| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Division of Endocrinology (D.J.H., M.A.S.), Department of Medicine and Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics (H.A.F., M.A.S.), University of Virginia Health Science Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, and +Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia Health Science Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908. E-mail: djh2q{at}virginia.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit and LHß promoter responses to GnRH by 4060%. LHß promoter constructs containing either proximal or proximal and distal GnRH-responsive regions were sensitive to inhibition. These data show for the first time that Ca/CaMK II activation plays an important role in the transmission of GnRH signals from the plasma membrane to the LH subunit genes. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Calcium has been implicated as a major component of the GnRH mechanism of action, stimulating both gonadotropin secretion and gene expression (13, 19, 20, 21). Calcium signaling and secretion or exocytosis have been studied in several model gonadotrope systems, including primary cultured pituitary cells as well as
T3 and LßT2 clonal gonadotrope cells (22, 23, 24). The elegant work of Hille and colleagues (23) demonstrated that acute GnRH-stimulated oscillations in intracellular calcium stimulated rhythmic exocytosis in rat gonadotropes. Studies in LßT2 cells demonstrated dose-dependent biphasic GnRH-induced calcium mobilization and calcium sensitivity of exocytosis, which were modulated by steroid treatment (3, 24). Changes in cytoplasmic calcium concentrations and calcium-stimulated secretion may not necessarily correlate with altered gene transcription. For example, changes in nuclear calcium alter gene transcription independently from changes in cytoplasmic calcium in neural cells, and specific transcription factors may respond independently to altered cytoplasmic [serum-responsive factor (SRF)] or nuclear (cAMP response element binding protein) calcium (25, 26). In our studies, we concentrated on the role of GnRH-stimulated changes in calcium that could regulate transcription of the LH subunit genes.
Recent studies using primary rat pituitary cells or LßT2 cells showed that a rise in intracellular calcium increases steady-state levels of
, LHß, and FSHß mRNAs and stimulates gene transcription (13, 27, 28, 29). Pulsatile application of a calcium channel agonist to normal gonadotrope cells regulates gonadotropin subunit transcription in a differential manner, reminiscent of GnRH frequency-dependent effects (2, 29). However, the downstream third messenger system(s) that transmit GnRH-induced calcium signals to the gonadotropin subunit genes have yet to be determined.
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (Ca/CaMK II) is an important intracellular mediator of calcium signaling in several cell and tissue types, including the pituitary (30, 31). Ca/CaMK II is a complex of subunits derived from 4 genes (
, ß,
, and
), with
and ß prominent within the brain and
and
distributed throughout the body (30, 31). Each Ca/CaMK II subunit has catalytic activity. Ca/CaMK II is activated by Ca/CaM binding to the regulatory domain, disinhibiting the enzyme, and allowing it to bind ATP and peptide substrate (31, 32). Following activation, the subunit is autophosphorylated, thus increasing the affinity for CaM-CaMK binding, and phosphorylation is correlated with enzyme activity (32). Ca/CaMK II is transported to the nucleus, allowing the enzyme to directly activate various transcription factors (31). Ca/CaMK II plays a role in cross-talk between intracellular messengers by activating calcium ATPase, adenylyl cyclase, calcineurin, nitric oxide synthase, and other enzyme systems (33). Ca/CaMK II regulates secretion and gene expression in several tissues (30, 31). In the brain, Ca/CaMK II stimulates glutamate and norepinephrine release and c-fos gene expression (32). In the pituitary, the enzyme stimulates both PRL secretion and promoter activity (34, 35, 36).
The potential role for Ca/CaMK II in the GnRH-stimulated gonadotrope has not been examined. However, several GnRH-response regions on the rat LH subunit gene promoters have been defined, and transcription factors binding to these sites could be targets for Ca/CaMK II (15, 16, 17, 37, 38). The rat
- subunit GnRH responsive element (-411 to -384 bp) has two Ets factor binding motifs, and members of the Ets protein family may be modulated by calcium (37, 39). The rat LHß promoter contains two GnRH-responsive elements. The distal GnRH-responsive element (-456 to -342 bp) contains 5' and 3'-Sp1 binding sites and a CArG box element, and the proximal GnRH-responsive element (-121 to -50 bp) contains two early growth response protein 1 (Egr-1) sites, two steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) sites, and a pituitary homeobox-1 (Ptx-1) site (37, 40). Any or all of these proteins could be modulated by calcium (41, 42, 43).
The present study was conducted to address two questions. First, does GnRH stimulate Ca/CaMK II activity within gonadotrope cells? Second, does Ca/CaMK II help mediate the calcium component of the
-subunit and LHß transcriptional responses to GnRH (13, 17, 18, 19)? We performed these experiments in the LßT2 clonal gonadotrope cell line, which represents a homogeneous system for biochemical and transcriptional studies. These cells express functional GnRH-R and the gonadotropin subunit genes and respond to GnRH with increased calcium mobilization and stimulated gonadotropin secretion and gene transcription (18, 24, 27, 37).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit promoter (-411 to +44/I77 bp, relative to the transcriptional start site) or two rat LHß promoter regions (the -617 to +44-bp region containing both distal and proximal GnRH-responsive elements, and the -245 to +44-bp region containing only the proximal response region; Ref. 37) fused to a luciferase (Luc) reporter were used for these studies. As controls for transfection efficiency and GnRH and drug responsiveness, we transfected several additional constructs including the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter (CMV-Luc; 0.5 µg/well) construct, or a construct (GAL-Luc; 1 µg/well) with five copies of the DNA binding site for the GAL4 protein and a minimal TATA box (PG5Luc; Promega Corp., Madison, WI) fused to Luc (8, 44). The ratio of basal expression of these constructs to LH subunit constructs gives a measure of transfection efficiency. In all studies comparing different constructs, such as
-subunit and LHß (see Fig. 5
|
|
|
Immunoblot assay.
Cell lysate protein (120 µg) was resolved by electrophoresis (420% SDS-PAGE). Protein bands were transferred to nitrocellulose filters and immunoblotted using antibodies specific to phosphorylated
and ß Ca/CaMK II subunits (P-CaMK II, Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY) and phosphorylated and unphosphorylated
, ß,
, and
CaMK II subunits (Total Ca/CaMK II [T-CaMK], Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). Enzyme autophosphorylation increases the affinity of the Ca/CaMK II for calmodulin and is correlated with functional enzyme activity (30, 45). The horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antirabbit secondary antibody was also obtained from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. Bands were detected using the Super Signal Pico West chemiluminescent system (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL), followed by autoradiography. P-CaMK II bands were quantified by densitometry and corrected to the amount of T-CaMK II per sample. Treatment-induced responses were similar for both
and ß Ca/CaMK II subunits. However, as the intensity of the signal for the ß Ca/CaMK II subunit was greater than that seen for
Ca/CaMK II subunit, results were quantified using ß Ca/CaMK II bands for each sample.
ERK immunoblot assay
For ERK assays, cell lysate protein (50 µg) was resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose filters and assayed with a kit purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA) as described previously (10). ERK1 and 2 phosphorlylation was measured and normalized for total ERK protein as previously described (10).
Statistical analysis
The Ca/CaMK II blot data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, with differences between treatment groups determined by Duncans multiple range test. Transfection data were analyzed using ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the Prism statistics program (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). When data were normalized within an individual experiment, the average of the three control points was determined and set to 100%. For analysis of multiple transfection experiments, the mean value of the treatment group from one experiment was used as a single value to average results from multiple experiments and expressed as the mean ± SEM for each group.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
-subunit and LHß promoters were stimulated by GnRH in LßT2 cells (3.3-fold and 21.3-fold, respectively; P < 0.05 vs. vehicle controls), in agreement with our previous data (37). In cells pretreated with 10 µM KN-93, there was a trend toward slightly decreased basal expression for the
-subunit and the LHß promoter, but this was not statistically significant. Pretreatment with KN-93 partially suppressed both
-subunit and LHß responses to GnRH (to 1.9- and 15-fold, respectively P < 0.05 vs. vehicle + GnRH), and activity of the promoters overall were decreased. Similar inhibition of GnRH stimulation was seen in cells pretreated with Nimo (to 2.0-fold for
-subunit and 11.2-fold for LHß, P < 0.05 vs. vehicle + GnRH). These findings clearly demonstrate that both Ca/CaMK II and calcium influx play a role in
-subunit and LHß promoter activity, and partially suppress the stimulation by GnRH.
To demonstrate the specificity of the response, we tested the KN-93 and KN-92 compounds, as well as several different promoter constructs (Fig. 6
). The LHß promoter was partially suppressed by KN-93 in the presence of GnRH but KN-92, which does not inhibit Ca/CaMK II phosphorylation, had no effect on GnRH stimulation (Fig. 6A
). In contrast to the effects on the LHß promoter, GnRH did not stimulate expression of the CMV-Luc or GAL-Luc constructs, and KN-93 also had little effect on activity (Fig. 6
, B and C). KN-92 had no affect on activity on any promoter in any experiment.
To determine which of the GnRH-responsive regions in the rat LHß promoter are sensitive to Ca/CaMK II, LßT2 cells transfected with two constructs were treated with GnRH ± KN-93 (Fig. 7
). Constructs included an LHß promoter construct (-617 to +44 bp) containing both the distal (-456 to -352 bp) and the proximal GnRH-responsive regions (-121 to -50 bp), and a truncated promoter construct (-245 to +44 bp) containing only the proximal response element. The -245 bp construct is stimulated to a lesser extent by GnRH, as expected with the loss of the distal response region (37, 40). In both constructs, GnRH stimulation is partially suppressed by KN-93, approximately one third lower compared with vehicle plus GnRH. These data demonstrate that the entire LHß promoter and the proximal GnRH-response region are sensitive to Ca/CaMK II. The proximal region of the promoter contains binding sites for Egr-1, a protein whose synthesis is rapidly stimulated by GnRH (17, 46). We performed immunoblotting studies of Egr-1 protein under basal and GnRH-treated conditions, and found that the GnRH-stimulation of Egr-1 protein in our cultures was not altered by KN-93 or KN-92 (Ferris, H., unpublished data). These data suggest that at least the proximal GnRH-sensitive region of the promoter contains a Ca/CaMK II-sensitive region. Overall, these studies demonstrate that GnRH can stimulate Ca/CaMK II phosphorylation in gonadotrope cells and that at least part of the calcium component of GnRH stimulation of the LH subunit genes is mediated by Ca/CaMK II.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit and LHß transcriptional responses to GnRH. Ca/CaMK II activity increased rapidly with GnRH stimulation (i.e. within 2 min). This effect was completely blocked by the specific Ca/CaMK II inhibitor, KN-93, but not by KN-92, the MEK inhibitor PD098059, or the general PKC inhibitor GF109203X. Our results also showed that a rise in intracellular calcium is essential in the GnRH activation of Ca/CaMK II, with increasing calcium from both intracellular pools (suppressed by Thap) and extracellular influx (stimulated by BK and suppressed by Nimo) playing a role. Calcium is an important mediator in the activation of downstream intracellular messenger systems, including PKA, PKC, ERK, JNK, and Ca/CaMK I, II, and IV (47, 48, 49, 50). In the present study, we investigated the link between GnRH-R activation and Ca/CaMK II. This enzyme is present within the anterior pituitary, and is stimulated by TRH binding to its seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptor, the receptor superfamily in which the GnRH-R is also a member (51). Studies by Dannies and colleagues (34, 35) reveal that Ca/CaMK II mediates TRH-induced PRL secretion by activating voltage-dependent calcium channels within rat lactotrope and GH3 cells. Ca/CaMK II also stimulates PRL promoter activity, via actions on the pituitary specific transcription factor, Pit-1 (36). GnRH also binds to a pituitary seven transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor, stimulates intracellular calcium through L-type calcium channels and the release of intracellular calcium stores (8), and modulates gonadotropin gene expression via calcium (13). We thus postulated that Ca/CaMK II could be the link between GnRH calcium signaling and gonadotropin gene transcription.
The role played by calcium in the regulation of gonadotropin subunit gene expression has been a point of intensive investigation and some controversy over the past few years, with results dependent on the biological system used and the endpoint measured. Studies with primary cultures of rat pituitary cells have shown that mature mRNAs for
, LHß, and FSHß subunits are stimulated by calcium influx (21, 52). We also showed, by measurement of primary transcripts of the endogenous genes in rat pituitary cells, that pulsatile BK duplicates the differential gonadotropin subunit transcriptional response to GnRH pulse frequency (29). This current work agrees with our previous studies showing that calcium influx plays an important role in GnRH stimulation of endogenous rat
-subunit and LHß gene transcription in normal rat pituitary cells as determined by nuclear run-on assays, and in the GnRH stimulation of an LHß promoter transgene in transgenic mice (13). Thus, increased intracellular calcium and calcium influx appear to be necessary for the GnRH stimulation of LH subunit gene transcription in normal rodent gonadotrope cells.
The importance of calcium in GnRH-stimulated gene transcription has not been as clear in studies with immortalized cell lines. Transient transfection studies in the heterologous GGH31 cells found that rat LHß and FSHß were primarily regulated by PKC, with calcium having only a minor role, whereas calcium played a major role in stimulation of the rat
-subunit promoter (19). Investigations in LßT2 gonadotrope cells demonstrated that calcium influx was important for the induction of the endogenous LHß and c-fos genes, but that MEK activation was important for stimulation of LHß protein (27). A more recent report (18) using a slightly different cell line, the LßT4 gonadotrope cells, showed that calcium played little role in acute GnRH stimulation of the transfected rat LHß promoter but is required for long-term repression of LHß gene expression by continuous GnRH. One intriguing difference with the results in the LßT4 cell line is that the proximal rat LHß promoter construct was not stimulated by GnRH, in contrast to our results and those from other investigators using LßT2 cells (37, 40, 53, 54, 55). Proximal promoter activity was suppressed by GnRH in a calcium influx-dependent process in LßT4 cells, whereas we find that the proximal promoter is stimulated by GnRH and calcium in LßT2 cells. These transcriptional studies did not link biological responses to calcium to specific intracellular signaling molecules.
Some of the differences between results in various cell lines, and between specific cell lines and primary cultures, could be due to differential GnRH receptor coupling in different cell contexts. For example, the GnRH receptor couples to Gq/11 and Gs in primary pituitary cells, LßT2 cells and GGH31 cells, but not to Gs in
T3 cells (5). LßT2 cells and
T3 cells, like primary cells, demonstrate GnRH dose-dependent increases in secretion and internal calcium concentrations (3, 24). Increases in calcium concentrations are biphasic, with rapid increases within 15 sec followed by a prolonged secondary phase of GnRH-induced calcium response. However, the oscillations in internal calcium noted at low concentrations of GnRH in primary gonadotropes are not observed in the cell lines (3). Cross-talk between GnRH signal transduction pathways is likely to play a role in transcriptional responses. It is probable that cross talk between pathways may vary in differing experimental models, adding to different outcomes seen by various investigators. The LßT2 cells represent a mature gonadotrope phenotype to study regulation of the LH subunit gene promoters. Calcium-dependent stimulation of LH subunit gene transcription occurs in both primary pituitary cells and LßT2 cells (13, 19, 27, 28, 29). Furthermore, recent collaborative studies have shown that Ca/CaMK II inhibition by KN-93 also suppresses GnRH-stimulated transcription of the LHß and
-subunit genes in primary cultures of normal rat pituitary cells (56).
Overall, results from several laboratories have demonstrated that expression of the rat, mouse and human
-subunit genes are regulated by several intracellular pathways, including calcium, cAMP/PKA, PKC, and ERK (7, 13, 16, 46, 57, 58). Our current and previous data show that GnRH stimulation of the endogenous rat
-subunit gene and the transfected rat
-subunit promoter are partially dependent on increases in intracellular calcium, and partially on increased MEK/MAPK activity (13, 19). The present study shows that the calcium component of GnRH stimulation of the rat
-subunit promoter occurs through Ca/CaMK II, and that blocking the enzyme with KN-93 reduces the GnRH response. The addition of PKC or MEK blockers did not affect GnRH stimulation of Ca/CaMK II, but Nimo and Thap together eliminated the GnRH stimulation. Thus, the Ca/CaMK II action on the
-subunit promoter is independent of the PKC/ERK pathway. This does not rule out the possibility that cross-talk between these various intracellular pathways is essential for physiological regulation of
-subunit transcription by GnRH. The rat
-subunit promoter contains a binding site for the orphan receptor SF-1, but this appears to play a critical role in basal, rather than GnRH-stimulated expression (15). The GnRH-responsive region of the rat
-subunit promoter (-411 to -384 bp) contains two putative Ets protein-binding sites, and the GnRH-response element of the mouse promoter contains one such site, but these proteins have not been identified (37, 59). Promoter stimulation by Ets proteins could be modulated by MAPK and Ca/CaMK II, potentially by protein modifications (59, 60).
Previous studies demonstrated that the endogenous rat LHß promoter is sensitive to GnRH-stimulated calcium influx (13). In these investigations of Ca/CaMK II regulation of the LHß promoter, we attempted to determine if the constructs containing the entire promoter or only the proximal GnRH response element could also be calcium sensitive. The -617 to +44-bp LHß construct contains both proximal and distal GnRH responsive regions, whereas the truncated promoter (-245 to +44 bp) construct contains only the proximal GnRH responsive region. As we have previously shown, elimination of the distal response region reduces but does not eliminate the stimulatory response to GnRH (37). KN-93 partially suppressed GnRH stimulation of the -617 construct, similar to results with Nimo, suggesting that calcium influx may act via Ca/CaMK II. Addition of KN-93 to cells transfected with the truncated LHß promoter construct (-245 to +44 bp) also partially suppressed the response to GnRH, suggesting the presence of an important Ca/CaMK II responsive site(s) within the proximal promoter region.
Ca/CaMK II could influence one or several important GnRH-sensitive transcription factors on the LHß promoter or act on a separate protein site to influence GnRH stimulation, as was found for chronic GnRH suppression in LßT4 cells (18). The distal GnRH-sensitive region contains two binding sites for Sp1, and a CArG box element, which may bind SRF-like complexes (61). The proximal GnRH responsive region of the LHß promoter contains two composite SF-1/Egr-1 binding sites separated by a Ptx-1 site (17, 54, 55). SF-1, Ptx-1, and Egr-1 interact functionally to increase LHß promoter activity (54). SF-1 is a tissue specific factor and plays a role in basal, but not GnRH-induced, LHß promoter activity, and is a less likely target for Ca/CaMK II (54). Sp1 and SRF may be phosphorylated by several intracellular kinases including Ca/CaMK II, which could modify DNA binding or recruitment of coactivators (25, 42, 43). GnRH stimulation of the mouse Egr-1 promoter, which uses Sp1, Egr-1, and SRF binding sites, is partially suppressed by KN-93, suggesting that Ca/CaMK II could play a role in GnRH stimulation of this promoter and the rise in Egr-1 protein that stimulates LHß (41). Under our cell culture conditions, we did not observe a suppression of Egr-1 protein by KN-93, but this does not preclude potential protein modification by Ca/CaMK II. GnRH treatment modifies the transcriptional activity of Egr-1 (62), although the signaling pathways have not been identified. Thus, the possibilities include Ca/CaMK II modification of Sp1, SRF, or Egr-1 selectively, modification of the SF-1/Ptx-1/Egr-1 complex, or additional promoter regions binding proteins with yet to be identified Ca/CaMK II-responsive sites. Because the rat LHß promoter requires cooperation of both GnRH-responsive regions for maximal stimulation, modification of one region will influence overall activity (40, 53).
In summary, these results show that Ca/CaMK II plays an important role in the GnRH signal transduction pathway within the gonadotrope, with significant effects on both
-subunit and LHß promoters. The GnRH-induced activation of Ca/CaMK II is mediated via increases in intracellular calcium derived from cellular storage pools and influx from plasma membrane calcium channels.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: Ca/CaMK II, Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II; CMV, cytomegalovirus; Egr-1, early growth response protein 1; GnRH-R, GnRH receptor; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; Luc, luciferase; MEK, MAPK kinase; Nimo, nimodipine; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; Ptx-1, pituitary homeobox-1; SF-1, steroidogenic factor 1; SRF, serum-responsive factor; Thap, thapsigargin.
Received November 6, 2002.
Accepted for publication February 24, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
T31 cells: evidence for cross-talk between PKA and protein kinase C pathways. Endocrinology 138:22592266
T31 cell line is mediated by protein kinase C, c-Src, and CDC42. Mol Endocrinol 12:815824
-subunit gene in pituitary gonadotropes. Mol Endocrinol 8:878885[Abstract]
-subunit gene expression. Recent Prog Horm Res 54:455484
calcium-calmodulin kinase II in LTP and learning. Science 279:870873
T31 cell line: differential roles of calcium and protein kinase C. Endocrinology 138:16731682
-subunit gene expression. Endocrinology 131:30273033[Abstract]
-subunit promoter by gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Mol Cell Biol 15:35313539[Abstract]
promoter in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 20:60846094This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Haisenleder, L. L. Burger, H. E. Walsh, J. Stevens, K. W. Aylor, M. A. Shupnik, and J. C. Marshall Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Stimulation of Gonadotropin Subunit Transcription in Rat Pituitaries: Evidence for the Involvement of Jun N-Terminal Kinase But Not p38 Endocrinology, January 1, 2008; 149(1): 139 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A Ferris, H. E Walsh, J. Stevens, P. C Fallest, and M. A Shupnik Luteinizing Hormone Beta Promoter Stimulation by Adenylyl Cyclase and Cooperation with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone 1 in Transgenic Mice and LBetaT2 Cells Biol Reprod, December 1, 2007; 77(6): 1073 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lim, M. Luo, M. Koh, M. Yang, M. N. bin Abdul Kadir, J. H. Tan, Z. Ye, W. Wang, and P. Melamed Distinct Mechanisms Involving Diverse Histone Deacetylases Repress Expression of the Two Gonadotropin {beta}-Subunit Genes in Immature Gonadotropes, and Their Actions Are Overcome by Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2007; 27(11): 4105 - 4120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Ferris and M. A. Shupnik Mechanisms for Pulsatile Regulation of the Gonadotropin Subunit Genes by GNRH1 Biol Reprod, June 1, 2006; 74(6): 993 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Roberson, S. P. Bliss, J. Xie, A. M. Navratil, T. A. Farmerie, M. W. Wolfe, and C. M. Clay Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Induction of Extracellular-Signal Regulated Kinase Is Blocked by Inhibition of Calmodulin Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2005; 19(9): 2412 - 2423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Liu, M. S. Ruiz, D. A. Austin, and N. J. G. Webster Constitutively Active Gq Impairs Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-Induced Intracellular Signaling and Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in L{beta}T2 Cells Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 19(8): 2074 - 2085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.J. Haisenleder, L.L. Burger, K.W. Aylor, A.C. Dalkin, H.E. Walsh, M.A. Shupnik, and J.C. Marshall Testosterone Stimulates Follicle-Stimulating Hormone {beta} Transcription via Activation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase: Evidence in Rat Pituitary Cells Biol Reprod, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 523 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L L Burger, D J Haisenleder, A C Dalkin, and J C Marshall Regulation of gonadotropin subunit gene transcription J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2004; 33(3): 559 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||