| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
B, Mediates the Transcriptional Inhibition of ß-Casein by Tumor Necrosis Factor-
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Margot M. Ip, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, New York 14263. E-mail: margot.ip{at}roswellpark.org.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is a physiological regulator of mammary gland development that stimulates the growth of both normal and malignant mammary epithelial cells in primary culture and inhibits functional differentiation. To understand how TNF exerts its effects, the current study examined the mechanism by which TNF down-regulates expression of the ß-casein and whey acidic protein (WAP) genes. TNF treatment markedly decreased activity of the ß-casein and WAP promoters in transiently transfected HC11 mammary epithelial cells. Overexpression of the nuclear factor-
B (NF
B) p50 and/or p65 proteins increased the transcriptional activity of the ß-casein and WAP promoters in HC11 cells, suggesting that the inhibitory effect of TNF on transcription of these genes is not mediated by NF
B. This was further confirmed in experiments in which an NF
B super-repressor was overexpressed, and by deletion of an NF
B binding site in the ß-casein promoter. In contrast, we found that TNF induced both nuclear expression and the DNA-binding activity of liver-enriched inhibitory protein (LIP) isoform of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein ß. Moreover, cotransfection of LIP and ß-casein expression vectors showed that LIP suppressed the transcriptional activity of the ß-casein promoter. Together, these results suggest that LIP plays a critical role in mediating TNF-induced down-regulation of the ß-casein gene. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is now widely regarded as a pleiotropic cytokine that affects the growth, differentiation, and function of many cell types (1, 2, 3, 4). In vivo and in vitro studies carried out in our laboratory have shown that TNF plays an important role in mammary gland development (5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Using a physiological three-dimensional culture model in which mammary epithelial cells (MEC) are cultured within a reconstituted basement membrane matrix in serum-free medium, our laboratory demonstrated that TNF stimulates the growth of MEC, in the presence or absence of epidermal growth factor (EGF) (5, 6, 7), an effect mediated by the p55 TNF receptor (6). TNF also induces extensive branching morphogenesis through a matrix metalloproteinase-9-dependent mechanism (5, 7, 8). The expression of TNF and its two receptors exhibits a highly regulated pattern during mammary gland development in vivo (6) (and unpublished data). TNF mRNA increases significantly during pregnancy and then gradually decreases during lactation and postweaning involution. TNF protein, measured by immunohistochemistry, is high in both stromal and epithelial cells during puberty, pregnancy, and involution but significantly reduced during lactation. Collectively, these results suggest that TNF is a physiological regulator of mammary gland development. In addition to its effects on cell growth and morphogenesis of MEC, TNF also inhibits their functional differentiation. Recent studies in our laboratory have shown that TNF decreases the mRNA levels of both ß-casein and whey acidic protein (WAP) (9), and the protein level of ß-casein (5, 6, 7) in MEC in primary culture. The inhibitory effect of TNF on steady-state mRNA levels of these genes is exerted through decreased transcription as shown by nuclear run-on assay, as well as decreased mRNA stability as shown in actinomycin D treatment studies (9).
The tissue- and developmental stage-specific expression of the milk protein genes is tightly regulated by a number of hormones, growth factors, and components of the extracellular matrix (reviewed in Refs.10 and 11). Extensive efforts to understand the transcriptional regulation of these genes have revealed that this involves a network of interactions or cross-talk among an array of transcription factors, including CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBP), signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)5, glucocorticoid receptor, ying-yang 1 (YY-1), nuclear factor-
B (NF
B), and nuclear factor 1 (10, 11). Using an NF
B consensus oligo, our laboratory reported that TNF induces the DNA-binding activity of NF
B in normal and transformed MEC in primary culture (12), as well as in HC11 cells (9). Thus, we hypothesized that TNF regulates the transcription of ß-casein and WAP through activation of NF
B. To test this hypothesis and to delineate the signaling pathways activated by TNF in MEC, the current study was designed to examine the roles of NF
B and other transcription factors in mediating TNF-induced down-regulation of milk protein expression.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B expression vectors, as well as the pFlag-I
B
-SR construct, were gifts from Drs. Albert S. Baldwin, Jr. (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC) and Warner Greene (University of California at San Francisco). The liver-enriched inhibitory protein (LIP) expression vector was generously provided by Dr. Pascal Gos (University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland). The 293 cells were generously provided by Dr. David Goodrich (Roswell Park Cancer Institute).
Cell culture
The mouse MEC line HC11 was obtained from Dr. Jeffrey Rosen (Baylor College of Medicine), with the permission of Dr. Bernd Groner (Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, Tumor Biology Center, Freiburg, Germany). Cells were plated and grown in basal medium (phenol red-free RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 ng/ml EGF, 2 mM glutamate, 5 µg/ml insulin, and 50 µg/ml gentamicin) for 4 d to reach confluency. The basal medium was then replaced with growth medium (phenol red-free RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 10 ng/ml EGF, 2 mM glutamate, 5 µg/ml insulin, and 50 µg/ml gentamicin). The cells were maintained in growth medium for 4 d before being switched to lactogenic medium (phenol red-free RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 5 µg/ml prolactin, 1 µg/ml hydrocortisone, 2 mM glutamate, 5 µg/ml insulin, and 50 µg/ml gentamicin). The cells were cultured in lactogenic medium for 5 d for maximal ß-casein induction and used for all the studies described below.
Transient transfection and reporter gene analysis
Supercoiled plasmid DNAs were prepared by the Qiagen column procedure (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The day before transfection, HC11 cells were trypsinized and seeded in 100-mm culture dishes at 1 x 107 cells per dish in 10 ml lactogenic medium in the absence of gentamicin. Four micrograms of luciferase reporter construct were mixed with 750 µl RPMI 1640 and 20 µl PLUS reagent (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. Thirty microliters of LipoFECTAMINE reagent were diluted with 750 µl RPMI 1640 and mixed with DNA-PLUS complexes and incubated at room temperature for another 15 min. The HC11 culture medium was subsequently replaced with 5 ml RPMI 1640, and the DNA-PLUS-LipoFECTAMINE reagent complexes were overlaid onto the cells. After incubation at 37 C for 4 h in a 5% CO2 incubator, cells were trypsinized, resuspended with lactogenic medium, and equally divided into 6-well plates. Where indicated, TNF was then added to the treatment wells at a concentration of 40 ng/ml. Cells were lysed in 500 µl of 1x passive lysis buffer (Promega) 48 h after transfection and stored at 70 C until assay.
For cotransfection experiments, HC11 cells were seeded at 1 x 106 cells per well in 3 ml lactogenic medium minus gentamicin in a 6-well plate. One microgram of pGL3B-ßcas2.8 was mixed with various amounts of the expression vectors and 0.025 µg pRL-CMV, and diluted in 100 µl RPMI 1640 and 6 µl PLUS reagent. Four microliters of LipoFECTAMINE were mixed with 100 µl RPMI 1640 and added into the previous mixture. Similar steps were carried out as described above.
To determine the firefly luciferase activity, 20 µl cell lysate was mixed with 100 µl luciferase assay reagent (Promega) and analyzed using a TD-20/20 luminometer (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA). For dual-luciferase assay, the renilla luciferase activity was determined by addition of 100 µl of 1x stop-N-glow reagent (Promega). Total protein concentration of the lysate was measured by the Bradford method (13) using a protein assay reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The firefly luciferase activity was normalized against total protein concentration (TNF treatment experiments; LIP transfection experiment) or renilla luciferase activity and total protein concentration (all other experiments). Because LIP transfection inhibited both the control and ß-casein constructs, equal transfection efficiency in the LIP transfection experiments was verified by Southern analysis using a probe specific for the luciferase construct.
Western blotting
The nuclear extracts used here and in the following studies were prepared from HC11 cells as described previously (12). Specifically, cell pellets were resuspended in 400 µl ice-cold buffer A containing 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.5 mM PMSF, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 20 µg/ml leupeptin, and 0.5 mg/ml benzamidine. After swelling on ice for 15 min, Nonidet P40 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) was added to a final concentration of 0.6% (vol/vol), and the samples were sheared 10 times through a 22-gauge needle. Light microscopy and trypan blue were used to verify that nuclei remained intact while the plasma membrane was disrupted. Nuclei were collected by a 30-sec centrifugation at 7500 x g, washed once with 500 µl buffer A, and resuspended in 50 µl cold lysis buffer containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 0.4 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, and 20% glycerol. Samples were vigorously shaken for 20 min at 4 C and centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 10 min at 4 C. Supernatants were supplemented with 25 µg/ml leupeptin, aliquoted, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at 80 C. Protein concentrations were determined by Bio-Rad protein assay. For Western blot, 30 µg nuclear extract was resolved on 420% gradient polyacrylamide-sodium dodecyl sulfate gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. After blocking in Tris-buffered saline (150 mM NaCl; 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4) containing 5% nonfat milk powder overnight at 4 C, membranes were washed in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 and then incubated with a 1:1,000 dilution of rabbit polyclonal antiserum against mouse C/EBPß proteins or a 1:5,000 dilution of anti-YY1 mouse monoclonal antibody for 2 h at room temperature. Blots were washed, incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antirabbit secondary antibody (1:1,000 dilution) for 90 min at room temperature, and developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Each blot was stripped and reprobed with a 1:20,000 dilution of anti-Hsp70/Hsc70 mouse monoclonal antibody. Immunoreactive bands were quantitated by volume densitometry using the ImageQuant 5.1 software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
EMSA
Complementary strands of the probes were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA) and annealed by heating at 95 C for 10 min and cooling down gradually to room temperature. Each double-stranded probe was radiolabeled with [
-32P]dATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase and purified using a Sephadex G-25 spin column (Roche). Ten micrograms of nuclear extract were incubated with 25,00050,000 cpm labeled probe for 30 min at room temperature in a 20-µl reaction vol containing 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, and 1 µg poly (dI-dC). The reaction mixture was loaded onto a 5% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5% Tris-borate EDTA buffer. After electrophoresis at room temperature, the gel was dried and autoradiographed.
Sequence information of the probes can be found in Table 1
.
|
B4 site (see below) was generated between the unique KpnI and PvuII restriction sites of a DNA segment of 1476 bp on pGL3B-ßcas2.8 (Fig. 1A
cells, and the clones carrying the desired mutant plasmids were selected by sequencing.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To study the effect of TNF on the transcription of the milk protein genes, a series of reporter gene constructs was generated by inserting various DNA fragments derived from the 5'-flanking region of the ß-casein and WAP genes upstream of a promoterless firefly luciferase reporter gene (Fig. 1A
). These constructs were transiently transfected into HC11 cells, and luciferase activity was measured in the presence or absence of TNF treatment. As shown in Fig. 1B
, TNF decreased the activity of both the ß-casein and WAP promoters, indicating that TNF exerts its role in down-regulating the expression of these genes at the transcriptional level. This is consistent with our previous data obtained using the nuclear run-on assay (9) and validates the transfection approach for the studies described below. Furthermore, the shortest ß-casein reporter construct, pGL3B-ßcas0.7, which contains 179 to +490 of the ß-casein promoter, showed a similar fold of inhibition by TNF compared with the other ß-casein reporter constructs, suggesting the presence of TNF-responsive element(s) in this proximal ß-casein promoter region, as well as upstream.
NF
B does not mediate the inhibitory effect of TNF on ß-casein expression
Many functions of TNF are mediated through the activation of NF
B (17). Using an NF
B consensus oligonucleotide, previous studies in our laboratory demonstrated that TNF induces the DNA-binding activity of the p50 homodimer of NF
B in both normal and transformed MEC in primary culture (12) and the p50/p65 heterodimer of NF
B in the HC11 MEC line (9). By sequence analysis using the MatInspector program and the TRANSFAC 5.0 database, we identified several potential NF
B binding sites in the ß-casein promoter (Fig. 2
and Table 1
). To test whether NF
B mediates TNF-induced down-regulation of ß-casein expression, various amounts of the expression vectors encoding NF
B p50 or p65 were cotransfected into HC11 cells with the ß-casein reporter construct, pGL3B-ßcas2.8. As shown in Fig. 3A
, both p50 and p65 induced an increase in ß-casein promoter activity in a concentration-dependent manner, although p65 was much more potent than p50. These observations suggest that NF
B is a positive regulator of ß-casein expression, in contrast to our original hypothesis of the role of NF
B in mediating the inhibitory effect of TNF.
|
|
B
super-repressor, I
B
-SR. It has been shown that I
B
-SR inhibits the function of NF
B by binding to p65 and preventing the nuclear translocation of the p65/p50 heterodimer (18). When cotransfected into HC11 cells with pGL3B-ßcas2.8, I
B
-SR caused a decrease in the promoter activity of ß-casein (Fig. 3B
B in regulating ß-casein expression. Thus, both these studies suggest that TNF-induced inhibition of ß-casein expression is not mediated directly through the activation of NF
B.
Mutation of a NF
B binding site in the ß-casein promoter has no effect on the response to TNF
The above data suggested that the putative NF
B sites in the ß-casein promoter (Fig. 2
) might not bind NF
B proteins, and/or that the sites were not functionally significant. To address this, we used oligonucleotide probes encompassing these sites to investigate whether NF
B proteins bound to these putative elements. No NF
B binding was detected when NF
B1, NF
B2, and NF
B3 oligonucleotides were used (data not shown); further studies on these sites were therefore not undertaken. However, when NF
B4 was used as the probe, we observed three specific binding complexes, two of which were induced by TNF treatment (Fig. 4A
, lanes 13). These complexes appear to consist of the p65/p50 heterodimer, and the p50/p50 homodimer, as suggested by supershift studies using p50 and p65 antibodies, respectively (Fig. 4A
, lanes 4 and 6). The results were confirmed by DAI assays using biotinylated NF
B4, where both p50 and p65 were found to be present in the DNA-binding complex eluted from the probe (data not shown).
|
B proteins, 2 bp near the 3' end of NF
B4 that are highly conserved among NF
B binding sites (19) were modified as indicated in the legend to Fig. 4
B proteins to this site, suggesting that the binding is highly sequencespecific.
Although the results from Fig. 1B
suggest the presence of TNF-responsive element(s) in the region from 179 to +490 of the ß-casein promoter, it does not exclude the possibility that redundant TNF-responsive element(s) also exists in the distal promoter region. To study the functional relevance of the NF
B4 site in the context of the ß-casein promoter, the same 2-bp mutation was introduced into pGL3B-ßcas2.8 by site-directed mutagenesis. Both the wild-type and mutant pGL3B-ßcas2.8 were (separately) transfected into HC11 cells and the cells lysed 48 h after addition of TNF. As shown in Fig. 4C
, TNF inhibited the transcriptional activity of both constructs to a similar extent, suggesting that the mutation that abolished the binding of NF
B proteins to the NF
B4 site has no effect on the TNF response. This result suggests that the suppression of gene transcription by TNF is not exerted through inducing the binding of NF
B to its target site in the ß-casein promoter. We therefore performed additional studies to determine how the TNF effect might be mediated.
TNF does not affect either the nuclear abundance or the DNA-binding activity of YY-1
Other investigators have demonstrated that YY-1 plays an important role in suppressing the expression of ß-casein during mammary development (20, 21). If TNF exerts its inhibitory effect on ß-casein expression by acting on YY-1, it would be expected that the nuclear abundance and/or the DNA-binding activity of YY-1 would be elevated by TNF. To test this possibility, Western blotting analysis and EMSAs were performed using nuclear extracts prepared from HC11 cells treated with TNF for the indicated times (Fig. 5
). TNF did not change nuclear YY-1 levels at any of the time points examined (24, 48, 72, or 96 h of TNF treatment) (Fig. 5A
). For EMSA, we used an oligonucleotide probe derived from 129 to 98 of the ß-casein promoter, which contains a previously characterized YY-1 binding site (20). No consistent changes in the DNA-binding activity of YY-1 were found after TNF treatment (Fig. 5B
). Collectively, these results suggest that YY-1 is not involved in mediating TNF action on ß-casein expression.
|
|
B oligo/protein complex also demonstrates the specificity of the assay. Together, the above studies demonstrate that TNF enhances the binding of C/EBPß to the ß-casein promoter.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B does not seem to be directly involved in mediating the TNF effect. Instead, our results suggest a potential role for the LIP isoform of C/EBPß as a downstream mediator of TNF-induced transcriptional repression of ß-casein expression. The involvement of C/EBPß in mammary gland development has been well studied. C/EBPß expression is induced during pregnancy and involution, and decreased during lactation (24, 28), a pattern that correlates very well with that of TNF (6). C/EBPß knockout mice exhibit abnormal mammary ductal morphogenesis, limited lobuloalveolar development, and diminished expression of the ß-casein and WAP genes (22). The ratio of LAP/LIP is tightly regulated during mammary development and is correlated with ß-casein expression (24). Overexpression studies have previously demonstrated that LIP inhibits casein expression (29, 30), an observation that we have confirmed here. However, despite its developmental regulation in the mammary gland and its specific appearance during liver regeneration (31), the physiological significance of the LIP isoform has been controversial, with its generation being attributed to an alternative internal translation start site (31, 32, 33, 34, 35), regulated proteolytic cleavage (31, 36), or artifactual proteolytic cleavage (30, 37). The studies described herein demonstrate that TNF increases the nuclear level of LIP and decreases the LAP/LIP ratio, leading to the suppression of ß-casein expression. The observation that LIP increased to a greater extent than LAP would tend to argue against LIP being a proteolytic artifact, in agreement with the data of Hirai et al. (38). Of special interest is that elevation of LIP levels has been reported to be associated with increased MEC proliferation (39). This is consistent with the previous findings in our laboratory that TNF stimulates the growth of both normal and malignant MEC (5, 6, 7, 12). Overexpression of LIP was also found in human breast cancers (40). Based on these findings, it is appropriate to propose that TNF regulation of C/EBPß is a physiologically important event during the course of normal mammary gland differentiation. Aberrant expression of TNF could lead to increased LIP expression, which in turn could contribute to mammary tumorigenesis.
The role of C/EBPß in conveying the TNF signal has been described in other cell types. In human keratinocytes and HeLa cells, C/EBPß mediates TNF-induced activation of the K6b promoter (41). TNF activates C/EBPß through a posttranscriptional mechanism in an adult rat hepatocyte line (42) and induces C/EBPß expression in mouse primary astrocytes (43). Binding of C/EBPß to the GLUT4 promoter is induced by TNF in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (44). More interestingly, Iraburu et al. (45) found that, in hepatic stellate cells, TNF down-regulated the expression of
1(I) collagen through LIP and C/EBP
. In a similar study, Greenwel et al. (46) found that TNF inhibition of the expression of
2(I) collagen was mediated by C/EBPß and C/EBP
in cultured fibroblasts. These findings are analogous to what we have found in MEC, suggesting that C/EBPß-mediated TNF regulation of gene expression is a common mechanism that is not unique to the mammary gland. Whether C/EBP
is involved in the down-regulation of ß-casein in our system remains to be determined.
STAT5, previously known as mammary gland factor, is the primary transcription factor that mediates prolactin-induced activation of the milk protein genes in the mammary gland (47). There are two STAT5 sites in the composite response element of the ß-casein promoter (26), which play an essential role in regulating milk protein gene expression (10, 11). Wyszomierski and Rosen (29) have shown that STAT5 and C/EBPß cooperatively transactivate ß-casein expression in the presence of the glucocorticoid receptor. The N-terminal transactivation domain of LAP is essential for such an activity, because substituting LIP for LAP resulted in the abolishment of the transcriptional cooperation between C/EBPß and STAT5. The authors suggested that it is possible that LIP inhibits ß-casein expression by binding to the neighboring C/EBPß3 site and interfering with the function of STAT5 (29). Our EMSA and DAI results, demonstrating: 1) that C/EBPß and STAT5 coexist in two DNA/protein complexes, and 2) that TNF treatment results in increased binding of LIP to the C/EBPß3 site, lend support to such a model. Together with the previously reported ability of TNF to inhibit STAT5 phosphorylation in HC11 cells (27), these observations suggest an important mechanism by which TNF inhibits ß-casein transcription.
Our data suggest that NF
B does not directly mediate the inhibitory effect of TNF on ß-casein gene transcription. Using EMSA analysis, we detected specific binding of nuclear extract proteins to the NF
B1, NF
B3, and NF
B4 sites; however, antibodies to p50, p52, p65, c-rel, or RelB did not supershift or decrease the intensity of the NF
B1 or NF
B3 complexes, suggesting that NF
B proteins did not bind to these two sites. This is consistent with the report of Geymayer and Doppler (27) that mutation of the 84 to 75 region of the NF
B site on the ß-casein promoter did not inhibit NF
B repression of STAT5. Based on the TNF inducibility of the p65/p50 heterodimer and the p50/p50 homodimer NF
B complexes on the NF
B4 oligo, and the loss of DNA-binding activity upon mutation of the oligo, we expected that the NF
B4 site would be functional. However, transfection of a ß-casein construct with a mutated NF
B4 site did not affect the ability of TNF to inhibit ß-casein transcription, suggesting that the inhibitory effect of TNF is not mediated by binding of NF
B to the promoter.
Unexpectedly, our data suggest that NF
B alone acts as an activator of ß-casein transcription in HC11 cells. NF
B/p65 or the p65/p50 heterodimer were most active in this regard, probably because bcl3, which is a critical coactivator of NF
B/p50 (which lacks a transcriptional activation domain), is not present in HC11 cells (L. Lee and M. Ip, unpublished data). In a study using 293 cells, a human kidney epithelial cell line, Geymayer and Doppler (27) reported that the p65/p50 heterodimer of NF
B inhibited ß-casein expression. This apparent discrepancy may be due to the difference in signaling pathways in different cell types, especially in view of the fact that the full complement of transcription factors and coactivators necessary for ß-casein transcription are present within HC11 cells but not within 293 cells. Alternatively, it could be attributed to different experimental designs. In Geymayer and Dopplers study, NF
B was cotransfected with STAT5 and a ß-casein promoter construct, and it was found that NF
B inhibited ß-casein expression indirectly by blocking prolactin-induced activation of STAT5. In the absence of prolactin, however, NF
B stimulated ß-casein transcription (27). Our study aimed to investigate the direct involvement of NF
B in mediating TNF-induced down-regulation of milk protein genes by cotransfecting NF
B with the ß-casein promoter construct into lactogenic-competent mouse MEC HC11. The results showed that NF
B is unlikely to be directly involved in repressing ß-casein expression, but we could not rule out the possibility that NF
B may play an indirect role by activating other genes that may indirectly alter ß-casein transcription or by interacting with other transcription factor(s) activated by TNF. One such candidate is C/EBPß. In the DAI assay, we detected the presence of NF
B p50 and p65 in the DNA/protein complexes formed by incubating the C/EBP probe with nuclear extracts from HC11 cells (data not shown). It has yet to be determined to which isoform of C/EBPß NF
B binds. However, it could be speculated that a direct binding of NF
B to C/EBP-LAP might interfere with the transcriptional activation activity of LAP on the ß-casein promoter. Further studies along this line are being conducted in our laboratory.
In summary, the work described herein demonstrates that C/EBPß LIP plays a critical role in mediating the effect of TNF on the expression of ß-casein. Current studies in our laboratory are focused on identifying other transcriptional regulators that are involved, as well as the cross-talk among these factors. A detailed knowledge of the molecular events initiated by TNF in MEC will not only provide the basis for fully understanding the role of TNF in mammary differentiation and tumorigenesis but may also help identify potential therapeutic targets for breast cancer.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein; DAI, DNA affinity immunoblotting; DTT, dithiothreitol; EGF, epidermal growth factor; LAP, liver-enriched activating protein; LIP, liver-enriched inhibitory protein; MEC, mammary epithelial cell(s); NF
B, nuclear factor-
B; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; WAP, whey acidic protein; YY-1, ying-yang 1.
Received December 22, 2003.
Accepted for publication February 10, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
: effects on proliferation of normal and transformed cells in vitro. Science 230:943945
. Endocrinology 130:28332844
: a multifunctional regulator of mammary gland development. Endocrinology 137:49154924[Abstract]
action in normal mammary epithelial cells. Endocrinology 138:38913900
induces NF
B/p50 in association with the growth and morphogenesis of normal and transformed rat mammary epithelial cells. J Cell Physiol 188:120131[CrossRef][Medline]
B
that functions as a stable inhibitor of NF-
B. J Biol Chem 274:2066420670
B transcription factors: structural views. Oncogene 18:68456852[CrossRef][Medline]
, is essential for ductal morphogenesis, lobuloalveolar proliferation, and functional differentiation in the mouse mammary gland. Genes Dev 12:19171928
are expressed in mammary epithelial cells and bind to multiple sites in the ß-casein gene promoter. J Biol Chem 270:1796217969
B p50/p65 is regulated in the developing mammary gland and inhibits STAT5-mediated ß-casein gene expression. FASEB J 14:11591170
regulates generation of C/EBPß isoforms through activation of specific proteolytic cleavage. Mol Cell Biol 19:16951704
and C/EBPß isoform expression. Genes Dev 14:19201932
induces K6b keratin synthesis through a transcriptional complex containing NF
B and C/EBPss. J Biol Chem 275:3207732088
promotes nuclear localization of cytokine-inducible CCAAT/enhancer binding protein isoforms in hepatocytes. J Biol Chem 271:1797417978
in astrocytes. Glia 29:9197[CrossRef][Medline]
initiated signal transduction in 3T3L1 adipocytes. J Cell Physiol 179:5866[CrossRef][Medline]
down-regulates expression of the
1(I) collagen gene in rat hepatic stellate cells through a p20C/EBPß- and C/EBP
-dependent mechanism. Hepatology 31:10861093[CrossRef][Medline]
inhibits type I collagen synthesis through repressive CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins. Mol Cell Biol 20:912918This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Warren, S. F. Shoemaker, D. J. Shealy, W. Bshar, and M. M. Ip Tumor necrosis factor deficiency inhibits mammary tumorigenesis and a tumor necrosis factor neutralizing antibody decreases mammary tumor growth in neu/erbB2 transgenic mice Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2009; 8(9): 2655 - 2663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang, M. A. Warren, S. F. Shoemaker, and M. M. Ip NF{kappa}B1/p50 Is Not Required for Tumor Necrosis Factor-Stimulated Growth of Primary Mammary Epithelial Cells: Implications for NF{kappa}B2/p52 and RelB Endocrinology, January 1, 2007; 148(1): 268 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |