help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2002-0088
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arosh, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fortier, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arosh, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fortier, M. A.
Endocrinology Vol. 144, No. 7 3076-3091
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Molecular Cloning and Characterization of Bovine Prostaglandin E2 Receptors EP2 and EP4: Expression and Regulation in Endometrium and Myometrium during the Estrous Cycle and Early Pregnancy

J. A. Arosh, S. K. Banu, P. Chapdelaine, V. Emond, J. J. Kim, L. A. MacLaren and M. A. Fortier

Département d’Ontogénie et Reproduction, Centre de Recherche en Biologie de la Reproduction, Centre de Recherche du CHUL (J.A.A., S.K.B., P.C., V.E., J.J.K., M.A.F.), and Département d’Obstétrique et Gynécologie (M.A.F.), Université Laval, Ste-Foy, Québec, Canada GIV 4G2; and Departments of Plant and Animal Sciences, Nova Scotia Agricultural College (L.A.M.), Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada B2N 5E3

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Michel A. Fortier, Département d’Ontogénie et Reproduction, Centre de Recherche en Biologie de la Reproduction, Centre de Recherche du CHUL, Université Laval, Ste-Foy, Québec, Canada GIV 4G2.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Prostaglandins (PGs) play important functions in the reproductive system, and PGE2 appears necessary for recognition of pregnancy. We have found that PGE2 is able to increase cAMP generation in the bovine endometrium. There are two PGE2 receptors (EP), EP2 and EP4, that are coupled to adenylate cyclase to generate cAMP, but these receptors have not been studied in the bovine. We have cloned and characterized bovine EP2 and EP4 receptors and studied their expression in the uterus. The amino acid sequences of bovine EP2 and EP4 possess a high degree (>80%) of identity with the other mammalian homologs. EP2 is expressed in most tissues, and EP4 is expressed only in intestine and testis. EP2 mRNA and protein are expressed in endometrium and myometrium during the estrous cycle, whereas EP4 is undetectable. The Western analysis indicates that EP2 is maximally expressed in both endometrium and myometrium between d 10 and 18 of the estrous cycle. Immunohistochemical localization reveals that EP2 protein is expressed in all cell types of endometrium and myometrium. On d 18, pregnancy up-regulates EP2 protein, primarily in endometrial stroma and myometrial smooth muscle cells. In conclusion, EP2 is the major cAMP-generating PGE2 receptor expressed and regulated in the bovine uterus during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PROSTAGLANDINS (PGS) are known as key mediators of several female reproductive functions, including ovulation, fertilization, implantation, and parturition (1). Arachidonic acid, an essential fatty acid stored in membrane phospholipids, is the primary precursor of PGs. Arachidonic acid is converted into PGH2 by the rate-limiting enzymes, cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-2. PGH2 is then converted into different primary PGs, including PGE2, PGF2{alpha}, PGD2, PGI2, and thromboxane A2, by cell-specific isomerases and synthases (2). These PGs exert their effects through G protein-coupled receptors, designated EP, FP, DP, IP, and TP, respectively (3, 4, 5).

PGE2 has four receptor subtypes, EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4. Each receptor is encoded by different genes. EP1 is coupled to phospholipase C, generating two second messengers, inositol triphosphate, which is involved in the liberation of intracellular calcium (Ca2+), and diacylglycerol, an activator of protein kinase C. EP2 and EP4 are coupled to adenylate cyclase and generate cAMP that activates the protein kinase A signaling pathway. The signaling of EP3 is more complex. EP3 receptor has four subtypes, A, B, C, and D, with a wide range of action from inhibition of cAMP production to increases in Ca2+ and inositol triphosphate. EP2 and EP4 are known as relaxant receptors, EP1 is considered as a contractile receptor, and EP3 is termed an inhibitory receptor (3, 4, 5).

PGE2 plays a vital role in the survival of cells acting as a mitogenic, antiapoptotic, and angiogenic factors (7, 8). PGE2 increases vascular endothelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and COX-2 mRNA expression via the cAMP-protein kinase A signaling pathway (9, 10). PGE2 increases cAMP in many tissues, including kidney, intestine, and uterus, but the relative contribution of EP2 vs. EP4 receptors to these effects is incompletely defined (11). EP2 and EP4 receptors were cloned in rat (12), mouse (13, 14), rabbit (15, 16), dog (17, 18), and human (19, 20). EP2 and EP4 mRNAs are expressed in uterine tissues of different species, such as rat (21), mouse (22), sheep (23), baboon (24), and human (25). EP2 and EP4 receptors mediate relaxation of uterine smooth muscle during pregnancy in different species (21, 22, 23, 24, 25). The effect of PGE2 in endometrial angiogenesis and vasodilatation, uterine receptivity, and decidualization is mediated by cAMP-dependent mechanisms in rat (21), mouse (22), rabbit (26), and human (27). Knockout studies in mice indicated that EP2, but not EP1, EP3, or EP4, was associated with reproductive failures (5).

During the bovine estrous cycle, d 15–17 are critical for either the establishment of pregnancy or the return to a new estrous cycle (28). The bovine endometrium produces PGE2 throughout the estrous cycle, but its production is comparatively higher at mid and late luteal phases of the estrous cycle (29). The exact role of PGE2 in bovine endometrium is not fully elucidated. Recently, we have shown that two PGE2 biosynthetic enzymes, COX-2 and PGE synthase (PGES) are coexpressed in bovine endometrium in the mid and late luteal phases of the estrous cycle (30). High levels of PGE2 have been found in the uterine vein during early pregnancy in the sheep (31). We have shown previously that interferon-{tau}, the pregnancy recognition signal in ruminants, increases the expression of COX-2 and PGES as well as PGE2 production in endometrial cells in vitro (32, 33). Very recent evidence suggests that pregnancy up-regulates COX-2 expression in the bovine and ovine endometrium (34, 35) in vivo. At the time of establishment of pregnancy, PGE2 is considered an important immunomodulatory (36) and a temporary luteostatic and/or luteoprotective factor in ruminants (37). Early findings from our laboratory have shown that treatment with PGE2 increases cAMP production in bovine endometrial epithelial and stromal cells in vitro (38).

Overall, the available information converges to indicate that cAMP generated in response to PGE2 is an important mediator of diverse functions during the estrous cycle and at the time of establishment of pregnancy. EP2 and EP4 are the primary PGE2 receptors coupled with cAMP generation, but they have not been cloned in the bovine. Therefore, the objectives of the present investigation were 1) to clone and characterize bovine EP2 and EP4 receptors, and 2) to study the expression of EP2 and EP4 receptors in bovine endometrium and myometrium during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
The numerous reagents necessary for this study were purchased from the following suppliers: Superscript II reverse transcriptase, DNA ladder, RNA ladder, dithiothreitol, T4 kinase, 5x forward reaction buffer, 5x first strand buffer, TRIzol, and Topo cloning kits from Invitrogen (Burlington, Canada); random primer-pd(N)6, deoxy-NTPs, RNA Guard, rTaq DNA polymerase, PCR 10x buffer, and Ready-To-Go DNA labeling kit from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Montréal, Canada); EcoRI, EcoRV, BamHI, HindIII, and prestained protein markers from New England Biolabs, Inc. (Mississauga, Canada); enzyme cutting buffers and trypsin from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Montréal, Canada); T7 sequencing kit from U.S. Biochemical Corp. (Cleveland, OH); Bright Star-Plus nylon membrane and UltraHyp from Ambion, Inc. (Austin, TX); Trans-blot nitrocellulose membrane from Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (Hercules, CA); [{gamma}-32P]ATP and [{alpha}-32P]deoxy-CTP from Perkin-Elmer, Markham, Canada); goat antirabbit biotinylated Ig from DAKO Corp. (Mississauga, Canada); goat antirabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc. (West Grove, PA); human antirabbit EP2 polyclonal antibody from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI); frozen specimen embedding medium Cryomatrix from Shandon (Pittsburgh, PA); Vectastain Elite ABC kit from Vector Laboratories, Inc. (Burlingame, CA); rabbit preimmune serum from Solution Recherche, Inc. (Québec, Canada); Renaissance from NEN Life Science Products, Inc. (Boston, MA); tissue culture plates from BD Biosciences (Franklin Park, NJ); RPMI 1640 from ICN Biomedicals, Inc. (Aurora, OH); fetal bovine serum and fetal calf serum (Multicell) from Wisent, Inc. (Québec, Canada); BioMax film from Eastman Kodak Co. (Rochester, NY); plasmid and mRNA purification kits from QIAGEN (Mississauga, Canada); and PGE2, isobutylmethylxanthine, goat serum, collagenase type II, deoxyribonuclease I, and Mayer’s hematoxylin solution from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (Oakville, Canada). All oligonucleotide primers were chemically synthesized using ABT 394 synthase (Perkin-Elmer). The other chemicals used were molecular biological grade available from Laboratoire Mat or Fisher Biotech (Québec, Canada).

Preparation of tissues
All of the bovine tissues used in the present study, endometrium, myometrium, caruncles, intercaruncles, fetal membranes, corpus luteum, testis, epididymis, seminal vesicle, and other nonreproductive tissues (brain, eye, lung, heart, liver, spleen, kidney, adrenal, rumen, and intestine) were collected at a local abattoir immediately after the slaughter. Tissues were placed on ice and transported to the laboratory within 1–1.5 h. Tissues were cut into small pieces, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 C until used.

Total RNA extraction and preparation of polyadenylated (poly A+) RNA and genomic DNA
Total RNA was extracted from different bovine tissues and cell cultures using TRIzol according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Poly A+ RNA was isolated from 500 µg total RNA using Oligotex beads suspension (30 µl; QIAGEN kit) as described by the manufacturer. Bovine genomic DNA was isolated from bovine testis using a phenol-chloroform extraction method (39).

Cloning and sequencing of bovine EP2 receptor
Bovine EP2 receptor cDNA was cloned in three steps. The primers used are shown in Table 1AGo.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Primers used for cloning of bovine EP2 and EP4 receptors

 
Step 1. RNA from caruncular endometrium collected during early pregnancy (d 20–25) was used as a template. Poly A+ RNA (2.5 µg) was reverse transcribed using random primer and Superscript II reverse transcriptase. Bovine EP2 cDNA (0.84 kb) was generated by RT-PCR using specific primers (nos. 1 and 2). The PCR conditions were 94 C for 1 min, 50 C for 1 min, and 72 C for 1 min for 30 cycles. The primers were deduced from the known EP2 sequences of human and mouse. The RT-PCR product was cloned into TOPO cloning pCR 2.1 and sequenced.

Step 2. For completing rapid amplification of 5' cDNA ends (5'RACE), bovine genomic DNA (2 µg) was used as a template, and primer (no. 3) was used to complete the first round asymmetric PCR. According to the known human and mouse EP2 gene structures (40, 41), no intron is present between ATG and the sixth transmembrane domain; primer 3 was selected near by the sixth transmembrane region. For the second round PCR, the reaction medium (2 µl) from the first round PCR was used as a template, and specific primers (no. 4 and 5) were used. The upstream primer was designed based on the known sequences of human and mouse 5' end. The downstream primer was deduced from the sequencing of the PCR product obtained in the first step. The PCR conditions were the same as in step 1, except for the annealing temperature, which was 40 C. The amplified PCR product (0.14 kb) was cloned into TOPO cloning pCR 2.1 and sequenced.

Step 3. For completing the 3'RACE, caruncular RNA from early pregnancy (d 20–25) was used as a template. Poly A+ RNA (2.5 µg) was reverse transcribed with Superscript II using adapter primer as anchor (no. 6). Primer 7 was used to complete the first round asymmetric PCR, deduced from the sequencing of PCR product obtained in the first step. For the second round PCR, reaction medium (2 µl) from the first round PCR was used as a template, and specific primers (no. 8 and 9) were used for PCR amplification. Primer 8 was deduced from the sequencing of the PCR product obtained in the first step, and primer 9 served as an adapter. The PCR conditions were the same as those in step 1. The RT-PCR product (1.63 kb) was cloned into pEF6/V5-His TOPO TA cloning vector and sequenced.

Finally, full-length EP2 cDNA was amplified using the specific primers sense 5'-ATGAATACTTCCAACGACTCC-3' and antisense 5'-TCAAAGGTCAATCTGTTTAC TGGC-3'. These primers were deduced from the sequencing of the PCR products obtained in the three steps. Comparisons were made between the sequences of full-length cDNA and partial amplified products generated in the three steps to establish the complete sequence of bovine EP2 receptor.

Cloning and sequencing of bovine EP4 receptor
Bovine EP4 receptor was cloned using the strategies described under EP2 using different sets of primers (Table 1BGo). Primers 10, 11, and 13 were deduced from the known EP4 sequences of human and mouse. Primers 12, 14, 16, and 17 were deduced from the sequencing of bovine EP4 cDNA obtained in the first step. Primers 15 and 18 served as adapters. In step 1, 1.28-kb bovine EP4 partial cDNA was generated by RT-PCR with primers 10 and 11. In step 2 for the 5' end, a 0.10-kb EP4 receptor fragment was obtained with primer 12 in an asymmetric reaction (annealing at 43 C) on genomic DNA, followed by PCR with primers 13 and 14. In step 3 for the 3' end, a 1.46-kb EP4 receptor fragment was obtained with primer 15 in an asymmetric reaction (annealing at 50 C) on cDNA transcribed with Superscript II, followed by PCR with primers 17 and 18. At each step the PCR product was cloned into TOPO cloning pCR 2.1 and sequenced. Repeated sequencing of the overlapping PCR products from both sides of the amplified products was performed to confirm the accuracy and reproducibility of the results and to establish the complete sequence of bovine EP4 receptor.

DNA sequencing and sequence analyses
The plasmid DNA was isolated using the QIAGEN plasmid purification system. After using the appropriate restriction enzymes, the clones were sequenced using a T7 DNA polymerase kit and automated analyzer. Multiple sequence alignments were obtained using the CLUSTALX program. Hydropathy analysis (42), Shaw-Kaman sequence consensus (43), and consensus sequences for phosphorylation and glycosylation (44) were performed.

Northern blot analysis
Northern blotting and hybridization were performed as described in our recent publication (30). Briefly, total RNA (~20 µg) or poly (A) RNA (~10 µg) was loaded in each lane and electrophoresed on 1.2% formaldehyde-agarose gel. RNA was transferred overnight onto a nylon membrane in 10x standard saline citrate (SSC). Blots were prepared separately for EP2 and EP4 and stored at -20 C until used. The cDNA probe for EP2 or EP4 was labeled with [{alpha}-32P]deoxy-CTP (3000 Ci/mmol) using Ready-To-Go DNA labeling kit. Prehybridization was carried out for 1 h at 45 C, and hybridization was carried out overnight at 45 C using UltraHyb. Full-length EP2 cDNA (1.05 kb) and partial-length EP4 cDNA (1.28 kb) served as probes.

Southern blot analysis
Bovine genomic DNA was prepared as described above and digested (10 µg/reaction) with EcoRI, BamHI, and HindIII overnight at 37 C and precipitated in ethanol (45). After electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose in 1x TBE, the gel was denatured in 0.5 M NaOH containing 1.5 M NaCl (twice, 15 min each time) and neutralized in 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 1.5 M NaCl (twice, 30 min each time). The DNA was transferred overnight onto a nylon membrane by capillary blotting in 10x SSC. The membrane was hybridized as described above for Northern blot using EP2 (1.05 kb) or EP4 (1.28 kb) 32P-labeled cDNA probe.

