| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Program in Neural, Informational and Behavioral Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Arshad M. Khan, Department of Biological Sciences, Hedco Neuroscience Building, MC 2520, 3641 Watt Way, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-2520. E-mail: arshadk{at}usc.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because peptide synthesis and release are difficult to monitor in real time in the conscious animal, many ways have been sought for identifying when neuroendocrine neurons undergo changes in their physiological state during stress. However, each of these ways is uniquely attended by particular limitations. Thus, circulating ACTH and CORT are well established indices of peptide release but are of limited use as indices of gene expression, whereas CRH neuroendocrine neuronal firing rates reveal more about electrical than metabolic or transcriptional processes. The expression of inducible factors such as Fos in these cells does not invariably correlate with cell firing rate or CRH expression (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), and detection of heterogeneous nuclear (hn)RNA or mRNA tracks the end products of gene expression, but not the signaling intermediates. Ideally, a marker for tracking the initiation of gene expression in CRH neurons should be present within the neurons themselves, be induced very rapidly, and be an upstream participant in signaling pathways leading to such expression. Moreover, it can be reasonably presumed that such a marker should be well suited to the task of funneling multiple incoming signals to appropriate intracellular pathways; i.e. it should itself be an integrator of cellular information.
A critical constraint when studying stimulus-transcription coupling is selecting an appropriate stimulus to activate CRH neuroendocrine neurons, because a particular stressor will likely recruit multiple sets of PVH afferents; each set will, in turn, use different neurotransmitter combinations to alter CRH neuronal function. Using complex stressors makes it difficult to determine whether and how particular neurotransmitter/receptor systems are coupled with intracellular signaling pathways to control gene expression. Ideally, the most useful stressor would be one for which all specific neural afferents are known. We have therefore sought to refine experimental approaches for studying cellular mechanisms underlying gene expression in CRH neurons by seeking experimentally expedient stimuli and markers for stress-induced activation.
Intravenous 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) was used as a stimulus in the present study because it rapidly triggers both CRH transcription in neuroendocrine neurons and CORT release, and it can be delivered with little nonspecific stress (6, 7, 8). Importantly, the induction of CRH gene expression by 2-DG requires an intact ascending catecholaminergic pathway originating in the hindbrain (8, 9).
Using this stressor we asked whether the phosphorylation of p44/42 MAPKs (also known as ERKs 1 and 2, respectively) could be used to detect rapid cellular activation in CRH neuroendocrine neurons in response to iv 2-DG. Because ERKs 1/2 have been shown in other systems to participate in the phospho-relay cascades that result in the activation of cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) (10, 11, 12 , but see Ref. 13), it is conceivable that they also participate in the activation of the crh gene. To date, CREB is the transcription factor most directly implicated in crh gene transcription (2, 14, 15).
Thus, we reasoned that using 2-DG as a stimulus and phosphorylated MAPK as a marker may together prove useful for delineating the precise functional links among a particular afferent input, its specific postsynaptic receptor targets, and the receptor-driven signaling machinery inside the target cell that ultimately lead to gene expression. Such links could generalize to other PVH afferent systems as well, perhaps leading to an appreciation of the general principles by which afferent control shapes hypothalamic responses to a variety of stressors. To begin exploring this issue, we also examined the effects of halothane anesthesia exposure upon levels of phosphorylated MAPK in PVHmp neurons.
Some parts of this work have been presented in preliminary form (16).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiments using iv 2-DG injection
Jugular catheterization.
Rats under halothane anesthesia (n = 14; 249327 g body weight at time of surgery) were surgically implanted with sterile jugular catheters fitted with Silastic tips that terminated near the atrium (7). The free end of each catheter was threaded under the skin and left to protrude through the skin between the shoulders. Animals were allowed to recover their presurgical body weights; during this time their catheters were flushed daily with 0.9% sterile, heparinized saline.
Induction of glucoprivic stress and preparation of perfusion-fixed tissue.
On the day of testing, rats were given iv infusions of 2-DG (250 mg/kg, dissolved in 0.9% sterile saline), followed approximately 1011 min later by iv anesthesia (2,2,2-tribromoethanol; mean volume 2.4 ml; bolus delivery). Control animals received only the anesthesia. In earlier experiments, approximately 20 min was allowed between 2-DG and anesthesia delivery, and a control group was included that received the saline vehicle instead of 2-DG. After infusions, rats were perfused through the ascending aorta with 100150 ml of 0.01 M sodium PBS (pH 7.4), followed by 300500 ml of ice-cold 4% (wt/vol) p-formaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (PB). Brains were then fixed in the p-formaldehyde fixative for 2448 h at 4 C and then immersed in 0.10.2 M PB containing 20% glycerol for 2448 h at 4 C (17). Brains were then frozen using hexane cooled with powdered dry ice and stored at -70 C until sectioning.
Eight series of one-in-eight, 20-µm-thick frozen coronal sections were cut through the PVH, from brain blocks mounted on the freezing stage of a sliding microtome. Sections kept for immunocytochemistry (ICC) were collected in tissue culture wells filled with cryoprotectant (50% 0.05 M PB, 30% ethylene glycol, 20% glycerol, pH 7.4) and stored at -20 C until further processing. Series kept for in situ hybridization (ISH) only were collected in ice-cold potassium PBS (K-PBS) containing 0.25% (wt/vol) p-formaldehyde. They were then mounted the same day on Superfrost Plus slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), vacuum desiccated overnight, postfixed in K-PBS-4% p-formaldehyde for 1 h at room temperature (RT), rinsed five times for 5 min each in clean K-PBS, air dried, and then stored at -70 C in airtight containers containing silica gel dessicant for hybridization at a later date. Serial sections were saved for thionin staining.
Experiments using halothane anesthesia exposure
Stimulation parameters.
Rats (n = 2) were gently transferred from their home cages to a glass chamber containing paper towels moistened with halothane (Halocarbon Laboratories, River Edge, NJ) for approximately 1530 sec. They were then removed from the chamber and placed back in again 1530 sec later. This was repeated two or three times in succession, after which they were returned to their home cages. Ten minutes later, the rats were decapitated and their brains rapidly removed for fixation by immersion (see below). Control animals (n = 2) were simply removed from their home cages and decapitated immediately.
Immersion fixation procedure and tissue preparation.
The low-temperature immersion fixation procedure used here, modified from Berod and colleagues (18), also incorporates a cryoprotectant recipe used by Swank and colleagues (17). Brains removed after decapitation were immediately placed in sodium acetate-buffered p-formaldehyde (pH 6.5) chilled at 14 C to form a semifrozen slush. The rate of infiltration of p-formaldehyde into fresh brain tissue, but not its ability to cross-link proteins, is reportedly optimal at this pH (18). Brains remained in the slush for approximately 8 h, during which time the temperature was maintained between 1 and 4 C by keeping the brains/fixative on ice in a refrigerator. After this time, each brain was removed from the pH 6.5 fixative, gently blotted dry, and placed in sodium borate-buffered p-formaldehyde (pH 9.5) at 4 C for 6 d. At this pH, the ability of p-formaldehyde to cross-link proteins in brain tissue, but not rapidly infiltrate such tissue, is reportedly optimal (18). Brains were then transferred to 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 20% glycerol (17) and kept on a rotating platform at 4 C for 2 d. They were then frozen in supercooled hexane chilled over a bed of dry ice and kept frozen at -70 C until ready for sectioning. The 20-µm-thick coronal sections were cut through the extent of the PVH using the freezing stage of a sliding microtome and then processed for immunocytochemical detection of pERK1/2 as outlined below.
ICC (free-floating method, based on Ref. 17).
For ICC, sections were brought to RT, passed through five 5-min rinses of Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 0.1 M Tris buffer containing 0.9% saline, pH 7.4) at RT. They were then transferred to a blocking solution for 1 h at RT in TBS containing 3% (wt/vol) BSA and 0.2% Triton X-100 (Triton). Sections were then reacted for 72 h at 4 C with an affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against the phosphorylated forms of ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA; http://www.cellsignal.com/). This antibody reportedly detects rat ERKs 1 and 2 only when they are phosphorylated at Thr183 and Tyr185 and does not cross-react with phosphorylated JNK/SAPK or p38 MAPKs (see suppliers web site for antibody validation data). This antibody was diluted in TBS containing 3% BSA and 0.2% Triton to final concentrations of 1:2000 (dual-label experiments) or 1:8000 (single-label experiments). For animals from 2-DG experiments, subsets of tissue sections were processed using a rabbit antiserum targeting Fos protein (1:40,000 and 1:60,000; Calbiochem/Oncogene, San Diego, CA; http://www.calbiochem.com/). This antiserum was raised against a synthetic immunogen corresponding to amino acid residues 417 of human Fos protein and recognizes Fos in rats. Sections were then rinsed five times for 5 min each in fresh TBS washes. To amplify the reaction, sections were next reacted for 2 h at RT with a biotinylated goat antirabbit IgG (heavy + light chains), diluted one part stock to two parts TBS containing 3% BSA and 0.2% Triton [Kirkegaard & Perry Labs (KPL), Gaithersburg, MD; http://www.kpl.com/home.cfm], followed by five 5-min fresh washes in TBS. For 11.5 h at RT, the immunocomplexes were then conjugated to streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase, diluted one part stock to one part TBS containing 3% BSA and 0.2% Triton (KPL), and rinsed again with the usual TBS washes. Development of the final reaction was performed by reacting sections for 24 min in a solution prepared from a commercial diaminobenzidine kit (HistoMark Enhanced Black solution, KPL), according to the manufacturers instructions. Reactions were visualized under bright-field optics to determine optimal levels of staining and were stopped by rinsing sections in cold TBS.
ISH (mounted sections).
Sections were hybridized as previously described (19, 20) with a [35S]UTP-labeled cRNA probe transcribed from a 700-bp cDNA sequence encoding RNA for part of exon 1 and all of exon 2 of the prepro-CRH gene. The probe was synthesized using the Promega Gemini kit (Promega Inc., Madison, WI) and the appropriate RNA polymerase, as described in detail (20). Sections were exposed to Biomax x-ray film for appropriate exposure periods (23 d), then dipped in nuclear track emulsion (Kodak NTB-2, diluted 1:1 with distilled water), exposed for 5 d, developed and (for single-label studies) counterstained with thionin.
Dual-label procedures (combined ICC and ISH).
For dual-label experiments, precautions were taken to RNase-protect the tissue during the ICC procedures before ISH, using a methodology modified from Watts and Swanson (21). To this end, the following reagents were added to the blocking solution: 0.5% dithiothreitol, heparin (5 mg/ml), and RNAsin (50 U/ml buffer). Also, fraction V BSA (Sigma) was used during ICC steps for dual-label runs. Because washout of immunostaining was observed after ISH, the final concentration of primary antibody was increased from 1:8000 to 1:2000, and nickel ammonium sulfate was added to the development reaction to help intensify and retain the stain within immunolabeled cells.
Quantitation of pERK1/2 immunoreactivity and [35S]UTP-cRNA hybridization signals.
To quantitate the number of PVHmp neurons singly labeled with either pERK1/2 immunoreactivity or CRH mRNA hybridization signal, or dually labeled with both reaction products, a single section from each 2-DG-injected subject was selected for analysis. This section corresponded in plane and rostrocaudal position most closely to that represented in plate 26 of the Swanson atlas (22) and was generally the one with the highest CRH mRNA signal. This level also reportedly contains the greatest representation of CRH neurons in the PVH (23). Hemifields for each selected tissue section were then visualized under bright-field optics and each digitally photographed as a single image at x16 magnification using a Spot RT Color Camera and associated software (version 3.5.5 for MacOS; Diagnostic Instruments, Inc., Sterling Heights, MI). The images were imported into Adobe Photoshop and contrast-enhanced to highlight neuronal elements within the PVHmp. Digital images of hemifields from six subjects were captured in this fashion, and their prints were overlaid with acetate. Under high-power visualization, the neurons in each hemifield were then examined for labeling, and the corresponding neurons depicted in that hemifields printed photomicrograph were then coded accordingly on acetate. The marked neurons in each single-image photomicrograph were then counted and the number of pERK1/2+, CRH mRNA+, and dually positive neurons recorded. Counts from all left hemifields were pooled and compared with pooled counts of the right hemifields, and significance of differences between both hemifield sets was determined using one-way ANOVA (Microsoft Excel), with P < 0.05 being regarded as statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
PVH levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2 are rapidly increased after halothane anesthesia exposure
Figure 3B
shows that, similar to rats treated with 2-DG infusions, rats exposed to halothane anesthesia displayed robustly elevated levels of pERK1/2 in PVHmp neurons. Although dual localization experiments were not performed for this tissue, it appears that the neuronal population displaying this elevated pERK1/2 immunoreactivity should include most PVHmp neurons containing CRH. In contrast to halothane-exposed rats, control animals displayed little to no pERK1/2 in PVHmp neurons (Fig. 3A
). Our halothane exposure experiments also involved the use of a rapid immersion fixation protocol that differed from the perfusion fixation protocol used to fix tissue from animals from the 2-DG experiments. The use of this protocol proved successful, with little qualitative difference in pERK1/2 immunostaining in the PVHmp observed between the two methods (unpublished observations, but also compare Fig. 1D
and Fig. 3B
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MAPK cascades are organized into modules of at least three sequentially activating protein serine-threonine kinases (29). Within its own three-tiered phospho-relay module, ERKs (phosphotransferase members within EC 2.7.1.37) occupy the most downstream position, being targets of MEK enzymes, which in turn are activated by Raf-1 or B-Raf (30). Sequential activation of Raf, MEK, and ERK enzymes occurs by phosphorylation of each kinase by the preceding one within the module, with Raf activation occurring by way of heptahelical (at times, G protein-coupled) receptor activation (31 , but see Ref. 32). At least one ERK isoenzyme, p42 MAPK (ERK 2) has been localized to the PVH, as well as one of its upstream activators, MEK1 (33), suggesting the presence of these multitiered MAPK modules within hypothalamic paraventricular neurons.
Utility of pERK1/2 as an index of cellular activation
Our results show that iv infusion of 2-DG is associated with a rapid and significant increase of pERK1/2 levels within both CRH and non-CRH parvicellular PVH neurons. Rapid elevations of pERK1/2 were also evident in rats subjected to halothane exposure. The increased levels of pERK1/2 may reflect the recruitment of signaling machinery that mobilizes the coordinated cellular response to these acute but very different challenges. These increases were detected using a highly selective phosphospecific antibody that does not recognize unphosphorylated enzymes already present in the cell and so tracks ERK phosphorylation but not translation. Phosphorylation occurs within seconds to minutes of exposure to a stimulus (e.g. Ref. 34), whereas translation can occur from 30 min to several hours after stimulation; such differences in temporal dynamics have even allowed for the simultaneous tracking of these processes within the same cell (35). Phosphorylated ERKs have the advantage over more traditional markers of activity such as Fos, because they can be detected closer to the time of stimulus presentation (6). Thus, cellular changes that fall within the temporal domain of secretory events within neuroendocrine neurons can be tracked more closely.
It will be of interest to examine whether increases in phosphorylated ERK coincide with the phosphorylation-induced activation of transcription factors such as CREB in CRH neuroendocrine neurons, levels of which have been shown to elevate rapidly in CRH neuroendocrine neurons after ether anesthesia (2). This is significant not only because CREB is implicated in activating the crh gene (14, 15) but also because pERK1/2 activity can be functionally linked to CREB phosphorylation (10, 11, 12) and, in at least one case, has been shown to inhibit CREB phosphorylation (13). It is therefore plausible that pERK1/2 activity could help control the ability of CREB to initiate gene expression in CRH neuroendocrine neurons and that their coincident activation within these neurons may be a useful means to track the mobilization of specific signaling pathways.
Utility of 2-DG as a stressor used to study ERK activation in CRH neuroendocrine neurons
From a neural systems standpoint, a major challenge to studying intracellular mechanisms in vivo is the method employed to activate target neurons. Using a stimulus that activates multiple sets of PVH afferents, each of which likely uses different neurotransmitter combinations to engage CRH neuroendocrine neurons, can lead to confusion with regard to how such afferents are chemically coupled to signaling pathways in these cells to drive gene expression. For example, ether anesthesia temporally correlates with increases in both CREB phosphorylation and CRH transcription in CRH neuroendocrine neurons (2). However, because the PVH afferents encoding ether anesthesia are complex and poorly characterized, it is difficult to identify neurotransmitters and their associated receptor subtypes involved in transducing these stress signals into meaningful transcriptional processes within the cell. If the goal is to explore how extracellularly derived signals are integrated by CRH neurons to drive gene expression, then the routes by which these signals reach CRH neurons must be well characterized and the stimulus to selectively activate these routes selected accordingly.
Intravenous 2-DG administration may circumvent such problems. In addition to its well documented effects as a powerful stimulator of feeding and hyperglycemia (8, 9), 2-DG also robustly stimulates both CORT secretion and CRH transcription in PVHmp cells (8). Specifically, Ritter et al. (8, 9) have recently used an immunotoxin to produce a selective lesion of noradrenergic and adrenergic PVH afferents that originate in the hindbrain. Using this technique, we recently showed that 2-DG-induced increases in feeding, CORT, CRH hnRNA, and c-fos mRNA are profoundly impaired in animals lesioned in this manner. However, basal CRH mRNA expression, circadian CORT release, hyperglycemia, and the response to forced swimming remain intact (8, 9). Thus, ascending catecholaminergic pathways are required for 2-DG-induced activation of CRH neuroendocrine neurons but are dispensable for both the daily rhythms of CORT secretion in unstressed animals and that following forced swimming.
These results (8, 9) provide evidence that a well defined stimulus, 2-DG, requires a single chemically defined neural input to drive the CRH neuroendocrine system. From a signaling standpoint, these results suggest that catecholaminergic neurotransmission may be necessary for driving crh gene expression in response to 2-DG, although the role of neuropeptide Y (NPY), which is colocalized extensively in these terminals (36), cannot be excluded here. The simplest circuit that can explain these findings is one where hindbrain-originating catecholaminergic afferents directly innervate CRH neurons. Alternatively, these catecholaminergic neurons may exert their effects indirectly by way of second-order glutamatergic or GABAergic neurons that in turn innervate the PVHmp (37), or they may work synergistically with NPY to help drive this system. In either case, it is likely that 2-DG-induced catecholaminergic neurotransmission directly or indirectly engages specific postsynaptic receptor subtypes on CRH neurons to drive crh gene expression. We hypothesize that pERK1/2 is an important signaling intermediate linking activation of such receptors to gene expression in CRH neuroendocrine neurons after 2-DG administration. Although we consider this hypothesis below within the context of cellular integration of stress-related signals, we must emphasize that the causal relationships among 2-DG injection, selective activation of PVH afferents, and recruitment of postsynaptic receptors and signaling machinery remain to be rigorously established. However, in the present study, the selective labeling of PVH neurons relative to regions immediately surrounding this nucleus argues against nonspecific humoral influences of 2-DG accounting for pERK immunostaining in these neurons and suggests recruitment of particular neural afferents in response to 2-DG.
MAPKs as potential integrators of afferent signals influencing gene expression in neuroendocrine neurons
CRH neuroendocrine neurons bear many different classes of neurotransmitter receptor, each of which may help convert afferent stress-related signals into meaningful intracellular signals driving gene expression. Many of these receptors have been shown in a variety of other systems to be functionally linked to MAPK pathways within cells. Within the context of the ascending catecholaminergic afferent system, the most relevant receptor subtypes to consider would be the
1B and
1D adrenergic receptor subtypes, which have been localized to subsets of PVHmp cells containing CRH mRNA (38, 39). In other cell systems, these receptor subtypes can be functionally coupled to ERK activation (40, 41, 42), albeit with differing agonist dependencies. This suggests the possibility that pERK1/2 may also be functionally linked to these receptor subtypes in CRH neurons to drive gene expression. This possibility is supported by our recent data showing that central administration of norepinephrine rapidly elevates CRH hnRNA, c-fos mRNA, and pERK1/2 in PVHmp neurons (43). Additionally, ERKs can potentially serve as funnels for multiple afferent signals that are transduced by a variety of other receptor systems in CRH neuroendocrine neurons. Thus, ERK1/2 may also be mobilized through activation of receptors for glutamate (44, 45), angiotensin (46), NPY (47), CRH (48), and
-melanocyte-stimulating hormone/agouti-related protein (28), subtypes for which are known to be present within CRH neurons or, more generally, within the PVHmp (49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54).
How could ERKs influence gene expression in CRH neuroendocrine neurons? As documented in a variety of systems (55, 56), phosphorylated ERKs (pERK1/2) stimulate transcription by directly phosphorylating transcription factors or by way of phosphorylating other downstream intermediates. Thus, pERK1/2 can phosphorylate members of the Ets family of transcription activators such as Elk-1, which preferentially activate genes containing serum-response elements, such as the c-fos gene (57). Alternatively, pERK1/2 may activate CREB, perhaps by first phosphorylating members of the RSK/MSK family of enzymes (58), which are known signaling intermediates between ERK1/2 and CREB (59). pCREB, in turn, could activate genes that contain Ca2+/cAMP-response elements, which include the crh gene.
Concluding remarks
CRH neuroendocrine neurons in the PVHmp receive inputs from many diverse cell groups (60). An essential question concerning this system is how these neurons integrate multiple afferent signals to produce coordinated responses. A heuristic that has been applied to this question at the level of general HPA axis function (61) is Sherringtons principle of "the final common path" (62). At a smaller scale, this principle remains useful as a subtext for considering how MAPKs might process signals from multiple receptor subtypes within single CRH cells to help coordinate stereotyped responses (e.g. secretion and gene expression). MAPKs have been broadly, if not explicitly, considered within Sherringtonian contexts as intracellular funnels for signals arriving from a variety of extracellular sources (63), an idea supported by reports of increased PVH pERK1/2 immunoreactivity after various stimuli (25, 26, 27, 28) and by our finding of similar increases after both 2-DG and halothane exposure. Understanding how MAPKs participate within a final common path to influence gene expression in CRH neuroendocrine neurons may provide useful insights (e.g. Ref. 64) regarding how stimulus-transcription coupling is coordinated by the HPA axis. Such coupling may involve the recently postulated role of MAPK acting as a rheostat-like switch that, instead of turning genes on or off, provides a continuously variable rate of gene transcription that is dependent on the strength of the signaling cascades within the cell (65).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: CORT, Corticosterone; CREB, cAMP response element-binding protein; 2-DG, 2-deoxy-D-glucose; hnRNA, heterogeneous nuclear RNA; HPA, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; ICC, immunocytochemistry; ISH, in situ hybridization; NPY, neuropeptide Y; PB, phosphate buffer; PVHmp, medial parvicellular part of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus; RT, room temperature; TBS, Tris-buffered saline.
Received April 30, 2003.
Accepted for publication September 16, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(1b) adrenoceptor mRNA in corticotropin-releasing hormone-containing cells of the rat hypothalamus and its regulation by corticosterone. J Neurosci 19:1009810106
1D adrenergic receptor messenger RNA in oxytocin- and corticotropin-releasing hormone-synthesizing neurons in the rat paraventricular nucleus. Neuroscience 91:639649[CrossRef][Medline]
1-adrenergic receptor subtypes. J Neurochem 72:23882396[CrossRef][Medline]
(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes. Mol Pharmacol 61:10081016
(1B)- and
(1D)-Adrenergic receptors exhibit different requirements for agonist and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation to regulate growth responses in rat 1 fibroblasts. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 300:8390
-receptors regulate phosphorylation of calcium/cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate response element-binding protein and activation of p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Endocrinology 140:15251536This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Arnhold, J. M. Yoder, and W. C. Engeland Subdiaphragmatic Vagotomy Prevents Drinking-Induced Reduction in Plasma Corticosterone in Water-Restricted Rats Endocrinology, May 1, 2009; 150(5): 2300 - 2307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Salter-Venzon and A. G. Watts The role of hypothalamic ingestive behavior controllers in generating dehydration anorexia: a Fos mapping study Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): R1009 - R1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Singru, E. Sanchez, R. Acharya, C. Fekete, and R. M. Lechan Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Contributes to Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Activation of Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Synthesizing Neurons in the Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus Endocrinology, May 1, 2008; 149(5): 2283 - 2292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Gorton, A. M. Khan, M. Bohland, G. Sanchez-Watts, C. M. Donovan, and A. G. Watts A Role for the Forebrain in Mediating Time-of-Day Differences in Glucocorticoid Counterregulatory Responses to Hypoglycemia in Rats Endocrinology, December 1, 2007; 148(12): 6026 - 6039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Khan, T. A. Ponzio, G. Sanchez-Watts, B. G. Stanley, G. I. Hatton, and A. G. Watts Catecholaminergic Control of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling in Paraventricular Neuroendocrine Neurons In Vivo and In Vitro: A Proposed Role during Glycemic Challenges J. Neurosci., July 4, 2007; 27(27): 7344 - 7360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wotus, M. M. Arnhold, and W. C. Engeland Dehydration-induced drinking decreases Fos expression in hypothalamic paraventricular neurons expressing vasopressin but not corticotropin-releasing hormone Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): R1349 - R1358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mukherjee, A. Knisely, and L. Jacobson Partial Glucocorticoid Agonist-Like Effects of Imipramine on Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenocortical Activity, Thymus Weight, and Hippocampal Glucocorticoid Receptors in Male C57BL/6 Mice Endocrinology, September 1, 2004; 145(9): 4185 - 4191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |