help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2002-221106
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiorini, S.
Right arrow Articles by Abelli, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fiorini, S.
Right arrow Articles by Abelli, L.
Endocrinology Vol. 144, No. 8 3359-3367
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

17ß-Estradiol Stimulates Arachidonate Release from Human Amnion-Like WISH Cells through a Rapid Mechanism Involving a Membrane Receptor

Sara Fiorini, Maria E. Ferretti, Carla Biondi, Barbara Pavan, Laura Lunghi, Guglielmo Paganetto and Luigi Abelli

Department of Biology, Sections of General Physiology and Comparative Anatomy, University of Ferrara, 44100-I Ferrara, Italy

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Maria E. Ferretti, Department of Biology, Section of General Physiology, University of Ferrara, via Luigi Borsari 46, 44100-I Ferrara, Italy. E-mail: clm{at}dns.unife.it.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
17ß-Estradiol (17ß-E2) greatly and dose-dependently stimulates [3H]arachidonic acid (AA) release from the human amnion-like Wistar Institute Susan Hayflick (WISH) cells. This action is abolished by the phospholipase A2 inhibitor AACOCF3, significantly reduced by the estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist ICI 182,780, and uninfluenced by cycloheximide. The estradiol-BSA conjugate E2coBSA, which binds putative membrane ERs and is unable to enter the cell, also highly stimulates [3H]AA release from WISH cells, although to a lesser extent compared with 17ß-E2. The fluorescent conjugate E2coBSA-FITC specifically binds to the surface of a subset of intact WISH cells, and labeling intensity appears dose and time dependent. Cell permeabilization results in a dense intracellular staining, mainly in the peripheral cytoplasm. H-150, an antibody against the N terminus of human ERß, also labels the plasma membrane of intact WISH cells and the cytoplasm of permeabilized cells. Almost no labeling is observed using ER-21, an antibody against the N terminus of human ER{alpha}. RT-PCR evidences the presence of mRNA for ERß, not for ER{alpha}. Our data suggest that 17ß-E2 stimulates [3H]AA release from WISH cells through an apparently nongenomic pathway and interaction with membrane binding sites. These last are, at least in part, similar if not identical to ERß.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE MECHANISMS RESPONSIBLE for the switch from myometrial quiescence during pregnancy to myometrial contractility at labor are still poorly understood. It has been proposed that the fetus itself plays a crucial role in this process. In fact, the activation of fetal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis causes an increase in fetal plasma cortisol that, in turn, stimulates estrogen production from the placenta and intrauterine tissues (1). This condition, together with the simultaneous local decrease in progesterone synthesis (1, 2), evokes myometrial activation through an increased expression of proteins such as ion channels, gap junctions, and receptors for agonists, including oxytocin and prostaglandins (PGs) (1). These uterotonins ultimately contribute to the onset of uterine contractions characteristic of labor and responsible for delivery (1, 3). It has also been demonstrated that estrogen receptor (ER) mRNA significantly increases in sheep myometrium, endometrium, and cervix during spontaneous and cortisol-induced labor (4); moreover, estrogens stimulate PG output from intrauterine tissues (1, 5).

Fetal membranes of several species, human included, are able to synthesize estrogens (1, 2, 6). Indeed, particularly high hormone levels have been found in human chorion and decidua, and they significantly increase after spontaneous vaginal delivery (7). Moreover, an increase of the estrogen/progesterone ratio is observed in the amniotic fluid of women in active labor compared with those not in labor (8). Fetal membranes represent not only a site of estrogen synthesis and release but also a target for such hormones. In fact, ER mRNAs have been found in human amnion and chorion, and it has been shown that their concentrations in chorio-decidua are 3-fold higher in tissues obtained after spontaneous labor onset than in tissues obtained from cesarean section at a similar gestational age but before labor onset (9). Moreover, it has been demonstrated recently that both ER subtypes, ER{alpha} and ERß, are expressed in rhesus monkey amnion and chorio-decidua (10).

Estrogen actions at the level of fetal membranes also contribute to preparing the uterus for delivery; in fact, it has been demonstrated that these hormones stimulate oxytocin gene expression in human chorio-decidua (9) and PG release from human amniotic cells obtained after spontaneous labor and vaginal delivery (5), as well as from amnion-like cells (11).

For several years, we have addressed the mechanisms responsible for the onset of labor, and in particular the regulation of PG release from fetal membranes, using the human amnion-like Wistar Institute Susan Hayflick (WISH) cells, which are considered a good model for analysis of the physiological functions of amnion cells as well as for the characterization of modulation by different agonists of PGE2 release. As a matter of fact, PGE2 has been found to be the main prostanoid produced by both amniocytes and WISH cells; moreover, PGE2 output from WISH cells is evoked by the same classes of agonists (11, 12, 13, 14, 15) that are effective in amnion cells (5, 16, 17, 18, 19).

We have recently demonstrated that 17ß-estradiol (17ß-E2) dose-dependently inhibits PGE2 release from WISH cells pretreated with the cAMP elevating agent Ro 20-1724 but stimulates PGE2 output from cells unexposed to the drug. In both conditions, the hormone effect is counteracted by the ER antagonist tamoxifen, by the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide, or when 17ß-E2 is administered together with BSA (11), which could impair the steroid diffusion through the cell membrane. Moreover, by means of the classical binding techniques, we have evidenced the presence of specific receptors for 17ß-E2 in whole WISH cells, but only when they are pretreated with Ro 20-1724 or forskolin (11). On the basis of these observations, we have hypothesized that WISH cells possess few constitutive 17ß-E2 receptors, whose activation leads to an enhancement of PGE2 release; when exposed to cAMP-elevating agents, new receptors predisposed to inhibit prostanoid output become available.