RT-PCR/Southern blot analysis
Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed using random primer and Superscript II reverse transcriptase. The gene structure analysis of human and mouse EP2 (40, 41) and EP4 (46, 47) receptors revealed that transmembrane domains I–VI are encoded by exon 1, and trans-membrane domain VII and the remaining part of the coding sequence are encoded by exon 2. Based on the gene structures, the forward primer was selected within exon 1, and the reverse primer was selected within exon 2 to eliminate nonspecific amplification of genomic DNA. Specific primers were used for EP2 [sense, 5'-GTGCTGCCCACTATCTACATAGTC-3' (positions 466–489); antisense, 5'-TCTA AGAGAGCTTGGAGGTCCCACTT-3' (positions 888–865)] and for EP4 [sense, 5'-TTCAGTTCCTTCCTCATCCTCGCC-3' (positions 571–594); antisense, 5'-CTGTCTTCCG CAGGAGGATGTATA-3' (positions 1024–1001)]. Oligoprobes were selected between these two primers to identify the mature amplified fragment. For EP2, primer 5'-GCCGTCTGC TCCTTGCCTTTCACG-3' (positions 802–825), and for EP4, primer 5'-TGGCTCCAGTTGTGGCCGAT ATAA-3' (positions 936–913) were used. The PCR conditions were 94 C for 1 min, 60 C for 30 sec, and 72 C for 1.30 min for 35 cycles. The expected size of the amplified EP2 cDNA was approximately 422 bp, and that of EP4 cDNA was approximately 454 bp. The RT-PCR products were confirmed by sequencing. As an internal standard, bovine ß-actin cDNA (~443 bp) was amplified using specific sense (5'-CAACTGGGACGACATGGAGAAGATCTGGCA-3') and antisense (5'-GAGGATCTTCATG AGGTAGTCTGTCAGGTC-3') primers. The PCR conditions were similar to those described above. After RT-PCR, 10 µl PCR product were run on a 1.2% agarose gel. Southern blotting was performed as described above. Classical hybridization solution (6x SSC, 5x Denhardt’s solution, 50 µg /ml salmon sperm DNA, and 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulfate) was used. Prehybridization was carried out for 1 h at 60 C. The EP2 or EP4 oligoprobes were labeled with [{gamma}-32 P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol) using T4 kinase. Hybridization was carried out for 3–4 h at 60 C. The blots were washed and exposed to BioMax film. Densitometry of autoradiograms was performed using an {alpha} Imager ({alpha} Innotec Corp., Montréal, Canada).

Nested PCR
Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed as described above. First, a PCR was performed using specific sense (5'-AAATCGCGCAAGGAGCAGAAGGAGAC-3'; positions 130–156) and antisense (5'-GACTTCCAGGGAGCTCCCCTTAGG-3'; positions 1434–1410) primers for EP4. Then, a 2-µl aliquot from the first PCR was amplified using a different set of primers. The sense (5'-TTCAGTTCCTTCCTCATCCTCGCC-3'; positions 571–594) and antisense (5'-CTGTC TTCCGCAGGAGGATGTATA-3'; positions 1024–1001) primers were chosen to amplify a fragment within the first PCR product. The amplified PCR product (454 bp) was cloned and sequenced as described above to confirm the identity of the EP4 messenger. The PCR conditions for each PCR program were 94 C for 1 min, 60 C for 30 sec, and 72 C for 1.30 min for 35 cycles. Bovine ß-actin was used as an internal standard as described above. The primers were deduced from the bovine EP4 sequence determined earlier.

Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed as described in our recent paper (30). In brief, total proteins (~20 µg) extracted from tissues (48) were loaded in each lane and electrophoresed on 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by electrotransfer onto nitrocellulose membrane. Antihuman polyclonal EP2, which possessed 83% homology with bovine (human, SLRTQDA TQTSCSTQSDASKQADL; bovine, SLRTQEATQTSCSTQSNASKQIDL) was used as the primary antibody (1:500). Amino acids different from human sequences are underlined. Goat antirabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase was used as the secondary antibody (1:20,000). Chemiluminescent substrate was applied according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The blots were exposed to BioMax film, and densitometry of autoradiograms was performed using an {alpha} Imager.

Immunohistochemistry
Tissues were embedded using embedding medium (Cryomatrix), and cryosections (6 µm) were made using a cryotome (Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA). Immunohistochemical localization of EP2 protein was performed using Vectastain Elite ABC kit according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Briefly, tissue sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. Endogenous peroxidase activity was removed by fixing sections in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol. Tissue sections were blocked in 10% goat serum for 1 h at room temperature. Incubation with the primary antibody (antihuman polyclonal EP2, 1:500) was performed overnight at 4 C. The sections were further incubated with the second antibody (goat antirabbit IgG biotinylated, 1:200) for 30 min at room temperature. For the negative control, preimmune rabbit serum (1:5000) was used instead of EP2 antibody. Between each step, tissues were washed in PBS. Finally, tissues were stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. Photos were captured using the Spot program (Carsen Group, Inc., Markham, Canada), and quantification was performed using Image-Pro-Plus (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD).

Specificity of EP2 antibody
A transient transfection study was performed to confirm the specificity of the EP2 antibody. Embryonal human kidney cells (transformed cell line, Invitrogen) 293 FT were cultured in 24-well plates in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 U/ml penicillin and streptomycin. Full-length bovine EP2 cDNA was cloned in PEF6V5His-TOPO TA cloning vector downstream of the T7 promoter. At 70–80% confluence, cells were transfected with bovine EP2 cDNA (0.8 µg/well) premixed with Lipofectamine 2000 (1.0 µl/well). During transfection cells were grown in the absence of antibiotics. As a control, 293FT cells were transfected with PCR 3.1 vector containing enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) (49). After 24–48 h, transfected cells were lysed, and total protein was collected as previously described (48). Total protein (20 µg) was electrophoresed in 10% SDS-PAGE, and Western blot was performed as described above.

Study during the estrous cycle
Cyclic uteri were collected from abattoir. Days of the estrous cycle were determined by utero-ovarian morphology (30). Uteri were classified into seven groups as d 1–3 (n = 4), 4–6 (n = 3), 7–9 (n = 3), 10–12 (n = 3), 13–15 (n = 6), 16–18 (n = 8), and 19–21 (n = 7). The endometrium and myometrium were isolated. Total RNA and proteins were extracted, and the expression of EP2 and EP4 receptors was studied.

Study during early pregnancy
Beef cattle were used in this study. All heifers (cycle length, 19 ± 1 d) were maintained at the Novo Scotia Agricultural College Research Farm. All procedures performed were in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care, 1993. Estrus was synchronized using a standard double PGF2{alpha} regimen. In the pregnant group (n = 3), heifers were inseminated with proven semen at estrus. In the control group (n = 3), heifers were not inseminated. On d 18 of the estrous cycle heifers were slaughtered at a local abattoir, and uteri were collected. Ipsi- and contralateral uterine horns were identified. Pregnancy was confirmed by the presence of a conceptus. One-cubic centimeter cross-sectioned blocks were dissected in the middle portion of the uterine horn ipsilateral to the corpus luteum in both cyclic and pregnant uteri. Tissues were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 until further use. The expression of EP2 protein was studied by immunohistochemistry.

Functional characterization of EP2 in bovine endometrium
Cyclic uteri (d 1–3) were collected from the abattoir. Endometrial epithelial and stromal primary cells were cultured as described previously (38). Medium (RPMI 1640 and 10% fetal bovine serum depleted of steroids by dextran-charcoal extraction) was changed every 2 d until the cells were used. Cells reached confluence within 7–10 d. Cell cultures were incubated at 37 C in an atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. At confluence the medium was replaced with serum-free RPMI 1640 and incubated for 24 h. Total RNA and proteins were extracted to study the expression of EP2 and EP4 mRNAs and proteins. The functionality of EP2 receptor was studied in epithelial and stromal cells by measurement of cAMP generation. Cells were treated with PGE2 at different concentrations from 10-9–10-5 M. At confluence, the cells were incubated for 15 min at 37 C in the presence of Krebs solution containing 0.5 mM isobutylmethylxanthine. The reaction was initiated by adding PGE2 for 10 min at 37 C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of an equal volume of ethanol/0.02 N HCl. All samples were lyophilized and resuspended in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 6.2. cAMP was measured by RIA as described previously (50). The experiment was repeated three times using different uterine tissues.

Statistical analysis
All numerical data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Where appropriate, data were subjected to statistical analysis with ANOVA, followed by Fischer’s protected least significant difference and Duncan’s new multiple range comparison tests (SUPER ANOVA, Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Molecular characterization of bovine EP2 and EP4 receptors
We have cloned and characterized the primary structures of bovine EP2 and EP4 receptors (GenBank/EBI accession no. EP2-AF539402 and EP4-AF539403). Bovine EP2 and EP4 mRNAs (Fig. 1GoGo, A and B) consist of an open reading frame of 1056 and 1476 bp and a 3'-untranslated region of 1441 and 1348 bp nucleic acids, respectively. The open reading frames of EP2 and EP4 encode 352 (~39 kDa) and 492 (~55 kDa) amino acids, respectively. The deduced amino acid sequences of bovine EP2 and EP4 receptors (Fig. 2GoGoGo, A and B) indicate the presence of seven transmembrane domains typical of rhodopsin type G protein-coupled receptors. Bovine EP2 amino acid sequences possess 84, 82, 80, and 79% identity with the homologs of human, mouse, dog, and rat, respectively. Bovine EP4 possesses 89, 89, 88, 87, and 87% identity with the homologs of human, rabbit, dog, rat, and mouse, respectively. Most of the sequence divergence is found in the extracellular and cytoplasmic loops, whereas a high degree of sequence conservation (~90%) is observed in the putative transmembrane domains. Arginine (R) is located at positions 296 and 322 in the seventh transmembrane domain of bovine EP2 and EP4 receptors, respectively. Putative N-glycosylation and serine/threonine phosphorylation sites are predicted (44) in the amino acid sequences of bovine EP2 and EP4, as was found for other species.



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Nucleic acid and amino acid sequences of bovine EP2 (A; GenBank/EBI accession no. AF539402) and EP4 (B; GenBank/EBI accession no. 539403) receptors. The translation initiation (ATG) codon, stop codons (TGA and TAG), poly A tail, and 5'-ATTTA-3' motif are shown in bold. The numbers on the right refer the last nucleic acid or amino acid on that line. The bovine EP2 and EP4 receptors were cloned as described in Materials and Methods.

 


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1A. Continued.

 


View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Multiple alignments of amino acid sequences of bovine EP2 (A) and EP4 (B) receptors with the other species obtained using CLUSTALX program. Identical residues are marked (*). Dashes indicate gaps introduced in the sequence for alignment purpose. The numbers on the right refer to the last amino acid on that line. The positions of putative trans-membrane domains are shown in the shaded box and indicated above the amino acid sequence. Conserved N-linked glycosylation sites ({diamondsuit}), key residue ({blacktriangleup}), and phosphorylation sites ({bullet}) are shown across the species.

 


View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2A. Continued.

 


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2B. Continued.

 
Northern and Southern blot analyses of bovine EP2 and EP4
Tissue expression of bovine EP2 and EP4 mRNAs was analyzed by Northern blot (Fig. 3Go, A and B) using total RNA (20 µg) or poly A+ RNA (10 µg). Both results indicate that EP2 mRNA is present in endometrium, but not in lung or kidney. The results (Fig. 3AGo) using poly A+ RNA further demonstrate that the EP2 transcript is present in two forms, primarily at about 4.4 kb and, to a lesser extent, at about 2.7 kb. EP4 mRNA is undetectable in any of the tissues using either total RNA or poly A+ RNA. The cDNA probes used for Northern analysis of EP2 and EP4 were also used for Southern analysis of bovine genomic DNA digested with different restriction enzymes. The results (Fig. 3CGo) show that a hybridization signal is present in at least two lanes for each probe. This confirms that the bovine EP2 and EP4 receptors are encoded by single copy genes.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Northern blot analysis of EP2 (A) and EP4 (B) receptors. Total RNA (20 µg) or poly A+ RNA (10 µg) was used. 18S RNA was used as an internal standard. Southern blot analysis of bovine genomic DNA for EP2 and EP4 genes (C) was performed. Bovine genomic DNA (10 µg) was digested with the indicated restriction enzymes. EP2 or EP4 cDNA probe labeled with [{alpha}-32P]deoxy-CTP was used. More details are given in Materials and Methods.

 
Tissue distribution of bovine EP2 and EP4 receptors by Southern RT-PCR
Because of the low abundance of EP2 and EP4 transcripts, a much more sensitive method, RT-PCR followed by Southern blotting, was used to study the EP2 and EP4 mRNA expression in bovine tissues (Fig. 4Go, A–C). The results indicate that EP2 mRNA is expressed in every tissue studied, and EP4 mRNA is expressed only in intestine and testis. The absence of expression of EP4 mRNA as determined by Northern and RT-PCR/Southern blotting was surprising given the pattern of expression in other species. A much more sensitive method, nested PCR, was used to validate our results. With this more sensitive method, EP4 mRNA could be detected in kidney, adrenals, lung, and endometrium (Fig. 4DGo). The results suggest that the limited number of copies of EP4 expressed in bovine tissues does not permit detection by classical RT-PCR/Southern blotting methods.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. RT-PCR/Southern analysis of EP2 (A) and EP4 (B) receptors in different bovine tissues. The bovine ß-actin (C) was used as an internal standard. PCR product (10 µl) was used in each lane. EP2 or EP4 oligoprobe labeled with [{gamma}-32P]ATP was used. D, Nested PCR was used as a complementary, highly sensitive method to evaluate the expression of bovine EP4 for some tissues negative in B, but for which EP4 was reported in other species. RT-PCR/Southern blotting and nested PCR were performed as described in Materials and Methods. The sizes of the cDNAs are indicated.

 
Validation of EP2 antibody
The immunoreactivity of the commercial rabbit antihuman polyclonal antibody with the bovine EP2 receptor was confirmed experimentally (Fig. 5Go). HEK298 FT cells were transiently transfected with full-length bovine EP2 cDNA. The immunoreactivity was tested by Western analysis that highlighted a strong signal appearing at about 54 kDa in transfected cells. EP2 is also expressed at a low level in control cells. This expression could be expected, because the cells were derived from embryonal human kidney, a tissue in which EP4 expression has been reported. Our results thus confirm the specificity and validity of the commercial EP2 antibody in bovine tissues.



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Immunoreactivity of the antihuman EP2 antibody in the bovine. The bovine EP2 was transiently transfected in 293FT as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were grown to confluence and recovered for protein extraction. Total proteins (20 µg) were electrophoresed in 10% SDS-PAGE, and Western blot was performed. The EP2 protein appears at the predicted level 54 kDa. A, Lanes 1 and 2, Cells transfected with the EGFP vector were used as a control. These cells expressed low levels of endogenous EP2. Lanes 3 and 4, Cells transfected with full-length bovine EP2 cDNA. The bovine EP2 was easily distinguishable in transfected cells as a strong signal. B, Coomassie blue staining is shown as a loading control. The EGFP protein appears at approximately 30 kDa (lanes 1 and 2).

 
Expression of EP2 and EP4 receptors during the estrous cycle
Endometrial and myometrial tissues were collected on different days of the estrous cycle, and the expression of EP2 and EP4 receptors was studied (Fig. 6Go). RT-PCR/Southern blot analysis show that EP2 mRNA is expressed in endometrium and myometrium with little modulation, whereas EP4 mRNA is undetectable in either tissue throughout the estrous cycle. RNA from intestine was used as a positive control. Western blot analysis confirms the presence of EP2 protein and its modulation in endometrium and myometrium. EP2 protein appears as one form (~54 kDa) in endometrium and as two forms (~54 and 60 kDa) in myometrium. Based on densitometric analysis, the expression of EP2 protein in endometrium is significantly (P < 0.05) higher between d 10 and 18 of the estrous cycle. In the myometrium, EP2 protein expression begins to increase on day 7, is maximal (P < 0.05) between d 10 and 18, and decreases on d 19 of the estrous cycle.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Expression of EP2 and EP4 receptors in endometrium (I) and myometrium (II) during the estrous cycle. A, EP2 and EP4 mRNA. The bovine ß-actin was used as an internal standard. RNA from bovine intestine was used as a positive control. The sizes of the cDNAs are indicated. B, EP2 protein; the molecular weight of the protein is indicated. C, Densitometry of EP2 mRNA. D, Densitometry of EP2 protein. Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM of relative integrated density value (IDV). For each group three to eight samples were analyzed, and representative samples are shown. Endometrium: a, d 10–18 vs. others; b, d 16–18 vs. others. Myometrium: a, d 7–21 vs. others; b, d 10–18 vs. others. Statistical significance is considered at P < 0.05. RT-PCR/Southern and Western analyses were performed as described in Materials and Methods.

 
Expression of EP2 and EP4 receptors during early pregnancy
Pregnant and cyclic uteri on d 18 were used to study EP2 protein expression immunocytochemically. EP2 protein is localized in epithelial, stromal, and glandular epithelial cells of the endometrium, and inner circular and outer longitudinal smooth muscle cells of myometrium in both pregnant and cyclic uteri (Fig. 7Go). Quantitative analysis indicates that pregnancy significantly (P < 0.05) increases EP2 protein expression in both endometrium and myometrium. The level of increase is 1.5-fold in luminal epithelium, 3-fold in stroma, 4-fold in circular, and 5-fold in longitudinal smooth muscle cells. No change is observed in glandular epithelial cells. The effect of pregnancy on EP2 expression is mainly observed in endometrial stroma and myometrial smooth muscle cells.



View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Immunohistochemical localization of EP2 protein on d 18 of the estrous cycle and early pregnancy (magnification, x400). EP2 protein is present in luminal epithelium, stroma, and glandular epithelium of endometrium, in circular and longitudinal smooth muscle cells of myometrium, and in embryonic trophoblastic cells. A, Negative control. B, Day 18 of the estrous cycle. C, Day 18 of pregnancy. 1 and 2 denote luminal epithelium and the presence of the conceptus (trophoblastic cells), respectively. D, Quantitative analysis based on integrated optical density (IOD). Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. For each group, three different uteri were analyzed, and representative samples are shown. a, Cyclic vs. early pregnancy (P < 0.05). Human antirabbit polyclonal EP2 (1:500) and goat antirabbit IgG biotinylated (1:200) were used as the primary and secondary antibodies, respectively. For the negative control, preimmune rabbit serum (1:5000) was used instead of EP2 antibody. Immunohistochemistry was performed using the Vectastain Elite ABC kit as described in Materials and Methods.

 
Functional characterization of EP2 receptor in bovine endometrium
We have shown previously that bovine endometrial cells in culture produced cAMP in response to PGE2. EP2 and EP4 receptors are functionally coupled to adenylate cyclase and generate cAMP (3, 4). Therefore, we decided to use bovine endometrial cell culture to study the relationship between EP2 receptor expression and cAMP generation (Fig. 8Go). EP2 mRNA and protein are expressed in both epithelial and stromal cells. The level of expression does not differ significantly between the two cell types. Treatment with PGE2 increases cAMP production in endometrial epithelial and stromal cells in a dose-dependent manner from 10-9–10-5 M (P < 0.05). The maximal cAMP production is observed at 10-5 M, and the levels of increase are 13- and 27-fold in epithelial and stromal cells, respectively. Overall, cAMP production is significantly higher (P < 0.05) in stromal than in epithelial cells.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Functional characterization of EP2 in bovine endometrium. A, EP2 and EP4 mRNA. Bovine ß-actin was used as an internal standard. The sizes of the cDNAs are indicated. B, EP2 protein; the molecular weight of the protein is indicated. C, Densitometry of EP2 mRNA. D, Densitometry of EP2 protein. E, cAMP production in epithelial and stromal cells in response to PGE2 treatment. Epithelial cells: a, basal vs. others; b, 10-5 M vs. others. Stromal cells: c, basal vs. others; d, 10-6 and 10-5 M vs. others; e, stromal vs. epithelial cells. Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM cAMP level or relative integrated density value (IDV). Three experiments were performed, and representative samples are shown. Statistical significance is considered at P < 0.05. Epithelial and stromal cell cultures were prepared, and RT-PCR/Southern and Western analyses were performed as described in Materials and Methods.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We found several years ago that there were PGE2 receptors functionally coupled to the generation of cAMP in the endometrium and myometrium of the rabbit (26, 51) and in the endometrium of the bovine (38). There are two PGE2 receptors known to be coupled to adenylate cyclase, EP2 and EP4 (3, 4). These receptors have not been cloned in the bovine. In this study we have cloned the bovine EP2 and EP4 receptors. Bovine EP2 and EP4 receptors exhibit the predicted DNA and protein sequences and structural features of the rhodopsin-type, seven transmembrane domain, G protein-coupled receptor. Comparative analysis of the amino acid sequences of bovine EP2 and EP4 show a high percentage (>80%) of identity with the corresponding rat (12), mouse (13, 14), rabbit (15, 16), dog (17, 18), and human (19, 20) receptors, with the putative transmembrane spanning domains being most highly conserved (>90%). By contrast, bovine EP2 and EP4 receptors exhibit only 28% homology. These results are in line with what has been reported for other species (4, 52). The bovine EP2 and EP4 receptor proteins possess putative posttranslational modification sites (N-glycosylation and phosphorylation) and key residues similar to other species. Several studies of PG receptors and G protein-coupled receptors suggest that a charged residue(s) in the seventh trans-membrane domain and posttranslational modification sites are involved in receptor activation and desensitization (4, 53, 54). Bovine EP2 receptor 3'-untranslated region contains five repeats of 5'-AUUUA-3' Shaw-Kamen consensus (43), believed to be associated with mRNA instability, translational efficiency, and rapid turn over (55). The successful cloning of these two bovine receptors involved the amplification of PCR fragments at expected sizes of 0.84 and 1.28 kb for EP2 and EP4, respectively, using consensus primers deduced from human and mouse sequence. The gene structure of the prostanoid receptor (40, 41, 46, 47), having no intron between ATG and the sixth transmembrane domain, points to the genomic DNA as a potential template for 5'RACE. The highly sensitive nested PCR cloning strategies allowed completion of the 3'RACE. Even though the EP4 messenger was below the detectable level in endometrium, our PCR cloning strategies were able to clone the bovine EP4 receptor successfully.

Southern analysis of bovine genomic DNA reveals that the EP2 receptor is encoded by a single gene in bovine, as was found in human (40), mouse (41), and dog (17). EP4 receptor is also encoded by a single gene in bovine. This is similar to the mouse (47) and dog (18), but differs from the human genome, where two pseudogenes are present in addition to the functional receptor gene (46). We have used cDNA probes to study the expression of EP2 and EP4 receptors in the bovine by Northern and Southern analyses. We were able to detect EP2 and EP4 genes in genomic DNA by Southern blot. Using the same method, it was difficult to detect EP2 mRNA in tissues other than the endometrium, and EP4 mRNA remained undetectable in all tissues tested. This indicates that the probing and hybridization procedures were functioning, but the number of copies of EP2 and EP4 mRNAs is low in the tissues studied. Using RT-PCR followed by Southern blotting, a much more sensitive method, it was possible to detect EP2 mRNA in every tissue studied, but EP4 mRNA was found only in intestine and testis. These results confirm the very low expression of EP2 and EP4 mRNAs in bovine tissues. When we compare the relative expression of bovine EP2 and EP4 mRNAs, we find that the number of EP4 mRNA copies is much lower than that of EP2. Indeed, optimal exposure time for autoradiograms was 3 h for EP2 mRNA and 3 d for EP4 mRNA. Low abundance of EP2 and EP4 mRNA was reported in human (19, 20), mouse (13, 14), rat (12), and dog (17, 18) tissues. Despite the low expression of EP2 mRNA, we were able to detect the EP2 protein by Western analysis and immunohistochemistry. We used a nested PCR procedure to confirm whether EP4 is expressed at an undetectable level or is not expressed in tissues such as lung, kidney, adrenals, and endometrium where EP4 expression was reported in other species (12, 14, 18, 20). We were able to detect EP4 in each tissue studied. The results confirm that EP4 is expressed at extremely low or undetectable levels, below the limit of sensitivity of Northern blot and RT-PCR/Southern blotting. This result demonstrates the high sensitivity of nested PCR, but does not support its use to quantitate mRNA expression. Therefore, we prefer to use the term undetectable instead of not expressed to describe the expression of EP4. In support of our results, a recent study also indicated that EP2 was detectable and EP4 was undetectable by RT-PCR in bovine granulosa cells (56).

In endometrium, EP2 mRNA and protein are expressed throughout the estrous cycle. EP2 protein (~54 kDa) is maximally expressed between d 10 and 18 of the estrous cycle. It has been proposed that the function of the EP2 receptor is regulated by posttranslational modification of the protein (18, 21, 40). Immunohistochemical localization of the EP2 protein reveals its presence in epithelial, stromal, and glandular epithelial cells of the cyclic endometrium. Our in vitro studies show that EP2 protein is expressed at comparable levels in epithelial and stromal cells. The EP2 receptor is functional in both cell types, and PGE2 induces a dose-dependent increase in cAMP. The levels of cAMP generated are higher in stromal than in epithelial cells, suggesting that the coupling between the receptor and adenylate cyclase is better in stromal cells. In human endometrium, both EP2 and EP4 mRNAs are expressed throughout the menstrual cycle without modulation (25). In mouse and rat, EP2 mRNA is expressed between d 4 and 5 of the estrous cycle, corresponding to the implantation window (21, 22). We have previously found that in the rabbit maximal sensitivity of the endometrium to generate cAMP in response to PGE2 occurs on d 6.5, corresponding to the uterine receptivity (26).

In the myometrium we observed that EP2 mRNA is expressed uniformly throughout the estrous cycle, whereas EP2 protein is expressed maximally between d 10 and 18 of the estrous cycle. We observed two forms of EP2 protein at approximately 54 and 60 kDa in myometrium. By contrast only one form (~54 kDa) was found in the endometrium. This may result from different processing of the receptor protein in endometrium and myometrium. Immunohistochemistry shows the presence of EP2 protein in circular and longitudinal smooth muscle cells of the myometrium. No information is available on the production PGE2 in the myometrium during the estrous cycle in the bovine.

During early pregnancy the expression of EP2 protein is up-regulated 1.5-fold in endometrial luminal epithelium and 3-fold in stroma. Interestingly, EP2 protein is also present in embryonic trophoblastic cells (Fig. 7CGo). It has been proposed for several years that PGE2 of embryonic origin could play a role in the establishment of pregnancy in ruminants (31). The presence of EP2 receptors on embryonic cells suggests that PGE2 may play a role in embryonic development as well. Recently, COX-2 expression was found in trophoblastic cells of the ovine embryo between d 10 and 17 of pregnancy (57). Roles for PGE2 in embryogenesis (58) and fetal development (59) have been proposed, and its immunomodulatory role (36) at the time of establishment of pregnancy is well documented in ruminants. Moreover, PGE2 has long been proposed as a temporary luteostatic and/or luteoprotective factor during the establishment of pregnancy in ruminants (37). Together, these data and our observation of the presence of EP2 receptors in epithelial, stromal, glandular epithelial, and embryonic trophoblastic cells indicate that PGE2 could act through cAMP to effect the cross-talk between the different cell types at the time of establishment of pregnancy.

Even though uterine receptivity is primarily related with the endometrium, the regulation of uterine quiescence involves myometrial activity. During pregnancy EP2 expression increases 4-fold in circular and 5-fold in longitudinal smooth muscle cells. The level of up-regulation of EP2 protein is comparatively higher in myometrium than in endometrium, but its contribution to the mechanisms leading to the establishment of pregnancy has not been addressed in the bovine. The EP2 receptor has been considered a relaxant receptor in the myometrium of different species (23, 24, 60). Butaprost, an agonist of EP2, increases cAMP production and reduces myometrial contraction (61). Myometrial cells isolated from human pregnancy are capable of producing PGE2 in addition to PGI2 (60). No information is available on myometrial production of PGE2 in early pregnancy in the bovine. Our results suggest that increased expression of EP2 receptors in myometrium may respond to PGE2 of myometrial and/or endometrial origin to effect uterine quiescence at the time of establishment of pregnancy.

Uterine receptivity and quiescence are both time and hormone dependent (21). Not much information is available on the regulation of EP2 receptor in uterine tissues. Ovarian steroids have been documented as potential regulators of EP2 and other PG receptors in rat and mouse uterus during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy (21, 22). The precise hormonal regulation of PGE2 and the other PG receptors is tissue specific and likely to be different between the endometrium and the myometrium (23). Studies of the promoter regions of the human and mouse EP2 receptors indicate the presence of response elements for progesterone, cAMP, a few cytokines, and the CAAT box (40, 41). The EP4 receptor has been described as a housekeeping gene in most tissues (47) and as an inducible gene under specific conditions (62, 63).

PGE2 plays a vital role in the survival of cells as a mitogenic, antiapoptotic, and angiogenic (7, 8) factor. PGE2 increases vascular endothelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, COX-2, and EP2 (9, 10) expressions. EP2 (64) and COX-2 (1) knockout mice both suffer from ovulation, fertilization, and periimplantation defects. By contrast, no reproductive abnormalities were reported in EP4-deficient mice (5). The exact role of PGE2 in bovine endometrium is not fully elucidated. Bovine endometrium produces PGE2 throughout the estrous cycle, but its production is comparatively higher in the mid and late luteal phases, between d 13 and 17 of the estrous cycle (29). Recently, we found that COX-2 and PGES are coexpressed in bovine endometrium between d 15 and 18 of the estrous cycle (30). We have already shown that interferon-{tau} increases COX-2 and PGES expression and PGE2 production in endometrial cells (32, 33) in vitro. Increased expression of COX-2 at the time of establishment of pregnancy was recently demonstrated in bovine (34) and ovine (35) endometrium in vivo. Interestingly, in bovine endometrium the high expression of EP2 receptor protein between d 10 and 18 of the estrous cycle closely matches the expression of COX-2, PGES, and PGE2 production. Taken together, these results suggest a significant role for PGE2 in uterine receptivity and quiescence, which are the prerequisites for successful establishment of pregnancy.

In conclusion, we have cloned and characterized two subtypes of PGE2 receptors, EP2 and EP4, for the bovine. Our results indicate that EP2 is the major cAMP-generating PGE2 receptor expressed and regulated in uterine tissues during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy. Our study is the first to report the expression and regulation EP2 and EP4 receptors in uterine tissues during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy in the bovine as well as in ruminants.


    Acknowledgments
 
We acknowledge the help of our colleagues, Dr. Eric Madore and Marianne Parent, during the course of this study.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by grants from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (to M.A.F. and L.A.M.).

Present address for J.J.K.: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60612-7313.

Abbreviations: COX, Cyclooxygenase; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescence protein; PG, prostaglandin; PGES, PGE synthase; poly A+, polyadenylated; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; SSC, standard saline citrate.

Received November 27, 2002.

Accepted for publication March 26, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Lim H, Paria BC, Das SK, Dinchuk JE, Langenbach R, Trzaskos JM, Dey SK 1997 Multiple female reproductive failures in cyclooxygenase 2-deficient mice. Cell 91:197–208[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Smith WL, Garavito RM, Dewitt DL 1996 Prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthases (cyclooxygenases)-1 and-2. J Biol Chem 271:33157–33160[Free Full Text]
  3. Coleman RA, Smith WL, Narumiya S 1994 International Union of Pharmacology classification of prostanoid receptors: properties, distribution, and structure of the receptors and their subtypes. Pharmacol Rev 46:205–229[Medline]
  4. Narumiya S, Sugimoto Y, Ushikubi F 1999 Prostanoid receptors: structures, properties, and functions. Physiol Rev 79:1193–1226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Narumiya S, FitzGerald GA 2001 Genetic and pharmacological analysis of prostanoid receptor function. J Clin Invest 108:25–30[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Jakobsson PJ, Thoren S, Morgenstern R, Samuelsson B 1999 Identification of human prostaglandin E synthase: a microsomal, glutathione-dependent, inducible enzyme, constituting a potential novel drug target. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7220–7225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Tsujii M, DuBois RN 1995 Alterations in cellular adhesion and apoptosis in epithelial cells overexpressing prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2. Cell 83:493–501[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Tsujii M, Kawano S, Tsuji S, Sawaoka H, Hori M, DuBois RN 1998 Cyclooxygenase regulates angiogenesis induced by colon cancer cells. Cell 93:705–716[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Jabbour HN, Milne SA, Williams AR, Anderson RA, Boddy SC 2001 Expression of COX-2 and PGE synthase and synthesis of PGE(2) in endometrial adenocarcinoma: a possible autocrine/paracrine regulation of neoplastic cell function via EP2/EP4 receptors. Br J Cancer 85:1023–1031[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Sales KJ, Katz AA, Davis M, Hinz S, Soeters RP, Hofmeyr MD, Millar RP, Jabbour HN 2001 Cyclooxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandin E(2) synthesis are up-regulated in carcinomas of the cervix: a possible autocrine/paracrine regulation of neoplastic cell function via EP2/EP4 receptors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:2243–2249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Nishigaki N, Negishi, Ichikawa A 1996 Two Gs coupled prostaglandin E receptor subtypes, EP2 and EP4 differ in desensitization and sensitivity to the metabolic inactivation of the agonist. Mol Pharmacol 50:1031–1037[Abstract]
  12. Boie Y, Stocco R, Sawyer N, Slipetz DM, Ungrin MD, Neuschafer-Rube F, Puschel GP, Metters KM, Abramovitz M 1997 Molecular cloning and characterization of the four rat prostaglandin E2 prostanoid receptor subtypes. Eur J Pharmacol 340:227–241[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Katsuyama M, Nishigaki N, Sugimoto Y Morimoto K, Negishi M, Narumiya S, Ichikawa A 1995 The mouse prostaglandin E receptor EP2 subtype: Cloning, expression, and northern blot analysis. FEBS Lett 372:151–156[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Honda A, Sugimoto Y, Namba T, Watabe A, Irie A, Negishi M, Narumiya S, Ichikawa A 1993 Cloning and expression of a cDNA for mouse prostaglandin E receptor EP2 subtype. J Biol Chem 268:7759–7762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Guan Y, Stillman BA, Zhang Y, Schneider A, Saito O, Davis LS, Redha R, Breyer RM, Breyer MD 2002 Cloning and expression of the rabbit prostaglandin EP2 receptor. BMC Pharmacol 2:14[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Breyer RM, Davis LS, Nian C, Redha R, Stillman B, Jacobson HR, Breyer MD 1996 Cloning and expression of the rabbit prostaglandin EP4 receptor. Am J Physiol 270:485–493
  17. Hibbs TA, Lu B, Smock SL, Vestergaard P, Pan LC, Owen TA 1999 Molecular cloning of canine prostaglandin E receptor EP2 subtype. Prostaglandins and other lipid mediators 57:133–147
  18. Castleberry TA, Lu B, Smock SL, Owen TA 2001 Molecular cloning and functional characterization of the canine prostaglandin E2 receptor EP4 subtype. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 65:167–187[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Bastien L, Sawyer N, Grygorczyk R, Metters KM, Adam M 1994 Cloning, functional expression, and characterization of the human prostaglandin E2 receptor EP2 subtype. J Biol Chem 22:11873–11877
  20. Regan JW, Bailey TJ, Pepperl DJ, Pierce KL, Bogardus AM, Donello JE, Fairbairn CE, Kedzie KM, Woodward DF, Gil DW 1994 Cloning of a novel human prostaglandin receptor with characteristics of the pharmacologically defined EP2 subtype. Mol Pharmacol 46:213–220[Abstract]
  21. Papay KD, Kennedy TG 2000 Characterization of temporal and cell-specific changes in transcripts for prostaglandin E2 receptors in pseudopregnant rat endometrium. Biol Reprod 62:1515–1525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lim H, Dey SK 1997 Prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype EP2 gene expression in the mouse uterus coincides with differentiation of the luminal epithelium for implantation. Endocrinology 138:4599–606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ma X, Wu WX, Nathanielsz PW 1999 Differential regulation of prostaglandin EP and FP receptors in pregnant sheep myometrium and endometrium during spontaneous term labor. Biol Reprod 61:1281–1286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Smith GC, Wu WX, Nathanielsz PW 2001 Effects of gestational age and labor on expression of prostanoid receptor genes in baboon uterus. Biol Reprod 64:1131–1137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Milne SA, Perchick GB, Boddy SC, Jabbour HN 2001 Expression, localization, and signaling of PGE2 and EP2/EP4 receptors in human nonpregnant endometrium across the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:4453–4459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Fortier MA, Boulet AP, Dugre FJ, Lambert RD 1990 Local alteration in adenylate cyclase activity and stimulation response at implantation site in rabbit endometrium during early pregnancy. Biol Reprod 42:106–113[Abstract]
  27. Tanaka N, Miyazaki K, Tashiro H, Mizutani H, Okamura H 1993 Changes in adenylyl cyclase activity in human endometrium during the menstrual cycle and in human decidua during pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil 98:33–39[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Thatcher WW, Guzeloglu A, Mattos R, Binelli M, Hansen TR, Pru JK 2001 Uterine-conceptus interactions and reproductive failure in cattle. Theriogenology 56:1435–1450[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Miyamoto Y, Skarzynski DJ, Okuda K 2000 Is tumor necrosis factor a trigger for the initiation of endometrial prostaglandin F2{alpha} release at luteolysis. Biol Reprod 62:1109–1115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Arosh JA, Parent J, Chapdelaine P, Sirois J, Fortier MA 2002 Expression of cyclooxygenases 1 and 2 and prostaglandin E synthase in bovine endometrial tissue during the estrous cycle. Biol Reprod 67:161–169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Thatcher WW, Bazer FW, Sharp DC, Roberts RM 1986 Interrelationships between uterus and conceptus to maintain corpus luteum function in early pregnancy: sheep, cattle, pigs and horses. J Anim Sci 62(Suppl 2):25–46
  32. Asselin E, Lacroix D, Fortier MA 1997 IFN-{tau} increases PGE2 production and COX-2 gene expression in the bovine endometrium in vitro. Mol Cell Endocrinol 132:117–126[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Parent J, Chapdelaine P, Sirois J, Fortier MA 2002 Expression of microsomal prostaglandin E synthase in bovine endometrium: coexpression with cyclooxygenase type 2 and regulation by interferon-{tau}. Endocrinology 143:2936–2943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Guzeloglu A, Bilby T, Kamimura S, Meikle A, Badinga L, Dinges AC, Hernandez O Thatcher WW 2002 Effects of pregnancy and bovine somatotrophin (bst) on endometrial estrogen receptor-{alpha} (ER-{alpha}), PGHS2, and PGF2{alpha} secretion on day 17 after estrus in nonlactating dairy cows. Biol Reprod 66(Suppl 1):314 (Abstract 532)
  35. Kim S, Choi Y, Bazer FW, Spencer TE 2002 Effects of the estrous cycle, pregnancy, and interferon {tau} on cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) expression in ovine endometrium. Biol Reprod 66(Suppl 1):267 (Abstract 417)
  36. Emond V, Asselin E, Fortier MA, Murphy BD, Lambert RD 2000 Interferon {tau} stimulates granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor gene expression in bovine lymphocytes and endometrial stromal cells. Biol Reprod 62:1728–1737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Magness RR, Huie JM, Hoyer GL, Huecksteadt TP, Reynolds LP, Seperich GJ, Whysong G, Weems CW 1981 Effect of chronic ipsilateral or contra lateral intrauterine infusion prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) on luteal function of unilaterally ovariectomized ewes. Prostaglandins Leukotriene Med 6:389–401
  38. Fortier MA, Guilbault LA, Grasso F 1988 Specific properties of epithelial and stromal cells from the endometrium of cows. J Reprod Fertil 83:239–248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Chapdelaine P, Delahaye S, Gauthier E, Tremblay RR, Dube JY 1993 A one-hour procedure for the preparation of genomic DNA from frozen tissues. Biotechniques 14:163–164[Medline]
  40. Smock SL, Pan LC, Castleberry TA, Lu B, Matcher RJ, Owen TA 1999 Cloning, structural characterization, and chromosomal localization of the gene encoding the human prostaglandin E2 receptor EP2 subtype. Gene 237:393–402[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Katsuyama M, Sugimoto Y, Okano K, Segi E, Ikegami R, Negishi M, Ichikawa 1998 Characterization of the gene for the mouse prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP2: tissue-specific initiation of transcription in the macrophage and the uterus. Biochem J 330:1115–1121
  42. Kyte J, Doolittle RF 1982 A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 157:105–132[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Shaw G, Kamen R 1986 A conserved AU sequence from the 3' untranslated region of GM-CSF mRNA mediates selective mRNA degradation. Cell 46:659–667[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Kennelly PJ, Krebs EG 1991 Consensus sequences as substrate specificity determinants for protein kinases and protein phosphatases. J Biol Chem 266:15555–15558[Free Full Text]
  45. Chapdelaine P, Ho-Kim MA, Tremblay RR, Dube JY 1990 Southern blot analysis with synthetic oligonucleotides: application to prostatic protein genes. Int J Biochem 22:75–82[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Foord SM, Marks B, Stolz M, Bufflier E, Fraser NJ, Lee MG 1996 The structure of the prostaglandin EP4 receptor gene and related pseudogenes. Genomics 35:182–188[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Arakawa T, Laneuville O, Miller CA, Lakkides KM, Wingerd BA, Dewitt DL, Smith WL 1996 Prostanoid receptors of murine NIH 3T3 and RAW 264.7 cells. J Biol Chem 271:29569–29575[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Chapdelaine P, Vignola K, Fortier MA 2001 Protein estimation directly from SDS-PAGE loading buffer for standardization of samples from cell lysates or tissue homogenates before Western blot analysis. Biotechniques 31:478–482[Medline]
  49. Chapdelaine P, Moisset PA, Campeau P, Asselin I, Vilquin JT, Tremblay JP 2000 Functional EGFP-dystrophin fusion proteins for gene therapy vector development. Protein Engin 13:611–615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Doualla-Bell F, Lye SJ, Labrie F, Fortier MA 1995 Differential expression and regulation of connexin-43 and cell-cell coupling in myocytes from the circular and longitudinal layers of bovine myometrium. Endocrinology 136:5322–5328[Abstract]
  51. Boulet AP Fortier MA, Lambert RD 1988 The embryo influences adenylate cyclase activity and hormonal response in rabbit myometrium during early pregnancy. Life Sci 43:1653–1662[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Toh H, Ichikawa A, Narumiya 1995 Molecular evolution of receptors for eicosanoids. FEBS Lett 361:17–21[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Gether U, Kobilka BK 1998 G Protein-coupled receptors. II. Mechanisms of action activation. J Biol Chem 273:17979–17982[Free Full Text]
  54. Anderson LE, Wu YL, Tsai SJ, Wiltbank MC 2001 Prostaglandin receptor in the corpus luteum: Recent information on the gene messenger ribonucleic acid and protein. Biol Reprod 64:1041–1047[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Beelman CA, Parker R 1995 Degradation of mRNA in eukaryotes. Cell 81:179–183[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Calder MD, Caveney AN, Westhusin ME, Watson AJ 2001 Cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) receptor messenger RNAs are affected by bovine oocyte maturation time and cumulus-oocyte complex quality, and PGE2 induces moderate expansion of the bovine cumulus in vitro. Biol Reprod 65:135–140[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Charpigny G, Reinaud P, Tamby JP, Crémion C, Guillomot M 1997 Cyclooxygenase-2 unlike Cyclooxygenase-1 is highly expressed in ovine embryos during the implantation period. Biol Reprod 57:1032–1040[Abstract]
  58. Gurevich M, Shemesh M 1994 Induction of cyclooxygenase and prostaglandin E2 production by the bovine pre-embryo. Reprod Fertil Dev 6:687–691[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Young IR, Thorburn GD 1994 Prostaglandin E2, fetal maturation and ovine parturition. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 34:342–346[Medline]
  60. Erkinheimo TL, Saukkonen K, Narko K, Jalkanen J, Ylikorkala O, Ristimaki A 2000 Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and prostanoid receptors by human myometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:3468–3475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Duckworth N, Marshall K, Clayton JK 2002 An investigation of the effect of the prostaglandin EP2 receptor agonist, butaprost, on the human isolated myometrium from pregnant and non-pregnant women. J Endocrinol 172:263–269[Abstract]
  62. Mutoh M, Watanabe K, Kitamura T, Shoji Y, Takahashi M, Kawamori T, Tani K, Kobayashi M, Maruyama T, Kobayashi K, Ohuchida S, Sugimoto Y, Narumiya S, Sugimura T, Wakabayashi K 2002 Involvement of prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP4 in colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 62:28–32[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Segi E, Sugimoto Y, Yamasaki A, Aze Y, Oida H, Nishimura T, Murata T, Matsuoka T, Ushikubi F, Hirose M, Tanaka T, Yoshida N, Narumiya S, Ichikawa A 1998 Patent ductus arteriosus and neonatal death in prostaglandin receptor EP4-deficient mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 246:7–12[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. Tilley SL, Audoly LP, Hicks EH, Kim HS, Flannery PJ, Coffman TM, Koller BH 1999 Reproductive failure and reduced blood pressure in mice lacking the EP2 prostaglandin E2 receptor. J Clin Invest 103:1539–1545[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
I. M. Sheldon, J. Cronin, L. Goetze, G. Donofrio, and H.-J. Schuberth
Defining Postpartum Uterine Disease and the Mechanisms of Infection and Immunity in the Female Reproductive Tract in Cattle
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2009; 81(6): 1025 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. K. Banu, J. Lee, V. O. Speights Jr., A. Starzinski-Powitz, and J. A. Arosh
Selective Inhibition of Prostaglandin E2 Receptors EP2 and EP4 Induces Apoptosis of Human Endometriotic Cells through Suppression of ERK1/2, AKT, NF{kappa}B, and {beta}-Catenin Pathways and Activation of Intrinsic Apoptotic Mechanisms
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2009; 23(8): 1291 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Waclawik, H. N. Jabbour, A. Blitek, and A. J. Ziecik
Estradiol-17{beta}, Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and the PGE2 Receptor Are Involved in PGE2 Positive Feedback Loop in the Porcine Endometrium
Endocrinology, August 1, 2009; 150(8): 3823 - 3832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S E Ulbrich, K Schulke, A E Groebner, H D Reichenbach, C Angioni, G Geisslinger, and H H D Meyer
Quantitative characterization of prostaglandins in the uterus of early pregnant cattle
Reproduction, August 1, 2009; 138(2): 371 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
K. S. Song, Y. H. Choi, J.-M. Kim, H. Lee, T.-J. Lee, and J.-H. Yoon
Suppression of prostaglandin E2-induced MUC5AC overproduction by RGS4 in the airway
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): L684 - L692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. K. Banu, J. Lee, V. O. Speights Jr., A. Starzinski-Powitz, and J. A. Arosh
Cyclooxygenase-2 Regulates Survival, Migration, and Invasion of Human Endometriotic Cells through Multiple Mechanisms
Endocrinology, March 1, 2008; 149(3): 1180 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. K. Banu, J. Lee, M. C. Satterfield, T. E. Spencer, F. W. Bazer, and J. A. Arosh
Molecular Cloning and Characterization of Prostaglandin (PG) Transporter in Ovine Endometrium: Role for Multiple Cell Signaling Pathways in Transport of PGF2{alpha}
Endocrinology, January 1, 2008; 149(1): 219 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S. P Kodithuwakku, A. Miyamoto, and M. P B Wijayagunawardane
Spermatozoa stimulate prostaglandin synthesis and secretion in bovine oviductal epithelial cells
Reproduction, June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1087 - 1094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
Z Cheng, E L Sheldrick, E Marshall, D C Wathes, D R E Abayasekara, and A P F Flint
Control of cyclic AMP concentration in bovine endometrial stromal cells by arachidonic acid
Reproduction, May 1, 2007; 133(5): 1017 - 1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Parent and M. A. Fortier
Expression and Contribution of Three Different Isoforms of Prostaglandin E Synthase in the Bovine Endometrium
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2005; 73(1): 36 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. A. Arosh, S. K. Banu, S. Kimmins, P. Chapdelaine, L. A. MacLaren, and M. A. Fortier
Effect of Interferon-{tau} on Prostaglandin Biosynthesis, Transport, and Signaling at the Time of Maternal Recognition of Pregnancy in Cattle: Evidence of Polycrine Actions of Prostaglandin E2
Endocrinology, November 1, 2004; 145(11): 5280 - 5293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. M. Aronoff, C. Canetti, and M. Peters-Golden
Prostaglandin E2 Inhibits Alveolar Macrophage Phagocytosis through an E-Prostanoid 2 Receptor-Mediated Increase in Intracellular Cyclic AMP
J. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 173(1): 559 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. K. Goff
Steroid Hormone Modulation of Prostaglandin Secretion in the Ruminant Endometrium During the Estrous Cycle
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 11 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. A. Arosh, S. K. Banu, P. Chapdelaine, E. Madore, J. Sirois, and M. A. Fortier
Prostaglandin Biosynthesis, Transport, and Signaling in Corpus Luteum: A Basis for Autoregulation of Luteal Function
Endocrinology, May 1, 2004; 145(5): 2551 - 2560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K.-F. Lee, W. S.B. Yeung, J. F.C. Chow, C. K. Shum, and J. M. Luk
Different Testicular Gene Expression Patterns in the First Spermatogenic Cycle of Postnatal and Vitamin A-Deficient Rat Testis
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2004; 70(4): 1010 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. A. Arosh, S. K. Banu, P. Chapdelaine, and M. A. Fortier
Temporal and Tissue-Specific Expression of Prostaglandin Receptors EP2, EP3, EP4, FP, and Cyclooxygenases 1 and 2 in Uterus and Fetal Membranes during Bovine Pregnancy
Endocrinology, January 1, 2004; 145(1): 407 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. K. Banu, J. A. Arosh, P. Chapdelaine, and M. A. Fortier
Molecular cloning and spatio-temporal expression of the prostaglandin transporter: A basis for the action of prostaglandins in the bovine reproductive system
PNAS, September 30, 2003; 100(20): 11747 - 11752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arosh, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fortier, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arosh, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fortier, M. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals