| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 Gene Expression by Tumor Necrosis Factor
via an Inhibition of CCAAT/ Enhancer-binding Protein
during the Early Stage of Adipocyte Differentiation
Division of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, 980-8574 Japan
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Akira Sugawara, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Nephrology, Endocrinology, and Vascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574 Japan. E-mail: akiras2i{at}mail.tains.tohoku.ac.jp.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is known to inhibit adipocyte differentiation and induce insulin resistance. Moreover, TNF
is known to down-regulate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)
2, an adipocyte-specific nuclear receptor of insulin-sensitizer thiazolidinediones. To clarify molecular mechanisms of TNF
- mediated PPAR
2 down-regulation, we here examined the effect of TNF
on transcription regulation of PPAR
2 gene expression during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation. 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (2 d after 100% confluent) were incubated in a differentiation mixture (dexamethasone, insulin, 3-isobutyl-1-methlxanthine), with or without 50 ng/ml TNF
, for 24 h. TNF
significantly decreased PPAR
2 expression both at mRNA and protein levels (to
40%), as well as aP2 mRNA expression. The mouse PPAR
2 gene promoter region (2.2-kb) was isolated and was used for luciferase reporter assays by transient transfection. TNF
significantly suppressed PPAR
2 gene transcription (to
50%), and deletion analyses demonstrated that the suppression was mediated via CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) binding elements at the 320/340 region of the promoter. Moreover, TNF
significantly decreased expression of C/EBP
mRNA and protein levels (to
40%). EMSA, using 3T3-L1 cells nuclear extracts with the 320/340 region as a probe, demonstrated the binding of C/EBP
to the element, which was significantly decreased by TNF
treatment. Overexpression of CEBP/
prevented the TNF
-mediated suppression of PPAR
2 transactivation. Taken together, TNF
suppresses PPAR
2 gene transcription by the inhibition of C/EBP
expression and its DNA binding during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation, which may contribute to the inhibition of adipocyte differentiation, as well as the induction of insulin resistance. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, an adipocyte-derived cytokine, is well known to inhibit adipocyte differentiation (1, 2) and induce insulin resistance via several mechanisms, including insulin signaling modification (3, 4, 5, 6), which may contribute to the progression of hypertension and cardiovascular events (7, 8, 9). In contrast to TNF
, antidiabetic thiazolidinediones, which function as ligands of nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)
(10), have recently been known to improve insulin sensitivity (11). Among PPAR
isoforms (
1 and
2), PPAR
2 is adipocyte-specific and plays a dominant role in adipocyte differentiation (12). During adipocyte differentiation, both PPAR
2 and CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBPs) function as key factors in the complex of transcriptional cascade by their subsequent transactivation of adipocyte-specific genes (13, 14). Genetic analyses of human PPAR
2 polymorphism have demonstrated an association between PPAR
2 and insulin sensitivity (15, 16).
Recently, expression of PPAR
2 in mature adipocytes has been demonstrated to be down-regulated by TNF
treatment (17, 18). Because PPAR
2 ligand thiazolidinediones have also been reported to decrease plasma TNF
levels (19, 20) as well as to inhibit TNF
actions (21, 22), PPAR
2 and TNF
may functionally antagonize each other. However, the molecular mechanisms by which TNF
down-regulates PPAR
2 expression, especially in terms of gene transcription regulation, remain unclear. Moreover, little is known regarding the effects of TNF
on PPAR
2 expression during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation, which may be important to understand the onset of adipocyte differentiation as well as insulin resistance. We therefore isolated mouse PPAR
2 (mPPAR
2) gene promoter region (2.2-kb) further upstream of the previously isolated clone (615-bp) (23) and examined the effects of TNF
on PPAR
2 gene transcription regulation during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation using 3T3-L1 cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
was purchased from Genzyme TECHNE (Minneapolis, MN). Insulin, 3-isobutyl-1-methlxanthine, and dexamethasone were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). FuGENE 6 Transfection Reagent was purchased from Roche Applied Science (Indianapolis, IN). [
-32P] Deoxycytidine triphosphate (6000 Ci/mmol) was obtained from Amersham Biosciences (Piscataway, NJ). Total RNA was prepared from 3T3-L1 using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD).
Cell culture
3T3-L1 preadipocytes (24) (purchased from ATCC, Manassas, VA) were grown in DMEM with 10% calf serum. Two days after 100% confluent, the cells were replaced with the differentiation mixture (DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum plus 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methlxanthine, 1 µM dexamethasone, and 10 µg/ml insulin) (25) for 24 h with or without TNF
(50 ng/ml). In some experiments, the 3T3-L1 cells (2 d after 100% confluent) were grown in DMEM with 10% calf serum alone for 24 h instead of the differentiation mixture.
Cloning of the promoter region of the mPPAR
2 gene
The promoter region of the PPAR
2 gene that was cloned by PCR using GenomeWalker kits (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) as described previously (26). Briefly, the first PCR was conducted with a combination of adaptor primer 1 (provided in the kit) and mPPAR
2 5'-untranslated region (UTR) primer 1 (5'-CAGCATAAAACAGAGATTTGCTG-3') (23) using mouse genomic libraries from ICR Swiss mice provided in the kit as a template. Nested PCR was then carried out with a combination of adaptor primer 2 (provided in the kit) and mPPAR
2 5'-UTR primer 2 (5'-CACTGGTGTTTTGTCTATGTCTTGC-3') using the first PCR product (produced from EcoRV library) as a template. The 2.2-kb PCR product was subcloned into the pCR2.1-TOPO TA vector using TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and the plasmid was termed as pTOPO-5'-flanking region (FL)-mPPAR-
2. The sequencing analysis of the insert was performed in both directions by the PCR cycle sequence method with an automatic sequence analyzer (ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The GenBank accession number of the isolated clone is AY339883.
Plasmids
Newly subcloned chimeric constructs containing mPPAR
2 gene promoter and luciferase cDNA were used for transient transfection studies: 2232/+17-luc (2232-bp 5'-FL and 17-bp 5'-UTR of mPPAR
2 gene); 1115/+17-luc (1115-bp 5'-FL and 17-bp 5'-UTR); 615/+17-luc (615-bp 5'-FL and 17-bp 5'-UTR); 527/+17-luc (527-bp 5'-FL and 17-bp 5'-UTR); 357/+17-luc (357-bp 5'-FL and 17-bp 5'-UTR); 320/+17-luc (320-bp 5'-FL and 17-bp 5'-UTR); 239/+17-luc (239-bp 5'-FL and 17-bp 5'-UTR); 201/+17-luc (201-bp 5'-FL and 17-bp 5'-UTR); 67/+17-luc (67-bp 5'-FL and 17-bp 5'-UTR); and their control plasmid pGL3-Basic. Distal mut (mutated) 357/+17-luc [357/+17 of mPPAR
2 gene whose C/EBP binding site at the 340/336 region (23) was mutated from ATTTTACTGCAATTTTAA to ATTTTACTGCGGTTTTAA; mutated sites are underlined] and proximal mut 357/+17-luc (357/+17 of mPPAR
2 gene whose C/EBP binding site at the 327/323 region was mutated from AAAAAGCAATCAATATTG to AAAAAGCGGTCAATATTG; mutated sites are underlined) were generated using a QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). ß-galactosidase control plasmid in pCMV was purchased from Clontech.
RNA preparation/Northern blot analyses/RT-PCR
Two days after 3T3-L1 cells became 100% confluent, the cells were replaced with the differentiation mixture and were incubated for 24 h with or without TNF
(50 ng/ml). In some experiments, the cells were incubated in the absence of the differentiation mixture for 24 h. Their total RNA was then extracted using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies). For Northern blot analyses, 10 µg of isolated total RNA was subjected to electrophoresis in 1% agarose-formaldehyde gels and transferred to nylon membrane (Hybond-N; Amersham Biosciences), and the blot was hybridized with 32P-labeled C/EBP probes (
, ß, and
) as described previously (27). All values were normalized to the densities of ß-actin mRNA level (26). For the determination of mPPAR
2 mRNA expression, we have performed semiquantitative RT-PCR using isoform-specific primers to distinguish PPAR
2 mRNA from PPAR
1 mRNA, because the mPPAR
2 cDNA encodes an additional 30 amino acids N terminal to the first ATG codon of PPAR
1 (23), and it is therefore difficult to distinguish them by Northern blot analyses (17). Semiquantitative RT-PCR was performed with the One Step RNA PCR kit (Takara Bio, Kyoto, Japan) with a forward primer (5'-GGTGAAACTCTGGGAGATTC-3') and a reverse primer (5'-CAACCATTGGGTCAGCTCTTG 3') for amplifying mPPAR
2 mRNA (28), or with a forward primer (5'-AACACCGAGATTTCCTTCAA-3') and a reverse primer (5'-TCACGCCTTTCATAACACAT-3') for amplifying mouse fatty acid binding protein (aP2) gene (29). Constitutively expressed mouse ß-actin mRNA was also amplified with a forward primer (5'-GGGAAATCGTGCGTGACAT-3') and a reverse primer (5'-CAGGAGGAGCAATGATCTT-3') (30). RT-PCR was performed under the following conditions: 50 C for 30 min and 94 C for 2 min for reverse transcription, 94 C for 30 sec; 60 C for 30 sec; 72 C for 1 min for 30 cycles. Under these conditions, a linear correlation between the densitometric intensity units of the PCR product and amounts of template was confirmed. mPPAR
2 mRNA expression was determined by a ratio between the densitometric intensity units of the PCR products from mPPAR
2 and ß-actin mRNAs on an ethidium bromide-stained 1.5% agarose gel. Densitometric intensities of the PCR products were determined using a computerized analysis system (Luminous Imager 2.0; Aisin Cosmos R&D, Kariya, Japan). For determination of mPPAR
2 mRNA stability, 3T3-L1 cells incubated in the differentiation mixture either with or without TNF
(50 ng/ml) for 24 h were coincubated with 5 µg/ml actinomycin D (Nacalai Tesque, Osaka, Japan) for an additional 2 or 4 h before harvesting.
Western blot analyses
Nuclear extracts were prepared from 3T3-L1 cells incubated in the differentiation mixture, either with or without TNF
(50 ng/ml) for 24 h, as described previously (31). Protein concentration was measured by Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Western blot analyses were performed as previously described (31). Briefly, 10 µg of the nuclear extracts (for both PPAR
2 and C/EBPs proteins) were subjected to SDS-PAGE (9% acrylamide gel), and the proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The blots were then incubated either with an isoform-specific anti-mPPAR
2 antibody that we generated (32, 33), anti-C/EBP
antibody (14AA X; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-C/EBPß antibody (C-19 X; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or anti-C/EBP
antibody (M-17 X; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) diluted at 1:500 for 1 h at room temperature. The isoform-specificity of the anti-mPPAR
2 antibody was previously confirmed by Western blot analyses using in vitro translated PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 (32, 33). The blots were subsequently incubated with horseradish peroxidase-linked donkey antirabbit Ig (Amersham Biosciences) diluted at 1:1000 for 1 h at room temperature, and were detected using ECL detection reagents (Amersham Biosciences). For normalization of PPAR
2 and C/EBPs proteins expression, blots loaded with 10 µg cytosolic proteins that were simultaneously obtained during preparation of the nuclear extracts (31) were incubated with monoclonal anti-ß-tubulin 1 antibody (mouse ascites fluid, Clone SAP.4G5; Sigma-Aldrich) diluted at 1:3000, and were subsequently incubated with horseradish peroxidase-linked sheep antimouse IgG (Amersham Biosciences) diluted at 1:3000.
Luciferase reporter gene assay
Two days after 3T3-L1 cells became 100% confluent, the cells were replaced with the same fresh media (DMEM with 10% calf serum) and were incubated for 56 h. Then the transfection using FuGENE 6 transfection reagent was performed at a lipid/DNA ratio of 3:1 according to the manufacturers instructions. Briefly, 1.2 µg reporter plasmid and 0.8 µg ß-galactosidase control plasmid in pCMV were transfected per 3.5-cm plate. Twelve hours after the transfection, the cells were replaced with the differentiation mixture. The cells were then incubated either with or without TNF
(50 ng/ml) for 24 h. For studying the promoter activity in undifferentiated 3T3-L1 cells, the cells were replaced with the fresh media (DMEM with 10% calf serum) 12 h after the transfection and were incubated for an additional 24 h. After harvesting, the cell extracts were analyzed for both luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities as previously described (34). Transfection efficiency was normalized by the ß-galactosidase expression. In an experiment, 0.1 µg expression plasmid containing C/EBP
cDNA in pEF-BOS (27) (kindly provided by Dr. M. Takiguchi, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan) or its control plasmid pEF-BOS was cotransfected with 2232/+17-luc into 3T3-L1 cells, and the cells were incubated either with or without TNF
(50 ng/ml) for 24 h.
EMSA
Nuclear extracts were prepared from 3T3-L1 cells incubated in the differentiation mixture either with or without TNF
(50 ng/ml) for 24 h as described above. EMSA using 3T3-L1 nuclear extracts was performed as described previously (34). Briefly, 32P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides containing C/EBP binding sites (23) (340/308 region; GTATTTTACTGCAATTTTAAAAAGCAATCAATATTGAACAATC; C/EBP binding sites are underlined) were incubated with 0.4 µg 3T3-L1 nuclear extracts for 30 min at room temperature and were subjected to electrophoresis on 4% polyacrylamide gels. For competition experiment, 100-fold excess of unlabeled oligonucleotides for the 340/308 region was coincubated.
Antibody supershift experiments
After 30 min incubation of 3T-3L1 nuclear extracts (0.4 µg) with the 340/308 region probe, further incubation, either with 1 µl of polyclonal anti-C/EBP
antibody (C-22 X, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or nonimmune rabbit serum at 4 C for 2 h, was performed before electrophoresis as previously described (34).
Statistical analyses
Statistical significance was calculated by one-factor ANOVA using StatView 4.0 (ABACUS Concepts, Piscataway, NJ). ANOVA was adopted to compare means among groups. The value for P < 0.01 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
on PPRA
2 mRNA/protein and aP2 mRNA expression
on PPAR
2 mRNA/protein expression in 3T3-L1 cells during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation were examined. As shown in Fig. 1A
2 mRNA expression, to 40%, by 50 ng/ml TNF
treatment for 24 h. Western blot analyses also demonstrated a decrease of PPAR
2 protein expression to 40% by TNF
treatment (Fig. 1B
suppresses the expression of PPRA
2 mRNA and protein during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation, as well as previously observed in fully differentiated adiposities (17, 18). To examine whether the effect of TNF
on PPAR
2 mRNA decrease was due to the decrease of PPAR
2 mRNA stability, we next treated the cells with 5 µg/ml actinomycin D. As shown in Fig. 1C
2 mRNA equally degraded either in the absence or presence of TNF
. These results suggest that TNF
does not affect PPAR
2 mRNA stability.
|
on the expression of aP2, which is well known as a marker of adipocyte differentiation (17, 18). As shown in Fig. 2
for 24 h, aP2 expression significantly decreased (lane 3). These data indicate that TNF
suppresses the onset of adipocyte differentiation.
|
2 gene promoter
2, we isolated mPPAR
2 gene promoter region up to 2232-bp of its transcription start site (GenBank accession no. AY339883), further upstream of the previously isolated clone (up to 615 bp) (23). Several putative cis-elements, including E-box (35), sterol regulatory element-like motif (35), and CCAAT-box (36, 37) were observed in the sequence. The position between 323 and 340 was previously confirmed as a tandem repeat of C/EBP binding sites (23, 38). The sequence of the clone was analyzed using NCBI Map Viewer (Mus musculus genome view), and was matched to the region 116,200116,205K on chromosome 6.
Effects of TNF
on PPRA
2 gene promoter activity
We next studied the effects of TNF
on mPPAR
2 gene promoter activity during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation. When 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were transfected, and were incubated in the absence of the differentiation mixture for 24 h, transcription activity of full-length 2232/+17-luc was almost identical with that of control plasmid pGL3-Basic (Fig. 3A
, lines 1 and 2), indicating that PPAR
2 gene promoter has no activity in undifferentiated 3T3-L1 cells. However, when the transfected cells were incubated in the presence of the differential mixture for 24 h, transcription activity of 2232/+17-luc significantly increased, compared with that of pGL3-Basic (Fig. 3B
, lines 1 and 2). Moreover, coincubation of TNF
for 24 h significantly suppressed the transcription activity of 2232/+17-luc (Fig. 3B
, lines 2 and 3). These data suggest that the transcription activity of PPAR
2 gene promoter is increased according to the induction of adipocyte differentiation, and the decrease of PPAR
2 expression by TNF
is mediated at the gene transcription level.
|

-mediated transcription suppression in mPPAR
2 gene promoter. As shown in Fig. 4
-mediated transcription suppression was observed in 2232/+17-luc, 1115/+17-luc, 615/+17-luc, 527/+17-luc, and 357/+17-luc, but not in 320/+17-luc, 239/+17-luc, 201/+17-luc, and 67/+17-luc. In addition, TNF
did not affect transcription activity of pGL3-Basic (Fig. 4
were not significantly different from the relative luciferase activity of 527/+17-luc in the presence of TNF
(line 8), indicating that the TNF
effect is identical with the deletion of the C/EBP binding sites. Because the relative luciferase activity of pGL3-Basic was significantly smaller than that of 67/+17-luc (Fig. 4
effects in constructs shorter than 320/+17-luc should not be due to their small luciferase activity. These data suggest that the element between 357 and 320 may be responsible for the suppression. Because the element is composed of a tandem repeat of C/EBP binding sites located between 323 and 340 (23), we next investigated the involvement of the sites in the transcription suppression. As shown in Fig. 5
-mediated transcription suppression observed in 357/+17-luc was abrogated when either upstream C/EBP binding site (distal mut 357/+17-luc) or downstream C/EBP binding site (proximal mut 357/+17-luc) was disrupted. There exists no significance between the relative luciferase activity of 357/+17-luc in the presence of TNF
(line 2) and the luciferase activity of either distal mut 357/+17-luc (line 3) and proximal mut 357/+17-luc (line 5) in the absence of TNF
, indicating that the TNF
effect is almost identical with the disruption of the half site of the C/EBP binding sites. These data indicate that the tandem repeat of C/EBP binding sites is necessary for the TNF
-mediated transcription suppression during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation.
|
|
expression by TNF-
2 gene promoter through the C/EBP binding sites between 323 and 340 (38, 39, 40), we next examined the effects of TNF
on C/EBPs expression during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation. As shown in Fig. 6A
treatment significantly decreased C/EBP
mRNA expression level during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation. C/EBP
protein expression level was also decreased by TNF
treatment by Western blot analyses (Fig. 6B
treatment did not affect the expression of C/EBPß both at mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 6
was not expressed during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation (13, 41), C/EBP
could not be detected both at mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 6
suppresses C/EBP
expression during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation, which may be related to the TNF
-mediated transcription suppression of mPPAR
2 gene promoter.
|
-DNA complex formation by TNF-
2 gene promoter by EMSA. When 32P-labeled oligonucleotides (340/308) containing the C/EBP binding sites were incubated with nuclear extracts prepared from 3T3-L1 cells incubated in the differentiation mixture for 24 h, formation of a protein-DNA complex was observed (Fig. 7A
were used, the protein-DNA complex was decreased to 64% (Fig. 7A
antibody significantly inhibited formation of the protein-DNA complex (Fig. 7B
. These data indicate that TNF
decreases C/EBP
-DNA complex formation on the C/EBP binding sites during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation, most likely due to the TNF
-mediated decrease of C/EBP
expression.
|
overexpression on the TNF
-mediated transcription suppression
overexpression on the TNF
-mediated transcription suppression. As shown in Fig. 8
-mediated transcription suppression of mPPAR
2 gene promoter (lines 1 and 2) was abrogated by the overexpression of C/EBP
(line 3). These data suggest that the decrease of endogenous C/EBP
expression may contribute to the TNF
-mediated transcription suppression.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-mediated PPAR
2 expression suppression during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation. Because TNF
has previously been demonstrated to suppress PPAR
2 expression in mature adipocytes (17, 18), TNF
may therefore be able to suppress PPAR
2 expression both during and after adipocyte differentiation. During the process of adipogenesis, C/EBPß and C/EBP
are induced immediately within 24 h after the differentiation stimuli (13, 41), and they synergistically induce PPAR
expression (14, 42). Among PPAR
isoforms (
1 and
2), PPAR
2 has been recognized to play a dominant role in adipocyte differentiation (12). Moreover, in contrast to PPAR
1, whose expression is induced later than 24 h, PPAR
2 expression is induced within 24 h after the differentiation stimuli in 3T3-L1 cells (25). Recently, selective disruption of PPAR
2 has been demonstrated to impair adipose tissue development (43). Because we have also demonstrated the suppression of aP2 expression by TNF
during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation, the TNF
-mediated PPAR
2 suppression may contribute to the inhibition of the onset of adipocyte differentiation.
Consistent with the previous observation indicating a rapid induction of PPAR
2 mRNA expression within 24 h after the differentiation stimuli (25), the isolated mPPAR
2 gene promoter region (2.2-kb) demonstrated a significant induction of its transcription activity by 24 h incubation in the differentiation mixture. These data suggest that the promoter region is actually activated during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation. Because coincubation with TNF
inhibited the induction of PPAR
2 gene promoter activity, TNF
may suppress PPAR
2 expression at the gene transcription level. Deletion/mutation analyses of the promoter region indicated the involvement of a tandem repeat of C/EBP binding sites located between 323 and 340 (23), which could be bound by C/EBP
and C/EBP
but not by C/EBPß (39). Moreover, C/EBP
induced by dexamethasone could transactivate PPAR
2 gene promoter via the sites during adipocyte differentiation (38). Because C/EBP
expression was induced later than 30 h after the differentiation stimuli (13, 41), C/EBP
might be the sole factor for the C/EBP binding sites during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation. The notion was also confirmed by our EMSA demonstrating the dominant binding of endogenous C/EBP
to the sites. Although TNF
has been known to suppress C/EBP
expression (44), its effect on C/EBP
expression has not yet been reported. We here have first demonstrated the TNF
-mediated down-regulation of C/EBP
expression during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation.
The mechanisms by which TNF
decreases C/EBP
expression remain unclear. Recently, C/EBP
expression in preadipocytes has been reported to be up-regulated by cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB), through its binding to the cAMP-response element in C/EBP
gene promoter (45). Moreover, cytokines including TNF
have recently been reported to decrease CREB activity by inhibition of its phosphorylation (46). It is therefore speculated that TNF
down-regulates C/EBP
expression through the inhibition of CREB activity. Consistent with the decrease of C/EBP
expression, TNF
-mediated inhibition of C/EBP
-DNA complex formation was also demonstrated by our EMSA. Taken together, TNF
may suppress PPAR
2 gene transcription by the inhibition of C/EBP
expression and its binding to the C/EBP binding sites of PPAR
2 gene promoter during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation.
TNF
has been recognized as a key molecule in inducing insulin resistance via several mechanisms, including the inhibition of insulin receptor signaling through the modulation of insulin receptor substrate 1 (3, 4, 5, 6). TNF
is also reported to suppress GLUT4 expression (44), which subsequently inhibits insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. Moreover, a strong inverse correlation between TNF
secretion and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake has been reported in human adipose tissue (47). Recently, TNF
was also demonstrated to suppress ligand-induced transactivation of PPAR
(48), indicating that TNF
inhibits PPAR
both at its function level and its expression level. Further studies are needed to define the roles of TNF
and PPAR
2 in the regulation of insulin resistance/sensitivity.
In summary, we have demonstrated the effects of TNF
on the transcription suppression of PPAR
2 gene mediated by the inhibition of C/EBP
expression and its DNA binding during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation. The TNF
effects on the down-regulation of C/EBP
and PPAR
2 during the early stage of adipocyte differentiation may contribute to the inhibition of adipocyte differentiation as well as the induction of insulin resistance.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein; CREB, cAMP-response element-binding protein; FL, flanking region; mPPAR, mouse PPAR; mut, mutated; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; UTR, untranslated region.
Received February 11, 2004.
Accepted for publication July 20, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
prevents the differentiation of human adipocyte precursor cells and causes delipidation of newly developed fat cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:742747[Abstract]
-mediated inhibition and reversal of adipocyte differentiation is accompanied by suppressed expression of PPAR
without effects on Pref-1 expression. Endocrinology 138:27762783
inhibits signaling from the insulin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:48544858
inhibits insulin signaling through stimulation of the p55 TNF receptor and activation of sphingomyelinase. J Biol Chem 271:1301813022
- and obesity-induced insulin resistance. Science 271:665668[Abstract]
function. Nature 389:610614[CrossRef][Medline]
(PPAR
). J Biol Chem 270:1295312956
knockdown by engineered transcription factors: exogenous PPAR
2 but not PPAR
1 reactivates adipogenesis. Genes Dev 16:2732
2 associated with decreased receptor activity, lower body mass index and improved insulin sensitivity. Nat Genet 20:284287[CrossRef][Medline]
2 gene is associated with lower serum insulin levels in nonobese African Americans: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Diabetes 52:15681572
gene expression contributes to the antiadipogenic effects of tumor necrosis factor-
. Mol Endocrinol 10:14571466[Abstract]
and BRL 49653 on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)
2 gene expression and other adipocyte genes. Mol Endocrinol 12:11501160
in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2:189191[CrossRef][Medline]
level in muscle and improves metabolic abnormalities in Wistar fatty rats. Diabetologia 41:257264[CrossRef][Medline]
-induced inhibition of insulin signaling. J Clin Invest 100:18631869[Medline]
-induced insulin resistance by a mechanism independent of adipogenic activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
. Diabetes 50:10831092
(mPPAR
) gene: alternative promoter use and different splicing yield two mPPAR
isoforms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:79217925
1 (PPAR
1) and PPAR
2 messenger RNA expression in the early stages of adipogenesis. Cell Growth Differ 10:4348
in macrophages via an interaction with NRF2. J Biol Chem 275:3314233150
2: tissue-specific regulator of an adipocyte enhancer. Genes Dev 8:12241234
and aP2 genes in adipose tissue: possible features of the antiobesity effects of a ß3-adrenergic agonist. Biochem Pharmacol 61:14711478[CrossRef][Medline]
-mediated transcription suppression of angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene. Hypertens Res 26:623628[CrossRef][Medline]
in vascular smooth muscle cells. Endocrinology 142:31253134
2 gene transcription in glucocorticoid-induced adipocyte differentiation. J Cell Biochem 76:518527[CrossRef][Medline]
2 promoter activity by CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins. J Biol Chem 275:2781527822
2 promoter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 240:99103[CrossRef][Medline]
during the conversion of 3T3 fibroblasts into adipocytes is mediated by C/EBPß, C/EBP
, and glucocorticoids. Mol Cell Biol 16:41284136[Abstract]
2 impairs fat tissue development and insulin sensitivity. Circulation 108(Suppl IV):IV-176IV-177
and GLUT4 genes in 3T3L1 adipocytes by tumor necrosis factor-
. Regulation is coordinate and independent of protein synthesis. J Biol Chem 267:1358013584
in preadipocytes. Mol Endocrinol 15:20372049
shows a strong relationship to insulin-stimulated glucose transport in human adipose tissue. Diabetes 49:688692[Abstract]
function through the TAK1/TAB1/NIK cascade. Nat Cell Biol 5:224230[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Lorenzo, S. Fernandez-Veledo, R. Vila-Bedmar, L. Garcia-Guerra, C. De Alvaro, and I. Nieto-Vazquez Insulin resistance induced by tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} in myocytes and brown adipocytes J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E94 - E104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zhou, R. Wu, W. Dong, A. Jacob, and P. Wang Endotoxin downregulates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} via the increase in TNF-{alpha} release Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): R84 - R92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-i. Machiya, Y. Shibata, K. Yamauchi, N. Hirama, T. Wada, S. Inoue, S. Abe, N. Takabatake, M. Sata, and I. Kubota Enhanced Expression of MafB Inhibits Macrophage Apoptosis Induced by Cigarette Smoke Exposure Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., April 1, 2007; 36(4): 418 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Saito, A. Sugawara, A. Uruno, M. Kudo, H. Kagechika, Y. Sato, Y. Owada, H. Kondo, M. Sato, M. Kurabayashi, et al. All-trans Retinoic Acid Induces in Vitro Angiogenesis via Retinoic Acid Receptor: Possible Involvement of Paracrine Effects of Endogenous Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Signaling Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 1412 - 1423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||