| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gene Expression through Conserved Hormone Response Elements
Gene Regulation Section, Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Christina T. Teng, 111 Alexander Drive, P.O. Box 12233, MD E201, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709. E-mail: Teng{at}niehs.nih.gov.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gene encodes a nuclear receptor protein, ERR
, whose structure is closely related to the estrogen receptors. ERR
modulates estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated signaling pathways both positively and negatively. It is selectively expressed in a variety of cell types during development and in adult tissues. We have previously shown that estrogen stimulates the expression of the ERR
gene in mouse uterus. In this study, we found that the ERR
gene is stimulated by estrogen in mouse uterus and heart but not in liver. Estrogen also stimulates the expression of ERR
in the human breast and endometrial cell lines. The human ERR
gene promoter contains multiple Sp1 binding sites, and the Sp1 protein is required for the promoter activity. The major estrogen response is mediated by a 34-bp DNA element that contains multiple steroid hormone response element half-sites (MHREs) that are conserved between the human and mouse ERR
gene promoters. Mutations made at a single or multiple sites of the MHREs abolished the ER-mediated transcription of the element in transient transfection experiments. By chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we demonstrated the interaction between ER
and MHREs of the endogenous ERR
gene promoter in MCF-7 cells. Estrogen treatment further enhanced the association of ER
and MHREs in vivo. The present study demonstrated that the ERR
gene is a downstream target of ER
. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and the recently discovered ERß subtype (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). ERs are structurally organized into functional domains consisting of a highly conserved DNA binding domain flanked by an activation domain 1 (AF1) in the N-terminal region and a ligand-binding domain and activation domain 2 (AF2) in the C-terminal region (7, 14). The function of AF1 is not well understood (15); however, the AF2 function has been extensively studied (10, 16, 17). Upon ligand binding, ERs transactivate the target gene by binding to a short DNA sequence termed an estrogen response element (ERE) that is composed of two AGGTCA motifs arranged in a palindrome structure separated by three base pairs (review) (18). In concert with other transcription factors and coactivators or corepressors, the ERs regulate the target gene activity in a ligand-, cell type-, response element-, and promoter context-specific manner (10, 11, 12, 13, 19, 20).
The estrogen-related receptor (ERR) subfamily contains three closely related members (
, ß, and
) (21, 22). The genes for ERR
and ß were identified during a search for genes related to the ER
(22). ERRs display significant homology to the ER
at the DNA binding domain (68% similarity of amino acids) and less homology with either N- or C-terminal regions. ERR
was first discovered to bind the extended hormone response element half-site, TCAAGGTCATC of the human lactoferrin gene (23) that is also the steroid factor 1 (SF1) binding element (24, 25), and later it was found to bind a variety of EREs as monomer or homodimer (23, 26, 27, 28, 29). In the absence of exogenous ligand, ERR
has been shown to interact with some of the same coactivators that interact with ER
(27, 28, 30, 31). Based on the nature of ERR
binding and the interaction with coactivators, it has the potential to regulate genes that are the target for either SF1 or liganded ER
. Recently, it was shown that ERR
activity can be inhibited upon binding to the organochlorine pesticides such as toxaphene and chlordane (32) and diethylstilbestrol (DES) at high concentrations (10100 µM concentration level) (33). These observations offer additional layers of regulatory complexity for ERR
to modulate the estrogen signaling pathway (34).
Other than modulation of ER-mediated transcriptional activity, ERR
plays an active role in bone morphogenesis such as regulation of the osteopontin gene, bone resorption, and osteoprogenitor cell proliferation and differentiation (35, 36). ERR
regulates the transcriptional activity of human lactoferrin gene (23, 28), human medium-chain acyl coenzyme A dehydrogenase gene (37, 38, 39), thyroid receptor
gene (40), aromatase gene (41), osteopontin gene (42), and small heterodimer partner orphan nuclear receptor (43). These findings imply that ERR
modulates activities of a number of genes and consequently, different biological functions.
ERR
is expressed early in the embryo and in selected fetal and adult tissues (44, 45, 46, 47). However, regulation of its expression in various tissues and during development is largely unexplored. Because ERR
functions as constitutive activator in the cell (27, 28, 30), its regulated expression could be a preliminary step in the regulation of its function. Our laboratory has previously shown that estrogen stimulates ERR
expression in the mouse uterus (47). In this report, we demonstrated that the expression of ERR
gene in the mouse uterus and heart is stimulated by estrogen. Furthermore, we established the estrogen responsiveness of the endogenous ERR
gene in human uterine and mammary gland cell lines. We characterized the multiple hormone response element half-sites (MHREs) of the ERR
responsible for estrogen-stimulated activity in both human cell lines and mouse tissues. By chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay, we showed that ER
indeed interacts with the MHREs of the ERR
gene in vivo and the exposure to estradiol-17ß (E2) enhances their interaction. Regulation of ERR
expression by ER
provides a foundation for understanding how ERR
modulates the estrogen response.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids and oligos
Full-length ERß cDNA in pcDNA3 expression vector was a gift from K. Korach (Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology, NIEHS). ER
expression vector (pSG-HEGO) was a gift from P. Chambon (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Strasbourg, France) and the pPacSp1 was from R. Tjian (University of California Berkeley). The 0.8-kb ERR
promoter (-811/+12) was amplified by PCR with the 1.3-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter (46) as the template and the forward primer 5'-CGGGTACCCGTGGAATTTGAGTCCTA-3' (-811/-794) containing the KpnI site (underlined) and the reverse primer with the NheI site (underlined) 5'-GCGCTAGCCCTACTCCGCTTCCTCCAGC-3' (-8/+12). The PCR product was cloned into CAT-B (basic 3) reporter at the KpnI/NheI sites as the 0.8-CAT. The 0.6-CAT (-593/+12) was constructed with an identical template and the reverse primer of the 0.8-CAT and a different forward primer, 5'-CGGGTACCTATTGCATGTTTTAAGTCGGC-3' (-593/-573) containing the KpnI site (underlined). Sequence of the human ERR
multihormone response element half-sites (MHREs, -712/-649) consists of a 23-bp nucleotides (A, 5'-GTGACCTTCATTCGGTCACCGCA-3') twice and a shorter 11-bp (B, 5'-GTGACCTTGAG-3') once (A,A,B). The mouse ERR
MHREs is identical with the human sequence except the A region appears only once (A, B). The wild-type and mutant oligos containing the A and B regions and its complementary strand were synthesized (Sigma Genosys, The Woodlands, TX). The top strand contains NheI site, whereas the bottom strand has the XhoI site. To make the double-stranded oligos, we first placed an equal amount of the complementary oligos in TE [10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0)] buffer, left in boiling water for 10 min and then slowly cooled to room temperature. The double-stranded oligos were then cloned into the simian virus 40 (SV40)-CAT reporter at the NheI/XhoI sites. The reporters are: A,A,B-CAT (wild-type human MHERs); A,B-CAT (wild-type mouse MHERs); A-CAT (B sequence deleted); Am1,B-CAT (the 5' CC in A was mutated into AA); Am2,B-CAT (the GG in A was mutated into AA); A,Bm-CAT (the CC in B was mutated into AA); Am1,m2,Bm-CAT (contains the above three mutations). The sequences of all constructs were verified by automated sequencing (NIEHS, sequencing core laboratory).
Oligo primers used in standard RT-PCR to detect mRNAs are as follows: the forward primer (exon 6) 5'-AGATGTCAGTACTGCAGAGCGT-3' and reverse primer (exon 7) 5'-GCTTCATACTCCAGCAGG-3' to detect the level of ERR
mRNA. The primer pairs for human ß-actin are as follows: the forward primer (exon 5) 5'-GACAGGATGCAGAAGGAGATCAC-3' and the reverse primer (exon 6) 5'-GCTGATCCACATCTGCTGGAA-3', which encodes a 144-bp product. The primer pairs for ER
are as follows: the forward primer (exon 1) 5'-TGCCCTACTACCTGGAGAACGA-3' and the reverse primer (exon 2) 5'-GCCATACTTCCCTTGTCATTGG-3', which encodes a 142-bp product. The primer pairs for ERß are as follows: the forward primer (exon 1) 5'-GGTGTGAAGCAAGATCGCTAGA-3' and reverse primer (exon 2) 5'-GTGAGCATCCCTCTTTGAACCT-3', which encodes a 122 bp product.
Oligo primers used in real-time PCR and the amplicon size are as follows: human ERR
forward primer 5'-GGCCCTTGCCAATTCAGA-3' (exon 6) and the reverse primer 5'-GGCCTCGTGCAGAGCTTCT-3' (exon 7) with a 79-bp amplicon; mouse ERR
forward primer 5'-TTCGGCGACTGCAAGCTC-3' (exon 6) and reverse primer 5'-CACAGCCTCAGCATCTTCAATG-3' (exon 7) with a 107-bp amplicon; mouse lactoferrin forward primer 5'-GAGATGTGGCTTTTACCAGAGGA-3' (exon 6) and reverse primer 5'-CTGGGCAGAGCAGCTTGTACT-3' (exon 7) with a 87-bp amplicon; human ß-actin primer pair has been described above; mouse ß-actin forward primer 5'-GACAGGATGCAGAAGGAGATTAC-3' (exon 5) and reverse primer identical with human ß-actin reverse primer (exon 6) with a 144-bp amplicon; mouse mitochondrial ribosomal protein L32 (MRPL32) forward primer 5'-AGAGGTGCTGGGAGCTGCTA-3' and reverse primer 5'-GATGGATGGTCTCTGGACGG-3' with a 101-bp amplicon.
Oligo primers used in ChIP to detect the human ERR
MHREs region by PCR are as follows: the forward primer 5'-GTCAGTGCAGGACAGCCCGCGAG-3' (-758 /-734) and the reverse primer 5'-GATAGGGCCCGGACGGAGAAAGC-3' (-649/-627).
Cell culture and transient transfection
Human endometrial carcinoma (HEC)-1B [American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA) no. HTB-113] was maintained in 90% Eagles MEM (E-MEM) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 C. MCF-7 (ATCC no. HTB-22) was cultured in 90% E-MEM, 10% FBS, and 10 µg/ml bovine insulin. Schneiders Drosophila line 2 (SL2, ATCC, CRL-1963) was maintained in 90% Schneiders Drosophila medium and 10% FBS. Cells were transferred into phenol red-free medium containing 10% dextran-coated charcoal-stripped FBS (CS-FBS) for at least 24 h before transfection and 7 d before real-time PCR and ChIP assay studies. The amount of DES, E2 and ICI 182,780 (Astra Zeneca, Wilmington, DE) is indicated for each experiment. The transient transfection experiments in HEC-1B cells and SL2 insect cells were performed with QIAGEN effectene transfection system (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). A DNA mixture consisting of 300 ng of reporter plasmids, 100 ng of internal control, 50 ng of expression vector (ER
or ERß), or empty vector and carrier DNA (to make the final DNA concentration of 500 ng/well in a six-well plate) was transfected into HEC-1B cells whereas total 750 ng/well of DNA consists of 650 ng reporter, 100 ng pPacSp1, or empty vector was transfected into SL2 cells. Twenty-four hours after transfection of HEC-1B cells, 10 nM DES was added for another 24 h. CAT reporter activities were measured and normalized with the ß-galactosidase (PCH110) activities as previously described (23). To measure the effect of ER
and ERß on the endogenous ERR
expression, 2 µg of either ER
or ERß expression vectors were transfected into HEC-1B cells. The transfected cells were either treated with 10 nM of DES or vehicle for 24 h. The total RNA was extracted from the cells according to the protocol of RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN). RT-PCR was performed according to the instruction of Titan One Tube RT-PCR system (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN) with 200 ng of total RNA from each sample. We performed 25 cycles of PCR at 94 for 45 sec, 58 for 45 sec and 68 for 45 sec to ensure that the PCR is not oversaturated.
Real-time PCR
The total RNA extracted from MCF-7 cells and the mouse tissues were copied into cDNA in a final volume of 20 µl containing 1x PCR buffer II, 5.5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM deoxy-NTP, 8 U of ribonuclease inhibitor, 2.5 µM random hexamers, 25 U of murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, and 1 µg total RNA according to the instructions of Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). PCR primers were designed with the Primer Express software package that accompanies the Applied Biosystems Model 7700 sequence detector (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Foster City, CA). We performed basic local alignment and search tool searches to confirm the gene specificity of the nucleotide sequences chosen as primers. To avoid amplification of contaminating genomic DNA, one of the two primers was placed at the junction between two exons or in a different exon. Primer sets were further analyzed by PCR for a single band on agarose gel. All PCRs were carried out using an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in 50 µl reaction mixture containing 150 ng (for ERR
and lactoferrin) or 50 ng (for ß-actin or MRPL32) cDNA template, 2.9 mM MgCl2, 1x SYBR-green buffer, 1 mM each deoxy-NTP, 0.2 µM of each forward and reverse primer, and 1.25 U Amplitaq Gold (Applied Biosystems). The PCR conditions were set up as follows: after incubation at 50 C for 2 min and denaturing at 95 C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95 C for 30 sec, 60 C for 1 min. Quantitation was accomplished by measuring the incorporation of the fluorescent dye SYBR-green. All PCRs were performed in duplicate, and the results were averaged. The averaged threshold cycle (CT) values of the real-time PCR were used in subsequent calculations. To quantify transcripts of the genes precisely, we monitored ß-actin gene expression (for MCF-7 samples) or MRPL32 (for mouse tissue samples) transcripts as the internal quantitative control. Each sample was normalized by quantitating against its ß-actin or MRPL32 transcript contents. The relative difference between E2 or DES induction was determined using the 
CT method as outlined in the Applied Biosystems protocol and the results are presented as fold increases.
Western blotting
The ER
or ERß transfected HEC-1B cells were treated with 10 nM DES or vehicle as described above. Nuclear protein was extracted according to the protocol of TransFactor Extraction Kit (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). Protein concentration was determined (Pierce, Madison, WI; bicinchoninic acid method) and the total of 30 µg protein was resolved by 12% NuPAGE gel. After electrophoresis, the proteins were blotted onto PVDF membrane (NOVEX, San Diego, CA). Western blotting was carried out by specific antibody to ER
(ER AB-10, NEOMarkers, Fremont, CA) or ERß (CO1531, mouse monoclonal antibody, a gift from Dr. G. K. Greene, University of Chicago) and ECL detection system (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). Blots were stripped according to the instructions of NOVEX and reprobed with specific antibody to ß-actin (mouse monoclonal antibody, SIGMARBI) as control.
ChIP
The ChIP was performed according to the instructions of ChIP Assay Kit (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) with slight modifications. MCF-7 cells that express endogenous ER
were grown in phenol red-free E-MEM supplemented with 10% CS-FBS and 10 µg/ml of insulin for 7 d. E2 (100 nM) or vehicle was added to the cells for 45 min followed by cross-linking the protein and DNA with 1% formaldehyde at 4 C overnight. The cells were washed with ice-cold PBS twice and permeablized in sodium dodecyl sulfate lysis buffer containing the protease inhibitor cocktail (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml aprotinin and 1 µg/ml pepstatin A). Chromatin was sheared by sonication until the average length of DNA was 200 and 1000 bp as evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis. The sheared chromatin was diluted in ChIP dilution buffer of the ChIP assay kit. An aliquot of the chromatin solution was reserved as an input control for the PCR. Eight microliters of specific ER
(ER Ab-10) or Ets-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) antibody (200 µg/ml) was added to the chromatin solution and incubated overnight at 4 C on a rotator. At the end of incubation, 60 µl of salmon sperm DNA/protein A agarose slurry was added, incubated for 1 h at 4 C with continuous rotation and the antibody/DNA complex on the agarose beads was collected by centrifugation. The beads were washed in the order of low salt immune complex buffer, high salt immune complex buffer, LiCl immune complex buffer, and the TE buffer provided by the supplier. The beads were suspended in elution buffer (1% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 0.1 M NaHCO3) and the precipitated protein/DNA complexes were eluted from the antibodies/beads. The resulting protein/DNA complexes were subjected to cross-link reversal in 5 M NaCl at 65 C for 4 h followed by the addition of 0.5 M EDTA, 1 M Tris-HCl, and 10 µg/ml proteinase K (Pierce) at 45 C for 1 h. DNA was purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The PCR condition was: 94 C for 30 sec, 55 C for 30 sec, and 72 C for 30 sec for 30 cycles.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
expression in vivo
gene in mouse uterus (47). To validate the earlier observation and to investigate whether the transcription of ERR
is also up-regulated in other estrogen target tissues such as liver and heart, we treated the 21-d-old immature mouse with one or three doses of DES at 300 µg/kg every 24 h. Total RNAs prepared from the uterus, liver, and heart of six mice were first reverse transcribed and then subjected to real-time PCR for quantitation of the mRNA (Fig. 1
mRNA (lanes 13) in the uterus was induced almost 3-fold in 24 h after DES injection (Fig. 1A
gene is sensitive to estrogen stimulation in immature mouse uterus and the level of sensitivity to estrogen was much lower than the estrogen-responsive lactoferrin gene (48, 49) (lanes 46) in the uterus (compare lanes 3 and 6). Two other estrogen-responsive tissues, liver and heart, were also examined. Interestingly, ERR
gene was not estrogen responsive in the liver (Fig. 1B
|
gene, we used human endometrial carcinoma HEC-1B cells transiently transfected with ER
or ERß expression constructs. HEC-1B cells do not express ER
or ERß (50), which we also verified by RT-PCR. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were treated with 10 nM DES for another 24 h and the total RNA prepared. After introducing the ER
expression plasmid, the endogenous ERR
mRNA of the HEC-1B cells was slightly increased and a significant induction of ERR
mRNA occurred while also treating the cells with DES, whereas the ß-actin mRNA remained constant in the cells with or without estrogen treatment (Fig. 2A
mRNA clearly demonstrated the ER
-mediated estrogen response (Fig. 2A
gene was not responsive to ERß-mediated estrogen action in the HEC-1B cells (Fig. 2B
gene expression was shown by the bar graph normalized with ß-actin mRNA (Fig. 2B
and ERß expression constructs indeed expressed in the HEC-1B cells after transfection, we prepared nuclear extracts from the transfected HEC-1B cells and performed Western blotting with specific antibody to ER
or ERß (Fig. 2C
(Fig. 2C
and ERß expression vectors were transcribed equally in HEC-1B cells, we measured the mRNA level of ER
and ERß by RT-PCR (Fig. 2D
are estrogen responsive in vivo and the ER
is the receptor primarily mediating the response.
|
promoter activity
gene promoter has been identified (46). The promoter lacks the CAAT and TATA boxes and contains high levels of Gs and Cs (-600/+1, 70%). There are 11 consensus Sp1 binding sites in the 600 bp of the promoter region. Further upstream from this region, a 57-bp sequence that is composed of MHREs arranged with variable orientations and spacing configurations was identified. To examine whether Sp1 is required for the ERR
promoter activity, we constructed two reporters, one which contains the 11 Sp1 sites was designated as 0.6-CAT, whereas a longer one that contains both the Sp1 sites and the MHREs was designated as 0.8-CAT (Fig. 3A
. Nonetheless, which Sp1 sites are crucial for the ERR
promoter activity is unclear at the present time.
|
promoter reporter activity in HEC-1B cells
or ERß and in the presence or absence of 10 nM DES (Fig. 4A
(lane 3) and ERß (lane 5) in the presence of DES stimulate the 0.6-CAT reporter activities severalfold compared with the promoter activity of the control cells (lane 1), even though there is no obvious estrogen response element present. Nonetheless, the ER
-mediated estrogen response of 0.6-CAT was moderate when compared with the 0.8-CAT (compare lanes 3 and 8). Inclusion of MHREs in the 0.8-CAT reporter rendered this reporter extremely responsive to ER
-mediated estrogen action. Interestingly, ERß elicited similar activation to 0.6-CAT and 0.8-CAT in the presence of DES (compare lanes 5 and 10), suggesting that the ERß-mediated estrogen action comes mainly from the 600-bp GC rich promoter region, whereas an additional estrogen response element that resides within the MHREs is the target for ER
. The estrogen response of the 0.8-CAT was dependent on both ER
expression level and DES concentration (data not shown). Although liganded ERß activated the ERR
promoter reporter activity in transiently transfected HEC-1B cells (Fig. 4A
gene to the level detected by RT-PCR (Fig. 2B
is a much stronger activator than ERß in comparison of many estrogen response genes (5). The chromatin structure of the endogenous ERR
gene and the transiently transfected gene promoter may also account for this variability. To verify the ER
-mediated estrogen response, we blocked the estrogen stimulated 0.8-CAT activity by ICI 182,780, a specific inhibitor for ERs (Fig. 4B
-mediated transactivation of ERR
gene.
|
gene is evolutionary conserved and is responsible for ER
-mediated activity
genes are estrogen responsive in selected tissues or cells, it is possible that a conserved estrogen response element is present in the gene and a similar estrogen signaling pathway is operative in both species. Searching the mouse genomic sequence database, we found a perfect match of 34 bp of the mouse ERR
gene to the human ERR
gene MHREs (Fig. 5A
can be divided into groups designated as A (23 bp) and B (11 bp). The human has duplicated A and one B that covers 57 bp region (Fig. 5A
|
-mediated effect on the reporter activities (Fig. 5B
gene requires both A and B regions such as in the mouse gene (lane 9), and with duplicated motifs such as in the human gene a robust estrogenic effect was observed (lane 6). To verify the finding from the deletion experiments that both A and B regions are involved in estrogen response, we generated single or multiple AGGTCA motifs mutation within the conserved A and B regions of human and mouse ERR
genes (Fig. 5A
In vivo binding of ER
to the MHREs of ERR
promoter
We have shown earlier that the endogenous ERR
in HEC-1B cells was estrogen responsive when ER
expression vectors were transiently transfected into the cells (Fig. 2A
). It is also important to be able to demonstrate that the endogenous ER
in the presence of natural estrogen can stimulate the expression of endogenous ERR
and the ER
indeed bind to the MHREs of the ERR
promoter in vivo. The MCF-7 cells contain both ERR
and ER
but lack of ERß (52) is an ideal cell line for the study. We treated the MCF-7 cells with 10 nM E2 for 24 h and the total RNA was prepared from the sample. The ERR
mRNA in the untreated and treated samples were quantitated by real-time PCR and normalized with ß-actin mRNA. ERR
mRNA levels increased more than 3-fold after E2 treatment (Fig. 6A
). With ChIP assay, we found that the MHREs region of the ERR
gene in MCF-7 cells was immunoprecipitated by the ER
antibody in the absence of added estrogen (Fig. 6B
, upper panel, lane 2). Nonetheless, the ER
immunoprecipitated with the MHREs chromatin fragment was enhanced after addition of E2 (lane 5). The nonimmune serum and the nonspecific immune serum could not immunoprecipitate the MHREs chromatin fragment of the ERR
gene (lanes 3 and 4, respectively). The association of ER
with MHREs was more evident by the densitometry scanning of the gel (Fig. 6B
, lower panel), and the increased association of ER
and MHREs after estrogen treatment was clearly shown (lower panel, compare ER
alone and ER
plus E2). It was interesting to find that the ER
was associated with the ERR
promoter/enhancer region in the absence of exogenous hormone. Because the cells were cultured in CS-FBS for 7 d before performing the experiments and because no activity was detected from a transfected ERE-luciferase (ERE-Luc) reporter (data not shown), it is unlikely that the CS-FBS contains residue estrogens. The present results provide in vivo evidence that the ERR
gene is an end target of the ER
-mediated signaling pathway in MCF-7 cells.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gene is estrogen responsive in selective estrogen target tissues and the human ERR
is also estrogen responsive in endometrial and mammary gland cell lines. These observations are supported by the identification of estrogen-responsive MHREs in both human and mouse ERR
genes. Finally, we showed an in vivo interaction between ER
and the MHREs of ERR
promoter.
ERs and ERR
were found in many tissues (1, 46, 47) and in some tissues both receptors were coexpressed. We examined the functional relationship of ER
and ERR
in three estrogen target tissues, liver, heart, and uterus of the mouse that also express abundant ERR
mRNA and protein. We found that ERR
was estrogen responsive in heart and uterus but not in liver, whereas the estrogen-responsive lactoferrin gene was up-regulated by estrogen in uterus and liver but not in heart (Fig. 1
). The chromatin structure of the ERR
gene in those tissues may play an important role in estrogen responsiveness and is an area currently under investigation. Both in vivo and in vitro studies suggested that ER
is the primary receptor to regulate ERR
expression under the influence of estrogen (Figs. 2
and 4A
). The ERR
is highly expressed in heart (46, 47), and the discovery of its estrogen responsiveness in the heart (Fig. 1C
) suggests that ERR
may play some role in the ability of estrogen to afford some protection against heart disease (56, 57).
The promoter from the human ERR
gene consists of 70% of Gs and Cs within a 600-bp region and 11 Sp1 binding sites (46), whereas the corresponding region for ERR
gene in mouse is 61% Gs and Cs with only four Sp1 binding sites (genomic database). In addition, whereas the human promoter lacks TATA and CAAT elements, the mouse promoter has a candidate TATA element 23 bp upstream from the transcription initiation site. Based on the organization of the human ERR
gene promoter, the Sp1 transcription factor could be important for the promoter activity. This was confirmed by the transfection experiments conducted in the insect SL2 cells (Fig. 3B
). Although we have not shown the actual binding of Sp1 protein to the Sp1 sites of ERR
gene promoter, the sequence of these putative Sp1 binding sites matches the consensus sequence of Sp1 binding element. It is well documented that estrogen stimulates GC-rich promoter through protein-protein interaction between the Sp1 and ERs in which Sp1 binds the DNA but not the ERs (58). Furthermore, ER
and ERß subtypes differentially transactivate GC-rich promoter in a cell type-, ligand-, and promoter context-dependent manner (54). Our current study supported these reports. The GC-rich human ERR
promoter indeed mediates estrogen action via both ER
and ERß with ER
yielding stronger response (Fig. 4A
, 0.6-CAT). Despite the moderate estrogen response of the promoter, ER
-induced transcription of ERR
gene was predominantly dependent on a MHREs. It is not known whether the Sp1 site 7 bp upstream to the MHREs (Fig. 3A
, Sp1 12) plays any role in estrogen response. Nonetheless, the MHREs (AAB element) conferred a robust estrogen response in the transfection studies (Fig. 5B
), suggesting that the MHREs is the major estrogen response element in ERR
gene. This conclusion is also supported by the ChIP assay (Fig. 6
) that demonstrated the MHREs is the target site of ER
. Detection of ER
binding to the MHREs of endogenous ERR
in MCF-7 without estrogen suggests that the MHREs adopts an open chromatin structure and the chromatin remodeling is not a prerequisite for estrogen response of this gene (59). Nonetheless, addition of estrogen further enhances the ER
binding to MHREs and stimulates the transcriptional activity of the ERR
gene. We could not exclude the possibility that a small amount of estrogen is present in the charcoal-stripped serum even though there was no detectable activity of transfected ERE-Luc reporters in these cells without addition of exogenous estrogen (data not shown).
Mutation and deletion analyses revealed that the estrogen response requires at least three of the AGGTCA motifs within the MHREs such as those found in the mouse ERR
gene. Widely spaced multiple AGGTCA motifs that serve as promiscuous enhancers for different classes of nuclear receptors have been reported (60) and the natural genes that confer hormone actions through these types of elements were documented (61, 62, 63, 64). The presence of promiscuous nuclear receptor binding elements such as the MHREs in ERR
indicates that the gene may respond to a number of distinct nuclear receptor regulated signaling pathways. Indeed, ERR
may play multiple roles in regulating different aspects of cellular physiology. For example, in addition to modulating ER
-mediated response, ERR
is coexpressed with the proliferator-activated receptor coactivator-1
, a key regulator of cellular energy metabolism in tissues that metabolize fatty acids and it controls the expression of medium-chain acyl coenzyme A dehydrogenase gene (37, 38, 39, 65), suggesting that ERR
may be important in regulating the balance of cellular energy. These biological activities are regulated by many nuclear receptors including the orphan receptors (66). It is possible that ERR
not only modulates estrogen action, it also plays a balancing role for other nuclear receptor-mediated pathways.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 8, 2003.
Accepted for publication July 16, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-regulated gene transcription, supporting a "ying yang" relationship between ER
and ERß in mice. Mol Endocrinol 17:203208
and ß from multiple tandem estrogen response elements. Mol Cell Endocrinol 165:151161[CrossRef][Medline]
depends on the coactivator subtype, the type of estrogen response element, and the promoter context. Mol Endocrinol 16:25712581
-dependent transcription with chromatin templates. Mol Cell Biol 23:335348
1 functionally binds as a monomer to extended half-site sequences including ones contained within estrogen-response elements. Mol Endocrinol 11:342352
1 interacts with coactivator and constitutively activates the estrogen response elements of the human lactoferrin gene. J Biol Chem 275:2083720846
and estrogen receptor-related receptor
1 compete for binding and coactivator. Mol Cell Endocrinol 172:223233[CrossRef][Medline]
(estrogen receptor-related receptor-
). Mol Endocrinol 13:764773
1 actively antagonizes estrogen receptor-regulated transcription in MCF-7 mammary cells. J Biol Chem 277:2482624834
-1 orphan receptor. Cancer Res 59:45194524
impinges on the estrogen axis in bone: potential function in osteoporosis. Endocrinology 143:36583670
(ERR
) is expressed throughout osteoblast differentiation and regulates bone formation in vitro. J Cell Biol 153:971984
in the control of mitochondrial fatty acid ß-oxidation during brown adipocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem 272:3169331699
is a transcriptional regulator of the human medium-chain acyl coenzyme A dehydrogenase gene. Mol Cell Biol 17:54005409[Abstract]
(PGC-1
) coactivates the cardiac-enriched nuclear receptors estrogen-related receptor-
and -
. Identification of novel leucine-rich interaction motif within PGC-1
. J Biol Chem 277:4026540274
gene promoter by the orphan nuclear receptor ERR
. Oncogene 17:24292435[CrossRef][Medline]
-1 orphan receptor. Cancer Res 58:56955700
. Cell Growth Differ 9:10071014[Abstract]
1: molecular cloning and estrogen responsiveness. J Mol Endocrinol 19:299309
/ß)-dependent activation at GC-rich (Sp1) promoter elements. J Biol Chem 275:53795387
. J Biol Chem 278:90139018This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Heck, J. Rom, V. Thewes, N. Becker, B. Blume, H. P. Sinn, U. Deuschle, C. Sohn, A. Schneeweiss, and P. Lichter Estrogen-Related Receptor {alpha} Expression and Function Is Associated with the Transcriptional Coregulator AIB1 in Breast Carcinoma Cancer Res., June 15, 2009; 69(12): 5186 - 5193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Chisamore, H. A. Wilkinson, O. Flores, and J. D. Chen Estrogen-related receptor-{alpha} antagonist inhibits both estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-negative breast tumor growth in mouse xenografts Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2009; 8(3): 672 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Bombail, S. MacPherson, H. O.D. Critchley, and P. T.K. Saunders Estrogen receptor related beta is expressed in human endometrium throughout the normal menstrual cycle Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2782 - 2790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bonnelye, N. Laurin, P. Jurdic, D. A. Hart, and J. E. Aubin Estrogen receptor-related receptor-{alpha} (ERR-{alpha}) is dysregulated in inflammatory arthritis Rheumatology, December 1, 2008; 47(12): 1785 - 1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Safe and K. Kim Non-classical genomic estrogen receptor (ER)/specificity protein and ER/activating protein-1 signaling pathways J. Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 41(5): 263 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Hu, H. K. Kinyamu, L. Wang, J. Martin, T. K. Archer, and C. Teng Estrogen Induces Estrogen-related Receptor {alpha} Gene Expression and Chromatin Structural Changes in Estrogen Receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative Breast Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., March 14, 2008; 283(11): 6752 - 6763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bonnelye, R. A. Zirngibl, P. Jurdic, and J. E. Aubin The Orphan Nuclear Estrogen Receptor-Related Receptor-{alpha} Regulates Cartilage Formation in Vitro: Implication of Sox9 Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 1195 - 1205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Ariazi, R. J. Kraus, M. L. Farrell, V. C. Jordan, and J. E. Mertz Estrogen-Related Receptor {alpha}1 Transcriptional Activities Are Regulated in Part via the ErbB2/HER2 Signaling Pathway Mol. Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 5(1): 71 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A M Tarrant, S R Greytak, G V Callard, and M E Hahn Estrogen receptor-related receptors in the killifish Fundulus heteroclitus: diversity, expression, and estrogen responsiveness. J. Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 37(1): 105 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zhang, K. Chen, J. C. Shih, and C. T. Teng Estrogen-Related Receptors-Stimulated Monoamine Oxidase B Promoter Activity Is Down-Regulated by Estrogen Receptors Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2006; 20(7): 1547 - 1561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bonnelye and J. E. Aubin Estrogen Receptor-Related Receptor {alpha}: A Mediator of Estrogen Response in Bone J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2005; 90(5): 3115 - 3121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Liu, Z Zhang, and C T Teng Estrogen-related receptor-{gamma} and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} coactivator-1{alpha} regulate estrogen-related receptor-{alpha} gene expression via a conserved multi-hormone response element J. Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 34(2): 473 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Cheung, S. Yu, K. B. Wong, L. W. Chan, F. M. M. Lai, X. Wang, M. Suetsugi, S. Chen, and F. L. Chan Expression and Functional Study of Estrogen Receptor-Related Receptors in Human Prostatic Cells and Tissues J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1830 - 1844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Stokes, B. Alston-Mills, and C. Teng Estrogen response element and the promoter context of the human and mouse lactoferrin genes influence estrogen receptor {alpha}-mediated transactivation activity in mammary gland cells J. Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2004; 33(2): 315 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Forster, S. Kietz, K. Hultenby, M. Warner, and J.-A. Gustafsson Characterization of the ER{beta}-/-mouse heart PNAS, September 28, 2004; 101(39): 14234 - 14239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Suzuki, Y. Miki, T. Moriya, N. Shimada, T. Ishida, H. Hirakawa, N. Ohuchi, and H. Sasano Estrogen-Related Receptor {alpha} in Human Breast Carcinoma as a Potent Prognostic Factor Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 64(13): 4670 - 4676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Laganiere, G. B. Tremblay, C. R. Dufour, S. Giroux, F. Rousseau, and V. Giguere A Polymorphic Autoregulatory Hormone Response Element in the Human Estrogen-related Receptor {alpha} (ERR{alpha}) Promoter Dictates Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {gamma} Coactivator-1{alpha} Control of ERR{alpha} Expression J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 18504 - 18510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |