| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin and Repatriation Medical Center (C.T., M.E.C., W.C.B., M.T.), Heidelberg West 3081, Australia; Baker Medical Research Institute (C.T., M.E.C., W.C.B.), St. Kilda Central, Melbourne 8008, Australia; and Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital (S.M.T.), St. Leonards 2065, Australia
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Chris Tikellis, Baker Medical Research Institute, P.O. Box 6492, St. Kilda Central, Melbourne 8008, Australia. E-mail: chris.tikellis{at}baker.edu.au.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surgical interventions, such as laser photocoagulation for neovascularization and vitrectomy for membrane proliferation and retinal detachment, can often result in the loss of peripheral vision. For this reason the discovery of new noninvasive therapies for the treatment and prevention of diabetic retinal disease is urgently required. Findings from the EUCLID study group have highlighted the importance of the renin-angiotensin system in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. This multicenter study found that after treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, lisinopril, patients with type 1 diabetes were less likely to develop proliferative diabetic retinopathy (10). Furthermore, after ACE inhibition, VEGF has been shown to be reduced in the diabetic retina (11, 12). For this reason, a further aim of this study was to examine the effect of the ACE inhibitor, perindopril, on the expression of CTGF in the diabetic retina.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of total RNA and synthesis of cDNA
Retinas were first minced and homogenized using an Ultra-Turrax homogenizer (Janke & Kunkel IKA, Labortechnik, Staufen, Germany) in TRIzol (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), and total RNA was isolated. cDNA was synthesized with a reverse transcriptase reaction carried out using standard techniques (SuperScript First Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR, Life Technologies, Inc.) with random hexamers, deoxy-NTPs, and total RNA extracted from control, diabetic, and perindopril-treated diabetic rat retinas. An aliquot of the resulting single-stranded cDNA was used in the real-time PCR experiments as described below. To assess genomic DNA contamination, controls without reverse transcriptase were included.
Real-time PCR
Real-time PCR is a fully quantitative method for the determination of amounts of mRNA. Briefly, gene-specific 5'-oligonucleotide corresponding to the rat CTGF (5'-GAGGAAAACATTAAGAAGGGCAAA), CTGF 3'-oligonucleotide primer (5'-CGGCACAGGTCTTGATGA), and CTGF probe [6-carboxy fluorescein (FAM)-5'-TTTGAGCTTTCTGGCTGCACCAGTGT-tetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA)] were designed using the software program Primer Express (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The primers and probes were manufactured by PE Applied Biosystems. The probe is labeled with a FAM reporter dye at the 5' end and a TAMRA dye as the quencher on the 3' end. The increase in FAM reporter dye fluorescence emission is recorded during PCR amplification by the PRISM 7700 sequence detector (PE Applied Biosystems). Similarly, the fluorescent dye attached to the 18S ribosomal mRNA was VIC, and dual detection was possible using the multiplexing protocol. The generation of amplicons was defined by the point during cycling when amplification of the PCR product is first detected. The parameter, threshold cycle (CT), is defined as the fractional cycle number at which fluorescence, generated by cleavage of the probe, passes a fixed threshold above the baseline.
Real-time amplification was measured in a reaction volume of 25 µl. A volume of 0.6 µl of cDNA (60 ng) sample was used for the CTGF reaction and the 18S ribosomal mRNA control reaction. The real-time reaction consisted of a two-step PCR (PRISM 7700, PE Applied Biosystems) with 10 min at 95 C and 40 cycles of 15 sec at 95 C and 1 min at 65 C. The reaction took place with 500 nmol/liter forward and reverse primer and 50 nmol/liter FAM/TAMRA CTGF probe and VIC/TAMRA 18S ribosomal probe, in 1x TaqMan universal PCR master mix (PE Applied Biosystems). Each sample was run and analyzed in triplicate, and the CT value for the CTGF probe was subtracted from the CT value of 18S ribosomal mRNA to obtain
CT. The control samples were then used as the calibrator with a given value of 1, and the diabetic groups were compared with this calibrator.
In situ hybridization: CTGF riboprobe
The 1047-bp human CTGF cDNA sequence (coding for the open reading frame) was inserted in the sense direction into the BamHI and XhoI sites of the pcDNA3 vector (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). The vector was digested with KpnI and transcribed with SP6 polymerase to provide the antisense CTGF riboprobe. The site-specific expression of CTGF mRNA was determined by in situ hybridization, with background hybridization controlled for by the inclusion of a sense riboprobe (14). Antisense and sense riboprobes labeled with [35S]CTP were prepared using the Promega Transcription System. Between 500 ng and 1 µg linearized template cDNA were transcribed in a reaction mix containing 1x transcription buffer; 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT); 0.6 mM each of ATP, GTP, and UTP; 100 µCi 35S; 0.5 µl RNasin; and 1 µl of the appropriate RNA polymerase. If the probe length was greater than 400 bp 4.25 pM cold CTP was added to the transcription reaction. The reaction was incubated at 37 C for a period of 90 min. After this time 1000 U deoxyribonuclease (ribonuclease-free; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) were added, and the reactions were incubated for a further 15 min at 37 C. The riboprobe was precipitated with ammonium acetate and ethanol using yeast tRNA as carrier, then reconstituted in 10 mM DTT. The length of the purified riboprobe was adjusted to approximately 150 bp using alkaline hydrolysis, followed by further purification with sodium acetate and ethanol, and was resuspended in 10 mM DTT.
Four-micrometer-thick sections were cut onto slides pretreated with aminopropyltriethoxysilane and baked overnight at 37 C. Before hybridization, sections were dewaxed in histolene and then rehydrated in graded ethanols and distilled water. The samples were equilibrated in P Buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 5 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), followed by a 10-min incubation in 125 µg/ml pronase E (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO) at 37 C. Samples were then rinsed twice for 2 min each time in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, postfixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, and washed twice more in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer. The sections were rinsed in distilled water, dehydrated in 70% ethanol, and left to air-dry.
A hybridization buffer containing 2 x 104 cpm/µl 35S-labeled riboprobe, 0.72 mg/ml yeast RNA, 50% deionized formamide, 100 mM DTT, 10% dextran sulfate, 0.3 M NaCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 0.02% BSA, 0.02% Ficoll 400, and 0.02% polyvinyl pyrrolidone was prepared. The buffer was vortexed and incubated at 85 C for 5 min before adding 25 µl to each section to be covered by a 22 x 22-mm coverslip. The slides were then hybridized overnight in a light-proof, humidified chamber at 60 C.
Coverslips were removed in a solution containing 50% formamide and 2x standard saline citrate prewarmed to 55 C. This was followed by two 30-min washes in the above solution in a shaking water bath. Sections were rinsed three times in ribonuclease buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), and 0.5 M NaCl, then incubated at 37 C in the same buffer containing 150 µg/ml ribonuclease A (Roche) for 1 h. Samples were washed in 2x standard saline citrate for 1 h at 55 C, followed by dehydration in graded ethanols. After air-drying, the slides were exposed to BioMax MR film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY) for 35 d.
Slides were coated in LM-1 emulsion (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK) in a darkroom, dried for at least 1 h, and then incubated at 4 C in a light-proof container with desiccant for a period of 24 wk depending on the autoradiography results. The slides were equilibrated to room temperature, then immersed in Kodak D19 developer (Eastman Kodak Co.) for 4 min, 1% acetic acid for 1 min, and Illford Hypan fixative (Integrated Sciences, Melbourne, Australia) for 4 min, followed by rinsing in distilled water for at least 15 min. The sections were then fixed in 4% formaldehyde and treated with a progressive hematoxylin/eosin stain.
Generation of anti-CTGF polyclonal antisera for immunohistochemistry
A peptide corresponding to residues 247260 (EENIKKGKKCIRTP) of human CTGF, was generated as four-branched multiple antigenic peptides and were purified by C18 reverse phase HPLC (Mimotopes Pty. Ltd., Clayton, Australia). The peptide sequence was chosen because it is not present in other CTGF family members and is conserved for CTGF across murine and human species (15). Each peptide was used to immunize two New Zealand White rabbits. Each rabbit was injected sc with 1 mg peptide in Freunds complete adjuvant, followed 2 wk later by a sc injection of 0.5 mg Freunds incomplete adjuvant, then two sequential im injections of 0.5 mg in PBS at 10-d intervals. The antiserum used was collected as a terminal bleed, in each case 10 d after the final im boost. The rabbit antiserum to peptide 247260, referred to as 197, was used for the immunohistochemical studies.
Western blotting
Retinas from six control, diabetic, and diabetic plus perindopril-treated animals were pooled, quickly removed, minced with a scalpel blade, resuspended in buffer [10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.02% NaN3, pH 7.4, containing 0.5 µg/ml pepstatin (Sigma-Aldrich Corp.), 0.25 µg/ml leupeptin (Sigma-Aldrich Corp.), 0.1 mg/ml benzamidine (Sigma-Aldrich Corp.), and 0.1 mg/ml bacitracin (Sigma-Aldrich Corp.)], homogenized at 13,000 rpm with the Ultra-Turrax (Janke and Kunkel IKA, Labortechnik), and centrifuged at 1,000 x g (4 C) for 30 min. The resultant supernatant was harvested and stored in aliquots at -80 C.
Before each run, the protein concentration of each sample was determined using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL). A mini-Protean II apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) was used with a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-denaturing gel system. Samples were prepared after thawing by centrifugation (10,000 x g; Eppendorf 5414C) for 5 min. Each sample was adjusted up to a desired protein content of 50 µg, an equal volume of 2x sodium dodecyl sulfate loading buffer (with 200 mM dithiothreitol) was added, and the sample was incubated at 95 C for 5 min. Samples and molecular weight markers (Kaliedoscope, Bio-Rad Laboratories) were loaded onto the gel, and after running the proteins at 120 V through the stacking gel, the voltage was increased to 160 V. Proteins were trans-blotted onto nitrocellulose filters (Hybond P, Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech) using a transfer tank at 15 V for 30 min. At the end of the transfer, the filters were blocked with 10% nonfat skim milk powder in Tris-buffered saline and 0.1% Tween (TBS/Tween) for 1 h at room temperature with gentle rocking. The primary antiserum used was anti-CTGF, specifically directed against amino acids 223348 (ab6992, abcam, Cambridgeshire, UK; 1:1,000 with 10% skim milk powder in TBS/Tween) and was incubated overnight at room temperature. The following day the membrane was washed thoroughly three times (10-min washes) in wash solution (TBS/Tween). Positive bands were developed using the Western Blotting Analysis system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), in which horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antirabbit antibody was diluted at 1:2,000 and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After washing three times, the filter was exposed to x-ray film (Kodak-Biomax) at four different exposure times (1 min and 30, 15, and 5 sec). Exposed Biomax film of bands representing CTGF protein were quantified on an Automated Imaging System (Imaging Research, Inc., St. Catherines, Canada).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical staining for CTGF protein was performed as outlined below. Four-micrometer-thick paraffin serial sections were prepared from 4% paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded rat retina. Sections were dewaxed and hydrated, then endogenous peroxidase was quenched for 20 min using 3% (vol/vol) hydrogen peroxide in PBS. Endogenous immunoglobulins were blocked by incubation for 20 min with 10% normal goat serum/PBS. The primary antiserum (197 at a 1:500 titer) was applied at room temperature for 1 h. Specific staining was detected using the standard avidin-biotin complex method (16). Briefly, slides were incubated for 20 min with the secondary antibody (biotin-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG, DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark) at a concentration of 1:250. The avidin-biotin Vectastain ABC system (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was then applied for 20 min. After thorough washing, the final detection step was carried out using 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich Corp.) as the chromogen. Sections were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin.
Statistics
Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. Comparisons were performed by ANOVA using StatView 5.0 (Brainpower, Calabasas, CA). P < 0.05 was viewed as statistically significant. For RT-PCR and Western blotting data, values for control animals were arbitrarily standardized to 1, and data for diabetic animals were expressed relative to this control value.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite the occurrence of apoptosis, fibrovascular proliferation, and neovascularization in diabetic retinopathy, processes that can occur in cells and tissues as a result of CTGF induction, there have been no studies examining the expression of CTGF in any type or grade of diabetic retinopathy. CTGF immunostaining has recently been localized to both cellular and fibrotic regions of epiretinal membrane in nondiabetic proliferative vitreoretinopathy (17). Although the link between hyperglycemia and CTGF up-regulation has not been previously reported in the diabetic retina, other studies have documented both in vitro and in vivo increases in CTGF in response to hyperglycemia and to the diabetic milieu in a range of nonretinal cell populations (18, 19) and at various sites of diabetic vascular complications, including the kidney (14, 19) and aorta (20).
A variety of cellular mechanisms could mediate CTGF up-regulation in the retina by diabetes. CTGF can be increased by reactive oxygen species (21), advanced glycosylation end products (22), cellular stretch (23), TGFß (18), protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent pathways (24), and hypoxia (25), albeit in a variety of cell types. Each of these factors is more active in diabetic retinopathy. In addition, CTGF expression is induced in bovine retinal capillary cells by VEGF (9), itself a factor strongly implicated in diabetic retinal complications. That the rodent model of diabetic eye disease presented in this current work is a preproliferative model of diabetic retinopathy that demonstrates early retinal changes of increased permeability and increases in VEGF (11) is consistent with the concept that one of the factors that up-regulates retinal CTGF may be VEGF.
The GCL is the main site of CTGF mRNA and protein up-regulation in the diabetic retina in this study. In addition to retinal ganglion cells, this layer contains astrocytes, and the end-feet of another population of retinal glial cells, Müller cells. Although the precise site of CTGF production cannot be deduced from these experiments alone, we postulate that it is produced by astrocytes and/or Müller cells. Previous studies have detected CTGF in astrocytes, ependymal cells, and tanycytes (26), whereas Müller cells have been reported to synthesize VEGF and its tyrosine kinase receptors (27, 28). After the production of CTGF by these cells, the factor may either remain within the cell or be deposited outside the cell, leading to the accumulation of extracellular matrix.
Whether CTGF acts predominantly in an intracrine, autocrine, or paracrine manner in the retina has yet to be determined, as does the identification of a functional receptor for CTGF. Recently, the integrin
vß3 has been reported to function as a receptor on endothelial cells for CTGF-mediated endothelial cell adhesion, migration, and angiogenesis (5, 6). Furthermore, immunoreactivity for the integrin
vß3/
vß5 has been detected in retinal and intravitreal growing vascular cells, the GCL, and the inner and outer nuclear layers in the retina in a murine model of ischemia-induced retinal neovascularization (29). Thus, integrin
vß3 appears to be a likely candidate as a site of cellular CTGF binding in the retina.
CTGF protein exists in a number of molecular weight forms, including glycosylation variants, proteolysed fragments, and high molecular weight forms (15, 22, 30). In this study we observed that retinal CTGF exists in monomeric, high molecular weight, immunoreactive and fragment forms by Western immunoblot. These immunoreactive forms were specifically detected on Western immunoblot using a number of anti-CTGF antisera, including antisera directed against differing ends of the CTGF molecule. CTGF has a self-dimerization domain, and rodent as well as human CTGF have been shown by others to exist in a molecular weight form consistent with CTGF homodimers (15). Whether dimeric CTGF varies in its bioactivity compared with monomeric CTGF has not been reported.
The exact consequences of up-regulation of CTGF in the GCL in diabetic retina are speculative. In addition to its role in ECM production, cell adhesion, neovascularization, and fibroblast proliferation (7, 8), CTGF is involved in apoptosis (31, 32). This may in part explain the finding that retinal ganglion cells are significantly reduced in experimental diabetes (33). That CTGF alone induces neovascularization in vascular endothelial cells and yet may bind directly to VEGF and modulate VEGF-mediated vascular neogenesis (34) exemplifies the complex behavior of this growth factor. Clearly, further in vitro and in vivo studies need to be performed before the role of CTGF in various cell types and stages of diabetic retinopathy is defined. The current studies of CTGF in the diabetic retina together with the growing body of work implicating CTGF as a factor contributing to renal complications in diabetes (19, 35, 36) suggest that CTGF may be a mediator in the development of complications in a number of microvascular tissues in diabetes.
A major finding from this study was that the ACE inhibitor, perindopril, resulted in a significant attenuation of both the CTGF mRNA and protein up-regulation in the diabetic retina. Using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, this reduction was localized to the retinal GCL. This result suggests that angiotensin II (Ang II) mediates, at least in part, the overexpression of CTGF in the retina of diabetic rats. Whether the effect of perindopril on CTGF in the current work is through the observed attenuation of blood pressure or through other mechanisms is unclear. Although this is the first study to examine the association between the renin-angiotensin system and CTGF in diabetic retinopathy, a recent study by our group has shown that perindopril treatment inhibits the overexpression of CTGF in the aorta of diabetes-induced apolipoprotein E-deficient mice (20). Furthermore, Ang II has been shown to partly mediate the overexpression of the CTGF gene in arterial smooth muscle cells in an experimental model of cyclosporine-induced myocardial damage (37). More recently, angiotensin II-induced CTGF expression in vascular smooth muscle cells was shown to involve a range of intracellular signals, including PKC and reactive oxygen species (38). Furthermore, it has previously been shown that ACE inhibition reduces retinal PKC expression in experimental diabetes (39).
In addition to a direct effect of Ang II on the regulation of CTGF in the diabetic retina, Ang II may mediate the increased CTGF expression indirectly, via the up-regulation of VEGF. In vitro experiments have shown that Ang II directly stimulates the secretion of VEGF in cultured vascular smooth muscle (40) and in cardiac endothelial cells (41, 42). ACE inhibition has also been shown to reduce retinal VEGF expression in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats (11) as well as in the model of retinopathy of prematurity (43). Together with the findings that CTGF is induced by VEGF via the VEGF receptors, kinase domain receptor and Flt1, in retinal vascular cells (9), the increase in CTGF in the diabetic retina may be a result of the induction of VEGF by Ang II.
In summary, these results have provided evidence that CTGF mRNA and protein are expressed in the GCL and inner nuclear layer in the adult rat retina. More importantly, CTGF mRNA and protein are up-regulated in the GCL after streptozotocin-induced diabetes, an increase that could be attenuated using the ACE inhibitor, perindopril. This study suggests that Ang II-mediated CTGF expression, either directly or indirectly via the up-regulation of VEGF induced by diabetes, may contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. However, one must be cautious in interpreting these findings, because animal models of diabetic retinopathy do not exhibit advanced retinal lesions such as those seen in man.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: ACE, Angiotensin-converting enzyme; Ang II, angiotensin II; CT, threshold cycle; CTGF, connective tissue growth factor; DTT, dithiothreitol; FAM, 6-carboxy fluorescein; GCL, ganglion cell layer; PKC, protein kinase C; TAMRA, tetramethylrhodamine; TBS/Tween, Tris-buffered saline and 0.1% Tween; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Received July 30, 2003.
Accepted for publication October 22, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
vß3, promotes endothelial cell survival, and induces angiogenesis in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 19:29582966This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. J. Kuiper, R. van Zijderveld, P. Roestenberg, K. M. Lyons, R. Goldschmeding, I. Klaassen, C. J.F. Van Noorden, and R. O. Schlingemann Connective Tissue Growth Factor Is Necessary for Retinal Capillary Basal Lamina Thickening in Diabetic Mice J. Histochem. Cytochem., August 1, 2008; 56(8): 785 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Kuiper, J. M. Hughes, R. J. Van Geest, I. M. C. Vogels, R. Goldschmeding, C. J. F. Van Noorden, R. O. Schlingemann, and I. Klaassen Effect of VEGF-A on Expression of Profibrotic Growth Factor and Extracellular Matrix Genes in the Retina Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 4267 - 4276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. van den Brule, J. Heymans, X. Havaux, J.-C. Renauld, D. Lison, F. Huaux, and O. Denis Profibrotic Effect of IL-9 Overexpression in a Model of Airway Remodeling Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., August 1, 2007; 37(2): 202 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. van de Pavert, J. Meuleman, A. Malysheva, W. M. Aartsen, I. Versteeg, F. Tonagel, W. Kamphuis, C. J. McCabe, M. W. Seeliger, and J. Wijnholds A Single Amino Acid Substitution (Cys249Trp) in Crb1 Causes Retinal Degeneration and Deregulates Expression of Pituitary Tumor Transforming Gene Pttg1 J. Neurosci., January 17, 2007; 27(3): 564 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Burns, S. M. Twigg, J. M. Forbes, J. Pete, C. Tikellis, V. Thallas-Bonke, M. C. Thomas, M. E. Cooper, and P. Kantharidis Connective Tissue Growth Factor Plays an Important Role in Advanced Glycation End Product-Induced Tubular Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition: Implications for Diabetic Renal Disease J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2006; 17(9): 2484 - 2494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Kane, L Stevenson, C Godson, A W Stitt, and C O'Brien Gremlin gene expression in bovine retinal pericytes exposed to elevated glucose Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2005; 89(12): 1638 - 1642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. He, K. J. Way, E. Arikawa, E. Chou, D. M. Opland, A. Clermont, K. Isshiki, R. C. W. Ma, J. A. Scott, F. J. Schoen, et al. Differential Regulation of Angiotensin II-induced Expression of Connective Tissue Growth Factor by Protein Kinase C Isoforms in the Myocardium J. Biol. Chem., April 22, 2005; 280(16): 15719 - 15726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |