Endocrinology Vol. 144, No. 6 2559-2565
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society
Mechanism of Adult Primitive Mesenchymal ST-13 Preadipocyte Differentiation
Yukiko Yajima,
Mayumi Sato,
Michihiro Sumida and
Seiichi Kawashima
Department of Molecular Biology (Y.Y., S.K.) and Pharmaceutical Research and Development Center (M.S.), Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8613, Japan; and Second Department of Medical Biochemistry, Ehime University School of Medicine (M.S.), Shigenobu-cho, Onsen-gun, Ehime 791-0295, Japan
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Yukiko Yajima, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, 18-22, Honkomagome 3-chome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8613, Japan. E-mail: yajima{at}rinshoken.or.jp.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Convincing evidence supports the idea that adipogenesis occurs throughout the life of organisms. However, little is known about the adipogenesis program for adult adipocytes. We examine this issue using mouse adult primitive mesenchymal ST-13 preadipocytes that express the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
(PPAR
) gene while in a predifferentiated state. The gene expression of PPAR
was sustained throughout differentiation when ST-13 preadipocytes were induced to become adipocytes by a PPAR
ligand. However, the differentiation of pluripotent C3H10T1/2 stem cells and 3T3-L1 embryonic fibroblastic cells was associated with enhanced expression of the PPAR
gene. Immunoblotting analysis revealed that C3H10T1/2 and 3T3-L1 cells expressed low levels of PPAR
1 from the early stage, and the amount increased during differentiation, whereas PPAR
2 appeared at the late stage. In contrast, ST-13 preadipocytes expressed an appreciable amount of PPAR
1 that significantly decreased on differentiation, and a small amount of PPAR
2 appeared late in the differentiation process. Furthermore, the standard hormone cocktail containing dexamethasone, methylisobutylxanthine, and insulin induced an increase in PPAR
1 protein only at the early stage, and a low level of PPAR
2 protein appeared late in ST-13 cells. However, levels of both PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 proteins were significantly induced within 2 d in 3T3-L1 cells in this hormonal adipogenesis. Moreover, exposing ST-13 preadipocytes to dexamethasone and insulin induced differentiation, but failed to induce adipogenesis in 3T3-L1. Adipogenesis in adult rat primary preadipocytes was also induced in a similar manner to that of ST-13. Our results indicate that ST-13 cells and primary preadipocytes derived from adults possess an adipogenesis program distinct from that of 3T3-L1 and C3H10T1/2 cells, and that it may represent the adipogenesis program for adult-specific adipocytes.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
DURING ADIPOCYTE differentiation, a large number of genes have to be regulated in a selective and coordinated manner, and cell morphology as well as gene expression undergo significant changes (1). Regulatory regions of adipose-specific genes have been characterized. This has led to identification of the transcription factors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
) and CCAAT/ enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), which play key roles in the complex transcriptional cascade of adipocyte differentiation (2, 3, 4). The 3T3-L1 preadipocyte cell line was clonally isolated from Swiss-3T3 cells derived from disaggregated 17- to 19-d-old mouse embryos (5, 6). This line has been used the most frequently as a model for adipogenesis research. During the differentiation of adipocytes from 3T3-L1 cells determined using a standard protocol including dexamethasone (DEX), 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine (MIX), and insulin, three C/EBP isoforms and PPAR
are sequentially expressed; C/EBPß and -
are induced temporarily at an early stage, and this is followed by PPAR
(7, 8). C/EBP
is expressed at the late stage of differentiation (7). The role of PPAR
in the initiation of differentiation has been documented (9). Two isoforms (
1 and
2) of this protein have been translated from at least three mRNAs, which are generated by alternative splicing of the same gene product. PPAR
1 and -
2 have almost identical amino acid sequences, but the N terminus of
2 has an additional 30 amino acids (10). The transcriptional product of the PPAR
gene has been detected in many tissues, and
1 is the predominant isoform. PPAR
2 is highly fat-selective and is expressed at very high levels in fat tissue (11). A member of the nuclear receptor family, PPAR
is activated through ligands that bind to its distinct domain at the carboxyl terminal. These ligands include natural prostaglandin J2 derivatives (12, 13), some nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (14), and antidiabetic thiazolidinediones (15, 16). All of these have similar PPAR
1 and -
2 binding potencies (17). Both isoforms of PPAR
form an obligate heterodimer with the retinoid X receptor to bind to regulatory elements within the promoters/enhancers of many genes associated with lipid metabolism (18). The ability of PPAR
for transcriptional activity is located in the NH2-terminal region, and is ligand independent. PPAR
2 is about 10-fold more active than PPAR
1 in terms of ligand-independent transcriptional activation, and this effect requires insulin (19). In addition, a key role has been suggested for PPAR
2 in driving the initiation of adipogenesis (20, 21).
Adipogenesis occurs in both the prenatal and postnatal states and also occurs throughout the life span of organisms (1). The homozygous null mutation of PPAR
is lethal on embryonic d (E) 9.5E10, before the stage where the establishment of embryonic fibroblasts is generally considered feasible to adipogenesis (22, 23). Therefore, adipogenesis of embryonic fibroblasts may be essential for life. On the other hand, the modulation of fat cell differentiation of adult preadipocytes can have profound effects at extraadipose sites. One such example found in a transgenic mouse is the association of lipoatrophy with systemic insulin resistance and diabetes (24). However, the precise adipogenesis program for primitive adult preadipocyte cells remains unknown. The present study used mouse primitive mesenchymal ST-13 preadipocytes established from adult murine mammary cells (25). These preadipocytes can undergo differentiation to adipocytes in the presence of the PPAR
ligand, ciglitadione (15). However, this cell line has not yet been characterized in terms of transcription factors. We compared the process of ST-13 cell differentiation with that of pluripotent C3H10T1/2 stem cells and 3T3-L1 embryonic fibroblast cells. Our results demonstrated that although the three types of preadipocytes have a morphologically defined adipocyte phenotype, only ST-13 cells express PPAR
1 as preadipocytes, and PPAR
1 might be responsible for the initiation of adipogenesis in ST-13 cells. Rat primary preadipocytes were also induced to undergo adipogenesis in a manner similar to that of ST-13 differentiation. Our results indicate that the adipocyte pathway of adult-derived ST-13 cells represents the adipogenesis program for adult-specific adipocytes.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Materials
Drugs and chemicals were obtained from the following sources: insulin, DEX, MIX, fetal bovine serum, calf serum, culture media, and BSA (fraction V, essentially fatty acid free) from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (St. Louis, MO); PPAR
antibody (catalog no. sc-7273) and C/EBP
antibody (catalog no. sc-61) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA); and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies and Vector substrate kit from Promega Corp. (La Jolla, CA). The thiazolidinedione derivative, ciglitazone (5-[4-(t-3-hydroxyl-methyl-r-1- cyclohexyl-methoxy)benzyl]-2,4-thiazolidinedione) was a gift from Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan).
Cell culture
Pluripotent C3H10T1/2 stem cells and 3T3-L1 embryonic fibroblast cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). ST-13 was established from adult primitive mesenchymal cell lines and has been used in vitro to study adipocytic conversion (25, 26). These three cell lines were maintained under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in DMEM-Hams F-12 nutrient medium (1:1 mixture) containing 25 mM glucose and supplemented with 10% calf serum. To induce adipocyte differentiation, all three murine preadipocytes were treated at confluence for 710 d with ciglitazone (1 µg/ml) and insulin (4 µg/ml) in DMEM-Hams F-12 containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Medium was replenished with ciglitazone and hormone every 2 d. ST-13 and 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were also cultured and induced to differentiate with a standard hormone cocktail containing 1 µM DEX, 0.5 mM MIX, and 1 µg/ml insulin or combinations of these inducers for 2 d. After incubation with these reagents, the basal medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum was replenished every other day. Differentiated adipocytes were stained with Oil Red O (27). Primary preadipocytes isolated from the sc adipose tissue of Wistar male rats (8 wk old) were supplied by Toyobo Co. (Tokyo, Japan) and cultured in synthetic growth medium as described in the suppliers manual. For adipocyte differentiation experiments, cells were seeded into cell culture dishes at a density of 3.5 x 104 cells/cm2 with growth medium. At confluence, the medium was changed to a synthetic basal medium supplemented with 1% FBS, the standard hormone cocktail (DEX, MIX, and insulin), or a combination of these inducers for 2 d. Thereafter, the synthetic medium supplemented with 1% FBS was replenished every other day. Triacylglycerol was quantified using triglyceride test kit (Wako Co., Tokyo, Japan).
Northern blot analysis
Total RNA was extracted using the method of Chomczynski and Sacchi (28). RNA was separated on a 1% formaldehyde agarose gel and then transferred to a Biodyne B membrane (Pall BioSupport Division, Port Washington, NY). cDNA probes were labeled with random 9-mers (Takara Co., Tokyo, Japan) and [
-32P]deoxy-CTP. Hybridization proceeded at 65 C in rapid hybridization buffer (Amersham International, Little Chalfont, UK) according to the manufacturers instructions. The membrane was washed with 2x standard saline citrate and 0.1% SDS at room temperature, followed by 0.1x standard saline citrate and 0.1% SDS at 55 C. An image analyzer (Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) detected radioactive bands. A cDNA probe for mPPAR
2-(40879) was prepared from genomic DNA. The cDNAs for C/EBP
, C/EBPß, and adipocyte protein 2 (aP2) were supplied by Dr. Masahiko Kuroda (Tokyo University, Tokyo, Japan) (29) and that for C/EBP
was supplied by Dr. Naohiro Yamamoto (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan).
Western blot analysis
Nuclear extracts were prepared as described by Engelman et al. (30). Briefly, cells in two 60-mm confluent dishes were harvested and resuspended in 0.3 ml cold buffer A [10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 µM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 2.5 µg/ml aprotinin]. Thereafter, 20 µl 10% Nonidet P-40 solution were added, and the cell suspension was rocked vigorously for 10 sec. Nuclei were recovered by centrifugation for 30 sec at 4 C and subsequently resuspended in 150 µl ice-cold buffer C [20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 0.4 M NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 µM dithiothreitol plus protease inhibitors, as described above] and rocked vigorously at 4 C for 30 min. The nuclear lysate was centrifuged at 100,000 rpm for 12 min in a TL-100 ultracentrifuge (Beckman, Palo Alto, CA) at 4 C, and the supernatant was divided into aliquots and stored at -80 C. Nuclear extracts were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels (10%) and transferred to Immobilon-P transfer membranes. Nonspecific binding on the membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline for 1 h at room temperature. After incubation with the primary antibody, anti-PPAR
or anti-C/EBP
antibody, binding was detected using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies and the Vector substrate kit. Preliminary experiments established that the intensities of these transcriptional factors were directly proportional to the amount of nuclear protein (from 320 µg nuclear proteins for C/EBP
and PPAR
1 and -
2 in 3T3-L1, C3H10T1/2, and ST-13 adipocytes, and from 7.730.8 µg nuclear proteins for C/EBP and PPAR
1 and
2 in rat primary adipocytes).
Protein determination
Protein was determined by the Bradford dye method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Richmond, CA) using BSA as the standard.
 |
Results
|
|---|
PPAR
ligand-induced adipocyte conversion and expression of adipogenic genes
We induced terminal adipocyte differentiation using ciglitazone. Confluent adult primitive mesenchymal ST-13 preadipocytes were cultured in medium containing 1 µg/ml PPAR
ligand, ciglitazone, 4 µg/ml insulin, and 10% fetal bovine serum as adipogenic inducers. Conversion was monitored using Oil Red-O staining. Figure 1
shows that most cells exhibited the adipocyte phenotype (cell rounding and accumulation of cytoplasmic lipid droplets) when cultured with the adipogenic inducers. The adipose conversion of pluripotent C3H10T1/2 stem cells and 3T3-L1 embryonic fibroblastic cells was similar to that of ST-13 cells accompanying the accumulation of triacylglycerol of 10.3 ± 0.5 mg/DNA mg in ST-13, 6.5 ± 0.3 mg/DNA mg in 3T3-L1, and 10.8 ± 1.5 mg/DNA mg in C3H10T1/2, respectively, after 9-d treatment of these inducers (Fig. 1
). ST-13 and C3H10T1/2 adipocytes accumulated more lipid than 3T3-L1 cells. On the other hand, the differentiation of ST-13 cells as well as that of C3H10T1/2 and 3T3-L1 cells were inhibited by TNF
(data not shown). We then examined the temporal expression of the adipogenic transcription factors and adipocyte-specific gene, aP2, during the differentiation of ST-13, C3H10T1/2, and 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Representative Northern blots are shown in Fig. 2
. Levels of C/EBP
mRNA, which were high in the three preadipocyte cell lines at confluence (d 0), were modestly diminished at differentiation. C/EBPß gene expression in 3T3-L1 cells transiently peaked on d 1 and decreased to 3050% of the original prestimulatory levels between d 4 and 6. The pattern of C/EBPß expression was similar during ST-13 cell differentiation. In contrast, C3H10T1/2 cells expressed C/EBPß mRNA in a different manner, starting to increase on d 3 after exposure to the adipogenic inducers and reaching a maximum level between d 48. The C/EBP
gene was similarly induced on d 3 and continued to increase to the maximum level between d 4 and 8 in all three cell lines. Expression of the PPAR
gene in ST-13 cells was quite different from that in C3H10T1/2 and 3T3-L1 cells. PPAR
expression in C3H10T1/2 and 3T3-L1 cells increased around d 13 and reached the maximum level on d 4. However, ST-13 cells expressed the PPAR
gene during the predifferentiated state. The level decreased between d 3 and 4 after exposure to the adipogenic inducers and then weakly increased between d 68. The expression of the gene for adipocyte-specific fatty acid-binding protein, aP2, was induced early in the differentiation process of all preadipocyte cell lines, confirming adipocyte differentiation.

View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. The thiazolidinedione derivative, ciglitazone, promotes adipocyte differentiation in three preadipocyte cell lines. Pluripotent C3H10T1/2 stem cells, 3T3-L1 embryonic fibroblasts, and ST-13 adult primitive mesenchymal cells were incubated for 9 d with vehicle alone (0.1% dimethylsulfoxide) or 1 µg/ml ciglitazone and 4 µg/ml insulin (see Materials and Methods), then lipid droplet accumulation was identified by staining with Oil Red-O.
|
|
Immunoblotting analyses of PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 proteins during adipocyte differentiation
Because the probe for PPAR
used in the Northern blotting could not distinguish PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 mRNAs, we examined the PPAR
proteins by immunoblotting (Fig. 3A
). A trace amount of PPAR
1 protein was detected in preadipocytes of C3H10T1/2 and 3T3-L1 cells. Expression of the PPAR
1 protein increased within 2 d of the differentiation course and reached a maximum at 46 d, whereas PPAR
2 protein appeared later in the differentiation process (d 6) in both cell lines (Fig. 3B
). ST-13 cells already expressed a high level of PPAR
1 protein at confluence (d 0), and ciglitazone caused a sustained fall in PPAR
1 that decreased by 62.0 ± 6.7% on d 6. ST-13 cells also contained a low level of PPAR
2 protein at 68 d. These data are consistent with those from the Northern blots of PPAR
mRNA (Fig. 2
). Ciglitazone on ST-13 cells also similarly affected the other PPAR
ligands, BRL-49653 and prostaglandin J2 (data not shown). The expression of C/EBP
protein was induced during differentiation with a time course similar to those of all preadipocyte cell lines (Fig. 3B
).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Expression of PPAR and C/EBP proteins during adipocyte conversion of C3H10T1/2, 3T3-L1, and ST-13 cells. The three cell lines described in Fig. 1 were cultured in the differentiation medium for 8 d postconfluence. Nuclear extracts from C3H10T1/2, 3T3-L1, and ST-13 cell lines were isolated at the indicated times. A, Equal amounts of nuclear extract (10 µg protein) were resolved by gel electrophoresis and immunoblotted using anti-PPAR and anti-C/EBP antibodies. B, Quantitation of PPAR 1 and PPAR 2 (upper), and C/EBP (lower), by densitometric analysis from three independent experiments. PPAR 1, PPAR 2, and C/EBP protein levels are expressed as arbitrary units, and data points are the mean ± SEM of three separate experiments.
|
|
Effects of hormonal stimulants on the process of adipocyte conversion and PPAR
expression
We exposed confluent ST-13 and 3T3-L1 preadipocytes to a standard hormone cocktail containing DEX, MIX, and insulin, or combinations of these inducers to determine differences in the mechanisms of adipogenesis. The cells were maintained according as described in Materials and Methods, and the nuclear fraction was extracted at the indicated times after induction. When treated with the standard hormonal cocktail, both cell lines differentiated to an adipocyte phenotype, but the omission of DEX or MIX from the standard mixture significantly attenuated the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes into mature fat cells, as indicated by their phenotype (Fig. 4A
). Percentages of lipid-containing cells were 5.0 ± 1.7% for MIX and insulin treatment, 15.6 ± 2.8% for DEX and insulin, and 89.0 ± 13.1% for MIX, DEX, and insulin. In the case of ST-13 cells, omitting MIX from the standard mixture resulted in a degree of lipid accumulation similar to that achieved when exposed to the standard hormone mixture (Fig. 4A
). However, evidence of differentiation was minimal in ST-13 preadipocytes cultured without DEX (Fig. 4A
). Percentages of lipid-containing cells were 27.4 ± 5.4% for MIX and insulin treatment, 70.4 ± 10.5% for DEX and insulin, and 85.0 ± 14.1% for MIX, DEX, and insulin. During the adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 cells exposed to the standard hormonal cocktail, the expression of PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 proteins increased dramatically within 2 d of differentiation, and continued to increase during adipocyte differentiation (Fig. 4
, B and C). In contrast, ST-13 cells exhibited a high level of PPAR
1 protein in preadipocytes; this level was amplified further, with an increase of about double on d 4 of differentiation in the standard hormonal cocktail. The induction of PPAR
2 protein was later (d 4), and it reached 38 ± 2.5% of the PPAR
1 levels (d 7). Of particular interest, the early expression of PPAR
1 protein in ST-13 cells treated with DEX and insulin increased, whereas PPAR
2 protein was expressed late and at a very low level. The ST-13 preadipocytes seemed to be converted to adipocytes in a PPAR
1-dependent manner.
Effects of hormonal stimulants on the adipocyte conversion of rat primary preadipocytes
To determine whether the adipogenesis program in ST-13 cells is universal for adult adipocytes, we incubated primary preadipocytes isolated from the sc adipose tissue of the adult rat with a combination of hormones. Figure 5A
shows that the rat primary preadipocytes converted to adipocytes in the presence of the standard hormonal cocktail or DEX combined with insulin, but these primary preadipocytes could not undergo adipogenesis in the absence of DEX (percentages of lipid-containing cells, 3.7 ± 0.9% for MIX and insulin treatment, 54.0 ± 13.0% for DEX and insulin, and 33.3 ± 12.6% for MIX, DEX, and insulin). The PPAR
1 protein that was detected in this primary preadipocytes, but at a low level unlike that in ST-13 preadipocytes, increased within 3 d of differentiation and continued to increase whenever cells were exposed to the standard hormonal cocktail or DEX plus insulin (Fig. 5
, B and C). On the other hand, a very low level of PPAR
2 was expressed during both adipogenic processes. Amounts of C/EBP
proteins also increased in the rat primary preadipocytes during adipogenesis (Fig. 5
, B and C). This was also similar to the profile of adipogenesis in primary preadipocytes from perirenal adipose tissue (data not shown). These results indicated that the primary preadipocytes isolated from adult rat adipose tissue were induced to adipocytes in a similar manner as adipogenesis of ST-13.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
It has been reported that embryonic fibroblasts isolated from 12- to 13-d-old embryos have the capacity to differentiate into adipocytes despite the absence of a clear molecular marker for preadipocytes (1). On the other hand, primary adult preadipocytes were isolated from various species at different stage of maturation. These cells are similar in many regards, but their responsiveness to inducing agents varies considerably (31). Primary preadipocytes from human adipose tissue need only a few hormonal signals for differentiation without requiring additional replication steps for the initiation of differentiation (32). It seems that the majority of adult preadipocytes isolated from fat pads has already entered terminal differentiation in vivo and may be in a late stage of the adipocyte program while embryonic fibroblasts are at an early stage. Therefore, the adipogenesis programs should be different between adult and embryonic primary preadipocyte cells. In this study, we discovered that adult-derived ST-13 cells possess an adipogenesis program distinct from that of 3T3-L1 and C3H10T1/2 cells, and this may represent the precise adipogenesis program for adult adipocytes. We showed that a PPAR
ligand, ciglitazone, induced adipogenesis in three preadipocyte cell lines. In C3H10T1/2 and 3T3-L1 cells, ciglitazone promoted an extreme increase in PPAR
1 protein during adipogenesis, and PPAR
2 appeared only late in the process (d 68). The induction of C/EBP
seemed to correspond with that of PPAR
1, not of PPAR
2 (Fig. 3B
). The ST-13 adult primitive mesenchymal cell line, however, has a completely different pattern of PPAR
mRNA and protein expression. ST-13 cells express an appreciable level of PPAR
1 protein at the preadipocyte stage, and an adipogenic inducer, ciglitazone, induced a moderate decrease in PPAR
1 expression and a slight appearance of PPAR
2 at the late stage of differentiation (d 6). Camp et al. (33) speculated that during the course of differentiation there is a threshold point for which a specific level of PPAR
activity is required for adipogenesis to proceed, and PPAR
activators enhance the rate at which this threshold is overcome. Upon attainment of the required level of PPAR
activity, the continued presence of ligands causes receptor down-regulation similar to that seen for other nuclear receptors (33). Therefore, it is likely that ciglitazone may activate the preexisting PPAR
1 early in ST-13 preadipocytes, and this triggers the initiation of adipogenesis. The down-regulation of PPAR
1 in ST-13 cells is consistent with the observation that troglitazone treatment caused a significant decrease in PPAR
proteins and DNA-binding activity (33, 34). However, it seems that C3H10T1/2 and 3T3-L1 cells do not have sufficient levels of PPAR
1 to be down-regulated during adipocyte differentiation.
Next, we again confirmed the specific pathway for ST-13 adipocyte differentiation. When the hormonal adipogenic inducers stimulated ST-13 as well as 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, cells produced increased levels of PPAR
1 protein and rarely expressed PPAR
2 at the early stage. On the other hand, considerable amounts of PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 proteins appeared in 3T3-L1 cells within 2 d in the presence of standard hormonal adipogenic inducers (Fig. 4
, B and C). This correlates well with published reports describing the early induction of PPAR
2 mRNA and protein during 3T3-L1 cell differentiation (20, 35). Furthermore, we demonstrated that omitting MIX from the standard cocktails in which ST-13 preadipocytes or primary adult preadipocytes were incubated induced large amounts of PPAR
1, C/EBP
, and a corresponding conversion of the preadipocytes into morphologically distinct adipocytes. However, 3T3-L1 cells did not convert to adipocytes under the same conditions. Hamm et al. (36) demonstrated that exposing 3T3-L1 preadipocytes to DEX and insulin does not induce adipogenesis. However, incubating MIX-deficient 3T3-L1 preadipocytes with PPAR
ligand rescues the block of adipogenesis (36). Therefore, ST-13 adult primitive or adult primary preadipocytes appear to have acquired the ability to produce an appropriate ligand for PPAR
, whereas 3T3-L1 cells cannot produce an endogenous ligand(s) or activators. Our results showed that ST-13 and 3T3-L1 cells have distinct adipogenesis programs. The activation of PPAR
1 in ST-13 preadipocytes seems to be involved in the initiation of a transcriptional cascade that results in the induction of PPAR
2 and C/EBP
expression, when PPAR
ligands or hormonal inducers are the source of stimulation. On the other hand, 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation might proceed through at least two pathways: one would be regulated by PPAR
ligands that activate PPAR
1 to accelerate adipogenesis, and the other is via hormonal inducers that may involve the activation of genes such as PPAR
2 rather than PPAR
1 (20, 33). These observations are in good agreement with the suggestion by Saladin et al. (20) that PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 have different functions, with PPAR
1 being used when ligand is abundant, and PPAR
2 being important under conditions of low ligand concentrations. It is conceivable that PPAR
1 is the most abundant isoform in preadipocytes in vivo, because its mRNA represents more than 80% of the PPAR
transcripts in sc adipose tissue and isolated adipocytes (37). This study showed that PPAR
1 might be responsible for the initiation of adipogenesis in the adult primitive mesenchymal preadipocyte cell line, ST-13, or in primary preadipocytes from adult rat adipose tissue.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We thank Drs. T. Ono and N. Suzuki for valuable advice regarding Northern blot protocols, and Mr. S. Isomura for excellent technical assistance.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Abbreviations: aP2, Adipocyte protein 2; C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein; DEX, dexamethasone; E, embryonic day; MIX, 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine; PPAR
, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
.
Received August 26, 2002.
Accepted for publication February 11, 2003.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Rosen ED, Spiegelman BM 2000 Molecular regulation of adipogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 16:145171[CrossRef][Medline]
- Tontonoz P, Graves RA, Budavari AI, Erdjument-Bromage H, Lui M, Hu E, Tempst P, Spiegelman BM 1994 Adipocyte-specific transcription factor ARF6 is a heterodimeric complex of two nuclear hormone receptors, PPAR
and RXR
. Nucleic Acids Res 22:56285634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tontonoz P, Hu E, Graves RA, Budavari AI, Spiegelman BM 1994 mPPAR
2: tissue-specific regulator of an adipocyte enhancer. Genes Dev 8:12241234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cao Z, Umek RM, McKnight SL 1991 Regulated expression of three C/EBP isoforms during adipose conversion of 3T3L1 cells. Genes Dev 5:15381552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Green H, Kehinde O 1974 Sublines of mouse 3T3 cells that accumulate lipid. Cell 1:113116
- Green H, Kehinde O 1975 An established cell line and its differentiation in culture. II. Factors affecting adipose conversion. Cell 5:1927[CrossRef][Medline]
- Yeh WC, Cao Z, Classon M, McKnight SL 1995 Cascade regulation of terminal adipocyte differentiation by three members of the C/EBP family of leucine zipper proteins. Genes Dev 15:168181
- Tontonoz P, Hu E, Spiegelman BM 1994 Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPAR
2, a lipid-activated transcriptional factor. Cell 79:11471156[CrossRef][Medline]
- Auwex J 1999 PPAR
, the ultimate thrifty gene. Diabetologia 42: 10331049
- Zhu Y, Qi C, Korenberg JR, Chen X-N, Noya D, Rao MS, Reddy JK 1995 Structural organization of mouse peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(mPPAR
) gene: alternative promoter use and different splicing yield two mPPAR
isoforms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:79217925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Fajas L, Auboeuf D, Raspe E, Schoonjans K, Lefebvre A-M, Saladin R, Najib J, Laville M, Fruchart JC, Deeb S, Vidal-Puig A, Flier J, Briggs MR, Steaels B, Vidal H, Auwerx J 1997 The organization, promoter analysis, and expression of the human PPAR
gene. J Biol Chem 272:1877918789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Forman BM, Tontonoz P, Chen J, Brun RP, Spiegelman BM, Evans RM 1995 15-Deoxy-12,14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPAR
. Cell 83:803812[CrossRef][Medline]
- Kliewer SA, Lenhard JM, Wilson TM, Patel I, Morris DC, Lehman JM 1995 A prostaglandin J2 metabolite binds peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
and promotes adipocyte differentiation. Cell 83:813819[CrossRef][Medline]
- Lehmann JM, Lenhard JM, Oliver BB, Ringold GM, Kliewer S 1997 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors
and
are activated by indomethacin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Biol Chem 272:34063410[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hiragun A, Sato M, Mitsui H 1988 Preadipocyte differentiation in vitro: identification of a highly active adipogenic agent. J Cell Physiol 134:124130[CrossRef][Medline]
- Lehmann JM, Moore IB, Smith-Oliver TA, Wilkison WO, Willson TM, Kliewer SA 1995 An antidiabetic thiazolidinedione is a high affinity ligand for peroxisome proliferator activated receptor
(PPAR
). J Biol Chem 270:1295312956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Mukherjee R, Jow L, Croston GE, Paterniti JR 1997 Identification, characterization, and tissue distribution of human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) isoforms PPAR
2 versus PPAR
1 and activation with retinoid X receptor agonists and antagonists. J Biol Chem 272:80718076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tontonoz P, Hu E, Devine J, Beale EG, Speigelman BM 1995 PPAR
2 regulates adipose expression of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene. Mol Cell Biol 15:351357[Abstract]
- Werman A, Hollenberg A, Solanes G, Bjorbak C, Vidal-Puig AJ, Flier JS 1997 Ligand-independent activation domain in the N terminus of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
). Differential activity of PPAR
1 and -2 isoforms and influence of insulin. J Biol Chem 272:2023020235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Saladin R, Fajas L, Dana S, Halvorsen Y-D, Auwex J, Briggs M 1999 Differential regulation of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor
1 (PPAR
1) and PPAR
2 messenger RNA expression in the early stages of adipogenesis. Cell Growth Differ 10:4348[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ren D, Collingwood TN, Rebar EJ, Wollffe AP, Camp HS 2002 PPAR
knockdown by engineered transcription factors: exogenous PPAR
2 but not PPAR
1 reactivates adipogenesis. Genes Dev 16:2732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Barak Y, Nelson MC, Ong ES, Jones YZ, Ruiz-Lozano P, Chin KR, Koder A Evans RM 1999 PPAR
is required for placental, cardiac, and adipose tissue development. Mol Cell 4:585595[CrossRef][Medline]
- Kubota N, Terauchi Y, Miki H, Tamemoto H, Yamauchi T, Komeda K, Satoh S, Nakano R, Ishii C, Sugiyama K, Eto K, Tsubamoto Y, Okuno A, Murakami K, Sekihara H, Hasegawa G, Naito H, Toyoshima Y, Tanaka S, Shiota K, Kitamura T, Fujita T, Ezaki O, Aizawa S, Kadowaki T 1999 PPAR
mediates high-fat diet-induced adipocyte hypertrophy and insulin resistance. Mol Cell 4:597609[CrossRef][Medline]
- Moitra J, Mason MM, Olive M, Krylov D, Gavrilova O, Marcus-Samuels B, Feigenbaum L, Lee E, Aoyama T, Eckhaus M, Reitman ML, Vinson C 1998 Life without white fat: a transgenic mouse. Genes Dev 12:31683181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hiragun A, Sato M, Mitsui H 1980 Establishment of a clonal cell line that differentiates into adipose cells in vitro. In Vitro 16:685693[Medline]
- Sato M, Yajima Y, Kawashima S, Tanaka K, Kagechika H 2001 Synergistic potentiation of thiazolidinedione-induced ST13 preadipocyte differentiation by RXR synergists. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 280:646651[CrossRef][Medline]
- Wu Z, Bucher NL, Farmer SR 1996 Induction of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
during the conversion of 3T3 fibroblasts into adipocytes is mediated by C/EBPß, C/EBP
, and glucocorticoids. Mol Cell Biol 16:41284136[Abstract]
- Chomczynski P, Sacchi N 1987 Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156159[Medline]
- Kuroda M, Ishida T, Takahashi M, Satoh M, Machinami R, Watanabe T 1997 Oncogenic transformation and inhibition of adipocytic conversion of preadipocytes by TLS/FUS-CHOP type II chimeric protein. Am J Pathol 151:735744[Abstract]
- Engelman JA, Berg AH, Lewis RY, Lin A, Lisanti MP, Scherer PE 1999 Constitutively active mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 6 (MKK6) or salicylate induces spontaneous 3T3-L1 adipogenesis. J Biol Chem 274:3563035638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gregoire FM, Smas CM, Sul HS 1998 Understanding adipocyte differentiation. Physiol Rev 78:783809[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Entenmann G, Hauner H 1996 Relationship between replication and differentiation in cultured human adipocyte precursor cells. Am J Physiol 270:C1011C1016
- Camp HS, Whitton AL, Tafuri SR 1999 PPAR
activators down-regulate the expression of PPAR
in 3T3L1 adipocytes. FEBS Lett 186:186190
- Hauser S, Adelmant G, Sarraf P, Wright HM, Mueller E, Spiegelman BM 2000 Degradation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
is linked to ligand-dependent activation. J Biol Chem 275:1852718533[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hu E, Kim JB, Sarraf P, Spiegelman BM 1996 Inhibition of adipogenesis through MAP kinase-mediated phosphorylation of PPAR
. Science 274:21002103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hamm JK, Park BH, Farmer SR 2001 A role for C/EBPß in regulating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
activity during adipogenesis in 3T3L1 preadipocytes. J Biol Chem 276:1846418471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Vidal-Puig AJ, Considine RV, Jimenez-Linan M, Werman A, Pories WJ, Caro JF, Flier JS 1997 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene expression in human tissues. Effects of obesity, weight loss, and regulation by insulin and glucocorticoids. J Clin Invest 99:24162422[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Yajima, M. Sato, H. Sorimachi, M. Inomata, M. Maki, and S. Kawashima
Calpain System Regulates the Differentiation of Adult Primitive Mesenchymal ST-13 Adipocytes
Endocrinology,
October 1, 2006;
147(10):
4811 - 4819.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Nagai, T. Sato, N. Akimoto, A. Ito, and M. Sumida
Isolation and Identification of Histone H3 Protein Enriched in Microvesicles Secreted from Cultured Sebocytes
Endocrinology,
June 1, 2005;
146(6):
2593 - 2601.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|