As a continuation of our research, we investigated a possible influence of 17ß-E2 on the release of the PGE2 precursor, arachidonic acid (AA), from WISH cell membrane phospholipids. Moreover, because our previous studies demonstrated the presence of ERs in WISH cells but provided no information about their characterization and distribution in the cell, we analyzed the above issues by means of RT-PCR techniques as well as fluorescence labeling assays.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemicals
17ß-E2, Ro 20-1724, 1,1,1-trifluoromethyl-6,9,12,15-heicosatetraen-2-one (AACOCF3), cycloheximide, BSA, 17ß-E2 6-(O-carboxymethyl)oxime:BSA (E2coBSA; 35 mol steroid/mol BSA), 17ß-E2 6-(O-carboxymethyl)oxime:BSA fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugate (E2coBSA-FITC; 10 mol steroid/mol BSA; 3.5 mol FITC/mol steroid:BSA), antiserum anti-PGE2-BSA, and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were obtained from the Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). [5,6,8,9,11,12,14,15-3H]AA (205 Ci/mmol) and [5,6(n)-3H]PGE2 (181 Ci/mmol) were purchased from Amersham Italia Srl (Milan, Italy). 7{alpha}-[(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentyl)sulfinyl]-estra-1,3,5 (10)-triene-3,17ß-diol (ICI 182,780) was obtained from Tocris Cookson Ltd. (Bristol, UK). The antibody H-150 was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA), the antibody ER-21 was the kind gift of G. Greene (Chicago, IL), the FITC-labeled goat antirabbit IgG serum was purchased from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA). Tissue culture media, sera, and RT-PCR reagents were purchased from Invitrogen (Paisley, Scotland, UK). All other chemicals were the highest reagent grades commercially available.

Cell culture
Amnion-like WISH cells (ATCC CCL-25; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were grown at 37 C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air, in a mixture of Ham’s F12 and DMEM (1:1 vol/vol) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 30 µg/ml gentamicin and 0.25 µg/ml amphotericin B. The cells were seeded into 24-well plates at 2 x 105 cells per well in F12/DMEM + 10% fetal bovine serum, and grown to about 70% confluence (2–3 d).

Incorporation and release of [3H]AA
Radiolabelling of the cells (2 x 105 cells per well) with [3H]AA was achieved by including 0.5 µCi/well in the serum-free medium 18 h before assay, because radioactivity incorporated by WISH cells was maximal at this time. Cells were then washed three times with pseudoamniotic fluid (PAF) containing 118.5 mM NaCl, 4.8 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1.15 mM KH2PO4, 1.15 mM MgSO4, and 25.0 mM NaHCO3, supplemented with 2.0 mM glucose, 6.0 mM urea, and 0.2% BSA (pH 7.0), previously gassed with a 95% O2/5% CO2 mixture. Cells were supplied with PAF at a constant flow rate of 0.3 ml/min by a four-channel peristaltic pump (Gilson, Villier Le Bel, France), then perifused with PAF for 1 h before treatment to obtain a stable [3H] AA basal release. The test substances were infused into the wells by means of the same pump. Fractions of perifusate were collected every 3 min, and radioactivity of the perifusate solution was determined by means of a Beckman LS 6500 scintillation spectrometer. In some experiments, BSA-free PAF was used for cell washing and perifusion. [3H] AA release was measured as dpm/3-min fraction. Basal release ranged from 150–200 dpm/3-min fraction among the different cell cultures, and it remained substantially unchanged throughout the entire experiment, which lasted up to 2.5 h. Experiments were performed at least in triplicate, using different cell cultures.

The test substances were dissolved in ethanol (17ß-E2, Ro 20-1724, AACOCF3, 10-2 M), in DMSO (ICI 182,780 and cycloheximide, 10-2 M and 5 mg/ml, respectively), or in PAF (E2coBSA, 10-5 M). When requested, they were then diluted with PAF plus BSA or BSA-free PAF and added to the perifusion system. Ethanol and DMSO, at the doses used, did not interfere with the assay performed.

PGE2 level determination
For PGE2 level determination, the medium was removed from cells and replaced with fresh serum-free F12/DMEM containing test substances. After incubation of samples for 30 min, the media were collected and stored at -80 C. The amount of PGE2 was assayed in the collected media by an RIA procedure, as previously described (11). Data are expressed as nanograms of PGE2 produced per 106 cells. Experiments were performed in triplicate, using different cell cultures. Assay sensitivity was 40 pg/106 cells, and the intraassay or interassay coefficients of variations were less than 10%. 17ß-E2 was dissolved in ethanol (10-2 M) and E2coBSA in serum-free F12/DMEM (10-5 M); they were then diluted with serum-free F12/DMEM. Ethanol, at the dose used, did not interfere with the assay performed.

Labeling with E2coBSA-FITC
WISH cells were incubated in serum-free medium 24 h before the experiments; then cells (1.5 x 106/ml) were allowed to adhere onto glass coverslips overnight. Intact cells were washed twice with PBS+ solution [140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 6.4 mM Na2HPO4, 1.4 mM KH2PO4, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.9 mM CaCl2 (pH 7.2)] and incubated at 37 C for different times (1, 15, or 60 min) with E2coBSA-FITC at different concentrations (1.4 x 10-7, 1.4 x 10-6, and 1.4 x 10-5 M in PBS+). For competition studies, cells were preincubated with 10-5 M 17ß-E2 or the vehicle (0.1% ethanol in PBS+) for 5 min; this was followed by the addition of the different doses of E2coBSA-FITC and incubation for 15 min at 37 C. Other experiments were performed by adding 5% BSA in PBS+, 15 min before incubation with E2coBSA-FITC. Experiments were also made on cells permeabilized then labeled with E2coBSA-FITC. After incubation with E2coBSA-FITC, cells were washed with PBS (0.01 M; pH 7.2), postfixed with 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 1 min and embedded in PBS/glycerol (1:1).

Localization of ER
Adherent WISH cells were prefixed with 0.5% PFA for 2 min, permeabilized, and labeled with different rabbit antibodies raised against the human ER (ER-21 and H-150; working dilutions in PBS, 5 and 2 µg/ml, respectively) for 1 h at room temperature. The antibodies (at the same dilution) were also used in prefixed cells without any permeabilization. Then, cells were washed in PBS and incubated with a FITC-labeled goat antirabbit IgG serum (working dilution, 1:100 in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature. Controls included labeling with secondary antibody alone, in the absence of primary antibody. The cells were postfixed with 3% PFA in PBS for 1 min and embedded in PBS/glycerol (1:1).

Cell permeabilization
Permeabilization was performed by incubating the cells for 2 min in the presence of PBS+ containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 0.5% BSA.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy
The laser scanning confocal microscope LSM 410 equipped with a Axiovert 100 TV microscope (Zeiss, Heidelberg, Germany) was used for the analysis, with FITC fluorescence excitation at 488 nm. Z-series optical sections, taken at 1-µm intervals, were evaluated using Adobe Photoshop 6.0 for Windows (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA).

RT-PCR
Amplification of individual RNA molecules was achieved by a method that combines RT and the PCR (RT-PCR). First, strand cDNA was synthesized using 5 µg total RNA, 3.5 µM oligo(dT)23, 500 µM 2'deoxynucleoside-5'triphosphates, and 2 U avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase. The samples were incubated at 37 C for 1 h in a reaction volume of 20 µl. PCR amplification from reverse transcribed cDNA was carried out using specifically designed PCR primers for ERß and ER{alpha} (20) (ERß sense, 5'-TGAAAAGGAAGGTTAGTGGGAACC-3'; ERß antisense, 5'-TTGTCAGGGACATCATCATGG-3'; ER{alpha} sense, 5'-GTGCCTGGCT AGAGATCCTG-3'; ER{alpha} antisense, 5'-TTGTGCATGATGAGGGTAAA-3'). PCR amplification for glyceraldehyde phosphodehydrogenase (GAPDH) was performed on the same samples as a parallel control (GAPDH sense, 5'-CCACCCATGGCAAATTCCATGGCA-3'; GAPDH antisense, 5'-TCTAGACGGCAGGTCAGGTCCACC-3') (21). A 1/20 volume of the generated cDNA reaction was used in the amplification reaction. PCR was performed in a 25-µl volume using 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM 2'deoxynucleoside-5'triphosphates, 0.25 µg of each sense and antisense primer, and 0.25 U of Taq polymerase. PCR conditions consisted of 35 cycles of amplification, using the following parameters: denaturation at 94 C for 30 sec; annealing at 50 C (ERß), 48 C (ER{alpha}), or 55 C (GAPDH) for 30 sec; and extension at 72 C for 30 sec. The amplified products were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide, using a DNA ladder as size marker.

Statistical analysis
Statistical significance of data was assessed by ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s or Bonferroni’s post test. When two populations of unpaired data were compared, one-tail t test was used. The computer program PRISM (version 3.0, Graph Pad Inc., San Diego, CA) was used.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Release of [3H]AA
In the first series of experiments, we evaluated the effects of increasing concentrations (from 10-9 to 10-6 M) of 17ß-E2 on [3H]AA release from WISH cells perifused with PAF containing 0.2% BSA and preincubated for 1 h in the absence (Fig. 1AGo) or presence of the cAMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor Ro 20-1724 at 10-5 M (Fig. 1BGo). As shown, similar actions were obtained in both conditions: the hormone dose-dependently stimulated [3H]AA release, evoking a statistically significant (P < 0.05) output at 10-8 M and the maximal stimulation (about 5.5-fold, peak value, vs. basal level) at the highest dose tested (10-6 M). In subsequent experiments, only untreated cells were used, and the hormone concentration chosen was 10-6 M.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Effects of increasing 17ß-E2 concentrations on [3H]AA release from WISH cells perifused with PAF containing BSA. Cells were pretreated for 1 h in the absence (A) or presence (B) of 10-5 M Ro 20-1724. Duration of treatments is indicated by shaded areas. Each point represents the mean of four independent experiments, performed on different cell cultures. *, 17ß-E2 concentration at which the stimulation becomes statistically significant (P < 0.05 compared with basal value, Dunnett’s posttest).

 
Figure 2Go illustrates the effect of the ER antagonist, ICI 182,780 (10-5 M), on basal as well as 17ß-E2-stimulated [3H]AA release. This drug was without effect in basal conditions, but significantly (P < 0.01) reduced the steroid-evoked release.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Effect of 17ß-E2 (shaded areas) and ICI 182,780 (in frame), alone or in combination, on [3H]AA release from WISH cells perifused with PAF containing BSA. 17ß-E2 was 10-6 M, and ICI 182,780 was 10-5 M. Each point represents the mean of four independent experiments, performed on different cell cultures. *, P < 0.001 compared with basal value; **, P < 0.05 compared with basal value; §, P < 0.01 compared with 17ß-E2 alone (Bonferroni’s posttest).

 
The phospholipase A2 inhibitor AACOCF3 at the concentration of 10-5 M, ineffective on basal [3H]AA release, completely blocked the hormonal action (Fig. 3Go). Otherwise, the effect of 17ß-E2 remained substantially unchanged in WISH cells pretreated for 30 min with cycloheximide (5 µg/ml) (Fig. 4Go), a protein synthesis inhibitor that influenced neither cell viability, as determined by the trypan blue exclusion test, nor [3H]AA release in the absence of the hormone.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Effect of 17ß-E2 (shaded areas) and AACOCF3 (in frame), alone or in combination, on [3H]AA release from WISH cells perifused with PAF containing 0.2% BSA. 17ß-E2 was 10-6 M, and AACOCF3 10-5 M. Each point represents the mean of four independent experiments, performed on different cell cultures. *, P < 0.0001 compared with basal value (unpaired t test).

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Effect of 17ß-E2 (10-6 M) on [3H]AA release from WISH cells preincubated for 30 min in the presence of 5 µg/ml cycloheximide, then perifused with PAF containing 0.2% BSA. Duration of the treatment is indicated by the shaded area. Each point represents the mean of three independent experiments, performed on different cell cultures. *, P < 0.0001 compared with basal value (unpaired t test).

 
It has been reported that BSA per se stimulates the [3H]AA release from isolated organs or cell cultures (22, 23); thus, to exclude any possible interference of the protein on 17ß-E2 effect, we performed a series of experiments in which WISH cells were perifused in BSA-free PAF. As shown in Fig. 5Go, basal as well as hormone-stimulated [3H]AA releases were very similar to those measured in cells perifused with PAF plus BSA; this protein (0.2%), as expected, significantly (P < 0.05) enhanced [3H]AA output (about 2.5-fold, peak value vs. basal level), and the combination BSA plus 17ß-E2 evoked a stimulation significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that observed in the presence of BSA alone. The effect of both 17ß-E2 and BSA was maintained in WISH cells pretreated for 30 min with cycloheximide (5 µg/ml), then perifused with BSA-free PAF (Fig. 6Go). The stimulatory action of 17ß-E2 on [3H]AA release from WISH cells perifused with BSA-free PAF was again reduced by ICI 182,780 and unaffected by cell preincubation in the presence of Ro 20-1724 (data not shown).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Effect of 17ß-E2 (10-6 M) and 0.2% BSA, alone or in combination, on [3H]AA release from WISH cells perifused with BSA-free PAF. Duration of treatments is indicated by shaded areas. Each point represents the mean of three independent experiments, performed on different cell cultures. *, P < 0.001 compared with basal value; **, P < 0.05 compared with basal value; §, P < 0.05 with respect to BSA alone (Bonferroni’s posttest).

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Effect of 17ß-E2 (10-6 M) or 0.2% BSA on [3H]AA release from WISH cells preincubated for 30 min in the presence of 5 µg/ml cycloheximide, then perifused with BSA-free PAF. Duration of treatments is indicated by shaded areas. Each point represents the mean of three independent experiments, performed on different cell cultures. *, P < 0.001 compared with basal value (Dunnett’s posttest).

 
We then examined the influence of a prolonged exposure to BSA on [3H]AA release from WISH cells perifused with BSA-free PAF. Protein application induced a rapid enhancement of the output (about 2.5-fold, within the first 6 min), which then progressively declined; after 24 min of perifusion in the presence of BSA, [3H]AA release became not different from that observed in basal condition (Fig. 7Go).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Effect of a prolonged application of 0.2% BSA on [3H]AA release from WISH cells perifused with BSA-free PAF. Duration of treatment is indicated by the shaded area. Each point represents the mean of three independent experiments, performed on different cell cultures. *, P < 0.0001 (unpaired t test).

 
We finally tested the effect of E2coBSA, a compound that has been shown not enter the cell and bind putative membrane ERs (24, 25, 26). As shown in Fig. 8Go, the drug (10-5 M) significantly (P < 0.01) stimulated [3H]AA release (about 3-fold, peak value vs. basal level) from WISH cells perifused with BSA-free PAF, even if at a lesser extent (P < 0.05) with respect to free 17ß-E2 (10-6 M).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Effect of 17ß-E2 (10-6 M) or E2coBSA (10-5 M) on [3H]AA release from WISH cells perifused with BSA-free PAF. Duration of treatments is indicated by shaded areas. Each point represents the mean of three independent experiments performed on different cell cultures. *, P < 0.001 compared with basal value; **, P < 0.01 compared with basal value; §, P < 0.05 compared with 17ß-E2 (Bonferroni’s posttest).

 
PGE2 release
In Table 1Go, the effects of 17ß-E2 or E2coBSA on PGE2 output from WISH cells are reported. As shown, the free steroid (10-9 to 10-5 M) dose-dependently stimulated the prostanoid release, reaching a maximum (180%) at 10-6 M. On the contrary, E2coBSA was completely ineffective at concentrations ranging from 10-9 to 10-5 M.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Effects of 17ß-E2 or E2coBSA on PGE2 release from WISH cells

 
Fluorescence labeling
Intact WISH cells grown on monolayer were incubated for different times (1, 15, or 60 min) in the presence of 1.4 x 10-7, 1.4 x 10-6, or 1.4 x 10-5 M E2coBSA-FITC, a compound previously shown not to enter the cell and label a membrane ER (24, 25, 26). Labeling of the outer cell membrane was already evident at the lowest concentration of impeded ligand and all the incubation times. Examination of multiple fields revealed that only a minority subset of WISH cells (<15%) demonstrated this cell surface binding of E2coBSA-FITC.

In Fig. 9Go the effect of 1.4 x 10-5 M E2coBSA-FITC is reported. As shown, the fluorescence was almost exclusively localized on the cell surface and increased progressively after incubation for 1, 15, and 60 min (Fig. 9Go, A–D). The binding was unaffected by excess free BSA (data not shown) and displaced by unlabeled 17ß-E2 (Fig. 9Go, E and F). Identically prepared cells, permeabilized as described in Materials and Methods, demonstrated intracellular (mainly cytoplasmic) labeling with E2coBSA-FITC (Fig. 10Go, A and B). H-150 (2 µg/ml), a rabbit polyclonal antiserum against a recombinant protein corresponding to the amino acids 1–150 mapping at the N terminus of human ERß, immunostained the outer cell membrane of a minority subset of intact WISH cells (<5%) (Fig. 10DGo). Cell permeabilization resulted in a dense intracellular (mainly in the peripheral cytoplasm) staining (Fig. 10CGo); in no instance was labeling seen within the nucleus. Otherwise ER-21 (5 µg/ml), a rabbit IgG affinity-purified peptide antibody raised to the first 21 amino acids mapping the N terminus of human ER{alpha}, slightly labeled only very scarce cells (Fig. 10Go, E and F).



View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. Labeling with E2coBSA-FITC of intact WISH cells. Incubations were performed for 1 min (A), 15 min (B), or 60 min (C, phase-contrast panel D) in the presence of 1.4 x 10-5 M E2coBSA-FITC. In E (phase-contrast panel F), pretreatment of cells with 10-5 M 17ß-E2 for 5 min, before incubation with 1.4 x 10-5 M E2coBSA-FITC for 15 min. Scale bars, 10 µm in D (also applies to A–C); 10 µm in F (also applies to E).

 


View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10. Labeling with E2coBSA-FITC of permeabilized WISH cells and localization of ERs. In A (phase-contrast panel B), permeabilized cells incubated for 15 min with 1.4 x 10-5 M E2coBSA-FITC; in C and D, immunostaining (1 h) with the H-150 antiserum against the N terminus of ERß in permeabilized and nonpermeabilized cells, respectively; in E (phase-contrast panel F), immunostaining (1 h) of permeabilized cells with the ER21 antibody against the N terminus of ER{alpha}. Scale bar, 10 µm in F (also applies to A–E).

 
RT-PCR studies
We then used the RT-PCR technique to evaluate the presence, in WISH cells, of mRNA for the classical ER subtypes, ER{alpha} and ERß. Using different primers of the carboxy terminus and the DNA-binding domain of ERß, RT-PCR revealed the same band corresponding to ERß (528 bp) previously detected by Lau et al. (20) (Fig. 11Go); on the contrary, ER{alpha} mRNA was not detected in the same cells.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 11. Expression of ERß isoform and of GAPDH in WISH cells. 1, DNA markers; 2, RT-PCR product of ERß.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It has been well established that most of the various estrogen effects on target cells are mediated by the so-called genomic pathway, involving the interaction of the hormone with an intracellular receptor protein. An alternative nongenomic pathway, involving the interaction of estrogen with putative cell membrane recognition sites, has been proposed to explain fast and short-lived effects of estrogen on different targets, among which is the reproductive system (27).

In this paper, we report that 17ß-E2 greatly and dose-dependently enhances [3H]AA release from the human amnion-like WISH cells, through an apparently nongenomic action involving the hormone interaction with a membrane binding site. As a matter of fact, 1) 17ß-E2 action is fast and short-lived, being measurable 3 min after application and rapidly declining when hormone administration still persists; 2) [3H]AA release from membrane phospholipids occurs through the phospholipase A2 pathway; 3) 17ß-E2 action is unaffected by inhibition of protein synthesis; 4) the plasma membrane-impermeable E2coBSA also induces a significant increase of [3H]AA release from WISH cells; this effect cannot be exerted by the BSA moiety of the complex, due to very low concentration (0.066%). On the contrary E2coBSA is completely ineffective on PGE2 release, a response that is significantly enhanced by free 17ß-E2. This observation confirms our previous results indicating that an interaction of 17ß-E2 with intracellular receptors was needed to induce PGE2 release (11); moreover, it allows us to exclude the possibility that a significant amount of estradiol dissociates from E2coBSA.

In our experiments, E2coBSA is less effective than 17ß-E2 in inducing the cellular response. For this purpose, conflicting results have been reported in the literature: estradiol-BSA conjugates are as effective as 17ß-E2 in human vascular endothelial cells (28), but less effective in Chinese hamster ovary transfected cells expressing ER{alpha} or ERß (26); the lower effectiveness of estradiol-BSA conjugates may be due to the BSA protein physically hindering 17ß-E2 binding to its receptor. In addition, Stevis et al. (29), demonstrating that estradiol-BSA conjugates and estradiol evoke differential effects in a neuroblastoma cell line, suggested that membrane receptors are different from the classical intracellular ERs and are not recognized by the 17ß-E2-BSA conjugate. Therefore, the lower biological activity of estradiol-BSA conjugates, compared with 17ß-E2, may also be due to the presence of heterogeneous ERs on cell membrane.

BSA is a normal component of PAF that stimulates per se arachidonate output in different systems, WISH cells included. In our experimental conditions, basal as well as 17ß-E2-evoked [3H]AA releases are substantially identical in cells perifused with PAF plus BSA or BSA-free PAF. This observation suggests that the presence, in the perifusion medium, of BSA (which can reversibly bind to 17ß-E2) does not significantly impair the hormone interaction with the membrane binding sites as well as their activation; moreover, BSA does not interfere with 17ß-E2 action in WISH cells or alter the basal release. These results can be explained considering that, in our system: 1) the stimulatory effect of BSA progressively decreases upon a prolonged exposure, disappearing 24 min after application; and 2) WISH cells are perifused with PAF for 1 h, time at which the stimulatory effect of BSA is already completely lost, before fraction collection for the evaluation of basal or evoked [3H]AA release. A similar declining of BSA-evoked [3H]AA release has been observed in intact rat aorta, exposed for 20 min to the protein (23).

The exact mechanism underlying BSA effect remains unknown. Beck et al. (23) recently proposed that BSA action, in vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells, can be explained by a high-affinity binding of the protein to AA and its extraction from the cell membrane; a role in this process could be exerted by specific albumin binding proteins which, indeed, have been identified on the cell surface (30, 31).

The presence of membrane interaction sites for 17ß-E2 in WISH cells is strongly supported by our observation that the impeded ligand E2coBSA-FITC labels the surface of a subset of intact cells. Labeling is specific, because it is unaffected by cell preincubation with an excess of free BSA but inhibited by previous exposure to 17ß-E2.

The E2coBSA-FITC compound has been shown to label a membrane ER in several cell types (24, 25, 26); in many instances only a low percentage of cells are labeled at their surface (26, 27, 28), as we observed in WISH cells. Fairly high concentrations of the fluorescent conjugate are needed to visualize binding on the surface of cells, probably for the same reasons invoked to justify the lower potency of E2coBSA, compared with 17ß-E2, in inducing cellular responses.

In addition to the plasma membrane, ERs have also been detected in the cytoplasm of WISH cells, as suggested by E2coBSA-FITC labeling of permeabilized cells. Intracellular labeling seems not to be the consequence of internalization processes observed in other cell types (32), because it is not significantly observed in intact cells even after long periods of incubation.

ERs identified in WISH cells, both on the membrane and inside of the cell, appear, at least in part, similar if not identical to ERß, as suggested by our demonstration that a specific antibody against this receptor subtype labels the surface of intact WISH cells or the intracellular space after permeabilization. Otherwise, ER21 antibody against a functional domain of the classical ER{alpha} dealing with transcription regulation (33) fails to label intact as well as permeabilized WISH cells. These data are in line with our RT-PCR results, which demonstrate the presence, in WISH cells, of mRNA for ERß but not for ER{alpha}.

Membrane ERs identical, or structurally related, to at least one form of the classical ER{alpha} or ERß have been localized in several cells; meanwhile, evidence for a membrane ER unrelated to both subtypes has also been obtained (27, 34). Two findings [i.e. 1) ICI 182,780, a pure antagonist of the classical ERs (35), only partially inhibits the 17ß-E2-evoked [3H]AA release from WISH cells; and 2) the membrane labeling by the anti-ERß antibody is apparently seen in a lower number of intact WISH cells compared with cells labeled by E2coBSA-FITC] can lead to speculation that heterogeneous ERs are present on WISH cell membrane. However, further experiments are needed to support this preliminary suggestion.

In previous experiments, we have demonstrated that 17ß-E2 modulates PGE2 release from WISH cells through an action that involves an interaction with intracellular receptors and new protein synthesis (11). On the basis of these data and those here reported, we hypothesize that 17ß-E2 evokes different actions in WISH cells, through separate mechanisms: 1) interacting with a membrane binding site, the hormone induces a rapid arachidonate release from membrane phospholipids; and 2) interacting with an intracellular receptor, it modulates PGE2 output. The existence of separate action mechanisms for 17ß-E2 in WISH cells is further demonstrated by the observation that cell preincubation with the cAMP elevating agent, Ro 20-1724, does not influence the hormone-evoked [3H]AA release. Otherwise, 17ß-E2 significantly inhibits PGE2 release from cells preincubated with Ro 20-1724 but exerts an evident stimulatory effect on prostanoid output in untreated cells (11).

Provided that our in vitro results are applicable to the amnion tissue in vivo, it can be hypothesized that AA, rapidly released in the presence of 17ß-E2, may serve as the precursor for PGE2 synthesis, a process that is indeed stimulated by the steroid when intracellular cAMP levels are low. In this way, the two different modes of 17ß-E2 action can operate together, leading to the production of active prostanoids probably involved in labor initiation and maintenance. Alternatively, AA may act itself as a second messenger or be converted to eicosanoids different from PGE2; this second way seems obligatory when high intracellular cAMP levels are present, a condition in which 17ß-E2 indeed inhibits PGE2 release from amniotic cells (11).

In conclusion, through its action on AA metabolism in the amnion, 17ß-E2 could regulate still unidentified fetal membrane functions, or contribute to either enhancing or inhibiting uterine contractions. This divergent effect seems to be strictly dependent on intracellular cAMP levels that, in turn, are regulated by several agonists that target the amnion tissue, among which 17ß-E2 as well as PGs themselves (11, 36). The nucleotide could therefore exert a protective role on pregnancy maintenance not only directly, through its well-known relaxing effect on myometrium, but also indirectly inhibiting PGE2 synthesis by amnion in response to 17ß-E2 and possibly converting AA to eicosanoids able to reduce uterine contractions. Examples of hormonal regulation of amnionic AA metabolism, leading to the production of compounds that could inhibit myometrium activity, have already been described. To this purpose, Toth et al. (37) demonstrated that, in the amnion as well as in WISH cells, the human chorionic gonadotropin enhances the expression of both cyclooxygenase-1 and prostacyclin synthase, thus leading to the release of the tocolytic compound PGI2.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. C. Celeghini, Electron Microscopy Center, University of Ferrara, for help in confocal laser scanning microscopy. We are grateful to Mrs. Linda Bruce, a qualified mother tongue English teacher, for the English revision of the text.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Grants from Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica (PRIN 2000) and from the University of Ferrara (ex 60%).

Abbreviations: AA, Arachidonic acid; AACOCF3, 1,1,1-trifluoromethyl-6,9,12,15-heicosatetraen-2-one; DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide; 17ß-E2, 17ß-estradiol; E2coBSA, 17ß-estradiol 6-(O-carboxymethyl)oxime:BSA; E2coBSA-FITC, 17ß-estradiol 6-(O-carboxymethyl)oxime:BSA fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugate; ER, estrogen receptor; GADPH, glyceraldehyde phosphodehydrogenase; ICI 182,780, 7{alpha}-[(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentyl)sulfinyl]-estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17ß-diol; PG, prostaglandin; PAF, pseudoamniotic fluid; PFA, paraformaldehyde; WISH, Wistar Institute Susan Hayflick.

Received October 25, 2002.

Accepted for publication May 5, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Challis JRG, Matthews SG, Gibb W, Lye SJ 2000 Endocrine and paracrine regulation of birth at term and preterm. Endocr Rev 21:514–550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Mitchell BF, Wong S 1993 Changes in 17ß, 20{alpha}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity supporting an increase in the estrogen/progesterone ratio of human fetal membranes at parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:1377–1385[Medline]
  3. Petraglia F, Florio P, Nappi C, Genazzani AR 1996 Peptide signaling in human placenta and membranes: autocrine, paracrine and endocrine mechanisms. Endocr Rev 17:156–186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wu WX, Myers DA, Nathanielsz PW 1995 Changes in estrogen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in sheep fetal and maternal tissues during late gestation and labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:844–850[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Olson DM, Skinner K, Challis JR 1983 Estradiol-17ß and 2-hydroxyestradiol-17ß-induced differential production of prostaglandins by cells dispersed from human intrauterine tissues at parturition. Prostaglandins 25:639–651[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Power SG, Challis JR 1987 Steroid production by dispersed cells from fetal membranes and intrauterine tissues of sheep. J Reprod Fertil 81:65–76[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Romano WM, Lukash LA, Challis JR, Mitchell BF 1986 Substrate utilization for estrogen synthesis by human fetal membranes and decidua. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:1170–1175[Medline]
  8. Romero R, Scoccia B, Mazor M, Wu YK, Benveniste R 1988 Evidence for a local change in the progesterone/estrogen ratio in human parturition at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:657–660[Medline]
  9. Chibbar R, Wong S, Miller FD, Mitchell BF 1995 Estrogen stimulates oxytocin gene expression in human chorio-decidua. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:567–572[Abstract]
  10. Wu WX, Ma XH, Smith GCS, Nathanielsz PW 2000 Differential distribution of ER{alpha} and ERß mRNA in intrauterine tissues of the pregnant rhesus monkey. Am J Physiol 278:C190–C198
  11. Pavan B, Biondi C, Ferretti ME, Lunghi L, Paganetto G 2001 17ß-Estradiol modulates prostaglandin E2 release from human amnion-derived WISH cells. Biol Reprod 64:1677–1681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Perkins DJ, Kniss DA 1997 Rapid and transient induction of cyclo-oxygenase 2 by epidermal growth factor in human amnion-derived WISH cells. Biochem J 321:677–681
  13. Hulkower KI, Otis ER, Li J, Ennis BW, Cugier DJ, Bell RL, Carter GW, Glaser KB 1997 Induction of prostaglandin H synthase-2 and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} in human amnionic WISH cells by various stimuli occurs through distinct intracellular mechanisms. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 280:1065–1074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Pavan B, Buzzi M, Ginanni-Corradini F, Ferretti ME, Vesce F, Biondi C 2000 Influence of oxytocin on prostaglandin E2, intracellular calcium, and cyclic adenosine monophosphate in human amnion-derived (WISH) cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:76–82[Medline]
  15. Biondi C, Pavan B, Ferretti ME, Ginanni Corradini F, Neri LM, Vesce F 2001 Formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine induces prostaglandin E2 release from human amnion-derived WISH cells by phospholipase C-mediated [Ca2+]i rise. Biol Reprod 64:865–870[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Casey ML, Korte K, MacDonald PC 1988 Epidermal growth factor stimulation of prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis in amnion cells. J Biol Chem 263:7846–7854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Romero R, Durun S, Dinarello CA, Oyarzon E, Hobbins JC, Mitchell MD 1989 Interleukin-1 stimulates prostaglandin biosynthesis by human amnion. Prostaglandins 37:13–22[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Moore JJ, Dubyak GR, Moore RM, Kooy DV 1988 Oxytocin activates the inositol-phospholipid-protein kinase C system and stimulates prostaglandin production in human amnion cells. Endocrinology 123:1771–1777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Buzzi M, Vesce F, Ferretti ME, Fabbri E, Biondi C 1999 Does formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine exert a physiological role in labor in women? Biol Reprod 60:1211–1216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Lau K-M, LaSpina M, Long J, Ho S-M 2000 Expression of estrogen receptor (ER)-{alpha} and ER-ß in normal and malignant prostatic epithelial cells: regulation by methylation and involvement in growth regulation. Cancer Res 60:3175–3182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Xue S, Slater DM, Bennett PR, Myatt L 1996 Induction of both cytosolic phospholipase A2 and prostaglandin H synthase-2 by interleukin-1 ß in WISH cells is inhibited by dexamethasone. Prostaglandins 51:107–124[Medline]
  22. Paul J, Kinsella JE 1983 Effects of bradykinin and bovine serum albumin on arachidonic acid and prostaglandin release from perfused rat heart. Prostaglandins Leukot Med 11:419–430[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Beck R, Bertolino S, Abbot SE, Aaronson PI, Smirnov SV 1998 Modulation of arachidonic acid release and membrane fluidity by albumin in vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells. Circ Res 83:923–931[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Pappas TC, Gametchu B, Watson CS 1995 Membrane estrogen receptors identified by multiple antibody labeling and impeded-ligand binding. FASEB J 9:404–410[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Morey AK, Razandi M, Prins BA, Hu RM, Biesiada E, Levin ER 1997 Estrogen and progesterone inhibit human vascular smooth muscle proliferation. Endocrinology 138:3330–3339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Razandi M, Pedram A, Greene GL, Levin ER 1999 Cell membrane and nuclear estrogen receptors (ERs) originate from a single transcript: studies of ER{alpha} and ERß expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mol Endocrinol 13:307–319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Falkenstein E, Tillmann HC, Christ M, Feuring M, Wehling M 2000 Multiple actions of steroid hormones. A focus on rapid, nongenomic actions. Pharmacol Rev 52:513–556[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Russell KS, Haynes MP, Sinha D, Clerisme E, Bender JR 2000 Human vascular endothelial cells contain membrane binding sites for estradiol, which mediate rapid intracellular signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5930–5935[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Stevis PE, Deecher DC, Suhadolnik L, Mallis LM, Frail DE 1999 Differential effects of estradiol and estradiol-BSA conjugates. Endocrinology 140:5455–5458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Ghinea N, Fixman A, Alexandru D, Popov D, Hasu M, Ghitescu L, Eskenasy M, Simionescu M, Simionescu N 1988 Identification of albumin-binding proteins in capillary endothelial cells. J Cell Biol 107:231–239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Schnitzer JE, Carley WW, Palade GE 1988 Albumin interacts specifically with a 60-kDa microvascular endothelial glycoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:6773–6777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Benten WPM, Stephan C, Lieberherr M, Wunderlich F 2001 Estradiol signaling via sequestrable surface receptors. Endocrinology 142:1669–1677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Evans RM 1988 The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science 240:889–895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Nadal A, Ropero AB, Fuentes E, Soria B 2001 The plasma membrane estrogen receptor: nuclear or unclear? Trends Pharmacol Sci 22:597–599[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Macgregor JI, Jordan VC 1998 Basic guide to the mechanisms of antiestrogen action. Pharmacol Rev 50:151–196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Vesce F, Tarabbia C, Farina A, Travagli S, Pareschi MC, Portolan A, Biondi C 1994 Modulation of amnionic adenylate cyclase and cAMP phosphodiesterase by prostaglandins E1 and F2{alpha}. Gynecol Obstet Invest 37:77–82[Medline]
  37. Toth P, Rao CV 1993 Direct novel regulation of cyclooxygenase and prostacyclin synthase by human chorionic gonadotropin in the human amnion. Trophoblast Res 8:503–514



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
B. Dong and F. Matsumura
Roles of Cytosolic Phospholipase A2 and Src Kinase in the Early Action of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin through a Nongenomic Pathway in MCF10A Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2008; 74(1): 255 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
W. H Walker and J. Cheng
FSH and testosterone signaling in Sertoli cells
Reproduction, July 1, 2005; 130(1): 15 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. L. Temple and S. Wray
Bovine Serum Albumin-Estrogen Compounds Differentially Alter Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-1 Neuronal Activity
Endocrinology, February 1, 2005; 146(2): 558 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
D. Korita, H. Itoh, N. Sagawa, S. Yura, M. Yoshida, K. Kakui, M. Takemura, and S. Fujii
17{beta}-Estradiol Up-Regulates Prostacyclin Production in Cultured Human Uterine Myometrial Cells Via Augmentation of Both Cyclooxygenase-1 and Prostacyclin Synthase Expression
Reproductive Sciences, October 1, 2004; 11(7): 457 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiorini, S.
Right arrow Articles by Abelli, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fiorini, S.
Right arrow Articles by Abelli, L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals