitory substance (15), and FSH receptor (16, 17). Therefore, Wnt-4 (and possibly other Wnt proteins) may perform important functions in the adult ovary that remain to be defined.

Recently, we and others reported the expression of several members of the Wnt and Frizzled (Fz) families as well as of downstream components of the Wnt-Fz signaling pathway in the mature rodent ovary (18, 19). Wnt-4, Fz-4, and Fz-1 were among the transcripts detected and found to be regulated by gonadotropins and steroids. Fz-1 mRNA was specifically induced by the LH surge in granulosa cells of periovulatory follicles, whereas transcripts for both Wnt-4 and Fz-4 were elevated in terminally differentiated luteal cells. Wnt-4, but not Fz-4, was also increased in granulosa cells of small preantral follicles. In ovaries of PR-null mice, Fz-1, but not Wnt-4, expression was reduced around the time of ovulation. Together these results suggest important roles for Wnt-Fz signals during ovarian follicular development, ovulation, and luteinization.

Wnt proteins comprise a large family of locally acting, extracellular signaling molecules that perform key roles during such processes as cell fate specification, proliferation, differentiation, and tissue patterning (20, 21). Wnts activate distinct signaling pathways, including the canonical Wnt signaling pathway that is initiated by formation of a complex between Wnt, a seven-transmembrane receptor of the Fz family, and either LRP5 or LRP6 (22, 23). Activation of the canonical pathway leads to downstream signaling via stabilization of ß-catenin, whereas noncanonical Wnt pathways lead to c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation or increased intracellular Ca2+ levels, activation of protein kinase C and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II, and decreased cGMP levels (24, 25, 26, 27, 28).

A family of secreted glycoproteins called secreted Fz-related proteins (sFRPs) also impacts Wnt-Fz signaling. The sFRPs are approximately 300 amino acids in length, contain an N-terminal cysteine-rich domain (CRD) homologous to the putative Wnt-binding site of Fzs, and a C-terminal domain containing a netrin-like module (29, 30). Several studies provide evidence for direct binding between Wnts and sFRPs as well as modulation of Wnt signals by sFRPs (31, 32, 33). The interaction between Wnts and sFRPs is thought to be mediated by the CRD, although a sFRP-1 mutant lacking the CRD retained the ability to bind Wg, the Drosophila ortholog of mammalian Wnt-1 (32). The CRD of Hfz6 and human FRP were also shown to interact (31), providing another mechanism by which sFRPs may regulate Wnt signals.

Of interest to our studies, sFRP-4 (also called frpAP, DDC-4, FrpHE, and FrzB-2) has been found to be expressed in the rat ovary (34). The studies described herein were undertaken to determine in greater detail the hormone-regulated (peptide and steroid) expression of sFRP-4, and its cell-specific expression in rodent ovaries in relation to other Wnt-Fz signals. The results of RT-PCR and in situ hybridization assays revealed increased expression of sFRP-4 mRNA in response to the LH surge in granulosa cells of periovulatory follicles and in terminally differentiated luteal cells. sFRP-4 expression does not appear to be PR regulated, but is induced by LH and maintained in corpora lutea by PRL. The localization of sFRP-4 to periovulatory follicles and corpora lutea overlaps with sites of Fz-1, Wnt-4, and Fz-4 expression, suggesting potential regulation of these signaling pathways by sFRP-4.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and hormone treatments
Immature 23-d-old C57BL/6 female mice (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc., Chicago, IL) were injected ip with 4 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG; Professional Compounding Center of America, Houston, TX) to stimulate follicular growth. After 48 h, the mice were injected ip with 5 IU human chorionic gonadotropin/Pregnyl (hCG; Organon Special Chemicals, West Orange, NJ), an LH-like molecule used to promote ovulation and luteinization.

Female Sprague Dawley rats (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc.) were hypophysectomized (H) on d 26 of age and given the following hormonal regimen beginning 4 d later. H rats were injected sc with 1.5 mg 17ß-estradiol/0.2 ml propylene glycol (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO) once daily for 3 d (HE). HE rats then received sc injections of 1.0 µg/0.1 ml ovine FSH (NIH oFSH-16, National Hormone and Pituitary Program, Rockville, MD) twice daily for 2 d (HEF), followed by a single ip injection of 10 IU hCG (HEF/hCG; Organon Special Chemicals). In both the mouse and rat models, ovulation occurs approximately 12–14 h after hCG administration. To examine corpora lutea function, luteinization was induced in additional HEF rats that were given a single sc injection of 10 IU hCG with or without sc injections of 100 µg ovine PRL (National Hormone and Pituitary Program) prepared as previously described (35) and given twice daily for 2–4 d.

PR knockout (PRKO) mice (provided by Dr. J. Lydon, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX) fail to ovulate in response to hCG (4, 36). These mice were also injected with PMSG and hCG as described above to induce follicle growth and differentiation. All animals were treated in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as approved by the animal care and use committee at Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX).

RNA isolation and RT-PCR
Whole ovaries (WO) were isolated from PMSG/hCG-stimulated wild-type or PRKO mice at selected time intervals as well as from d 15 pregnant C57BL/6 mice (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc.) and were used for extraction of total RNA using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen/Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). The RNAs were then purified as specified by the manufacturer. Total RNA was similarly prepared from whole ovaries of HEF/hCG rats stimulated for 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, from WO of HEF/hCG+PRL rats stimulated for 48, 72, and 96 h and from WO of intact immature Sprague Dawley rats (23–25 d old; Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc.). RNA was also extracted from granulosa cells and residual cells isolated from H, HE, HEF, and HEF/hCG 12 h rat ovaries. Briefly, granulosa cells were harvested from ovaries by needle puncture as previously described (37, 38) in DMEM/nutrient mixture F-12 (Invitrogen/Life Technologies) containing penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich Corp.), pelleted by centrifugation at low speed to remove the medium, and homogenized in TRIzol reagent to extract total RNA. Residual cells that consist of the remaining ovarian cell types, including thecal cells, interstitial cells, endothelial cells, and trace granulosa cells, that were not easily isolated from small preantral follicles by the puncture method were also homogenized in TRIzol reagent for extraction of RNAs.

Total RNA (300 ng) was reverse transcribed using poly-deoxythymidine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) and avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) at 42 C for 75 min and 95 C for 5 min. Each reaction mixture was separated into two aliquots. Primers for mouse sFRP-4 (forward, 5'-CATCAAGCCCTGCAAGTCTG-3'; reverse, 5'-TAAGGGTGGCTCCATCACAG-3') or rat sFRP-4 (forward, 5'-TATGACCGTGGAGTGTGCAT-3'; reverse, 5'-CTTAGGACTGGCAGGTTTGG-3') were added to one aliquot, and primers for ribosomal protein L-19 (36, 39) were added to the other aliquot as an internal control. [32P]Deoxy-CTP (ICN, Los Angeles, CA), Taq polymerase, and Thermocycle buffer (Promega Corp.) were also included in the PCRs. Mouse sFRP-4, rat sFRP-4, and L-19 were amplified in 18, 23, and 20 PCR cycles (94 C for 1 min, 60 C for 2 min, 72 C for 3 min), respectively. The amplified cDNA products were resolved on a 5% polyacrylamide gel and subsequently quantified using a Storm 860 PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). The identities of the PCR products were verified by sequencing (as described below).

In situ hybridization
The RT-PCR products for mouse and rat sFRP-4 were subcloned into the pCR4-TOPO vector (TOPO TA Cloning Kit, Invitrogen/Life Technologies), verified by sequencing, and used to produce [35S]UTP-labeled antisense and sense riboprobes using the Riboprobe In Vitro Transcription Systems Kit (Promega Corp.). In situ hybridization was performed as described by Wilkensen (40) and as previously shown in our laboratory (18, 41). Briefly, ovaries from PMSG/hCG-stimulated mice and hormone-treated H rats were isolated at selected time intervals, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, paraffin-embedded, and sectioned at 7 µm onto Fisherbrand SuperFrost Plus microscope slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). Tissue sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, treated with 20 µg/ml proteinase K and 0.1 M triethanolamine/acetic anhydride, and dehydrated before overnight incubation with radiolabeled probe at 55 C. Next, slides were washed under highly stringent conditions and dried. The specificity and intensity of the probe were determined by exposing slides overnight to X-OMAT film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Afterward, each slide was dipped in photographic NTB-2 emulsion (Eastman Kodak) and exposed at 4 C. Slides were developed with D-19 developer and fixer (Eastman Kodak) and were stained with hematoxylin. Light- and dark-field illuminations were used to visualize tissue histology and the mRNA probe, respectively.

Immunohistochemistry
Rat ovaries were fixed, embedded, and sectioned as described above. Tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylenes, quenched with 3% H2O2 in methanol, and rehydrated. Slides were next incubated in 10 mM sodium citrate (pH 6.0) at 90 C for 20 min, removed from heat, cooled at room temperature for 20 min, and washed in PBS (80 mM Na2HPO4, 20 mM NaH2PO4, and 100 mM NaCl). Sections were blocked with 20% goat serum in PBS/0.025% Tween 20 for 1 h at room temperature, then incubated overnight at room temperature with affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit anti-sFRP-4 antibody (42) diluted 1:200 in 10% goat serum (in PBS/0.025% Tween 20). The next day, sections were washed in PBS/0.025% Tween 20 and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with biotinylated antirabbit IgG (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) diluted 1:450 in 10% goat serum (in PBS/0.025% Tween 20). Afterward, sections were washed first in PBS/0.025% Tween 20, then in PBS alone. After the washes, sections were incubated for 30 min at room temperature with streptavidin-conjugated peroxidase diluted 1:500 in PBS, then washed again in PBS. Localization of the primary antibody was visualized with diaminobenzidine (Vector Laboratories, Inc.), which produces a brown stain. Sections were dehydrated, cleared in xylenes, and mounted with Permount (Fisher Scientific).

Immunofluorescence
Immature (23–25 d old) female Sprague Dawley rats were injected sc with a low dose of hCG (0.15 IU) twice daily for 2 d to promote the development of preovulatory follicles, followed by a single ip injection of 10 IU hCG the next morning to initiate luteinization (35). After 7 h, ovaries were collected, and large vascular periovulatory follicles were dissected from the ovaries. Granulosa cells were harvested from the isolated follicles by the needle puncture method and cultured on glass coverslips for 4 d in DMEM/Ham’s F-12/1% fetal bovine serum [FBS; Invitrogen/Life Technologies and Hyclone (Logan, UT)] containing penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich Corp.). These cells spontaneously luteinize and constitutively express luteal cell markers such as P450scc (35). Additional luteinizing granulosa cells were cultured in medium with or without PRL (1 µg/ml) for another 3 d. Granulosa cells from nonovulatory follicles were also isolated from the remainder of the ovaries by needle puncture and similarly cultured.

After culture, granulosa and luteinized granulosa cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS to remove the fixative, cells were permeabilized in 0.5% Nonidet P-40/PBS, washed with PBS, and blocked in 4% BSA/PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Next, cells were incubated overnight at 4 C with rabbit anti-sFRP-4 antibody (42) diluted 1:200 in 4% BSA/PBS. On the following morning, cells were washed in PBS and incubated in the dark for 1 h at room temperature with fluorescein goat antirabbit Ig (Vector Laboratories, Inc.; 1:20 in 4% BSA/PBS). Afterward, cells were washed in PBS and mounted onto slides with Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Inc.). The edges of the coverslips were sealed with nail polish.

Western blot
Granulosa cells from ovulatory and small follicles were isolated and cultured in six-well dishes as described for immunofluorescence. Protein was extracted from nonluteinized and luteinized granulosa cells in boiling sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer [100 mM Tris (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, and a pinch of bromphenol blue). Medium was also collected from these same cultures and concentrated using Centricon-30 microconcentrators (Amicon, Beverly, MA). SDS sample buffer [0.35 M Tris-Cl/0.01 M SDS (pH 6.8), 30% glycerol, 10% SDS, 6% 2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.012% bromphenol blue] was added to an aliquot of concentrated medium and boiled before loading samples onto an acrylamide gel. Protein samples were run on SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) by electrophoresis. Membranes were blocked with 5% Carnation milk (Nestle, Solon, OH) for 1 h at room temperature, then incubated with affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit anti-sFRP-4 antibody (1:1,000 in 5% milk) (42) also for 1 h at room temperature. Next, blots were washed in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.5% Tween 20 and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with antirabbit IgG peroxidase-linked antibody (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) diluted 1:10,000 in 5% milk. After washing blots in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.5% Tween 20, detection of immunoreactive protein was performed using SuperSignal chemiluminescent detection reagents (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL), and protein was visualized by autoradiography.

Granulosa cell cultures
Granulosa cells were isolated by needle puncture (37, 38) from intact immature rats (23–25 d of age) treated with estradiol (E; 1.5 mg 17ß-estradiol/0.2 ml propylene glycol; Sigma-Aldrich Corp.) once daily for 3 d to promote follicle growth. Granulosa cells were also isolated from immature rats treated with 10 IU PMSG (Professional Compounding Center of America) for 48 h to bring follicles to the preovulatory phenotype (43). E- and PMSG-primed granulosa cells were seeded at a density of 1 x 106 cells/well in a six-well plate. E-primed granulosa cells, which were seeded in serum-coated wells, were cultured overnight in serum-free medium (DMEM/F-12/penicillin/streptomycin), followed by the addition of FSH (50 ng/ml) and testosterone (T; 10 ng/ml) to promote granulosa cell differentiation, and forskolin (Fo; 10 µM) and/or phorbol 12-myristate 12-acetate (PMA; 20 µM) to stimulate acute agonist effects. PMSG-primed granulosa cells were cultured overnight in medium containing 5% FBS. On the next day, the medium was removed, and cells were washed with PBS and refed with serum-free medium containing the above hormones or agonists. Granulosa cells were harvested in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen/Life Technologies) at selected times after the addition of hormones or agonists for preparation of RNA as described above.

Statistics
ANOVA was performed to determine whether there was a significant difference between sample values within an experiment. To more clearly determine where those differences occurred, the Tukey test was performed, and t test confirmed the significance of the differences. P < 0.05 was considered significant. All P values are provided in the figure legends.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Hormone-regulated expression of sFRP-4 in wild-type mouse ovaries
We recently reported the expression of multiple components of the Wnt-Fz signaling pathway in the rodent ovary (18). sFRP-4 functions as a modulator of Wnt signals and has previously been shown to be expressed in the ovary (34, 44). To more closely examine the hormonal regulation of sFRP-4 expression in rodent ovaries, RT-PCR analyses were first performed using ovarian RNA isolated from PMSG/hCG-treated mice. Results revealed that sFRP-4 was expressed at low levels in immature and PMSG-treated mouse ovaries (Fig. 1Go). sFRP-4 mRNA levels increased significantly in response to stimulation with hCG between 2 and 4 h. After a decrease at 24 h, sFRP-4 message increased again at 48 h after hCG to levels observed between 4 and 16 h. The increased presence of sFRP-4 in ovaries containing corpora lutea 48 h after hCG is supported by elevated levels in d 15 pregnant mouse ovaries that contain highly functional corpora lutea.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. sFRP-4 expression is induced by hCG in mouse ovaries. Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis with representative autoradiographs shows an increase in sFRP-4 mRNA in mouse ovaries between 2 and 4 h after hCG stimulation (P < 0.05), a decrease between 16 and 24 h after hCG (P < 0.05), and an increase between 24 and 48 h after hCG (P < 0.05). sFRP-4 expression was also elevated in d 15 pregnant mouse ovaries (significant compared with all other samples). sFRP-4 expression levels were quantitated by phosphorimage analysis and normalized to L19 expression levels. Values are represented as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (i.e. three different sets of RNAs) with ovaries of three animals pooled at each time point. The d 15 pregnant mouse ovary sample is from one animal in each experiment. Statistical analyses were performed as described in Materials and Methods.

 
Localization of sFRP-4 transcripts to periovulatory follicles and to corpora lutea of mouse ovaries
Because the expression of sFRP-4 is strongly induced at times when transcript levels for Fz-1, Wnt-4, and Fz-4 are also elevated (18), in situ hybridization analyses were performed to localize sFRP-4 mRNA in mouse ovaries. sFRP-4 mRNA was low in both immature and PMSG-stimulated mouse ovaries (Fig. 2Go). Between 4 and 12 h after hCG stimulation, sFRP-4 expression was markedly elevated in granulosa cells of large follicles destined for ovulation. sFRP-4 mRNA levels were also elevated in corpora lutea formed 48 h after hCG and in corpora lutea of d 15 pregnant mouse ovaries.



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Transcripts for sFRP-4 localize to granulosa cells of periovulatory follicles and to corpora lutea of mouse ovaries. In situ hybridization analyses showed low sFRP-4 mRNA in immature and PMSG-stimulated ovaries [preovulatory follicles (PO)] and localized sFRP-4 mRNA to granulosa cells of large periovulatory follicles (Ov) after hCG stimulation. High expression levels were also observed in corpora lutea (CL) of hormone-primed and pregnant mouse ovaries. No specific signal above background was detected using a sense sFRP-4 probe (not shown).

 
sFRP-4 expression is not altered in ovaries of mice null for PR
The PR is induced by the LH surge and is obligatory for ovulation (4). We previously observed altered expression of Fz-1 in PRKO mouse ovaries compared with PR heterozygote mouse ovaries at the time of ovulation (18). As sFRP-4, like Fz-1, is highly expressed in granulosa cells of ovulatory follicles, RT-PCR was performed to determine whether sFRP-4 is also a downstream target of PR. Our results show that sFRP-4 is induced equally well by hCG in both PR heterozygote and PRKO mouse ovaries (Fig. 3Go), suggesting that sFRP-4 is not a PR-regulated gene in the ovary.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. The expression of sFRP-4 is not altered in the ovaries of PR-null mice. Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that sFRP-4 expression is induced equally well by hCG in PR heterozygote mouse ovaries ({square}) and PRKO mouse ovaries ({blacksquare}). No significant differences were observed between the PR heterozygote and PRKO mouse ovarian samples. RNA was prepared separately from ovaries of three individual PR heterozygote or PRKO mice after PMSG or PMSG/hCG treatment at each time interval, and the results were analyzed separately by RT-PCR. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of phosphorimage-quantitated sFRP-4 expression normalized to L19.

 
Expression of sFRP-4 in H rat ovaries
The expression of sFRP-4 was also analyzed by RT-PCR in granulosa cells and residual cells isolated from hormone-treated H rats. sFRP-4 was expressed at low levels in granulosa cells of H and HE rats (Fig. 4AGo). Expression increased after stimulation with FSH for 48 h and was highly induced in granulosa cells after 12 h hCG (HEF/hCG12 h). sFRP-4 mRNA levels were low in residual cells of H and HE rat ovaries. A small increase in expression was observed in residual tissue of HEF and HEF/hCG12 h rat ovaries, probably due to the presence of granulosa cells that were not easily isolated from small follicles by the puncture procedure. In contrast to the high expression observed in mouse ovaries stimulated for 48 h with hCG, sFRP-4 expression appeared to decline in HEF rat ovaries isolated after 24 and 48 h of hCG stimulation. This may be due to the absence of PRL signals that are normally received from the pituitary and are important for the maintenance of functional corpora lutea in rodents.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. sFRP-4 expression in H rat ovaries is hormone regulated. A, Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis with representative autoradiographs shows low sFRP-4 mRNA in intact immature rat ovaries (WO) and in granulosa cells (GC) of H and HE rats. sFRP-4 mRNA was induced in granulosa cells (GC) from HEF rat ovaries (P < 0.01, comparing values of HE with those of HEF) and HEF/hCG 12 h-stimulated rats (P < 0.01, comparing HEF with HEF/hCG 12 h). Low levels of sFRP-4 mRNA were observed in residual cells (RC). After 24 and 48 h of hCG, sFRP-4 expression in WO appeared low. For each hormone treatment group, RNAs were prepared from ovaries, granulosa cells, or residual cells pooled from 3–12 animals to obtain a sufficient amount of RNA and representative samples for analyses. RT-PCR was performed three times on the same pooled samples to ensure reproducibility of the results. Relative expression levels for sFRP-4 were normalized to those for L19, and data are presented as the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed as described in Materials and Methods. B, Semiquantitative RT-PCR revealed increased sFRP-4 expression in PRL-stimulated HEF/hCG rat ovaries () compared with levels in ovaries of HEF/hCG rats ({blacksquare}). The increase in sFRP-4 mRNA in response to PRL was significant (P < 0.05) between HEF/hCG 48 h and HEF/hCG+PRL 48 h, between HEF/hCG 72 h and HEF/hCG+PRL 72 h, and between HEF/hCG 96 h and HEF/hCG+PRL 96 h, as determined by t test. Each bar represents sFRP-4 expression in ovaries of individual hormone-treated animals (two animals for HEF/hCG+PRL 72 h). sFRP-4 expression levels were normalized to L19 expression levels and are shown as the mean induction ± SD of three repeated RT-PCRs for reproducibility of results.

 
To determine whether PRL regulated the expression of sFRP-4 in rat ovaries, RT-PCR analysis was performed using RNAs prepared from whole ovaries of HEF/hCG-stimulated rats that were additionally stimulated without or with PRL, as described in Materials and Methods. As observed in Fig. 4AGo, sFRP-4 expression levels appeared low after 48 h of hCG (Fig. 4BGo). However, sFRP-4 message increased in ovaries exposed to PRL (HEF/hCG+PRL 48 h). Similarly, sFRP-4 transcript levels were significantly induced in ovaries that had been stimulated with hCG+PRL for 72 and 96 h compared with those in ovaries stimulated with hCG alone. These results strongly suggest that PRL impacts sFRP-4 expression in corpora lutea of H rats.

Localization of sFRP-4 transcripts to corpora lutea of PRL-stimulated and pregnant rat ovaries
In situ hybridization analyses were performed to localize sFRP-4 mRNA in HEF/hCG with or without PRL rat ovaries and in pregnant rat ovaries. sFRP-4 mRNA was not easily detected above background levels in ovaries of rats stimulated with HEF/hCG for 48 and 72 h (data not shown) and for 96 h (Fig. 5Go). However, in ovaries of HEF/hCG-treated rats that had also been stimulated with PRL for 48 and 72 h (data not shown) and 96 h, the sFRP-4 message in corpora lutea was elevated, confirming the above RT-PCR data. As expected, sFRP-4 mRNA was also evident in corpora lutea of ovaries from normal rats after 14 d of pregnancy (Fig. 5Go) as well as after 7 and 20 d of pregnancy (data not shown).



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. sFRP-4 mRNA is elevated in corpora lutea of PRL-stimulated HEF/hCG rat ovaries and in pregnant rat ovaries. In situ hybridization analysis revealed increased expression of sFRP-4 transcripts in corpora lutea of HEF/hCG rat ovaries that had also been stimulated with PRL (lower left panels) compared with those that did not receive PRL (upper left panels). sFRP-4 transcripts were also elevated in corpora lutea of a d 14 pregnant rat ovary (upper right panel).

 
Regulated expression of sFRP-4 in cultured rat granulosa cells
To further examine hormone-induced expression of sFRP-4, two granulosa cell culture systems were analyzed. In the first system, granulosa cells were isolated from E-primed rats and cultured in serum-free medium with FSH/T to stimulate differentiation, followed by Fo/PMA to mimic conditions of the LH surge. RNA was extracted from these cells, and RT-PCR analyses revealed that sFRP-4 was expressed at low levels in granulosa cells cultured in medium alone, Fo/PMA, or FSH/T for 2 h (Fig. 6AGo). After 12 h of FSH/T, a 2.5-fold increase in sFRP-4 expression was observed over the control value, and sFRP-4 mRNA was further induced approximately 40- and 70-fold over control levels after 24 and 48 h of FSH/T, respectively, when cells had reached a more differentiated phenotype (Fig. 6AGo). The addition of Fo/PMA for 2 h after 48 h of FSH/T did not significantly increase sFRP-4 expression levels above those observed in granulosa cells after 48 h of FSH/T. Control unstimulated granulosa cells after 48 h in culture did not express detectable levels of sFRP-4 message.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Expression of sFRP-4 in cultured rat granulosa cells is dependent on hormone-induced differentiation of cells to a luteal-like phenotype. A, Regulation of sFRP-4 mRNA was examined by semiquantitative RT-PCR in cultured granulosa cells isolated from E-primed rats. sFRP-4 mRNA was low in control and agonist-treated (Fo/PMA) or hormone-treated (FSH/T) cells at 2 h and was most highly induced (~40- to 70-fold over control levels) in granulosa cells that had differentiated in the presence of FSH/T for 24 and 48 h (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). B, sFRP-4 message was also examined in granulosa cells isolated from ovaries of PMSG-stimulated rats that contain large preovulatory follicles. sFRP-4 mRNA was low in control and agonist-treated (Fo or Fo/PMA) or hormone-treated (FSH/T) cells at 2 h. sFRP-4 expression increased progressively over time with agonist or hormone treatment, and a 7- to 8-fold induction was observed after 12 h Fo or FSH/T (P < 0.05). Expression was most highly induced (~60-fold over control) after 48 h of FSH/T (P < 0.01), when granulosa cells acquired a more luteal-like phenotype. Further addition of Fo or Fo/PMA did not increase sFRP-4 transcript levels above those observed after 48 h of FSH/T. Data are represented as the mean induction ± SD of sFRP-4 mRNA compared with L19 internal controls from three repeated experiments.

 
In the second system, granulosa cells were isolated from rats stimulated with PMSG to promote follicle growth to the preovulatory phenotype. Granulosa cells were cultured overnight in serum-containing medium, then stimulated in serum-free medium. This system was also used to analyze the effects of FSH/T, Fo, and Fo/PMA on sFRP-4 expression. As in the E-primed model, sFRP-4 mRNA levels were low in unstimulated PMSG-primed granulosa cells and in cells treated with Fo alone, Fo/PMA, or FSH/T for 2 h (Fig. 6BGo). A 2- to 3-fold increase in sFRP-4 expression was observed after 4- and 8-h culture of cells in the presence of Fo alone or FSH/T, and further induction (7- to 8-fold) occurred after 12 h with Fo alone or FSH/T (Fig. 6BGo). After differentiation of cells in the presence of FSH/T for 48 h, sFRP-4 was induced approximately 60-fold over control unstimulated granulosa cell levels. Addition of Fo alone or Fo/PMA for another 2 h after 48 h of FSH/T did not further induce sFRP-4. That PMA had no effect on sFRP-4 expression in differentiated cells indicates that the acute effect of protein kinase C alone does not further impact differentiation. Taken together, these results indicate that the expression of sFRP-4 by granulosa cells is dependent on hormone-induced differentiation of granulosa cells to a luteal-like phenotype.

Expression and localization of sFRP-4 protein
To localize sFRP-4 protein in rat ovaries, immunohistochemistry was performed using an affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit anti-sFRP-4 antibody (42). Staining for sFRP-4 protein was evident in granulosa cells of antral follicles and in luteal cells of pregnant rat ovaries, whereas little staining above background was detected in granulosa cells of small follicles (Fig. 7AGo). Furthermore, the intense staining for sFRP-4 within the cytoplasm of luteal cells indicated that this secreted protein was localized to secretory vesicles.



View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. sFRP-4 protein localizes to granulosa cells of antral follicles and to luteal cells. A, Immunohistochemistry with an affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit anti-sFRP-4 antibody and diaminobenzidine detection was performed on whole ovarian sections from an H rat, HEF rats (HEF, HEF/hCG 8 h), and a d-22 pregnant rat. sFRP-4 protein was detected in granulosa cells (GC) of antral follicles and also in luteal cells (CL, corpora lutea), where it was clearly cytoplasmic (shown at higher magnification at the far right). B, Immunofluorescence was performed on cultured granulosa (GC) and luteinized granulosa cells (LGC) to localize the sFRP-4 protein in more detail. Granulosa cells cultured in DMEM/Ham’s F-12/1% FBS presented a low immunoreactive signal. Luteinized granulosa cells were cultured for 4 d in DMEM/Ham’s F-12/1% FBS to allow cells to attach, then for an additional 3 d with or without PRL. On d 7, the immunosignal for sFRP-4 was evident in punctate regions throughout the cytoplasm of luteinized granulosa cells stimulated without or with PRL (secretory vesicles). C, sFRP-4 protein was detected in cultured granulosa cells and at higher levels in luteinized granulosa cells by Western blot analysis. Granulosa and luteinized granulosa cells were cultured for 4 d in DMEM/Ham’s F-12/1% FBS (lanes 3 and 6), and additional cells were cultured for an additional 3 d in the presence (lanes 1 and 4) or absence (lanes 2 and 5) of PRL. D, Western blot analysis was performed on concentrated medium collected from cultured granulosa and luteinized granulosa cells. sFRP-4 protein was not detected in medium from granulosa cells cultured in the presence (lane 1) or absence (lane 2) of PRL. In contrast, a high level of sFRP-4 protein was present in concentrated medium from luteinized granulosa cells cultured in the presence (lane 3), but not in the absence (lane 4), of PRL.

 
To localize sFRP-4 in more detail, immunofluorescence was performed on cultured granulosa and luteinized granulosa cells. In nonluteinized granulosa cells, a low immunoreactive signal for sFRP-4 was observed (Fig. 7BGo, left). However, the immunosignal for sFRP-4 was clearly visible in luteinized granulosa cells as punctate regions throughout the cytoplasm, but not in the nucleus (Fig. 7BGo, middle and right). This pattern of staining within the cytoplasm is likely to be secretory vesicles containing the sFRP-4 protein. Western blot analysis was performed to confirm the presence of sFRP-4 protein in these cultured cells. sFRP-4 protein was detected in nonluteinized granulosa cells, but was much higher in luteinized granulosa cells (Fig. 7CGo). Interestingly, Western blot analysis of medium collected from these same cultures revealed the presence of sFRP-4 protein in the medium from luteinized granulosa cells, but not from nonluteinized granulosa cells that had also been stimulated with PRL (Fig. 7DGo). Thus, PRL appears to stimulate the secretion of sFRP-4 protein from luteinized granulosa cells.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The findings of these studies demonstrate the dependence of sFRP-4 expression on LH-induced terminal differentiation of granulosa cells and their maintenance by PRL. Furthermore, our results show that sFRP-4 transcripts localize in the ovary to sites of Fz-1, Wnt-4, and Fz-4 expression (18), suggesting that sFRP-4 may regulate signaling through these factors. That both sFRP-4 and Fz-1 are expressed in granulosa cells of large follicles suggests potential regulation by sFRP-4 of Fz-1 signals that may impact granulosa cell differentiation or expression of genes involved in follicle rupture and ovulation. Also, interactions among sFRP-4, Wnt-4, and Fz-4 in corpora lutea may be critical for the proper maintenance, function, and regression of this tissue. Earlier studies reported an association of sFRP-4 expression with apoptosis in the corpus luteum of the rat as well as in the mammary gland and ventral prostate (34, 44). However, our results suggest additional nonapoptotic-related functions for sFRP-4 in the rodent ovary. In these studies sFRP-4 appears highly expressed in nonatretic, healthy follicles and in functional corpora lutea.

A role for sFRP-4 in luteal cells is supported by the finding that its expression in these cells is regulated by the luteotropic hormone PRL. Stimulation of HEF/hCG rats additionally with PRL was effective in inducing and maintaining the expression of sFRP-4 transcripts in corpora lutea. Interestingly, the expression of sFRP-4 protein in luteinized granulosa cells cultured in the absence or presence of PRL is similar to the pattern observed previously for the expression of cholesterol side-chain cleavage cytochrome P450 (CYP11A). Once expression of CYP11A mRNA and protein as well as progesterone biosynthesis is induced by LH, CYP11A is constitutively expressed in luteinized granulosa cells in culture (35). PRL also regulated the secretion of sFRP-4 protein, as immunoreactive sFRP-4 was detected only in medium collected from luteinized granulosa cells cultured in the presence of PRL, but not in medium from cells cultured in the absence of PRL. Thus, PRL appears to stimulate not only the expression of sFRP-4 in corpora lutea in vivo, but also secretion of the protein from luteinized granulosa cells in culture. A potential role for Wnt/Fz regulation of steroidogenesis is indicated because Wnt-4 and Fz-4 are expressed in luteal cells, and gonads of female mice null for Wnt-4 (at birth) misexpress the steroidogenic enzymes 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and 17{alpha}-hydroxylase that participate in progesterone and androgen biosynthesis, respectively (11). It is tempting to speculate that sFRP-4 may modulate Wnt-4 signals, possibly through the Fz-4 receptor, to impact steroidogenesis in corpora lutea. In addition or alternatively, sFRP-4/Wnt-4/Fz-4 may regulate or be targets of specific kinases that are highly expressed in luteal cells (Sgk, components of the p38 MAPK pathway) (45, 46, 47) or of other signaling pathways, such as the prostaglandin F2{alpha} pathway that is involved in parturition (48).

Regulation of sFRP-4 expression by LH and PRL may be direct, via specific regulatory elements contained within the promoter region (from -202 to -144) found to be essential for efficient transcription of sFRP-4 (49). Using TFSEARCH version 1.3 software, Yam et al. (49) identified binding sites for Stat3, Lyf-1, and myeloid zinc finger protein 1 in the region -196 to -185, and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-ß, GATA-1, and cAMP response element-binding protein in the region -149 to -141. In the ovary, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-ß mRNA is induced, whereas cAMP response element-binding protein is rapidly phosphorylated and activated, in granulosa cells in response to an ovulatory dose of LH/hCG (50, 51, 52). These LH-responsive factors may confer the rapid LH-dependent induction of sFRP-4 expression. During luteinization of granulosa cells, induction of sFRP-4 mRNA becomes responsive to PRL. PRL activates the Janus kinase signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat) pathway that leads to phosphorylation of Stat proteins (Stat1, Stat3, and mainly Stat5) (53). Although both Stat3 and Stat5 are expressed in the ovary, Stat5b appears to be the principal target of PRL signals during luteinization (54). Stat3 is activated primarily in granulosa cells of small follicles by a cytokine pathway other than PRL (54). Thus, activated Stat5b may be binding directly to the putative Stat binding site in the sFRP-4 promoter and regulating sFRP-4 gene expression in the corpus luteum. The mechanism by which PRL regulates the secretion of sFRP-4 from luteal cells is not yet known.

Whether sFRP-4 functions as an antagonist or agonist of Wnt signals or performs some other novel function in the ovary is unclear. Although sFRPs have generally been described as antagonists of Wnt signals, recent studies provide evidence for positive regulation as well. During kidney development, Wnt-4 induces epithelial conversion of the metanephric mesenchyme (55). sFRP-1 blocks events associated with epithelial conversion (tubulogenesis and expression of lim-1, sFRP-2, and E-cadherin) in cultures of metanephroi, whereas concurrent treatment with sFRP-2 rescues some branching and tubular morphogenesis (33). Because sFRP-2 and Wnt-4 are coexpressed in newly formed epithelia, sFRP-2 may compete locally with sFRP-1 to promote Wnt-4 signaling (33). Recently, sFRP-1 has been observed in the mouse ovary (56). sFRP-4 and sFRP-1, then, may similarly compete or act together to modulate Wnt signals in the ovary. In another study, Üren et al. (32) reported biphasic regulation of wingless activity by sFRP-1, where low concentrations of sFRP-1 increased and high concentrations reduced armadillo (the Drosophila ortholog of ß-catenin) levels. Formation of sFRP homodimers or sFRP-Fz heterodimers may be important for this biphasic regulation. In vitro cotransfection of human FRP and the CRD domain of Hfz6 led to complex formation (31), and crystallographic data revealed the presence of a dimer interface in the crystals of both sFRP-3 and mFz8 CRDs (57), suggesting potential biological significance of CRD dimerization.

In addition to the N-terminal CRD domain, sFRPs have a C-terminal netrin-like (NTR) domain that is present in other proteins, including some complement proteins, type I procollagen C-proteinase enhancer proteins, and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) (58). The NTR modules of TIMPs and possibly also of procollagen C-proteinase enhancer proteins are involved in the inhibition of extracellular matrix metalloproteinases (58). Interestingly, TIMP-1 expression, like that of Fz-1, is up-regulated in periovulatory follicles by the LH surge, and the expression of TIMPs varies with luteal formation, maintenance, and regression (18, 59). However, the role of the NTR domains of sFRPs is not yet known. Based on homology to metalloproteinase inhibitors, it is tempting to speculate that sFRPs may also be involved in extracellular matrix remodeling. Thus, in addition to modulating Wnt signals during follicle growth, ovulation, and luteinization, sFRP-4 may be important for regulating matrix formation or tissue breakdown during ovulation, and subsequent remodeling and differentiation to the corpus luteum.

In summary, the results presented herein document that sFRP-4 mRNA expression and protein secretion are regulated by hormones LH and PRL in the rodent ovary. Its elevated expression in luteinized granulosa cells in vivo and in vitro suggests that it impacts a Wnt/Fz pathway in these cells, possibly Wnt-4/Fz-4, which is coordinately expressed in luteal cells. Whether sFRP-4 enhances or antagonizes Wnt/Fz signaling in this ovarian tissue is not yet known.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported in part by NIH Grants HD-16229 and SCCPRR-HD-07495 (to J.S.R.) and Molecular Endocrinology Training Grant DK-07696.

Abbreviations: CRD, Cysteine-rich domain; E, estradiol; FBS, fetal bovine serum; Fo, forskolin; Fz, Frizzled; H, hypophysectomized; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; HE, hypophysectomized and treated with 17ß-estradiol; HEF, hypophysectomized and treated with 17ß-estradiol and FSH; NTR, C-terminal netrin-like; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 12-acetate; PMSG, pregnant mare serum gonadotropin; PR, progesterone receptor; PRKO, progesterone receptor knockout; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; sFRP-4, secreted frizzled-related protein-4; Stat, signal transducer and activator of transcription; T, testosterone; TIMP, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase; WO, whole ovaries.

Received January 9, 2003.

Accepted for publication June 27, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Richards JS 1994 Hormonal control of gene expression in the ovary. Endocr Rev 15:725–751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Richards JS, Russell DL, Ochsner S, Hsieh M, Doyle KH, Falender AE, Lo YK, Sharma SC 2002 Novel signaling pathways that control ovarian follicular development, ovulation, and luteinization. Recent Prog Horm Res 57:195–220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Couse JF, Hewitt SC, Bunch DO, Sar M, Walker VR, Davis BJ, Korach KS 1999 Postnatal sex reversal of the ovaries in mice lacking estrogen receptors {alpha} and ß. Science 286:2328–2331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Funk CR, Mani SK, Hughes AR, Montgomery CA, Shyamala G, Conneely OM, O’Malley BW 1995 Mice lacking progesterone receptor exhibit pleiotropic reproductive abnormalities. Genes Dev 9:2266–2278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Elvin JA, Yan C, Wang P, Nishimori K, Matzuk MM 1999 Molecular characterization of the follicle defects in the growth differentiation factor 9-deficient ovary. Mol Endocrinol 13:1018–1034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Yan C, Wang P, DeMayo J, DeMayo FJ, Elvin JA, Carino C, Prasad SV, Skinner SS, Dunbar BS, Dube JL, Celeste AJ, Matzuk MM 2001 Synergistic roles of bone morphogenetic protein 15 and growth differentiation factor 9 in ovarian function. Mol Endocrinol 15:854–866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Behringer RR, Cate RL, Froelick GJ, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL 1990 Abnormal sexual development in transgenic mice chronically expressing Mullerian inhibiting substance. Nature 345:167–170[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Durlinger AL, Kramer P, Karels B, de Jong FH, Uilenbroek JT, Grootegoed JA, Themmen AP 1999 Control of primordial follicle recruitment by anti-Mullerian hormone in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology 140:5789–5796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. McGee EA, Smith R, Spears N, Nachtigal MW, Ingraham H, Hsueh AJ 2001 Mullerian inhibitory substance induces growth of rat preantral ovarian follicles. Biol Reprod 64:293–298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Shimasaki S, Zachow RJ, Li D, Kim H, Iemura S, Ueno N, Sampath K, Chang RJ, Erickson GF 1999 A functional bone morphogenetic protein system in the ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7282–7287[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Vainio S, Heikkila M, Kispert A, Chin N, McMahon AP 1999 Female development in mammals is regulated by Wnt-4 signalling. Nature 397:405–409[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Jordan BK, Mohammed M, Ching ST, Delot E, Chen XN, Dewing P, Swain A, Rao PN, Elejalde BR, Vilain E 2001 Up-regulation of WNT-4 signaling and dosage-sensitive sex reversal in humans. Am J Hum Genet 68:1102–1109[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Fitzpatrick SL, Richards JS 1994 Identification of a cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate-response element in the rat aromatase promoter that is required for transcriptional activation in rat granulosa cells and R2C Leydig cells. Mol Endocrinol 8:1309–1319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Clemens JW, Lala DS, Parker KL, Richards JS 1994 Steroidogenic factor-1 binding and transcriptional activity of the cholesterol side-chain cleavage promoter in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 134:1499–1508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Shen WH, Moore CC, Ikeda Y, Parker KL, Ingraham HA 1994 Nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1 regulates the Mullerian inhibiting substance gene: a link to the sex determination cascade. Cell 77:651–661[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Heckert LL 2001 Activation of the rat follicle-stimulating hormone receptor promoter by steroidogenic factor 1 is blocked by protein kinase a and requires upstream stimulatory factor binding to a proximal e box element. Mol Endocrinol 15:704–715[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Levallet J, Koskimies P, Rahman N, Huhtaniemi I 2001 The promoter of murine follicle-stimulating hormone receptor: functional characterization and regulation by transcription factor steroidogenic factor 1. Mol Endocrinol 15:80–92[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hsieh M, Johnson MA, Greenberg NM, Richards JS 2002 Regulated expression of Wnts and Frizzleds at specific stages of follicular development in the rodent ovary. Endocrinology 143:898–908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ricken A, Lochhead P, Kontogiannea M, Farookhi R 2002 Wnt signaling in the ovary: identification and compartmentalized expression of wnt-2, wnt-2b, and frizzled-4 mRNAs. Endocrinology 143:2741–2749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Cadigan KM, Nusse R 1997 Wnt signaling: a common theme in animal development. Genes Dev 11:3286–3305[Free Full Text]
  21. Miller JR, Hocking AM, Brown JD, Moon RT 1999 Mechanism and function of signal transduction by the Wnt/ß-catenin and Wnt/Ca2+ pathways. Oncogene 18:7860–7872[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Pandur P, Kuhl M 2001 An arrow for wingless to take-off. Bioessays 23: 207–210
  23. Mao J, Wang J, Liu B, Pan W, Farr 3rd GH, Flynn C, Yuan H, Takada S, Kimelman D, Li L, Wu D 2001 Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-5 binds to Axin and regulates the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Mol Cell 7:801–809[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Weston CR, Davis RJ 2002 The JNK signal transduction pathway. Curr Opin Genet Dev 12:14–21[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Yamanaka H, Moriguchi T, Masuyama N, Kusakabe M, Hanafusa H, Takada R, Takada S, Nishida E 2002 JNK functions in the non-canonical Wnt pathway to regulate convergent extension movements in vertebrates. EMBO Rep 3:69–75[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Lisovsky M, Itoh K, Sokol SY 2002 Frizzled receptors activate a novel JNK-dependent pathway that may lead to apoptosis. Curr Biol 12:53–58[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Kuhl M, Sheldahl LC, Park M, Miller JR, Moon RT 2000 The Wnt/Ca2+ pathway: a new vertebrate Wnt signaling pathway takes shape. Trends Genet 16:279–283[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Ahumada A, Slusarski DC, Liu X, Moon RT, Malbon CC, Wang HY 2002 Signaling of rat Frizzled-2 through phosphodiesterase and cyclic GMP. Science 298:2006–2010[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Rattner A, Hsieh JC, Smallwood PM, Gilbert DJ, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Nathans J 1997 A family of secreted proteins contains homology to the cysteine-rich ligand-binding domain of frizzled receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2859–2863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Jones SE, Jomary C 2002 Secreted Frizzled-related proteins: searching for relationships and patterns. Bioessays 24:811–820[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Bafico A, Gazit A, Pramila T, Finch PW, Yaniv A, Aaronson SA 1999 Interaction of frizzled related protein (FRP) with Wnt ligands and the frizzled receptor suggests alternative mechanisms for FRP inhibition of Wnt signaling. J Biol Chem 274:16180–16187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Üren A, Reichsman F, Anest V, Taylor WG, Muraiso K, Bottaro DP, Cumberledge S, Rubin JS 2000 Secreted frizzled-related protein-1 binds directly to Wingless and is a biphasic modulator of Wnt signaling. J Biol Chem 275:4374–4382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Yoshino K, Rubin JS, Higinbotham KG, Uren A, Anest V, Plisov SY, Perantoni AO 2001 Secreted Frizzled-related proteins can regulate metanephric development. Mech Dev 102:45–55[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Wolf V, Ke G, Dharmarajan AM, Bielke W, Artuso L, Saurer S, Friis R 1997 DDC-4, an apoptosis-associated gene, is a secreted frizzled relative. FEBS Lett 417:385–389[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Oonk RB, Krasnow JS, Beattie WG, Richards JS 1989 Cyclic AMP-dependent and -independent regulation of cholesterol side chain cleavage cytochrome P-450 (P-450scc) in rat ovarian granulosa cells and corpora lutea. cDNA and deduced amino acid sequence of rat P-450scc. J Biol Chem 264:21934–21942[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Robker RL, Russell DL, Espey LL, Lydon JP, O’Malley BW, Richards JS 2000 Progesterone-regulated genes in the ovulation process: ADAMTS-1 and cathepsin L proteases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4689–4694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Zeleznik AJ, Midgley Jr AR, Reichert Jr LE 1974 Granulosa cell maturation in the rat: increased binding of human chorionic gonadotropin following treatment with follicle-stimulating hormone in vivo. Endocrinology 95:818–825[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Fitzpatrick SL, Richards JS 1991 Regulation of cytochrome P450 aromatase messenger ribonucleic acid and activity by steroids and gonadotropins in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 129:1452–1462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Park OK, Mayo KE 1991 Transient expression of progesterone receptor messenger RNA in ovarian granulosa cells after the preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge. Mol Endocrinol 5:967–978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Wilkensen DG 1993 In situ hybridization. In: Stern CD, Holland PWH, eds. Essential developmental biology: a practical approach. New York: Oxford University Press; 258–263
  41. Robker RL, Richards JS 1998 Hormone-induced proliferation and differentiation of granulosa cells: a coordinated balance of the cell cycle regulators cyclin D2 and p27Kip1. Mol Endocrinol 12:924–940[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Lacher M, Siegenthaler A, Jager R, Yan X, Hett S, Xuan L, Saurer S, Lareu R, Dharmarajan A, Friis R 2003 Role of DDC-4/sFRP-4, a secreted Frizzled-related Protein, in the onset of apoptosis in mammary involution. Cell Death Differ 10:528–538[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Park-Sarge OK, Sarge KD 1995 Cis-regulatory elements conferring cyclic 3',5'-adenosine monophosphate responsiveness of the progesterone receptor gene in transfected rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 136:5430–5437[Abstract]
  44. Guo K, Wolf V, Dharmarajan AM, Feng Z, Bielke W, Saurer S, Friis R 1998 Apoptosis-associated gene expression in the corpus luteum of the rat. Biol Reprod 58:739–746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Alliston TN, Gonzalez-Robayna IJ, Buse P, Firestone GL, Richards JS 2000 Expression and localization of serum/glucocorticoid-induced kinase in the rat ovary: relation to follicular growth and differentiation. Endocrinology 141:385–395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Gonzalez-Robayna IJ, Falender AE, Ochsner S, Firestone GL, Richards JS 2000 Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulates phosphorylation and activation of protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) and serum and glucocorticoid-induced kinase (Sgk): evidence for A kinase-independent signaling by FSH in granulosa cells. Mol Endocrinol 14:1283–1300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Maizels ET, Mukherjee A, Sithanandam G, Peters CA, Cottom J, Mayo KE, Hunzicker-Dunn M 2001 Developmental regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated kinases-2 and -3 (MAPKAPK-2/-3) in vivo during corpus luteum formation in the rat. Mol Endocrinol 15:716–733[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Sugimoto Y, Yamasaki A, Segi E, Tsuboi K, Aze Y, Nishimura T, Oida H, Yoshida N, Tanaka T, Katsuyama M, Hasumoto K, Murata T, Hirata M, Ushikubi F, Negishi M, Ichikawa A, Narumiya S 1997 Failure of parturition in mice lacking the prostaglandin F receptor. Science 277:681–683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Yam JW, Chan KW, Wong VK, Hsiao WL 2001 Transcriptional activity of the promoter region of rat frizzled-related protein gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 286:94–100[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Sirois J, Richards JS 1993 Transcriptional regulation of the rat prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2 gene in granulosa cells. Evidence for the role of a cis-acting C/EBPß promoter element. J Biol Chem 268:21931–21938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Sterneck E, Tessarollo L, Johnson PF 1997 An essential role for C/EBPß in female reproduction. Genes Dev 11:2153–2162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Mukherjee A, Park-Sarge OK, Mayo KE 1996 Gonadotropins induce rapid phosphorylation of the 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein in ovarian granulosa cells. Endocrinology 137:3234–3245[Abstract]
  53. Bole-Feysot C, Goffin V, Edery M, Binart N, Kelly PA 1998 Prolactin (PRL) and its receptor: actions, signal transduction pathways and phenotypes observed in PRL receptor knockout mice. Endocr Rev 19:225–268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Russell DL, Richards JS 1999 Differentiation-dependent prolactin responsiveness and stat (signal transducers and activators of transcription) signaling in rat ovarian cells. Mol Endocrinol 13:2049–2064[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Kispert A, Vainio S, McMahon AP 1998 Wnt-4 is a mesenchymal signal for epithelial transformation of metanephric mesenchyme in the developing kidney. Development 125:4225–4234[Abstract]
  56. Dufourcq P, Couffinhal T, Ezan J, Barandon L, Moreau C, Daret D, Duplaa C 2002 FrzA, a secreted frizzled related protein, induced angiogenic response. Circulation 106:3097–3103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Dann CE, Hsieh JC, Rattner A, Sharma D, Nathans J, Leahy DJ 2001 Insights into Wnt binding and signalling from the structures of two Frizzled cysteine-rich domains. Nature 412:86–90[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Banyai L, Patthy L 1999 The NTR module: domains of netrins, secreted frizzled related proteins, and type I procollagen C-proteinase enhancer protein are homologous with tissue inhibitors of metalloproteases. Protein Sci 8:1636–1642[Medline]
  59. Curry Jr TE, Osteen KG 2001 Cyclic changes in the matrix metalloproteinase system in the ovary and uterus. Biol Reprod 64:1285–1296[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G.-C. Wu and C.-F. Chang
wnt4 Is Associated with the Development of Ovarian Tissue in the Protandrous Black Porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegeli
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2009; 81(6): 1073 - 1082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. A. Edson, A. K. Nagaraja, and M. M. Matzuk
The Mammalian Ovary from Genesis to Revelation
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2009; 30(6): 624 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Bachelot, J. Beaufaron, N. Servel, C. Kedzia, P. Monget, P. A. Kelly, G. Gibori, and N. Binart
Prolactin independent rescue of mouse corpus luteum life span: identification of prolactin and luteinizing hormone target genes
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2009; 297(3): E676 - E684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Liu, E.-S. Park, and M. Jo
Runt-Related Transcription Factor 1 Regulates Luteinized Hormone-Induced Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthase 2 Expression in Rat Periovulatory Granulosa Cells
Endocrinology, July 1, 2009; 150(7): 3291 - 3300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. M. Wayne, H.-Y. Fan, X. Cheng, and J. S. Richards
Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Induces Multiple Signaling Cascades: Evidence that Activation of Rous Sarcoma Oncogene, RAS, and the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Are Critical for Granulosa Cell Differentiation
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2007; 21(8): 1940 - 1957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. R. A. Sherwin, A. M. Sharkey, P. Cameo, P. M. Mavrogianis, R. D. Catalano, S. Edassery, and A. T. Fazleabas
Identification of Novel Genes Regulated by Chorionic Gonadotropin in Baboon Endometrium during the Window of Implantation
Endocrinology, February 1, 2007; 148(2): 618 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. P. Hewitt, P. J. Mark, A. M. Dharmarajan, and B. J. Waddell
Placental Expression of Secreted Frizzled Related Protein-4 in the Rat and the Impact of Glucocorticoid-Induced Fetal and Placental Growth Restriction
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2006; 75(1): 75 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
I. Hernandez-Gonzalez, I. Gonzalez-Robayna, M. Shimada, C. M. Wayne, S. A. Ochsner, L. White, and J. S. Richards
Gene Expression Profiles of Cumulus Cell Oocyte Complexes during Ovulation Reveal Cumulus Cells Express Neuronal and Immune-Related Genes: Does this Expand Their Role in the Ovulation Process?
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 20(6): 1300 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. A. Pangas, X. Li, E. J. Robertson, and M. M. Matzuk
Premature Luteinization and Cumulus Cell Defects in Ovarian-Specific Smad4 Knockout Mice
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 20(6): 1406 - 1422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. Boerboom, L. D. White, S. Dalle, J. Courty, and J. S. Richards
Dominant-Stable {beta}-Catenin Expression Causes Cell Fate Alterations and Wnt Signaling Antagonist Expression in a Murine Granulosa Cell Tumor Model
Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 66(4): 1964 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Hsieh, D. Boerboom, M. Shimada, Y. Lo, A. F. Parlow, U. F.O. Luhmann, W. Berger, and J. S. Richards
Mice Null for Frizzled4 (Fzd4-/-) Are Infertile and Exhibit Impaired Corpora Lutea Formation and Function
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2005; 73(6): 1135 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. Boerboom, M. Paquet, M. Hsieh, J. Liu, S. P. Jamin, R. R. Behringer, J. Sirois, M. M. Taketo, and J. S. Richards
Misregulated Wnt/{beta}-Catenin Signaling Leads to Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumor Development
Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9206 - 9215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. S. McRae, H. M. Johnston, M. Mihm, and P. J. O'Shaughnessy
Changes in Mouse Granulosa Cell Gene Expression during Early Luteinization
Endocrinology, January 1, 2005; 146(1): 309 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
E. Jansen, J. S. E. Laven, H. B. R. Dommerholt, J. Polman, C. van Rijt, C. van den Hurk, J. Westland, S. Mosselman, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
Abnormal Gene Expression Profiles in Human Ovaries from Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2004; 18(12): 3050 - 3063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Jo and T. E. Curry Jr
Regulation of Matrix Metalloproteinase-19 Messenger RNA Expression in the Rat Ovary
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2004; 71(6): 1796 - 1806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hsieh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hsieh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*Protein
*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN
*ESTRADIOL


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals